November 08, 2012
— Gabriel Malor People telling themselves that we had an insufficiently conservative candidate, that having a more conservative candidate would have made a difference, are kidding themselves. We didn't lose because of conservative or even liberal issues. We lost because of cultural issues -- binders, Big Bird, birth control, and blame Bush. Those four issues would have dogged ANY Republican candidate, regardless of their conservative bonafides.
That, if you want to skip the rest of this post, is the point. Republicans didn't lose a policy debate. They lost a PR contest. And the hardest part is that we insufficiently understood that we were even fighting on cultural grounds and not for political issues.
Binders, Big Bird, birth control, and blame Bush are not conservative or liberal issues. They're cultural issues. And the Left seized them and never let them go for the final two months of the campaign. Romney stood up and said "it's the economy." Swing voters answered: "but how are you different from Bush?" They weren't listening to our argument. They were listening for those cultural signifiers that would reassure them that the candidate was like them.
If there's one thing to take away from this loss it's that you can't force voters to pay attention to political issues. Remember now, swing voters are already a "special" group of people. They don't want to take sides. Politics is icky for them. So trying to persuade them on political grounds is not an efficient use of time. You have to persuade them on cultural grounds.
Swing voters really didn't want to think about the economy. But they sure had lots to say about Sandy clean-up. About Big Bird. About birth control and, God help us, rape. Those cultural issues that Democrats seized -- binders, Big Bird, birth control, and blame Bush -- went largely unrebutted by Romney.
To be honest, they were ignored by just about all the conservative commentariat too. I mean, they're ridiculous topics. Binders? Really? I'm as guilty as anybody else. I was standing here in my office complaining about having to write about something as frivolous and stupid as binders. But it turns out that swing voters are pretty ridiculous people. Go figure. Boy, don't I wish I'd paid more attention to binders now. The people who were frivolous enough to think binders was important were exactly the swing voters we needed to talk to, but didn't.
We should have suspected it after the foreign policy debate. I mean, these men are so close together on foreign policy as to be almost indistinguishable. All that was left was the *cultural* policy: how do we relate to other countries. And Obama's great at being the Great Relator. In the cultural consciousness, he's still bouncing off the Bush years, reassuring everyone that he's different. Romney didn't do that except very briefly right at the end of the campaign.
When I talk about rebutting these cultural issues, I mean a campaign of rebuttal. Almost every Obama ad on TV and radio I heard in the last two days of the election was about abortion and birth control. And they went totally unanswered. Romney's ads during the same period were about the economy. The war on women accusation went entirely unanswered except a few times at debates or on the stump.
It's because we thought those cultural issues were stupid, and, sure, they were. But we weren't supposed to be convincing ourselves. We were supposed to be convincing the neighbors who don't want to be partisan. SNL nailed that point perfectly in their "undecided voters" skit. It's not precisely that swing voters are dumb. It's that they've got other interests than partisans like you and me.
There was only one time during this election when Romney excelled on a cultural issue. It was in July. It was the response "we built that." That was Romney's rebuttal to Obama's "you didn't build that" gaffe and it resonated. For a brief period, we made the President and his supporters into a cultural punchline. That resonated with voters. Because it was cultural, pre-politics.
But "we built that" happened very early in the cycle and we never offered another cultural issue. Obama had several in the final two months. Birth Control. 47%. Big Bird. Binders. And, briefly (thank you, Candy Crowley), Benghazi. The nearest Romney came to a winning cultural issue after "we built that" was Clint Eastwood's empty chair. But that was a little too hokey for younger folks. The response to that chair cut right across generational lines. Older people loved it; younger people loved to mock it.
Put in the simplest terms: Republicans need to find a way to make fun of Democrats on something other than political grounds. Something to cackle over at the water cooler. It's easy to laugh at Democrats when you're safe among Republicans, though. That's preaching to the choir. "He ate a dog" kills among Republicans. It doesn't work so much among swing voters.
We used to be good at this. Think how we mocked Kerry and turned him into a punchline. We turned his words against him -- "for it before I was against it" -- and riffed on that to stick him with the "flip-flopper" label. That was cultural. Not political. We made Kerry out to be a squish and a traitor (thank you, Swiftboat Veterans) and it stuck. It had nothing to do with politics, or perhaps it was pre-politics.
But we didn't do that this time. This time we kept our eye on the ball: "it's about the economy, stupid." Well, yes and no. We were too busy fighting Bill Clinton. We forgot that Obama excels at this cultural stuff. We scorned the Left for their "Dear Leader" propensities, but we failed to offer a rebuttal to it. We told voters that Obama's politics were wrong, but we failed to offer a cultural alternative.
So we lost.
Now, I'm not saying that we should have been fighting on ONLY cultural grounds. Obviously, we have to fight the Democrats' disastrous politics. But we have to offer some cultural signifiers in addition to politics.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
05:30 AM
| Comments (453)
Post contains 1034 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at November 08, 2012 05:33 AM (jZn+7)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at November 08, 2012 05:36 AM (uk04h)
Posted by: Adam at November 08, 2012 05:36 AM (/YJYi)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 08, 2012 05:36 AM (zfFcz)
Posted by: GIJared at November 08, 2012 05:37 AM (VzgFl)
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at November 08, 2012 05:37 AM (Rwrs+)
Posted by: Mr pink at November 08, 2012 05:37 AM (EQT2D)
Everywhere there's lots of piggies , living piggy lives...
You can see them out there voting, with their piggy wives...
Posted by: AmericanDawg at November 08, 2012 05:38 AM (XIsD/)
If there's one thing to take away from this loss it's that you can't force voters to pay attention to political issues.
__
Since swing voters are pretty much lazy when it comes to being informed, the MSM being a donk propaganda machine is their default position in getting news on what's relevant. They do pay attention to political issues, those that are presented on the alphabet networks.
Posted by: kallisto at November 08, 2012 05:38 AM (jm/9g)
I think as far as the culture argument goes, we lost in a cultural environment that wants free stuff from the government and doesn't care where it comes from. And the bitter reality is that there's no conservative approach to ultimately winning that argument. Sure, we can try to go all pop culture and such, but when you get right down to it we now have a majority of the electorate addicted to entitlements and there's nothing we can do about it until the whole thing comes crashing down.
Gabe, you mention swing voters (by which I presume you mean independents). Romney won independents by a sizeable margin and Obama still won. That tells me this wasn't an election largely based on cultural signifiers but about who is going to take care of voters in a depression. And in that sense, the answer was pretty resounding.
Posted by: JohnTant at November 08, 2012 05:38 AM (tVWQB)
These people made their beds - let them lie in them.
Posted by: Mike Jonze at November 08, 2012 05:39 AM (XpAxm)
Romney did not inspire the base. I don't know with one of the others would have done any better, but they could not have done worse.
As I said earlier, we lost to the worst President in modern history with an economy in the depression levels.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 05:39 AM (YdQQY)
Obama's lack of experience and his past was ignored because of his race, and his first term was graded on a curve-or ignored completely-due to the same.
Posted by: Not Greg at November 08, 2012 05:39 AM (gI9Bk)
Posted by: we are so screwed at November 08, 2012 05:40 AM (HEa5q)
Get in THEIR faces! Fight hard, fight dirty, enough of the "Marquis of Queensbury" rules crap. They're playing Streetfighter and kicking our a$$, and in the process killing the spirit of what remains of America. If we want to save our Republic, we have to fight like our patriot forefathers- not in straight lines like the British, but from behind rocks and trees and from ambush! And be prepared to finish them when they're down. Take no prisoners!
Posted by: Bulldog in Kansas at November 08, 2012 05:40 AM (z1C58)
Posted by: Steven at November 08, 2012 05:40 AM (PqaZC)
Anbody here gonna explain what happened with Romney's super-duper, ultra-modern ground game?
It had apps!
It had strike lists!
It brought in fewer Republican voters!
Posted by: Gerry at November 08, 2012 05:40 AM (i8u8P)
Posted by: Bacon Industry at November 08, 2012 05:41 AM (OGk0S)
Yeah...no. You're wrong. Dead fucking wrong.
All the PR in the world wasn't going to convince shallow, superficial, greedy people to vote for a guy who wanted to give them an opportunity to work over a "rock star" Hollywood hip-hop mogul who promises them Free Shit.
Americans no longer want to be free, they want to live in ease and have a good time (and a significant fraction want to feel good about themselves by bullying us subhumans who just want to be left alone by government into doing their bidding...looking at you, eco-fascists, gyno-fascists, QUILTBAG).
Making fun of Democrats--pointing out the gyno-fascists radiate half the sexual charm of Michael Moore, for example--does not change the fact that they want to let you sit around watching TV all day and the Republicans think you should be doing something productive with your life.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ loves sausage at November 08, 2012 05:41 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: real joe at November 08, 2012 05:41 AM (PD2ad)
Posted by: LASue at November 08, 2012 05:42 AM (gjIQF)
I looked at all that in VA and OH which gave Obama the election. Obama still lost a LOT of votes in that State. The problem was so did we.
The unions may have helped in from losing any more, but it is not what cost us VA and OH.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 05:42 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: jwest at November 08, 2012 05:42 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: izoneguy at November 08, 2012 05:42 AM (oKH8p)
Posted by: Mr pink at November 08, 2012 09:37 AM (EQT2D)
THIS.
and that we are not allowed to write the discussion only constantly to react to the things "worthy of discussion according to the DEM media and Their g-ds"
If we try to discuss anything ITS shrieking BINDERS, VAGINAS.
Posted by: willow at November 08, 2012 05:42 AM (hX8cq)
Posted by: Terry Gain at November 08, 2012 05:43 AM (+BlWU)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 08, 2012 05:43 AM (MVGKx)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 08, 2012 05:44 AM (X3lox)
- Todd Akin was defeated, due to comments on abortion
- Richard Murdock was defeated, due to comments on abortion
- Washington legalized gay marriage
- Maryland legalized gay marriage
- Maine legalized gay marriage
- Minnesota failed to pass a ballot that would amend their state constitution to ban gay marriage
- Florida failed to pass a ballot that would have allowed public funds to go to private, religious schools
- The first openly gay politician was elected to office
All of that happened in a single election-an election where turnout for democrats was lower than it had been in 2008. Now, ask yourself after looking at what happened on Tuesday, do you honestly believe that allowing extremest social conservatives to continue to have the type of influence that they currently have in the party will end up having a positive outcome for republicans in the future?
Posted by: thatonepersonguy at November 08, 2012 05:44 AM (WyTqs)
No Gabe, we REALLY lost because slightly more than half the American people are stupid. Ignorant. Idiots who can't think for themselves and who couldn't reason their way out of a fifth grade math problem.
Because that's what YOU'RE really getting at.
People who let cultural issues push them to voting in someone who is going to destroy the country are stupid. People who vote against a Senate candidate because of a flub in his words are stupid. People who are more concerned about the GOP not giving them free rubbers than they are about being able to find a job after college are stupid.
In short, cultural liberals are stupid. They are stupid, self-centred, worthless little people who, in a perfect world, would not be allowed within a mile of a voting booth.
I, for one, am kind of glad, in a strange way, that these people are going to be the ones who bear the brunt of the difficulties when the economy collapses, and society follows it shortly thereafter.
Sure kids, try defending your homes from marauding bands of looter with your free condoms and tapes of Sesame Street. They almost deserve to be victims in the insuing maelstrom that is going to engulf this country within a decade.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at November 08, 2012 05:44 AM (+inic)
Posted by: jwest at November 08, 2012 05:44 AM (ZDsRL)
Yup. I try engaging them on social media using logic, charts and math. I try to depersonalize it and avoid the cheap shots so it's not all negative and icky for them.
It doesn't work. You simply can't get through to them.
The thing is, Romney/Ryan went big and bold with Medicaid reform. They offered, for once, to treat voters like adults. And the voters chose to be treated like children instead.
So honestly? I'm done wringing my hands over it. Fuck it. Give them what they want. They want to be lied to. They want to talk about stupid, frivolous issues. So fuck it. Give them the collapse.
Posted by: Warden at November 08, 2012 05:45 AM (0DlnM)
We lost because single, young women bought into the war
Posted by: real joe
You mean single young women preferred the guy who promised to take care of them and give them the most free stuff?
Seems unlikely...
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 08, 2012 05:45 AM (kdS6q)
Romney screwed up when he didn't fight the "Blame Bush" meme and the MFM virtually handed to Obama.
Romney did not energize the base to get off their ass was the main reason though.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 05:45 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at November 08, 2012 05:45 AM (Rwrs+)
Posted by: we are so screwed at November 08, 2012 05:45 AM (HEa5q)
http://tinyurl.com/b3tnm8d
$100 million in negative ads, concentrated in 7 states, with zero opposition for 3+ months... and that $100 million was not at peak rates, bought well in advance, so effectively probably like $250 million... and then 18-30's still showed up to vote, which nobody really expected
Posted by: phreshone at November 08, 2012 05:45 AM (MAhUT)
You can only make so many calls a day. You can only pay someone so much to make calls for you.
When you have three major networks and every major media outlet with "The Magical Negro" love, you simply can not make enough calls.
Does anyone think for a moment the Libya cover up would not have lead the NY Times and Wa Po if a Republican had been president?
Mitt tried to get along. It got him NOTHING.
Reagan did not try to get along.
Reagan won.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at November 08, 2012 05:45 AM (wR+pz)
It will immediately be called racist for making fun of democrats. There are a great many ways to joke about democrats and the typical democrat voter. It's just that it's almost political suicide to do so. The media has made sure of that.
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 05:46 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Bacon Industry at November 08, 2012 05:46 AM (OGk0S)
Posted by: In the bunker at November 08, 2012 05:46 AM (R7H3g)
Election's ovah. Did they cheat for victory? Probably. Only two things to worry about now:
Prepare.
Resist.
Posted by: Thor, God of Awesome at November 08, 2012 05:47 AM (Xa1VJ)
I was pissed with the socons for having ignited the rapebortion nonsense. Still am.
But it appears that they at least did show up at the polls in reasonable numbers if not in overwhelming strength. Some had accused them of having not done so.
It really seems as though the election hinged on:
-- Vote fraud
-- Demographic shifts
-- Idiot yoof, particularly white female ones
There isn't that much that can be done at a campaign level about the first two.
The last one could have been defused. Romney needed an instant and overwhelming response to Akin. Ace saw the disaster developing. Many morons did. Romney needed to go there himself and personally pressure Akin on the spot in Missouri to leave the race.
Simple stuff. Just say, "I'm pro-life, strongly and proudly pro-life, but this man's comments are so insulting and so wrong on the facts that I don't think they have a place in our national discourse."
If Romney had successfully forced Akin out, it would have defused the issue with a lot of the worried young women. And it probably would have meant that that klutz Mourdock would have measured his own words more carefully. Perhaps even, I don't know, practiced them in front of a mirror in response to a question that was obviously coming?
What kills me is how CLOSE this thing was. A few hundred thousand votes out of over 130 million votes cast.
(We might even have won the Missouri seat where rapebortion got going, if Akin had bailed and been replaced. Air Claire was an incredibly weak candidate and there were better GOP alternatives on hand.)
Posted by: torquewrench at November 08, 2012 05:47 AM (ymG7s)
THEY make the rules
Republicans can fight that how?
binder was an unforcd error? bah
akin comment was, i agree
how many crazy comments by Obama and Biden wer made that were nothingburgers to the media?
Posted by: willow at November 08, 2012 05:47 AM (hX8cq)
Posted by: Lisa Lisa at November 08, 2012 05:48 AM (20V+c)
Posted by: maddogg at November 08, 2012 05:48 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: real joe at November 08, 2012 05:48 AM (PD2ad)
Romney should never have said "Planned Parent hood - we are going to get rid of that".
I agree with him! I'd love to get rid of planned parenthood. But I am in the minority.
Instead - Mitt should said -- "Tax payer funded abortion-- in the face of our economic troubles, tax payers should not be forced to pay for abortions." - The democrats NEVER would have touched that. The democrats would have never made a TV ad with that quote.
Posted by: Fresh at November 08, 2012 05:48 AM (O7ksG)
After all, they started the fire, they are the first responders, and the Nightly News truck reporting it is theirs, too.
Me, just an abstracted bystander.
Posted by: tubal at November 08, 2012 05:48 AM (BoE3Z)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at November 08, 2012 05:48 AM (RuUvx)
We let the other side get their way.
When they pushed left and weren't' smacked down they advanced their agenda.
When we kept voting for people who have never seen a hill worth defending the left advanced their agenda.
When we ceded the schools, the culture and now the military, the left has advanced their agenda.
When Obama names three new Supreme Court nominees during his term, as he surely will, the lefts agenda will be enshrined.
Their is no stopping the leftward push of this country and society, if you believe there is you have not been paying attention for the last 30 years.
The Republican plank and platform has not changed since Ronald Reagan was innaugurated but our society has.
It's all over but the shouting.
Posted by: General Woundwort at November 08, 2012 05:48 AM (06lNq)
Boehner will fold like a lawn-chair during Sandy on fiscal issues.
We will get new tax rates and become complicit partners in our countries fiscal destruction.
When it comes to fully standing on principle and showing the American people the reality of their choices we will show them our "principles" are always negotiable.
And we really didn't mean it.
It was just politics, not conviction.
Posted by: Marcus at November 08, 2012 05:49 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 05:49 AM (79ueO)
Welcome to Athens in America.
“Nor were the superior classes in the actual enjoyment of a rational liberty and independence. They were perpetually divided into factions, which servilely ranked themselves under the banners of the contending demagogues; and these maintained their influence over their partisans by the most shameful corruption and bribery, of which the means were supplied alone by the plunder of the public money.” Tytler, op. cit., Book 1, Chapter VI -- Political reflections arising from the history of Greece, p. 216, 1792
Isn’t this a wonderful phrase?; “The banners of contending demagogues”.
It’s truly ironic we actually title the demagogic banners “Democrat” and “Republican” in what’s supposed to be a democratic republic. I swear to God or Nature we’re as ignorant and misguided as Athenians and will probably end up in the same trash heap of history.
The Democrat banner won. The Republican banner lost.
Actually “rational liberty and independence” was the loser in, to quote myself, “Athens in America.” The “partisans”, those “bribed” to “servilely” rank themselves under separate banners, truly lost.
It’s why I self-identify as a small “l” libertarian and try to vote in defense of “rational liberty and independence.”
Citizens of Athens in America, enjoy the presidency of your current factional demagogue-in-chief. You chose him!
Shakespeare:
Romeo:
Hold, Tybalt! Good Mercutio!
[Tybalt under Romeo's arm thrusts Mercutio in. Away Tybalt]
Mercutio:
I am hurt.
A plague a' both your houses!
I am sped.
Is he gone and hath nothing?
Posted by: RiverRat at November 08, 2012 05:49 AM (NRQJk)
Posted by: Chuck Pylon at November 08, 2012 05:49 AM (2oSxi)
Posted by: Fresh at November 08, 2012 05:50 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: brad at November 08, 2012 05:50 AM (Lyf+u)
And they're gonna choke on it because....math is hard.
Posted by: Tami at November 08, 2012 05:50 AM (X6akg)
I wouldn't go to hard on the vote fraud shit. We only won two more states, NC and IN.
VA, OH and FL? all lost to Black turnout.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at November 08, 2012 05:50 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: thatonepersonguy at November 08, 2012 09:44 AM (WyTqs)
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
What was Barney Frank?
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at November 08, 2012 05:51 AM (Rwrs+)
Posted by: madamex at November 08, 2012 05:51 AM (+kvQd)
Posted by: RWC at November 08, 2012 05:51 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 08, 2012 05:51 AM (X3lox)
Not to beat a dead horse here, but when the Akin controversy broke, many commenters here on AoSHQ and elsewhere immediately jumped up and said Akin had to go, and that Romney had to be the one shoving him off the ticket.
Why? Because rape is everyone woman's nightmare, and for an old white man to hold the completely retarded view that women's bodies could distinguish between boyfriend/husband sperm, and legitimate rape sperm, is beyond offensive. It was and still is a firing offense.
Women are a bigger share of the electorate than men. Women hate rape and live every day of their lives knowing they could someday be a victim. For Akin to put himself and Romney and every Republican in a position of arguing about legitimate rape on every TV show in America, was an unforced error and seeped into the consciousness of the electorate.
The Republicans were way too timid here, and were so afraid of offending the religious right in Missouri, that they did not take the bold step they needed to take and "shut that thing down".
The Mourdock comments about rape being a gift from G*d if a baby is conceived as a result of rape were just icing on the cake.
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 05:51 AM (neKzn)
1. under 30% GOP registration
2. Weimar Republic
Posted by: Jack J at November 08, 2012 05:52 AM (t4nf+)
Posted by: Long Island at November 08, 2012 05:52 AM (EsJl1)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at November 08, 2012 05:52 AM (RuUvx)
According to the exit polls Obama lost ground with the young voters this time.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 05:52 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 05:52 AM (/eBe8)
Posted by: rukiddingme?!? at November 08, 2012 05:52 AM (MbeEN)
It's the media. As long as Pravda is in the house, the elections are going to go to The Party.
They showed us what the Democrats wanted us to see about both candidates, and hid what they wanted hidden. Every negative issue about Romney listed in the post-mortems became an issue because the media wanted it to be an issue.
Posted by: TB at November 08, 2012 05:53 AM (b6qqq)
Posted by: Walkers! at November 08, 2012 05:53 AM (C4dFv)
Posted by: Avi at November 08, 2012 05:53 AM (Gx3Fe)
Posted by: Whatev at November 08, 2012 05:53 AM (2t6Gz)
If america should have loaded up drug cartels in Mexico / without the govt of Mexico's knowledge., without follwing the guns in fact making sure they Weren' followd?.
300+ dead and gangwalker...
Benghazi.
Posted by: willow at November 08, 2012 05:53 AM (hX8cq)
>People telling themselves that we had an insufficiently conservative candidate, that having a more conservative candidate would have made a difference, are kidding themselves.<
There is so much wrong with a person that believes that- it is hard to comprehend.
We've become a nation of takers. Until someone has the stones to stand up and really show people there is no more to take, we will lose.
It's about convictions and the realities of choice.
Posted by: Marcus at November 08, 2012 05:53 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: izoneguy at November 08, 2012 05:54 AM (oKH8p)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 08, 2012 05:54 AM (vCK/R)
If you tax the rich at the rates Obama advocates, it raises about 80 billion a year.
The yearly deficit is about 1.2 trillion.
So now what?
See how simple that is? I pose this question all the time to moderates/leaners. And do you know what? They don't care. They don't want to hear it.
They want someone else to just FIX IT and not at their expense.
And that's the extent of their "thinking."
I don't know how to get through to them. In fairness, I'd make a lousy salesmane because ... uh ... logic and facts and stuff are more my thing. Empathy? Not so much.
I don't know what to do with these idiots anymore. So fuck it. I'll worry about me and mine.
Posted by: Warden at November 08, 2012 05:54 AM (0DlnM)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at November 08, 2012 05:54 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 05:54 AM (79ueO)
Hopefully Akin losing by 20%, will be used against any other GOP Senate Candidate with a big mouth in the future, and show the GOP primary voters cannot win
Posted by: Jack J at November 08, 2012 05:55 AM (t4nf+)
He meant openly lesbo and in the Senate.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at November 08, 2012 05:55 AM (wR+pz)
The chronically stupid and cultural idiots that voted for this guy are probably those whom are chronically unemployed, high debt and basically a me generation type. The big issues will bite these people hard and I mean real hard over the next four years. Condoms, Big Bird, Binders, Romney Killed My Wife, etc. doesn't pay the bills or put food on the table. The rest of us that are rugged individualists (Not dependent on the Gov for maintaining a lifestyle) will at the worst maintain our present quality of life and may improve upon our QOL because we are of the current situation and where we are going. The rift between the haves and have nots will increase over the next four years rather reverse course. Yea I may have to pay more for gas and electricity, but I have prepared for this scenario and it will not alter my QOL too much. The chronically stupid are going to suffer badly and all along they thought Obama was going make everything even. I don't feel sorry for these people because they got what they wanted and now they must live with it ! With that I toast these idiots with a dramm of Laphroig 10 and a Arturo Fuente Hemingway and say "Own It Losers" .......
Posted by: Wall_E at November 08, 2012 05:55 AM (48wze)
Posted by: Whatev at November 08, 2012 05:55 AM (2t6Gz)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 05:55 AM (79ueO)
@34 - "Todd Akin was defeated, due to comments on abortion"
"- Richard Murdock was defeated, due to comments on abortion"
Neither was defeated due to comments on abortion. They were defeated because they made STUPID comments that could be spun and twisted by the MSM to make it appear that they were excusing, or even condoning, rape. Quite a bit of difference, there, especially when we note that Republicans at least stayed at their present levels in the Senate and House, picked up some governourships, and even expanded their presence in several state legislatures (including Ohio's). Most all of those Republicans are pro-life, and certainly are perceived as being such by a voting public.
Using extreme outliers is not a good way to build your general case, sorry.
"- Washington legalized gay marriage
- Maryland legalized gay marriage
- Maine legalized gay marriage
- Minnesota failed to pass a ballot that would amend their state constitution to ban gay marriage"
All of them are liberal states, too, so it's not exactly surprising. This doesn't, all the same, indicate some sort of general trend for the nation at large. It just means that liberal states will approve gay marriage, while conservative ones (which have mostly already dealt with the issue) don't. If nothing else, it's federalism at work.
"- Florida failed to pass a ballot that would have allowed public funds to go to private, religious schools"
As a socially-conservative movement conservative, I wouldn't have voted for this, either. Both on the basis that I don't want the government to control what religious schools teach, and also because I don't want my tax monies to support schools for groups not my religion.
In other words, this isn't exactly a "SoCon" issue. Certainly not one that you can point to and claim that it's part of a huge trend against social conservatism.
"- The first openly gay politician was elected to office."
I assume you mean first openly gay *Republican* politician, since there have obviously been many openly gay politicians elected before (e.g. Barney Frank). The same argument applies here as applies above for the gay marriage issue - this election took place in Massachusetts, so it's not exactly like you can draw normative conclusions from it.
Look, I realise that you may personally dislike social conservatism, and I realise that as a libertarian (small l), that Gabe does as well. But these arguments you all are making are simply nonsensical. Face it - this was a free stuff election, and people wanted free stuff. Other than in very specific and "special case" instances, what we saw was a failure of economic conservatism to attract the support that economic conservatives thought it should have. This is not due, I don't think, to the wrongness or unattractiveness of economic freedom, per se, but because Romney was simply a terrible articulator of it, and failed to make the connexion between economic liberty and liberty in a larger sense.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at November 08, 2012 05:55 AM (+inic)
Before election day, I posted multiple times that if Romney lost we could not say that he did not run the best campaign he could. No one disputed that point. I did it specifically because I knew the recriminations against the Romney campaign would come tumbling out in the event he lost. Unfortunately I was correct.
In hindsight, I believe no Republican campaign could overcome what America has become. It took this election to confirm my suspicions that we crossed the Dumbicon.
Posted by: polynikes at November 08, 2012 05:56 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Cricket at November 08, 2012 05:56 AM (DrC22)
On a different note, while some of this stuff is currently still under investigation, fraud to play a part. Did it carry the day? I don't think so. But it was prevalent. This year I had 8 districts to assigned to me in the downtown area. One precinct was as bad as the next. And I feel it was coordinated. I'm trying to get information from some other folks working the urban precincts to see if they feel the same.
If you asked me to describe the fraud in one word? I'd use Obama's -- unprecedented.
I'll tell one thing. If we ever want to carry another swing state we HAVE to stop early voting before 2016. We absolutely must. Will never win another Presidential election if we don't.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 08, 2012 05:56 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: no good deed at November 08, 2012 05:56 AM (mjR67)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at November 08, 2012 05:57 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: M. Murcek at November 08, 2012 05:57 AM (GJUgF)
Better to stick to snarky sound bites. That's sad, but true.
Posted by: Matt S. at November 08, 2012 05:57 AM (moRRg)
Democrats do not care about reducing the debt. They CARE ABOUT REMOVING PRIVATE WEALTH and placing that wealth into the corrupt democrat big government machine.
Posted by: Fresh at November 08, 2012 05:57 AM (O7ksG)
Look over the past several elections: the guy more likeable to the general public tended to win: Obama vs. McCain, Bush vs. Kerry, Bush vs. Gore (ok, Gore got more votes, but he was riding Bill Clinton's coattails, and he probably would not have received more votes if not for the Bush DUI story), Clinton vs. Dole, Clinton vs. GHW Bush, Reagan vs. both of his opponents, etc.
This, of course, applies to low information, middle of the road voters, of course. I don't understand why Obama is "likeable" but apparently he is. Leftists certainly don't understand why Bush was likeable, either. And all that really matters is that he's more likeable than the other guy.
Posted by: Mullaney at November 08, 2012 05:58 AM (wXcfQ)
When the time comes to fell real pain, remember the Media will work hard to blame the Republicans where the ones who did not fill the EBT card that they have used for then 6 years.
Posted by: Trevor (@TJexcite) at November 08, 2012 05:58 AM (Ea64Y)
Posted by: izoneguy at November 08, 2012 05:58 AM (oKH8p)
Posted by: slackmac at November 08, 2012 05:58 AM (oyLYV)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 08, 2012 05:58 AM (6Hf3R)
We need to make fun of how he throws a baseball and claims the White Sox are his favorite team (yet can't name any). We need to plaster the pictures of him riding the bike everywhere. Play endlessly and comment on his thoughtful quip about he bowls like a retarded kid. etc etc
The left are kings of hypocrisy... we must make them own it... it doesn't play well.
It has to be about simple things that are self-evident - unable to be spinned.
On our side... we are told that Donald Trump could NEVER win. I am not a fan per se of the Don. But would he have not won a hell of a lot more votes?
The Republican brand kind of sucks right now. We need to end it somehow... lets just go ahead and make it politicians (the left) vs. the American people.
Posted by: nudgie at November 08, 2012 05:58 AM (W2bh0)
So...we need Karl Rove back?
Some thoughts. One fault here is we didn't apparently win the Regan democrats back. If you are going to rely on whites, you need to maximize your gains there. Looking at the exits, it looks like a lot of working class whites in coal country Ohio and Penn thought Romney looked like thier boss.
We should try to win asians. Unlike the other minorities, they are natural conservatives.
We need to utilize the wedge issues going forward to divide the democratic coalition. This may not have been attainable in this election, but will be a big deal going forward. I think we have to raise taxes, but ONLY in turn for a hard debt ceiling. We announce this at the time. We frame it as willing to raise revenue, but not to add to future debt. Once we hit the debt, which will happen, it will pit public unions against voters, Mexican americans against new arrivals, etc. The economy will suffer, but we make sure Obama is holding the knife.
We need to find a way to appeal to Socons without holding hard and fast to gay marrige and marijuana. I actually side with the socons here, but I realize we lost. Its over. We should emphasize that to mazimize thier freedom of religion it means government cannot interfere anywhere.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 05:59 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: Palerider at November 08, 2012 05:59 AM (vL0Nv)
We turned the state, we elected THREE more House members, we kept the State House and Senate AND we elected a Republican Governor.
First time in over a hundred years we have controlled EVERYTHING!
Trust me boys, the democrats are buying KY by the case, cause every fucking pork barrel bullshit in the state is on the line.
It is going to be sooo much fun fucking these assholes who have fucked us for years.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at November 08, 2012 05:59 AM (wR+pz)
Every moderate candidate we have ran since RR has lost except Bush. And he ran as a conservative and then jumped left.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 05:59 AM (YdQQY)
@ 64 "I wouldn't go to hard on the vote fraud shit. We only won two more states, NC and IN."
Let's face it - vote fraud played a major factor in this election, whether you like it or not. It's the only thing that explains the disconnect betweem all of the independent variables pointing to a Romney win before, and the Romney loss that happened. Plus, it explains why the GOP lost on statewide races, but remained pretty much where it was at in the House - House districts are actually harder to defraud than statewide races becuase most House districts exist outside of the hard-core Dem urban political machine bases of operation. When you don't have a Dem machine in place in some suburban or rural district, it's much harder to manufacture tens of thousands of votes for the Dem. Meanwhile, you can swing an entire state merely by kicking the fraud machine in motion in Miami or Philly or Milwaukee.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at November 08, 2012 05:59 AM (+inic)
Posted by: Kat Von Clawswits at November 08, 2012 06:00 AM (+qTNb)
2. Stop watching the news or cut your cable entirely.
3. Let the advertisers know why.
4. If you absolutely can't then patronize a conservative outlet.
5. Stop going to movies, renting movies or buying movies (exceptions, see line 4.)
6. make sure any and all advertisers in your (presumably liberal) paper know that you will not patronize them unless they stop advertising with that paper OR that you are canceling you subscription OR will never purchase the rag against because of it's lies and coverups and that you hold them responsible for it's existence.
7. It's time that some protests began being aimed at the Media.
Notice they never get a lot of flack over any thing they say no matter what. No one holds them accountable.
Doing all the above won't make the next 2-4 years better but may make it more palatable to you and may eventually do some good if we can make at least one of these lying douchebags pay for their propaganda.
Posted by: Jcw46 at November 08, 2012 06:00 AM (SP4jC)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 08, 2012 06:00 AM (79ueO)
Wait a sec, the analysis so far has shown that our base was just not mobilized/enthusiatic/giving enough of a shit and Romney clearly won swing voters. So Malor's take is that Romney didn't appeal to swing voters?
Is there some good reason I should read the rest of this "analysis"?
The data so far directly contrdicts the whole opening paragraph. I'm surprised I made it through the third.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 08, 2012 06:00 AM (uD2fR)
Swing voters say they hate negative ads and mud-slinging politics, but those tactics (almost invariably) work. We used them against Gore and Kerry, and they worked. We didn't against Obama, and he was elected twice.
Even when FDR won election the first time, he did it by going incredibly negative. So did Clinton when he beat Bush.
Negative ads work. Maybe it was because we couldn't believe others didn't see it, or maybe it was because Romney wanted to appear "above the fray" but the case was never made to the American people that Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure, let alone that he's a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant, or a stuttering clusterf*ck of a malignant traitor.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 06:00 AM (/eBe8)
To add a point on TFG's win, look at where he went for the last month of the campaign -- to social media television sites like MTV.
He knew what he was doing, or at least it worked.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 08, 2012 06:00 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: slackmac at November 08, 2012 06:01 AM (oyLYV)
How about "slim form factor sex kitten"?
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 09:48 AM (GQ8sn)
Too wordy
339 What can you do about fraud? You can go to jail after beating a graduated senseless with a baseball bat.
A few of these and we'll be fine.
We just have to find some beaters down for the cause.
Posted by: Truman North at November 08, 2012 09:48 AM (I2LwF)
Hi. Have I mentioned that I played baseball for close to 20 years? Went to college on a partial athletic scholarship?
Posted by: BCochran1981 at November 08, 2012 06:01 AM (da5Wo)
1) Obamacare was neutered as an issue
2) Culturally, he is Thurston Howell,IV or the generational equivalent
3) He does not act like a fighter for us, himself, or anyone. He waited too long to respond to the attacks...like Bush.
4) His body language was harmless and almost self-apologetic. I came to like him but never thought for a second he would have my back
4) The Mormon thing gave Democrat bigots a wedge to paint him as The Other
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 08, 2012 06:02 AM (6H6FZ)
We turned the state, we elected THREE more House members, we kept the State House and Senate AND we elected a Republican Governor.
First time in over a hundred years we have controlled EVERYTHING!
It was very close, too close IMO. NC should not have been a close call at all. Lets see how McCrory does. I'm ready for some fucking slicing and dicing.
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 06:02 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: spypeach at November 08, 2012 06:03 AM (pwTow)
Meh. Europe loves them some fucking SCOAMF, and they got what they wanted.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ loves sausage at November 08, 2012 06:03 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: separate at November 08, 2012 06:03 AM (JWT7J)
I know Ace already beat it into the ground, but Akin and Mourdock hurt all Republicans. If you read lefty social media and websites the first thing they do is impute this stuff to all of us. Many of us are uncomfortable with abortion, especially late term abortion, but as always somehow we were dragged into defending the weakest position at the worst possible time.
Abortion should be a tough moral issue for everyone. Women are humans with the right to control their own bodies. But humans are created from fertilization onward and viability goes up with time.
Untangling conflicting fundamental rights isn't for kids. Akin not only was wrong in what he said but he then claimed he had only misplaced "one word". Mourdock was just fundamentally tone deaf and stepped in a philosophical minefield instead of redirecting to some talking points. Worst was Mourdock seeming to confirm the lefty claim that's the Republican view of abortion in the case of rape.
You have to have a simple soundbite answer to these impossible and complex questions which moderates and swing voters can live with. Crazy, but that's politics.
Posted by: Beagle at November 08, 2012 06:03 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: lions at November 08, 2012 06:03 AM (MTPLw)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 08, 2012 06:04 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 08, 2012 06:04 AM (ZBjRZ)
Posted by: izoneguy at November 08, 2012 06:04 AM (oKH8p)
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 10:02 AM (GQ8sn)
I am going to Raleigh to help with some cutting! It WILL get ugly.
Fuck them. The worst are the democrat law firms that now are frantic to hire some Republicans.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at November 08, 2012 06:05 AM (wR+pz)
Swing voters really didn't want to think about the economy.
When the whole fucking country come crashing down the drooling retards can be thankful that they still have Big Bird. People that stupid shouldn't be allowed to vote
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 08, 2012 06:05 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Scobface, Staying Positive at November 08, 2012 06:05 AM (IoNBC)
I'm sorry, but I think binders and contraceptions pale in comparison to the media. I've never seen anything like these past 5 years in media bias.
As for all this 47% moocher stuff, I think it's somewhat exaggerated. I'm in the 47% and I voted for Romney. My younger sister is a postal worker and she voted for Romney. However, my older sister who has a good-paying job with a major corporation voted for Obama, because she equates her company (which she hates) to Bain and Romny.
She's been sending me anti-Obama emails for four years, but she's so angry with her employer that she (and everyone in her office) voted for Obama.
Posted by: Brenda at November 08, 2012 06:05 AM (i/s89)
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (YdQQY)
That's not true but you know that. Compassionate Conservatism was a campaign slogan.
Posted by: polynikes at November 08, 2012 06:06 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Vizzini at November 08, 2012 06:06 AM (O7Q1u)
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 06:06 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: Carman at November 08, 2012 06:06 AM (C8XlI)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 06:06 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Cricket at November 08, 2012 06:06 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 06:06 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: slackmac at November 08, 2012 06:07 AM (oyLYV)
Posted by: Long Island at November 08, 2012 06:07 AM (EsJl1)
Posted by: CatoRenasci at November 08, 2012 06:07 AM (IT84g)
If I had a dollar for every line of computer code I ever wrote I'd be a gazillionaire or something. It would be child's play to write one single line of code to take away every tenth vote. It would simply disappear without a trace.
But I'd be pretty stupid, and lose my job for certain, if I took away 10,000,000 votes from the eventual winner. There's an explanation, but I doubt it's something (like in the software) which could be so easily reverse engineered.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 08, 2012 06:07 AM (feFL6)
Yes, I hope you like what you got. 4 more years of Obama
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 06:07 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 08, 2012 06:07 AM (3A7PP)
Yup. "Identify with"--for fuck's sake, they weren't picking a Chief Executive, they were voting for a Dancing Celebrity.
We don't deserve the coming shitstorm, but the people who voted for it sure do.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ loves sausage at November 08, 2012 06:08 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: UGAdawg at November 08, 2012 06:08 AM (WYOrt)
Either shut up about it during elections or learn how to answer gotcha questions. This is the most basic PR stuff in existence, yet we have candidates that fuck this up every single time. It gets old being on the side of the stupid people.
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 08, 2012 06:08 AM (6H6FZ)
Oh really?
Raleigh is going to be a big change from Charlotte. I hope Pat does keep his word and start with a ritual sacrifice of some state dems for his inauguration.
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 06:08 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: volfan at November 08, 2012 06:08 AM (RTb48)
Posted by: Paul at November 08, 2012 06:09 AM (RDP+N)
Posted by: CarolLK at November 08, 2012 06:09 AM (2mYTU)
We're going to turn into Zimbabwe.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ loves sausage at November 08, 2012 09:59 AM (/kI1Q)
Someone on another blog wrote, We are all Rhodesians now. Not in a racial way but that those who work are being surrounded by a larger group who want to take everything we have and like Rhodesia/Zimbabwe we have a thug as president who will give it to them
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 08, 2012 06:10 AM (1Jaio)
Teh left wing machine blamed "the bankers". They have no clue that is was "the government" who ruined everything.
Barney Frank ruins lives.
Posted by: Fresh at November 08, 2012 06:10 AM (O7ksG)
What we don't need to do is take on "tenure" and the Teachers Unions. Infiltrate the unions. Take them over from within. A single teacher can do a lot of good for conservatism.
That said, I don't think we have time. I seriously think the collapse is coming too soon for that to stop it. It's still necessary, because we need people in place when the recovery begins, but this is positioning for what comes after, not to stop what's coming.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 06:10 AM (/eBe8)
Good morning, Comrades! It's a beautiful day in the glorious People's Republic of Amerika.
What will everyone be doing after their morning prayers for the health of our Glorious Dear Leader?
Posted by: Comrade BackwardsBoy at November 08, 2012 06:10 AM (lOmbq)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at November 08, 2012 06:10 AM (KCvsd)
Posted by: Ferb Fletcher at November 08, 2012 06:10 AM (hyP1j)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 08, 2012 06:10 AM (vCK/R)
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 09:48 AM (GQ8sn)
Too wordy
But the alliteration makes it work!
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 06:10 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: ejo at November 08, 2012 06:11 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: LASue at November 08, 2012 06:11 AM (gjIQF)
Posted by: Carman at November 08, 2012 10:06 AM (C8XlI)
True. We got out organized and played a regular election in a base election.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 06:11 AM (t06LC)
I still say that Rove had less to do with electing Bush than the shitty candidates the Dems fielded.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 06:12 AM (YdQQY)
Something we can look FORWARD to in the age of Obama.
"Acela Strategy: making money by exploiting regulation rather than by creating more effective ways to finance the rest of the economy.”
Posted by: Fresh at November 08, 2012 06:12 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: rickb223 (I am John Galt) at November 08, 2012 06:12 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: separate at November 08, 2012 10:03 AM (JWT7J)
---
I agree. I have left-wing facebook friends who know me personally, know my politics, know I'm not an idiot or a racist, yet still post nonesense about how racist and stupid conservatives are. In other words, even though they have evidence to the contrary, they still post untrue garbage that insults people like me. And yet, they're the high minded ones.
We have one party talking about the effects of taxation on productively and job creation, debts and deficits, the problems facing medicare and social security, and the other talking about binders and birth control and some fictitious "war on women" and other such trivialities. And yet, they're supposed to be the smart, serious thinkers. It's laughable.
And also, it basically comes down to women vs. men. Women are winning.
Posted by: Mullaney at November 08, 2012 06:12 AM (wXcfQ)
Posted by: ejo at November 08, 2012 06:12 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 08, 2012 06:12 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: yinzer at November 08, 2012 06:12 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at November 08, 2012 06:12 AM (WwR1j)
"We made Kerry out to be a squish and a traitor (thank you, Swiftboat Veterans) and it stuck. It had nothing to do with politics, or perhaps it was pre-politics. "
Oh, brother. The difference between what was said about Kerry in 2004 and what was said about Romney is that what was said about Kerry was true and what was said about Romney was a lie. I know this concept is foreign to you Beta Male Dickless Wonders who are incapable of ever defending a conservative. But try working on it. Rush Limbaugh and Bill Maher are not comparable. Write that 500 times until it sinks into your thick skulls. Oh, nevermind. You'll never get it.
Posted by: Jaynie59 at November 08, 2012 06:13 AM (4zKCA)
Posted by: Max Power at November 08, 2012 06:13 AM (+wxCD)
Posted by: Scobface, Staying Positive at November 08, 2012 06:13 AM (IoNBC)
Hey, who told the press about my sleepovers?
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at November 08, 2012 06:13 AM (i8u8P)
Posted by: ejo at November 08, 2012 06:13 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: separate at November 08, 2012 06:13 AM (JWT7J)
60% of people aged 18-29 voted for Obama.
Young people want free abortion, free stuff, and they want their student loans forgiven and paid off by tax payers. Obama and Reid will give it to them.
Posted by: Fresh at November 08, 2012 06:14 AM (O7ksG)
@ 149 "But I'd be pretty stupid, and lose my job for certain, if I took away 10,000,000 votes from the eventual winner. There's an explanation, but I doubt it's something (like in the software) which could be so easily reverse engineered."
The issue is not the 10 million votes disappearing from Obama's total, but a potentially indeterminate amount disappearing from Romney's.
Not hard to do when taking place in a few hard-core Dem-controlled urban centres (Miami, Philly, Cleveland, and Milwaukee come to mind).
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at November 08, 2012 06:14 AM (+inic)
Posted by: Mr pink at November 08, 2012 06:14 AM (EQT2D)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 08, 2012 06:14 AM (zfFcz)
They can't even fucking find Europe on a map. All the know is Europe is full of white people who came here to oppress them, so fuck 'em.
Posted by: HeatherRadish, Crankypants at November 08, 2012 06:14 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Hector at November 08, 2012 06:14 AM (TVbdM)
Posted by: JDTAY at November 08, 2012 06:14 AM (a0nis)
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 10:10 AM (GQ8sn)
Fun to read, tough to scream out....I mean.....tough to say.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at November 08, 2012 06:14 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 08, 2012 06:14 AM (P7hip)
Issues with Romney:
1) Wasn't conservative enough to motivate his base (as evidenced by the fact that the base turnout was far lower.)
2) RomneyCare. Inextricably related to #1. The only real tangible wedge issue of the campaign was off the table (evidence is self evident)
3) Poor campaign advisers. (evidenced by the bad or woefully incomplete data)
4) Poor Strategy. It was painfully obvious to some of us that he waasn't responding to negative campaign ads in swing states AT ALL, let alone forcibly enough. We were told "It's the ground game stupid." No, no it wasn't. (Evidenced by results)
5) Karl Rove. Tough to distance yourself from Bush when The Architect is such a key player. Can we just put him out to pasture now? Enough of the big donors might now agree that it's time.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 08, 2012 06:15 AM (uD2fR)
Posted by: Drew in MO at November 08, 2012 06:15 AM (RteAT)
"To add a point on TFG's win, look at where he went for the last month of the campaign -- to social media television sites like MTV."
Yeah. And, where was Romney? I guess maybe he thought it wouldn't look presidential or something to be on MTV or hit the late night shows like BHO did, but these shows are how you reach a lot of people who didn't watch the debates, or who don't watch the news. And, you can bet that the Democrats will have this as part of their strategy in future elections. Question is, will the Republicans?
Maybe that question about which candidate would you want to have a beer with is more important than we think.
Posted by: sydney jane at November 08, 2012 06:15 AM (zYWPO)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 06:15 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at November 08, 2012 10:12 AM (WwR1j)
Did you take a big hit of the ganja before you wrote this?
Posted by: polynikes at November 08, 2012 06:15 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Scobface, Staying Positive at November 08, 2012 06:16 AM (IoNBC)
Not a single station would ever air it, citing "community standards."
Posted by: HeatherRadish, Crankypants at November 08, 2012 06:16 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 08, 2012 06:16 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: BadCandidate at November 08, 2012 06:16 AM (XIFQU)
Posted by: Truman North at November 08, 2012 06:16 AM (wqp6j)
The only silver lining that I see in all of this is that Nancy Pelosi has to look at BHO's smug puss for 4 more years, knowing that she did all of the heavy lifting and now he gets to take credit for all of her hard work while she rots in obscurity.
He won't give her the time of day now that she's out of power, and the press doesn't fawn over her like they used to.
Warms the cockles of my cold, shriveled heart, it does......
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at November 08, 2012 06:16 AM (P6H+d)
Posted by: Walkers! at November 08, 2012 06:16 AM (C4dFv)
Now Reid's senate will come up with creative ways for the rest of us to pay for Obama's wasted debt.
The removal of private wealth is the big democrat goal.
Posted by: Fresh at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (O7ksG)
Unfortunately I think this too is probably kidding ourselves. The election is a symptom, not a cause, of the dire and unsolvable problem. We have a large majority of all colors and genders addicted to entitlements, and a large demographic ethnic minority voting bloc. Both of these things are irreversible. I hate to be all doom and gloom, but there's a good chance Bush was the last Republican president of the US as currently constituted. Conservatives been saying for decades that this endgame was inevitable in some abstract "the future", but now it's here
It was scary when the Titanic hit the iceberg, but there's no point in hanging out in the ballroom wishing it hadn't happened. It's time to start formulating a lifeboat strategy, because the ship is lost.
Posted by: Matt at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (Aqc5i)
Posted by: Hector at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (CX71c)
Posted by: rickb223 (I am John Galt) at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (GFM2b)
"It's the economy stupid."
The conventional wisdom is also that America loves a sunny, optimistic candidate.Angry, sullen ones don't generally get elected.
So what happened? Obama had a miserable economic track record and he ran a small, petty, meanspirited campaign. He offered no hope, no plan, little optimism.
And he won.
Someone explain that to me.
Posted by: Warden at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (0DlnM)
We lost because the Media refuses to tell the truth about the Democrats. If we had a media that investigated all parties equally, no Democrats would ever be elected to any office. It's that simple.
I'm disappointed in you, Comrade. Don't you realize that the Media is the Truth?
Posted by: Comrade BackwardsBoy at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (lOmbq)
Then I woke up and realized, again, that Obama was re-elected. I'm no longer in the grief stage, I'm entering seething anger stage.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Brisco_County at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (BSPOC)
Posted by: MostlyRight at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (ZG8Ti)
Posted by: Jesusland at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (jIlzK)
Posted by: Terry Gain at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (+BlWU)
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 10:07 AM (YdQQY)
Ok, so who should have run?
Posted by: Tami at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Paul at November 08, 2012 06:17 AM (yauAQ)
All the PR in the world wasn't going to convince shallow, superficial, greedy people to vote for a guy who wanted to give them an opportunity to work over a "rock star" Hollywood hip-hop mogul who promises them Free Shit.
Americans no longer want to be free, they want to live in ease and have a good time (and a significant fraction want to feel good about themselves by bullying us subhumans who just want to be left alone by government into doing their bidding...looking at you, eco-fascists, gyno-fascists, QUILTBAG).
Making fun of Democrats--pointing out the gyno-fascists radiate half the sexual charm of Michael Moore, for example--does not change the fact that they want to let you sit around watching TV all day and the Republicans think you should be doing something productive with your life.</i><br></br>This. Times infinity. This country is done, because the electorate has fulfilled de Tocqueville's prophetic warning in the 1830s.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ loves sausage at November 08, 2012 09:41 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: ICBMMan at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (DH4ET)
Posted by: teebone at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (YtLSL)
Posted by: Hector at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (CX71c)
127 Meh. Europe loves them some fucking SCOAMF, and they got what they wanted.
-------------------------------------
I'm with you 100%. Why are we spending trillions of dollars a year defending those layabouts? Let everybody around the world start paying for their own defense, AND let them deal with the Russian Bear on their own.
The rest of the world has been slamming America for decades now, so fine, get the hell out of all those countries, save the money and pay down our debt.
Let them negotiate for their lives with the enemy that wants to kill them. Those people hate us anyway, so why are we paying for their defense?
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: separate at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (JWT7J)
Posted by: Chuck at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (fnWd3)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (vCK/R)
This is why we're going to end up Zimbabwe instead of Greece.
Posted by: HeatherRadish, Crankypants at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at November 08, 2012 10:12 AM (WwR1j)
Social issues were all but ignored by Romney/Ryan and most R's at the federal level. So the dems created the "war on women" themselves.
And even libertarian types, who have no interest at all in pushing social issues, were lumped into that "war on women" as well, because they want to "limit a woman's access" to birth control by not requiring insurance companies to pay for it.
Posted by: yinzer at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (/Mla1)
I agree, the Republican Party needs a name change. We also have to get off this abortion high horse.
Posted by: Hector at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (CX71c)
So you're looking at 8 to 20 year olds.
Some of them have hormones raging so: BIRTH CONTROL!
Some of them are still watching Sesame Street: BIG BIRD!
Most of them are clueless so: BINDERS!
Todays letter is "B" and the number is still 16 trillion.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 08, 2012 06:18 AM (feFL6)
Is it just me or haven't we been told not to bring up social issues? That there is no culture war? And who brings it up over and over again? In fact, we are in an undeclared ideological war and the American side is not fighting.
And BTW what is the logical rebuttal to "Binders!"? Folders? Jump drives? Face it, the schools and media have succeeded in filling the country with a good percentage of nitwits who have so much self-esteem they believe it is unnecessary for them to become informed on important issues so long as they know how they feel.
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at November 08, 2012 06:19 AM (qwK3S)
I've never had the opportunity to see first hand the disintegration of a country. The Germans and the Japanese did in WWII, but to all Americans it's a difficult thought to wrap your mind around.
I look at it as the start of another great adventure.
I guess the point I'm trying to make is this: America is great, not because of the Constitution but because of the people that could create such a wonderful document. American spirit can't be defeated. So, to paraphrase the old standard; 'pick yourself up, and dust yourself off'. This is another great adventure.
Posted by: Phil-Inn at November 08, 2012 06:19 AM (3dAId)
Rove wasn't the only one, not by a long shot. The list of "Experts" that ought to be sent to the glue factory is long. For starters, you can add all the "conservatives" employed by the MFM, then move on to Sean Hannity, Dick Morris, Jonah Goldberg, Rich Lowry, Erik Ericson, Ed Morrissey, Michelle Malkin and many others.
As far as I'm concerned, teh Noot is on the bubble, too. And so is Limbaugh. I suppose I should applaud them for realizing that four more years of treason is good for their personal popularity (and thus, bank accounts), but I can't.
When Race and Free Shit make the country collapse, we're going to need some brass-balled leaders to get things right, not the eunuchs currently at the head of the pack.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 08, 2012 06:19 AM (yKUrR)
This. Look at what the Democrat party stands for. Look at the delegates (who are, more or less, the definition of the 'grass roots') Booing adding God back into their platform. The Democrat party is evil. And anyone who supports it is therefore also evil.
If you're someone who's been a Democrat "forever" and hates that- either take back your party (which means you'll get blasted just like Republicans) or quit the party.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 06:19 AM (/eBe8)
I'm sure they'd post the exact same thing if Romney won, right? Right.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 08, 2012 06:19 AM (P7hip)
211 The Republican Party needs to throw George Bush under the bus. We need to distance ourselves from him. We also need to neuter the Santorum/Social Con/ Nativist wing of the party.
Posted by: Hector at November 08, 2012 10:17 AM (CX71c)
Well, looky looky.....
Posted by: BCochran1981 at November 08, 2012 06:19 AM (da5Wo)
Damnit, I don't know how to properly post quotes. Let's try that again:
24Yeah...no. You're wrong. Dead fucking wrong.
All the PR in the world wasn't going to convince shallow, superficial, greedy people to vote for a guy who wanted to give them an opportunity to work over a "rock star" Hollywood hip-hop mogul who promises them Free Shit.
Americans no longer want to be free, they want to live in ease and have a good time (and a significant fraction want to feel good about themselves by bullying us subhumans who just want to be left alone by government into doing their bidding...looking at you, eco-fascists, gyno-fascists, QUILTBAG).
Making fun of Democrats--pointing out the gyno-fascists radiate half the sexual charm of Michael Moore, for example--does not change the fact that they want to let you sit around watching TV all day and the Republicans think you should be doing something productive with your life.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ loves sausage at November 08, 2012 09:41 AM (/kI1Q)
This. Times infinity. This country is done, because the electorate has fulfilled de Tocqueville's prophetic warning in the 1830s.
Posted by: ICBMMan at November 08, 2012 06:19 AM (DH4ET)
I say you didn't need to write about binders, as no swing state idiot reads visits this site.
They watch things like the Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert shows for their news. It's all about "entertain me."
Posted by: CJL at November 08, 2012 06:19 AM (3wa9V)
And I hope Sandy Fluke comes down with a painful STD.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 08, 2012 06:19 AM (UOM48)
Oh and stock up on food and water folks
Posted by: MarkC at November 08, 2012 06:20 AM (Kf68R)
Hate to burst your bubble but Europeans and Indians would vote Democratic at first. They come from Statist Socialist nations. Your attitude is why the GOP lost. We need to win hearts and minds, not bitch about the demographics.
Posted by: Hector at November 08, 2012 06:20 AM (TVbdM)
I'm NOT a reistered Republican, so the word "we means little".
REPUBLICANS lost for several reasons.
First - they haven't kept pace with a changing electorate. Not being able to attract Latinos is a MAJOR problem that will hamper that party for years (and already has) unless they WAKE UP. Boehner should've pushed a House version of Rubio's "Dream Act" thru and landed it on Harry Reids desk. This would have eliminated any perceived Democratic advantage. And for gods sakes, YOU CANNOT RUN ON DEPORTING MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS!
Second, you're in trouble when your Senate candidates need to take sensitivity training on social and womens issues. If you cannot intelligently arriculate a MODERATE position on abortion and contraception, YOU LOSE!
Third - so-called "social" issues have become economic ones, and that's the way your position should be explained. In poor economic times, people gravitate towards "safety nets" such as FoodStamps and SS Disablility. Having 47 MILLION people on FoodStamps is unsustainable from an economic perspective (less workers and taxpayers and a drain on the Treasuty). That's how you should be talking to Americans about "social" issues. Entitlments are BROKE...PERIOD! If you can't make that clear to Americans who view YOUR PARTY as the ecomomic one, YOU LOSE!
Lastly - with the Boomer age dying out, your base keeps shrinking. That's another reason why their are fewer Republican voters. You need to find a way to attract new voters NOW!
This race was winnable, even with a mediocre candidate. It's NOT gonna get any better than this when challenging an incumbent. I've known for 4 years that there was no way Obama could piss-off that many people and keep that many voters. HE LOST TEN MILLION AND YOU STILL COULDN'T WIN. What a disgrace. Republicans desperate need to realize once and for all that the elctorate has changed and they're behind the curve.
I'm thru supporting Republican candidates for National office and throwing my vote away until the Republican Party WAKES THE HECK UP!
Posted by: PelosiSchmelosi at November 08, 2012 06:20 AM (oBrP/)
Posted by: Shoot Me at November 08, 2012 06:20 AM (qiXMt)
Posted by: Oh sorry that's just me Hector at November 08, 2012 06:20 AM (pwTow)
The only possible cultural response to that is a two pronged approach. First, if I am paying for someone's birth control, I am going to be the one fucking that person. Second, where's my batteries, bitch. Neither response are ones that a Republican candidate can use.
Seriously I would pay to hear you say that some lib chick's face. If this country is going to shit, I might as well be entertained.
Posted by: Long Island at November 08, 2012 06:21 AM (EsJl1)
Posted by: political correctness czar at November 08, 2012 06:21 AM (Q2Ne0)
All the PR in the world wasn't going to convince shallow, superficial, greedy people to vote for a guy who wanted to give them an opportunity to work over a "rock star" Hollywood hip-hop mogul who promises them Free Shit.
This!
Free Shit> Working For Shit.
Posted by: Roland THTG at November 08, 2012 06:21 AM (I7O5y)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 06:21 AM (qe2/V)
tribalistic manner telling nonwhite voters to punish the Republican
party for daring to oppose him.
This is why we're going to end up Zimbabwe instead of Greece.
"Hello, how much for that SCAR-L? I've got cash."
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 06:21 AM (GQ8sn)
SHIT!! One more time:
24Yeah...no. You're wrong. Dead
fucking wrong.
All the PR in the world wasn't going to convince shallow, superficial, greedy
people to vote for a guy who wanted to give them an opportunity to work over a
"rock star" Hollywood hip-hop mogul who promises them Free Shit.
Americans no longer want to be free, they want to live in ease and have a good
time (and a significant fraction want to feel good about themselves by bullying
us subhumans who just want to be left alone by government into doing their
bidding...looking at you, eco-fascists, gyno-fascists, QUILTBAG).
Making fun of Democrats--pointing out the gyno-fascists radiate half the sexual
charm of Michael Moore, for example--does not change the fact that they want to
let you sit around watching TV all day and the Republicans think you should be
doing something productive with your life.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ loves sausage at November 08, 2012 09:41 AM (/kI1Q)
This. Times infinity. This country is done, because the electorate has fulfilled de Tocqueville's prophetic warning in the 1830s.
Posted by: ICBMMan at November 08, 2012 06:22 AM (DH4ET)
Congratulations. You've just written the stupidest thing on the site today.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at November 08, 2012 06:22 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Warden at November 08, 2012 10:17 AM (0DlnM
Sweet, sweet, government cheese. People voted for the freebies. My brotgher and sister-in-law own a large day care. Wager a guess on how much of the income is government subsidies on child care and meals? Wonder why they vote for the "O" even though brother is a conservative by nature, hunts, fishes, camps?
M O N E Y
Free. Money.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at November 08, 2012 06:22 AM (23NGc)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at November 08, 2012 06:22 AM (qwK3S)
And that will clench the next election for Republicans?
Posted by: CJL at November 08, 2012 06:22 AM (3wa9V)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 08, 2012 06:22 AM (vCK/R)
We lost because the Media refuses to tell the truth about the Democrats.
------
100% True, the steno pool of networks are the cause.
Next thread.....
Posted by: Whatev at November 08, 2012 06:23 AM (2t6Gz)
Romney should have come out with an "Ow, My Balls!" ad.
Posted by: EC at November 08, 2012 06:23 AM (GQ8sn)
Aren't you forgetting something?
Posted by: Fiscal Cliff at November 08, 2012 06:23 AM (5iuEW)
Posted by: eman at November 08, 2012 06:24 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 06:24 AM (QupBk)
@242
Can't shoot a looter or commie with water. Plus, this world has two types of people. Those who have the guns, and those who don't have water. (Paraphrased from The Good, Bad, and the Ugly)
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 06:24 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: spypeach at November 08, 2012 06:24 AM (pwTow)
Posted by: rickb223 (I am John Galt) at November 08, 2012 06:24 AM (GFM2b)
I'm slowly moving from grief to trying to figure out what happened
I certainly understand that Romney had flaws but I think he was uniqually qualified to deal with the current financial crisis and hopefully getting govt under control again. Having watched him in MA I think he would have been more conservative than most people here state. Also there was hope for a better future that has now been dashed and we are back to 4 more years of crap
Thoughts on loss
1. Still want to understand why larger crowds, historic enthusiasm, etc led to lower votes than 2008. I believe Truman N posted that GOP projections at 12 noon were for a R romp
2. Sandy stopped R's momentum and moved the needle back to O. A relative in FL pointed out that both FL and NC have experience with hurricanes adn might have affected their results
3. Low information voters don't understand the shitstorm that is coming with debt, entitlements etc and thought O was ok
4. MSM obvious covering for O and slanting stories for him
Posted by: NoBama12 at November 08, 2012 06:24 AM (ykY2u)
If you're begging a tyrant to enslave me so you can get free shit, you're not my friend.
Posted by: HeatherRadish, Crankypants at November 08, 2012 06:25 AM (/kI1Q)
Oh and for all the crap the Palin family has taken these last 4 years, it's the Palin family that understands how to fight the left on the left's battlefield.
The Palin's are out there on the MSM all the time, they are on TV, they get talked about in social media, they are warriors for the conservative cause. We need an army of Palins on our side, doing battle every single day.
During the last election, David Mamet the playwright had a public conversion to conservatism, and Rush interviewed him. Even Rush was a bit taken aback during the interview. We need public faces of conservatism out there every single day.
Breitbart understood this. It's why the left hated him, he was a big man who could get in the left's sandbox and make it his.
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 06:25 AM (neKzn)
You missed "popular election of Senators." Otherwise, your list is spot on.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 06:25 AM (/eBe8)
There is no way around that.
And increasingly non-White electorate will take any joking the White Party does at the expense of the anti-White Party badly. Sometimes it's not the comedian, it's the audience.
In any case, joking at the expense of Democrats will be called racist. Are you up for taking on the whole "racist / anti-racist" meme knot, and calling out its users as anti-White? Understandably, no. OK, then you can't do anything that will be called "racist!" because you'll crumble when that label is used.
It's the demographics. There is no joking your way around that.
Posted by: The Lightworker at November 08, 2012 06:25 AM (3nUI/)
All Dems that turned their backs on Obamacare and did not endorse Obama will be the last ones to get a little trickle down government action. I'm in a blue state that went red (like last time). We'll be penalized for sure, unlike states like Va.
Posted by: CJL at November 08, 2012 06:25 AM (3wa9V)
Posted by: Scobface, Staying Positive at November 08, 2012 06:25 AM (IoNBC)
-- The ad was called factually accurate in the same WaPo fact check that gave it four Pinocchios. That's part of the culture; no one bothered to read the ad, they just trusted that labeling it a lie meant it was a lie, even when the person saying it was a lie was careful to note it really wasn't.
Posted by: Matt S. at November 08, 2012 06:25 AM (moRRg)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 08, 2012 06:26 AM (Hx5uv)
yes if the GOP was more inclusive, tolerant, focused on economic matters and stop with NeoCon nation building garbage, they would defeat the Dems.
Posted by: Hector at November 08, 2012 06:26 AM (CX71c)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at November 08, 2012 06:26 AM (jZn+7)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 06:26 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Long Island at November 08, 2012 06:27 AM (EsJl1)
Permanent dem majority.
Que?
No Habla!
Donde esta lugar de votación?
Posted by: Roland THTG at November 08, 2012 06:27 AM (I7O5y)
Posted by: flyonthewall at November 08, 2012 06:27 AM (aZ7lL)
@252
Right on. Romney got defined before he defined himself and lost Regan Democrats. He didn't even maximize the white vote.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 06:27 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: rickb223 (I am John Galt) at November 08, 2012 06:27 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 08, 2012 06:27 AM (X3lox)
Now we need to go out and start pressuring congresscritters to make no deals. Allow all the Bush Tax RATES to expire and allow sequestration to happen. Give the libs what the want. They WON after all.
Posted by: Iblis at November 08, 2012 06:28 AM (U0ndG)
Posted by: free rider at November 08, 2012 06:28 AM (Kflw4)
They only way to have a secure voting machine with a CPU in it is to have specially designed hardware that's physically isolated from the CPU do the tally and selections. That physically isolated hardware's only interactions with the CPU should be :
1. Choice status (a CPU input) - a choice was "made" or not "made". NOT what the choice was. What the choice was has to be latched separately in the isolated hardware and physically inaccessible to the CPU.
2. Choice committed (a CPU input) - when the voter hits a commit button (that the CPU has no physical access to), the choice that's been latched is used to select/strobe one of many different count UP configured counter chips, and a status line indicating a choice has been committed is made available to the CPU.
3. Move to next race (a CPU output) - tells the isolated choice circuitry to move to the next race, which would alter the "chip enable" pins on the previous set of counters to off, and set the chip enable on the next bank of counters to on. Forcing the inactive counter banks to hi-Z makes it harder for even a hardware hack to read interim vote tallies as it could only see the active counter bank.
Posted by: @PurpAv at November 08, 2012 06:28 AM (/i+eU)
Posted by: jewells45 saysRomney wins in a landslide at November 08, 2012 06:28 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 08, 2012 06:28 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Barry O'Joker at November 08, 2012 06:28 AM (23NGc)
Que?
No Habla!
Donde esta lugar de votación?
At least until you hear:
"Lo siento, amigo. No hay dinero."
Posted by: Fiscal Cliff at November 08, 2012 06:28 AM (5iuEW)
Posted by: Drew in MO at November 08, 2012 06:28 AM (RteAT)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 06:29 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 08, 2012 06:29 AM (tOkJB)
We need to assert a cultural presence that can take the form of popular images -- in so doing, we need to use them to define our political opponents in a manner that is helpful to us. Its the new form of communication. We have to adapt.
Posted by: Revenant at November 08, 2012 06:29 AM (W7GH9)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 08, 2012 06:29 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Carman at November 08, 2012 06:29 AM (C8XlI)
Assuming (and I use that word intentionally) that we win another election, we will subsequently have to be as judgmental and hard-assed as the Democrats: mass firings at all levels of "public service," replacement of the resulting jobless with people who share our ideology and moral values, laws governing what may/may not be taught in schools, draconian cuts to all entitlement programs and mandated adherence to the Constitution.
This is what has worked since 1932. It will always work until the intelligence and awareness of the average citizen are forced upward.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 08, 2012 06:29 AM (yKUrR)
Yeah like European immigrants from Socialist countries would vote Republican. Wake up and try to win. Attitudes like yours cost us Florida, Virginia, Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico. Keep up and we will lose Texas.
Posted by: Hector at November 08, 2012 06:29 AM (CX71c)
I agree with your third point about entitlements, the case was not made that disabled people are suffering more now because all the newly poor are clogging up the system with their applications for relief. For instance, Section 8 now has a three year wait list. That means a disabled person will have to gut it out for years in a group home or homeless shelter until an available unit comes up, since families get priority in Section 8 world.
But I don't agree with the following:
What a disgrace. Republicans desperate need to realize once and for all that the elctorate has changed and they're behind the curve.
We hold two thirds of the governorships. Four suburban Philly counties that went for Obama sent their GOP incumbent house members back to Congress. How did those four incumbents manage to avoid the stink of the #war on women, binders, and Romnesia jokes?
Posted by: kallisto at November 08, 2012 06:29 AM (jm/9g)
This is sure-fire shit.
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 08, 2012 06:29 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: jewells45 at November 08, 2012 06:30 AM (l/N7H)
Why do you think The View and Ellen or even The Today Show would book pro-Romney guests for any reason other than to mock them?
Posted by: HeatherRadish, Crankypants at November 08, 2012 06:30 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at November 08, 2012 06:31 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Scobface, Staying Positive at November 08, 2012 06:31 AM (IoNBC)
Posted by: @PurpAv at November 08, 2012 06:31 AM (/i+eU)
Posted by: separate at November 08, 2012 06:31 AM (JWT7J)
Posted by: volfan at November 08, 2012 06:31 AM (RTb48)
Romney won independents. We didn't get the base excited. But it WAS cultural. As someone said above, the blue collar conservatives didn't connect with or trust Romney. The numbers actually support this in Ohio in places like Athens county which is a very poor, white area.
I don't know what he could have done. Picked Portman? I loved the Ryan pick at the time, but maybe they were too similarly wonkish and intellectual.
Maybe we need some buffonish cartoon like Biden to appeal to lower class whites? Is that what they want? I just don't know.
Posted by: Warden at November 08, 2012 06:33 AM (0DlnM)
Posted by: Revenant at November 08, 2012 06:33 AM (W7GH9)
@306
Somewhat tellingly we lost Honey Boo Boo. I did not know at the time what a cultural touchstone that was or its significance. Looking back I realize it now.
We, as a nation, a culture, are fucked.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 08, 2012 06:33 AM (t06LC)
"Just because we disagree doesn't mean we can't be friends!"
Get off of Facebook. It's run by a commie fuck face Obozo lover. If we're going to starve the beast. Starve all of it
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 08, 2012 06:33 AM (1Jaio)
You think restricted suffrage was an accident, or an artifact of the founder's culture? No. It was a deliberate choice.
You think that the States' Legislatures selecting the Senators was just some oversight? No. It was a deliberate choice.
Most people don't understand those. Heck, on this very forum, we get into vile arguments about suffrage rights and who should have them.
Europeans just don't get (as a rule) the idea that Government is not the source of our rights, but a burden on them. They just don't get (as a rule) that when a government can "create" rights, then that same government can take rights away.
Hopefully people will come to understand this again one day. Until they do, the best we can do is a holding action, and taking care of ourselves.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 06:33 AM (/eBe8)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 06:34 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: eman at November 08, 2012 06:34 AM (sRus3)
All area to the North of that line will be a new country called Communist US. All area to the South will be called the good country.
It is time we split this country into the workers and the looters.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 06:34 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Fritz at November 08, 2012 06:34 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: Whatev at November 08, 2012 06:34 AM (2t6Gz)
Posted by: Tami at November 08, 2012 10:32 AM (X6akg)
It answers your question.
Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2012 06:34 AM (YdQQY)
301
The left always talks about equality but freedom goes against equality because people are free to make themselves unequal through their own efforts. If your goal is equality, we are far more equal when we are all enslaved by a tiny benevolent overseer group that has taken the burden of being "more equal" upon themselves so the rest of us can enjoy equality in servitude.
Posted by: Drew in MO at November 08, 2012 06:35 AM (RteAT)
Posted by: MamaBinTx at November 08, 2012 06:35 AM (Abmgg)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Coming not nearly soon enough. at November 08, 2012 06:35 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 06:35 AM (qe2/V)
Bullshit, er caca del toro or something.
Euro immigrants? really? How many are you talking about?
Did they walk across the the fucking ocean?
20 million + illegals in this country from where again?
Latvia?
Posted by: Roland THTG at November 08, 2012 06:36 AM (I7O5y)
Basically, the entire Democrat Party is the protected class. That's why they're so think-skinned that we can't even unpack our ideas without getting shouted down. They are entitled to preferred treatment in all forums, every stage, in publications and airwaves. They hate us and they can't even articulate why. In their eyes, we're lucky they let us live here. Oh, but our money's good enough for them.
Posted by: CJL at November 08, 2012 06:36 AM (3wa9V)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 08, 2012 06:36 AM (3Y7RV)
Posted by: Golan Globus at November 08, 2012 06:36 AM (NuQ2+)
Posted by: NoBama12 at November 08, 2012 06:37 AM (ykY2u)
Posted by: Golan Globus at November 08, 2012 06:37 AM (NuQ2+)
Whoopie Do asked her since Mitt had never served in the military, how she would comfort family members with loved ones coming home in "bags" (nice).
I realize no one on that show has two brain cells to rub together, but the irony that we have a prissy little nobody as CiC who never served was completely lost on that pig.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 08, 2012 06:37 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at November 08, 2012 06:38 AM (3Y7RV)
As Republicans, we continue to take the high road but that only resonates with our own, and we are continually astonished that stupid sh** actually sticks, and works. Since the McCain campaign, I said we need a PR firm 24-7-365 that explains conservatism in easy-to-read billboards, on the radio and in sound bites. And it needs to target out natural allies on economics by being in English, Spanish, Chinese, Korean, etc.
We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Posted by: exliberal at November 08, 2012 06:38 AM (leIQP)
Posted by: Matt S. at November 08, 2012 06:38 AM (moRRg)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 06:38 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: Golan Globus at November 08, 2012 06:38 AM (NuQ2+)
I understand what you are saying here, Gabe, and I even agree with you to a certain extent, but I believe it is a bit disenguous to lament that we lost on cultural (social) issues after the way social conservatives were treated during the election.
How many times was it said social cons need to shut up? How many times, whenever a social issue was raised, were socons hissed at, and told "its the economy you dumbass...this is the most important election EVAH and no one wants to talk about ____." How many times was it said "The Republican Party would get along better if it wasnt for those damn social conservatives."?
Posted by: DaveinNC at November 08, 2012 06:39 AM (boNGU)
This is true.
It's also the reason I am not participating in politics anymore.
I know how to persuade people. I've been in advertising and marketing, and I've been a trial lawyer. My whole life has been devoted to the art of persuasion.
My experience tells me that we're lost, and there is no hope for a sale of conservative values of liberty to voters. It's gone. Americans are now too corrupt to be appealed to.
Like any good marketer (or trial lawyer), I have learned to ask the most important questions first -- What is the political marketer selling, anyway? What business is the government in?
This is where a lot of marketing clients get things wrong. Let's say you're in the restaurant business. What are you selling? Food? No. You're not in the food business. You're selling a place to sit and be catered to. You're selling time -- a a short-term stay at a spa. Sometimes customers want the ultra-quick in-and-out experience of just having someone make them a sammich. Sometimes they want the full Monty and have a butler wait on them for 2 hours. Whatever. But restaurants are selling something other than food.
Let's say you're in the book business. What are you selling? Books? No. You're not in the book business. You're in the coffee shop business. You're in the Miniature Theme Park business. Successful booksellers are in the business of setting up a cafe where people will come and hang out and THEN buy the overpriced paper that contains entertaining words and pictures. That's why Borders closed. They thought people came into their stores to buy books. They didn't. Bookstores are not like AutoZone or Walmart. Customers came in to relax and be stimulated by a zillion different topics. They can "buy books" from Amazon, cheaper. You can't relax at Amazon.
So, what business are politicians in? What does government sell?
They're in the violence business. They sell death and pain and jail cells.
But part of being in the violence business is pretending you're not in the violence business. That's actually Rule No. 1. You can't talk about it.
So, politicians are also in the lying business. They're in the Magical Thinking business. They're in the Fantasy business. They sell pleasant fantasies. Just like Disney, only Disney does it without the rape rooms.
The ONLY thing that matters in government is the issue of freedom from violence, usually freedom from its own violence. This is the key question in everything that government does or could possibly do. In all issues of the State (i.e., "policy"), there's only one question (couched in a billion different forms) -- who's going to get the stick?
Who's going to get the gun pointed in his face and forced to comply?
Who's going to get the cocoa butter hand job? But in actuality, that question really is about who is going to get the barbed cock shoved up his ass and forced to give someone else a cocoa butter hand job.
That's all government is. That's all it CAN do. Government is guns. That's all they've got.
Now, as freedom-loving conservatives, we think that guns should be used only on bad people. For defense. Someone tries to steal your shit or rape your daughter? He gets the gun. In those circumstances, guns=good. Yes, fine.
The Left does not think this way.
They're completely immersed in the Fantasy side of the business. The Magical Thinking side of the governmental operation. They think Free Shit is great. They don't EVER want to hear about who's getting the stick. In their world, no one gets the stick. When you tell them about the stick, they STOP LISTENING.
So, when Conservatives approach the customer (the Swing Voter) with a sales pitch that describes in careful detail exactly who's going to get the stick (criminals), and who's not going to get the stick (employers, business people, investors), and all the well-thought-out reasons for distinguishing between the two, they get confused.
The Swing Voter thinks, "I've had NONE of my Buying Motivation buttons pushed! Where's the pleasant fantasy? Where's the fun and sparkle? Where's the part where buying what you're selling makes her more intelligent/mysterious/powerful/fun/attractive person?"
The Left is fully in the Fantasy Business. The Fantasy Business serves a very important marketing function for them, which is to hide the government's real business, which is SWAT teams and prisons.
The Fantasy is an indispensable part of the whole operation. There's a reason that you NEVER see Disney characters in the Magic Kingdom walking around without their masks on. You never see the 20-something dude take his Tigger mask off when he's taking pictures with the kiddies. It kills the fantasy, which is the WHOLE POINT for being there.
You can't sell reality to people who CAME TO BUY AN APPEALING FANTASY.
So, that's it. We're past the tipping point.
Save yourselves. It's only going to get worse.
Posted by: Phinn at November 08, 2012 06:40 AM (oFH2D)
-
Whites need to be a lot less "intellectual" and a lot more like block voters, which is to say winners.
The Republican Party could help out by running for things they want to vote for. Apparently the pure cold water of economic rationality isn't it.
Posted by: The Lightworker at November 08, 2012 06:40 AM (3nUI/)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 08, 2012 06:40 AM (NersQ)
Lets say they did come here in drove, you think they would be voting Republican, dream on. You Nativists would be bitching about the Euros as well. We need to win hearts and minds, not demonize people.
Your mentality is why we lost.
Posted by: Hector at November 08, 2012 06:40 AM (p+4lN)
Thrown them some more red meat, maybe? Rick Perry's line (which, I'm still convinced, if he'd stuck to would have won him the nomination, if not the election) "I promise every day to make Washington, DC as inconsequential in your life as possible" resonated. People liked it.
In many ways, it was the Conservative version of "Hope and Change." When he spoke of the flat tax, he spoke of it in terms of "simplicity" and "fairness." "Hey, it's not fair that you have to spend all that time doing your taxes" (never mind that, for most people, it takes minutes to an hour or so).
Now, this is not to say Perry was a better candidate than Romney (at least during the primaries); it's fairly obvious he wasn't. But I think those kinds of things speak to white-collar Conservatives.
Conservatives often flounder when asked "what are you going to do for me." We need to be able to answer with things like "My policies will lower your cost of living, giving you more money and time to do things you want to do." We need to be able to answer with things like "I'm going to make college more affordable for you."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 06:41 AM (/eBe8)
How do you counter Blame Bush? IDK, apparently he's going to kill the entire party. Apparently, Rs cause hurricanes, and Ds fix them. 2 Hurricanes result in the destruction of our republic - where's providence now, socons??
Funny how we get beat on abortion and rape and SCIENCE!, and so many think it was because we didn't run a a pure enough socon candidate? Yeah. if your goal is to get no more than 40% of the vote.
I thought our "silent majority" would turn out, but it doesn't exist anymore. The reason there are less Rs is because our dead folk don't vote.
Most of us won't even engage in the culture war ... a battle many refuse to even believe it exists, yet, somehow Binders and Big Bird were the final straw? A joke, really ...
Socons can go home now, and sit in their ideological purity, completely alone ...
Posted by: Joe at November 08, 2012 06:41 AM (pM5lc)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 06:41 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: separate at November 08, 2012 06:42 AM (JWT7J)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 08, 2012 06:42 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Trainer on his iphone at November 08, 2012 06:42 AM (L8M3D)
We passed the rubicon Tuesday night. For staters, pollsters are shit. Explain to me how Ras had a 15,000 person party ID poll Monday at R+5 and we end up with D+6 Tuesday night. To this moron, that seems as statistically impossible as me hitting the bunk with Kate Upton.
And if we really are a D+6 country, then we are toast; culturally, ethically, morally, and financially. We simply cannot compete with half of the population being moochers, takers, binders, Big Bird, educated by Marxists, wanting free shit, etc..... Now that we are clearly outumbered, at some perverse level, I am at peace with this. We now know the path ahead of us....we can see it. They cannot.
So prepare.
Spend time with your family, your God, your like-minded neighbors.
Seriously, if you morons don't own a firearm, run, do not walk to your local gun shop and buy 5.....and ammo.....lots and lots of ammo.
They think protection is about rubbers and pills. We think otherwise and now that the writing is on the wall for this Republic, we must alter our mindset from elections to collapse, survival and rebirth.
(Gawd, I sound like that Rawles guy......)
Posted by: MuthaFuckin'Media at November 08, 2012 06:43 AM (IxejE)
Posted by: Phinn at November 08, 2012 10:40 AM (oFH2D)
__
If all that you said is true, the electorate won't come back to the GOP on a presidential level unless we experience a visible, undeniable existential threat, such as we did on Sep. 11, 2001. Because the MFM had no choice but to cover that situation. When their own asses were that close to GZ, all of a sudden they liked conservatives.
Posted by: kallisto at November 08, 2012 06:44 AM (jm/9g)
The left always talks about equality but freedom goes against equality because people are free to make themselves unequal through their own efforts. If your goal is equality, we are far more equal when we are all enslaved by a tiny benevolent overseer group that has taken the burden of being "more equal" upon themselves so the rest of us can enjoy equality in servitude.
Welcome to the Party, Comrade. Shared equality is what makes Amerika the greatest country in the world!
Posted by: Comrade BackwardsBoy at November 08, 2012 06:44 AM (lOmbq)
Posted by: Golan Globus at November 08, 2012 10:36 AM (NuQ2+)
Finally, some else here gets it. Everyone is going through deep and complicated explanations about why people who are not deep or complicated vote the way they do. I saw plenty of facebook "friends" who were cheering the reelection of Obama who probably could not tell you what the unemployment rate is. Or how much debt the U.S. current has (in fairness, neither can Obama). Or which party controls the House or the Senate. Or don't know that our budget deficits are higher under Obama than Bush. Or think that Obamacare means that they get free healthcare (can't wait until some of them face the fines for not having health insurance). Or that Mitt Romney really wants to ban tampons. Etc. The left and those who vote with them are fundamentally unserious people. We need to stop acting like they are if we want to win.
Posted by: Mullaney at November 08, 2012 06:44 AM (wXcfQ)
1980 was more than thirty years ago. The Reagan Democrats are dead or in retirement homes. I wish it weren't so, but this is simply not the same country as it was then.
We are demographically sunk. Minority voting blocs are addicted to free stuff, and some substantial majority of unmarried white people are too. Obama's re-election is not some disaster that happened, it is a symptom of a disaster already in progress.
Posted by: Matt at November 08, 2012 06:44 AM (Aqc5i)
Posted by: eman at November 08, 2012 06:45 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 06:46 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: Avi at November 08, 2012 06:47 AM (Gx3Fe)
Posted by: In the bunker at November 08, 2012 06:47 AM (R7H3g)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 08, 2012 06:47 AM (sRsX7)
Gabe:
Can we ban the America haters from this site. I am tired of hearing the constant mantra of burn baby burn from these know-nothing, keyboard warriors. They sound like a bunch of spoiled, crazy-bizarro world right-wing version of 1960 Haight-Ashbury hippies.
Stop sounding like spoiled brats. This is a great country. We have elections all the time that allow us to change things. We just happened to lose this one. If you withdraw from politics and stick your head in the sand like an Ostrich, how you think that will change things.
Gabe -- I agree with your point to a limited extent. This election was lost due to marketing and persuading (or our lack thereof), but I disagree with you about the binders, Big Bird theory. I think that was an absolutely horrible marketing mistake by the Democrats and I think, but for Sandy, it might well have cost them the election. Yes, it spoke to their base -- but it turned off anyone who is not part of their base. Yes, their base may be bigger than ours, but I still think there were people who could have been persuaded outside of the bases. Those ads did not do it. Hell, we should have paid for those adds to run in some places.
I do agree though that we need to pay attention to cultural issues and spend more time on persuading and selling. The more I think about it, I think Romney's 47% comment was more than a gaffe (or maybe it was the Mickey Kaus version of a gaffe, a politician accidentally speaking his mind). It revealed Romney (and many Republicans view of the world), i.e., we are never going to persuade that 47%, so why try. But in doing so, we are giving ourselves very, very, little room to win elections. We have to start selling ourselves to at least 60% to 65% of the country (not just 53% percent).
Also, after a 2 days to think, I wonder if we are overthinking this. We have lost elections. Is this worse than than the 1936, 1940 or 1964 defeats. No. We came back from those. We will come back. The Democrats will misread this election and think they have a mandate. They will do stupid things. The media can't carry their water for ever. Late night talk shows can't keep making jokes only at Republicans expense. The tide will turn.
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 06:47 AM (Cxl7g)
We lost because the electorate failed.
The people failed.
And I'll leave you to it.
Posted by: eleven at November 08, 2012 06:48 AM (KXm42)
Speaking of Facebook, I see a lot of libs posting little pictures saying "Just because we disagree doesn't mean we can't be friends!"
------
Haven't seen that one. It might have something to do with manually blocking 10% of my list of "friends" a couple days ago. And the 22 year old niece who I got sick of seeing her love of all things Disney for the past few years. As I was going down the list I figured, yeah, fuck her too.
Posted by: Whatev at November 08, 2012 06:48 AM (2t6Gz)
-----
Huh? I don't know about that. I doubt more than 25% of swing voters has any knowledge about the story of Obama's canine culinary past.
Posted by: Serious Cat at November 08, 2012 06:49 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: separate at November 08, 2012 06:49 AM (JWT7J)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 06:50 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: eman at November 08, 2012 06:50 AM (sRus3)
-
That's true.
297 No race based power groups should be socially acceptable in America. We are being Balkanized so that the far left can govern long term in America. The best part of this all being that this has largely been put together by very liberal white people filled with nihilistic self loathing.
-
In fact non-White race based power groups with anti-White agendas are socially acceptable in America and will remain so. Do you think the left will spontaneously decide that winning is no fun and they should stop?
This is a gunfight, even if you think it should be a boxing match. You can bring a gun to the gunfight, and have a small chance, or not bring a gun to the gunfight, and get shot for sure. Those are the options.
Posted by: The Lightworker at November 08, 2012 06:50 AM (3nUI/)
Posted by: BuddyPC at November 08, 2012 06:50 AM (jfUIE)
319 The sad fact is (and this is why whatever arises from the ashes will not, at least at first, be based on anything resembling the Constitution) Liberty and Self Government constituted on the concept that all men are created Equal, and that they have certain inalienable (natural) rights- and that Government's job is ONLY to secure those rights, are completely foreign to most people in the world.
You think restricted suffrage was an accident, or an artifact of the founder's culture? No. It was a deliberate choice.
You think that the States' Legislatures selecting the Senators was just some oversight? No. It was a deliberate choice.
Most people don't understand those. Heck, on this very forum, we get into vile arguments about suffrage rights and who should have them.
Europeans just don't get (as a rule) the idea that Government is not the source of our rights, but a burden on them. They just don't get (as a rule) that when a government can "create" rights, then that same government can take rights away.
Hopefully people will come to understand this again one day. Until they do, the best we can do is a holding action, and taking care of ourselves.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) All Dead Inside at November 08, 2012 10:33 AM (/eBe
Cut. Jib. Newsletter.
Although, in this day and age, a blog might work better than a newsletter. You should look into getting one of those.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at November 08, 2012 06:52 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Avi at November 08, 2012 06:52 AM (Gx3Fe)
Hector, what specifically should the GOP be more inclusive and tolerant of?
The values of economic freedom are inherently inclusive. And are you speaking of social tolerance, meaning lifestyle choices? Are you drawing a distinction between tolerating and subsidizing? As for abortion, GOP candidates know it's legal and most accept there will have to be a change of heart before numbers decline.
Your last point about "nation-building garbage" tells me that you're Libertarian. If that's true, then you will likely never agree with much of the Republican party on matters of foreign policy and defense.
If you are a Libertarian, did you vote for Obama out of pure hatred for Republicans? If so, did you knowingly choose to punish Republicans even if it meant that devastating consequences for our country?
If I misunderstand your views in that last paragraph, I apologize. My intent isn't to be mean but to understand. These are only ideas, and what's the threat of those on a thread? If we're not thin-skinned we can actually make progress in understanding one another.
Posted by: CJL at November 08, 2012 06:55 AM (3wa9V)
Posted by: ByLaw at November 08, 2012 06:55 AM (kJJ2z)
Posted by: volfan at November 08, 2012 06:55 AM (RTb48)
I do agree though that we need to pay attention to cultural issues and spend more time on persuading and selling.
Unless your face is constructed of Gorilla Glass and responds to touch, you'll be wasting your time. Amerikans no longer relate to other people, they relate to those machines they hold constantly. Whatever those things tell them to do, they do. They vote the way they are told and think the way they are told to think. The Progressive Left controls those machines.
Step outside of that idea and you are criticized, ostracized, and mocked. Think for yourself, challenge today's conventional wisdom, go against the grain of "popular thinking" and see what happens to you. Welcome to the New Amerika and its electronic peer pressure, Comrade.
Posted by: Comrade BackwardsBoy at November 08, 2012 06:56 AM (lOmbq)
"Also, after a 2 days to think, I wonder if we are overthinking this. We have lost elections. Is this worse than than the 1936, 1940 or 1964 defeats."
nc at November 08, 2012 10:47 AM (Cxl7g)
Why yes it is. In 1936, 1940 and 1964 we had a manufacturing base, we still made things, people still went to church on Sunday, the family unit was intact, kids were taught about real American history and we were not in debt as a nation to the tune of 100% of GDP not to mention we weren't $100T more in the hole due to underfunded entitlement liabilities.
We are none of this now. So yes it is worse. We have half of the nation that is morally bankrupt, concerned about free shit, Obama-phones, who's going to pay for my house and gas, we don't make shit....except paper money that won't be worth anything by the time mid-terms roll about in 2014.
So you may choose to call some of us defeatist, I think the more accurate term is realist. The writing is on the wall. You can sell youself to 60-65% of the country when less than 50% would even listen to you in the first place. We aren't the America-haters....the other 51% are.
Posted by: MuthaFuckin'Media at November 08, 2012 06:56 AM (IxejE)
Here's an article talking about the low turnout among white voters. Libs spent all the post-election talking about how the GOP is dead because the white voters aren't there. Well they are there, but they just didn't turn out (unless they did, and shenanigans prevailed) because Obama attacked Mitt as wealthy and out of touch going all the way back to February.
To win in 2016 we need a short primary, a blue collar candidate that can excite the big doners, sharp negative ads that define the opposition, and GOTV efforts that target low-propensity white voters (the kind the Romney camp swore they were getting in early voting, but shenanigans).
(I posted this in an earlier thread, bumped here for relevance)
Posted by: bigpale at November 08, 2012 06:57 AM (b00RV)
Posted by: laughing at neck braces at November 08, 2012 06:57 AM (nVqtU)
Posted by: Jim Bender at November 08, 2012 06:58 AM (fbpjp)
Bevel Lemelisk @346-
Yeah, I am seeing that, too. And you know, I like to think that I am mature enough to accept that little tiny twig of an olive branch and move on. But you know what? They made their bed. Yep, their guy won. Its all theirs. And when it breaks into a million pieces, all of the million pieces will be theirs, too. Just do not expect me to come in and clean up the mess.
The election results Tuesday angered me. A lot. But now that anger is past, and has become contempt. I used to love this country; I used to have respect for its institutions, and its customs. But not anymore. I venerate what this country started out to be; I respect the history and the sacrifice that went into creating this nation and making it what it once was. But all that is past now; this new nation, conceived in divisiveness and dedicated to the proposition of free stuff, is not something I will recognize nor support.
Posted by: DaveinNC at November 08, 2012 06:59 AM (boNGU)
Posted by: Chuck at November 08, 2012 06:59 AM (fnWd3)
Posted by: rockmom at November 08, 2012 07:00 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: t-bird at November 08, 2012 07:01 AM (FcR7P)
Your side ran its dream campaign with irs dream candidate, and it was a cataclysmic failure.
Keep running Scott Browns, and maybe the whole country can continue to have results like MA.
Because Northeastern Republican candidates know how to succeed.
Nice sentiment, socon, but you make my point exactly. Even with decent candidates, a united coalition, and a completely failed incumbent, we cannot win because we are so despised in the culture. I'm sure Akin or Mourdock would've done soooo much better nationally. Our bench is a joke. I am in Colo - NOT the NE - and we lost the entire state 2 yrs ago due to running ridiculously unqualified pro-lifers who were open to the war on women attack. Obama took this strategy and played it nationally, and it won for him, because BINDERS! lol
Posted by: Joe at November 08, 2012 07:01 AM (pM5lc)
Posted by: KG at November 08, 2012 07:02 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: separate at November 08, 2012 07:02 AM (JWT7J)
Posted by: eman at November 08, 2012 07:02 AM (sRus3)
because:
1) He was our guy but we didn't defend him
and
2) We still are not hitting back on that, we are agreeing
If you don't analyze what is losing and change it to winning strategies, you keep losing.
Do you have any fucking idea how much I hate losing?
Almost as much as I hate teaching people shit they should have learned in 1992.
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 08, 2012 07:03 AM (6H6FZ)
227 Right on the money. I've been saying for years that our immigration policy should be let anyone in who is:
1) Aged 18-40
2) Can speak, read and write english at a 12th grade level.
3) Pass the citizanship test.
Once they've been here a couple of years, have been gainfully employed and have clean record, they can then bring in their spouses and children.
No racial quotas! No preferences for politically connected ethnic groups! No chain migration!
Not only would we have steady influx of bright, motivated people coming into the country which would go a long way towards our age demographic inbalance, but we would have millions of young people around the world learning English and about the American Constitution. It would literally change the world overnight.
Posted by: Jaylord at November 08, 2012 07:05 AM (RuF8n)
Posted by: eman at November 08, 2012 07:07 AM (sRus3)
If SoCons want to go down with the ship, then so be it.
Posted by: ByLaw at November 08, 2012 10:55 AM (kJJ2z)
So being against illegal immigration is extreme? Tell you what I'm going to rob you but don't try to stop me because of your extreme position on theft
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 08, 2012 07:10 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: gladys at November 08, 2012 07:11 AM (p+4lN)
Posted by: volfan at November 08, 2012 07:12 AM (RTb48)
Romney's fundamental problem is that he never realized he was running against two presidents, Obama and Bush. And even then he attacked the one that was less important.
Most conservatives have forgotten how deeply unpopular Bush was and is. I guess it's human nature to filter out of our memories mistakes we've made, like my/our previous support for Bush. So we've forgotten about him. The rest of the country has not.
Especially after Obama really started hammering the line "Take us back to the policies that got us into this mess in the first place." after the conventions (and Clinton's very effective speech), Romeny should have attacked Bush's policies even more than he did Obama's.
Romeny's line that Obama's policies didn't work or made things worse was just not credible with the Honey Boo-Boos without this full throated attack on Bush. Only after destroying Bush and his policies would he have any street cred for going after Obama's. The Honey Boo-Boos still loves them some Bush-hate and so without Romeny joining in on the bashing, Obama's tying of Bush to Romney worked like a charm.
Coulda, woulda, shoulda...
Posted by: Jaylord at November 08, 2012 07:16 AM (RuF8n)
Posted by: matt_from_ohio at November 08, 2012 07:17 AM (XE1lu)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 08, 2012 07:20 AM (X3lox)
Because they are failures that failed.
Posted by: eleven at November 08, 2012 07:21 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: KG at November 08, 2012 07:22 AM (p7BzH)
396 Eman
Â@
Yeah, guilty as charged -- I am pretty intolerant of people who want to watch America burn. Go find a world where everyone is exactly like you -- and good luck finding it.
And all of you who think we are doomed -- what is your plan? To keep saying we are doomed? To find a bunker and hide there? Do you think everything goes right all the time. Live a little - it does not. But as long as we are alive, we have a chance to make a change. And I am not just saying that as some kind of pop, feel good psychology. We are a player in this game. We get to affect how things happen. It may take a while, it may not be noticeable, and it may be frustrating. We may feel like we are Sisyphus -- rolling a rock up a hill just to have it keep coming back down. But I think we have a good message. We just need to use it. People can be persuaded. Just because someone is Hispanic or AA (or the child of a hippy) doesn't mean that they do not want more for themselves. I just think that it is wired into our DNA to have dreams and go for them -- and I think that is what we are about. I get it, that its probably also wired in our DNA to get free stuff without working for it. But that is just something we will have to deal with.
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 07:22 AM (Cxl7g)
Posted by: Timwi at November 08, 2012 07:23 AM (pdhxN)
Posted by: ben h at November 08, 2012 07:24 AM (pSbfg)
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 07:26 AM (Cxl7g)
To make it simple. Gabe, you're wrong. Do you really believe that those voters in Cleveland, Phillie, Chicago, etc. care about anything other than their entitlements? Of course they don't. Do you think the Dem apparatus cares about Gay marriage, abortion, etc. Of course they don't. The Dems only want to stay in office and make money. To do that they are willing to give the country what it wants. And thanks to FDR and LBJ, that means entitlements.
Unless we are willing to compromise our basic principles on this we will never win. So should we do that? Nope. Because those voters will never believe us anyway, It's been too long for them. I'm afraid no matter what the voter registration rolls say this is a Democrat controlled country. At least until the the money dries up. And who knows, they may find some way to blame us for that too.
Posted by: Deanna at November 08, 2012 07:27 AM (+npP4)
Looking forward to the next republican candidate for pres, here's what I see:
1) Compelling personal story - i.e., blue collar or ethnically exotic. Or both, like Barky and Biden.
2) Abortion and rape are off the table. Abortion is the law of the land. It's a personal choice, and shut the hell up about legitimate rape. It used to be that the majority of people were squishy pro-life. I don't think that's true anymore.
3) Lifestyle. This is going to tick off base republican voters, but the ship has sailed on gay relationships. Younger people know lots and lots of gay people. Start right now and figure out an acceptable position on gay relationships. The Log Cabin Republicans and guys like HillBuzz should take the lead on this.
4) Get aggressive in the public square and make it cool to be a republican, owning your own business is cool, making decisions for yourself is cool, and sitting around waiting for Santa to deliver your free stuff is uncool.
5) Save the heavy thinking for position papers. Educational research is showing that younger people have grown up in a digital world and have shorter attention spans and think differently. The KISS principle needs to be invoked. Math was a loser.
6) Nixon's Silent Majority is dead. Reagan's Democrats are also dead or in a nursing home. The majority of older voters next time out will be baby boomers. They are not going to be conservative republicans automatically. They are white-guilt old fogies who still crave to be cool. Being old, they will turn out to vote in large numbers, and it's a big bulge demographically. We need them.
Posted by: Boots at November 08, 2012 07:32 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: eman at November 08, 2012 07:33 AM (sRus3)
Posted by: LASue at November 08, 2012 07:37 AM (gjIQF)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at November 08, 2012 07:40 AM (UU0OF)
Posted by: KG at November 08, 2012 07:40 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 08, 2012 07:43 AM (X3lox)
drive through virginia or pa- off the main roads-they are economically depressed. they would like/need? a government job or a hand out. they hate rich people (anyone earning more than they do) unless they are entertainers or atheletes
any govt hand out they currently receive is a right
they have been taught that to avoid being mocked as ignorant and inbred they must worship diversity and accept the government's thoughtful rules and regulations/ including energy destroying fracking rules
big business bad/doctors bad/big pharma/bad; lawsuits/good
that's why their gov't runs on lottery sales-aka the poor people's tax
Posted by: wm flap at November 08, 2012 07:44 AM (lB/5N)
Posted by: kitty at November 08, 2012 07:45 AM (JeYW2)
Posted by: pointsnfigures at November 08, 2012 07:45 AM (EBPRt)
414 Eman
Ok --thanks for the clarification. I disagree. We are nothing like the USSR and never will be. Maybe, maybe we will end up like the UK -- but I doubt even that. And even if we do, things can change.
I have little statistical proof of this, but anecdotally, I can tell you that most immigrants I know come here because there is opportunity in this country. Yes, Democratic policies are training people to ask for a handout and not work, but I don't think the demographics of this country fundamentally dooms us. I am a descendant of people from the British isles. At one time, we made up a majority of the population of this country (ok, I am too lazy to check that point, but I am assuming most early immigrants were from England, Scotland and Northern Island -- with a decent number of Germans mixed in). That changed pretty quickly. My wife's father is 1st Generation American -- his family is from Italy. He owns his own business and is more conservative than I am. My brother's wife is from Latin America and is very conservative. Yes, this is anecdotal -- but racial origin is not destiny. I do think cultural background plays a huge part in how you view the world -- but viewpoints can be changed.
Don't be a nihilist.
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 07:46 AM (Cxl7g)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 08, 2012 07:47 AM (G9qZk)
419
Dude, I clearly don't speak your code. I am not calling for plagues on anyone, but apparently you think I did. Sorry if I offended.
Posted by: nc at November 08, 2012 07:48 AM (Cxl7g)
Posted by: NJRob at November 08, 2012 07:50 AM (FVp26)
Posted by: ALL_IS_LOST at November 08, 2012 07:51 AM (T/L2Z)
It's not policy arguments; it's not appeals to individual liberty; it's not cogent facts about economic recovery. None of these makes a dent with a 'swing' voter, an ordinary Joe or Josephine. It's all BORING to them. Or it's over their heads. Or they don't understand the words that are coming out of your mouth. You may as well not put in the effort.
It's who is cute; who is likable, who communicates that they are the most like them; that's the person they will vote for. Also, the candidate who is lampooned and made fun of by their cultural icons is the candidate that these pop culture skimmers are NOT going to vote for. And we know who that invariably will be -- the republican/conservative/fuddy duddy/dad figure/white man/choose your term.
When you go after the great unwashed and undecided, you must be smiley, cool, with it, clued in to the cultural "dogwhistles" if you like, attractive, hot (if possible), young (if possible).
Of course, all those positives for knee jerk voters can be neutralized by a goofy face by Jon Stewart, or continual degrading by standup comics, or demeaning jokes and assumptions by characters on favorite TV shows and sitcoms.
The battle for America is not fought on the Op-Ed pages. It's fought on the airwaves, the silver screen, pop culture Internet sites, and to a secondary degree, the halls of high school and academia.
Posted by: Sphynx at November 08, 2012 07:52 AM (j2McS)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at November 08, 2012 07:52 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Tickled Pink at November 08, 2012 07:54 AM (uCR70)
Posted by: SH at November 08, 2012 07:58 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: David C. at November 08, 2012 08:00 AM (ZtMso)
Posted by: ALL_IS_LOST at November 08, 2012 08:01 AM (T/L2Z)
Posted by: Sam Haysom at November 08, 2012 08:07 AM (xwlja)
@#433 No, we don't have to give in on abortion, but we have to be smarter and somewhat disingenuous, i.e. act like liberals.
The way to do this is to hammer at late-term abortions and then pretend that all abortions are like late-term abortions. Honey Boo-Boos are used to slick 3-D animations in movies, use them to generate videos that show a sanitized, although still guesome, view of what a late-term abortion looks like. Then run ads along the lines of this:
"Abortion is murder. Here's is what a late term abortion looks like..."
See. Tie something morally wrong with something that is truly despicable and use slick graphics to illustrate the point. The liberals in politics, the media and in the broader culture do this all the time, except the thing they're going after isn't actually morally wrong, such as taking responsibility for yourself and getting a job.
It. Works. Every. Time.
Posted by: Jaylord at November 08, 2012 08:13 AM (RuF8n)
Posted by: nip at November 08, 2012 08:15 AM (11Tdq)
Spot on! The idea that the way to win the culture war is MOAR Palins is kinda like saying the Japanese could've won WWII with more Midways.
They voted with their vaginas, now we are stuck with this pussy.
Posted by: Joe at November 08, 2012 08:18 AM (pM5lc)
Does the name Barney Frank mean anything to you? Harvey Milk?
Openly gay politicians are not a recent development.
Posted by: epobirs at November 08, 2012 08:26 AM (kcfmt)
So, socons would win the abortion debate if we only posted more fetus pics on FB?
See, this was Robert's genius - he realized a judicial solution was not a political solution. 40 yrs after umbras and penumbras and we are still getting wedged by this issue.
Posted by: Joe at November 08, 2012 08:26 AM (pM5lc)
439 In a word, Yes! Look, a lot of people who support abortion either don't know what it is really like, or don't want to know. Rub their faces in it and make sure they can't deny that they know tall the implications of their "choice". Why do you think liberals fight so hard against provisions that make women learn about what abortion reallt means before they go through with one.
This is part of a broader problem that conservatives have; you never make the liberals own the consequences of their policies.
Posted by: Jaylord at November 08, 2012 08:38 AM (RuF8n)
That is complete nonsense. It wasn't Bush's policies that created the insane MBS debacle. That was initiated and grown almost 100% by Democrats like Dodd and Frank. The Bush White House tried EIGHTEEN TIMES to draw attention to Fannie and Freddie, and every time they were told they were the worst kind of racists for the merest suggestion that this stuff needed to be reined in.
When people don't know what actually happened and whose policies got us there, all else is lost. Once the Big Lie is accepted as fact you're automatically discrediting your own side in the argument.
The leftist play a long game. The original Cloward-Piven Strategy article was published back in the 60s and they've been pushing it forward ever since. When the CRA and similar 'lets give mortgages to people who have no hope of ever keeping up with them' initiatives were pushed, the people behind them knew what the end game was. It succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
The real problem is an unwillingness to publicly label people who are genuinely EVIL as such. But what other word can be applied to those who push for policies that are guaranteed to be highly destructive failures? Time after time the supposedly right-wing politicians keep maintaining the public farce that the other side is honorable and there is merely a disagreement over some policy issues. Having a functional civilization is a policy issue?
Posted by: epobirs at November 08, 2012 08:54 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: Joe at November 08, 2012 08:55 AM (pM5lc)
Posted by: Ace's Anus at November 08, 2012 09:08 AM (wWrHp)
Posted by: joeindc44 says choom on fuckers at November 08, 2012 09:15 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Phinn at November 08, 2012 09:58 AM (3p/jD)
Great post Gabe,
Bush 04 Understood this. Even if you don't run on every issue, you have to run on every issue. You need a full spectrum game. Obama declares there is a war on women, we hit back with a war on babies. Democrats especially Obama are so far left on the abortion debate. Slam him on the born alive act, slam him on parental notification, slam him as uncaring on abortion.
Slam him on gun control, bring his liberal voting record up on it.
Slam him on how he claims to be pro hispanic, and how he keeps deporting them. Slam him on every issue. In the PA TV market, Romney ran the same campaign add again and again and again. In the same 30 Minutes we got 4 of the same add, it should have been 4 different ads.
1. Economy
2. How super left his abortion record is
3. Bitter people clinging to Guns God and Religion
4. Jokes about how our Navy is as important to him as our Cavalry
Posted by: miikeb at November 08, 2012 10:04 AM (0GONp)
No, dude. You are. This race was Obama vs. Obamalite and a chunk of the electorate either stayed home or just voted for Obama because they saw little difference between the candidates (because that was actually the case).
You want to beat the other guy? Don't send in a candidate who sounds and acts a lot like the other guy.
A markedly different, CONSERVATIVE candidate - not one who changed positions and made conservative sounding platitudes - would have won this election.
Your formula brought us Bush, McCain and Romney and what floors me is how you insist on trying again what worked only once - and that barely - before.
Posted by: Sgt. York at November 08, 2012 10:30 AM (NCrX2)
There are lots of things that could be done that the Dems would have problems opposing.
Posted by: Teri Pittman at November 08, 2012 11:14 AM (5HBd1)
until all voter fraud is exposed and,prosucuted i will not accecept this election,as is.
then after that i have to accecpt the fact romney lost,was because he was running a campaign trying to better america,and americans rather than,running an american idol contest.
it just keeps getting better,and better.
i wish these o'bama voters,good luck,socialism is a very personal,ugly,unforgiving,ideoligy,this will be the time ows'ers will be right,socialism is meant to lower the 99%,into equality,at the bottom,leaving the 1% on top.
i worked for over 40yrs.,raised two chrildren paid my taxes,utility bills,house,car,life,and health, insurance,bought cars,bought a house,saved for retirement,as one of my highest priorities,i lived frugally,nothing fancy,no new cars.
i'm not rich,but comfortable,this was accomplished in the america i grew in,this will not be possible for you,in the america you just voted in.
Posted by: david lager at November 08, 2012 05:19 PM (ohZ9s)
This is hysterically funny given the amount of time people here spend bashing the social conservatives and shouting at them to SHUT UP about social issues. Long lectures and some times banning threats to anyone who mentioned social issues because they distracted from the economy. The entire dem party is ALWAYS about social issues, because that's all they have. Thats why they devote endless amounts of money establishing "culture." And feckless republicans let them get away with defining culture and "legitimate" social issues and politically correct language. I understand that, the MSM, and the entire Hollywood media complex understands that. Breitbart understood it perfectly. Glad to see that you finally noticed. Now if you could only get your fellow travelers to stop bragging about how they don't care about tv, movies, and music, we could begin to have a positive effect on the culture issues.
Posted by: black redneck at November 08, 2012 10:06 PM (bib2h)
Posted by: JohnGalt at November 09, 2012 05:50 AM (+5yFu)
That's fine but that's not why we lost. We lost because people who would have voted for Romney did not show up to vote.
If you're going to explain it to us, explain ALL of it. You left out the most important part. And in so doing, you explained ... nothing.
Posted by: Paul A'Barge at November 19, 2012 10:41 AM (7JpOx)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2721 seconds, 581 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: cajun carrot at November 08, 2012 05:31 AM (UZQM8)