September 13, 2012
— Ace At Hot Air.
I've asked Saletan a series of questions about this piece on Twitter. Alas, I got his name wrong, so he has all the excuse he needs to pretend not to notice.
The question I ask -- it's long and multi-pronged -- is this:
What does William Saletan imagine the purpose of anti-Christian art is? I do not dabble in it myself, but it seems to me that such art is animated by several things:
1. Simple hate. There is no doubt that many anti-Christian artists simply hate Christianity, and, perhaps more than the religion itself, Christians themselves.
2. A belief that art which injects doubt into the mind of a believer is a good thing, because artists tend to think of themselves as free-thinkers, and wish to encourage free thought. They believe that Christianity (and other religions, but especially Christianity) is a silly superstition, and they think their art helps to liberate people from this superstition.
3. An anger at the political stances engendered by Christianity. They don't like where fundamentalist Christianity leads, politics-wise, so they seem the sowing of doubt as a useful method of undermining the Christianity where the rubber meets the road, that is, at the point Christian thought affects policy choices.
Has William Saletan ever objected to any anti-Christian art? Has anyone at Slate magazine? Has any liberal in the media, the entire media, objected?
Even when the motivation seems to be simple hate -- and yes, there are those who simply hate Christians and Christianity, and that bitter venom comes through -- I never see anyone calling such art "juvenile provocations" or "hateful stupidity."
Now, many of us -- and this includes me; does it include William Saletan, I wonder? -- think that fundamentalist Islam is dangerous and rather bad for those living under it. And we -- again, is William Saletan among them? -- would like to see, if possible, a movement away from fundamentalist Islam.
We don't like that it justifies murder in the name of "god." We do not like that it turns women into de facto slaves -- every wife is the slave of her husband, to be beaten, or raped, or disposed of as the husband may wish. Every non-married woman is in an even worse position, except to the extent her male relations may protect her. But even in that case, a woman's status comes through the men around her.
We do not like its rejection of the Enlightenment, or of its reactionary opposition to unobjectionable (or so we thought) universal values of human dignity. We do not like its insistence on championing believers in a faith with a superior legal status over nonbelievers (also known as "polytheists," "blasphemers," "apostates," "dhimmis," or, worst of all, "Jews").
We do not like its apparent political agenda of building a bridge to the 14th century.
For nonbelievers like myself -- agnostics -- and believers in other creeds as well, it is alarming in its championing of anti-blasphemy laws (punishments ranging from long terms in prison to execution) and its insistence that everyone living in an area controlled by Islam give praise to a "god" and an ideology that we do not actually believe in.
It is unobjectionable in the modern age to express hostility towards the Catholic Inquisition. It is, however, very strangely considered something approaching a hate crime to express hostility to the currently existing Islamic Inquisition.
Now, if someone like myself would like to encourage people to abandon this hidebound, hateful, backward mode of thought -- and, again, I ask: Does William Saletan disagree? Is he a big fan of fundamentalist Islam? -- we might take a page from all that anti-Christian art the country has been awash in for 70, 80 years, and think to ourselves, "Perhaps spoofing this religion, pointing out its absurdities, pointing out its true evils, will help inject a modicum of useful doubt into the minds of the believers, and perhaps cause a moderation, a skepticism of things like woman's servitude and especially Murder In The Name of 'God.'"
Would I be wrong in thinking this? To read William Saletan, I would, because his piece says, with very little caveating at all, that to offend the dignity of Islam (especially fundamentalist Islam) is not a use of free speech -- not a permissible use of it, like all that anti-Christian art he's never got 'round to condemning -- but an an abuse of it.
One might have certain beliefs -- such as the idea that a religion predicated upon the de facto slavery of women, the rejection of the reason and humanism, and ultimately, even the rejection of the Commandment Thou Shalt Not Kill -- and one might think he would be on firm ground to use the exact same methods and techniques of subversion and spoof and plain ol' vitriol directed against the Faith of the West for coming on a century now.
But no, William Saletan sharply disagrees, and calls such things an "abuse" of free speech.
Not a legitimate use of free speech. Not a true expression of truly held beliefs (and, again, does William Saletan disagree that fundamentalist Islam could use some reform and rethinking? Let's get him on the record).
But an abuse of free speech, and if not a crime, per se, at least such a transgression as requires the mobilization of social pressures (ostracization, demonization, even threats to physical safety -- ask Salman Rushdie about that) to punish those who would give themselves to such "abuses."
Am I wrong to think that fundamentalist Islam is in dire need of some doubt?
William Saletan, I am fairly confident, would be quite effusive in describing all the manifold ways in which the Christian mind is "closed" and "hidebound" and "haunted by superstition." He would, I'm reasonably certain, be quite in favor of any artistic project which undermined the foundations of Christian thought.
And yet, when we turn to fundamentalist Islam, he becomes... a censor. He becomes not an agent of the Inquisition per se, but a bit of a fanboy of it.
And why? Why the anger directed towards someone who is doing what Saletan would almost certainly praise were it directed at any other religion?
I think I know. There is a line of magnificent wisdom in the film The Spanish Prisoner (by David Mamet). It is spot-on about human nature.
The circumstances of the quote are that a young financial wizard has created a "Process" which is worth, literally, trillions. However, it was created as work-for-hire. He created it, but the company owns it. And he's wondering if the company will actually compensate him for it, as they have promised.
Steve Martin gives him the bad news (paraphrased): "I think if they have a moral obligation to you but not a legal one you will begin to find them behaving cruelly towards you. You will find them treating you poorly, isolating you, speaking badly about you when you are not present. Even as they decide to stiff you out of what they owe you, they will compound that with bad manners and worse intent. They will not be apologetic about it; they will become increasingly hateful towards you."
The reason is this: When people know they have a moral obligation towards someone which they do not feel like honoring, for reasons of personal interest, or personal safety, or personal political agenda, they feel awfully bad about themselves for not honoring the moral obligation. They feel awfully bad that they are ignoring a moral obligation in favor of their own personal interests.
And people do not like feeling bad about themselves.
So what people do, is this: They begin demonizing the person to whom they have an inconvenient moral obligation, convincing themselves that he is in fact the Bad Guy because, hey, he makes them feel bad. So he must be the bad guy.
In fact, he must be a Monster.
And no one owes a moral obligation to a Monster.
So, as William Saletan, and the news media generally, gives up completely on its own duty to protect free speech, they have to explain this to themselves in terms of No Duty To Protect a Monster.
Indeed, they will even, at the end of the day, help jihadists find the inconvenient Monster in order to murder him, and thereby make the Bad Feeling About Oneself go away.
If left to his own devices, without any contrary narrative to cast doubt on his claims, a coward can write an account of his heroic deeds in battle that would make Achilles himself quail.
Posted by: Ace at
10:33 AM
| Comments (217)
Post contains 1454 words, total size 9 kb.
Posted by: lorien1973 at September 13, 2012 10:36 AM (0tkqC)
Barky "killed Bin Laden"....and came out in favor of Gay Marriage.
How could that not 'offend the religious feelings of Muslims'?
I guess he wasn't worried about it.
Posted by: wheatie at September 13, 2012 10:37 AM (LdrIf)
Posted by: garrett at September 13, 2012 10:37 AM (6uCLh)
Posted by: Red Shirt at September 13, 2012 10:37 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 13, 2012 10:37 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: Adam at September 13, 2012 10:38 AM (V6aL5)
It's just shallow playboy bunny level politics.
Posted by: eleven at September 13, 2012 10:38 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Thorvald at September 13, 2012 10:39 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 13, 2012 10:39 AM (jUytm)
#7: That is a distinction without much of a difference. IYKWIMAITTYD.
Posted by: Mikey NTH deciding a fantasy power-trip would be scads of fun at September 13, 2012 10:40 AM (hLRSq)
R and R make sense. Thank Bob.
Posted by: eleven at September 13, 2012 10:40 AM (KXm42)
Did muslims come out in favor of....'Womens Rights'?
How is it that the entire DNC Platform is not..."offensive to muslims"?
Posted by: wheatie at September 13, 2012 10:41 AM (LdrIf)
Posted by: fluffy at September 13, 2012 10:41 AM (O6q63)
Posted by: t-bird at September 13, 2012 10:41 AM (b1g/X)
Posted by: Adam at September 13, 2012 10:42 AM (V6aL5)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 13, 2012 10:42 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Rondinellamamma at September 13, 2012 10:43 AM (53riN)
Posted by: Ferb Fletcher at September 13, 2012 10:43 AM (hyP1j)
This Saletan cocksucker again?
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 13, 2012 02:37 PM (jUytm)
Apparently, there are certain male individuals here at AoSHQ that actually do suck cock and who take offense at that term. Why? I have no idea.
Just mentioning it because I'm so sensitive to the feelings of others.
Posted by: jwest at September 13, 2012 10:43 AM (ZDsRL)
Art now is the politics of affectation.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at September 13, 2012 10:43 AM (NRwWP)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at September 13, 2012 10:43 AM (8y9MW)
The counter to speech that you don't like. Wait for it. Wait for it.
MORE SPEECH
Unless of course you're a fascist or communist.
Posted by: polynikes at September 13, 2012 10:44 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at September 13, 2012 10:44 AM (PHb2k)
Posted by: eleven at September 13, 2012 10:44 AM (KXm42)
For all of you Morons who play EVE please read:
It's a tribute to Sean "Vile Rat" Smith an EVE player and State Department employee who died yesterday in Bhengazi.
Posted by: Psycotte at September 13, 2012 10:45 AM (Hk10/)
So... wait a minute. This didn't go the way I wanted.
Posted by: Billy Saletan at September 13, 2012 10:45 AM (R18D0)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at September 13, 2012 10:45 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Havedash at September 13, 2012 10:46 AM (F0WNa)
One thing though, I think you miss the mark a little when talking about Saletan's (and a vast number of others) motivation to suppress anti-islamic criticisms. The simple answer is because he doesn't want his head cut off.
This is the exact same reason given by Penn and Jillette when they refused to talk about radical islam. When they were asked why they didn't do a "Bullshit" special on islam, their words were to the effect of "because we have families". Nothing cows the frightened like a bit of the odd ultraviolence.
Posted by: EC at September 13, 2012 10:46 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 13, 2012 10:46 AM (1hLHC)
Not sure.. Not verified...I think not..
Posted by: the pink not panicking about one poll formerly known as the hobbit Donna at September 13, 2012 10:46 AM (W2Z3C)
I mean, if they plan on taking away the first amendment, I'd like to know ahead of time.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at September 13, 2012 10:46 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 13, 2012 10:47 AM (xtvQl)
True story - I knew William Saletan when he was a kid; he used to come to play practice at the high school (walked over from the elementary school) and catch a ride home with his sister (she was a couple of grades ahead of me).
Cute kid, very sweet and polite.
I think his family moved before he graduated from HS, because he lists a different HS on his FB page. He lives in NY now, so I'm not surprised by some of his opinions.
But I still think of him as "Willie" or "Will", 'cuz that was what everyone called him back then.....
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at September 13, 2012 10:47 AM (P6H+d)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 13, 2012 10:48 AM (VtjlW)
I mean, if they plan on taking away the first amendment, I'd like to know ahead of time.
Well if they're gonna arrest filmmakers how about Michael Moore?
Posted by: the pink not panicking about one poll formerly known as the hobbit Donna at September 13, 2012 10:48 AM (W2Z3C)
Posted by: Flounder at September 13, 2012 10:48 AM (Kkt/i)
The reason is this: When people know they have a moral obligation towards someone which they do not feel like honoring, for reasons of personal interest, or personal safety, or personal political agenda, they feel awfully bad about themselves for not honoring the moral obligation. They feel awfully bad that they are ignoring a moral obligation in favor of their own personal interests.
And people do not like feeling bad about themselves.
So what people do, is this: They begin demonizing the person to whom they have an inconvenient moral obligation, convincing themselves that he is in fact the Bad Guy because, hey, he makes them feel bad. So he must be the bad guy.
In fact, he must be a Monster.
And no one owes a moral obligation to a Monster.
And they'll do this even when aware of it. Scienter and even high intelligence won't stop them. Because nothing is more important that feeling okay about your bad deeds.
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 13, 2012 10:48 AM (Iyg03)
dude, watch some porn already. This treatise is way beyond my attention span.
Speaking of, does anybody else think Drudge's picture of the new monkey species looks just like the Sebeilus picture he has right next to it?
Posted by: california red at September 13, 2012 10:48 AM (Ho3p+)
You cannot restrict speech because it _might_ cause others to react toward death or violence. Only speech that _directly_ incites the listeners is restricted--insulting, offensive, vulgar, vile, rude, bigoted, racist and all other manner of impolite speech is protected. Because a government, if given the power to restrict disagreeable speech, will soon restrict any and all speech critical of the government.
Which is why the totalitarian left loves restricting speech that offends.
I'll just steal this from one of the commentators there:
I.e. "The man who shouts "Fire!" in a crowded theater is neither sending a political message nor inviting his listener to think about what he has said and decide what to do in a rational, calculated manner. On the contrary, the message is designed to force action without contemplation. The message "Fire!" is directed not to the mind and the conscience of the listener but, rather, to his adrenaline and his feet. It is a stimulus to immediate action, not thoughtful reflection. It is—as Justice Holmes recognized in his follow-up sentence—the functional equivalent of "uttering words that may have all the effect of force.""
This doesn't apply to the film
Posted by: RoyalOil at September 13, 2012 10:48 AM (imtbm)
"ItÂ’s no great insight to note thereÂ’s a carve-out for certain groups who must be exempt from ridicule, and another group whose ridicule is an expected component of enlightened thought."
There lies the crux of the problem, created by our elitist "betters". Screw 'em.
Posted by: Tex Lovera at September 13, 2012 10:48 AM (wtvvX)
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at September 13, 2012 10:49 AM (CmUeB)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 13, 2012 10:49 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at September 13, 2012 10:49 AM (MdDPG)
WASHINGTON (AP) — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is sharpening her criticism of an anti-Islam video that provoked protests in the Arab world.
Clinton says the film is "disgusting and reprehensible." She calls it a cynical attempt to offend people for their religious beliefs.
Funny, I don't remember Hill saying something like this about all of the anti-Christian crap that's made by her Hollywood pals
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 13, 2012 10:50 AM (1Jaio)
"The reason is this: When people know they have a moral obligation towards someone which they do not feel like honoring, for reasons of personal interest, or personal safety, or personal political agenda, they feel awfully bad about themselves for not honoring the moral obligation. They feel awfully bad that they are ignoring a moral obligation in favor of their own personal interests.
And people do not like feeling bad about themselves.
So what people do, is this: They begin demonizing the person to whom they have an inconvenient moral obligation, convincing themselves that he is in fact the Bad Guy because, hey, he makes them feel bad. So he must be the bad guy."
An ugly part of the human condition and one that I recognize in my personal life. It's a battle against those emotions that I feel I am winning and ultimately makes me stronger.
It's sad that many people succomb to it and feed off of it, turning them into pathetic and hateful bastards, which, not coincidentally, describes progressives.
Posted by: ErikW at September 13, 2012 10:50 AM (O4sdw)
As a group, agnostics seem to be the most thoughtful and observant.
Posted by: Tonawanda at September 13, 2012 10:51 AM (l62NP)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 13, 2012 10:51 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are rather doomed at September 13, 2012 10:51 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: thunderb at September 13, 2012 10:52 AM (Dnbau)
39....I want answers to these questions. I truly do.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 13, 2012 02:48 PM (VtjlW)
---------
I know, Atc.
The Left's defense of Islam has never made any sense.
Now....they are getting tangled up in it.
I am waiting for them to try to rationalize and defend, the "death to non-believers" part.
Posted by: wheatie at September 13, 2012 10:52 AM (LdrIf)
Because kill me last, that's why.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 13, 2012 10:52 AM (SY2Kh)
I'm done with that courtesy.
Posted by: EC at September 13, 2012 10:53 AM (GQ8sn)
I'm sorry you felt you had to waste so many words on Saletan, but your larger point is well made.
To us, not them. Self examination and study of history and its parallels in human nature are not strong suits of the North American Libtard.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 13, 2012 10:53 AM (+yYvY)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 13, 2012 10:53 AM (VtjlW)
They hate the industry but love their cellphones and Nike shoes.
They hate misogyny but support islam.
They hate "theocracy" but support islam.
They hate homophobia but support islam.
They hate employers but demand employment.
They hate Western culture but would not tolerate the sanitation, medical standards, technology or poverty of the Third World.
They love diversity but tolerate no opinions but their own.
They hate globalism but wouldn't pay for an iPod made in America.
They love "choice" when it comes to killing a baby, but not when it comes to choosing a school for your kid, buying large beverages or selecting your own medical coverage.
They admire communism but would never tolerate living in East bloc conditions.
Leftism is a mental defect. It stopped being a coherent ideology ages ago.
Posted by: Cicero at September 13, 2012 10:54 AM (QKKT0)
Useless fucks, the whole lot of them.
Posted by: EC at September 13, 2012 10:54 AM (GQ8sn)
I'd just like to say that from this moment on, I will no longer capitalize obama or islam.
I'm done with that courtesy.
Posted by: EC at September 13, 2012 02:53 PM (GQ8sn)
Indeed.
Posted by: ErikW at September 13, 2012 10:54 AM (O4sdw)
Posted by: Ma Bell, now R squared at September 13, 2012 10:54 AM (uVuwp)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 13, 2012 10:55 AM (sbV1u)
The Left's defense of Islam has never made any sense.
--
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend". To the left, conservatives are the most hated enemy, and they would rather destroy this country than let conservatives win. This is why they don't mind $16 trillion in debt, headed to $20 trillion, a caliphate from Algeria to Pakistan, and terrorist attacks on American citizens.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 13, 2012 10:55 AM (xtvQl)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are rather doomed at September 13, 2012 10:55 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 13, 2012 10:55 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: The Political Hat at September 13, 2012 10:55 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 13, 2012 10:55 AM (LRFds)
Well, we'd have to build a basement, first. They're not really a thing in this part of Texas.
If you're willing to help shell out for ammunition and food, I could probably convince her to make the kids double-up and give you the resulting extra room, though.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at September 13, 2012 10:56 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Dirks Strewn at September 13, 2012 10:56 AM (VLifP)
PC bigotry.
btw, authoritarianism sucks, no matter it's source. Regardless of the ideological arena whether economic, educational, professional, political, religious, or sexual, I denounce anti-Spiritual propaganda. That includes art or curriculum coming from any quarter that feigns "free thought" and "independence" in order for the artist/teacher to enforcing the artists' own self-righteous dictate onto others, demanding compliance to the artists' will.
"Fart for its own sake" has nothing to do with creative expressions prior to the 20th Century. It doesn't matter which form an artist or human expresses spiritual affinity. There's inspiration. And the effort to express inspiration that stands on its own reception in the mind and heart of the recipient, that effort deserves respect regardless of creed. And if you don't like it, or see things differently, there's no problem since independent free thought exists in the creative realm.
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 13, 2012 10:56 AM (BAnPT)
ace i attemptd to speak to this in another post.
if his ideas of speech are correct than christainity - judasm , buddhism would all have a pretext to rise up and kill infidels of their specific or lack of beliefs.
we are obligated in unision to protect the speech even we ourselves abhore,
we don't or shouldn't bend to the least common denominator especially especially now!
Posted by: willow at September 13, 2012 10:56 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Mr Fever Head at September 13, 2012 10:56 AM (SzAZ7)
That one thing is their real religion which is "hate the US and everything it stands for". You see, they have that in common with the Muzzies.
The only difference is that the Muzzies live in places like Lybia and Egypt and they live here.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2012 10:56 AM (YdQQY)
So you'll be conducting basement cheesecake pit fighting with his wife? Cool.
Can we get these tickets on Stub Hub?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 13, 2012 10:57 AM (sbV1u)
@vermontaigne
The Movie the Muslim World Is Furious About Might Not Even Be a Movie | Alternative | It's The Producers come to life. http://goo.gl/aEzQg
If the 'producer' did rip off investors, he'll be prosecuted and the O-min can tell the Muzzies that they took care of him.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at September 13, 2012 10:57 AM (NRwWP)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are rather doomed at September 13, 2012 10:57 AM (AZGON)
BIDEN: I'm supposedly an expert on foreign policy. Well, you know, an expert from where I come from is anyone from out of town with a briefcase. I do not have a briefcase.
Don't worry Joey, we know that you're just the village idiot
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 13, 2012 10:57 AM (1Jaio)
All these commie leftists making common cause with the jihadis, do they really think they will be free to live their pleasant lives of decadence once the jihadis take over?
Ask Trotsky how that worked out, once he was no longer useful to the commies they tracked him down all over the globe and snuffed him out.
Posted by: Boots at September 13, 2012 10:58 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 13, 2012 10:58 AM (LRFds)
Go on.
Posted by: Barney Frank at September 13, 2012 10:58 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Tonawanda at September 13, 2012 10:58 AM (l62NP)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 13, 2012 10:58 AM (05RcU)
I want answers to these questions. I truly do.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 13, 2012 02:48 PM (VtjlW)
Stompy boots are definitely halal, so you don't have to worry about that anyway.
Posted by: Havedash at September 13, 2012 10:58 AM (F0WNa)
Posted by: toby928© at September 13, 2012 10:58 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: Mr Pink at September 13, 2012 10:58 AM (jeZBh)
Posted by: Y-not at September 13, 2012 10:58 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 13, 2012 10:59 AM (1hLHC)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 13, 2012 10:59 AM (VtjlW)
You know, you really left the door open on that one, willow.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 13, 2012 10:59 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, still angry at September 13, 2012 10:59 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: the pink not panicking about one poll formerly known as the hobbit Donna at September 13, 2012 11:00 AM (W2Z3C)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 13, 2012 11:00 AM (+yYvY)
Someone call Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors.
Posted by: EC at September 13, 2012 11:00 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: willow at September 13, 2012 11:00 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Barack H. Obama at September 13, 2012 11:00 AM (EJ6V1)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 13, 2012 11:00 AM (05RcU)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are rather doomed at September 13, 2012 11:00 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: the angel of death in a funny hat at September 13, 2012 11:01 AM (evdj2)
Wyatt Earp: What makes a man like Ringo, Doc? What makes him do the things he does?
Doc Holliday: A man like Ringo has got a great big hole, right in the middle of him. He can never kill enough, or steal enough, or inflict enough pain to ever fill it.
Wyatt Earp: What does he need?
Doc Holliday: Revenge.
Wyatt Earp: For what?
Doc Holliday: Bein' born.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2012 11:01 AM (YdQQY)
I think most Leftists are like that: they think "Well, I don't agree with that, but I'm an enlightened, civilized individual; not at all like those knuckle dragging conservatives, so I will take the high-road and assume that this thing with which I disagree is actually a good thing."
Which, yes, is stupid, but no one (here, at least) ever accused the Left of being too intelligent.
And I think that's what idiots like this Satan dude (that's his name, right?) are doing. They assume that whatever offends our sensibilities must be right and sensible, and whatever offends our enemies sensibilities must be wrong and mean. They never bother to think about why, they're just sure that "right-thinking, civilized" people would believe that, so they force themselves to believe it.
It's like self-brain-washing.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at September 13, 2012 11:01 AM (8y9MW)
This is the exact same reason given by Penn and Jillette when they refused to talk about radical islam. When they were asked why they didn't do a "Bullshit" special on islam, their words were to the effect of "because we have families".
They had the spine to be honest about it.
Posted by: fluffy at September 13, 2012 11:01 AM (O6q63)
Yeah... don't insult the manatee
Posted by: the pink not panicking about one poll formerly known as the hobbit Donna at September 13, 2012 11:01 AM (W2Z3C)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 13, 2012 11:01 AM (VtjlW)
62...Posted by: Cicero at September 13, 2012 02:54 PM (QKKT0)
Nicely said, Cicero. All of it. ....And exactly so.
Posted by: wheatie at September 13, 2012 11:01 AM (LdrIf)
It's all I can do to not come back with the obvious response.
Must....
Not....
Can't...
Arrrrrrrrggggghhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 13, 2012 11:01 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: the pink not panicking
Probably Christians. Or 100 Jews.
Posted by: Dang at September 13, 2012 11:01 AM (R18D0)
"All you can eat does not mean all YOU can eat!" -- Chinese restaurant owner/cook to the big fat lunch buffet hog who wouldn't leave any crab rangoon for the other customers batch after batch.
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 13, 2012 11:02 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at September 13, 2012 11:02 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are rather doomed at September 13, 2012 11:02 AM (AZGON)
The manatee's cooter smells more... fresh.
Posted by: Dang at September 13, 2012 11:03 AM (R18D0)
Killing is not banned; murder is.
Not that this changes anything, because murder is what they are engaged in.
Posted by: Troll Feeder at September 13, 2012 11:03 AM (opbqq)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 13, 2012 11:03 AM (BAnPT)
"The reason is this: When people know they have a moral obligation towards someone which they do not feel like honoring, for reasons of personal interest, or personal safety, or personal political agenda, they feel awfully bad about themselves for not honoring the moral obligation. They feel awfully bad that they are ignoring a moral obligation in favor of their own personal interests."
Open question. Is there evidence that conservatives in general have this same reaction, or is this more of a characteristic of the leftist mind? Certainly, there are examples from the right, that I am too lazy to think of a this point. But I would suscribe that many conservatives are less susceptible to this because (a) we tend to be more "religious" (which I use losely to simply mean we are God-fearing, and therefore (b) if we have a moral obligation that we don't feel like honoring, we honor it.
Posted by: SH at September 13, 2012 11:03 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 13, 2012 11:04 AM (BAnPT)
Hillary Clinton and a manatee wearing a Mao jacket: is there a difference?
One eats aquatic plants, the other eats bearded clams.
Posted by: fluffy at September 13, 2012 11:04 AM (O6q63)
Posted by: Mr Fever Head at September 13, 2012 11:04 AM (SzAZ7)
Posted by: tasker at September 13, 2012 11:04 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at September 13, 2012 11:04 AM (dN5sa)
Wyatt Earp:
For what?
Doc Holliday:
Bein' born.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2012 03:01 PM (YdQQY)
Top 5 all time fave movie.
Posted by: ErikW at September 13, 2012 11:04 AM (O4sdw)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 13, 2012 11:05 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Justamom in Achin' Akin's district at September 13, 2012 11:05 AM (Sptt8)
There Is Only One Clusterfuck And Joe Biden Is His Prophet.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 13, 2012 03:00 PM (+yYvY)
Oh that's gold.
Posted by: ErikW at September 13, 2012 11:06 AM (O4sdw)
Clinton says the film is "disgusting and reprehensible." She calls it
a cynical attempt to offend people for their religious beliefs.
Look...squirrel, and a nice shiny one at that!
Posted by: Havedash at September 13, 2012 11:06 AM (F0WNa)
AtC, while we could argue (and plenty of people do) about being gay, you have the right to choose to live your life how you wish. Regardless of what I think of it. You are not physically infringing upon my, or anyone else's, right to live life. Therefor I have no binding say on your lifestyle. I say again, every American has the right to make their choices in life. And that's a right that every man on this blog, and I'm guessing the women too, will stand in front of you and defend to the last breath.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at September 13, 2012 11:06 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Ktgreat at September 13, 2012 11:07 AM (iS7G9)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are rather doomed at September 13, 2012 11:07 AM (AZGON)
I would have it no other way, my Queen.
As long as I have a front row seat on the edge of the cheesecake pit....
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 13, 2012 11:08 AM (sbV1u)
The manatee is cuter? Also, it has better judgement and fashion sense.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at September 13, 2012 11:08 AM (8y9MW)
Ace, I wouldn't worry too much about misspelling Saletan's name. Frankly, almost all Ashkenazic (Eastern European Jewish) family names are a meaningless grab-bag with interchangeable spellings depending on no factor at all. Some are made up out of thin air (in the US, for example, thanks to all sorts of factors at immigration-processing time).
In terms of Jewish peoplehood and identification therewith/therein, the issue is what (in Hebrew alef-bet spelling, not transliteration) William Saletan (or any other Jew's) is named in being called to public reading of the Torah. That and only that. A Jew who gets worked up or snippy about "Goldstein pride" or some such is just talking out his/her tuches.
Posted by: RamonAllones at September 13, 2012 11:08 AM (3lLli)
"brainwashing" comes from a Chinese term invented by the commies--combining the characters for 'cleanse' or wash and 'brain'. Prior to Mao and his flunkies, that term didn't exist
Used by the commies, it had a positive connotation--similar to 'purification' in Chinese. Irony is problematic for lefties...
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 13, 2012 11:08 AM (Dll6b)
129Hillary Clinton and a manatee wearing a Mao jacket: is there a difference?<<<__<<<
I would only giggle if I ran over one of them with my boat propeller.
The other - I would both giggle AND clap my hands with glee.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 13, 2012 11:09 AM (+yYvY)
What does he need?
Doc Holliday:
Revenge.
Wyatt Earp:
For what?
Doc Holliday:
Bein' born.
Posted by: Vic
Continued in the director's cut:
Doc Holliday:
Yeah, revenge for being born in a sandy shit hole to a mother who wears a tarp and a father who's dick stinks of goat butt.
I can see why they cut that. It borders on the vulgar.
Posted by: Dang at September 13, 2012 11:09 AM (R18D0)
Posted by: Penfold at September 13, 2012 11:09 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: tasker at September 13, 2012 11:09 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at September 13, 2012 11:10 AM (qwK3S)
I am not talking about warzone attacks here.
Posted by: Flounder at September 13, 2012 11:11 AM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows we are rather doomed at September 13, 2012 11:11 AM (AZGON)
* raises hand *
I AM ALEXTHECHICK!
Posted by: EC at September 13, 2012 11:11 AM (GQ8sn)
>>>If left to his own devices, without any contrary narrative to cast doubt on his claims, a coward can write an account of his heroic deeds in battle that would make Achilles himself quail.
[clap]. . .[clap]. . .[clap]
Posted by: MikeTheMoose on independent ops! at September 13, 2012 11:11 AM (0q2P7)
---
Yah know.... I saw that on Drudge morning this morning and I whigged out. I would LOVE to hear ONE HONEST reporter ask "Well, Michelle, when was the last time cellulite stormed an embassy, sodomized and killed our ambassador along with three staffers."
Posted by: fixerupper at September 13, 2012 11:12 AM (C8hzL)
It's like the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and Schroedinger's Cat Theory all wrapped up in one.
Posted by: EC at September 13, 2012 11:13 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: ErikW at September 13, 2012 03:04 PM (O4sdw)
Yep, everything came together for that movie. Perfect script, perfect casting, and outstanding cinematography. It should have won every award that year.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2012 11:13 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Mr Fever Head at September 13, 2012 11:13 AM (SzAZ7)
Your takeaway on that Yahoo piece I just read before coming here is exactly right. Reuters has identified the film maker so that jihadis can kill him and, presumably, make all this badness stop. Until the ulema whips up the ummah again of course. Then we'll have to sacrifice the next person.
Now we see how Islam slowly grinds a culture to death and replaces it. Fear disguised as "respect" takes over and non-Muslims act as the mufti issuing the fatwa of death. Amazing to see.
Posted by: Beagle at September 13, 2012 11:14 AM (sOtz/)
I am not talking about warzone attacks here.
Posted by: Flounder at September 13, 2012 03:11 PM (Kkt/i)
There was that gun cleaning accident at Ford Hood a few of years back.
Posted by: Havedash at September 13, 2012 11:15 AM (F0WNa)
Posted by: Thorvald at September 13, 2012 11:15 AM (1V6Pv)
Oh God, Ace, I was with you 110% until you tried to diganose this mentality. You could not be more wrong.
William Saletan is one of a vanguard of leftist idiots who over the last 40 years have rabidly championed one or another Third World population. It is part of the warp and woof of modern leftist thought that the Christian West is Guilty Guilty Guilty of centuries of "oppression" of these Noble Poor Brown Peoples. This organized sympathy and West-bashing was first aimed to the Vietnamese, then Africans, then people in Nicaragua/Honduras, and since the fall of the Sandinistas it has been the Palestinians. The Palestinians are now the Holiest of the Holy Oppressed People to these assholes. It is an article of faith to them that if such people, or those who support them, do kill Americans or any other people it is only because They Have Been Driven To Extremes By Our Oppression. And they totally buy the Osama bullshit that terrorism has arisen only because the United States refuses to give all of Israel back to the Palestinians. This is why they hate Israel, and the "neo-cons," ans why they REALLY hated George W. Bush -- because they didn't buy the bullshit about the Palestinians.
In this context the Mohammed movie is absolutely an abuse of free speexh because it offends the Holiest of the Holy Oppressed People and is actually, itself, Oppression! Which is going to drive them to kill more of us!
I know it's really hard for normal people to understand this mindset, but I spent a lot of time around these people back in the 1980s and I get them. John Kerry is one of the leaders of this vanguard. The shit he said back in the 1980s about the Sandinistas and how wonderful was their revolution of liberation and other nonsense would make everyone here vomit. Buit its exactly the same shit they are saying now about the Palestinians and the rest of the Muslim world.
Posted by: rockmom at September 13, 2012 11:17 AM (aBlZ1)
Sound like the "always root for the underdog" crowd.
Sometimes the underdog needs to be put down.
I really wonder if these idiots would have rooted for Hitler late in WWII.
Posted by: Dang at September 13, 2012 11:20 AM (R18D0)
Posted by: rockmom at September 13, 2012 11:20 AM (aBlZ1)
Posted by: keninnorcal at September 13, 2012 11:24 AM (MZxBc)
Posted by: rockmom at September 13, 2012 11:28 AM (aBlZ1)
Can I ask the feds why they released all this info on the guy? Is this human sacrifice now to shut up the radicals? The blood is on Obama's hands.
If anybody votes for this fucking guy in November, they will get what they deserve.
Posted by: PJ at September 13, 2012 11:29 AM (DQHjw)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at September 13, 2012 11:29 AM (9eDbm)
Posted by: Havedash at September 13, 2012 03:15 PM (F0WNa)
Yeah, OK, I knew I would forget something. Major differences, but still a tough sell.
Posted by: Flounder at September 13, 2012 11:32 AM (Kkt/i)
It's not just "root for the underdog" it's "root for the Oppressed People That We Have Oppressed." It's the remnant of the old anti-colonialism movement that drove a lot of the intellectual oppsition to the Vietnam War. Many of thes people are now part of the AGW croed, becaue they see carbon-caps and such as a form of global reparations by the West to the Oppressed! Third World.
They will not wake up about Islam until the scimitar is literally at their throats to behead them.
Posted by: rockmom at September 13, 2012 11:33 AM (aBlZ1)
Posted by: rockmom at September 13, 2012 11:34 AM (aBlZ1)
To refute people like Saletan: "The Last Superstition: Refuting the New Atheism" by Edward Feser is a good place to start. These anti-Christian pretend-to-be-think-ers are so ingnorant it amazes me they are not laughed out of the room where serious thought takes place.
Posted by: Michael Babbitt at September 13, 2012 11:35 AM (p/jtE)
Posted by: LC LaWedgie at September 13, 2012 11:35 AM (PcoXF)
Ah, the white guilt boom box amplified as the Christian Guilt boom box. pfft
Whoever wrote that is applying as if law their own personal expectation of public compliance to provide that author ample opportunity to abuse his audience. Granted, getting repeatedly woken up by rowdy selfish bastards, I feel awfully bad about assholes who blare their damned boom boxes so loud coming home at midnight that our entire neighborhood of homes shake and reverberate, predictably disturbing the peace. "Because they could."
Moral Obligation? Keep it simple. Stick to the Golden Rule.
If you wish, bow to Mecca only if you're not disturbing the peace. Sing your own call to prayer without blaring it from loud speakers disturbing the peace and good faith of everyone else.
I certainly don't feel bad for not being a Muslim or for not believing exactly what they believe. I am also relieved for not being an orthodox anything. There's reason to studying what others believe in order to understand and appreciate what exists in their reality. But so far as I'm concerned, the kingdom of God is within. Find it or not according to your own will. (btw, in Pope John Paul II's opinion, "God With Us" is denied by the Muslim religion, disconnecting those faithful from personally experiencing their Allah as merciful inside the global or "whole" human experience, despite all the pretty lip service. So long as they don't impose their business as my business, I'd leave it be except that they insist on making their business everyone's business in full compliance of Sharia.) As soon as people make a ritualistic religion out of an epiphany, it becomes man made and is arbitrarily applied across the board, disregarding epiphanies experienced by others, missing the internalization of creative inspiration and love, intentionally or not.
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 13, 2012 11:38 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: JennyLoveBrandon at September 13, 2012 11:38 AM (UOYbf)
Exposed by CNN, Hillary disavows her own moveon.org movie production.
"Curses, foiled again."
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 13, 2012 11:44 AM (BAnPT)
Yep. Obama on his shoulder.
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 13, 2012 11:45 AM (BAnPT)
NO ONE on Fox would listen to her. They were all in the "wonderful student uprising" mode, not understanding anything about what was going on.
Kirsten Powers makes sense because she actually knows what is going on on the ground in Egypt. And she says the middle class and the Christians are terrified. Thanks, Obama. Your dream of a new Caliphate is near fruition.
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 13, 2012 11:46 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: jeanne at September 13, 2012 11:50 AM (GdalM)
Posted by: Yakov Smearedsomething at September 13, 2012 11:54 AM (FUozQ)
You know, I'd like an answer to this question as well. Because, excepting the last characteristic* this describes me too.
*a number of faintly disturbing dreams about Sofia Vergara might mean this is still an open question.
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at September 13, 2012 12:02 PM (17FRN)
Posted by: grognard at September 13, 2012 12:02 PM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: Komissar Vladimir at September 13, 2012 12:07 PM (sBegS)
I think Mr. Saletan is right that there is a time to speak and a time to be quiet. You wouldn't talk loudly in a movie theater or a library, would you? Even if everything you said was true and it didn't insult Muslims it would be an abuse.
Ace you seem to be saying it's great to hate Christians. No, its just as bad as hating Muslims. Two wrongs do not make a right! (or two Wongs do not make a White, that is my bf Brandons favorite joke).
Posted by: JennyLoveBrandon at September 13, 2012 03:38 PM (UOYbf)
For consideration for your essay;
1. Use spell check.
2. Reread Ace's post. If you get that Ace is saying it's great to hate on Christians, consult wikipedia: sarcarsm.
3. Don't confuse the constitutional right of free speech and it's valid limits, with common courtesy, or with the constitutional right not to be offended. Tip: the last is made up.
4. Brandon is the ghey. Evidence? Wong jokes.
Good luck with your essay.
Posted by: Flounder at September 13, 2012 12:11 PM (Kkt/i)
I did this once as an experiment on some people I knew at college. They were going off on the Palastinians and about 5 other groups I can't recall anymore. I spun a tale of a country wracked by economic depression, caused by a war and subsequent economic punishment by 'the Imperial Powers', who were just starting to get their house back in order. Part of their ethnic group lives in another country, across a border, but if they could have that area they'd be contiginous, and they say the other country is oppressing their ethnic group and want permission to go in with military force to try to save their people and to help develop the economy.
They thought I was talking about some place in Africa and wanted to know where so they could bring light to these peoples' situation. I almost got decked when I told them that they were supporting Hitler's invasion of Czechoslovakia.
Posted by: Ranba Ral at September 13, 2012 12:18 PM (G99e4)
Posted by: steevy at September 13, 2012 12:21 PM (6o4Fb)
#civility means apologizing to the guy about to behead you preemptively for getting blood on his shoes
Posted by: Sven10077@svenJolafson at September 13, 2012 12:23 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at September 13, 2012 12:24 PM (i0App)
Fucking awesome.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ still needs a beer at September 13, 2012 12:27 PM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: DavidJay at September 13, 2012 12:30 PM (/DTlV)
Posted by: Fritz at September 13, 2012 12:31 PM (uRFJj)
Where does it say Little Willy and his liege have some type of mastery over social issues which begets our serious consideration or attention?
He a partisan pushing a partisan philosophy which ignores facts, promotes false memes and is generally sophistic. It plays on emotions and artfully uses them as a substitute for cogitation.
It's actuall a lazy, loathsome, self-indulgent endeavor they engage in to satisfy their own egos and lack of stature.
It's like trying to reason with an idiot who has no basis for factual, intellectual argument. Dialogue with a 6 year old is more productive.
Posted by: Exile at September 13, 2012 12:35 PM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Northern Lurker at September 13, 2012 12:35 PM (gpvAx)
AtC
~I don't know whether to say thanks or sorry.~
No need for either.
To me you represent...are a symbol... of the freedoms I fought for.
I don't like bullies...and same bad nasty bullies want to do bad things to you, and our society as a whole.
War isn't coming...it's already happening.
Posted by: USMC8541 at September 13, 2012 12:51 PM (v3pYe)
_______________________________________________________
Tuned in to see if the idiot Shep Smith had anything beneficial to say. Nope!
He's pushing the meme that people like the man (which I think he called an "imbecile") can create a backlash like this, and then had on another idiot that agreed with him.
Shep doesn't even listen to his own news programs just before him.......that pointed out that these attacks are well coordinated by a small vicious crowd who used the crowd to cover their actions of committing a terrorist attack against America , and didn't just spring up in reaction to the YouTube video (or anything).
BZZZT! Shep still wins the Dumbo or Just Plain Stupid Award on Fox.
Posted by: avagreen at September 13, 2012 01:09 PM (WR2rX)
90I want answers to these questions. I truly do.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Please? at September 13, 2012 02:48 PM (VtjlW)
"Over our dead bodies."
Posted by: Is what JQ Public is thinking... at September 13, 2012 01:12 PM (NBj0d)
"So what people do, is this: They begin demonizing the person to whom they have an inconvenient moral obligation, convincing themselves that he is in fact the Bad Guy because, hey, he makes them feel bad. So he must be the bad guy."
You could extend this to the way that people who voted for Obama in 2008 (and who now see that he is a fraud) treat those who never voted for him and won't vote for him now. We recognized Obama's screamingly obvious incompetence when they did not. Now, because they like to think of themselves as intelligent, thoughtful people, they'd have to admit that they were anything but when they fell for Obama's smoke and mirrors in 2008. So, instead of doing the moral thing -- admitting that they were wrong and that there mistake is damaging this country --- they demonize those of us who were right to avoid feeling bad about themselves. When you throw in their fear of being called "racist" if they don't continue to support an inept, bloviating fool who just happens to be half black, that gives them a mindset virtually inpossible to penetrate with logic.
If there are more of these jerks, plus the union stooges and the gooberment hand-out freaks, then we can kiss this country goodbye.
Posted by: Natasha at September 13, 2012 01:17 PM (jU5uf)
Or not so much for people who disagree with him?
Posted by: CaptainComic at September 13, 2012 01:19 PM (jJeAn)
Now its just about making the right sort of political targets uncomfortable and angry. Its how you get noticed, how you get space in a gallery. Its why Banksy is the hottest artist alive today.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 13, 2012 01:43 PM (r4wIV)
Posted by: BuddyPC at September 13, 2012 02:59 PM (nXICX)
Posted by: meleager at September 13, 2012 04:18 PM (c9c7I)
152
a "war zone" is anyplace with a critical mass of muslimes. Thats why, in more lucid times, its call the "global war on terror" because that is what to expect..
Posted by: meleager at September 13, 2012 04:35 PM (c9c7I)
Posted by: Moonbeam at September 13, 2012 05:23 PM (1k4dd)
"Indeed, they will even, at the end of the day, help jihadists find the inconvenient Monster in order to murder him, and thereby make the Bad Feeling About Oneself go away."
This is EXACTLY what I've been thinking today. Thanks.
Posted by: Bookaday at September 13, 2012 06:17 PM (rEhP8)
You see, van Gogh made this movie about Islam, and that made some people very angry, and, well, they must've failed Art Appreciation in the sixth grade because one of them expressed his opinion of the work with a gun and a knife.
Posted by: mrp at September 13, 2012 07:40 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Annie at September 14, 2012 12:33 PM (78rQP)
Posted by: Rich Rostrom at September 14, 2012 02:23 PM (JLF2x)
Posted by: DrZin at September 14, 2012 04:31 PM (nXbmM)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2505 seconds, 345 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: The Libyan Mob at September 13, 2012 10:35 AM (b1g/X)