January 10, 2012
— Ace I avoided it yesterday, but with the nerdrage over my Tolkein dis, I feel compelled to mention it now.
Some journalists were invited for a playtest, including one from Forbes and another one from the NYT. (No link; the NYT story is boring.)
What makes this sort of a story -- beyond the nerdcore element -- is that it's a business story.
See, I don't even want to admit that I know this, but-- Dungeons and Dragons 4th edition was extremely... controversial. Yeah I said it. It really changed the game, and mostly not in ways that people liked. It has been accused of turning the game into "World of Warcraft, Pencil and Paper Version," or, more accurately, "Magic: The Gathering with characters." In an effort to be more like other games which are far more popular, it alienated a lot of players.
Not me. I don't play this crap.
I just... know about it. None of your business how.
In business terms, they tried to be revolutionary rather than evolutionary, and revolutionary isn't a great idea, necessarily, if people actually already like your product. In addition, you'd better make sure your "revolutionary" changes aren't just, what's the word, often dumb. A mix of the clever, the neat, the interesting... and the straight-up just plain dumb.
And they began to make the game for hypothetical customers, dorks who played World of Warcraft and Magic: The Gathering and could, they thought, be induced to play D&D, if D&D more resembled those games.
But hypothetical customers aren't actual customers. Many of the actual customers hated the changes. For every one actual customer, there are thousands of possible customers who like this sort of thing, and it makes sense to make a play for those people... but you can't lose your actual audience while you're chasing that theoretical audience.
Now, the third edition (the previous edition) was popular and the RPG hobby had a huge renaissance during it. Actually a huge bubble and then a huge crash, but for a time, the RPG industry, which is barely a rounding error even in the category of specialty games, actually was making money.
Partly fueling that bubble was an Open License. For the first time, ever, the game was packaged with an open license. Homebrewers and wannabe D&D writers could actually just publish their own stuff for D&D, and it was all perfectly legal. The Open License allowed everyone to use D&D rules in perpetuity. Freely -- no royalties owed.
The theory was that if you could essentially corner the market by doing this, by unleashing a thousand garage game designers to write for your product, and even if you were losing, hypothetically, sales dollars to these "competitors," they really weren't full competitors-- because at the end of the day they were supporting, and generating a need for, your main product, the actual rules.
That part of it worked like the dickens.
But -- there's a downside to granting, to everyone in the world, a super-generous royalty free open license "in perpetuity." When this was first dreamed up, people asked the head of the D&D company, Ryan Dancey, Doesn't this mean people can just publish all your rules under their own covers and charge for it?
Dancey said, "It sure does!" But he didn't think that would be a problem because D&D would always have better production values which result, naturally, from an operation of some scale (at least a much larger scale than a guy in his garage cranking out illustration-free copies of the rules). So the threat of some competitor for the actual rules was pretty minor.
Except.
What happened was that D&D 4th was such a departure from the well-liked (and yet super-clunky) 3rd edition rules that... someone did in fact go ahead and start publishing the rules under the Open License, but it wasn't some guy in his garage. It was a somewhat-established game company, using a lot of the same artists who illustrated the actual D&D products.
And further, the anger over D&D 4 was so great people flocked to support this competitor company, which was actually simply publishing D&D 3rd edition under a different (lame) name, Pathfinder. And I hear that Pathfinder is actually... outselling the actual D&D game it's knocking off. Or at least it's too close for comfort.
So this is really a Coke/New Coke story, but with the added twist that, in this analogy, Coke actually licensed its old Coke recipe to anyone who wanted to make Coke, and someone did in fact start making Coke Classic under a different name.
And that began seriously cutting into New Coke's sales.
The new edition is a difficult business proposition, because the actual goal is to unify the D&D audience again and have them all buy actual D&D rulesets, which means they have to placate several different audiences (including people who have, ahem, "gone off the grid' and began playing "retro-clones," clones of first or second edition rules). And the idea is that somehow it will all be "modular" where you can choose from a variety of different rules to make your own perfect ruleset.
That sounds kind of impossible to me. After all, if people are just picking and choosing from four different rulesets and variations thereupon, why do they need One Big Book for that? Why can't they just buy some old edition they like secondhand?
But that is the Business Challenge they have. Somehow they have to unite two very different editions (and a couple of earlier, not quite as different editions) and make it all modular, such that their lost customers (the 3rd edition grognards) will come back, but that their loyal customers -- the ones who actually like 4th edition and have continued supporting it in their Time of Great Dividing -- will also not feel burned and punked out.
See: The loyal customers have been defending these changes all along, and supporting D&D with cash money. You can't really now tell them, Yeah, you were wrong, the 3rd edition boosters were right all along. Dummies. You suck for having supported us.
Oh, and they also have to convince everyone to shell out another $150 for the basic rules, and then hundreds more for the never-ending rules expansions.
Anyway, that's your nerd-news for the day.
Corrected: Initially I had a digression about the D&D MMORPG, which I'm told is just wrong in basic respects, so I've deleted that.
Posted by: Ace at
01:26 PM
| Comments (353)
Post contains 1099 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Penfold at January 10, 2012 01:29 PM (1PeEC)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 01:30 PM (8y9MW)
But thanks for posting.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 10, 2012 01:30 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: garrett at January 10, 2012 01:31 PM (fOmkv)
Posted by: todler at January 10, 2012 01:31 PM (OluE0)
Posted by: Matt at January 10, 2012 01:31 PM (vA4M5)
Ace doesn't want you to know that he was banging one of them blacked out goth chicks for about 2 months.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 10, 2012 01:31 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 01:32 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: madamex at January 10, 2012 01:32 PM (5+Fw+)
Posted by: Emperor of NotRickMittJonNewtRick at January 10, 2012 01:33 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Jew janitor's mop bucket at January 10, 2012 01:33 PM (jV57q)
You mean like the one Turbine developed at the same time they developed Lord of the Rings Online? That has never been a serious player in MMOs despite the fact is was one of the best free ones for a while.
Well keep holding out.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 10, 2012 01:33 PM (0q2P7)
The fact is, however much my friends and I like D&D4, a whole lot of people don't, and WotC (well, Hasbro, really) would be dumb not to try to increase their market share again.
The big problem though, as I see it, is the entry cost. I can get the Pathfinder rulebook on PDF from drivethrurpg.com for about $20.00 (last time I checked). Hasbro won't do that with D&D, so even if I buy it on PDF, I'm paying nearly full price for it. And Pathfinder gives me the whole rule-set in one book- not spread out over 3 more-or-less required books.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 01:34 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at January 10, 2012 01:34 PM (QKKT0)
I think Ace's mom got him Druid pjs for Christmas.
No, my little Ace likes cartoons on his jammies.
Posted by: Mama Ace at January 10, 2012 01:34 PM (fOmkv)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 01:35 PM (8y9MW)
Just play Hero System instead. I'll run a game at my house.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 10, 2012 01:35 PM (r4wIV)
DDO
Dungeons and Dragons Online. I know, huge investment in coming up with an original name. But it's free. Have Fun.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 10, 2012 01:35 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 01:35 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: major major major major at January 10, 2012 01:36 PM (utCAk)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 05:32 PM (nj1bB)
It's cryptically named "Dungeons and Dragons Online," just to throw you off the scent....
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at January 10, 2012 01:36 PM (ggRof)
Posted by: Polliwog, Teahada hobbit at January 10, 2012 01:36 PM (AhUir)
Posted by: Mr.Lips at January 10, 2012 01:36 PM (bFNQb)
Posted by: Nobel Prize Jury at January 10, 2012 01:36 PM (I2LwF)
I'd rather not do algebra to make my character, thanks.
HERO (are they still on FRED, or have they moved to 6th ed, yet?) is way too crunchy for me.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 01:36 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 10, 2012 01:36 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at January 10, 2012 01:37 PM (ndlFj)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at January 10, 2012 01:37 PM (YeIP1)
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 01:37 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Truman North at January 10, 2012 01:38 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 01:38 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 10, 2012 05:36 PM (pLTLS)
You wouldn't say that if you saw Ace in his Mage garb.
Posted by: garrett at January 10, 2012 01:38 PM (fOmkv)
I have no idea how it got there. Mice, probably.
But, yeah, I know the 4th edition story (so I married a mouse, sue me!). My mouse probably won't invest in any new stuff, but I think he misses Dragon Magazine.
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 01:38 PM (5H6zj)
There, FIFY
I mean, "Battleship"? Really.
And I loved the old DragonLance modules and books. When I was 12.
Posted by: holdfast at January 10, 2012 01:38 PM (Gzb30)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 01:38 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Reed at January 10, 2012 01:39 PM (sOkip)
I'll be damned if I understood a single word of this post. Looks like English but I can't make heads or tails of it.
Posted by: Miss_Manners at January 10, 2012 01:39 PM (Q0z3n)
Posted by: bannor, voting Notromney with enthusiasm at January 10, 2012 01:39 PM (RZqFI)
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 01:39 PM (5H6zj)
There's also (as mentioned) Eberron Online, which isn't free (I think).
But, frankly, the whole franchise started circling the toilet bowl (from a community cred standpoint) when Hasbro bought Wizards of the Coast. There were enough people who weren't happy when WotC bought TSR.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 01:40 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 10, 2012 01:40 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Harlequin at January 10, 2012 01:41 PM (7SuSt)
Posted by: Truman North at January 10, 2012 01:42 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Polliwog, Teahada hobbit at January 10, 2012 01:42 PM (AhUir)
I believe in the Right Tool for the Right Job.
If I want good Super Heros, I'll do the old Marvel FACERIP system, or Mutants & Masterminds. For Fantasy, D&D is probably the best out there- Pathfinder is good, but 3.5 was too crunchy for me, I like that D&D4 is much more streamlined (which is part of what some people hate about it, I'll grant). For Sci-Fi... it depends on the setting. Nothing can do Star Wars like the old West End Games D6 version, for instance.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 01:43 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: wooga at January 10, 2012 01:43 PM (vjyZP)
This is like hanging out with a bunch of climbers. I don't know what the hell you all are talking about.
Posted by: garrett at January 10, 2012 01:43 PM (fOmkv)
Posted by: Truman North at January 10, 2012 01:44 PM (I2LwF)
FPS are the only fun games.
But I have decent hand-eye coordination and blood lust, something most AOS geeks lack.
Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at January 10, 2012 01:44 PM (7+pP9)
Wizards Of the Coast: We are announcing dev on 5.0 today.
Fans: So you are admitting 4.0 was a colossal failure that destroyed the game and fractured gamers into a thousand pieces?
Wizards: In a word: yes. 4.0 was a huge mistake, and lots of folks said so at the time, and we said go soak your head, and buy what we tell you to buy. You are gonna play it, and you are gonna like it. But in the end, all the detractors were exactly right. We broke the game, gutted it and ripped out it’s soul. We would have put its soul in a Magic Jar, but 4.0 rules stripped that spell out because it’s a story device, and not useful in combat. We are now sorry, so please come back to us, because after all we still have the name “dungeons & dragons”. We are the brand.
Fans: Uh Huh.
Wizards: You see because we broke the game so badly, and have dismal sales figures, we have been forced to lay off most of our developers, so we are asking you the fans, to actually do all the work of developing the new rules.
Fans: Uh Huh. Pathfinder already did that.
Wizards: But wait. Pathfinder is really Version 3.75. You could help us build Version 5. ThatÂ’s a full 1.25 versions better!
Fans: There is a little saying that conveys a lot of wisdom: DonÂ’t fix what ainÂ’t broke.
Wizards: But Hasbro, a public company owns us. We have to keep tinkering to feed the profit machine.
Fans: Did you ever stop to think how pissed off your eight customers who did buy all your 4th edition garbage will feel when they find out you stuck them with an admittedly dead edition that is abandoned after less then 3 years, when all other editions averaged over 10?
Wizards: Eight sheep? They will line up again to be shorn.
Fans: www.paizo.com
Posted by: Buzzardo at January 10, 2012 01:44 PM (+vrSU)
I guess I'll just mozy on back to The Nobel Prize In Dreck I'll Never Read Even In Reeducation Camps.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 10, 2012 01:44 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 10, 2012 01:44 PM (h6mPj)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at January 10, 2012 01:45 PM (WvXvd)
Please tell me they aren't Hummels or Precious(Make Me Puke) Moments.
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 01:45 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Polliwog, Teahada hobbit at January 10, 2012 01:45 PM (AhUir)
Do any of these versions have hawt, nekkid chicks?
Posted by: Soona at January 10, 2012 01:45 PM (/VmDe)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 10, 2012 01:45 PM (h6mPj)
Posted by: Potato Bandit at January 10, 2012 01:45 PM (H15Ok)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 01:45 PM (nj1bB)
I've played FREd before. Not a huge fan. If I want that kind of customization, I can get it from Mutants & Masterminds, without having to worry about 1/4 limitations (or whatever).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 01:45 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 10, 2012 01:46 PM (h6mPj)
Posted by: Preznit Training Pants at January 10, 2012 01:46 PM (jucos)
Most of them. We're talking nerds, so there's a lot of improbable armor. Like chain-mail bikinis.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 01:46 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Steve Jobs at January 10, 2012 01:46 PM (e8kgV)
Boring.
But I did enjoy the novel from Sharyn McCrumb, Binbos of the Death Sun, a murder mystery based on the game. Was very funny. I can see our dear Ace in that book.
Posted by: Pecos, Thron backs Perry at January 10, 2012 01:46 PM (2Gb0y)
yes. But they're played by guys.
---
Ah, so just like the internet!
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 01:47 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Dr Spank at January 10, 2012 01:47 PM (lVGED)
Posted by: Greatbeefalo at January 10, 2012 01:47 PM (/2be6)
Posted by: Harlequin at January 10, 2012 01:48 PM (7SuSt)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 10, 2012 01:48 PM (hUM6f)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 10, 2012 01:48 PM (PLHIl)
Well a couple of things.
1. The game doesn't suck, it's actually pretty good. And has always been ranked near the top of free games. But has always only attracted moderate numbers.
2. If you have trouble giving it away.
Seriously I think they could do real well actually implementing a real good version of Forgotten Realms, but given that there are oodles more people pining to see what Rohan will be like in LOTRO it seems unlikely that the ball is going to get picked up since Turbine kind of has the market covered as long as they keep giving away DDO.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 10, 2012 01:49 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Soona at January 10, 2012 01:49 PM (/VmDe)
My mouse is still a paper guy.
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 01:49 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 10, 2012 01:50 PM (h6mPj)
I used to have internet debates with a guy who thought that computer RPGs were better than table-top RPGs because "special moves." Seriously.
They're a different medium. I loved Baldur's Gate when it came out; I loved Neverwinter Nights and NWN2 as well. But they're not the same, to me. Even MMORPGs don't quite give me what I'm looking for in a sit-down, table-top RPG session.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 01:50 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Polliwog, Teahada hobbit at January 10, 2012 01:50 PM (AhUir)
But I did enjoy the novel from Sharyn McCrumb, Binbos of the Death Sun, a murder mystery based on the game. Was very funny. I can see our dear Ace in that book.
I drink because of people like you.
Posted by: Appin Dungannon at January 10, 2012 01:50 PM (O6q63)
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 01:51 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 10, 2012 01:51 PM (jucos)
My cousin taught his son to play D&D (yes, using D&D4) with those Play School knights & dragons figures for the minis.
Even did a pod-cast of the games, somewhere.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 01:52 PM (8y9MW)
I drink because of people like you.
Posted by: Appin DungannonI just drink. I don't need an excuse.
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 01:52 PM (iYbLN)
Please tell me they aren't Hummels or Precious(Make Me Puke) Moments.
Oh, no, they're D&D figures. Hot chicks and badass monsters.
Posted by: Truman North at January 10, 2012 01:52 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Harlequin at January 10, 2012 01:52 PM (7SuSt)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 10, 2012 01:53 PM (hUM6f)
Yeah, I gather a lot of these newish games are into all that weird vampire stuff. Blech.
I don't play (I did a few times when I was in h.s.), but I like that he does all of this research into their worlds. He's the DM. He knows a lot of history, comparative religions, and esoterica. It's cool. I can relate to that a lot more than the first person shooter games.
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 01:53 PM (5H6zj)
If anybody's interested in some speculative news, I've got a piece of you. Granted, it's from Debkafile (so you'd need secondary confirmation), but if the Iranians are planning some kind of nuclear test, a small "pop" is the way to go.
Iran Plans 1-Kiloton Underground Nuclear Test
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 10, 2012 01:53 PM (UR5vq)
Posted by: gamer girl at January 10, 2012 01:54 PM (/MuFf)
As long as one of them doesn't actually belong to you, I wouldn't fret about it.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 10, 2012 01:55 PM (HBqDo)
I loved that! And they had a version of swordsmen riding on the backs of dragons. You know, for fags.
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 10, 2012 01:55 PM (Hx5uv)
Is Iran gonna blow up that elf world or something? I never read (horror) Lord of the Rings so I don't know if they deserve to be blowed up or not.
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 01:56 PM (iYbLN)
Happily, I never stopped playing 3.5 and my group has basically ignored Wizards since they switched to 4E. I suspect we will continue to ignore Wizards when 5E comes out.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at January 10, 2012 01:57 PM (I2U+E)
If anybody's interested in some speculative news, I've got a piece of you. Granted, it's from Debkafile (so you'd need secondary confirmation), but if the Iranians are planning some kind of nuclear test, a small "pop" is the way to go.
How can we tell if it was nuclear or just some Iranian pulling his head out his ass?
Posted by: Soona at January 10, 2012 01:57 PM (/VmDe)
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 01:59 PM (iYbLN)
So I'll just say that Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant.
Posted by: Doofus at January 10, 2012 01:59 PM (xKC/c)
--Next, when I have to learn these things here, I must be out of the loop.
--GURPS 4ed, punks!
--I have no life. God help me.
Posted by: DarkLord©, Rogue 3/Commenter 5 at January 10, 2012 02:00 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 10, 2012 02:00 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: phoenixgirl....all in for perry at January 10, 2012 02:01 PM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: Truman North at January 10, 2012 02:01 PM (I2LwF)
Gah! You're right! Fighting, Agility, Strength, Endurance (?), Reason, Intuition, Psyche. Bah, can't believe I screwed that one up.
Oh, and GURPS sucks.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 02:01 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: mugiwara at January 10, 2012 02:01 PM (KI/Ch)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 10, 2012 02:02 PM (hUM6f)
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 10, 2012 02:02 PM (BhuDE)
Okay, but that's generally true anyway.
Or hot IDF chicks.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 02:03 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: phoenixgirl....all in for perry at January 10, 2012 02:03 PM (Ho2rs)
I hate elves. If they aren't engaging in wild orgies with Santa and Mrs. Claus at the North Pole, they are arrogant, aloof, and condescending jerks who can't even destroy evil (as manifested by the Ring) themselves - they outsource that task to the furry offspring of Robert Reich.
Thus I would applaud Iran if they were trying to destroy the Elven world. However, as you already know, Iran's true plans are much more sinister and evil.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 10, 2012 02:03 PM (UR5vq)
Posted by: Soona at January 10, 2012 02:03 PM (/VmDe)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 10, 2012 02:04 PM (i6RpT)
I'm afraid this thread emanates a Circle of Protection against cheerleaders that extends 100yds.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 10, 2012 02:04 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Potato Bandit at January 10, 2012 02:04 PM (H15Ok)
Posted by: SFGoth at January 10, 2012 02:05 PM (dZ756)
I refuse to admit the D20 version (either of them) of Star Wars ever existed. Kind of like the Prequels.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 02:05 PM (8y9MW)
Did you play the D6 version or the D20?
Posted by: Potato Bandit at January 10, 2012 06:04 PM (H15Ok)
Shit, I don't remember. The kid whose house we'd go to had all the books and always DM'd.
Posted by: mugiwara at January 10, 2012 02:06 PM (KI/Ch)
Posted by: Truman North at January 10, 2012 02:06 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 10, 2012 02:07 PM (niZvt)
Some of the States still don't allow that kinda thing, I'd keep the lights down low and draw the curtains.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 10, 2012 02:07 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 10, 2012 02:07 PM (hUM6f)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 02:08 PM (nj1bB)
Okay Truman, how old ARE you?
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 02:08 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 10, 2012 02:09 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Norcross at January 10, 2012 02:09 PM (RM0br)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 10, 2012 02:09 PM (eAOqP)
Posted by: AndrewsDad at January 10, 2012 02:10 PM (C2//T)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 02:11 PM (8y9MW)
ˊ ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` Â…___µqpppq_ ` ` ` ` ``` ``` ``` ``` Â…
` ` ` ` … ` `_µp#F'™… … … ¯'¾…````````````` ``` …
` ` Â… Â… `]₫F¯¯ ` ` Â… _µr ` Â… Â…ʹ'# ` ` ` ` ``` ``` ``` Â…
` ` Â… `]₫™ Â… µr™+^₫urÂ…Â…_``&$µ `` ``` ``` ``` ```
` Â… `'µFÂ… Â… ` ¯¯¯''F™… `r'[sµ_ _ ʹ''$[ ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` `
` ` `'# ` Â… ʹ'` g₫]µ ` ʹyÂ…r[ƒ₫[₫₫Â… ` ₫µµ_Â…_`Â… ``` ```
` ` ʹ]R ` Â…__'₫}r₫$ `…™```₫₫ALÂ…u¾÷AZ77Agµ…````Â…
Â… `'R ` ` `¯ '₫₫₫₫$/ ʹƒ'_'']]h===²''''''''™']g₫F'c ` ʹʹ'¾ ` ` Â…
Â… `][ `_c Â… ¿_][pF_rʹhr4r₫¨ `Â… _`sgg₫]$Â… `'[ `Â… '¾``Â…
Â… `$ `Â… Â… ` ¯]O›''_ ` ` `'\™ _g]₫₫F[]₫F ƒ ``Â… Â… `''#` ``
Â… ›R ` ` Â… '/ `₫'₫₫$gg₫₫₫₫[]₫₫$F[™¯ ʹƒ¯'^ `` `Â… Â…'$Â… `
` ʹ'#ʹ[ ` Â… ʹL``$XLÂ…_Â…ʹˆLˆˆ…¯'™ˆµxˆµrˆr ` Â… Â… Â… ʹrAÂ…
` ʹ'₫ ²&_ Â… ʹ¾`A`Â…Â…`ˆr=sAµµ»ˆ…''¯¯… Â… ` Â… Â… Â… `''$Â…
Â… ₫ ʹʹ'''$¯ ƒ ` Â… ʹ( `?'»__Â… ` ``` Â… Â… ʹ1``Â…` `ƒ… Â… `[ ₫`
Â…'$ ` `Â… ¹` Â… Â…Â… Â… Â… ` ` Â… ` Â… ` ` Â… ` Â…' ʹƒ… ` Â… ʹL'$
`]F ʹ¿_ Â… ʹÂ… Â… Â…Â… ` Â… Â… Â… ` Â… Â… ` ` ` Â… Â…F Â… ` Â… Â…₫
ʹ'# ʹµ^`Â…`` Â… `''Â… Â… ` Â… '' ` ` ` Â… ` ` Â… Â… [ Â… ` Â… Â… ʹ$
ʹ'$ ¯ ` # ` ` ` ` Â…ʹCÂ… Â… ` ` Â… ` ``Â… Â… ¯ `'™``Â…Â… Â…']F`
³$_ ʹƒ… ` ` ` ` Â… `ˆ…… Â… `A_ ` Â… ` Â… Â… Â… ` ` Â… Â… ]R `
`''¾… ` …… … ` … ` ¹… ` ` ` ` ` `ˆ ` ` … ` ` ` … `']R `
` ` '¾_ … … ` … … … … ` … ` … …[ ` ` ` ` ` ` ` … ]&``
` Â… ` ''$µ ʹ's''A_ ` Â… Â… ` ` ` ` ` Â… `[ ` ` ` ` ` Â… ` ]™ ``
` Â… ` …¯&_ Â…Q Â… ` ` ` ` ` ` ` Â… `™ ` ` ` Â… Â… ʹµA`````
` ` Â… Â… ` '¾_µ]Z_ ` `` ``` `Â… …ƒ ` Â… Â… `Â… _g₫Â… ` ` Â…
` ` ` ` … ` `¯$gµ_ˆ ` `<_____``…'L_+~rr`g8ˆ… ` `` …
` ` ` ` ` … … … ¯¯'48µ__µ[[[[µ__µpd$$$#5… ` ` ``` ```
` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` … … ` `¯¯¯¯¯¯¯][¯ ` ` ` … ` ` ` … ` ` ` …
` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` Â… Â… _]₫₫₫gµ_ ` ` ` ``` ``` ```
` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` Â… ` _]₫Rš₫` ¯''₫gµ_ ` ` ` ` ``` ```
` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` Â… _₫#Â… c¾……`7š$µ…``` ``` ```
` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` Â… `']#Â… ` `][` `Â… ` `3$g ` ``` ```
` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` Â… ʹʹAÂ… ` Â… ʹA``Â…`Â… …¯¾L``````ˋ
Posted by: Forever Alone at January 10, 2012 02:11 PM (4136b)
Fixed It For Me.
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 02:11 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: mugiwara at January 10, 2012 02:11 PM (KI/Ch)
Posted by: Free2Smooze at January 10, 2012 02:11 PM (4l66I)
Posted by: Keith Arnold at January 10, 2012 02:11 PM (Jdtsu)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 06:08 PM (nj1bB)
Much improved, thanks. I'll be in my bunk.
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 10, 2012 02:11 PM (BhuDE)
a DnD class
It requires classes to figure out? Maybe the kid would be better of with a smack habit to occupy his time. Lower impact on your time.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 10, 2012 02:12 PM (eAOqP)
Where the men are men, the women are men, and the children are Chris Hanson. Posted by: Harlequin
I'm stealing this. LOL
Posted by: todler at January 10, 2012 02:12 PM (OluE0)
Posted by: Soona at January 10, 2012 02:12 PM (/VmDe)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 10, 2012 02:13 PM (0q2P7)
LOL
I missed this whole era, thank Gawd. We just got stoned and listened to Pink Floyd. In the 80's we snorted coke and drank ourselves sober, same difference
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 02:13 PM (iYbLN)
I owe a lot to 4th edition D&D.
I've saved a lot of money by not going to gaming conventions, since I stopped playing when D&D4E came out.
Posted by: malclave at January 10, 2012 02:13 PM (OCRaO)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at January 10, 2012 02:13 PM (QcFbt)
"I played the original AD&D back in 1980-85 or so. Quite happy with it and didn't need any upgrades."
Same here. I still have my books and crap somewhere in the house. It was a blast. Playing till 4-5 in the morning, drinking and smoking. Good times.
Posted by: Bosk all in for Rueben Sandwich at January 10, 2012 02:13 PM (n2K+4)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at January 10, 2012 02:14 PM (YeIP1)
Posted by: Truman North at January 10, 2012 02:14 PM (I2LwF)
Please don't get my hopes up... Especially since he didn't even campaign there.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at January 10, 2012 02:15 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Shiggz at January 10, 2012 02:15 PM (RfvTE)
So there's an emoticon of hope.
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 10, 2012 02:15 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Soona at January 10, 2012 02:16 PM (/VmDe)
Perry has a demanding lead in NH according to Fox.
Bitchin. The northeast knows what mittens is all about, and they've had their fill.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 10, 2012 02:16 PM (eAOqP)
Posted by: BurtTC at January 10, 2012 02:16 PM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 10, 2012 02:18 PM (QF8uk)
Posted by: Soona at January 10, 2012 06:12 PM (/VmDe)
That's a different level of geekery of which I've enjoyed myself. I had the 2004 Century of Flight from MS.
It was pretty cool. I rolled a 747 but lost 37,000 feet in the process. I don't think that's technically called a roll.
Posted by: ErikW at January 10, 2012 02:18 PM (qKEux)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 10, 2012 02:18 PM (eAOqP)
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 10, 2012 06:13 PM (Hx5uv)
Yeah. And she definitley doesn't look like a virgin.
Posted by: Tim Tebow at January 10, 2012 02:18 PM (/VmDe)
You do? I see them as pistol grip ears.
Or reins
Posted by: todler at January 10, 2012 02:19 PM (OluE0)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at January 10, 2012 02:19 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: cackfinger at January 10, 2012 02:20 PM (a9mQu)
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 02:20 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Joffen, fucking sunshine patriot at January 10, 2012 02:20 PM (zLeKL)
Posted by: cackfinger at January 10, 2012 02:21 PM (a9mQu)
Posted by: Potato Bandit at January 10, 2012 02:21 PM (H15Ok)
It was pretty cool. I rolled a 747 but lost 37,000 feet in the process. I don't think that's technically called a roll.
Posted by: ErikWThat is called Crash Scene.
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 02:21 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: mpfs
My staff is at the ready
Posted by: todler at January 10, 2012 02:22 PM (OluE0)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 10, 2012 02:23 PM (hUM6f)
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 06:20 PM (iYbLN)
Your Thumper has totally changed you, mpfs.
Posted by: Tim Tebow at January 10, 2012 02:23 PM (/VmDe)
The only place I will role play my morons is the bedroom. I'll say no more. Let your minds wander with the possibilities.
Hey Baby, wanna...
Oh, MAGIC MISSLE!!
Posted by: fluffy 'n' nerdy at January 10, 2012 02:25 PM (O6q63)
Lightning Bolt! Lightning Bolt! Lightning Bolt!
Posted by: buzzion at January 10, 2012 02:25 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Joffen, fucking sunshine patriot at January 10, 2012 02:25 PM (zLeKL)
Posted by: cackfinger at January 10, 2012 02:26 PM (a9mQu)
Posted by: Norm L. at January 10, 2012 02:27 PM (8uRsR)
Posted by: Baldy at January 10, 2012 02:27 PM (4bTF5)
So they were casting all sorts of spells 'n' shit trying to take down the "impenetrable wall". I was like, "hmm, isn't this a sign or something that maybe we should keep out?" They kept doing all this stuff to try to get through this wall. I don't think I showed up for the second session, it all seemed kinda dumb.
So that's what an invisible barrier looks like!
Posted by: Time Bandit at January 10, 2012 02:27 PM (O6q63)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at January 10, 2012 02:27 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 10, 2012 02:28 PM (QF8uk)
Posted by: mpfs at January 10, 2012 06:21 PM (iYbLN)
Heh, a buddy of mine is a for-real commercial pilot with over 30,000 hours of flight time and when I described my stupid sim flight he told me that even though I didn't hit the ground, the stresses would have exceeded the structural integrity of the plane and it would have disintegrated.
Good thing I'm not a pilot.
Posted by: ErikW at January 10, 2012 02:28 PM (qKEux)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 10, 2012 02:29 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: I am the walrus, goo-goo-ga-joo at January 10, 2012 02:30 PM (ybkwK)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 10, 2012 02:30 PM (hUM6f)
big ears, small boobs, pointy elbows, some funny mark down next to the poontang.........
yeah, i would hit it.
Posted by: Racefan at January 10, 2012 02:31 PM (BoG0J)
Posted by: Shoey at January 10, 2012 02:32 PM (jdOk/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 10, 2012 02:33 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: billygoat at January 10, 2012 02:34 PM (+zWnc)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 02:35 PM (q0xgf)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 02:35 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Shoey at January 10, 2012 06:32 PM (jdOk/)
That's how it starts. But before you know it, you're down in a dark basement, wearing torn underwear, watching pron with Ace.
Posted by: Tim Tebow at January 10, 2012 02:36 PM (/VmDe)
Posted by: Derpman at January 10, 2012 02:37 PM (FRJUJ)
Posted by: chemjeff at January 10, 2012 06:24 PM (7FadD)
----
hee, hee!
The one time I tried to play D&D with Mr Y-not the adventure set up had something to do with being hired by some slimey seeming dude to go into a forest or somewhere with tons of goblins in it and investigate something. Anyway, the first step was to go down into a cave and I kept standing there saying "What's my motivation?" I was too stuck in character to get going. Adventure fail.
But I think it's a great hobby. There's a lot to it, if done right. I would much rather be with a D&D nerd than a video game addict.
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 02:37 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: gamer girl at January 10, 2012 02:38 PM (/MuFf)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 02:38 PM (q0xgf)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 02:38 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ontherocks at January 10, 2012 02:39 PM (HBqDo)
They're really hurting their candidate.
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 02:40 PM (5H6zj)
I never did get into dungeons & dragons much. I'm a gamer, Final Fantasy, Megaman, Metroid, et cetera - and I've been a longtime player of Final Fantasy XI online, so I've got that mark against me, too. But D&D... eh.
First time a friend convinced me to join a group, I was in a party with an orc, and a violent criminal (in the game). Being lawful good, I did what I thought I was supposed to, and as soon as opportunity presented itself, I killed the two of them behind a tavern.
I got kicked out of the group that night. >.> Apparently I'm not cut out for tabletops.
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at January 10, 2012 02:41 PM (kUd5w)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 02:42 PM (q0xgf)
Posted by: Shoey at January 10, 2012 06:32 PM (jdOk/)
Girls also like fresh-baked lasagnas and chocolate mousse in a cup.
Protip!!
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at January 10, 2012 02:43 PM (kUd5w)
Posted by: gamer girl at January 10, 2012 02:44 PM (/MuFf)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 02:45 PM (q0xgf)
I got kicked out of the group that night. >.> Apparently I'm not cut out for tabletops
---
I think if I were to try again I'd pick something other than lawful good (which is too close to my own real personality). My husband's best friend plays what would best be described as chaotic greedy. That works!
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 02:45 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: buzzion at January 10, 2012 02:45 PM (GULKT)
I got kicked out of the group that night. >.> Apparently I'm not cut out for tabletops
---
I think if I were to try again I'd pick something other than lawful good (which is too close to my own real personality). My husband's best friend plays what would best be described as chaotic greedy. That works!
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 06:45 PM (5H6zj)
I suppose playing as the fantasy equivalent of Batman was out of the question?
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at January 10, 2012 02:46 PM (je9Ke)
Posted by: Free2Smooze at January 10, 2012 02:47 PM (4l66I)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at January 10, 2012 06:27 PM (bxiXv)
I loved me some Shadowrun. Tricking a character out with cybernetic enhancements, equipping seriously badass weaponry, then planning sophisticated missions of questionable legality, was all kinds of fun.
Posted by: Insomniac at January 10, 2012 02:49 PM (jj/Ys)
I suppose playing as the fantasy equivalent of Batman was out of the question?
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at January 10, 2012 06:46 PM (je9Ke)
I like Batman. I really do.
But the Joker has entire graveyards written in his name because Batman just refuses to cop to the truth that every time I let this clown go, I sentence a few hundred good men and women to death.
Slice first, ask no questions. Urite mala mundi!
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at January 10, 2012 02:49 PM (kUd5w)
4E was not that severe a departure from 3.5; indeed a lot of elements in 4E were either introduced in 3.5, and make appearances in Pathfinder.
The problem, among many, is that 4E was promoted as a severe departure from 3.5, including the almost obligatory sneering at 3.5 and certain elements they said they were changing. Of course when 4E came out those very same elements were there. To make it worse, they were soon promoting elements they had previously sneered at as high points of 4E.
Ultimately though, 4E was almost completely evolutionary in only one critical area, and rather egregiously devolutionary in another critical area, and that is what wound up forcing WotC to come out with 4.5, excuse me, "D&D Essentials", faster than they came out with 3.5 compared to 3E. Those areas?
For evolution, they focused on making a more mathematically "perfect" game, where everything was in absolute balance. Being adventure writers rather than mathematicians, they naturally screwed that up completely, introducing some truly atrocious quirks.
For devolution, they turned the game massively back to its wargame roots. It is much more a miniatures boardgame (like say Advanced Squad Leader) with RPG elements tagged in than it is an RPG using hacked wargame rules (like say AD&D). That does not mean you cannot role-play with the 4E rules; far from it. It does however mean you need mad tactical combat skills to be really good at it, and their intended target simply did not have those skills. A good portion of their previous market did, but they had made such an effort to ditch that group that they left the game in an oblivion of complexity, incidentally completely blowing one of their major stated initial design goals.
From there things just went from bad to worse, such as destroying their organized play system, trading the concept of an afternoon/evening (4-hour) play session, for a hyperactive, Yuppie-on-the-Run, quickie (1-hour) play session, throwing in Twitter feed bonuses for extra fun.
And those are only the highlights of the issues with WotC's 4E run.
As for Pathfinder, it simply is not as backwards compatible as the publishers and fans like to pretend it is, and is quickly accumulating just as much dead weight rules books as 3E/3.5/4E did. Add to that the hard Left worldview of well near the entire management and workforce, and a dominant theme of Torture Porn masquerading as "edgy" and "adult", and you have a product with no real attraction above and beyond sticking with whatever junk WotC is spamming the shelves with.
As for OSR movement, they are hellbent on proving they are a worthless pack of vultures. I'd have to get really rude to discuss them.
As a last note, when 4E was announced there were the usual cynics who asked when 5E would be out.
Having my share of miserable cynicism, I pointed out that when 3E was announced WotC said they were looking at a 5-year cycle for the game. They got a bit messed up on that and brought 3.5 out after 3 years, but they stuck with 3.5 for 5 years, still surprising many people. I made it quite clear to all my fellow nerds that I absolutely expected 5E in 2013, with an announcement at Gen Con 2012. I further said the announcement could be moved up with another announcement of movement on the electronic game rights. Lo and behold, said announcement was made, and 5E was announced now instead of at Gen Con.
Shocking, but there you have it: a company that actually told the truth about its plans.
Posted by: Sam at January 10, 2012 02:50 PM (ZFvlD)
Posted by: Warden at January 10, 2012 02:51 PM (HzhBE)
Posted by: Cerebral Paul Z. at January 10, 2012 02:52 PM (XpM53)
I suppose playing as the fantasy equivalent of Batman was out of the question?
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at January 10, 2012 06:46 PM (je9Ke)
I like Batman. I really do.
But the Joker has entire graveyards written in his name because Batman just refuses to cop to the truth that every time I let this clown go, I sentence a few hundred good men and women to death.
Slice first, ask no questions. Urite mala mundi!
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at January 10, 2012 06:49 PM (kUd5w)
Correction. Not Batman. Big Daddy from Kick-Ass. Like Batman, but more murderey.
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at January 10, 2012 02:52 PM (je9Ke)
MAN!...you can say that again!...lotsa new nics and hashes in here. Not a gamer but certainly can understand the attraction to gaming...only thing I've ever played was Golden Eye during snowboard vacations...
Posted by: billygoat at January 10, 2012 02:52 PM (+zWnc)
Also, Batman should have chipped in to Arkham Asylum a bit more financially. You would think with his money that the security would be a bit better.
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at January 10, 2012 02:54 PM (je9Ke)
I think if I were to try again I'd pick something other than lawful good (which is too close to my own real personality). My husband's best friend plays what would best be described as chaotic greedy. That works!
Posted by: Y-not at January 10, 2012 06:45 PM (5H6zj)
See, for me it is exactly the opposite. I find brandishing a sword relentlessly and unapologetically against wicked men/beings in RPGs and action games to be terribly cathartic for my own Lawful Good personality in reality. Ninja Gaiden is among my favorite games for this very reason. I am indeed a dyed-in-the-wool nerd, and probably beyond help.
But honestly, who wants to travel with an Orc? It was a favor to the group, in my opinion!
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at January 10, 2012 02:54 PM (kUd5w)
My head hurts.
Posted by: mrp at January 10, 2012 02:54 PM (HjPtV)
Yeah had a problem with that playing a canned scenario for CoC with my wife. The guide described one room as a room with a cabinet and a boxes of junk. The cabinet was important had clues, was nailed shut. What did my wife obsess over? The JUNK, and made me come up with article after article of unique things that weren't interesting or useful. "You said it was full of junk! what ELSE is in the box?" A more experienced player would have spotted me struggle to come up with new useless contents after the third box and moved on.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 10, 2012 02:56 PM (0q2P7)
I play a homebrew version of "Spawn of Fashan". But you all already knew that, didn't you?
Posted by: Barack obama at January 10, 2012 02:56 PM (HtUdo)
Posted by: Racefan at January 10, 2012 02:57 PM (BoG0J)
Also, Batman should have chipped in to Arkham Asylum a bit more financially. You would think with his money that the security would be a bit better.
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at January 10, 2012 06:54 PM (je9Ke)
The best investment in that madhouse would have been carefully placed explosives burying the entire building, after calling the institutional staff to the front lawn for some contrived meeting. Staff survives, villains perish, Gotham's safer, Bats gets a day off. The perfect plan!
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at January 10, 2012 02:57 PM (kUd5w)
Posted by: Tammy al' Thor at January 10, 2012 03:00 PM (SsG4J)
The best investment in that
madhouse would have been carefully placed explosives burying the entire
building, after calling the institutional staff to the front lawn for
some contrived meeting. Staff survives, villains perish, Gotham's
safer, Bats gets a day off. The perfect plan! Posted by: Kinley Ardal
Or, you know, bat-injected AIDS.
Whatever works, right?
Posted by: weft cut-loop at January 10, 2012 03:01 PM (jcnm8)
Posted by: Winston Churchill at January 10, 2012 03:04 PM (AYfPj)
@58
"separate hit points for individual body areas:
Ah, the good old days of RuneQuest... rolling up a character, receiving the divine gift of "master of pike", and then in your very first combat rolling a fumble, and killing yourself with a critical hit to the head. With a pike, and I don't mean the fish.
Posted by: malclave at January 10, 2012 03:04 PM (OCRaO)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at January 10, 2012 03:04 PM (QcFbt)
The best investment in that
madhouse would have been carefully placed explosives burying the entire
building, after calling the institutional staff to the front lawn for
some contrived meeting. Staff survives, villains perish, Gotham's
safer, Bats gets a day off. The perfect plan!
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at January 10, 2012 06:57 PM (kUd5w)
Or, in keeping with the spirit of "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you" from Batman Begins, he could just "let" Frank Castle take the nickel tour of the facility. I'm sure dum-dum would have something to say about that.
This is all taking place in Imaginationland from South Park, right? Also, my DC comics knowledge is rather lacking, so I'm unaware of any Punisher-equivalent.
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at January 10, 2012 03:05 PM (je9Ke)
And what's this about a maximum number of times a person can be divinely healed in a day? If a god wants to keep on restoring the battered flesh of a mighty warrior, SO BE IT.
Posted by: Little Lebowski Urban Acheiver at January 10, 2012 03:06 PM (evtdB)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 03:08 PM (q0xgf)
Or, in keeping with the spirit of "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you" from Batman Begins,
he could just "let" Frank Castle take the nickel tour of the facility.
I'm sure dum-dum would have something to say about that.
This is all taking place in Imaginationland from South Park, right? Also, my DC comics knowledge is rather lacking, so I'm unaware of any Punisher-equivalent.
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at January 10, 2012 07:05 PM (je9Ke)
Crossovers are acceptable. I, too, am not very knowledgeable about comic books aside from Batman and Superman.
Damn. Need The Dark Knight Rises to be out already.
Or, you know, bat-injected AIDS.
Whatever works, right?
Posted by: weft cut-loop at January 10, 2012 07:01 PM (jcnm
Okay, I'm liking it, but it's missing something.
Needs explosives somewhere. It just isn't the same without explosives.
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at January 10, 2012 03:08 PM (kUd5w)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 03:12 PM (q0xgf)
By the way, the D&D MMOG is pretty good, its just lousy solo.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 10, 2012 03:12 PM (r4wIV)
4 sucked.... 3 OK... and this from a guy who started with Chainmail....
They managed to kill the brand by making it almost imposssible to translate your older characters into the new system...
So the Lawful Evil Paladin of the God of War... that I PLAYED at Gencon with Gary Gygax? whose been around for 38 REAL years? His equipment, and skills... did not translate into the new system when I tried to play with my Kids...
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 10, 2012 03:13 PM (NtXW4)
Chartmaster Rolemaster had the most brutal critical hit/fumble charts in existence. Slice your eyball with an arrow fletching by accident as you fire? Its in there. Hit your friend in the knee with your attack, crippling him? Its in there.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 10, 2012 03:17 PM (r4wIV)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 10, 2012 03:17 PM (X3vSL)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 10, 2012 03:18 PM (r4wIV)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at January 10, 2012 03:19 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: malclave at January 10, 2012 03:23 PM (OCRaO)
Posted by: Barry S at January 10, 2012 03:24 PM (hHFjS)
Speaking of which, where's Johnny Coldcuts been? I gotta know.
It's a matter of anticipating what the audience will actually seize on, and find mysterious and interesting, and avoiding making things which aren't supposed to be interesting too interesting. Keeping the mystery for the actual mysterious bits.
Oh, good. I've been waiting for the English lit proficiency class. This must be where it starts....
Posted by: The Black Republican at January 10, 2012 03:24 PM (aF97q)
In the elf-chick's panty front, I see a 'devilish' face- no lie. There are 5 'seams' running down the front- the 'eyes' appear to be either side of the middle two...
inner fabric? or some really good photo-shop?
yeah- original DnD'r here. Late '70s- like, '77 or earlier. Hard to remember that far back. Only played a few times- never did enough drugs to really get into it...
Posted by: Mr Wolf, esq at January 10, 2012 03:25 PM (mIGM1)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at January 10, 2012 03:25 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 03:26 PM (q0xgf)
Yeah, there are plenty of lady gamers and married gamers and dating gamers. its not the bastion of disgusting unbathed losers it once was, although the conventions are still kind of scary.
Try being a GM running four people trying to make Hero characters for the first time. 100+50 pts, fantasy. Timer starts now.
Try it with D&D and we'll race each other. You'll win, but not by much. Usually though I start out with premades and teach people the system with a few arena fights, then a simple scenario. Eventually people want to make their own guy and then they can learn the system better.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 10, 2012 03:31 PM (r4wIV)
Our group chose to stay with 2.0 when 3.0 came out. Yes, 3.0 was superior in game mechanics, but we had already spent too much time editing our world from the changes to 1.0, and had already bought ALL of the 2.0 supplements and accesories. We weren't going to go through all that again.
For us, 3.0 was just about TSR/WOTC changing the core rules so we would all have to go out and by a new set of books. Screw that. The early release of 3.5 confirmed our suspicion that we would have been ripped off again.
We're on DDO now. But Turbine sucks. They actually had an advertising wall you could look at in game. Just *passing* that wall would download phising software onto your computer. They handled the blowback poorly, banning people who expressed outrage and questioned Turbine's ethics. They eventually shut down the phising wall, but at great expense to their rep. I hope they die a slow and painful death.
Posted by: Fen at January 10, 2012 03:31 PM (Cih47)
Interesting story. I have a friend who is big into the Living Arcanis stuff. During college she'd talk for hours about the storyline and the people she played with. She also is a big proponent of getting more women involved in gaming, especially wives who may feel left out from their husband's hobby. Anywho, so years ago during the 2004 Democratic primary, she was upset one day about an article that she read on the internet. The article talked about which DnD character each primary candidate would be. She was particularly upset that Sheila Jackson Lee didn't have a character because "She's not a real candidate." I asked her for the link, and the rest is history.
Posted by: Alex at January 10, 2012 03:32 PM (+1TUS)
Posted by: Berserker at January 10, 2012 03:36 PM (FMbng)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 10, 2012 03:37 PM (r4wIV)
270 comments and nobody mentions the left nipple?
Plain as day.
Ears, elbows, whatevs...
Posted by: RamonAllones at January 10, 2012 07:34 PM (ha+6S)
Obviously, we have our priorities.
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at January 10, 2012 03:38 PM (je9Ke)
Posted by: Jean at January 10, 2012 03:38 PM (WnnBz)
"4E was a better game from a DM's persective"
Thats like saying "the menu changes were better from a waiter's perspective"
Okay, nevermind. I'm not going to start a flame war over this.
Posted by: Fen at January 10, 2012 03:38 PM (Cih47)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 10, 2012 03:40 PM (r4wIV)
I believe she could be effectively subdued with a d4 +6.
Posted by: Fritz at January 10, 2012 03:44 PM (3raPN)
Posted by: Zakn at January 10, 2012 03:49 PM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: Errol at January 10, 2012 03:49 PM (vewos)
Posted by: Cerebral Paul Z. at January 10, 2012 04:00 PM (XpM53)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 04:24 PM (q0xgf)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 04:29 PM (q0xgf)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 10, 2012 04:32 PM (r4wIV)
Right? Just like that maybe?
Yeah. It's a bad thing for D&D to do this but it's a GOOD thing for conservatives to compromise their ideals so as to MAYBE attract some unknown number of voters who they don't know will for sure vote for them if they do compromise?
Posted by: Theocracy or Corporate Statism, you choose. at January 10, 2012 04:35 PM (xqpQL)
261 Brennan
The thing with 4E's "ease" of encounter set up is it still collapsed beyond 1 or 2 levels of variation, and that directly because of the nearly universal math failures of the design team.
The sad thing is that defines virtually all of the 4E design - great ideas, horrific execution. I liken it to the South Park episode with Christopher Reeve. Every time someone had a truly evolutionary idea in the 4E design pits, someone wandered by, snapped its neck, and sucked all the usefulness out of it.
Case in point, the character system.
For every bit of creativity they added with customizing certain features, they drained away all the utility and fun by insisting every class be absolutely equal at absolutely every level.
What makes that really sad is even they realized how bad it was, and directly said to revise the flavor text to make characters more unique and appealing. If I should just change it myself, what exactly am I paying for?
Posted by: Sam at January 10, 2012 04:37 PM (ZFvlD)
Posted by: DngrMse at January 10, 2012 04:40 PM (Wzdwz)
Posted by: Mike James at January 10, 2012 04:40 PM (E5gnO)
yes. But they're played by guys.
I think it was the Conan themed MMORPG that allowed topless female toons. They all had names like 'Moonlea', and they were all played by bepimpled teenage boys. They looked pretty good while battling giant desert scorpions...but still, knowing that behind those bouncing virtual boobies, there was a leering, pimpled teenage face? Serious buzz-kill.
Posted by: DngrMse at January 10, 2012 04:50 PM (Wzdwz)
Posted by: Bunk at January 10, 2012 04:54 PM (J6liE)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 04:56 PM (WkoWH)
Posted by: Brennan at January 10, 2012 05:13 PM (WkoWH)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 10, 2012 05:14 PM (r4wIV)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 10, 2012 05:26 PM (ac6ny)
Posted by: Trimegistus at January 10, 2012 05:33 PM (rCEvh)
But Skyrim is calling so I gotta go. Need to enchant some clothes so I can train mage skills.
Posted by: The Atom Bomb of Loving Kindness at January 10, 2012 05:33 PM (jqHOY)
310 posts? On this subject?
The nerd quotient just went off the chart!
...wait a minute; "Illusionists and Monks"? Really?
Posted by: -Shawn- at January 10, 2012 05:34 PM (JIOCk)
Posted by: Kasper Hauser at January 10, 2012 05:41 PM (tB2tX)
Really liked 3.0, disliked 3.5 (why can't keen edge and improved critical stack, again?) but I got over it.
If you ever want to cause a fight among close friends, try to run an evil campaign w/o lawful characters. Two words, GROUP COHESION.
That's where you witness the DM either throw a smoke grenade and dart out a window, or summon a tararasque and kill them all.
Posted by: Xenophon at January 10, 2012 05:47 PM (gHBfR)
Truly amazing to see a large group of people with a firm grasp of good and evil, law and chaos, morals and dhimmicraps, who spend what little free time they have hanging out at AoS.
Morons RULE!
Posted by: Blacksmith8✡ at January 10, 2012 06:02 PM (Q1qy3)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 06:11 PM (nj1bB)
That being said, I was very impressed by DnD 3.0, because they managed to create an entirely new game under the hood, which nevertheless looked and played like old DnD. That took a lot of good design work to pull off.
Posted by: Trimegistus at January 10, 2012 06:12 PM (rCEvh)
Posted by: LauraNotW at January 10, 2012 06:27 PM (NUU3Z)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 06:37 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 06:39 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Matt Harris at January 10, 2012 06:44 PM (C76be)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 10, 2012 06:47 PM (h6mPj)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 06:50 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 06:52 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: FPW at January 10, 2012 06:53 PM (BDNF5)
Posted by: LauraNotW at January 10, 2012 06:54 PM (NUU3Z)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 10, 2012 06:57 PM (h6mPj)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2012 06:58 PM (nj1bB)
304 Brennan - The thing is, they tried to open up more customization in 3E. The problem was, they set things up in a way that there was typically only a very few, very specific, ways to be effective, eliminating well over 99.9% of customization where there was the least hint of competitiveness between players at a table. This was set up in a context of where the organized play program, which they knew was filled with hyper-competitive, gratuitously cheating, mega-nerds, was supposed to be a core part of the sales program. Not only that, they tried promoting these "secret" combos as a selling point of the game. Then of course they fed it with the usual power creep of constant expansions. Which they then tried to restrict in the organized play.
Did I mention before I was only scratching the surface of their design and business errors?
Posted by: Sam at January 10, 2012 07:04 PM (ZFvlD)
321 Ace - That's sort of a yes and no thing.
I'm an old timer too, and played the same way you did back in 79. However it should be remembered that the game was designed by a miniatures gamer. Gygax and everyone he was dealing with at the time all had several K worth of figures lying around anyway, and the earliest iterations of the rules are written with quite a bit of carried over miniatures wargame terminology and structure.
From that perspective, it is more an issue of "What gamer doesn't have all that stuff just lying around anyway?" rather than "Go out and buy it to play our game."
OTOH, if you go and dig up Ryan Dancey's pre-3E report on the state of gaming from 98-99 (IIRC), he has a very clear section showing that there was a single area of game type crossover (tabletop RPGs, CRPGs, console games, CCGs, etc.), and that was in miniatures. A certain segment of the RPG population was also part of the miniatures purchasing population, with a typical investment of about $1K.
In light of that, it made absolutely perfect sense for WotC to put out an in-house line of miniatures. While they screwed it up initially with the "modern" Chainmail, they quickly got back on their feet with their line of pre-painted, plastic, randomized, "collectible", miniatures. Sadly they blew their organized play program for those, which ultimately led to their dropping the line entirely.
Corporate disclaimers aside, the impact of designing for that on the 4E rules is blatantly obvious.
Of course WotC tried doing the whole online thing in-house, and it was the massive disaster everyone except abject fanboys expected.
Posted by: Sam at January 10, 2012 07:21 PM (ZFvlD)
But, seriously... I cannot for the life of me understand why someone hasn't made an app - PC, Android, iPad, whatever - to do all the mundane crap. THAT would sell!
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 10, 2012 07:29 PM (UTq/I)
Posted by: Zakn at January 10, 2012 07:52 PM (7F9i5)
Posted by: Nobody at January 10, 2012 08:10 PM (FT2NW)
Posted by: TB at January 10, 2012 08:46 PM (PyBAO)
Posted by: Little Rock Big Rock at January 10, 2012 09:45 PM (RXQ2T)
Posted by: Smart Trust ePub at January 10, 2012 11:10 PM (DLvML)
Posted by: A Universe from Nothing ePub at January 10, 2012 11:37 PM (+M9J5)
Posted by: Greedy Bastards PDF at January 11, 2012 12:11 AM (wwGAA)
Posted by: Poor Economics Audiobook at January 11, 2012 12:21 AM (Cndsw)
Yeah had a problem with that playing a canned scenario for CoC with my wife
I don't mind those. In the "wall" example described in post 193, the DM simply says "guys, you spend the entire day using everything you have on that wall. You realize its not coming down".
My beef was with the cheesy Dragonlance scenarios that said "Note to DM: Captain of the Guard cannot die in this section as he needs to reappear in the next chapter". Nothing is worse than the party figuring out the DM simply won't let them kill him no matter what.
Posted by: Fen at January 11, 2012 02:07 AM (Cih47)
I'm really late to this party, but here's the few things I feel I ought to toss in: I like 4th edition, it's what my gaming group plays when we play fantasy games. I never understood all the hate the system received, nor the complaint that it was "Tabletop WoW." Those arguments just never seemed coherent to me.
Nevertheless, backlash wasn't the only thing that went wrong with 4th edition. The larger problem was mismanagement of the franchise by the company. As I understand it, WotC let a bunch of their designers and writers go right before the transition, resulting in some good talent going over to Paizo. Integration of the new edition with online tools and resources was poor and did not improve much over time. Their print magazines were shut down and turned to online-only affairs (despite the sunset of print media, this was seen as a bad move since those ventures were supposedly profiting). The organized gaming community did not receive company support until far too late in the life of the game. Much of the material published under the 4th edition moniker was material from the previous editions converted to the new ruleset. The cost of obtaining and utilizing the gaming license for publishing something using 4th edition rules (as with the OGL from 3rd edition) was too high for most, which is probably why there were no 4th edition video games or other clones on the tabletop market.
I'd rather WotC spent more time trying to fix what went wrong here than start a new edition; it seems to me that the audience that was alienated by 4th edition isn't going to come back for anything. Nerd rage is an odd thing.
Posted by: Hal at January 11, 2012 03:08 AM (o6IXR)
Posted by: Noncentsical at January 11, 2012 03:26 AM (NuGbl)
On the other hand, Paizo has a phone number right there on their order page for handling order issues where they actually answer the phone, figure out how to solve your issue, and then - gasp! - follow through on what you just talked about. Same with rules questions and product opinions, etc., on their message boards. As a customer, I really appreciate the extra effort.
Other, non-D&D folks seem to understand this sentiment as well. Once while playing Arcana Evolved I had a rules question, wrote an email to Monte Cook (the author of the book and owner of the company), and the next morning had a personal reply from Monte explaining the rule. Rock solid.
So, while D&D has always been a fun RPG and was definitely the progenitor of that genre, they can go fuck themselves for treating their customers so shabbily for three decades. Unless Paizo runs off the rails or (more likely) gets bought by Hasbro, they have my business.
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 11, 2012 03:53 AM (8/DeP)
Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at January 11, 2012 05:57 AM (qndXR)
Castles & Crusades is my D&D game of choice, now. All the good stuff of 3E without the ridiculous number crunching overhead. Since I'm the DM, that means a lot.
Posted by: grognard at January 11, 2012 06:22 AM (NS2Mo)
I played 2nd edition too much in college.
Some of the 1st edition stuff was excellent, but I never played it. The Manual of the Planes is one of the best gaming books ever written. I bought a lot of the books for the quality of the art and the interesting story.
I had some 3rd edition stuff, but never played it.
In 2010 I sold 90% of my stuff to a local bookstore, which was a lot.
WoW killed the market. You can log in and play an hour without three hours of prep time.
Posted by: Grim at January 11, 2012 06:24 AM (gyNYk)
Of course, I'm still most fond of AD&D First Edition, so take my sentiment for what it's worth. THAC0 fo' life! Or somesuch.
Posted by: JR at January 11, 2012 08:21 AM (gWOju)
Posted by: ace at January 11, 2012 01:23 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at January 11, 2012 01:32 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at January 11, 2012 01:34 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at January 11, 2012 01:38 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Mad Capn Bob at January 11, 2012 01:59 PM (LZ/lZ)
Posted by: Big Mo at January 11, 2012 05:52 PM (MkaSC)
"Whereas in the old system it assumed a large range of things you could do. No choosing necessary; you could just do them."
Yup. And any experienced DM could roll with whatever mad "skill" you could throw at him.
DM: "Okay, you want to blind the guy with that fistful of sand you just grabbed? Make a Dex check at -4 because of the rain. If he fails a R/S/W save we'll assume his clearing dirt out of his eyes for the next round"
And it worked. In fact, some of the funnest instances I remember were when players thought outside the box and Murphy decided to bless/curse them.
One guy even got accidentily impaled by a penguin...
Posted by: Fen at January 12, 2012 12:54 PM (Cih47)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3094 seconds, 481 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








nerd-centric
Posted by: soothsayer at January 10, 2012 01:27 PM (sqkOB)