November 07, 2012
— Pixy Misa Well. We lost. We lost in a disappointing fashion. If these numbers hold, Romney and Obama will have received less votes than Bush and Kerry did in 2004. It was said that Obama would benefit from a low turnout election and he clearly has.
I warn you that this post may be rambling and incoherent. Anger and disappointment can do that to a man.
First, as Gabe pointed out, Romney ran a good campaign. I didn't like Romney and didn't want him in the primaries, but I won't deny that I came to like him as the campaign went along. He did everything he was supposed to do. He campaigned hard. He spent his money wisely. He ran competitively in a lot of states. He made a lot of gains on what John McCain lost in 2008. Unfortunately McCain lost by so much in 2008 and there was too much ground to be made up.
I don't know why or how we only turned out, as of now, some 56 million people. That's less than McCain got. Were those 3 million people independents who voted for McCain but decided to stay home? Were the 10 million people who voted for Obama in 2008 but didn't in 2012 also independents who decided to stay home? Were they demoralized Democrats and Republicans?
If it turns out those 3 million people belong to a demographic that normally votes Republican then we'll have to find a way to appeal to them in 2016 or find a way to win without them.
Regardless, we're going to have to find a way to cobble together coalitions to win elections in the future. The Democrats are the party of free stuff. We can't really compete with that. I'll leave this to better minds, but I can tell you that you probably won't like where we'll have to go to win votes. Think amnesty.
Now I'm of the Monty/Andy school of thought. That which can't go on forever simply won't. This system will collapse. Medicare, Social Security, our debt, etc. It can't last. My hope was that we'd win this election and be able to temporarily fix those problems until the economy started moving again. We needed to buy ourselves time.
Those problems will remain unfixed. Instead the Democrats do will everything they can to push the reckoning further down the road. They'll raise taxes on everyone. By itself, that isn't the end of the world, but it will be devastating when viewed in conjunction with their other policies. What does our future hold? Look at California and Illinois. Last night, those states re-elected all the people responsible for their current state of affairs. You think those responsible will get punished as things get worse? Did FDR ever lose a Presidential election during the depression?
What do I mean by that? Well, you'll have more of your money taken by the government. This isn't taking place in a vacuum. The cost of goods has been rising and will continue to rise. Thanks to the EPA, your utility bills are going to continually increase. Nat Gas, Oil, Coal are going to cost more. But Ben, what about the Marcellus shale and our great coal reserves in Appalachia? Well, in my state we elected an anti-coal/shale Senator and President. Chances are good that your state did as well last night. Do you think they're not going to hinder production with regulations? If the energy producing company has to pay more to comply with regulations, then guess who ends up paying for those increased costs.
Obamacare is now permanent. Are you medium to low income? Are you relatively young? Well guess what happens when you get older and need surgery? You can't afford to pay for it outright, so you won't get it at all. Our healthcare model will mirror Canada or Europe. The poor and middle class will get pain pills and the rich will pay for surgeries and treatments out of pocket. It's almost funny how the party of the working man is going to ruin the healthcare system for the common man.
Oh and the Supreme Court. Yes the Supreme Court. Scalia is 76, Breyer and Ginsburg are 74, and worst of all Justice Kennedy is 76. The same Justice Kennedy who voted against Obamacare and is the swing vote on the court. If he passes or retires...well say goodbye to all the progress we made on gun rights and to some extent on property rights.
I can't even go on. The list is endless.
This isn't Bill Clinton's win in 1996. I hated the Clinton, but I didn't fear that he'd destroy our way of life. We are entering a brave new world. Prepare yourself.
[update] Let's wait for the analysis to come in before we start blaming RINOs, Conversatives, Pro-Lifers, etc etc. We don't yet know who stayed home or voted for Obama over Romney.
[update 2] There is one consolation. Chances are good that the people who voted for Obama will be those who suffer the most. People like you and I can take care of ourselves to an extent. We will suffer, but we're compentent and capable. We will survive, they won't. Quite literally in some cases.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
05:23 AM
| Comments (360)
Post contains 882 words, total size 5 kb.
WTF
Posted by: phreshone at November 07, 2012 05:27 AM (MAhUT)
Posted by: phreshone at November 07, 2012 05:29 AM (MAhUT)
Posted by: blehzor at November 07, 2012 05:30 AM (s9K+V)
Posted by: Texmom at November 07, 2012 05:30 AM (xSFpw)
Mr. Obama’s campaign stitched together a shrunken but still decisive version of his 2008 coalition—single women, the young and culturally liberal, government and other unions workers, and especially minority voters.
http://tinyurl.com/at4s5yx
Posted by: kbdabear at November 07, 2012 05:32 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 07, 2012 05:32 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: TFC3Tweets at November 07, 2012 05:32 AM (bgzAd)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 07, 2012 05:33 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: teebone at November 07, 2012 05:33 AM (YtLSL)
Posted by: JDTAY at November 07, 2012 05:34 AM (a0nis)
The fundamental mistake that Romney (and I) made was about those 23 million he kept talking about. We assumed that they wanted jobs. What they really want is to sit on the couch, watch Honey-Boo-Boo and get more free stuff from Obama.
Civil War by '24!
Posted by: Jaylord at November 07, 2012 05:34 AM (RuF8n)
Posted by: Bostonpat at November 07, 2012 05:34 AM (lejgy)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 07, 2012 05:35 AM (SKX2R)
Were the 10 million people who voted for Obama in 2008 but didn't in 2012 also independents who decided to stay home?
___
Just from what I've learned in my personal network, the ones who registered just to be historic in 2008 stayed home yesterday.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at November 07, 2012 09:26 AM (hlUJY)
__
I agree. I keep hearing about how 52% exit polling said the country was on the wrong track, so how did preazy get re-elected? Well duh, dead people don't answer exit polls nor do manufactured votes.
Posted by: kallisto at November 07, 2012 05:35 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: we are so screwed at November 07, 2012 05:35 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: Tim Vincent at November 07, 2012 05:35 AM (aQyt7)
Posted by: Evil Libertarian at November 07, 2012 05:35 AM (rIxVD)
Ban dildos.
Posted by: Rick Santorum at November 07, 2012 05:36 AM (mnpQF)
Posted by: Saxinis at November 07, 2012 05:36 AM (zPa3K)
Posted by: El Kabong at November 07, 2012 05:36 AM (JycCV)
2008 Presidential election
Obama 69,498,215 (52.93%) McCain 59,948,240 (45.66)
2012 election
Obama 59,633,456 (50.33%) Romney 57,003,614 (48.11%)
Note; not all votes counted yet.
Note that the Dem turnout was much lower as expected, but Republican turnout is also much lower which was NOT expected.
Posted by: Vic at November 07, 2012 05:36 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Average Jen at November 07, 2012 05:37 AM (D9XwM)
Posted by: Danny at November 07, 2012 05:37 AM (YZbNi)
The "silver lining" here is that you've already got your open military service, and soon you'll have your marriage too.
At THAT point maybe gays can start looking after their wallets for a change.
Posted by: Looking closely at November 07, 2012 05:37 AM (6Q9g2)
Yet all of our "betters" in the so-called conservative ranks will tell us to keep ignoring the fraud, deceit and outright lies that have pushed our country over the edge.
They will blame Rmoney for being a "weak" candidate, and blame him for being a Mormon. We will be told to accept Choom Boy's "historic" reelection, and prepare for the future.
I suspect there were those on the losing side in WWII who said the same thing while the bombs were falling. We have "miracle weapons," folks, and victory can still be ours.
The truth is simpler: Democrats ignore the law, while we ignore law-breaking.
I'm sorry the good people will have to take the biggest hit while the entitlement crowd complete the destruction they began in the 1930s. But it is always so. Failure hits all, whether deserved or undeserved. There is no satisfaction in being right when you lose.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 07, 2012 05:37 AM (yKUrR)
Morons.
Remember:
90% of America is worthless, lazy and stupid."
Seriously, what do people think Obama even DID during Sandy?
Posted by: Bostonpat at November 07, 2012 05:37 AM (lejgy)
I'm so glad we had that storm last week because I think the storm was one of those things. No, politically I should say. Not in terms of hurting people. The storm brought in possibilities for good politics.
http://tinyurl.com/cjav47q
Posted by: kbdabear at November 07, 2012 05:37 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: Ian S. at November 07, 2012 05:38 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 07, 2012 05:38 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: Danny at November 07, 2012 05:38 AM (YZbNi)
Yes, the entire system is headed for collapse. The best we could've hoped for was to mitigate the damages and the resultant loss of life.
Now, today, you must begin to lay the ground work for the future. You must begin to work locally, in your own neighborhoods, towns and counties, laying a foundation for the future of freedom.
Not only must you lay such a foundation, you must plan how to survive during the coming collapse - and the resultant wars - but also how to thrive, and how to save and even spread our philosophy of individual freedom and liberty.
Over the twenty years, the Republicans have screwed the pooch. You must also re-examine your own premises and even much of your own personal philosophies. There's a reason you keep losing the big elections and on the most important issues, and it has little to do with the MSM or even with your own opponents. It has to do with you. This is politics and economics, not religion, faith or even belief in an ideology. This is not what you want, when you want, just the way that you want. This is not a dream world. This is reality. You must learn to face it directly. Confront it, and make the best of it, no matter how ugly you might think it to be.
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at November 07, 2012 05:38 AM (WwR1j)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at November 07, 2012 05:38 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: Brother Cavil presents at November 07, 2012 05:38 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Bostonpat at November 07, 2012 09:34 AM (lejgy)
__
Please don't apologize, the attitude you describe has infected the entire nation. It is the result of a secularist attitude that results in narcissism and hubris. It's all around us, it has infected every race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation and even some people's pets. Just look at our neighboring Governor Christie as Exhibit A.
Fuck Mitt Romney over on the eve of a crucial election? Why not, after all: it's all about him, he was griefstricken about the drowned rollercoasater.and looking to next year's governor race.
Posted by: kallisto at November 07, 2012 05:39 AM (jm/9g)
I don't think pandering to amnesty gets us anything but more of the base sitting it out. The pundits this morning on Fox said Florida Hispanics were more and more Puerto Ricans and they vote overwhelmingly Democrat. So do the Mexicans. The only Hispanic group who support Republicans are ex Cubans.
Posted by: Vic at November 07, 2012 05:39 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: TFC3Tweets at November 07, 2012 05:40 AM (bgzAd)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 07, 2012 05:40 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at November 07, 2012 05:40 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Ian S. at November 07, 2012 05:40 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: TFC3Tweets at November 07, 2012 05:41 AM (bgzAd)
'Unfortunately McCain lost by so much in 2008 and there was too much ground to be made up.'
I don't agree with this. Each election is different. They are not incremental.
It's not a matter of 'making up ground'. It is a matter of getting more votes than the other guy.
The reason why Obama got more votes is that more people agree with him. The US has crossed that point of no return where the republicans are going to have to reinvent themselves in a manner similar to a European ‘conservative’ party to survive and the decline of the West will continue now at an ever accelerating pace. There is not much time left.
Posted by: Steve D at November 07, 2012 05:41 AM (flNRe)
Posted by: Ian S. at November 07, 2012 05:41 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: Bostonpat at November 07, 2012 09:37 AM (lejgy)
__
He wore a preazy FEMA jacket and looked at the drowned rollercoaster and hugged a lady who was crying?
Chris Matthews actually said: THANK GOD FOR THE STORM.
Posted by: kallisto at November 07, 2012 05:41 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 07, 2012 05:42 AM (ddb4x)
Allow me to apologize on behalf of gay people
Posted by: Bostonpat
On the upside, which group is going to be eviscerated by the coming tax storm? Middle to high income unmarried singles with no kids in blue state urban areas.
So, at least a bit of Schadenfreude there.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 07, 2012 05:42 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: runner at November 07, 2012 05:42 AM (WR5xI)
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 07, 2012 09:37 AM (yKUrR)
If they committed fraud to increase their total... its didn't work... the only way their fraud "worked" is if they have the polling stations programmed to "under-report" republican votes... all the "walking around money" didn't help them yesterday... we haven't necessarily created the permanent welfare class... but there were 5 million people yesterday who didn't care, who should have
Posted by: phreshone at November 07, 2012 05:42 AM (MAhUT)
Posted by: M. Murcek at November 07, 2012 05:42 AM (GJUgF)
I hate to see pudding go to waste.
I hear Michael Moore's ass has a vacancy.
Posted by: Gerry at November 07, 2012 05:42 AM (jQm+J)
Posted by: poots at November 07, 2012 05:43 AM (gDytV)
Brilliant!
I think the answer (at least, in part) is to actually have a candidate who *stands* for conservative values so the voters have a much sharper choice. As the old saying goes, give them a choice between a Democrat and a Democrat, and they'll pick the Democrat every time. And I say that as someone who thinks Romney ran about as good a campaign as was possible for a candidate like him to run. I like him personally now...he grew on me as the campaign went on. But, if you nominate a guy who can't even get 3-4 million McCain voters to show up and vote 4 years later, something is badly wrong with the types of nominees we're picking to run.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 07, 2012 05:43 AM (qEkGZ)
I'm sick to my stomach. I'm glad my parents are gone and can't witness this. My socialist sister can gloat all she wants. I'll never give her another dollar.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 07, 2012 05:43 AM (UOM48)
I think you would lose that bet. Last night was about a party that says "here's your Free Shit" and a party that says "you have to earn what you get."
If you have a bill to pay, and one side says to pay up and the other counsels throwing the bill in the trash, who do you listen to? We got the answer last night.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 07, 2012 05:43 AM (yKUrR)
Again, an unforced error by the Stupid Party.
Posted by: Gerry at November 07, 2012 05:43 AM (jQm+J)
Posted by: A. at November 07, 2012 05:43 AM (bm6ls)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 07, 2012 05:44 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: Krispy Kreme Chris Christie at November 07, 2012 05:45 AM (ypzqs)
I posted this at the bottom of the "Let it Burn" thread, and if re-posting it here isn't cool, I apologize. But I really do want to know these things.
Can I ask a question? I've read here that my U.S. passport is my biggest liability, and that being a U.S. citizen is not a good value. Why do you say that? Seriously? And what happens if your renounce citizenship? Is it permanent? Clearly you have to get another passport to travel, right? And what is a go-green card? I've been living abroad for 13 of the past 15 years, with 2-3 years more coming, so it's not like it would change a whole lot for me. I would appreciate any real information about this.
Posted by: MikeinAmman at November 07, 2012 05:45 AM (JFcfR)
Ten Seconds to Hell, Yesterday's Enemy, Cash on Demand, The Savage Guns, Maniac, Chamber of Horrors.
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 07, 2012 05:45 AM (GeD0A)
Bill, you've been hinting at it, and I'm hesitant to go there. But I'm suspicious too. I don't how it could be proved though.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at November 07, 2012 05:45 AM (JxIkO)
Posted by: Rorschach at November 07, 2012 05:45 AM (5iuEW)
Posted by: Joffen, fucking sunshine patriot at November 07, 2012 05:45 AM (Cl95C)
Posted by: tadcf at November 07, 2012 05:45 AM (6yjdq)
We are a nation of crackheads that needs to hit bottom as quickly as possible; thus we'll rebound higher.
Posted by: Shirley at November 07, 2012 05:46 AM (U4ceb)
Oh and the Supreme Court. Yes the Supreme Court. Scalia is 76, Breyer and Ginsburg are 74, and worst of all Justice Kennedy is 76. The same Justice Kennedy who voted against Obamacare and is the swing vote on the court. If he passes or retires...well say goodbye to all the progress we made on gun rights and to some extent on property rights.
THIS is what scares me the most. Without the Supreme Court, dictators can do what they want, see Venezuela.
Executive orders, etc will by pass Congress.
They said this might be the last election, and they could very well be right.
Posted by: Al Franken at November 07, 2012 05:46 AM (wR+pz)
"Regardless, we're going to have to find a way to cobble together coalitions to win elections in the future. The Democrats are the party of free stuff. We can't really compete with that. I'll leave this to better minds, but I can tell you that you probably won't like where we'll have to go to win votes. Think amnesty."
The Democrats can only be the party of free stuff for now. Eventually, (and I'm thinking 1 or 2 years, tops) that is going to crash hard on reality.
Posted by: Advo at November 07, 2012 05:46 AM (7vbG1)
----
Yup.
We are the party of "work hard.... eat your peas.... clean your room"
The country is now "free shit for you.... do want you want... stay up til 2:00am on a school night."
Tipping point indeed.
Posted by: fixerupper at November 07, 2012 05:46 AM (yzX2R)
You know, everyone's is pointing fingers at the evangelicals, but if Catholics had shown up to vote in their impressive numbers in swing states, we would have seen a different result.
I'm an observant Roman Catholic. Most in my faith community don't give a shit about the bishops, about religious freedom, about the traditions and history of our Church, or anything that would take away from their feeling of being special because they voted on behalf of the little guy. Again: narcissism and hubris.
Posted by: kallisto at November 07, 2012 05:46 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: M. Murcek at November 07, 2012 05:46 AM (GJUgF)
Um, an even larger number of Americans don't have any idea what Mormonism is.
Ass.
Posted by: burned cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 07, 2012 05:46 AM (jo069)
Posted by: JoeyPalmTree at November 07, 2012 05:47 AM (lhQRS)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 07, 2012 05:47 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Joffen, fucking sunshine patriot at November 07, 2012 05:47 AM (Cl95C)
I'd be willing to bet a large sum of money that Obama last evening was elected by the margin of evangelicals who stayed home and didn't vote specifically because of Romney's Mormonism.
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II
If that we're true, you would expect to see a narrower margin in the results from heavily evangelical Red states. That doesn't appear to be the case.
Now, Blue states where the moderate Republicans nest.....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 07, 2012 05:48 AM (kdS6q)
Ah, the retardation.
Let's see, the storm allowed Barry to circumvent regular procedures and "cut through the red tape" of a sclerotic and ill-prepared bureaucracy in order to release whateverthefuck kind of aid which leaves Staten Island still FUBAR.
Then the Compassionate Left assures us what we need is MORE permanent sclerotic and ill-prepared bureaucracy, so that some future "leader" can again circumvent the rules under which it operates (rules designed to offer a modicum of protection against corruption), and look like a hero or something.
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 07, 2012 05:48 AM (RsSRf)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 07, 2012 05:48 AM (SKX2R)
'I don't understand how W got 62.0 million in 2004, McLame got 59.9 million in 2008 and Romney only got 57.0 million in 2012.'
The totals are not in yet.
Posted by: Steve D at November 07, 2012 05:48 AM (flNRe)
Posted by: VJay at November 07, 2012 05:48 AM (q5NFp)
Posted by: jewells45 says Romney wins in a landslide at November 07, 2012 05:48 AM (1hNQS)
Posted by: dr. shatterhand at November 07, 2012 05:49 AM (n/ogz)
Posted by: Roy - I am John Galt at November 07, 2012 05:49 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 07, 2012 05:49 AM (vCK/R)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 07, 2012 05:49 AM (sgNEe)
Posted by: Jack Burton at November 07, 2012 05:49 AM (L+4Fu)
Reagan won against JC with just a little more then 50% of the vote. The Independent got about 7% while JC got around 40% of the vote.
Romney got damn near 50% of the vote.
I have no point other then Reagan *might* have been able to beat Obama and that Romney did a pretty good job.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 07, 2012 05:49 AM (feFL6)
Richard Murdock + MainStream Media
Hurricane Sandy + Chris Cristie + MainStream Media
Any Questions?
Posted by: jeremiah God Damn Barack Obama the Mother Fucking SCoaMF wright at November 07, 2012 05:50 AM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at November 07, 2012 05:50 AM (JxIkO)
How about we blame the half of the country that can't rub two brain cells together and imagine where this is all headed?
Posted by: red sweater at November 07, 2012 05:51 AM (CUi62)
Posted by: Tim at November 07, 2012 05:51 AM (xq7pr)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 07, 2012 05:51 AM (sgNEe)
There are two competing philosophies in the country. One believes in freedom, one believes in getting free stuff. One believes in the power of the individual, one believe in the power of the state. These philosophies are irreconcilable.
It is time for a divorce.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at November 07, 2012 05:51 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 07, 2012 05:51 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Ian S. at November 07, 2012 05:52 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: El Kabong at November 07, 2012 05:52 AM (JycCV)
Posted by: jewells45 at November 07, 2012 05:52 AM (1hNQS)
Posted by: Baldy at November 07, 2012 05:52 AM (opS9C)
If it turns out they did.. well.. fuck it.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 07, 2012 05:52 AM (f9c2L)
We just just HAD a "character election." What we learned is that character doesn't matter. Free Stuff and skin color matter.
Romney could have been Jesus Christ reincarnated and he would have lost. Affirmative action is the path to victory.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 07, 2012 05:52 AM (yKUrR)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at November 07, 2012 05:53 AM (BuSM8)
Posted by: schizoid at November 07, 2012 05:53 AM (mnpQF)
- Romney won voters age 30+ by 1.8 million. He lost voters 18-30 by 5.1 million. FIVE POINT ONE MILLION. The under-30 crowd is all but lost to us because they are totally conditioned in the ways of gay "marriage," "reproductive rights" (abortion on demand, free contraception, consequence-free sex), and "making the rich pay their fair share." They learn it in the schools and in college.
- Obama got 93% of the black vote. He got about 95% in 2008. So much for gay marriage being a wedge issue. Melanin is thicker than issues, but remember, it's only racist for whites to vote racially. It's OK for everybody else.
Posted by: Moose4 at November 07, 2012 05:53 AM (W15Fy)
Posted by: El Kabong at November 07, 2012 05:53 AM (JycCV)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at November 07, 2012 05:53 AM (JxIkO)
Posted by: jeremiah God Damn Barack Obama the Mother Fucking SCoaMF wright at November 07, 2012 05:53 AM (ovpNn)
2. what happened to zero's 10-13 million votes ?
too early to say what happened....but the fact that W got 44% of hispanic vote and Romney 27% should be considered before yelling at evangelicals
Posted by: runner at November 07, 2012 05:54 AM (WR5xI)
Posted by: Ian S. at November 07, 2012 05:54 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at November 07, 2012 05:54 AM (gznAu)
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com "Game Called"
Wikipedia - Cloward Piven strategy
Posted by: Ben Hale at November 07, 2012 05:54 AM (iyRtB)
There's some really depressing talk on our side today and then there's some really stupid shit being said. The depressing talk is understandable (doom, collapse, unplugging), but the stupid shit (Impeachment!, ditch SoCons!) is...well...stupid shit.
And I'm not even close to a SoCon.
Circular Firing Squad - DISMISSED.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 07, 2012 05:54 AM (uD2fR)
Chris Christie's butthurt over being passed over for VP and cutting off his nose to spite his face by giving a public blowjob to TFG. His praise of Obama for standing around in a jacket and looking presidential buttressed the MSM's facade that TFG's FEMA was doing much better than Bush's
Gas prices high but not rising significantly. People have gotten used to 3.50 a gallon as the new normal
Obamacare hasn't taken effect yet. People still think they're going to get free visits to the doctor
The MBM has fooled enough people into thinking that the economy is "recovering" but TFG needs more time to "undo Bush's damage"
Too many low information voters who know all about The Kardashians, Honey Boo-Boo, Twilight, and Glee, but don't know about Solyndra, Fast & Furious, and believe that Benghazi was caused by a very obscure Youtube video
Candy Crowley sandbagging Mitt with a lie during the debate, which shook him up and took Benghazi off the table
These are just some of the reasons ...
Posted by: kbdabear at November 07, 2012 05:54 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 07, 2012 05:55 AM (sgNEe)
FORWARD
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 07, 2012 05:55 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: JDTAY at November 07, 2012 05:55 AM (a0nis)
can tell you that you probably won't like where we'll have to go to win votes - amnesty
-----
Worked in 2008.
-----
Here's a gem from the Teas Dem chmn regarding Ted Cruz (via Huff Post):
“His last name may be Cruz, but there is nothing, not an ounce, about the way he thinks and the way he has led his life that in any way is similar to Hispanics in the state of Texas and all across America … Ted Cruz is as much Hispanic … as Tom Cruise.”
Posted by: RioBravo at November 07, 2012 05:55 AM (eEfYn)
Well to look on the bright side at least that old lady at the Rosebud Nursing Home can stay home and play bingo today instead of going out to burn the motherfucker down.
Posted by: kallisto at November 07, 2012 05:55 AM (jm/9g)
And he's not alone. Let the entitled class send their worthless spawn to fight and die in Barry's next war.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 07, 2012 05:55 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at November 07, 2012 09:45 AM (JxIkO)
I mentioned this on your blog a few days ago. Honestly, how hard would it be to hack into the software for the electronic voting machines, but a algorithm in that, say, skims 1 in 25 or 30 Romney votes off and adds them to Obama's total. You end up showing the same, correct number of people having voted in a give precinct, but the subtotals are different. It wouldn't take much - you wouldn't want to steal many for fear of raising suspicions - but just a few in an election like this would do. (shrug) That said, I don't know that there was any more fraud this time than usual (there's always some, and almost all of it by Dems), but that idea sure would be tempting to the Dems to try and I do know various people have successfully hacked into voting machine software before just to prove how vulnerable they are. It's something Instapundit harps on all the time..about going back to paper ballots and making photo ID mandatory, etc. It would explain all the anecdotal evidence of high turnout in various GOP areas that doesn't seem to have translated to high GOP vote totals. Honestly, right now, I'm in the "give us free shit" people outnumbering the producers at the polls camp, but the possibility of something like I describe above surely exists and needs to be guarded against. Well, if the GOP is actually ever going to try to win another national election, it does anyway.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 07, 2012 05:56 AM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at November 07, 2012 05:56 AM (Rwrs+)
Posted by: Elize Nayden at November 07, 2012 05:56 AM (bonPh)
Things I learned last night:
1. Calling someone else racist works
2. Free stuff will win over not free stuff every time
3. Libertarianism is dead. It presupposes personal reliance. Personal reliance aren't what we're about anymore
4. Broken glass republicans will vote unless you can't find them
5. the polls are right.
6. Both parties internal polls were off in Florida and NC.
7. Fuck this country. Math says its toast. Start prepositioning for what rises from its ashes.
Posted by: JollyRoger at November 07, 2012 05:57 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: RondinellaMamma at November 07, 2012 05:57 AM (53riN)
Posted by: Brother Cavil presents at November 07, 2012 05:58 AM (GBXon)
Well, our son said if General Pissypants was re-elected he was leaving the Marines this fall.
And he's not alone. Let the entitled class send their worthless spawn to fight and die in Barry's next war.
My brother is going to get out too. The guys he knows are superpissed about Benghazi. The writing is on the wall and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people starting getting out.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at November 07, 2012 05:58 AM (JxMoP)
Yeah, because fifteen million more Democrats will really help us win next time.
But forget that, at current rates legal immigration is going to add some 5 million or so new voters to the rolls by 2016. How are they going to vote? Remember all those news stories about how popular Romney was internationally? Me neither.
Posted by: Matt at November 07, 2012 05:58 AM (Aqc5i)
America is a center right country
"It's the economy, stupid."
National Review
Dick Morris
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 07, 2012 05:58 AM (8sCoq)
People who either;
1. Never had a job
2. Are still in school or college
3. Have a menial low-paying 'first' job
How in the hell do you appeal to that faction? Did a whisper campaign
that Obama's gonna pay our student loans off occur?
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 07, 2012 05:58 AM (feFL6)
In 08 McCain took it over Obama, 1,034,896 to 862,449, or 53.9-44.9%. Total votes 1,897,345.
Romney just took it here 1,005,870 to 799,026, or 55-43.7%. Total votes 1,804,896.
So in short, the total SC turnout was 95% of the 2008 turnout. I don't think that's unusual for a re-election effort.
If you look at turnout by party breakdown, the GOP pulled 97% of its McCain vote; the Dems took only 92.6% of their '08 Obama vote.
And note that Romney lost SC to Gingrich in the GOP primaries, the first time in 30+ years that the eventual GOP nominee didn't take SC. So its not like SC was enamored by Romney six months ago.
The point is, at least in SC, I don't see evidence that Romney repelled evangelicals or any other particular bloc. Overall turnout was down, and Romney took a significantly bigger piece of it than McCain. If you're going to make that sort of assumption, I think the only fair conclusion is that Romney had MORE appeal to evangelicals than McCain did.
Posted by: Looking closely at November 07, 2012 05:59 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: rockmom at November 07, 2012 05:59 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 07, 2012 06:00 AM (8sCoq)
There is a third. Mine.
I hate everything; there is not a single thing I don't hate.
Posted by: Shirley at November 07, 2012 06:00 AM (U4ceb)
We are truly in uncharted waters and my knees just fucking buckled at the thought of it all.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 07, 2012 09:49 AM (vCK/R)
Who's to say he'll even bother with the running part if he doesn't feel like it?
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 07, 2012 06:00 AM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: twoslaps at November 07, 2012 06:00 AM (pbUEP)
Posted by: El Kabong at November 07, 2012 06:00 AM (JycCV)
"The Walking Dead" is reality. Who new? Maybe "Red Dawn" will be prophetic.
Posted by: c6dave at November 07, 2012 06:00 AM (I08eI)
It's not quite as bad the Khmer Rouge rounding up everyone who wears eyeglasses, but it will be plenty bad.
Posted by: navybrat at November 07, 2012 06:00 AM (cAlrv)
Well, I know who voted for Osocialist. About 50 million people receiving food stamps and the like.
Romney was wrong about the 47%. Its over 50% now. It matters not who we would have nominated or will in the future or how they run the campaign. If you try to outbid them, you become worse than them (from a conservative point of view).
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 07, 2012 06:00 AM (PHb2k)
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 07, 2012 06:01 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at November 07, 2012 06:01 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: ET at November 07, 2012 06:01 AM (s72/N)
I don't want to hear ONE lib/Democrat/taker or whatever bitch when it all starts going to shit (which will be January 1). The money will run out. The money is going to start leaving the country tout de suite.
Thank God I don't have kids. That's all I can say.
Posted by: bicentennialguy at November 07, 2012 06:01 AM (RUocD)
Posted by: Baldy at November 07, 2012 06:01 AM (opS9C)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 07, 2012 06:01 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Whitehall at November 07, 2012 06:02 AM (1+mGd)
I'm not convinced that this election wasn't won as a result of massive fraud.
Think about it - there were, what, twenty different types of more or less independently derived data that all pointed in the same general direction - everything from polls to enthusiasm to % of independents to % of white voters, etc. etc.
All pointing the SAME WAY.
And they were all wrong? Really? So even though several polls all said PA was very close, and BOTH campaigns were treating the state as an obvious proze to be won, the state went to Obama by 9 points?
Something doesn't connect here.
Now, what was the one area where the GOP did reasonably well last night? The House races. We won a few, lost a few more, probably have a net -5 to -10 in aggregate once the dust settles. But about what we expected, I think.
What's different between House races, and Senate and the Presidential races?
Senate and Presidential races are statewide races, which means they are much easier to defraud. They are more susceptible to boxes of filled out ballots suddenly appearing in Philly or Milwaukee or Cleveland, at the behest of the Dem-run urban political machines. It's actually harder to defraud House elections, since most of these districts are NOT in hard-core Dem-urban areas, and hence are much less likely to be liable to massive defrauding.
Something to think about.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at November 07, 2012 06:02 AM (+inic)
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 07, 2012 06:02 AM (RsSRf)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at November 07, 2012 06:02 AM (/eBe8)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 07, 2012 06:02 AM (vCK/R)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 07, 2012 06:02 AM (sgNEe)
If the ditherer-in-chief wants you dead, you will be dead.
Four Dead In Benghazi.
Dead Border Patrol Agent.
Complicit Media
Posted by: Watergate Had No Body Count at November 07, 2012 06:02 AM (xLOnw)
Posted by: twoslaps at November 07, 2012 06:03 AM (pbUEP)
No to Amnesty, no fucking way. Posted by: Joffen, fucking sunshine patriot at November 07, 2012 09:45 AM
See, that's the thing I don't get. I know people who have immigrated from Canada and from Mexico legally. They paid lawyers and fees and followed the rules and couldn't even go to their former countries for a visit for years. They are all opposed to amnesty. They realize it makes them chumps if someone can walk across a border somewhere and just get handed what they worked so hard to attain. I guess, that's it. You do not value things for which you do not pay.
Posted by: Hannibal Lecter at November 07, 2012 06:03 AM (bAGA/)
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 07, 2012 06:03 AM (RsSRf)
And, no. "paper ballots" don't solve anything. It's how the votes are COUNTED, not marked.
Posted by: Gerry at November 07, 2012 06:03 AM (jQm+J)
But you must have a Hispanic on one side and a black on the other, and one must be gay and/or female, or you will be shot on sight.
Obama is ready to work together with you ... but you must submit to Him. (He learned that from Muhammad). /sarc
Posted by: Illini bill at November 07, 2012 06:03 AM (iogmr)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 07, 2012 06:03 AM (SKX2R)
Posted by: Cackfinger at November 07, 2012 06:03 AM (CCHli)
Posted by: Shirley at November 07, 2012 10:00 AM<<<<
I think I love you.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 07, 2012 06:04 AM (PHb2k)
Posted by: Janir at November 07, 2012 06:04 AM (j3JxV)
But I can't comprehend how Romney got 3 mil less than McStain, especially considering the dire economic circumstances.
That just doesn't pass the smell test.
But if that is in fact accurate, it is an indictment against the GOP for sure.
You would really have to think really hard before donating (tighter) money in the future to that political entity again.
If the hearings on the Benghazi fiasco now go nowhere, it is a sign that we are living in an oblivious, third world style society replete with a supplicant and corrupted faux media.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 07, 2012 06:04 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: jewells45 says Romney wins in a landslide at November 07, 2012 09:48 AM (1hNQS)------ ------ -------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------Osceola County, East Orlando and eastern Lake Co. Yeah. Those are my peeps. The district is now 41% Hispanic and Grayson managed to get rid of John Quinones and replace him with Todd Long. Democrat picking the Republican as McCaskill did Akin. It's not a good formula for us.
Not that Quinones would have won a blue district, but he would have made it competitive. Stuck with the most clownish buffoon in US congressional history again. Yay!
Posted by: Beagle at November 07, 2012 06:04 AM (sOtz/)
And what do we say when they say "well, Obama inherited a bad economy"?
Yeah, from HIMSELF.
I just had to send an email to my Active Duty Navy Son.... appologizing to him for my generation...
My Parents were in the Greatest Generation.... I am in the Stupidest.
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 07, 2012 06:04 AM (lZBBB)
50% of the country wants free shit (and pays no taxes). Until everyone has skin in the game this shit will continue. And that will take an Art V convention.
Posted by: Vic at November 07, 2012 06:05 AM (YdQQY)
Can not accept elections results. Never, ever, ever were so many who voted for Obama in '08 eager to vote him out. With low enthusiasm for the disaster in the White House, and even die hard democrats refusing to back the disaster they voted for in'08, the STENCH of the election results is overwhelming.
Posted by: Deli Llama at November 07, 2012 06:05 AM (lGu1O)
1. Never had a job
2. Are still in school or college
3. Have a menial low-paying 'first' job
How in the hell do you appeal to that faction? Did a whisper campaign
that Obama's gonna pay our student loans off occur?
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at November 07, 2012 09:58 AM (feFL6)
I'm 18-30! I know a lot of 18-30 year olds who voted for the SCOAMF. Here's the thing about 18-30 year olds voting for democrats: They tend not to understand economics, so even promising cheap student loans and "Great paying jobs in the future" tends to work.
I have many fights trying to explain to them how economics works. Several of them believe Upper 1% starts at over a million dollars a year in income, they fail to see the distinction between "wealth" and "income" (so they get confused on how taxation actually works.) It's a mess.
Posted by: tsrblke at November 07, 2012 06:05 AM (GaqMa)
I saw the strike list in several counties in OH and the numbers of R votes DO NOT match up with the number of Rs we had voting on the strike list.
Not by a long shot.
So, (making up numbers here) if the vote count says 20,000 Rs voted, our strike list had 30,000 Rs voting.
They should be the exact same. Plus, I saw these earlier in the night and I know that I voted at 8AM and was called twice because my name was not marked of the voting roll for yesterday even though I signed the book and showed my ID.
How is that possible?
Yes, our Sec in charge of voting is an R. That is why it made no sense to see R/R's name as the last name on the Pres. ballot under 3 or 4 other names. I bet the guy in the 2nd slot garnered voted by people who waited in line for hours and just assumed they were voting R/R when actually they were voting for a no name in the 2nd slot.
And yes, our Sec of voting is an R so I don't get how he allowed R/R to be the last of 4 or 5 names on the ballot.
I bet a lot of people voted for the guy in the 2nd slot just assuming that it was R/R because they were stupid, tired of waiting in line, etc.
Posted by: momma at November 07, 2012 06:05 AM (fKyrY)
Backin 1987, my father bought a Toyota Corolla. When his family found out, they treated him as a pariah. He was the first of a large mid-Western family to not buy American. My father was sick of the inferior products GM was producing and decided to get a highly-rated and reliable Japanese car. His sibilings and relatives- that logic was wrong; just buy American - namely GM.
Now, I will no longer ever buy a GM. Ever. Screw that company and most of all, screw their unions. Because in the end - that's what gave Obama the election: the states like Ohio and Michigan.
Companies like Toyota and Volkswagen and Honda build cars in non-union plants around the nation. They don't get handouts or taxpayer dollars to avoid bankruptcy. Of course, they are also mostly in red states.
Congrats. I will buy those cars even if GM makes the best cars on the planet. And even if Democrats pass a law forcing Americans to buy a GM, I will forgo a car, buy a vespa, and strap two car seats on the back.
Posted by: Hoi Polloi Wingnuttia at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (xvtYZ)
Posted by: Jumbo Shrimp at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (DGIjM)
13 million people LESS voted this year than in 2008...
and early voters and election day voters reported unprecedented long lines at the polls.
I am stumped.
Posted by: RondinellaMamma at November 07, 2012 09:57 AM (53riN)
Perhaps folks don't understand the literal definition of "unprecedented." I live in Maryland, a state as safely blue as any out there. In '08, I voted on election day. The line was very long. This year, I voted early. Still a long line, but it's hard to compare under different circumstances, four years between events.
I want to believe we turned out in record numbers, but I don't trust people to be accurate observers of truly large numbers. Anecdotes are not reliable.
Posted by: red sweater at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (CUi62)
It's like having to choose how to die, coitus with Helen Thomas or coitus with Susan Estrich. Either way, you're dead and your last memories are horrible.
Posted by: Moose4 at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (W15Fy)
Posted by: CraigR3521 at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (IcGZb)
As one who did not vote for Romney, but who has no inherent oppostion to voting GOP I think the only lesson you need to learn from this result is that the country is somewhere to the right of center fiscally and somewhere to the left of center on other issues. The GOP establishment is to the left of center fiscally and to the right of center on other issues. Your establishment candidates can thus no longer deliver victory. In the name of electability you allowed your establishment to nominate the candidate least likely to win.
The GOP establishment may be philosophically opposed to such a a change, but it should not be too difficult to do if change is desired.
Posted by: BVBigBro at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (XrVRY)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (RFl8c)
Posted by: Jack Burton at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (L+4Fu)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Walkers! at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (C4dFv)
The America I grew up in (I was born in 195
Posted by: Jones in CO at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (8sCoq)
It may simply be that Republican presidents are no longer electable, ever. The Galt strategy at this point might be the only thing left. Make you and your family as comfortable as possible, and wait for the whole thing to collapse.
Posted by: Matt at November 07, 2012 06:06 AM (Aqc5i)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 07, 2012 06:07 AM (uD2fR)
Civil War by '24!
Jaylord right on the $$$. This was THE most transformational election ever...
It's a version of the North & South all over again, the wealth creators vs. the moochers. I'm not sure what "appealing" to these people means... If it's pandering, count me out. If you can't make a decision about your future & the future of your children, one that a 6 yr. old child could easily make, I DON'T WANT you with me. We shouldn't be talking of building a fence along Mexico... more like a fence along Calif., Illinois, Mass., NY, Penn. Fuck 'em.
Posted by: jwillmoney at November 07, 2012 06:07 AM (zU03n)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 07, 2012 06:07 AM (8Hnjw)
Posted by: Palmcroft at November 07, 2012 06:08 AM (P9kUH)
Posted by: Auntie Doodles at November 07, 2012 06:08 AM (JcN7j)
Posted by: Evilpens at November 07, 2012 06:09 AM (ck76k)
"The Dow is down over 200 points. The economy how do it work?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 07, 2012 10:06 AM (1Jaio) "
I wouldn't be shocked to see it up 200 at the bell. It stopped making sense long ago.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 07, 2012 06:09 AM (uD2fR)
Posted by: 80sBaby at November 07, 2012 06:09 AM (YjDyJ)
Posted by: Jean at November 07, 2012 06:09 AM (tmzN0)
But [update2] The media will sitll do everything possible to make sure the Republicans are to blame for the misery that Obama pt bring.
Posted by: Trevor (@TJexcite) at November 07, 2012 06:09 AM (Ea64Y)
Let the other side suffer for their bullshit. Lefties have no problems screwing you if you are a conservative, so I will have no problems screwing them back any way I can.
Watch the employment figures go up even farther. Don't expect charitable donations. Nothing. Just suck it!
Posted by: Walkers! at November 07, 2012 06:09 AM (C4dFv)
Posted by: Auntie Doodles at November 07, 2012 06:10 AM (JcN7j)
Posted by: Your Inner Voice at November 07, 2012 06:10 AM (C34KJ)
What has happened to my country? When did I become the outsider?
I don't know if serving in the military, or volunteer firefighting, or raising money for the poor is proper for me anymore. Maybe I'm just naively contributing to the problem by allowing others to benefit unjustly and selfishly, free from obligation to contribute. Only to take for themselves and dictate to me what I am obliged to do.
When did I become the bad guy?
Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at November 07, 2012 06:10 AM (70Mth)
Posted by: Jack Burton at November 07, 2012 06:11 AM (L+4Fu)
On TV you will hear a large number of Republican talking heads saying the same thing. But, notice that you will hear 100% of Democrats saying that the Republicans have to do amnesty for their own good. Why are Democrats going out of their way to offer such good advice to Republicans? Because they love the Republicans and can't stand to see them lose elections.
Gosh, it's almost like the Bush/Rove immigration strategy was meant not to help the nation, or the GOP, but was meant to perpetuated the Bush dynasty...who can save us in 2016? Only Jeb.
Posted by: Links at November 07, 2012 06:11 AM (RgIRJ)
That's a dandy attitude, pal. At least if you happen to be young enough to see a future beyond the collapse.
For many of us, "next time" or "the future" is too friggin' late.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at November 07, 2012 06:11 AM (yKUrR)
Posted by: Hopeless at November 07, 2012 10:06 AM (RFl8c)
The hierarchy may be suing the government, but that doesnt necessarily mean that catholics showed up for us. I think we offered SoCons of all religions little in this campaign.
Posted by: Elize Nayden at November 07, 2012 06:11 AM (bonPh)
Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at November 07, 2012 06:11 AM (2rMmy)
And it was close... 59.9 million versus 59 million in 2004...
basically equal given population growth
With the economic conditions, Team Obama had to make it a low-turnout-election... and the negative advertising coupled with the MSM's lack-of-coverage successfully drove down GOP turnout...
Posted by: phreshone at November 07, 2012 06:12 AM (MAhUT)
Posted by: Jack Burton at November 07, 2012 10:06 AM (L+4Fu)
That shouldn't find any objectors here. Weren't we all calling for him to get out of the race before the ballot was set in stone?
He said a very very very stupid thing and tanked his chances in a race the GOP should have won. No matter what his policies or credentials, he proved he can't be a reliable politician. Until people stop caring about issues irrelevant to the office in question (i.e., never), politicians *have* to be the loathsome pukes who dodge issues and flip flop to whatever's popular at the moment. We force them to be that way. We have no right to complain about the rules we set.
Posted by: red sweater at November 07, 2012 06:12 AM (CUi62)
We picked some guy because he was squeaky clean. A good model but an old model. See "Choom Gang" if you need reference.
We thought "New Press" would compete with "MSM". See "The View"
We thought Rule of Law meant something. We thought the rules meant something. We thought that we lived in a Republic.
This is not about the homos wanting to be "married". It is not about "war on women'.
This is a war on our power base. A direct, in your face war.
They want our shit and now they can have our shit.
The implications are profound. We call it "national security", the call it "imperialism" . What it really is (was), is maintaining force to allow us to compete. They will further degrade it. We will lose our standing.
All because we are a bunch of spoiled fucking brats that no longer want to work for anything. For reference, see "illegal immigration". Things that will tear this country down.
Oh, and I am in a great mood this morning. If you want to argue with me, well, come on.
Posted by: Artruen at November 07, 2012 06:12 AM (fDGF1)
Posted by: DCPensFan at November 07, 2012 06:12 AM (ma/2m)
Posted by: Jean at November 07, 2012 06:12 AM (pmDdf)
1) I will continue to believe God has a plan and I will never lose faith in Him, although I have lost faith in American people (or half of them). While I may not see it in my lifetime, things have a way of getting better after getting much worse. I will probably see the "much worse" part. I feel badly for my children and, especially, for my parent's generation who kept us from speaking German or Japanese and started American back towards the prosperity that was lost in 2008. For that I am bitter.
2) Again, history shows revolutions started when things got really, really bad. The next two years will be telling if things go worse...what will happen in the mid-term elections. I will be fired up again, I am sure...even though I cannot imagine being more fired up that I have been. I have no energy left for this right now. But you never know...
3) Fifty percent of this country are still Americans at heart. We will never give up. You should not give up.
4) Due to my faith in God, I am not going to allow myself to ask "why." This country has voted for what they deserve: socialism, abortion on demand, gay marriage. I am not sure what will happen next, for my family nor yours, but I will have faith that all will be well in the future. I am an eternal optimist and will always be this way. For if that was taken from me...which is my faith...I have nothing.
5) I urge you all to pray for this country today. Pray for future leaders who will truly represent all that is good about America. I guess 8% unemployment is still "good" to those who voted this buffoon into office again. I guess Israel will be left hanging..and may the American Jews who voted for The Won feel their vote (I am not a saint). Don't get me wrong, I am angry and sickened today. The election of 2008 did not surprise me. This one did. Yet I am resolved to fight on and never, ever give up. It is going to get worse in all possible ways. Good does come from bad. God has a plan. I accept His will.
6) Recharge. Do whatever you have to do to preserve your family. Pray. But come back fighting as you are needed. I have no idea what happened or who lied to us and gave us hope. I do not understand how this went so badly for us. I felt the enthusiasm for this ticket, the energy, the real possibility for winning.
7) I have to reflect on this country in WWII. We should have lost. We did not. While America was not facing internal enemies,as we do now, they still overcame amazing odds and won. When people are without jobs even longer, paying over $5/gallon for gas, well, eventually they are going to realize this little experiment of socialism is not working out so well. No one has any answers today. Rant, rave all you want. Cry. I have had tears in my eyes, but I am not one for the stuffed sinus thing and catharsis. I will fight until death.
9) I feel badly for those of you already suffering from the horrible economics in place and the lack of a job. My prayers, today, are more for you than myself. I hate, more than anything, to see what is happening to you all.
10) Find something to be thankful for today, in spite of this political mess. This is the test of faith in God. I have had a horrible year, starting with the sudden death of one of my brothers in October 2011. A cascade of messes and hideousness followed with other family members and those I love. I still try, daily, to thank God for His blessings. To thank God even for the tests that make my faith stronger, as that is how it works. I may not live to see it, but things will get better for those of us who love God and this country.
I am off to recharge. I will fight the battle of Benghazi in a few days. I plan to not watch tv for a few days, nor read much about this mess of politics, as I have better things to do than torture myself.
Ace and others...keep fighting. Your blog has been invaluable to my sanity for the past four years. Keep fighting, Morons and 'ettes. Blessings to you all.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, raving lunatic about Benghazi at November 07, 2012 06:13 AM (baL2B)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 07, 2012 06:13 AM (/g5vp)
Well, time to go to work, while it's still there.
I think I'll have enough info on whether or not I'm going to shut it down by Friday of next week. I can easily gauge local consumer sentiment by my customer base. Many of them run or work for small, medium and large businesses. The word should start trickling down what their immediate future will hold.
I'm predicting ugly.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 07, 2012 06:13 AM (uD2fR)
Posted by: CraigR3521
The 'Other' vote was only 1.8 million. So even if all of that was jackass libertarian (it's not), Romney still lost.
Posted by: burned cut-loop [/i] [/b] at November 07, 2012 06:14 AM (jo069)
Posted by: jim at November 07, 2012 06:14 AM (VwhRo)
Posted by: Honey Badger at November 07, 2012 06:14 AM (GvYeG)
Posted by: jimmytheclaw at November 07, 2012 06:15 AM (qWu3+)
Look, the horrible Republican primary process elected a moderate Democrat to run as its presidential candidate. This just killed Tea Party enthusiasm, which Romney tried to lure back with the Ryan pick. Epic Fail: Repeat in 2016.
Posted by: Gerry at November 07, 2012 06:15 AM (jQm+J)
If I didn't have a disabled relative to care for, I'd pack up my shit and move back to Italy. It's what America's turning into, minus the good pasta and handbags/shoes to die for.
Trying to wrap my head around the fact that the nation my parents escaped to now looks more like the country they fled.
All in the span of one generation.
Posted by: kallisto at November 07, 2012 06:15 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at November 07, 2012 06:15 AM (jZn+7)
Posted by: Sugar Fatty at November 07, 2012 06:15 AM (EX+sq)
Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at November 07, 2012 06:16 AM (2rMmy)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 07, 2012 06:16 AM (8Hnjw)
Posted by: Daryl Herbert at November 07, 2012 06:17 AM (Ad/UR)
Posted by: twoslaps at November 07, 2012 06:17 AM (pbUEP)
A lot of my customers work for large, national corps (Citigroup, Ally, Kemper). I'll be eager to see what the scuttlebutt is from those guys.
Ok, now it's really off to work.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at November 07, 2012 06:17 AM (uD2fR)
Posted by: Jaynie59 at November 07, 2012 06:18 AM (4zKCA)
Posted by: Mindy at November 07, 2012 06:18 AM (6jLT3)
Posted by: Jumbo Shrimp at November 07, 2012 06:19 AM (DGIjM)
The Stupid Party nominated a Mormon "severe conservative" statist architect of RomneyCare to go up against a secular humanist Marxist statist patron of ZeroCare.
Did you expect HIGHER conservative voter turnout?
Posted by: Gerry at November 07, 2012 06:19 AM (jQm+J)
Posted by: momma at November 07, 2012 06:20 AM (fKyrY)
Posted by: Moose4
I think this analysis is correct. There are too many swing voters now who view Mormons, and evangelicals and SoCons generally as just a different flavor of busybody nanny staters. But I also can't see any way to assemble a winning coalition if the SoCons are run off.
We are so screwed.
Posted by: cool breeze at November 07, 2012 06:20 AM (hx/td)
Posted by: rockmom at November 07, 2012 06:20 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: Sugar Fatty at November 07, 2012 06:20 AM (EX+sq)
Posted by: Evilpens at November 07, 2012 06:20 AM (ck76k)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 07, 2012 06:21 AM (/g5vp)
Posted by: Jean at November 07, 2012 06:21 AM (pmDdf)
Posted by: Matt S. at November 07, 2012 06:21 AM (moRRg)
Posted by: Mindy at November 07, 2012 10:18 AM (6jLT3)
Ditto.
People have to blame someone, I guess. However, I believe, with all of my heart, these two men would have brought our country to economic prosperity.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, raving lunatic about Benghazi at November 07, 2012 06:21 AM (baL2B)
I've only really cared about immigration restriction to the extent of preventing demographic change. The problem last night wasn't that the Hispanic share of the electorate surged significantly, its that the percentages they have given have trended too poorly. We are going backwards with Hispanics compared to even last decade. We need to change on this.
Posted by: Chris P at November 07, 2012 06:21 AM (LuvqF)
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at November 07, 2012 06:22 AM (Rwrs+)
Posted by: Baldy at November 07, 2012 06:22 AM (opS9C)
166 Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a malignant traitor.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at November 07, 2012 10:02 AM (/eBe
Well, at least you don't have to come up with a new acronym.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at November 07, 2012 06:22 AM (da5Wo)
@ 201 "I'm starting to come to terms with this already by adopting the school of thought that re-electing the SCOAMF is preferrable. Romney could only probably stalled the collapse. Better to give it to the Donks, let them own it, eat it, and wreck it so we can start over sooner."
You know, I have some (admittedly wierd) theories about how chaos theory can apply to American history, especially as we seem to have gone through a cycle of building energy-dislocation-establishment of a new paradigm starting from the mid 1760s, and moving on a 10-30-50-70 year cycle.
Guess what? The end of the 90 year is right around 2016.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at November 07, 2012 06:23 AM (+inic)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 07, 2012 06:23 AM (/g5vp)
Posted by: rockmom at November 07, 2012 10:20 AM (qe2/V)
__
How did it happen that all GOP congressmen in the Philly collar were re-elected, when only one county went to Romney? wtf are people thinking?
Posted by: kallisto at November 07, 2012 06:23 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Sugar Fatty at November 07, 2012 06:24 AM (EX+sq)
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at November 07, 2012 10:22 AM (Rwrs+)
At least to a greater degree than the GOP has done that for quite awhile now, yes.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 07, 2012 06:26 AM (qEkGZ)
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 07, 2012 06:26 AM (qEkGZ)
You know, I still wish we had stuck Gingrich against the cocksucker because at least he would have done some damage to the Obama brand, he would have lost but it would have been way more satisfying.
Posted by: Jaimo at November 07, 2012 06:27 AM (9U1OG)
Now, of course, the problem is how to attract today's addle-brained youf without just becoming New Donk Lite! Now with 20% Less Fascism! is a knotty problem. But, unless you're in Chicago, dead voters never come back; so we have to figure out a way to replace them with live ones.
Perhaps the reaming the 18-29 cohort will be taking jobs-wise over the next few years will help, but that's only a problem to them if mom and dad kick them out of the house.
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 07, 2012 06:27 AM (DLu2s)
Posted by: Sugar Fatty at November 07, 2012 06:28 AM (EX+sq)
Posted by: jwillmoney at November 07, 2012 06:28 AM (zU03n)
Blame the RINO's or the prolife freaks, something is wrong and these were issues that weren't even mentioned in the debates. How can we recriminate without knowing what happened.
Basically, it seems like you have to blame Christie for pushing Obama over the top at the last minute. And blame Romney's mechanics for failing to reach the right people to turn out.
Posted by: joeindc44 has a D+10 sample for you at November 07, 2012 06:29 AM (Z3ckx)
Posted by: Baldy at November 07, 2012 06:29 AM (opS9C)
Posted by: Jack Burton at November 07, 2012 06:30 AM (L+4Fu)
Posted by: Your Inner Voice at November 07, 2012 06:31 AM (C34KJ)
Posted by: DCPensFan at November 07, 2012 06:31 AM (ma/2m)
This loss is on the American people, and that's far more terrifying.
I will say though that I think the GOP needs to reboot similar to Democrats did in 1988.
I say this as a traditional Christian, we need to drop the culture war. That is killing us with both young and female voters. We have to understand this is no longer a Christian nation and politicians aren't spiritual leaders.
Posted by: McAdams at November 07, 2012 06:32 AM (ZI/Cb)
@ 251 "It was all about social issues."
That's a dubious proposition at best. Let's not forget - Romney was from the "business/economic conservative" wing of the GOP. And he just did worse than McCain.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at November 07, 2012 06:32 AM (+inic)
Well then,
FUCK YOU
You've self identified as part of the problem.
Posted by: DaveA at November 07, 2012 06:32 AM (MOWP1)
Posted by: Mindy at November 07, 2012 06:32 AM (6jLT3)
MEDIA should be target # 1. Does not matter what platform the GOP has or would adopt, MEDIA would still cover any leftist ass.
Posted by: Deli LLama at November 07, 2012 06:33 AM (lGu1O)
Posted by: Sugar Fatty at November 07, 2012 06:34 AM (EX+sq)
Jesus! This isn't rocket surgery folks. You ran a milder version of Obama. No one is going to out Obama, Obama. If the R's are really conservative then fucking run a conservative. Hang it out there, give people a real choice instead of this cold water versus warm water bullshit you ran the last 2 times.
The way to win is not to become more left (amnesty, pro-choice, big gov.) It's to offer voters a real choice, to believe in yourselves.
Quit being ashamed of who you are and what you believe.
Posted by: flyonthewall at November 07, 2012 06:34 AM (aZ7lL)
I was watching several swing state vote tracker feeds last night (mainly covering OH and FL) and kept reading that Romney was outperforming McCain in some key counties but there were also some troubling signs from other important counties. (Have yet to see the totals, though it is obvious that we underperformed in certain areas.) Wonder what issues specifically made the difference.
Posted by: 80sBaby at November 07, 2012 06:34 AM (YjDyJ)
Posted by: Artruen at November 07, 2012 06:36 AM (fDGF1)
So, we're about 2M off of pace from 2008?
wow
Posted by: joeindc44 has a D+10 sample for you at November 07, 2012 10:33 AM (Z3ckx)
It all came down to turn out and too many Republicans sat at home. I hope they enjoy their future
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 07, 2012 06:37 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Ian S. at November 07, 2012 06:38 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: Stormageddon Thundercock at November 07, 2012 06:40 AM (dB02l)
Dead on accurate. Too many people get their "news" from the Comedy Channel.
Posted by: Peregrine Took, Hobbit S.O.B. at November 07, 2012 06:45 AM (Mwakv)
Posted by: Motorhead at November 07, 2012 06:47 AM (qAMin)
Yeah, but "war on women" was going nowhere-- was a joke-- was practically dead as a campaign tactic--
And then Akin happened.
Looking back on it, just as the 1st debate was the pivotal *positive* moment of the Romney campaign, the Akin debacle was the pivotal *negative* moment (and remember, it happened right before the GOP convention-- the worst moment possible). The "war on women" got an infinite influx of oxygen (later amplified by Murdock) that, in the end, captured too many women and youth. (Also a factor for the young: the "historical" factor of "gay marriage.")
Posted by: lael at November 07, 2012 06:48 AM (tUcg9)
Posted by: Danny at November 07, 2012 06:50 AM (YZbNi)
Posted by: rockmom at November 07, 2012 06:50 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: Golden Boy at November 07, 2012 06:52 AM (Efk+H)
As for amnesty, what makes you think that the Dems are not going to pass this in the next month?? Little Hugo will do it by executive order if necessary!
And than it's really over. The US is the sick man of the Americas! Canada and Mexico are doing fine!
Posted by: PJ at November 07, 2012 06:54 AM (DQHjw)
Societal decay is the number one reason why this country is slowly dying. The liberals began their ascent by taking over our schools, our government, the media, and popular culture. They are also trying to destroy the Church. If there is to be any hope of restoring this country, we must fight to reclaim those institutions.
Posted by: 80sBaby at November 07, 2012 06:54 AM (YjDyJ)
What's-her-name, American Idol winner, big singer. In an interview, she said something like: at heart and deep down she was really a Republican (!), but would probably vote for Obama because she loves her gay friends.
No comment necessary.
So those may be the missing Republicans, who didn't turn out for Romney: the young Republicans. Repelled by an Akin scarecrow (made to stand for the GOP), swept up with their peers in the historical/ moral aura of "gay marriage" rights (replacing the "first black president" thing), the age group most susceptible to peer pressure.
And the 2012 Dem campaign was ALL about peer pressure.
Posted by: lael at November 07, 2012 06:56 AM (tUcg9)
'You're not even willing to acknowledge the existence of a long-ago postulated theory which may be the answer to your own question, which you expressed being absolutely perplexed about?'
Obama got the dead people to vote for him. That's his core consistuency!
Posted by: Steve D at November 07, 2012 07:01 AM (flNRe)
Posted by: perdogg at November 07, 2012 07:01 AM (oSdsj)
OK, let me preface this next statement: I have nothing whatsoever against gays. I'm not religious, I don't care who fucks who, doesn't matter to me. Get married, whatever, hell if I care. That said....
I am so, so SO sick and fucking tired of hearing about them I'm sick and tired of minor policies of inconvience for a tiny minority (comparing gay marriage to Alabama 1964 is one of the most repulsive things I've ever heard) being cited constantly as a reason to keep voting for the far left. Just pork each other and go about your business for crissakes.
Posted by: radar at November 07, 2012 07:01 AM (zmlwq)
Among the premises you must re-examine... Proposing a return to the Constitution...while endorsing a large and active military presence in over a hundred nations around the world. (That's in addition to active military conflicts or ongoing wars.) The two positions are logically inconsistent. One is a small government, mind your own business kind of affair, while the other embraces the idea of The American Empire and empire building. Empires have never promoted individual freedom and liberty...for anyone.
Promoting individual freedom and liberty, while pushing limits on freedom of choice, including the war on drugs and other federal and state legislation and other regulations that are in direct opposition to individual freedom and liberty? (Then, you complain about the size of our prisons and about the crime rate.)The two positions are logically, even reasonably, inconsistent.
You complain about jobs which are 'outsourced' and 'offshore.' But there is little related talk of limiting government rules, regulations and taxes which force companies to send jobs overseas. (If they want to keep making money, they gots to go overseas in order to do so.) You offer no alternative, except a generic and unspecified call for smaller government...while embracing big government interference in the private lives of American citizens.
You complain about welfare moms, but embrace social security - which is just another way of promoting government theft of a worker's paycheck. (Hint: social security is socialism in action.)
If you've ever said, 'There ought to be a law...' or 'The government oughta do sumpin'!' you're a part of the problem. You're not a constitutionalist or a proponent of smaller government.
These are just a few items which outline the illogical premises often found in your debates. Are you conservatives? ...or are you socialists in all but name? Hint: Social conservatism is still...socialism.
The rest of us (independents, libertarians, etc.) have little choice...if the choice is between socialism light and hardcore left-wing politics. This year's libertarian and independent vote may have given you the election. Revile them if you will, but they had little choice. You gave them no choice. Hell, they often agree with you on many issues...but you still revile them. Are you crazy? Attacking the very people who would help you to restore The Constitution?
Embrace The Constitution, yes, but embrace all of it...or keep losing the big elections.
No. You don't want to hear any of this...but until you do think about it, and consider it very carefully, you'll keep losing the big elections and you'll keep losing on the big issues.
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at November 07, 2012 07:03 AM (WwR1j)
Posted by: rockmom at November 07, 2012 10:50 AM (qe2/V)
__
Yes, in my district Pat Meehan was front and center when the Marcus Hook refineries closed. The union brothers rewarded his effort. I guess they disregarded the fact of Meehan's membership on Issa's committee.
Posted by: kallisto at November 07, 2012 07:05 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: rockmom at November 07, 2012 07:07 AM (qe2/V)
Posted by: Kegger at November 07, 2012 07:08 AM (a1dHN)
They'll come around eventually, or at least a lot of them will, once the economy kicks them in the daddybags (or their contraceptive-laden uterus) and Reality goes upside their heads with a Clue-by-Four. But by that time there will be a new set of 18-29 skulls full of mush coming off the liberal indoctrination treadmill and the demographics will continue to turn relentlessly against us.
Posted by: Moose4 at November 07, 2012 07:09 AM (W15Fy)
Oh, well. She has her millions, and I'm sure they're safely tucked away somewhere so she can have parties galore and invite all her newly married gay friends.
Posted by: JohnInOhio at November 07, 2012 07:10 AM (aPfC6)
Posted by: booger at November 07, 2012 07:12 AM (HI6wa)
@ 308 "They vote for their friends and their vaginas."
So, essentially the choice is either ditch social issues because a large segments of the country is stupid, or hang onto them and lose because a large segment of the country is stupid.
I agree. Let's just burn the country down now and rebuild it later.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at November 07, 2012 07:14 AM (+inic)
#309 Exactly. The only (small) consolation is that Caesar was possibly the most all around brilliant man in all of History, while Obama is a stuttering incompetant. He's basically Juan Peron without the snazzy uniforms. So it's...
Civil War by '24!
Then comes Caesar.
Posted by: Jaylord at November 07, 2012 07:14 AM (RuF8n)
Ace said that the socons rape quotes kept moderates at home.
Samwise said that Romney's Mormonism kept socon bigots at home.
You can't both be right. It looks like some Republicans just don't like socons and want to find a reason to blame them for this loss, even when they are the most reliable conservative voters.
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at November 07, 2012 07:15 AM (WYTHl)
Posted by: rockmom at November 07, 2012 07:18 AM (qe2/V)
Trying to understand what the fuck happened.
In my own little world, here's the numbers for my small precinct in south central Michigan:
2008 - 52.04% voter participation
2012 - 78.53% (67/31 for Romney)
For a predominantly black area nearby:
2008 - 31.45% voter participation
2012 - 31.91% (86/12 for Obama)
For a bible-thumping evangelical area nearby:
2008 - 48.29% voter participation
2012 - 74.37% (68/30 for Romney)
What is impossible to understand is the vote downticket. Our county went for Mitt 52%/46%. We went 56%/40% for the bible-thumping representative (R), but on the senate vote, it went 52%/44% for the democrat cow Stabenow. What the fuck?
Posted by: jwest at November 07, 2012 07:21 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: mpfs at November 07, 2012 07:24 AM (Mkhiu)
Posted by: Gordon Marock at November 07, 2012 07:25 AM (vp31D)
Posted by: the other coyote at November 07, 2012 07:31 AM (yK44T)
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at November 07, 2012 07:32 AM (WYTHl)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at November 07, 2012 07:32 AM (JxIkO)
Posted by: CivilWar2 at November 07, 2012 07:33 AM (4ZDLm)
I see four possible culprits:
1) Media propaganda
2) Minorities
3) Evangelicals
4) Fraud
Normally, I don't think I would even include #4, but a number of things don't add up. Comment #1, above, is a good summary, and "momma" has some disturbing on-site testimony. With all the early voting, and stories of people waiting in line for hours to vote, how can it POSSIBLY be a lower turnout than 2008?
Further, on a very recent FOX report, they say the Romney camp is "Scratching their heads" because they thought they had sufficiently gotten out the vote in the key states.
It also flies in the face of 2010. We showed up in droves to oust congressmen for ObamaCare, and now all of a sudden nobody cares?
Then there's the Senate races. There were 15 races where there was at least a small chance; some were considered extremely likely. It's just not reasonable that only one, to my knowledge (I haven't found out about MT and ND), was won. That must be at LEAST a 1 in 100 probability, if not lower.
A rumor has been started that the Evangelicals wouldn't vote for a Mormon. We should be able to figure out if that was true, but it sounds more like a story planted by Dem operatives, to me.
It is IMPERATIVE that we determine whether the count is legit before we move forward. How can you EVER win, if the deck is stacked? If it is, no adjustments will fix it.
As to #1 and #2, they go without saying; there isn't only one right answer. I believe we could make gains with Hispanics, whose culture is said to be compatible, but blacks are indoctrinated into the idea that all their problems are because of "whitey". It will be a very long time before an appreciable number will jump off that crazy train.
Posted by: Optimizer at November 07, 2012 07:34 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: Rich K at November 07, 2012 07:42 AM (X4l3T)
Posted by: Drider at November 07, 2012 07:46 AM (HaJD9)
To paraphrase, "You may not be interested in history, but history is interested in you."
Posted by: PJ at November 07, 2012 07:48 AM (DQHjw)
Posted by: moki at November 07, 2012 07:50 AM (wi/sM)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at November 07, 2012 07:50 AM (1hM1d)
I'm a fan of history. History demonstrates time and again that nations will rise, become dominant and then ultimately go into decline. The arc of a nation... I've wondered on and off over the last 20 years or so where we were on that arc. I believe that last night we blew past the inflection point and are now on the decline. And we, the American people, made the conscious decision to do so.
I did not ever believe I would see it in my lifetime.
There are now more of them than there are of us.
Posted by: Hari Seldon, Psychohistorian at November 07, 2012 07:57 AM (r2z3p)
Two words - Executive Order.
With the Senate remaining in Democrat hands, Obama is pretty much free to govern without regard to the law. Throw in a replacement Justice of the like of Sotomayor or Kegan or Ginsberg, and there will be no constraints on his use and abuse of governmental power.
He has already shown how he can circumvent the normal rules of US government in the case of his DREAM act workaround, the imposition of birth control on insurers who have religious objections, EPA rules on carbon dioxide, and others.
Up until now, he was somewhat constrainted by fear of this election turning the Senate and possible impeachment. Now, that problem has gone away.
He has 2 years to seize control permanently of the Federal government. Hate to say it but he how has the same conditions and opportunities as Hitler did in the late Weimar Republic.
Posted by: whitehall at November 07, 2012 07:58 AM (FmPSC)
Posted by: Danny at November 07, 2012 07:58 AM (YZbNi)
@ 319 "Social conservatism turns a lot of people off."
So does social liberalism.
And so does fiscal conservatism, for that matter.
The problem is not with this, that, or the other piece of the conservative coalition. The problem is with the country itself. And I hate to say it, but that problem is probably well nigh unfixable without a whole lot of pain and suffering for all involved.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at November 07, 2012 07:59 AM (+inic)
Oh, crap, you already have people indulging in shit:
You and I both know Karl Rove and Jeb Bush think he can get enough brown votes to win next time--no, he can't, not unless he thinks his brand of "conservatism" will assure them they can't continue collecting welfare checks. Those of you who don't live in Hispanic-heavy states: please, please understand that yes, it's a huge voting bloc, but it's not the Hispanics you grew up with--it's young women who have babies out of wedlock. While some of them eventually marry the father of their kids, a growing number don't. In other words, look at the black community you know and apply it to browns. Jeb Bush is under the impression that Mexicans as he knows them are conservative. No, they are not. They are Catholic in name only--baptize the kid, maybe go to one Mass a year, that's it. The conservatism he sees in many of the elderly Mexicans of the border states is non-existent in the demographics that count.
In other words, appeal to browns in order to get votes and put a guy like him in office, and what do you get to improve the lot of the country? Nada. Zip.Zero. You've just shifted one dependent class to another party. Of course, if all you are interested in in a personal sense is to get elected and not change the dysfunction of the country, you can try that, but we want an America that works, is functional.
Rubio? Okay, I have no idea if a Cuban-American who says he espouses the values I think he does will appeal to welfare-collecting brown peoples. He will get a much bigger share of the Hispanic last names than RR, but only if he isn't going up against another black or a "real Hispanic." Remember, browns will discover once they see Marco and learn of his Cuban background know that Marco is ethnically Spanish and that will matter depending on whatever opponent he might have.
We have Huckabee saying that the GOP has done a bad job of reaching out to minorities. OH, please. Is that what people in the GOP want? Get the votes of welfare moms??????? HUH? Is that what any of you really want?
This is what I want: I want TO GET RID OF WELFARE MOMS, TO cut off their source of existence, to shred their checks.
I want to get rid of baby daddys. I want a candidate that says, "No more!"
What the hell good does it do to get their votes if you can't get rid of their expense?
I was going to write more, but I'm disgusted.
Posted by: gayle in ca at November 07, 2012 08:00 AM (wgmUB)
#117 , #330 - THAT. The under 30 set are idiots, and I blame their parents. If you can't raise a kid to understand that people need to stand on their own two f*cking feet, get out of bed and get a f*cking job, don't envy successful people (try emulating instead), don't blame them for your problems, and don't try to get "revenge" on them, then you have no business breathing my oxygen.
I apologized to my kid this morning for the country I'm leaving her. She asked me, after she saw Obama telling the crowd to get revenge, what she had ever done to those people to make them hate her.
Posted by: the other coyote at November 07, 2012 08:02 AM (yK44T)
Look at the breakdown of singles: they are the group that put Obama in office. The marriage gap and the singles gap is twice that of the gender gap everyone worries about.
That's the gap. The growing number of unmarrieds who remain so far longer than ever...that's the gap.
Posted by: gayle in ca at November 07, 2012 08:03 AM (wgmUB)
Thanks, I needed to hear that.
Hold fast to what remains.
Posted by: wisenheimer who only lurks these days at November 07, 2012 08:08 AM (JEVhf)
Posted by: teebone at November 07, 2012 09:33 AM (YtLSL)
I only agree with the part about Mitt Romney. I think Obama knew he had lost, especially with his puny turn-outs everywhere. However, there was a smugness about his comment on Tuesday that he had prepared both kinds of speeches and his thanking Mitt Romney for a good campaign. The first seemed a give away that he knew the fix was in and the second was so totally out of character that it felt like a give-away. (If the fix was in; I think we don't know.)
I am not troubled about the fact of a loss (although I am grieved) in our representative democracy. So be it. But I think every Republican governor better True the Vote in his/her state. And I think we need some big "epidemiological" study of voters who actually voted and possible fraud. How this study could be conducted, I don't know. But it should be large and therefore it will be expensive. It is about the scientific method here -- and Western Civilization is the only place where that preserver of truth has been developed and preserved (except with AGW). We know the failing media is socialist(administration)-controlled. We don't know about our "new" voting methods and oversight of them to keep voting honest.
I also think Obama campaigned more aggressively than Romney (in a good sense -- you do what you have to do to win), and I think he addressed his (splintered) coalition on a individual basis (even though mean and small). Republicans must do both. They must treat women who choose abortions (very strictly limited) with dignity; they must treat homosexuals who want the rights of a loving partnership with dignity (doesn't have to be marriage); they must treat immigrants, however they got here, with dignity (we are a nation of immigrants) and "help" them find work and make a good life (most immigrants work bloody hard); and they must not be "morally Christian" (our founders wanted both freedom of religion and freedom from religous righteousness -- dictators of behavior). Do not sneer at people who are receiving government assistance, especially in a time of deep economic crisis. Help them to become independent with dignity. Can we have this big tent within the context of limiting government and enhancing freedom of opportunity? I sincerely hope so. These views with the implied sneer towards so many Americans can make the current Republicans seem like an end-of-an-era "older white person's" party. The reality in the states is very different -- young and vibrant; older and wiser.
The electorate as a whole did not vote FOR socialism (or worse), even if a radical minority did. We are at the end of an era, deeply divided, and people need assurances that they are honored and respected in whatever new directions we take. Obama gave them assurances that they mattered -- even if he told them lies. They want acknowledgement of a safety net, but it does not have to be this current safety net. (Rich people do not need a "safety net". It is so hard for Republicans -- intelligent, talented, hard working, usually affluent -- to empathize with those who are not so "well endowed". And this truly is a have or have not issue.)
Let thoughtful leadership start with the states -- 30 of them. And make sure that the next Republican (or opposition to Leftist Power) is a current governor who has planned a White House run for some years and has proven leadership abilities. The crew who ran in the primaries were pathetic (as viable presidential candidates, honorable otherwise), every single one -- as was the "electorate", if that is what we can be called, who ran from flavor to flavor. (Romney was the best of the bunch in terms of preparation, but he was years out of a governorship and he did not even govern a "Republican" electorate.)
If we are smart and heed the lessons of this election (and check voting fraud), 2014 can better the results of 2010 (enlarge the meaning of TeaParty -- do not get trapped by a phrase) and can set the stage for 2016. I believed from the beginning that Romney would be a transitional figure. I regret that he does not get to bring his business acumen to the current economic mess.
Endings are always messy and troubling. But new beginnings cannot happen without endings. Stand the mess and begin the clean up.
Posted by: pyromancer76 at November 07, 2012 08:09 AM (i0aYq)
@333
Exactly, but I'm not sure I'd go as far as the Hitler thing quite yet. People keep saying "he'll have to reach across the aisle". They're delusional. He doesn't even talk to his own guys in Congress. He doesn't even talk to his fawning press.
He already told us that this is what he was going to do. "If Congress won't act, I will". Congress will still be gridlocked. Obama will legislate through executive orders, and through regulations his agencies write.
In other words, we will have a socialist dictator for the next four years, assuming he doesn't use that power to cancel future elections.
Posted by: Optimizer at November 07, 2012 08:10 AM (Mxt9o)
#334. The Illegals who come and work are fine with me too. The problem is they have kids, and the kids won't work. They join gangs and collect welfare. Welcome to Texas.
My solution is a guest worker program where any kids you have while you're here aren't citizens. The problem I have with that is that we really don't need foreign workers, but it is too easy for native-born Americans who could do those jobs to do nothing, that the jobs go unfilled because why would anyone get out of bed and sweat all day, when you can maintain the same standard of living on welfare?
So long as the welfare state is propping up native born Americans who won't work, we are going to continue to have illegals coming across the border, and as long as their children are American citizens, the cycle is going to continue until it all burns down.
Posted by: the other coyote at November 07, 2012 08:10 AM (yK44T)
When you've got Rush praising Romney, as he is doing now, you know it's not the candidate that was the problem. (I agree the praise is deserving.)
The only thing I believed they were doing wrong is not sending Ryan to speak to college age kids at every opportunity, holding up a paycheck and explaining to them what will come out of their paychecks when and if they ever get a job.
It was still about "cool" versus a working guy.
Posted by: gayle in ca at November 07, 2012 08:12 AM (wgmUB)
On top of them making up more of the electorate, it's an even more pronounced shift in a number of swing states. Coloardo, Florida, possibly Virginia (up in NoVa) all likely swung to Obama solely on the Hispanic vote and this trend is only going to continue in those states. And Nevada and New Mexico are traditional swing states that were effectively taken off the map going into this race. And I'm not sure about the make up of the Philly area but I'm sure that there is presence of Hispanics there too that add to the gap we face in that state.
Hispanics are a very engaged demographic and turn out regardless of the makeup of the candidate; we cannot continue to lose their vote by 40%. Hispanics are very industrious and very religious, it shouldn't be hard to make a strong appeal to them, especially when you look at how Bush was able to win 44% of their vote in 2004. The promising (and sort of ironic) thing is if you look at the up-and-coming Hispanic politicans, they mostly are on our side: Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Susana Martinez, Brian Sandoval. I don't even think I can name one that would stand up to these names on the other side. Castro, that mayor from San Antonio? I mean, the only other names that come to mind are Menendez and Villaraigosa.
Posted by: Uncle Milty at November 07, 2012 08:15 AM (8J5Ck)
Posted by: Uncle Milty at November 07, 2012 12:15 PM (8J5Ck)
_________________
Meant to add that those are not exactly appealing names.
Posted by: Uncle Milty at November 07, 2012 08:17 AM (8J5Ck)
If nothing else, can we finally agree that Chris Christie needs to be persona non grata in the Republican Party from here on out?
No Chris Christie in 2016, or ever.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at November 07, 2012 08:25 AM (+inic)
We've seen this entire movie. It's going to end exactly the same way.
Posted by: rockmom at November 07, 2012 11:18 AM (qe2/V)
The only good thing about that, rockmom, was that after the coup that tossed Peron out, anyone who had a picture of Juan and Eva - even if it was hidden - was tossed into jail. I'd love a coup just to put every tattooed or sign-displaying Obot into the cooler.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at November 07, 2012 08:26 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: blindside at November 07, 2012 08:32 AM (x7g7t)
You're nuts. An amnesty will not win the Hispanic vote over to the conservative side. It will increase the size of the Democratic advantage. Stop thinking Hispanics are going to go conservative Any. Day. Now. if we just toss them a bone. It didn't happen under Reagan and it's certainly not going to happen today. Hispanic voters consistently indicate they like government handouts even more than they like immigration. This is a population that, according to the CDC, has a 50% illegitimacy rate at present. So sorry, but they're not going to turn out as social values voters either. The only reason Cubans even skewed rightward is that the older generation was disproportionately drawn or descended from the business owner class in Cuba. That doesn't apply to any other Hispanic group.
The whole reason we have the Hispanic problem is because Republicans failed at every opportunity to do anything about illegal immigration and chose instead to play the identity politics game and pandered to Hispanics rather than promote the interests of middle-class white families. Now you're watching the party descend into demographic irrelevancy unless it abandons all its conservative principles. Given what you saw last night, do you honestly think it's going to get any easier in the future to win elections?
Posted by: tommy at November 07, 2012 08:49 AM (Ufxn1)
Romney's campaign was vague. His image was vague, his principles were vague, his policies were vague. Only his intended results -- revive the economy, cut the deficit and provide for our national security -- were concrete, and Obama vaguely promised the same things plus free stuff! and peace! and president-of-color! and hipness!
Romney also vaguely promised to cut government regulation, which -- coming from the guy who gave Massachusetts its healthcare system -- was not the most believable promise ever made.
Either his campaign was terrible or he was a terrible candidate.
Posted by: Ken at November 07, 2012 08:59 AM (3ar4L)
Google election turnout by state 2012 and you'll get real time reports by people like secretaries of state from across the whole country affirming that turnout was unprecedented. Juxtaposed with these are late reports from MSM that turnout was millions below 2004.
NO!
Just NO.
Millions of votes have been "disappeared". I don't tend to conspiracy theories, but I trust my own eyes and reports from the ground as voting was going on. Turnout WAS up, way way up, all across the nation. So, before anything else, we have to find out how did so very many votes not get counted.
Posted by: But I DON'T butter my hair at November 07, 2012 09:20 AM (HxW7r)
Posted by: Danny at November 07, 2012 09:28 AM (YZbNi)
Posted by: Dan at November 07, 2012 09:40 AM (/7gN/)
Posted by: Dan at November 07, 2012 09:43 AM (/7gN/)
When I lived in CA many years ago, my wife was planning a trip for the Cub Scout den to visit the Mormon Battalion monument in San Diego. Before she had a chance to bring it up, she chanced upon a conversation among some of the other mothers about Mormons that changed her mind about bringing it up. Anti-Mormon prejudice is alive and well out there. And I don't think it's among the evangelicals, methinks it is the "moderates" and "independents".
Posted by: Harold at November 07, 2012 01:22 PM (hyWkl)
I hate this sort of thinking: constantly confusing the hard scrabble work ethic of the developing world that disappears as soon as its necessity disappears with a culturally transmittable Puritan work ethic.
You can always find people in the Third World who will work for peanuts in the absence of a welfare system. The problem is that these very same people arrive in this country and have children who tend to do poorly at school, tend to get involved in gangs and criminal activity at high rates, tend to be disproportionately unemployed compared to the majority white population, and tend to cast their ballots for the party of free shit. Like it or not, whites are much more reliably conservative than either Hispanics or Asians and, without open borders, America would be a much more conservative country today. While Republicans engage in futile pandering to Hispanics, California is looking like our future.
Posted by: tommy at November 07, 2012 02:08 PM (Ufxn1)
Posted by: Danny at November 07, 2012 02:35 PM (YZbNi)
Posted by: Danny at November 07, 2012 02:41 PM (YZbNi)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 07, 2012 03:21 PM (SKX2R)
Posted by: Samwise Gamgee the 3rd at November 07, 2012 03:38 PM (SKX2R)
Posted by: Benson II at November 07, 2012 04:22 PM (CBpMz)
I have an idea, don't run a fricking moderate who's offering the same stuff the Democrats offer and doesn't know how to explain things to the brain dead voters. I was turned off to. I wanted to see Obama embarrassed by all his lies and mistakes instead I got our candidate that everyone raved about looking more presidential than Obama. Evidently the electorate didn't get the message that looking presidential is more important than defeating your opponent with facts. Romney was McCain II and if he'd known how to win might have been a better president but he didn't. We pushed, pulled and tried to drag him over the finish line but it's the candidate that needs to be leading us over the finish line. Did you ever listen to one of Romney's speeches. Platitudes. People who wanted to oust Obama more than anything else in the world were enthused. I was never enthused but I damn well voted for him. Romney tried to lead from behind. He was never in front leading us.
Posted by: Benson II at November 07, 2012 04:39 PM (CBpMz)
Change is going to start in my
home. It's really simple, that's where I go from here.
I have been blessed with great success for myself and my family. I plan to
double those efforts, with enough money, gold and other assets, to protect my
family when I am gone.
My business decisions will start to become political. What do i know about my
vendors? I will find out the political backgrounds of any employee I plan to
hire, and they will not know about it. Liberals, and the weak minded will not work
for me.
Donations to any organization that has ties to abortion or "women's
rights" will never happen again. Sorry Komen and others. You lose. Cry
about your breasts and vaginas at another doorstep.
Yep, getting personal with my politics, because now it impacts my family. Now
you are screwing with my friends' lives.
Don't like it, take your products and services down the road and sell it to a
47 percenter living off the government. See how far that will get you. Maybe he
can pay you in pot.
Posted by: abe at November 08, 2012 06:51 PM (lDWQr)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2404 seconds, 488 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








THIS DOESNÂ’T EQUAL THAT:
1) Record Republican Enthusiasm
2) Record Republican Fundraising
3) Record GOTV
4) Record Early Voting
5) Record Republican Crowds
6) Record Independent Support
= Record Low Turnout?
How low was Republican turnout? Lower than 2004!
Folks, something stinks.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at November 07, 2012 05:26 AM (hlUJY)