July 01, 2013
— Ace It's the deadliest calamity for firefighters since 9/11.
The fast-moving wildfire that killed 19 firefighters here Sunday is now more than quadruple in size, as crews battle triple-digit heat and erratic winds in an effort to contain the blaze.Eratic winds and dry grasses fed the blaze as it tore through the communities of Yarnell and Glen Isla, about 85 miles northwest of Phoenix. An estimated 200 homes and many businesses had been destroyed as the lightning-sparked fire spread to nearly 8,400 acres from 2,000 acres overnight.
More than 400 firefighters were trying to contain the fire on three flanks, but officials said there was "zero containment" early Monday afternoon. "This is a nightmare scenario for firefighting: thunderstorms producing little rainfall, unpredictable, shifting winds, and, of course, lightning strikes," says Weather Channel meteorologist Jon Erdman.
The firefighters, trapped by the hellish blaze, sought refuge in their fire shelters, which are portable individual tents which can reflect away some amount of heat and keep some cool air inside. But the shelters failed, possibly because wind batted them around.
Posted by: Ace at
01:26 PM
| Comments (174)
Post contains 191 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:30 PM (VS04T)
Posted by: UWP at July 01, 2013 01:30 PM (r98SZ)
Posted by: alexthechick - Commence drinking now. at July 01, 2013 01:30 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: © Sponge at July 01, 2013 01:31 PM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 01, 2013 01:31 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at July 01, 2013 01:32 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:33 PM (VS04T)
The picture shown on Fox this morning was of a group of nineteen young men.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 01, 2013 01:33 PM (lVPtV)
"compassion"...I do hope the families are resting as easily as they can...it has to hurt.
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 01:34 PM (LRFds)
Very sad.
Terrible loss.
My heart goes out to their families and friends.
What a horrible way to go.
Posted by: wheatie at July 01, 2013 01:34 PM (Jw4kG)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:35 PM (VS04T)
Posted by: Cheri at July 01, 2013 01:35 PM (EAgmr)
Posted by: Adam at July 01, 2013 01:36 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:36 PM (VS04T)
Posted by: © Sponge at July 01, 2013 01:36 PM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:37 PM (VS04T)
Posted by: kathysaysso at July 01, 2013 01:38 PM (6H6o8)
Posted by: Adam at July 01, 2013 05:36 PM (Aif/5)
-- Where was it Adam?
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at July 01, 2013 01:38 PM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:39 PM (VS04T)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at July 01, 2013 01:39 PM (kXoT0)
Posted by: waldo at July 01, 2013 01:40 PM (hc19V)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 05:39 PM (VS04T)
Ha! I've been called worse than that. Usually several times a day!
Posted by: kathysaysso at July 01, 2013 01:40 PM (6H6o8)
Posted by: kathysaysso
Exactly. The libs dreams of having women in Special Forces units is insane.
Posted by: Cheri at July 01, 2013 01:41 PM (EAgmr)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:42 PM (VS04T)
I think it is a reasonable question to ask if this task is one we should do? If we continue as we are, it is inevitable that we sacrifice the lives of young people so that others can build houses in areas that should never have them. I assume (but don't know for sure) that these young men worked for the state, and not for private insurance companies. There's a reason for that, just like there's a reason Harry Homeowner can't insure his million dollar house on a sea level sand bar in Hurricane Alley.
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 01:42 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at July 01, 2013 01:43 PM (PH+2B)
Posted by: polynikes at July 01, 2013 01:43 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at July 01, 2013 01:45 PM (X6akg)
sorry, but I can't agree with you on this one. It's one thing to sacrifice your life in the service of your country, IOW to protect your folks. It's another to do it so that Sam Donaldson can pretend to be living the life of the cowboy.
This whole thing just angers me.
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 01:46 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 05:42 PM (6TB1Z)
Of course we should continue to protect fellow citizens lives and property including these special teams of fire fighters. This is the same debate that comes up when we rescue stranded mountain climbers and hikers. Its one of the responsibilities of government that is actually valid.
Posted by: polynikes at July 01, 2013 01:46 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: © Sponge at July 01, 2013 01:46 PM (xmcEQ)
They likely didn't suffer. When the Monument Fire burned in my AO a few years back the leading edge of the fire burned at over 1000 degrees (some measurements approached 2K degrees).
The worst part is knowing there is no way out except maybe, just maybe, this little bag of foil and fiberglass. Those men have balls that clang, for certain.
Posted by: AZ Hi Desert (All my Hate cannot be found) at July 01, 2013 01:47 PM (cyKNf)
Posted by: Penfold at July 01, 2013 01:47 PM (Fbt5B)
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 05:46 PM (6TB1Z)
Its not only the Sam Donaldson's that lives in these areas. And besides , the Sam Donaldson's have just as much right to have the taxpaying protection that inner city folks have where far more fire fighting lives have been lost.
Posted by: polynikes at July 01, 2013 01:49 PM (m2CN7)
Protect the lives of our firefighters, yes. Send them in to rescue McMansions, no. At what point do we say to people that do stupid things, "this is on you, don't come whining to me when you get in trouble."
BTW, I feel the same way about Alaskan crabbers. You want to risk your life for a big payday, knock yourself out. Just don't ask somebody else to risk their lives in an arctic hurricane to pull your butt out of the water when it all goes pear-shaped.
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 01:49 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: moki at July 01, 2013 01:49 PM (EvHC8)
Posted by: kathysaysso at July 01, 2013 01:50 PM (6H6o8)
Posted by: maddogg at July 01, 2013 01:51 PM (OlN4e)
Why aren't we pinning these senseless deaths on the Democrats??
Unlike their baseless and outlandish accusations aimed at Bush and the Republicans, we actually have a legitimate argument in this case. Even if we don't, who gives a shit.
Democrats have always blocked efforts to clear brush and trees (on dubious environmental grounds) that could absolutely prevent many wildfires and forest fires.
This is how politics is done. You snooze, you lose.
Blame them before they blame you.
Posted by: soothsayer at July 01, 2013 01:51 PM (FC8Yl)
simply because I figure 99.9% of women don't possess the physical
strength necessary to do the job.
Posted by: kathysaysso
my little sister led firecrews for years in Idaho, Utah, and Oregon. Sometime all convicts.
Posted by: Jean at July 01, 2013 01:51 PM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Jean at July 01, 2013 05:51 PM (CMlD4)
Good for her. She isn't the norm.
Posted by: kathysaysso at July 01, 2013 01:52 PM (6H6o8)
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 05:49 PM (6TB1Z)
We are going to have to respectfully agree to disagree.
Posted by: polynikes at July 01, 2013 01:52 PM (m2CN7)
Those 'shelters' are ersatz body bags.
I have a few friends who are smoke jumpers and they know that they likely aren't coming out of those if they get into them.
Posted by: garrett at July 01, 2013 01:52 PM (2TQQt)
Posted by: moki at July 01, 2013 01:53 PM (EvHC8)
Normalized to per capita, I'd bet that the inner city folks are less of a risk. Even if I'm wrong, there's stupid based on economic circumstance, and then there's just willfully stupid by choice.
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 01:53 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: alexthechick - Commence drinking now. at July 01, 2013 01:53 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:53 PM (VS04T)
Posted by: UWP at July 01, 2013 01:54 PM (r98SZ)
Posted by: moki at July 01, 2013 01:55 PM (EvHC8)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:55 PM (VS04T)
Posted by: Cheri at July 01, 2013 05:41 PM (EAgmr)
Tom Kratman has an excellent SF book, The Amazon Legion, in which he deconstructs why women--even the biggest and the strongest can't be effective infantry. The Kindle version is $6.83.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at July 01, 2013 01:55 PM (kXoT0)
Here? On this site? Perish the thought.
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 05:55 PM (6TB1Z)
My bad I forgot to add F you.
Posted by: polynikes at July 01, 2013 01:56 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at July 01, 2013 01:56 PM (codCi)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 05:53 PM (VS04T)
Well spoken, sir.
Agreed.
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 01:56 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Jones in CO at July 01, 2013 01:56 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Soona at July 01, 2013 01:57 PM (+XAA/)
The 19 - all men - were part of the elite Granite Mountain Hotshots of Prescott in the worst wildland firefighter tragedy in the U.S. since 25 died in 1933's Griffith Park Fire in Los Angeles.
Cities, counties etc. supply firefighters to areas not in their jurisdiction all the time. It's common practice.
Posted by: Ronster at July 01, 2013 01:57 PM (51V49)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at July 01, 2013 01:57 PM (codCi)
49
Why aren't we pinning these senseless deaths on the Democrats??
Liberal policies get people killed.
We often say...."The stupid, it burns".
Well, in this case, it did.
Not that the poor firefighters are stupid, no, not at all.
The stupid liberal policies of not clearing away the brush is the stupid that burns...and gets people killed.
Posted by: wheatie at July 01, 2013 01:57 PM (Jw4kG)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:57 PM (VS04T)
Posted by: Jones in CO at July 01, 2013 01:57 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Adam at July 01, 2013 01:57 PM (Aif/5)
I spent a couple of summers doing "reserve" wildfire cleanup / firefighting in NC back in the 80's. Great money, BTW... (that's about 11ty rungs down the ladder from this team, BTW).
Those "shake n bake" shelters are refuge of last resort, that they didn't save lives isn't surprising depending on the heat.
RIP
Posted by: BunkerinTheBurbs at July 01, 2013 01:57 PM (5lVZz)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil
-------------
That's BS...., it is only necessary that we relax the standards.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at July 01, 2013 01:58 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: rickb223 at July 01, 2013 01:58 PM (7qw1E)
Wonderful invention that works perfectly if you are in laboratory conditions...
when my uncle sh=owed me the mylar bag at his Station House I commented it looked like Jiffy Pop foil...
he laughed.
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 01:59 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 01:59 PM (VS04T)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at July 01, 2013 01:59 PM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: Jones in CO at July 01, 2013 05:56 PM (8sCoq)
Yeah.... and when that fire does hit... Vail is at ground zero...
Posted by: Romeo13 at July 01, 2013 01:59 PM (lZBBB)
Wildfires make their own wind. Very intense and very eratic winds.
That's why those beetle kill forests are so f'n dangerous, there's too much fuel available to the fires and they burn hot and long.
In more open country, fires can fall back on themselves and go out for a lack of fuel. Not so in a dense, dead forest.
Posted by: garrett at July 01, 2013 01:59 PM (2TQQt)
Whatever. The Democrats will use this push for climate change crap and for more spending for first responders.
And if you stand in their way, you're killing more firemen.
Posted by: soothsayer at July 01, 2013 01:59 PM (GcwH1)
Andrew Branca, LOSD @LawSelfDefense 1m #Zimmerman Trial: MOM: "Do you think George Zimmerman was telling the truth?" Serino: "Yes." BAM
Bam indeed.
Posted by: toby928© for TB at July 01, 2013 02:00 PM (codCi)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at July 01, 2013 02:00 PM (VS04T)
Longbows.
Posted by: Blanco Basura at July 01, 2013 05:59 PM (4WhSY)
OK... but no Frying pans used a shields... that would be cheating...
Posted by: King Richard the Lionheart... at July 01, 2013 02:01 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at July 01, 2013 05:58 PM (aDwsi)
They relaxed the standards in the book. The women died and died and died even though they were fighting for their world and their kids. They did find things that the women excelled at, but, regular grunt infantry for 99% of women is not it. It is a fabulous book.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at July 01, 2013 02:01 PM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Adam at July 01, 2013 02:03 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: moki at July 01, 2013 02:04 PM (EvHC8)
Breaking news EricHolder@mypeopledoj "I'm gonmna indict that whole department on civil rights charges cracka"
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 02:04 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: California Red at July 01, 2013 02:04 PM (aCD1U)
Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at July 01, 2013 02:06 PM (7mQyC)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at July 01, 2013 02:06 PM (aB+tO)
well survivor's guilt, bravado, or serenity.
It's as tough a job in its way as combat arms only you can't outsmart the Opfor and Mom Nature wins all ties...
something tells me they've all dealt with mortality psychologically to some degree and the ones that haven't are hurting as bad as the survivors of the fallen.
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 02:07 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: moki at July 01, 2013 06:04 PM (EvHC
It may be my paranoia speaking but I am convinced that is why I couldn't even get a job in NYC in the mail room of all the advertisment agencies I interviewed with. Mine was a Southwest Louisiana accent with some East Texas mixed in.
Posted by: polynikes at July 01, 2013 02:07 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: rickb223 at July 01, 2013 02:07 PM (7qw1E)
Posted by: Jones in CO at July 01, 2013 02:08 PM (8sCoq)
If Hollywood had any balls they'd make a film based on this lunacy...
hell even let them switch ethnic identities for giggles.
I grasp this is about self-defense, and the right of people to want to live.
Switch anything I'll side with the defender not the aggressor....
Jeantel can't say that
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 02:09 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at July 01, 2013 02:09 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes more nonsense ...... at July 01, 2013 02:09 PM (RFeQD)
Ouch.
Posted by: rickb223 at July 01, 2013 06:07 PM (7qw1E)
Isn't it fun that when the Police LIE to you, its OK, but for you to lie to the Police, is a Felony?
ie... the State may lie to you... you may not lie to the State... shows who is the Master...
Posted by: Romeo13 at July 01, 2013 02:09 PM (lZBBB)
It makes one glad though that there are men brave enough to fight to save others.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at July 01, 2013 02:09 PM (P7hip)
Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at July 01, 2013 02:10 PM (7mQyC)
I'm Ohio Midwestern, with a spot of Canuckian, and a little Texan...
needless to say no one will ever accuse me of being from New England.
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 02:10 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at July 01, 2013 02:11 PM (X6akg)
105 I don't know which media source this is from but......Bob Owens tweeted it....
-----------
Tami...it's from the main page, top headline, of foxnews.com.
Posted by: wheatie at July 01, 2013 02:12 PM (Jw4kG)
She's a moonbat at heart...a fair moonbat but she swings left.
It may well be they are really serious about trying to be a new news network...
bwahahaha
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 02:12 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at July 01, 2013 02:13 PM (P7hip)
http://annapuna.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-far-side.html
From last thread, posted as it died for this one.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at July 01, 2013 02:13 PM (aB+tO)
Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at July 01, 2013 02:13 PM (7mQyC)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at July 01, 2013 02:13 PM (codCi)
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at July 01, 2013 02:14 PM (X6akg)
Pardon my ignorance, but can't anyone make a profit by felling the dead trees and cleaning up the brush ?
I would think the wood has to be of some value.
Or is the Government in the way, again?
Posted by: seamrog at July 01, 2013 02:15 PM (FC0Uh)
Posted by: Ronster at July 01, 2013 02:15 PM (51V49)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at July 01, 2013 02:17 PM (aB+tO)
>> I would think the wood has to be of some value.
Beetle kill can't be used for much other than fuel.
Posted by: garrett at July 01, 2013 02:17 PM (2TQQt)
Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at July 01, 2013 02:17 PM (7mQyC)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at July 01, 2013 06:01 PM (kXoT0)
Read Amazon's first chapter excerpt ...
Was it that the women excelled at being sacrificial lambs?
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at July 01, 2013 02:17 PM (oY6Yp)
no newsie should ever have to live in the closet...
Shine Greta Shine@!
and get your jaw reattached to your head doll
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 02:17 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Greta Van Susteren at July 01, 2013 02:17 PM (V1ZIU)
Or is the Government in the way, again?
Yes, and the environmental wacko's. It's what caused all the beetle kill in the first place. Couldn't spray with pesticides.
Posted by: Infidel at July 01, 2013 02:18 PM (SkhKv)
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at July 01, 2013 02:18 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Jones in CO at July 01, 2013 02:19 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request [/i] at July 01, 2013 02:20 PM (U2UQk)
Believe it or not a fair but left leaning CNN was one of the ingredients that allowed 1994 to happen....
hell Newt got the message out on ABC back when Brinkley was running the Sundays and George Will was still young and vibrant and acting like Tron....
I miss my 20s
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 02:20 PM (LRFds)
I wish I could believe that. I truly do.
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 02:20 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at July 01, 2013 02:21 PM (7mQyC)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at July 01, 2013 02:21 PM (pxDth)
The article says SHE contacted them. I don't get that....Fox has the highest ratings in all the evening timeslots. Why would she go to a channel with lower ratings?
Doesn't want to stay at Fox for reasons other than ratings? Ideology, personality conflicts, wants more control over her on-air persona than Fox will allow and she thinks that another channel might give her what she wants?
Posted by: Grey Fox at July 01, 2013 02:21 PM (CdQRQ)
Except for the delicate flower of Jeantel who liberals will attest was devastating to the defense! And even if she wasn't we white people just don't understand her.
Posted by: Cheri at July 01, 2013 02:21 PM (EAgmr)
I remember that. All of the rest of them would speak, and then look expectantly at Will, as if looking forward to the inevitable cosmic ass-whipping.
Posted by: pep at July 01, 2013 02:22 PM (6TB1Z)
I would think the wood has to be of some value.
Or is the Government in the way, again? Posted by: seamrog at July 01, 2013 06:15 PM
Yes, they could. The wood is usable. Yes, they are.
Posted by: huerfano at July 01, 2013 02:22 PM (bAGA/)
Maybe Greta's contract is up soon and she wants to be able to negotiate with FNC with another offer up her sleeve so she can ask for more money. Ratings are irrelevant; all she cares about is the contract. She is a lawyer, after all.
All these TV personalities would do their show in front of a kindergarten class if it paid them the most.
Posted by: soothsayer at July 01, 2013 02:22 PM (1WM2H)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 01, 2013 02:23 PM (g1DWB)
>>Those who are suggesting "clearing out the underbrush" need to reconsider the vastness of the forests.
All of the private forests up here have been cleared and have had the beetle kill burned. It's the public land that is the problem, now.
Posted by: garrett at July 01, 2013 02:23 PM (2TQQt)
Believe it...my power bill here in Indiana was ~35 bucks versus ~ 90 bucks last year....
Freeshit Army and Low Information Voter are not necessarily evil even if they are bad at civics, if you ask them they've outsmarted society by getting their news off the daily show and twatter and facebook...
you tell 'em an outright falsehood that insults their intelligence too hard they'll bust out their own memehammer...
it's why the GOP is gonna get fucked and lose the white working class for a decade in a bit.
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 02:23 PM (LRFds)
130...The article says SHE contacted them. I don't get that....Fox has the highest ratings in all the evening timeslots. Why would she go to a channel with lower ratings?
It could be Contract Renewal Time for Greta...and maybe she's checking to see what she could make elsewhere?
Posted by: wheatie at July 01, 2013 02:23 PM (Jw4kG)
Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at July 01, 2013 02:24 PM (7mQyC)
Posted by: Jones in CO at July 01, 2013 02:25 PM (8sCoq)
All these TV personalities would do their show in front of a kindergarten class if it paid them the most.
Posted by: soothsayer at July 01, 2013 02:26 PM (1WM2H)
Re: clearing dead trees and brush
Thanks to all who responded.
My guess was it was the greentards and the govtards.
Can I please have my Country back?
Shit.
Posted by: seamrog at July 01, 2013 02:27 PM (FC0Uh)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 01, 2013 02:28 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: huerfano at July 01, 2013 02:28 PM (bAGA/)
Posted by: Berserker at July 01, 2013 02:29 PM (FMbng)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at July 01, 2013 02:30 PM (pxDth)
Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at July 01, 2013 02:30 PM (7mQyC)
The wildlife, death and destruction mean nothing to them. Liberal policies kill.
Posted by: Cheri at July 01, 2013 02:30 PM (EAgmr)
Posted by: Ronster at July 01, 2013 02:30 PM (51V49)
It's bad enough I really am wondering if the DA is going through the motions to either put the riots to bed, or undermine the majority of the rage....
like I said earlier my new beanie is bronze the tin foil one wore out.
Posted by: Esteban10077@sven10077 at July 01, 2013 02:31 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Cheri at July 01, 2013 02:32 PM (EAgmr)
Posted by: Cheri at July 01, 2013 02:35 PM (EAgmr)
Posted by: rickb223 at July 01, 2013 02:35 PM (O2PXL)
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 01, 2013 02:37 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at July 01, 2013 06:17 PM (oY6Yp)
Partly, but, more to do with the things that women naturally excel at such as communication. I do not want to spoil the book for anyone.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at July 01, 2013 02:41 PM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 01, 2013 02:41 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at July 01, 2013 02:43 PM (TbVAj)
Posted by: Zombie Andrew at July 01, 2013 02:47 PM (fqspt)
Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at July 01, 2013 02:48 PM (7mQyC)
A few years ago, I received a cold call from a politician saying that he had been given my name as someone who would be a great conservative candidate for a state office.
He asked if I had any interest.
I wouldn't have any chance of winning, because of the amount of (D) LIV's in the area.
For a split second, I considered it. But only that split second. I am by no means a squeaky-clean choir boy.
I declined, explaining why.
He asked that I do it just to divert (D) funds from other elections. I understood the logic behind his request, but I had no desire to have my life under the MSM microscope.
It'd be more like being under a magnifying glass on a sunny day. That day I realized that you had to be insane to run for public office.
Everything that I have watched since has solidified my opinion. Really sad if you think about it.
Posted by: seamrog at July 01, 2013 03:00 PM (FC0Uh)
Posted by: weft cut-loop at July 01, 2013 06:34 PM (XS/b3)
Assuming that the majority of the trees are mature. They aren't.
The number of mature trees dictates the economic viability of harvesting them. Like I said, most of the beetle kill forests are good only for fuel. No reason we can't use them for that and for pulp, though.
Posted by: garrett at July 01, 2013 03:05 PM (2TQQt)
>>>I'm just pointing out that there is a big difference between fire mitigation efforts on a several acre private lot compared to trying to clear out hundreds of square miles of National Forest.
Oh, I'm talking hundreds and in many cases even thousands of acres of private forest.
Posted by: garrett at July 01, 2013 03:07 PM (2TQQt)
Posted by: garrett at July 01, 2013 07:07 PM (2TQQt)
***
Sorry for the late reply on a dead thread. I appreciate your perspective, and I don't pretend to be any kind of expert. It just strikes me as an interested observer as I drive through the mountains of Colorado that the sheer size and remoteness, combined with the density of the trees would make any sort of thinning process very time and labor intensive. It seems that many of the people who work in fire mitigation, also work as firefighters, so the resources are spread very thin.
It does seem to me that decades of "management" has created an explosive tinderbox in the public lands of Colorado.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at July 01, 2013 03:16 PM (pxDth)
Look for the Union Label, Boeing batteries as well.
Posted by: Blortrak at July 01, 2013 05:37 PM (gRUIP)
I will take no position on the management (beetle-damaged forests) matter, but .....
..... to echo/amplify what pep said up-thread, a primary and huge question that needs to be asked (not just in light of this tragedy, either, though obviously related to it) is just what fire-fighting strategy does actually make sense and seem worth it.
Live in a southwestern state with wildfires as part of the package. Here there seems to be a sensible mix (anything sensible here is stunning - yes, it's CA): codes about clearing fuel away from buildings, requirements for on-site water storage in certain remote locations, no-nonsense evacuation approach in places with one road in/out. Insurance rates reflect risk. Nothing lately has happened to test this part out, but I know that on certain federal lands (big Yellowstone fire years back?), FINALLY, it has been suggested (and actually followed) to let nature take its course. Squelch things when safe and feasible at the outset, beyod that evacuate life, contain safely when feasible. Otherwise, let it burn (to coin a phrase).
No idea where the AZ tragedy would fit into this matrix, but I think there's little serious argument for doing more than protecting life in almost all situations. This assumes that sensible preventive measures are in place (fuel clearing from structures, fire-resistant structures, etc.). There are few situations where sensible-to-aggressive preventive measures will no prevent or mitigate property damage (not enough situations to alter the general principle here).
I think it's actually pretty outrageous that lives are risked in this way outside cases of rescuing humans. Fire is as natural as climate change, and in a similar way trying to resist it is likely to be as and futile dangerous as the climate nonsense is impoverishing.
Posted by: non-purist at July 01, 2013 05:51 PM (afQnV)
This was an IHC (Inter Agency Hotshot Crew) They can work on fires not only on USFS lands but BLM, Park Service, USFW, BIA, State, County and local. They may even travel over seas, Australia for example. When man power is short you can find Ausies, Kiwis, and Canadians in over head positions on US fires. Most hot shot crews are not inter agency meaning USFS crews will usually only work on National Forests or sometimes other Federal lands in bad years.
Why aren't these fire prone areas thinned or treated to prevent the fires or mitigate the effects?
Environmental concerns are a problem. You need to do at least a formal environmental assessment or more common Environmental Impact Statement and get that through the courts and public comment for each project. There are literally hundreds of enviro groups /lawyers just waiting to sue the government over these things because the government pays them to, basically.
Another problem is money and manpower. The wood removed is typically low value and poor quality with the exception of house logs for log cabins. The South Western US lacks the processing facilities, equipment, and manpower to do it even if the money was there. The timber value is less than the costs to harvest it so... no money there.
A friends crew get burned over and they deployed the baked potato wrappers. Only one got minor burns but the winds associated with the fire front make it very difficult to deploy and hold down once inside. They also fill with smoke. He figured he would die from the smoke trapped inside instead of the fire outside. He had to dig a little hole to put his face into to find any air to breathe. Not fun. Fortunately the year before that was my last year on fires otherwise it was likely I would have been with him.
Posted by: forest nomad at July 01, 2013 10:44 PM (KVVCv)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2813 seconds, 302 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: huerfano at July 01, 2013 01:29 PM (bAGA/)