November 03, 2013
— Purple Avenger Anecdotal I'm sure. An isolated case. Nothing to be concerned about.
Dean Griffin liked the health insurance he purchased for himself and his wife three years ago and thought he'd be able to keep the plan even after the federal Affordable Care Act took effect.Flounder, you effed up...
But the 64-year-old recently received a letter notifying him the plan was being canceled because it didn't cover certain benefits required under the law...Oh, wait...what was the plural of anecdotal again? It just slipped my mind. Ah yes, now I remember -- DATA. The plural of anecdotal is called DATA.
...The Griffins are among millions of people nationwide who buy individual insurance policies and are receiving notices...
Shit DATA happens
Posted by: Purple Avenger at
10:54 AM
| Comments (179)
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jay Carney at November 03, 2013 10:58 AM (OP1M9)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at November 03, 2013 10:58 AM (l3vZN)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 10:58 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: MTF at November 03, 2013 10:59 AM (F58x4)
Posted by: carol at November 03, 2013 11:00 AM (XIF5G)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at November 03, 2013 11:00 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at November 03, 2013 11:03 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: hammer meet nail at November 03, 2013 11:04 AM (EMtVt)
Posted by: Karusky at November 03, 2013 11:05 AM (wtCU5)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at November 03, 2013 11:06 AM (P6QsQ)
Jinx, I'm with you. Right now my plan is to go without insurance for the first time in my life, and put the wife on the now-tripled-in-price-for-less private plan that replaces our previous plan. I will not even go on the state "exchange" to check on eligibility for welfare. Die on your feet vs. cower on your knees sort of thing.
But again - I seriously doubt even THIS gigantic, concrete, indefensible assault on millions of peoples' pocketbooks and freedom will result in any meaningful political fallout. Meaningful. As in, not just a bloodbath of historic proportions as 2010 was for the Dems - but a bloodbath that leads to any change (as 2010 did not). If people don't have the tools and framework to understand their predicament, then their ideas for fixes will have only a random chance of being effective or sensible.
A giant GOP wave in 2014 would not surprise - but any meaningful reversal of the broad degredation of the country, or the rule of lawlessness, or the devolution of representative "government" into raw rent-seeking and self-dealing and corruption in a way not seen since government got large enough to matter that much? Nah.
Posted by: non-purist at November 03, 2013 11:07 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:08 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 03, 2013 11:08 AM (ZPrif)
Geez, this is a nervous tic with you. Give it a rest.
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:08 AM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:10 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 11:10 AM (AO9UG)
First tier: you voted for Obama-sucks to be you. You get OCare full force.
2nd tier: you voted Republican. Yes, eman, Republican-the party that provided not a single vote for this POS. You folks don't have to have anything to do with OCare. The law does not apply to you.
The Dems would never win another election. '14 and '16 aren't looking to good for them as it is.
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:11 AM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: t-bird at November 03, 2013 11:12 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 03, 2013 11:12 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:13 AM (XIxXP)
The insurance companies must have know this would happen.
Didn't the Lizard Lady, the one with the Mao Xmas ornaments, say as much a few years back?
Why would any government want to destroy an entire industry (and a heavily regulated one at that) that employs a large number of people? /rhetorical
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at November 03, 2013 11:13 AM (0HooB)
We are winners, losers.
//Vote D for Democrats
Posted by: sven10077 at November 03, 2013 11:13 AM (9jfyN)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 11:13 AM (AO9UG)
You really think a vast amount of employers are going to stay with providing insurance? When the financial incentive to pay the fine/"tax" is better then providing insurance, I don't think many will do it.
Posted by: lowandslow at November 03, 2013 11:13 AM (IV4od)
Posted by: Kreplach at November 03, 2013 11:14 AM (F05dQ)
Fuck Olympic Snowe...
which about 65 years ago would have made her what 40 and perhaps not unthinkable...
Posted by: sven10077 at November 03, 2013 11:14 AM (9jfyN)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:15 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 03, 2013 11:16 AM (wNF3N)
Posted by: Sebelius the Baby Killer at November 03, 2013 11:16 AM (O7OxF)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 03, 2013 11:16 AM (ZPrif)
My guess is the insurance companies looked at Obamacare and said we're screwed, at which they tried to pick the option less painful for them.
Posted by: Harry at November 03, 2013 11:17 AM (ao2LR)
It's a good thing I'm a Moron...the 3 year schadenboner won't drain enough blood I look dumber than normal
Posted by: sven10077 at November 03, 2013 11:17 AM (9jfyN)
Posted by: Sebelius the Baby Killer at November 03, 2013 11:18 AM (O7OxF)
The dickholes were bought off with the captive audience stick to wield and the carrot of AIG style bailouts....
Posted by: sven10077 at November 03, 2013 11:18 AM (9jfyN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 03, 2013 11:19 AM (ZPrif)
Its a low margin high overhead segment of their business. Losing it wouldn't be that big a deal unless it was the only insurance market you were in.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at November 03, 2013 11:19 AM (fZ2Zr)
Posted by: no good deed at November 03, 2013 11:19 AM (k55Fc)
Her vote put us here, pep.
My statement stands.
Look, my point is that things are looking up for us now. OCare is an unmitigated disaster, and is unfixable. This will not play out to the Dems advantage. If you've been on this site for awhile, and I know you have, then you also know that I take a back seat to nobody in opposing amnesty, but your gloom and pessimism at a time when we're winning doesn't help the cause of defeating amnesty. That is what you want, right?
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:19 AM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 03, 2013 11:20 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Burnt Toast at November 03, 2013 11:20 AM (80R0X)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 03, 2013 11:21 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 11:21 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Joe Biden, Elder Statesman at November 03, 2013 11:21 AM (bJm7W)
pep, you may be right about the tic thing. But for one I cannot get over the very idea that, amidst the ongoing depression, fiscal insanity, and federal lawlessness/scandals now too numerous to list (and they are not trivial - some, like the IRS scandal, are arguably the biggest domestic scandals in US history), the GOP would do anything but explode with derision and outrage at the idea of amnesty. Instead? The truly jaw-droppingly unbelievably stupid and offensive Rubio shit, and Paul Ryan beclowning himself and re-branding as a minor fund-raising functionary for the Chamber.
Now I assume that the GOP has been, or soon will be, scared off of the unbelievably stupid, inexcusable, and offensive idea of amnesty. But they were scared off. That they even gave it a moment's thought, to me, is very revealing. And not in a good way.
Then again, soon enough various commenters will be along to correct me, since the immigration system is "broken" because typical bureaucratic snafus affect some legal immigrants, and it takes more than 6 weeks to get your CR-1 after marrying a 19-yr old Ukrainian 40 years your junior, or something.
But eman may be wrong in one regard. I doubt the "ice would break" even if the astonishing outrage of amnesty were advanced. I don't think we get a Democratic Party, or a GOP, or a state of the country like we've got, with an electorate that really has any effective limits to the degradation and punishment it will accept or inflict on itself. The smart and responsible people are vastly outnumbered (an no, not by the "FSA"), and there is no escape from the pernicious cycles that situation sets up.
Posted by: non-purist at November 03, 2013 11:22 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 03, 2013 11:22 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Lauren at November 03, 2013 11:23 AM (hFL/3)
Posted by: Sebelius the Baby Killer at November 03, 2013 11:23 AM (O7OxF)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 03, 2013 11:24 AM (ZPrif)
The dog that isn't barking here, so far, is the Dems aren't threatening price controls to limit these huge increases in premiums and deductibles.
But the one that is, is requiring doctors to treat Medicaid patients. Drudge had it earlier.
Woof.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at November 03, 2013 11:24 AM (0HooB)
What he said was: "right way to replace Obamacare is to elect Republicans to the Senate and the House and, ultimately, the White House and repair Obamacare, replace it, and put in place something thatÂ’s going to do a better job"
That seems pretty unambiguous to me.
He also said Obama lied (didn't tell the truth) and had he done so, OCare would not have passed. He's right on both counts.
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:24 AM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe
Actually, they are. Today, a candidate in VA for State Senate called for forcing doctors to participate in Medicare and Medicaid. That's price controls by another name.
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:26 AM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Blacksheep at November 03, 2013 11:26 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Progrestive Flow-bot at November 03, 2013 11:26 AM (KQp38)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 11:27 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:28 AM (XIxXP)
Agreed, they're politicians, not angels. Hold their feet to the fire. And fire them if they screw up.
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:29 AM (6TB1Z)
What he said was: "right way to replace Obamacare is to elect Republicans to the Senate and
the House and, ultimately, the White House and repair Obamacare,
replace it, and put in place something thatÂ’s going to do a better job"
Well, we'd need to find some Republicans who actually believe in a smaller government and who'd vow to repeal OCare. So far, there are only a handful, Cruz, Paul, and Lee among them.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at November 03, 2013 11:29 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at November 03, 2013 11:29 AM (Kud5A)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 03, 2013 11:29 AM (ZPrif)
“Are you ready to have a government bureaucrat decide if you may own a gun or not, with no day in court?” GOA asks. “Once doctors start entering your personal information into the medical database, there will be nothing to stop the FBI from using your medical information to deny you the right to purchase a firearm.
“President ‘Above-the-Law’ Obama has now waived Obamacare for everyone except for us -- the ‘little guys,’” GOA charges, citing waivers for unions, Congress and their staffers, and businesses. “Obamacare is ‘the law of the land’ only when it suits Barack Obama’s purposes.
“The bottom line? Obama can’t force you to comply with Obamacare, if he’s not going to comply with it himself,” GOA maintains.
Posted by: Rurik the Damned at November 03, 2013 11:30 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:30 AM (XIxXP)
Tomorrow is the IRS audit pt2.
It's sucking to be a conservative right now.
I can blame the tea party because life was good until we joined.
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at November 03, 2013 11:30 AM (pgQxn)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 11:31 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 03, 2013 11:31 AM (U2UQk)
That would be all of them, even the ones who don't believe in smaller government. This is a slam dunk political win. Politicians are capable of realizing it.
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:32 AM (6TB1Z)
I have no doubt that this is a trial balloon and will be repeated. The Dems are desparate. What else can they do?
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:32 AM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:33 AM (XIxXP)
I agree.
Romney needs to do what losers of Presidential elections have done in the past. Quietly retreat to the sidelines or sell boner pills. Posted by: Schrödinger's cat
If he chooses to do so. Otherwise, I'm perfectly happy to have him as part of the party. He is a vivid reminder to the "undecideds" and assorted LIVs of what they could have had. Now, they can rue their decisions as they write big fat checks.
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:35 AM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at November 03, 2013 11:36 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 11:36 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:37 AM (XIxXP)
There's nothing in medical info that could disqualify someone unless they were ALREADY ineligible under current law.
To change that would require changing existing firearms law to incorporate more disqualifiers.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at November 03, 2013 11:38 AM (fZ2Zr)
Posted by: Meremortal at November 03, 2013 11:38 AM (jTKU5)
Posted by: Zombie Eddard Stark at November 03, 2013 11:38 AM (mpTrn)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 11:39 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:39 AM (XIxXP)
Heh.
OK, real @73, that bill would only need to be one page, reading "The Affordable Care Act is hereby repealed in its entirety."
The push it, hard, everywhere, all the time, on every interview and talk show, to the exclusion of all else.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at November 03, 2013 11:39 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: RR Pollster at November 03, 2013 11:41 AM (nLIMC)
Just put it back the way it was first.
This is basic simplex method optimization stuff. FIRST find a feasible solution, THEN start walking the edge incrementally towards optimality.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at November 03, 2013 11:41 AM (fZ2Zr)
Posted by: JEM at November 03, 2013 11:42 AM (vovcn)
Data which does not bolster your case is known as "anecdotal evidence".
Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at November 03, 2013 11:42 AM (H0R/1)
Posted by: Future post in the AoSHQ comments at November 03, 2013 11:42 AM (N3Al8)
Posted by: tsrblke PhD(c) (No Really!) at November 03, 2013 11:43 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 03, 2013 11:44 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:44 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Lester at November 03, 2013 11:44 AM (qTsuK)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 11:45 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars [/i] [/b] [/s] at November 03, 2013 11:45 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: Zombie Eddard Stark at November 03, 2013 11:46 AM (mpTrn)
Posted by: t-bird at November 03, 2013 11:47 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:47 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: tsrblke PhD(c) (No Really!) at November 03, 2013 11:48 AM (GaqMa)
RINO. Not only will I shed no tears, crocodilian or otherwise, but I will twirl my mustachios at them.
As soon as I grow some.
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:48 AM (6TB1Z)
sniff sniff I smell an American Spring a comin
Posted by: common sense at November 03, 2013 11:50 AM (N3Al8)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 11:50 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: tsrblke PhD(c) (No Really!) at November 03, 2013 11:51 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 11:51 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars [/i] [/b] [/s] at November 03, 2013 11:52 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: NSA Bob. at November 03, 2013 11:53 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: eman at November 03, 2013 11:53 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: common sense at November 03, 2013 11:54 AM (N3Al8)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 03, 2013 11:54 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Truck Monkey, Gruntled New Business Owner at November 03, 2013 11:55 AM (jucos)
It won't be long before the Medicaid folks can only see shamans and crystal healers.
Posted by: pep at November 03, 2013 11:56 AM (6TB1Z)
Me and uncle sam are on the good foot as we speak Bob but I will not give my information on your O care site. sorry but I reserve the right to refuse...
Posted by: common sense at November 03, 2013 11:56 AM (N3Al8)
Posted by: NSA Bob. at November 03, 2013 11:59 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: common sense at November 03, 2013 03:52 PM (N3Al
Whats my smiley wearing sun glasses?
Posted by: common sense at November 03, 2013 11:59 AM (N3Al8)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 03, 2013 12:00 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: tsrblke PhD(c) (No Really!) at November 03, 2013 12:00 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 03, 2013 12:00 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 03, 2013 12:01 PM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 03, 2013 12:02 PM (DmNpO)
"Some states, including Virginia and Kentucky, required insurers to cancel old policies and start from scratch instead of beefing up existing ones."
Keep -- in the broad sense of the word.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 03, 2013 12:02 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at November 03, 2013 12:04 PM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Major T.J. "King" Kong [/i] at November 03, 2013 12:07 PM (U2UQk)
Posted by: --- at November 03, 2013 12:07 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: garrett at November 03, 2013 12:11 PM (A99o6)
Tommy Thayer @tommy_thayer*
"If you like your healthcare plan you can keep it, period." Not true. I just got notice mine's cancelled 12/31. #ObamaCareFail
*The guitarist for KISS
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 03, 2013 12:11 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at November 03, 2013 12:13 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: Jean at November 03, 2013 12:18 PM (CMlD4)
Posted by: --- at November 03, 2013 04:07 PM (MMC8r)
Yeah, that one vanished faster than a snowflake on a hot stove, didn't it?
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at November 03, 2013 12:21 PM (8Fl6F)
We're going to fumble this and add amnesty so we just move the needle enough to keep our phony baloney jobs.
Posted by: Teh GOP at November 03, 2013 12:22 PM (DL2i+)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 03, 2013 12:23 PM (DmNpO)
If you incorporate, can you go for an employer plan and wait a year for the pain.
If you like the pain, you can keep the pain.
Just kidding. It's going to get worse.
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at November 03, 2013 12:24 PM (A99o6)
Posted by: Ambassador Stevens at November 03, 2013 12:33 PM (Pr6hk)
Posted by: Vince Foster at November 03, 2013 12:34 PM (Pr6hk)
If access to ObamaCare was available to me, I would still be reporting the news fairly and unbiased.
Posted by: Zombie Helen Thomas at November 03, 2013 12:39 PM (pJF+c)
If ObamaCare was available during my youth, I would in all probability never have tasted the taco.
Posted by: Ellen Degeneres at November 03, 2013 12:43 PM (pJF+c)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at November 03, 2013 12:44 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at November 03, 2013 12:45 PM (/IXKu)
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 03, 2013 12:50 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at November 03, 2013 12:57 PM (ZPrif)
Now, increasingly, you're lashed to the mast of the sinking ship. If your savings and income are in dollars, you can expect giant sticker shock when pricing treatment out of the USA.
Even treatment in places like India now costs a lot more in greenbacks than it used to only a few short years ago. Because Obamanomics are steadily robbing the dollar of its buying power, both here and abroad.
Posted by: torquewrench at November 03, 2013 01:08 PM (gqT4g)
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 03, 2013 03:16 PM (wNF3N)
You should probably see a doc...
oh, right...
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at November 03, 2013 01:22 PM (yh0zB)
Posted by: garrett at November 03, 2013 01:29 PM (cQCD0)
"You must be hurt," says the donkey. "If you are not hurt I can not help these others."
"But why can you not help them without hurting me?"
"What are you, some kind of tea-bagger? Help can only be given if others are hurt."
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Jeers and More at the Outrage Outlet! at November 03, 2013 01:29 PM (gmoEG)
I'll take "people that don't need or want to wait 3 years for a hip replacement", Alex.
Posted by: navybrat at November 03, 2013 01:33 PM (P5xur)
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 03, 2013 01:35 PM (ZshNr)
I'll take "people that don't need or want to wait 3 years for a hip replacement", Alex.
Yeah, no thanks. I'll wait and avoid the plague, altogether.
Posted by: garrett at November 03, 2013 01:37 PM (cQCD0)
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 03, 2013 01:40 PM (ZshNr)
an Elephant God can squish the fuck out of any microbe, that's a proven fact.
Why do you think they have all those arms?
Posted by: garrett at November 03, 2013 01:40 PM (cQCD0)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at November 03, 2013 01:41 PM (jKE+l)
The cost delta is in the 5X range for some operations. A $20k operation might cost $6k now rather than the $4k it did a few years ago.
A big chunk of that is the hugely inflated prices hospitals charge for the actual operating room facilities and subsequent couple of day stay during recovery.
I wonder if some enterprising collection of doctors, or insurance companies, might setup their own private co-op surgical facilities to reduce costs?
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at November 03, 2013 01:52 PM (fZ2Zr)
Posted by: Angel with a sword at November 03, 2013 01:52 PM (hpgw1)
Posted by: Dave S. at November 03, 2013 01:55 PM (UvR6d)
Posted by: The Political Hat at November 03, 2013 02:17 PM (Vk2pI)
I don't think I would, but I have met people who have gone there for everything from a root canal to a quad bypass. Satisfaction seems reasonably high.
Remember this: those Indian clinics are working for CASH MONEY. If they get a rep for killing and maiming and infecting patients, the flow of CASH MONEY will dry up awfully fast. People respond to market incentives. And, CASH MONEY works wonders for pushing past the various inefficiencies and unsanitaries to be found in India.
Note as well that the U.S. medical system isn't exactly a paragon of excellence when it comes to patient outcomes.
Last year, about thirty thousand American died in motor vehicle accidents. Depending on how you reckon it, the number of Americans who died last year from preventable medical error may have been more than _ten times_ that figure.
In 2010, the HHS Inspector General's office said that preventable medical error contributed to the deaths of 180,000 patients that year, on Medicare alone.
Posted by: torquewrench at November 03, 2013 02:21 PM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at November 03, 2013 02:40 PM (CeNUw)
Second look: witch doctors
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at November 03, 2013 02:41 PM (fZ2Zr)
Hold their feet in a tub of hardening cement, then take them for a tour of the harbor.
Posted by: tlk244182 at November 03, 2013 02:41 PM (rafF+)
Posted by: Javems at November 03, 2013 02:44 PM (c8xU9)
Great idea. Less strain on this piece of shit I concocted. I'll suggest this to Boobelius right away.
Posted by: Prez'nit 404 at November 03, 2013 02:58 PM (Dwehj)
Posted by: Vendette at November 03, 2013 03:04 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: seamrog at November 03, 2013 03:11 PM (hJn41)
Posted by: Patrick at November 03, 2013 03:27 PM (b6koZ)
A lot of anecdotes does not data make.
The reason we have anecdotes and not data in this case, of course, is because the administration is deliberately gagging the insurance companies in an effort to prevent them from releasing the data.
Posted by: lauraw at November 03, 2013 05:16 PM (yGblt)
Posted by: Cornfed at November 03, 2013 06:36 PM (TLyp/)
Posted by: roald dahl at November 03, 2013 08:41 PM (Gtt2/)
Absolute BOLLOCKS.
The vast majority of independently purchased plans are FULL COVERAGE PLANS, either HMOs or the old 80/20% choose-your-own-doctor plans.
I also notice that they're saying, "Oh, this will only affect 5% of the insured population."
Erm, yeah -- THIS year.
Next year? try 93 MILLION PEOPLE being thrown off their plans when the EMPLOYER mandate kicks in.
Thank you for playing, Ass Press.
Posted by: Beverly at November 03, 2013 09:40 PM (PkUsT)
Posted by: Lester at November 04, 2013 01:13 AM (qTsuK)
Posted by: Lester at November 04, 2013 01:32 AM (qTsuK)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2285 seconds, 307 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Anchor Baby who BRINGS IT at November 03, 2013 10:57 AM (xehjI)