January 31, 2013
— Ace AP actually calls NBC out for this. I made this point yesterday: NBC issued a statement claiming they'd reviewed the controversy, and they decided that opinions could vary on whether or not the father was "heckled" at the proceeding.
That's a whitewash in and of itself (no, there is no question), but the characterization of the controversy as such is itself deceptive: The real question -- and there is no question about the answer to this question -- was whether or not NBC
once again
doctored video or audio to create a false impression for purposes of sensationalizing a story for its liberal partisan audience.
Because that question has a brutally simple answer -- "Yes" -- NBC just pretended it wasn't a question at all.
And AP does in fact notice this.
MSNBC invited viewers Wednesday to draw their own conclusions about whether the parent of a Connecticut school shooting victim was heckled at a legislative hearing but didn't address criticism that it aired a deceptively edited video of the event.The NBC-owned cable news network found itself under attack for its editing practices less than a year after three employees of NBC or an NBC-owned station lost their jobs over the editing of a 911 call in the Trayvon Martin case.
...
The passage as aired by MSNBC received criticism for being deceptive.
"This is not how a legitimate, professional news organization operates," said Brent Bozell, founder of the Media Research Center, a conservative media watchdog. "MSNBC's relentless anti-gun advocacy is bad enough, but this is downright dishonest."
MSNBC spokeswoman Lauren Skowronski did not immediately address questions about why MSNBC made the changes or whether criticism that it was misleading is valid.
Posted by: Ace at
08:44 AM
| Comments (217)
Post contains 301 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Felt Wrapper at January 31, 2013 08:47 AM (ecmD4)
Posted by: locomotivebreath1901 at January 31, 2013 08:48 AM (tUT9B)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at January 31, 2013 08:48 AM (P7hip)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at January 31, 2013 08:49 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: CarolT at January 31, 2013 08:49 AM (s0f54)
Posted by: Mikey NTH - there on Thunder Island! at January 31, 2013 08:49 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Pravda at January 31, 2013 08:50 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at January 31, 2013 12:49 PM (7ObY1)
That's the first time that's ever happened on this blog!
Barrel.
Posted by: jwb7605 (Let It Burn) at January 31, 2013 08:51 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at January 31, 2013 08:51 AM (PH+2B)
What's the penalty for abusing First Amendment rights?
Could they be demoted to black-and-white TV?
And then would they have to hire Soledad?
Posted by: comatus at January 31, 2013 08:51 AM (qaVK+)
Posted by: sans_sheriff at January 31, 2013 08:52 AM (OQHM+)
Posted by: NBC at January 31, 2013 08:52 AM (F6KtL)
What's the penalty for abusing First Amendment rights?
Could they be demoted to black-and-white TV?
And then would they have to hire Soledad?
Posted by: comatus at January 31, 2013 12:51 PM (qaVK+)
Replace Beckel with her and turn Gutfeld loose, and I'd start watching that again instead of Gunsmoke reruns.
Posted by: jwb7605 (Let It Burn) at January 31, 2013 08:53 AM (Qxe/p)
The False Impression is what is imprinted on the weak-minded viewers, since that came first.
That is all that matters.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at January 31, 2013 08:53 AM (+z4pE)
This is not how a legitimate, professional news organization operates
=============
Well, no. But I don't think NBC (or MSNBC) sees themselves that way at this point.
Let's not forget, NBC blew up a car and tried to say it was spontaneous. Dateline NBC producers had rigged the truckÂ’s fuel tank with remotely controlled model rocket engines to initiate the explosion.
Dateline co-anchor Jane Pauley, apologized on air for this.
Posted by: Jay at January 31, 2013 08:53 AM (3LaGb)
Posted by: jakeman at January 31, 2013 08:53 AM (4xDEY)
I wonder if you have to take a purity test to be employed over there.
"The press must grow day in and day out — it is our Party's sharpest and most powerful weapon."
- Joe Stalin
Posted by: Rev Dr. E Buzz Yannoglanchie at January 31, 2013 08:54 AM (HQml1)
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna let it burn really.really bummed at January 31, 2013 08:55 AM (9+ccr)
Posted by: jakeman at January 31, 2013 08:55 AM (4xDEY)
Posted by: Dang at January 31, 2013 08:55 AM (R18D0)
Posted by: Secundus at January 31, 2013 08:56 AM (SWgCQ)
Because if we did that journalists might begin to feel like people are watching their every move and might feel that acting professionally would be one way to avoid scrutiny.
Don't vet the media. It might change things.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 31, 2013 08:56 AM (xz0nG)
We need press control
1. 5 day waiting period for all news stories
2. Background check for all news stories for veracity
3. Convicted felons not allowed to be reporter or news reader
4. Jail time for false stories
5. No more than 10 stories per reporter.
Posted by: Vic at January 31, 2013 08:56 AM (53z96)
Barky is their god...and they are his religious disciples.
This is how they justify what they do for him.
The DNCmedia has become a pack of 'religious extremists' who will persecute anyone who blasphemes their god.
Posted by: wheatie at January 31, 2013 08:56 AM (BZMZX)
I once hazed a CNN anchor, just to watch her cry.
Posted by: Greg Gutfield at January 31, 2013 08:57 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Goebbels Univ. Professor (D-Media) at January 31, 2013 08:57 AM (pmsMR)
Posted by: Squishy the road skunk at January 31, 2013 08:58 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Plato's house boy at January 31, 2013 08:59 AM (4eNxd)
Posted by: Andy at January 31, 2013 08:59 AM (C/NnJ)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 08:59 AM (piMMO)
28 So, where can I find NBC's video archives? So I can chop some footage together to make it seem like their anchors are endorsing rape, pedophilia, terrorism, theft, murder, and the square toed shoes on men?
They'd be cool with that, right?
Posted by: Secundus at January 31, 2013 12:56 PM (SWgCQ)
Shit dude...you don't anything but a DVR to do that. Just hit "play."
Posted by: JQP at January 31, 2013 08:59 AM (NBj0d)
That would be awesome.
Posted by: HeatherRadish, fashioning a shiv from a spork w/ the breakroom toaster at January 31, 2013 08:59 AM (ZKzrr)
The funny part is that nowadays Pravda is actually more right-wing, and more sensible, than NBC or the NYT. Seriously, check out "english.pravda.ru."
Amazing times, my friends, truly amazing times.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 31, 2013 09:00 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 12:59 PM (piMMO)
Hagel?
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna let it burn really.really bummed at January 31, 2013 09:00 AM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Chris W. at January 31, 2013 09:00 AM (m7mrm)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 31, 2013 09:00 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: cardinal fang at January 31, 2013 09:01 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 31, 2013 09:01 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 09:01 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Secundus at January 31, 2013 09:02 AM (SWgCQ)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 31, 2013 09:03 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Ian S. at January 31, 2013 09:03 AM (B/VB5)
42 Quick OT
Anyone who isn't watching CSpan should be,
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 12:59 PM (piMMO)
----------
Jim Inhofe is no fan of Hagel...are they letting him speak?
Posted by: wheatie at January 31, 2013 09:03 AM (BZMZX)
What I always love is the last line of these stories on media malpractice: "We tried to contact the network's spokesperson, but they were unavailable for comment."
Posted by: BurtTC at January 31, 2013 09:04 AM (TOk1P)
They'd be cool with that, right?
Posted by: Secundus at January 31, 2013 12:56 PM (SWgCQ)
I think we should consider targeting certain media figures in the non-violent, data-mining the shit out of them and then exposing and ridiculing them sense of the term. I doubt the private lives of many of those in the propaganda business would stand up to very close and very public scrutiny.
Say, for example, we find out that NBC CEO Stephen Burke is a furry, one of those pervy weirdos who like to have sex with other pervy weirdos while dressed up like a big stuffed animal. Nothing would be better than furnishing video or pictorial evidence this media stalwart engaging in such, ahem, activity.
The possibilities are endless.
Posted by: troyriser at January 31, 2013 09:04 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:04 AM (piMMO)
Sorry, re my "Pravda" comment above, check out one of the lead stories, entitled "American education system" Critical infrastructure, ignorant adults," which cites "video games, American Idol, late night talk shows, nonsense news and information" as factors in our lousy educational performance.
All joking aside, Pravda now is literally more reliable and informative than the American MSM.
Good God.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 31, 2013 09:04 AM (IDSI7)
Here's another subtle psychological trick Leftards love to use: a gauzy, fuzzy, "it may or may not be X" lack of any sort of definitive certainty to anything or issue.
It's almost like they're trying to say there's no concrete basis for anything, that all is subjective. It's merely more of the codified insanity of Post-Modern Thought.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at January 31, 2013 09:04 AM (+z4pE)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 31, 2013 09:05 AM (l86i3)
This is good, but more names need to be named.
Bashir's show has a producer - why isn't this person named? Why haven't they been contacted for a statement? Oh, they refused to comment? That is news too.
Where is the reaction of the executives at NBC news? Is it so hard to pick up the phone and make the call (for either the AP or one of our reputable blogs) and report either their comments or their lack of comment?
You need to personalize this, isolate people involved or in charge, hector and ridicule until they turn on their own to get the spotlight off of them.
Posted by: jwest at January 31, 2013 09:05 AM (ZDsRL)
I hope the lawyers for Zimmerman are watching this.
NBC seems to have a persistent pattern at the corporate level for this libel and slander using deceptive editing.
Can you say Billions?
Posted by: rd at January 31, 2013 09:05 AM (zLp5I)
*lightbulb*
Remember how we were talking about the Cold War here at the HQ? Remember ace or someone saying something about, we really didn't win the Cold War because the commies successfully infiltrated our schools and media?
Well....looks like we fucked with their media just like they did with ours. If Pravda is risking Polonium-210 flavoured sushi rolls with their editorials, then I'd say we really did win.
Posted by: Greg Gutfield at January 31, 2013 09:05 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 31, 2013 09:05 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:06 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Secundus at January 31, 2013 09:06 AM (SWgCQ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 31, 2013 09:06 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: NBC interviewing Homer Simpson at January 31, 2013 09:06 AM (NF2Bf)
Posted by: Mary Mapes at January 31, 2013 09:06 AM (pmsMR)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:07 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: beachie keen at January 31, 2013 09:08 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at January 31, 2013 09:08 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Ian S. at January 31, 2013 09:08 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:09 AM (S7Hzw)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 31, 2013 09:09 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: beachie keen at January 31, 2013 09:09 AM (LpQbZ)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 01:07 PM (piMMO)
That was a fun place before bike boy couldn't maintain the sanity act.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 31, 2013 09:10 AM (B/mBM)
What I always love is the last line of these stories on media malpractice: "We tried to contact the network's spokesperson, but they were unavailable for comment."
This little statement should be followed by something along the lines of, "The refusal of NBC to address the very real question of whether or not they purposely altered footage casts doubt on their commitment to be impartial in their coverage, which is clearly designed to favor one side."
Or something like that.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at January 31, 2013 09:10 AM (+z4pE)
Sorry, semi OT, but I've got the bit between my teeth now re Pravda.
From their article on American education:
From preschool to graduate school students undergo a form of distraction therapy. Video games, American Idol, late night talk shows, nonsense news and information, marketers for clothing, tech gear, music, and credit cards bombard the mind like spray wax at the end of a car wash. But this is all part of the plan for education in America. It's an education in buying and selling; what George W. Bush described as freedom, "freedom is the ability to buy and sell." He was right on many levels but no one likes to pull the curtain back and find that the education industry is just like the defense industry with contractors, consultants, presidents, CEO's, analysts, investment bankers, fraud, waste, abuse etc.
Whoa. Catch the American MSM saying Bush was right on any level about anything.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 31, 2013 09:11 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 31, 2013 09:11 AM (l86i3)
68...Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 01:06 PM (piMMO)
Thanks, NDH.
Yeah, Inhofe is often the lone voice against the weasels.
He used to cross swords with Hagel on a lot of issues, iirc.
Posted by: wheatie at January 31, 2013 09:11 AM (BZMZX)
"Republican schisms deepen: conservatives mutiny against leadership"
Posted by: The Fourth Estate at January 31, 2013 09:11 AM (pmsMR)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:11 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 31, 2013 09:12 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:12 AM (piMMO)
Say, for example, we find out that NBC CEO Stephen Burke is a furry, one of those pervy weirdos who like to have sex with other pervy weirdos while dressed up like a big stuffed animal. Nothing would be better than furnishing video or pictorial evidence this media stalwart engaging insuch, ahem, activity.
The possibilities are endless.
Posted by: troyriser at January 31, 2013 01:04 PM (vtiE6)
This probably should have been started after Joe The Plumber The Tea Party accusation (racist epithets) and at the least Zimmerman.
When They made it their duty to go after regular citizens for political purpose.
Posted by: ette at January 31, 2013 09:13 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: comatus at January 31, 2013 09:14 AM (qaVK+)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:14 AM (piMMO)
Chukkkles and his comment rating system. Then the bannings and the Orwellian rewriting of the blog to remove all traces of those who sinned against his orthodoxy. Yeah it became a digital CPUSA meeting.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:14 AM (S7Hzw)
It wouldn't be that hard to find out who the video editors of Bashir's show are.
Then, as they come and go from their homes and office they are ambush interviewed. Every Fucking Day.
"Why did you change the tape?" "Who ordered you to do this?"
"How much of your previous work is altered to lie to the public?"
"Is your wife leaving you because of this?"
"Are your children ashamed of you?" "How do you sleep?"
Posted by: jwest at January 31, 2013 09:14 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 09:15 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:15 AM (S7Hzw)
Eh?
If you get defense dollars and deliver a defective product, there are consequences. If you graduate kids who can't read, you get a pension greater than the median household income.
Posted by: HeatherRadish, fashioning a shiv from a spork w/ the breakroom toaster at January 31, 2013 09:15 AM (ZKzrr)
weirdos while dressed up like a big stuffed animal.
*sobs quietly*
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 31, 2013 09:15 AM (szUf0)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 31, 2013 09:15 AM (GFM2b)
*SNORT* Speaking of media bitchfaces, apparently the WaPo newsroom is having a slapfight with the editorial section. It's hilarious.
The story is at Buzzfeed and is linked over at Drudge.
Senator Jim Inhofe cited a blog post by conservative Washington Post bloggerJennifer Rubin during the confirmation hearing for Secretary of Defense nominee Chuck Hagel on Thursday, setting in motion a public argument on Twitter.
Inhofe, who called Rubin a reporter, cited a blog post of her's about Hagel. Shortly thereafter, Post reporter Rajiv Chandrasekaran took issue with Rubin's work on Twitter, saying that Rubin "is NOT a WaPo reporter."
His words brought into sharp relief something that has divided the Post newsroom for several years: Late to the internet and struggling to maintain its status as a top-tier news outlet, the Post turned to high-profile, often partisan bloggers, led by the liberal policy wonk Ezra Klein, to generate traffic and buzz. But the outlet's unfamiliarity with the online news environment quickly showed: Their first conservative blogger was fired in a plagiarism flap, and the second, Dave Weigel, was let go after Post management learned — apparently to their surprise, if not to his actual readers' — that he wasn't a movement conservative.
The newsroom, meanwhile, has bemoaned that the mixture of slant and partisanship has dented the newspaper's reputation for fairness and neutrality (MWR: BWA-HA-HA!), a claim the opinionated bloggers reject....
I'm laughing so hard.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at January 31, 2013 09:16 AM (4df7R)
Facts are relative. Within the penumbra of each claimed falsehood therein lies some measure of absolute truth.
Posted by: Journalism School Professor at January 31, 2013 09:17 AM (pmsMR)
I don't get that. Is there like a.....hatch or something down there that opens, so the two can "connect"?
Posted by: EC at January 31, 2013 09:18 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: John Morris at January 31, 2013 09:18 AM (sCRhB)
Posted by: t-bird at January 31, 2013 09:18 AM (FcR7P)
"Are your children ashamed of you?" "How do you sleep?"
"Have you stopped molesting children yet?"
"Who really paid for your last rehab stay?"
Damn, this is fun.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at January 31, 2013 09:18 AM (+z4pE)
91...This probably should have been started after Joe The Plumber The Tea Party accusation (racist epithets) and at the least Zimmerman.When They made it their duty to go after regular citizens for political purpose.
Barky is their god.
And Zimmerman killed his 'son'.
So they went after Zimmerman with all the religious zeal of Al Jazeera.
Posted by: wheatie at January 31, 2013 09:18 AM (BZMZX)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 09:18 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: ette at January 31, 2013 01:13 PM (nqBYe)
Better late than never. Think of it as applied game theory: tit for tat with escalating retaliation.
Posted by: troyriser at January 31, 2013 09:18 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Secundus at January 31, 2013 09:18 AM (SWgCQ)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 31, 2013 09:18 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:18 AM (S7Hzw)
Posted by: wooga at January 31, 2013 09:20 AM (tNWB8)
Dontcha know
Layers of fact checking, people.
Layers.
Posted by: Squishy the road skunk at January 31, 2013 09:20 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:20 AM (S7Hzw)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:20 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 01:20 PM (S7Hzw)
Better confiscate everyone's scissors.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at January 31, 2013 09:21 AM (4df7R)
I'm assuming that those are full outfits so they can stay in "character". If they have to undress, then it seems the whole illusion is broken.
In other news, people are fucked up.
Posted by: EC at January 31, 2013 09:21 AM (GQ8sn)
yeah going after corporations as they did with chevy back in the day. offensive, but they have atty's money, the means to fight back.
citizen joe or jane not so much.
Posted by: ette at January 31, 2013 09:21 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Rich at January 31, 2013 09:21 AM (fxjo5)
It's almost like there's some sort of ideological kinship here; a seemless integration of politics and media, where everything flows the same way.
Oh, and thinking of the Menendez story: You mean to tell me not one fucking person in the entire Republican Party knew about this? Not one single person said, "Hey, we should have someone whose job it is to dig around and find dirt on the Democrats?"
No. That's not true: They knew, there's lots of people in the Republican Party who knew about this, knew what was going on.
Now: You ask yourself, what could possibly motive them to keep quiet, look the other way?
Posted by: RoyalOil at January 31, 2013 09:21 AM (imtbm)
Posted by: TallDave at January 31, 2013 09:21 AM (/s1LA)
Posted by: wooga at January 31, 2013 09:22 AM (tNWB8)
Posted by: EC at January 31, 2013 01:18 PM (GQ8sn)
Don't want to know. Don't need that image in my head.
Posted by: troyriser at January 31, 2013 09:22 AM (vtiE6)
EC putting many of the Dems in Pedobear fur suits would improve their image tremendously.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:22 AM (S7Hzw)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 09:23 AM (r2PLg)
;-)
Posted by: Rich at January 31, 2013 01:21 PM (fxjo5)
none, it's just a 'bump in the road'
(to be caught)
Posted by: ette at January 31, 2013 09:23 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: eleven at January 31, 2013 09:23 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 09:24 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:24 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: wg at January 31, 2013 09:25 AM (uVc0d)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:25 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:25 AM (S7Hzw)
Posted by: Burglars & Thieves local 392 at January 31, 2013 09:25 AM (GlnE7)
@ ette,
Joe the Plumber...dared...to question their Lord Barky.
So he must be punished!
The Tea Party...dared...to protest the Lord Barky's policies.
So they must be crushed!
Any lies told in the service of their Lord Barky are justified!
The Lord Barky must not be blasphemed!
We should just shut up...and be grateful that they let us live.
Posted by: wheatie at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (BZMZX)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 01:20 PM (piMMO)
I advocate nothing illegal, ever. Purusing publicly accessible information is not a criminal act.
Posted by: troyriser at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: SFGoth at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (dZ756)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (PH+2B)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (piMMO)
'what media doesn't tell you'
show a scene media talking about an incident and what they left out?
ask why?
might be a stupid idea as i don't even know how to do a video.
Posted by: ette at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Jean at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (EYbqR)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: MSNBC at January 31, 2013 09:26 AM (SO2Q8)
How will this end? Easy.
In a few hours, Martin Bashir will begin his program by saying that a poorly edited piece of video (what they used) was received by a junior staffer at MSNBC from an acquaintance at Media Matters.
Without taking the time to check it or put it through the layers upon layers of fact checkers, it was put into a segement that Mr. Bashir had no prior knowledge of.
MSNBC regrets the error. The junior staffer has been dismissed and procedures have been put in place to assure this doesn't happen again.
Posted by: jwest at January 31, 2013 09:27 AM (ZDsRL)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:27 AM (S7Hzw)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 31, 2013 09:27 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:27 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 31, 2013 09:28 AM (+K5zQ)
Stays bought.
No, Lindsey is the biggest bitch at Senate High School. He's aggressive-passive.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 31, 2013 09:28 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 01:26 PM (Dnbau)
ISWYDT.
Well played.
Posted by: jwb7605 (Let It Burn) at January 31, 2013 09:28 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:28 AM (S7Hzw)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 31, 2013 01:27 PM (VtjlW)
Trolling them is fun. They're very sensitive about their 'fursonas'. lol.
Posted by: troyriser at January 31, 2013 09:28 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at January 31, 2013 09:28 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: phoenixgirl waiting for spring training at January 31, 2013 09:29 AM (GVxQo)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 09:29 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:29 AM (piMMO)
Incrementalism, how do it work?
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at January 31, 2013 09:29 AM (kXoT0)
We should just shut up...and be grateful that they let us live.
Posted by: wheatie at January 31, 2013 01:26 PM (BZMZX)
hahah. hmm, takes back short laugh,
yeah they are definitely using intimidation. pretty much dailty
outcasting, lying, shaming, maligning.. yep.
Posted by: ette at January 31, 2013 09:30 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: HeatherRadish, fashioning a shiv from a spork w/ the breakroom toaster at January 31, 2013 09:30 AM (ZKzrr)
No. To all such things. You guys sound like lefties saying they have to go to Al Jazeera to get the truth about Bush (and, incidentally, to learn about the Joos).
Pravda contains things that are more right-wing-sensible than NBC or the NYT do, because the NYT's and NBC's audiences won't tolerate any unorthodoxy. Pravda has a longer view.
Their "American" editorials are largely taken off a feed from WorldMeets.US, an NGO specializing in anti-American propaganda translations, most popularly those from La Jornada, a Mexican paper so old-Pravda, Noam Chomsky advertises it as the only "independent" newspaper in the West. Just for example, the lefty wet dream that the guy who shot Giffords did it to Save America For Palin was first aired as truth in La Jornada. Every English-language repetition of that claim was sourced from Pravda's reprint.
It's the official media outlet of the fucking CPRF. That's commies, dude. Real ones. Not bullshit American-college "Marxian" gulag-fantasy pussies. Ones who'll shoot you themselves.
Don't get played.
Posted by: oblig. at January 31, 2013 09:30 AM (cePv8)
The fakery is being caught almost in real-time as it stands now in the intertubes/blog era, but its still a reactive process.
Pavlov trained his dogs. NBC need to be trained in a way that makes faking shit too painful to contemplate.
Posted by: Burglars & Thieves local 392 at January 31, 2013 09:30 AM (GlnE7)
You know what I bet is happening that is causing all these media outlets to simultaneously start PMSing? What with the AP calling out NBC, and this internal WaPo feud, and the strife over at CNN, etc? Now that the election is over, I bet that all of Obammy's media buttboys aren't getting the super-special preferential treatment from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave anymore. The phone's stopped ringing and the Preezy isn't answering their text messages. And just like any jilted woman with a clingy-complex will make everyone's life a living hell if she feels she's been unfairly dumped by her boyfriend, so, too, will the MFM.
I suspect that there's a lot of fingerpointing and blame-casting behind the scenes. Lots of suspicious glares and accusations: "You homewrecker! You stole him from me! I used to go to all the trendy White House parties, and now only YOU get invited!"
It's a media catfight, and everyone's piling on.
I LOVE IT.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at January 31, 2013 09:30 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: HeatherRadish, fashioning a shiv from a spork w/ the breakroom toaster at January 31, 2013 09:30 AM (ZKzrr)
What Chicago says (and the NY Times reports) is that it is the weak gun laws OUTSIDE its borders, in WI, IN, and downstate IL, that make their gun violence so uncontrollable.
---
So logically, those areas outside the borders should also suffer from uncontrollable violence....
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at January 31, 2013 09:30 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 09:31 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 31, 2013 01:28 PM (+K5zQ)
If you're interested, use the link on my username, which leads to my online portfolio. Click on the 'contact' link and establish email contact. I have some ideas.
Posted by: troyriser at January 31, 2013 09:31 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 09:31 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:31 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 31, 2013 09:31 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 31, 2013 09:31 AM (VtjlW)
Don't get played.
Still better than the New York Times.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 31, 2013 09:32 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 09:32 AM (Dnbau)
Drop any of those editors in a real world situation and they will find out just whom lets who live. Ask the reporter who now carries a socket wrench to protect his pretty prissy little self in his new "edgy" neighborhood in LA. He must not love himself or he would be packing a Glock, not a Craftsman.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at January 31, 2013 09:32 AM (kXoT0)
Sure, anybody can fool any employer for a while. But, when enough time has passed employers know what their employees do -- and if they keep giving them paychecks for it -- then it is entirely reasonable to conclude that employer wants that employee to behave in that manner.
NBC reflects the boardroom that authorizes the paychecks. Yes, my fellow righties, it really is about "the corporations." Unless you believe in accidental paychecks.
Now, if that statement makes you mad -- at least ask yourself the question "why would any corporation pay these assholes when a Beverly Hillbillies rerun would probably get the same ratings at a much lower cost?"
It must be those accidental paychecks. They are everywhere. Strangely enough though, no one ever writes me one. I do actually know a couple people who get "I can't believe I am still writing you these" paychecks. Both are government workers that everyone wants to fire but can't because of union rules. Is MSNBC secretly a government unionized shop? No? Then how could those paychecks be an accident?
Posted by: jc at January 31, 2013 09:32 AM (PlzOe)
Posted by: phoenixgirl waiting for spring training at January 31, 2013 09:32 AM (GVxQo)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at January 31, 2013 09:32 AM (kXoT0)
I didn't used to be a fan of that sort of thing, but I've come around recently and believe I can live with it.
Posted by: Burglars & Thieves local 392 at January 31, 2013 09:33 AM (GlnE7)
*cue Jack Nicholson voice*
"Wait'll they get a load of me! "
Posted by: Swingline Semi-Automatic Assault Stapler at January 31, 2013 09:33 AM (EZl54)
Spoilt children.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:33 AM (S7Hzw)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 09:33 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:33 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Milton Waddams at January 31, 2013 09:34 AM (ZKzrr)
It doesn't matter who we get policy-wise. I'd rather it not be a former Republican Senator and an imbecile for cover. Let Barky's gutting of the military be on the head of him and some nobody assistant secretary promoted to the big chair.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 31, 2013 09:35 AM (xSegX)
*cue Jack Nicholson voice*
"Wait'll they get a load of me! "
Posted by: Swingline Semi-Automatic Assault Stapler at January 31, 2013 01:33 PM (EZl54)
I have posted before...buy a damn nail gun from Lowe's or Home Depot, you think a nail through the noggin can't kill? Or that funny little gadget that looks like a bug sprayer that the killer in There Will Be Blood used on his victims.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at January 31, 2013 09:35 AM (kXoT0)
That being said, statements made in grief while emotionally compelling are not necessarily true or righteous. We are a nation of laws, not emotions and the actions of one insane person is not cause to dilute our rights. Nor is it the process by which such things occur in a democracy.
We've seen far too much of a party in charge and their liege assume powers they do not possess or obfuscate constitutional process in the name of some perceived utopian good. In our Democratic Republic we call that tyranny and acts of despotism.
If you want to change the Second Amendment, there is a process to do so. No amount of legislating can effectively change that, nor should it.
Why is there opposition to the gun bans and limitations under discussion? Because most rational people intuitively know they would not have, nor will they in the future prevent such tragedies. And so they have seen them for what they are; ill-advised emotional acts or a deliberate strategy by people already opposed to guns using this tragedy to despicably further their agendas.
Posted by: Marcus at January 31, 2013 09:35 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 09:35 AM (Dnbau)
I think you're supposed to eat Grandma.
Wow, nothing disturbing about that. O_O
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 31, 2013 09:35 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 09:36 AM (r2PLg)
The pathology isn't hardware, its liberal run large urban areas that are soft on crime.
If you lock up enough criminals for long enough, problems kinda dry up.
Posted by: Burglars & Thieves local 392 at January 31, 2013 09:36 AM (GlnE7)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 31, 2013 09:36 AM (piMMO)
I guess you won't like this video then of Amy the Squirrel and really cheesy gags. From 1994 and created on Amiga computers.
http://youtu.be/T8Yh8_rfTMQ
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 09:36 AM (S7Hzw)
184 Inhofe is bringing it to Hagel as well.
He didn't vote for Kerry's confirmation either.
Inhofe was one of three, who voted against Kerry.
Cruz and Cornyn were the other two.
Posted by: wheatie at January 31, 2013 09:37 AM (BZMZX)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 09:37 AM (r2PLg)
OT a bit - the Seattle Times this morning did not have One. Fucking. Word. about the revised figures that showed the economy contracted slightly in 4Q2012. It. Did. Not. Happen. You hear people?!!
I encourage all here to write to the Times Executive Editor and express our condolences that he has such a tiny, tiny pee-pee.
Boardman@SeattleTimes.com">DBoardman@SeattleTimes.com
(206) 464-2205
Posted by: sherlock at January 31, 2013 09:39 AM (b9fEe)
__
Not at all. In fact, out of deference to his mourning, the audience remained silent, despite the obvious answer being the Bill of Rights 2nd Amendment.
If there were any heckling, it was from the father who wasn't about to let his crisis go to waste, but was up front and personal accosting the public, denouncing the 2nd Amendment as if asking a rhetorical question, and declaring not only that there is no legitimate reason for anyone (in the room) to own firearms, but that the audience's polite silence that was in consideration for his mourning meant approval of his stand against our nation's Constitution when it comes to our citizens' right to own firearms.
To fall back on "a matter of opinion" and again, that the onus being on the public to honor HIS opinion above their own, really was obnoxious, imho.
Posted by: panzernashorn at January 31, 2013 09:40 AM (MhA4j)
Inhofe was one of three, who voted against Kerry.
Cruz and Cornyn were the other two.
Posted by: wheatie at January 31, 2013 01:37 PM (BZMZX)
He also just published a book debunking Global Warming. He has been on the forefront of that.
The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at January 31, 2013 09:51 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at January 31, 2013 10:00 AM (7ObY1)
If you want to know what's really going on in America you have to go to the British media
Posted by: kbdabear at January 31, 2013 10:11 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse
------------------------------
That was a fun time. Then the meds wore off on CJ.
Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at January 31, 2013 10:18 AM (uhftQ)
Look at the life cycle of a typical corporation. Capitalist founder grows new company, IPO happens and more growth. Sooner (if venture capital is involved) or later (like Microsoft or Walmart with a big personality founder) the founder dies, retires or is pushed aside. What happens then? Responsible, professional 'adult' management takes over. Which typically means Harvard and Yale MBA types. Socialists.
And even before the founder goes the pressure starts right after the IPO. Institutional investors, which these days increasingly means pension funds. Who runs those? And as major stockholders these snot nosed forty something Harvard types start pushing 'socially responsible investing', 'socially responsible corporate citizenship' and all the other socialist catchphrases that all boil down to snot nosed Harvard MBAs get to misspend shareholder wealth on pet projects. And use the corporations to push an agenda. See GE/Comcast/NBC, Disney/ABC, TimeWarner/HBO/CNN, etc. They are willing to run the Party Media operations at a loss to the shareholders and subsidize it from profits out of the other divisions.
We have to be thinking about ways to win that battle. And the only way I see is to make publicly traded corporations less attractive ways to organize capital.
Posted by: John Morris at January 31, 2013 10:26 AM (sCRhB)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at January 31, 2013 10:58 AM (UU0OF)
Posted by: AlanR at January 31, 2013 10:58 AM (L4Z+2)
Ford Pintos hardest hit.
Posted by: VekTor at January 31, 2013 03:53 PM (N7DZ0)
Posted by: dissent555 at January 31, 2013 04:12 PM (yR6A1)
Joe the Plumber...dared...to question their Lord Barky.
So he must be punished!
The Tea Party...dared...to protest the Lord Barky's policies.
So they must be crushed!
Any lies told in the service of their Lord Barky are justified!
The Lord Barky must not be blasphemed!
We should just shut up...and be grateful that they let us live.
Posted by: wheatie at January 31, 2013 01:26 PM (BZMZX)
One word - taqiyya.
Posted by: Decaf at February 01, 2013 08:25 AM (NmvvV)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2877 seconds, 345 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: BarrackHusseinObama at January 31, 2013 08:47 AM (7ObY1)