June 17, 2013
— DrewM This wasn't part of the illegal immigration enforcement bills from a few years back but rather a voter imitative law put in place in 2004.
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states cannot require would-be voters to prove they are U.S. citizens before using a federal registration system designed to make signing up easier.The justices voted 7-2 to throw out Arizona's voter-approved requirement that prospective voters document their U.S. citizenship in order to use a registration form produced under the federal "Motor Voter" voter registration law.
Federal law "precludes Arizona from requiring a federal form applicant to submit information beyond that required by the form itself," Justice Antonia Scalia wrote for the court's majority.
It's a fairly straight forward preemption issue. The federal government has mandated a use of a specific registration* form through the Motor Voter Act and the court is simply saying that states can't add qualifications to it.
What the Court didn't seem to say is that such a requirement would be unconstitutional. So, it's time to press House and Senate candidates to add this to the federal form. Ideally, they'd repeal Motor Voter all together but that's not going to happen so fixing this oversight is probably the best we can hope for. Of course, that's likely a bridge too far.
*Apparently some people are confusing proof of citizenship at the time of registration with being able to vote. Just to be clear, SCOTUS didn't find a right to vote for non-citizens or say states couldn't stop non-citizens from voting.
That's why I said this was more a simple preemption case than an earth shattering voting rights case. Still, I think it's something states should be allowed to do and with political will it's a simple fix.
(I added "Registration" to the title to help avoid confusion)
Posted by: DrewM at
07:26 AM
| Comments (250)
Post contains 325 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 17, 2013 07:28 AM (GEICT)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 07:29 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at June 17, 2013 07:29 AM (a3iAA)
I guess I see the logic of this ruling, but I have no hope that any resolution is possible in this political climate.
Posted by: BurtTC at June 17, 2013 07:29 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 07:30 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Huge Chavez's Ghost at June 17, 2013 07:30 AM (fFpLz)
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 07:30 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/s]akula_51 at June 17, 2013 07:31 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: georgeofthedesert at June 17, 2013 07:31 AM (Eq2MX)
Since that has never happened motor voter should be declared null and void by the States, not the inept and shitty congress,
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 07:32 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Misanthropic humanitarian at June 17, 2013 07:32 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 17, 2013 07:32 AM (5tpzF)
Posted by: nip at June 17, 2013 07:32 AM (lGVXf)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at June 17, 2013 07:32 AM (a3iAA)
Posted by: America's Nutsack at June 17, 2013 07:33 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 07:33 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Misanthropic humanitarian at June 17, 2013 07:33 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: Infidel at June 17, 2013 07:35 AM (O/fK8)
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 07:37 AM (VtjlW)
This makes a great case for immigration reform.
"Legalize" those that are here by getting all of their information, where they're from, where they work and live, fingerprints, DNA, everything. Put them on the long, slow path to citizenship.
Make it crystal clear that if they are caught registering to vote or voting, they will be immediately deported. Same with any criminal activity. No appeal, no years worth of legal wrangling, just a quick and and permanent deportation.
They would have to be really motivated to try voting with that sort of penalty.
Posted by: jwest at June 17, 2013 07:37 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl at June 17, 2013 07:37 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: eleven at June 17, 2013 07:38 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Jean at June 17, 2013 07:39 AM (jPtkn)
Just remember. Ed Snowden is a traitor and the government is looking out for our rights. Seriously, guys.
Posted by: Methos at June 17, 2013 07:39 AM (hO9ad)
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 17, 2013 07:39 AM (0qYx9)
HaHa, you think those rules that apply to us, apply to them, hahahahahah
Posted by: Jean at June 17, 2013 07:40 AM (jPtkn)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at June 17, 2013 11:40 AM (wbmaj)
We could form up down there, get some real military weapons and attack and conquer Mexico from the south.
I like it.
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 07:41 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: eleven at June 17, 2013 07:42 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: RioBravo at June 17, 2013 07:42 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 07:42 AM (+98Gb)
And oneth is a good one Backwards Boy
It keeps Pixy's hamsters on their little toes.
About this immigration thing, I'm still wondering why certain politicians are so intent upon allowing us to be invaded. I mean, I know why, it's so they can keep and hold power. But they're doing so against the will of the country, and they somehow, magically, keep getting reelected.
And on the Motor Voter bill, I seethe when I recall seeing both Cloward and Piven in the line behind Billy Jeff Cliton when he signed it, cheering it and him on.
What should be done for the best interests of the country isn't even talked about anymore. It's almost like we're not a sovereign nation with control over our government.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at June 17, 2013 07:43 AM (0HooB)
Oh. Hey. Why are we shooting you?
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 07:43 AM (VtjlW)
23 Lovely. Because we all know illegals wouldn't lie on any forms they filled out. ----- And the Dems wouldn't try to "help" them fill them out. Or bus them to the polls. Nah, crazy talk.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at June 17, 2013 07:44 AM (YmPwQ)
Unfortunately, "compromise" means "We get what we want, you take it up the ass".
Ummm....can I get both?
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at June 17, 2013 07:44 AM (NF2Bf)
Posted by: Andrew at June 17, 2013 07:45 AM (+/z4q)
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 11:43 AM (VtjlW)
Kinda quick on the trigger, aren't you, Sundance?
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 07:45 AM (OQpzc)
*reloads*
BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG
*nudges with toe*
Oh. Hey. Why are we shooting you?
Posted by: alexthechick
Stop making us look bad!
Posted by: LAPD at June 17, 2013 07:45 AM (NF2Bf)
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/real-id-act-text.pdf
DHS's "Real ID" scheme is going to do quite a bit of that work.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 17, 2013 07:45 AM (rVul6)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at June 17, 2013 07:46 AM (a3iAA)
---
Laboratories of mandate compliance.
Posted by: RioBravo at June 17, 2013 07:46 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: DrewM. at June 17, 2013 07:46 AM (MbMSS)
Embrace the suck. Posted by: nip
----------------------------------------
It is really difficult *not* to do that. It is a little like the politician who suggested that if you are being raped you ought to lie back and enjoy it.
And yet..., I think about on the Marines on Wake Island, who ultimately knew that support was not going to be provided. They fought on anyhow. The demands being placed on us in this struggle aren't anything by comparison. While we can, we should fight harder.
Posted by: Table at June 17, 2013 07:46 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Mainah at June 17, 2013 07:46 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 17, 2013 07:47 AM (4yFKY)
Super quick not at all thought through thought but hey can't the Tea Party groups smack the IRS in the mouth with this argument? Content of our prayers? Not on the form. Donor list? Not on the form.
At least now there's precedent for it.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at June 17, 2013 07:48 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Ma Bell at June 17, 2013 07:48 AM (RLdcX)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 17, 2013 07:48 AM (rVul6)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, CEO, Hodorburton at June 17, 2013 07:48 AM (zUi7I)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 17, 2013 07:49 AM (rVul6)
Gee, the gubmint -- not to mention countless private companies, organizations, etc. -- requires all kinds of proofs for other, less-important daily tasks. Try getting a driver's license without a SocSec card and proof of identity/citizenship....
Yup...makes perfect sense to me.
Choom Boy, Congress and teh Supremes are the horse's asses of the Apocalypse.
Buckle up, folks. This ain't gonna be a smooth or fun ride.
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 17, 2013 07:49 AM (lNAFm)
The Democratic Party has become a full-fledged criminal enterprise, and is extending it's rule over the entire government.
What is the process required for convening a Constitutional Convention ?
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at June 17, 2013 07:49 AM (fb100)
Posted by: Ma Bell
Because our base is too fucking stupid to obtain identificat....ummmm....I mean shut up you racisty racist!
Posted by: DNC at June 17, 2013 07:50 AM (NF2Bf)
Posted by: Ma Bell at June 17, 2013 07:50 AM (RLdcX)
Posted by: Purp at June 17, 2013 11:45 AM (rVul6)
Show me your papers, citizen.
Even in Texas it is a misdemeanor to fail to ID yourself to a cop. Some folks get arrested for just that. No other charges. And, these days, any arrest makes you known to the system in the biblical sense.
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 07:51 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: polynikes at June 17, 2013 07:51 AM (ZhNCB)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 17, 2013 07:51 AM (rVul6)
Posted by: EC at June 17, 2013 07:52 AM (GQ8sn)
---
Passport application fee would thereby be a tax on voting.
Posted by: RioBravo at June 17, 2013 07:52 AM (eEfYn)
The same reason people climb Mount Everest.
Because it's there.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/b][/s][/u] at June 17, 2013 07:53 AM (MPIX5)
Posted by: Ma Bell at June 17, 2013 07:53 AM (RLdcX)
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl at June 17, 2013 07:53 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: Accused pederast Harry Reid fondling himself to a bing search of Bobby at June 17, 2013 07:54 AM (NF2Bf)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at June 17, 2013 07:54 AM (h+OzC)
That would weed out maybe half the illegals.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 17, 2013 07:55 AM (rVul6)
There was never a chance they would have held this up. States simply can't change a Federal law. I understand and agree with the reason why they wanted this change to the law, but it is a Federal law and a State does not have the authority to modify, change or amend it.
The majority did sympathize with Arizona though....."However, Scalia said Arizona could try a different approach to challenge the federal law's pre-emption, thereby holding out the possibility that the state could resurrect its proof-of-citizenship requirement."
Posted by: Johnnyreb at June 17, 2013 07:55 AM (6McTJ)
I have a simple voter intelligence test -- Name the president, VP, and one of your senators. If you can do that, you're good to go.
That would weed out maybe half the illegals.
That would weed out half the country. Which I can't imagine would be a bad thing.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at June 17, 2013 07:55 AM (NF2Bf)
Other than simply asserting you're a citizen in a check box?
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 17, 2013 07:56 AM (rVul6)
------
No. However, lots of citizens do not have passports - particularly poor minorities. As of January 2012 about 1/3 of American held passports.
Posted by: RioBravo at June 17, 2013 07:56 AM (eEfYn)
Only citizens can legally vote. Operative word being "legally".
If a non US Citizen knowingly votes in an election they can be deported or charged with voter fraud.
But since we are on an amnesty binge, it doesn't really matter.
Posted by: Marcus at June 17, 2013 07:57 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: T. at June 17, 2013 07:57 AM (LyGCU)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at June 17, 2013 11:54 AM (h+OzC)
No
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at June 17, 2013 07:57 AM (R8hU8)
These people (the Dims) are quite busy doing the same thing to the average American that was done to the Brits during the '90's, namely importing a new electorate. One that they can control, thereby staying in power in perpetuity.
We are so terribly screwed.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at June 17, 2013 07:57 AM (0HooB)
-------------------
It is only necessary that one states that one is a citizen, I believe.
Posted by: Table at June 17, 2013 07:57 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, CEO, Hodorburton at June 17, 2013 07:57 AM (zUi7I)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 07:58 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Jean at June 17, 2013 07:58 AM (jPtkn)
If you can't enforce a law to find and deport them, how do you plan to enforce this law?
Why won't they just ignore it?
Because if you're changing the law, now is the time to make it enforceable. Not only make the penalty stiff, but make it such that no sane "recently legalized" person would risk violating that law.
The same goes for the border. It doesn't matter how high the fence is, they are going over, around, through or under it. It makes more sense to allow them in through the same process, have all their information, issue them a ID card and be able to immediately deport anyone who doesn't have ID.
Now, with actual ID, you can control the work permits. Crack down hard on companies who use illegals, now that you have an ID that the company can rely on. No work, no illegals.
Posted by: jwest at June 17, 2013 07:58 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, CEO, Hodorburton at June 17, 2013 11:48 AM (zUi7I)
I have a plan. We take all the hot women as war brides, sell the ugly ones to the arabs and kill all the men. Then we open immigration to any men from Europe who have a minimum amount of testosterone. Not many of those, I'll grant, but there has to be some Vikings left in the world.
And we change the name to Valhalla and refuse to let anyone who hasn't served in the military vote.
And we train, and drink, and screw, and carouse and recruit until the Dollar collapses and then we allow the former red states to join us. On probation, of course.
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 07:58 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Horrified Observer at June 17, 2013 07:59 AM (/sohm)
Actually, that's a good idea.
Because the resulting "mobilization" of all the La Raza-type groups to teach their constituents how to clearly say "El Senador Juan McCain" would provide hours of endless entertainment.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/b][/s][/u] at June 17, 2013 08:00 AM (MPIX5)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 08:00 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: McAdams at June 17, 2013 08:00 AM (1a1NJ)
Posted by: T. at June 17, 2013 08:01 AM (LyGCU)
"And we train, and drink, and screw, and carouse and recruit until the Dollar collapses and then we allow the former red states to join us. On probation, of course."
I knew if we just kept brainstorming, a plan would develop.
Posted by: jwest at June 17, 2013 08:01 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Ma Bell at June 17, 2013 08:01 AM (RLdcX)
Here, you're stuck with the fuckers until they time out...which is bad when you're being attacked from within.,
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 17, 2013 08:01 AM (rVul6)
Posted by: Enraged Citizen at June 17, 2013 08:02 AM (/sohm)
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
So States get to make the law about elections, unless over ridden by the Congress of the US.
Has the Congress of the US passed a Law that says you DON'T have to prove citizenship?
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 17, 2013 08:05 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Randall Hoven at June 17, 2013 08:05 AM (YxJKp)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 08:06 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 17, 2013 08:06 AM (NvZnr)
Posted by: Enraged Citizen at June 17, 2013 12:02 PM (/sohm)
Congress has no Amnesty Power... and in fact... this Amnesty would be an Ex Post Facto LAW, as it will make something Illegal, Legal...
Congress cannot do that... at least if they bother following the Constitution.
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 17, 2013 08:06 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: teej at June 17, 2013 08:07 AM (6Zy+s)
You know what would be a good tax?
Tax all money sent to Mexico.
If we could get a Dem to sponsor that, we'd own the Mexican vote.
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 08:07 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 17, 2013 08:08 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 08:08 AM (+98Gb)
what's the big deal on this?
the illegals are going to be voting for the GOP anyway
that's what Rubio said
Posted by: navycopjoe at June 17, 2013 08:08 AM (UWEUP)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at June 17, 2013 08:09 AM (0HooB)
Does the federal Motor Voter form have any proof of citizenship requirement?
Other than simply asserting you're a citizen in a check box?
Posted by: Purp at June 17, 2013 11:56 AM (rVul6)
That's what I was wondering, but from the other responses and my own looksee, check box is all that is required.
Thanks to all who responded.
Posted by: Nash Rambler at June 17, 2013 08:09 AM (h+OzC)
Posted by: Enraged Citizen at June 17, 2013 08:09 AM (/sohm)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 08:09 AM (UVBO7)
So being registered to vote is no longer proof of eligibility to vote? and now when you go to vote you will have to prove citizenship? How can one prove citizenship? Birth certificate? Can the State of Arizona now demand a birth certificate at the time a ballot is cast since the state can not now demand proof of citizenship to register?
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at June 17, 2013 08:09 AM (bLijS)
Posted by: SFGoth at June 17, 2013 08:11 AM (dZ756)
109 at least if they bother following the Constitution
while we're in fantasy land, i'll take a new Porsche and two big tiited blonds pls
Posted by: navycopjoe at June 17, 2013 08:11 AM (UWEUP)
Posted by: Ma Bell at June 17, 2013 12:01 PM (RLdcX)
----
The Germans are particularly skilled at the documentation thing. Most Americans don't have a requirement to leave the country as we're not some small, piss-ant European country. And in comparison, Aussies seem to have a need to get away that Americans don't have.
Posted by: RioBravo at June 17, 2013 08:11 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 12:09 PM (UVBO7)
We have to stop conquering shit and then giving it back. That is crazy.
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 08:11 AM (OQpzc)
They are inheriting a nation in decline.
Posted by: MrShad at June 17, 2013 08:11 AM (Xqfwb)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 08:13 AM (UVBO7)
Posted by: Scalia at June 17, 2013 08:13 AM (Cs2tJ)
Posted by: Zombie Justice Potter Stewart at June 17, 2013 08:13 AM (5RUlF)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 08:13 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 08:13 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 08:14 AM (UVBO7)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 17, 2013 08:15 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 08:15 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 08:15 AM (UVBO7)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 08:16 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: navycopjoe at June 17, 2013 08:16 AM (UWEUP)
The message from Arizona to Congress should be as follows:
"Okay, you want to run the elections for yourselves and for the Electoral College? Here's the list of requirements of the electors for our House of Representatives, which is our most-populous house of the Legislature. You go buy the equipment, hire the workers, and find places for your polls. We're done being your bitch."
Posted by: Bo(eh)ner at June 17, 2013 08:16 AM (o44nj)
Because Bush is a stealth progressive.
Posted by: Scalia at June 17, 2013 08:16 AM (Cs2tJ)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at June 17, 2013 08:17 AM (a3iAA)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 12:14 PM (UVBO7)
The Forrestal would be fitting for Odolph.
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 08:17 AM (OQpzc)
*reloads*
BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG
*nudges with toe*
Oh. Hey. Why are we shooting you?
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 11:43 AM (VtjlW)
Huh, AtC uses a revolver? Seems the Empress deserves heavier caliber weaponry.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at June 17, 2013 08:18 AM (ioT3q)
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 12:11 PM (OQpzc)
---
At one time we actually had the wisdom to avoid protracted guerilla wars and occupations when possible. That damned Trist should have gotten Tampico-Mazatlan though.
Posted by: RioBravo at June 17, 2013 08:18 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: Chromoly Man at June 17, 2013 08:18 AM (f6C+f)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 08:19 AM (9Bj8R)
GD socks.
Posted by: FUBAR at June 17, 2013 12:17 PM (Cs2tJ)
Blame it on a case of the Mondays; I did.
Posted by: steveegg at June 17, 2013 08:19 AM (o44nj)
130 -
What did he tell the Russians and the Chinese? That we have the capability of using data mining technology to spy on the cell phone and internet content of Americans?
This is news to you? I guarantee you, it was NOT news to the Russians and the Chinese.
Now, that our government IS spying on Americans, that's news. But I don't really see why the Russians and the Chinese would care half as much as Americans would.
You don't seem to though. Funny, that.
Posted by: BurtTC at June 17, 2013 08:20 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 08:20 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Chromoly Man at June 17, 2013 08:20 AM (f6C+f)
Ambassador Stevens wishes he just had 200 Marines.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 08:20 AM (UVBO7)
142 The Forrestal would be fitting for Odolph.
whoa, slow down there buttercup, that was my first ship (waves to GGE who was there with me)...give him the saratoga
Posted by: navycopjoe at June 17, 2013 08:20 AM (UWEUP)
Posted by: Soona at June 17, 2013 08:21 AM (eKXog)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 08:21 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 08:21 AM (ZPrif)
sorry, but that drives me insane
Posted by: navycopjoe at June 17, 2013 12:19 PM (UWEUP)
---
Anyone but the U.S. would consider it one. It does carry aircraft! Now about those tanks with wheels...
Posted by: RioBravo at June 17, 2013 08:23 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 08:23 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 08:23 AM (9Bj8R)
Comment redacted due to NSA surveillance.
Posted by: McGregor at June 17, 2013 12:21 PM (qo244)
This Comment of the Day™ is brougt to you by Government Bell - We can hear you now.
Posted by: steveegg at June 17, 2013 08:23 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: buzzion at June 17, 2013 08:23 AM (LI48c)
157 And I assume they are not sending Fleet Carriers over there for such a limited mission as emergency evacuation
I can dash that reasoning with two words: Obama's ego
Posted by: navycopjoe at June 17, 2013 08:23 AM (UWEUP)
158 -
You're not paying attention. I see dozens of posters here, myself included, who have not excused Snowden's actions. I also see more than a few who can't seem to get beyond his actions, and ask questions of the government. None more frequently than you.
Do you care that your government is spying or Americans or not?
Posted by: BurtTC at June 17, 2013 08:24 AM (TOk1P)
Seems to me this means States need two different voter registration schemes - one for state elections (which, presumably, is exclusively under state jurisdiction) and one for Federal elections.
Posted by: @JohnTant at June 17, 2013 08:24 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 08:25 AM (9Bj8R)
Seems to me this means States need two different voter registration schemes - one for state elections (which, presumably, is exclusively under state jurisdiction) and one for Federal elections.
Posted by: @JohnTant at June 17, 2013 12:24 PM (tVWQB)
Why do I get the feeling Motor Voter eliminated that possibility (and if not, the Roberts Lawgivers-In-Black will shortly)?
Posted by: steveegg at June 17, 2013 08:25 AM (o44nj)
Or the 2 they had with better weapons and air support.
Posted by: McGregor at June 17, 2013 08:25 AM (qo244)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 08:26 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: navycopjoe at June 17, 2013 12:20 PM (UWEUP)
Hey, that was my first ship. Give him the Langley.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 08:27 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 08:27 AM (ZPrif)
163 -
I'm sure it is. Which is why they seem to want to distance themselves from the guy, and that's more a part of the diplomatic game than it is the spy game.
Posted by: BurtTC at June 17, 2013 08:27 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 08:28 AM (UVBO7)
The supreme court decides that the federal government preempts and sets the standard, and since the federal standard does not require proof of citizenship then the only conclusion one can reach is the only requirement necessary is to show up and claim the right to vote and you don't even need to prove your identity..
Same day registration
provisional ballots
claim of citizenship
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at June 17, 2013 08:29 AM (bLijS)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 08:30 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: MostlyRight at June 17, 2013 08:30 AM (w9AQ4)
Posted by: Danny Werfel at June 17, 2013 08:30 AM (e8kgV)
Make getting welfare as easy to get as a building permit.
Make voting as easy as buying a handgun.
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at June 17, 2013 08:30 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 08:30 AM (UVBO7)
I can dash that reasoning with two words: Obama's ego
Posted by: navycopjoe at June 17, 2013 12:23 PM (UWEUP)
Ya got a point there. We will see. It does sicken me, no matter what the make up.
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 12:25 PM (9Bj8R)
----------------------------------------------------
This just proves that we are not the only ones in this world that hate Odolph. No matter where he goes, he divides people against one another. If he's not the anti-christ then he's the leader of the foward team.
Posted by: Soona at June 17, 2013 08:31 AM (eKXog)
WTF? Are they expecting a wave of Tu-22Ms or an armored division rolling in?
Posted by: Waterhouse at June 17, 2013 08:31 AM (Kppp9)
provisional ballots
claim of citizenship
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at June 17, 2013 12:29 PM (bLijS)
Early voting. Most roofing contractors won't let the illegals off to go vote.
Move it to Friday night and most will be too drunk. That cut down on the yute vote too.
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 08:31 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, CEO, Hodorburton at June 17, 2013 08:32 AM (zUi7I)
It is odd no state will stand up for the 10th amendment. The system is rigged with money and power and we are screwed.
Posted by: McGregor at June 17, 2013 08:32 AM (qo244)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 17, 2013 08:32 AM (g1DWB)
Which class carriers - Nimitz or Wasp?
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 12:14 PM (UVBO7)
Article doesn't say. Considering the Mission, I'd assume Wasp Class, but what do i know
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 12:16 PM (9Bj8R)
At least one of them is a Nimitz class; the article says that it is there to be the offshore-to-US leg of a bug-out move. The Wasps can't handle multi-passenger jet aircraft.
Posted by: steveegg at June 17, 2013 08:32 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Waterhouse at June 17, 2013 12:31 PM (Kppp9)
-----
Possibly. Obama has RESET Russian relations back to 1985.
Posted by: RioBravo at June 17, 2013 08:33 AM (eEfYn)
It is odd no state will stand up for the 10th amendment. The system is rigged with money and power and we are screwed.
Posted by: McGregor at June 17, 2013 12:32 PM (qo244)
But mostly power. There's this little matter of the Civil War that neutered the 9th/10th.
Posted by: steveegg at June 17, 2013 08:33 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 08:34 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 08:34 AM (9Bj8R)
I understand what they are saying but effectively (for most intents), registration is proof a citizenship to poll workers.
We are now allowing (have for a while actually) other countries to elect our representatives.
Boned.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at June 17, 2013 08:35 AM (g5YAm)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 08:35 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 08:36 AM (9Bj8R)
WTF? Are they expecting a wave of Tu-22Ms or an armored division rolling in?
Posted by: Waterhouse
Remember that scene in the movie 300 when Xerxes descends a staircase made from his soldiers backs?
Maybe The O just wants to make an entrance.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at June 17, 2013 08:36 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 08:36 AM (UVBO7)
The war didn't weaken the 9th/10th. FDR did by packing the court with commies.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 12:35 PM (lZvxr)
That was the nail in the coffin.
Posted by: steveegg at June 17, 2013 08:36 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at June 17, 2013 08:37 AM (zpqa2)
When I find myself in times of trouble,
Mother Mary comes to spurn...
Speaking words of wisdom,
Let it Burn
And in my hour of darkness
She does say it's now our turn....
Speaking words of wisdom,
Let It Burn
Let It Burn
Let It Burn
Whispers words of wisdom..... Let it burn.
Posted by: fixerupper at June 17, 2013 08:38 AM (nELVU)
One wonder what the basis of that damn ruling is? I have no love for this practice but I don't recall anything in the Constitution giving any wing of the government, including the courts, authority over this.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 08:38 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at June 17, 2013 08:39 AM (zpqa2)
Posted by: Future Illegal Immigrant at June 17, 2013 08:39 AM (9j/Zj)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 08:40 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Jean at June 17, 2013 11:58 AM (jPtkn)
-- Yes
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at June 17, 2013 08:41 AM (R8hU8)
That's a good link, there
Posted by: RiverC at June 17, 2013 08:41 AM (El+h4)
Posted by: Future Illegal Immigrant at June 17, 2013 12:39 PM (9j/Zj)
College students in the North routinely do this.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 08:41 AM (lZvxr)
One wonder what the basis of that damn ruling is? I have no love for this practice but I don't recall anything in the Constitution giving any wing of the government, including the courts, authority over this.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 12:38 PM (lZvxr)
The same provision that found PlaceboCare "constitutional" - the Lawgiver-In-Black Whole Cloth Clause.
Posted by: steveegg at June 17, 2013 08:41 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 08:41 AM (UVBO7)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 12:21 PM (ZPrif)
Is it Treason to defend the Constitution? Tricky question isn't it....
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 17, 2013 08:42 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: snopercod at June 17, 2013 08:42 AM (LvTrc)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 08:42 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: FUBAR at June 17, 2013 08:42 AM (Cs2tJ)
Posted by: Abe Lincoln at June 17, 2013 08:43 AM (5Wx2B)
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl at June 17, 2013 08:43 AM (8JJ6O)
- Things you'll never hear the Obamas say.
Posted by: Fritz at June 17, 2013 08:44 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: McGregor at June 17, 2013 08:44 AM (qo244)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 17, 2013 08:44 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Jack S. Phoggbound, Esq. at June 17, 2013 08:45 AM (BNO/C)
Because Bush is a stealth progressive. ---- Why didn't the Pubs do ANHYTHING under Bush...and to a lessser extent, in the states where they hold power...? Answer, because the Dems are relentless and hold on to their gains kicking and screaming. Note the resistance to Paul Walker (moron reference) and the GOP majority in Wisconsin for merely ending the mandatory state union dues withdrawlals. Dem legislators fleeing the state to prevent a quorum, Walker subjected to a recall. In PA the GOP majority and governor cower from doing anything responsible by shouts of racism from the Philly Dems. Now with a new election cycle coming up, it's CYA time, so iothing will get done (still). It's fucking hopeless.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at June 17, 2013 08:45 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at June 17, 2013 08:46 AM (zpqa2)
Posted by: eleven at June 17, 2013 08:46 AM (KXm42)
Remember that scene in the movie 300 when Xerxes descends a staircase made from his soldiers backs?
Maybe The O just wants to make an entrance.
Barack Xerxes. I like the way that just rolls off the tongue.
Posted by: King Putt at June 17, 2013 08:47 AM (qoQi/)
Motor Voter, absentee voting, and early voting were the doors that were opened for rampant voter fraud in this nation. I know longer trust this process. It's a shame too, because it's one of the basic active rights I have for dissent.
Our voices are being, or, I should say, have been muted.
Posted by: Soona at June 17, 2013 08:47 AM (eKXog)
Posted by: Danny Werfel at June 17, 2013 08:50 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Jack S. Phoggbound, Esq. at June 17, 2013 12:45 PM (BNO/C)
"Forever" is undefined.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 08:50 AM (lZvxr)
3 words
Karl Fucking Rove
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 08:51 AM (lZvxr)
Well, fuck it. I'm off to vacuum seal another 50lbs of rice and beans. You should probably consider doing the same.
Posted by: FUBAR at June 17, 2013 12:42 PM (Cs2tJ)
I'm off to buy another 1,000 rounds of ammo. What good are survival supplies without the means to defend them?
Posted by: steveegg at June 17, 2013 08:52 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: RiverC at June 17, 2013 12:41 PM (El+h4)
Ruh Roh Raggy.... guy does not sound like an idiot....
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 17, 2013 08:55 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 12:41 PM (lZvxr)
-----
Yup and I'm with Soona. Absentee voting (particularly in the U.S.) should be restricted to the military. It's not like you don't know when the election is. If you want to vote then make sure you're home to do it.
Posted by: Future Illegal Immigrant at June 17, 2013 08:58 AM (9j/Zj)
Posted by: notachanceinhell at June 17, 2013 08:58 AM (jJA/4)
Don't issue a license until the applicant surrenders the old one.
Posted by: Kristophr at June 17, 2013 09:01 AM (wYVte)
until another lawsuit is filed to strike down that requirement as discriminatory against minorities, poor people, young people, and old people.
Posted by: Joshua at June 17, 2013 09:03 AM (oCZ4e)
And don't allow expats to absentee vote unless they are paying federal income tax, like US military personnel.
No skin in the game? No vote.
Posted by: Kristophr at June 17, 2013 09:05 AM (wYVte)
Posted by: Cobalt Shiva at June 17, 2013 09:06 AM (OY/SZ)
Posted by: airandee at June 17, 2013 09:52 AM (KzwzI)
Posted by: Smarty at June 17, 2013 10:35 AM (llVl9)
Posted by: Goatweed at June 17, 2013 10:47 AM (8HrdX)
Posted by: Goatweed at June 17, 2013 10:48 AM (8HrdX)
Posted by: Goatweed at June 17, 2013 11:17 AM (8HrdX)
Posted by: Airandee at June 17, 2013 01:14 PM (9GHCK)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.361 seconds, 378 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at June 17, 2013 07:27 AM (0HooB)