May 10, 2013
— DrewM “Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times, it's enemy action.”—Ian Fleming's “Gold Finger”
I was reminded of this quote yesterday when I saw a spate of articles musing on the relationship between conservatives, the federal government and the “common good”.
First, there was Peter Wehner at Commentary arguing that conservatives have become too focused on individualism and less concerned about the “common good”.
The emphasis one hears these days has to do almost solely with liberty, which of course is vital. But there is also the trap of hyper-individualism. What’s missing, I think, is an appropriate appreciation–or at least a public appreciation–for community, social solidarity, and the common good; for the obligations and attachments we have to each other and the role institutions play in forming those attachments.
As I noted at my little blog
Wehner never points to any examples of conservatives retreating from the community. Does he think conservatives are eschewing participation in churches or other religious communities? Have they stopped participating in their children’s schools, Little Leagues, or Scouting programs? Have conservatives abandoned volunteer groups or charities? Are there no conservatives who serve as volunteer firefighters? Or on the local school board?We are never told by Wehner how conservatives actually have demonstrated a lack of “an appropriate appreciation” for the “common good”. It is simply asserted.
There is one hint as to what Wehner maybe referring to. He speaks of, “the role institutions play in forming those attachments”. Whener never identifies what “institutions” he is taking about but having already identified a number of communal “institutions” I think conservatives are very much attached to, I’d say it’s fair to infer the institution that dare not speak its name is “government”.
Ok, thatÂ’s just happenstance.
But lo and behold! Coincidently Matt Lewis publishes a piece the same day entitled, “A conservative defense of government".
While most conservatives concede that we need some social safety net, they are mostly worried about the out-of-control growth of the redistributive state. And yet, too seldom is that distinction made. Instead, the criticism is usually directed at "government."
When it comes to government, a lot of conservatives are probably too obsessed with size. Grover Norquist famously wants to shrink government to such a small size that you can drown it in a bathtub.But I'm not sure most Americans want that. And trying to force it via draconian cuts doesn't work, especially if they don't address the specific problem, such as the need for entitlement reform. "You can't make a fat man skinny by tightening his belt," observed John Maynard Keynes.
Whether you're a conservative who cares about preserving law and order, or a free marketer who appreciates the importance the rule of law plays in providing confidence and incentives to entrepreneurs, you're a fan of government. Stop pretending otherwise.
As Philip Klein pointed out LewisÂ’ column is a crime against straw men. (Coincidentally, thatÂ’s the same charge I made against Wehner).
Why the sudden respect from the right for government and the role it plays in America? Well, that’s where the 3rd piece comes in. It turns out the night before these posts show up, Paul Ryan gave a speech at the American Enterprise Institute entitled “Conservatism and Community”.
And there we find our “enemy action”. The pro-government wing of the GOP is laying out its markers in the battle for the future of the party and the conservative movement.
Of the three pieces, I like RyanÂ’s the best (though in the end the supposed policies he wants to institute to restrain government will lock in place a lot of the big government we already have). He comes at it from the perspective of a politician who wants to convince moderates and liberals of the righteousness of the conservative case.
Wehner is a part of George W. Bush’s big government/”Compassionate Conservatism” group whose only interest in fighting liberals is over which kinds of big government programs we have, not whether or not we should have them.
Lewis strikes me mostly as someone who wants to climb the media food-chain and the easiest way for a conservative to do that is to be the “reasonable conservative” that MSM bookers will bring on to bash actual conservatives.
Make no mistake, there’s a war being fought for direction of the party and the movement. What we saw yesterday is simply one of the many attacks the activist government wing of the GOP/conservative movement are launching in response to the Cruz/Rand Paul “fight to shrink the government” wing.
As IÂ’ve said before, the activist wing makes the most political sense if youÂ’re worried about the 2014, 2016 or any election in the next decade or two. But if youÂ’re interested in challenging and trying to change the underlying big government assumptions of the bi-partisan governing and media classes youÂ’re going to have to take a longer term view of things.
As Ronald Reagan put it, itÂ’s a time for choosing.
Added: A couple of people have pointed to this speech by Mike Lee to say it's along the lines of Ryan's speech. I want to think about it a bit more but I don't agree.
Yes, they have a similar focus and underpinning but Ryan comes off much more as a technocrat who wants to make government work better. As I said in the post, I'm somewhat sympathetic to Ryan's point of view but I think it concedes too much ground to the status quo.
Maybe the biggest difference between Ryan and Lee is just tone but A-I don't think so (Lee voted against the Ryan budget because it grew the size of government) and B- even if it is, tone and emphasis are important things. Lee has the better of both over Ryan.
Keep in mind there are some very big differences between Ryan's plan and Rand Paul's approach (one of them is that Paul's isn't even remotely possible in the current political climate because it aggressively reduces government).
Posted by: DrewM at
09:28 AM
| Comments (165)
Post contains 1006 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: ejo at May 10, 2013 09:29 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: huerfano at May 10, 2013 09:30 AM (bAGA/)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 09:31 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: ejo at May 10, 2013 09:31 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: toby928© at May 10, 2013 09:32 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at May 10, 2013 09:32 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 09:33 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: spongeworthy at May 10, 2013 09:33 AM (r5w1L)
Posted by: toby928© at May 10, 2013 09:33 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: rockmom at May 10, 2013 09:34 AM (aBlZ1)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 10, 2013 09:34 AM (da5Wo)
I see it too from just seeing how the establishment GOP here in Texas fought a very tough fight to forward the fair-haired reasonable candidate for the Senate and then here comes 'fire-brand" Ted Cruz messing it all up.
It is a fight we must have and prevail in.... and I'm feeling kinda good about our chances
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 09:34 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 09:35 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 09:36 AM (/jHWN)
I would add this, paraphrasing Joe McCarthy re George Marshall:
"If
Posted by: Jerry Lee Lewis at May 10, 2013 09:36 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Bob Dole at May 10, 2013 09:37 AM (G6kli)
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 01:34 PM (/jHWN)
-- Hope you are right but I don't see it
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at May 10, 2013 09:38 AM (R8hU8)
What this RINO "enemy action" assumes is that the battle of Individualism vs Community has already been lost. TFG's reelection was the proof.
Now they're just elbowing for a spot at the table as Your Betters carve up the carcass.
Related: Please scroll up to the top of the AoSHQ masthead for my additional thoughts on the subject.
Posted by: Jaws at May 10, 2013 09:38 AM (4I3Uo)
Every conservative 'win' is balanced by 58 progressive 'wins'.
There are only a handful of legislators out of 500+ who are actively fighting the progressives.
There are only a handful of media outlets covering real news, and most of them are off-shore.
The great majority of our citizens don't care that this administration routinely commits murder.
There is nothing left of the constitution. Let. It. Burn. While. We. Still. Have. Firearms.
Posted by: trainer at May 10, 2013 09:39 AM (K5X44)
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 10, 2013 09:39 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Stuff Liberals Say When There's A Conservative Administration at May 10, 2013 09:39 AM (27KAF)
Posted by: filbert at May 10, 2013 09:39 AM (7vimm)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 10, 2013 09:40 AM (aDwsi)
Fuck this fucking pos fucking government and these fucking radical muslim scum who need to be fucking exterminated from the earth.
When our Navy Seals lost 17 in the horrible helicopter crashes, THIS FUCKING MILITARY BRASS, which should be tried and shot for their fucking incompetence, REFUSED to allow any mention of Christ, but they did allow a radical fucking camel fucker to say a few words. what follows is the curse this fucking cocksucker said at the service, that's right THE CURSE:
Amen. I shelter in Allah from the devil who has been cast with stones.
In the name of Allah the merciful forgiver.
The companions of “THE FIRE”
(The sinners and infidels who are fodder for the hell fire)
ARE NOT EQUAL WITH the companions of heaven.
The companions of heaven (Muslims) are the WINNERS.
Had he sent this Koran to the mountain, you would have seen the mountain prostrated in fear of Allah.
(Mocking the GOD of Moses)
Such examples are what we present to the people, so that they would think.
(repent and convert to Islam)
Blessings are to your God (Allah) the God of glory and what they describe.
And peace be upon the messengers (prophets) and thanks be to Allah the lord of both universes (mankind and Jinn).
The best of the best are cursed by these radical fucking scum before their very coffins. ARE WE DONE WITH THIS SHIT YET?? What the fuck are we going to do about it??????????
Sorry, but I am beyond incensed. Link and story at Gateway Pundit.
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 10, 2013 09:40 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: BunkerintheBurbs at May 10, 2013 09:41 AM (5lVZz)
"As IÂ’ve said before, the activist wing makes the most political sense if youÂ’re worried about the 2014, 2016 or any election in the next decade or two."
Riiiiight....because McCain then Romney. No thnaks.
Posted by: Anabolic State at May 10, 2013 09:41 AM (DS2Ry)
His view--his whole business experience--was, "All government is awesome. We just need to pull this level, twist this dial, adjust this guide and it'll be perfect."
Like I've said several times here: If the Republicans in Washington were not happy with the current size, scope and reach of the federal government, what would they be doing differently?
Truth is, they are perfectly happy with the current size, scope and reach of the federal government and all of their actions are 100% consistent with that.
Many--like Mark the Rube and Shitstain McCain--want to expand it.
Some of you still hold to notions that buy into the fears that scare people off of a third party. But, we already have a third party. It's called the "you and me" party
There's the Government Party--All the Dems and large portions of the Republicans.
Then there's the rest of us . . . .
Posted by: RoyalOil at May 10, 2013 09:42 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 09:42 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: SurferDoc
----------------
Agreed. If we engage inpetty bickering over particular issues, we will remain off-balance, and unable to mount an opposition to the lock-step left.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 10, 2013 09:42 AM (aDwsi)
I trust no one. But I particularly distrust those who offer the choice of death vs. death by bunga bunga.
Posted by: Wodeshed at May 10, 2013 09:43 AM (a9L+B)
Does it say "Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure"?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 10, 2013 09:43 AM (ZKzrr)
And if they don't start moving on legislation to shrink the Federal asshole parade, they aren't on our side.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 10, 2013 09:43 AM (YTstp)
Posted by: Jim Scrummy at May 10, 2013 09:43 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Jean at May 10, 2013 09:44 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 10, 2013 09:44 AM (da5Wo)
I do think though one big political miscalculation though conservatives make is going after popular, middle class New Deal entitlements that aren't going anywhere. When Obama was making his march to remake this country into Europe, the dumbest response conservatives made was "Let's completely change MediCare!" How about going after the explosion in food stamps, fake disability claims, and MediCaid first?
The GOP has to make sure it's a party that serves the middle class. That's why America turned on the Democrats in the 70's and 80's, it no longer served the middle class.
Posted by: McAdams at May 10, 2013 09:45 AM (oX5bl)
Posted by: Fritz at May 10, 2013 09:45 AM (UzPAd)
Non-progressive Americans are not some tribe of indigenous Borneans just discovered.
There used to be a civil religion in this country which taught things like checks and balances, separation of powers, limited government of enumerated powers, the utility of a diverse (INTELLECTUALLY!1!1!, sorry) citizenry in a marketplace of ideas. The sacred right to criticize any idea, religion or your government so long as you keep yourself in check and don't hurt anybody. Not basing educational or government contracting decisions on race. Not wanting to be gay was considered acceptable. Obviously a lot more which used to be pretty non-controversial.
The reality is that any small cut in government spending causes them to attempt to inconvenience or kill us to prove a point about spending. So the hell with it. Full speed ahead completely unsustainable levels of spending and insane monetary policy.
Posted by: Beagle at May 10, 2013 09:45 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 09:46 AM (sXWmd)
The key quote from Wehrner's piece is that what he thinks is missing is an APPROPRIATE appreciation for the common good.
And that's what this is all about.
Fuck you, limpdick. The threat of "hyper-individualism" is that I get left alone by you and your cronies. The only threat is to your burning need to control every aspect of everyone's life.
Dick.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 09:47 AM (CJjw5)
"Every GOP candidate needs a mike shoved in his face and asked what he is going to do today to curb this fucking shit."
Just who do you expect to do this mic shoving? Candy Crowley? Anderson Cooper? Charlie Gibson?
No, the MFM is quite happy to maintain the current trajectory where the Donks make the rules and a few token conservatives present themselves as interesting naysayers who can be pounded as kooks.
Posted by: Jaws at May 10, 2013 09:48 AM (4I3Uo)
Who gives a shit what some pencilneck fuck writes.
They are allowing muslim clerics TO CURSE dead Navy Seals in Arabic, during their funeral procession.
Beyond outrage.
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 10, 2013 09:48 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: BunkerintheBurbs at May 10, 2013 01:41 PM (5lVZz)
May God bless and protect our great military.
I saw a video of them that broke my heart. http://tinyurl.com/d6lbeak
Posted by: ChristyBlinky is thankfully not the Duchess of Alba at May 10, 2013 09:48 AM (baL2B)
Seriously, can that mean anything more than sellout. Are we here really not reasonable conservatives?
Posted by: dogfish at May 10, 2013 09:49 AM (nsOJa)
Posted by: Up With People! at May 10, 2013 09:49 AM (krveP)
Posted by: dananjcon at May 10, 2013 09:49 AM (jvd3N)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 10, 2013 09:49 AM (jE38p)
"Let's get this thing to go viral. A minute and a half video starring the #2 diplomat in Libya at the time of the attack, Greg Hicks, offering devastating testimony that directly contradicts Hillary Clinton and the administration."
http://tinyurl.com/d8nqcev
Posted by: Caustic at May 10, 2013 09:50 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: Dworkin Barimen at May 10, 2013 09:50 AM (48j+X)
Posted by: polynikes at May 10, 2013 09:51 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 10, 2013 09:51 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 10, 2013 09:52 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: RWC at May 10, 2013 09:52 AM (fWAjv)
Bush wasn't a conservative so you don't have to defend him.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 10, 2013 09:53 AM (YTstp)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 10, 2013 09:53 AM (jE38p)
Sen. Mike Lee, who is close friends with Sen. Cruz and Sen. Paul, delivered a speech similar to Ryan's last month. Also, Rush talked about this subject earlier this month and said he agreed with Lee.
"What Conservatives Are For"- http://1.usa.gov/12g6qvq
"Senator Mike Lee on Conservatism and Community"- http://bit.ly/11D1T4A
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at May 10, 2013 09:53 AM (YjDyJ)
As Ronald Reagan put it, itÂ’s a time for choosing.
Would love to see the stats as I think a lot of folks chose already. They chose to change their registration to independent as the clusterfuck they saw this election was almost too much to bear.
People are angry still. A symptom of that is the fact that one too many persons have told me they won't listen to hannity and rush anymore as they "lied to them during the election" and they won't watch cable news or, in some instances, any news. So yeah people chose already but the republicans are too stupid to figure this out.
Posted by: Caustic at May 10, 2013 09:55 AM (/b8+5)
The dad, whose name I did not catch, may be a moron? If not he is a great American. In a 2 minute segment he covered all the inept actions that caused his son to lose his life in Afghanistan, took a direct shot at Biden, and said something along the lines of "the policies in Afghanistan make Obamacare look well thought out..."
Trying to find a link, it is worthy.
Posted by: BunkerintheBurbs at May 10, 2013 09:55 AM (5lVZz)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 10, 2013 09:55 AM (h1D+w)
BUSH HAD 13 BENGHAZIS!!!!!!
Posted by: RWC at May 10, 2013 01:52 PM (fWAjv)
Where did you get that from?
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 10, 2013 01:53 PM (jE38p)
That's showing up in a few places. Libs are screaming that there were (I saw
attacks on embassies during the Bush administration yet Republicans never cared about it then so this is just political. These assholes must sit around all day just trying to figure out how to spin things
Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 10, 2013 09:56 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 10, 2013 09:56 AM (VtjlW)
How do even our guys not get that?
Posted by: typo dynamofo at May 10, 2013 09:56 AM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: weft cut-loop at May 10, 2013 01:53 PM (YTstp)
I disagree. But we also probably disagree on what the definition of Conservative is. Is Gingrich a conservative? Is Ronald Reagan a conservative? Depending on where people decide to set the goal posts for Bush, I could make the argument they are not based on those standards.
Posted by: polynikes at May 10, 2013 09:58 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: RWC at May 10, 2013 09:59 AM (fWAjv)
11tee
Posted by: Kay in Maine at May 10, 2013 09:59 AM (jvd3N)
---
Really.
How many dead ambassadors? How many YouTube videos blamed??
Somewhere south of "none".
Posted by: fixerupper at May 10, 2013 10:00 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: typo dynamofo at May 10, 2013 01:56 PM (WVMUQ)
----
.... pssssssstt ..... they're not "our guys".....
Posted by: fixerupper at May 10, 2013 10:01 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 10, 2013 01:56 PM (1Jaio)
Beckel raised it yesterday on The Five. Said there was only one hearing while they have had nine hearings on Benghazi . Of course people on the left were born without the gene that allows people to make logical comparisons.
Posted by: polynikes at May 10, 2013 10:01 AM (m2CN7)
Fucker needs to get off the Amnesty Train though.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 10, 2013 10:02 AM (SY2Kh)
>>>BUSH HAD 13 BENGHAZIS!!!!!!
Yeah, I've heard this just today. There were a total of 3 hearings about attacks on Embassies during W's admin that went nowhere really becoz those were posturings by the Dems.
First tu coque is not an argument, Second it implies that hearings are not called for in every instance. Third no Ambassadors died although 13 employees did. 4th they weren't covered up by either the admin or the MSM. 5th W didn't essentially order these deaths.
Like I said earlier, this is ruinous to them, Barry and Hillary and they know it. They're desperate to change the fkn subject.
Posted by: Bigby's Gunpowder Burnt Hands at May 10, 2013 10:03 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 01:46 PM (sXWmd)
Ich bin ein Berliner?
Posted by: © Sponge at May 10, 2013 10:03 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 10:03 AM (sXWmd)
I hear ya.
Why do we have so many lukewarm at best "team players" when the Dems seem to be all in all the time.
Posted by: typo dynamofo at May 10, 2013 10:04 AM (WVMUQ)
Tsaernev was buried in a muslim cemetery in VA? Well, that's nice.
They should've put the other brother in the grave with him.
The other brother, incidentally, is not in the news at all. Nary a mention since he changed hospitals. It's almost as if they want The People's memory of the terrorists to be buried along with the dead brother.
Posted by: soothsayer at May 10, 2013 10:04 AM (vanqS)
Posted by: Bigby's Gunpowder Burnt Hands at May 10, 2013 10:05 AM (3ZtZW)
It's easily determined: did he expand the Federal government or expand individual liberty?
There is only one answer.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 10, 2013 10:05 AM (YTstp)
85 OT: Why did Prince Harry lay flowers at JFK's grave???
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 01:46 PM (sXWmd)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it was tomb of the unknowns at Arlington, also was to visit the afghan lost area there. Classy I think.
Posted by: BunkerintheBurbs at May 10, 2013 10:05 AM (5lVZz)
The problem, however, is perception. Voters think Republicans hate government.
having already identified a number of communal 'institutions' I think conservatives are very much attached to, I'd say it's fair to infer the institution that dare not speak its name is government
No.. not "government", "federal government". This needs to be hammered home over and over by prominent Republicans.
Conservatives serve on local government bodies, we are mayors, we serve on school boards, we manage counties and other governing bodies the size of some small states - and our states have more governors than libs.
We do not hate government. We hate the disconnected federal government. We believe as did Milton Friedman that government closer to home, closer to its funding is more effective (I wish I could find the quote).
We don't hate government, and we need to say that.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 10, 2013 10:05 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 10, 2013 10:05 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: T. at May 10, 2013 10:06 AM (1qp/j)
Posted by: T. at May 10, 2013 10:06 AM (1qp/j)
Oh Mr. GOP? I have "The Dustbin of History" on Line 1 - says he's calling from the 1858 national HQ of something called the Whig Party...
Posted by: DocJ at May 10, 2013 10:07 AM (A5uiv)
I find it quite enlightening that liberals are PERFECTLY FINE with their government LYING to them openly without repercussion regardless of content so long as its a democrat doing it.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 10, 2013 10:07 AM (xmcEQ)
Math is racist, sexist, anti-gay, and now ageist. Tsk.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 10, 2013 10:07 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 10:08 AM (i3yCl)
http://tinyurl.com/brshhxr
**
What assholes. I guess the whole cover-up and lying before congress about the death of 4 U.S. citizens is just tertiary events compared to Bushes incompetence!
**spit**
Posted by: dananjcon at May 10, 2013 10:08 AM (jvd3N)
I commented about this last night. It's everywhere you wouldn't think it would be. Doc Thompson on the blaze network mentioned it this morning and did a fantastic job of isolating it and devastating it. Problem is a person goes onto the site, makes a thread and leaves it there for others to carry the ball. The thread is always the same, which is how you know it's talking points. The republicans need more folks out there debunking this stuff. I was exhausted last night answering the same list of bush transgressions and why this doesn't matter. The easiest place to find it is at a place called "Above Top Secret": "What exactly was "covered up" in Benghazi?" They have this thread and the first thread the guy started with the numbered talking points which is referenced in this thread. His initial thread is exactly the same as all the other threads started all over that Doc Thompson mentioned this morning on his program.
Posted by: Caustic at May 10, 2013 10:08 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: T. at May 10, 2013 02:06 PM (1qp/j)
-----
Stop wasting band width. Your burning up our environment.
Posted by: Your Government Betters at May 10, 2013 10:08 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: soothsayer
...............
yeah.. or maybe there is no "news". You want to to artificially keep this asshole's story on the front page every day for months? You guys read too much tin hat shit into everything.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 10, 2013 10:08 AM (f9c2L)
Bush did not have 13 Benghazis. They are fucking idiots.
No Americans died. Almost every attack was a suicide bomber on a well fortified position. I.e., they did their fucking job on security.
Next fucking question.
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 10, 2013 10:08 AM (tVTLU)
There is only one answer.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at May 10, 2013 02:05 PM (YTstp)
The Federal Government expanded under Reagan. He also failed in his promise to eliminate the Department of Education. The deficit when compared to GDP was greater under Reagan that under Bush. He signed an Amnesty bill that expanded the entitlement liabilities immediately.
Is Reagan not a conservative to you?
Posted by: polynikes at May 10, 2013 10:08 AM (m2CN7)
congrats
I was the Taoiseach, btw. Just another Fianna Fail hack, but Taoiseach nontheless
Posted by: Bertie Ahern at May 10, 2013 10:09 AM (omBWL)
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 10, 2013 10:09 AM (6H6FZ)
And why is Prince Harry visiting the Jersey Shore?
I have a rotten feeling he's doing so because of his father's stupid Global Warming cause.
I never thought much of Diana and her 'causes' either. She came off as a phony. But that's what British royalty does, right? They pose for photos and pretend to care about the peons and their problems.
Posted by: soothsayer at May 10, 2013 10:09 AM (39q3n)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at May 10, 2013 10:10 AM (Ec6wH)
Ah, Math - the ultimate stone-cold heartless biatch. Don't know from Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative. Only knows "IS".
Posted by: DocJ at May 10, 2013 10:10 AM (A5uiv)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 10, 2013 10:11 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: dananjcon at May 10, 2013 10:11 AM (jvd3N)
Posted by: derit at May 10, 2013 10:12 AM (I88Jc)
Posted by: Madtom at May 10, 2013 10:12 AM (IyxzF)
Isn't Virginia jihadi central, second only to Michigan?
---------
New York? From successful plots to foiled plots, jihadis hate NY.
Jihadi is a lot more networked and distributed these days.
Posted by: Beagle at May 10, 2013 10:12 AM (sOtz/)
It's working in Japan.
Posted by: TallDave at May 10, 2013 10:12 AM (/s1LA)
99 - but that was like a 100 years ago or something.
>>>I find it quite enlightening that liberals are PERFECTLY FINE with their government LYING to them openly without repercussion regardless of content so long as its a democrat doing it.
They're ironing out their stories right now. You can watch it real time on Kos or DU if you care to.
"Generations will look back on this moment and recall that this was time the waters receded and State Department personnel were reduced and the planet started healing and the 1st, 2nd and 4th amendmnets died"
Posted by: Bigby's Gunpowder Burnt Hands at May 10, 2013 10:12 AM (3ZtZW)
Is Reagan not a conservative to you?
Posted by: polynikes
Reagan also cut government. Bush, not so much.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 10, 2013 10:13 AM (YTstp)
Which was wrong, you know. The proper response would have been for Bush to apologize to the attackers and blame an unrelated third party.
The world loves us now, because our god-king understands this.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at May 10, 2013 10:14 AM (ZKzrr)
We gotta get Pixy to fix this comment editor someday.
Posted by: TallDave at May 10, 2013 10:14 AM (/s1LA)
Is Reagan not a conservative to you?
Posted by: polynikes
And what was he promised in return?
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at May 10, 2013 10:14 AM (fwARV)
hahahhaha @ no "news" to report on the terrorist
Here's what was on the "news" this morning:
-- Prince Harry is greeted by Michelle Obama and Dr Jill Biden
-- Top 5 baby names for a girl
Terrorist?
What terrorist?
Posted by: soothsayer at May 10, 2013 10:15 AM (052zE)
Posted by: TallDave at May 10, 2013 10:15 AM (/s1LA)
Posted by: The Obsidian Owl at May 10, 2013 02:13 PM (tWmgi)
My question is, why do they feel the need to be? Who cares? Their ideals and beliefs are FUCKED and will destroy society. Why would you want to be part of THAT crowd?
Posted by: © Sponge at May 10, 2013 10:16 AM (xmcEQ)
You know we have all this talk about amending the Constitution to repeal or modify the Second Amendment.
I bet you there would be a helluva lot more support for amending the First Amendment to take Islam and Muslims out of protection.
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 10, 2013 10:16 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 10, 2013 10:16 AM (jE38p)
Posted by: Attila at May 10, 2013 10:16 AM (Cs2tJ)
>>>The thread is always the same, which is how you know it's talking points.
Which is how you know its Axelrod
Posted by: Bigby's Gunpowder Burnt Hands at May 10, 2013 10:17 AM (3ZtZW)
Who here can tell me if the Dhzokar is handcuffed to his bed?
Can you tell me if he's been charged?
Has he met with his lawyer? Who is his lawyer?
When's his next court date?
We don't know.
You don't know SHIT about what's going on. Yeah, "no news" to report. None at all.
Posted by: soothsayer at May 10, 2013 10:18 AM (vanqS)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 10, 2013 10:18 AM (jE38p)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at May 10, 2013 10:18 AM (co+55)
"Subsidiarity is like federalism. It’s the belief that each part of society adds to the whole, and that each part must be free to do its work—on its own terms. So government shouldn’t assume other people’s tasks. It shouldn’t make decisions better left with the family or the neighborhood. The people closest to the problem are the most likely to solve it—because they know the community best. And this is the opposite of progressivism, which believes Washington knows best."
How is this liberal?
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at May 10, 2013 10:19 AM (YjDyJ)
Posted by: The Obsidian Owl at May 10, 2013 02:12 PM (tWmgi)
Because your supporters don't have a 24 hour a day megaphone to beat you with and clerks in every gov't agency who will leak every time you missed a child support payment or got in a fistfight in 8th Grade?
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 10, 2013 10:19 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 10, 2013 10:19 AM (jE38p)
But we know the top 5 baby names for girls! ( Olivia is one of them, btw)
And we know where Prince friggin Harry is today!
Posted by: soothsayer at May 10, 2013 10:19 AM (052zE)
Posted by: Eleanor Roosevelt at May 10, 2013 10:20 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Jean at May 10, 2013 10:21 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 10:23 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 10:24 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: T. at May 10, 2013 10:26 AM (1qp/j)
Posted by: Cece - at May 10, 2013 10:27 AM (n4EDK)
Posted by: filbert at May 10, 2013 10:27 AM (7vimm)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 10:28 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: ejo at May 10, 2013 10:29 AM (GXvSO)
Any guesses?
http://tinyurl.com/cjkztuv
Posted by: Caustic at May 10, 2013 10:30 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: T. at May 10, 2013 10:30 AM (1qp/j)
Posted by: Waldo at May 10, 2013 10:30 AM (sXWmd)
If Obama doesn't want press coverage of crime - because he wants to use it (gun control) or it might hurt him (Boston) all he has to do is snap his fingers, send this thug Holder out and presto - no coverage.
Posted by: jeannebodine at May 10, 2013 10:31 AM (LBBS3)
The most transparent of administrations!
They be worried, y'all.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky is thankfully not the Duchess of Alba at May 10, 2013 10:32 AM (baL2B)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky is thankfully not the Duchess of Alba at May 10, 2013 02:32 PM (baL2B)
"Transparency: WH Holds Benghazi Briefing ... Off-the-Record" (via matt drudge) http://tinyurl.com/cc5vpxa
Posted by: Caustic at May 10, 2013 10:35 AM (/b8+5)
http://tinyurl.com/csoao4p
First heard this as a rumor and my response was "paranoid much?"
Posted by: Caustic at May 10, 2013 10:38 AM (/b8+5)
Well, that is not entirely true. We do, however, largely hate government workers. One of the things that ought to keep IRS workers from engaging in partisan decisions on who to audit is that thought that one day Republicans will be back in office and that they hate government workers and would like nothing better to put government workers who had engaged in partisan violations of the law into prison for as long as possible.
In fact, Republicans would be willing to release violent criminals if necessary in order to make enough room for all the Democrat government workers we would like to lock up.
I am not sure how much political appeal there is for that sort of program but I think it would test pretty well during the primaries.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at May 10, 2013 10:43 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: theBuckWheat at May 10, 2013 10:44 AM (SsVuS)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at May 10, 2013 10:47 AM (xAtAj)
I would say that Ryan is obviously more of a pragmatist when it comes to his voting record and proposals but the key arguments in their speeches are the same. Also, Lee makes what can be called a technocratic argument near the end of his speech (starting with "Once the federal government stops...").
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at May 10, 2013 10:48 AM (YjDyJ)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at May 10, 2013 10:49 AM (xAtAj)
http://tinyurl.com/d47r4go
Posted by: Caustic at May 10, 2013 10:55 AM (/b8+5)
Others seem to have a strange notion that "community" consists of government forcing people to do things.
Posted by: Tonawanda at May 10, 2013 10:57 AM (GeFHE)
Posted by: Caustic at May 10, 2013 11:04 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: filbert the Whig at May 10, 2013 11:08 AM (7vimm)
Posted by: Rich at May 10, 2013 12:06 PM (WVRxe)
71 AtC - well said, as usual. I've had the same thoughts though not as articulately stated. Actually, I tend to use several more "sentence enhancers"....
God boiled human governance down to 10 Laws (Commandments). We (humans) added the "rules of government" and additional laws to justify our circumventing the original 10.
LiB.
Posted by: 1bulwetweft at May 10, 2013 12:19 PM (g+Cz1)
Posted by: Nation of Joshuas at May 10, 2013 01:15 PM (oIV1K)
Posted by: MlR at May 10, 2013 05:15 PM (ujErg)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at May 10, 2013 07:50 PM (/b8+5)
There has been no, nada, none, zero cuts, draconian or otherwise. Base line budgeting and the last 4 years of no budgets, has destroyed any "budgeting".
Posted by: Tortuga at May 11, 2013 05:55 AM (FmyWU)
Posted by: westie at May 11, 2013 06:47 AM (3YBFV)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2381 seconds, 293 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: phoenixgirl at May 10, 2013 09:27 AM (3exA+)