May 15, 2013
— DrewM Cooke (follow him on Twitter) has been a revelation at National Review. (link added/fixed thanks to CBD)
On May 5, Barack Obama shamefully told graduating students at Ohio State University:
Unfortunately, you’ve grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems. Some of these same voices also do their best to gum up the works. They’ll warn that tyranny is always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices. Because what they suggest is that our brave, and creative, and unique experiment in self-rule is somehow just a sham with which we can’t be trusted.This statement is telling. Contrary to the manner in which both Al Gore and President Obama customarily use the term, “self-rule” does not in fact describe a process by which the citizen submits himself to the state and, in return, is given occasion to cast a vote on how the government may run the more significant parts of his life. Instead, “self-rule” denotes a system in which a free man may maintain control over the lion’s share of his decisions while maintaining some say over the government’s conduct in those few areas where it is necessary for government to operate.
...
Why, you might ask, do I use “paranoia,” instead of the more palatable “skepticism”? Paranoia, after all, is an involuntary reaction — less of a tendency to “wait and see” than a recipe for constant fear. I will tell you why: because reflexive suspicion of government power is a magnificent and virtuous tendency, and one that should be the starting point of all political conversation in a free republic.
Go. Read it all.
Sad that it takes a young man (I think he's in his mid-20s) from the United Kingdom to remind, or more worryingly educate for the first time, so many Americans of their birthright of freedom.
In a better world, Cooke would be at the Washington Post and Ezra "The Constitution is old" Klein would be back at Pandagon (or whatever lefty swamp he emerged from).
By the way, you know who all this talk of tyranny and government overreach benefits? This guy.
Via Monty, Jonah Goldberg takes issue with Cooke's defense of the word "paranoia". I don't know. It's a polemic. A little license is allowed.
Via RD (blogging is a team effort) Cooke responds to Goldberg.
Posted by: DrewM at
07:26 AM
| Comments (192)
Post contains 423 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 15, 2013 07:30 AM (XYSwB)
GOP Rep. ‘Not Willing’ to Take Obama Impeachment Off The Table
"Dispatch, this is car 54. We have a positive sighting on a set of balls, over."
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 07:31 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: t-bird at May 15, 2013 07:31 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: t-bird at May 15, 2013 07:32 AM (FcR7P)
Just got back from a potty break. Any new scandals come to light since I flushed?
Posted by: Jaws at May 15, 2013 07:33 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Svengali Obama at May 15, 2013 07:33 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at May 15, 2013 07:34 AM (wbmaj)
Posted by: Book at May 15, 2013 07:34 AM (ee/nS)
Posted by: t-bird at May 15, 2013 07:35 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Book at May 15, 2013 07:35 AM (ee/nS)
Posted by: Mindy at May 15, 2013 07:36 AM (xIq7K)
Obama: Now that you've got your "hard earned" college degree--fuck that self-sufficiency jive--let me...the government...do everything for you.
Nothing scary in that.
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at May 15, 2013 07:36 AM (wbmaj)
Posted by: Adloph Hitler at May 15, 2013 07:36 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: t-bird at May 15, 2013 11:32 AM (FcR7P)"
WUT.
Posted by: Book at May 15, 2013 11:35 AM (ee/nS)
Don't worry about it. Your ISP probably refreshed your modem's IP. It will happen from time to time. Nothing sinister is going on.
Yet...
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 07:36 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Midaz at May 15, 2013 07:36 AM (f2FvF)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at May 15, 2013 07:36 AM (wbmaj)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at May 15, 2013 11:36 AM (wbmaj)
But we'll extract the hawt co-eds first, right?
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 07:37 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Mr Pink at May 15, 2013 07:38 AM (ASWbs)
Posted by: Book at May 15, 2013 11:30 AM (ee/nS)
---------
Electrical engineers per nanosecond?
Posted by: Assault Citizen Anachronda at May 15, 2013 07:38 AM (U82Km)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at May 15, 2013 07:38 AM (wbmaj)
Posted by: Cameo Appearance at May 15, 2013 07:38 AM (R8yKQ)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 15, 2013 07:39 AM (piMMO)
Would love to see on an OSU t-shirt:
"I spent $100,000 in tuition and all I got was a stupid paranoia lecture from Barack Millhouse Obama."
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at May 15, 2013 07:39 AM (EGPJQ)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at May 15, 2013 11:36 AM (wbmaj)
But we'll extract the hawt co-eds first, right?
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 11:37 AM (GQ8sn)
Yes. But first, they will blow me.
Posted by: Operation Commander Mel Gibson at May 15, 2013 07:40 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: JPS at May 15, 2013 07:40 AM (g11mv)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorirst) Party Hobbit [/s][/i][/b][/u] at May 15, 2013 07:40 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: JPS at May 15, 2013 07:40 AM (g11mv)
"Dispatch, this is car 54. We have a positive sighting on a set of balls, over."
----
Addendum: Objects in mirror are smaller than they appear.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at May 15, 2013 07:41 AM (EGPJQ)
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 15, 2013 07:41 AM (Hx5uv)
Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens....
This conduct has included one or more of the following:
He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavoured to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposes not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigations to be intitiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.
I'm just sayin'.
Posted by: The Regular Guy at May 15, 2013 07:42 AM (qHCyt)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 15, 2013 07:42 AM (da5Wo)
***
It's a sham within a hoax within a con within a Ponzi scheme.
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 15, 2013 07:43 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at May 15, 2013 07:43 AM (wbmaj)
Both Cooke and Goldberg make good points. My question to Goldberg would be, "So what word would you use instead?" Because Cooke is right -- "skepticism" is not strong enough.
If "paranoia" is defined as "irrational fear," then what term would best define "rational fear?"
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorirst) Party Hobbit [/s][/i][/b][/u] at May 15, 2013 07:43 AM (4df7R)
Car 54, Dispatch, your coffee and donuts are ready.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/u][/s][/b] at May 15, 2013 07:44 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 15, 2013 07:44 AM (da5Wo)
Attention ladies, your learning curriculum during your stay will include the following:
Pole Dancing: Advanced Studies and Lab
Pole Dancing: graduate thesis and special project
Car Washing
Sandwich Making
Advanced Gender Studies of the Male Mind: TV Remote Controls and Internet Pr0n
Uniforms: Lingerie and Clear Heels
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 07:44 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Clemenza at May 15, 2013 07:45 AM (3GuQx)
Posted by: Dispatcher at May 15, 2013 07:45 AM (+x8q5)
"And Just like Unions you probably see as evil, they hire Lobbyists to work with Elected Officials to grow their businesses that Taxpayers fund 100%.
---
I wonÂ’t make many more comments going down the line Emiro, because I learned a long time ago that I can get 25 more voters with open minds faster than I will ever convince a person who comments on blogs to change their minds."
Open minds: closed to critical thought, responsibility and consequences.
Posted by: Liberal's Little Book of Brawndo at May 15, 2013 07:46 AM (2iU3x)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 15, 2013 07:46 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: The IRS at May 15, 2013 07:46 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 15, 2013 07:47 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 15, 2013 07:47 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 15, 2013 07:47 AM (dhncb)
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 15, 2013 07:48 AM (Hx5uv)
===========
A few years back I had occasion to hear Nigel West deliver a lecture on how MI-5 brought down the Provisional IRA. Some of the tactics they employed could NEVER have been done in the U.S. When at the end of the lecture he was asked why MI-5 could do such things while US security services could not he replied: "You must remember that you are citizens, while we are subjects".
There is an awful lot in that distinction that is, unfortunately, being traded away by today's electorate for a plate of beans. And a cell phone.
Posted by: Nighthawk at May 15, 2013 07:49 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: The Obama Bus at May 15, 2013 07:49 AM (+x8q5)
Posted by: t-bird at May 15, 2013 07:49 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Roy at May 15, 2013 07:49 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Mr Pink at May 15, 2013 07:49 AM (ASWbs)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 15, 2013 07:50 AM (+x8q5)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 15, 2013 07:50 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Roy at May 15, 2013 07:50 AM (VndSC)
...and we're all trying to see around the corner and never look just behind us, where it's standing.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ crosses the streams at May 15, 2013 07:51 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: USA at May 15, 2013 07:52 AM (VIaw0)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 15, 2013 07:52 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 15, 2013 07:52 AM (+x8q5)
Is it just me?
Posted by: dananjcon at May 15, 2013 07:52 AM (jvd3N)
Fuck.
Posted by: Mr Pink at May 15, 2013 11:49 AM (ASWbs)
How do ya like me now, bitches?
Posted by: Alex Jones of the InfoWars, buy my stuff at May 15, 2013 07:53 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Mr Pink at May 15, 2013 07:53 AM (ASWbs)
Hmm... Instead of paranoia, what about "distrust?"
"In Praise of Distrust of Government."
Sounds good, doesn't it?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorirst) Party Hobbit [/s][/i][/b][/u] at May 15, 2013 07:53 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 15, 2013 11:52 AM (da5Wo)
I made my own at work. I have it sitting on my filing cabinet. It even has a beanie on it!
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 07:53 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 15, 2013 07:54 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 15, 2013 07:54 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: t-bird at May 15, 2013 07:55 AM (FcR7P)
Nothing scary in that.
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at May 15, 2013 11:36 AM (wbmaj)
=========
Link to what is still the best commencement addresses never given:
http://bit.ly/19tjpeA
Posted by: Nighthawk at May 15, 2013 07:55 AM (OtQXp)
The sitemeter widget loads every time you come to the page or refresh. Something about it makes stuff go crazy. Not sure what it is exactly, but pixy should look into it.
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 07:55 AM (GQ8sn)
..."fill your tuneup and save that, uh, gas for the corpseman."
Posted by: Greatest Orator EVAR at May 15, 2013 07:56 AM (7gwGw)
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 15, 2013 07:56 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 15, 2013 07:56 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: no good deed at May 15, 2013 07:56 AM (mjR67)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at May 15, 2013 07:57 AM (wbmaj)
Yes, yes indeed. Please
Posted by: Prince George's County SWAT Team[/i][/u][/s][/b] at May 15, 2013 07:58 AM (sbV1u)
Paranoia may well be a survival characteristic, at least in times like these.
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius at May 15, 2013 07:59 AM (BDU/a)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 15, 2013 07:59 AM (da5Wo)
If "paranoia" is defined as "irrational fear," then what term would best define "rational fear?"
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea
Eternal ______ is the price of liberty.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 15, 2013 08:00 AM (YTstp)
Posted by: College Park Cuddler at May 15, 2013 08:00 AM (X4HxX)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 15, 2013 08:00 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: major major major major at May 15, 2013 08:00 AM (MUhs0)
That should be on the AOSHQ t-shirt.
#twoweeks
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at May 15, 2013 08:00 AM (O6Tmi)
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 15, 2013 08:01 AM (X6akg)
(That's the force that my FIL was on. Well, PGPD, not SWAT.)
Was it them that did the wrong no-knock raid and accidentally kill/injure someone other than who they were looking for?
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:01 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 15, 2013 08:01 AM (ZPrif)
Sometimes I forget and the fan and smoke rising from my machine reminds me.
It's like Mission Impossible.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 15, 2013 12:00 PM (ZPrif)
This blog will self-destruct in five seconds...
Not that far from the truth actually.
#twoweeks
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:02 AM (GQ8sn)
"Paranoia" means "beside thinking"--thought that resembles but exceeds logic, deduction (the form of reason) applied to incomplete information.
If you're being lied to, as we almost always are, "paranoia" is eunoia.
Own it, tubby.
Posted by: oblig. at May 15, 2013 08:02 AM (cePv8)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 15, 2013 08:02 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: USA at May 15, 2013 08:02 AM (VIaw0)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 15, 2013 08:02 AM (da5Wo)
And after that, proceed to Idylwild to provide security for arrival of Khrushchev.
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at May 15, 2013 08:03 AM (IlZPo)
Posted by: RWC at May 15, 2013 08:03 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: [/i][/b]akula51 at May 15, 2013 08:03 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: mugiwara at May 15, 2013 08:03 AM (W7ffl)
ORLY? Let's see your diplomas.
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:04 AM (GQ8sn)
This sentence struck me immediately as wrong and conflating two opposite ideas. Our self-rule specifically warns us to be suspicious of government, of power, and to rule one's self instead of letting the EPA, WH, IRS, SEC, yada yada, do it.
Is his speechwriter really that stupid, or was this a sleight of rhetorical hand?
Posted by: PJ at May 15, 2013 08:05 AM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Mr Pink at May 15, 2013 11:53 AM (ASWbs)
Goldberg isn't saying that "paranoia" is too strong; he's just saying the definition of paranoia is at odds with Cooke's point. Cooke makes the completely true assertion that it is healthy for a society to be suspicious of its government's actions. The definition of "paranoia," however, as Goldberg notes, is, "suspicion and mistrust of people or their actions without evidence or justification."
Well that's just not the case.
As you yourself pointed out, it is not paranoid to accuse the IRS of targeting conservative groups, because THAT'S WHAT THEY DID. And what they're still doing, I'm sure.
The word "paranoid" has negative associations in our culture. Using "paranoid" or "paranoia" to describe a healthy vigilance and distrust of those in power simply morphs into a cultural belief that ANY vigilance or distrust of those in power is a bad thing. That's what we want to avoid.
It's not paranoia when your fears are justified. And the lessons of history will always justify suspicion of the controlling authority. So what can we call it instead of "paranoia?"
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorirst) Party Hobbit [/s][/i][/b][/u] at May 15, 2013 08:05 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: t-bird at May 15, 2013 08:05 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 15, 2013 08:05 AM (XYSwB)
Gingerism
Posted by: Prince George's County SWAT Team[/i][/u][/s][/b] at May 15, 2013 08:06 AM (sbV1u)
When you think of the 80,000+ pages of rules and regulations some stooge in the IRS can nail you on just because he feels like it, or the hundreds of thousands of other pages of rules and regulations other agencies have, along with the enforcement powers to crush any American that tries to stand up to them, then yeah, I'm paranoid....
What three government rules have you broken today that they haven't tried to punish you for....yet?
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at May 15, 2013 08:07 AM (AC0lD)
Posted by: RWC at May 15, 2013 08:07 AM (fWAjv)
Stimulus--crap
Obamacare--crap
Iran--bomby (slightly crazy)
North Korea--bomby (totally batshit)
Benghazi--lies
IRS--lies
AP--lies
Drones--truth
Deficit--I have no words
Jobs--Ditto
Solyndra--fire
Joe Biden--Vice President ofthe Untied States
Chuck Hagel--Secretary of Defense
John Kerry--Carrots
John Brenna--DCI
Janet Napolitano--In your backyard with a parabolic mic and rubber gloves
Now, why on earth would we be paranoid?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 15, 2013 08:07 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 15, 2013 08:08 AM (ZPrif)
Gosnell was given "Life", huh?
***
Sandra Fluke has reminded us that we need to remember what drove women to Gosnell to begin with. Hint: It's you.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/bv9ynum
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 15, 2013 08:09 AM (Hx5uv)
Skepticism is the most appropriate word, though unfortunately most people don't actually know what the word really means.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 15, 2013 08:09 AM (SY2Kh)
No, half-blooded weasel though.
And his father smelt of elderberries.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/u][/s][/b] at May 15, 2013 08:09 AM (sbV1u)
ARTICLE 1
In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his consitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, in that:
On June 17, 1972, and prior thereto, agents of the Committee for the Re-election of the President committed unlawful entry of the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee in Washington, District of Columbia, for the purpose of securing political intelligence. Subsequent thereto, Richard M. Nixon, using the powers of his high office, engaged personally and through his close subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the investigation of such illegal entry; to cover up, conceal and protect those responsible; and to conceal the existence and scope of other unlawful covert activities.
The means used to implement this course of conduct or plan included one or more of the following:
...making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct...
I'm just sayin'. Again.
Posted by: The Regular Guy at May 15, 2013 08:09 AM (qHCyt)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 15, 2013 08:09 AM (+x8q5)
Posted by: RWC at May 15, 2013 08:10 AM (fWAjv)
Gee...it's almost like he knew that some big scandals were about to hit...
Scandals that would expose some of his abuses of government power.
Posted by: wheatie at May 15, 2013 08:10 AM (y8LTw)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 15, 2013 08:10 AM (+x8q5)
Posted by: t-bird at May 15, 2013 08:10 AM (FcR7P)
Interesting...
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:11 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 15, 2013 12:09 PM (SY2Kh)
The problem with "skepticism" is that its connotations are too light. It doesn't carry the kind of rhetorical weight that "paranoia" carries.
"Pineapple on pizza? I dunno, I'm skeptical."
"Pineapple on pizza? Call me paranoid, but are you trying to poison me or something?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorirst) Party Hobbit [/s][/i][/b][/u] at May 15, 2013 08:12 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:12 AM (GQ8sn)
I don't trust the government without any specific justification except their prior actions and the congenital make up of government that makes it not trustworthy.
The government has not done one thing to help me unless in turn it was advantageous to itself.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2013 08:13 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 12:12 PM (GQ8sn)
It's like an MC Escher sketch...
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorirst) Party Hobbit [/s][/i][/b][/u] at May 15, 2013 08:13 AM (4df7R)
I don't trust the government because it's full of people straight out of Kos, except some of them have a badge and a gun.
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:14 AM (GQ8sn)
It's like an MC Escher sketch...
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorirst) Party Hobbit at May 15, 2013 12:13 PM (4df7R)
I wonder...
Next up: self-replicating machines.
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:14 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 15, 2013 08:14 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: t-bird at May 15, 2013 08:15 AM (FcR7P)
That was ALL I needed to see to know we were in deep shit with this fucking prick.
Posted by: Berserker at May 15, 2013 08:16 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: USA at May 15, 2013 08:16 AM (VIaw0)
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 15, 2013 08:16 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: RWC at May 15, 2013 08:17 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 15, 2013 08:17 AM (+x8q5)
Posted by: Lauren at May 15, 2013 08:17 AM (wsGWu)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at May 15, 2013 08:17 AM (C8mVl)
xkcd lends us this warning regarding the proliferation of 3D printers..
http://tinyurl.com/6jdfh9q
(SFW - xkcd comic)
Posted by: RWC at May 15, 2013 12:17 PM (fWAjv)
I give it...
#twoweeks
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:18 AM (GQ8sn)
Caution. ...Apprehension, in the face of danger.
These are normal, rational reactions to a harmful situation.
Barky was trying to get ahead of the scandals that were about to hit.
He was telling these kids...
"You should have no rational fear of my abuses of power. Instead, you should suspend all normal survival instincts and love me irrationally...because I'm cool."
Posted by: wheatie at May 15, 2013 08:18 AM (y8LTw)
He was telling these kids...
"You should have no rational fear of my abuses of power. Instead, you should suspend all normal survival instincts and love me irrationally...because I'm cool."
Not 5 years ago, they were being told just the opposite.
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:19 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: RWC at May 15, 2013 08:19 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Jmel at May 15, 2013 08:20 AM (t1oUn)
Posted by: RWC at May 15, 2013 08:20 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: t-bird at May 15, 2013 08:21 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 15, 2013 12:17 PM
yeah ok, I thought I had the right state, because I remember thinking about how long it would be before their decomposing bodies were hanging from the arch.
Posted by: Berserker at May 15, 2013 08:21 AM (FMbng)
OT. Maybe why I'm home hibernating today. BFF has dr. appt with BF in 2 hours to find out what kind of cancer BF has. Not going to be good. Weeks or less than months is expected.
Could explain my terribly foul mood. Not looking for sympathy, just venting.
Sympathy comes between shit and syphillis in the dictionary.
Posted by: Infidel at May 15, 2013 08:22 AM (gqEUi)
Geez, if you're going to hate people because of their religion, at least get the religion right.
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 15, 2013 08:22 AM (Hx5uv)
I wonder if Stevens should have been a little paranoid about his government.
'No way they would let these terrorists kill me and and burn down our consulate without any attempted response. That's just paranoia talking. '
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2013 08:22 AM (m2CN7)
What we really need to do is stop using negative terms to describe our feelings toward the government. The government works for us, allegedly. That means suspicion and menace and, yes, paranoia, is experienced by the government and those in power, NOT us. What we define as "suspicion of the government" isn't suspicion -- it's oversight. What we define as "distrust" of the government isn't distrust -- it's an exercise in proper stewardship of the rule of law.
WE are not the ones experiencing negative emotions. What we feel and do are what WE ARE SUPPOSED TO FEEL AND DO. Everything comes back to language; absolutely everything. I'm not going to keep saying I'm suspicious of the government's motives for this or that; I'm going to start saying I'm exercising my right as an employer to review my employees' work product. And they can kiss my ass if they have a problem with that. I'm not the one in the wrong.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorirst) Party Hobbit [/s][/i][/b][/u] at May 15, 2013 08:22 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: RWC at May 15, 2013 08:23 AM (fWAjv)
Being strong just means you probably win a fight, but may come away bloodied.
Being strong and paranoid means you probably don't even get into that fight.
Fair fights are what prey demand. Slam dunks are what predators demand.
Posted by: @PurpAv at May 15, 2013 08:24 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: EC
***
+100
Posted by: Tilikum The Killer Assault Whale at May 15, 2013 08:24 AM (uhftQ)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at May 15, 2013 08:24 AM (fx7EL)
Posted by: RWC at May 15, 2013 12:19 PM
Yup, that was them. Kinda like the saudi police of virtue.
Posted by: Berserker at May 15, 2013 08:24 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Jmel at May 15, 2013 12:20 PM (t1oUn)
**
Heheh...you said "staind" the White house.
Posted by: Slick Willy at May 15, 2013 08:26 AM (jvd3N)
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 15, 2013 08:26 AM (Hx5uv)
How about...just FEAR?
As in "I love my country, but I fear my government."
Posted by: Paladin at May 15, 2013 08:29 AM (E1aoU)
Excel question again.
How do I write the visual basic code that tells Excel to go to the very first worksheet without using the specific name? Typically, the first worksheet is called "Sheet1", but I want to tell Excel not to pay attention to the name but just select the first worksheet in the list of tabs without regard to the name.
Thanks!
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:29 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Infidel at May 15, 2013 12:11 PM (gqEUi)
=======
That one of his is one of my favorites:
"ThereÂ’s nothing the matter with honest money-making. Wealth is not a pizza where if I have too many slices you have to eat the DominoÂ’s box. In a free society, with the rule of law and property rights, no one loses when someone else gets rich."
Pretty much dis-assembles the entire TFG campaign in 3 sentences.
Posted by: Nighthawk at May 15, 2013 08:29 AM (OtQXp)
How about...just FEAR?
As in "I love my country, but I fear my government."
http://thesaurus.com/browse/suspicion?s=t
Lots of good choices.
Posted by: EC at May 15, 2013 08:30 AM (GQ8sn)
We don't know.
It could be that a partisan actor in the IRS did this on their own. It's not at all unlikely.
It could be that Obama (via a staffer or appointee) gave a wink-wink nudge-nudge suggestion along the lines of "Someone should take a closer look at these groups and who is financing them".
If the latter, it's unlikely that anyone will step forward to pin it on Obama. I doubt there exists an e-mail or memo directly from the White House explicitly telling the IRS to target conservative group.
Now, if someone ends up facing jail time- all bets are off. Would they fall on their sword or not?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 15, 2013 08:32 AM (SY2Kh)
In case you didn't see Hannity last night...
There were Democrat Senators, such as Shummer and Al Franken, who wrote letters to the IRS, demanding that they do this to the Tea Party groups.
Yes...demanding.
They were basically saying to the IRS, that these Tea Party groups "must be stopped!"
Posted by: wheatie at May 15, 2013 08:32 AM (y8LTw)
They were basically saying to the IRS, that these Tea Party groups "must be stopped!"
Wait, what? Really? Do they have the actual letters with signatures?
Posted by: Infidel at May 15, 2013 08:35 AM (gqEUi)
Rand Paul should be polishing his sword right about now. I look forward to how he addresses these scandals.
Posted by: frode at May 15, 2013 08:36 AM (8z3Pa)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 15, 2013 08:36 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at May 15, 2013 08:37 AM (Q9qpj)
177...Wait, what? Really? Do they have the actual letters with signatures?
Karl Rove was holding up copies of the letters.
[Yeah, I know...I don't like him either. But still...]
There are about 7 senators...all Dems...who wrote letters to the IRS, demanding that they do this to the Tea Party people..
Posted by: wheatie at May 15, 2013 08:39 AM (y8LTw)
They were basically saying to the IRS, that these Tea Party groups "must be stopped!"
Wait, what? Really? Do they have the actual letters with signatures?
***
Saw the letter. It is implied that they wanted them harrased.
Gateway pundit had the copy.
Posted by: Tilikum The Killer Assault Whale at May 15, 2013 08:41 AM (uhftQ)
Posted by: wheatie at May 15, 2013 12:39 PM
Then they are the ones that need to be in jail.
Posted by: Berserker at May 15, 2013 08:42 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 15, 2013 08:48 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 15, 2013 08:49 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: [/i][/b]akula51 at May 15, 2013 08:49 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: gracepmc at May 15, 2013 08:53 AM (rznx3)
I'm neither an Excel or VB expert, but this MSDN help looks promising as a starting poing
http://tinyurl.com/ae9j8q9
The code samples deal with the active sheet. Maybe its as simple as Setting Workbook.ActiveSheet to zero or one
Posted by: @PurpAv at May 15, 2013 08:54 AM (/gHaE)
Examples must be made. Pikes adorned with heads, retirements revoked, prison sentences applied.
If the employees don't understand where the boundaries are, then mark them with fucking corpses.
Posted by: @PurpAv at May 15, 2013 08:57 AM (/gHaE)
*Probably some fixers acting on behalf of Chris "Only Half the RINO He Used to Be" KrispyKreme.
Posted by: Ken at May 15, 2013 09:14 AM (fFh95)
Posted by: Rich at May 15, 2013 09:37 AM (vm0dY)
Posted by: Aloha Akhbar @PirateBallerina at May 15, 2013 10:20 AM (/lWM8)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2334 seconds, 320 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Kurt Cobain at May 15, 2013 07:28 AM (+x8q5)