February 19, 2013
— Ace And other Deep Thoughts from our lightweight prettyboy.
Some good analysis from David Foster. Responding to Jonathan Chait's bafflement over why the wise, moderate Obama would nominate such a dangerous ignoramus, Foster answers:
[A]s far as old Bill Occam and I are concerned, the most plausible explanation for why President Obama nominated Chuck Hagel is that . . . he wanted to. He thinks Chuck Hagel will be effective in administering the national-security policy of candidate Obama circa 2007 or 2008, and even of President Obama circa 2009. And that’s the policy President Obama is interested in pursuing in his second term. In other words, the reason President Obama’s defense nominee sucks is that President Obama’s defense policy sucks.While the earnestly consternated in the political middle don’t seem to get this, the Hagel cheerleaders on both of their political flanks do, and they’re super psyched about it. Where I see in Hagel a man whose ceiling as SecDef is ineffectual bumbler disliked by Pentagon lifers (and he has no floor), these nouveau-America-Firsters, left and right, see a man who will preside bravely over a gradual withdrawal of the United States from whole theaters of geopolitics — and they positively beam at the prospect. But they are missing something else. In their war fatigue, they have refused to reckon with Hagel’s record as a poor organizational leader and domineering, ineffective manager of people; with his amorphous views and tenuous grasp of policy detail; and with his unremarkable intellect.
They ignore all this because they naively and narrowly view Hagel as above all else an “anti-war” figure....
The alternative to Hagel isn’t “more war” or the well-groomed love child of Dick Cheney and the Jewish Lobby. It’s basic strategic competence. It’s a man equal to the dangerous world he’ll be asked to stand sentry over.
Maybe the best way to illustrate what the far left, far right, and dead center are missing about Hagel is with the following dilemma: HagelÂ’s foreign-policy views are clearly to the left of the presidentÂ’s rhetoric for the last couple of years. ThatÂ’s not even debatable.
I like how Foster cuts to the obvious. We don't do enough of that. There are so many commentators now, all vying to say something clever and counterintuitive, that the obvious (and usually accurate) answer is ignored 90% of the time.
That won't get you hits, after all. It's not clever. It doesn't demonstrate that you, the Maker of Theories, are clever yourself.
It doesn't advertise you.
Now, why on earth would Chuck Hagel insist that Israel negotiate with a group directly funded by Iran?
Well, Chuck Hagel's speaking gigs are funded by Iran, too.
That's not really clever. That's just the fact of it.
It's About Competence: And Hagel doesn't have it.
Posted by: Ace at
01:34 PM
| Comments (238)
Post contains 481 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: toby928© for TB at February 19, 2013 01:37 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Tami[/i] at February 19, 2013 01:38 PM (X6akg)
Hagel was chosen to divide the GOP and to make them look bad. It's as if Bush nominated the most hawkish Democrat possible.
But the GOP can't play this game as well as the Dems because we actually have an appreciable diversity of thought in our party, which means we have to compromise first among ourselves before with the Dems.
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at February 19, 2013 01:38 PM (A6JfA)
I think the reason it is ignored because it isn't obvious to 90% of them. And that is scary.
Posted by: dogfish at February 19, 2013 01:39 PM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Whatev at February 19, 2013 01:40 PM (A7Wh1)
Posted by: Karl Rove at February 19, 2013 01:41 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 19, 2013 01:41 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 19, 2013 01:41 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Quint&Jessel, Sea of Bly, Azof, UK at February 19, 2013 01:41 PM (7v5Ct)
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at February 19, 2013 01:42 PM (AWmfW)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at February 19, 2013 01:42 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: Karl Rove at February 19, 2013 01:42 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at February 19, 2013 01:42 PM (evdj2)
Hagel is the perfect scapegoat for Barky and the Dems.
They want to be able to blame him for their failures, and further demoralize the R's.
If Hagel doesn't realize this...then he is an idiot.
If he *does* realize this...and is going along with it...then he is despicable.
Posted by: wheatie at February 19, 2013 01:43 PM (DZbQ0)
Posted by: Real Joe at February 19, 2013 01:44 PM (PD2ad)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at February 19, 2013 01:45 PM (QxSug)
#17, "US has all the global influence of Cameroon"
is that close to Botswana? And where did my Pippa pics go?
Wait, what?
Posted by: Jess1 at February 19, 2013 01:46 PM (lbiWb)
Posted by: Jones in CO at February 19, 2013 01:46 PM (8sCoq)
only advocacy and bullsh*t-- or advocacy bullsh*t, if you prefer
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at February 19, 2013 01:46 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: tasker at February 19, 2013 01:46 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: soothsayer at February 19, 2013 01:47 PM (0nyYS)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at February 19, 2013 01:47 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Jones in CO at February 19, 2013 05:46 PM (8sCoq)
You need to change the channel before you explode all over everything....or is it too late?
Posted by: Tami[/i] at February 19, 2013 01:47 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 01:47 PM (53z96)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at February 19, 2013 01:47 PM (evdj2)
10 PRETTY boy??? Lord, Ace, don't be drinkin' this early.
Hagel *is* kind of attractive...in a Cabbage Patch Kid sort of way.
Posted by: wheatie at February 19, 2013 01:47 PM (DZbQ0)
Posted by: mallfly at February 19, 2013 01:48 PM (bJm7W)
You need to change the channel before you explode all over everything....or is it too late?
Posted by: Tami at February 19, 2013 05:47 PM (X6akg)
10 minutes
Posted by: Jones in CO at February 19, 2013 01:49 PM (8sCoq)
There are no more "hawkish" Democrats. And no Lieberman is only hawkish in one area, Israel.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 01:49 PM (53z96)
Posted by: USS CONSTITUTION at February 19, 2013 01:49 PM (KqwSL)
"Kimberly Guilfoyle's"
Ah, so that's the "KG" from earlier. Google shows her to be quite the looker...
(I don't do cable. At all. So there)
Posted by: Jess1 at February 19, 2013 01:49 PM (lbiWb)
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at February 19, 2013 01:49 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: soothsayer at February 19, 2013 01:49 PM (0nyYS)
Posted by: maddogg at February 19, 2013 01:49 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Jones in CO at February 19, 2013 01:49 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 01:50 PM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Justice Bork at February 19, 2013 01:51 PM (R4WsQ)
I've said from the beginning that Hagel's main credential from the right and left supporters is that he became an adamant anti-Iraq war critic including the surge. This of course means he was also a huge GWB critic.
What's not to like according to the criteria of the Paulians and facist lefties.
Posted by: polynikes at February 19, 2013 01:51 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at February 19, 2013 01:51 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 19, 2013 01:51 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 01:52 PM (53z96)
Posted by: no good deed at February 19, 2013 01:52 PM (mjR67)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 01:53 PM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 05:47 PM (53z96)
You are becoming unhinged. Wait what am I saying? Becoming?
Posted by: polynikes at February 19, 2013 01:53 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at February 19, 2013 01:53 PM (NzBQO)
I'm heading out from work with a reminder to Wisconsinites, go vote for Roggensack for Supreme Court. Don't let the Dems sneak one in while we weren't looking.
Posted by: lowandslow at February 19, 2013 01:53 PM (7Nq2G)
Posted by: soothsayer at February 19, 2013 01:53 PM (SljXf)
Posted by: maddogg at February 19, 2013 01:53 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 19, 2013 05:51 PM (jucos
o_O
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 19, 2013 01:54 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: zsasz at February 19, 2013 01:54 PM (MMC8r)
And divorced him and is into Navy SEALs now.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 19, 2013 01:55 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: polynikes at February 19, 2013 05:53 PM (m2CN7)
I take that as a compliment from a 10 year Romneybot. How's that electable ass taste now.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 01:55 PM (53z96)
No, all I need to know is she's wicked smaht and has killer gams
Posted by: Jones in CO at February 19, 2013 01:56 PM (8sCoq)
So where are the Joos? Why are they not stepping up to the plate on this?
Something does not smell right. Just saying, if Boosh had nominated this dickhead, Sen. Schumer would be all over his ass.
Posted by: Billy Bob, the 1% at February 19, 2013 01:56 PM (wR+pz)
--but we insist others do.
Posted by: zsasz at February 19, 2013 05:54 PM (MMC8r)
---
Ding Ding Ding
Posted by: Craig Poe at February 19, 2013 01:56 PM (BVkEs)
Posted by: Quint&Jessel, Sea of Bly, Azof, UK at February 19, 2013 01:57 PM (7v5Ct)
Rons, that means you have a chance. She is capable of incredible lapses in judgement.
Posted by: no good deed at February 19, 2013 01:57 PM (mjR67)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 19, 2013 01:57 PM (C8mVl)
40
wheat thins, yes
Cheney made that point last week -- he said Obama chose Hagel to be the Republican "foil"
Our own PurpAv called it way back, sooth, almost immediately after Hagel was nominated.
"Foil" is way too tame a word for it.
Hey...how did you know my brothers used to call me 'wheat thins'?
Posted by: wheatie at February 19, 2013 01:57 PM (DZbQ0)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at February 19, 2013 01:58 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at February 19, 2013 01:58 PM (0xhuc)
Posted by: naturalfake at February 19, 2013 01:58 PM (j2lYi)
Posted by: soothsayer at February 19, 2013 05:57 PM (NNTrd)
What list
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 01:59 PM (53z96)
Posted by: soothsayer at February 19, 2013 02:00 PM (SljXf)
"Foil" is way too tame a word for it.
Beard, then.
Posted by: Cicero, Semiautomatic Assault Commenter at February 19, 2013 02:00 PM (8ZskC)
65...Something does not smell right. Just saying, if Boosh had nominated this dickhead, Sen. Schumer would be all over his ass.
Yeah, exactly.
The Dems would also be screaming about his money connections to Oil Companies, and companies that do business with the Pentagon.
It stinks, bigtime.
Posted by: wheatie at February 19, 2013 02:00 PM (DZbQ0)
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at February 19, 2013 02:00 PM (AWmfW)
Posted by: Billy Bob, the 1% at February 19, 2013 02:00 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at February 19, 2013 02:00 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: steevy at February 19, 2013 02:01 PM (9XBK2)
btw, that other Chuck, Chuck Todd, is a dumbass too. Just thought it needed mentioning again. Carry on.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at February 19, 2013 02:01 PM (p/cQy)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at February 19, 2013 05:42 PM (evdj2)
------
No, because they no longer care about even putting up a pretense of factuality.
***
We can deal with rockets and dreams
But reality, what does it mean?
Posted by: Freddy's Dead Media at February 19, 2013 02:01 PM (Hx5uv)
I am thinking they want a Republican fall guy when all this shit hits the fan.
AKA, Israel bombs fucking Iraq.
Joos, leave us alone, and we'll help out?
Posted by: Billy Bob, the 1% at February 19, 2013 02:02 PM (wR+pz)
Iran money = good.
Posted by: Chuck Hagel at February 19, 2013 06:00 PM (Hx5uv)
mmmmm mmmm mmm.
Posted by: Al Gore at February 19, 2013 02:02 PM (AWmfW)
Posted by: steevy at February 19, 2013 02:02 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: tasker at February 19, 2013 02:02 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 19, 2013 02:02 PM (C8mVl)
Anyway if you sit down with Mr. Ahmadinejad I think you'll find you're not so different after all
***
Apart from the whole he's-living-you're-dead thing.
Posted by: Chuck Hagel at February 19, 2013 02:03 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 19, 2013 02:03 PM (jucos)
It's about competence. And Hagel doesn't have it.
Which means he's a perfect fit for the Obama administration. A feature, not a bug. LiB
Posted by: puddleglum at February 19, 2013 02:03 PM (7JtS+)
Oh, that's worse than I thought. I was hoping he was some fucking movie star, not a ghey politician.
Posted by: Billy Bob, the 1% at February 19, 2013 02:03 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Jones in CO at February 19, 2013 02:03 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 02:04 PM (53z96)
Posted by: Meg McCain at February 19, 2013 02:04 PM (Oi60j)
As for Hagel - he's Obama's big well-lubed reacharound to the (Ron) Paulbots.
Posted by: JEM at February 19, 2013 02:04 PM (o+SC1)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 02:05 PM (53z96)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 19, 2013 02:05 PM (O8sZf)
Posted by: steevy at February 19, 2013 02:05 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: sTevo at February 19, 2013 02:06 PM (VMcEw)
***
Adultery and theft are polling pretty well. Maybe God could bend on those two.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2013 02:07 PM (Hx5uv)
Perceived weakness invites aggression. There is unlikely to be worse leadership in Washington in our lifetimes, however short our lifetimes may be. The bad guys are watching. Some of them are probably gaming the possibilities right now, weighing options, thinking it over.
If I were an open or covert deadly enemy of the United States, seething with hatred toward the Great Satan, I'd get together with my like-minded pals and plan something special before the end of President Obama's second term. We see Obama and Biden and Hagel and Reid, et al as a collective disaster. Someone on the other side might see it as an opportunity.
Posted by: troyriser at February 19, 2013 02:07 PM (vtiE6)
92 Wheatie,
I am thinking they want a Republican fall guy when all this shit hits the fan.
Yup, exactly.
They need someone to blame, when the chaos in A-stan gets bad, too.
So, who better than someone with an R beside their name.
And the anti-semitism serves as a big 'fuck you' to Israel.
Posted by: wheatie at February 19, 2013 02:07 PM (DZbQ0)
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 19, 2013 02:07 PM (U3zhg)
Posted by: steevy at February 19, 2013 02:07 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 06:05 PM (53z96)
Wait, just a fucking minute here. You are telling me someone lives in SF and is not ghey?
You the the HQ rules, pictures or it didn't happen.
Posted by: Billy Bob, the 1% at February 19, 2013 02:07 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 19, 2013 06:05 PM (O8sZf)
What? You mean like a scapegoat?
Posted by: David Petraeus at February 19, 2013 02:07 PM (AWmfW)
There is a lot of time spent overthinking, and pontificating, on WHY somthing is done.
When the 'why' is not important.... its WHAT they did that we must respond to.
I see Obama destroying our Military. EVERY decision made, makes it weaker.... everything from Gays and Women on the front lines, to sequestration, to the ROEs, to both the Sec State and Defense Picks... (note, US Navy has announced that by signing a Form, your Gay partner gets full dependent priveleges, including ID cards...). They are even going after the traditions which make the military distinct (no more Navy Chief Initiations?).
The Sequestration, while not REALLY that large, will be taken from important operational funds.... not gedunk... and that is the Obama administrations choice.
Even the drone strikes are blurring the International Agreements on the Laws of War... somthing which WILL come back to haunt us...
Now.... does it really matter WHY he is destroying the Greatest Military Machine in History? Or is the fact that he IS destroying it important... and IMO, Treasonous.
Posted by: Romeo13 at February 19, 2013 02:07 PM (lZBBB)
You the the HQ rules, pictures or it didn't happen.
Posted by: Billy Bob, the 1% at February 19, 2013 06:07 PM (wR+pz)
LOL, SF is not 100% gay, only about 75% to 90%.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 02:08 PM (53z96)
Hamas: We want to kill 100% of Jews
Israel: 100%, no we can't do that
Hamas: OK, 80%
Israel: 30% and that's final
DEAL!!
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:08 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 19, 2013 02:08 PM (C8mVl)
Newsome is not gay. The reason for the divorce was he was caught porking his best friend's wife. But he has supported ALL the gay causes in SF.
Close enough, then.
I do, however, wonder what his best friend's wife looks like. KG has somewhat masculine facial features, but screen-door, hurricane, IYKWIM.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at February 19, 2013 02:08 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 19, 2013 02:09 PM (O8sZf)
So the Sabine Women should have negotiated with Rome. Failing that, they could fall back on their anti-rape whistles.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 19, 2013 02:09 PM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 19, 2013 02:10 PM (O8sZf)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:10 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 02:11 PM (9Bj8R)
YES.
Posted by: Billy Bob, the 1% at February 19, 2013 02:11 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Invictus at February 19, 2013 02:11 PM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 02:12 PM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 19, 2013 02:12 PM (jucos)
@dannowicki:Crowd turns on McCain at immigration town hall.Ex-law enforce official shouts,McCain sez guy is jerk
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at February 19, 2013 02:12 PM (Ipj15)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at February 19, 2013 06:08 PM (+z4pE)
When I lived in CA porking other people wives and vice versa the women other people's husbands was almost normal. I had married women trying to climb in my windows at times. I was single.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 02:13 PM (53z96)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 06:13 PM (53z96)
______________
Psssst....wanna hear a secret? It happens in all 57 states, not just CA.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:13 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 19, 2013 02:14 PM (jucos)
The Tea Party/Republicans, conservatives, or whatever you want to call them need to keep slamming Hagel at his every fuck up. The liberals wanted him for a reason and this needs to be brought up at every chance.
Foil my ass - don't let them control the narritive.
Posted by: Cheri at February 19, 2013 02:14 PM (G+Wff)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 19, 2013 02:15 PM (C8mVl)
his best friend's wife.
If his wife really believed in the liberal cause and supported her husband she would accept his polyamory as a natural part of his sexual being and support him exploring his sexuality in this manner, understanding his sexual needs include having more than one intimate partner.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at February 19, 2013 02:15 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: The Blade Runner at February 19, 2013 02:15 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 06:13 PM (HDgX3)
Yeah it happens, but not to the extent I saw out there.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 02:16 PM (53z96)
And yes yes I know Israel is the only democracy in the region, etc. Not need for a history lesson.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:16 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 06:13 PM (53z96)
Going to bragging now, eh?
Like I said earlier, you know the rules. Pictures or it didn't happen.
Once you cross the fucking Appalachian Mts, all those fuckers are a little strange. Just saying, there is a reason they didn't stay.
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at February 19, 2013 02:17 PM (wR+pz)
When I lived in CA porking other people wives and vice versa the women other people's husbands was almost normal. I had married women trying to climb in my windows at times. I was single.
That explains a lot about CA. My half-assed brother lives out there and has been married at least five times that I can remember.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at February 19, 2013 02:17 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: If the blade Gunner were a member of the Beatles at February 19, 2013 02:17 PM (Hx5uv)
If he *does* realize this...and is going along with it...then he is despicable.
Can't it be both?
Posted by: DaveA at February 19, 2013 02:17 PM (6YLIm)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 19, 2013 02:18 PM (O8sZf)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at February 19, 2013 02:18 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 02:18 PM (53z96)
Posted by: Baldy at February 19, 2013 02:18 PM (opS9C)
Ace, I disagree that its all about competence. That's part of it. But its a lot more.
I don't know, I'm not sure what DANIEL (not David) FOSTER is saying that is anything different from a dozen other critiques of Hagel. Maybe I'm missing it.
Posted by: SH at February 19, 2013 02:19 PM (gmeXX)
Now he's just a dumb ex-senator no one cares about.
As SoD, he'll get attention! People will open doors for him! Congressmen will vie for his favors!
And if he falls from grace, so what?
He'll just be a nobody again, no worse off than he is now.
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 19, 2013 06:15 PM (C8mVl)
I too think it's that simple. He want to be one of the big boys. Now they will listen to him!
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at February 19, 2013 02:20 PM (AWmfW)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 06:16 PM (53z96)
___________________
My best friend in high school worked at golf course one summer and was fucking the manager's wife. And good lord he didn't let anyone within earshot not know all the details. Another friend, post-college was fucking his married co-worker. I had the misfortune of staying at his house once overnight and awoke to the sounds of the two of them on the couch. Both incidents happened nowhere near the CA border.
It happens everywhere all the time.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:20 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: AmishDude at February 19, 2013 02:20 PM (T0NGe)
That's nothing to the strange you can fuck when you just hike 'em!
Posted by: Vote For Me, Mark Sanford, For Integrity and Shit at February 19, 2013 02:20 PM (QTHTd)
138 I still say that Kimberly Guilfoyle has a butter face. Her Adams apple is off putting too.
She has an adams apple?
I never noticed.
I still think she's gorgeous.
Posted by: wheatie at February 19, 2013 02:21 PM (DZbQ0)
Posted by: JDP at February 19, 2013 06:18 PM (60GaT)
_________________
I disagree.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:21 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: AmishDude at February 19, 2013 06:20 PM (T0NGe)
Well.... not really Bad Bad....
Posted by: King Soloman at February 19, 2013 02:22 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 02:22 PM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at February 19, 2013 02:23 PM (uhftQ)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 19, 2013 02:23 PM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 02:23 PM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 19, 2013 02:23 PM (O8sZf)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2013 02:24 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Baldy at February 19, 2013 02:24 PM (opS9C)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 06:22 PM (9Bj8R)
______________
So you have a group of people that votes 80% for a guy who is well know for hating that group. And then he appoints someone who hates that group even more. And then we're supposed to fight like hell against these two people in order to help that group? Yeah you're right. That's fantastic logic.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:25 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 02:25 PM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Baldy at February 19, 2013 02:26 PM (opS9C)
Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at February 19, 2013 02:26 PM (uhftQ)
***
It ain't the way I wanted it! I can handle things! I'm smart! Not like everybody says... like dumb... I'm smart and I want respect!
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2013 02:26 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 02:26 PM (53z96)
That's fantastic logic.
It is if you carry the new Democratica Master Card!
Double points for stupid!
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at February 19, 2013 02:27 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 02:27 PM (9Bj8R)
***
And yes, I am including Italy and Greece as countries in the region.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2013 02:28 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at February 19, 2013 02:28 PM (lWfmI)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 19, 2013 02:29 PM (C8mVl)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2013 06:28 PM (Hx5uv)
I would not include either one of them in the region.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 02:29 PM (53z96)
Posted by: thunderb at February 19, 2013 02:29 PM (euH7k)
Again, I'm still confused with what Ace thinks Daniel Foster is cutting right too.
I read Foster's article, and to me the most salient point is his critique of the "middle." People are operating under the assumption that Obama is a moderate. An assumption that only a fool would make or an assumption one says because they know that Obama the Ideologue wouldn't sell.
Obama and Hagel (and Ron Paul) all share the same foreign policy (though I think for different reasons). Obama wants America brought down and to atone for its Western Civilization sins, and Hagel and Paul just seem to hate Israel. But the end result is the same. A weakened America.
Posted by: SH at February 19, 2013 02:29 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at February 19, 2013 06:26 PM (uhftQ)
_________________________
Israeli Jews hate Obama? That's why the state is going to give him a "special award" (whatever the fuck that means) when he visits? If that's hate, I'm interested to see what love is.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:29 PM (HDgX3)
There's that, and the point that if we let the Arabs have Syria-Palaestina / Judah / southern Phoenicia or whatever the hell you want to call it, they'll decide they want Andalusia. And Sicily. And bits (more) of India.
You don't negotiate with a religion that claims sovereignty over the entire planet. Especially when said religion is barbaric and obscurantist. You push it back wherever you are able.
Posted by: zimriel at February 19, 2013 02:30 PM (QTHTd)
Just a thought.
Posted by: mallfly at February 19, 2013 02:30 PM (bJm7W)
BBL to look at Vic's pics of the married womyns.
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at February 19, 2013 02:30 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 19, 2013 02:30 PM (O8sZf)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 19, 2013 06:23 PM (O8sZf)
No rational argument? Er, the well-being of children? Societal stability? The maintenance and perpetuation of the foundation upon which all successful civilizations are built? Those are irrational arguments, in your view? Define 'rational', please. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Posted by: troyriser at February 19, 2013 02:30 PM (vtiE6)
To prove his isn't the village idiot Joo hater he will play Tevye in the Obama production of Fiddler On The Roof this weekend.
Posted by: mpfs, assault fishstick at February 19, 2013 02:30 PM (TCy/B)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 06:27 PM (9Bj8R)
____________
Yeah because the fact that Isarel is Jewish has ***NOTHING*** to do with the support it has received from the US over the years. You can't be this dumb.
And do you realize you're doing the same thing Obama does? Question him and you are racist. Question why we should support Israel unconditionally (something we don't do to any other country in the world) and you're an anti-Semite.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:31 PM (HDgX3)
IIRC the Bible is chock full of stories of Jews stabbing themselves in the foot. Doesn't change my support for Israel. They are willing to fight, and we should support them in that.
I wouldn't be at all surprised that Obama arming all Israel's enemies is to force the big showdown with nukes. That would end the Arab threat for quite some time and leave his hands clean as far as the world's hypocrit progressives are concerned.
Posted by: Invictus at February 19, 2013 02:31 PM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo
***
Yeah, keep justifying your anti-semitism.
So let's see, you hate our military, our police, and Jews. Ronulan identified.
Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at February 19, 2013 02:31 PM (uhftQ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 02:31 PM (9Bj8R)
Sonia Sotomayer.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/bg4dgbk
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2013 02:32 PM (Hx5uv)
It's not coming from Bibi I read but from the "president" Peres or somebody Excuse the spelling... They're are not exactly simpatico if you know what I mean....
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna let it burn really.really bummed at February 19, 2013 02:32 PM (9+ccr)
Just a thought.
Posted by: mallfly at February 19, 2013 06:30 PM (bJm7W)
_____________
Indeed. Because Republicans fall for this shit all the time thanks in large part to the Hannity talking points spewed by the likes of Nevergiveup.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:32 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: rickl at February 19, 2013 02:33 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 19, 2013 02:33 PM (O8sZf)
I sit possible that they picked him in order to make the Repubs look bad?
It's highly probable. TFG will fuck up our military and point to Hagel and say, "See? A Pubbie did that, I didn't."
We are so screwed...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at February 19, 2013 02:34 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2013 06:28 PM (Hx5uv)
I would not include either one of them in the region.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 06:29 PM (53z96) "
Bit of a joke but, you're right, Italy and Greece may both be crazy but compared to rest of the region, they are stellar examples of sanity.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2013 02:34 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 19, 2013 02:35 PM (ZshNr)
Here is where I agree with Foster, Obama is unlike any politician we have seen. He just doesn't care what the public thinks because in the end the public backs him. Winning two presidential elections will do that to you. And if the toughest question he faces is did you beat Tiger, then there is simply no reason for him to change course.
For me, defeating Hagel has two purposes (a) to keep this incompetent lunatic away from Defense, but (b) it is also to defeat Obama (make him suffer one loss).
Posted by: SH at February 19, 2013 02:35 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Chuck Hagel at February 19, 2013 02:35 PM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 02:35 PM (53z96)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 19, 2013 02:36 PM (C8mVl)
1. Could you explain your theory of management?
2. What is the largest organization you have ever managed?
3. What areas of the Pentagon budget could stand some cuts? What areas need more funding?
4. Explain how you think the officer corps and the enlisted men could better interact. (This goes to my theory that he blames a great many officers he served under during Vietnam and cannot let it go. In other words, he's nuts.)
5. Have you ever been treated for depression or any other psychiatric disorder? (Not that there's anything wrong with that.)
Posted by: Miss Marple at February 19, 2013 02:36 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: steevy at February 19, 2013 02:36 PM (9XBK2)
http://online.wsj.com/article /SB10001424052970204488304574427312061008166.html
Posted by: zimriel at February 19, 2013 02:36 PM (QTHTd)
Anything American jews get out of US support for Israel is an incidental side effect of, not a reason for such policy.
Posted by: @PurpAv at February 19, 2013 02:37 PM (1rU+d)
this James Baker "fuck the Jews, they don't vote for us anyway" mindset is just an emotional response that doesn't mean anything
Posted by: JDP at February 19, 2013 06:34 PM (60GaT)
_______________________
You know why Democrats win? Because they identify a few key constituencies, and pander to them. Then those constituencies keep voting for them over and over. You don't see Obama fighting like hell for people that voted against him by 50-60%. On the other hand, Republicans are doing just that. And they wonder why they never win anymore.
Stupid Party.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:37 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at February 19, 2013 02:38 PM (uhftQ)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 19, 2013 02:39 PM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:39 PM (HDgX3)
Miss Marple, I disagree. We can say it is about incompetence, but I think we are lying to ourselves if we think that is the real issue at play. One, it isn't. Two, incomptence is boring and the public wouldn't care for it. We should block Hagel for the exact reason we think he should be blocked. He gives comfort to the enemy.
Posted by: SH at February 19, 2013 02:40 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at February 19, 2013 02:40 PM (oDAWZ)
A great Marine. Another nail in the coffin of our once great nation and its military.
Obama = POS
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 19, 2013 02:41 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 02:41 PM (9Bj8R)
has accepted Gen. John Allen 's request to retire from military.
Abandoning a sinking ship?
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna let it burn really.really bummed at February 19, 2013 02:41 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2013 02:42 PM (53z96)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 06:41 PM (9Bj8R)
_____________
That's the problem. It shouldn't matter. We should act in the best interest of America, not based on how someone in another country feels.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 19, 2013 02:43 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at February 19, 2013 02:43 PM (oDAWZ)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 19, 2013 06:33 PM (O8sZf)
We're posting in the comments section of a blog. I truncate posts not to somehow discredit the poster by quoting out of context but to avoid needless redundancy and to address the specific point highlighted in the excerpt. Besides, I included the timestamp of your post. Anyone interested can go back and look at what you wrote in all of its unexcerpted glory. Few will do it but they can if they like. That isn't 'nontransparent'.
Posted by: troyriser at February 19, 2013 02:43 PM (vtiE6)
what makes you think Republican opposition to Hagel is because they want to increase their Jewish vote share, and not, you know, cuz they disagree with the guy
---
further, couldn't we say it is a pander to the base, which does believe in support of Israel.
I'm under no illusions that supporting Israel will give the GOP an avenue into the Jewish vote. As Rush says, they are liberals first. That being said, its always worthwhile to keep reminding them that the party they support basically hates Israel.
I think they know they can get away with it on the cheap because they know the GOP will always support Israel. Knowing that is the case, why not take the position that will still get you invited to the right parties.
Posted by: SH at February 19, 2013 02:44 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 19, 2013 02:45 PM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 19, 2013 02:45 PM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at February 19, 2013 02:46 PM (piMMO)
Consolidation.
The GOP has surrendered the rest of the government to the left and now they want the military. They have the wind at their backs and are looking forward to letting the shooting start.
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at February 19, 2013 02:46 PM (KAWvv)
That's the problem. It shouldn't matter. We should act in the best interest of America, not based on how someone in another country feels
---
Mr. Moo, I agree completely. And right now I think it is in the best interest of America to support Israel. Not simply because of the strategic importance of where the country sits, not simply because it is an ally surrounded by our declared enemies, but also because it is a moral necessity.
Posted by: SH at February 19, 2013 02:49 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at February 19, 2013 02:49 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: Hrothgar at February 19, 2013 02:51 PM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: JPS at February 19, 2013 02:57 PM (BgUUm)
Hagel would be a terrible Defense secretary even if he was Israel's #1 backer. I am not even sure the guy can answer the phone.
Plus I sincerely believe he has a grudge against the officers, and this will make his working with the Pentagon really difficult.
This is another example of the libs pushing conservative group buttons, in this case defense hawks and Israel supporters. Everyone is going off into the anti-Israel stuff which doesn't resonate with many voters, either. I personally feel a better strategy is to simply say "The guy can't do the job. Next."
Posted by: Miss Marple at February 19, 2013 03:16 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at February 19, 2013 03:31 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: Voluble at February 19, 2013 04:04 PM (qYvEa)
Posted by: Rich Fader at February 19, 2013 04:42 PM (2Zrwv)
"Do you denounce hamas and hizbollah?"
Record the answer. You just might learn something.
Posted by: Blacksmith8 at February 20, 2013 02:42 AM (Yzu6e)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2414 seconds, 366 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: dogfish at February 19, 2013 01:36 PM (N2yhW)