May 04, 2013
— Monty ItÂ’s becoming more and more obvious that AmericaÂ’s job engine is stuck, and thereÂ’s no real consensus on what's causing the problem. Some of it has to do with changing demographics, some with government regulation of (and interference with) the economy, some with bad fiscal and tax policy -- the usual suspects. However, it is also obvious that we are undergoing a major shift in the post-Industrial Age economic model.
A book called Race Against the Machine came out a couple of years ago that concisely stated what many economists, technologists, and futurists have been thinking for a while now: that machines are obviating the need for humans in many parts of our high-tech globalized economy. And the pace of this displacement is accelerating. IÂ’m not going to recapitulate that book here, but I recommend it -- I donÂ’t agree with everything the authors say, but overall I find the argument compelling.
If machines are displacing humans in the workplace, and thus causing higher unemployment than we are used to without necessarily causing a drop in GDP, what (if anything) can be done about it?
Before I dive into that question, I want you to consider the following simple graph:

This is what is known as a Gaussian distribution, or a “bell curve”. Many statistical phenomena in nature conform to this distribution, but the one I want to discuss is human cognitive ability (or “IQ”). It’s long been accepted as scientific fact that human cognition among large populations adheres to a Gaussian distribution. There are sharp disagreements about how to measure human cognition (or even whether it can be measured accurately), and even sharper disagreements as to the outcomes of experiments designed to measure cognitive ability, but decades of empirical study leave the basic fact intact: human cognitive ability falls into a Gaussian distribution just like other human properties like height, weight, and so forth.
But why does this matter to our discussion of the technology-driven change to the economy?
It matters because the changes will spell a lot of grief and hardship for people on the left side of that cognitive-ability bell curve.
It turns out that being smart is a huge advantage in nature. Human beings have ascended to the very apex of life on this planet not by being faster or stronger or more durable or more patient than any other species -- we got here by being smarter. Being smart is a huge survival advantage mainly because it allows a creature to plan, to think ahead, to weigh alternatives. It allows us to alter our environment to protect and benefit ourselves rather than be at the mercy of nature. It allows us to extend our bodies via tools and machines to vastly magnify our power. It allows us to consider future consequences to present actions. All of these traits add up to a huge survival advantage, and thatÂ’s why homo sapiens has taken over the earth in a little over one hundred thousand years.
But as our collective intelligence has grown and our civilization becomes increasingly reliant on technology, a problem has arisen, a problem based in the reality of the bell curve: the Red Queen’s race is leaving the cognitively duller and slower humans behind. Machines are doing more and more of the work that used to be done by people on the left side of the bell curve -- the “strong back” agricultural and Industrial-age factory work that used to define what “work” was for most people. Machines are cheaper than human workers over the long term because they don’t get sick, they don't get bored, they don’t go on strike, they don’t draw a pension or require healthcare benefits, and when they break, they can be thrown away and replaced with a new machine with no muss and no fuss.
The Industrial-age Luddite movement was a cry against this automation of work, but it was doomed to failure. The machines were simply superior to their human counterparts in many jobs. As technology has moved on and become more advanced, machines have been moving into more and more niches that used to be driven by human labor: agriculture, resource extraction, fabrication, construction, even the production of art and music. And the process is accelerating.
Today, we have reached the point where we can maintain and even grow our GDP with less and less human input into the process. Hence the chronic and structural unemployment problems not just in America, but across the developed world. We have a surfeit of workers whose labor price is not competitive with machines. Most (but not all) of these workers fall on the left side of the cognitive bell curve.
Nearly anyone can be a dishwasher or a salesclerk or a janitor or a groundskeeper or an assembly-line worker. These jobs do not require a high degree of skill or training, and tend to involve performing simple, repetitive tasks. This also means that a machine can (or will be) invented to do that job for less money. Not everyone can be a software developer, a database administrator, a structural engineer, or a doctor. These jobs are hard to automate because they require a high level of cognitive ability and have proven difficult to automate (so far).
The simple answer -- to which politicians and social planners return again and again -- is "more education". But this doesnÂ’t help people on the left hand side of the bell curve all that much. They simply do not have the capacity to retain the cognitively-advanced information. It is beyond them. It sounds cruel to say so, but it is nevertheless a fact. The simple truth is that a great deal of human cognitive ability is innate: youÂ’re either born with it or youÂ’re not. This issue is still ferociously debated, but the evidence so far is that nature wins over nurture to a significant degree.
If it is true that duller people cannot simply be made smarter through training or schooling or other forms of conditioning...how can they be gainfully employed in the highly-automated, high-technology workforce of the 21st century? And the uncomfortable truth is: no one knows. Governments the world over have instituted welfare and entitlement systems to protect people against the ravages of unemployment, but these systems are starting to stagger and fall underneath their enormous costs. If itÂ’s really true that a third to half the present workforce of the world is unsuited for gainful employment, what is society to do with these millions of unemployed (and essentially unemployable) people?
Aldous Huxley, in his 1935 novel Brave New World, foresaw a world split into two basic castes: the intellectual elite, and the cognitively dull servant class. But even in Huxley’s dystopia, the Epsilons at least had a job to do, even if it was only being a beast of burden. In the real world in the 21st century, a machine can probably do that “strong back” job better and more cheaply than any human Epsilon could.
A wage is the cost of labor for a given job. The problem weÂ’re facing is that for millions and millions of people, their labor cost is too high for the skills they can bring to bear. A machineÂ’s labor-cost can undercut them...but at the same time the workers lack the cognitive resources to re-train for a better job. For many people, it means a life lived in vain -- fit only for government handouts and welfare, a life bereft of meaning or goals, a life consumed by minutiae, tedium, and waste. If we assume that useful work provides a person not just with a livelihood, but with dignity and purpose and meaning, what options do we have going forward?
I offer no answer because I honestly donÂ’t know. But I suspect that this issue will become more critical as the years go by and the old Industrial-age economies struggle to deal with the realities of highly-automated 21st century industry. Those millions and millions of unemployed people aren't simply going to disappear just because they're inconvenient.
Posted by: Monty at
07:53 AM
| Comments (353)
Post contains 1351 words, total size 9 kb.
Posted by: Blacksheep at May 04, 2013 07:59 AM (yS85w)
Oh, yeah? Watch this: presto, changeo, disappearo! See? Gone.
Until a Republican president gets elected, that is. Then hoo, boy, are they gonna be back!
Posted by: Time, Newsweek, The Washington Post, NBC, ABC, CBS, et. al. at May 04, 2013 08:00 AM (DLu2s)
We simply repeal all laws designed to protect stupid people.
Posted by: Dastardly Dan at May 04, 2013 08:02 AM (2iVM3)
Posted by: dandalo at May 04, 2013 08:03 AM (/839j)
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 04, 2013 08:03 AM (Cnqmv)
-------
Many robots already do this to some degree (space probes, complex computer systems, industrial robots).
Posted by: Monty at May 04, 2013 08:04 AM (G8OwX)
Posted by: zsasz at May 04, 2013 08:04 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 04, 2013 08:05 AM (UTq/I)
And maybe we should inform folks that the first thing to buy is not a big screen TV or a Cadillac with pimp rims.
Posted by: tcn at May 04, 2013 08:06 AM (VLG62)
Posted by: Dastardly Dan at May 04, 2013 08:06 AM (2iVM3)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, elsewhere at May 04, 2013 08:07 AM (m9V0o)
Posted by: The Matrix at May 04, 2013 08:07 AM (29vnO)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at May 04, 2013 08:07 AM (JQuNB)
Especially in office work, where entry level skills were easy. Couple of years ago I watched two secretaries...er, assistants put out a mailing to over 100 people in one day. I thought, this would have taken 10 people a week to do 20 years ago.
So, many fewer jobs to get just to help out the family or make a modest living.
Posted by: PJ at May 04, 2013 08:07 AM (ZWaLo)
Add to that your book's notion of a natural shift in work, but I think without the above, this could be overcome and would not be as pronounced as it is.
anyway, I doubt I'll go see this movie. Thanks for the review.
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 08:07 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Dang at May 04, 2013 08:07 AM (R18D0)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at May 04, 2013 08:08 AM (XF3+u)
Posted by: acat at May 04, 2013 08:08 AM (gGEmy)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, assault Hobbit at May 04, 2013 08:09 AM (lVb7s)
Posted by: PJ at May 04, 2013 08:09 AM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: FART at May 04, 2013 08:09 AM (erQJO)
Posted by: teej at May 04, 2013 08:09 AM (6Zy+s)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 04, 2013 08:09 AM (TVS9d)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, elsewhere at May 04, 2013 08:10 AM (m9V0o)
I learned a while back that Gauss' distribution curve is very representative of all large statistical populations and thus will be a good approximation for generalized human performance no matter how you try to fudge the evaluation "test" or indeed even what the nature of the test is. Of course, now that Obama and the progs are in charge, I expect an attempt to shift the curve by eliminating the right hand side "outliers". The IPAB is one such tool.
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 04, 2013 08:10 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: PJ at May 04, 2013 12:09 PM (ZWaLo)
In AK, it was the slime line at the fish processing plant. Now those jobs go to Mexicans, mostly, and they don't get the overtime we used to get by staying as long as we could after a 10 hour shift when the fish came in.
Regulations, and attitudes, and porous southern borders.
Posted by: tcn at May 04, 2013 08:11 AM (VLG62)
If we repeal the requirement for labels and interlocks on power equipment, the production costs will go down.Also, ban lawsuits against manufacturers whent he equipment is used for a purpose for which it was not intended. For example, using a push lawnmower to prune a hedge, losing the tips of fingers in the process.
Posted by: Dastardly Dan at May 04, 2013 08:11 AM (2iVM3)
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 08:11 AM (jmVS/)
Posted by: zsasz at May 04, 2013 08:11 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at May 04, 2013 08:11 AM (29vnO)
What if there is a racial component to this?
What if certain races are clustered unequally along the curve?
What if certain races predominate along the left side of the bell curve, certain races predominate along the right side of the bell curve, and certain races are more equally distributed?
What then?
Posted by: Taco Stand at May 04, 2013 08:12 AM (C+qQ0)
***
I have explained this to my robot paranoid colleagues for years. You can't justify robots without a massive market. Robots are typically used in production lines that produce in some cases millions of one product per day. They have made certain goods so cheap relative to what they would cost with human labor that even people who are considered lower income or poor can afford to have these goods.
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at May 04, 2013 08:13 AM (SkyIE)
After that in-depth discussion of Lemurs this shit is easy.
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 08:13 AM (jmVS/)
Posted by: krakatoa at May 04, 2013 08:14 AM (KwNa8)
Posted by: Richard Herstein and Charles Murray at May 04, 2013 08:14 AM (TVS9d)
What then?
*****
Then SHUT UP
Posted by: teh department of edjumacation at May 04, 2013 08:14 AM (SkyIE)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, elsewhere at May 04, 2013 08:15 AM (m9V0o)
The first full-time job I had, I hit overtime on Thursday. That job no longer exists!
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 04, 2013 08:15 AM (Cnqmv)
certain races predominate along the right side of the bell curve, and
certain races are more equally distributed
***********
The won't.
Stupid is universal
Posted by: Dastardly Dan at May 04, 2013 08:15 AM (2iVM3)
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 08:16 AM (jmVS/)
I don't blame him.
It is personal and professional suicide in today's culture.
Posted by: Taco Stand at May 04, 2013 08:16 AM (C+qQ0)
Unless, of course, someone takes a wrong turn along the way: the same tech that can increase intelligence could just as easily be warped to create a population of mind-numbed biological robots. . .
Posted by: salgak at May 04, 2013 08:16 AM (ShrCV)
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 08:17 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Secundus at May 04, 2013 08:17 AM (i86TN)
No, that would be the whole "reset" thing.
Think about what the old guy told Neo. It was going to be the 7th (?) iteration of the Matrix whereby the One chooses to save the code and select 14 men and women to start the next round of human civilization. Everything is supposed to reset again, yet the humans are still flying around in those hoverships made in 2069. That means, there's a store of hoverships somewhere the humans are using each time the whole thing collapses and resets.
Where are they getting them from?
Each time, Zion is destroyed and then rebuilt with each successive reset. Why do the machines bother trying to find them? They know where Zion is. Why can't they just home in on the same place each time instead of pretending to go look for them?
Everything about that story arc falls apart with the 2nd and 3rd movie.
Posted by: EC at May 04, 2013 08:17 AM (doBIb)
A fundamental problem here is that this issue, as so many, is convolved with race, and that will largely preclude any meaningful attempt to address the problem. Any disparity between the normal distribution of the population as a whole with that of any given subpopulation will be (and is now) taken as prima facie evidence of discrimination, and a call to arms to "fix the problem."
Yet it may be that there is no solution. Some ethnicities are on average shorter than others, for example. There is no reason to presuppose that the normal distribution of a subpopulation should exactly track that of the population as a whole.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 04, 2013 08:17 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: krakatoa at May 04, 2013 08:18 AM (KwNa8)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at May 04, 2013 08:18 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Aloha Akhbar @PirateBallerina at May 04, 2013 08:18 AM (/lWM8)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 04, 2013 08:18 AM (TVS9d)
Posted by: Your Progressive Overlords at May 04, 2013 08:18 AM (m9V0o)
Posted by: Infidel at May 04, 2013 08:19 AM (gqEUi)
Posted by: Jmel at May 04, 2013 08:19 AM (9tSXa)
Posted by: Donna V. at May 04, 2013 08:19 AM (R3gO3)
There will be an underground, black market economy, where you get to pay what things are actually worth. Eventually, a leader will unite the left side of the curve against the right side-- who will have considerable influence, because they'll be the ones who make things go.
There will be a horribly violent revolution, after which the Triumphant Masses will eat each other. The dust will settle...
...And it'll start all over.
And then Atlas will Shrug.
Posted by: Dastardly Dan at May 04, 2013 08:19 AM (2iVM3)
It's pretty much human nature to be a shiftless bastard when you're trained to be that way.
Posted by: just paasin by at May 04, 2013 08:19 AM (yBJsx)
Posted by: EC at May 04, 2013 12:17 PM (doBIb)
Maybe. But don't my new tits look fabulous?!
Posted by: Lana Wachowski at May 04, 2013 08:20 AM (29vnO)
***
Although it was received as a joke, I was totally serious (several years ago) when I suggested making the chronically unemployed, welfare and food-stamp recipients generate electricity by walking in a giant hamster wheel. Make them earn their free stuff.
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at May 04, 2013 08:20 AM (SkyIE)
Posted by: SFGoth at May 04, 2013 08:20 AM (gtiB3)
Posted by: zsasz at May 04, 2013 08:20 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, elsewhere at May 04, 2013 08:20 AM (m9V0o)
Posted by: fastfreefall at May 04, 2013 08:21 AM (mUqtg)
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 08:21 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Beto at May 04, 2013 08:22 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 08:22 AM (jmVS/)
Posted by: Donna V. at May 04, 2013 12:19 PM (R3gO3)
Exactly!
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 08:22 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: motionview at May 04, 2013 08:25 AM (6Tbb5)
Well, you saved yourself a lot of headache. I thought the first one was great.
Posted by: EC at May 04, 2013 08:25 AM (doBIb)
Posted by: brian at May 04, 2013 08:26 AM (y05cf)
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 08:26 AM (jmVS/)
Just as they keep adjusting what constitutes "poor".
This is a pet peeve. The Dems define "poor" as the bottom N% of the income distribution, then want taxes and programs to "help the poor." Yet of course if you define "poor" in this fashion, there will always be a bottom N%. Rinse, lather, repeat.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 04, 2013 08:27 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: Sam Watterston at May 04, 2013 08:28 AM (MMC8r)
Like I said earlier:
"All robots should have a easily accessible kill switch and not be able to turn themselves on."
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 08:29 AM (jmVS/)
Posted by: I'm lighting my torch now... at May 04, 2013 08:29 AM (ULH4o)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 04, 2013 08:29 AM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: somebode else, not me at May 04, 2013 08:31 AM (29vnO)
Posted by: fastfreefall at May 04, 2013 08:31 AM (mUqtg)
I think the only role for problem solvers is to figure out every possible way that to get the "problem solvers" in the government the hell out of the way, so that the powerful distributed ingenuity of the marketplace can be properly brought to bear. That is the best tool we have, not the minds in our think tanks.
Cognitive skills have become more valuable, yes, but I don't see guys who know how to make things in a machine shop, or skilled plumbers, or skilled electricians, starving. Why most of these guys don't have an apprentice, scooping up their knowledge, is beyond me, but I'd bet you'd see a lot more of it if you declared tomorrow that such things were entirely free from all regulations and price controls.
Posted by: Splunge at May 04, 2013 08:31 AM (bKA83)
Posted by: Jean at May 04, 2013 08:31 AM (7PjX7)
It's a dessert topping.
It's a floor wax!
It's a dessert topping!
It's a floor wax!!
It's a dessert topping, you meercat!!
-Classic skit from SNL (Saturday Night Lemur, of course)
Posted by: Aloha Akhbar - philosophunculist jihad at May 04, 2013 08:31 AM (/lWM8)
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 08:31 AM (jmVS/)
Posted by: Beto at May 04, 2013 08:33 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: zsasz at May 04, 2013 08:34 AM (MMC8r)
Even the first movie, amazing as it is, has its holes. We are asked to believe:
Morpheus is a really smart and capable guy
Within a single phone conversation, Morpheus says two things to Neo:
"This line may be tapped"
"They don't know how important you really are"
Gee, dumbass, you think they know now?
Posted by: Splunge at May 04, 2013 08:35 AM (bKA83)
I'm apologize for the length of this comment but I can't explain it fewer words. I've witnessed this process first hand as an expert in my own limited technical field.
I worked for the phone company. I became an expert in DMS100/200 TOPS translations. I was a union tech for many years and then I got promoted to management as second tier support for routing, trunking, and codes. In other words, when you pick up a landline phone and dial a number, I made that happen. I built the trunk group. I opened the code. I made sure it routed where it was supposed to go. And I shot the troubles when we screwed something up.
In 2004 the whole "everybody gets a trophy" mentality came to upper management at Verizon. They revamped the recognition system so that it went from the "go to people" being the top ranked, meaning intelligence and expertize and experience, to a "what have you done for me lately" system. My boss told me it wasn't "fair" that the same people were always the top ranked every year and whenever the "go to people" were brought up in upper management meetings they were laughed out of the room.
This demoralized everybody. Not just us top ranked people. We knew the job and could do every aspect of it. Hell, we were the ones who wrote the job aids and trained others. So, yeah, I hated sitting there opening codes, but I could it. But the people who were really hurt by the policy were the middle rung people. The worker bees. They made the place run. They did the drudge work and were perfectly happy doing it. They had no responsibility. But they churned out a lot of work. So they freed up those of us with the talent and intelligence and ambition to develop new ideas and new processes to make all our jobs easier.
When they changed the ranking system all that broke down. Everybody was equal. So I was miserable doing drudge work while the person who was perfectly happy doing drudge work was miserable because they couldn't shoot a trouble. They ended up being the first to be laid off.
The funny thing is that I'm all those people. When I was young and ambitious and hungry I was a top person. After 30 years and the new IP and softswitch technology came out I was perfectly happy to let the youngun's carry on and learn it. I would have been just fine doing the old stuff that I knew. But I eventually walked away from all of it. I'd rather work at Walmart.
Posted by: Jaynie59 at May 04, 2013 08:35 AM (4zKCA)
Posted by: Jmel at May 04, 2013 12:19 PM (9tSXa)
There probably is some truth in your comment, Jmel. However, with the shit I see being taught in public schools today I can't help but think that his teachers from K-11 didn't drop the ball as to why he doesn't know how to do a research paper in 12th grade.
Posted by: olddog in mo at May 04, 2013 08:36 AM (A9na/)
Posted by: Julius Caesar at May 04, 2013 08:36 AM (A71EA)
Our education system has shifted also from teaching a skill set for educating productive people to teaching a skill set geared more to ego-stroking self-fulfillment and barely good enough for the workers to ask "Do you want fries with that?"
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 04, 2013 08:36 AM (tsPRH)
"This line may be tapped"
"They don't know how important you really are"
Gee, dumbass, you think they know now?
Posted by: Splunge at May 04, 2013 12:35 PM (bKA83)
Well, they weren't interested in Neo, they wanted Morpheus. That's why they put that tracker on him, to lead them to Morpheus.
Posted by: EC at May 04, 2013 08:37 AM (doBIb)
Posted by: mycherrysmores at May 04, 2013 08:37 AM (qLxQ4)
That wasn't pretty. Not sure what happened to line spacing.
Posted by: olddog in mo at May 04, 2013 08:37 AM (A9na/)
A modest proposal: we eliminate all those warnings against things that should be obvious to any higher primate, and let nature take its course.
For example, windshield sunscreens gravely admonish users not to drive with the sunscreen covering the windshield. I say that if you don't perceive the problem with driving with the windshield occluded, by all means go ahead and do so. Just do it where there's no one else.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 04, 2013 08:37 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: Joe Biden, Vice-President of the United States at May 04, 2013 08:38 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: Beagle at May 04, 2013 08:39 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Fox2! at May 04, 2013 08:39 AM (+N4be)
It's simple. Do away with all testing and evaluations in school and then nobody will be able to determine who the dumb ones are.
The white man stacks the system with prep schools, anyway.
Posted by: Woikerz o' da Whirled at May 04, 2013 08:39 AM (2iU3x)
Posted by: motionview at May 04, 2013 08:39 AM (6Tbb5)
All robot wimin should have a easily accessible kill switch and not be able to turn themselves on.
Don't forget it's ICAW!
Posted by: Muhommand at May 04, 2013 08:39 AM (jmVS/)
Posted by: Staff at May 04, 2013 08:40 AM (G9qZk)
This is not easy to implement, of course, but it is not impossible. Well, it is if Progressives are in charge. They have to go, of course.
Posted by: mycherrysmores at May 04, 2013 08:40 AM (qLxQ4)
Posted by: Donna V. at May 04, 2013 08:41 AM (R3gO3)
Posted by: TexBob at May 04, 2013 08:41 AM (in4Fg)
Go watch an excellent 10 minute short Sci- Fi movie "Blinky" on Youtube. It's about a robot and a boy, the production values are very good. A heartwarming story with a feel good ending.
Posted by: brian at May 04, 2013 08:42 AM (51eUf)
The worker bees. They made the place run. They did the drudge work and were perfectly happy doing it. They had no responsibility. But they churned out a lot of work.
When I first moved from academia to industry I was astonished to find how many people were perfectly happy doing repetitive drudge work, in part because (they said) they knew what they'd be doing on any given day, because that's what they did every day. I'd be throwing a rope over a rafter in that situation, but apparently they'd have been doing so in a managment position.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 04, 2013 08:42 AM (IDSI7)
What does this have to do with brewing? Nothing. Headed for the brew store now. Will read the movie review later. Looks interesting.
Posted by: sTevo at May 04, 2013 08:42 AM (VMcEw)
There is no end to the 'services' one can do for others
I for one welcome the arrival of Cootertown.
As long as I get to be Masterblaster.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at May 04, 2013 08:43 AM (ZRmWD)
Posted by: Retread at May 04, 2013 08:43 AM (tC1Gq)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 08:43 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Emily at May 04, 2013 08:44 AM (q0xB2)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 04, 2013 08:44 AM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 04, 2013 08:44 AM (tsPRH)
Posted by: John Henry at May 04, 2013 08:45 AM (hpYnL)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 04, 2013 08:45 AM (ZshNr)
How did this happen? To an extent, we have taught ourselves to do it. Parents have shifted more and more responsibility off the shoulders of their children. Things that we (I am 52) were expected to do for ourselves, they now do for their children. Want a college scholarship but need to write an essay? Dad will do it. Have a kid as a teenager? Don't worry yourself; mom will raise it. Kids never face tough times or adversity. They don't know how to adapt.
Schools are no better. Students don't want to learn; they want to be given answers. I've seen kids at the top of a class melt down while working on a project and they ran up on a problem that they couldn't immediately solve. This particular course is designed to place the responsibility for learning on the student. The teacher isn't supposed to help them. Without someone to tell them the answers, they quit on the project. They've lost the ability to adapt.
The example I always use is a man who lives here in our little town. He is the guy you go to for lunch. When you want an informal event catered, you call him. You need lots of barbeque, you order from him. He's been in business at the same location over 50 years. He didn't start out cooking. Fifty+ years ago, he and his wife opened a neighborhood grocery store and did well. When the big chain grocery stores started moving in, he started losing business. He decided to start serving sandwiches at lunch to bring in some extra money. He decided to cook some meat and offer plate lunches. Over time, the demand increased for his food. He added tables and catering. A funny thing happened. When people came in for a plate, they went ahead and grabbed some bread and milk while they were there. He's still going strong because he didn't give up. He found a way to adapt.
I think fewer people can do this any more. The government has replaced their parents. The government takes care of their problems. Need money? Here's a check! Don't have a cell phone? Here you go! Can't afford your house? We'll take care of it! Instead of finding ways to solve problems, we have begun to rely on others to solve them. Automation is only one factor. There are much larger issues causing these problems.
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at May 04, 2013 08:45 AM (1hekh)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 08:45 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Marxism for Dummies; A Primer at May 04, 2013 08:45 AM (G9Mmf)
>What then?
What then? Then you ignore that data and call Charles Murray a racist.
Posted by: DanInMN at May 04, 2013 08:46 AM (JCKxJ)
You don't know the answer? Then what was all that stuff in the middle I didn't read?
Posted by: BurtTC at May 04, 2013 08:47 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: Beagle at May 04, 2013 08:49 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Staff at May 04, 2013 08:49 AM (G9qZk)
#129 Jay Guevara at May 04, 2013 12:42 PM
I can't express how valuable these people were to our department. Yeah they needed detailed job aids and training, but once they got it down they really produced so much work and that freed up us top performers to do what we did. Because we were free from the daily drudge we had the time to experiment and test things. One of my co-workers wrote a PERL program to open codes automatically. Then he trained another worker on how to run it. In more than a hundred end offices. And she was perfectly happy doing it. She ended up getting laid off, too.
Posted by: Jaynie59 at May 04, 2013 08:50 AM (4zKCA)
Posted by: Sidney Allen Johnson at May 04, 2013 08:50 AM (6oSGa)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 08:51 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Dennis Rodman at May 04, 2013 08:52 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: sdavis at May 04, 2013 08:53 AM (njVMI)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 08:55 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: TexBob at May 04, 2013 12:41 PM (in4Fg)
Wait--they're not doing that already?
Posted by: Aloha Akhbar - philosophunculist jihad at May 04, 2013 08:56 AM (/lWM8)
Posted by: zsasz at May 04, 2013 08:56 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: CAC at May 04, 2013 08:57 AM (cgX+7)
Uh excuse me sweetie. What part of Catholic don't you get? For 19 years you were teaching young girls in gym while living a lie. You were lying to your employer. What kind of example are you? Not a good one.
And before I forget. I wonder how many parents are now asking their daughters where she touched them.
http://tinyurl.com/boy5uh7
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 04, 2013 08:58 AM (tsPRH)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 08:59 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 08:59 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:00 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:00 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 09:00 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 04, 2013 09:00 AM (tsPRH)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:01 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 09:01 AM (jmVS/)
Posted by: Howard Wolowitz at May 04, 2013 09:01 AM (ZRmWD)
Posted by: CAC at May 04, 2013 09:01 AM (cgX+7)
Posted by: Fritz at May 04, 2013 09:03 AM (G9Mmf)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:03 AM (ZPrif)
>>>And before I forget. I wonder how many parents are now asking their daughters where she touched them.
Under the monkey bars.
Posted by: garrett at May 04, 2013 09:04 AM (QOjdg)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:04 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: John Henry at May 04, 2013 12:45 PM (hpYnL)
Next thing, you'll be telling us that that terrifying sound ain't nothin' but your hammer suckin' wind.
Posted by: OSHA at May 04, 2013 09:05 AM (/lWM8)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:05 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Marco Rubio at May 04, 2013 09:05 AM (YOWAW)
Posted by: CAC at May 04, 2013 09:05 AM (cgX+7)
Posted by: The Burning Times at May 04, 2013 09:06 AM (ZRmWD)
Posted by: Thermadin at May 04, 2013 09:06 AM (W+08+)
Posted by: USS Diversity at May 04, 2013 09:07 AM (5wHPS)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 04, 2013 09:08 AM (tsPRH)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:08 AM (ZPrif)
Uh excuse me sweetie. What part of Catholic don't you get? For 19 years you were teaching young girls in gym while living a lie. You were lying to your employer. What kind of example are you? Not a good one.
And before I forget. I wonder how many parents are now asking their daughters where she touched them.
http://tinyurl.com/boy5uh7
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 04, 2013 12:58 PM (tsPRH)
Well she was a Phys Ed teacher. I'm sure most of the girls were aware that she was a lesbian.
Posted by: buzzion at May 04, 2013 09:09 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:09 AM (52n2x)
So they worked and worked over the years with this program and that to boost numbers and relax standards to achieve a less exclusive mix, and too all the while, in Virgina in a wonk shop working on how to automate the entire thing. That is their ultimate goal. There are airline wonks that want the same. Automated cockpits data-linked to automated ATC with a human sitting there watching.
They'd rather obviously automate the entire enterprise but people alive today wouldn't trust a system like that. maybe in 100 years.
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 09:10 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:10 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 04, 2013 09:11 AM (tsPRH)
The future IS Idiocracy. How long we can hold it off is the question.
Posted by: Muhommand at May 04, 2013 09:11 AM (jmVS/)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:11 AM (52n2x)
Smart doesn't necessarily mean that one has a degree. And having a degree doesn't necessarily make one smart.
Too many blocks by HR departments and protocols to those without credentials and too many laws restricting those who who think out side the box or are willing to work in ways others don't, won't or didn't know could make them money.
We've become Britain of the early 20th century. And we're undergoing the same shrinkage and loss of power that they did.
WWII just finished them off. They were in decline before then.
The major reasons were over-regulation and the attitude by their businesses and business leaders that they had the only answers and those who thought they had other answers were fined and regulated out of business.
Top that off with an arrogance a mile thick and then the lack of response and in many cases the outright hostility to those who saw/reported the things that THEY could see were wrong and you have British production failures that abounded during the '40's and '50's.
There isn't any way out folks. we're on the slide and there is no way to stop other than outright rebellion and a coup d'etat that would remove all business and labor restrictions. Since that AIN'T gonna happen, we'll just have to enjoy the slide into poverty and irrelevancy in the world.
Space exploration MIGHT be a possible out OR a war. But I don't see either of them as a long term solution.
That's why I sometimes get frustrated with the constant reiteration of our problems; No fixes are given, and there's little that can really realistically be done about our situation.
Not without "drastic measures" being taken.
And that means blood, violence and destruction with little chance of rapid change to the positive.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 04, 2013 09:11 AM (Kpn/z)
Posted by: zsasz at May 04, 2013 09:12 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:13 AM (ZPrif)
------------
So... in the brave new world, you see us all as George Jetson?
Posted by: Assault Citizen Anachronda at May 04, 2013 09:13 AM (U82Km)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:13 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 09:14 AM (jmVS/)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:14 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:15 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 04, 2013 09:15 AM (tsPRH)
Posted by: Beto at May 04, 2013 09:15 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:16 AM (52n2x)
This is a great post, and raises many interesting issues.
At the same time I find it surprising, in that it says some things that seem to be wildly absurd - that anybody who frequents this place ought to know better. I hope to explore the "good stuff" in a minute, but my main beefs are:
(1) the only new thing going on that made this a jobless and recover-less recession is ObamaCare, and it doesn't a rocket scientist to figure out that if you greatly increase the cost of hiring people, that employers will HAVE to hire less, ESPECIALLY at the low end, where the added cost represents a much higher percentage of the cost of employing that person. The Baby Boomers retiring (not directly mentioned here) is a significant factor, but it's not the main thing, not by a long shot.
(2) It's amazing to me that the author brings up the Luddites, because his central thesis is basically a Luddite one. Even more aggravating is how I remember Obama blaming ATMs, in part for unemployment, putting tellers out of work. When you're saying the same thing as Obama, regarding anything having to do with economics - well, I'm sorry, but you need to take a deep breath look in the mirror, and spend a few days rethinking some of your basic premises. I could give an actual argument (and maybe will), but do I really NEED TO!?! C'mon - it's an argument to live like the Amish!
Posted by: Optimizer at May 04, 2013 09:16 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: Pops53 at May 04, 2013 09:16 AM (5nrs4)
Aha! I've got the solution for poor old China!
Two words: Muslim immigration!!
It's working in Europe as we speak.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 04, 2013 09:16 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at May 04, 2013 09:16 AM (4Ez/D)
Posted by: Beagle at May 04, 2013 09:17 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:17 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:18 AM (ZPrif)
(MS Powershell, perl & WMIC scripts)
Posted by: WinLinBSD_Admin at May 04, 2013 09:18 AM (eAogH)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:18 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: Beto at May 04, 2013 09:18 AM (MhA4j)
"205 Robotics is exploding as a field.
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM!
I know. I design and build them."
I have always found it fascinating, studied control systems in college (especially optimal control), and am pretty good with software, if I say, myself. Any ideas how an "old" guy could get involved in that stuff?
Posted by: Optimizer at May 04, 2013 09:18 AM (Mxt9o)
You see, when the lower rung gets sick, have no doubt that they will be subject to Death Panels, and will get the short straw. So, over time, the left side of the curve will gradually be diminished.
It's sort of like ... what's the word... "eugenics." Yeah, that's it.
And if anyone brings that up, well, we'll just say we have to do it for Mother Earth, Overpopulation, your death is a Green Solution!
Posted by: shibumi at May 04, 2013 09:19 AM (z63Tr)
Ok I get it about the IQ. It was used a a figure of speech.
What I meant is we are becoing a notion of dumbasses.
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 09:19 AM (jmVS/)
Question:
Any reason I should be hesitant to buy E-mycin at the pet shop to treat my inner ear infection?
Posted by: garrett at May 04, 2013 09:19 AM (jPY3+)
Beagle you mean all the missiles the PRC has buried in tunnels that are mobile and perhaps even have stolen US nuclear warhead designs?
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 04, 2013 09:20 AM (tsPRH)
Posted by: WinLinBSD_Admin at May 04, 2013 09:20 AM (eAogH)
Posted by: Lauren at May 04, 2013 09:20 AM (wsGWu)
The problem with that was well stated by the delightfully subversive The Incredibles: if everyone is special, nobody is.
In that particular case, you will then have 115+ IQ people doing welding and mopping restrooms, and probably a lot unhappier about it than someone further down the bell curve would be. This is sort of a microcosm of the "everyone must go to college" mania that took over the West post-WW2. No, everyone must not.
Posted by: Ian S. at May 04, 2013 09:20 AM (OevbG)
They are already killing people in Britain that don't have a future.
It's only a few steps from that basic decision to the euthanizing, whether by active neglect or passive neglect, of those who have little future but years of life left.
"Managed Care" always was about balancing the costs to maintain a life compared with the rewards of doing so.
More and more people are estranged from their family. Old to young, young to old.
It doesn't take much imagination to believe that when faced with an older person who doesn't have any relatives to consider becomes neglected to the point where they die sooner than otherwise.
And that's a slippery slope that the world is already ON.
It's all on where you draw the line. And believe me, those with college degrees and money WON'T be the ones who are chosen to "lessen the load" first.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 04, 2013 09:20 AM (Kpn/z)
As everyone SHOULD know anyway, the tests are, and always have been notoriously unreliable for measuring anything other than a certain, specific type of learning ability.
Intelligence was never necessarily the same thing.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 04, 2013 09:21 AM (BeSEI)
What's the big deal? Stalin had all this figured out years ago. The Soviet Union had zero unemployment and millions of people building all sorts of things. Read part 3 chapter 22 "We are building" of "The Gulag Archipelago". Hail Socialism. Hail Progressivism. Hail the Vanguard Doctrine.
Posted by: deepred at May 04, 2013 09:21 AM (rUiSC)
Posted by: Freak Out! at May 04, 2013 09:21 AM (jmVS/)
xxx
Another word of the day: consanguinity. It explains the constant warring in the Middle East, as well as the insanity that is Islam. It's what happens when whole nations are settled on the wrong side of the bell curve.
Posted by: shibumi at May 04, 2013 09:21 AM (z63Tr)
Yes there are many jobs that require a high degree of intelligence, but many more jobs require the ability to do different things over the course of the day or just plain social skills - two things automation is poor at.
The real problem we have is that welfare programs make these jobs unappealing to the dependent class since they can make more money not working. Remove this requirement and suddenly people will start taking these jobs again, and even find markets that right now do no exist because of the government.
Yes, this means that there will be "income inequality". This is a good thing. Having a real difference in your quality of life depending on the difficulty of the job you take is a good thing for society. We want people to strive to provide more value for society not sit on their asses and vote D every 4 years.
Posted by: 18-1 at May 04, 2013 09:22 AM (zPVBH)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:22 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:22 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: BignJames at May 04, 2013 09:22 AM (Sg0G/)
Posted by: Beagle at May 04, 2013 09:22 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Beto at May 04, 2013 09:23 AM (MhA4j)
Don't worry, we took notes.
Posted by: The Democrats at May 04, 2013 09:23 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: Waterhouse at May 04, 2013 09:24 AM (UTrWI)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 04, 2013 09:26 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at May 04, 2013 09:26 AM (YYyqq)
Posted by: Antibiotic-resistant bateria at May 04, 2013 01:24 PM (vbh31)
Well, I'd rather feed you than a cock-suckin' doctor.
Posted by: garrett at May 04, 2013 09:27 AM (jPY3+)
My job in corporate strategy will be among the last to be automated, since even if my company had an all-robot workforce, I would be one of the people deciding what those robots should do for the company, so I will be one of the people funding the guaranteed income and, while it isn't my preferred solution, it seems to be the only one which is politically feasible and even then, the idea of restricting people's ability to reproduce is a tough sell. I do wish that politicians would talk about this issue of robots and artificial intelligence more and in an honest way, but I realize that is a pipe dream because telling the vast majority of the population that they are less valuable than a machine isn't exactly a popular message.
Posted by: BS Inc. at May 04, 2013 09:27 AM (b6l0F)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:27 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Tutu at May 04, 2013 09:28 AM (CpWI4)
Posted by: Fritz at May 04, 2013 09:28 AM (G9Mmf)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at May 04, 2013 09:28 AM (jucos)
We all have AIDS though, and AIDS treatments rely on technology, so... there goes that theory.
Posted by: Africa at May 04, 2013 09:30 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 09:30 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:31 AM (ZPrif)
You didn't ask me, and I'm no expert, but if I were getting started in this stuff, and wanted to get some things going quickly, I'd at least take a look at Lego. Seriously. There seems to be a lot of cool stuff going on, and I can see how using those blocks would get you past a lot of the physical construction and on to the fun control stuff.
Hacking Roombas seems to be another thing people are playing with.
Posted by: Splunge at May 04, 2013 09:31 AM (bKA83)
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 09:32 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Lauren at May 04, 2013 01:20 PM (wsGWu)"
Technological advances in the past have been about multiplying human muscles. These advances freed up people to use their brains more and more. Now, the technical advances are aiming to recreate the ability of the brain, at the lower end of the cognitive scale. This will not end up in the same way as previous advances did.
Posted by: BS Inc. at May 04, 2013 09:32 AM (b6l0F)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at May 04, 2013 09:34 AM (U2UQk)
This is not a high value job, but it does generate value. And it puts those doing the job in the same category as everyone else - a productive member of society.
The leftwing take on this seems to be we'd be better off paying someone who could take a more intellectually rigorous job $25/h bagging groceries and abort the mentally disabled.
And note, this is what happens eventually in any "egalitarian" society - those who can't meet society's expectations will be forceably removed from it. This is as true of Sparta with its exposure of infants as it is with Obamameria's genocide against those with Down's syndrome.
Posted by: 18-1 at May 04, 2013 09:34 AM (zPVBH)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:35 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Staff at May 04, 2013 09:37 AM (G9qZk)
Posted by: Beagle at May 04, 2013 09:38 AM (sOtz/)
Look at all the aerospace tech he allowed to flow over there? Truly deserving of major, major scorn and rebuke. ( I know,, kinda harsh, but it's saturday! )
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 09:39 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:39 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: LindaFell at May 04, 2013 12:49 PM (PGO8C)
Late to see this but if you're still here, yes I usually just have a tab open to the group all day.
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, assault Hobbit at May 04, 2013 09:40 AM (lVb7s)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 09:42 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at May 04, 2013 09:44 AM (C8mVl)
Besides, if we stopped worrying about them and supporting them into our self-designed pigeonholes of projecting our needs / wants / desires onto society at large - which is what the Progressive Libtards do - we'd be amazed that these so-called dullards will be surprisingly creative and enduring.
To think that this is a problem is Luddite thinking. Your Gaussian distribution hasn't altered for the whole of history; it's sheer elitist hubris to think that today is somehow different. What bunk!
Posted by: Cannot see the future at May 04, 2013 09:46 AM (nEDGE)
The IQ thing is another one of touchy subjects where ideology trumps the data. The fact is (correct me if I'm wrong - please!) that blacks in the US score a full standard deviation below practically everybody else, and that's HUGE.
Put it this way. To use invent an unkind term, suppose we call the people who are more than one standard deviation to the left of the curve "dumb as a rock". That's probably a bit too harsh a term, but I'll use it here to define the bottom 16%. Whatever you call it, 50% of blacks fall in this category, vs the 16% among other demographics.
Now let's go the other way. Lets call the top 16% "smart as a whip", (which is probably a bit too kind). With their curve 1 standard deviation to the left, only about 2.5% of blacks fall in this category.
The Left concludes that there is some sort of biological law that blacks MUST have the same IQ as everybody else, despite there being a wide disparity of other physiological traits, and therefore the IQ tests MUST be biased! The joke of it is, that other groups of people - from every race and ethinic group imaginable, including people who haven't lived as Americans for CENTURIES - do just fine. Further, in the "Voter ID" debate, the same people make the tacitly racist claim that blacks are too incompetent to get their butts down to register, and therefore are "disenfranchised" by having to produce a birth certificate!
The problem nobody wants to talk about is that people with such a low IQ will naturally live in a world where they can just never seem to catch a break. They're never going to say, "well, it's because most of us aren't very smart." They're ALWAYS going to look for scapegoats, and "whitey" will always be at the top of the list.
Nobody also wants to observe that Asians actually do a little better than whites, and are actually MORE discriminated against than whites in college admissions.
Anyway, that's my thesis for how the Hispanics might not be completely hopeless, as far as embracing libertarian ideals (I think they do better, IQ-wise), while the vast majority of the black population will NEVER come around, always resorting to voting themselves goodies produced by others, to get much of anything. Hell - they've got 50% unemployment, and voted TFG back in because he has a dark complexion!!
On a final note, let us not conflate the idea of having a higher IQ with general "worth". It's not "racist" to identify IQ differences among races; racism is about tribalism, denying opportunities or rights because somebody's not in your group. True, higher IQ tends to help in the job market, and life itself, but it isn't everything, and having too high an IQ can actually be a problem in various ways.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 04, 2013 09:48 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at May 04, 2013 09:49 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: irright at May 04, 2013 09:50 AM (DtNNC)
So we are going back to the future, where we will be cleaning our clothes on rocks in the river. Or living on Soviet Russia, where a benevolent state lies to us and wrecks our lives with their reality every day.
Posted by: PJ at May 04, 2013 09:52 AM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 09:53 AM (/jHWN)
Yes, thanks Monty for a very thought provoking post (& the kind of thing I only seem to find at AoS). You caused me to avoid all sorts of "useful" work that must now be done in a compressed time-frame because I was reading this blog and the comments!
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 04, 2013 09:53 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: sexypig at May 04, 2013 09:54 AM (dZQh7)
Your dishwashers don't work because your detergent doesn't have phosphates in it anymore.
Go to HomeDepot and buy TSP in the paint department.
Add some of that to your dishwasher.
Your dishes will be clean again.
Posted by: Taco Stand at May 04, 2013 09:57 AM (C+qQ0)
"228 In that particular case [Singapore], you will then have 115+ IQ people doing welding and mopping restrooms, and probably a lot unhappier about it than someone further down the bell curve would be. ...."
Singapore is a case study in how everything the Left says about economics couldn't be more wrong. They say it's about "natural resources", meaning "wealth just exists, people don't MAKE it", and that's necessary - on their part - because it helps in their moral argument to seize that wealth. But I digress!
The folks in Singapore will either hire people to come in to do that stuff for them, or buy or invent technology that will eliminate most of that work.
Don't e such a Luddite! (I guess that's the word of the day!)
Posted by: Optimizer at May 04, 2013 09:57 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: Borat in a leisure coat and thong at May 04, 2013 09:59 AM (DtNNC)
Only so long as the cheap beer is also good beer!
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 04, 2013 10:00 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: sexypig at May 04, 2013 10:01 AM (dZQh7)
Posted by: President For Life Obama at May 04, 2013 10:02 AM (7tVNd)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 10:03 AM (ZPrif)
"239 ... Look into companies that do industrial testing. Especially RF system testing. Almost everything we build now goes to Japan, China or India."
Thanks! Anything someone can do to make themselves more qualified (if you're still around)?
Posted by: Optimizer at May 04, 2013 10:05 AM (Mxt9o)
I don't think race mixing is like mixing paint... ie you get a uniform brown.
I think with race mixing, you get more of a continuum...with a pure race at each end of the continuum, and a graduated blend inbetween.
Both of the pure races are self sustaining, as well as the blend.
Posted by: Taco Stand at May 04, 2013 10:05 AM (C+qQ0)
Posted by: Pops53 at May 04, 2013 10:07 AM (5nrs4)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 10:08 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: sexypig at May 04, 2013 10:08 AM (dZQh7)
Posted by: Pops53 at May 04, 2013 10:09 AM (5nrs4)
The Left has already done that -- it's called imputed income.
Posted by: SFGoth at May 04, 2013 10:11 AM (hwU62)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at May 04, 2013 10:11 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 10:11 AM (ZPrif)
No need to tax childless people, they don't have the number of dependents to deduct. And who's to say they are not charitable. Why tax? More power for the powerful i guess.
Posted by: yerro at May 04, 2013 10:20 AM (Vy1j+)
"255 You didn't ask me, and I'm no expert, but if I were getting started in this stuff, and wanted to get some things going quickly, I'd at least take a look at Lego. Seriously. There seems to be a lot of cool stuff going on, and I can see how using those blocks would get you past a lot of the physical construction and on to the fun control stuff."
Well I know there's some sort of robotics program called Lego IIRC for middle schoolers. I was actually involved in the High School robotics deal at my kid's high school (something called "FIRST"), but it went horribly wrong.
What happened was that it turned out to be a scam. I plunked down $500, and you had a bunch of blowhards lecturing away at the kids at times, and encouraging them to come up with their own ideas, but in the end, it turned out to be the kind of scam that Obama would be proud of. A big shot in the local corporation that was providing the grants essentially had his own little playground for him and his two sons (who were in the program). Most of the other "volunteers" were apparently either explicitly or implicitly arm-twisted by him to attend, while the teachers (who got to put stuff on their resume) played along. My kid and I got to play around with programming robots a bit, but were essentially not allowed to have anything to do with the competition - only Mr. big shot's stuff was allowed. We knew better than to join again the following year.
The competition in general showed that a lot of this stuff was going on. The better teams had robots that the high school-ers had little to do with. But it was at least encouraging to see a lot of teenagers partying up at an essentially very nerdy event - celebrating technology.
And, naturally, there was a certain socialist flavor to the whole thing.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 04, 2013 10:22 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: Beagle at May 04, 2013 10:23 AM (sOtz/)
Third Horseman, the college degree requirement IIRC from other commentators is a scam by business HR departments to protect themselves from lawsuits from the truly less qualified. That it feeds the diploma mill is just bonus.
I'm thinking of starting a business that provides prospective employees with a certificate that they are not gangbangers from the ghetto, can read and write, and will generally show up for work when they're supposed to. I'm going to market it as a cheaper alternative than a college degree, but serving the same functions for most jobs.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 04, 2013 10:25 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: TOF at May 04, 2013 10:29 AM (PV2IU)
Posted by: SunSword at May 04, 2013 10:30 AM (cVtEO)
Good idea. But... you have a choice to make in regards to your business model.
You can either provide this certificate to everyone who asks. In which case it will have zero predictive power. So employers will pay it no mind. So you will be selling a useless product. But a legal product.
Or you can screen out applicants which do not meet those criteria. Which will have a disparate racial impact. Which will lead to your being sued out of existence.
Choose wisely.
Posted by: Taco Stand at May 04, 2013 10:37 AM (C+qQ0)
The problem we have, more than anything, is convincing people that all work has value. This starts at a young age when you praise a child for making his bed or taking out the trash. We have a huge number of fmailies who are raising children who are simply incapable of work, whether manual or intellectual. They cannot clean or garden, and they cannot study, either. They are basically watchers of television, listeners of iPods, and players of video games.
Well, I am not as pessimistic as some are. I think it possible that an unknown developement will change our course.
And because of my Faith, I believe all people have value.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 04, 2013 10:37 AM (GoIUi)
Miss Marple at May 04, 2013 02:37 PM (GoIUi)
This.
Posted by: Taco Stand at May 04, 2013 10:39 AM (C+qQ0)
Posted by: Pops53 at May 04, 2013 10:40 AM (5nrs4)
"283 @Optimizer, the races are mixing fairly rapidly at this point. I'd like to see if lower IQ portions of races are mixing.
Probably since as part of the progress I have seen in California is now you have groups of scumbags that are integrated."
My biracial niece put a posting on Facebook that was interesting in this regard. It made note of the racial mixing, and put forth the notion that racial boundaries would ultimately disappear as a result.
That's when things got amusing (from my perspective). You should have heard the race-baiters, who are constantly supposedly railing against racism, go nuts at the suggestion!
In the final analysis, it was ridiculous to talk about this stuff as though it's even anything NEW. Ethnic groups and races have been intermixing forever, and the result has never been the elimination of races and ethnic groups, but rather the creation of new ones!
The discouraging part is that the article ended up where they always seem to - a new group (this one was for mixed race/ethnicity) looking to be recognized for its place within the ranks of Victimhood. Hell, in this town my mother was "bi-ethnic", by virtue of her father being German, and her mother being Irish. It's nothing new, especially in THIS country.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 04, 2013 10:42 AM (Mxt9o)
I suspect the solution is the one that Mandela finds, and that is to go back to space and stay in the military. He and his mates are elites, of course, but the real salvation for mankind will likely involve sending a broad range of people to the new frontier when it finally opens up. It's never a good idea to try and guess where evolution is going. You never know when a particular "skill" will be needed. Remember what happened to the Golgafringians when they exported the "useless" segment of society. They died from a virulent infection caused by an unsanitized telephone, a skill they had deemed unnecessary.
Posted by: MichiCanuck at May 04, 2013 10:47 AM (Zf8bj)
Or they can be rebuilt to be pretty much like brand new. Again.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at May 04, 2013 10:47 AM (9+PGS)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 04, 2013 10:49 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Yip at May 04, 2013 10:52 AM (/jHWN)
Assemblyman William Boyland Jr. just canÂ’t catch a break.
Mr. Boyland, who was previously charged with soliciting bribes to pay his legal bills in an unrelated corruption trial, was indicted again last March for wire fraud charges stemming from alleged abuse of per diem requests. And he was just charged yet again today.
“Boyland engaged in a scheme to defraud New York State by steering public funds to a Brooklyn based non-profit organization (‘Non-Profit A’) and then directing that a portion of those public funds be used to pay for community events promoting Boyland and on goods such as t-shirts imprinted with the slogan ‘Team Boyland’ which were distributed at those events,” a press release from the U.S. Attorney’s office this evening declared.
“To conceal this scheme, Boyland allegedly directed members of his staff to instruct vendors involved in the community events to falsely list Non-Profit A, and not Boyland, as the purchaser on invoices for goods purchased for the events,” it continued. “A representative of Non-Profit A then submitted the fraudulent invoices to the New York State Office for the Aging (‘NYSOFA’), which administered the public funds, without disclosing that these invoices were for events and goods promoting Boyland.”
But wait. There's more!
(from his assemblyman webpage bio)
"Boyland also sponsored legislation to create the GovernorÂ’s Employment and Training Council, which puts unemployable and untrained constituents back to work."
unemployable and untrained working -- distribution of "Team Boyland" t-shirts, no doubt about it. Brilliant!
Posted by: Woikerz o' da Whirled at May 04, 2013 10:54 AM (2iU3x)
"... Today, we have reached the point where we can maintain and even grow our GDP with less and less human input into the process. ..."
What we're seeing is the inevitable triumph of the "maker" over the "takers". ObamaCare and the minimum wage were a shake-down by the less valuable "takers", and the "makers" said, "Screw you, you'd cost too much - we can find cheaper ways to do it without you."
Naturally, the "takers" are shocked and outraged. They are the ugly mob that only knows that it wants stuff, and if it gathers up other like-minded people they can just take it. At least until the "makers" either figure out a way to keep their stuff, or decide to simply not "make" it in the first place, since it will only be stolen from them.
It's not exactly rocket science, but if you don't want to believe it you simply won't.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 04, 2013 11:05 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at May 04, 2013 11:05 AM (U2UQk)
I haven't even looked at the Benghazi timeline yet, but you don't to be brilliant to realize that if they don't allow the FBI on the scene for THREE WEEKS, that there is a MAJOR cover-up going on, and that the FBI has apparently not been corrupted by the current administration (at least not yet).
The excuses being made sound like junior high - it's unbelievable to hear from grown-ups, much less high-ranking government officials. "What difference does it make!?" ... "That was a long time ago." ... Still most media are part of the cover-up. It's scary and unreal.
Those whistle-blowers coming out are a heartwarming reminder that there are still real-life American heroes, and a scathing commentary on the state of the media.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 04, 2013 11:11 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: Pops53 at May 04, 2013 11:26 AM (5nrs4)
Posted by: Connertown at May 04, 2013 11:32 AM (ceOGc)
Posted by: Cato at May 04, 2013 11:40 AM (oWqSV)
Posted by: rickl at May 04, 2013 11:43 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: rickl at May 04, 2013 11:47 AM (sdi6R)
I do not believe in the perfectibility of humankind; I don't even believe in its improvement. But I have unlimited belief in its creativity, which creativity is not and never has been limited to the 'elites' (eloi?) on the right end of the curve.
Posted by: Cannot see the future at May 04, 2013 11:52 AM (nEDGE)
It's a bit different, IMO. As technology is filling the lower job occupancies, it just makes it clearer that the majority of our civilization's advancement is due to those who occupy the far right tail of the g-loaded/IQ distribution.
Think an <i>Archimedes Lever</i> effect whereby a small force can exert an outsized, nonlinear outcome on a larger mass.
Throughout history we've seen the same pattern of a small number of either highly motivated or highly intelligent individuals shape the events which followed: from people like a Newton or Guass, von Neumann or Einstein, to the Michaelangelos and Descartes, or the Huns, Napoleon, Lenin and Hitler.
The illusion is that progress has been a product of the advancement (or work) of the masses, of the middle of the distribution. But, contra Marx, this is just an illusion -- which is why advanced education of the masses is a losing proposition.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at May 04, 2013 11:56 AM (jhI6f)
You do realize, globally, that "left side of the curve" lives off less than $3/day in shanty towns or overcrowded villages.
Hell, in supporting my last post, it's only the work of the extreme far right tail of the distribution which improves their quality-of-life substantially. Gates Foundation and Malaria, the US and our food and AIDS relief. Eradication of smallpox, whooping cough, etc.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at May 04, 2013 12:01 PM (jhI6f)
Posted by: rickl at May 04, 2013 12:17 PM (sdi6R)
I've worked in those areas (energy, petroleum). Poverty is our definition, not theirs. Nor does it have anything to do with intelligence, much less creativity. As The Political Hat pointed out (up in post #96) machines & technology merely free up the individual to produce more stuff besides his/her subsistence. Compare the souls of the folks who hang around the NGO distribution centers in Eritrea with those of the folks in the country-side: it isn't ennobling to live on freebies.
$3/day doesn't mean a whole lot to these villagers, because that is only an average. Many of them live on $0/day, and their economy is unrecognizable to us. So what? Money isn't the only item that can be used as a store of value; it is merely convenient in the more complex societies. And even there it isn't necessary - only massively convenient.
Posted by: Cannot see the future at May 04, 2013 12:19 PM (nEDGE)
I sided with Obama on that one.
Sometimes someone says something genuinely noxious and stupid; quite often, it's Obama (and Biden, Pelosi et al.). But sometimes someone says something that's basically, um, true; perhaps not parsed perfectly, but you can see where he's trying to go with that.
Conservatives deliberately distorted that ATM comment, like Leftists distorted Romney's binder-of-women. Yet another (minor) reason I sat the last election out.
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at May 04, 2013 12:57 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: Roy Batty at May 04, 2013 12:58 PM (0gnMc)
I'm not saying they will invade the world.
I'm saying China will be, by far, the richest most powerful country in the world after 2030. And the transition will happen quicker than Americans expect.
Uh no it won't. China has huge problems that you are ignoring. For one thing it is a Communist country - hello, that never works, and never will. Think about how badly Obamao is screwing up this country's econonmy then multiply that by a minimum of 10 for a pure Communist government.
China has already peaked and they won't be recovering. They've had the most people of any country for a long time - never has done them much good. Their people - like the people in the Russian Federation - simply don't know how to be free so even the collapse of Communism there won't help them.
Posted by: An Observation at May 04, 2013 01:02 PM (ylhEn)
Two things from reading this story.
1) Darwin will NOT be cheated. He is coming for the weak and ill-adapted one way or another.
2) "For many people, it means a life lived in vain -- fit only for government handouts and welfare, a life bereft of meaning or goals, a life consumed by minutiae, tedium, and waste. For many people, it means a life lived in vain -- fit only for government handouts and welfare, a life bereft of meaning or goals, a life consumed by minutiae, tedium, and waste." These people will not live lives of quiet despair.
If they are miimally intelligent and self-aware enough to recognizr their position, they wil be a permanent criminal and/or terrorist class. Just like Mid Eastern countries whose privileged young adults have too much time and not enough to do, the people left of this centerline will become neemies of the state.
Posted by: Advo at May 04, 2013 01:06 PM (XQ2sU)
Money is a bit different, it's value to us isn't in any intrinsic value it may hold (as you correctly point out), but as a price signal which conveys information. It conveys the economies distributed and continually updated calculation about what value X, Y, or Z holds.
So, my point was using this information-based view as a standard metric or window into just how *not getting by* the vast majority of the distribution is in day-to-day life compared to those on the far right tail, who really are responsible for our civilizations advancement.
Your point was that the masses in the middle and on the left would manage if left to their own agency. They will and *cannot*. See the RA Heinlein quote:
"Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as “bad luck.”"
Posted by: Uriah Heep at May 04, 2013 01:11 PM (jhI6f)
Posted by: rickl at May 04, 2013 01:32 PM (sdi6R)
Your premises are so fallacious they are not even wrong. But the kind of social science crap you are peddling here gets my blood up so I'll start with:
So what?
Granting - for the sake argument - that IQ is randomly distributed (and this is by no means as settled a fact as you suggest: the sample size is much too small relative to the entire population of all humans that have ever existed) does not give us any special insights as to the future course of human society.
Simply consider yourself: Are your ancestors all on the right side of the IQ curve? Most certainly not. And the same is true for all living humans. Yet here you are, using this forum to pass some trivial statistical artifact off as wisdom. Does this not logically undercut your entire premise?
BTW, you might ask yourself why the shape of the distribution should make any difference? What if it were shown that IQ followed a power law distribution?
Finally, your premise ignores the time domain: All human characteristics change over time and in ways that are NOT accessible to statistical theory. Therefore, using simplifying statistical models to predict the capabilities of future individuals or groups is bullshit.
Posted by: eldubelu at May 04, 2013 01:40 PM (w68JZ)
Posted by: rickl at May 04, 2013 01:52 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: rickl at May 04, 2013 01:57 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Trimegistus at May 04, 2013 02:15 PM (xAp2X)
Posted by: Monty at May 04, 2013 12:04 PM (G8OwX)
I disagree (says the guy who fixes industrial robots). They can diagnose themselves to a certain degree, but broken is broken. Space probes and complex computer systems do not really "fix" themselves, they simply route around the existing problem (which is why military and space hardware have redundancy built-in to their design). Once all the alternate routes are broken, game over.
However, fixing these machines takes a degree of intelligence beyond the average button pusher job. Take auto mechanics, for instance, where once we had skilled craftsmen who were masters at their craft, today we have parts replacers with a diagnostic computer.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at May 04, 2013 02:20 PM (yh0zB)
We are a long way from having robots that can replace carpenters.
Posted by: typo dynamofo at May 04, 2013 02:23 PM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: Trimegistus at May 04, 2013 06:15 PM (xAp2X)
What's worse, they DO teach how do do things...they teach to toe the line, to conform, to not question authority, to be good little button-pushing drones...and then we're upset when that is all they are good at producing. The system is working, it's just not working the way we need it to work right now. It would have been fine for a button pushing job economy...but now all the buttons are being pushed by Robbie the Robot.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at May 04, 2013 02:27 PM (yh0zB)
Posted by: typo dynamofo at May 04, 2013 06:23 PM (WVMUQ)
Not so much. Load the material into a jig, a robot punches the staples in, all you need human workers for is to maintain the machinery and move the materials around. Now if you are talking about the craftsmanship that you get out of, for example, Amish furniture, you are absolutely right...unfortunately these skills are slowly being lost because mass-produced, while not as "good", is cheaper.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at May 04, 2013 02:30 PM (yh0zB)
That, by the way, is a wonderful way to confound a leftist. "You are either for abortion or you are a racist Mr. Marx. Which are you, sir?"
In reality there was no significant problem until just very lately. We are reaching a point where the below the mean folks are becoming less and less useful to the economy. Remember that the average intelligence is 100. I don't really care if you believe the measurement technique but it is clear that half the world is dumber than rocks. If you have ever worked -- in an urban setting -- with the lower half of the curve then it is intuitive. Think of TSA screening and adult hamburger flippers.
Sadly, also think of many graduates from schools of education. The rigid stupidity of the educational establishment is indicative of the heavily structured systems required by the dull to function.
This, however, has been a deadly discussion for the last thirty-five to forty years. Look at what the academic mob did to William Shockley (Nobel, transistors) in the 1970's for even doing the math for this.
In the end we will wind up taxing the capable to support the incapable. Gotta be fair, dontchaknow.
Posted by: wjr at May 04, 2013 02:32 PM (NT7t4)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 04, 2013 02:37 PM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 04, 2013 02:55 PM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: LC at May 04, 2013 03:05 PM (ObEIX)
Posted by: dad29 at May 04, 2013 03:22 PM (7Kti7)
Posted by: Gus Bailey at May 04, 2013 03:27 PM (HdrAT)
Machine sales and service. The more machines, the more salesmen you need to sell them, and the more servicemen you need to use the machines that fix the machines the salesman sold. And for those second machines that the servicemen use to fix the first machines, somebody has to sell them, too. Etc.
Salesmen will come more and more from the left of the IQ spectrum, as people on the right will more likely recognize the benefits of specialized training and education. In the past, salesmen were probably slightly to the right of center on that spectrum, because they needed to be able to keep accounts - a job that called for at least a high school education, which many laborers didn't have. Keeping accounts is done today by machines (or applications on machines), which means that a salesman doesn't have to have the same amount of "smarts" or cognitive ability (people skills are still required, more than ever, but those are largely unrelated to pure cognitive ability). Right of center (i.e., "kinda smart") people who used to be salesmen will go into designing machines and applications, or into management of all the new designers, sellers, and servicers of all the new machines and applications.
The kind of guys who used to be salesmen are now lawyers (but the kind of guys who used to be lawyers are still lawyers, which unfortunately makes for too many lawyers). The kind of guys who used to do physical labor are now salesmen.
Posted by: Dave H at May 04, 2013 03:43 PM (k85z0)
Posted by: PJ at May 04, 2013 04:08 PM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Ken at May 04, 2013 05:26 PM (9ImMr)
Posted by: firecaptain at May 04, 2013 08:02 PM (L8Qa7)
Posted by: Chicago Voter at May 05, 2013 02:38 AM (qZb8X)
Posted by: Field Marshal Blucher at May 05, 2013 03:17 AM (2SlSM)
Posted by: sTevo at May 05, 2013 03:28 AM (VMcEw)
chill man
if robots become that powerful then goods will become so cheap you will be able to afford practically anything on m.w.
America thrived and more ppl were working than ever after the i.r. We absorbed an almost 2x increase when women enterd the workforce.
the only think that can destroy our econ is bad gov policy. dont be a luddite. and go get a refresher via a wealth of nations summary or econ in on lesson by hazlit. its been explained b4...
and sides, if you give mainstream economists credit then you are in the wrong party.The chicago school is drivin the policy train these days man
Posted by: Stone at May 05, 2013 06:04 AM (gleGu)
Posted by: Rdohd at May 05, 2013 07:05 AM (OPKdd)
Posted by: Amy Shulkusky at May 05, 2013 12:59 PM (bdged)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3235 seconds, 481 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Beto at May 04, 2013 07:58 AM (MhA4j)