September 18, 2013
— Gabriel Malor The short version of the leadership's plans: the House will pass a CR that defunds Obamacare and send it to the Senate to see if Senate GOP can make it stick. The House, anticipating that Senate Dems will strip out Obamacare defunding, will also pass a 1-year debt ceiling increase in exchange for an Obamacare delay until 2015, some tax and budget reforms, and the Keystone pipeline.
The longer version notes that this is essentially a challenge to Senate conservatives to put their money where their mouths are. They've been slamming House GOP members as, among other things, part of "the surrender caucus."
Well, says Speaker Boehner, here's their big chance:
“On every major issue we’ve faced for the past two and a half years, the math has been the same,” Boehner said, according to a source in the room. “House Republicans either find a way together to get to 218, or the Democrats who run the rest of Washington essentially get everything they want.”
GOP leadershipÂ’s goal is to force conservatives like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to hold up any government funding bill that doesnÂ’t defund Obamacare. Senior House Republican aides and lawmakers are sick of Senate conservatives blaming the House for funding the law.
I suspect this won't satisfy Senate conservatives or outside conservative groups like Heritage and Freedom Works. If the Senate Dems can simply strip out the Obamacare defunding portion, the House vote to defund matters about as much as its 40 prior votes to repeal.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
06:38 AM
| Comments (272)
Post contains 268 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at September 18, 2013 06:42 AM (09o/X)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at September 18, 2013 06:42 AM (09o/X)
Even if you get the Senate to vote for it (and you might this being an election year coming up), wouldn't the Big O veto it?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 18, 2013 06:43 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: joncelli of Triskelion at September 18, 2013 06:44 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: ginaswo at September 18, 2013 06:44 AM (9faJ5)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at September 18, 2013 06:45 AM (09o/X)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 06:45 AM (LSJmV)
Does the House go to shut-down mode?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 18, 2013 06:45 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Decaf at September 18, 2013 06:45 AM (2liBQ)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 18, 2013 06:47 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: John Boehner suddenly discovering he does have Cojones at September 18, 2013 06:48 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Decaf at September 18, 2013 06:49 AM (2liBQ)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at September 18, 2013 06:49 AM (09o/X)
Let's all just give up.
We can rebuild a country with freedom somewhere else.
What land mass looks good to the Moron Horde?
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 18, 2013 06:51 AM (JSmUP)
Would Obama go for a 1+ year delay?
Even if you get the Senate to vote for it (and you might this being an election year coming up), wouldn't the Big O veto it?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 18, 2013 10:43 AM (f9c2L)
He won't have to; we'll strip out any defunding, delaying, or Keystoning for him.
Posted by: Dingy Harry at September 18, 2013 06:51 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 06:51 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at September 18, 2013 06:51 AM (9MLX+)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at September 18, 2013 06:52 AM (09o/X)
The big question, of course, is what happens if/when the Senate votes down both?
Does the House go to shut-down mode?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 18, 2013 10:45 AM (f9c2L)
If by "shut down", you mean "kill the conservatives", you betcha. If by "shut down", you mean "shut down the government", not so much.
Posted by: Bo(eh)ner at September 18, 2013 06:52 AM (o44nj)
I would gladly pay for Obamacare, next Tuesday...
Posted by: Mr.KnowItAll at September 18, 2013 06:53 AM (uJK1E)
Then I will join in the hating Boner camp.
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at September 18, 2013 10:52 AM (09o/X)
The Dingy One has been Teh SCOAMT's personal roadblock for the last 2+ years, and now Bo(eh)ner wants in on that action.
Posted by: steveegg at September 18, 2013 06:54 AM (o44nj)
I know its tough when "we" only control 1 half of Congress..... but..... can somebody at least rent a spine? You dont have to keep it.
Posted by: fixerupper at September 18, 2013 06:54 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: blaster at September 18, 2013 06:55 AM (W6bkf)
Does the House go to shut-down mode?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 18, 2013 10:45 AM
*cough* John Boehner *cough*
If Congress goes through all this "process" and "strategy" bullshit so beloved of the Pundit Class and our elected felons, Choom Boy gets his way and we get screwed.
Too many people acting as if this is some kind of game, not a real situation that will have a negative effect on people's lives.
Do not ask for whom the bell tools, Gabe and the rest of the gamers -- it tolls for every-friggin'-one of us. Except Congress and the traitor in the White House, that is.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 18, 2013 06:55 AM (kaGpp)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at September 18, 2013 06:56 AM (Ec6wH)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 10:45 AM (LSJmV)
Splitting atoms with their minds.
Posted by: Clownf*cker at September 18, 2013 06:56 AM (l2max)
Posted by: eman at September 18, 2013 06:56 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now more than ever. at September 18, 2013 06:58 AM (VtjlW)
I suppose both bills will wind up in conference after the Senate acts to strip out the places where the bad Republicans touched them on their Senate doll.
MOAR FUNZ
Posted by: GnuBreed at September 18, 2013 06:58 AM (wNF3N)
>>>Let's all just give up.
The US has been a small-c communist country from before the USSR. Obamacare is just an expansion of the same, extending it beyond the "workers and peasants" to the general population. Plus, maybe, putting the label itself within reach to make us capital C should the populace decide they want that formality [and they probably won't].
This stuff? Not going anywhere, sadly.
Posted by: Bigby's Shadow Puppet Hands at September 18, 2013 06:59 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 07:00 AM (LSJmV)
As corrupt as this is now? Imagine it in 10 years. Need to put some industrial strength glue on the gas pedal of the Obamacare Winnebago.
Posted by: Clownf*cker at September 18, 2013 07:00 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Vexations and Peevishness to Go! at September 18, 2013 07:00 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Fritz at September 18, 2013 07:00 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: jd at September 18, 2013 07:01 AM (ROXo4)
Posted by: Michelle Chewbama at September 18, 2013 07:01 AM (EX+sq)
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 18, 2013 10:51 AM (JSmUP)
----
Antarctica......
Posted by: fixerupper at September 18, 2013 07:02 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: X at September 18, 2013 07:02 AM (KHo8t)
Posted by: Iceland at September 18, 2013 07:03 AM (naUcP)
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 18, 2013 07:03 AM (JSmUP)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now more than ever. at September 18, 2013 07:03 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at September 18, 2013 07:03 AM (naUcP)
Gabe, why don't you publish your thoughts on the way forward, as DrewM did yesterday, rather than just repeatedly whining all the time?
We know your position is surrender, surrender and surrender, hoping to one day control the entire Congress, the Presidency and (perhaps) even the Courts (Then we'll show them!). Because we can't win.
I still like Drew's Plan B best of all: pass the CR at sequester levels, but specifically require full compliance with the crap sandwich ZeroCare for everyone, government employees most especially, revoke any and all "waivers", and throw in additional HHS sequester tied to missing deadlines. I'd also like to require the Defense Department to enforce Warn Act fines for caving on notice requirements before the 2012 election, with a prohibition against now or ever allowing affected contractors to get those fines repaid by the evil Democrats.
Hit the progressive bastards right in the fiscal face.
Posted by: MTF at September 18, 2013 07:04 AM (B5y+v)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, BFD, ZOMG, WTF, BBQ, QED at September 18, 2013 07:04 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: eman at September 18, 2013 07:05 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at September 18, 2013 07:05 AM (epxV4)
Ummmm. Ummmm. Pssst, here's a secret. Don't tell anyone. But appropriations bills? Have to come from the House. I know, I know, it's a Super Sekrit but I thought I would share it.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now more than ever. at September 18, 2013 10:58 AM (VtjlW)
The problem isn't always the appropriations bills as they come out of the House. It's more often El PRL adopting whatever comes out of Dingy Harry's Senate as the conference appropirations bills. It takes a bit longer, but the Full French Surrender is just as thorough.
Posted by: steveegg at September 18, 2013 07:05 AM (o44nj)
There is no can.... and we are out of road.
Krauthammer was on one of the shows the other day and was saying that Obamacare is projected to cost 6 TRILLION in 2016..... more if more waivers, carvouts and exclusions are approved.
Posted by: fixerupper at September 18, 2013 07:05 AM (nELVU)
Although I am in agreement with most of the posters here. Nothing good can ever happen. We will always be betrayed. Even when the GOP takes a step we want them to take we are doomed to failure. And betrayal.
Because of cocktails.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Vexations and Peevishness to Go! at September 18, 2013 07:06 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Decaf at September 18, 2013 07:06 AM (2liBQ)
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at September 18, 2013 07:07 AM (/lWM8)
Posted by: Bigby's Shadow Puppet Hands at September 18, 2013 07:08 AM (3ZtZW)
We're post-constitutional now. That shit's old school. This is new school.
You just grab some DOA house bill that died in the Senate, jack it up, re-title it, and drive a new bill underneath. Voila, a spending bill that "originated in the house", but was completely written in the Senate.
See how that works?
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at September 18, 2013 07:08 AM (9MLX+)
Posted by: brak at September 18, 2013 07:09 AM (M2qTM)
Raise the debt ceiling in exchange for Keystone? As it's been said before, do you trust the SCOAMT not to block Keystone after he gets the green light to put us farther into debt?
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at September 18, 2013 11:05 AM (epxV4)
And as my Dingy sock said above, that won't even make it out of the Senate or into the conference bill (which will be 99.9% the Senate version because Bo(eh)ner and Co. can't negotiate off full sticker with a "$500 off invoice" sign in the window).
Posted by: steveegg at September 18, 2013 07:09 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at September 18, 2013 07:10 AM (9MLX+)
"Is he implying that none of the other GOP senators give a hoot, even symbolically?"
It seems to me he is saying "Put up or shut up. It is real easy to sit there in the back benches and snipe and complain. Now show us what you got and see if you can get this through the Senate with the numbers as they are."
That's how I am reading it.
And cocktails. This must be done before cocktail time.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Vexations and Peevishness to Go! at September 18, 2013 07:10 AM (hLRSq)
We're post-constitutional now. That shit's old school. This is new school.
You just grab some DOA house bill that died in the Senate, jack it up, re-title it, and drive a new bill underneath. Voila, a spending bill that "originated in the house", but was completely written in the Senate.
See how that works?
Posted by: Purp at September 18, 2013 11:08 AM (9MLX+)
Just like I've been doing since 2009.
Posted by: Dingy Harry at September 18, 2013 07:10 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: eman at September 18, 2013 07:10 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at September 18, 2013 07:11 AM (l3vZN)
Why are the Republicans doing everything they can to help the Democrats?
Posted by: Null at September 18, 2013 07:12 AM (FCv25)
Posted by: Josef K. at September 18, 2013 07:12 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: willow at September 18, 2013 07:13 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: eman at September 18, 2013 07:14 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at September 18, 2013 07:14 AM (l3vZN)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at September 18, 2013 07:14 AM (32Ze2)
Posted by: Serious Cat at September 18, 2013 07:14 AM (5TFvk)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 18, 2013 07:15 AM (ajEYe)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at September 18, 2013 07:15 AM (l3vZN)
Did anyone know we've "come a long way on the economy"?
No? Me either.
Oh and it's "unprecedented" to use the debt ceiling to extort a president?
Actually, no its not unprecedented to use the debt ceiling as a "negotiation" point with the president. It's what Congress and our government are suppose to do; negotiate and debate. Not play golf, go on continuous vacations and fling poo as a substitute for doing their job.
Oh and he's says the budget is a "ideological fight". Ya think? Speaking of the economy, entitlements, budget deficits and other fiscal matters- how's your "ideology" working out? Time to try something new- don't ya think?
Posted by: Marcus at September 18, 2013 07:16 AM (GGCsk)
At least the House is also offering a Republican plan to replace Obamacare.
Dailey Caller has a story. It is only 200 pages or so. I hope it is all they say it is.
This actually could begin to repeal Obamacare if they play it carefully enough to get some Democrats on board before the mid-terms.
We may actually get the discussion that was denied us in 2009.
Posted by: petunia at September 18, 2013 07:16 AM (DAcBA)
The House, anticipating that Senate Dems will strip out Obamacare defunding, will also pass a 1-year debt ceiling increase in exchange for an Obamacare delay until 2015, some tax and budget reforms, and the Keystone pipeline.
Artisanal 'ette is right. This is a fucking joke. No debt increase and no delaying Barkycare. Either implement the goddamn thing now, with every one of its onerous provisions applicable to everyone, or kill it. Do not fucking delay Obamacare until some mythical fortuitous time! Kill it now!
And "tax and budget reforms?" "Keystone?" Agreement from the fucking lying ambulatory pieces of shit known as Democrats? Ask Reagan how well gooing along with Democrats works. Ask GWHB how well they keep their promises.
The GOP needs to die.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 18, 2013 07:16 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at September 18, 2013 07:16 AM (wmz48)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 18, 2013 07:16 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: McBeth, Prince of Denmark at September 18, 2013 07:16 AM (niesl)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now more than ever. at September 18, 2013 07:16 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Josef K. at September 18, 2013 11:12 AM (tOkJB)
Simple.... they pass a bill saying we continue to fund the Government at the current levels except for this specific money... then list the Obamacare funding...
Problem will come when Obama shifts money from one account to another... like they have to play with the Government debt for the last 4 months.... which has not gone up because of accounting tricks...
Because.... how does Congress ENFORCE cutting a budget without defunding the entire Dept?
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 07:17 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Josef K. at September 18, 2013 11:12 AM (tOkJB)
So far, PlaceboCare has been fully funded as envisioned by the POR Troika when they had their staffers and lobbyists (though I repeat myself) write the PlaceboCare bill, with most of that funding written into the act and thus not subject to annual appropriations. Of course, there's nothing that says Congress can't pass a subsequent law to wipe out those automatic approprations.
As for what is funded by annual appropriations, that's the Defense Department, Forest Service, State Department, CIA, and other minor federal entities, or about $1.2 trillion of the $3.5 trillion spent by the government every year. The rest, from PlaceboCare to SocSecurity to Medicare (all of which have perpetual funding) to food stamps (which has a 5-year funding cycle), are not funded by annual appropriations.
Posted by: Dingy Harry at September 18, 2013 07:17 AM (o44nj)
In any negotiation you have to have a point where you're willing to walk away. Boehner and the House leadership have stated that they're not willing to walk away from the table no matter what (shut down the government).
Posted by: Colorado Alex at September 18, 2013 07:19 AM (lr3d7)
why can't the team Republican point this out and demand EVERYONE, absolutely every american has to comply with their Law?
how is this legal?
created equal ? my ass.
Posted by: willow at September 18, 2013 07:19 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 18, 2013 11:16 AM (zF6Iw)
Yep.... the amount of chaos defunding will create in the market place will be astronomical.
The only thing Business hates worse than bad rules, is not knowing what the rules are... because they literally can't write a year long contract for healthcare without knowing what the rules are...
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 07:19 AM (lZBBB)
>>>>We'll take the Morons but we don't want the Irish!
Just pass a law saying the Irish have to live in taverns, then surround the taverns with palisades.
Posted by: Bigby's Shadow Puppet Hands at September 18, 2013 07:19 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 07:20 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: SARDiver at September 18, 2013 07:21 AM (v5Foa)
Posted by: Decaf at September 18, 2013 07:21 AM (2liBQ)
Seriously, the Rubicon was crossed a long time ago. No empire in the history of the world has ever recovered from this level of internal rot. EVER. It doesn't happen.
Newton is doing the driving now, not us. The trajectory is ballistic; maneuvering thrusters are out of fuel.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at September 18, 2013 07:21 AM (9MLX+)
>>>i loove how leadership has exempted themselves from the pain of it.
They're exempt from a lot of laws. OSHA and Equal Opportunity laws amongst them.
Posted by: Bigby's Shadow Puppet Hands at September 18, 2013 07:22 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at September 18, 2013 07:22 AM (l3vZN)
People won't feel the full effects until after the election anyways.
The longer it's actively in place, the harder it will be to repeal it.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 18, 2013 07:22 AM (SY2Kh)
"GOP leadershipÂ’s goal is to force conservatives like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas)..."
Almost implies that GOP leadership is anti-conservative...
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 11:20 AM (LSJmV)
ReWrite™ engaged for reality - El Partido Republicano Legado has no use for conservatives as their new bases are the elderly and the Mexicans.
Posted by: steveegg at September 18, 2013 07:22 AM (o44nj)
I'd much prefer that they abandon the whole delay position.
Implement it now, and implement it FULLY. As has been stated before, the only way to get rid of bad legislation is to enforce it mercilessly.
Let the sheeple get what they voted for. Let them get it long. Let them get it hard. Sometimes children have to get their hands burnt a little for them to grasp WHY they shouldn't touch the hot stove.
Freedom or Fire!
Posted by: Azenogoth at September 18, 2013 07:23 AM (/qzu7)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 18, 2013 11:16 AM (zF6Iw)
Note.... I am on Tricare.... and usually pay upfront for the entire year...
UHC would not take my year payment this time (option was not even available for paying online)... only for a quarter... because they said they did not know what Congress would do to the rates...
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 07:23 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: dananjcon at September 18, 2013 07:23 AM (wmU4G)
Posted by: Professor Peabody's Throwback Apparatus at September 18, 2013 07:23 AM (LNYzO)
We have defacto royalty now.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at September 18, 2013 07:24 AM (9MLX+)
Posted by: Jean at September 18, 2013 07:24 AM (CMlD4)
Newton is doing the driving now, not us. The trajectory is ballistic; maneuvering thrusters are out of fuel.
Posted by: Purp at September 18, 2013 11:21 AM (9MLX+)
If only Newton were in charge, then we could slow to terminal velocity. The rockets are going full steam...straight down.
Posted by: steveegg at September 18, 2013 07:24 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2013 07:24 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 11:20 AM (LSJmV)
-- Yea, I saw that too
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at September 18, 2013 07:24 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Josef K. at September 18, 2013 07:25 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: The MFM at September 18, 2013 07:25 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Y-not at September 18, 2013 07:27 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 18, 2013 07:27 AM (2fm0d)
The math is not conducive to Republicans in DC, period. But the vast amount of hate has been heaped on the House and I think Boehner is getting a little sick of it.
If he wants to be sick of something, it should be the gangsters auditing the groups giving his party money and time.
No, he's mad at the people who want to oppose them.
John Boehner is a drunken orange coward.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 18, 2013 07:28 AM (TpXEI)
Posted by: The MFM at September 18, 2013 11:25 AM (FcR7P)
But we swallow whole.
Posted by: Presstitute Organs at September 18, 2013 07:28 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 07:29 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: RWC at September 18, 2013 07:29 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Jean at September 18, 2013 07:29 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at September 18, 2013 07:29 AM (9MLX+)
We have defacto royalty now.
Posted by: Purp at September 18, 2013 11:24 AM (9MLX+)
I think of them as Mandarins.... you know... the 'educated class' who ran the empire of China... they had their own entrance exams... watched out for each others 'families'... and were able to over ride the will of the Emperor by using rules, and delays...
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 07:30 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Iblis at September 18, 2013 07:30 AM (9221z)
Posted by: Jean at September 18, 2013 07:30 AM (CMlD4)
I called Harry Reid. I told him about the two bills. I said we'll send the first over so they can vote it down, then afterward, we can send my original plan through.
I didn't say I'm terrified of a shutdown out loud, but somehow picked up on that.
Posted by: John Boehner at September 18, 2013 07:30 AM (TpXEI)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 07:30 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: RWC at September 18, 2013 11:29 AM (fWAjv)
Soooo.... if they are not deported... after SELF identifying as Illegal...
This country is done.
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 07:31 AM (lZBBB)
Implement it now, and implement it FULLY. As has been stated before, the only way to get rid of bad legislation is to enforce it mercilessly.
How?
Obama decided on a whim to ignore the law as written in Obamacare. What makes you think he won't ignore a new law telling him to stop ignoring the old law?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 18, 2013 07:32 AM (SY2Kh)
Seems we are, once again, shooting a little low.
One man without courage gets to hit the tanning booth and have a few highballs afterward.
Posted by: John Boehner at September 18, 2013 07:32 AM (TpXEI)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 18, 2013 11:28 AM (TpXEI)
**
Please retract immediately. The Drunken Orange Coward coalition is not or has ever been affiliated in any way with that weepy, rot gutted, weasel John Boehner.
Good Day Sir.
Posted by: Drunken Orange Coward Local 386 at September 18, 2013 07:32 AM (wmU4G)
Posted by: Jean at September 18, 2013 07:32 AM (CMlD4)
And we wonder why we've got Obama.
I gave her a couple regarding current events. One was about congresses power to tax and spend in light of the upcoming apocalypse next Tuesday (she wasn't excited about that) the other about congress's power to declare war but president's using military action without congressional approval. She chose that one. I mention Reagan bombing Libya so maybe Reagan will at least be mentioned in school.
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 18, 2013 07:32 AM (XUKZU)
Best case is a sharp/quick Soviet style collapse and reformation that leaves most core manufacturing infrastructure and public services intact.
However, the US cities strike me as a lot less disciplined and accustomed to general hardship than the Soviets were.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at September 18, 2013 07:32 AM (9MLX+)
Posted by: RWC at September 18, 2013 07:33 AM (fWAjv)
The math is not conducive to Republicans in DC, period. But the vast amount of hate has been heaped on the House and I think Boehner is getting a little sick of it.
Boehner deserves it.
Posted by: buzzion at September 18, 2013 07:33 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 18, 2013 07:34 AM (2ZmoT)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at September 18, 2013 07:34 AM (aDwsi)
Offer to deport the whole family as a unit.
Problem solved.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at September 18, 2013 07:34 AM (9MLX+)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now more than ever. at September 18, 2013 07:34 AM (VtjlW)
>>>'Seven illegal immigrants"
Which was based on Akira Kurosawa's "Seven Wetbacks" but this one is updated to reflect modern sensibilities and is in color.
Posted by: Bigby's Shadow Puppet Hands at September 18, 2013 07:35 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at September 18, 2013 07:35 AM (l3vZN)
Posted by: Decaf at September 18, 2013 07:35 AM (2liBQ)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 18, 2013 11:32 AM (SY2Kh)
The bill as written said the Sec of DHS could grant Waivers.... THAT part of the bill needs to be rescinded.
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 07:35 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: CDR M at September 18, 2013 07:35 AM (JSetw)
This country is done.
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 11:31 AM (lZBBB)
**
Seems to me like fish in a barrel for a young, ambitious ICE agent.
Or not.
Posted by: dananjcon at September 18, 2013 07:36 AM (wmU4G)
I'm for it. The Dems are mortgaged to the hilt on Obamacare, higher taxes, and Keystone. Let's get a Dem nose count on these matters. LIV voters are on the table - they are listening, and anytime Obamacare is mentioned, they twitch.
Posted by: mrp at September 18, 2013 07:37 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: CDR M at September 18, 2013 07:38 AM (Mv/2X)
Posted by: mrp at September 18, 2013 07:39 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 18, 2013 07:40 AM (g1DWB)
As a negotiator, John Boehner is like a drunken divorce telling you she's wearing her "fun" undies.
Everybody knows how this date is gonna end.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at September 18, 2013 07:42 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 18, 2013 11:32 AM
Shit, taking the radical and unprecedented tack of enforcing existing law would get Choom Boy's attention.
Of course, so would the resulting prison term for the treasonous shitweasel, but that's another story.
At least he'd have a minimum of 535 of his BFFs keeping him company in SuperMax if the "Nation of Laws" were to magically come back to life....
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 18, 2013 07:42 AM (kaGpp)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 07:42 AM (LSJmV)
Yes the media will trash you but FIGHT LIKE HELL!
Rinos be damned
Posted by: getonwithit at September 18, 2013 07:42 AM (MbeEN)
Posted by: Iblis at September 18, 2013 07:43 AM (9221z)
Posted by: @JohnTant at September 18, 2013 07:44 AM (hNNJ5)
Ohhhh..... kewl...
Seems that yesterday Obama 'waived' the legal prohibition for sending Arms to known terrorist groups in Syria!
Good Times!
The only thing worse than a Dictatorial President... is a Congress who writes laws that give him the power with no checks and balances....
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 07:44 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at September 18, 2013 07:45 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 18, 2013 11:40 AM
So-fucking-what?
No one held a gun to his head and demanded that he take his cushy gig in Congress, nor did any eeeeevil miscreants demand that he play footsie with Choom Boy, swill all that free lobbyist booze, take those free first-class jaunts on the gubmint dime, etc., etc., etc....
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 18, 2013 07:45 AM (kaGpp)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 18, 2013 11:32 AM (SY2Kh)
By that argument, the Rs should do nothing: no defunding, no shutdown, no parliamentary tricks, no surrender. Just sit, why act?
Posted by: KG[/i][/b] at September 18, 2013 07:45 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: Decaf at September 18, 2013 07:46 AM (2liBQ)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 07:46 AM (LSJmV)
Any urban moron should really consider a buying a cabin or small farm on the cheap, or at a minimum stashing a few things (like a change of clothes, critical medicine, copies of important documents) at a relative who lives in a small town. If not for the burning times - just regular disasters - like floods in Colorado.
Posted by: Jean at September 18, 2013 07:46 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Iblis at September 18, 2013 11:43 AM (9221z)
Congress has not power to grant either Immunity, nor Pardon...
As they are not the enforcement arm with the WAY abused idea of 'Prosecutorial Discretion'.
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 07:46 AM (lZBBB)
Note that House Republicans are not sick of lying POS Dems who haven't passed a budget in 4-5 years or the worst President in living memory who slanders them at every opportunity, usurps their Constitutional authority, etc. No, they are only too happy to be Obama's butt boys on Syria without knowing all the facts but when it comes to Senate conservatives, they hate, hate, hate.
The House leadership bully, threaten and remove conservatives from leadership in the House, make deals with Democrats to pass bills. They are beneath contempt. I won't vote for my GOP rep. who I worked to get elected in 2010. His conservative rating is 53% and he is now a proud member of No Labels. If he can't be successfully primaried, I will either stay home or vote Libertarian.
Ckuf the GOP.
Posted by: jeannebodine at September 18, 2013 07:46 AM (2LJqa)
Posted by: Havedash at September 18, 2013 07:47 AM (F0WNa)
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 11:35 AM (lZBBB)
Yes. In fact, that ought to be the ONLY thing debated or negotiated:
Obamacare for EVERYONE or NO ONE!
No waivers. No exemptions. No funding until everyone is included. And the beauty is that it's a simple declarative sentence:
"But what about a government shutdown?"
"Obamacare for EVERYONE or NO ONE."
"Children will starve!"
"Obamacare for EVERYONE or No ONE."
"You're racist!"
"Obamacare for EVERYONE or NO ONE!"
If that's what pisses people off the most about Barkycare, then jam it down the government's throat. EVERYONE or NO ONE!
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 18, 2013 07:47 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: RWC at September 18, 2013 07:48 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at September 18, 2013 07:48 AM (wmz48)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at September 18, 2013 07:48 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Self-Promoting Autistic Douchebag (Dedicated Blogger) at September 18, 2013 07:48 AM (4f/S/)
Posted by: Self-Promoting Autistic Douchebag (Dedicated Blogger) at September 18, 2013 07:49 AM (4f/S/)
Posted by: Self-Promoting Autistic Douchebag (Dedicated Blogger) at September 18, 2013 07:49 AM (4f/S/)
(Hollowpoint) 132: "How?"
My Protocol-Fu is weak on this one. But presumabley, the congress is able to impeach the AG for not prosecuting violation of law.
Or instead of defunding O-Care, how's about defunding HHS and the IRS (as mentioned by Iblis above) unless the law is carried out since these agencies are tasked with implementation?
"You want the welfare checks to go out on the first? Then you will do X, Y, and Z."
The GOP may not be able to get any actual legislation passed, but they can actually start to live up to their title of The Party of No". This may result in a few party invitations being withdrawn for the Gabe types who are concerned with what Frum et. al. says about them. But power that is not exercised, is power that is not existant.
Freedom or Fire!
Posted by: Azenogoth at September 18, 2013 07:49 AM (Kh+vp)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now more than ever. at September 18, 2013 07:49 AM (VtjlW)
As a negotiator, John Boehner is like a drunken divorce telling you she's wearing her "fun" undies.
Hmm. Do you happen to have an address where I might meet some of these charming ladies? Just for informational purposes, of course.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 18, 2013 07:49 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Fritz at September 18, 2013 07:50 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 18, 2013 07:50 AM (g1DWB)
Ckuf the GOP.
Posted by: jeannebodine at September 18, 2013 11:46 AM (2LJqa)
Did you forget you are at AoSHQ and can fucking say, "FUCK the GOP!" (or as I say, "Fuck El PRL!")?
Posted by: Presstitute Organs at September 18, 2013 07:50 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 18, 2013 11:47 AM (zF6Iw)
And its a very simple argument to make...
Because America, as a Republic, is based on the idea of Equality under the Law.
I've been saying for YEARS now, that the Republicans... a party started to defend the Republic... even named for that... should make the Application of the Written law an issue.
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 18, 2013 07:50 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Critical Gender Studies Graduate Student, with an emphasis is [CENSORED] at September 18, 2013 07:51 AM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now more than ever. at September 18, 2013 07:51 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 18, 2013 11:40 AM (g1DWB)
He's in a no win situation because he's demonstrated time and again that he's not interested in winning. He doesn't take a stand. He jumps up on Obama's lap like an idiot poodle on Syria. When he claims a "win" and cutting the budget by $50 billion, the reality is that it was only like $1 billion. He refuses to do his job as a representative on Amnesty because he's "just a facillitator." No asshole you're a rep take your position so your constituents can know what a worthless little weasel and coward you truly are.
He deserves ALL the hate piled on him.
Posted by: buzzion at September 18, 2013 07:51 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: Bigby's Shadow Puppet Hands at September 18, 2013 07:51 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Karl Rover at September 18, 2013 07:52 AM (XdnQT)
that House Republicans are not sick of lying POS Dems who haven't
passed a budget in 4-5 years or the worst President in living memory who
slanders them at every opportunity, usurps their Constitutional
authority, etc. No, they are only too happy to be Obama's butt boys on
Syria without knowing all the facts but when it comes to Senate
conservatives, they hate, hate, hate.
The House leadership bully,
threaten and remove conservatives from leadership in the House, make
deals with Democrats to pass bills. They are beneath contempt. I won't
vote for my GOP rep. who I worked to get elected in 2010. His
conservative rating is 53% and he is now a proud member of No Labels. If
he can't be successfully primaried, I will either stay home or vote
Libertarian.
Ckuf the GOP.
Posted by: jeannebodine at September 18, 2013 11:46 AM (2LJqa)
Total agreement! Preach it!
Posted by: Havedash at September 18, 2013 07:52 AM (F0WNa)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at September 18, 2013 07:53 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: @JohnTant at September 18, 2013 07:53 AM (hNNJ5)
It can't. But Obamacare is even more unpopular now than when it was passed. Obamacare is severely damaging the economy and it is a gross violation of individual rights. We need a constitutional conflict to make these matters clear and that makes this fight essential for the future of our country.
Posted by: mrp at September 18, 2013 07:53 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at September 18, 2013 07:53 AM (aDwsi)
Refuckulate the carbinator and transfer all power to the pedals of Barry's lady bike.
Ramming Ludicrous speed.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 18, 2013 11:27 AM (2fm0d)
Fixed.
Posted by: cajun caret at September 18, 2013 07:54 AM (UZQM8)
Posted by: President Skroob at September 18, 2013 07:55 AM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 07:55 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at September 18, 2013 07:55 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 18, 2013 07:56 AM (XdnQT)
181 We need to have a President-For-A-Day Contest, find the dumbest fucking no-speaky-Inglés illegal alien we can, and lavish him with praise, meals, and gifts for a day.
Posted by: Fritz at September 18, 2013 11:50 AM (UzPAd)
Um, like, I think we already did that. Except instead of a day, we accidentally made it for eight years.
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at September 18, 2013 07:57 AM (/lWM8)
44 defund and go home. if Obama and the Senate want to hold the Free Shit Army's and government "workers" checks hostage, GOD BLESS THEM. I can hold my breath longer than they can.
Me too.
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at September 18, 2013 07:58 AM (oDCMR)
For House and Senate races? AOSHQ commenters.
Posted by: artisanal 'ette
If nominated, I will not run. If elected, I will not serve.
But I will gladly accept any sexual favors thrown my way.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 18, 2013 07:58 AM (zF6Iw)
Yes, but we need to let the first one know his expendable. No really.
Posted by: Fritz at September 18, 2013 07:59 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: Sydney Leathers at September 18, 2013 08:00 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: RWC at September 18, 2013 08:01 AM (fWAjv)
97 Forgive me...no chance to read all of the comments, but many of those 40 repeal votes did overturn portions of the law move deck chairs around on the Titanic successfully.
fixt
Posted by: Anachronda at September 18, 2013 08:01 AM (xGZ+b)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 18, 2013 08:01 AM (g1DWB)
Obamacare is even more unpopular now than when it was passed.
Posted by: mrp
There is a tactical argument that if the can is kicked until Oct 1, people will start open enrollment and using the exchanges. Once voters are hit in the face with the jump in their healthcare costs, that will give the Reps momentum for an extended delay.
But Team Republican really just wants to push this issue out until after the next election.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at September 18, 2013 08:01 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Fritz at September 18, 2013 08:02 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 18, 2013 12:01 PM (g1DWB)
Because they totes wouldn't do that in any other situation right?
Posted by: buzzion at September 18, 2013 08:03 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: John Smith at September 18, 2013 08:04 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 18, 2013 08:05 AM (g1DWB)
OK, this is completely off topic, but we're past 200 comments:
A "modern" trailer for Monty Python and the Holy Grail:
http://tinyurl.com/qgc3f97
Maybe someone could forward this to Maet for the overnight thread?
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 18, 2013 08:06 AM (zF6Iw)
Who is Leslie Graham?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 18, 2013 08:08 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Ragamuffin at September 18, 2013 08:09 AM (fzFF6)
Doing nothing, IS doing something. The American public has never been very susceptible to reason, some lessons need to be learned the hard way.
Tell a little kid the stove burner is hot, and they're gonna touch it anyway. Lessons learned via pain have the longest retention period.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at September 18, 2013 08:09 AM (9MLX+)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 11:46 AM (LSJmV)
Moto: Grunt!
Posted by: joncelli of Triskelion at September 18, 2013 08:10 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Ragamuffin at September 18, 2013 08:10 AM (fzFF6)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 18, 2013 08:10 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at September 18, 2013 08:11 AM (l3vZN)
Here's my suggestion - implement it all NOW. I want every self-employed person in America to have to start shelling out 2-10K per year out-of-pocket for health care insurance, and every single other person who will incur extra out-of-pocket costs (and there will be plenty) to feel the pain NOW.
Having to shell out cash will cause a lot of reflexive democrats to actually examine their preferences. All that 'social responsibility' that Liberals love to display, like feathers on a peacock, but expect other people to pay for will evaporate like acetone on a griddle.
THEN we repeal & replace when we actually have the constituency.
Screw this defund bullshit, if it leaves the law on the books, it's not good enough.
Bring the pain.
Posted by: West at September 18, 2013 08:11 AM (1Rgee)
Someone beat him... (fixed)
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at September 18, 2013 08:11 AM (EGPJQ)
And he laughed his ass off when questioned about Iran having nukes. He may or may not have explained the "glowing Jooos are funny, Allahu Ackbar".
Posted by: Ian S. at September 18, 2013 08:12 AM (B/VB5)
Tell me if the roles were reversed that every Dem wouldn't be standing on their soapboxes shouting 'we don't have to go along with this shit'.
It's why such a high political value is placed on "bi-partisanship". Even if it's just one vote from the other side; presto, bipartisan.
Well, OCare ain't. So Rs are under absolutely no obligation to go along with it at any point, on any issue, at any time.
And since the public also hates this pos, it's the winning move. I think the leadership could advance this argument.
Posted by: GnuBreed at September 18, 2013 08:13 AM (wNF3N)
Doing nothing, IS doing something. The American public has never been very susceptible to reason, some lessons need to be learned the hard way.
Tell a little kid the stove burner is hot, and they're gonna touch it anyway. Lessons learned via pain have the longest retention period.
Posted by: Purp at September 18, 2013 12:09 PM (9MLX+)
A man learns something he can learn in no there way, when he holds a cat by the tail - Mark Twain
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 18, 2013 08:13 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: backhoe at September 18, 2013 08:15 AM (ULH4o)
People always feel a need to "do something" about bad shit. Doing nothing, IS doing something. The American public has never been very susceptible to reason, some lessons need to be learned the hard way.Tell a little kid the stove burner is hot, and they're gonna touch it anyway. Lessons learned via pain have the longest retention period.
Posted by: Purp at September 18, 2013 12:09 PM (9MLX+)
A man learns something he can learn in no other way, when he holds a cat by the tail - Mark Twain
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 18, 2013 12:13 PM (nTgAI)
Corrected - Dumbass
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 18, 2013 08:15 AM (nTgAI)
Neatly trimmed and maybe bedazzled is just fine with me.
Posted by: dananjcon at September 18, 2013 08:16 AM (wmU4G)
The people asked for this, they should get it good and hard. I'm down.
Unfortunately, a lot of us/our families are going to be the collateral damage. It's hard to watch your own kid suffer so other selfish scrunts can be taught a lesson (particuarly when there's no guarantee they're going to learn shit).
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, BFD, ZOMG, WTF, BBQ, QED at September 18, 2013 08:19 AM (/kI1Q)
You do know that they are going to cave, again. Right? Roll over, give up, quit, fail, etc.
The republican party's strategy appears to be that in order to win, they must surrender.
They do it over and over and over again.
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at September 18, 2013 08:20 AM (klGLB)
The biggest mistake Republicans made in 2010 was "delaying" the tax increases until after the 2012 election with that ridiculous extension. Had they said "either make the Bush tax cuts permanent or you're going to have to raise taxes" Obama would have been a one-term President.
Posted by: McAdams at September 18, 2013 08:20 AM (KsJrW)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at September 18, 2013 12:01 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: mrp at September 18, 2013 08:21 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 18, 2013 08:22 AM (gqgiP)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 18, 2013 08:24 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 18, 2013 12:22 PM (gqgiP)
I sense another twitter fight.
Posted by: buzzion at September 18, 2013 08:24 AM (LI48c)
...yeah, I know. The GOP we have is the worstest thing of all the things.
Posted by: Null at September 18, 2013 08:25 AM (FCv25)
No. No. No. If something is evil, the answer is not to watch others suffer from the effects, but to fight the source of the suffering. Within our constitutional framework, that means encouraging our representatives to engage in battle. If they don't have the right stuff, we replace those representatives with people who will.
Posted by: mrp at September 18, 2013 08:26 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: joncelli of Triskelion at September 18, 2013 08:28 AM (RD7QR)
Exactly how do Senate Rs, in the minority, kill the funding in the Senate?
I really want to know the answer to that question.
Posted by: prescient11 at September 18, 2013 08:29 AM (tVTLU)
I really want to know the answer to that question.
Posted by: prescient11 at September 18, 2013 12:29 PM (tVTLU)
The first step is to put Senate Dems in a position where they must vote up or down on defunding Obamacare. Call it a reconnaissance in force.
Posted by: mrp at September 18, 2013 08:32 AM (HjPtV)
-------------------------
I understand that sentiment, but ObamaCare is not going to be repealed with parliamentary tactics from the House, it's just going to have to collapse on its own. All we're doing is giving the people that put in place an escape.
We had an election over Obamacare, and a repeal has been voted for something like a dozen times. At some point, we need to change tactics because it's just not working. The people have to see it for themselves,
Posted by: McAdams at September 18, 2013 08:35 AM (KsJrW)
Here is the dirty little secret which no one seems to have told Boehner. The Republicans control the House which means the only way Obamacare gets funded is if Republicans in that body vote to fund it. They have 100% control over whether we are subjected to this thing and that is why the blame falls on them.
If the government shuts down then we get two things we want, less spending and no Obamacare. The Dems should have to come to us offering something to prevent that or they just keep getting the same bill back over and over again where they can choose funding everything else vs Obamacare. We have over a year before the next election. Does anyone see the Dems not caving well before then?
And can you even imagine the fun we could have calling up Dem Senators and lambasting them about how we are pissed our checks aren't coming because they insist on adding another program we can't afford and don't want?
Posted by: Thatch at September 18, 2013 08:35 AM (qYvEa)
Hey that's the GOP...
when the democrats are blowing their brains out to the point Ogabe is running from his own "win" be sure to add cover GOP...
BRILLIANT!
Defund it or fucking enforce it to the letter universally.
Posted by: sven10077 at September 18, 2013 08:36 AM (9jfyN)
Posted by: KG[/i][/b] at September 18, 2013 08:36 AM (p7BzH)
225 Seems that yesterday Obama 'waived' the legal prohibition for sending Arms to known terrorist groups in Syria!
And where is the outrage at this? This is simply illegal and it mocks the blood that was shed on 9/11 along with every drop shed on the battlefields since. I suppose weaping boner, crash mccain, and cheerleader graham have TFG's back on this, huh? Shucks, Issa may even get around to calling a hearing on this sometime in 2017.
Posted by: Havedash at September 18, 2013 08:37 AM (F0WNa)
Posted by: Cretin, not a Commie, never was/will be a Commie at September 18, 2013 08:37 AM (tfSla)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now more than ever. at September 18, 2013 08:37 AM (VtjlW)
I really want to know the answer to that question.
Magic happens. Do you not believe in the magical powers of hope and dreams? Have you no imagination?
Over and over the Tea Party types on this very website have assured us that if only we wish hard enough, those wishes will come true, math, logic, reason be damned. Those are for RINOs who don't want to believe.
But don't you worry. When (not if) this fails due to the Dems refusing to sign on, it'll be because the GOP Elite Establishment wouldn't take Peter Pan seriously. Or something.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 18, 2013 08:38 AM (SY2Kh)
The time for BS political games is past. Put up a vote on the record to repeal it and let the chips fall. Shut down the government until the vote is taken and if it passes, put it in force immediately with no exemptions, and let everyone know that any exemptions will be challenged in court.
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at September 18, 2013 08:40 AM (KuUy9)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at September 18, 2013 08:40 AM (9MLX+)
Posted by: Cretin, not a Commie, never was/will be a Commie at September 18, 2013 08:40 AM (tfSla)
All the parliamentary tricks in the world aren't going to achieve anything either. That soap box doesn't exactly fit you.
Posted by: KG[/i][/b] at September 18, 2013 08:40 AM (p7BzH)
It's time for the Senate to go on record.
The GOP fellatory wing up there needs to force a fucking fight and the donkey caucus needs on record as saying, "this shit sandwich is our gift to you America."
Posted by: sven10077 at September 18, 2013 08:41 AM (9jfyN)
And when House members were in their districts, they got an earload about Obamacare from their constituents. Boehner's announcement is a confirmation that the GOP caucus is becoming increasing militant about dealing with the issue.
Posted by: mrp at September 18, 2013 08:43 AM (HjPtV)
And so, the GOP officially accepts the mantle as "the defeatist party."
Imagine if Obama went into Syria and said, "We are going to strike hard. But make no mistake, we will surrender unconditionally at the first sign of opposition." That would never be acceptable. However, somehow it is now laudatory in the GOP leadership. Great.
Posted by: boone at September 18, 2013 08:43 AM (3p8HS)
I have the same basic problem with the "no delay" crowd that I have with the "no defund" crowd - the subsidies must be stopped by any means possible before the first checks go out the door. There's enough "pre-funding" (remember the "10 years of taxes to fund 6 years of benefits" line back in 2010?) to keep it from fiscally collapsing in the next 3 years, and once welfare begins, it takes a complete financial collapse to kill the welfare program.
Of course, El PRL is just fine with the welfare portion; after all, their predecessor the GOP gave us Medicare Part D. That's why they're not serious about either defunding or delaying PlaceboCare.
Posted by: steveegg at September 18, 2013 08:43 AM (o44nj)
And can you even imagine the fun we could have calling up Dem Senators and lambasting them about how we are pissed our checks aren't coming because they insist on adding another program we can't afford and don't want?
Posted by: Thatch at September 18, 2013 12:35 PM (qYvEa)
Whats that, an invite to tonights gala?! Consider your bill passed, good sir!
Posted by: our betters in congress at September 18, 2013 08:47 AM (FIDMq)
Ok, so why not just leave them there? Where are they going to go? They will get tired of it after awhile, but then they're chained to the fence.
Posted by: Lewis Prothero, the Voice of Reason at September 18, 2013 08:51 AM (JPPz1)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 18, 2013 08:56 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: toby928© at September 18, 2013 08:59 AM (QupBk)
Repeal.
Posted by: mrp at September 18, 2013 09:04 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Trevor (@TJexcite) at September 18, 2013 09:21 AM (a7NX9)
Trevor exactly. Hollowpoint, yep!
This is ridiculous. Perhaps I'm not understanding, but it looks like House GOP Est. just fucking caved.
Do they forget why they have the fucking majority in the House????
Posted by: prescient11 at September 18, 2013 09:35 AM (tVTLU)
Step 1: Break the budget up into 40-50 bills.
Step 2: Never let the "fund Obamacare" bill see the light of day.
Step 3: When the shutdown noise ramps up, point out who voted against the other 39 bills.
Posted by: cthulhu at September 18, 2013 09:49 AM (T1005)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 18, 2013 10:32 AM (Y92Nd)
And somehow the fact they overpromised and can't back it up is the House's fault? Boehner and Cantor are to blame for Lee and Cruz writing checks with their mouths that their butts can't cash?
Posted by: Adjoran at September 18, 2013 11:20 AM (473jB)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at September 18, 2013 10:26 PM (JUmsH)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4106 seconds, 400 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








First?
Posted by: Jimmy'sAttackRabbit at September 18, 2013 06:42 AM (xQwP1)