March 04, 2013
— Monty

Monday's DOOM post will be 2.3% shorter due to the budget cuts mandated by the sequester.
Arthur C. Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), wants your heart to bleed for the poor. This is a deeply misguided editorial, for one simple reason: "social engineering" public policy has proven to be terribly destructive to American society. Government policies tend to promote exactly the wrong behaviors in people. It's not "here's now you can help yourself", it's always "here's how the government or bureaucracy can help you". Government "help" produces dependence and apathy, not responsibility. Instruction without judgement is worthless. Religious instruction works to transmit ethics and values because there is an element of judgement and shame involved; public policy fails precisely because it tries hard to avoid any stigma or shame. The government treats being poor as a disaster that happens to a person, like a tornado or hurricane, and is thus amenable to a governmental "fix". Religious teaching, on the other hand, understands that poverty is equal parts luck, fate, and behavior: it cannot be "fixed". It is part of the human condition. What Brooks is advocating is therapy not for the poor, but for the people who want to feel better about themselves by "helping" the poor. Liberals have been doing this for decades, and now Brooks wants the GOP to start doing it as well.
His Majesty the King has proclaimed a "recovery" every quarter for his entire Presidency so far. So how is the "recovery" going so far? Well, last quarter we grew at a blazing 0.1% percent. Forward!
His Majesty the King Barack Hussein Obama disdains the mundane reality around him, and wishes his humble subjects could catch a glimpse of the rarified universe that he himself inhabits.
The next step in His Majesty's plan to "raise revenue": abolishing the tax exemption for contributing to 401(k) savings plans. Note the way the government thinks of this: it's not more of your money that you're keeping for yourself; it's money you're taking away from the government. That's really how they see it -- money you don't pay in tax is revenue they lose. Your money belongs to them; they simply allow you to keep a certain percentage of it. This is how the American government sees the individual taxpaying citizen.
Being master of your own destiny: out. Being a servant to a self-selected group of elites: in. It's hard to feel too badly for these newly-minted serfs, however -- they voted for their overlords, so they're only getting what they asked for.
Speaking of the Democrat fiefdom of California, Governor Moonbeam's "balanced budget" is every bit the bad joke I assumed it was. I'm amazed at how long states like California and Illinois can keep the plates spinning by deceptive accounting, budgetary tricks, and a mostly-inert legistlature. (And like his Democrat colleage Barack Obama, Jerry Brown benefits from a liberal-dominated press that has long since devolved into a Democrat propaganda organ.)
The true national debt isn't $16 trillion, as ghastly as that number is. The real federal debt is closer to $32 trillion. And that number doesn't include the huge load of state, county, and municipal debt, which could double that number.
Lots of parents are shorting their own retirement funds in order to send Junior to college, and in many cases that college degree is a waste of money.
Woonsocket, RI is the latest city to face bankruptcy due to public-employee pension and healthcare costs.
Is employment a "human right"? Answer: no. Employment is a side-effect of industry, not the purpose of it. You have the right to labor all you please, either on your own behalf or on someone else's. But you don't have the natural right to be paid for that labor. Your labor is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it.
In Europe, public demonstrations against "austerity" have sprung up in both Italy and Portugal. Seems like every time the Euro-crats declare the crisis over, a new wildfire blazes to life.
The sexual revolution continues to wreak havoc on the lives of Boomers and their children. The Baby Boom generation has gotten divorced at a prodigious rate, and one of the side-effects of that inability to make marriage work is that Boomers now have to sustain two households going into retirement. And that's on top of having insufficient retirement funds saved to begin with.

Posted by: Monty at
04:11 AM
| Comments (179)
Post contains 748 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at March 04, 2013 04:15 AM (UrENZ)
Monty, you say that like it's a bad thing.
I prefer to think of it in another, more positive way.
Payback is a bitch!
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 04, 2013 04:21 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: beach monday at March 04, 2013 04:23 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: blaster at March 04, 2013 04:24 AM (/1U3u)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at March 04, 2013 04:25 AM (nZvGM)
Being poor almost always comes from making stupid choices in life. The quickest way to get poor is get pregnant, drop out of High School and have a baby subsidized by welfare.
Same thing for guys except they participate in the baby then leave.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 04:26 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at March 04, 2013 04:26 AM (r2PLg)
If you can't afford that, silver, ammo, beans, and a camper.
Posted by: blaster at March 04, 2013 08:24 AM (/1U3u)
--- Why Idaho?
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at March 04, 2013 04:26 AM (R8hU8)
SOUTH BEND – The former head of the St. Joseph County Democratic Party, accused of forging hundreds of signatures on election petitions, was scheduled to appear in court Monday morning.
Butch Morgan is accused in the forging of signatures on petitions to help land Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on the Indiana primary ballots in 2008.
In 2011, our partners at the South Bend Tribune reported that without the suspected fake signatures, it's likely Obama and possibly Clinton would not have had enough signatures to be on the state primary ballot.
Three other former party workers are also accused in the case.
Morgan's court hearing was set for 10 a.m.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at March 04, 2013 04:26 AM (UrENZ)
Posted by: beach monday at March 04, 2013 04:26 AM (XYSwB)
Back in the day, they would have married some guy who worked at a mill, and stayed home fucking around all day. I know some of them too, my age now. They seem kinda stupid because they never worked, but least they didn't cost the rest of us so much.
Posted by: Jeanne of the North at March 04, 2013 04:26 AM (IzynC)
Posted by: VIA, on the tiny keyboard at March 04, 2013 04:27 AM (eAGfX)
My checks from Preznit Obama come every month, and if a white devil was in the White House, I would be workin' my ass off for minimum wage instead of educating poor citizens about their right to welfare and stuff.
Posted by: Peggy Joseph at March 04, 2013 04:27 AM (ndqJC)
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 04:28 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Jeanne of the North at March 04, 2013 04:29 AM (IzynC)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 04, 2013 04:29 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 04, 2013 04:30 AM (2tt1J)
Posted by: beach monday at March 04, 2013 04:31 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at March 04, 2013 04:32 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: Clemenza at March 04, 2013 04:33 AM (x59Gv)
But if I had to say one generation being bad it would be the one coming up now. They have grown up completely under a system that rewards not working and sitting at home on your ass.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 04:33 AM (53z96)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at March 04, 2013 04:36 AM (XvrTA)
The beauty is that you improve the lives of the poor and vulnerable by following those principals we all follow.
Conservative - or classically liberal - ideology lifts everyone up. We need to blame the failures of liberalism for the social welfare state and it's myriad of disasters.
That is his point.
Posted by: Car in at March 04, 2013 04:36 AM (YwCHA)
Illinois actually has IOUs out on some of its bills. But I guess not being able to pay your bills doesn't matter any more as long as important issues like gay marriage and licenses for illegals is taken care of.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 04, 2013 04:39 AM (1Jaio)
2,000+ Mine Resistant vehicles backfitted for DHS use.
What could go wrong?
http://preview.tinyurl.com/c6jgafp
What used to be tin foil territory is becoming commonplace topics of discussion.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 04, 2013 04:39 AM (RCPzx)
Posted by: beach monday at March 04, 2013 04:39 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 04, 2013 04:40 AM (yJ2ax)
Posted by: MountainTurtle at March 04, 2013 04:40 AM (eZJHk)
That's his plan.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 04, 2013 04:40 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: somejoe at March 04, 2013 04:41 AM (SSWdi)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at March 04, 2013 04:42 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Monty at March 04, 2013 04:43 AM (G8OwX)
23
I single out the BOOMERS with me included
The 80's-90's...did you ever see a generation so clearly out of their collective FUCKING MINDS?
S&L's anyone?....Ooohh...."housing boom-boom baby"...LOTS O' COKE!!!
Posted by: Richard at March 04, 2013 04:44 AM (vOFmE)
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at March 04, 2013 04:44 AM (msygv)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 04, 2013 04:46 AM (yJ2ax)
3116 Vic,
Uh yeah Vic because a lot of folks were taught not to marry in the first place.
Men are foregoing marriage because 80% of divorces are initiated by women and men pay dearly for the divorce that they don't want in the first place. Please don't take offense, 'ettes. I wrote a book and courtship and marriage and the 80% number is accurate. Divorce became easier for woman because of subsidized daycare.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at March 04, 2013 04:48 AM (UrENZ)
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 08:26 AM (53z96)
This is also a topic I debate often. The roots of this are deeper than they appear, but they begin with World War II.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 04:48 AM (bb5+k)
No question in my mind that the path to success for the republicans is to embrace the FSA principles and offer more "stuff".
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 04, 2013 04:49 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: An Observation at March 04, 2013 04:49 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 04, 2013 04:49 AM (GVxQo)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 04, 2013 04:51 AM (yJ2ax)
Please don't leave out the FEMANAZI screws turned inplace since the 70's.
Remember they did so love burning those bras....carbon fall-out was to be expected.....just who inhaled is the question.....
Posted by: Richard at March 04, 2013 04:53 AM (vOFmE)
Posted by: Crispy Chris Christie at March 04, 2013 04:54 AM (AjnrJ)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 04, 2013 04:54 AM (GVxQo)
Posted by: a mindful webworker at March 04, 2013 04:55 AM (ma3QC)
Posted by: Jeanne of the North at March 04, 2013 08:29 AM (IzynC)
Not just World War II, but it kicked off the familial destruction.
My theory is that because it took so many men out of circulation, the remaining women had to loosen their morals to compete for the remaining eligible men. It became a buyers market for the men. As a result, culture shifted, and not in a good way.
At approximately the same time, Penicillin was developed, and it and other subsequent drugs were able to kill what had been up to then, deadly venereal diseases, thus reducing the anxiety even more regarding pre-marital sex.
The Third hit, was the development of the Birth Control Pill (research funded by the Rockefellers, and their fear of a human population bomb.)
Make men scare, eliminate/reduce fear of disease, eliminate/reduce fear of pregnancy, what would you have expected to happen.
The Sexual revolution came thereafter, because a lot of forces were steering towards it.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 04:55 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: An Observation at March 04, 2013 08:49 AM (ylhEn)
They didn't pull us out of the Great Depression. They voted for FDR, 4 fucking times. Then came home from the war and seeded the baby boomers. Not exactly a winning record
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 04, 2013 04:55 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 04:56 AM (9Bj8R)
but at least they are all equally mediocre!
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 04, 2013 04:56 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 04:57 AM (9Bj8R)
Good morning, all! Or DOOMy morning, if you will.
Cali Morons, I beg you -- please move somewhere that's better for your mental, physical, and above all economic health. They don't deserve you out there!
PS - I'm so disappoitned to see I missed an ENTIRE erg bashing thread.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 04, 2013 04:57 AM (4df7R)
But if I had to say one generation being bad it would be the one coming up now. They have grown up completely under a system that rewards not working and sitting at home on your ass.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 08:33 AM (53z96)
This is an artificial/unnatural condition which nature is about to rectify. I would step back in the interim.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 04:57 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Monty at March 04, 2013 04:58 AM (G8OwX)
Posted by: rickl at March 04, 2013 04:58 AM (sdi6R)
Sat next to a guy at a Wedding who would not shut the fuck up about organic food and longer life. A) like a give a shit B) he'll probably get hit by a truck crossing the street on his way to buy organic rhubarb.
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 08:56 AM (9Bj8R)
FIFY
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 04, 2013 04:59 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 08:57 AM (9Bj8R)
Only because they had not yet established the massive FSA. LBJ did that. It wasn't boomers who set up this massive fail. It was liberals from the WWII generation like LBJ.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 05:00 AM (53z96)
Female kicker tries out at NFL combine, fails miserably:
http://tinyurl.com/c7ewk2g
Be sure to check out the video. Why does the NFL pull this shit, anyway? PC madness gone to extreme levels....
Posted by: Tex Lovera at March 04, 2013 05:02 AM (wtvvX)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 04, 2013 05:02 AM (yJ2ax)
But if I had to say one generation being bad it
would be the one coming up now. They have grown up completely under a
system that rewards not working and sitting at home on your ass.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 08:33 AM (53z96)
I actually have hope for the upcoming generation. No thanks to the schools they attend or their often-as-not absent parents, but for the simple fact that it always falls on a later generation to mend the faults of the previous generations. The children today -- not the teenagers, but the younger children -- are going to grow up in a world that's a lot less indulgent than even their older siblings knew. This is a fact; math can't be denied. They're going to be forced, in one way or another, to grow up DOING something. It's a pity they'll have their own family to blame for making the world of their adulthood such a rat hole.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 04, 2013 05:03 AM (4df7R)
Some people view the glass as half empty........
After Nov. 6th 2012, I view the personal bunker as half empty,
yet filling fast....
Posted by: Richard at March 04, 2013 05:03 AM (vOFmE)
Posted by: Monty at March 04, 2013 08:43 AM (G8OwX)
I noted some of the other forces at work in creating the conditions which the boomers faced.
The Effect of government welfare also should not be understated.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:03 AM (bb5+k)
" Religious teaching, on the other hand, understands that poverty is equal parts luck, fate, and behavior"
*******
I must take exception to this sentence. In essence this states that being poor is 2/3 random (luck and fate) and 1/3 behavior. I would say that although individual circumstances may vary, the proportion is more likely in the range of 70-85% behavior (including conscious choice) and the remainder luck (or circumstances beyond one's control).
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 04, 2013 05:03 AM (qqZuQ)
Posted by: Tex Lovera at March 04, 2013 05:04 AM (wtvvX)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at March 04, 2013 05:04 AM (XvrTA)
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at March 04, 2013 05:04 AM (msygv)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 05:04 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 08:48 AM (bb5+k)
It started after WWI. More so in Europe than America. They lost 3 monarchies and got the commies in Russia. But the Roaring 20s was when a lot attitudes started to change then came the Depression and people looked to saviors to get them out of it. People really bought into socialism, communism and fascism. We were saddled with FDR for 12 years. WWII just accelerated what started at the end of WWI. So thank you very much Gavrilo Princip
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 04, 2013 05:05 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: EC at March 04, 2013 05:05 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at March 04, 2013 05:05 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 09:03 AM (bb5+k)
Yep, you can follow the collapse of black families with the advent of LBJ's great society beginning in the mid 60s. It is collapsing white society now as well.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 05:05 AM (53z96)
Posted by: beach monday at March 04, 2013 05:08 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 04, 2013 05:09 AM (Sptt8)
That is also probably due to the Great Society. You could get more free goodies if you did not have a "man" in the house.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 05:09 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 04, 2013 09:03 AM (qqZuQ)
I second that. MOST of the problem with being poor is that of attitude and habits.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:09 AM (bb5+k)
OOOOH!!! SHINY OBJECTS!!!!
Make 'em do their math on a blackboard and draw their fucking graphs by hand, dammit...
Posted by: Tex Lovera at March 04, 2013 05:10 AM (wtvvX)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 04, 2013 05:10 AM (Eg4wq)
I just read the linked WSJ article and it makes me wonder, why doesn't the GOP simply state Obama's position - that he believes in the theory that continual spending is good for the economy and then destroy that notion that it is naïve and historically proven wrong every time its tried. Why are we insisting on copying Europe's mistakes? The GOP acts so stunned that Obama says such stupid and outrageous things, that they don't know how to act. They need to declown the clown.
Posted by: Liberty Lover at March 04, 2013 05:10 AM (eQ4W/)
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 09:05 AM (53z96)
If LBJ was still alive I'd be mimicking the leftists and demanding he be brought up on charges of genocide for what his policies have done to the black family in America today, and by extension ALL families. He should be forced to wander the world in chains like Jacob Marley, seeking atonement for the misery he helped create in life.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 04, 2013 05:10 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at March 04, 2013 05:11 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: beach monday at March 04, 2013 05:11 AM (XYSwB)
You would think that the logical person would have made a fairly quick mental jump connecting the flaming chaos in the EU with very similar trends that were tracking in the US......alas...the low information voter ruled the day and Darwin gets to check off another box.....
yup!
Posted by: Richard at March 04, 2013 05:12 AM (vOFmE)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 05:12 AM (9Bj8R)
They didn't pull us out of the Great Depression. They voted for FDR, 4 fucking times. Then came home from the war and seeded the baby boomers. Not exactly a winning record
Uh - the WW II generation was too young to have voted for FDR four times. Their presidents were Truman - Eisenhower, Kennedy etc. Those were all dream presidents compared to what we have now.
The collapse of parenting started with the WWII generation and has continued ever since.
Posted by: An Observation at March 04, 2013 05:13 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 05:13 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 04, 2013 05:13 AM (Sptt8)
It started after WWI. More so in Europe than America. They lost 3 monarchies and got the commies in Russia. But the Roaring 20s was when a lot attitudes started to change then came the Depression and people looked to saviors to get them out of it. People really bought into socialism, communism and fascism. We were saddled with FDR for 12 years. WWII just accelerated what started at the end of WWI. So thank you very much Gavrilo Princip
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 04, 2013 09:05 AM (1Jaio)
I argue that much of what we are seeing is the result of societal and demographic forces which were unavoidable for any technologically developing people. The Industrial revolution produced greater prosperity than before. My observation is that debauchery/insanity always seem to be linked to money/prosperity.
Note that the richest parts of the nation are always the most Liberal/Insane. Money allows people to be foolish, and let's face it, discipline is not as much fun as foolishness. People have a built in desire to be foolish, and when they get enough money to make them feel secure, they let their inner fool out.
According to "Leftism Revisited" the French Revolution was instigated primarily by the wives and children of the wealthy French Aristocracy. (Probably because they were bored, and really had no clue about the social realities of their situation.)
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:14 AM (bb5+k)
On ABC's This Week, re: Gov. Christie and CPAC:
"CPAC, to me, has totally diminished its credibility as an organization. ... And you invite Sarah Palin, who wasn't competent enough to keep a Fox News contract? But she's invited to CPAC meeting?"
Matthew Dowd, the former strategist for President George W. Bush via NPR
Strategist, you guys.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 04, 2013 05:14 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 09:12 AM (9Bj8R)
There are no Jooooos, this is true. But I wonder if the poor remaining Coptics might fill that niche at this particular point in time.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 04, 2013 05:15 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 05:15 AM (9Bj8R)
Idaho is part of the "American Redoubt"...not to be confused with the "Southern Redoubt" or the "Texas Redoubt".
Posted by: Country Singer at March 04, 2013 05:15 AM (L8r/r)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at March 04, 2013 05:15 AM (Ec6wH)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 05:16 AM (9Bj8R)
Confiscation of the assets and replacement with government bonds.
Ask the Argentines about how that works.
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at March 04, 2013 05:16 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: beach monday at March 04, 2013 05:16 AM (XYSwB)
Best insight to generational ebb & flow - 'The Fourth Turning' by Strauss and Howe. Written in the early 90's, it actually predicts most of what you're seeing today. We're in a Fourth Turning right now. Spoiler Alert: It doesn't end well. Conservative values will make a very strong return - once enough of us die. Sure. It's easy to blame the boomers - my parents generation. As generations go, they're positively fucktarded and we'll all pay the price for it. (Note: Generations are NOT 'individuals.' Not all individuals match the characteristics of their generational/behavioral archetype.) But they - like all 3rd turnings that set up 4th turnings - are not the first and won't be the last 'irresponsible' generation. They too, are just a product of these historical cycles - as predictable as the sun, and the authors do a wonderful job tracing those cycles back for over 600 years. Highly recommended if you really want to understand 'why?' all of this is happening and where it's likely to lead. Also recommended by the same authors: 'Generations' and for Gen Xer's - 'The 13th Gen'.
PS - LBJ was a Silent Generation President. Not 'Greatest' not 'Boomer' - the one in between that everyone forgets. (Born 1925-1945)
Posted by: JQP at March 04, 2013 05:18 AM (GVL0g)
Posted by: and irresolute at March 04, 2013 05:18 AM (DBH1h)
Posted by: joncelli, dodging the Zombies of Sequester at March 04, 2013 05:18 AM (RD7QR)
Yep, you can follow the collapse of black families with the advent of LBJ's great society beginning in the mid 60s. It is collapsing white society now as well.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 09:05 AM (53z96)
This is also a topic I argue often. I am convinced that LBJ created the "Great Society" programs as a political "fuck you" to the Republicans who supported the 24th amendment.
LBJ was a Racist Southern Democrat. He didn't give a shit about black people. He saw the newly enacted 24th amendment (supported and advanced primarily by Republicans) as an attempt to dis-empower Democrats. He responded by bribing the newly created voters with government money, and he captured that Demographic which the Republicans were trying to get their hands on.
Kind of a "If you can't beat em, Join em" tactic. Blacks have been voting Democrat ever since. (Supposedly LBJ said that was his intention.)
That it would eventually wreck the country was something of which I don't think he could conceive.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:18 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 05:19 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 04, 2013 05:19 AM (GVxQo)
91
Are we then the result of the Hippie/Yippie generation?
We may never truely know because LSD was cocktail of the classes back then.
Posted by: Richard at March 04, 2013 05:19 AM (vOFmE)
Posted by: beach monday at March 04, 2013 05:20 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 09:16 AM (9Bj8R)
Hell yes they would. The only problem is, where would they go?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 04, 2013 05:20 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Liberty Lover at March 04, 2013 09:10 AM (eQ4W/)
This proposition requires that we have access to the Television broadcasting system. We do not. The other side controls it completely, and they will not allow anything which effectively counters their arguments, to be broadcast.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:20 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: t-bird at March 04, 2013 05:20 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 05:21 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 04, 2013 05:21 AM (yJ2ax)
SEVERAL MORE BABIES POP UP, and the frames multiply.
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet at March 04, 2013 09:11 AM (feFL6)
"Idiocracy" was a documentary.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:21 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 05:22 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 04, 2013 05:23 AM (Sptt8)
Posted by: An Observation at March 04, 2013 05:23 AM (ylhEn)
Is employment a "human right"? Answer: no. Employment is a side-effect of industry, not the purpose of it. You have the right to labor all you please, either on your own behalf or on someone else's. But you don't have the natural right to be paid for that labor. Your labor is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it.
There's some confusion here by the libs. Or perhaps "positive rights creep." The right to employment (to the extent that any would exist) is largely negative. (Again, to the extent that any exists at all.)
But Libs tend to engage in confusion between these distinctions so that all rights become positive rights. It's moronic.
It's also strange. Monty points out the right to labor, and I agree, I'd go farther and point out that you have a right to take this labor to market (with only a few restrictions, it's not an absolute right, but those restrictions are a different discussion for a different day.) Yet this government seems hell bent on limiting the ability of people to bring their labor to market to see what it's worth (see: Gibson Guitars, oil drilling, myriad other things.) So there's this strange contradiction between the supposed (and fake) right to "employment" (which is really more of a claim to a right of income frankly) and the interference on the already existing (but now) ignored negative rights of market.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 04, 2013 05:24 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Jenny tries too hard and also hates her phone at March 04, 2013 05:24 AM (aZHrU)
about the "family" thing...that is probably the best safeguard against "poverty" and a resumption of the "clan" system will protect good people.
All of this has happened before, and all of it will happen again and again and again
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 04, 2013 05:24 AM (LRFds)
80 Meanwhile it seems locusts are descending upon the land of Egypt.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 04, 2013 09:10 AM (Eg4wq)
Is it wrong that I laughed when I saw the headline at Drudge?
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 04, 2013 05:24 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: zsasz at March 04, 2013 05:24 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at March 04, 2013 05:24 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Irony Importers Inc. at March 04, 2013 05:25 AM (i5xnd)
Posted by: lowandslow at March 04, 2013 05:26 AM (7Nq2G)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 05:26 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 08:33 AM (53z96)
I'm 32. I completely agree. As a whole, my generation hasn't had to struggle. At all. Because we've never met any obstacles, we expect life to continue to operate without obstacles.
If you didn't choose to serve before or after getting a degree in a marketable field, you've never had hard decisions, you've never had to choose need versus want.
Now we're having to choose, and we're very very pissed off. Of course, 'pissed off' in this case does NOT mean 'working to change my circumstances.'
A good friend summed it up perfectly for me when I was moaning about how rough my lif was at a certain point. "You're either miserable enough to change things - in which case, make new decisions - or you aren't. In that case, stop calling me to complain."
If you're unhappy with where life has taken you, MAKE NEW CHOICES.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 04, 2013 05:27 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: zsasz at March 04, 2013 09:24 AM (MMC8r)
*clearing throat* My personal soapbox issue, so if you'll excuse me...
*climbs on soapbox*
*lifts megaphone*
DISBAND AND DISMANTLE ALL UNIONS!
Thank you.
*hops down*
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 04, 2013 05:27 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 09:13 AM (53z96)
Dare I say that the Abolitionists were the first progressives? Once it was demonstrated that they could move Society by pulling the levers of Government, they subsequently used these levers to enact all sorts of other government mandates such as Child labor laws, Alcohol Prohibition, Women Suffrage, Minority population control (Margret Sanger) , etc.
This is my recollection of the historical period between 1868 and 1930.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:27 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 04, 2013 05:27 AM (Sptt8)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 04, 2013 05:27 AM (GVxQo)
or conversely don't and lie back and enjoy the movie with green meadows and butterflies...
http://youtu.be/edQNjJZFdLU
"Positive rights it's people, PEOPLE!"
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 04, 2013 05:27 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at March 04, 2013 05:27 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 04, 2013 05:28 AM (Eg4wq)
Sweet mother of meteors, we're boned.
Yep, and just in time for Monday. G'mornin', jackwagons.
SNAFU.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at March 04, 2013 05:28 AM (+z4pE)
There were several flavors of abolitionists...I'd say yes the radicals largely a new England phenomena by the way were weaponized into the Secular Evangelists we see today...
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 04, 2013 05:28 AM (LRFds)
Poppin' Fresh thinks Charles Ingalls is a badass capitalist...
and Crowder....
where to begin?
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 04, 2013 05:30 AM (LRFds)
Brain implants 1/100th width of a hair, 1,000 miles apart by computer. Train to control thoughts, actions.
The article sees future use as cloud sourcing to use aggregate of intelligence to solve problems.
Uh......
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 04, 2013 09:13 AM (Sptt
There was a science fiction book (Oath of Fealty) written by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle which details a similar electronic based telepathy system, but for humans. I suspect that in the future, we will have something similar to a telepathy system.
Direct brain to brain interface through electronic telepathy.
WE ARE THE BORG.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:31 AM (bb5+k)
Oops - just checked - Carter and GHW Bush were the only Silent Gen presidents. LBJ was the first to articulate Silent Gen values - 'The Great Society', etc... Silent's elected him.
Posted by: JQP at March 04, 2013 05:31 AM (GVL0g)
Posted by: a mindful webworker at March 04, 2013 05:32 AM (rf20m)
Pam Geller dis'd by CPAC.....because
arrows shot from atop the north tower.......using nothing but pig-pistons with elbow grease......and pudding.........and maybe hobo BVD's with the crotch cut out..for extra slingyness and arch....
Posted by: Richard at March 04, 2013 05:33 AM (vOFmE)
Posted by: eman at March 04, 2013 05:34 AM (dZnxf)
General knowledge pop quiz:
If someone in India is refering to a hand tool and says it is a "Brass Tomy", what are they talking about?
Posted by: jwest at March 04, 2013 05:34 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 09:16 AM (9Bj8R)
Absolutely, but where can they go, and how? I feel sorry for them, but I regard their situation as hopeless. The Islamists will not be content until they are all dead or converted.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:34 AM (bb5+k)
Confiscation of the assets and replacement with government bonds.
Ask the Argentines about how that works.
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at March 04, 2013 09:16 AM (wR+pz)
Yeah, I wouldn't count too hard on any of that paper money you might have in an account somewhere. I'm trying very hard to get to a point where I don't need money at all.
I know of other people who have accomplished this, and I know it can be done.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:35 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: eman at March 04, 2013 09:34 AM (dZnxf)
IIRC IQ is fitted to a normalized bell curve. (The target for 110, which is average) actually moves to fit that curve.
So statistically this actually follows.
But IQ also correlates horribly with just about everything, it's largely a meaningless statistic frankly. (Except maybe at the edge cases, but more so for lower IQ than higher I suspect.)
You could be slightly below "normal" but dedicated, hard working, and reasonably good with your hands, and do far better than a "Special snowflake" just above normal (so mirroring you) who doesn't put effort into anything.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 04, 2013 05:37 AM (GaqMa)
Hell Israel I guess. The can hang out in Haifa with the Baihi
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 09:22 AM (9Bj8R)
That might actually be a viable solution, but there are both logistical and governmental problems with adopting that solution. Israel could surely use the extra non-islamic population, but could they assimilate them and would Egypt let them go?
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:40 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: eman at March 04, 2013 05:42 AM (dZnxf)
families with the advent of LBJ's great society beginning in the mid
60s. It is collapsing white society now as well.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 09:05 AM (53z96)
Vic is right on here. The Boomers had nothing to do with FDR and LBJ. I personally saw the destruction LBJ's programs had on Black families in the South.
The cliff notes version? It became a better economic decision for them NOT to work and than work. They got paid for bad behavior, illegitimate children, and they got penalized for good behavior.
Guess what? Less than 30% of Black children are now born with a father in the home.
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at March 04, 2013 05:42 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: An Observation at March 04, 2013 09:23 AM (ylhEn)
That, and we created two laws that eliminated some of the obstructions to idiots voting. The 24th amendment made it possible to vote even if you paid no taxes at all. (A serious break from previous practice.) The 26th amendment made it possible for 18 year olds to vote. People learn a lot of wisdom between 18 and 21, so this was very detrimental to common sense in government.
18 year olds are still full of foolish ideas because they haven't had a chance to live in the real world yet.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 05:44 AM (bb5+k)
I know of other people who have accomplished this, and I know it can be done.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 09:35 AM (bb5+k)
It's not the money, it's the socialism. Taking the stocks basically made the government majority owners in lots of companies.
They still could not stop some of the News papers down there, so guess what? The government took over the news print company and refused to sell the papers, paper to print on.
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at March 04, 2013 05:45 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: a mindful webworker at March 04, 2013 05:56 AM (wPzgV)
If you have half a brain, as you go through what is left of Marlin, you cannot help but realize of how it got to where it is. What tore it down is the same affliction that will surely tear us all down.
Posted by: Artruen at March 04, 2013 05:57 AM (fDGF1)
Posted by: Wendy at March 04, 2013 06:09 AM (KydDZ)
This is a huge comet moving very fast - if it hits Mars it will impact with the energy of about 20 Billion Megatons - 20 Billion one megaton hydrogen bombs. Most likely it would penetrate down to the Martian magma creating something like the Siberian Traps lava flows, and releasing a huge amount of CO2 into the Martian atmosphere.
On Earth such an impact would be more than an extinction level event - it would approach a sterilizing level impact.
SMOD date for Mars Oct 19, 2014
http://tinyurl.com/ch4u2qc
Posted by: An Observation at March 04, 2013 06:10 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2013 09:22 AM (9Bj8R)
That might actually be a viable solution, but there are both logistical and governmental problems with adopting that solution. Israel could surely use the extra non-islamic population, but could they assimilate them and would Egypt let them go?
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2013 09:40 AM (bb5+k)
Copts are estimated to be around 10% of Egypt's population, which would mean there are about as many of them as the entire population of Israel. And Israel has enough problems with providing adequate housing for its growing population, thanks in part to criticism from the "international community" any time someone tries to build homes for Jews in Judea or Samaria.
On the other hand, it would make sense to transfer Syria's Christian population (estimated also to be around 10%, of a much smaller total) to Lebanon and transfer Lebanon's Muslim population to Syria, but of course this would never happen.
Posted by: DKCZ at March 04, 2013 06:18 AM (9/bcB)
Originally, it was purely a brain to computer interface. It appeared in a series of short in the same universe as the later 'Oath of Fealty.' Most of them are in the collection 'High Justice' or packaged with the novella 'Exiles to Glory.' Whether this becomes the CoDominium/Mote universe depends on what mood you catch Jerry in. ('Exile and Glory' can be read online at Baen.com.)
When Jerry first used the interface implant in a story, e-mail was still a very new concept and the number of users in the whole world could be measured in the hundreds at most. By the time of 'Oath of Fealty' the idea that computers would be useful for communications between people had become more commonplace. A decade can bring a lot of change.
Posted by: epobirs at March 04, 2013 06:21 AM (/qEpG)
If it is mostly dirty ice it could be beneficial to any future colonists. Purposely guiding comets into Mars has beenproposed as a stage in terraforming.
Posted by: epobirs at March 04, 2013 06:25 AM (/qEpG)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at March 04, 2013 06:25 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2013 09:13 AM (53z96)
No, it didn't. 'Progressivism' did not originally equate to 'socialism' although socialists call themselves 'progressives nowadays because of the stigma associated with gulags and death camps. Teddy Roosevelt, for example, considered himself a progressive and I don't think anyone could pin the socialist tag on him. Progressives in the early Twentieth Century believed in social progress along with economic progress, plain and simple. Some of the legislative and regulatory reforms proposed by early progressives were morally and economically sound--the introduction of child labor laws, for example, as well as the implementation of health and safety rules in manufacturing environments. Although it's true the progressive movement was later suborned by the Marxists, the movement itself was a reaction to Gilded Age corruption and exploitation and inspired by optimism about the future and that very American sense of fairness and fair play.
If Republicans had any sense, they would at least borrow some of the optimism of those early progressives. More people would join the fight if they thought we could win. These 'Doom' and 'Let It Burn' memes are self-fulfilling loser talk. If enough people believe we are doomed and it will burn no matter what we do, then what's the point? Why try?
Posted by: troyriser at March 04, 2013 06:25 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at March 04, 2013 06:28 AM (1hM1d)
Ever been poor? I mean having to literally live under a bush?
Then thinking about all the steps that brought you there and not being able to see one thing you would have done differently given the information you had at the time?
You see luck is happenstance the opposite of say and accident. Fate is where you're past decisions or past decisions of others have set up circumstances where you are very likely to fail. The behavioral part is where you examine where you've been and modify your behavior only to have fate and luck fuck you in the ass multiple times to where you are left with nothing.
Experience that sometime and you will change your perception about how much behavior has to do with where we wind up in life.
Oh, granted there's lots of neer do wells who are poor but about the same number of rich.
And luck won't do you any good if you aren't equipped to take advantage of the circumstances.
Fate? Ah, there's the rub. Future decisions taken because of past decisions made. Made in error true but made not out of stupidity or sloth but because of ignorance. Lack of experience and the only way to acquire experience is to live through them.
Be not so easy to condemn the poor as deserving of their fate for that fate may one day befall YOU.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at March 04, 2013 06:35 AM (qyv02)
I'd argue it did because they mainstreamed the idea that ratfucking industry and thrift was the mission of the feds...
I am low on time but will be happy to have this chat with you when we both have the time...
not meant as a slap to your face with a gauntlet either...
I enjoy our chats.
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 04, 2013 06:38 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Saber Alter at March 04, 2013 06:45 AM (8V74Y)
SNAP is more responsive but the amounts are very low (they only seem high because you consider it extra money while the poor only have that as their income. (unless they are gaming the system by working on the side but that's difficult to arrange. It's more likely that they supplement their welfare through illegal activities.)
They also have to be at least a minimum of responsible for the raising and care of that child which is not that easy and they do get supervision. Yes we hear about all the bad things that can happen but they don't happen that often, do they? That's because for the most part welfare are supervised and are discovered when they're not doing what they're supposed to for the child.
I'd ask anyone here if they could/would/have ever been on welfare and how "easy" they felt it was.
What HAS happened is that people have become disincentivized to work because of welfare and because any work they are qualified for doesn't pay very well. That issue is not be addressed and until/unless more jobs are available that can provide a family with a basic living and training opportunities afforded for those who lack the skills then that situation will continue. And it will continue because we have overburdened the employers with regulations that keep them from hiring/training underskilled workers AND we've afforded them the opportunity to move their operations to china where there is a lower standard of living and fewer and less onerous regulations on the workplace. And their are no unions per se.
All you complaining about welfare should stop trying to find the best deal and buy only american because part of our welfare burden is the result of those demands on the part of the American buying public.
We allowed the Liberals to dismantle a well working system. Republicans cooperated because they saw it as a positive thing for american employers they neglected to fully understand what the market would do when given a choice between a functioning economy that had higher prices and lower profits and an economy that had fewer workers but really low prices and high profits for some companies.
During all this downturn and increased unemployment, profits have gone UP. That's why Wall Street is doing so good because it reflects how BUSINESS is doing and not how the economy is doing on an individual basis.
It's a complex problem with no simple solution. We got here by making one decision at a time but the aggregate is overall detrimental to everyone except those above a certain level of income and those who do not have their existence tied to one country.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at March 04, 2013 06:55 AM (qyv02)
Posted by: Mary Cloggenstein from Brattleboro, Vermont at March 04, 2013 06:57 AM (jCQ+I)
167
snark with only a slight wiff of Hippie post-gore elan '
should have plugged your mental Prius into some REAL juice.....Honey.
Posted by: Richard at March 04, 2013 07:08 AM (vOFmE)
Posted by: troyriser at March 04, 2013 10:25 AM (vtiE6)
He believed in big government controlling and regulating industry's practices and profits, why the hell not? The only reason he wasn't an official "Socialist" was because the Socialists of his day were much more radical-bomb throwers and many were more akin to what we would call Communists today. If you stuck TR into Europe today, he'd smile and nod with satisfaction "Now that's what I was talking about!" Not a Socialist? In a pig's eye.
Posted by: Weirddave at March 04, 2013 07:35 AM (aH+zP)
I'm amazed at how long states like California and Illinois can keep the plates spinning by deceptive accounting, budgetary tricks, and a mostly-inert legistlature.
If only the California legislature were inert. Then they wouldn't do so much damage.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 04, 2013 08:01 AM (IDSI7)
@22 Then I opened the paper to find Mr Heinze has given 250 Million of our greenbacks to the Mooslum back Government of Egypt.
100 million of which we had to borrow. Why don't the ragheads borrow the money themselves? Oh, that's right, they're an even worse credit risk than we are. An impressive achievement right there.
For my part, I wouldn't give 'em the contents of my handkerchief. They're Muslim, they're hostile to us, and they don't have any oil, so fuck 'em.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 04, 2013 08:12 AM (IDSI7)
Illinois actually has IOUs out on some of its bills.
Hell, California did that years ago. You know everything starts here. They tried to pay vendors and even employees with IOUs. The banks said "no dice."
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 04, 2013 08:14 AM (IDSI7)
Actually, the old saw about mommas having babys to get rich on welfare is an exaggeration. The amount a woman is entitled to for an additional child, barely pays much of any of the expenses.
No, it isn't an exaggeration. You're right about the additional emolument barely covering the additional expenses of a child, but it takes some intelligence to realize that.
Anecdote: in grad school I dated a very liberal social worker who used to rail against this problem. She tried to explain to the FSA recruits that having another baby would actually make them worse off. Their response to any and all arguments? "I get mo' money." End of discussion. Used to drive her wild.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 04, 2013 08:58 AM (IDSI7)
167
You mean the hate and sexism of accounting and balanced books, and "correctly thinking persons" are Pollyannas. Your inability to balance a check book and your maxed out credit cards is your downfall. FORWARD for you is over a cliff without a parachute.
Posted by: Wendy at March 04, 2013 09:03 AM (KydDZ)
Posted by: aj4coco at March 04, 2013 10:51 AM (EvT57)
Posted by: Mistress Overdone at March 04, 2013 07:21 PM (2/oBD)
Posted by: Mistress Overdone at March 04, 2013 07:23 PM (2/oBD)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1835 seconds, 307 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 04, 2013 04:13 AM (GVxQo)