April 11, 2013
— Ace Instapundit linked this interesting observation about the beliefs elites have about the people "beneath them" (in their minds). You will not be shocked to learn they don't think much of us.
This observation is specifically about elite feelings about how plebians will behave in moments of disaster -- such as in Hurricane Katrina. However, I'd suggest a broader reading than that. I think this applies to how they view us generally.
It's not just about fearing how we'll behave during an earthquake; it's about fearing how we'll behave if the Wrong Information comes into our hands. Things that might excite us and make us all crazy.
Elites tend to believe in a venal, selfish, and essentially monstrous version of human nature, which I sometimes think is their own human nature. I mean, people don't become incredibly wealthy and powerful by being angelic, necessarily. They believe that only their power keeps the rest of us in line and that when it somehow shrinks away, our seething violence will rise to the surface -- that was very clear in Katrina. Timothy Garton Ash and Maureen Dowd and all these other people immediately jumped on the bandwagon and started writing commentaries based on the assumption that the rumors of mass violence during Katrina were true. A lot of people have never understood that the rumors were dispelled and that those things didn't actually happen; it's tragic.But there's also an elite fear -- going back to the 19th century -- that there will be urban insurrection. It's a valid fear. I see these moments of crisis as moments of popular power and positive social change.
I think this is how the elites -- God, how I despise that term, as it gives complement to mediocrity; let me try again. I think this is how those who imagine themselves to be elite justify their complete embargo on the Kermit Gosnell serial-murder trial.
People who do evil generally don't imagine they're doing evil. In fact, some of the worst evils are perpetrated by those who've convinced themselves they're doing good. One's conscience tends to restrain one from evil; but if one can trick one's conscience into thinking one's doing good by doing evil, well. Then you've really got something.
I imagine the media believes it's "doing good" by being so cautious about What Truths the Public Is Capable of Hearing. After all, if this Gosnell trial were publicized, people would Get Angry, and come to All the Wrong Conclusions, and put the allies of those in the media (such as NARAL and Planned Parenthood) on the defensive.
Hell, these maniacs might even get in into their skulls to hurt people!
Well, we can't have that. We can't let the Wrong Kind of Information -- true information, but the sort of information the non-enlightened may be confused about -- passing into the Wrong Kinds of Brains.
Thus, this embargo on the Gosnell story is not just partisan bias, fronting for the Democrats by refusing to mention anything that might be used as a wedge issue against them.
No, this embargo is done for the Public Good, even if the public is too stupid to understand that. If the public heard about these things... Well, that's not gonna happen. Not on our watch.
It's been occurring to me lately that much media behavior is explainable by this prism. They don't want to report certain facts, not because the facts aren't true (they're facts by definition), but because they're Concerned About The Capacity of Non-Journalists to Successfully Interpret These Facts.
And they justify this to themselves by conceiving themselves as Angels guarding the outer doors of Hell itself, with millions of slavering monsters just beyond the gate.
By deliberately misleading the public, you see, they're protecting the world.
From us.
They have taken the exact opposite side of the proposition this nation was founded upon. Far from a well-informed citizenry being necessary for a free democracy, they've decided a well-informed citizenry is a deadly threat to it.
Don't worry, though. They're working their level-best to end that threat.
Posted by: Ace at
10:13 AM
| Comments (150)
Post contains 690 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: DangerGirl at April 11, 2013 09:49 AM (pUAXu)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at April 11, 2013 09:51 AM (X7MMs)
Posted by: BuddyPC at April 11, 2013 09:51 AM (jfUIE)
Posted by: MJ at April 11, 2013 09:52 AM (akfQd)
Take it a bit further and link it with the concept of "false consciousness" in Marxism, Ace.
For what it is worth, I happen to believe that humans are inherently evil and are kept in line by a combination of social pressure, the threat of retaliation (legal or therwise), and their own conciences, but that means ALL people, including myself. Funny how they think that they are above the common failings of humanity, isn't it?
Posted by: Grey Fox at April 11, 2013 09:52 AM (UtkqU)
Posted by: The boomers at April 11, 2013 09:52 AM (SSMVT)
Posted by: @PurpAv at April 11, 2013 09:54 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 11, 2013 09:58 AM (8/DeP)
I want them so scared they're stuck in their showers terrified of the truth, fearing the zombie like masses outside the door with torches and pitchforks, coming to take their lattes and IKEA furniture.
Posted by: Iblis at April 11, 2013 10:03 AM (9221z)
Posted by: ace at April 11, 2013 10:15 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: soothsayerwing plover at April 11, 2013 10:18 AM (xVKk3)
Posted by: Roy at April 11, 2013 10:18 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: huerfano at April 11, 2013 10:18 AM (bAGA/)
There was a Survivor edition a while back where all of the teams were sorted by race.
There was concern among my societal betters that the 'unenlightened' (their words) among us, might draw the wrong conclusions from such an experiment.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at April 11, 2013 10:19 AM (AC0lD)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Tea. at April 11, 2013 10:20 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: matt foley at April 11, 2013 10:20 AM (X69df)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 11, 2013 10:21 AM (9Bj8R)
They are right about one thing Ace, a well informed citizenry would be a death knell to the political system we have.
Too bad we don't have one...
Posted by: Jollyroger at April 11, 2013 10:21 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: Vic at April 11, 2013 10:21 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Gustaf III at April 11, 2013 10:21 AM (epWQP)
Nutshell.
Posted by: eleven at April 11, 2013 10:21 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 11, 2013 10:22 AM (9Bj8R)
I don't know if humans are "inherently EVIL." They're inherently, I guess, not particularly good, but I don't know if they're inherently evil.
I was using the theological definition of evil as "in rebellion against God" - people vary in intensity, and have the added complication of also being made in the image of God - rather than the current colloquial definition of evil, which is closer to "transgresses mores in a manner particularly shocking to those around them."
How about all people are inclined towards evil?
Posted by: Grey Fox at April 11, 2013 10:22 AM (UtkqU)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 11, 2013 02:18 PM
---------------
They see whatever they do AS their Noblesse Oblige.
Posted by: irright at April 11, 2013 10:22 AM (8GKDa)
Posted by: Mr Pink at April 11, 2013 10:22 AM (dWFb6)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at April 11, 2013 10:22 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: soothsayer at April 11, 2013 10:23 AM (xVKk3)
*"white" Hispanic, the popular image of Martin taken about five years before his death, the edited 911 audio tape, embargo of exculpatory image of his bloodied face and head and so on . . .
Posted by: Alec Leamas at April 11, 2013 10:24 AM (iR2Oi)
in 200 years there's gonna be good poetry written in chinese on this stupid shit
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at April 11, 2013 10:24 AM (LRFds)
You'll never hear how Qualitative Easing steals your savings
You'll never hear of liberal voter fraud
You'll never hear of liberal political corruption
You'll never hear of how guns save citizens lives
You'll never hear where all out tax dollars go
You'll never hear of the global persecution of Christians
Please continue, I'm too pissed.
Posted by: Iblis at April 11, 2013 10:24 AM (9221z)
I don't know if humans are "inherently EVIL." They're inherently, I guess, not particularly good, but I don't know if they're inherently evil.
But yes, the self-imagined elites do imagine that they themselves are above all these failings.
Posted by: ace at April 11, 2013 02:15 PM (LCRYB)
A good ass whuppin is what these people need. Having the shit kicked out of you gives you perspective. I would assume most of the ass muncher "elites" have never had a good ass kicking. It's a humbling experience and makes you think before you run your mouth.
Posted by: The Jackhole at April 11, 2013 10:25 AM (nTgAI)
We should have a contest.
And put on a show in the old barn.
Posted by: eleven at April 11, 2013 10:25 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: thunderb at April 11, 2013 10:26 AM (+afNf)
Posted by: ace at April 11, 2013 02:15 PM (LCRYB)
Humans are inherently BASE.
Posted by: Iblis at April 11, 2013 10:27 AM (9221z)
Posted by: Heralder at April 11, 2013 10:27 AM (+xmn4)
Posted by: tasker at April 11, 2013 10:27 AM (r2PLg)
more babies die by abortion than other people die by gun fire....if it saves one life!
Why aren't republicans screaming about this?
Posted by: thunderb at April 11, 2013 10:27 AM (+afNf)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 11, 2013 10:27 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: mallfly at April 11, 2013 10:27 AM (bJm7W)
Didn't Law and Order teach you rubes ANYTHING?
Posted by: The NY Times at April 11, 2013 10:28 AM (mCvL4)
Posted by: Nate in New Orleans at April 11, 2013 10:28 AM (lhX9P)
Posted by: Mr Pink at April 11, 2013 10:28 AM (dWFb6)
Posted by: thunderb at April 11, 2013 10:28 AM (+afNf)
Anyway, you might want to think on that as the self-anointed all seem in a panic.
Posted by: RoyalOil at April 11, 2013 10:29 AM (VjL9S)
Isaiah 5:20
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.
Posted by: bonhomme at April 11, 2013 10:29 AM (QehQP)
Posted by: soothsayer at April 11, 2013 10:30 AM (hNqVf)
There is a certain vanity in thinking like this. In one fell swoop it sets themselves on a pedestal - we the elite can handle it, we know better - and at the same time flows nicely with thier ideology as it always leads to more control over the unwashed.
After the fall of the traditional media, I cannot wait for the fall of the ivy league.
Posted by: Jollyroger at April 11, 2013 10:30 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: The Jackhole at April 11, 2013 02:25 PM (nTgAI)
Or you can sit down and make a cogent argument to convince them of the logic....ah I'm only kidding, I'll go with a good ass kicking also
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 11, 2013 02:27 PM (9Bj8R)
RE; Pulp Fiction; SMACK SMACK " you feel that...that's pride fucking with you" SMACK SMACK
Posted by: The Jackhole at April 11, 2013 10:30 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: joeindc44 says we should not stand up for this issue, let us redraw our lines at April 11, 2013 10:31 AM (QxSug)
John Brown was a hero, undaunted, true and brave,And Kansas knows his valor when he fought her rights to save;Now, tho the grass grows green above his grave,His soul is marching on.
He captured HarperÂ’s Ferry, with his nineteen men so few,And frightened "Old Virginny" till she trembled thru and thru;They hung him for a traitor, they themselves the traitor crew,But his soul is marching on.
John Brown was John the Baptist of the Christ we are to see,Christ who of the bondmen shall the Liberator be,And soon thruout the Sunny South the slaves shall all be free,For his soul is marching on.
The conflict that he heralded he looks from heaven to view,On the army of the Union with its flag red, white and blue.And heaven shall ring with anthems oÂ’er the deed they mean to do,For his soul is marching on.
Ye soldiers of Freedom, then strike, while strike ye may,The death blow of oppression in a better time and way,For the dawn of old John Brown has brightened into day,And his soul is marching on.
Posted by: RoyalOil at April 11, 2013 10:31 AM (VjL9S)
Yet, they love to 'inspire' mobs when it suits their narratives. What was the Occupy Movement about? By this same logic, the Penn State administrators were correct in keeping years of child abuse from the public.
I also think it goes deeper than this on the abortion issue. Abortion is a holy sacrament of the progressive religion. It is blasphemous to call out Gosnell as the monster he is, because the left most likely believes he was 'well-meaning' and just got a little carried away in some instances. Instead of what it truly was - Murder for Hire.
Posted by: Liberty Lover at April 11, 2013 10:31 AM (encrR)
Sorry, Ace, a low opinion of the hoi polloi, that's one I happen to agree with. It is like being told, "Don't drive on the railroad tracks".
A population who twice elected Obama is plainly capable of bottomless stupidity.
Posted by: Gus at April 11, 2013 10:32 AM (Xv7f/)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 11, 2013 10:33 AM (BAS5M)
Don't worry, though. They're working their level-best to end that threat.
Posted by: Ace at 02:13 PM
Nice post, Ace. Seriously.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at April 11, 2013 10:33 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: The Jackhole at April 11, 2013 02:25 PM (nTgAI)
Ive been jumped several times and all it's made me determined to do in those situations is hit first.
Posted by: Mr Pink at April 11, 2013 02:28 PM (dWFb6)
It taught me to stay away from places I have been jumped.
Posted by: The Jackhole at April 11, 2013 10:33 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 11, 2013 10:33 AM (WRskJ)
Posted by: Iblis at April 11, 2013 10:34 AM (9221z)
----
Not me.
Posted by: Bawney Fwank at April 11, 2013 10:34 AM (8GKDa)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at April 11, 2013 10:35 AM (+z4pE)
Just always remember, these are the same elite who like to drive 90 mph fapping with their junk out the window...
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at April 11, 2013 10:35 AM (AC0lD)
Which leads me to a not-so-rhetorical question: NBC, how many foreign bureaus could you afford for the $25 million you pay Matt Lauer? You know, the Matt Lauer that is truly one of the journalistic giants of our time.
As for the Gosnell situation, I have ceased being outraged over the continuous and brazen selective editing. The list is endless: Firearms used in self-defense BY WOMEN, the now longer-than-my-arm list of completely unworkable portions of Obamacare, the inability of the world economy to generate jobs, all those bad housing loans from 2007--still bad, and how we will lose the next war we fight quite spectacularly.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 11, 2013 10:35 AM (ltdV/)
When they say nuh-uh, 15K!!!
You ask them if they are richer today than 4 years ago.
Posted by: soothsayer at April 11, 2013 02:30 PM (hNqVf)
Then point out that as a percentage, average Americans own LESS of the stock market... and companies and Funds MORE...
So while Average income in America decreases... the people getting rich are those in the Government/Business Cabal that the LEFT is creating...
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 11, 2013 10:36 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Stephen at April 11, 2013 10:36 AM (PeTbx)
Posted by: ace at April 11, 2013 02:15 PM (LCRYB)
_________________________
I think the more apt analogy is that people are like water - their natural condition is to seek the path of least resistance. They seek material comfort, social acceptance, and security. You need to incentivize good behavior by making those goods conditioned upon good, moral, and productive behavior, and withdrawing those goods for bad behavior. We used to have a network of institutions, cultural conventions and mores that did a good job of this. Much less so today. With the hollowing out of institutions, we'll be getting more bad behavior from a wider base of people, and a call for more government supervision and intervention to mitigate the effects of both not good and bad behaviors.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at April 11, 2013 10:37 AM (iR2Oi)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 11, 2013 10:37 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: wooga at April 11, 2013 10:38 AM (ft5wB)
Posted by: alexthechick
Remember the reaction to that published picture of 'The Falling Man'?
Down the memory hole, quick! Don't want the rubes angry.....errr...I mean, it's upsetting. Just too upsetting. We in the media are better than that type of cheap sensationalism!
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at April 11, 2013 10:38 AM (BrQrN)
I don't think one is born evil.
By deliberately misleading the public, you see, they're protecting the world.
From us.
They are not protecting the World from Us, they are Protecting their positions from Everyone . by lying about their intentions of every "Good" deed. Bah
when one hears Ginsburg basically repeat Sanger
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we donÂ’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion.
Posted by: willow at April 11, 2013 10:38 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Yip at April 11, 2013 10:38 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Stienhofer Jones at April 11, 2013 10:39 AM (R8X+X)
They have taken the exact opposite side of the proposition this nation was founded upon. Far from a well-informed citizenry being necessary for a free democracy, they've decided a well-informed citizenry is a deadly threat to it.
Don't worry, though. They're working their level-best to end that threat.
Posted by: Ace at 02:13 PM
----------------
Mark Styen made a similar point, but with an opposite conclusion...
---------------
What Dead Kids?
By Mark Steyn
April 9, 2013 11:30 A.M.
There used to be a formulation of cynical news editors to determine American news priorities for mass murder. It ran something like: 1,000 dead Bangladeshis = 100 dead Italians = 10 dead Americans.
So how many dead American babies does it take to make the news? I wrote two-and-a-half weeks ago about the U.S. mediaÂ’s determination to ignore a story thatÂ’s inconvenient to their biases. But, given the gun-bannersÂ’ ceaseless grief-feasting on Sandy Hook, at some point doesnÂ’t the corpse count in Philadelphia merit maybe, oh, a thousandth of the attention?
He also claimed he saw about 100 babies born alive and then ‘snipped’ with surgical scissors in the back of the neck, to ensure their ‘demise’.
ThatÂ’s from a story about GosnellÂ’s Pennsylvania abattoir in the Daily Mail, a British newspaper doing the job American media wonÂ’t do. Headline:
’Fetuses And Blood All Over The Place’: Medic’s Graphic Account Of ‘Beheading Live Babies’ At Abortion ‘House Of Horrors’ In Philadelphia
More dead baby testimony:
There an 18-to-24-inch baby, who did not yet have eyes, was lying in a clear glass pan, she recalled in horror. It was “screeching, making this noise” that “sounded like a little alien,” she said. It “really freaked me out,” she said, causing her to leave the room.
Sorry it “freaked you out,” but as the Pundette comments:
“Making this noise” “like an alien”? That’s called crying. It’s what human babies do when they’re in distress, in this case, the ultimate distress. The “aliens” here are the inhuman monsters who caused that distress.
So . . . if a baby screams during an outside-the-uterus “abortion,” does it make a sound? Or, to put it another way, if an abortionist goes on trial for murdering infants, but the media refuses to cover it, is it really happening?
The U.S. mediaÂ’s unanimous agreement to see no evil is sick and totalitarian. A very small consolation is that, with news judgments like these, the wretched American press is doing a pretty good job of sawing through its own neck.
---------------
That line about "sawing through its own neck" links to that chart showing the free-fall in newspaper advertising.
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 11, 2013 10:40 AM (UypUQ)
Elites tend to believe in a venal, selfish, and essentially monstrous version of human nature, which I sometimes think is their own human nature.
Exactly. They are projecting their own nature onto others.
Posted by: Lugo at April 11, 2013 10:40 AM (lHn6+)
__________________________
Isn't this essentially a description of the media handling of Mr. Obama since his rise to prominence? There are things about Obama that only the right sort are allowed to know and discuss, because they enhance his position among those people, while the same information is jealously guarded from the hoi polloi in order that they not come to the ideologically incorrect but perfectly reasonable conclusion about the man and his policies?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at April 11, 2013 10:40 AM (iR2Oi)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 11, 2013 10:42 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 11, 2013 10:42 AM (1Jaio)
The stories are so disgustingly horrible, so stomach churning, that we are beyond "morbid curiosity" and into "thinking about this will make me physically ill" territory. Unless you can push the bile down, out of a drive to serve the greater purpose of educating the public about the horrors of abortion -- who wants to write about this?
Posted by: wooga at April 11, 2013 02:38 PM (ft5wB)
But what of the lack of coverage in print? Print has never sparred gorey details in the past.
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 11, 2013 10:42 AM (UypUQ)
One can ONLY support late term abortion by remaining ignorant of what, exactly, a late term abortion is.
Posted by: Warden at April 11, 2013 10:44 AM (0DlnM)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 11, 2013 01:58 PM (8/DeP)
The most amusing rationalization to me is, "there is no absolute right or wrong".
Disproven by the very existence of rationalizations. What are we rationalizing to, if not the standard we know we are falling short of?
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at April 11, 2013 10:44 AM (sGtp+)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 11, 2013 10:45 AM (MhA4j)
They might find it far more nasty, brutish and short than dreamed . . . .
Posted by: RoyalOil at April 11, 2013 10:45 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: tasker at April 11, 2013 10:45 AM (r2PLg)
This Gosnell story, and the new one coming out of Delware today would put paid to unregulated abortion in the US once and for all. And the libs can't have that. They've invest too much in it. If you have to be responsible for your actions, their whole reason for existence is negated.
Posted by: Iblis at April 11, 2013 10:45 AM (9221z)
'I wasn't saying that Paul is a white supremacist,' Manifee told the UK MailOnline. 'But he's the product of white privilege, so take that for whatever you think it means. It takes some real you-know-what for a white Republican to come here and speak.'
/"Nuts!"
Posted by: panzernashorn
***
And he is so certain of his moral superiority and self righteousness, it doesn't even begin to occur to him that HE is the bigot and not Rand.
Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at April 11, 2013 10:45 AM (uhftQ)
Posted by: angel with a sword at April 11, 2013 10:45 AM (Of9ho)
_____________________________
I don't think this is so - I've read about the size and destructiveness of the wounds on Lanza's victims. The thread there is that we need to know about this to understand why we need gun control.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at April 11, 2013 10:46 AM (iR2Oi)
When a baby born to a woman that Wanted the baby would actually be a baby long before 22 weeks 24 weeks etc weeks . No one said , oh hey don't worry your head about that blob of parasitical tissue.
Posted by: willow at April 11, 2013 10:46 AM (nqBYe)
They have taken the exact opposite side of the proposition this nation was founded upon. Far from a well-informed citizenry being necessary for a free democracy, they've decided a well-informed citizenry is a deadly threat to it.
A great post, to a point - but your conclusion here is quite wrong. They know full well, and understand thoroughly, how important a well-informed citizenry is to a free democracy.
The point is, they hate democracy.
They purposefully withhold information with the full intent and ultimate goal of destroying it.
I don't believe I'm being paranoid or hyperbolic about this. I recall you using Buckley's conclusion about Buchanan's anti-semitism to illustrate something or otehr about the media a few days back - this is another example. Taken individually, maybe we could draw more charitable conclusions about the intent of the media. But taken in aggregate, what other conclusion can a reasonable person draw?
Posted by: Rocketeer at April 11, 2013 10:46 AM (Z7toi)
Posted by: wooga at April 11, 2013 02:38 PM (ft5wB)
Leftist animal welfare groups like PETA, Mercy for Animals, and HSUS routinely depict animal abuse that the media hypes as 'beyond the pale'. And yet they treat human babies worse than animals. This is an evil that is beyond the pale and they know it. Liberals also know that this is their scandal. This is what comes from the modern liberal party.
Posted by: Liberty Lover at April 11, 2013 10:46 AM (encrR)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 11, 2013 10:46 AM (9Bj8R)
too gorey to print? Really? What about all those car accidents, the parading of the Newtown families, vivid decriptions of the horrors the US military and Israel visit on poor helpless ME peoples? Really?
Rush is right. Abortion is the left's sacriment. This shows it to be infanticide
Posted by: thunderb at April 11, 2013 10:46 AM (+afNf)
I disagree, Ace. I don't think the Elites (tm) actually believe they are not doing evil. I think that they know objectively in their hearts that they are doing evil, but they don't give a fuck. It's a hell of a lot more "fun" and a lot less work to fuck with no responsibility, cheat, lie, steal, cover-up, go to cocktail parties, etc. etc. etc. than it is to do the right thing, day in and day out for a lifetime, like folks try to do who allow themselves to be guided by a true moral code.
And because they know they are doing evil, they hide their crimes as best they can, not only from us benighted rightwing knuckledraggers, but from themselves.
People suck.
Posted by: Sharkman at April 11, 2013 10:47 AM (03IDC)
Posted by: soothsayer at April 11, 2013 10:47 AM (E7Qlq)
As some writer noted the other day, this is perfectly made for the mfm, what with all the blood and gore and death and dismemberment.
Yet crickets.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 11, 2013 10:48 AM (mKNJE)
There have always been those who wish to control others... and that will never stop... its part of humanity.
Aristocracy? Religious Elite? Mandarins? Comrades in Communism?
But America has been an experiment in tryng to NOT allow any group power... for that power to be given over, at the peoples behest, in an orderly and non violent manner.
But eventualy, as with all systems... there are areas prone to attack... and the MEDIA / Government / Bank triumverate is now what is in control.... as they understand that people can only make decisions on what they know.... so by controlling the knowledge of ENOUGH (the Low Info Voter)... they can maintain power.
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 11, 2013 10:48 AM (lZBBB)
Its that projection thingy. They look into the mirror and realize how horribly they would behave in a disaster or any other stressful event. The true leftist is a weak willed person who is a cowardly monster at heart.
They'd beat Costanza to the door in a nursing home fire.
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 11, 2013 10:48 AM (BAS5M)
I came across a quote from a Moron two years ago on a thread that I thought summed up me quite well:
"You really don't want people like me running around unconstrained by the binding strictures of Christianity; and the attendant fear of the judge who can't be fooled. Furthermore, I worry that we are many."
If anyone knows the Moron who wrote this beauty, I'd like to buy him a virtual drink.
Posted by: gw mclintock at April 11, 2013 10:48 AM (qwUGR)
Posted by: Northern Lurker at April 11, 2013 10:49 AM (uh9BG)
I checked the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel just now. They published two AP articles on the trial on March 18th and 19th, but nothing since. Not sure whether they were in the dead tree paper or only online. Clearly a conscious decision.
If there were real reporters at the Journal Sentinel, they'd go find the local Planned Parenthood (I'd be happy to give them the address... it's on Wisconsin Avenue just west of Marquette University around 22nd or 23rd Street), and ask to interview the boss. Then they'd ask them what policies and procedures they have in place to make sure that what happened in Gosnell's abortion mill doesn't happen in there's. They'd ask how many late term abortions they provide. They'd ask how they dispose of fetal remains. They'd ask whether they would permit an independent laboratory examine the fetal remains for gestational age. If not, they'd ask what they have to hide. See, that's how a real reporter would get a real story about a real issue.
By the way, the first article contained the most remarkable sentence I think I've ever read in a newspaper. After describing the murders of live babies by Gosnell and his helpers, the reporter interjects this helpful clarfication:
"Abortions are typically performed in utero."
OK, then. Nothing to see here. Move along.
In other words.... Forget about it, Jake. It's Chinatown.
Posted by: The Regular Guy at April 11, 2013 10:49 AM (qHCyt)
I imagine the media believes it's "doing good" by being so cautious about What Truths the Public Is Capable of Hearing. After all, if this Gosnell trial were publicized, people would Get Angry, and come to All the Wrong Conclusions, and put the allies of those in the media (such as NARAL and Planned Parenthood) on the defensive.
Hell, these maniacs might even get in into their skulls to hurt people!
This is also accomplished in the inverse.
Just as the media and other self-assumed "elites" deliberately embargo certain information to keep "the masses" from being afflicted with Right Wing Paranoia Syndrome, those same individuals and groups FEED certain information to the masses to anesthetize pushback.
How many stories have you all read so far this year, out of places like Philly and Chicago, talking about how the "warm weather" may stir up the city's yoots into an unmanageable, violent mob? I know I've read two or three already, most of which are related to stories about mob actions that have already taken place! "Oh, it was a warm day, so that brought all the kids downtown and they rioted." As if 50 degree weather is a heat wave, and it's only natural that hotblooded young people would be driven to criminal mayhem as a result of the added warmth.
They're scapegoating. They're warning the public ahead of time that, "Hot weather is going to bring out the mobs!" so that when there ARE mob attacks, or unmotivated "Knockdown King" style attacks, in the streets of the city, they'll have a designated fallguy. "Well, the weather was warm today, so we were expecting to see some out of hand behavior. Luckily we were able to stop it before it got worse." ALWAYS they'll include that last part, because it implies that things COULD get worse, and by golly aren't we lucky that there are people in power who are quick to respond when the thermostat inches toward sixty degrees and all the chilluns go craaaaaaazy?
No reference is made to race, gender, age, economic status, school level, family unit, or any other motivations these rampaging yoots may have had that would lead to their bad behavior. Those things are all incidental and have no bearing on their mob action, which we've already been warned is due to "peer pressure and warm weather." They're good kids who just did something bad because they were acting impulsively. "That's just what kids do! *slide whistle of humor!* Now back to the studio!"
The "Elites" will deny you the knowledge you should have and feed you the knowledge they THINK you should have until you forget that there's a difference.
"All the news that's fit to print" has never been a more ominous threat.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 11, 2013 10:50 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Woody at April 11, 2013 10:52 AM (07RHD)
____________________
I think you're unwittingly accepting their tautological frame of the issue. They want to say because the act fits the definition of murder, it is not an abortion. The truth of the matter is that these acts were both at the same time. The same people who are ignoring this and embargoing stories would be the same people advocating that what Gosnell did be perfectly legal, or at the very least constrained to a veil of impenetrable "privacy" between a woman and her doctor.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at April 11, 2013 10:52 AM (iR2Oi)
Posted by: thunderb at April 11, 2013 10:53 AM (+afNf)
'it's for the children' would be blown.
Gosnell is Their tool for Their cause.
They had been given information about Gosnell and his shop of horrors prior to this becoming known to Some of the public.
They didn't stop him,
They themselves President and wife have been advocates for just this thing. (Partial Birth Abortion) where the survivor is not to be saved)?
How can this be 'for children"
Posted by: willow at April 11, 2013 10:54 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: thunderb at April 11, 2013 10:55 AM (+afNf)
Posted by: thunderb at April 11, 2013 10:56 AM (+afNf)
Posted by: Alec Leamas at April 11, 2013 02:46 PM (iR2Oi)
I must have missed the release of the official reports on wounds, rounds, and weapons used. Also on what happened at his home.
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 11, 2013 10:56 AM (BAS5M)
Who the hell are YOU to oppose us?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.Unite humanity with a living new language.Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.Avoid petty laws and useless officials.Balance personal rights with social duties.Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.Last time I checked, reasonable, common-sense infanticide fits #1, 2,3, 7, 8 and 10 of our commandments.
Posted by: Ted Turner at April 11, 2013 10:57 AM (Bv9qa)
Posted by: Dante Steppenwolf at April 11, 2013 10:59 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: thunderb at April 11, 2013 02:53 PM (+afNf)
It's a hatred of the "unwashed masses". They have the form of a human, but they're mindless non-humans who can be killed with impunity. Remind you of any leftist fantasies?
Some of the early zombie movies were explicitly about consumerism and making the subtle commentary, "gee, these zombies are indistinguishable from the average consumerist American".
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at April 11, 2013 10:59 AM (sGtp+)
And that you need an iron fistted government to keep everyone in line and the elites safe. Oh yeah its propaganda. just like every other episode of House Hunters or Income Property has a homosexual couple. Propaganda.
Posted by: Iblis at April 11, 2013 11:01 AM (9221z)
Posted by: the grand sez who at April 11, 2013 11:02 AM (dY+4R)
Posted by: Yip at April 11, 2013 11:02 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: MSM at April 11, 2013 11:02 AM (mjR67)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 11, 2013 11:02 AM (MhA4j)
What an oxymoron! If a background is cultural, then it's not unique, it's common to a group.
So what is in this guy's background that dis-enables him to fact-finding and assigning responsibility? Is he so ingrained with collective dogma that in his culture there is no responsibility assigned to one person, ever? Or are facts so pliable in his culture that there cannot be any finding?
Posted by: bonhomme at April 11, 2013 11:05 AM (o4Xc4)
Posted by: Pluskat's Dog at April 11, 2013 11:05 AM (N8Ijm)
*"white" Hispanic, the popular image of Martin taken about five years before his death, the edited 911 audio tape, embargo of exculpatory image of his bloodied face and head and so on . . .
Posted by: Alec Leamas at April 11, 2013 02:24 PM (iR2Oi)
------------------------------------------------
This is an excellent point. The whole purpose of the MFM now is to incite the mobs to the destruction of this country and all of it's unique traditions and to create the chaos that wannabe dictators need in order to gain complete power. The reportage is one-sided for a reason.
The natural goodness of most people have to be repressed and replaced with cold indifference and for others, violent behaviour. I think it's one of the reasons that the murders in Chicago aren't being reported. They'll need that personality type in the future.
Posted by: Soona at April 11, 2013 11:05 AM (oVT8y)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 11, 2013 11:06 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: andrew at April 11, 2013 11:08 AM (5PdYy)
Posted by: ESPN at April 11, 2013 11:14 AM (FcR7P)
I would bet my life that since the Gosnell clinic was exposed ansd shut down, Planned Parenthood and its allies have spent considerable time and money enforcing a news blackout about it, in a methodical and organized fashion. This is not just a matter of a few elite news editors not wanting people to have information that they might not process correctly.
It is about maintaining the lie that late-term abortions are both rare and safe. There is a lot of money being made on these abortions, and it is paramount that the general public keep believing there are very few of them happening.
It is equally important to maintain the fiction that a fetus is a blob of cells that does not bleed, cry out, move, or act in any way human when it is sucked out of the womb.
Posted by: rockmom at April 11, 2013 11:15 AM (aBlZ1)
"Noblesse oblige" is generally used to imply that with wealth, power, and prestige come responsibilities. The phrase is sometimes used derisively, in the sense of condescending or hypocritical social responsibility.[1] In American English especially, the term is sometimes applied more broadly to suggest a general obligation for the more fortunate to help the less fortunate. (wiki)
For a good description in music, read the lyrics to Lucky Man by ELP.
We have this "nobility" class in the US, as exemplified by the Bush, Kennedy, Clinton, etc. clans. There's very fucking little noble about these clans; and if they be Dems, none whatsoever beyond a little military service by one out of fifty. Mostly what I see is a long uninterrupted string of grifters, losers, dopers and cads. I wouldn't trust most of these asswipes to check my tire pressure.
Yet I see fawning MFM media coverage of that dead murdering Kennedy as 'The Lion of the Senate'. It is to gag. The taxpayers get to erect a shrine in his 'honor'.
It's why I get pissed when people fawn over British royalty as well. Their main accomplishment is to get born. Whooptefuckingdo.
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 11, 2013 11:16 AM (ccXZP)
Depends what you mean by "evil," of course.
My definition--so "evil" can signify a worse quality than, say, "shitty" can--would be something like "valuing injury to others over benefit to oneself." In which case...yeah. That's what distinguishes us from the animals.
Or so my lying eyes and the entire history of experimental psychological research would have me believe. ...And also the entire history of history.
And everything we've come up with so far in the realm of "social pressure, the threat of retaliation (legal or otherwise)," etc., is an example of human evil, not a hindrance to it.
So. Yeah.
On the sunny side, I'm not sure that "inherently" means much in this case. Not because humanity is an especially free or willful or moral (post-)animal, but because our distinction from the other, not-evil animals is new and tenuous. Maybe we still have the option to not be evil. But that must not generate a very good "fit," in the "survival of the..." sense, or we wouldn't be so much like we are--and are probably still getting more.
We might seem to have changed recently, just enough to have changed, but what looks from here like our species's high point isn't really far enough behind us to call it "behind," is it?
But we do have to remember where we peaked. It wasn't on the moon. It was in Auschwitz.
Posted by: oblig. the joyous at April 11, 2013 11:18 AM (cePv8)
Posted by: rockmom at April 11, 2013 11:19 AM (aBlZ1)
Since when does the media leave out horrible details about police brutality.
Remember, the nightstick "incident".
Or when there is a white on minority hate crime. James Byrd, anyone?
No, gruesome details are only an excuse for not want to cover a story that is against their agenda.
They never mind gruesome details when it fits the left's agenda. I mean how many times has the media covered the horrific details of newtown??
Posted by: Prescient11 at April 11, 2013 11:21 AM (tVTLU)
I much prefer the Catholic Church to the false gospel "church" of media "do-gooders."
Posted by: Lisa Graas at April 11, 2013 11:38 AM (gONgZ)
Posted by: rockmom at April 11, 2013 03:19 PM (aBlZ1)
But it's perfectly okay -- and in fact morally justified -- to wave the bloody bodies of dead children in Newtown because guns.
I fucking hate the media.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 11, 2013 11:45 AM (4df7R)
It's why I get pissed when people fawn over British royalty as well. Their main accomplishment is to get born. Whooptefuckingdo.
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 11, 2013 03:16 PM (ccXZP)
Yeah. You're a better man than I because of whose hoo-hah you passed through?
Fuck you.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at April 11, 2013 11:50 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: pfn at April 11, 2013 12:02 PM (z6nwP)
Posted by: shoeless hunter at April 11, 2013 12:09 PM (dY+4R)
Posted by: CarolHS at April 11, 2013 12:20 PM (P7Qgs)
Uh-huh. When did that ever stop the media?
Posted by: Jishin at April 11, 2013 02:07 PM (uk04h)
Benghazi. Failure of administration. Too difficult for public to know.
After all, if the public became aware that #1 (Gosnell) was evil, funding to Planned Parenthood and Roe vs Wade may be questioned when morals are scraped off as the harsh reality of killing babies is unveiled.
Regarding #2...the American public may realize that a squishy buffoon is in the White House, a narcissist who could give a hoot in hell about other Americans. Along with this, it was prior to a national election of squish, with the added uh oh of Hillary being in charge (and her future).
The media should be drawn, quartered and thrown to the fishes as chum.
I was a bit naive until 9/12/12, with the lack of honest reporting of Benghazi. That is the day I will remember, always. And, by 9/14/12, I decided we were no better than North Korea in having the media report the truth.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at April 11, 2013 03:37 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at April 11, 2013 03:38 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: Aarradin at April 11, 2013 09:50 PM (4T3FG)
Posted by: Chromoly Man at April 12, 2013 07:09 AM (cTOEQ)
Posted by: oic at April 14, 2013 04:46 AM (8pQ0T)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2288 seconds, 278 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 11, 2013 09:48 AM (MMBvc)