May 14, 2013
— Ace Live feed here. So far, it's another guy who doesn't know anything at all.
News: Holder says he wasn't part of the AP investigation at all, because, if I have this right, he himself was questioned by the FBI as a possible leaker. So he recused himself.
An couple of odd lines from Holder: Speaking about the administration's civil rights record, he declared "I'm proud of what we've done," then lists, as his only proof of a strong record on civil rights, treating terrorists kindly.
No one follows up -- that's all well and good for terrorists, but how about American citizens?
Then, speaking about the Administration's promise to make drone decisions more transparent, Holder says, "That was a promise, by me, that I think will be kept."
Outstanding. Can't get a stronger guarantee than that.
Posted by: Ace at
09:53 AM
| Comments (244)
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Dr Spank at May 14, 2013 09:54 AM (4cRnj)
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 14, 2013 09:54 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Jerry Seinfeld at May 14, 2013 09:55 AM (+x8q5)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 14, 2013 09:55 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Dr Spank at May 14, 2013 09:55 AM (4cRnj)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 14, 2013 09:55 AM (+x8q5)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 14, 2013 09:55 AM (8ZskC)
But of course he doesn't.
LIVs, do you really want someone this clueless running the country's Justice system?
Never mind - of course you do.
Hey - there's Kim K's baby bump!
Posted by: Marybeth at May 14, 2013 09:56 AM (Ks0w4)
Posted by: mugiwara at May 14, 2013 09:56 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 14, 2013 09:57 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at May 14, 2013 09:57 AM (lbJ4Y)
Posted by: imp at May 14, 2013 09:57 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: filbert the Whig at May 14, 2013 09:57 AM (7vimm)
Posted by: Slapweasel at May 14, 2013 09:57 AM (7gwGw)
Posted by: Brain Gremling at May 14, 2013 09:57 AM (+x8q5)
Turn yourself in now, confess. You will feel better and you will get consideration for that at sentencing.
Posted by: real joe at May 14, 2013 09:57 AM (GwfxE)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at May 14, 2013 09:58 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Dr Spank at May 14, 2013 09:58 AM (4cRnj)
1) Fast and Furious
2) Foreign Chinese money flowing to reelection campaign
3) IRS Scandal
4) Benghazi
5) EPA emails
6) AP investigation/wiretapping
7) HHS operations/illegal pushing for obamacare
others?
And note, these are not just scandals, but scandals UPON scandals.
The gun walking/running in Fast and Furious was bad enough. But when investigated they lied, misrepresented and have refused to produce almost 60,000 pages of documents under the misnomer of "executive privilege".
I mean, each initial scandal begets its own scandal/coverup.
The one biggie they try to get Reagan with is Iran-Contra, essentially gun running to unsavory individuals. Ooooohhhhh, big scandal. That's all they had.
But in the one scandal in Benghazi, gun running to Syria IS ASSUMED TO BE GOING ON. Geraldo said he had a source confirm it!!!! And yet the media isn't out to rape zero. It isn't out for zero's head. There have been no hearings on the actual, underlying fucking original scandal of Benghazi which is the gun running.
There are just too many fucking scandals within scandals. It's a joke. The media buried them all, but like a zombie they always come back.
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 14, 2013 09:59 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectal at May 14, 2013 09:59 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at May 14, 2013 09:59 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: Slapweasel at May 14, 2013 09:59 AM (7gwGw)
Posted by: imp at May 14, 2013 10:00 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: no good deed at May 14, 2013 10:00 AM (mjR67)
Posted by: Virginia SoCon might become Harrison Bergeron at May 14, 2013 10:00 AM (+/C3g)
Posted by: Eric Holder at May 14, 2013 10:00 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at May 14, 2013 10:00 AM (XvrTA)
Posted by: Baldy at May 14, 2013 10:00 AM (tyDFN)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at May 14, 2013 10:00 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 14, 2013 10:01 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Baldy at May 14, 2013 02:00 PM (tyDFN)
They're trying to overwhelm everyone.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 14, 2013 10:01 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Eric Holder at May 14, 2013 10:01 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Umgwana Kickbooty at May 14, 2013 10:01 AM (+x8q5)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 14, 2013 10:02 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Tami
___________________________________________
Does Cloward n' Piven work for Scandals? We'll see.
Posted by: Slapweasel at May 14, 2013 10:02 AM (7gwGw)
Posted by: Baldy at May 14, 2013 02:00 PM (tyDFN)
They're trying to overwhelm everyone.
Posted by: Tami at May 14, 2013 02:01 PM (X6akg)
exactly
Posted by: willow at May 14, 2013 10:02 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Red Lobster at May 14, 2013 10:02 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: t-bird at May 14, 2013 10:02 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 14, 2013 10:03 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at May 14, 2013 10:03 AM (NcPjb)
The Sgt. Schultz Adminisration. "We know nutink! But let us run health care ja!"
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 14, 2013 10:03 AM (uIz7u)
Back to Carney... it was a confusing situation on Benghazi in the early hours, throws CIA under the bus again.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 14, 2013 10:03 AM (jKWYf)
Posted by: baldilocks at May 14, 2013 10:03 AM (Su0W2)
"It's Scandalfest!"
I was gonna go with Black Tuesday, but the mandatory sensitivity training classes would interfere with my schedule.
Posted by: Jaws at May 14, 2013 10:03 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at May 14, 2013 10:03 AM (7mQyC)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 14, 2013 10:03 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 14, 2013 10:04 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: buzzion at May 14, 2013 10:04 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: hello, it's me Donna at May 14, 2013 10:04 AM (9+ccr)
Posted by: maddogg at May 14, 2013 10:04 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 14, 2013 10:04 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: t-bird at May 14, 2013 10:04 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at May 14, 2013 02:03 PM (NcPjb)
Weird. There was a good set for Friday's newsdump, and a few yesterday.
Guess the people at the top are still trying to figure out their story before they tell the low level employees what to push.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 14, 2013 10:04 AM (oY6Yp)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 14, 2013 10:05 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 14, 2013 10:05 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at May 14, 2013 10:05 AM (NcPjb)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 14, 2013 10:05 AM (WX6M1)
Posted by: filbert the Whig at May 14, 2013 10:05 AM (7vimm)
Posted by: K. Gosnell, Inmate at May 14, 2013 10:05 AM (WCe8r)
Posted by: t-bird at May 14, 2013 10:05 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Gag me with a spoon! at May 14, 2013 10:05 AM (Akvfj)
Even their denials of responsibility should be ample reason for impeachment.
Assuming Holder didn't know (he knew, but let's play along), then:
1) Why didn't he know?
b) What will be done to the person who authorized the spying?
III) Why should he be trusted to run the agency going forward?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 14, 2013 10:06 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Eric Holder at May 14, 2013 10:06 AM (vJ+mj)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at May 14, 2013 10:06 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Red Lobster at May 14, 2013 10:06 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: Slapweasel at May 14, 2013 10:06 AM (7gwGw)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at May 14, 2013 10:06 AM (XvrTA)
Posted by: ace at May 14, 2013 10:06 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 14, 2013 10:07 AM (uIz7u)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at May 14, 2013 10:07 AM (29vnO)
Posted by: hello, it's me Donna at May 14, 2013 10:07 AM (9+ccr)
takes Obama time to collect their ideas
Posted by: willow at May 14, 2013 10:07 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Rufus T. Firefly at May 14, 2013 10:07 AM (PwV7G)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 14, 2013 10:07 AM (+x8q5)
Assuming Holder didn't know (he knew, but let's play along), then:
1) Why didn't he know?
b) What will be done to the person who authorized the spying?
III) Why should he be trusted to run the agency going forward?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 14, 2013 02:06 PM (/PCJa)
They are either the criminals in charge, criminally complicent, or criminally negligent.
Posted by: buzzion at May 14, 2013 10:08 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: t-bird at May 14, 2013 10:08 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at May 14, 2013 10:08 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: filbert the Whig at May 14, 2013 10:08 AM (7vimm)
Posted by: Staff at May 14, 2013 10:08 AM (vJ+mj)
Posted by: HoboJerky at May 14, 2013 10:08 AM (lk9x3)
Posted by: LASue at May 14, 2013 10:08 AM (gjIQF)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 14, 2013 10:09 AM (g1DWB)
I'm waiting to see "Politics of Personal Destruction" decried again. I give it a couple of weeks, max.
Posted by: junior at May 14, 2013 10:09 AM (UWFpX)
It's amazing when they themselves are targeted They suddenly show interest in the corruptness of the administrations.
They sure had fun when they Helped target private citizens with the blessings of Obama.
i guess they might like some of the constitution.. bigots and teabaggers all.
Posted by: willow at May 14, 2013 10:09 AM (nqBYe)
They are either the criminals in charge, criminally complicent, or criminally negligent.
Depending on the specific scandal, I think they've each filled each one of those roles at least once.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 14, 2013 10:09 AM (/PCJa)
Is this a way of him subtly saying he's on his way out?
Posted by: tsrblke (work)[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 14, 2013 10:09 AM (ULkyQ)
Posted by: grease monkey at May 14, 2013 10:09 AM (qQk+U)
Posted by: Minnfidel at May 14, 2013 10:09 AM (dedTA)
--
However temporary, honeymoon is over. And the media can't walk and is now sore and chaffed.
Posted by: Lady in Black (I haven't read all the comments yet, but....) at May 14, 2013 10:09 AM (ovWeo)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 14, 2013 10:10 AM (VtjlW)
Thanks to Holder, America has risen in recent polls of terrorists from 16th to 4th when asked where they hope to conduct their next operation.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 14, 2013 10:10 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at May 14, 2013 10:10 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: willow at May 14, 2013 10:10 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Dr Spank at May 14, 2013 01:55 PM ..................The press got cum in their eye.
Posted by: Minnfidel at May 14, 2013 10:10 AM (dedTA)
Posted by: buzzion at May 14, 2013 02:08 PM (LI48c)
I don't think those options are mutually exclusive.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 14, 2013 02:10 PM (VtjlW)
Well no. But the point is that those are the options. Innocent of wrongdoing is not one of them.
Posted by: buzzion at May 14, 2013 10:11 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 14, 2013 10:11 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 14, 2013 10:11 AM (WX6M1)
Posted by: Marybeth at May 14, 2013 01:56 PM (Ks0w4)
I'm sure you actually meant to say "Fetus Bump"
Posted by: TiminAL at May 14, 2013 10:11 AM (1aLkV)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 14, 2013 10:11 AM (8sCoq)
I have turned over the investigation to the crack team that investigated the Black Panthers
---
And yes i do mean that they are all on crack.
Posted by: Eric at May 14, 2013 10:11 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: willow at May 14, 2013 10:11 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: RWC at May 14, 2013 10:12 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 14, 2013 10:12 AM (+x8q5)
If low-level fed employees did this without the knowledge of the WH or AG, then this government really is out of control.
This should be the conservative tact.
Posted by: Soona at May 14, 2013 10:12 AM (JDLgB)
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 14, 2013 10:12 AM (bZvSF)
Okay who is playing that Slim Whitman song again? 'Ohnly yyyyyooouuuuuu....."
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 14, 2013 10:12 AM (uIz7u)
Posted by: TiminAL at May 14, 2013 02:11 PM (1aLkV)
Kim K punished with a fat stomach.
Posted by: buzzion at May 14, 2013 10:12 AM (LI48c)
I don't think those options are mutually exclusive.
Aren't they? I think you can't be the criminal in fact and also simply criminally complicit. You can't be criminally complicit and also merely criminally negligent.
That said, any one of them could be the criminal of fact in one scandal, criminally complicit in another, and criminally negligent in yet another.
There's plenty of malfaesance to go around.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 14, 2013 10:12 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 14, 2013 10:12 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: t-bird at May 14, 2013 10:13 AM (FcR7P)
129 I'm sure you actually meant to say "Fetus Bump"
Will NARAL & Planned Parenthood ever forgive me?
Posted by: Marybeth at May 14, 2013 10:13 AM (Ks0w4)
So we're to believe that a man and his administration who spend half their time at political fundraisers have no knowledge of political chicanery inside their own offices?
Posted by: soothsayer at May 14, 2013 10:13 AM (9Q7Nu)
Posted by: willow at May 14, 2013 10:13 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 14, 2013 10:13 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 14, 2013 10:13 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Rev Thunder at May 14, 2013 10:13 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at May 14, 2013 10:14 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 14, 2013 02:11 PM (jKWYf)
-------------------------------------------
Yes! We mustn't lose sight of the other side of the coin of Ocare.
Posted by: Soona at May 14, 2013 10:14 AM (JDLgB)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 14, 2013
Don't be so sure.
Posted by: Reggie Love at May 14, 2013 10:14 AM (dedTA)
Nobody in the Administration will do that thing in your mouth again.
That was a promise, by me, that I think will be kept
Posted by: Eric (the Dick) Holder at May 14, 2013 10:14 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 14, 2013 10:14 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 14, 2013 10:14 AM (tVTLU)
WH's seems to be over rated, They really have Nothing to do with anything. seems to be just a salesman's position
so we should, what?
Posted by: willow at May 14, 2013 10:14 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Bobo the Jugeared Clown at May 14, 2013 10:15 AM (NcPjb)
Posted by: willow at May 14, 2013 10:15 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 14, 2013 10:15 AM (uIz7u)
This should be the conservative tact.
That was kind of my point. If their denials will always be, "Well we only learned about it from the News Media too!" then start running with that- "The President has no control over his Cabinet, the Cabinet have no control over their respective branches, and on down the line. For the Good of the Country we have to remove these officers and replace them with people who will actually manage their departments."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 14, 2013 10:15 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 14, 2013 02:13 PM (8sCoq)
Leaked to the AP by whom?
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 14, 2013 10:15 AM (X6akg)
This administration is so full of shit.
Posted by: An Observation at May 14, 2013 10:15 AM (ylhEn)
I guess it may hide some of their acts but is it really going to force Congress to pick and choose their hearings?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 14, 2013 10:15 AM (YTstp)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 14, 2013 10:16 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: RWC at May 14, 2013 10:16 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Roy at May 14, 2013 10:16 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Eric Holder at May 14, 2013 10:16 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: WolfinNC at May 14, 2013 10:16 AM (HVOxM)
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 14, 2013 10:16 AM (bZvSF)
Posted by: Barbara Billingsly at May 14, 2013 10:16 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at May 14, 2013 10:17 AM (aD92d)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 14, 2013 10:17 AM (8sCoq)
"I'd say the honeymoon is over in the White House press room."
It was all going so well until TFG tried "The Shocker" on a complient but unsuspecting press corps. You'd think he's understand they're not as rough and ready as Reggie.
Some bells can't be unrung without a lot of expensive cars and jewelry.
Posted by: Jaws at May 14, 2013 10:17 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: [/i][/b]Dick Windsor at May 14, 2013 10:17 AM (Vgn84)
149 Carl Bertstein on _________scandal: ”It’s outrageous. It’s totally inexcusable…the object of it is to
_____________. ThereÂ’s no excuse for it
whatsoever… a nuclear event.”
You can fill in the blanks for just about anything this WH does, fool.
Hey Carl - is it only outrageous when it's something you think will affect you?
You and your ilk need to do your f****** job ALL the time.
Posted by: Marybeth at May 14, 2013 10:18 AM (Ks0w4)
Some bells can't be unrung without a lot of expensive cars and jewelry.
Posted by: Jaws at May 14, 2013 02:17 PM........Or a massive pile of coke.
Posted by: Reggie Love at May 14, 2013 10:18 AM (dedTA)
WH's seems to be over rated, They really have Nothing to do with anything. seems to be just a salesman's position
so we should, what?"
Oooh, oooh, Me! Me! I know!!!
Make sure they have very little power!
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 14, 2013 10:19 AM (+z4pE)
Sadly, most sentient beings can see that the White House truly IS that incompetent and clueless. They don't need to fake it.
Posted by: Roy at May 14, 2013 10:19 AM (VndSC)
That was kind of my point. If their denials will always be, "Well we only learned about it from the News Media too!" then start running with that- "The President has no control over his Cabinet, the Cabinet have no control over their respective branches, and on down the line. For the Good of the Country we have to remove these officers and replace them with people who will actually manage their departments."
*scribbling furiously*
That sounds like good brain thoughts!
Pudding!
Posted by: The Geee Ohhh Peee at May 14, 2013 10:19 AM (BrQrN)
Posted by: Build Builder at May 14, 2013 10:19 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: Ace Journalist Stephen Price Blair at May 14, 2013 10:19 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: Saul Alinsky at May 14, 2013 10:19 AM (NcPjb)
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 14, 2013 10:19 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 14, 2013 02:17 PM (8sCoq)
Ah....so they were comparing #'s called from someone inside the government (leaker) to incoming calls to the AP?
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 14, 2013 10:20 AM (X6akg)
Leaked to the AP by whom?
Posted by: Tami at May 14, 2013 02:15 PM (X6akg)
that's the question, and what DOJ hoped to find out by reviewing months of AP employees' phone records
That's really the problem with the AP scandal. It's good because the AP's knickers are in a twist, so maybe we'll get some real reporting for the next week or two, but all DOJ really has to do is produce some warrants for the information (assuming there are any- though you'd think they'd have already produced them if that was the case) and say, "This was completely legit. We didn't tell anyone because telling anyone would have ruined any chances of the investigation bearing fruit."
If they do that, the scandal goes away, and all will be forgiven.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 14, 2013 10:20 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 14, 2013 10:20 AM (uIz7u)
Posted by: toby928 at May 14, 2013 10:20 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: Saul Alinsky at May 14, 2013 02:19 PM (NcPjb)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFTLKWw542g
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 14, 2013 10:21 AM (sGtp+)
Posted by: The Emperor Has No Clothes at May 14, 2013 10:21 AM (MhA4j)
or open borders , or not checking on visa's after immigrants overstayed.
or checking out people you are warned about from Other countries.
Posted by: willow at May 14, 2013 10:21 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at May 14, 2013 10:22 AM (NcPjb)
Posted by: [/i][/b]akula51 at May 14, 2013 10:22 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 14, 2013 10:22 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: toby928 at May 14, 2013 02:20 PM ..............In a hot van with a bunch of sweaty illegals. He can take some guns with him!
Posted by: Minnfidel at May 14, 2013 10:23 AM (dedTA)
Posted by: toby928 at May 14, 2013 10:23 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: toby928 at May 14, 2013 02:20 PM (evdj2)
That would require the fuckface that runs that shithole to care enough about his citizens to demand it.
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 14, 2013 10:23 AM (bZvSF)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at May 14, 2013 02:17 PM (aD92d)
---------------------------------------------
Report it to your congresscritters. If they're dems, well, I guess you're SOL.
Posted by: Soona at May 14, 2013 10:23 AM (JDLgB)
Posted by: t-bird at May 14, 2013 10:23 AM (FcR7P)
And the CEO of the USA is the President.
The board can remove a CEO. aka Impeachment
Posted by: Tobacco Road at May 14, 2013 10:24 AM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: USA at May 14, 2013 10:25 AM (VIaw0)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 14, 2013 10:25 AM (8sCoq)
Serious?
Posted by: Tobacco Road at May 14, 2013 02:22 PM (4Mv1T)
-------------
Yes.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at May 14, 2013 10:26 AM (w41GQ)
Posted by: WolfinNC at May 14, 2013 10:26 AM (HVOxM)
Posted by: USA at May 14, 2013 10:27 AM (VIaw0)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at May 14, 2013 02:22 PM (4Mv1T)-------------Yes.
If you, then there's others. Like stated up thread, if you are a constituent of some republican leadership, I'd approach.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at May 14, 2013 10:28 AM (4Mv1T)
i think we're getting snowed.
hillary was looking pretty vulnerable on benghazi.
so the dems/media unleash a number of other scandals simultaneously, and now the media is coming down hard of the IRS and AP issues. dumping on the lame duck, but letting hillary slide
Posted by: uncle jj at May 14, 2013 10:28 AM (9b2ES)
Posted by: Barackus Obammus at May 14, 2013 10:29 AM (/Mla1)
The board can remove a CEO. aka Impeachment
I don't know if you were around yesterday, TR, but we had a good discussion about that very subject.
While impeachment would be personally satisfying on a great many levels, it'd also give the Leftards an enemy (us) and a reason to circle the wagons around TFG.
A better alternative is to just let this administration drown in its own malfeasance for the remainder of the term, and poison the left just like the GOP was poisoned after Watergate. I'd personally like to see 3.5 more years like what we've seen for the past week.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 14, 2013 10:29 AM (+z4pE)
If you, then there's others. Like stated up thread, if you are a constituent of some republican leadership, I'd approach.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at May 14, 2013 02:28 PM (4Mv1T)
My congresscreature and both of my senators are brain-damaged Democrats.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at May 14, 2013 10:30 AM (w41GQ)
Posted by: They did it, blame them! at May 14, 2013 10:31 AM (MhA4j)
The DOJ, who was spying on reporters, is going to investigate the IRS, who was targeting conservatives. Meanwhile, the DOJ will investigate itself on the wiretaps. Then they'll both report to the President, who let 4 Americans die in Libya. I can't see a problem there.
Oh, and when the reports are released, Jay Carney will brief us all, as soon as he reads the summaries in the newspapers.
Posted by: WolfinNC at May 14, 2013 10:31 AM (HVOxM)
Posted by: SpongeBob Saget at May 14, 2013 10:31 AM (epxV4)
Posted by: Some Guy In The White House at May 14, 2013 10:32 AM (HjPtV)
Ha!
It only took a day and half of searching online, but I've found a latch for the small back door of a '99 Izuzu Trooper at a scrap yard in California.
Between that and Obama's troubles, it's turned out to be a pretty good day.
Posted by: jwest at May 14, 2013 10:33 AM (u2a4R)
Ugh. I am fortunate where I live, for now.
And by the way, my kin had to hide the family silver from Sherman's march. But no hard feelings. You're on the right side now.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at May 14, 2013 10:33 AM (4Mv1T)
hillary was looking pretty vulnerable on benghazi.
so the dems/media unleash a number of other scandals simultaneously, and now the media is coming down hard of the IRS and AP issues. dumping on the lame duck, but letting hillary slide
Posted by: uncle jj at May 14, 2013 02:28 PM (9b2ES)
----------------------------------------
I'm very curious as to what was discussed in that private WH press meeting. You may be on to something.
Posted by: Soona at May 14, 2013 10:33 AM (JDLgB)
Posted by: what?????? at May 14, 2013 10:35 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: USA at May 14, 2013 10:36 AM (VIaw0)
Posted by: They did it, blame them! at May 14, 2013 10:40 AM (MhA4j)
If they do that, the scandal goes away, and all will be forgiven.
Posted by: AllenG (
The problem with that is Holder claimed today that *he didn't issue the subpoenas.* If it were a legit investigation he would have had to sign them.
Options:
A ) He's lying and did issue them
B ) Not a legit investigation but illegal seizure of info.
Further, leak investigations start with deposing the leak outlets, in this case supposedly the AP reporter on the bomb story.
The AP would have known about the investigation at that point. Maybe they couldn't report on the investigation but other news outlets would have known.
Why would the DOJ break investigative procedure, order the subpoena, and then drop it?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 14, 2013 10:41 AM (YTstp)
Bill O'reilly ought to think. Impeachment occurs in the democratically controlled Senate, not the Republican controlled house and "if" is the biggest word in the english language.
Nixon resigned because he was rendered helpless.
Posted by: what?????? at May 14, 2013 10:42 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: Cheribebe at May 14, 2013 10:42 AM (9dWvN)
Posted by: toby928 at May 14, 2013 10:43 AM (evdj2)
No. Articles of Impeachment are passed in the House, then the impeached are tried in the Senate.
Posted by: toby928 at May 14, 2013 02:43 PM (evdj2)
Forget it toby....that's 'curious'...she's on a roll.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 14, 2013 10:45 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 14, 2013 01:59 PM (tVTLU)
Could be McStain and Grahamnsty were all in on the Syrian gun running with other repunk warriors of the stupid variety!
Seblieus shaking down Bidness for Obamacare funds/
And oh hey look what some guy in Chicago found tapped to the bathroon stall in the gay bath house, an envelope with a birth cert that says Odog Eater, born in kenya and the Idonesian passports with six fake social security cards! grade transcripts and college entrance papers to follow!
Posted by: ConcealedKerry or Submit at May 14, 2013 10:45 AM (vXqv3)
Posted by: They did it, blame them! at May 14, 2013 10:45 AM (MhA4j)
I'm thinking that the Media is just reminding Barky that he only reigns at their sufferance.
We the people do not enter into the calculation.
Posted by: trainer at May 14, 2013 10:52 AM (K5X44)
Posted by: The Chicken Heart Blob Administration at May 14, 2013 10:53 AM (MhA4j)
Let's see, we have scandals involving:
DOJ
IRS
EPA
State
Anyone heard from teh Department of Transportation lately? They're due for one.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Pirate Scum of Umbar at May 14, 2013 10:56 AM (hLRSq)
Let's see, we have scandals involving:
DOJ
IRS
EPA
State
Don't forget
HHS, ATF, FBI
The hits keep on coming...
Posted by: runningrn at May 14, 2013 11:01 AM (PLOz8)
"There has been some speculation – as yet unconfirmed – that General Ham was relieved of his command because he intended to send a rescue mission to the U.S. consulate facility in Benghazi, where the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were killed by a terrorist force in a 7-hour firefight on September 11th and 12th."
Be interesting to hear from General Ham - don't you think?
There was a destroyer with cruise missiles close to Benghazi that night.
Don't tell me nothing could have been done. As I have already pointed out they could have at least crashed the Predator on the mortar site that was being lazed. By the way - who told us the Predator was unarmed and why exactly do we believe him?
Posted by: An Observation at May 14, 2013 11:13 AM (ylhEn)
Let's see, we have scandals involving:
DOJ
IRS
EPA
State
---------------
Hell, when the search words include "intern", "cigar", "east wing", and "oral", ONLY THEN do have a scandal.
Posted by: Bill Clinton at May 14, 2013 11:22 AM (EGPJQ)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 14, 2013 11:33 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 14, 2013 11:35 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: An Observation at May 14, 2013 03:13 PM (ylhEn)
got a link on that Destroyer??? I've been looking for that info...
And they would not have used Cruise Missles... but the 5 inch Gun in fire support mode is a VERY accurate weapon.. and Benghazi is not that large...
Plus, with its helo... it could have started the evacuation of the CIA folks... and supported with its boarding team...
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 14, 2013 11:36 AM (lZBBB)
Jeeb. I leave the office for a couple hours and the shit just kept flying.
Gotta lot of catching up to do. Unreal.
Posted by: wth at May 14, 2013 11:47 AM (wAQA5)
What was his response to the Trayvon question?
Posted by: PJ at May 14, 2013 02:22 PM (ZWaLo)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1964 seconds, 372 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: imp at May 14, 2013 09:54 AM (UaxA0)