May 10, 2013
— andy But not really.
The revolutionary concept of 3-D printed firearms has been building momentum for months now. Online observers, innovators, investors and the generally curious celebrated as the first completely 3-D printed handgun became a reality. Since the blueprint for “The Liberator” hit the web, the file was downloaded more than 100,000 times in a few days.Today, the government shut it down.
And in this case "shut it down" means they maybe made the file slightly harder to find. Because if you're looking for it, you'd certainly never think of looking on Pirate Bay or somewhere like that.
This move by the government was pretty predictable, as was the fact that it would induce more people to hunt down and download the plans than would otherwise have done so, what with the Streisand Effect and all.
But if you've been paying attention to Cody Wilson, Defense Distributed's founder, at all, this whole project has never been about guns anyway. It's about something more fundamental than that.
According to Wilson, the organization’s ideal goal is to test constitutional rights. “This is the conversation I want,” he says. “Is this a workable regulatory regime? Can there be defense trade control in the era of the Internet and 3D printing? I think this isn’t a project about firearms, it’s a project about political equality.”
This core problem with the left's predictable BAN ALL THE THINGS! response to events like Newtown is that it's wildly unrealistic as a solution to the problem they purport to address. I know this may come as a shock to regular readers of the HQ, but it would seem that the left is much more interested in using these events to justify their long march towards top-down, authoritarian control than it is in any of the particulars.
Guns have been around for centuries now, and the basic technology isn't going away. The 3D-printed gun isn't even all that revolutionary (it shares the name and basic idea of the FP-45 Liberator that we planned to flood Axis-occupied Europe with during World War II) and zip guns and other crude firearms are no big trick to make.
If you follow the left's anti-gun fetish to it's ultimate goal, a complete gun ban, then two groups wind up with guns: the government and criminals. In such a regime, it'd be awfully hard for anyone who values civil liberties to tell the difference between the two.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have a file to share.
Posted by: andy at
07:30 AM
| Comments (215)
Post contains 429 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Icedog at May 10, 2013 07:36 AM (9ScGj)
This is something that the Libs just don't get. There's a whole Internet out there, and it exists on levels far beyond the top level stuff you see on the WWW, and far beyond even the gray area stuff like Pirate Bay and Megaupload.
Just issuing an edict to remove something "from the Internet" isn't going to do squat.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 10, 2013 07:37 AM (eytER)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at May 10, 2013 07:37 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: kreplach at May 10, 2013 07:37 AM (eiJIn)
I'm pretty sure that this action from DoS was EXACTLY what Wilson and DD was after. Now he likely has standing for any number of legal actions.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 10, 2013 07:38 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Dang at May 10, 2013 07:38 AM (R18D0)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at May 10, 2013 07:38 AM (co+55)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at May 10, 2013 07:38 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Emile Antoon Khadaji at May 10, 2013 07:39 AM (6NIyO)
Posted by: mugiwara at May 10, 2013 07:39 AM (W7ffl)
Too many freedoms have been lost because good men have allowed the nanny-state to step in and regulate and once done, we never get back to where we started. There is no reset button with the big-government types.
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 07:40 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 10, 2013 07:40 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at May 10, 2013 07:41 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 10, 2013 07:41 AM (6H6FZ)
BATF rules allow for the fabrication of firearms by an individual so long as the firearm is "detectable", and the maker never sells or transfers that firearm to another individual.
Posted by: fixerupper at May 10, 2013 07:41 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 10, 2013 07:42 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at May 10, 2013 07:43 AM (4rxW7)
Posted by: Andy at May 10, 2013 07:43 AM (fXBVJ)
He had the right idea, though. When the idea of printable guns gained a bunch of traction a couple months ago, the initial push was to make it possible to print out AR-15 parts. I thought that was a mistake, and people should be concentrating on making new designs that were explicitly designed to be manufactured by amateurs using easily available parts, not to copy a gun designed to be built to close tolerances by factories.
Honestly, ammo I think is likely to be more of a problem than rigging up something to fire it.
Posted by: Grey Fox at May 10, 2013 07:43 AM (XQsSC)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at May 10, 2013 07:44 AM (XIxXP)
"So how much does a 3D printer cost vs a trip to Home Depot? This is goofy, I tell ya. Goofy."
Kinda missing the point of the whole exercise there, chief. This is a political protest, not an engineering session.
Posted by: Jaws at May 10, 2013 07:46 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 10, 2013 07:47 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Andy at May 10, 2013 07:47 AM (fXBVJ)
Posted by: Icedog at May 10, 2013 07:47 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 10, 2013 07:47 AM (52n2x)
"Now if you'll excuse me, I have a file to share."
--- ---- ---- ---
Not me. Twin machetes and a cross bow. Have they banned throwing knives yet?
Posted by: Beagle at May 10, 2013 07:48 AM (sOtz/)
It's already been pointed out, these printers and material cost waaaayyyyy more than you can get a regular weapon for, and would likely only be a one shot deal anyway.
Clearly a proof-of-concept thing to attract attention AND to draw the regulators. I don't see it as helpful as the leftards and hollywood will dramatize a threat that just doesn't exist and the low-info types will assume a threat.
ie, high capacity magazines that never run out
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 07:48 AM (/jHWN)
http://www.filedropper.com/improvisedmunitionshandbookv3
Posted by: ARL at May 10, 2013 07:48 AM (X4Pz8)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 10, 2013 07:48 AM (52n2x)
>> Not a whole one but prolly your favorite parts.
Why would anyone want to make a whole one of those anyway?
Oh. Did I say that out loud?
Posted by: Andy at May 10, 2013 11:47 AM (fXBVJ)
I just want the parts neccessary to make me a sammich.
Posted by: mugiwara at May 10, 2013 07:49 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 10, 2013 07:49 AM (52n2x)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 10, 2013 07:50 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Pyrocles at May 10, 2013 07:50 AM (cv5Iw)
Posted by: The MFM at May 10, 2013 07:51 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 07:51 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Grey Fox at May 10, 2013 11:43 AM (XQsSC)
Agreed.
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at May 10, 2013 11:44 AM (XIxXP)
-----
Disagree. The hard part is the chamber. Center fire pressures run anywhere from 15000 to 60000ish PSI on common calibers. Get your headspace wrong and your going to blow your hand or your face off.
Posted by: fixerupper at May 10, 2013 07:51 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 07:51 AM (/jHWN)
This seems like exactly the opposite of what we say when the NY Slimes prints classified information on its front page.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 10, 2013 07:52 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Icedog at May 10, 2013 07:53 AM (9ScGj)
From what one of buddies at work says, it's probably even cheaper to get a cheap computerized CNC machine than a 3D printer. After you have that it isn't that big of a step to turn out, oh, an AR lower.
Posted by: Emile Antoon Khadaji at May 10, 2013 11:39 AM (6NIyO)
There's a long-time CNC geek community who build inexpensive CNC machines at home. Been around for many years.
Lots of home builders of ARs and AKs as well (like tens of thousands of them), using cheap hydrolic presses and drill presses from Harbor Freight, along with simple jigs to accurately bend & drill the receivers and assemble the parts into working firearms that are equal to the quality and durability of commercial guns.
The guns, normal capacity magazines and other evil items really weren't the point anyway. It's about the government restriction on information and the private affairs of the citizenry. Wilson's genius is to attack these restrictions via the new fad of 3D fabrication. The fact that the finished product is pretty much a one-time use item doesn't matter.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 10, 2013 07:53 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at May 10, 2013 07:54 AM (PMGbu)
Posted by: Infidel at May 10, 2013 07:54 AM (O/fK8)
Posted by: polynikes at May 10, 2013 07:54 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: fastfreefall at May 10, 2013 07:54 AM (YIGpV)
Class.
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 07:54 AM (/jHWN)
The federal government does not have the authority to ban firearms period.
Posted by: kreplach
Technically, it looks like the government isn't banning the gun, but rather banning the information on how to build the gun from being available to non-Americans.
And that does appear to fit within ITAR restrictions.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 10, 2013 07:54 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 10, 2013 07:55 AM (XioR/)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 10, 2013 07:55 AM (9Bj8R)
No! No! I refuse to believe it!
*bursts into tears*
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 10, 2013 07:55 AM (VtjlW)
"The hard part is the chamber. Center fire pressures run anywhere from 15000 to 60000ish PSI on common calibers. Get your headspace wrong and your going to blow your hand or your face off."
------ ---
Right. "Merely" using military .308 machine gun ammo instead of .308 civilian can cause a pressure disaster in guns made out of steel. Lots of stupid crap happens in reloading.
Anything but .22 rimfire in a plastic gun seems fairly suicidal.
Posted by: Beagle at May 10, 2013 07:56 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 10, 2013 07:56 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: maddogg at May 10, 2013 07:57 AM (OlN4e)
Honestly, ammo I think is likely to be more of a problem than rigging up something to fire it.
Posted by: Grey Fox at May 10, 2013 11:43 AM (XQsSC)
Agreed.
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at May 10, 2013 11:44 AM (XIxXP)
---------------
If you're talking cetnerfire/rimfire, OK maybe. But pellet guns are at the point where I wouldn't want to be hit with one either, and those run on compressed air. It's not too far out to imagine a printable pellet gun that runs on those small CO2 cartridges, or for that matter other commonly available compress gas containers. And the pellets could be easily made.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 10, 2013 07:57 AM (tVWQB)
A 3D printer cannot produce ammo (yet) but the means of producing that at a good rate in a basement workshop is widespread. The chemistry required is pretty low level, the sort of thing that was once common in kid's chemistry sets.
The Liberator only has to fire once or twice, if used to obtain better weaponry from the opposition.
Posted by: epobirs at May 10, 2013 07:57 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: Pyrocles at May 10, 2013 11:50 AM (cv5Iw)
yeah, tell him you read on the interweb that guys in Georgia are printin' off hand grenades and claymore mines.
And they printed off a functioning robot Ronald Reagan in a bunker in Wyoming at the Haliburton complex where they 3-D printed off Cheney's new heart...
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 07:58 AM (/jHWN)
The mental gymnastics required to be a liberal are astounding...
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at May 10, 2013 07:59 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: Stedenko at May 10, 2013 07:59 AM (rd9se)
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/u][/s][/b] at May 10, 2013 08:00 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Icedog at May 10, 2013 08:00 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: maddogg at May 10, 2013 08:00 AM (OlN4e)
The deuce you say!
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 10, 2013 08:00 AM (jKWYf)
Posted by: kreplach at May 10, 2013 08:00 AM (hjRtO)
Now he likely has standing for any number of legal actions.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 10, 2013 11:38 AM (TIIx5)
He has an FFL. The plans explicitly add a slug of metal to make it detectable.
Only tyrants could charge him.
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at May 10, 2013 11:47 AM (52n2x)
True. Yet I was thinking more in terms of Wilson and DD having suffered a legal injury from the DoS action, giving them standing to file suit. Some of the AoS sharks.....errr, lawyers should probably chime in on the details of how that would work, I'm just a moron.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 10, 2013 08:01 AM (TIIx5)
Anything but .22 rimfire in a plastic gun seemsfairly suicidal.
-----
Yup.... and guess what.... There are thousands of places you can download detailed drawings of just about every chamber ever manufactured that meets SAMMI specs for a given caliber. Hell you can RENT the reamers from Brownells.
But 3D printers. Ban those puppies.
Posted by: fixerupper at May 10, 2013 08:01 AM (nELVU)
If you're talking cetnerfire/rimfire, OK maybe. But pellet guns are at the point where I wouldn't want to be hit with one either, and those run on compressed air. It's not too far out to imagine a printable pellet gun that runs on those small CO2 cartridges, or for that matter other commonly available compress gas containers. And the pellets could be easily made.
Back in the late 18th century, the Austrians came of with a military air gun and used it for sniping. I don't think it was particularly effective, but it freaked out the French to the point that Napoleon threatened to hang any Austrian soldier captured while using one.
With CO2 cartridges available, it shouldn't be hard to improve on the Austrians' design.
Posted by: Grey Fox at May 10, 2013 08:02 AM (XQsSC)
Posted by: Roy at May 10, 2013 08:02 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 10, 2013 08:02 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Your Federal Betters, Barack Obama and Eric Holder at May 10, 2013 08:02 AM (FcR7P)
The hell?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 10, 2013 08:02 AM (lVPtV)
========
$500 for a mini-mill from Harbor Freight. Lots of instructions on the internet on how to turn that into a mini-CNC mill.
Posted by: RoyalOil at May 10, 2013 08:03 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 08:03 AM (/jHWN)
It's also a taxation racket. If you have an FFL 06 license to make and sell ammo, you get stuck with almost three grand a year in "fees" because of ITAR. Doesn't matter if you never intend to sell overseas, you still have to pony up the money to the Feds.
Posted by: B at May 10, 2013 08:04 AM (XyoGP)
I've seen different stories on this... WHO shut them down? I've heard State Dept. under Export laws... and DOD who supposedly classified it (which is problematic as there is no new technolgy here, and I'm not sure you can involuntarily classify somthing you do not own... )...
This is a Property Rights, and Free Speech issue.... so just where, IN THE CONSTITUTION, does it say the Federal Government can order this guy to take this down?
Oh... and he also owns it under CopyRight Law....
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 10, 2013 08:04 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Roy at May 10, 2013 08:04 AM (VndSC)
Anyone watching Fox? We have Marines in Spain on alert for possible deployment to Libya.
The hell?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 10, 2013 12:02 PM (lVPtV)
Finally!
Posted by: Zombie Chris Stevens at May 10, 2013 08:04 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: t-bird at May 10, 2013 08:05 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: RoyalOil at May 10, 2013 12:03 PM (VjL9S)
The CNC is fine for production. Be advised that having a CNC machine doesn't make you a machinist. The machine has no skill. And without the skills, the machine is an anchor.
Posted by: maddogg at May 10, 2013 08:05 AM (OlN4e)
The hell?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 10, 2013 12:02 PM (lVPtV)
Yes.... seeeeee.... we are deploying Military to Libya to help those poor Americans in Benghazi....
Is it our fault the Military took so long.... sequest ya know...
Posted by: Obama White House at May 10, 2013 08:05 AM (lZBBB)
Yes it would be cheaper currently to build your own without the 3d printer, but eventually most people will have one in their home building all kinds of stuff. This is just the early adopters doing their thing.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 10, 2013 08:05 AM (jKWYf)
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 10, 2013 08:06 AM (8sCoq)
If they're disseminating that information to persons in Iran or a half-dozen other hostile states, they can.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 10, 2013 08:07 AM (ZKzrr)
------
When seconds count, the Department of State is only 8 months away.
Posted by: Assault Citizen Anachronda at May 10, 2013 08:07 AM (U82Km)
Posted by: t-bird at May 10, 2013 08:07 AM (FcR7P)
Back in the late 18th century, the Austrians came of with a military air gun and used it for sniping. I don't think it was particularly effective, but it freaked out the French to the point that Napoleon threatened to hang any Austrian soldier captured while using one.
With CO2 cartridges available, it shouldn't be hard to improve on the Austrians' design.
Grey Fox at May 10, 2013 12:02 PM
-----
Actually, Lewis and Clark had a .44 cal air rifle on their expedition. They used it for hunting and did pretty well with it. The Austrians didn't have Gaston Glock around yet to help with their design, but agreed that a contemporary design air rifle/pistol would not be a slouch.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 10, 2013 08:08 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Grey Fox at May 10, 2013 12:02 PM (XQsSC)
----
Another little BATF twist in the rules. Compress air rifles are excluded from the BATF purview...... at this time.
I know of several large bore air rifles suitable for hunting larger game. No background check, no restrictions on ownership.
Posted by: fixerupper at May 10, 2013 08:08 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 10, 2013 08:08 AM (9Bj8R)
Putting US Armed Forces in Europe on alert for possible action in Libya is another Obama ploy to make it appear he is in control and prepared to act. Does anyone believe Obama would actually commit to a hostile environ?
Pussies always lead from behind, and we have Big Pussy as CiC.
Posted by: Doctor Fish at May 10, 2013 08:08 AM (1lQzY)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 10, 2013 08:09 AM (bb5+k)
Yeah, there's really no good reason I shouldn't be allowed to sell weapons software to Iran or Syria or North Korea, 'cause C code is copyrighted free speech, amirite?!
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 10, 2013 08:09 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: T. at May 10, 2013 08:09 AM (1qp/j)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 10, 2013 08:09 AM (9Bj8R)
I do. He'd do it now that he's safely elected. "See," he'd say, "I'm protecting our interests abroad, and projecting American power."
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at May 10, 2013 08:10 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: Roy at May 10, 2013 08:10 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Grey Fox at May 10, 2013 12:02 PM (XQsSC)
Lewis and Clark had an Aurtrian Air Rifle on their Expedition.... when they met a new tribe, they would put on their uniforms, and give a demonstration of the rifle...
The indians, who knew about black powerder muzzle loaders... did not know that they only had ONE.... and so left them alone...
The rifle was VERY effective... more powerful than a standard muzzle loader... and could fire multiple rounds before it needed to be refilled... problem was that the idea of interchangable parts had not happened yet, so they were very difficult to maintain and repair...
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 10, 2013 08:10 AM (lZBBB)
...and an additional readme...in Chinese.
Is it just possible that the reason the State Department is clamping down on this not because of pure anti-gun sentiment(for which I'm sure the ATF could throw its weight around)...but perhaps a worry that the plans will head east, and possibly get into the hands of citizens in a tyrannical Communist regime that we just happen to be best buds with, in terms of trade?
Trust me, I'm not trying to give the Benghazi Bullshitters the benefit of the doubt. However, the inclusion of the Chinese readme is incredibly curious.
Posted by: Michael at May 10, 2013 08:11 AM (Y/HG5)
Posted by: polynikes at May 10, 2013 08:11 AM (m2CN7)
Really?
I'm unaware of the clause in the Constitution where it says "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear and manufacture arms shall not be infringed."
And this fits within the ITAR regime. You can bitch about it, but it's not some capricious power grab.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/u][/s][/b] at May 10, 2013 08:12 AM (sbV1u)
The federal government does not have the authority to tell any person who resides in the several states they cannot fabricate and disseminate the plans for a firearm.
Posted by: kreplach
Can and does -- if that firearm or its plans is or may be distributed overseas:
Directorate of DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS
Division VI - Small Weapons and Firearms
(USML Commodity Categories I, II, III and X)
Now clearly, the impetus for this particular action isn't really fear of North Korea getting advanced Liberator technology. It's part of the Great Gun Grab. But the Feds do have legal cover. That's why the designer is really mostly interested in forcing a test case to define how broad those powers are.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 10, 2013 08:12 AM (kdS6q)
On Libya: See that guy that was leading the attack is just hanging around in the open in Tripoli and now that the heat is on the WH they have to go get him to change the subject (plus he may have knowledge of something or other so he must also die).
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 10, 2013 08:12 AM (jKWYf)
We have Marines in Spain on alert for possible deployment to Libya.
The hell?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 10, 2013 12:02 PM (lVPtV)
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Just making sure your hash said this year.
I know there is an ongoing problem with militias flying al Qaeda flags over everything and shutting down government functions at will in Libya, but getting in their ongoing civil war seems a bit crazy.
If it's a punitive raid on Ansar al-Sharia, probably best to call it off if you and I know about it beforehand.
Posted by: Beagle at May 10, 2013 08:13 AM (sOtz/)
---
Well.... to be fair.... he did go to Texas this week.....
Posted by: fixerupper at May 10, 2013 08:13 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: kreplach at May 10, 2013 08:13 AM (pmDdf)
Btw over at the DEFCAD forums there's talk that the feds are invoking ITAR.
Posted by: Xavier at May 10, 2013 08:14 AM (z7c10)
Posted by: kreplach
FIFY
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 10, 2013 08:14 AM (jKWYf)
Posted by: t-bird at May 10, 2013 12:05 PM (FcR7P)
There are 80% lower parties where a guy brings the machinery for a fee and three or four guys use it over a weekend. All strictly legal.
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 10, 2013 08:15 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 10, 2013 08:15 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 10, 2013 08:15 AM (XioR/)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at May 10, 2013 08:16 AM (NokrH)
Posted by: RoyalOil at May 10, 2013 12:03 PM (VjL9S) The CNC is fine for production. Be advised that having a CNC machine doesn't make you a machinist. The machine has no skill. And without the skills, the machine is an anchor.
=====
I know. But practice does.
That's my next project; getting a mini-CNC mill up and running, with an old dedicated computer with a basic CAD program to run it.
Not for guns really, but to make parts and build shit; a new hobby for when I finish my other projects.
Posted by: RoyalOil at May 10, 2013 08:16 AM (VjL9S)
True 'dat. But the SCOTUS has recognized reasonable limits on firearms. This issue is always that the gun grabbers are unreasonable, which is why they are so frequently thwarted.
But I think there's a pretty good legal, and public policy case for not allowing unfettered access to undetectable guns to guys named "Mohammad"
Jus' sayin'
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/u][/s][/b] at May 10, 2013 08:16 AM (sbV1u)
Damn straight it is a tax racket. Looked at a sideline business in making fmj bullets using swaging equipment. You can make fair plinking bullets using 22 rimfire casing for the fmj on .223 bullets.
After researching this, not willing to pay the 3K per year for the privilege along with the local zoning issues. Yes, even casting lead bullets using the latest military technology from the 1700's and selling them gets you covered by the ITAR regulations. It is almost like the Govt don't want you making these things and selling them.
Posted by: wg at May 10, 2013 08:16 AM (bWXAn)
http://bit.ly/IT9qBK
Posted by: Nate in New Orleans at May 10, 2013 08:16 AM (lhX9P)
>>>IRS ADMITS TARGETING CONSERVATIVE GROUPS; APOLOGIZES
...they point to "lower-level" employees in Cincy. follow the money. I bet it ends up in Valerie Jarrett's pocket.
Posted by: Roy at May 10, 2013 08:17 AM (VndSC)
Actually, Lewis and Clark had a .44 cal air rifle on their expedition. They used it for hunting and did pretty well with it. The Austrians didn't have Gaston Glock around yet to help with their design, but agreed that a contemporary design air rifle/pistol would not be a slouch.
The Austrian gun was a variant design on the Italian piece that L and C had, IIRC.
I don't think that the air gun was as powerful as a comparable muzzleloader, but it could be fired very rapidly, was silent, and had some power - there was a negligent discharge right before they set out that grazed a woman at about sixty yards and knocked her out (she recovered).
Posted by: Grey Fox at May 10, 2013 08:17 AM (XQsSC)
Powerball jackpot tomorrow - $270 million annuity.
Could afford a real nice machine shop on an island with that much bread.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 10, 2013 08:17 AM (XioR/)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at May 10, 2013 08:18 AM (NokrH)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 10, 2013 08:18 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 10, 2013 12:12 PM (kdS6q)
Uh.... he's not trading weapons...
He's making the plans available to Americans...
Now... he just HAPPENS to be making them available to the rest of the world as well... but can he be stopped from making them available to AMERICANS?
Hmmm.... maybe... yeah.... a Big Banner at the top... saying if you are NOT a US Citizen, you can't download it??? Kinda like the Gun Free zone crap they think will stop a mass murderer from hitting a school?
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 10, 2013 08:18 AM (lZBBB)
Now make with the 'IRSS' thread so I can get my rant on.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 10, 2013 08:19 AM (YTstp)
Posted by: Beer Ninja at May 10, 2013 08:19 AM (2tXeA)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 10, 2013 12:18 PM (bb5+k)
----
Thus.... all the grabbing of the guns.
Dovetails.
Posted by: fixerupper at May 10, 2013 08:19 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: The Soviet Union at May 10, 2013 08:19 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: Jean at May 10, 2013 08:20 AM (CMlD4)
Honestly, ammo I think is likely to be more of a problem than rigging up something to fire it.
Posted by: Grey Fox at May 10, 2013 11:43 AM (XQsSC)
Agreed.
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at May 10, 2013 11:44 AM (XIxXP)
----------------------
Nonsense. John Malkovich was able to hide two .38 Supers in a rabbit's foot keychain when he went to assassinate the president with his plastic gun.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 08:21 AM (CJjw5)
Yup. Got it.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/u][/s][/b] at May 10, 2013 08:21 AM (sbV1u)
=========
"Gun Control" has always been much more about "Control" than about "Guns".
Posted by: Nighthawk at May 10, 2013 08:22 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 10, 2013 08:22 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Jean at May 10, 2013 08:23 AM (CMlD4)
I hear they are remaking The Graduate.
They are replacing the famous quote "one word. plastics" with "two words. 3D Printers"
Posted by: polynikes at May 10, 2013 08:23 AM (m2CN7)
He's not. He's putting it on the internet.
Posted by: kreplach
And that's the legal principle the designer is trying to test, general vs specific distribution. And that's where he's going to fail. The Feds have an established power to regulate the transfer of weapons, components, plans and directly related science and technology overseas.
And since once something is on the internet is can go overseas: Game Set Match.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 10, 2013 08:23 AM (kdS6q)
Apologies if this has been said before.
Compare this with how the left feels about teenagers and sex.
They are going to do it anyway. Why fight it? Just teach them how to be safe.
...but then they approve of teenagers having sex.
Posted by: Sheik Yur Bouty at May 10, 2013 08:24 AM (gC/L+)
============
And fuck them too.
They have no more authority than any other branch of the government to restrict our natural, God-given rights.
We need to remember that whole "consent of the governed" thing applies to ALL branches of the government.
Such a con, that just because one branch of the government blesses the unconstitutional acts of another branch of the government that makes it ok.
Posted by: RoyalOil at May 10, 2013 08:24 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at May 10, 2013 11:35 AM (XvrTA)
Ooooohhhhh! That will make Barney Frank's day. Or did you mean "first"?
Posted by: Slappy at May 10, 2013 08:24 AM (LTbLf)
Posted by: T. at May 10, 2013 08:25 AM (1qp/j)
Posted by: t-bird at May 10, 2013 08:25 AM (FcR7P)
Click the link in my nick, or at least hover your mouse. I have not actually read that yet.
Ah....
Mmmm.....
How to put this. That should not happen to the best and bravest people in America who actually, as opposed to people just saying it inappropriately, "paid the ultimate price."
Did not even curse or fulminate once. Computer spittle free.
Posted by: Beagle at May 10, 2013 08:26 AM (sOtz/)
A bit off-topic. Following a link at Glenn Reynold's site (below the Bill Whittle link), I read a NYT column devoted to Karl Rove's Liberty Works data management deal with the RNC. The NYT columnist explicitly quoted multiple FreeRepublic COMMENTERS by userid. That's something.
Posted by: mrp at May 10, 2013 08:26 AM (HjPtV)
More and more comfortable every Thursday during Ladies Day at the range.
Pretty sure she will be ordering her own gun here within about 30 days.
Anyone ever been smacked in the face by a paintball from about five foot away, traveling at 300FPS?
Could come in handy inside a home, if there was enough warning.
Mrs VIA is up to about 12RPS in semi-auto with that particular toy of hers.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at May 10, 2013 08:26 AM (10U4R)
Could afford a real nice machine shop on an island with that much bread.
And a foreman!
I'm trying to come up with a suitable logo for Alextopia's Machining Services.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 10, 2013 08:26 AM (+z4pE)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 10, 2013 08:27 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: DAve at May 10, 2013 08:28 AM (XDC0v)
-----
WWII was such a loooong time ago.
Posted by: Jay Carney at May 10, 2013 08:28 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, assault Hobbit at May 10, 2013 08:29 AM (lVb7s)
Posted by: kreplach at May 10, 2013 08:29 AM (qvsl/)
Glenn Reynolds also has a link to an article about Bloomberg (company) reporters having considerable access to customer's Bloomberg terminals and private information.
Posted by: mrp at May 10, 2013 08:30 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: t-bird at May 10, 2013 08:30 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 10, 2013 12:26 PM (+z4pE)
I believe Keebler has the elf logo copyrighted.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at May 10, 2013 08:31 AM (rXcBX)
Raptors rampant over a field of hipsters.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at May 10, 2013 08:31 AM (Gk3SS)
IRS THREAD NOW!
Posted by: weft cut-loop at May 10, 2013 12:27 PM (YTstp)
The cobloggers are essential to this blog and this blog is essential to the conservative cause. The conservative cause is essential to the United States of America. I for one will not idly sit here while you bad mouth the United States of America!
You sir should be banned.
Posted by: polynikes at May 10, 2013 08:32 AM (m2CN7)
Hang on to your seats.
A pack of pit bulls mauled a jogger to death in L.A. Shocking, right?
Why we have not exterminated that breed is beyond me.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 08:32 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at May 10, 2013 08:32 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 10, 2013 08:33 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: DAve at May 10, 2013 12:28 PM (XDC0v)
Thanks for the updated info. Shouldn't be too hard to figure out a work-around for that.
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 10, 2013 08:36 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 10, 2013 08:36 AM (Vgn84)
http://bit.ly/IT9qBK
Posted by: Nate in New Orleans at May 10, 2013 12:16 PM (lhX9P
Ok, I already knew about the gas can cause I bought two a few years back and they are horrid by design.
I now think I want my 3-D printed jerry-can or a proper spout and a vent.
Posted by: Yip at May 10, 2013 08:36 AM (/jHWN)
Hello everyone way up there from a little Aussie insomniac Down Here
OT alert
Who the hell is Jodi Arias???
I'm watching Fox News here and I'm thinking that Jodi Arias (who?) and that vile bloke who kidnapped those girls is all that has happened in the US
My thinking ...what your beloved President and his sidekick the lovely Hillary did to those US staff in Libya trumps anything else
They lied, they covered up, they actually fibbed to the rellies of those killed AND they have a political prisoner in that film maker....
Just imagine if a Republican President had been in
OK Now Fox is covering the media bias....
Posted by: aussie at May 10, 2013 08:38 AM (GIzXf)
No..."An African American mother, and her same sex life partner were assaulted by a pack of pit-bulls this morning while hitting softballs in the park. The mother was able to defend herself by firing her legally carried semi-automatic pistol at the pack. injuring three of them and killing one more while emptying her 13 round magazine at them. The mother credits her survival to the Affordable handgun act, passed by Republicans in 2014, which thru government subsidies allowed financially challenged women to legally purchase the weapon,as well as her thanks to the NRA for offering her a free firearms safety course to allow her to own and operate the handgun safely" would be a shocker.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at May 10, 2013 08:41 AM (10U4R)
130 CADOJ has declared build parties illegal. The process takes about 9 minutes per.
Posted by: DAve at May 10, 2013 12:28 PM (XDC0v)
Thanks for the updated info. Shouldn't be too hard to figure out a work-around for that.
Just call it a LGBT Hardware Party. The Kali bigwigs will both encourage it and not want to even think about investigating the goings on at the same time.
Posted by: Jaws at May 10, 2013 08:41 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: DAve at May 10, 2013 08:43 AM (XDC0v)
Posted by: at May 10, 2013 12:36 PM (Vgn84)
-----------------
Oh, yes it is. I saw a study a couple of years ago that collated all the news accounts of dog attacks, whether by a single dog or a pack of dogs. Pit bulls were not the breed with the most incidents of biting, which is understandable because they are by no means the widest-owned breed.
However, of dog attacks that ended in a fatality, almost every one of them involved a pit bull, or a pack of dogs in which a pit bull is a member.
Everyone says, "It's not the breed" until the next instance of a toddler or neighbor being maimed or killed by the family pitbull. Were all of these families raising them for dog fights? No. A sixty-pound pit bull is almost more than your average 180 lb man can handle. Two of them - you don't stand a chance.
To my mind, keeping these animals as pets is every bit as dumb an idea as keeping a 15 foot constrictor - once they've decided you're food, it's too late.
Never own an animal you can't kill with your bare hands, if necessary.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 08:43 AM (CJjw5)
There's a great article Instapundit linked earlier about how the government has wrecked the gas can.
Posted by: Nate in New Orleans
"An ominous regulatory announcement from the EPA came in 2007"
Another fine product from The House of Bush.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 10, 2013 08:45 AM (kdS6q)
Oh, and if you want to screw the media/hollywood, purchase a Blu Ray BD-ROM Burner about $70. Then buy AnyDvD HD ($70) and download Imgburn (free). You then get 50GB Blu Ray disks or a big harddrive. A big hardrive can be cheaper per MB (4TB for $190 at Newegg) and go to town.
Posted by: Iblis at May 10, 2013 08:45 AM (U0ndG)
Posted by: RWC at May 10, 2013 08:45 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 10, 2013 08:47 AM (Vgn84)
@190 aussie
"They lied, they covered up, they actually fibbed to the rellies of those killed AND they have a political prisoner in that film maker...."
------ ------ ----- -----
In order to actually understand this scandal it helps to be half a planet away from US media.
Posted by: Beagle at May 10, 2013 08:48 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at May 10, 2013 08:50 AM (xAtAj)
If the the plans how to build a nuke was leaked no one would have the uranium to do anything with it and even those that can, it will take many years to get the right type of uranium to have it work.
Posted by: Trevor (@TJexcite) at May 10, 2013 08:52 AM (CdeLs)
idk, I kinda like my horses. YMMV.
Next up on "Absolute Friday..."
Posted by: at May 10, 2013 12:47 PM (Vgn84)
Are you sure you want to make that comparison? Tell me - how many attacks on humans by horses can you find?
Because I can Google "horse attacked by pitbulls" and find three incidents that occured in February, one of which involved the same horse getting attacked twice by pitbulls, and sadly dying.
Can your horses access your child's room? Get into its crib and chew it's arms and legs off? Rip open its throat? Has that EVER happened?
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 08:53 AM (CJjw5)
Never own an animal you can't kill with your bare hands, if necessary.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 12:43 PM (CJjw5)
You are one heckuva an advocate for pet ownership. Can we also apply that philosophy to roommates?
Posted by: Slappy at May 10, 2013 08:54 AM (LTbLf)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 10, 2013 08:57 AM (Vgn84)
Let's try....
Never own an animal that you, or your room-mate can't kill with your bare hands, if necessary.
Hey, it works!
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at May 10, 2013 08:57 AM (10U4R)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 10, 2013 08:58 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 12:43 PM (CJjw5)
That sorta limits the sort of livestock you might be able to keep around. Do you plan to eat rabbit all your life?
Posted by: maddogg at May 10, 2013 08:58 AM (OlN4e)
Let's try....
Never own an animal that you, or your room-mate can't kill with your bare hands, if necessary.
Hey, it works!
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at May 10, 2013 12:57 PM (10U4R)
I don't know about you but based on some of the roommates I had before meeting my wife, the philosophy really should be expanded beyond animals and applied directly to roommates, especially when they pilfer your food, alcohol, money, etc. One rat bastard roommate of mine broke my Steve Miller "Greatest Hits" cassette back in '89.
Posted by: Slappy at May 10, 2013 09:02 AM (LTbLf)
What are your thoughts on cars? I know they're inamimate, but they kill so many more orders of magnitude of Americans than dogs...?
----------------
Would you like to know my thoughts on strawmen, instead?
You're comfortable with keeping pitbulls in the house, even with small children - that's your responsibility. I do not have the same appetite for risk where my children are concerned. Nor do I wish to accept the liability for what happens to some poor woman out for a jog and my dog gets loose.
It is sticking your head in the sand to pretend that these are not dangerous animals with the capacity for extreme violence, that you take into your home as a pet. Violence that the average grown adult would be defenseless against. This is the same reason it's a bad idea to keep wolves, chimpanzees, lions, tigers, bears, honey badgers and wolverines as pets. Because they just don't give a fuck.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 09:03 AM (CJjw5)
Again, it's ironic, EoJ, that this very thread starts with an article featuring this quote:
"This core problem with the left's predictable BAN ALL THE THINGS! response to events like Newtown is that it's wildly unrealistic as a solution to the problem they purport to address."
Maybe that's what got me thinking down this line of reasoning.
Posted by: at May 10, 2013 12:58 PM (Vgn84)
Have I said to ban all dogs? All pets?
Pit bulls didn't pop into existence. They were bred with specific characteristics in mind. Characteristics that make them a bad idea to keep as pets.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 09:06 AM (CJjw5)
Kinda missing the point of the whole exercise there, chief. This is a political protest, not an engineering session.'
Exactly. It's also about asserting the government's "rights" before it becomes easily possible with this technology to make some guns in a cost effective manner. Per a 3D printer reseller I know, you can get a cheap 3D printer for under $2K, but those can't produce parts that are good for more than visualization. You know, to show to marketing dweebs bereft of the ability to visualize a product. When 3D printers first came out in the late 80s, the cost was at least $30k, most a lot more. The more capable 3D printer and resin that can produce this gun is $8k. Not exactly Moore's Law at work, but its easy to see where its headed. I wonder what implied threats were made to the law student who headed up this project.
Posted by: chuckR at May 10, 2013 09:09 AM (XLu7l)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 10, 2013 09:09 AM (Vgn84)
I'm going with EoJ on this one.
Pretty clear that he wasn't talking about farms, ranches, circuses and such.
But he does build a good argument against the potential dangers of bringing a specific breed into close proximity with children.
But I do understand the room-mate from hell scenario, and could conceivably get on board with burying the body in an isolated location.
Course, it would be a bitch to go shallow, and have a neighbors pit-bull dig it up, and drag it home.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at May 10, 2013 09:12 AM (10U4R)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 10, 2013 09:18 AM (Vgn84)
You know who hates children?
LEFTISTS.
Seriously. That's how ridiculous the constant "You're a flaming liberal because we disagree on this issue" sounds.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 09:23 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 10, 2013 09:27 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Stuff Liberals Say When There's A Conservative Administration at May 10, 2013 09:32 AM (27KAF)
I wasn't going anywhere. I'm pointing out that I see the tactic of disagreeing on one issue (pitbulls) and extending it to other, unrelated issues (cars, guns) and then going into "Are you sure you're really pro-2A?"
Not germane to the discussion. I've established my own conservative bonafides to my own satisfaction, and ulitmately, I am the controlling authority on me.
Also not implying anything about your proclivities. Pit bulls were created. I think they should be un-created because they are a bad idea either as pets or to be set free into the wild.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 09:37 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 10, 2013 09:38 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 10, 2013 09:48 AM (Vgn84)
I'm only surprised that none of them have been sent to Gitmo.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at May 10, 2013 10:46 AM (e8kgV)
I'm using Firefox and Avast, and when I try to download the file from Pirate Bay, Avast kicks up a "malicious URL/virus" warning.
Is this a "default" setting for Pirate Bay in Avast, and therefore can be ignored?
Or need I fear the first two entries on the search page? Attempting to download either produces the same result.
Thanks in advance,
Best,
Mike
Posted by: Lt. York at May 10, 2013 11:03 AM (C4tio)
Posted by: Boxy Brown at May 10, 2013 11:17 AM (OgpUV)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at May 10, 2013 11:36 AM (UdAC4)
Posted by: PabloD at May 10, 2013 11:47 AM (wQLBl)
Posted by: St. John Talbot, Federation Representative on Nimbus III at May 10, 2013 12:03 PM (vg8iE)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 10, 2013 01:00 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 10, 2013 01:03 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: PersonFromPorlock at May 10, 2013 01:28 PM (5hNpF)
Posted by: Mauser757 at May 10, 2013 01:43 PM (sVobu)
Posted by: Mauser757 at May 10, 2013 01:52 PM (sVobu)
Thanks for the info.
Another moron sent me a link to a direct download, so didn't wind up needing PB.
But thank you so much for taking time to help....right decent of you, man.
Have a great weekend.
Best,
Mike
Posted by: Lt. York at May 11, 2013 04:06 AM (C4tio)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at May 11, 2013 06:19 AM (1hM1d)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3507 seconds, 343 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at May 10, 2013 07:35 AM (XvrTA)