April 07, 2013
— Open Blogger All that missing heat is like...hiding in the oceans now and threatening to come popping back out FAST with a vengeance. Any. Time. Now.
... Experts in France and Spain said on Sunday that the oceans took up more warmth from the air around 2000. That would help explain the slowdown in surface warming but would also suggest that the pause may be only temporary and brief.Their explanation for the arctic being ice free in the early 1900, then a deep freeze by WWII is "shutup". How heat wafting around 2,000' below MSL suddenly sallies forth like the four horsemen of the Apocalypse is explained by peer reviewed and multiply fact checked hand waving."Most of this excess energy was absorbed in the top 700 meters (2,300 ft) of the ocean at the onset of the warming pause, 65 percent of it in the tropical Pacific and Atlantic oceans," they wrote in the journal Nature Climate Change...
Posted by: Open Blogger at
12:00 PM
| Comments (226)
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
How has hurricane activity been lately?
Posted by: fluffy at April 07, 2013 12:04 PM (z9HTb)
Posted by: Prepositions Fists And A Beginners SMOD Kit at April 07, 2013 12:05 PM (x1L8S)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at April 07, 2013 12:06 PM (5lScX)
Posted by: @PurpAv at April 07, 2013 12:06 PM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Prepositions Fists And A Beginners SMOD Kit at April 07, 2013 12:07 PM (x1L8S)
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 07, 2013 12:07 PM (rkmk3)
Yahoo.... Science News with even MORE Propoganda!
I guess the Ocean just decided one day to take the heat for the rest of the earth... what a nice ocean....
/facepalm
And note.... they say its been a 15 year 'slowdown' in warming... well... yeah... STOPPED is slower than it was....
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 07, 2013 12:08 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 07, 2013 12:08 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Stephana at April 07, 2013 12:08 PM (nfC6Z)
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 07, 2013 04:07 PM (rkmk3)
And really interesting.... as warming quite in 1997 or 1998.... so the Ocean stopped the warming, before it even started taking in more Heat...
That whole Conservation of Energy thing??? its not a Law... its more like a guideline... I guess...
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 07, 2013 12:09 PM (lZBBB)
Oh, don't be such a baby.
Posted by: Global Warmenists Hiding an Inconvenient Truth at April 07, 2013 12:10 PM (6TB1Z)
More of a suggestion, really.
Posted by: pep at April 07, 2013 12:11 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: dudenolongerinsantacruz at April 07, 2013 12:11 PM (ZCu9v)
Posted by: Craig Poe at April 07, 2013 12:11 PM (BVkEs)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 12:11 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 07, 2013 12:11 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Heat, hiding in the oceans, preparing to strike at April 07, 2013 12:12 PM (6TB1Z)
More stupid science.
Posted by: Vic at April 07, 2013 12:13 PM (53z96)
Posted by: Bill H at April 07, 2013 12:14 PM (3sZO1)
Posted by: nnptcgrad at April 07, 2013 12:15 PM (Opyrm)
Posted by: BuddyPC at April 07, 2013 12:15 PM (jfUIE)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 07, 2013 12:15 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Hi! Speed! Rail! at April 07, 2013 12:15 PM (ULH4o)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 07, 2013 12:15 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: The Dude at April 07, 2013 12:16 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at April 07, 2013 12:17 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at April 07, 2013 12:17 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 07, 2013 12:18 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 07, 2013 12:18 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at April 07, 2013 12:18 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: BignJames at April 07, 2013 12:18 PM (H9MGI)
Not so. Read the article again. These are experts. EXPERTS, I tell you!
Posted by: pep at April 07, 2013 12:18 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 07, 2013 12:19 PM (G230Z)
Another damn lie from the assholes, except we can blame NOAA for that one. That supposed hottest year of forever (last year) averaged 7° cooler than the previous year in actual measured temps in my yard.
You see, I didn't modify the temp by fancy algore-rhyms like they did no "normalize" the numbers.
Posted by: Vic at April 07, 2013 12:19 PM (53z96)
Posted by: t-bird at April 07, 2013 12:19 PM (oJQ+J)
Posted by: @PurpAv at April 07, 2013 04:17 PM (/gHaE)
---
That's Einsteinian.
Posted by: Craig Poe at April 07, 2013 12:20 PM (BVkEs)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 07, 2013 12:20 PM (Fzo3y)
Posted by: 99% of deeply concerned climatologists at April 07, 2013 12:20 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 07, 2013 12:20 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at April 07, 2013 12:20 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Beagle at April 07, 2013 12:21 PM (sOtz/)
Just once I'd like to hear one of these guys say, "boy, these models are worthless, aren't they? They don't predict squat."
Posted by: pep at April 07, 2013 12:21 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at April 07, 2013 12:21 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Fritz at April 07, 2013 12:21 PM (WM+rJ)
A slug of water, 2000' deep, covering millions of square miles, insulated by R-20 miles bats of fiberglass...
...its like warming up a pot of tea.
Posted by: @PurpAv at April 07, 2013 12:22 PM (/gHaE)
another incredibly stupid post by purple avengetard. the oceans periodically retain and release heat, exactly as the article claims.
however, that neither proves nor disproves the man-made global warming argument.
whatever point you wanted to make is completely lost by picking an article of scientific opinion that could easily be 100% true and have absolutely nothing to do with the global warming controversy.
Posted by: Dogstar at April 07, 2013 12:22 PM (OhsWQ)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 07, 2013 12:23 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Craig Poe, not trying to be ALARMIST!!!!, or anything at April 07, 2013 12:23 PM (BVkEs)
Posted by: BignJames at April 07, 2013 12:23 PM (H9MGI)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 04:11 PM (aDwsi)
------------------------------------------------------
One of these years they're gonna be right! Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 07, 2013 04:15 PM
===================
Check this rarely-mentioned news. Just ONE day of record LOW temps in JULY of 2012 http://iceagenow.info/2012/06/massive-number-record-lows-summer/
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 12:24 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Waldo Truth at April 07, 2013 12:24 PM (8yFIG)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 07, 2013 12:25 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: puddleglum at April 07, 2013 12:25 PM (UHXBy)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:25 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: garrett at April 07, 2013 12:26 PM (diTQe)
Posted by: 99% of deeply concerned climatologists at April 07, 2013 12:26 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Beagle at April 07, 2013 12:26 PM (sOtz/)
So, if they peridically retain and release heat, and that is a big enough effect to change world climate, why wasn't that included in the models, or at least used to assign error bars?
The point of the post is that these are not scientists. They are people with an agenda, looking for any reason at all to dismiss those who disagree with their religion. As such, they are eminently worthy of mockery.
Posted by: pep at April 07, 2013 12:26 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: The 5th dimension at April 07, 2013 12:26 PM (/jHWN)
*dons gas mask*
*crawls into 50's era fallout shelter, never to be seen or heard from again*
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 12:27 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 07, 2013 12:27 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 07, 2013 12:27 PM (Fzo3y)
Wait. In researching my hypthesis it seems that the heat has jumped from Kate Upton's bikini to my boxer shorts.
How can this be?
I must do more research. Brb...
Posted by: garrett at April 07, 2013 12:27 PM (diTQe)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 07, 2013 12:28 PM (jucos)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 07, 2013 12:28 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at April 07, 2013 12:29 PM (bxiXv)
We took half a semester of stats classes in undergrad. We know what the fuck we're doing!
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 07, 2013 04:20 PM (ZPrif)
Bwaahahaaaaa... THIS!
Posted by: Yip at April 07, 2013 12:29 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 07, 2013 12:29 PM (XYSwB)
You mean, other than the fact that its CLEARLY presented as support for maintaining the global warming theory?
Posted by: @PurpAv at April 07, 2013 12:30 PM (/gHaE)
Posted by: french scientist peeing in the ocean while swimming at April 07, 2013 12:30 PM (VwC86)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 07, 2013 04:28 PM (jucos)
---
Funny how the seasons change.
Posted by: Craig Poe at April 07, 2013 12:30 PM (BVkEs)
Answer: Yes
Question: What happened?
Answer: The earth flourished........
Oh....
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 12:30 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 07, 2013 12:30 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 12:31 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 12:31 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:31 PM (8sCoq)
Now there are too many eyes over their shoulders to get away with "fudge factors" anymore.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 07, 2013 12:31 PM (xSegX)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 07, 2013 12:31 PM (Fzo3y)
Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 07, 2013 12:32 PM (IDSI7)
Posted by: 99% of climatologists at April 07, 2013 12:33 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 07, 2013 12:33 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 07, 2013 12:33 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:33 PM (8sCoq)
The predictions are WRONG.
WRONG. Now we are in the excuse phase because the predictions they made were WRONG.
WRONG.
The idea of the scientific method is that it's predictive, not reactive.
If this is such a well-known phenomenon, then the predictions should have accounted for it.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 07, 2013 12:33 PM (xSegX)
I've examined the source code for about a dozen of them where its available. 10% professionally done, 90% shoddy amateur work full of bugs.
In many, the comments even admit to egregious bugs, where they just made up corrections/fudges so they could MoveOn.
Posted by: @PurpAv at April 07, 2013 12:34 PM (/gHaE)
Meh for NASCAR. I'm watching IndyCar's on a very nice road course in Alabama.
Posted by: puddleglum at April 07, 2013 12:34 PM (UHXBy)
I used to take the mufflers off everything I ever drove, two wheels or four. Adds 50% more horsepower.
Right?
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 12:34 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 07, 2013 12:34 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 07, 2013 12:35 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at April 07, 2013 12:36 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:36 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: non-judgemental obseverist III at April 07, 2013 12:36 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Global Scientist at April 07, 2013 12:36 PM (HiKk0)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 07, 2013 12:36 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 04:35 PM
====
Crap! See what happens when you mess around with dead languages? Ex Post Facto
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 12:36 PM (aDwsi)
Experts in France and Spain said on Sunday that the oceans took up more warmth from the air around 2000. That would help explain the slowdown in surface warming but would also suggest that the pause may be only temporary and brief.
Save yourselves a lot of intellectual gymnastics and accept the simpler explanation: your model is wrong. - William of Ockham
Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 07, 2013 12:36 PM (IDSI7)
Oh, hell no!
I am in favor of Global Warming. The Earth is too damned cold.
They told me if I burned a lot of fossil fuels, the Earth would get warmer.
They promised, dammit!
Posted by: AmishDude at April 07, 2013 12:37 PM (xSegX)
It's science, and it's sexy, baby!
Posted by: Fritz at April 07, 2013 12:37 PM (WM+rJ)
Posted by: spanish scientist peeing in the ocean while swimming over an undersea vent at April 07, 2013 12:37 PM (VwC86)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:38 PM (8sCoq)
well... it helps. I don't know about 50%
the motor guys at the bike shop advised me to have the catalytic converter removed and replaced with a straight pipe for more HP Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 04:36 PM
=======
Yeah..., Stephen Chu told Barky to clip playing cards against his bicycle spokes.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 12:38 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: zsasz at April 07, 2013 12:38 PM (MMC8r)
I was kidding. I am pretty sure I screwed up a perfectly good H-D driving 17K miles with straight drag pipes. Change in back pressure necessiates change in carberetion/injection.
It "sounded" faster, anyways.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 12:38 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 07, 2013 12:39 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 07, 2013 12:39 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: @PurpAv at April 07, 2013 12:40 PM (/gHaE)
Posted by: just another fappin' moron at April 07, 2013 12:40 PM (nK2Sx)
Great observation about the null hypothesis.
I call it the "social scientific method". Test hypothesis against data. If the data disproves the hypothesis, change the data.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 07, 2013 12:40 PM (xSegX)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at April 07, 2013 12:40 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 07, 2013 12:40 PM (ZPrif)
I was kidding. I am pretty sure I screwed up a perfectly good H-D driving 17K miles with straight drag pipes. Change in back pressure necessiates change in carberetion/injection.
It "sounded" faster, anyways.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 04:38 PM
=========
Notice any ringing in your ears?
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 12:40 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:41 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 07, 2013 12:41 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: eman at April 07, 2013 12:41 PM (Q0gEg)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 12:42 PM (aDwsi)
PS it's not a global warming or climate change "theory," it's a "hypothesis." A Theory has been tested and has not yet failed a test. A hypothesis is untested or has not yet been adequately tested or proven.
Actually, I'd call AGW a "conjecture," i.e., a thoughtlet on how something might work. A "hypothesis" is a conjecture that makes specific predictions that can be experimentally checked. A hypothesis that has withstood many such experimental checks becomes a "theory."
Which is not to say theories are not overturned. At one time parity, like energy and momentum, was thought to be conserved. Certain experiments on emission of subatomic particles overturned this notion ("downfall of the conservation of parity") and led to a Nobel Prize for Lee and Yang.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 07, 2013 12:43 PM (IDSI7)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:44 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Yip at April 07, 2013 12:44 PM (/jHWN)
The sound is mostly behind you. No helmet, no wind buffet. (A whole other debate, but I don't care) I was 30ish at the time and the sound didn't bother me. My ears are much more sensitive now 25 years later and I wear my shooting ear protection just cutting the grass.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 12:44 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Cicero, Semiautomatic Assault Commenter at April 07, 2013 12:45 PM (vpQ1M)
Posted by: just another fappin' moron at April 07, 2013 12:45 PM (nK2Sx)
Are you talking to me? I said, ARE YOU TALKING TO ME?!
Posted by: The Ether at April 07, 2013 12:45 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at April 07, 2013 12:45 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: Yip at April 07, 2013 12:46 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:46 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: garrett at April 07, 2013 12:46 PM (diTQe)
Posted by: phlogiston at April 07, 2013 12:47 PM (VwC86)
The sound is mostly behind you. No helmet, no wind buffet. (A whole other debate, but I don't care) I was 30ish at the time and the sound didn't bother me. My ears are much more sensitive now 25 years later and I wear my shooting ear protection just cutting the grass.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 04:44 PM
=======
My hearing is about shot. Small arms, loud cars, road racing motorcycles. Hearing aid is in the very near future.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 12:47 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: eman at April 07, 2013 12:49 PM (Q0gEg)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 07, 2013 12:49 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:49 PM (8sCoq)
...and loud concerts, guitar amplifiers...
My ears do ring some. Constantly.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 12:50 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: real joe at April 07, 2013 12:50 PM (PD2ad)
No one is doing more to damage the reputation of science and scientists than these AGW criminals and carny hucksters.
Damn them all to Hell.
Posted by: eman at April 07, 2013 04:49 PM (Q0gEg)
True dat.
These clowns are giving legitimate scientists a bad name.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 07, 2013 12:51 PM (IDSI7)
I am getting flashbacks.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 07, 2013 12:51 PM (Fzo3y)
Posted by: phlogiston at April 07, 2013 12:51 PM (VwC86)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 07, 2013 12:51 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 12:52 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: eman at April 07, 2013 12:52 PM (Q0gEg)
Um, that depth is insignificantly closer to the Earth's molten goodness, but your point stands anyway.
Just that much closer to that molten core of the earth, which is at millions of degrees, per that noted scientist Al Gore. Core of earth? Much hotter than the sun's surface. The science is settled!
Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 07, 2013 12:52 PM (IDSI7)
That's nothin'. I wear hairplugs when I'm with biker chicks!
Posted by: joey biden at April 07, 2013 12:53 PM (VwC86)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 07, 2013 12:53 PM (Fzo3y)
Posted by: real joe at April 07, 2013 12:53 PM (PD2ad)
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at April 07, 2013 12:53 PM (MhA4j)
The goddamned idiots will just never go away.
I'm thinking I should just get one of those Squareup credit card payment devices for my iPhone and go around while waiting for flights at the airport and sell any fucking doofus wearing Birkenstocks or in hipster gear some carbon credits
Posted by: Albie Damned at April 07, 2013 12:54 PM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at April 07, 2013 12:54 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:55 PM (8sCoq)
Yang did all the work. Lee just looked good and got all the chicks.
Posted by: eman at April 07, 2013 04:52 PM (Q0gEg)
So ... situation normal, then?
A scientist in a Soviet institute gets an idea, does the experimental work, writes it up, and sends the manuscript to his boss. His boss likes it, puts his name on it, and sends it to his boss. It goes up the line like this until it gets to the head of the institute, who also likes it, puts his name on the manuscript, then glances down at the authorship. "Who's this asshole?" he says, crosses off the name of the first guy, and submits the MS for publication.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 07, 2013 12:56 PM (IDSI7)
Posted by: real joe at April 07, 2013 12:57 PM (PD2ad)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 12:57 PM (8sCoq)
The Higgs Boson keeps tweeting you'll be making a comback any time now.
Posted by: @PurpAv at April 07, 2013 12:58 PM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Waldo at April 07, 2013 12:58 PM (8yFIG)
Posted by: real joe at April 07, 2013 12:58 PM (PD2ad)
Posted by: eman at April 07, 2013 12:59 PM (Q0gEg)
Posted by: Wilhelm Reich at April 07, 2013 12:59 PM (JQuNB)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 01:01 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: wheatie at April 07, 2013 01:01 PM (5kUwW)
Posted by: Yip at April 07, 2013 01:01 PM (/jHWN)
If I ever buy another, I'm thinking Road King with windshield, no faring of course. I'm at the same age as my dad when he toppled off a bike I sold him in 1974. He split his head on the floor and had to have stitches, just sitting on it in the garage.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 01:03 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Beagle at April 07, 2013 01:04 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 07, 2013 01:04 PM (piMMO)
Once congress has been convinced that OMG we need to worry about climate change than multiple agencies will write solicitations for proposals to study this -- and it gets crazy. Dept of Energy funds proposals to study climate impact on animals and that is not an exaggeration. Well scientists mold their studies to give the answers that the funders want based on the proposal solicitations. Oh a few are probably investing in Al Gore's carbon trading schemes on the side or some such but for the most part they are just like students saying they got the result the textbook predicted when they did their labs.
Posted by: PaleRider at April 07, 2013 01:07 PM (vL0Nv)
Posted by: Meghans Diary [/i] at April 07, 2013 01:09 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 01:09 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at April 07, 2013 01:12 PM (MhA4j)
Wish I was top heavy then
I nearly never drove interstates at speed. I didn't mind catching critters in the face at 55MPH. I did NOT like catching bees in my shirt. Which was frequent. That's why I'll have a windshield next time. No faring.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 07, 2013 01:14 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Beagle at April 07, 2013 01:17 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: The legendary Flap Maxwell at April 07, 2013 01:18 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: pep at April 07, 2013 04:21 PM (6TB1Z)
*********************
They don't have to. There are plenty of us out here to do that for them. (Maybe we should start charging them for our services?)
Posted by: Seedy Effigy at April 07, 2013 01:29 PM (rz0yi)
you to keep a job.
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 07, 2013 04:28 PM (jucos)
**************************
You might try management.
Posted by: Still looking for talent at April 07, 2013 01:33 PM (rz0yi)
Posted by: Yip at April 07, 2013 01:38 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: G P Hanner at April 07, 2013 01:48 PM (PV2IU)
Posted by: yujin at April 07, 2013 02:00 PM (/A1Rb)
Posted by: Minuteman at April 07, 2013 02:18 PM (YOWAW)
Posted by: Rats Alley Express at April 07, 2013 03:10 PM (PlcqH)
Posted by: political correctness czar at April 07, 2013 03:14 PM (a77Rm)
Posted by: Rats Alley Express at April 07, 2013 03:16 PM (PlcqH)
Also..Are not France and Spain in some sort of Money Crisis? This is no doubt a plea for CASH.
Posted by: Rats Alley Express at April 07, 2013 03:22 PM (PlcqH)
Posted by: Fen at April 07, 2013 03:27 PM (a422o)
Prove Anthropogenic Global Warming.
Just prove it. If you cannot provide data that actually proves your belief, then stop bombarding us with this religious balderdash.
Posted by: Kristophr at April 07, 2013 03:39 PM (wYVte)
Posted by: chuckR at April 07, 2013 04:27 PM (WE9pd)
Posted by: Ashley Judd's Puffy Scamper at April 07, 2013 04:52 PM (Zd/NW)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at April 07, 2013 05:39 PM (xjpRj)
"You mean, other than the fact that its CLEARLY presented as support for maintaining the global warming theory?"
bullshit. it is established scientific fact that the oceans act as a heat sink. there is no contention between the two sides of the global warming debate about the oceans' ability to store and release heat.
the article states NOWHERE that global warming is caused by the oceans' ability to trap and re-release heat.
just like last week, when purple dipshit imagined that amanda knox had been "acquitted" and she was suffering from "double jeopardy".
Posted by: Dogstar at April 07, 2013 07:15 PM (OhsWQ)
kristoph, you dumbshit, I don't have the slightest bit of belief in global warming and never stated anything to the that effect.
but the argument about global warming's existence has NOTHING to do with the oceans' ability to trap, store and release heat.
Posted by: Dogstar at April 07, 2013 07:17 PM (OhsWQ)
another incredibly stupid post by purple avengetard. the oceans periodically retain and release heat, exactly as the article claims.
>>>Periodically? The oceans do that continuously, as in all....the....time.
however, that neither proves nor disproves the man-made global warming argument.
>>>>then why was it offered to support the AGW theory?
whatever point you wanted to make is completely lost by picking an article of scientific opinion that could easily be 100% true and have absolutely nothing to do with the global warming controversy.
>>>>Sorry, it looks like you didn't go to the link. If you had, you would see that you've soiled yourself badly.
Many problems with this theory: For starters, these Frenchies seem to be telling us that warm water, which is less dense than cold water, somehow "hides" in the deep oceans. Wanna splain that, skippy? Had any thermo courses? Of course not. "Too hard." "I hate math". etc etc.
Dead thread, I know....but crikey, the arrogance and ignorance!!!
Posted by: wholelottasplainin' at April 07, 2013 07:42 PM (WGOcs)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1807 seconds, 354 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at April 07, 2013 12:01 PM (XvrTA)