January 25, 2013
— Ace Safe link to Hot Air (it's an NYT article).
“We need to get people organized and learn from what Obama did,” said Mike Duncan, a former national party chairman who now represents Kentucky on the committee. “We’ve got to reverse engineer what they did and leapfrog to the next cycle.”
By which they mean Obama's microtargeting of voters, making micropitches, data-mining for every available Democrat even in red districts -- the so-called project NARWHAL, which appeared to be a delusion (even to the people implementing it) until it actually swiped an election.
That last bit is crucial: Generally we target our own districts and try to churn out as many votes in those districts (whether with us or against us) as possible.
As @conartcritic pointed out numerous times, though: There are lots and lots of red voters in blue cities.
Now the cities as a whole of course will go overwhelmingly Democratic. But -- this is crucial -- in statewide campaigns you can microtarget the Republican flowers hidden by all the choking liberal weeds and get them to vote and thereby increase you statewide totals.
And thereby win state elections -- and electoral college delegates.
Obama used advanced data-mining techniques -- scanning FaceBook likes and purchasing history (I'm sure-- though I'm speculating on that) to find people who were likely Democratic voters, even if they almost never voted, and gin them up with narrowly-tailored political mail.
For example, if you find an unmarried woman, age 25, who follows the Anthropologie feed on FaceBook (the fashion shop, I mean, not the science), she's almost certainly liberal-leaning. Even if she lives in red territory, like Kansas.
So Obama sent that girl Alarming Abortion mailer after Alarming Abortion mailer.
We must absolutely copy this technique.
There is one problem that faces us that the Democrats don't face -- note that this technique involves a lot of saying one thing to one audience while saying something different to another. In their private mailers, Democrats ran as abortion and gay marriage enthusiasts... something they did not run on generally. (They pretended to not be outright liberal extremist generally.)
Now the media of course covered up for them, and would never report that while the Democrats talk about "common sense" guidelines about abortions, they advance a strong pro-abortion agenda in their micro-targeted mailers.
Republicans, naturally, will be hit with this relentlessly -- if a mailer uses stronger-than-usual language to defend gun rights in a mailer to a gun owner, we'll be hit about how "extreme" our message is "below the radar." Reporters will make every single one of our mailers famous, and not in a good way.
That said, that's the terrain we fight on, and there's little use complaining about it. This technique must be copied.
Posted by: Ace at
11:44 AM
| Comments (330)
Post contains 475 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 25, 2013 11:47 AM (xz0nG)
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2013 11:47 AM (8/DeP)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 25, 2013 11:47 AM (xtvQl)
Stop nominating RINOs.
The libs went very had left with obama (and Hillary ). We go middle of the road milktoast McCain and Romney.
Posted by: retired military at January 25, 2013 11:47 AM (SElov)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 25, 2013 11:48 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Average American voter at January 25, 2013 11:48 AM (F6KtL)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 25, 2013 11:48 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 11:48 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: joncelli at January 25, 2013 11:48 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 25, 2013 11:48 AM (GFM2b)
Rock mom got their "technique" in the last thread
Many people had Obama figured out, in 2007. But the reason they were so vehemently attacked and shut up when they said anything was that the Democrat/media complex determined at a very early stage (well before the economy started to tank) that Democrats had to have a Black nominee to win in 2008. They didn't think Hillary could win. They worride after 2004 that Republicans had found a way to get just enough black and latino votes to keep winning. Their only hope was a massive turnout of blacks and Latinos in tribal support of a black candidate. There were definitely powers within the Democratic Party (I think led by Howard Dean) who talked Obama into running (he wanted to be President but wanted to wait until 2012), rounded up a bunch of rich liberals to fund him, and then ruthlessly controlled his image to get him elected. It had nothing to do with "tact" being enforced by the media or anyone else. It was pure message discipline in service of the higher goal - to get the White House back, by any means necessary.
The Vichy Republicans who supported Obama in 2008 willfully ignored everything in his ideological background, in favor of some sort of magical thiking that because he seemed to be temperamentally moderate he would also be idologically moderate. A lot of them also were horrified at Sarah Palin and terrified that if she were elected VP she would then be President someday and she was too big of a dumb so-con hick for them to allow that. (Not MY view of her, please, but I think an accurate description of elitist republican views of her).
In short, they were elitists above all, and supported the elitist canddiate, Barack Obama. The only reason some are recoiling now is because Obama has laid bare not his leftwing policy agenda, but his community-organizingthuggishness and crassness that belies the smooth ceased-pants image they bought in 2008.
Posted by: rockmom at January 25, 2013 03:32 PM (qE3AR)
Posted by: thunderb at January 25, 2013 11:49 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Average American voter at January 25, 2013 03:48 PM (F6KtL)
No, sorry. We're the Not-so-free Shit Army.
Posted by: troyriser at January 25, 2013 11:49 AM (vtiE6)
Yes. Especially since empirically there are fewer districts which are "ours".
Where is the hawk article, damn it?
Posted by: Marcus at January 25, 2013 11:49 AM (xPfg3)
Posted by: sTevo at January 25, 2013 11:50 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: Daybrother at January 25, 2013 11:50 AM (+paCV)
I think what they did is up the fineness of Rove's playbook by an order of magnitude. Whereas Rove could find conservative blocks and streets in swing or blue areas, the Obama "NARWHAL" project finds individual voters.
Rove's playbook was using zip codes and income levels and such like to find Republicans on a district-of-a-town basis. NARWHAL finds partisans individually.
Posted by: ace at January 25, 2013 11:51 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 11:51 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 25, 2013 11:51 AM (x0g8a)
in a very red area. Voting fell off sharply after 5pm
f*cked, we were ( I could feel it )
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville at January 25, 2013 11:52 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 25, 2013 11:52 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Dems at January 25, 2013 11:52 AM (wsGWu)
Is it just a remnant of the Democrats-for-the-unions-and-factories thing? I mean, more factories, more unions, more democrats. Or is it just that whenever you smash a lot of people together, the ones in the middle turn into criminal, lazy Obamaphooo' zombies?
---
Re: your article about the media's lies. I believe the media is purposely ignorant. They can spread lies and falsehoods as far and wide as they want, do as much damage as possible and then apologize if they get called out for it. It's a form of plausible deniability. I'm going to write about this.
They are willfully ignorant.
Posted by: ElKomandante at January 25, 2013 11:52 AM (xIUnF)
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 03:48 PM (8sCoq)
Hmmm...maybe something like
CUE PORTENTIOUS MUSIC.
NARRATOR [in deep, menacing tones]: Is it possible that Hillary Clinton practices satanic rites with children?
MUSIC DARKENS.
NARRATOR: Did she really perform nude Wiccan rituals with children, goats, and feta cheese?
SOUND OF WITCH CACKLING.
NARRATOR: We may never know...but why take a chance? Vote Rand Paul and keep the satanic Wiccan menace at bay -- before it's too late!
Posted by: joncelli at January 25, 2013 11:52 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Roy at January 25, 2013 11:53 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Beef at January 25, 2013 11:53 AM (mb1uj)
Posted by: Marcus at January 25, 2013 03:49 PM (xPfg3)
-
That cannot be true, as we won the house. Essentially, we won the majority of districts, and in a very small number of dem districts and especially precincts (ones without adequate GOP supervision) a suspiciously outsize turnout generated 50-100K extra votes in five states which won the EC.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 25, 2013 11:53 AM (xtvQl)
TFG is an...agitator.
That is the basics of his 'technique'.
What we need are Conservative Agitators...like Ace...but in the national spotlight.
We had one, in Andrew Breitbart.
But sadly, he is not physically with us now.
Posted by: wheatie at January 25, 2013 11:53 AM (fH4X9)
That shit about bringing a knife to a gun fight is an apt analogy for the way conservatives operate
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 11:53 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: your very first logic error at January 25, 2013 11:53 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2013 11:53 AM (Y4TdB)
Posted by: eman at January 25, 2013 11:54 AM (jp2Ur)
Posted by: Tami[/i] at January 25, 2013 11:54 AM (X6akg)
Grasping and maintaining power...important.
Liberty...meh.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs an intervention at January 25, 2013 11:54 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at January 25, 2013 11:54 AM (Y5I9o)
One way to minimize the damage of targeted messages is to decentralize the senders. If you want to hit conservative leaners in New York, then instead of sending from the national HQ, send it via a conservative local guy.
Not rocket surgery, but then it may be too difficult for the Republican hierarchy.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at January 25, 2013 11:54 AM (GsoHv)
NARWHAL was a data-mining, voter-finding effort.
I did a piece on all this before... it's a big thing. I know that ideology is what we mostly care about and these technological edges and advantages seem like cheating but you gotta have the votes.
I did not believe in NARWHAL, I thought they were deluding themselves, until they won Virginia and Florida.
Posted by: ace at January 25, 2013 11:54 AM (LCRYB)
Don't let the door hit you then. I'd rather start trying to get people in power that aren't communist douchebags than not. If it takes lying, then it takes lying.
Posted by: GMan at January 25, 2013 11:54 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: My GF has big boobies at January 25, 2013 11:55 AM (F6KtL)
Posted by: L, elle at January 25, 2013 11:56 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, Meadow Party 2016 at January 25, 2013 11:56 AM (GBXon)
Its not at all a stretch to say that Obama wouldn't have even been the Dem nominee in 2008 if it weren't for media fawning over him. Let alone won election, let alone won re-election.
Posted by: looking closely at January 25, 2013 11:56 AM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: realityman at January 25, 2013 11:56 AM (9AQdP)
Posted by: The Political Hat at January 25, 2013 11:56 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at January 25, 2013 11:57 AM (Y5I9o)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at January 25, 2013 11:57 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: eman at January 25, 2013 11:57 AM (jp2Ur)
Sorry, Game Over, we lost..
LIB
Posted by: catman at January 25, 2013 11:57 AM (NYdB8)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at January 25, 2013 11:57 AM (NzBQO)
Posted by: realityman at January 25, 2013 11:57 AM (9AQdP)
Posted by: Deli LLama at January 25, 2013 11:57 AM (lGu1O)
actually if I understand this right mailers have a not-bad influence rate-- better than, say, radio and tv (especially on a cost-per-influenced-vote basis).
But in addition, look, modern marketing techniques mean we can make some very good educated guesses about your beliefs if we know things like where you live, how old you are, income level, religiosity or lack thereof, etc.
That means that NARWHAL doesn't just send mailers but mailers which have a fairly high chance of actually interesting the recipient.
You wouldn't want to send a Northeastern social moderate/fiscal conservative a mailer about the Human Life Amendment but you might want to send them something about taxes or ending the government schools monopoly or something else.
Posted by: ace at January 25, 2013 11:58 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 25, 2013 11:58 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2013 11:59 AM (8/DeP)
Posted by: The Political Hat at January 25, 2013 03:56 PM (XvHmy)
----------------------------
Well, of course He does. Todd Akin was right. You see it's all about principles. It's not whether we win or lose. Don't you see?
Posted by: Dana Loesch (and her House Husband) at January 25, 2013 11:59 AM (uRumV)
I know I'm a shit for thinking this but..with the state that our country is in and with the Democrat's mask slipping and revealing them for the totalitarian control freaks that they really are...if the fate of our country rests on painstakingly digging up little packets of half-awake conservatives...well then all is fucking lost anyway.
If after all this, we just need to reach out to the right people and find them to energize them? Well, hell. These people are already dead. Or in a coma and fucking useless.
Posted by: LGoPs at January 25, 2013 11:59 AM (BJVEF)
Posted by: Separation of TaxMoney from Campaigns at January 25, 2013 11:59 AM (LpQbZ)
Conservatives (singly or organizations) are only on TV (commercials and PSAs) around election time
what if the effort was year round
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 11:59 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 25, 2013 11:59 AM (GFM2b)
We need to get better at the parry and riposte.
Republicans need to point out the flaws with the other side's plans- in plain terms- and then play up the benefits of their own. And they need not to pull punches.
Romney never once pointed out that TFG was offering "free stuff" but, "'Free' just means someone else is paying for it- but who do you think is going to pay? Not the "rich," they have enough money to choose not to make money. Income taxes won't affect them, because they can decide how much income to make."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 25, 2013 11:59 AM (8y9MW)
I think He wants babies born, not ripped from the womb. However, any GOP candidate needs to be sent to a re-education camp where they are trained with sleep deprivation and electric shock therapy to never answer any abortion/ladyparts questions AT ALL, other than to say, "Ladyparts are great, my Mom and wife have ladyparts, I am a big fan. Next question."
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at January 25, 2013 11:59 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at January 25, 2013 12:00 PM (FKQng)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at January 25, 2013 12:00 PM (Y5I9o)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at January 25, 2013 12:00 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2013 12:01 PM (vyPsz)
The worst is over. We take the Senate in 2014. As long as the SCOTUS stays healthy, Obama gets no more seats to fill and after 2014 we can stop any nomination.
Ace, I don't think you have commented on the NLRB case. It is huge. They completely shut down recess appointments until the Senate closes shop for the session. That would be in TWO years.
BE HAPPY. Sing this:
http://tinyurl.com/28asmzc
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 25, 2013 12:01 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at January 25, 2013 12:02 PM (NzBQO)
Posted by: Aqua Buddha at January 25, 2013 12:02 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:02 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Eaton Cox at January 25, 2013 12:02 PM (q177U)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:02 PM (p+4lN)
I have an idea, at least for one element of the next election:
Get the names and addresses of the residents of a blue city that don't own guns. We don't publish it, but we do use it, and here's how.
Knock on the door of each resident and explain to them that with the gun registration laws as they stand now, almost anyone can find a way to obtain them as I have with you.
Then lower the voice and tell them that at this point in the converstion their door could be kicked in and they would be completely defenseless against whatever one wishes to do.
Explain to them that this is exactly the position the democrats want them in. If you feel like you have the right to defend yourself, vote republican.
Posted by: Rick Perry at January 25, 2013 12:02 PM (/ZV9/)
Wrong first question, in GA.
Correct first question, "Are you dumb enough to admit you believe that God wants 'Rape Babies?'"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 25, 2013 12:03 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at January 25, 2013 12:03 PM (Y5I9o)
I think it's (in part) because for city dwellers (and I'm currently one), government plays a greater role in their daily lives.
I grew up in a very rural area. The only evidence of the government we regularly came in contact with was in the form of the mail, schools and the occasional snow plow. Maybe the rare encounter with the police- mostly local government services.
In the city, you commute on the Interstate, have entire neighborhoods on welfare and food stamps, and countless federally funded projects and employers.
A population more reliant on government will tend to vote for bigger government. Those who see the federal government as little more than a paycheck deduction and the military will tend to vote for smaller government.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 25, 2013 12:04 PM (SY2Kh)
2 things:
1. We should start with actual conservative candidates. That would help.
2. A good mailer for some of these young people is gonna be in 2014 after smokers rates on medical insurance are allowed to have up to a 50%! surcharge due to obamacare.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 25, 2013 12:04 PM (p/cQy)
Posted by: Golden Boy at January 25, 2013 12:05 PM (zkASm)
There's truth to that. For the last few years, the Republican Party has run on White resenetment. Rather than form an inclusive center-right coalition, it's just a party of resentful white people who want a theocracy. The missing center-right voters are people who despise the Socialism of the Democrats but are turned off by the bigotry of the Republican party. Until the Republicans put the white resentment types in their place, they will continue to lose.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:05 PM (p+4lN)
Use their fanaticism against the Democrats, and make satire.
Posted by: edmund at January 25, 2013 12:06 PM (Bjz58)
Why would they care? Mom's employer is paying that.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs an intervention at January 25, 2013 12:06 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at January 25, 2013 12:06 PM (Y5I9o)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 25, 2013 12:06 PM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Lauren at January 25, 2013 12:06 PM (wsGWu)
It seems it, but not really. That information is all public domain (the retrieve it legally) and "volunteered" (often not knowingly, but all the same...). They didn't use secret FBI/NSA/CIA files. They didn't go get police records. They didn't install bugs on everyone's phones.
They went to demographic data-warehousing groups and bought as much information as they could. Completely legit (if creepy).
Do you think it's invading your privacy when, for instance, your pharmacy calls you up to tell you your RX is ready, before you even called for a refill?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 25, 2013 12:06 PM (8y9MW)
That's a very effective campaign technique. It would make the voters think about the gun policies of Democrats.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:06 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 12:06 PM (mOyDx)
Posted by: Mittens at January 25, 2013 12:07 PM (FKQng)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:02 PM (p+4lN)
you mean like telephones and stuff?
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 12:08 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: soothsayer at January 25, 2013 12:08 PM (GcwH1)
The abortion question needs to be reframed by every conservative candidate, as such:
The government exists to protect rights. All people, even those unborn have rights. In any situation, the government should lean to the side of protecting life. There are situations where one must balance one life against another, but the government should never be in the business of allowing the convenience of one person from taking precedence over the life of another.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 25, 2013 12:08 PM (xtvQl)
Posted by: Mittens at January 25, 2013 04:07 PM (FKQng)
Well, they gave me a "Happy Ending".
Posted by: Injun Black Foot Barry, the one that eats dogs. at January 25, 2013 12:08 PM (wR+pz)
Ace,
Regarding your comment on elitism and Sarah Palin's intellect, or lack thereof, I would say I value common sense more than anything else and a sense of decency and an understanding/foundational principle.
What is very instructive is to review the test subjects of Milgram's obedience experiments. It didn't matter what walk of life you were from, rich/poor; educated/uneducated; professional/blue collar; man/woman, the most shocking thing about the experiment was that you could not tell which one of the subjects would refuse to hurt another person.
The hint being even the educated, welloff, professionals make good fucking nazis.
The scientists were huge with the nazis.
These people tend to believe everything can be controlled, and can be controlled by HUMANS.
This is a falsehood, especially when it comes to OTHER HUMANS.
Once we understand that, true learning is possible. Trying to stop this fundamental truth leads to every nightmare that has been society over all these years, especially in the "industrialized" age. Where "means" of "control" are easy for the powerful to use and those that resist are simply disposed of.
Posted by: Prescient11 at January 25, 2013 12:08 PM (tVTLU)
Dismiss my observations all you want, but that is the the perception of the Republican party.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:09 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: Dems at January 25, 2013 03:52 PM (wsGWu)
Right, whatever. Won't presume to speak to any other members of the GOP, but either we play to win or get the hell off the field. Any more of McCain's 'losing honorably' strategy and we'll be shunted off to the darkness of fringe for the duration. You like it out there, or what?
Posted by: troyriser at January 25, 2013 12:09 PM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 04:06 PM (mOyDx)
Wait just one damn minute.......
Bullet points?!!
I want my subscription money back.
Posted by: Tami[/i] at January 25, 2013 12:09 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: rrpjr at January 25, 2013 12:09 PM (pnjFD)
Abortion is a losing issue, drop it. The stance should be, we do not want to pay for it. Leave it at that.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:09 PM (p+4lN)
Yeah, I don't think too many Mommas are gonna be happy paying for Jr's smoking premium starting next Jan.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 25, 2013 12:10 PM (p/cQy)
Posted by: My GF has big boobies at January 25, 2013 12:11 PM (F6KtL)
I grew up in a very rural area. The only evidence of the government we regularly came in contact with was in the form of the mail, schools and the occasional snow plow. Maybe the rare encounter with the police- mostly local government services.
In the city, you commute on the Interstate, have entire neighborhoods on welfare and food stamps, and countless federally funded projects and employers.
A population more reliant on government will tend to vote for bigger government. Those who see the federal government as little more than a paycheck deduction and the military will tend to vote for smaller government.
Well said. I've lived in the country, small town and the middle of a large city. What you said makes sense.
Posted by: ElKomandante at January 25, 2013 12:11 PM (xIUnF)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 12:11 PM (mOyDx)
Posted by: jeremiah God Damn Barack Obama the Mother Fucking SCoaMF wright at January 25, 2013 12:11 PM (+OTLF)
Posted by: Joe at January 25, 2013 12:12 PM (TQaK3)
Posted by: The Political Hat at January 25, 2013 12:12 PM (XvHmy)
I don't see people working two 28-hr/wk jobs to make ends meet having a lot of desire to go out in the evening to listen to someone who isn't giving away free shit.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs an intervention at January 25, 2013 12:12 PM (ZKzrr)
63>>>>if the fate of our country rests on painstakingly digging up little packets of half-awake conservatives...well then all is fucking lost anyway.
------
That's it, isn't it? If you can't sell prosperity and freedom to people whose incomes and liberties are eroding away, then it's probably not the message.
Posted by: Beef at January 25, 2013 12:12 PM (mb1uj)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:09 PM (p+4lN)
-
Over half of the coalition follow Christian principles. If you give those up, there is no chance of winning, or having anything worth winning.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 25, 2013 12:12 PM (xtvQl)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:12 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: Lauren at January 25, 2013 12:13 PM (wsGWu)
Posted by: looking closely at January 25, 2013 03:56
It's not a stretch -- it's a fact. The MSM called Bill Clinton a racist, covered up the entire Rev. Wright deal and spun Obama's poor debate performances in his favor during the Dem *primary.*
People think Obama "handed Hillary her ass" during the Dem primary, but it isn't true -- that's just the way the MSM reported it. When Obama gave his infamous "this is the moment when the planet began to heal" speech in June 2008 after he "cinched" the Dem nomination, he in fact did *not* have the delegates needed to be named the nominee. (Neither did Hillary Clinton, but she only had about 17 less delegates and she had a huge lead over him in the popular votes because most of Obama's wins were caucus states). The Dem nominee was picked by the superdelegates at the convention -- which is quite ironic given that very early on during the primary Obama-fluffer no. 1 Donna Brazile declared there would be "blood on the streets" if the superdelegates picked the nominee when it looked like most were in Hillary's column.
And that's not even getting into the mess of that DNC rules committee meeting on May 31, 2008 where delegates that represented votes for Hillary were actually taken from her and given *to* Obama based on MI primary exit polling (again, not covered by MSM so, for all intents and purposes, it didn't happen).
Posted by: angienc at January 25, 2013 12:14 PM (w3JGl)
Christianity does not call for a theocracy. Let abortion be between that person and god. This issue is the biggest stumbling block in expanding the GOP. If you want to stay pure on this issue, you will never win another election.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:14 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 25, 2013 12:15 PM (xGlYu)
Looks like people would rather lose. Hey, fascism's not so bad...the alternative is having those icky Christians in the public sphere. *shudder* They might even take away jwest's right to kill people to save a few bucks.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs an intervention at January 25, 2013 12:15 PM (ZKzrr)
Prosperity is racist.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs an intervention at January 25, 2013 04:04 PM (ZKzrr)
Did someone say 401ks and IRAs?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 25, 2013 12:15 PM (1Jaio)
Posted by: The Political Hat at January 25, 2013 12:15 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: Lauren at January 25, 2013 04:13 PM (wsGWu)
I'm with you there.
Posted by: troyriser at January 25, 2013 12:15 PM (vtiE6)
The gop will keep losing elections over that stupid issue. If this continues, another center-right party will overtake the republicans and you will go the way of the whigs.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:16 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:12 PM (p+4lN)
Thank you for your advice Megan McCain
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 25, 2013 12:16 PM (1Jaio)
BTW, how bad could Truman North have fucked up to get hisself banned? He's been around a long time. How does that happen?
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 04:11 PM (mOyDx)
I missed that. Today?
Posted by: Tami[/i] at January 25, 2013 12:16 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at January 25, 2013 12:16 PM (Y5I9o)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 25, 2013 12:16 PM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:09 PM (p+4lN)
So, how long ago did you pay for that abortion?
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:17 PM (VLG62)
This is where AmishDude and I point out we're so old, we remember when suggesting gays form permanent pairs instead of perpetually whoring around was homophobic.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs an intervention at January 25, 2013 12:17 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at January 25, 2013 12:17 PM (Y5I9o)
Somehow forget that mentioning death or murder of a certain person is forbidden even in the context of a joke.
Truman not a ahole or a dummy, so momentary lapse I suppose.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 25, 2013 12:17 PM (xz0nG)
Then enjoy 1 party rule in washington then. This abortion crap has been debated for 40 years. It's not a winning issue.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:17 PM (p+4lN)
102The abortion question needs to be reframed by every conservative candidate, as such:
The government exists to protect rights. All people, even those unborn have rights. In any situation, the government should lean to the side of protecting life. There are situations where one must balance one life against another, but the government should never be in the business of allowing the convenience of one person from taking precedence over the life of another.
-------------
The problem with this is...the Left has successfully emplanted the meme:
"The Right to Choose"
You say..."The government exists to protect rights"?
The Leftists would agree with that.
They say that the government needs to protect a 'Woman's Right to Choose'.
Posted by: wheatie at January 25, 2013 12:18 PM (fH4X9)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:16 PM (p+4lN)
It's only stupid if you are not the one being aborted.
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:18 PM (VLG62)
I absolutely agree that data mining such as this should be used. But it shouldn't completely replace traditional methods.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at January 25, 2013 12:18 PM (Gk3SS)
If the Republican Party gives up on it- even if they don't really, and just want to shelve it for a little bit, but the MFM plays it up as Republicans "abandoning their base," (and face it, they will): Republicans start losing the south.
You want Texas to become a battle ground state? You want Oklahoma to become a battle ground state? Stop opposing Abortion on Demand. That'll do it.
You may not like it, but you've got to face up to it.
That said: Republican politicians need to be a lot smarter in how they address it and how they answer questions pertaining to it. Magic vaginas and "Rape is a gift from God" (no, not what he said. But it what people heard that he said), are not going to win elections.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 25, 2013 12:18 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: joncelli at January 25, 2013 12:18 PM (RD7QR)
Unfortunately, as JohnE told Laura Ingraham, the RNC is still content with rubbing two sticks together.
Posted by: John P. Squibob, channeling his inner Howard Cosell at January 25, 2013 12:18 PM (kqqGm)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:14 PM (p+4lN)
I like that caveat you snuck in: 'If you want to stay pure on this issue'. You'll find few abortion absolutists in the GOP. I oppose abortion, yes, but I'm not going to use state coercion to force a woman to carry the child to term.
To win on this issue, we need to convey the extremism of the Democratic Party's stance: third-trimester and partial birth abortions on demand IS the extremist position.
Posted by: troyriser at January 25, 2013 12:19 PM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 25, 2013 12:19 PM (jE38p)
issue. If this continues, another center-right party will overtake the
republicans and you will go the way of the whigs.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:16 PM (p+4lN)
Says Chilling from this side of the birth canal.
Posted by: Tami[/i] at January 25, 2013 12:19 PM (X6akg)
I'm talking about bringing a battalion of Abrams tanks to a series of bar brawls.
And at the same time lose the professional self defeating political strategists that the GOP traditionally throw work to while pissing away contributions and blowing elections and the MFM.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 25, 2013 12:19 PM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:19 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: wheatie at January 25, 2013 04:18 PM (fH4X9)
So, we need to fill in the blank at the end of that phrase. Right to choose to murder her child. Plain and simple. Just finish the phrase every time it comes up.
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:19 PM (VLG62)
we need to take stories like this and spam every left leaning blog, news outlet, and facebook page, not once, but day after day, time after time, story after story, untill they either stop, or people stop believing them.
i believe the term is "death by a thousand paper cuts"
Posted by: xtron at January 25, 2013 12:19 PM (x5GOG)
We need to start having ONE spokesman for the party and enforce some disciple on the members of congress to STFU.
One clear message to counter Barry's mouth piece. Everyday, Carney talks. After he finishes, we talk.
The MSM would have to cover both sides and we get a clear message out, not 265 individual messages.
KISS= Keep It Simple Stupid.
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 25, 2013 12:19 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Beef at January 25, 2013 04:12 PM (mb1uj)
-----------------------------------------------
With a little positive advertizing it could work.
How about this: If you're tired of working two jobs 12 to 14 hours a day, paying $4 dollars for a gallon of gas, tired of paying $2 a pound for hamburger, then come to the town hall meeting tonight. We'll tell you how you could make your life exponentially better.
.......or something like this.
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 12:20 PM (/ZV9/)
You have no idea.
BTW, we actually are evil and we support Progressivism (BIRM).
Posted by: Google at January 25, 2013 12:20 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 12:20 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 12:20 PM (mOyDx)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 25, 2013 12:21 PM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 25, 2013 12:21 PM (jE38p)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:18 PM (p+4lN)
Todd Akins is an idiot, the worst possible right-to-life spokesman one could imagine. McCaskill's people used the Chicago strategy of voting in the Republican primaries to ensure the weakest GOP candidate won the nomination. If abortion hadn't come up, Akins probably would've stepped on it on another issue eventually.
Posted by: troyriser at January 25, 2013 12:21 PM (vtiE6)
Posted by: joncelli at January 25, 2013 04:18 PM (RD7QR)
Could be a troll, could just be an asshole.
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:21 PM (VLG62)
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2013 12:21 PM (8/DeP)
I am willing to lose the south to beat the democrats. That region has been dead weight on the gop. The truth is southern republcians are not fiscal/economic conservatives. they are theocratic progressives. I will gladly abandon the south if it means the GOP will be a party of individual liberty and free market. I have my Priest on Sunday to lecture morality to me.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:21 PM (p+4lN)
Can't be a paulin. Laup Nor is against abortion.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:21 PM (0q2P7)
This is a much better idea than harassing people--whose supposed disengagement in fact represents an American-conservative aversion to politics--with a barrage of finely lifestyle-targeted let's-get-political shit...sent on behalf of candidates who hate them.
I mean, "What Would Breitbart Do?" Fill your mailbox with infuriating garbage! From your vindictive mother-in-law!
...
Yeah, fuck it. Pay more consultants, more campaign-parasite traveling grifters, more politicians' groupies and spreadsheet-with-a-buzzword-on it scam artists. They know what they're doing.
With your money.
While openly wishing they worked for the Democratic Supermen who are Our Superiors.
Do it.
Posted by: oblig. at January 25, 2013 12:21 PM (cePv8)
Posted by: Andy at January 25, 2013 12:21 PM (C/NnJ)
----
"Hispanics voted for Sen. Hillary Clinton over Sen. Barack Obama by a margin of nearly two-to-one in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, according to an analysis by the Pew Hispanic Center of exit polls taken throughout the primary season."
[link to Pew - Hispanic]
Posted by: RioBravo at January 25, 2013 12:22 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: Real Joe at January 25, 2013 12:22 PM (u1hOQ)
>>>Posted by: Chilling
Look we have two trolls. Stroking each other off.
More likely it's one troll masturbating with both hands.
Posted by: ToursLepantoVienna at January 25, 2013 12:22 PM (6NIyO)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 12:22 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at January 25, 2013 12:23 PM (HJsDx)
Posted by: Lauren at January 25, 2013 12:23 PM (wsGWu)
Scott Brown lost because the of the image of the national gop. The party is viewed with good reason as bunch of resentful theocrat white bigots. The republican party dragged down scott brown.
How did murdoch do?
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:23 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 25, 2013 12:23 PM (jE38p)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:21 PM (p+4lN)
No, no you don't. Or, if you do, maybe you should start listening. Until then, FOAD.
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:23 PM (VLG62)
89>>>"The missing center-right voters are people who despise the Socialism of the Democrats but are turned off by the bigotry of the Republican party."
Bullshit. Republicans aren't bigots just because the democrats label them as such. The democrats are a coalition of leftists and non-whites. The Republicans have no other population to draw from other than center-right white voters, many of whom are turned off because the dems portray that natural whiteness as some kind of bigotry.
The Republican brand has been an appeal to the kind of universalist ideal embodied in the founding documents. If minorities tend to not embrace universalism in favor of tribal interests, that does not make the Republicans the party of bigots.
Posted by: Beef at January 25, 2013 12:24 PM (mb1uj)
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2013 12:24 PM (8/DeP)
Then enjoy going the way of the whigs. In 20 years, the republicans will be just a regional party that places in 3rd place in national elections. A new center-right party will merge and be competitive with democrats. enjoy the death of your party!
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:24 PM (p+4lN)
I believe the word is "complicit," not ignorant, willing or otherwise, though they are often that, too.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 25, 2013 12:25 PM (eHIJJ)
==========
No, it's not. They get away with it by having the extreme positions sent out by 1) individuals associated with the party but not speaking for the party; Michele, Sandra Fluke, etc. 2) Groups everyone knows were working hand in glove with the party but fully above-board as far as the FEC cared, 3) Plausible deniability.
Now, having the media cover for all this is great. But for the GOP, the same will work, just dial up a few more layers of separation from the candidate and the messenger.
Posted by: RoyalOil at January 25, 2013 12:25 PM (imtbm)
The R candidate says something like "I would like to see Roe v Wade overturned. Let state governments decide the issue, based on what their voters say they want."
That night, the nightly news soundbite is 'The R candidate wants to see Roe v Wade overturned.'
The next day, the D candidate runs a TV commercial saying 'the R candidate wants to overturn Roe v Wade in order to take away women's reproductive rights!'
And the R candidate never answers.
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 12:25 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:24 PM (p+4lN)
What part of FOAD did you not hear?
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:25 PM (VLG62)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at January 25, 2013 12:25 PM (Y5I9o)
How did murdoch do?
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:23 PM (p+4lN)
Let me guess, Miss McCain, you've always voted Republican going back to Lincoln but the party has become sooooooo intolerant that you just can't support no mores.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 25, 2013 12:26 PM (1Jaio)
Do republcians even try to win minority votes? Nope, just re-read what you wrote with your tribal accusations and tell me how a minority will read that. I know minorities who are center-right, but they feel unwelcomed in the gop and sense hostility. Seeing some of the comments on conservative sites, I do not blame them.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:26 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 12:26 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 12:27 PM (mOyDx)
Posted by: Lauren at January 25, 2013 12:27 PM (wsGWu)
Rand Paul is advocating what I am calling for. An inclusive center-right coalition based on individual freedom. I love Rand Paul, he's my type of republican.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:28 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: The Political Hat at January 25, 2013 12:28 PM (XvHmy)
I saw one post where he made a wisecrack hoping something bad happened to a certain leader with ears like jug handles, followed by the word banhammer and a question mark. There may have been more than that, but if so I missed it.
I dunno, seems like a post flush and move on moment rather than a ban deal to me, but I don't run the place.
Posted by: Lemmenkainen, Freelance Warlord at January 25, 2013 12:28 PM (ZWvOb)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 04:21 PM (0q2P7)
---------------------------------------------
I concur.
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 12:28 PM (/ZV9/)
Personally I don't even care anymore. I want single party Democrat rule. Why I live in California and I know what it looks like. If people fall for your type of lies, simultaneously not realizing that a wholly amoral people cannot be free, then slavery to to your utopian socialism is what is needed. If we say the law will not protect the innocent unborn, than what appeal can any of us make that it should protect us? Law becomes an arbitrary contrivance, not the assurer of rights. As such it becomes ultimately a bludgeon for the slaver.
The amoral cannot be free not even in atheist political theory. Sorry Charlie.
LiB
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:28 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 25, 2013 12:29 PM (jE38p)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:26 PM (p+4lN)
Sweetie, any racism or classism or other issues you would like to paint on Republicans with your broad brush are entirely the purview of your progressive asshat friends who have to label everyone by race, creed, and sexual perversion. You get to own that one, lock stock and barrel.
Now, go lay down by your dish.
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:29 PM (VLG62)
Posted by: Lemmenkainen, Freelance Warlord at January 25, 2013 12:29 PM (ZWvOb)
Posted by: crosspatch at January 25, 2013 12:30 PM (YRCZD)
Posted by: The Political Hat at January 25, 2013 04:28 PM (XvHmy)
---------------------------------------------------
Blunt force trauma. It's the only thing the LiV is going to understand.
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 12:30 PM (/ZV9/)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at January 25, 2013 12:30 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Lauren at January 25, 2013 12:30 PM (wsGWu)
---
I am s sorry but that is not appropriate content for our audience.
Posted by: TVS tation Director at January 25, 2013 12:30 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: KG at January 25, 2013 12:30 PM (p7BzH)
Candidate Jones in CO's opponent would be (politically) bloody beaten and bruised early and often, 24/7, right thru election day
My opponent's time would be 100% consumed in defending himself and his record- he wouldn't have a moment's rest
his every utterance, every vote, would be turned against him
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 12:31 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 12:31 PM (evdj2)
I am a libertarian who believes in individual liberty and inclusiveness. Enjoy the last few years of the relevancy as a party. A new center-right will emerge and republcians will be just be a party of rural people and theocrats. History is passing you by!
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:31 PM (p+4lN)
The sooner debt is tackled the better. It is sickening how many PSA's are on the radio advertising everything from food stamps, soc. sec. disability, to dangerous paint chips to blame your child's misbehavior on and encouraging people to sue.
Posted by: Deli LLama at January 25, 2013 12:31 PM (lGu1O)
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2013 12:31 PM (8/DeP)
153They say that the government needs to protect a 'Woman's Right to Choose'.
Posted by: wheatie at January 25, 2013 04:18 PM (fH4X9)
So, we need to fill in the blank at the end of that phrase. Right to choose to murder her child. Plain and simple. Just finish the phrase every time it comes up.
I've said this before....it takes two.
It takes two people to create an 'unwanted' pregnancy.
I think where we go wrong...and play into the hands of the Left, as being 'anti-women'...is to keep attacking women as though they are the sole reason why abortions happen.
For every abortion that happens...there is a guy out there who didn't want that baby, or didn't do a good job of convincing the woman to have his baby.
If we call women 'murderers' for aborting their babies...we are giving a pass to all the guys out there who told those women to "just go take care of it".
Posted by: wheatie at January 25, 2013 12:31 PM (fH4X9)
Posted by: L, elle at January 25, 2013 12:31 PM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:28 PM (p+4lN)
The same Rand Paul who was at the Pro-life rally today?
Sen. Rand Paul, a first-term Kentucky Republican who is a physician, spoke about times he looked "into the eyes of one-pound babies Â… cradled their small bodies in the palm of one hand."
"I believe that great nations and great civilizations spring from a people who have a moral compass," Paul said. "Our nation is adrift, adrift in a wilderness where right and wrong have become subservient to a hedonism of the moment. I believe our country is in need of a revival."
That Rand Paul?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 25, 2013 12:31 PM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 25, 2013 12:32 PM (uhAkr)
Oh I am. I've got weenies and marshmallows to roast over the LiB Fire.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:32 PM (0q2P7)
He's pro-life but does not seek to impose that view through government. He is open to making alliances with people who are not into social issues. Read his interviews.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:33 PM (p+4lN)
BTW Rand Paul went on Beck this morning and said abortion should be illegal so.....Maybe you should rethink your position.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:33 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: toby928©
Hector.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 25, 2013 12:34 PM (xz0nG)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:31 PM (p+4lN)
There I go again, standing in the way of history.
Posted by: troyriser at January 25, 2013 12:34 PM (vtiE6)
It's the republcian party that is dying. But don't let the truth get to you in this echo chamber. the majority of Americans hate the republican party. You are a laughing stock in politics.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:34 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:31 PM (p+4lN)
No, you are not a libertarian. You are progressive moby hiding behind the skirts of the libertarian party. If you were a libertarian, you would realize that most libertarians are rural, and those who are not are not far from it. You would also realize that murdering babies is not the libertarian ideal, and that most folks on this site are not as stupid as you and your prog cohort.
Once again, go lay down by your dish.
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:34 PM (VLG62)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:34 PM (p+4lN)
Breathless hyperbole much?
Posted by: troyriser at January 25, 2013 12:35 PM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 25, 2013 12:35 PM (jE38p)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 12:35 PM (mOyDx)
Ace, it won't work because Republicans project (truthfully or not) hatred for lying and cheating and stealing. In addition, and for whatever reason, your candidates are unattractive and those who aren't unattractive are not up-to-par in other essentialities ( I say it's a word!).
You need to explain that while Israel, good friend that she is, represses her citizens with universal/compulsory health care, the United States must absolutely resist the tyrannical geographic transmog. That our aid and assistance to this dear friend comes with the usual and customary "freedom watch" disclaimer.
I voted for Bush The Good and voted for Bush The Destabilizer. And I still like them both.
I did not vote for President Obama and I didn't vote for Mitt Romney.
I won't vote for Paul Ryan, I won't vote for Marco Rubio, I won't vote for Chris Christie, etc. Many others won't either. You're losing those votes you need without offsetting them with gain.
I can't figure out whether conservatives take their existence from liberal recoil or liberals take their existence from conservative recoil. It must be the former because justice for all does seem to arc to the left. Ever read Lincoln's letter to a friend describing spiritually disfigured men riding trains in chains?
Dunham has imagination. Yours needs a bit of work even with your good mind and good spirit.
Hitchens is dead, Orwell lives and Republicans can go straight to hell!
Posted by: Ade at January 25, 2013 12:35 PM (vZLcL)
That is his personal; opinion and believes it should be left up to the States. Watch his National review interview. He is a different kind of republcian who can agree to disagree on this stupid abortion issue.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:36 PM (p+4lN)
Actually he does. He sited the very same concept on Beck I've espoused several times. If the unborn is a person, than it is the duty of law to protect that person from aggressive harm caused by another. Maybe you should pay better attention to what's going on.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:36 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:31 PM (p+4lN)
We invite you to be Special Snowflake of the Day
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 12:36 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: wheatie at January 25, 2013 04:31 PM (fH4X9)
--------------------------------------------------
But hasn't the leftist AND legal meme been that it's strictly the "woman's" choice?
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 12:36 PM (/ZV9/)
@133Abortion itself isn't what loses the issue for the GOP. What does that is the fucking assholes like Todd Akin who make it plausible to believe that opposition to abortion is step one is the grand plan to ban condoms and seal up everyone's lady parts in Federal Reserve.
-----------------------------------------
Exactly. There's not the proverbial snowball's chance of making abortion illegal in this country at any time in the next couple of decades. It'd probably take that long at minimum just to get Roe v. Wade overturned (which is somewhat ironic, since from what I've heard most legal scholars agree that the decision itself is a very poorly reasoned one). The fight long ago ceased to be whether or not abortion was illegal. Instead, it's where exactly to draw the line between what's legal and what isn't. i.e. how late into the pregnancy can an abortion be performed? Should parents be notified if their under 18 child has an abortion? What happens to fetuses that somehow survive an attempt to abort them? But whenever the GOP finally starts to get things focused on where the battle actually is, some idiot like Akins opens his mouth and gives the Democrats another opportunity to slander the entire Republican party.
Besides, even if the Republican party didn't officially back making abortions more difficult, you'd still get local-level candidates arguing for it. And idiots like Akins would *still* get you in trouble as a result.
Posted by: junior at January 25, 2013 12:36 PM (UWFpX)
This, this, and more this.
Reject every premise made, every twist of words, every liberal talking point asserted by those apparatchiks. And throw in some ad hominem early to get them off their game to thwart inevitable ambush.
The MFM is the biggest enemy we face. I'm not sure everyone realizes just how insidious these bastards are (though Ace and much of the horde does). The corrupted media is truly an existential threat.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 25, 2013 12:36 PM (eHIJJ)
I'd like to think that there would be some way for him to make amends that would be both instructive and insulate Ace from similar mistakes in the future.
It is Ace's rep on the line after all.
A lot of people are feeling fears spawned by fatigue, and while the clever and snarky irreverence here right now is one of the main attractions, we can't allow ourselves to forget about the landmines being laid around us.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 25, 2013 12:36 PM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at January 25, 2013 12:36 PM (Y5I9o)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 12:36 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:34 PM (p+4lN)
Yes, and you are a laughing stock in the men's room at the truck stop.
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:37 PM (VLG62)
>>>>>189@ 179 Beef
I know minorities who are center-right, but they feel unwelcomed in the gop and sense hostility
-----------------
Why is that? Is the GOP not putting minority faces out there as much as they can? Can you point out any examples of prominent party members who sending out negative vibes to minorities? They have done an admirable job getting minority candidates elected across the South no less. The center-right minorities you know are confusing liberal propaganda for reality.
It's a tough slog because the meta narrative has been established. But I reject completely the notion that the party is hostile to minorities.
Posted by: Beef at January 25, 2013 12:37 PM (mb1uj)
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2013 12:37 PM (8/DeP)
Posted by: Lauren at January 25, 2013 12:38 PM (wsGWu)
Newsflash. That's what Akin wanted too. No one has been suggesting a national law banning abortion. The entire Republican platform has been about getting rid of the moratorium on states laws against abortion. Try and keep up huh?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:38 PM (0q2P7)
It shows your ignorance. Many Libertarians are Urban. We believe in free markets and individual liberty. What separates us from you Socons is we like to have sex, get drunk and smoke pot. We enjoy life and do not lecture others.
Your kind is shrinking, enjoy your permanent minority status.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:38 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: Paul at January 25, 2013 12:38 PM (i2xLO)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 25, 2013 12:38 PM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2013 12:38 PM (8/DeP)
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2013 04:37 PM (8/DeP)
And designate the Pancake as America's national breakfast food
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 12:39 PM (8sCoq)
I won't vote for Paul Ryan, I won't vote for Marco Rubio, I won't vote for Chris Christie, etc.Many otherswon't either. You're losing those votes you need without offsetting them withgain.
I can't figure out whether conservatives take their existence from liberal recoil or liberals take their existence from conservative recoil. It must be the former because justice for alldoes seem to arc to the left. Ever read Lincoln's letter to a frienddescribingspirituallydisfigured men riding trainsin chains?
Dunham has imagination. Yoursneeds a bit of work even with yourgood mind and good spirit.
Hitchens is dead, Orwell lives and Republicans can go straight to hell!
Posted by: Ade at January 25, 2013 04:35 PM (vZLcL)
Personally, I just think you're too fucking drunk or too fucking lazy to get off of your ass and vote.
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 12:39 PM (/ZV9/)
Your kind is shrinking, enjoy your permanent minority status.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:38 PM (p+4lN)
Thanks again Megan McCain. Your advice is duly ignored
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 25, 2013 12:40 PM (1Jaio)
The official republican platform calls for banning abortion even in the case of rape or incense. abortion is what the modern republcian party is based on. All your talk about fiscal responsibility is bs. When republicans had complete power, they ran up the debt.
Socials issues are more important to republcians than fiscal issues. No one believes your fiscal talk.
Enjoy your march to irrelevance!
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:40 PM (p+4lN)
Your kind is shrinking, enjoy your permanent minority status.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:38 PM (p+4lN)
Libertarians LIKE YOU (and you really aren't a libertarian, just an asshole) just want to be sluts and get stoned and kill babies. Sandra Flukes, if you will. This is somehow a superior position? And the only reason you like to call yourself libertarian is that you think it justifies your teenage lifestyle.
Do come back if you ever get out of your mom's basement and start using your brain. Until then, let's hope you don't kill too many babies or brain cells.
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:42 PM (VLG62)
I am laughing at all of you. Your party is becoming a joke and soon, you will be placing 3rd in elections. I can't wait until the new cnter-right party emrges and we laugh at your 3rd place finish.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:43 PM (p+4lN)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 12:43 PM (mOyDx)
Posted by: Lauren at January 25, 2013 12:43 PM (wsGWu)
Ignore it. What it's doing is the equivalent to jerking off to an Obama campaign poster
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 12:44 PM (8sCoq)
Great, and sincerely I am not being flip or bigoted make the case in Spanish and ebonics now.
That is the problem we face.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 12:44 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 25, 2013 12:44 PM (uhAkr)
I like to be taxed at a low rate, not have to deal with regulations and make my own money. It's Socons who want government hand outs. You are just mad it's not rural whites getting money. The Socons are Marxists using The bible. You are not fooling me you socialist scum.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:44 PM (p+4lN)
I've heard that a lot too. But the hostility comes not from members of the Republican party or Conservatives but others in their community.
>>>we like to have sex, get drunk and smoke pot. We enjoy life and do not lecture others.
1. If you don't like lecturing folks why did you come here and do just that? We here are in common company and as such are lecturing nobody.
2. we like to have sex, get drunk and smoke pot. Well other than smoke pot I see no major difference. If you like pot that's your business. If you draw 1 cent of government aid, it's mine. That said if you aren't as ardent about getting rid of entitlements and making people stand on their own as you are about making smoking out legal, you really aren't presenting a full salient platform.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:44 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 25, 2013 04:42 PM (8/DeP)
I hate to admit this, but it is rather enjoyable batting this pinata around the basement. Guilty pleasure?
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:44 PM (VLG62)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 12:46 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Chillin' at January 25, 2013 12:46 PM (wsGWu)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 12:46 PM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna let it burn really.really bummed at January 25, 2013 12:47 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 04:36 PM (/ZV9/)
----------
They sure do, Soona...so that they can include it in the concept of 'Women's Rights'.
But I still think we harm ourselves by attacking only women, and calling them 'murderers', for having an abortion.
Personally, I think it is murder.
But we are getting nowhere with the rhetoric of attacking women that way...and not talking about how men bear some of the responsibility of an abortion happening.
Posted by: wheatie at January 25, 2013 12:47 PM (fH4X9)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 04:43 PM (mOyDx)
------------------------------------------
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 12:47 PM (/ZV9/)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 25, 2013 12:47 PM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:44 PM (p+4lN)
Quick, you chill little asshole, what race am I and where do I live?
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 12:47 PM (VLG62)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 12:47 PM (evdj2)
Fine the dude who wants to "enjoy life and do not lecture others." came here to lecture us and not listen to our response in good faith.
My blog's troll has a first name it's spelled h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:47 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 12:48 PM (evdj2)
Everybody who posted "Stop nominating RINOS/'electable'/milquetoasts/geldings/Democrat-lites"...
DING DING DING DING WE HAVE WINNERS!
All the rest of you who talk about micro-this and demographic-that and targeted-whatsit and projected-whatchamacallit, keep on losing it for us, thanks.
Posted by: NotAMoose at January 25, 2013 12:48 PM (ZZg4j)
>>>>271I think at this point all we can hope for is States rights on the issue
-------------
That and almost every other issue. There is no way to impose centralized solutions on a nation of 320 million people without causing gross inefficiencies and injustices.
Posted by: Beef at January 25, 2013 12:49 PM (mb1uj)
There is one problem that faces us that the Democrats don't face
Actually, two. A second problem you don't mention - and that I actually think is more important - is our inherent aversion to the creepiness/stalking/"surveillance" factor this approach entails.
Democrats are totally cool with those. Seriously, they are. They're statists, after all.
Us, not so much. We're protective of our own freedom from intrusions into our private lives and therefore respect that of others, even our political opponents.
That's a real handicap for us that Dems don't have to overcome.
Posted by: Rocketeer at January 25, 2013 12:49 PM (/AHDz)
I don't want nobody judged man, but I'm gonna judge SoCons man b/c they are like control freaks man but the left they are like you know laid back and not in your business DOOOOD now where's my grow lamp?
//stonerz
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 12:49 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 12:49 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 25, 2013 12:50 PM (uhAkr)
I like to be taxed at a low rate, not have to deal with regulations and make my own money. It's Socons who want government hand outs. You are just mad it's not rural whites getting money. The Socons are Marxists using The bible. You are not fooling me you socialist scum.
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:44 PM (p+4lN)
----------------------------------------
No, dumbass.
Posted by: NotAMoose at January 25, 2013 12:50 PM (ZZg4j)
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna let it burn really.really bummed at January 25, 2013 04:47 PM (9+ccr)
---------------------------------------------------
Unless RvW is overturned, the states will never be able to rid themselves of it.
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 12:50 PM (/ZV9/)
Posted by: Rocketeer at January 25, 2013 12:51 PM (/AHDz)
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 04:50 PM (/ZV9/)
I wish. Hopefully the question of life and pain of an unborn abortion victim or even more advanced sonograms will hit home that this is murder. I pray for that day...
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna let it burn really.really bummed at January 25, 2013 12:51 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: polynikes at January 25, 2013 12:52 PM (m2CN7)
Makes sense hector would fit.
Why he likes sucking cock is between him, her, and God I guess....
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 12:53 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 04:47 PM (evdj2)
I want to go out on nefari
shoot some nerfs
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 12:53 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 25, 2013 12:54 PM (SY2Kh)
I think the problem is that the country, as a whole, is now left-leaning.
So, I don't see how data mining for "conservative voters" is going produce much since there aren't that many more to begin with.
The current Repub majority in the House is due to gerrymandering. Eventually even this will cease to provide Repub House wins since districts get re-drawn every time there is a US census.
Either the GOP figures out how to turn people more right-leaning or it will go the way of the Whigs.
Posted by: boo at January 25, 2013 12:55 PM (oKFz+)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 12:55 PM (mOyDx)
We'll show you you goddamned SOCONs we'll make sure you never get elected again and elect the full bore fascists....
I like to suck on blunts and the occasional penis....
//Stonerz
yeah I wonder why they can't form a fucking coalition....
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 12:56 PM (LRFds)
Are we going to have issues?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 04:49 PM (0q2P7)
--------------------------------------------
I dunno, haven't read through all the muck in the thread. The first few posts hit the mark perfectly. They said exactly what I told my goofy 21-year-old son when he insisted before the Republican nominations were done that Obama would lose his second term. I bet him that, #1, Romney would be the nominee because the dipshit GOP establishment don't know their asses from holes in the ground, and #2, they would repeat the Democrat vs. Democrat-lite race of 2008.
They did. My boy lost the bet. He paid up, like a good son.
He's back at it again with his whole "numbers, demographics, strategeriez" schtick. Strangely enough he's not putting his money where his mouth is this time.
Hillary is going to be the next Prez, unless that whole 22nd Amendment thing is somehow defenestrated.
Posted by: NotAMoose at January 25, 2013 12:57 PM (ZZg4j)
However, first, if we do not start to reclaim the schools it does not matter. Texas has started the battle by simply working on obtaining better, more honest textbooks. If people cannot think and reason then all the microtargeting in the world will not help.
A longer view problem, I know, but an important one.
Posted by: Dandolo at January 25, 2013 12:57 PM (GAJm6)
You have no idea how tempted I am to run for that seat.
Posted by: Country Singer at January 25, 2013 12:57 PM (mDanm)
>>>>> I think the problem is that the country, as a whole, is nowleft-leaning.
_______________
We can all thank Teddy Kennedy and his Immigration Reform Act for that. May he live in infamy.
Posted by: LGoPs at January 25, 2013 12:59 PM (4x8W0)
Posted by: polynikes at January 25, 2013 04:52 PM (m2CN7)
------------------------------------------------------
I voted for the RINO. Twice. Good going on nominating those pieces of shit.
Posted by: NotAMoose at January 25, 2013 01:00 PM (ZZg4j)
My point. You are "NotAMoose"
I am "MikeTheMoose"
Figured you might have something against moose or something.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 01:00 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: 2nd Amendment Mother at January 25, 2013 01:01 PM (L4CWX)
Posted by: LGoPs at January 25, 2013 01:01 PM (4x8W0)
Posted by: Ernie King Commander in Chief US Fleet (CINCUS) at January 25, 2013 01:02 PM (p4U6S)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at January 25, 2013 01:04 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Lurkasaurus at January 25, 2013 01:04 PM (4a7nR)
Posted by: polynikes at January 25, 2013 01:04 PM (m2CN7)
Oh Darth Merovign, beating up on trolls is part of my therapy. It helps lower my blood pressure.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 01:05 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Dandolo at January 25, 2013 04:57 PM (GAJm6)
-----------------------------------------------------
True, the counter-Gramscian long march through the institutions would have been nice to start, at latest, 10 years ago. Now I'm afraid we're on the wrong side of the hill, rolling down.
Yuri Bezmenov warned us, a lot of us didn't listen. It's gotten so bad now that a substantial portion of the conservative movement has been infected.
Posted by: NotAMoose at January 25, 2013 01:07 PM (ZZg4j)
Posted by: NotAMoose at January 25, 2013 05:00 PM (ZZg4j)
You must have used the ' running against a declared Communist' exception except that again, Obama never declared he was a communist. You obviously wasted your vote.
Posted by: polynikes at January 25, 2013 01:07 PM (m2CN7)
I am "MikeTheMoose"
Figured you might have something against moose or something.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 05:00 PM (0q2P7)
--------------------------------------------------------------
LOL! Sorry, the name is an old inside joke. No personal slight at all.
Posted by: NotAMoose at January 25, 2013 01:09 PM (ZZg4j)
You and me both. Again, look at the MFM! During the 2012 GOP Convention, the MFM cut away from coverage when a person of color or person with vagina spoke. They were patently and fraudulently framing the "GOP is a bunch of rich, racist, white men" story.
It was appalling... and totally expected from the Democrats' campaign arm aka the MFM.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 25, 2013 01:09 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: NotAMoose at January 25, 2013 05:00 PM (ZZg4j)
You must have used the ' running against a declared Communist' exception except that again, Obama never declared he was a communist. You obviously wasted your vote.
Posted by: polynikes at January 25, 2013 05:07 PM (m2CN7)
-------------------------------------------
So you didn't want McCain or Romney as nominees? Just spit it out, son, I'm too old for this jibber-jabber.
Posted by: NotAMoose at January 25, 2013 01:13 PM (ZZg4j)
Could be a troll, could just be an asshole.
Posted by: tcn at January 25, 2013 04:21 PM (VLG62)
Can't it be both? I'd also add, "race-baiting bigot."
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's solid gold diaphragm at January 25, 2013 01:16 PM (7xeJQ)
Thank you for the Yuri Bezmenov mention. I had to google him, but it is well worth the read.
It is hard enough to keep a civilization alive without people actively working to bring it down.
Posted by: Dandolo at January 25, 2013 01:27 PM (GAJm6)
Posted by: madamex at January 25, 2013 01:31 PM (+kvQd)
I personally think that the clever talk about "data mining", Narwal, and micro-targeting is the narrative that the Democrats want to put out about how clever they are . And I suspect that they broke some laws in acquiring data that they allegedly used.
This is a great cover story for what they probably likely did, which was voter fraud. I think that in detail and in a broad strategy, the Democrat party, in the close-run states (Virginia, Florida, Ohio and perhaps one or two others) committed MASSIVE voter fraud.
I dunno how they did it, but am pretty sure they did it. And all three of the above states have Republican state governments, that as far as I can tell, are doing NOTHING to investigate even the possibility of voter fraud. This kind of pre-emptive surrender is possibly the most disturbing aspect of the 2012 election. There were hints of Democrat voter fraud in the local newspaper (Columbus Dispatch), but nothing substantive, and no continued reporting of it - just stories of Democrats organizing itinerant Somalis to vote, who are likely NOT citizens, etc. to vote the straight Democrat ticket. Multiply that by the same effort in hundreds of precincts, and you could easily swing the election by a hundred thousand or so votes.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at January 25, 2013 01:40 PM (RFeQD)
Posted by: davod at January 25, 2013 01:41 PM (C5U9L)
Posted by: rplat at January 25, 2013 01:57 PM (U/Ao5)
Posted by: Chilling at January 25, 2013 04:21 PM (p+4lN)
Fuck you Chilling. I live in the South. You have no clue.
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at January 25, 2013 02:00 PM (QyMDY)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at January 25, 2013 02:23 PM (s7iqn)
Posted by: bob at January 25, 2013 02:45 PM (ZruHX)
One last thing Ace, liberals give conservative bromides the nod then move on to move revenue to Hospice.
Jindal had to back off on eliminating the funds. Why can't he sell the elimination of the funding? Why not use the need to do so as a teaching moment to the 47%? He can't because we're not just one nation when we're warring, we're one nation when we're living and when we're dying.
The Republican lie would reveal itself in the way it did for Jindal. Democrats lies are revealed through rights tampering, perhaps, but also through aid and comfort to the dying. Deny or ignore that at your peril.
Posted by: Ade at January 25, 2013 03:04 PM (vZLcL)
Posted by: Timwi at January 25, 2013 03:50 PM (pdhxN)
I think Republicans miss out on the military/defense technology and general followers of the military WHO HAVEN'T SERVED.
The next nominee should go fly in an F-35 or F-22 shoot a SAW with a Ranger or Green Beret unit.
I would call this the 'traditional man's man' voting block.
It would include throwing a baseball or football around, etc. Go lift some weights
BE A MAN and show Americans you are a man
And I guarantee it would help with women and male blacks and hispanics.
Posted by: bobbymike at January 25, 2013 04:25 PM (wJSZn)
I dunno how they did it, but am pretty sure they did it. And all three of the above states have Republican state governments, that as far as I can tell, are doing NOTHING to investigate even the possibility of voter fraud. This kind of pre-emptive surrender is possibly the most disturbing aspect of the 2012 election. There were hints of Democrat voter fraud in the local newspaper (Columbus Dispatch), but nothing substantive, and no continued reporting of it - just stories of Democrats organizing itinerant Somalis to vote, who are likely NOT citizens, etc. to vote the straight Democrat ticket. Multiply that by the same effort in hundreds of precincts, and you could easily swing the election by a hundred thousand or so votes.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at January 25, 2013 05:40 PM (RFeQD)
--
This is indeed what they did, in OH, FL, VA, CO, and WI. PA too, though I don't know if Romney would have won without the fraud. Any three of those being investigated and proved would turn the election, or more likely a constitutional crisis.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 25, 2013 05:16 PM (/i3Yt)
Some of the liberals I work with get their political direction from SNL, remember that started about 30 years ago. We got a long way to go....
Posted by: dtih at January 25, 2013 05:24 PM (EoTCW)
this is just patently stupid. because the guy won, we have to do just what he does? no, you have to move one step past what the other guy is already doing to beat him. but all that common sense aside, let's be honest; this guy didn't win by doing anything special; he won because the media is owned by the party of government.
Posted by: matt foley at January 26, 2013 05:54 AM (ES9kw)
Posted by: Crowley at January 27, 2013 05:54 AM (ip+RW)
"We're gonna be buddies! We're gonna be pals! We're gonna wrassle around! Ol' Matt's gonna be your shadow! Here's you, here's Matt! There's you, there's Matt! Here's you, here's [slip--SPLAT!]" Alternatively, the real Matt Foley, the guy who Farley played rugby with at Marquette and unwittingly lent his name (not so much his looks or personality) to the character, went on to become a priest. Maybe he could sprinkle holy water on Barry and see what happens.
2. Here in California, I've been for all intents and purposes over into the future Chilling wants for the GOP nationwide. Our guys, statewide and even local are using pretty much the strategy he wants the last couple of elections. And...it doesn't work for the most part. And this is exactly the kind of state where it's supposed to. Good luck getting actual red states to go along with that.
3. This sounds more like an plan to make the direct-mail guys rich and the USPS a little less bankrupt than something that'll actually translate into ballots cast.
Posted by: Rich Fader at January 27, 2013 04:32 PM (OQM8v)
i keep hearing over,and over how o'bama,and his team outsmarted romney,and the republicas.
romney was up against a president with no morales ,and all the info.,and data bases in america,and a team pretty much funded by tax-payers,and and illegal donors.
not to mention his boots on the ground that pulled off the most fraudulent election in american history,not to forget about the magic voting machines that voted for o'bama all by themselves.
get over it fix the fraud,or expect it again.
Posted by: david lager at January 28, 2013 05:02 PM (l9gxL)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2752 seconds, 458 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








In politics, all that is not illegal is allowable. No more nice.
Posted by: troyriser at January 25, 2013 11:46 AM (vtiE6)