June 14, 2013
— Ace No more secrets?
Some of this I approve of, such as Microsoft tipping off the government about bugs and hack-exploits shortly before it widely disseminates patches to fix those bugs. This permits the government a short period of time to exploit the security holes in terrorists' or foreign officials' computers before they're fixed.
But I don't know the extent of it. And I don't know what the government gets in return.
Thousands of technology, finance and manufacturing companies are working closely with U.S. national security agencies, providing sensitive information and in return receiving benefits that include access to classified intelligence, four people familiar with the process said.These programs, whose participants are known as trusted partners, extend far beyond what was revealed by Edward Snowden, a computer technician who did work for the National Security Agency. The role of private companies has come under intense scrutiny since his disclosure this month that the NSA is collecting millions of U.S. residentsÂ’ telephone records and the computer communications of foreigners from Google Inc (GOOG). and other Internet companies under court order.
Many of these same Internet and telecommunications companies voluntarily provide U.S. intelligence organizations with additional data, such as equipment specifications, that donÂ’t involve private communications of their customers, the four people said.
Makers of hardware and software, banks, Internet security providers, satellite telecommunications companies and many other companies also participate in the government programs. In some cases, the information gathered may be used not just to defend the nation but to help infiltrate computers of its adversaries.
Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), the worldÂ’s largest software company, provides intelligence agencies with information about bugs in its popular software before it publicly releases a fix, according to two people familiar with the process. That information can be used to protect government computers and to access the computers of terrorists or military foes.
...
The extensive cooperation between commercial companies and intelligence agencies is legal and reaches deeply into many aspects of everyday life, though little of it is scrutinized by more than a small number of lawyers, company leaders and spies. Company executives are motivated by a desire to help the national defense as well as to help their own companies, said the people, who are familiar with the agreements.
Most of the arrangements are so sensitive that only a handful of people in a company know of them, and they are sometimes brokered directly between chief executive officers and the heads of the U.S.Â’s major spy agencies, the people familiar with those programs said.
One thing that might be surprising to people is that there has long been a lot of cooperation between the CIA and private corporations in the tech area. The CIA's gadget shop, for example, would often go to private companies with specific needs, and private companies would put their engineers on the job to make them, say, a very miniaturized camera, or a battery that lasted for years (to power a hidden microphone and transmitter planted in an official's office), or so on.
In many cases these breakthroughs would then become subject of patents and tech items available to the general public, but only after a certain period of time during which the CIA had exclusive use of the technology.
The popular, but somewhat silly-sounding, idea that the CIA has technology that won't see the light of day for years is actually... true. (Citation: Spycraft: The Secret History of the CIA's Spytechs, from Communism to Al-Qaeda by Wallace, Melton, et al. discusses this. The book is based on declassified documents, and the forward was written by George Tenet, so this book is relatively accurate and not some flight of fancy. )
I'm not entirely sure if I should be alarmed by this because this scary-sounding secret tech alliance between the CIA and private tech corporations has been going on since, I don't know, at least the forties.
Now, sharing citizens' private data is something else again, but... Here's the thing: Google is already spying on you and collecting your information. Google is the world's largest espionage organization. Not the NSA, but Google.
Microsoft is a somewhat smaller one, and Apple, and Amazon, and etc...
I don't know how much more alarmed I should be that the government is recording my data when practically every large tech company on earth is already doing it.
I Wonder if There are Secret Patents and a Secret Patent Office. I think there must be. Patents are public. That's the point of them -- in exchange for an inventor voluntarily telling the world how his device works, and adding to the world's net wealth of technological knowledge, he receives a government-granted right of exclusive use of the patent for a period of years. After that period, the patent lapses, and now anyone can use it.
But if a corporation is doing work for the CIA, and they create a patentable innovation, they surely would want a patent on that. The trouble is, they can't get a public patent. The whole point of the CIA's request for a super-long-lasting tiny battery is that they don't want the world to know they have such things.
So I wonder -- and I think it must be the case -- that somewhere in the law, or perhaps some secret Executive Order, there's a provision that says corporations' will get the benefit of the patent without publicly disclosing it, and that their official patent application -- when they seek it, after the CIA has used it for some years -- will be back-dated to reflect the actual date of invention.
Not sure how this would work. Gotta be going on, though.
Posted by: Ace at
09:24 AM
| Comments (261)
Post contains 954 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: Andy at June 14, 2013 09:27 AM (9L0Ba)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at June 14, 2013 09:27 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at June 14, 2013 09:28 AM (8ZskC)
"Some of this I approve of, such as Microsoft tipping off the government about bugs and hack-exploits shortly before it widely disseminates patches to fix those bugs. This permits the government a short period of time to exploit the security holes in terrorists' or foreign officials' computers before they're fixed."
Here, let me re-write that last sentence:
This permits the government a short period of time to exploit the security holes in news media reporters computers before they're fixed.
Posted by: doug at June 14, 2013 09:29 AM (uJ8q7)
Posted by: AmishDude at June 14, 2013 09:30 AM (xSegX)
>>>Google is the world's largest espionage organization. Not the NSA, but Google.
True fact - I just googled it to verify.
Posted by: Roy at June 14, 2013 09:31 AM (VndSC)
The government has an army and a growing list of paramilitary organizations (IRS agents with AR-15s, for instance). As far as I'm aware, Google has a couple of self-driving Prii and a lot of patchouli.
Posted by: Ian S. at June 14, 2013 09:31 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 14, 2013 09:31 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: SarahW at June 14, 2013 09:31 AM (LYwCh)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at June 14, 2013 09:32 AM (u82oZ)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 09:32 AM (mUSYR)
----
Heh, read that as "swapping intelligence, spit" first time around.
Prolly more accurate tho....
Posted by: fixerupper at June 14, 2013 09:32 AM (nELVU)
The 'F' in FISA does not mean Federal.
That and the impossible to answer question of the extent of the surveillance is why the apologetics from the Right read like so much insanity.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 14, 2013 09:32 AM (SX6wc)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 14, 2013 09:33 AM (jE38p)
Posted by: Waldo at June 14, 2013 09:33 AM (RZwdH)
Posted by: SarahW at June 14, 2013 01:31 PM (LYwCh) .......................
My Gas can is adult proof, Can't get gas in it let alone out..
Posted by: notachanceinhell at June 14, 2013 09:34 AM (jJA/4)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 14, 2013 09:34 AM (g1DWB)
GPS came out of Rockwell's early NavStar sat system work in the 1970's. By 1980, I think there were ~3 in orbit. Rockwell wasn't just building space shuttles and truck axles...
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 14, 2013 09:34 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 14, 2013 09:34 AM (jE38p)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at June 14, 2013 09:34 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Tiglon at June 14, 2013 09:35 AM (V2QM2)
Posted by: thunderb at June 14, 2013 09:35 AM (nH8jP)
Unfortunately, I think it's pretty well established that Area 51 is actually:
1) Where they test nifty new secret planes
2) Where the federal government dumps stuff to avoid subjecting themselves to their own EPA regulations
And it's mostly the second thing now.
Posted by: Ian S. at June 14, 2013 09:35 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: Artemus Khan, Supervillian-billionaire-layabout at June 14, 2013 09:35 AM (27tUc)
Posted by: thunderb at June 14, 2013 09:35 AM (nH8jP)
Until it all gets nationalized. Because "unfair profits."
Posted by: Blanco Basura at June 14, 2013 09:37 AM (4WhSY)
Posted by: kreplach at June 14, 2013 09:37 AM (ihCPW)
Posted by: Winston Smith at June 14, 2013 09:37 AM (8PndB)
(firefox/mozilla) bing is what i have on as search engine yet Google is always there as the master even though i deleted Google in programs.
Posted by: willow at June 14, 2013 09:38 AM (nqBYe)
This is too complex to be useful.
Posted by: soothsayer
Utility:
Big government = Bad.
Smaller government = Slightly better.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 14, 2013 09:38 AM (SX6wc)
Posted by: Al Gore at June 14, 2013 09:38 AM (jJA/4)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at June 14, 2013 09:39 AM (ZPrif)
Well private companies don't show up in the middle of the night with guns drawn, yet. That, and private companies have a profit motive not to perpetrate a bunch of clusterfucks on the public, with a bottomless budget to draw from while they fuck up your existence, and "national security" or "executive privilege" to shield them scrutiny of money hungry lawyers. But yeah, other than that, they are pretty much the same.
Posted by: assault flounder at June 14, 2013 09:39 AM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at June 14, 2013 09:39 AM (eJuQy)
The difference between Google spying on us and the government is HUGE. Google just wants to sell ad space and help their paying customers target your buying preferences. Don't like it, use another search engine. The government is no longer a neutral, pro-American entity. It has become a hyper-partisan super-bueracracy, and it is using its spying aparatuses to silence and intimidate opposition.
This is the very deffinition of out of control government. It's not just the act of spying that differentiates the government and private companies, but what they do with it. Both are a breach of your privacy, sure. But one is simply for commercial gain; the other is an attempt to bully their way into permanent control of the country.
Posted by: Scot at June 14, 2013 09:40 AM (G74SD)
They've been doing that since the 1800's.
The Watervliet arsenal got scaled back a lot when Vietnam ended and the cold war died out though. A lot of the space and manufacturing facility is rented out these days.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 14, 2013 09:40 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: SarahW at June 14, 2013 09:40 AM (LYwCh)
Posted by: thunderb at June 14, 2013 09:41 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: notachanceinhell at June 14, 2013 09:41 AM (jJA/4)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 14, 2013 09:41 AM (da5Wo)
Cheap import trolls. Good quality American trolls are hard to find at any price these days.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 14, 2013 09:42 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Waldo at June 14, 2013 01:33 PM (RZwdH)
It's Bosco.
Posted by: assault flounder at June 14, 2013 09:42 AM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: Vendette at June 14, 2013 09:42 AM (iXuYG)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at June 14, 2013 09:43 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 09:43 AM (mUSYR)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 09:43 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 09:43 AM (/PCJa)
(firefox/mozilla) bing is what i have on as search engine yet Google is always there as the master even though i deleted Google in programs.
Posted by: willow at June 14, 2013 01:38 PM (nqBYe)
--------------------------------------------
Dear Sweet Lady,
We'll always be with you. Don't ever think we've abandoned you.
Yours Forever,
Posted by: Soona at June 14, 2013 09:43 AM (BP/3G)
Posted by: Assault Citizen Anachronda at June 14, 2013 09:43 AM (w/Ebk)
http://bit.ly/11llu96
Posted by: Yip at June 14, 2013 09:43 AM (/jHWN)
Not if you don't use Google.
Likewise, cellphones can't trace you if you turn them off. And browsers can't track you ... rather, they have a lot more trouble tracking you ... if you routinely delete cookies and history.
Posted by: wolfwalker at June 14, 2013 09:44 AM (lLT1z)
Posted by: Andy at June 14, 2013 09:44 AM (Lnvih)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 14, 2013 09:44 AM (jE38p)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 01:32 PM (mUSYR)
This is one of the last of the great conspiracies that hasn't come into the open this year, I give it until Labor Day.
Posted by: BunkerintheBurbs at June 14, 2013 09:44 AM (0tHG6)
Yours Forever,
Posted by: Soona at June 14, 2013 01:43 PM (BP/3G)
lol, yikes!
Posted by: willow at June 14, 2013 09:45 AM (nqBYe)
(firefox/mozilla) bing is what i have on as search engine yet Google is always there as the master even though i deleted Google in programs.
Posted by: willow
Left click Google icon in the Search field > Manage Search Engines > select > Remove > restart FF
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 14, 2013 09:45 AM (SX6wc)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 09:45 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 09:45 AM (mUSYR)
Posted by: Ace Runner Stephen Price Blair at June 14, 2013 09:45 AM (QF8uk)
Kinda like the way copyright used to work before it became effectively perpetual.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's solid gold diaphragm at June 14, 2013 09:45 AM (7xeJQ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 14, 2013 09:45 AM (KdyqO)
Posted by: thunderb at June 14, 2013 09:46 AM (nH8jP)
Muslim Rappers, ‘Google Ideas’: Inside the Flawed U.S. Campaign to Fight Militant Memes
http://tinyurl.com/9of228p
Posted by: jeannebodine at June 14, 2013 09:46 AM (LBBS3)
Bing is just as bad as Google in terms of data mining, but if you want to make it your first choice as a search engine in the toolbar just click on the logo next to the search box in your toolbar. That will show you the dropdown menu that you can select from to pick a new search engine.
ixquick is an alternative search engine that advertises itself as "the world's most private search engine". It is not automatically available in the dropdown menu, but you can download it as a plugin for Firefox, at which point it will offer you the option to select it as your first choice for the search in the toolbar. You will still be able to switch back using the method above, however.
Posted by: TH at June 14, 2013 09:46 AM (S+/XI)
But cartoon characters that fall into the wrong hands are a threat to national security.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at June 14, 2013 09:47 AM (8ZskC)
Are they not handing data over to the actual IRS, ATF, etc? Not to mention OFA.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at June 14, 2013 09:47 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 09:47 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: zsasz at June 14, 2013 09:47 AM (MMC8r)
How did we ever lose the election to a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable tyrant.
..
..
oh yeah - we suck. and we have no credibility or vision. and not one shred of intelligence. sorry. I almost forgot how much we suck.
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 09:48 AM (KdyqO)
Posted by: zsasz at June 14, 2013 09:48 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 14, 2013 09:48 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at June 14, 2013 09:48 AM (eJuQy)
Posted by: Ian S. at June 14, 2013 09:48 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: thunderb at June 14, 2013 09:48 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 14, 2013 09:48 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 14, 2013 09:50 AM (9GG/0)
I don't know all of what it does, but it's the repository for nukular tech at least.
In the old Crystal City offices, it was a separate, locked area and you needed to be one of them to get in. Not sure how it works in the new, Alexandria complex.
Purp ,the Watervliet Arsenal is still going strong.
They made bunker busters from idea to workable device in about 6 months for the first Iraq war.
They took a 16 inch gun barrel design (for battleships) and turned it into a penetrating bomb.
Freaking awesome. I love driving by there, they have a bunch of BFG barrels out front.
Posted by: Veeshir at June 14, 2013 09:50 AM (JjQ0n)
Get back to me when Google has its own IRS, ATF, etc.
Posted by: Andy at June 14, 2013 01:44 PM (Lnvih)
Google doesn't need their own jackbooted divisions due to their being in bed with the Democrat party.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's solid gold diaphragm at June 14, 2013 09:50 AM (7xeJQ)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 14, 2013 09:50 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 14, 2013 09:51 AM (XkotV)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 09:51 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: zsasz at June 14, 2013 09:51 AM (MMC8r)
I knew it!! I always suspected that the government is stealing all our spaces and ampersands on this damn website..... causing confusion, distrust and disillusionment among the morons. This confirms ev
*bzzzzt*
Posted by: Some Guy in Wis *bzzzt* at June 14, 2013 09:51 AM (fhR3f)
Posted by: The New and Improved Sean Bannion at June 14, 2013 09:51 AM (eJuQy)
He had access, but my take is he didn't have all the access he claims to have had.
Don't worry, they got his laptops locked away in a "secure room" for "safe keeping" while his disposition is being decided. I'm sure they're be handed back to the US govt intact as soon as negotiations are completed.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 14, 2013 09:51 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: The New and Improved Sean Bannion at June 14, 2013 09:52 AM (eJuQy)
Posted by: Ace Runner Stephen Price Blair at June 14, 2013 09:52 AM (QF8uk)
Pretty smart on Google's part - why pay for your own private jackboot army when you can just co-opt the government's?
Posted by: chemjeff at June 14, 2013 09:52 AM (9GG/0)
Posted by: Yip at June 14, 2013 09:52 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Weiner for Mayor at June 14, 2013 09:53 AM (LJ2uj)
Posted by: gm at June 14, 2013 09:53 AM (/kBoL)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 14, 2013 09:53 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Juan de Hattatime at June 14, 2013 09:53 AM (CqZmo)
These programs, whose participants are known as trusted partners, extend far beyond what was revealed by Edward Snowden
But I thought Snowden didn't reveal anything. That's what I was told anyway.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at June 14, 2013 09:54 AM (g5YAm)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 09:54 AM (eJuQy)
>>>Only vaguely related, ran across a neat identity-theft trick today.
Seems like a helluva lot of work.
Posted by: Roy at June 14, 2013 09:54 AM (VndSC)
What's going on here is the development of Chinese-style communism being fastracked via fascism.
Any time that govt and corporations 'partner' up, The People lose a little freedom, lose a little privacy, and lose a little more of their paycheck.
But Government will have the last laugh. These 'partnerships' are only temporary -- the takeover is imminent.
Posted by: soothsayer, now with 20% less ruth at June 14, 2013 09:54 AM (Y4TdB)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 09:54 AM (mUSYR)
Posted by: Artemus Khan, Supervillian-billionaire-layabout at June 14, 2013 09:55 AM (27tUc)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 09:55 AM (eJuQy)
It's late. I'm worried that something may have happened to it.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at June 14, 2013 09:56 AM (8ZskC)
Not just tech. This is where the U-2 and SR-71 came from.
U2 had some good songs, I didn't know they came from the CIA. I never heard of that other band.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at June 14, 2013 09:56 AM (g5YAm)
ok it didn't let me left click google icon.
I did the other thing at the right top end of screen where BING and other suggestions of search engine are.
selected BING again which i type in for whatever search i am asking for. (google is no longer in that Manage search engines ) but...
when search finishes I'M back On Google!
Posted by: willow at June 14, 2013 09:57 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: thunderb at June 14, 2013 09:57 AM (nH8jP)
They did have some old ones laying around out in the yard out in back by what used to be Adirondack Casting years ago near the Shamrock pub. Same road that AlTech used to be on that had the overpass over the RR tracks.
Shit must have been out in that field for 30 year or more that I can remember...
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 14, 2013 09:57 AM (/gHaE)
I Wonder if There are Secret Patents and a Secret Patent Office.
It's next to the Secret Warrants Office.
Posted by: zsasz at June 14, 2013 01:48 PM (MMC8r)
-
You win
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at June 14, 2013 09:57 AM (D5iHx)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 09:58 AM (eJuQy)
Posted by: Ace Runner Stephen Price Blair at June 14, 2013 01:52 PM (QF8uk)
Except for Obama's SSN. It was handed to him personally Beelzebub.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at June 14, 2013 09:58 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: zsasz at June 14, 2013 09:58 AM (MMC8r)
I don't know how much more alarmed I should be that the government is recording my data when practically every large tech company on earth is already doing it.
Given corporate entities require the acquiescence of government to really fuck you up (at least in semi-civilized countries), and government can really fuck you up all by itself regardless of the status of civilization, the tie goes to government.
However, given the closeness of the goals of Google/Apple/et al and Team SCOAMT with respect to conservatives, the current situation is more of six of one, half a dozen of the other.
Posted by: steveegg at June 14, 2013 09:59 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 09:59 AM (eJuQy)
Posted by: Supra Vibrators at June 14, 2013 09:59 AM (+iA5G)
Posted by: Ian S. at June 14, 2013 09:59 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 14, 2013 09:59 AM (da5Wo)
SR-71 is more of a punk band.
Posted by: Blanco Basura at June 14, 2013 10:00 AM (4WhSY)
"I don't know how much more alarmed I should be that the government is
recording my data when practically every large tech company on earth is
already doing it."
A) Because the government has the power to make your life a living hell, and
B) A lot of the tech companies are already leftwing sympathisers who will happily use their exclusive tech patents to further aid their favorite politicians in achieving their ideological and electoral goals. That these government connections already exist simply makes the transition easier.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 14, 2013 10:00 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: How at June 14, 2013 10:00 AM (V+Pei)
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 14, 2013 10:00 AM (XkotV)
They took a 16 inch gun barrel design (for battleships) and turned it into a penetrating bomb.
Freaking awesome. I love driving by there, they have a bunch of BFG barrels out front.
Posted by: Veeshir at June 14, 2013 01:50 PM (JjQ0n)
I thought it was surplus 8" barrels.
Posted by: steveegg at June 14, 2013 10:01 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 10:01 AM (eJuQy)
It would just be denied and they'd be "counseled" about how wise it would be to STFU about it.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 14, 2013 10:01 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Vendette at June 14, 2013 10:01 AM (iXuYG)
Secret patent enforcement comes under the category "wet work." It usually happens at night.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at June 14, 2013 10:02 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 14, 2013 10:02 AM (g1DWB)
They have shown themselves to be untrustworthy. I unequivocally do not trust them with anything. Nothing. Not. A. Damn. Thing.
Posted by: dogfish at June 14, 2013 10:02 AM (NuPNl)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 10:02 AM (mUSYR)
*slips a roofie into Cochran's drink*
You are using those wrong. Unless you are into that sort of thing...
Posted by: garrett at June 14, 2013 10:02 AM (Th2Iv)
Posted by: Vendette at June 14, 2013 10:02 AM (iXuYG)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 14, 2013 01:53 PM (da5Wo)
-------------------------------------------------
It's like licking eyeballs.
Posted by: Soona at June 14, 2013 10:03 AM (BP/3G)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies with whipped cream. at June 14, 2013 10:03 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: chad at June 14, 2013 10:03 AM (1RWFE)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 14, 2013 10:03 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 10:04 AM (eJuQy)
Posted by: Ace Runner Stephen Price Blair at June 14, 2013 10:04 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 10:04 AM (mUSYR)
*slips a roofie into Cochran's drink*
*hands Vendette the camera*
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 02:01 PM (eJuQy)
.... The NoVaMoMee is going to be interesting.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 14, 2013 10:04 AM (4df7R)
Worn out old 105's headed for the smelter with fins, guidance module, and a DU/W penetrator shoved down the barrel would be pretty damned cheap.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 14, 2013 10:05 AM (/gHaE)
"So I wonder -- and I think it must be the case -- that somewhere in the law, or perhaps some secret Executive Order, there's a provision that says corporations' will get the benefit of the patent without publicly disclosing it, and that their official patent application -- when they seek it, after the CIA has used it for some years -- will be back-dated to reflect the actual date of invention.
Not sure how this would work. Gotta be going on, though."
Was always struck by the fact that people who took ordinary engineering jobs would also get security clearances for the government. And, it always struck me that they never asked why they were getting these clearances, they just assumed it was part of getting the job and giving them all your information, like the drug tests everyone is suddenly taking.
But, since it's come out that having these security clearances means more money, perhaps the government temporarily hires the engineers working in the labs of the private company and their income, for that time, comes from the government.
So they can probably use the stuff they develop but the government probably owns the technology.
I'm wondering, if the government comes to a private company and asks for something to be developed, are there any consequences, if the private company chooses to say "no thank you."
Posted by: caustic at June 14, 2013 10:05 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 10:05 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Bob Dole mentions Bob Dole at June 14, 2013 10:05 AM (m0le6)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 14, 2013 10:06 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: alexthechick
^^ This ^^
As always, AtC is able to say what I wanted to say, but much better.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 14, 2013 10:06 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Vendette at June 14, 2013 10:06 AM (iXuYG)
Google alone - no. But Google *can* share info with the government as part of a quid pro quo that will get you arrested/audited. It's the cooperation that makes the distinction between government and private corporation powers less distinct.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 14, 2013 10:06 AM (XkotV)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 10:06 AM (/PCJa)
You know, you gotta stop them at the beginning. Just like we shoulda stopped Hitler at Munich, we shoulda stopped TIVO in 2002.
-- Clemenza, The Godfather
Posted by: soothsayer, now with 20% less ruth at June 14, 2013 10:07 AM (NLH1M)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 10:07 AM (eJuQy)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at June 14, 2013 10:07 AM (AsiVD)
Posted by: notachanceinhell at June 14, 2013 10:07 AM (jJA/4)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 14, 2013 10:07 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 10:08 AM (mUSYR)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 10:08 AM (eJuQy)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 02:04 PM (mUSYR)
Ideally the only time they would be able to provide that info to the gubmint is under the terms of a warrant.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 14, 2013 10:08 AM (4df7R)
My cow-orkers were just talking about this.
If this is you, wave.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at June 14, 2013 10:08 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 14, 2013 10:08 AM (jE38p)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 10:08 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at June 14, 2013 10:09 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Vendette at June 14, 2013 10:09 AM (iXuYG)
Posted by: Cheri at June 14, 2013 10:09 AM (G+Wff)
when search finishes I'M back On Google!
Posted by: willow
Hmm. It works for me.
Google was and has been part of FF for a while so there may be some feature that re-installs the search.
Things to check:
• Make sure your homepage isn't a variant of Google.
• Options > Applications > check to see if something there points to Google
• Options > Privacy > Tell Sites I Do Not want to be Tracked
And play around with the History settings; one of those may be the sticking point. I have my Accept Cookies setting to Keep Until I close FF.
If you have any Gmail syncing or Google Earth plugins, those may be the issue.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 14, 2013 10:09 AM (SX6wc)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 10:09 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2013 10:10 AM (mUSYR)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 10:10 AM (eJuQy)
162- I'm thinking I'm due a very high level job of some kind, might have too much indian blood though
Posted by: How at June 14, 2013 10:10 AM (V+Pei)
Yeah, that ship's sailed.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at June 14, 2013 10:10 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 10:11 AM (eJuQy)
You mean consequences other than IRS audits, bogus EPA toxic contamination claims, OSHA inspections every month, and extra-special SEC scrutiny?
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 14, 2013 10:11 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Mr. Feverhead at June 14, 2013 10:11 AM (SzAZ7)
Posted by: YIKES! at June 14, 2013 10:11 AM (mETGQ)
Posted by: Cheri at June 14, 2013 02:09 PM (G+Wff)
Is he talking literally about fertility, or is he talking "fertile" as in "fertile minds that can be swayed to Republican causes?" I refuse to look it up because I don't want Google telling the gubmnt that I'm interested in Jeb Bush. They might think it means I want him to run for Preezy.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 14, 2013 10:12 AM (4df7R)
http://tinyurl.com/kqq4l9m
Posted by: caustic at June 14, 2013 10:12 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 10:12 AM (/PCJa)
Tools ( Alt + T ) > Add Ons > Google plugins > disable them > restart > retry Remove in Manage Search Engines.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 14, 2013 10:12 AM (SX6wc)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at June 14, 2013 10:12 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 10:12 AM (eJuQy)
Posted by: Ace Runner Stephen Price Blair at June 14, 2013 10:13 AM (QF8uk)
I Wonder if There are Secret Patents and a Secret Patent Office.
Yes there are secret patents, but the decision to slap the secrecy label on it doesn't come from a "secret patent office". It comes from the national security aparatus.
Despite the intimation from the New Scientist that this started in the Cold War (http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2008/10/us-patent-office-reveals-numbe.html), it extends back at least to 1933, with patent #6097812 being filed that year and not being officially issued until 2000).
Posted by: steveegg at June 14, 2013 10:13 AM (o44nj)
I'm wondering, if the government comes to a private company and asks for
something to be developed, are there any consequences, if the private
company chooses to say "no thank you."
You mean consequences other than IRS audits, bogus EPA toxic contamination claims, OSHA inspections every month, and extra-special SEC scrutiny?
Posted by: Purp at June 14, 2013 02:11 PM (/gHaE)
Don't forget being shut out of the running for any future gubmint contracts.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 14, 2013 10:13 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at June 14, 2013 02:12 PM (qwK3S)
-
Colonel Sanders, the bastard.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at June 14, 2013 10:13 AM (D5iHx)
Posted by: thunderb at June 14, 2013 10:13 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: Mainah at June 14, 2013 10:14 AM (659DL)
I know this has been covered ad nauseum, but what do I need to do in "tools" to avoid some of the formatting snafus that occur in Firefox? I tried yesterday and didn't see the menu choices that were referenced.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at June 14, 2013 10:14 AM (4Mv1T)
The sad part of it is, is now that these companies have laid down with the devil, they'll forever be in his servitude. I thinks it's a deal they made with DC, that they either share their data or Dear Leader shuts down the intertubes. I think it's that simple.
Remember. Congress gave Baraka the on/off switch to the internet last year.
Posted by: Soona at June 14, 2013 10:14 AM (BP/3G)
Posted by: Peter Venkman at June 14, 2013 10:14 AM (q00GQ)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 10:14 AM (eJuQy)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 14, 2013 10:14 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 10:15 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Vendette at June 14, 2013 10:15 AM (iXuYG)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 10:16 AM (eJuQy)
MWR @ 203
He was actually talking about their propensity to procreate -
"Immigrants create far more businesses than native-born Americans," Bush said. "Immigrants are more fertile, and they love families, and they have more intact families, and they bring a younger population. Immigrants create an engine of economic prosperity."
I guess he lit twitter up
Posted by: Cheri at June 14, 2013 10:16 AM (G+Wff)
Soooo now we have a troll socking Bannion?
How sweet!
But sugarpie, you should run along home and have your mommy change your diaper. You smell like shit.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 14, 2013 10:16 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: joncelli at June 14, 2013 10:16 AM (RD7QR)
You mean consequences other than IRS audits, bogus EPA toxic contamination claims, OSHA inspections every month, and extra-special SEC scrutiny?
Posted by: Purp at June 14, 2013 02:11 PM (/gHaE)
Don't forget being shut out of the running for any future gubmint contracts.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at June 14, 2013 02:13 PM (4df7R)
Up until recently those were the stealth consequences. I'm wondering if the government has any recourse legitimately via the rule of law to compel someone to do something for them that they don't want to do.
Posted by: caustic at June 14, 2013 10:16 AM (/b8+5)
The key here is that these two partners -- govt and tech companies -- are sharing our secrets, not their own secrets.
They're exchanging and comparing notes...on us.
Posted by: soothsayer, now with 20% less ruth at June 14, 2013 10:16 AM (+oin+)
But now that we know Obama has already targeted( in one case a guy still sits in jail )... those who spoke against His administration or those He 'likes'. IRS, EPA, other alphabets etc.. AP- and Rosen . That we Know of.
there is a difference in how I feel about tech and govt SPY on American Citizens (considered possible terrorists Because ? )
Posted by: willow at June 14, 2013 10:16 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at June 14, 2013 10:17 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 14, 2013 10:17 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: The Original Sean Bannion, Now With Extra Snark at June 14, 2013 10:17 AM (eJuQy)
Posted by: KM at June 14, 2013 10:18 AM (bCger)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 14, 2013 10:20 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: willow at June 14, 2013 10:20 AM (nqBYe)
Worn out old 105's headed for the smelter with fins, guidance module, and a DU/W penetrator shoved down the barrel would be pretty damned cheap.
Posted by: Purp at June 14, 2013 02:05 PM (/gHaE)
If memory serves, even the GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb is thicker than that, so integrating them onto aircraft might be a bit expensive.
Posted by: steveegg at June 14, 2013 10:20 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at June 14, 2013 10:20 AM (KdyqO)
"Immigrants create far more businesses than native-born Americans," Bush said. "Immigrants are more fertile, and they love families, and they have more intact families, and they bring a younger population. Immigrants create an engine of economic prosperity."
Good grief, what an idiot.
Immigrants create an engine of economic prosperity."
He must have read that wrong. It SHOULD say, "ILLEGAL immigrants create an engine of lifelong welfare dependence, outbreaks of communicable disease like TB and diptheria, and dispossessed youth who feel they're above the law and, by golly, seem to be correct in that assumption. See, this is why they're here ILLEGALLY. Because current immigration law would have prevented them from immigrating legally."
But whatever. What do I know? My grandmother was almost turned away as she got off the ship from England because they thought she had TB. What do I care that LA is now teeming with superbug TB thanks to the illegals who infest the slums like termites?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 14, 2013 10:22 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Tobacco Road
Not much choice in the matter but check
Tools > Options > Content > Fonts and Colors > Advanced
Allow pages to choose their own...
I'd check that and test it out.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 14, 2013 10:23 AM (SX6wc)
I'm sure all those who supported Perry will be quite pleased with this Christmas in June present.
Posted by: caustic at June 14, 2013 10:24 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: [/i] [/b] [/u] [/s] An Observation at June 14, 2013 10:24 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: An Observation at June 14, 2013 02:24 PM (ylhEn)
So then, the only reason anyone would do this is because they love this country.
Posted by: caustic at June 14, 2013 10:27 AM (/b8+5)
I can't scroll up and down as easily in Firefox with the arrow keys as well as Chrome either.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at June 14, 2013 10:28 AM (4Mv1T)
Since the government gets to decide what has military applications - this applies to all patents - allowing a tyrannical state to suppress any new technology they please.
Not - of course - that the patent office could be corrupted any more than say the IRS or the DOJ could be.
Posted by: [/i] [/b] [/u] [/s] An Observation at June 14, 2013 10:35 AM (ylhEn)
I can't scroll up and down as easily in Firefox with the arrow keys as well as Chrome either.
Posted by: Tobacco Road
There is some under-the-hood tinkering you can do with
about:config
But, Caveat Tinker.
I'd look through mozilla's help forums for a setting tweak if it bugs you enough to care.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at June 14, 2013 10:37 AM (SX6wc)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at June 14, 2013 11:04 AM (X4HxX)
Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards at June 14, 2013 11:22 AM (3Znbm)
I say this cause everything I've read implies not just the US.
Posted by: caustic at June 14, 2013 11:35 AM (/b8+5)
Google is the biggest spying agency of all?????????
Several problems with this assertion:
1) You enter into an agreement with Google, meaning you voluntarily allow THEM to mine data for promotions etc. Not to make your emails public or readable. And if they violate this AGREEMENT you can SUE THEM.
2) Using Google is voluntary;
3) Try suing the US govt.
4) Google can't kick in your fucking door and arrest you.
Next question.
Posted by: Prescient11 at June 14, 2013 12:10 PM (tVTLU)
Hope and change = don't be evil (i.e complete and total bullshit).
Whatever Obama wants, Google kneepad-wearing lickspittles are more than happy to oblige him no matter what. Is it that simple? I don't know but I'm not going to crack on someone who thinks this way nowadays.
Posted by: MikeD at June 14, 2013 01:05 PM (iZiIb)
I don't know how much more alarmed I should be that the government is recording my data when practically every large tech company on earth is already doing it.
I think you should be way more alarmed about the government doing it because last time I checked, none of those companies you named has a standing army. Not to mention huge array of federal agencies most of whom have armed agents of their own that can be unleashed on you for whatever "misdeed" the "find" you "doing".
Posted by: TimInVirginia at June 15, 2013 01:24 PM (DZWjR)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3385 seconds, 389 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: EC at June 14, 2013 09:25 AM (doBIb)