March 24, 2013
— andy A Reminder of What We're Up Against
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. ~ George Orwell, 1984
As a callback to that stupid "Earth Hour" thing last night, please allow me to veer from the topic of guns for a brief second to talk about sticks ... particularly, Michael Mann & Co.'s "Hockey Stick" graph. Everyone always focuses on the blade of the graph, where the temperature is shown going up, Up, UP, but the real magic of this particular piece of fraud is in the handle. That's where Mann erased the medieval warm period and the little ice age to make it look like current temperatures are out of line with historical norms.
About the same time time Mann was concocting this fiction, an "historian" named Michael Bellesiles was engaged in a similar effort with firearms. Bellesiles sought to make today's level of gun ownership look unprecedented by erasing the record of America's historical level of gun ownership using methods that were farcical when they weren't outright fraud (see the explanation by Ross McKitrick, co-breaker of the Hockey Stick, beginning on page 23 of this PDF for a brief but devastating explanation). This passage is among my favorite things ever:
Bellesiles claimed to have examined hundreds of San Francisco probate records from the 1850s. When confronted with the fact that all the San Francisco probate records had been destroyed in the 1906 earthquake, Bellesiles claimed that he obtained them from the Contra Costa County Historical Society. But the Society stated that it did not possess the requisite records. Bellesiles soon resorted to ad hominem, claiming that the amateur critics could not be trusted because they lack credentials.
Maybe Michael Bellesiles is Michael Mann?
Unlike Mann, whose work is worshipped and protected by the Gaia cult, Bellesiles' fraud was uncovered, and his study was tossed in the wastebin. But human beings' capacity for self-delusion is a powerful thing, it seems.
I've been wanting to talk about Bellesiles in a gun thread for a while, and in doing the research, I almost fell out of my chair when I ran across this piece in the notorious right-wing publication Inside Higher Ed.
It may be the most striking and provocative bit of prose concerning a scholarly book to have circulated in some while. The passage in question runs to one paragraph appearing about two-thirds of the way down the page of a note accompanying the page proofs for 1877: AmericaÂ’s Year of Living Violently by Michael A. Bellesiles, to be published by the New Press in August. Here it is:
A major new work of popular history, 1877 is also notable as the comeback book for a celebrated U.S. historian. Michael Bellesiles is perhaps most famous as the target of an infamous ‘swiftboating’ campaign by the National Rifle Association, following the publication of his Bancroft Prize-winning book Arming America (Knopf, 2000) -- ‘the best kind of non-fiction,’ according to the Chicago Tribune -- which made daring claims about gun ownership in early America. In what became the history profession’s most talked-about and notorious case of the past generation, Arming America was eventually discredited after an unprecedented and controversial review called into question its sources, charges which Bellesiles and his many prominent supporters have always rejected.These sentences have absorbed and rewarded my attention for days on end. They are a masterpiece of evasion. The paragraph is, in its way, quite impressive. Every word of it is misleading, including “and” and “the.”
Read the whole thing. Even though the author clearly is on the opposite side of this issue than I am, he at least doesn't resort to the machinations that Bellesiles did to get there. And read that McKitrick piece, too. Then consider that people (like the publisher interviewed in the IHE piece) defend Bellesiles to this day. Like modern environmentalism, hating guns and, by extension, gun owners and the NRA is a matter of faith on the left.
Gun Of The Week

(answer below)
Hero of the Day - Oklahoma: Man Shot During Home Invasion - okcfox.com/newsroom/top_sÂ… #NRA #ArmedCitizen (via @okcfox)
— Cam and Company (@CamAndCompany) March 22, 2013
Gun Of The Week - Answer
That's the Colt Model 1905 in .45 ACP. Even the great John M. Browning made a prototype every now and then.
Senate votes 53-46 to stop US from joining UN Arms Trade Treaty
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) said he thought it was irresponsible to be considering major foreign policy decisions at 3 a.m. on Saturday morning.
Funny, I'd have thought Bob Menendez would be most comfortable engaging in foreign relations around that time.
Pro Tip
Hickock45 on how NOT to shoot a semi-automatic pistol.
Tips
If there are topics you're interested in seeing in the gun thread, please send them to AoSHQGunThread at gmail. You can also send them to me on Twitter at @AndyM1911.
Posted by: andy at
06:12 AM
| Comments (283)
Post contains 857 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at March 24, 2013 06:14 AM (vN7SY)
Posted by: Andy at March 24, 2013 06:14 AM (OZPoa)
That's AoSHQ standard html tag closing, people. Don't try it at home.
I would pass judgement but....well, you know.
Posted by: Couch Fucker - Aspiring Testicle Nibbler at March 24, 2013 06:16 AM (vN7SY)
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at March 24, 2013 06:18 AM (i7B17)
Fox weather guy was just on. Said it was going to be nationwide cold right up through next Wed. Last year in the much bally-ho'd hottest year of forever the average daily high for the year was 7° lower than the previous year.
Liars lie, it is what they do.
Posted by: Vic at March 24, 2013 06:20 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Professor Marius von Totenkopf (formerly Hoss Fuentes) at March 24, 2013 06:21 AM (aozUR)
And yet this discreted fk is still quoted by libtards.
Posted by: Vic at March 24, 2013 06:22 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2013 06:23 AM (u29Gj)
Posted by: UGAdawg at March 24, 2013 06:23 AM (WYOrt)
Posted by: Professor Marius von Totenkopf (formerly Hoss Fuentes) at March 24, 2013 06:24 AM (aozUR)
Posted by: rickl at March 24, 2013 06:24 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at March 24, 2013 06:24 AM (i7B17)
I have the plain-Jane Bushmaster A2 and it is very nice. Never jammed, the fit and finish is surprisingly good, and it is relatively accurate. If I were buying again, would get a flat-top rather than one with the carry handle.
However, I am not an expert on these rifles, so take these comments with that in mind.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 06:26 AM (3Mkrp)
Their self-promotion machinery goes into auto-pilot, and only a complete collapse of civilization will remove it from the public memory.
They will believe in global warming as the glaciers advance over Tennessee.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 24, 2013 06:27 AM (GoIUi)
Some dead White dude designed one a long time ago. It's sort of nice if you are looking for an exposed hammer, and don't mind using antiques.
It's called the Colt 1911.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 06:29 AM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Jess1 at March 24, 2013 06:29 AM (yi8PE)
Posted by: New docudrama on NBC's Fantastic Friday line up. at March 24, 2013 06:29 AM (i7B17)
------------
Stop right there. I've heard nothing but great things about the M&P15 Sport, and no, you don't need the dust cover and forward assist. The 5R rifling is great, although I heard a rumor they're not using that rifling anymore.
I'll be getting one before the year is out, hopefully.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 06:30 AM (celt+)
Also, does mil-spec vs commercial spec matter if I'm primarily using it for targets and hunting (unless, of course, the Burning Times come, and I decide to volunteer for EoJ's Death's Head Legions)?
Posted by: Professor Marius von Totenkopf (formerly Hoss Fuentes) at March 24, 2013 06:30 AM (aozUR)
Andy- The lying liars do nothing but lie. This is also deeply imbedded in supposedly expert scientific organizations. The American Academy of Pediatrics in testimony to the Senate Subcommittee last month intentionally twisted already dubious "research" to their advantage. (Link in my nick)
The sequence went something like this:
1. Original research showed people out of doors, with a gun on them, late at night, in parts of town with high crime rates were more likely to be shot in an assault.
2. The original researchers mathematically cancelled all of those factors except 'having a gun on them', and claimed that having a gun in your possession makes you four times more likely to be shot.
3. AAP wrote a policy statement saying evidence "suggests" you are four times more likely...
4. AAP refers to its own policy statement in testimony, saying flat out "individuals possessing a firearm are more than four times more likely to be shot".
These people are despicable. We need to shine every light we have on every little dark crevice where they are hiding.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 24, 2013 06:31 AM (p8Mda)
Posted by: Michael Bellesiles at March 24, 2013 06:32 AM (tOkJB)
Guess you're not the person in New Jersey that won the powerball jackpot.....being here right now and all.
Has anyone seen Nevergiveup?
Posted by: Tami[/i] at March 24, 2013 06:32 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: jakeman at March 24, 2013 06:33 AM (96M6e)
Miss Marple,
Last thread you asked about a bizarre post by Deety. She, I think it's a she, made some equally bizarre posts near the end of last night's ONT.
Posted by: ExSnipe at March 24, 2013 06:36 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 06:37 AM (celt+)
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at March 24, 2013 06:37 AM (i7B17)
Where did this rule come from? It makes no sense.
Posted by: Warden at March 24, 2013 06:38 AM (0DlnM)
"...his Bancroft Prize-winning book Arming America"
Psst. Columbia UniversityÂ’s trustees took back the Bancroft history prize it had awarded the book.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 24, 2013 06:39 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: epobirs at March 24, 2013 06:39 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: Warden at March 24, 2013 06:40 AM (0DlnM)
Perhaps someone should go take a look at that post. It was creepy to me.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 24, 2013 06:40 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: jakeman at March 24, 2013 06:41 AM (96M6e)
Posted by: Warden at March 24, 2013 06:41 AM (0DlnM)
http://tinyurl.com/acbdwh8
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 06:43 AM (celt+)
It's because 'H' is often unpronounced, leaving the resulting word said as if it began with a vowel. So 'an' is used to insert a hard consonant separator. Same thing with words beginning with 'X' but those don't up nearly as often.
Posted by: epobirs at March 24, 2013 06:43 AM (kcfmt)
Got one of these in memory of Chris Kyle. I didn't know Chris, I know men that did. I tried to track him at SHOT in Jan to shake his hand, but always missed him by 1 minute or less as he hit the booths. Little bit mad at the universe that our paths never crossed, he was a good man.
http://tinyurl.com/cde367g
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 06:44 AM (x3YFz)
I think maybe acid flashbacks can be passed on to your children.
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at March 24, 2013 06:44 AM (i7B17)
That happened to me in uniform on Division Street in Chicago in '68. I was enlisted so my options were a bit more extensive. Somewhere there is an aging hippy with a crooked nose. The memory still warms me on cold nights.
Posted by: trainer @ LIB at March 24, 2013 06:44 AM (1QEkm)
Posted by: The Dude at March 24, 2013 06:45 AM (vJdyz)
Posted by: trainer @ LIB at March 24, 2013 10:44 AM (1QEkm)
I wish it'd been on camera. I'd pay good money to see that.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 06:46 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 06:46 AM (ptcFO)
Posted by: DAve at March 24, 2013 06:47 AM (XDC0v)
Posted by: DAve at March 24, 2013 10:47 AM (XDC0v)
...the hell? that's like buying a car without doors.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 06:48 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: DAve at March 24, 2013 06:48 AM (XDC0v)
Posted by: naturalfake at March 24, 2013 06:49 AM (G9qZk)
Posted by: trainer @ LIB at March 24, 2013 10:44 AM (1QEkm)
Happened to me at the SF airport back in 1972. Only they did not hit me just the floor. When I turned on them they ran like the chickenshit SOBs they were.
We had to wear uniforms then to get a military discount on our flights.
Posted by: Vic at March 24, 2013 06:49 AM (53z96)
----------------------
There's no dust where I live.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 06:49 AM (celt+)
Same thing with words beginning with 'X' but those don't up nearly as often.
No respect I tells ya....no respect.
Posted by: Xerxes at March 24, 2013 06:50 AM (vN7SY)
Posted by: DAve at March 24, 2013 06:50 AM (XDC0v)
Posted by: DAve at March 24, 2013 10:48 AM (XDC0v)
you want to shoot the caliber the gun was manufactured to fire. I'll save the physics discussion.
That said, avoid the 855. Steel core sounds sexy, but it blows when it comes to making the bad guy fall down.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 06:51 AM (x3YFz)
So the 'high crime rate' didn't overwhelm every other factor? Once you have that in the mix, all of the other details lack weight. I'd give 'carrying a gun' as much importance as 'wearing denim' if the list starts with 'high crime rate.'
But that would require thinking and I imagine that is a bothersome waste of valuable Congressional time.
Posted by: epobirs at March 24, 2013 06:52 AM (kcfmt)
The best example of this is Margaret Mead- who was absolutely proven decades ago, beyond a shadow of a doubt, to be a complete fraud.
Now that's just crazy talk.
Posted by: Rachel Carson at March 24, 2013 06:52 AM (vN7SY)
Posted by: DAve at March 24, 2013 10:50 AM (XDC0v)
I went Sig for #2. or was it #4? or #7... anyway...
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 06:53 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: DAve at March 24, 2013 06:53 AM (XDC0v)
#35
MM,
I did. If you go to last night's ONT it's first post is #845. It makes several more equally bizarre posts.
Posted by: ExSnipe at March 24, 2013 06:53 AM (PBm/l)
Where did this rule come from? It makes no sense.
Posted by: Warden at March 24, 2013 10:38 AM (0DlnM)
I dunno if it's a rule, but it kinda makes sense when the stress is on a non-leading syllable. "A history lesson" versus "An historical event."
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's award-winning solid gold diaphragm at March 24, 2013 06:53 AM (7xeJQ)
Yup. If I had done what Bellesiles did while I was doing my research on my history degree, I would have been expelled with no hope of being readmitted and my professors would have made sure that anywhere else I applied knew exactly why. I've gotten into what I consider shocking arguments by those who defend what he did because he was seeking of a Higher Truth.
If you ever wanted to know why I don't have a career in academia, that's part of the reason why. I cannot sit there and shut up about fraud, even if it were to support my side. Truth is truth and if it's inconvenient for your position, mayhap it's your position that should be reevaluated, not reality.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at March 24, 2013 06:54 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: DAve at March 24, 2013 06:54 AM (XDC0v)
"I dunno if it's a rule, but it kinda makes sense when the stress is on a non-leading syllable. "A history lesson" versus "An historical event."
------------------
Bingo.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 06:56 AM (celt+)
Posted by: DC in Towson, assault human at March 24, 2013 06:56 AM (jIaZt)
Posted by: DAve at March 24, 2013 06:56 AM (XDC0v)
the rule is in how you'd verbalize it. First example starts with a "HISSS" sound. Second it an "Istorical."
This is why we all hate english majors.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 06:56 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's award-winning solid gold diaphragm at March 24, 2013 06:56 AM (7xeJQ)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 06:56 AM (ptcFO)
So the 'high crime rate' didn't overwhelm every other factor? Once you have that in the mix, all of the other details lack weight. I'd give 'carrying a gun' as much importance as 'wearing denim' if the list starts with 'high crime rate.'
*******
Yeah, kind of a "duh" moment, eh? In addition- the original researchers listed 677 shooting victims, of whom 40 (less than 6%) had a gun on them when they were shot, compared to 94% who did not have a gun. What kind of statistical contortionism do you have to engage in for that to come out as 4 times more likely to be shot if you have a gun?
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 24, 2013 06:58 AM (p8Mda)
Posted by: naturalfake at March 24, 2013 06:58 AM (G9qZk)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 24, 2013 06:59 AM (p8Mda)
Posted by: phoenixgirl,commenter on a conservative award winning blog at March 24, 2013 06:59 AM (GVxQo)
Better ideas?
Posted by: DC in Towson, assault human at March 24, 2013 10:56 AM (jIaZt)
Kerosene in a galvanized steel trashcan. But do not blow yourself up.
Posted by: Vic at March 24, 2013 06:59 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's award-winning solid gold diaphragm at March 24, 2013 10:56 AM (7xeJQ)
Marksmanship has more to do with consistency and technique than equipment when you start out.
You can buy a Daisy bb gun and build solid fundamentals and start shooting smiley faces on targets at 20 meters. THEN you start upgrading. Most people do it in reverse order.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:00 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 07:01 AM (ptcFO)
----------------
For the metal, I just boil a kettle of water and pour it over. Repeat as necessary. Dissolves the cosmo right quick. Do it outside or clean the tub before the missus gets home.
Afterwards, oil the metal up immediately, everywhere. I shoot WD-40 to displace the water, then gun oil.
For the wood, wipe as much as you can, leave it in the sun for a day, wipe up what sweats out, repeat for days until it stops sweating. Some guys keep it in their hot cars with paper underneath, but I don't want my whip smelling like cosmo.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 07:01 AM (celt+)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 24, 2013 07:02 AM (p8Mda)
Posted by: Felix Arabia, MD, Chancre Mechanic to the Stars at March 24, 2013 07:02 AM (Pjq2D)
We've discussed this here before, but if the various QEs and the like actually worked, then I would reevaluate my views on economics. That they've failed does not appear to affect those who believe in those views in the least.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at March 24, 2013 07:03 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Jen at March 24, 2013 07:04 AM (UvHXN)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 24, 2013 07:04 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: Felix Arabia, MD, Chancre Mechanic to the Stars at March 24, 2013 11:02 AM (Pjq2D)
depending on range. My EoTech is fine for door kicking but at 200 meters the "tacks" are the size of basketballs. Swap it out for a Trij.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:04 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: zsasz at March 24, 2013 07:04 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: epobirs at March 24, 2013 10:39 AM (kcfmt)
Than the academics who actively chose to VOID the truth (slight change for fullness of truth)
Posted by: willow-ette at March 24, 2013 07:06 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Jen at March 24, 2013 11:04 AM (UvHXN)
...and this is why we dropped cable/DirecTV 9 months ago. Nexflix and Amazon prime. You'll never go back.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:06 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at March 24, 2013 07:07 AM (i7B17)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 07:07 AM (ptcFO)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, assault Hobbit at March 24, 2013 07:09 AM (wbeNt)
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at March 24, 2013 11:08 AM (vN7SY)
ya'll canadeeans never did learn to speak right!
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:10 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 24, 2013 07:10 AM (p8Mda)
I never understood that myself. Having a sophisticated vocabulary seems to me the opposite of being close to nature. Rather, it's a manifestation of what separates humans from the beasts. If all you've got is snow, snow, and more snow, you'll soon have snow nerds who correct any casual observation that there is snow by insisting it be winnowed down to the exact form.
Posted by: epobirs at March 24, 2013 07:10 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: laddy at March 24, 2013 07:10 AM (znNnT)
Posted by: traye at March 24, 2013 07:11 AM (99vXN)
Swiftboating: Pointing out the lies and deceptions of the left and identifying them as such.
It takes two for a lie to be successful: One to tell it and one to believe it. Swiftboating is a threat to the Left's success because it undermines the belief in the lie.
Posted by: Minuteman at March 24, 2013 07:11 AM (dSE0q)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 24, 2013 07:13 AM (p8Mda)
An halibut?
----------
Nope. The stress is on the first syllable.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 11:04 AM (celt+)
Non-limeys stress the first syllable and the 'h'.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/halibut?s=t
No, I am not an English major.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's award-winning solid gold diaphragm at March 24, 2013 07:13 AM (7xeJQ)
'Taint about the Henglish, it's about the Greek. We don't think of "H" as an imported letter, but it kinda-sorta is. A Greek "H" is eta, sounds like "A." Greek does its voicings with little-bitty marks up above, strokes -- strophes. A bad stroke is a catastrophe. A high stroke is an apostrophe.
So English uses "H" differently from its original use, to avoid using breath-marks. The rest is Cockney, and elision. A lot of speech is silence: mostly very brief silences. And to write in Cockney or Northumbrian, you use a lot of strophes.
Sure, "X" is an imported Greek letter. I wonder if UPS ever realized that in Greek they could put all their initials in one letter. Oopsilon. You don't often think of "Y" as being foreign to Yerp. I was shopping in Verviers, Belgium, and a shopkeeper insisted on writing me out a receipt with my name on it. My meat-world surname has a "Y" in it, and he couldn't do one. My splendidly multilingual guide had to prompt him, "Griechischen" - and he dutifully penned in an upsilon in place of a "Y."
Posted by: comatus at March 24, 2013 07:14 AM (qaVK+)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 24, 2013 11:13 AM (p8Mda)
The problem is that most reporters will never list the source document (or any document) for their lying bullshit.
Posted by: Vic at March 24, 2013 07:14 AM (53z96)
ya'll canadeeans never did learn to speak right!
It's 'you 'all'! Remember to add the extra 'u's!
Speaking of snow....I have about 79 different word for it.
And they all start with fuckingoddamnmutherfuckin.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at March 24, 2013 07:14 AM (vN7SY)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 24, 2013 07:15 AM (p8Mda)
Posted by: rickl at March 24, 2013 07:15 AM (sdi6R)
I was at the Marverick Arms (Mossberg) plant this week, doing bidness. Short version: the meager production still in Connecticut is coming to Texas; they expect to produce 700K units this year.
So, help a brother out and buy a new one.
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at March 24, 2013 07:17 AM (i7B17)
Posted by: Vic at March 24, 2013 11:14 AM (53z96)
********
Yep. It takes time and diligence on the part of the reader. And most readers do not bother to do that any more than the writers do. The trick, I think, is to determine those who are willfully lying and expose them. Hard to do in practice, I know.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 24, 2013 07:17 AM (p8Mda)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 24, 2013 07:19 AM (tOkJB)
----------
You're right. Because it's the first syllable that's stressed in "heteronormative." Or "hickory."
If the second syllable is stressed, it's "an." As in, "an historic."
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 07:20 AM (celt+)
Posted by: Felix Arabia, MD, Chancre Mechanic to the Stars at March 24, 2013 07:21 AM (Pjq2D)
Posted by: laddy at March 24, 2013 11:10 AM (znNnT)
Yes, but what always jacks you up is during night ops when you've got 1 in 4 of 856 that come in 64 grain. You'd think the energy loss due to thermal would fix it (and fk me if it doesn't tear through barrels) but you still have to adjust for precision shooting.
Tracer sounds sexy. It ain't.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:21 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Eric the half-a-bee at March 24, 2013 07:21 AM (vs8HS)
Posted by: Felix Arabia, MD, Chancre Mechanic to the Stars at March 24, 2013 11:21 AM (Pjq2D)
Hey, it's whatever works and keeps you not dead.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:22 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 24, 2013 07:24 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at March 24, 2013 11:17 AM (i7B17)
Already have a 590. Can't duel wield shotguns (wish!). Behind you in spirit.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:24 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at March 24, 2013 07:25 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 07:25 AM (ptcFO)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 24, 2013 11:15 AM (p8Mda)
Right. But, the focus upon syllabic emphasis came about due to the observation regarding pronunciation of H-words--which, in turn, dictates the usage of "a" versus "an."
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's award-winning solid gold diaphragm at March 24, 2013 07:25 AM (7xeJQ)
Posted by: Oswald at March 24, 2013 07:25 AM (5fSr7)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at March 24, 2013 07:26 AM (m9Q0F)
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 11:20 AM (celt+)
Who says "historic" that way tho? That's not how you pronounce it...
Posted by: KG at March 24, 2013 07:26 AM (IPz9m)
Posted by: Trainer @ LIB at March 24, 2013 07:26 AM (y5n9/)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's award-winning solid gold diaphragm at March 24, 2013 11:25 AM (7xeJQ)
you guys are trying to pin down a language held together by baling wire and duct tape.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:28 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 24, 2013 07:29 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: a mindful webworker at March 24, 2013 07:29 AM (izPgb)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 07:31 AM (ptcFO)
The second lower I'm building into a .45 CQB carbine.
Posted by: Trainer @ LIB at March 24, 2013 11:26 AM (y5n9/)
my book rec for you:
Navy SEAL Sniper (by Glen Doherty, KIA, Brandon Webb, and Chris Kyle)
We've got 24/7 security on BW to keep him breathing... seems this particular crew is given to gettin' shot.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:31 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:32 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: KG at March 24, 2013 11:26 AM (IPz9m)
--------------------
How do you pronounce "the"? Do you pronounce it "thuh" or "thee"?
Depends, doesn't it?
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 07:32 AM (celt+)
Posted by: a mindful webworker at March 24, 2013 07:34 AM (izPgb)
How come I'm A SOB for not taking my wife to AN estate sale?
Posted by: I really don't give a shit at March 24, 2013 07:35 AM (i7B17)
Posted by: Eric the half-a-bee at March 24, 2013 07:35 AM (vs8HS)
Posted by: and irresolute at March 24, 2013 07:35 AM (DBH1h)
Posted by: comatus at March 24, 2013 07:38 AM (qaVK+)
Depends, doesn't it?
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 11:32 AM (celt+)
Huh? I'm talking about the word, historic, you pronounce the h, at least that's what I was taught and I just checked on one of those online dictionaries, and it seems to be so...
Posted by: KG at March 24, 2013 07:38 AM (IPz9m)
Because you're applying a decoded interpretation of the acronym. If you regard SOB as a word in it's own right, then you can be an SOB.
Posted by: epobirs at March 24, 2013 07:39 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at March 24, 2013 07:39 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 07:47 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 24, 2013 07:48 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: real joe at March 24, 2013 07:51 AM (PD2ad)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 07:52 AM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: real joe at March 24, 2013 07:53 AM (PD2ad)
Posted by: Mr Wolf, non-ESQ at March 24, 2013 08:06 AM (UIAT6)
And of course, it's DIS goddam place. Settles everything, don't it?
Posted by: comatus at March 24, 2013 08:06 AM (qaVK+)
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 08:08 AM (celt+)
--------------
Er?
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 08:09 AM (celt+)
Posted by: Xander Crews at March 24, 2013 08:11 AM (os2sk)
We've got 24/7 security on BW to keep him breathing... seems this particular crew is given to gettin' shot.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 11:31 AM (x3YFz)
I had not known they were both seals known to eachother.
it's really odd they are both dead mths from eachother
Posted by: willow-ette at March 24, 2013 08:25 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Fritz at March 24, 2013 08:26 AM (WM+rJ)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 24, 2013 08:30 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Minuteman at March 24, 2013 08:33 AM (dSE0q)
A major new work of popular history, 1877 is also notable as the comeback book for a celebrated U.S. historian.
Classic Communist technique, as detailed by Whitaker Chambers.
Reds disperse themselves throughout opinion-forming organizations, then validate each other through describing other Reds with honorifics ("celebrated," in this case), awards, honors, and other recognition (e.g., Nobel Peace Prizes).
Then the cite their comrade as a manufactured authority on the subject, with whom the unwashed are not permitted to disagree. Anyone questioning the credentials of said comrade is immediately subjected to ad hominem vituperation, and discounted as a "crank," a "right-winger," etc.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 24, 2013 08:43 AM (IDSI7)
We've discussed this here before, but if the various QEs and the like actually worked, then I would reevaluate my views on economics. That they've failed does not appear to affect those who believe in those views in the least.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at March 24, 2013 11:03 AM (Gk3SS)
Bullseye. I would do exactly the same. If any of the leftist crap actually worked, I would have a rethink too. But the fact that I can predict what will happen - and be borne out by events - supports my original hypothesis regarding the leftist crap. Namely, that it is crap.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 24, 2013 08:48 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at March 24, 2013 08:48 AM (MhA4j)
I read multiple reviews at various outfitter websites regarding this issue on the $100 18" cylinder-bore barrel, so I sprung for the $170 20" barrel with vent rib and accu-set choke. Came scuffed up, too, and I expect if I sent it back I'd end up with another one based on what I've read. Will have to brush on my art skills with a blueing pen.
Anyone else noticing this quality or packaging issue?
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 08:59 AM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: pat at March 24, 2013 09:01 AM (jlQR7)
5.56 vs .223. It has to do with case pressures, the 5.56 isn't tested in the same labs (being military) as .223 so the case pressures are a bit higher. Bottom line, .223 in a 5.56 chamber is OK, 5.56 in a .223 chamber probably not so much.
Here's a pretty good study: http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/5-56-vs-223/
I like my Saiga in .223. Maybe it's not a MOA tack-driver at 10,000 miles like the vaunted AR-15, but it will make minute-of-dickbeater shots at 200 yards all day long, and that's all I need it to do. And, fully accoutremented and modified by moi made it mine mine mine, and for about half the total cost (at the time) as a generic AR, plus I know if it ever doesn't go bang when it should I can fix it with a screwdriver, a pair of pliers and a BFH.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at March 24, 2013 09:07 AM (U7ErG)
Perhaps our inability to predict the results of limited government and maximum personal freedom is what disturbs the lefties so much?
They are afraid of the unknown, while freedom-loving people tend to see opportunity in an uncontrolled future.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 09:10 AM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at March 24, 2013 09:11 AM (U7ErG)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 24, 2013 09:12 AM (MBqvE)
In the barrel!
They are nice rifles, although the AR-15 platform fits me really nicely, so I haven't branched out into anything else.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 09:14 AM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 09:14 AM (zzeVM)
Posted by: Andy at March 24, 2013 09:17 AM (OZPoa)
#68, Towson DC, here's my cosmoline removal recipe:
* soak all small parts in mineral spirits - 24 hours or more - then wipe down vigorously, make sure it's all gone (I use an empty 7.62X54R spam can, perfect for this sort of thing)
* the receiver/barrel I heat by standing in a large bucket of boiled water; after about 15 minutes (before it all starts to really cool down), I then stand the receiver, bottom end down, in a bucket of mineral spirits. I will then repeat this step again, THEN wipe/inspect/push-pull many patches down the barrel. Two reps should get the cosmo out of the receiver end; barrel can be patched/brushed with mineral spirits until clean.
* stock - I built a small little solar oven by taping clear plastic wrap over a long box (rifle box one of my guns came in) after cutting off one big side of it; then I stuff tp into every nook and cranny of the stock - and wrap/tape tp onto handguards or other small stock pieces - and bake in the sun for days and days. Depending on cosmo situation, I might replace the tp after a week and do another cycle. Eventually most of the cosmo will bake out - though not always ALL of it. And in your neck of the woods, by late May you'll have weeks/months of good hot days for this sort of thing.
Anyway, that's it. For my milsupr bores, I plan to do the electronic bore-cleaner thing once my massive house project is done. Seems simple once you have the right hardware, and if you do it repeatedly I'd think these old Soviet bores would shine as brightly as the glorious communist future I used to see beckoning to me on Soviet billboards in Leningrad .....
Posted by: non-purist at March 24, 2013 09:17 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 24, 2013 09:18 AM (MBqvE)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 09:22 AM (zzeVM)
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at March 24, 2013 09:22 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at March 24, 2013 09:27 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 09:27 AM (zzeVM)
Posted by: RWC at March 24, 2013 09:31 AM (sqp6o)
Ran out of nearly all my patches in all sizes last weekend. Went to the new little gun shop up the road. He had those little packs of Hoppe's patches that are thick and absorbent, but only look like there's about 12 in each sleeve. No, no, no, no NO.
Went to Walmart where they had those WADS of bulk Hoppe's patches, for like 3 bucks.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 09:31 AM (4Mv1T)
But wait, there's more. (I'm still on about Bellesiles.)
The publisher of his latest book is "The New Press." The name set my antennae twitching, because Commies love to prepend "New" to anything they're involved in (e.g., the Communist propaganda rag of back when, "New Masses).
So I Binged "New Press." It describes itself as "Publishing in the Public Interest," which really got my antennae twitching. Here are a few of their offerings, which prove my point above about recognition of Reds by Reds:
"Michelle Alexander, author of The New Jim Crow, has been awarded the Michael Harrington Best Book Award, given for a book of excellent academic quality with the potential to mobilize change on a pressing social and political issue."
The "Michael Harrington Best Book Award?" THAT Michael Harrington? Oh.
"Jefferson Cowie, author of Stayin' Alive , was awarded the 2011 Annual Labor History Book Prize, presented by Labor History magazine to the best book in labor history studies."
Well, you can't go wrong with Labor History magazine. "Jane RhodeÂ’s Framing the Black Panthers wins the 2010 North East Black Studies AssociationÂ’s (formerly the North East Black Studies Alliance) annual W.E.B. Du Bois Book Prize.
The W.E.B. du Bois Book Prize? The Lenin Prize wasn't available?
And my personal favorite:
"Howard Zinn
A Life on the Left
Martin Duberman
From the award-winning historian and activist Martin Duberman, a sweeping political biography of Howard Zinn, “the people’s historian” who himself made history, changing forever how we think about our past."
Conclusion: The "New Press" is obviously an outlet for Communist propaganda, and validates my point above about Commies lauding each other.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 24, 2013 09:31 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 09:34 AM (zzeVM)
and about 473 patches
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 01:27 PM (zzeVM)
Heh. I picked up an old Lee Enfield which was covered in cosmoline.
MY buddy the wood scientist (no shit...a real thing) took care of the stock, and all I did with the barrel and action was lots and lots of hot water. I poured boiling water down the barrel several times as as well.
It worked, although it did take a while, and once it dried (quickly, because it was hot) the action started to rust within minutes.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 09:36 AM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 09:36 AM (zzeVM)
Call me crazy, but I keep a stack of Q-tips in the gun cleaning box. Makes it easy to clean the nooks and crannies soaked with Hoppe's Elite Gun Cleaner. But they can leave fibers behind.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 09:39 AM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 09:39 AM (zzeVM)
Posted by: TejasJudio de la Frontera at March 24, 2013 09:44 AM (lD8ju)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 09:45 AM (zzeVM)
So do I. And I'll peel off the cotton afterward and use it as a guide to run a patch along the rails. It gets the crud out nicely.
But I don't clean the way most people do. I'll do a thorough cleaning after 1,000 rounds, but between? Just a wipedown and a quick clear out the gunk session.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 09:52 AM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 09:53 AM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at March 24, 2013 09:58 AM (JQuNB)
New and untested.
If it's not a John Browning design, it's too new to use.
Now get off my lawn!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 10:00 AM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 10:01 AM (zzeVM)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at March 24, 2013 10:07 AM (JQuNB)
Not sure if it's a design issue or just a size/weight issue, but the new pocket cannon felt like holding a firecracker in my hand every time I pulled the trigger. Made shooting the 1911 afterwards feel like shooting a .22.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 10:08 AM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at March 24, 2013 10:11 AM (JQuNB)
Tobacco, and everyone else, if you use Q-Tips (as I do) in gun cleaning or lubricating, and would like to try something that might not leave fibers behind, check out Bore-Tips by Swab-its (bing/ixquick these terms). They're Q-Tips with foam tips instead of cotton - I'm thinking of getting some mostly for lubricating the 1911, Garand, and M1 Carbine. Foam tips will definitely be better for lubricating - cleaning, might use both regular Q-Tips and those.
Jake in ID, bore snakes are actually quite handy for "regular" light cleaning, I have found. Depending on the ammo, the number of rounds, and how long it's been since a thorough cleaning, I'll just bore-snake the barrel (and cylinder on revolvers). I use them dry, don't add any solvent, as I figure that will just gunk them up. So for example if I've shot 200 rounds from the 9mm XD, and used factory ammo (not my perfectly good but dirty lead bullet reloads), I'll just do a good CLP/rag wipe down of all the surfaces after disassembly, then snake the barrel 4 or 5 times, and the gun's quite clean.
Another advantage of bore snakes is for example with the carbines. I don't want to take them out of the stock any more than absolutely neccessary, so I'll just snake the bores and wipe down the metal very vigorously after most sessions (and I always use FMJ bullets, incl. my reloads, so they're much cleaner than say my Model 66 revolver after a day of Trail Boss and lead, which leaves it filthy). Especially for any old or milsurp guns of a vintage age, bore snakes can be one more trick to maintaining them with minimal additional wear and tear.
Back on cosmo removal, heat and solvents are really your best bet. That's why I use a bit of both, esp. for the receiver/barrels. Use the white milky looking mineral spirits and you have a good visual indicator of any cosmo coming off, and likewise on your second or third soak, an indicator if there's any still left on the gun parts.
Posted by: non-purist at March 24, 2013 10:11 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 24, 2013 10:12 AM (MBqvE)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 10:12 AM (zzeVM)
Is the new one in .45ACP also? If so, the difference in recoil is probably a function of weight, because most of them seem to be well-designed ergonomically.
The 1911 is 100+ years old and it still kicks ass.
I love it!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 10:13 AM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at March 24, 2013 01:58 PM (JQuNB)
I bought my dad a Mossberg pump .410 about 20 years ago because he always said he wanted one. It has never been fired.
Posted by: Ook? at March 24, 2013 10:15 AM (OQpzc)
At my old range in CA, they sold really good reloads for next to nothing. I could shoot all day, then the last magazine I would fire jacketed bullets, and it seemed to clear out some of the leading. I never did a study, but that was my impression.
Anyone do the same thing?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 10:16 AM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 24, 2013 01:12 PM (MBqvE)
Not yet, I haven't been able to spend any quality time with my reloading bench lately. I use a boresnake and then run a couple of patches to wipe everything out and check the cleanliness of the bore, if the patches come out dirty I go back with the boresnake a couple of times until the patches are clean. Except the Mosin, that damn thing is never going to be clean ever again, it's Windex down the bore at the range and then the boresnake/patches at home just to dry the bore out. I've been thinking about building one of those electronic bore cleaners that I've read about.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at March 24, 2013 10:17 AM (U7ErG)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at March 24, 2013 10:17 AM (JQuNB)
Just owning guns is a pleasure in and of itself.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 10:18 AM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 10:23 AM (zzeVM)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at March 24, 2013 10:26 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: Johnny I at March 24, 2013 10:26 AM (YyKGS)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at March 24, 2013 10:31 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Professor Marius von Totenkopf (formerly Hoss Fuentes) at March 24, 2013 10:21 AM (aozUR)
Doublestar makes a nice M4. They provide parts to many of the major AR manufacturers. Got mine from Buds Police Supply for $665. However, this was before the tragic boating accident.
Posted by: Ammo Dump at March 24, 2013 10:32 AM (YYyqq)
Yes, the XDs is .45ACP. A little beast, it is. I think .45 is that's the only caliber for the XDs . The "s" denotes single stack.
I must be seriously OCD. I field strip and clean my guns after every session at the range, which may only be 50 rds per piece in these times of ammo scarcity, say for .223/5.56.
But, then I might go months, sometimes years between trips, and I never know when that'll be.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 10:35 AM (4Mv1T)
You know, no question is rhetorical enough (that's "an rhetorical" to you) that some moron won't take it seriously, or sort of.
The answer, of course, is Aristotle's doctrine of predication -- like so many other things. Until Aristotle's time, the telling of truth was considered to be like shooting an arrow at a target: you either hit it or you didn't. A miss was the same as nonsense. Some guys thought about that and realized that it required the importation of a concept of truth being out there, behind a veil, and us gesturing at it. Some of those guys found that explanation sufficient, or attractive.
Aristotle put forward the idea that you chose a subject, and an action ascribed to it, when you make a statement. This opens up the whole idea of a statement being mostly right, or partly right, instead of a mystical hit or miss.
Say what you like about horseshoes and hand grenades, marksmanship is like that too. Consider the notion of a strong nine vs a weak ten. You build skills, or improve equipment, gradually approaching accuracy and consistency. The idea of a natural who just picks up the super-gun of all time and blazes away is stunningly Hollywoodian in its fantasy.
Also, if you can't do a hard-voiced "H" you'll never get good at air rifle.
Posted by: comatus at March 24, 2013 10:35 AM (qaVK+)
Posted by: comatus at March 24, 2013 10:39 AM (qaVK+)
Posted by: Cicero Skip at March 24, 2013 11:08 AM (hDFYF)
Refreshing.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 11:23 AM (4Mv1T)
I had not known they were both seals known to eachother.
it's really odd they are both dead mths from eachother
Posted by: willow-ette at March 24, 2013 12:25 PM (nqBYe)
Brandon was teamed with Glen through sniper school, and then went on to be Chris' instructor. It's a small community.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 11:23 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: RWC at March 24, 2013 11:27 AM (sqp6o)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 11:28 AM (4Mv1T)
I love it!"
------------------
I own a Sportster and a 1911. I bet there's a connection.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 11:33 AM (celt+)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 11:33 AM (iZ0BY)
I put 17K miles on an H-D without a helmet back in the day, but I don't think I would attempt this. Maybe it's just me.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 11:40 AM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 11:50 AM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 11:52 AM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: RWC at March 24, 2013 12:00 PM (sqp6o)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 12:03 PM (4Mv1T)
I'm not trying to bust your chops here. I'm just an old guy raising two young males who has seen more than his fair share of shit go wrong.
Stay safe.
/rant off.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 12:04 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 12:05 PM (iZ0BY)
Hmmmm. Interesting thought. I'm in a fairly blue metro area, in a red state. However, the number of new gun owners is surging like crazy, like everywhere else. Might be possible. I need to go check out the one closest to me in Oxford NC.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 12:09 PM (4Mv1T)
Texting while driving is also illegal here. I even hate manipulating my
GPS while driving cause I invariably hit those rumble strips in the
emergency lane. If I tried to strip and clean a gun while driving, and I
did it often enough, something wrong would happen.
I'm not
trying to bust your chops here. I'm just an old guy raising two young
males who has seen more than his fair share of shit go wrong.
Stay safe.
/rant off.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 04:04 PM (4Mv1T)
You clear and clean off time. not while mobile. That's just fn stupid.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 12:13 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: RWC at March 24, 2013 12:19 PM (sqp6o)
Posted by: tangonine
Preachin' to the choir here, my friend. I was just trying to make that point a little more gently.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 12:26 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 12:29 PM (ptcFO)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 12:32 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 12:33 PM (ptcFO)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 24, 2013 12:37 PM (QupBk)
Wow. Just watched.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 12:43 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 12:43 PM (ptcFO)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 12:52 PM (iZ0BY)
Likewise. First, thinking of the bolt in my AR. Beyond just extractor removal, those springs seem awfully stiff. Like it will fly apart into my neighbors yard if I remove.
Then my 1911. Never had it apart more than a field strip. I may or may not even have 500 rounds though it.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 12:52 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 12:56 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 01:05 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 01:09 PM (ptcFO)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 01:11 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 01:14 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: lindafell at March 24, 2013 01:19 PM (PGO8C)
I think Leno has a spot open for a stand-up next week.
Hilarious :-)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 01:23 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 24, 2013 01:32 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 01:34 PM (zzeVM)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 01:38 PM (zzeVM)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 24, 2013 01:39 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 01:43 PM (ptcFO)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 24, 2013 01:47 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 01:47 PM (zzeVM)
------------
Holy shit! You got $30,000 back?!?
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 24, 2013 01:54 PM (celt+)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 01:55 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 02:02 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 02:05 PM (zzeVM)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 02:06 PM (zzeVM)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 02:10 PM (zzeVM)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 02:14 PM (zzeVM)
I lived in CA before it went completely insane, and I used to live 20 minutes from my gun club.
But now? Awful.
Enjoy!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 24, 2013 02:18 PM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 02:22 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 02:33 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: Jake in ID at March 24, 2013 02:34 PM (zzeVM)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 02:38 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 02:41 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at March 24, 2013 03:24 PM (4Mv1T)
Wonder what kind of "foreign relations" Hillary was talkin' bout in 2008.
Posted by: PutinsPuppetBarry at March 24, 2013 04:37 PM (l2max)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 24, 2013 05:02 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Judge_Roy_Bean at March 24, 2013 05:22 PM (Sedwk)
After about an hour, I checked on the rifle. It was still sitting there, right where I had left it. It hadn't moved itself outside. It certainly hadn't killed anyone, even with the numerous opportunities it had been presented to do so. In fact, it hadn't even loaded itself.
Well you can imagine my surprise, with all the media hype about how dangerous assault rifles are and how they kill people. Either the media is wrong, and it's the misuse of guns by PEOPLE that kills people, or I'm in possession of the laziest gun in the world.
All right, well I'm off to check on my spoons. I hear they're making people fat.
Posted by: lindafell at March 24, 2013 05:19 PM (PGO8C)
I'd never leave a weapon with a full mag unattended. There's no reason to and there's plenty of reasons not to.
Not a good idea. ever. That's just stupid. actually: offense intended. This ranks right up with running round with your booger hook on the bang switch. It's dumbassery.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 06:35 PM (x3YFz)
You get an F- in securing your weapon.
Military? I'd article 15 your ass. At least.
LE? I'd fire you.
Posted by: tangonine at March 24, 2013 06:39 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 06:45 PM (ptcFO)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 08:08 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at March 24, 2013 08:35 PM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: troyriser at March 24, 2013 09:03 PM (ptcFO)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2661 seconds, 411 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Couch Fucker at March 24, 2013 06:12 AM (vN7SY)