August 18, 2013
— andy "Stop & Frisk" Through a 2A Lens
As I mentioned on the podcast, it occurred to me that New York's "stop & frisk" law that was put on hold by a judge last week was just the logical outcome of a path that began when the "wrong people" *wink, nod* were prevented from owning firearms after the Sullivan Act went into effect in 1911. Last century's usurpation of New Yorkers' 2nd amendment rights begat this century's usurpation of their 4th amendment and 14th amendment rights.
Little did I expect to find a pretty clear line drawn to this same idea (although directed at Nanny Bloomberg not the Sullivan Act) directly in the opinion (pdf):
"Mayor Bloomberg stated in April that the NYPD’s use of stop and frisk is necessary “to deter people from carrying guns. . . . [I]f you end stops looking for guns, . . . there will be more guns in the hands of young people and more people will be getting killed.”"At the same time, the City emphasized in its opening arguments that “blacks and Hispanics account for a disproportionate share of . . . crime perpetrators,” and that “90 percent of all violent crime suspects are black and Hispanic.” When these premises are combined — that the purpose of stop and frisk is to deter people from carrying guns and that blacks and Hispanics are a disproportionate source of violent crime — it is only a short leap to the conclusion that blacks and Hispanics should be targeted for stops in order to deter gun violence, regardless of whether they appear objectively suspicious."
Remind me again how those slippery slope arguments about gun control are invalid.
Related, from Charles C. W. Cooke: Mayors Against BloombergÂ’s Bombast
The New York NannyÂ’s group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, is attracting scant support.
Duck Dynasty
Season 4 opened to about a month's worth of MSNBC's audience. Good on 'em.
And if you're in the market for a new pair of running shoes, these come highly recommended from Moronette '2nd Amendment Mother'.
Gun Of The Week

(answer below)
Marksmanship Award
Hero of the Day - Michigan: Victim and suspect both shot in Detroit attempted robbery - http://t.co/Hpmn0Chh8J #NRA (via @mlive)
— Cam and Company (@CamAndCompany) August 13, 2013
Gun Of The Week - Answer
That's the Ruger Hawkeye in .256 Win. Mag. It looks like a revolver, but it's not. It's a single-shot based on the Ruger Blackhawk single-action. It was a commercial flop, but it's always a neat find at a gun show.
Facts? Who Needs Those If You're A "Journalist"?
Oh, Piers. You stupid, stupid man.
If you have the misfortune to be familiar with Piers Morgan, the British former tabloid "reporter" and "talent judge" known on this side of the Atlantic as CNN's most overbearing gun control proselytizer, you won't be surprised at what he did on Tuesday.It began during an interview with military history expert A.W.R. Hawkins, as Morgan pushed his theory that more gun ownership leads to more crime. Hawkins disagreed, noting that Virginia had recently experienced a significant increase in gun ownership, followed by a significant decrease in violent crime.
The insufferable Morgan then counter-claimed that, according to the FBI, no less, Virginia had the highest murder rate in the United States in 2009. Morgan's statement would have been true only if 25 states had seceded in 2008, however, and according to the FBI's 2009 crime report, there were still 50 states in 2009 and Virginia ranked 26th among them in murder, with a rate 12 percent lower than the national rate.
Podcast guest Lee Doren dismantles Cenk Uygur over a similar factually-challenged claim here:
Related: CDC Study Ordered by Obama Contradicts White House Anti-gun Narrative
Tips
If there are topics you're interested in seeing in the gun thread, please send them to AoSHQGunThread at gmail. You can also send them to me on Twitter at @AndyM1911.
The owner's manual for your concealed carry permit: The Law of Self Defense
Defend the Second Amendment. Join: The National Rifle Association * Gun Owners of America * The National Shooting Sports Foundation * Your state's second amendment org.
Celebrate America's firearms heritage: participate in Project Appleseed.
Posted by: andy at
05:35 AM
| Comments (145)
Post contains 708 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: Miguel Ambivalence@sven10077 at August 18, 2013 05:41 AM (A4hKL)
The CDC gun violence study commissioned by Obama backfires and shows that all the anti-gun rhetoric is a pack of lies. Something most of us already knew.
http://tinyurl.com/ljjdqhl
Posted by: Vic at August 18, 2013 05:42 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: zsasz at August 18, 2013 05:42 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 18, 2013 09:38 AM (k9TQr)
The "right" people include his bodyguards and rich buddies.
Posted by: Vic at August 18, 2013 05:43 AM (lZvxr)
You owe it to yourself to torture yourself with Discovery Redneck's Twin or Triple Terrors "Moonshiners, Tickle, and Amish Mafia."
It seems there is one set of folk TVLand is still allowed to tee off on...
Posted by: Miguel Ambivalence@sven10077 at August 18, 2013 05:44 AM (A4hKL)
Posted by: Miguel Ambivalence@sven10077 at August 18, 2013 05:45 AM (A4hKL)
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at August 18, 2013 05:47 AM (MnSla)
Posted by: Trivial Pursuer at August 18, 2013 05:47 AM (/sohm)
Posted by: GnuBreed at August 18, 2013 05:49 AM (cHZB7)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 05:53 AM (c2oll)
Posted by: Invictus at August 18, 2013 05:57 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: BignJames at August 18, 2013 05:58 AM (ZNQKl)
Posted by: BignJames at August 18, 2013 09:58 AM (ZNQKl)
And only then if it was a male flight attendant named, Fact.
Posted by: Invictus at August 18, 2013 06:00 AM (OQpzc)
Fuck you forever Nidal Hasan:
(Fox)An Army soldier who died in the Fort Hood attack was shot 12 times as he charged Maj. Nidal Hasan, it was revealed Thursday during Hasan's court-martial.
Spc. Frederick Greene, 29, of Mountain City, Tenn., was identified as the solider whose gunshot wounds were 'consistent' with him trying to charge Hasan, Dr. Phillip Berran, a pathologist, said. He reviewed photos of Greene's body for the judge before jurors were led into the courtroom.
And thank you forever Mr. Greene for your service and your bravery. What a shame that your family can't even get a Purple Heart to remember you by; because the dickless soulless turds in DC decreed this incident 'workplace violence'.
All to push their bullshit agenda. They really don't give a fuck about anything but power. This makes me sick. Also, please note that it took at least TWELVE shots to stop Mr. Greene from shoving Nidal's head up his ass.
So hey NY pols, what do you think about that? Seven shots is all you can carry in a mag, right? Anything more than that is overkill -- or so you say.
Idiots.
Posted by: GnuBreed at August 18, 2013 06:01 AM (cHZB7)
Well, that was just wrong. Sullivan's supporters had few enough pleasures in their lives and these gun toting Italians were seeking to deprive them of one of their favorites. Sullivan got the law passed and it is still on the books in New York. A couple of months later he was tossed into the looney bin.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 06:03 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at August 18, 2013 06:06 AM (e0nsQ)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl i support the rodeo clown at August 18, 2013 06:14 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: Ruthless at August 18, 2013 06:15 AM (+xKk0)
Poor boy - he was on antibiotics for weeks.
Posted by: Jaws at August 18, 2013 06:15 AM (Rbtz3)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 18, 2013 06:16 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 06:17 AM (c2oll)
Posted by: panzernashorn at August 18, 2013 06:18 AM (MhA4j)
It is one of those things that nerds like to have theological arguments about.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 06:18 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 18, 2013 06:21 AM (V3kRK)
.223 caliber vs 5.56mm ammo
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at August 18, 2013 10:06 AM (e0nsQ)
---------------
5.56 case is slightly longer than .223, and specifies loading to higher pressure than .223.
A true 5.56 mm chamber can accommodate either 5.56 or .223. A true .223 chamber can only accommodate .223.
Example is the Ruger Mini-14. Despite .223 Remington label on receiver, it has a 5.56 mm chamber and either round can be used. The exception is the Mini-14 target rifle, which has a true .223 chamber -- use .223 only, no 5.56.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at August 18, 2013 06:21 AM (rNCEP)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl i support the rodeo clown at August 18, 2013 06:24 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: Disarmament Democratist at August 18, 2013 06:26 AM (Pm4tN)
Posted by: RWC at August 18, 2013 06:27 AM (uRqqf)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at August 18, 2013 06:28 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at August 18, 2013 06:29 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 06:29 AM (c2oll)
Posted by: soothsayer lightfoot at August 18, 2013 06:30 AM (KfZLa)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at August 18, 2013 06:30 AM (tWrwm)
Posted by: BignJames at August 18, 2013 06:31 AM (ZNQKl)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at August 18, 2013 06:32 AM (HDgX3)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 06:32 AM (c2oll)
skips off to take a shower
Posted by: RWC at August 18, 2013 10:27 AM (uRqqf)"
All purpose response to those reply to that post:
You're wrong you Eurodisney pansy/geriatric troglodyte. The superiority of my cartridge has been proven in ballistic gelatin and thousands of real world gun fights. Anyone who disagrees with me is dangerously stupid and should not be permitted to spread their ignorance on the internet.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 06:35 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 10:29 AM (c2oll)
Preparing for the Canadians, eh?
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 18, 2013 06:35 AM (GoMJD)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 10:32 AM (c2oll)
Opponent armed with a banana.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 18, 2013 06:37 AM (GoMJD)
.905
http://scoamf.us/DH
Posted by: Blanco Basura at August 18, 2013 06:38 AM (JawqV)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 06:39 AM (c2oll)
Posted by: real joe at August 18, 2013 06:40 AM (rXQYA)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at August 18, 2013 06:41 AM (M3APu)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 18, 2013 06:41 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: traye at August 18, 2013 06:43 AM (Xtswp)
My shoulder hurts just thinking about it.
It's the difference between eliminating the zombie beaver and having your leg gnawed off. Your choice.
Posted by: Blanco Basura at August 18, 2013 06:43 AM (JawqV)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 10:32 AM (c2oll)
Opponent armed with a banana.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 18, 2013 10:37 AM (GoMJD)
We have to ban assault banana clips! For the children!
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 10:39 AM (c2oll)
"Watch out! He's peeling the banana!"
*A-Team opens fire"
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 18, 2013 06:44 AM (GoMJD)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 10:29 AM (c2oll)"
Well, they can be mean little buggers so I recommend .600 Nitro, although you might be able to get by with .458 Winchester if you can place your shots. If you are going to be out in beaver country, you should definitely carry one of these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfeifer_Zeliska_.600_Nitro_Express_revolver
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 06:44 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 18, 2013 06:45 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: backhoe at August 18, 2013 06:47 AM (ULH4o)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 18, 2013 06:47 AM (MhA4j)
Namely those who can pass the traditional "paper bag test".
Doubtless pointing out the invidious racism of "stop and frisk" AND gun control will be determined to be "racist".
By the way, the discredited and disbanded "S.O.S." home invasion, burglary and kidnapping ring operating INSIDE the Chicago Police Department was formed in part to disarm the populace.
No, no "slippery slopes" in gun control...
Posted by: Chris Morton at August 18, 2013 06:48 AM (uoVFE)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 06:48 AM (c2oll)
Posted by: Jones in CO at August 18, 2013 06:48 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 18, 2013 06:49 AM (UeUjL)
Posted by: traye at August 18, 2013 06:50 AM (Xtswp)
Posted by: Worker at August 18, 2013 06:50 AM (Q8Wa9)
I keep in shape with the Colt Woodsman. Much cheaper to use than the .45.
Also a .22 is a great starter for a beginner. You can teach allthe techniques without dealing with recoil.
Posted by: irongrampa at August 18, 2013 06:51 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 18, 2013 06:52 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: traye at August 18, 2013 06:53 AM (Xtswp)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectal at August 18, 2013 06:54 AM (wR+pz)
One of the holes in the revolver market is the lack of a decent affordable .45LC DA.
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at August 18, 2013 06:55 AM (E3gqr)
Posted by: BignJames at August 18, 2013 06:55 AM (ZNQKl)
Posted by: Jones in CO at August 18, 2013 10:48 AM (8sCoq)"
No! No! Eleventy!!! No!
My gun is the only correct choice and yours is grotesquely over powered to compensate for your inadequate penis!!!
Your gun will only cause needless collateral damage to innocent bystanders!!! You can tell I am right because I am using so many exclamation points! Don't make me have to resort to typing in ALL CAPS!!!
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 06:56 AM (31Nrp)
The CDC gun violence study commissioned by Obama backfires and shows that all the anti-gun rhetoric is a pack of lies. Something most of us already knew.
Posted by: Vic at August 18, 2013 09:42 AM (lZvxr)
*****
Vic, I have started reading the actual publication, (not just the WZ post). I would be cautious about saying that it backfires. So far I am about 17 pages into a 121 page report and I can see that there will be plenty of soundbites that dishonest progressives (BIRM) will attempt to use as leverage. We need to identify and stress the key relevant portions. I'll let y'all know if I find anything meaningful.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at August 18, 2013 06:56 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 18, 2013 06:57 AM (UeUjL)
Posted by: Mayor Bob from San Diego at August 18, 2013 06:58 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 06:58 AM (c2oll)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at August 18, 2013 06:59 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: nip at August 18, 2013 07:00 AM (jI23+)
Posted by: BignJames at August 18, 2013 07:01 AM (ZNQKl)
Best self defense pistol ever built.
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 18, 2013 10:52 AM (MhA4j)"
Interesting choice. Do you carry them with a round in the chamber?
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 07:04 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: EC at August 18, 2013 07:06 AM (doBIb)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 18, 2013 07:07 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Jones in CO at August 18, 2013 07:07 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 07:08 AM (c2oll)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectal at August 18, 2013 07:08 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Trainer on his iPhone at August 18, 2013 07:09 AM (LfjBa)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 18, 2013 07:11 AM (MhA4j)
Thanks.
Was asking for a friend, for real, who recently bought a sweet lookin' one. Hadn't fired it yet. Wants to get more ammo first.
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at August 18, 2013 10:30 AM (tWrwm)"
As long as he sticks to factory made with 55 grain bullets, everything should be fine no matter what kind of chamber. Some of the longer, heavier bullets in 5.56 might be a problem in a .223 chamber. M193 is the military designation of the 5.56 ammunition with a 55 grain bullet.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 07:12 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at August 18, 2013 07:14 AM (vZOX+)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 18, 2013 07:14 AM (MhA4j)
Glocks are crappy for accuracy.
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy
I have a Glock 22, chambered in .40 S&W, and have found that a little familiarity and practice works wonders. I haven't had it long, and it's my first gun, but I can now shoot the entire center out of a target. The accuracy issues I had initially weren't the Glock's fault.
I AM thinking about getting a little Smith and Wesson M&P Shield to carry, though. It's a toss up between that and the Baby Glock. Anyone familiar with the M&P Shield?
Posted by: Former Lurker at August 18, 2013 07:19 AM (4hp6w)
Horseshit. Spokane is the reason we can't have clean dishes anymore. They almost singlehandedly got phosphates (specifically TSP) taken out of dishwasher soap throughout the country because a few clowns there thought that there was too much in the Spokane river and that was the source. Never proven - they're still reading the same levels.
http://tinyurl.com/6k4w2rl
Posted by: Jeff Weimer at August 18, 2013 07:22 AM (ylG8S)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 18, 2013 07:25 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy
I can't argue with that, not having enough experience behind me to know one way or the other. I suspect I would have had the same problems with just about anything except a 22 out of the box. I qualified for my CCW with a 22, but I wanted something a little more potent for my wife and I. She can take out anything with almost no practice - I have to work at it. She's great with the Glock, even right out of the box, and doesn't go to the range with me much.
I have to practice, but at least I can run circles around her writing Java code.
Posted by: Former Lurker at August 18, 2013 07:31 AM (4hp6w)
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 11:04 AM
Yes. It takes a diesel truck to release the hammer.
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 18, 2013 11:11 AM (MhA4j)"
At one point I had a CZ-52, a Broomhandle and a Tokarev so that I had a bunch of guns that shot 7.62X25. The Tokarev had a trigger pull that was not real different than an Army issue .45 or any other military single action. I would, personally, be reluctant to carry it because it had no safety so cocked and locked is not an option and racking the slide requires two hands and some extra time.
The 7.62X25 cartridge is definitely the way to go if penetration is your primary consideration. If John Schrank had shot Theodore Roosevelt with a Broomhandle Mauser in 1912, William Howard Taft would have been reelected and Woodrow Wilson's whole misguided administration could have been avoided.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 07:31 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl i support the rodeo clown at August 18, 2013 07:32 AM (8JJ6O)
Fortunately, you're at AoS. Tasteless and uncalled for is our forte.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 18, 2013 11:08 AM (c2oll)
*****
Not to mention self-flagellation (IYKWIMAITYD)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at August 18, 2013 07:33 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: Former Lurker at August 18, 2013 07:33 AM (4hp6w)
Yup add in that "oohh" factor of a vaguely Mal's gun looking outline and "voila"...of course my gunsmith swears at the Starr's DA and all...
Posted by: miguel ambivalence@sven10077 at August 18, 2013 07:36 AM (A4hKL)
Okay gun morons (if anyone is still left). I'm dissecting the CDC gun violence report and cross-referencing with the original raw FBI data.
Pop quiz- Off the top of your head (no looking it up), how many homicides by firearm are there per day in the entire United States (average of five-year span covering 2007-2011 inclusive)?
Gun homicides per day in the entire country?
I'll post the answer if I get 3 or 4 guesses.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at August 18, 2013 07:37 AM (pxDth)
Glocks are crappy for accuracy.
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy
I have a Glock 22, chambered in .40 SW, and have found that a little familiarity and practice works wonders. I haven't had it long, and it's my first gun, but I can now shoot the entire center out of a target. The accuracy issues I had initially weren't the Glock's fault.
I AM thinking about getting a little Smith and Wesson MP Shield to carry, though. It's a toss up between that and the Baby Glock. Anyone familiar with the MP Shield?
Posted by: Former Lurker at August 18, 2013 11:19 AM (4hp6w)"
Is that the little .380? I saw one at the store. It seems to be about the same size and capacity as the KelTek A3AT and Ruger LCP. The main difference is that it has a safety. I actually think that any of those .380 pistols would be a good choice for regular carry. For the ones without a safety I would make sure that I carried it in a holster that covered up the entire trigger guard, especially if carried in a pocket.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 07:38 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: BignJames at August 18, 2013 07:43 AM (ZNQKl)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 18, 2013 07:45 AM (UeUjL)
Okay gun morons (if anyone is still left). I'm dissecting the CDC gun violence report and cross-referencing with the original raw FBI data.
Pop quiz- Off the top of your head (no looking it up), how many homicides by firearm are there per day in the entire United States (average of five-year span covering 2007-2011 inclusive)?
Gun homicides per day in the entire country?
I'll post the answer if I get 3 or 4 guesses.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at August 18, 2013 11:37 AM (pxDth)"
OK. The homicide rate is something like 5 per 100,000 nation wide and there are about 350,000,000 people in the US so that would be 5 X (350,000,000 / 100,000) per year divided by 365 works out to 48.66 so say a little less than 50?
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 07:45 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 18, 2013 07:46 AM (UeUjL)
Posted by: DAve at August 18, 2013 07:47 AM (OksBo)
Posted by: RWC at August 18, 2013 07:49 AM (uRqqf)
BigNJames is closest. The number is 25 per day for that time period.
Just shooting from the hip (pun intended) I would have probably said somewhere between 100 and 200 per day- way off.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at August 18, 2013 07:53 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 18, 2013 07:57 AM (UeUjL)
Now compare that number- 25 per day to what you will hear the left say, from the same report-
"...more than 335,600 people who died from firearm-related violence in the United States."
'cause 'statistics and stuff' OMG a huge number, it's a freaking crisis, ban the guns!!!
They will conveniently neglect to mention that the 335,600 number comes from an 11 year time span, and includes 61% (or 204,716) that are suicides and also includes accidental and LEO-involved shootings).
There are four types of lies: lies, damn lies, statistics and progressive propoganda.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at August 18, 2013 07:58 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl i support the rodeo clown at August 18, 2013 07:59 AM (8JJ6O)
"Less than 35" ..... 35-25 = 10
"14" ..... 25-14 = 11
New math?
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 18, 2013 11:57 AM (UeUjL)
*****
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I gave you credit @112.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at August 18, 2013 08:00 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at August 18, 2013 08:02 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 18, 2013 08:02 AM (UeUjL)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 18, 2013 08:06 AM (UeUjL)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 18, 2013 08:07 AM (UeUjL)
Posted by: Cicero Skip at August 18, 2013 08:08 AM (w7s2Y)
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 08:12 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: Jean at August 18, 2013 08:20 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: 11B40 at August 18, 2013 08:46 AM (IwfGA)
OK Horde,
If there's anyone still around this thread, I need a decent recommendation for a home defense gun for my wife.
Who has decided we should have one. (Currently for the time being the shotgun lives under my bed.)
It needs to be small enough to easily store in the bedroom, fairly easy to use, and reliable.
I suppose that means either a handgun or a revolver. Relatively inexpensive (and possibly easy to find used) would be a nice thing to have as well. We're not sitting on a ton of cash.
Having said all that, she didn't really like the Walther P22 compared to a 10/22 rifle. She felt the handgun was harder to aim, but somehow I think a rifle doesn't meet the "easy to store in bedroom" criteria she put forth. (And practice can eventually mitigate the aiming issues.)
She has a friend with a 9mm of unknown brand. Her friend does not like the 9mm since apparently she finds it hard to shoot. (My wife takes my friends advice very seriously.)
Posted by: tsrblke at August 18, 2013 08:50 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 18, 2013 09:10 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 18, 2013 01:10 PM (V3kRK)
Thanks.
Our plan right now is to sit tight (as I said Shotgun) because we're both busy. And unlike a .22 where I buy it for fun, I'd hate to get a home defense weapon that either of us finds hard to fire.
Then, when our schedule clears up (October) we're going to go to one of the ranges that rents (and sells) guns to try a few out. I just wanted to narrow down the options.
We had our first neighborhood break in this weekend. (ironically they stole the guys guns.)
I asked her if that set off this and she said "actually, no I started thinking about this around the Zimmerman trial. You gotta protect yourself."
Irony I guess (suck it leftards.)
Posted by: tsrblke at August 18, 2013 09:13 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Ostral B Heretic at August 18, 2013 09:18 AM (2vl2+)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at August 18, 2013 09:19 AM (X4HxX)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at August 18, 2013 01:19 PM (X4HxX)
We'll probably put a 9mm on the try list. But the wife doesn't handle recoil to well.
Of course that could rule out the handgun all together. We'll see.
Posted by: tsrblke at August 18, 2013 09:25 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: MsMulan at August 18, 2013 09:42 AM (FM+fg)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 18, 2013 09:43 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: Caesar North of the Rubicon at August 18, 2013 09:46 AM (QVC7W)
Posted by: Synova at August 18, 2013 11:27 AM (7/PU+)
OK Horde,
If there's anyone still around this thread, I need a decent recommendation for a home defense gun for my wife.
Who has decided we should have one. (Currently for the time being the shotgun lives under my bed.)
It needs to be small enough to easily store in the bedroom, fairly easy to use, and reliable.
I suppose that means either a handgun or a revolver. Relatively inexpensive (and possibly easy to find used) would be a nice thing to have as well. We're not sitting on a ton of cash.
Having said all that, she didn't really like the Walther P22 compared to a 10/22 rifle. She felt the handgun was harder to aim, but somehow I think a rifle doesn't meet the "easy to store in bedroom" criteria she put forth. (And practice can eventually mitigate the aiming issues.)
She has a friend with a 9mm of unknown brand. Her friend does not like the 9mm since apparently she finds it hard to shoot. (My wife takes my friends advice very seriously.)
Posted by: tsrblke at August 18, 2013 12:50 PM (GaqMa)"
What you want is a police trade in Smith & Wesson Model 10 .38 Special revolver. They used to be available all over the place when police departments were trading in their .38 revolvers to go to 9mm pistols. You can still find them but now you have to look around a bit. Many police departments have armorers who went to school at S&W and learned how to polish up the actions on these revolvers so for less than $200 you can find a used revolver with some holster wear that has a double action trigger pull that is smoother than snot on a glass door knob. You can shoot it with target wad cutter ammunition which has very little recoil. The Model 10 has fixed sights which should not be an issue as long as they point at the target. You can load this revolver and leave it untouched in a bedroom end table drawer for 20 years and it will work perfectly well when you pull it out. You might want to buy a set of rubber grips for the revolver because they really do reduce perceived recoil and make the gun more comfortable to shoot with stronger loads.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 11:35 AM (31Nrp)
Either way, now that we have the internets at our fingertips via the magic that is smarter-than-me phones I'd love for someone to call him on his bullshit.
This holds true for every single other talking head fuckwad out there as well. RNC, are you f'n listening?
of course you're not, what am I thinking...
Good day roonz and roonettez. In before I have to go to work.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at August 18, 2013 12:09 PM (yh0zB)
Posted by: tsrblke at August 18, 2013 12:50 PM (GaqMa)
This has been said before but cannot be said enough...she must handle and shoot the gun before you buy. Just because her friend does not like the particular 9mm she has does not mean your wife won't like it, and in fact you should see if your wife wants to try it out (might be able to pick it up cheap from the friend). Either way, try before you buy because a gun that sits unloaded in the gun safe doesn't do any good when you really need it.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at August 18, 2013 12:19 PM (yh0zB)
It is strange what people will like. I took my daughter shooting at a place that rents different pistols. I had her try a lot of different ones but as soon as she shot the SIG 228 she said that is the one. Of course they don't make them any more but the other SIGs apparently feel pretty much the same.
When I took my wife there she wanted a little gun so I had her shooting various 9mms, .380s and .22s, none of which she liked all that much. Then I rented a 1911 for myself. When she tried the .45 she decided that was the gun that she loved.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 18, 2013 12:40 PM (31Nrp)
Posted by: deadrody at August 18, 2013 12:44 PM (osIoP)
Posted by: lindafell at August 18, 2013 04:03 PM (PGO8C)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2858 seconds, 273 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 18, 2013 05:38 AM (k9TQr)