August 04, 2013
— andy SSK Brings Out The Big Guns
The .950 JDJ, the largest caliber center fire rifle ever made, looks and sounds like one shot would send a grizzly bear flying into the air.
Of course it won't, because physics, but the video of it being fired is entertaining nonetheless.
SSK Industries has a long history of innovative firearms and ammo, with the .375 JDJ offering for the T/C Contender being something I've been interested in for a long time. I really should pull the trigger on that one of these days.
Stopping Power and High Minimum Capacity Mags
Maet linked this story in the ONT a while back.
Sergeant Timothy Gramins fired 43 rounds at an assailant shooting at him and hit him 14 times with 6 shots in supposedly fatal locations. But the shooter just kept on coming.
Give it a read and keep it in mind next time some anti-gunner who's watched too much TV tells you you don't need more than X rounds in your gun.
Gun Of The Week

(answer below)
Marksmanship Award
Hero of the Day - Georgia: Would-be Waffle House bandit shot by customer - http://t.co/ceV4JzK3H0 #NRA #ArmedCitizen (via @AJC)
— Cam and Company (@CamAndCompany) July 29, 2013
That's the Heckler & Koch HK21 belt-fed GPMG in 7.62x51 NATO (.308 Win.)
What. In. The. F*ck?
I was hoping this was a late April Fool's gag, but, no, the military actually is looking to "go green" with its ammo.
The Army’s Picatinny Arsenal is working on a “green” version of the M80A1 7.62 mm bullet, which troops are supposed to start being issued in 2014, according to an Army press release.The Army has been looking to “green” small caliber ammo for some time now. In 2010, the Army switched to the greener 5.56 mm M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round.
It'd be one thing if we were experimenting with different bullet materials to more efficiently kill the enemy. I'm all for that. But replacing lead for environmental reasons is a solution to a non-existent problem (as is well described in the G&A piece linked in the article).
Armslist Suit Dismissed
Good.
Armslist.com isnÂ’t liable for the brutal murder of an Illinois woman shot to death by a man who used the online firearms marketplace to make an illegal gun purchase, a federal judge ruled this week.
The actual seller got jail time, but that wasn't good enough for the Brady Center's campaign of anti-second amendment lawfare and harassment.
Tips
If there are topics you're interested in seeing in the gun thread, please send them to AoSHQGunThread at gmail. You can also send them to me on Twitter at @AndyM1911.
The owner's manual for your concealed carry permit: The Law of Self Defense
Defend the Second Amendment. Join: The National Rifle Association * Gun Owners of America * The National Shooting Sports Foundation * Your state's second amendment org.
Celebrate America's firearms heritage: participate in Project Appleseed.
Posted by: andy at
05:56 AM
| Comments (106)
Post contains 501 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 04, 2013 06:03 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Hrothgar at August 04, 2013 06:05 AM (XdnQT)
But what is bad is even when Barky the enemy is finally out of office the shit will still be around.
Posted by: Vic at August 04, 2013 06:05 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 04, 2013 06:06 AM (0WdQr)
Posted by: Hrothgar at August 04, 2013 06:08 AM (XdnQT)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at August 04, 2013 06:09 AM (l3vZN)
Green ammo should be used only to shoot envirowhackos. Clean up a lot of smug pollution that way.
Jim
Sunk New Dawn
Galveston, TX
Posted by: Jim at August 04, 2013 06:09 AM (vvk2F)
Posted by: Yep at August 04, 2013 06:10 AM (6sqK6)
Posted by: rickl at August 04, 2013 06:10 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: toby928© at August 04, 2013 06:11 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 04, 2013 06:12 AM (0WdQr)
And they're looking at ammo that won't cause any physical harm or injuries. It'll just cause hurt feelings...but in a very PC way, of course.
Posted by: Albie Damned at August 04, 2013 06:13 AM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: Vic at August 04, 2013 06:13 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: BornLib at August 04, 2013 06:14 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 04, 2013 06:14 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: die trying at August 04, 2013 06:15 AM (w7J/R)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 04, 2013 06:16 AM (0WdQr)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 04, 2013 06:17 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: BornLib at August 04, 2013 06:17 AM (zpNwC)
They also have a nice SMLE, also $900, but some quick browsing on Gunbroker shows that as a little too pricey.
So, what should I do? Assume it's your money and you don't make a whole helluva lot of it.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at August 04, 2013 06:17 AM (celt+)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 04, 2013 06:17 AM (lbBsF)
Posted by: Dianne Feinstein (Packing) at August 04, 2013 06:18 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes more nonsense ...... at August 04, 2013 06:19 AM (v6hyJ)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 04, 2013 06:19 AM (0WdQr)
Posted by: Gmac - Pondering the coming implosion at August 04, 2013 06:20 AM (IanLz)
Posted by: BornLib at August 04, 2013 06:21 AM (zpNwC)
Apparently these feculent shitweasels don't consider the military's task is to protect and defend in the most effective manner possible.
Time for the bat and some wall to wall counseling.
Posted by: irongrampa at August 04, 2013 06:21 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes more nonsense ...... at August 04, 2013 06:21 AM (v6hyJ)
Posted by: Jade Sea at August 04, 2013 06:22 AM (P6s+c)
1. I am a former U.S. Marine with an Honorable Discharge.
2. I have a clearance.
3. I have no criminal record.
But it's still going to take a while to pick up these weapons. Thus the reason I'm pushing for a potential job out in Texas right now.
Posted by: NR Pax at August 04, 2013 06:23 AM (U+O64)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 04, 2013 06:23 AM (0WdQr)
But we don't use as much of them. The other thing I would like to see is a study that says firing lead bullets is a hazard to your health once they get into the ground. I don't know too may people above the age of 3 who eat dirt.
Posted by: Vic at August 04, 2013 06:24 AM (lZvxr)
...has been in the slammer since July 7, when she was arrested after allegedly storming into her estranged husbandÂ’s home. She was dressed like a ninja and allegedly threatened him with a gun and a metal baton in a desperate bid for cash.
http://tinyurl.com/lr72vpn
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 04, 2013 06:25 AM (0WdQr)
Posted by: NR Pax at August 04, 2013 10:23 AM (U+O64)
Someone from MD posted on here a few weeks ago that he had been waiting months for his permit. I would not live in a State that required you to get a permit just to own a gun.
Posted by: Vic at August 04, 2013 06:26 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 04, 2013 06:27 AM (lbBsF)
Posted by: Vic at August 04, 2013 06:28 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Dept. Of Acuracy at August 04, 2013 06:29 AM (MhA4j)
MD replied that there was already a policy in place that allowed weapons to be transferred after seven days if the State Police refused to get back to the dealer. The Plaintiff demanded that the policy be documented and put up in writing, which it was. So if the other moron from MD is reading this, I'd be happy to send you the relevant .pdf form to help you out.
Thankfully, I have a possible job in Texas. It's going to be a big pay cut but I don't care any more. So long as I get out of MD and somewhere more free.
Posted by: NR Pax at August 04, 2013 06:30 AM (U+O64)
I would not move back there.
Posted by: Vic at August 04, 2013 06:30 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Gmac - Pondering the coming implosion at August 04, 2013 06:31 AM (IanLz)
@43: Statements like that just reinforce my decision to move.
Posted by: NR Pax at August 04, 2013 06:31 AM (U+O64)
Vic, here's a question you can ask gun control freaks--
Why is it necessary to obtain a permit to exercise a constitutionally affirmed right?
You're never going to get a logical answer (been my experience), but it's fun to watch them squirm.
Posted by: irongrampa at August 04, 2013 06:33 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: BornLib at August 04, 2013 06:33 AM (zpNwC)
http://jpfo.org/
Thnx
Posted by: badanov at August 04, 2013 06:34 AM (gFy7w)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) on vacation at August 04, 2013 06:34 AM (ewXQL)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) on vacation at August 04, 2013 06:34 AM (ewXQL)
I hear in Texas they have shooting ranges in bars instead of pinball machines
Posted by: Albie Damned at August 04, 2013 06:36 AM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: BornLib at August 04, 2013 06:37 AM (zpNwC)
This is why the term "Stop" rather than "Kill" is used in self-defense classes (including but not limited to martial arts and CHL classes). Since not everyone can effectively conceal a 1911, the next best solution is carrying a lot of bullets.
It doesn't matter that the one I used is fatal if you're still coming at me too hopped up on drugs and/or adrenaline trying to kill me. As a corollary, the point of shooting someone 17 times "because I didn't have 18 bullets, sir," is not to "make sure he's dead," but to make sure he's stopped and can't start again.
Yes, if everyone could shoot with Action Hero accuracy, we could limit ourselves to six-shooters, and always aim for the knee (it's really hard to chase someone when one of your kneecaps is in about 20 pieces). However, everyone does *not* have Action Hero accuracy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) on vacation at August 04, 2013 06:39 AM (ewXQL)
Posted by: CarolT at August 04, 2013 06:40 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: Liberty Lover at August 04, 2013 06:41 AM (OKmp0)
Posted by: BornLib at August 04, 2013 06:41 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Vic at August 04, 2013 10:24 AM (lZvxr)
Wut? Why's everybody looking at me?
Posted by: Joe Biden at August 04, 2013 06:41 AM (Yhu4q)
No, that's archery ranges- you're not allowed to have a shooting range in a bar, that's silly.
Of course, you know that carnival game with the ducks and plates and stuff, and you're supposed to shoot 'em? Yeah, we use real 10/22s for that one.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) on vacation at August 04, 2013 06:41 AM (ewXQL)
Posted by: NR Pax at August 04, 2013 06:43 AM (U+O64)
Well, yeah.
I mean, they might get away with one or two targets hit that don't fall ("whoops, I guess the spring is too tight on that one, I'll have to fix it tonight.") but after 8, there's still 2 bullets left to drive the point home.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) on vacation at August 04, 2013 06:45 AM (ewXQL)
You could get a smallish gun with a light trigger pull weight
...and you can shoot the roses for practice
Posted by: Joe Biden at August 04, 2013 06:46 AM (Yhu4q)
So far, so good. Actually, I'm going to sign off here in a little bit to get Jr. Tenther ready to go fire his first .22.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) on vacation at August 04, 2013 06:46 AM (ewXQL)
Posted by: [/i] [/b] [/u] [/s] An Observation at August 04, 2013 06:48 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: BornLib at August 04, 2013 06:48 AM (zpNwC)
Which is a PITA for my CHL instructor, who also holds a (an? -stupid grammar rules) FFL and ships handguns across the country. Because you can ONLY use the USPS for such shipments. Which, further, means he has to take guns onto Post Office Property, which is legal as long as it's for official Post Office business (such as shipping one somewhere).
He says he usually avoids the problem by parking a block away, leaving his own weapon in his car, and then walking to the PO.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) on vacation at August 04, 2013 06:51 AM (ewXQL)
Their standard issue rifle is 7.62 as well, and has quite a kick, but I preferred the M16.
Posted by: BurtTC at August 04, 2013 06:51 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: BornLib at August 04, 2013 06:51 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: sinalco at August 04, 2013 06:52 AM (7580N)
Posted by: Hrothgar at August 04, 2013 06:53 AM (XdnQT)
Then I realize that it could probably put a hole in a Bradley, and I think, "There may come a day when stupid ain't so stupid."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) on vacation at August 04, 2013 06:54 AM (ewXQL)
Posted by: BignJames at August 04, 2013 06:55 AM (ZNQKl)
Good point. Hard to see what practical use it has other than piercing armor. Which we civilians shouldn't have to do, but you never know. One of these days.....
Posted by: BurtTC at August 04, 2013 06:57 AM (BeSEI)
Then again, they can wear the bruising like a badge of honor.
Posted by: Fritz at August 04, 2013 07:00 AM (K7xnX)
Posted by: BornLib at August 04, 2013 07:03 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: t-bird at August 04, 2013 07:17 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: BignJames at August 04, 2013 07:22 AM (ZNQKl)
So, what should I do? Assume it's your money and you don't make a whole helluva lot of it.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at August 04, 2013 10:17 AM (celt+)
Crap! I remember buying a SMLE, all drenched in Cosmoline, from 3Vets in Vancouver, B.C. for the princely sum of $25. Of course that was in the early '70's.
But I did go to Cabela's the other day, and bought me a Tradition Arms .50 caliber Hawken replica flintlock. Have yet to shoot it, but it is a pretty piece of workmanship.
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at August 04, 2013 07:23 AM (fNpC1)
Posted by: t-bird at August 04, 2013 07:32 AM (FcR7P)
1 to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another <infringe a patent> 2 obsolete : defeat, frustrate
The phrase "shall not be infringed" was placed in the second amendment of the Constitution for a specific reason: under the Constitution - no government can legally limit the right to keep and bear arms in any way.
All gun control actions are Constitutionally forbidden.
That is what the founding fathers said, and that is what they meant; no other interpretation of that phrase is even possible.
Of course, The Supremes have ruled that the Draft is Constitutional despite the clear 13th amendment prohibition on "involuntary servitude" because the 14th amendment makes it ok. (Go ahead, find that in the 14th amendment, I dare you.) So I am sure that Roberts would rule that the 16th amendment overrules the 2nd; because its a tax.
Posted by: [/i] [/b] [/u] [/s] An Observation at August 04, 2013 07:39 AM (ylhEn)
I prefer the working group, myself, although the toy group are fun to watch and a real crowd pleaser. A Beretta .25 once took Best of Show.
Posted by: comatus at August 04, 2013 07:41 AM (JNUY4)
Posted by: RWC at August 04, 2013 07:53 AM (8FeS+)
More evidence that "An Armed Society is a Polite Society." Heh, heh. This has to drive the Left nuts.
"Virginia Gun Crimes Drop Again As Firearms Sales Soar."
Posted by: RushBabe at August 04, 2013 08:08 AM (idNGj)
Would love to have a SMLE but not for the price. Need to get some other stuff first."
------------------------
Actually, I'm passing on the Smellie, because yes, it's a bit pricey. It's the Kar98k I'm dithering on.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at August 04, 2013 08:13 AM (celt+)
Posted by: Miguel Ambivalence at August 04, 2013 08:13 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Jake in ID, lets get it over with and let it burn already at August 04, 2013 08:28 AM (DWF95)
Posted by: SpongeBob ReaverSaget at August 04, 2013 08:54 AM (kxSZr)
Posted by: rickl at August 04, 2013 09:20 AM (sdi6R)
--------------------
Probably not. That won't stop it from going viral. Infowars will be right on top of it.
This is the food equivalent of "the DHS is buying a hundred billion rounds of ammo."
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at August 04, 2013 09:40 AM (celt+)
Posted by: Jean at August 04, 2013 09:44 AM (7tVNd)
Posted by: FGCU_James at August 04, 2013 10:01 AM (hZ9YO)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 04, 2013 10:06 AM (0WdQr)"
Because 20 mm is only .80 caliber.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 04, 2013 10:42 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: Vic at August 04, 2013 10:26 AM (lZvxr)"
Do you think that it is a coincidence that California has been a reliably blue state since they passed the Roberti-Roos gun law? Passing laws at the state level that harass law abiding gun owners is one of the ways that Democrats guarantee that they will keep their phony baloney jobs as gun owners, who tend Republican, won't move there and will also move away when they get the chance.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 04, 2013 11:11 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: rld77 at August 04, 2013 11:17 AM (z28Fp)
Posted by: Tantor at August 04, 2013 02:12 PM (S4AQU)
Posted by: Miguel Ambivalence at August 04, 2013 02:32 PM (pKG85)
Posted by: Tantor at August 04, 2013 06:12 PM (S4AQU)"
Maybe I'm kind of puny but a 110 rifle or even the light weight 50 pound rifle is a bit much for me to tote around. When we start cloning dinosaurs, I'll carry one of these. The nice thing is with the right holster, you can carry it concealed. I know some people will say I'm undergunned but if you pay attention to shot placement, it should be adequate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0keZr_2wbc
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 04, 2013 02:57 PM (31Nrp)
Posted by: EROWMER at August 04, 2013 03:03 PM (OONaw)
http://tinyurl.com/28qt62x
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 04, 2013 03:08 PM (31Nrp)
Posted by: SargeantS at August 04, 2013 08:22 PM (KzG2w)
The M855A1may well be significantly better than the M855 round. How does it compare to the old 55 grain M193? While there is plenty of hype written on the subject, the general impression that I have gotten is that the M855 has proven to be less effective in the real world than the old M193 round, especially when fired from the short barreled M-4 rifle.
I can understand why the Army would want something better than the M855 and given its disappointing performance, it may well be possible that the M855A1 is an improvement. If it also makes the Greens happy, that is all to the good, but is it the most effective round that we can supply to our troops and would a less green round be more effective?
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 05, 2013 06:22 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: SargeantS at August 05, 2013 07:36 PM (KzG2w)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2608 seconds, 234 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Hrothgar at August 04, 2013 06:00 AM (XdnQT)