August 08, 2013
— Ace Via Hot Air, there are only so many times one can say "I'm quitting this party and will henceforth only support third party candidates."
Well, I have said it. Many of us have. We mean it. And it's over.
Go ahead and do what you like, GOP. The divorce is final.
Members of Congress have been on recess for only a few days, but it already seems the time away from Washington means more support for a pathway to citizenship among some Republicans.In the past few days, two Republican members of the House of Representatives — Daniel Webster in Florida, Aaron Schock in Illinois — have expressed preliminary support for a way to legalize undocumented immigrants and allow them to eventually earn full citizenship. Even the House GOP whip, Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), announced support for legal status, although he stopped just short of supporting full citizenship.
Meanwhile, in more Donzo news, Chuck Shumer says he doesn't mind the Republicans' piecemeal strategy (passing small separate bills on immigration), because he intends just to collect them all up into a single bill which will be "conferenced" with the Senate, and then he'll deliver amnesty just as the Gang of Eight has long plotted.
I guess this is why I'm not terribly political anymore, or it seems as if I don't care as much. I don't. I knew this was coming, I knew there was nothing to stop it.
There will be a third party and there will be a 20 year period of Democratic dominance.
It is unavoidable.
So I have retreated into a sort of philosophical take on it all. Politics isn't fun when you always lose and worse yet your team plays to lose, because secretly they have a great deal of affection for and allegiance to the other side.
There's no point plotting this move and that move; all moves are failures and result in the same dismal outcome. I don't know if it is an effective strategy to just retreat into the completely impractical/philosophical, but I do know I have no interest in playing a ludicrous game in which there is only one set of permissible moves and only one permitted outcome.
I don't want to play this pretend-game. There is no point to this pretend-game, except to snooker people into thinking they have some input into the system, which they do not.
For those of us who are done: You may have our acquiesensce but you will no longer have our votes.
Gerbil Out Party: I wrote this to rockmom:
rockmom, they are determined to do this.It's like I say about gerbils. Gerbils will always get out of their cages because all they do is plot 14 hours per day how to get out of the cage. They have no other thoughts. They have no other goals.
You cannot control something that is plotting every waking hour to escape the cage.
The Republican Gerbils want this, they will never stop wanting it, they will never stop, period.
I'm tired of fighting with them. At some point, you just accept that the Gerbil wants to be free to be eaten by the cat. And you let him go.
Because you have better things to do with your time than minding a Gerbil all day long.
You know, all these months that Mickey Kaus has been saying "Hey, don't go to sleep, we have to fight amensty," I've been thinking one thing: What's the point? It's kabuki. It's nothing but a never-ending string of "breakthroughs" and "dramatic compromises" and "billions of new dollars for border security" all with the exact same goal, to con us into acquiescence.
It's always the same deal, they just try to think of somewhat different ways to say it. Like a very bad tv show. Which it all actually is, in a very real way.
But I don't want to watch this crap. And I've said so continuously.
So I'm done.
Gerbil Credit: Steve_in_hb wants credit as he first explained the Gerbil Principle to me. Except he said Hamsters. I changed it to gerbils "to make it my own."
Posted by: Ace at
11:35 AM
| Comments (592)
Post contains 706 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Gingy at August 08, 2013 11:37 AM (aH+zP)
I hope this means more movie reviews.
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 08, 2013 11:38 AM (uYaYO)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at August 08, 2013 11:38 AM (09o/X)
Just another drop of water on the mountain top. Takes a long time to wear down the mountain one drop at a time.
So no need to worry.
Posted by: Reverend William Arcibald Spooner at August 08, 2013 11:38 AM (gRCR3)
Posted by: sTevo at August 08, 2013 11:38 AM (NtfWz)
Posted by: kahall at August 08, 2013 11:38 AM (u0NM1)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at August 08, 2013 11:38 AM (09o/X)
Posted by: maddogg at August 08, 2013 11:39 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: LauraC at August 08, 2013 11:39 AM (fXZDm)
Posted by: eleven at August 08, 2013 11:39 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 08, 2013 11:39 AM (2Tv3A)
I'm not sure 20 years is the right number. At least all by itself. Maybe 20 years of Democrat rule, followed by a 200 years dark Age. A real one.
Posted by: John W. at August 08, 2013 11:39 AM (PVBzL)
Unfortunately, you are able to think for yourself...something those GOP douches don't like at all.
Like the time I saw Harry Browne kissing celebrity ass on the old Maher show and not defend liberatarianism...I've given up on those assholes.
They are Democrats, and on board with all the sweaty, juicy, moist Marxism you can handle.
That's pretty fucked up.
But it's life. Shit was worse for the Camobidans, and Cubans and Chinese and eveyrone else touched by this disease.
But is it inevitable owing to our inherent monkey-ness?
Prolly.
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz Feminist at August 08, 2013 11:40 AM (raGXo)
Better or worse than suitcase nukes? Asking for a friend.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at August 08, 2013 11:40 AM (/kI1Q)
Saw this coming awhile back--re possible third party. The GOP is not only gutless and but seems to have lost integrity re constitutional conservatism.
Stopped giving to the party since Romney was the candidate.
Posted by: Old Guy at August 08, 2013 11:40 AM (wZWbN)
Reckon we're just glad we finally got someone with us who adequately bring it.
Posted by: Cameron at August 08, 2013 11:40 AM (g63Ex)
Posted by: Just A Guy at August 08, 2013 11:40 AM (T8BfZ)
Posted by: Alex #11 at August 08, 2013 11:40 AM (+sMAy)
Posted by: Just A Guy at August 08, 2013 03:40 PM (T8BfZ)
Shoomer only gets involved in sure things.
Posted by: caustic at August 08, 2013 11:41 AM (/b8+5)
I'll discuss this latest development on my show tonight with the unbiased, straight-shooting journalists of Politico. Tune in!
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at August 08, 2013 11:41 AM (/AHDz)
Posted by: Hedley Lamar at August 08, 2013 11:41 AM (SPaCH)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 11:42 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: The Bourbon in Boehner's Belly at August 08, 2013 11:42 AM (n50fF)
Posted by: RS at August 08, 2013 11:42 AM (YAGV/)
i feel more and more like this. I do not have ownership in this project, this project is not my doing and not my wish, so there is no point in having an emotional investment in it.
Posted by: ace at August 08, 2013 11:42 AM (/IWYB)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at August 08, 2013 11:42 AM (XG/5o)
The good news is that there are a lot of democrats who will jump on the third party bandwagon.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at August 08, 2013 11:43 AM (FZnrK)
All I'm doing now is working on making sure my family is taken care of.
Yep. But with teenagers, I have to also find a way for them to land on their feet after the inevitable collapse.
My only question any longer politically is do I completely sit out, or do I vote D to hasten the fall?
Posted by: hindmost at August 08, 2013 11:43 AM (t6Jvs)
Only 20? More like forever by my count.
the american political system hates a vacuum of one sided dominance so what will happen, eventually, is some sort of political realignment.
I will pick parties then, after that has happened, or decided to continue to abstain.
Posted by: ace at August 08, 2013 11:43 AM (/IWYB)
Posted by: steevy at August 08, 2013 11:43 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: USA at August 08, 2013 11:43 AM (VIaw0)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 11:44 AM (GQ8sn)
Yeah. 2014 and 2016 will be 1964 all over again: GOP in permanent opposition and the welfare state triumphant.
Posted by: joncelli at August 08, 2013 11:44 AM (RD7QR)
I was going to point out that even if he didn't vote for or agree with the upcoming screwing, he was still going to pay because he hasn't helped throw these bastards out of the "leadership" positions.
There fore he's just as complicit. Like a felony murder rap.
The Senate, I've long written off because of McCain and McConnell as being a lost cause.
I suspect Palin won't be much use in forming a 3rd party. (that's why she let her contract expire and then renegotiated another fairly quickly) She may be useful in funneling some bucks around but don't look for her to assume any leadership role unless it's one by acclamation.
No. We're on our own.
I won't say I won't vote but I'm not voting for any Republican and certainly not for any Democrat. What choices I'll have after that, I have no idea.
As to a 20 year Democrat/Liberal hegemony; I say that the sooner people get a taste of what's really in store, the faster and longer any reformation will take place. Unless they gas us first of course.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Ecclesiates 9:11) at August 08, 2013 11:44 AM (28TG+)
Posted by: Joe Tenebris at August 08, 2013 11:44 AM (HX9fK)
Posted by: Michael Medved at August 08, 2013 11:44 AM (/AHDz)
WTF, Ace? You're wetting your pants now because of some obviously biased MSM stories that are specifically designed to split the Republican Party? That ABC News "story" is the most tarted up piece of trash I've seen in a long time.
And here I thought you were one of the smart guys on our side.
News flash: MSM is DESPERATE to drag Obama's sorry ass across the finish line on SOMETHING, anything, so he doesn't finish his term as a total failure.
Posted by: rockmom at August 08, 2013 11:44 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 08, 2013 11:44 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 11:45 AM (pmDdf)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 11:45 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Drumwaster at August 08, 2013 11:45 AM (K6BSx)
Posted by: Suppressed Flasher at August 08, 2013 11:45 AM (X+nFp)
Disobey.
Or are you going to kowtow to their Communistic rules, laws, and programs for the next 20 years? Can you do that and still look at yourself in the mirror?
I can't.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at August 08, 2013 11:45 AM (SCcgT)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 08, 2013 11:45 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: MaureenTheTemp at August 08, 2013 11:45 AM (hslAc)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at August 08, 2013 11:46 AM (9+ccr)
change from the inside, not from the out. if there's a third party, it won't be liberal (not just the democratic party, but cultural liberalism) dominance for only 20 years, but until the end. take what you can get.
Posted by: Joe at August 08, 2013 11:46 AM (AHp2f)
Posted by: The Third Horseman Of The Apocalypse at August 08, 2013 11:46 AM (Dwehj)
>>> On the plus side I'm not planning on kids, so what the hell do I care what happens to this country.
-------------------
Are you planning on leaving the country? Dying in the next 20 years? Why would what happens to the country not involve you?
--------------------
i feel more and more like this. I do not have ownership in this project, this project is not my doing and not my wish, so there is no point in having an emotional investment in it.
----------------------
You may not have ownership in this project, but you damn sure have residency in it.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 11:46 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at August 08, 2013 11:46 AM (qyfb5)
i feel more and more like this. I do not have ownership in this project, this project is not my doing and not my wish, so there is no point in having an emotional investment in it.
I do have kids. I have to keep fighting. There is no other option.
Posted by: pep at August 08, 2013 11:46 AM (6TB1Z)
Great campaign, guys.
Said it before and I'll reiterate it again: If amnesty passes I'm voting locally for conservative/libertarians and nationally for either a) no one or b) the Democrat depending on just how fast I want to let it burn on a particular day.
The GOP doesn't know just how dead it will be.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at August 08, 2013 11:46 AM (eHIJJ)
Have you ever seen Schock? He doesn't look like the kind of guy who'd complain about a mouth full of salty IYKWIMAITTYD.
Posted by: Lemmenkainen, Freelance Warlord at August 08, 2013 11:46 AM (ZWvOb)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Ecclesiates 9:11) at August 08, 2013 03:44 PM (28TG+)
Not to get your spirits down, but failure is always an option.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 08, 2013 11:46 AM (sGtp+)
Posted by: caustic at August 08, 2013 11:47 AM (/b8+5)
What are you, gay?
Posted by: Dr Spank at August 08, 2013 11:47 AM (v1mq9)
Posted by: LauraC at August 08, 2013 11:47 AM (fXZDm)
And here I thought you were one of the smart guys on our side.
News flash: MSM is DESPERATE to drag Obama's sorry ass across the finish line on SOMETHING, anything, so he doesn't finish his term as a total failure.
Posted by: rockmom at August 08, 2013 03:44 PM (NYnoe)
Yup, the MSM knows that Obama is a totes lame-duck if nothing major gets passed by the time of next year's State of the Union.
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 08, 2013 11:47 AM (UypUQ)
***
It's like playing tic tac toe when the other side gets the first three moves.
Oh, and on Drudge, another day, another Filner victim comes forward.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 08, 2013 11:48 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Dennis at August 08, 2013 11:48 AM (Mtpmh)
Posted by: rickb223 at August 08, 2013 11:48 AM (qc7at)
Posted by: no good deed at August 08, 2013 11:48 AM (WmLrU)
Posted by: steevy at August 08, 2013 11:48 AM (9XBK2)
Be ready for the onslaught of the morning thread Morons who will scream "you want PERFECTION and if we don't accept a few disagreements we'll have DEMOCRATS!! We need Republicans for some reason to promise one day to speak up about the damage done is what they'll say
You know what The Who song said ..
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 11:48 AM (/9IC1)
Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 11:48 AM (SmQqB)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 08, 2013 03:45 PM (UypUQ)
-
This, or the massive financial destruction that will hit next spring with the socialized medicine bill are the only two things that can stop the freight train. Even then, it might require violence to stop the twin headed evil in DC.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at August 08, 2013 11:48 AM (FZnrK)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars[/i][/b][/s] at August 08, 2013 11:48 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: runningrn at August 08, 2013 11:48 AM (PLOz8)
It's like a say about gerbils. Gerbils will always get out of their cages because all they do is plot 14 hours per day how to get out of the cage.
You cannot control something that is plotting every waking hour to escape the cage.
The Republican Gerbils want this, they will never stop wanting it, they will never stop, period.
I'm of fighting with them. At some point, you just accept that the Gerbil wants to be free to be eaten by the cat.
Posted by: ace at August 08, 2013 11:49 AM (/IWYB)
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 03:48 PM
YAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH !!!!
Posted by: The Who at August 08, 2013 11:49 AM (/9IC1)
Posted by: georgeofthedesert at August 08, 2013 11:49 AM (Eq2MX)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 08, 2013 11:49 AM (2Tv3A)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 08, 2013 11:49 AM (ZshNr)
The Left's ambition in this country for decades has been a Soviet-style government with them in permanent charge of it. After all, it's what they've done in every other nation in history where they've gotten enough power.
The difference this time is that there won't be any free nations on the other side of the wall to show the inhabitants the truth behind their system.
200 years may be a minimum.
Posted by: TB at August 08, 2013 11:49 AM (5jZ/P)
I've got a balloon right here somewhere.
Mr. Rodriguez, por favor, can I have a balloon please?
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at August 08, 2013 11:50 AM (pgQxn)
Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 11:50 AM (SmQqB)
I think after 10 more years (2024), it will not matter, Our children and grandchildren will be well-mannered serfs on the Democrat "estates" (which sounds so much more European, and nice, than "plantations").
It took them 250 years to destroy this country, and it would take at least 100 years to recover it, and it is more than likely that it is not recoverable. There were too many unique aspects of our founding that cannot be repeated.
Posted by: Hrothgar at August 08, 2013 11:50 AM (XdnQT)
I'll continue to work to stop the shitweasels in DC from destroying what remains of this country. I owe our son that much.
Posted by: Oprah Sharpton Winfrey at August 08, 2013 11:50 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: acat at August 08, 2013 11:50 AM (4UkCP)
One of the reasons they want to let half the Third World vote here is to make the system less American.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at August 08, 2013 11:50 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at August 08, 2013 11:50 AM (qyfb5)
Meanwhile, cobloggers insult commenters who dare to suggest we don't agree with the R plan of sucking up to network television.
Posted by: BurtTC at August 08, 2013 11:50 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: @AuthorLMendez at August 08, 2013 11:50 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: RWC at August 08, 2013 11:51 AM (fWAjv)
I'm certain to regret this, but I have to ask: When did a pathway to citizenship become synonymous with amnesty?
Some have suggested a return to home country and application for a green card to be part of a pathway to citizenship. Is that amnesty?
Posted by: spongeworthy at August 08, 2013 11:51 AM (r5w1L)
And on a more positive note, remember it only took the original Republicans 6 years to go from upshot-third-party to having a tall ugly-ass-mofo sitting in the Oval Office.
Posted by: John Bradley at August 08, 2013 11:51 AM (zlEwG)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 08, 2013 11:51 AM (2Tv3A)
Posted by: Golden Boy at August 08, 2013 11:51 AM (ZAFzJ)
could you stop whining maybe about other people expressing their opinions?
what do you want me to do? Yell at them?
Posted by: ace at August 08, 2013 11:52 AM (/IWYB)
Posted by: Saint James at August 08, 2013 11:52 AM (C5V36)
Posted by: spongeworthy at August 08, 2013 03:51 PM (r5w1L)
That's deportation.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 08, 2013 11:52 AM (sGtp+)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 08, 2013 11:52 AM (+98Gb)
***
I'm not so sure. When the Whigs refused to confront the issues of the day, they died and, in 1854, a new party was created. Six years later they won the White House. And this without blogs, telephones, etc.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 08, 2013 11:52 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, fewer than 8 limbs at August 08, 2013 11:52 AM (zUi7I)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 08, 2013 11:53 AM (CzPap)
Yep. Make it clear for the history books that the GOP conspired with Statists of another party to bring down a nation.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at August 08, 2013 11:53 AM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: LauraC at August 08, 2013 11:53 AM (fXZDm)
Posted by: Vote Lord Humungus 2016 at August 08, 2013 11:53 AM (HEa5q)
It's what I've been saying for some time. The secret of retaining our freedoms and God-given rights is not through DC anymore. It's through local and state governments.
Here in OK, the question of nullification is being put on the front burner.
It's going to be up to the states now, where it should have been all along.
Posted by: Soona at August 08, 2013 11:53 AM (wtHgA)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 11:53 AM (Ttj5v)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 08, 2013 11:54 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: RWC at August 08, 2013 11:54 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Mark1971 at August 08, 2013 11:54 AM (Vjplh)
The American experiment lasted as long as it could. It is time for a new experiment, and that has to start with rebellion and revolution against those who seek to (and are succeeding at) destroying America.
From this experiment, we have learned that no matter what the original intent, all institutions/gov'ts will become more and more tyrannical.
So, we need to create a new system, with a new constitution with even more checks and balances on power, with even more limits on gov't power spelled out, with clearer language regarding things like "interstate commerce", "freedom of speech", "freedom of religion" and the right to bear arms.
It is time to feed the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants. It would have to start with small groups doing actual activity and grow into a bigger movement, but the time has arrived.
We have reached the point in the downward slope where the power accumulated to the federal gov't will accelerate at a geometric pace. Once Obamacare is in full swing, almost every aspect of life is controllable because it affects the cost of healthcare. We already see that in the name of "healthcare", religious rights can be trampled. It is only a matter of time before Churches are forced to perform gay marriages and provide abortions.
I don't have patriotism toward what America currently is. I care very little about the nation as it is currently formulated. I care about the America that was and was meant to be. But they are gone, never to return. Instead, we must move forward to create something new from the ashes of America that we create.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at August 08, 2013 11:54 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Taco Shack at August 08, 2013 11:55 AM (C+qQ0)
Admit it, you don't know anything about them. So we all vote 'party' hoping the party stands for something. We don't have time! So we trust the news, but do you read the local news? Who wants to read about zoning, or local budgets, or taxes, or the schools. Do you even know who you are voting for on the school board?
Judges? is to laugh. You get a hand out with a paragraph for a biography.
So now we're all dill pickles. We can't trust the party, we can't trust the news. We certainly can't trust the politicians. So what are we going to do?
It's an honest question.
Posted by: Reverend William Arcibald Spooner at August 08, 2013 11:55 AM (gRCR3)
Posted by: Dr Spank at August 08, 2013 11:55 AM (v1mq9)
Might still be some hope for Poland.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at August 08, 2013 11:55 AM (/kI1Q)
Has Marco and friends ever been asked about this issue?
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 08, 2013 11:55 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 11:55 AM (SmQqB)
Posted by: NAMEREDACTED at August 08, 2013 11:55 AM (HBi2h)
95 -
It's not defeatism, chum. There are people on this blog with the means and the methods to fight back. It just won't be at the ballot box. Good luck, you are definitely going to need it.
Posted by: BurtTC at August 08, 2013 11:55 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: ace at August 08, 2013 03:42 PM
Good on ya ace, now you're one of us ...
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 11:55 AM (/9IC1)
Posted by: ahem at August 08, 2013 11:56 AM (lKGzI)
Jumping into the shit bucket with both feet...
Has anyone here heard of ObamaCare? Want to know how a terrible piece of legislation like this got passed?
It's because they had a plan and we didn't.
We could have come up with a conservative healthcare plan that embraced individual responsibility and fiscal sense, but everyone was too busy fantasizing that everything was fine just the way it was. It wasn't.
Bitch, moan, jerk your knees, scream and yell, but that's the situation.
Now, the same thing is happening with immigration. We could put together a conservative plan that secures the borders, handles the people who are already here and follows all the principles and values everyone claims they uphold.
But no. We would rather demonize anyone on our side who attempts to craft a conservative alternative. All the "true conservatives" have their heads planted firmly up their asses pretending that the status quo is what we need.
We'll lose this battle too.
It's time to focus on discussing how to solve problems with conservative plans instead of just bitching about liberal plans.
Let the shit storm begin.
Posted by: jwest at August 08, 2013 11:56 AM (u2a4R)
Obviously Webster, Schock and McCarthy enjoy the cut and thrust of Republican primaries. Wouldn't want to disappoint them.
Posted by: Dirks Strewn at August 08, 2013 11:56 AM (VLifP)
Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 03:50 PM (SmQqB)
You are pond scum. Absolute pond scum. And nothing will ever change that.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 08, 2013 11:56 AM (Hx5uv)
You're not landing on your feet. You're not rebuilding.
Hell, even the people who spent sixty years planning to be the ones who get to rebuild won't be the ones to rebuild.
It will be the most ruthless thug. And then another, and another. We had an *incredibly* exceptional revolution, they don't usually go like that.
----------------------
And with your support, I will BE that thug.
Join my Death's Head Legions today and take your place by my side as we wrest the canned goods and blond wimmen that are rightfully ours from the grubby, lifeless fingers of the pitiful, ragtag defenders of Salina, Kansas.
Seniors! Reject the false promises of Social Security and join my Grey Expendables Sapper Brigade. End your golden years with dignity and honor clearing the minefields and wire obstacles for a path to a better tomorrow! For the rest of us.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 11:56 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 08, 2013 11:56 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 08, 2013 11:57 AM (+98Gb)
I want to see the expression on its face.
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at August 08, 2013 11:57 AM (pgQxn)
As hard as you can.
When this amnesty floods the workplace and Blacks are unemployed to the tune of 80%, let's make sure the fingerprints on Amnesty are all Democrats.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Ecclesiates 9:11) at August 08, 2013 11:57 AM (28TG+)
Posted by: I Be That Chick On Her iPad at August 08, 2013 11:57 AM (hgT3V)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at August 08, 2013 11:57 AM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 08, 2013 03:53 PM (CzPap)
Why are you linking spiders? Did one of your cats take over your laptop?
Oddly, I can think of no cute anime spiders. Roaches, sure (/shudder), but not a spider ...
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 08, 2013 11:57 AM (v3pYe)
Posted by: Andrew at August 08, 2013 11:57 AM (HS3dy)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 03:53 PM (Ttj5v)
A new party will accomplish nothing. Change can only come about by overturning everything entirely and supplanting it with something new. The state has become too large to change now. Liberals and the courts have mostly eviscerated the constitution - to the point where it is almost a meaningless document. The best a new party can do is slow down the disease. It could never cure it.
To cure the disease you have to destroy the host and create something new.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at August 08, 2013 11:57 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: AmishDude at August 08, 2013 11:58 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: tasker at August 08, 2013 11:58 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Vote Lord Humungus 2016 at August 08, 2013 11:58 AM (HEa5q)
Don't dispair...Oh well then there's this!
http://tinyurl.com/muhxhms
Plus Sarah Palin is running for Senate as well as Allen West is a maybe for the same in FL
Posted by: sonnyspats at August 08, 2013 11:59 AM (N3Al8)
It mist suck seeing Many Republicans are not bigots. People like you have been a poison for the Republican Party. Your defeat is imminent and America will breath a sigh of relief. Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 03:55 PM
In Detroit that's called "agonal breathing"
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 11:59 AM (/9IC1)
Great closing. The parties forever fight against the legal citizen/taxpayer in a rigged game. Fine. This isn't my living as it is yours, political hacks. In the design you were supposed to represent my interests. You don't. You get paid to scheme, to steal, to insulate. I simply cannot compete with that. So, I'll have to move to an arena where I can. In the interim, welcome to the sh*thole. You guys want it, it's coming. And you and your heirs won't escape it much as you think you will.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at August 08, 2013 11:59 AM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: The Political Hat at August 08, 2013 11:59 AM (Vk2pI)
But it really will not make much difference. With Nancy Boy (Thank you Nancy Mace) and McShitty stabbing us in the back and siding with one of the most liberal Senators in office it is the same thing.
I will vote in the primaries to try and get rid of Nancy Boy but is he is not ousted in the primary I will not vote in the general election.
They have stabbed me for the last time.
Posted by: Vic at August 08, 2013 11:59 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Ben at August 08, 2013 11:59 AM (rYSAQ)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 08, 2013 11:59 AM (9Xc5j)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at August 08, 2013 11:59 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Eton Cox at August 08, 2013 12:00 PM (q177U)
Posted by: Grouchos at August 08, 2013 12:00 PM (cm5Dy)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 12:00 PM (+NYjg)
110 -
I don't want you to do anything, Ace. I'm doing what I want to do. You let him post here, so maybe you should just live with the fact that some of us are going to give him both barrels when he acts up. Which he does. Essentially every day.
So don't worry about it. It's taken care of.
Posted by: BurtTC at August 08, 2013 12:00 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: AmishDude at August 08, 2013 12:00 PM (T0NGe)
But the Wall Street GOPers say immigration will save these programs!
Posted by: Michael Medved at August 08, 2013 12:01 PM (MkZzi)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at August 08, 2013 12:01 PM (qyfb5)
Without the NSA and FBI and ATF etc etc etc reading their e-mails and sending the IRS to harass their donors and shooting their dogs during no-knock raids.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at August 08, 2013 12:01 PM (/kI1Q)
I'll admit this kills me too.
What I hate is when they run saying they'll vote one way and then actually vote another.
if you want to be pro-amnesty, fine. Let voters know that before they pull the lever for you.
Posted by: Ben at August 08, 2013 12:01 PM (rYSAQ)
Oddly, I can think of no cute anime spiders.
---------------
Charlotte sent me a note stating that while she's not anime, she still dislikes your sentiments.
Posted by: junior at August 08, 2013 12:01 PM (UWFpX)
Posted by: The IRS at August 08, 2013 12:02 PM (+NYjg)
Posted by: Dirks Strewn at August 08, 2013 12:02 PM (VLifP)
Posted by: (T)expat - West Africa Time at August 08, 2013 12:02 PM (tr9Xj)
Posted by: Nuclear SUV at August 08, 2013 12:02 PM (rUB/V)
Posted by: tasker at August 08, 2013 12:02 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at August 08, 2013 12:02 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Buzzion at August 08, 2013 12:02 PM (UPHUJ)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at August 08, 2013 12:02 PM (QF8uk)
Posted by: Rickroll at August 08, 2013 12:02 PM (6VB4r)
It's tough to discover there are republicans who are not bigots like you. I have some tissue for the tears.
Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 12:03 PM (7/Z2O)
Posted by: Andy at August 08, 2013 12:03 PM (3qKxK)
I think our strategy was wrong. I have always said that the best deal we could get would to have a process to legalize those already here but deny them the ability to ever get citizenship. This would accomplish a few things. It would take away most of the demonization of the Republicans as hard hearted. It would be a plan those on the fence would support. It would eliminate the danger of a new democrat voting bloc and it would allow the shit head corps to keep their cheap labor.
We should have gone with the Bush plan eight years ago.
Posted by: polynikes at August 08, 2013 12:03 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Motorhead at August 08, 2013 12:03 PM (lHUyY)
McClellan never went golfing with Jeff Davis.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at August 08, 2013 12:03 PM (/kI1Q)
Good, good. Welcome to the dark side. Just don't wimp out on usin 1 or 3 years and rah rah for gotv efforts and the like.
We don't say let it burn because we appreciate the blaze, but because we've noticed the FD filling the water reservoirs with gasoline.
Posted by: Randy M at August 08, 2013 12:04 PM (vI8R6)
I'm don't get it either, but I am getting turned on by it.
Posted by: Richard Gere at August 08, 2013 12:04 PM (uYaYO)
--
My exact thought, as well. I only had a flicker of a hope the GOP would come to their senses and listen to us. They will not. And they will die as a party. And we will all be Detroit in 20 years, or less. And I say that not to be histrionic or over-the-top dramatic. It's just a fact. And it's so very plain to see. The country will descend into a morass of stinking leftism. Congrats, lefties, you're gonna get what you've wanted. And good night once-great America...my beautiful America.
Posted by: Lady in Black at August 08, 2013 12:04 PM (LFvB+)
Posted by: LauraC at August 08, 2013 12:04 PM (fXZDm)
If conservatives started voting in Dem primaries, the "thank God the GOP is dead" crowd would be sorry they got what they wished for
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 12:04 PM (/9IC1)
We'll lose this battle too.
It's time to focus on discussing how to solve problems with conservative plans instead of just bitching about liberal plans.
Let the shit storm begin.
Posted by: jwest at August 08, 2013 03:56 PM (u2a4R)
Anything other than blocking amnesty or very small-ball, token legislation is unrealistic. The Dems have control of enough of the Government that they can rewrite and negotiate anything conservatives pass to be pretty much what they wanted all along, 11 million new voters and all their overseas families.
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 08, 2013 12:04 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 08, 2013 12:05 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: AmishDude at August 08, 2013 12:05 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at August 08, 2013 12:05 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at August 08, 2013 12:05 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Monkeytoe at August 08, 2013 03:57 PM (sOx93)
That is not a cure.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 08, 2013 12:06 PM (sGtp+)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 12:06 PM (GQ8sn)
It'll suck when you end up having to pay for your own free shit. In the meantime, enjoy mom's basement and government freebies
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 12:06 PM (/9IC1)
Before we get too drastic, we should at least try an opposition party.
A real one, not one run by an orange-skinned lush coward.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 04:00 PM (+NYjg)
That will take decades to accomplish and by then, it'll be a completely socialist nation with an economy like Greece's. If it happens at all (it won't).
the vast majority of Americans are lemmings at best. Politicians, as a class, are going to always move left - it is far easier to win an election and/or win reelection promising people the world and passing "feel good" legislation than actually confronting problems and telling people the truth. So, even a third party is going to end up with politicians doing what the GOP politicians do.
No, we have to create a new constitution, which even more explicitly and more severely limits gov't power. that creates even more checks and balances, that provides even more specific individual rights and that spells out explicitly that gov't does not exist to take care of the individual from cradle to grave.
Anything else is just pissing in the wind at this point.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at August 08, 2013 12:06 PM (sOx93)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 12:06 PM (+NYjg)
For once, I agree with jwest.
The day after George Bush's immigration bill went down, Republicans should have been crafting their own damn bill. But since this has somehow become a new litmus test for how conservative you are, I guess too many of them were scared to even touch the issue - and the reactions here seem to prove them right. The people who beat back Bush's bill apparently think they can keep killing these bills forever. It's possible they are right, but I would not count on it.
It's irresponsible as a matter of policy for one party to have NO policy on the fate of 12 million people who are obviously not going anywhere.
Posted by: rockmom at August 08, 2013 12:06 PM (Q4elb)
Posted by: steevy at August 08, 2013 12:06 PM (9XBK2)
I don't see how our current dilemma is the fault of the GOP.
It's the fault of the American people. There are more Free Shitters than conservatives. You could run Ronald Reagan again and it wouldn't matter.
There Are More Of Them Than There Are Of Us. Even WITHOUT Amnesty.
That's the dead-simple equation that determines our future. We are in the decline of the American Empire, cursed with our own affluence. Shiftless fucking layabouts like our idiot cunt of a troll have been shielded from the consequences of their lack of responsibility for generations, and they will continue to be shielded all the way down to impact.
What's wrong with America is not reversible. The only unknowables right now are how long the collapse lasts and what comes out the other side.
Get bulletproof, provide for your family's future. Everything else is wasted effort.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 12:06 PM (CJjw5)
I didn't have kids because I saw 20 years ago what was in store. I'm of a firm belief that mankind has to go through a constant cycle of oppression, then a collapse, then a period of motherfuckers hanging from lamp posts, then a brief freedom, then an overpopulation of complacent dumb fucks to piss it all away. The cycle just starts again. The founders knew this. A republic if you can keep it they said, they knew mankind sucks and needs to learn the hard way time after time without fail.
Posted by: Berserker at August 08, 2013 12:06 PM (FMbng)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 03:56 PM (CJjw5)
Dibs on brunettes. I call dibs. Dibs.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile at August 08, 2013 04:01 PM (qyfb5)
I am amused by the utter lack of love for gingers. AtC?
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 08, 2013 12:07 PM (sGtp+)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 03:56 PM (CJjw5)
Dibs on brunettes. I call dibs. Dibs.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile at August 08, 2013 04:01 PM (qyfb5)
I'm in for the redheads
Posted by: The Jackhole at August 08, 2013 12:07 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Nuclear SUV at August 08, 2013 04:02 PM (rUB/V)
Ehhh... those are for old people.
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 08, 2013 12:07 PM (UypUQ)
This is just awesome and seeing Ace give up makes my day.
Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 12:07 PM (7/Z2O)
***
Delusions of adequacy.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 08, 2013 12:07 PM (Hx5uv)
--
And we now know it's because they want it, too. Suckers, us.
Posted by: Lady in Black at August 08, 2013 12:07 PM (LFvB+)
the basic premise is, no stupid overly complicated stuff, but the laws that are no brainers, especially in the criminal area like rape and murder, take off the stupid kid gloves and give the bad actors real punishment
I know its an overly simplistic message to start with, but everytime I talk to someone about my idea I find that their counter arguments tend to be pretty stupid and they have no response when I say "don't give a shit, if the guy doesn't want to wear a seatbelt he shouldn't be forced to, and if that means that the city cannot continue to pay 6 secretaries when they only need 1, those other 5 can find a job somewhere else"
Posted by: seaniep at August 08, 2013 12:07 PM (46rS/)
I wouldn't call the implementation of assorted socialist policies--Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, AFDC, on and on and on--" conservative." Not even compared to the Obama-Pelosi-Reid years.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at August 08, 2013 12:07 PM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Grouchos at August 08, 2013 12:07 PM (cm5Dy)
Posted by: sonnyspats at August 08, 2013 12:07 PM (N3Al8)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at August 08, 2013 12:08 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Dr Spank at August 08, 2013 12:08 PM (v1mq9)
Posted by: SpongeBob ReaverSaget at August 08, 2013 12:08 PM (epxV4)
Posted by: Dirks Strewn at August 08, 2013 12:08 PM (VLifP)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 08, 2013 12:08 PM (9Xc5j)
Posted by: The GOP at August 08, 2013 12:08 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 12:09 PM (GQ8sn)
By the way, for what it's worth, I'm way more optimistic that you (seem to be) about America's long-term prospects.
Posted by: sandy burger at August 08, 2013 12:09 PM (4dy3y)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 08, 2013 12:09 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 08, 2013 04:06 PM (sGtp+)[/]
it is in this case. The host is the gov't and our current laws. The problem is not "party" - it is human nature. It is human nature to cease more and more power. so, incumbents bring onto themselves more and more power that they shouldn't have. It is human nature to do what is easy. So incumbents pass feel good laws and ignore that pesky constitution. It is human nature to want what others have, so people seek to grab what you have.
The constitution was written to combat human nature. But, over time it has been corroded to the point of no longer working. Simply creating a third party will do nothing. Trying to change the GOP will do nothing.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at August 08, 2013 12:09 PM (sOx93)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 08, 2013 12:09 PM (9Xc5j)
Posted by: X at August 08, 2013 12:09 PM (KHo8t)
The plans aren't really that different - unserious border security claims and ammesty.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 04:06 PM (+NYjg)
Yes they are in addition to the increase in illegals in past eight years regardless of what the stats may claim.
Posted by: polynikes at August 08, 2013 12:10 PM (m2CN7)
***
Boehner's idea of a head fake.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 08, 2013 12:10 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Soona at August 08, 2013 12:10 PM (wtHgA)
That might make an interesting Open Thread: Why Not Secession?
Posted by: Guy in Texas at August 08, 2013 12:10 PM (AcmH4)
Posted by: The Political Hat at August 08, 2013 12:10 PM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 08, 2013 12:10 PM (9Xc5j)
Posted by: Dr Spank at August 08, 2013 03:55 PM (v1mq9)
Hey do my goat ! Ace isn't giving up he is staying true to his principles. Its the RINO's in DC who sold out and left their principles back home.
Posted by: sonnyspats at August 08, 2013 12:10 PM (N3Al8)
You are a voice of sanity and I realize there are more Republicans like you. Hopefully the bigot brigade will take their marbles and go home. Reasonable Republicans can take back their party and I can have a choice other than Commie Democrats to vote for.
I wish your faction well.
Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 12:10 PM (7/Z2O)
I can't understand how, when poll after poll says Americans don't want an immigration bill now, the republicans think this is the most important thing of the year. You have to wonder if there isn't a two party system anymore and the constituency is the last to know. Or, who is telling the republicans they need to do that? Maybe lobbyists and democratic strategists in republican garb.
Posted by: caustic at August 08, 2013 12:10 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: Movie quotes for 100 at August 08, 2013 12:11 PM (d3X9n)
Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards at August 08, 2013 12:11 PM (3Znbm)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 08, 2013 12:11 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at August 08, 2013 12:11 PM (TbVAj)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at August 08, 2013 12:11 PM (QF8uk)
Here. it's the taxpayer and legal resident that takes it on the chin.
It's the drones, welfare cheats and illegals who are in the driver's seat.
Just the other day, a Haitian welfare queen driving a 2006 Cadillac was pulled over after hitting a truck. She was drunk, and had ten prior suspensions of her license. She repeatedly called the arresting cops, bragged that she was on welfare, had three EBT cards in her possession, and threatened to put a voodoo curse on the arresting officers.
It's all here. and it's the wave of the future.
http://tinyurl.com/m9xjyc9
See if you can read it w/o going into an Incredible Hulk transformation and heading for The Projects.
Posted by: Cheese Louise at August 08, 2013 12:11 PM (OxC+n)
Posted by: Dr Spank at August 08, 2013 12:11 PM (v1mq9)
Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 03:48 PM
Enjoy the Obamatopia that today is Detroit and will be the entire country for a sky of tomorrows.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 08, 2013 12:12 PM (Hx5uv)
I knew this was coming, I knew there was nothing to stop it.
Gosh, I wonder if amnesty will pass by a narrow margin at the last minute? So close that, if we had just given a bit more money to the Republicans, we might have won?
It's just like slot machines always giving you two winning reels out of three, or a lottery ticket that always happens to get three matching numbers out of six. Design the game so the suckers think they almost won, so they'll play some more.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 08, 2013 12:12 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Buzzion at August 08, 2013 12:12 PM (N2D9o)
Posted by: JQP at August 08, 2013 12:12 PM (U4GjV)
Posted by: flashbazzbo, s.e. at August 08, 2013 12:12 PM (i0rVe)
And then there was Porkulus and ObamaCare. And there was no opposition.
It was not so much the passage of the actual legislation that demoralized me, that caused me to realize that there is no future in the Republican party. Legislation comes and goes.
What did it for me was the reasons the politicians gave. The lack of comprehension, the deceptions, the values being expressed, the sense of history and economics, the basic philosophy of government, and the utter contempt and vitriol they showed at conservatives, economic libertarians and the rest of the (secular) base.
I can't see where the GOP advocates a substantially different set of ethical principles than the Democrats.
If the GOP won't stand for economic liberty and the defense of the rights in property, then what good are they?
Posted by: Phinn at August 08, 2013 12:13 PM (oFH2D)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 08, 2013 12:13 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 08, 2013 12:13 PM (9Xc5j)
Posted by: AmishDude at August 08, 2013 12:13 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Grouchos at August 08, 2013 12:14 PM (cm5Dy)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 08, 2013 12:14 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Jersey Jim at August 08, 2013 12:14 PM (ESmik)
The drunk white trash redneck getting DUIs worry me more.
I am glad Ace has called it quits. Now sensible Republicans can take back their party and offer non bigoted Righties like me an alternative from voting Communist.
Victory over bigotry is at hand. The modern KKK is almost dead!
Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 12:14 PM (7/Z2O)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at August 08, 2013 12:14 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: steevy at August 08, 2013 12:14 PM (9XBK2)
Without the GOP, who would be the bad guys in an Aaron Sorkin movie?
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 12:15 PM (/9IC1)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 08, 2013 12:15 PM (+98Gb)
And when the collapse will truly begin.
And NO we're not there yet.
All it will take is the collapse of the world sovereign debt market due to one or more countries being unable to meet their obligations (could be us) OR the new Head of the Fed ignites uncertainty in the markets by mishandling the manipulation of interest rates and inflationary pressures.
It's like a very dry forest. You know it's a tinderbox but you don't know when it will go up in flames.
And all it takes is one spark at the hands of an idiot or a random unforeseen event.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Ecclesiates 9:11) at August 08, 2013 12:15 PM (28TG+)
Posted by: Y-not at August 08, 2013 12:15 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: rockmom at August 08, 2013 04:06 PM (Q4elb)
Straw man alert. they would leave if we enforced our laws. If we made it impossible for them to work, go to school, get entitlements, etc., they would self deport.
what you meant to say is - we don't want them to leave and we want to give them amnesty so we should give them amnesty.
Getting them to leave would be fairly easy. Just because they don't want to do it doesn't mean it would be hard. Sure, a small percentage would stay - they wouldn't all leave. But then it would be a manageable number.
Other straw man - we have to do something!!!! Why? They picked their current status voluntarily, and stay here because it is apparently better than where they came from. So, from their perspective they have it good right now. We don't owe them anything morally or legally - so why exactly do we have to have a policy on their fate? Their fate is exactly what THEY CHOSE - to be here "in the shadows". They can live and die in the shadows just like they chose to. That is their fate.
It is exactly this kind of thinking that means we are doomed. You believe that we somehow owe other countries' citizens something. That it is America's responsibility to take care of them and give them things. Exactly how are you not a liberal?
Posted by: Monkeytoe at August 08, 2013 12:15 PM (sOx93)
Daniel Webster in Florida, Aaron Schock in Illinois — have expressed preliminary support
Forget those guys, Paul Ryan - VP candidate is all onboard.
As far as parties, I think there is an American Conservative Party that I will check out sometime when I am less disenchanted with the fed elections.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at August 08, 2013 12:15 PM (qM18f)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 08, 2013 12:15 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 08, 2013 12:15 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 08, 2013 12:16 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Grouchos at August 08, 2013 04:14 PM (cm5Dy)
A lot of people are thinking third party. The shredder is enjoying the republican party requests for money. For many Paul Ryan and Chris Christie's actions lately coupled with Romney's blabbering the other night were just the straws that broke the camel's back.
Posted by: caustic at August 08, 2013 12:16 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 08, 2013 12:16 PM (/Crba)
Posted by: Karusky at August 08, 2013 12:16 PM (ZOHwt)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 12:16 PM (IS2o0)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 08, 2013 12:16 PM (9Xc5j)
EC,
I'm executing my plan to secure my family's future. Hundreds of years ago, my ancestors executed their plan, by leaving their country for a better life and a secure future. Almost everyone here is descended from immigrants. Why is the notion of immigrating to make a better life so distasteful?
Incidentally, just got my Ontario Provincial Nomination Certificate in the mail yesterday. Next stop - permanent residency.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 12:16 PM (CJjw5)
It's all just guns and ammo now. Only a matter of time.
Posted by: Suppressed Flasher at August 08, 2013 03:45 PM (X+nFp)
Indeed.
Which reminds me, Grafs has primers in stock right now. Just bought a case of small pistol primers this morning. They also had CCI 41s in stock for 5.56mm reloading. Get 'em while they're in stock.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 08, 2013 12:16 PM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Winners always gloat at August 08, 2013 04:14 PM
So ergie, what do you consider "bigotry" that us evil right wingers say or do?
Your buddy Toure says "opposing tax hikes" is racism
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 12:17 PM (/9IC1)
Posted by: X at August 08, 2013 04:09 PM (KHo8t)
---------------------------------------------
We'd need a very large segment of the population educated on how the US government is Constitutionally set up and, to say the least, become interested in the political process.
Unfortunately, our education system has made sure that most of the voting age population is knowledgable about neither.
Posted by: Soona at August 08, 2013 12:17 PM (wtHgA)
Posted by: Infidel at August 08, 2013 12:17 PM (O/fK8)
had to be much more conservative due to the Old South being a Democrat
monopoly.
---
Ummmm .... no.
There has always been an element of Marxists on the left (see Wilson and Roosevelt)..... but by and large the party of Truman and Kennedy and to a degree LBJ are where Republicans are today.
I always laugh at libs that say Reagan couldnt be nominated today. The truth is that JFK with strong defense, tax cuts to stimulate the economy and American excellence would derided today as "extreme right wing positions" by our leftarded brethren.
Whats really changed is the surge of the Marxist wing of the Democrat Party, since the Clinton years, has seized the reins largely through the efforts of Mr Soros.
You REALLY want to have a chance at change..... you need to rip out the Hungarian Marxists influence at its roots.
Posted by: fixerupper at August 08, 2013 12:17 PM (nELVU)
Posted by: X at August 08, 2013 04:09 PM (KHo8t)
You know what that means? It means you go to the meetings, you show up, you are an outsider, a volunteer, an intern. You don't sit in on the strategy sessions. You don't make policy. You get assignments based on how well you carried out the last assignment. In order to gain credibility with the party leadership you have to win their approval. You work for them, and your (our, conservative) policies don't work to advance the party leadership.
If you want to gain influence with the GOP you have to think like a union organizer, or an outside special interest group. You have to show up at a GOP leadership meeting representing multiple millions of other voters who you have influence over. So look what happens to the GOP interest groups, the Family Research Council, or Focus on the Family or
http://preview.tinyurl.com/lr9asnz
Posted by: Reverend William Arcibald Spooner at August 08, 2013 12:17 PM (gRCR3)
If say 90% of Republicans in the House votes against Amnesty, is it really fair to dump the whole Party and go somewhere else? Maybe.
I will say though that if something resembling the Senate bill ends up passing, it won't matter, it will just be a slow motion burn for the next few decades. I just don't see some "perfect" form of government rising up, that's not usually how these things go in human history.
One point, these people that say "I knew the GOP was done when Romney was nominated", Romney was probably the most anti-illegal immigrant nominee the GOP has had in several generations.
Reagan actually passed a blanket amnesty, Dubya tried and failed, McCain was doing his best with Kennedy, etc. Romney was one of the few that actually took a pretty tough stand, vetoing the "DREAM" act in Massachusetts (unlike Perry) and calling for self-deportation.
Posted by: McAdams at August 08, 2013 12:18 PM (40nki)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 04:16 PM (CJjw5)
Punch a smug Canadian liberal for me. Or two. Or three.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 08, 2013 12:18 PM (sGtp+)
So I have retreated into a sort of philosophical take on it all. Politics isn't fun when you always lose and worse yet your team plays to lose, because secretly they have a great deal of affection for and allegiance to the other side.
There's no point plotting this move and that move; all moves are failures and result in the same dismal outcome. I don't know if it is an effective strategy to just retreat into the completely impractical/philosophical, but I do know I have no interest in playing a ludicrous game in which there is only one set of permissible moves and only one permitted outcome.
**********
This is where I'm at. It's where I've been since the 2012 election, although I don't necessarily attribute my bitterness JUST to Republicans but also, to an extent, the American voting public as a whole, because they're either too gullible or lazy to really make intelligent choices about the future of their country.
I used to be way more interested in politics. And I still am interested, obviously, because I still read a political blog like this daily, but I discuss it and debate it a lot less, really.
Because what's the point. The "right" always seems to lose, in part because the media and those who control education and entertainment are in collusion with the left, but also in part because the GOP doesn't really want to win (it would appear), and frankly, most Americans seem content to just go along with the ride as we keep speeding towards the cliff.
It's just endlessly depressing.
So might as well just sit back, as we slouch towards Gehenna, and wait for the inevitable crash.
Posted by: Vyce at August 08, 2013 12:18 PM (mqy6N)
I'll be checking it twice
When the shit hits the fan
Don't plan on me being nice
Santa LIB is coming to town...
Posted by: Santa Let it Burn at August 08, 2013 12:18 PM (n/0Nw)
Posted by: DC Zombie at August 08, 2013 12:18 PM (1U7Jo)
Posted by: Y-not at August 08, 2013 12:18 PM (5H6zj)
???
A) insulting us, or some of us, is a bad way to start a post
B) Hold what line? Do you understand what is going on here. If the House passes any Immigration bill at all, the Senate expects to co-opt it and run with their own?
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 08, 2013 04:16 PM (9Xc5j)
I think the Blaze has an audio of Michelle Bachman explaining why this is so important and how it will be corrupted in the Senate after the House passes it. She was of the opinion that the house should pass nothing. Obviously, during the golf game, Mr. Trump convinced Boehner that this was the best course of action.
Posted by: caustic at August 08, 2013 12:18 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: The Political Hat at August 08, 2013 12:19 PM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: tasker at August 08, 2013 12:20 PM (r2PLg)
I propose an alternative solution:
Vote against every incumbent, irrespective of party, irrespective of level of government, irrespective of office, for the next 4 to 5 election cycles.
The current political class must be purged. Voting against all incumbents is the only way to do it.
Posted by: allmenroder at August 08, 2013 12:20 PM (FBLQf)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at August 08, 2013 12:20 PM (09o/X)
I have gerbils (7 of them). They never escape. Just saying.
Posted by: SangreTheBold at August 08, 2013 12:20 PM (PIf8q)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 08, 2013 12:20 PM (9Xc5j)
I ignored dumb coworker, crazy coworker is on vacation, I have a new hot water heater, my internet is back and husband forgives my idiocy. It has been a much, much better day.
It's also amazing how wonderful a hot shower can be.
Posted by: DangerGirl, full of sweet rage at August 08, 2013 12:20 PM (GrtrJ)
Posted by: The Political Hat at August 08, 2013 04:19 PM (Vk2pI)
Step 1.) Burn it all down
Step 2.) ????
Step 3.) Socialist Utopia!
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at August 08, 2013 12:20 PM (oY6Yp)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 08, 2013 12:20 PM (+98Gb)
Go get laid, Ace.
August ain't over and you should know better than to broadcast the enemies propaganda. All you you're doing is getting everybody down.
Time enough for this "woe is me" bullshit after after we actually lose.
Posted by: RayJ at August 08, 2013 12:20 PM (pI/IV)
I have a policy for the 11 or 12 million illegals.
Posted by: steevy
Have you got one for 60 million? Becasue that's what we actually need:
The number of people in the United States who speak a language other than English at home has nearly tripled over the past three decades, far outpacing the overall population growth, U.S. data released on Tuesday showed.
Some 60.6 million people, or nearly one in five people in the United States aged 5 or older, spoke a language other than English at home in 2011, according to the report. That is up from 23 million in 1980, or almost one in 11.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 08, 2013 12:21 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Y-not at August 08, 2013 12:21 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: steevy at August 08, 2013 12:21 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 12:21 PM (IS2o0)
***
The establishment Republicans have been insulting us for decades but they take our votes for granted.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 08, 2013 12:21 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: The GOP at August 08, 2013 12:21 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Buzzion at August 08, 2013 04:12 PM (N2D9o)
Make that three.
Posted by: polynikes at August 08, 2013 12:21 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 08, 2013 12:22 PM (/Crba)
Even the House GOP whip, Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), announced support for legal status, although he stopped just short of supporting full citizenship.
Grumble, grumble, grumble. Shame he runs unopposed. The Democrats usually don't even bother to run anyone against him.
Posted by: Anachronda at August 08, 2013 12:22 PM (IrbU4)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 12:22 PM (GQ8sn)
When I've explained to people the gerbil point, I've called it "the naughty cat" principle, but it's the same idea. You're smarter than a cat, but if all the indoor cat thinks about is sneaking outside, eventually he will, because it's his sole purpose and you have other interests. Same for gerbils, and bastard politicians. You just have to have a system that minimizes the damage.
Posted by: Bud Norton at August 08, 2013 12:22 PM (6cOMd)
Posted by: Lauren at August 08, 2013 12:22 PM (ELdpj)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 08, 2013 12:23 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 08, 2013 12:23 PM (/Crba)
story.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 04:21 PM (IS2o0)
------------------------
Did it hit you "right there?"
***points to butt***
I keed, I keed!
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 12:23 PM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 08, 2013 12:24 PM (/Crba)
Posted by: caustic at August 08, 2013 12:24 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: TenthJustice at August 08, 2013 12:24 PM (qB8lN)
And I, for one, am looking forward to a choice between the Democrats and the PRI.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 08, 2013 12:24 PM (31Nrp)
Posted by: Buzzion at August 08, 2013 12:25 PM (N2D9o)
--
Hold what line? It's not us you need to be telling that to. It's Webster, Schock and McCarthy (and I'm sure others).
Posted by: Lady in Black at August 08, 2013 12:25 PM (LFvB+)
Posted by: Mallfly at August 08, 2013 12:25 PM (bJm7W)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at August 08, 2013 12:25 PM (9Bdcz)
We could watch the fires together, standing on the top deck of the Fallsview Casino and Resort.
Holding hands.
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 04:22 PM (GQ8sn)
------------------
Decent! It'd be like Sleepless In Seattle, but with two dudes!
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 12:25 PM (CJjw5)
Posted by: joncelli at August 08, 2013 12:25 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 12:25 PM (IS2o0)
Posted by: Grouchos at August 08, 2013 12:26 PM (cm5Dy)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at August 08, 2013 12:26 PM (QF8uk)
Haven't read anything, but though I should note I just put in an email to someone:
The Ace of Spades Style guide requires me to reply to the article: "Get your facts straight, but first you will blow me" Recognizing that such a response is suitable only for the depths of the internet that I live in, perhaps a better response
(Fear not, it was a friend of the horde.)
Posted by: tsrblke at August 08, 2013 12:26 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: The Political Hat at August 08, 2013 12:26 PM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at August 08, 2013 12:26 PM (09o/X)
Posted by: steevy at August 08, 2013 12:27 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Winner Ergie Always Faps at August 08, 2013 12:27 PM (/9IC1)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 08, 2013 12:27 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 12:27 PM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at August 08, 2013 12:27 PM (/kI1Q)
Boo-ya, Ace.
Posted by: Delores Kearns Goodwin at August 08, 2013 12:27 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 08, 2013 04:16 PM (/Crba)
------------------------------------------------
We steal them on the way out. One of the elements of succession that has worried me is access to communications, like satelites. But a guy knowledgable in the field told me that DC couldn't cut off satelite communications for some of us without cutting it off for everyone.
Other types of communication could be re-arrainged by going back to using towers and tall buildings. It worked very well for us once, it could work again. Plus, where does one think the prime technical people would want to live if there was a split? Also, hackers will become our friends.
Posted by: Soona at August 08, 2013 12:27 PM (wtHgA)
Posted by: DFCtomm at August 08, 2013 12:27 PM (/myZr)
Still waiting for someone to explain how it matters who's in the GOP when we have a majority Free Shitter voting populace.
DOOM.
It's not just for breakfast anymore.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 12:27 PM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Lauren at August 08, 2013 12:27 PM (ELdpj)
Fuck. Them.
Posted by: dananjcon at August 08, 2013 12:28 PM (jvd3N)
Posted by: steevy at August 08, 2013 12:28 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 08, 2013 12:28 PM (2Tv3A)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 08, 2013 12:28 PM (9Xc5j)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at August 08, 2013 12:29 PM (QF8uk)
Nevada, Delaware, Colorado, Missouri, Wisconsin, and Indiana.
***
Yeah, betraying the base is always a smart move.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 08, 2013 12:29 PM (Hx5uv)
#267 - you're nuts. They are in the underground all-cash economy, just like millions of American citizens that our government also doesn't know exist. As long as people need day laborers and nannies and people to pick up the trash and get the weeds out of their yards, these people are going to stay. You can't build an immigration enforcement force big enough to bust every Tom, Dick, and Harriet who wants to save a few bucks - and get good work done fast - by getting a bunch of illegals to do it. It would take 2X the entire fucking National Guard. This notion of self-deportation is just ignorant of the reality of what has been going on in this country for the last 25 years.
As long as it is possible to fake a Social Security card, they are going to stay. Please tell me how you stop people from faking Social Security cards.
Democrats are desperate to make all these people legal, primarily to get them paying into Social Security and paper over the impending bankruptcy of the SS fund. Liberal policies over the last 50 years have made sure we otherwise will not have enough people working to support the massive numbers of Baby Boomers when we all retire. They can't raise the payroll tax any higher and they won't cut benefits or significantly raise the retirement age.
Posted by: rockmom at August 08, 2013 12:29 PM (NYnoe)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 12:29 PM (GQ8sn)
Meh. I'm just not sure that even matters anymore. Popping a can of sunshine on anyone is a media nightmare anymore. Hell, look at the Hiroshima threads from yesterday.
Besides...Pantex.
Long Live Texiana! Gig 'em!
Posted by: Jaws at August 08, 2013 12:30 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at August 08, 2013 12:30 PM (QF8uk)
The way to handle the multiple situations we have is to put together a new Contract With America. In it, we can have our healthcare plan, immigration plan, gun control, tax plan and whatever else we want.
We school the incumbents and the potential candidates so that they can speak intellegently on the plans and make the 2014 midterms a real cause.
Everyone hates Obamacare. No one but the craziest of liberals wants to give citizenship to illegals. Everyone agrees that criminals and crazies shouldn't have guns (but everyone else should). Everyone but the same liberals agree we can't have the highest corporate taxes in the world.
This is all obvious stuff that 75% of the country agrees on without any conversation.
2014 could be a transforming sweep election that sets the direction of the country for a generation.
All we need is a fucking plan.
Posted by: jwest at August 08, 2013 12:30 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 12:30 PM (IS2o0)
328 -
Nobody's ideas lost Missouri, genius. Nominating a nincompoop did.
YOUR nincompoop. Not the Tea Party's, not conservatives'. Yours.
Posted by: BurtTC at August 08, 2013 12:30 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: tasker at August 08, 2013 12:30 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 04:27 PM (CJjw5)
Yup. Free shit is hard to beat and anything negative gets blamed on the Republicans. Last month, 69% in a Gallup survey still blame Bush for this economy.
Posted by: CDR M at August 08, 2013 12:30 PM (y67bA)
--
I prefer the forewarning. That way, when the woe comes, I can buy a new top and fix my hair. For the occasion, of course.
Posted by: Lady in Black at August 08, 2013 12:30 PM (LFvB+)
They should change the name of the Washington Redskins to one of the three I have chosen,
1) Washington Pilgrims
2) Washington Pioneers
3) Washington Militia
I personally like number 3, but number 2 is a good compromise. It gives the American Indian Tribes what they want, to be erased from history and popular culture.
Posted by: No There There at August 08, 2013 12:30 PM (rCS6C)
Posted by: LauraC at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (fXZDm)
There's a reason every religious freak starts babbling about the "burning times' when they go crazy. It's so common, it's a cliche.
But it's not real. And you aren't being wise or profound when you mistake fantasies from books for the real world.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 08, 2013 04:27 PM (ZPrif)
-------------------------------
That's the kind of talk that gets you strapped to the front bumper of The Humungous' machine.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (CJjw5)
Posted by: The Political Hat at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (/9IC1)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Lauren at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (ELdpj)
Posted by: redguy at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (oqvI4)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (09o/X)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 08, 2013 04:27 PM (ZPrif)
Phew, that's a relief!
Posted by: Civilians from Dresden and Tokyo at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (v3pYe)
When I first started reading this blog and commenting in '07, I was vigorously rallying against the presumptive nominee John McCain. This was bad for the GOP, I declared. Worse than Bush's compromises.
We got McCain (and Obama)...then Obamacare, with a complicit GOP refusing to filibuster...and the rest...
I remember watching McCain's convention acceptance speech and deciding that day I was done as a member of the GOP. Changed my affiliation to 'independent' the next day.
I was derided for being a "purist".
And again when I opposed Romney.
Decided to lurk because I grew tired of it.
Odd thing is, I'd have to be a member of the party for me to want it to be 'pure'. And seriously, what exactly is wrong with being a purist? Holding to the ideals and refusing to compromise the things this party once said it believed in?
Much as I like a lot of what the Libertarians stand for, I can't subscribe to their Pro Choice and Pro Legalization platforms.
I'll sign on to the Constitution Party when it's formed, and I don't care how small it is for the next few decades.
Romney was the last time I vote while holding my nose and then taking a shower.
I am pro-immigration. And I am STAUNCHLY anti-illegal-immigration. There's nothing racist about that. I don't want anyone, from any other country, coming to this country undocumented and not paying taxes. There is no other country that has this sizeable a population of undocumented immigrants.
No. Other. Country.
I'd say enforce the laws we have but no one wants to, not even the "Right".
So let it burn - not because I want it to - but because it's going to anyway.
Then rebuild.
Posted by: SGT. York at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (k4ehJ)
Posted by: steevy at August 08, 2013 04:28 PM (9XBK2)
Probably true but, knowing your opponent is very important. They should have had a triple back up and let them sabotage one tool and they would have had the remainder.
Plus, Corsi talked about how the left "frames" people. It sounded more like MSM imprisonment of ideas to me but essentially he felt rand paul had already been framed to make him ineligible for the presidency. The MSM and the dem party decide how they will "frame" you and for some reason, you can never recover. ie, o'donnel the witch. nuff said.
Posted by: caustic at August 08, 2013 12:31 PM (/b8+5)
Better yet, the way Ace is sneeringly contemptuous of what he calls the "abortion jihadists" when he is nothing more than a SHAMNESTY jihadist.
Hey, Ace, don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out. Have fun pissing your vote down your leg on a third party. The GOP doesn't need you, doesn't want you and would be better off without you.
Posted by: Fart at August 08, 2013 12:32 PM (2aB+q)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 12:33 PM (GQ8sn)
That's not the end of the world, as I'll either find a a job where insurance does cover it or save up and get the procedure done out of pocket if I have to, but I could just go the easy route and whine to Uncle Sugar about it or go on disability.
Honestly, always trying to be the responsible adult in society gets pretty damned tiresome after a while. At least I have my violent fantasies to keep me warm when it's cold outside.
Posted by: Lemmenkainen, Freelance Warlord at August 08, 2013 12:33 PM (ZWvOb)
Posted by: Y-not at August 08, 2013 12:33 PM (5H6zj)
People are being naive if they don't think this was precisely the plan. Just read the friggin book. The whole game plan is laid out very clearly.
Posted by: JackStraw at August 08, 2013 04:23 PM (g1DWB)
-----------------------------------------
You are correct, sir.
Posted by: Soona at August 08, 2013 12:33 PM (wtHgA)
Posted by: Mr. Slave at August 08, 2013 12:33 PM (Vk2pI)
REPEAL:
the 16th Amendment
the 17th Amendment
EXPAND:
the 22nd Amendment to include Congressional elections
DISSOLVE
Department of Education
Department of Energy
Housing and Urban Development
Health and Human Services
Homeland Security
Department of Labor
Department of Transportation
ADD:
Amendment to codify and clarify exact qualifications for all national offices
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at August 08, 2013 12:33 PM (/lWM8)
ideas cost us senate seats that we otherwise could have used to help
promote conservatism in the senate.
---
So .... the plan is to elect people who really dont believe in conservatism so that we can promote conservatism in the Senate.
o_O
Posted by: fixerupper at August 08, 2013 12:34 PM (nELVU)
All we need is a fucking plan.
Since when is stocking up on Macallans not a plan?
Posted by: John Boehner at August 08, 2013 12:34 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Guy from Hiroshima at August 08, 2013 12:34 PM (sGtp+)
Posted by: rickb223 at August 08, 2013 12:34 PM (qc7at)
You can take Indiana off that list...Lugar loved him some fucking amnesty when he was in office.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at August 08, 2013 12:34 PM (/kI1Q)
I'm sure not one-tenth of those people will show up, but just the thought of it makes the GOP pee in their pants and cave.
I'm done too. I've been an Independent for years and will stay that way. I will not give any more money for presidential candidates who have a chance to win but throw it away. I will save it in my mattress for the bad days to come.
LIB.
Posted by: PJ at August 08, 2013 12:35 PM (ZWaLo)
There are some Visigoths at the Northern Gates who would like a word with you.
Posted by: SGT. York at August 08, 2013 12:35 PM (k4ehJ)
Don't worry ace. I know it hurts now, but when all the hope inside you dies, you'll feel a lot better.
I've been racking my head with an expansion of the Jeffersonian Tree of Liberty along with the men are not angels concept. I call it The Free Society Paradox. In a society where both ideologies of collectivism and individualism occur, governed by a representative government, the natural greediness for power of man will perturb the representative government. Within the caucus that supports collectivism that greediness for power aligns with collectivist goals of a more powerful governing body. Within the individualist caucus the greediness for power is at odds with the goals of individualism which is to weaken government influence. In this way the caucus for more powerful government will always be unified and the caucus for smaller government always divided. Within this framework where both ideologies share a fairly even representation in the population government is ensures a continual bias for more powerful government that eventually deprives the society of freedom. In short no free society which has both a representative government and accepts the concept of the philosophy of collectivism to be valid and socially acceptable will remain free. So paradoxically to remain free a society has to either not have representative government, OR certain types of philosophies have to be socially unacceptable to the point depriving those that hold them of participation, both of which are hallmarks of a society that isn't free. What I'm not quite sure of is whether randomly selecting your representatives instead of using popular manages this problem so long as collectivism is kept sufficiently small.
Oh and F*CK REPUBLICANS. I'm done. I'm ready for full Democrat control again. LET IT BURN.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Laughing Maniacally While Throwing Matches. at August 08, 2013 12:35 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Fart at August 08, 2013 04:32 PM (2aB+q)
Wow, you are a prime example of being totally unaware of what is going on in the real world around you. At least ace sees the world as it is, not as he'd want it to be. You talk as though you think the republican party is still viable. You'll see next election. The base, tea party sympathizers, won't come out unless they want to come out. And, youse guys can't win without the base, so good luck with that.
Posted by: caustic at August 08, 2013 12:35 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 08, 2013 12:35 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: steevy at August 08, 2013 12:35 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: McCool at August 08, 2013 12:35 PM (nCSwS)
Posted by: Arbalest at August 08, 2013 12:35 PM (FlRtG)
Posted by: Y-not at August 08, 2013 12:36 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Grouchos at August 08, 2013 12:36 PM (cm5Dy)
Romney was probably the most anti-illegal immigrant nominee the GOP has had in several generations.
Posted by: McAdams
Yep. That's what I remember about the election, Romney, his voice trembling with barely suppressed rage, declaring that we are a nation of laws and that laws will be enforced -- including immigration. Out of the country and back of the line, he said.
But I've been cleaning the oven and it just might be the effects from the Easy-Off fumes.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 08, 2013 12:36 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: The Burning Hat at August 08, 2013 12:36 PM (Vk2pI)
Posted by: Fritz at August 08, 2013 12:36 PM (K7xnX)
Posted by: trickamsterdam at August 08, 2013 12:37 PM (qetj4)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at August 08, 2013 12:37 PM (qyfb5)
" Why are the numbers all messed up? Lots of references to comments by number that are clearly wrong. "
That's a glitch in the Matrix
Posted by: McCool at August 08, 2013 12:37 PM (nCSwS)
"After much thoughtful consideration brought upon by influential sports magazine Slate, we have decided to change our name. Henceforth, we shall be known as the Virginia Redskins."
Posted by: TenthJustice at August 08, 2013 12:37 PM (qB8lN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 08, 2013 12:37 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: SGT. York at August 08, 2013 04:35 PM (k4ehJ)
---
... as well as the little old 90 year old lady that survived a place called Buchenwald.
Posted by: fixerupper at August 08, 2013 12:37 PM (nELVU)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 12:38 PM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: EC at August 08, 2013 12:39 PM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at August 08, 2013 12:39 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: caustic at August 08, 2013 04:24 PM (/b8+5)
EoJ? Anyone?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 08, 2013 12:39 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, doom masochist at August 08, 2013 12:40 PM (YOZSv)
We citizens may be in an uproar, but the GOP is not about representing individual citizens. The GOP votes to benefit GOP economic interests. Big business in Agriculture, Hospitality, Manufacturing, Constructions, etc...
Here is the viewpoint on Amnesty of that set:
Cons: never win another election, ruin our county
Pros: cheap labor and big profits
Posted by: California Red at August 08, 2013 12:40 PM (aCD1U)
--
Yes, scraping up all the winos laying on every street corner helps. As does large buses full of non-English speaking Somalis.
Posted by: Lady in Black at August 08, 2013 12:40 PM (LFvB+)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at August 08, 2013 12:41 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: tasker at August 08, 2013 12:41 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: rockmom at August 08, 2013 12:41 PM (NYnoe)
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at August 08, 2013 12:42 PM (EdNLk)
Absolutely correct.
You know what's not in the plan? Rebuilding.
I looked into this. Alinsky never had a plan to rebuild other than some sort of vague anti-capitalist utopia, but didn't lay out details. All he had were plans on how to destroy.
At some point you have to realize the foundational beams of your ship are rotten and you need to burn it, then rebuild it.
Democrats/Leftists have never built a thing. All they've ever done is torn down either actively or via incompetence (Detroit). Hell, Obamacare is supposed to be a glorious step in the Left direction and they can't even implement it.
So it crashes.
They won't rebuild it. They don't have the skill, or the knowledge. We build the shelters and grow the food. They will turn to us. And we will rebuild it the way it should be built.
Posted by: SGT. York at August 08, 2013 12:42 PM (k4ehJ)
Once it burns, it's gone for good.
You will not rebuild. Your corpse will be what their Progressive utopia is build out ofÂ…
The flaw in your reasoning is that it's going to burn no matter what we do. So we need to stop using strategies designed for the "will not burn" path and start applying "will burn" strategies. The first and foremost is. We are getting weaker generation by generation not stronger, so the sooner the burning starts, the better odds we have in all areas that still contain uncertainty.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Laughing Maniacally While Throwing Matches. at August 08, 2013 12:42 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Caiwyn at August 08, 2013 12:43 PM (MmZIj)
Posted by: LauraC at August 08, 2013 12:44 PM (fXZDm)
Amnesty, something they CAN stop? Nope, we have to accept the "reality" of reaching out to people who love socialism and forgive corrupt thugs as long as the checks don't bounce
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 12:44 PM (/9IC1)
Mister Roberts will save us.
Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at August 08, 2013 12:45 PM (MkZzi)
There is no winning this fight politically now or in the near future. If we continue to do what we have done there will be no way to win it ever.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Laughing Maniacally While Throwing Matches. at August 08, 2013 12:46 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Lady in Black at August 08, 2013 04:40 PM (LFvB+)
82% turnout in Fairfax County, Virginia. Decided the election there for Obama. I'm convinced that a lot of them were bussed over from DC, but a hell of a lot of non-Mexican immigrants have landed in Fairfax over the last 10-15 years. Obama's campaign found every single one of them and got them to the polls. I have a friend who has been running his white-suburban precinct in Fairfax for 35 years, and he said he has never seen anything like it.
Posted by: rockmom at August 08, 2013 12:46 PM (Q4elb)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at August 08, 2013 12:46 PM (lbBsF)
I told NBC and CNN if they air the rectum licking movies about Hillary we'd take our bats and balls and go home, and swearsies, THIS time I REALLY MEAN IT !!!!
Posted by: Reince Priebus at August 08, 2013 12:46 PM (/9IC1)
As I just said, they won't, because they can't.
They cannot build anything. And when there is nothing, there will be nothing for them to rebuild.
See Detroit.
Posted by: SGT. York at August 08, 2013 12:47 PM (k4ehJ)
And so that happens today instead of in 20 years when no one will care anyways.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Laughing Maniacally While Throwing Matches. at August 08, 2013 12:47 PM (0q2P7)
Give us someone to show the fuck up for.
Posted by: SGT. York at August 08, 2013 12:48 PM (k4ehJ)
You want to win? The first step toward winning is to show the fuck up.
Posted by: Caiwyn at August 08, 2013 04:43 PM (MmZIj)
THIS. x10000
Posted by: rockmom at August 08, 2013 12:48 PM (NYnoe)
Posted by: Conservative Crank's iPhone at August 08, 2013 12:48 PM (tKDiO)
See Detroit.
What are the progressive house words?
"WE DO NOT BUILD!"
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Laughing Maniacally While Throwing Matches. at August 08, 2013 12:49 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: LauraC at August 08, 2013 12:49 PM (fXZDm)
Posted by: Arbalest at August 08, 2013 12:49 PM (FlRtG)
Yup. I was done with the game after all the budget cut drama where the deal they cut actually increased spending.
At this point, I hate the Democrats more than the GOP, but I respect them more. Those fuckers play to win. The weak-ass bitches on our side are happy to sit the bench on the JV squad.
Posted by: Warden at August 08, 2013 12:51 PM (HzhBE)
Why was it so difficult getting conservatives out the door to vote for John McCain ....
Posted by: Caiwyn
And so on....
For the Nth-millionth time, exit polling showed in 2008 and 2012 that conservatives dragged themselves out to vote Republican yet again, but libertarian and liberal "republicans" pulled the D lever yet again, because "Oooo those icky conservatives" or "hope change" or peer pressure or whatever daemons motivate them.
That's why the Republicans continue to do well in Red States like Texas and get stomped in Blue States like Pennsylvania over and over. As a moments reflection would indicate.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 08, 2013 12:51 PM (kdS6q)
Luckily, I have plans for healthcare, immigration, taxes, gun control and everything else.
So, we've got that going for us.
Posted by: jwest at August 08, 2013 12:51 PM (u2a4R)
Ace is saying "this time I'm kicking that bitch in the head"
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 12:52 PM (/9IC1)
Gee itÂ’s not like I didnÂ’t call out this being Schumer and likely the GOPÂ’s game when McCain and Graham-McCain and Mark the Rube started the ployÂ….
go ahead and owngoal the conference House GOPÂ…we gifted you the house in 2010 and I will happily give the hammer back to Pelosi in 2014Â…
if I wanted democrat policy IÂ’d vote democrat and if you give me democrat policy I will vote you into oblivion.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 08, 2013 12:52 PM (A4hKL)
Did it not occur to you that a couple of Republicans going home and saying they "support 'some' form of path to citizenship" falls short of agreeing to a bill - ANY bill, much less Schumer-Rubio? Or that politicians say things they have no intention of following through upon, just to pacify a few voters?
Of course, you could just slit your wrists today and avoid the rush. But then, if it turns out I'm right and it isn't The End of America, you will feel mighty foolish burning in hell and being shtupped in the arse by Ted Kennedy for all eternity over nothing, won'tcha?
Posted by: Adjoran at August 08, 2013 12:52 PM (473jB)
I think it had to do with the number of scalding showers it would took to make the feeling dirty go away. They weren't just bad, they were lessor versions of the same problem. LIB
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Laughing Maniacally While Throwing Matches. at August 08, 2013 12:53 PM (0q2P7)
The democrats are so incredibly weak. Without OFA and SCOAMFy that have are toast. And this is what so fucking hilarious. This GOP doesn't get that. This GOP doesn't get that the time to run through democrats is now.
Why did the IRS target the Tea Party? Because they were bored? no because the Tea Party is the biggest motherfucking threat ever.
Posted by: I didn't leave the GOP. They left me. at August 08, 2013 12:54 PM (qxcKC)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 08, 2013 12:54 PM (IS2o0)
Presidential elections are just gone. With amnesty, for a long, long time. LIVs rule on these. It's not so much that they are stupid but they don't feel the results of federal action for a long time after a bill or a reg has been passed. Who cares about HUD and their new discriminatory housing policy, or has even heard about it? But just wait till a Section 8 apt. building is put up next to their house. Then it's too late.
Posted by: PJ at August 08, 2013 12:54 PM (ZWaLo)
Small communities run by a strong man (note I don't say an intelligent or compassionate man)
Women's right go out the window
Militia will become synonymous with vigilante
We'll all learn what horse tastes like. And rat.
The only thousand points of light will be the fires upon which various heretics are burned (actual heretical beliefs will vary by location; check your local TV guide for scheduling and info)
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at August 08, 2013 12:54 PM (/lWM8)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at August 08, 2013 12:55 PM (Ec6wH)
Give us someone to show the fuck up for.
Posted by: SGT. York at August 08, 2013 04:48 PM (k4ehJ)
Romney was more than worth showing up for especially if you base it on the subject of this post. Someone pointed out earlier that he was the strongest candidate on illegal immigration and had the results to back that up. Instead we got more suppression of the Romney vote by a Mark Levin then we did by any deomcrat.
Posted by: polynikes at August 08, 2013 12:56 PM (m2CN7)
we tried changing the GOP instead the GOP changed into more donk lite in response...
hey GOP if you want to go full donkey I am voting for the fucking donkey
Posted by: sven10077 at August 08, 2013 12:56 PM (A4hKL)
America is different. It was built on a culture of from many into one. Immigrants and people of different cultures were welcomed but expected to become a part of the American culture and ethic.
That is the heart of this immigration debate despite the idiots who keep calling racism. This country is losing the spirit and ethic that made it America first. We are becoming a balkanized location of groups, all pulling in their own direction for their own little goals.
Look around. Look at the cities. Strip away the PC bullshit and look at what's happening all around us. This is the future the liberals are pushing on us. Not Tokyo, Detroit.
Posted by: JackStraw at August 08, 2013 04:35 PM (g1DWB)
I was thinking the same thing. Japan is a completely different culture. They had a tsunami fuck them up but good, and you didn't see mofo's walking down the street with flat screen TVs and pushing shopping carts of looted booze.
Europe on the other hand are mostly worthy pussies anyway, they still like tonging the bung of kings and tyrants, so to being a peasant for them isn't much different than anything they did for the last 1000 fucking years.
Posted by: Berserker at August 08, 2013 12:56 PM (FMbng)
The RNC has changed their rules to make it close to impossible to elect anyone who rocks the boat
Try bringing in a true small government candidate or a real conservative and they'll yank the funding and run to their MSM buddies to smear you in a way that would make a Chicago Democrat fap
Hubby will never change his ways until you pack your bags and leave the house
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 12:56 PM (/9IC1)
Posted by: rickb223 at August 08, 2013 12:56 PM (qc7at)
GOP = Government Ordained Progressives
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 12:56 PM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: The Mayans at August 08, 2013 12:58 PM (wtHgA)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at August 08, 2013 12:58 PM (Ec6wH)
They'll keep doing it as long as we keep coming back
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 12:59 PM (/9IC1)
Posted by: rickb223 at August 08, 2013 12:59 PM (qc7at)
Ever wonder why congressional pay raises need a vote to discontinue, but tax cuts require a vote to continue? The game is rigged to fall the way they want it.
Why are federal elected officials and thier staffs allowed to insider trade?
The hardest part of being in Congress is keeping from snickering at all you yokels that think your running something.
Its a fucking joke, when in all your life has government ever tried for less documentation or regulation, yet when it comes to voting, suddenly an ID is a bad thing? That doesnt maybe raise a red flag?
Your vote counts for nothing.
You think Democrats give a shit about Obamacare working? It was designed not to work, so that they would have to "reform" the system, at which time they can reform it to single payer, because we cant go back, because all the insurance companies will be out of business, and most the doctors quit.
The current amnesty bills were set in motion back in 1965 when Kennedy rammed thru Hart-Celler.
Conservatism, as practiced the last 30 years is dead
Posted by: Vikings fan at August 08, 2013 01:00 PM (drXjQ)
Posted by: Y-not at August 08, 2013 01:00 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Tracy Coyle at August 08, 2013 01:00 PM (pYeEs)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 08, 2013 04:16 PM (/Crba)"
There are a number of nuclear armed countries that would view a second nuclear armed country in North America as being in their interest since a united and strong United States has made them less able to achieve their national and international goals and a weakened United States is in their interest. The birth of greater Texas would probably involve close and initially dependent relationship with Russia, China, Iran or North Korea. Nice friends.
I suppose that there is a possibility of alliance with Israel if the Obama administration tilts farther in the direction that you know they want to go. From Israel's standpoint, they could expect a whole lot of people in the remainder of the United States to be making Aliyah in response to the sudden decline in popularity they would experience if Israel helped "Jesusland" to leave the union. Israel would obviously cease receiving the billion dollars worth of military equipment every year but considering that a lot of that equipment is manufactured in Fort Worth, maybe some kind of deal could be worked out.
With the United States diminished and facing a powerful and unfriendly rival on the same continent, the stabilizing influence that the US military plays around the world would come to an end. Russia would probably dominate Europe. China would move to dominate Asia and the Pacific, although Japan, Korea, Australia, Taiwan and possibly a few more small countries might assemble nuclear weapons overnight which would raise the stakes on any aggressive moves the Chinese might make.
Of course, negotiating with any of those countries for nukes would meet any definition of treason but that is what secession is so there is that.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 08, 2013 01:01 PM (31Nrp)
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
This.
Posted by: flaming_dildo at August 08, 2013 01:01 PM (26BCU)
Posted by: ginaswo at August 08, 2013 01:01 PM (iYVEB)
In fact, I might even vote for the Democrat nominee in certain cases.
Posted by: Strife
One advantage of living in a two top finishers open primary state is the final election can end up D vs D. So the temptation to vote R out of habit is removed.
Kinda like having one of those Breathalyzer ignition locks on your car.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 08, 2013 01:02 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Arcadehero at August 08, 2013 01:04 PM (27BfC)
Bullshit. Pure. Bullshit.
Precisely what's wrong with the GOP.
"Hey, this guy isn't what he actually is!"
Also Romneycare.
Seriously...
Posted by: SGT. York at August 08, 2013 01:05 PM (k4ehJ)
I'd say it is more like requiring a failed breathalyzer to start the car, but I digress...
Posted by: sven10077 at August 08, 2013 01:05 PM (A4hKL)
Posted by: Jen at August 08, 2013 01:06 PM (wh+9d)
Posted by: Rufus T. Firefly at August 08, 2013 01:06 PM (ymovd)
Posted by: GardenGnome at August 08, 2013 01:06 PM (/1Zl6)
Hey ALM, have a nice cup of GFYS you're about to win buddy be happy.
Your new and improved AMIGO GRANDE! GOP will never get another vote from me.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 08, 2013 01:07 PM (A4hKL)
I am so tired of bullshit about everything, every time, every where, and continually piling up.
NoBS. The only platform plank is 'we are sick of bullshit.'
Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 01:07 PM (i8c5b)
So thank you for the link and the web traffic and your adorable persistence in believing our "reporting" at face value. We only named a couple of Republicans, but that was enough to take it as serious as a heart attack. For good reason. Like Chuck Schumer, you will only get the truth from us. Swearsies.
Posted by: ABC News at August 08, 2013 01:08 PM (ptetZ)
469 If everyone caterwauling here would continue to work on their own representatives(and no kids, you won't always get your own way with them, they do represent everyone in your district, including the big donors and businesses), we could effect change.
Uh-huh. And how's that worked out for you so far on the national level?
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 01:09 PM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: qixlqatl at August 08, 2013 01:09 PM (oK/o2)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at August 08, 2013 01:09 PM (9Bdcz)
Posted by: Chop at August 08, 2013 01:11 PM (2GFY1)
471 So your abject surrender to amnesty is a great strategy. You idiots.
You fight and never let up. But you guys don't fight. You whine.
What boycotts have you started? None. They work yet you surrender.
You project weakness and don't try and even organize a fight.
I have no choice to fight. There is no where to go. I have children. You coward Ace.
Fight in the townhalls then fight the root of the problem: the media. Don't surrender!
Calm down there Francis. How exactly do you "fight" when your army is mainly controlled by a High Command of Benedict Arnold's?
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 01:11 PM (Ojgjr)
(Blame any translation errors on Microsoft):
No dejes que la puerta te golpee al salir. Creemos que La Raza para ser el futuro, y la manera de conseguir que La Raza es comprarlos con mierda gratis.
Posted by: Legacy GOP (or is that Republicanos Legados) at August 08, 2013 01:12 PM (o44nj)
Yup. I was done with the game after all the budget cut drama where the deal they cut actually increased spending.
At this point, I hate the Democrats more than the GOP, but I respect them more. Those fuckers play to win. The weak-ass bitches on our side are happy to sit the bench on the JV squad.
Posted by: Warden at August 08, 2013 04:51 PM (HzhBE)"
You know, recently I have been thinking the same thing about Putin. I mean he is an unscrupulous and evil motherfucker but at least he does not hate his own country.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at August 08, 2013 01:13 PM (31Nrp)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 08, 2013 01:14 PM (chqG9)
Posted by: Conservatronic at August 08, 2013 01:14 PM (ZgUuK)
ideas cost us senate seats that we otherwise could have used to help
promote conservatism in the senate.
Nevada, Delaware, Colorado, Missouri, Wisconsin, and Indiana.>>
Yeah, that Senator Heller's working out real good on immigration, isn't he?
Posted by: SGT. York at August 08, 2013 01:15 PM (k4ehJ)
Posted by: Caiwyn at August 08, 2013 01:15 PM (MmZIj)
Posted by: gracepmc at August 08, 2013 01:17 PM (rznx3)
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
We'll likely never see a Republican Prez nominee who is not an open borders cultist. No matter what they say before gaining the office. The big money Republican donors close their wallets to anyone who opposes "cheap" labor.
It's kinda funny and backwards. The Republicans say about the conservative base: "Where else they gonna go?". They should start thinking that about the Chambers of Commerce. Let's feed those assholes to the Democrats and see how long they have any financial interests to pursue.
Posted by: Rufus T. Firefly at August 08, 2013 01:17 PM (ymovd)
I was ahead of the curve on the "why not Putin?" train....
I am on the first day of a path to a likely 1500 hotel bill....
ever upward.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 08, 2013 01:17 PM (A4hKL)
Welcome to the non-Party pal, only about ---- years too late.
The GOP leadership is not only useless from a limited/constitutional government standpoint, it is your enemy. The good cop to the Democrat's bad cop.
And it's the same on foreign policy as well. They are the small p progs, doing the dirty work for the big P progs, and not even getting the good press in doing so. Same policies, just presented in different ways for different audiences, but all (mostly) in on the overall con.
Posted by: MlR at August 08, 2013 01:18 PM (BEuE2)
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 05:11 PM (Ojgjr)
----
Is that actually an honest question and are you actually interested in some ideas?
Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 01:18 PM (i8c5b)
Posted by: trickamsterdam at August 08, 2013 01:19 PM (9hekj)
Posted by: rrpjr at August 08, 2013 01:19 PM (Ss9Kn)
"Is that actually an honest question and are you actually interested in some ideas?"
Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 05:18 PM (i8c5b)
Oh I'm interested in "ideas". Conservative ideas. The GOP however is not. And never will be again.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 01:22 PM (Ojgjr)
So quit. Step aside,if you no longer wish to continue.
I'll bear you no ill will, and will welcome you at the victory.
But know this, they will have to kill me before I stop fighting for my country.
I can only keep on with my effort here, locally--at the GRASSROOTS--where the meaningful change must begin.
Enough of our effort will make the crucial difference.
Don't have the pretty words to say to make my point here, but no letting it burn, that is quitting--can't be doing that.
Not going to post further on this, simply will do as I have before.
Posted by: irongrampa at August 08, 2013 01:23 PM (SAMxH)
Posted by: Rufus T. Firefly at August 08, 2013 01:23 PM (ymovd)
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 01:24 PM (Ojgjr)
GOP(Lucy) to Charlie Brown(Voter) - "Go ahead Charlie Brown, I promise I'll hold the football for real THIS time. I totes swearsies!"
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 05:24 PM (Ojgjr)
ReWrite™ to put it in the modern vernacular.
Posted by: Legacy GOP (or is that Republicanos Legados) at August 08, 2013 01:26 PM (o44nj)
You're missing the point.
Posted by: Caiwyn
And you are intentionally glossing over it.
At the end of the days, who has the most votes wins. Conservatives have, until now, pretty much held their nose and voted R no matter what our minds and hearts tell us, while the more moderate part of the party always seems to nuance themselves to vote D because drugs or gay marriage or "think about the children" or what have you.
We tried moderation. We're tried reaching across the aisle.
It does not work.
And the continued embrace of these policies will simply chase away the voters the Rs have managed to hold.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 08, 2013 01:26 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: rrpjr at August 08, 2013 01:26 PM (Ss9Kn)
494
So quit. Step aside,if you no longer wish to continue.
I'll bear you no ill will, and will welcome you at the victory.
Um.... it's the conservative BASE that is leaving here.
Good luck with those Moderate (i.e. Liberal) "victories" you're about to get.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 01:28 PM (Ojgjr)
Ace,
I think it's kind of a dick move to put your response to me up in the main post without including at least the gist of my comment that prompted your response. My comment was calling you out for falling for the MSM bullshit on this. Your response didn't really address that.
Just sayin'. Your blog, you can do what you want.
Posted by: rockmom who comes in peace at August 08, 2013 01:28 PM (qE3AR)
Awesome news from the Foreign Policy website...
Ogabe has decided what America needs is thousands more Syrians...
Go Donkey!
You fucking asshole GOPers you enable this shit with your weakness you c**ts.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 08, 2013 01:28 PM (A4hKL)
The GOP had the White House and the Congress from 2002 to 2006 and did fuck all with it. If the Republicans want turn out they need to perform and give people something to turn out for.
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at August 08, 2013 01:29 PM (E3gqr)
Yeah yeah we get it IG....
WINNING! now with 95% more democrat like policy is "WINNING!"
I'd prefer a split after the mules destroy what's left.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 08, 2013 01:30 PM (A4hKL)
Posted by: MTF at August 08, 2013 01:32 PM (ZuiHO)
Anybody see a problem with the overt implied suppositions of that charming little phrase?
Anybody recognize the smelly legislative and Party platform results of that charming little phrase?
*spits* Yeah. Burn the fucking Party down already.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 01:35 PM (Ojgjr)
Look a few of us called this the minute the McCain gang passed AMIGO GRANDE! with the donk ass mofos...
the GOP at large thinks they are going to pass a "tough" house bill then go owngoal conference and placate the base with "gosh we tried but look Reid is a tough guy!"
Time to shut the fuck up and call them on it.
They fuck my working poor and lower middle class relatives, I'll turn fucking the GOP moderates into my hobby.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 08, 2013 01:35 PM (A4hKL)
"Don't have the pretty words to say to make my point here, but no letting it burn, that is quitting--can't be doing that."
By "Let It Burn", we don't mean quit.
We mean let the bastards suffer the consequences of there own stupidity but minimize your own exposure to the same.
Maybe they'll learn
Or maybe they'll just die.
Just don't let them drag you down with them.
Posted by: RayJ at August 08, 2013 01:38 PM (pI/IV)
Posted by: Darkdrake at August 08, 2013 01:39 PM (ShXPn)
The Republicans keep disappointing the base. They think because republicans in the end always do the right thing, that the base will be there after they've cheated and had their night on the town, cause the base is always there. I think the tide is changing. I think people are no longer willing to be there after they've been disrespected. I think the RINO's and perhaps other republicans who are disappointing will have a rude awakening this next election unless they dramatically turn around which, is unlikely as we, the little folks, the voters don't seem to matter as much as the corporations and the lobbyists and he money folks.
Posted by: caustic at August 08, 2013 01:42 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: NoMoreMrNiceGuy at August 08, 2013 01:47 PM (QZ94q)
The Republican Party is based on Payola.
Ideologues can BUY Republicans.
Here Endeth The Lesson kids.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 01:47 PM (Ojgjr)
knew the GOP was dead when it borrowed a page from the Liberal Verbal Engineering Handbook under Karl (Turd Blossom) Rove and it introduced to the Party it's new perfume scented turd called "Compassionate Conservatism"
Anybody see a problem with the overt implied suppositions of that charming little phrase?
Anybody recognize the smelly legislative and Party platform results of that charming little phrase?
*spits* Yeah. Burn the fucking Party down already.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 05:35 PM (Ojgjr)
Until Rush saw that the NextInLine™ principle had been extended to the offspring of former Presidents, he did. Then he tried to co-opt it and ended up being co-opted for the succeeding 13 years.
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 01:47 PM (o44nj)
"Is that actually an honest question and are you actually interested in some ideas?"
Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 05:18 PM (i8c5b)
Oh I'm interested in "ideas". Conservative ideas. The GOP however is not. And never will be again.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 05:22 PM (Ojgjr)
===
I was asking if you actually wanted ideas for how to go about changing things. I have no interest in measuring differing views of 'conservative' principles.
This situation can be changed, but it won't done by people sitting at home no matter how furiously they type.
Food for thought -- politicians are just people who see a parade and rush to the front to claim they started it. They are as manipulable as anyone.
Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 01:49 PM (i8c5b)
Posted by: qixlqatl at August 08, 2013 01:49 PM (oK/o2)
Its a couple of reps. Stop getting all emotional.
Presidents historically win re election if they win. It sucks, but we survived Wilson and got Coolidge. We survived FDR and got Eisenhower. We survived Carter and got RR. Hell we had Adams and got Jefferson.
Relax. Realise that politics is mostly a pendulem...as long as the other side fights. Dont give up the fight Ace.
For all the crying around here, when you look at the record Obama has gotten nothing major pass Congress since the 10 elections.
We win the Senate in 12, Obama is a lame duck. Historically parties do not win 3 prez elections in a row. So we should also take 16.
Just dont panic and keep on fighting.
Posted by: Stone at August 08, 2013 01:50 PM (Mv1O4)
Posted by: Matt at August 08, 2013 01:51 PM (RQxu7)
So the RINO strategy is to make the TENT BIGGER for...... more Liberal Democrap Purist policies?
And this is "WINNING"?
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 01:51 PM (Ojgjr)
I have to agree. After 2012 I asked tons of Obama voters why they voted for him.
No 1 reason without fail: "He's giving us free stuff."
Don't underestimate the power of the handout.
Posted by: Kim at August 08, 2013 01:53 PM (ICqvM)
515 "I was asking if you actually wanted ideas for how to go about changing things. I have no interest in measuring differing views of 'conservative' principles." - Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 05:49 PM (i8c5b)
Wait. What?
First you offer "ideas"
and then you qualify your "ideas" with
" I have no interest in measuring differing views of 'conservative' principles"
So..... your "ideas" consist of even more RINO policies that shit on Conservative principles.
Is that about it sunshine?
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 01:56 PM (Ojgjr)
Kind of the same pitch you'd get from a rigged poker game. As long as there are suckers who think they can win a game and believe it's totes honest if the con artists running the game let them win some hands, the con artists will keep telling the suckers "gotta be in it to win it"
Posted by: kbdabear at August 08, 2013 01:58 PM (/9IC1)
Posted by: Reggie 1971 at August 08, 2013 01:59 PM (3gbpx)
Hey, whoever socked Hugh Hewitt way up above, bravo! You perfectly captured his infuriating quasi-squishiness: he simply declares as "nutters" anyone who takes a reasonable - often unassailably correct and sensible - position on a major issue where the GOP is beclowning itself.
I recall exactly once, one glorious interlude, where Hewitt snapped out of his smarmy know-it-all establishment arrogance, and actually got pissed. Right after the 2010 Tea Party victory (GOP somewhere in there), when the House leadership completely screwed up the "showdown" with the WH on income tax rates (thereby allowing tons of vile nonsense to be done, incl. on the Senate side, including the end of DADT, another arms treaty with the Russians, etc.). All they had to do was stand tough - the WH had no cards, and the usually worthless Senate GOP had actually done something smart and stated they would not allow any other business until the fiscal/tax things were fixed.
For several days, Hewitt was sputtering with rage and saying exactly what any of us, or anyone with any experience and political/ Capitol Hill sense would say, about the ridiculous, disastrous fumble by the House GOP.
As I say, an interlude. Then back to more ass-kissing with vile cretins from the "press" like Crowley and worse. And even his actual area of expertise, the law, he barely uses. We are in a state of lawlessness, utter collapse of serious standards, in disparate areas from bankruptcy (GM and Chrysler bond-holders) to immigration to inter-branch balance (recess appointments, etc.) to the devolution of the DOJ into a weird race-baiting gang to the big constitutional issues (the SCOTUS has become a farce, its "rulings" literally risible and preposterous). But Hewitt barely touches on these. I get the feeling that many invested in the legal/judicial industry via work or education are complete prisoners of their social and self-regarding obligations and motivations - very few will acknowledge much less speak up on the the collapse of the legal system outside mundane business law and everyday criminal law.
Posted by: non-purist at August 08, 2013 01:59 PM (afQnV)
For party affiliation I corrected it to "Unknown".
For Membership Status I corrected it from Lapsed to "Abandoned".
For US Representative I corrected it from Pete Sessions to "None if Pete Sessions votes to Amnesty Illegals"
For Donation Amount I put "Other: Nothing"
Plus a note - Not one dime, not one vote until amnesty for illegal aliens is dead, dismembered, burned and buried.
I encourage everyone to do something similar. Maybe a few million voters threatening to leave the party will make a difference.
Why not be on the winning team if Republicans are just going to help deliver the Democrats' top priorities? Since I'm holding my nose in the voting booth every four years anyway I might as well go full retard.
Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at August 08, 2013 02:01 PM (6WVi+)
515 "Food for thought -- politicians are just people who see a parade and rush to the front to claim they started it. They are as manipulable as anyone.
Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 05:49 PM (i8c5b)
See. That's where you're wrong. Democraps are pure political ideologues first and foremost. Period. End of story. No Compromise. Now they'll "moderate" their views come election time IF their state leans Right. They have no problem lying like a whore in order to advance the Party ideology. The end always justifies the means. Because the public is a herb of moronic mouth breathing cattle (which they are).
However, once they are re-elected they instantly fall right back into lock-step synchronicity with the uber-left Party Platform. They get their minds right - or else.
And THAT my friend is how it truly "works".
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 02:03 PM (Ojgjr)
Gee. That's odd. Because we've been consistently LOSING even when we DO show up.
I don't think "win" means what you think it means.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 02:05 PM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: Sophie13 at August 08, 2013 02:11 PM (Gdjfb)
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 05:56 PM (Ojgjr)
===
I am clearly not making it past your assumptions about what I am writing.
This place often degenerates to constant bitching about how our representatives are not perfect. Well, they aren't. But they can be manipulated and they will grudgingly go along with the political tide. If the tide is big enough, they will switch to claiming they started it all and try to take all the credit from those that did.
So, everyone has some basic choices -- complain, shut up, or do the things that make politicians change how they vote. No one here needs any help with their ability to complain, and no one here is at all interested in shutting up. So, the only question left is: is anybody actually interested in ideas about getting politicians to change how they vote?
And, no, I am not talking about their principles. As far as I can tell they don't have any.
Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 02:12 PM (i8c5b)
On a related note, how many states got rid of their "millionaire" tax? Indeed, Wisconsin, which otherwise has proven rather resistant to the Occupy crowd and where the Pubbies ran in 2010 in no small part on repealing the hundred-thousandaire tax imposed by Jim "Craps" Doyle (WEAC/HoChunk-For Sale) and his fellow Rats in 2009, actually reinforced the hundred-thousandaire tax by keeping the entire bracket and lowering its rate by the smallest percentage-point amount.
Why is that? Why have the small-yet-violent Occupiers succeeded where the large-but-peaceful Tea Party failed? If your answer ends with "presstitute organ coverage", you're limiting yourself.
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 02:16 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: TC at August 08, 2013 02:18 PM (ygAxO)
531 "But they can be manipulated and they will grudgingly go along with the political tide. If the tide is big enough, they will switch to claiming they started it all and try to take all the credit from those that did." Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 06:12 PM (i8c5b)
Uhm.... why does that *ONLY* hold true for the Republican candidates and never ever ever the Dems?
Riddle me that.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 02:18 PM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 06:03 PM (Ojgjr)
===
forget it. anger gets me nowhere I don't need to add yours to mine.
Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 02:18 PM (i8c5b)
Posted by: Schaeffer at August 08, 2013 02:23 PM (rqazu)
forget it. anger gets me nowhere I don't need to add yours to mine.
Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 06:18 PM (i8c5b)
That's the problem - anger, especially when it manifests itself in defecation on cop cars, broken store windows, and assaults on one's class enemies, works.
Our problem - we don't have, and will never have, the protection of the local law-enforcing apparatus the Occupiers do.
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 02:25 PM (o44nj)
"forget it. anger gets me nowhere I don't need to add yours to mine."
Posted by: jc at August 08, 2013 06:18 PM (i8c5b)
So much for those "ideas" of yours ...eh.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 02:25 PM (Ojgjr)
What on Earth do they get out of this? I don't think they're stupid, just selfish and spineless. But Boehner will be gone as leader if this passes, at least a 100 House Republicans will have tough primaries even if they didn't go along (there will be a "throw all of them out" mantra) and there will likely be a real 3rd party challenge to dozens of seats. All of which will put the House within reach for Democrats next election, to say nothing of the long term consequences of legalizing 20 million new Democrats.
What again is the benefit of all of this for the GOP? A pat on the head from Joe Scarborough? A thousand dollar check from the local Chamber of Commerce?
No matter what your motivation, it's just stupid all the way around. I honestly can't figure it out, even if I was approaching it from a nihilistic perspective.
Posted by: McAdams at August 08, 2013 02:27 PM (40nki)
Posted by: Schaeffer at August 08, 2013 02:30 PM (rqazu)
nanosecond after amnesty passes, my association with the GOP will be no more. After that point, I think one idea might be for a lot of us to register as Democrats and do all we can to wreak havoc on their party.
This. We have to utterly extirpate the establishment GOP. Safe districts have to be rendered unsafe, and not just during primary season.
Posted by: Schaeffer at August 08, 2013 06:23 PM (rqazu)
Brilliant logic with one huge fatal flaw - if we couldn't keep any influence over the minority half of the bipartisan Party-In-Government, what makes you think we'll have any influence over the majority half of the PIG?
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 02:30 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: McAdams at August 08, 2013 06:27 PM (40nki)
It gives them total control over a minority party. They value total control of nothing over partial control over a ruling coalition because they will keep their perks and their DC cocktail party invites.
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 02:32 PM (o44nj)
541 "Brilliant logic with one huge fatal flaw - if we couldn't keep any influence over the minority half of the bipartisan Party-In-Government, what makes you think we'll have any influence over the majority half of the PIG?
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 06:30 PM (o44nj)
You're missing the point here. The goal is to relinquish any influence over the GOP and thereby shed any responsibility and undue blame for the predictable disastrous outcome. The fate of the Republican Party is complete. There is no saving it. Now is the time for Conservatives to separate themselves from the wreckage. And the only real separation comes from a truly Conservative Third Party identity.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 02:36 PM (Ojgjr)
That may be what ends up happening, but I honestly don't think their plan is to destroy the GOP and they'll be in charge of the scraps. That's sort of like saying I want to burn down my house so I can get control of the TV remote.
Posted by: McAdams at August 08, 2013 02:38 PM (40nki)
Ace Ace Ace Ace Ace:
America's obscene, de facto Open Boarders policy is just a byproduct of an obscenely huge federal government that mindlessly 'believes' that it can do anything and handle any problem.
More importantly, the game of winning elections to curtail a huge federal government was decided long, long ago.
I only finally realized that that game had long been over when Obamacare was passed into law. That event caused me to take a close look at the last 80 or so years of history and realize that the US federal government has only ever had one Leviathan trajectory.
Sure, I vote. Yes, I wanted Romney to win. And yes, I will continue to vote. But I haven't been under the illusion that elections might be able to solve America's gargantuan problems since Obamacare passed.
And it would make no difference even if the Republican party were behaving much better than it is and playing to win. We could have ten more Ted Cruz like figures and a majority in the Senate; fifty more in the House like him: and it would not make any difference in the long term trajectory.
There is only one solution to America's problems: a Constitutional Amendment that provides new mechanisms of checks and balances to limit the taxation power of the federal government.
Note that a balanced budget amendment won't do the trick because there is no enforcement mechanism. - It would just lead to endless blatant violations of the Constitution which in turn would only further weaken the Constitution.
Here is what has to happen:
Article 1 Section 8 must be severely revised (via amendment) to state that Uncle Sam does not have the plenary right to tax anything it wants anytime it wants for any reason it wants. If such an amendment were to also give the lion share of taxation power to State governments yet make those State governments accountable to the federal government: voila, we would have a new set of mutual checks and balances over taxpayers dollars. The balanced between the US government an all 50 State governments.
"You think the federal government will just stop taking our money because it's written down on paper in the Constitution that they habitually ignore? What would be the enforcement mechanism to stop them?" - one might ask.
You don't need one.
Once the Constitution plainly states that any US citizen (or business entity) residing within a State is only obligated to pay taxes to his State government and is no longer obligated to pay taxes to the federal government: all those citizens simply stop sending their money to the federal government.
"Okay then, well what would the enforcement mechanism be to make sure that each State government would pay its tax obligation to the federal government? What could the federal government do, arrest an entire State?" - one might also ask.
No, not the entire State. But the feds could certainly arrest any State government employee (like the treasurer) that obstructed or evaded tax collection.
What would be the motivation of a State employee (even a State's Governor) to not account for and give over the Constitutionally mandated taxes that a State owes the federal government?
So, yes, there would be massive federal intrusion into the accounting books of every State government. - That's the very notion of a whole new set of checks & balances.
Wouldn't we rather have the federal government probing into pockets of each State government rather than into our personal pockets?
To be sure: Under _current_ federal law, what would happen if Oregon's treasurer arranged for all state employees' paychecks to not have any federal taxes taken out and paid over to the federal government? Obviously, the same thing would happen if you or I refused to pay our federal taxes. The feds would come and arrest Oregon's treasurer and anyone who knowingly conspired with him to evade taxes.
So the enforcement mechanism that would ensure that each State paid its due taxes to the federal government is the very mechanism in place now.
Posted by: _Dave_ at August 08, 2013 02:39 PM (J+Q+d)
No, they are manipulating us.
The Party system is a game existing to operate in the furtherance of itself. It is populated by those who actually like governance because it offers the most spoils. The illusion being perpetuated is that voters really matter. Hypothetically, they do, but this is an industry that lives and dies to protect its turf. Incumbency is in the high 90% range. The institutions are not even bound by their own laws because they write their own exclusions. They protect and reinforce their bubbles. They trade votes and spoils to retain their power and are expert at concealing their acts and intent.
The State reigns supreme. The ratcheting moves ever forward as the Leviathan crushes individuals. It happens from the Executive. It happens in the Legislative. It happens in the Judicial. We win an occasional battle but the war is being lost and now by bigger margins.
We are playthings.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at August 08, 2013 02:40 PM (eHIJJ)
546 jc: "But they can be manipulated and they will grudgingly go along with the political tide."
No, they are manipulating us.
That is correct.
Politics ultimately bows to power. And the people can flex the greatest amount of power by destroying a corrupt established Party via the creation of a new Third party.
Rest assured - the New Party Leaders will get message for some time.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 02:43 PM (Ojgjr)
You're missing the point here. The goal is to relinquish any influence over the GOP and thereby shed any responsibility and undue blame for the predictable disastrous outcome. The fate of the Republican Party is complete. There is no saving it. Now is the time for Conservatives to separate themselves from the wreckage. And the only real separation comes from a truly Conservative Third Party identity.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 06:36 PM (Ojgjr)
While that is true, the attempt to fuck up the Rats by "joining them" is even more doomed than the Republicanos Legados.
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 02:48 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: qixlqatl at August 08, 2013 02:48 PM (oK/o2)
- Anyway, that would do the trick.
If the taxation powers of the federal government were to become truly limited, that would massively curtail the size and scope of the federal government.
I know it's hard to imagine how that would make the difference on the issue of open boarders immigration. But it would.
With less money to collect and spend, the federal government would be less busy-body and intrusive.
And it would also sharpen and narrow voters' focus on just what kind of issues the federal government should be handling: like sound immigration policy.
If the federal government were generally curtailed, it would have less to do. And more attention and scrutiny would be focused on the things it did do.
Posted by: _Dave_ at August 08, 2013 02:50 PM (J+Q+d)
That may be what ends up happening, but I honestly don't think their plan is to destroy the GOP and they'll be in charge of the scraps. That's sort of like saying I want to burn down my house so I can get control of the TV remote.
Posted by: McAdams at August 08, 2013 06:38 PM (40nki)
Since they're moving into the mother-in-law suite in the detached garage to gain control of the TV remote, they don't mind if the mansion burns down.
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 02:50 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: Jen at August 08, 2013 02:50 PM (wh+9d)
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 06:48 PM (o44nj)
If your enemy is attempting to commit suicide - don't stop him. And you might just sharpen his blade for him or give him a bigger gun.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 03:02 PM (Ojgjr)
Keep dreaming, John Boener or Nancy Pelosi control your Rep. as soon as they enter the beltway, and if they cant control them, they marginalize them.
Posted by: Vikings fan at August 08, 2013 03:09 PM (xhupI)
Posted by: Cakefinger at August 08, 2013 03:10 PM (OsCtd)
I'm with Ace although I think I really gave up when McCain started talking about the "casino culture" on Wall Street and got behind the bailout in 2008. I realized "what am I voting for other than to choose who will screw me over less" and even that wasn't assured. I voted in 2012 because I thought surely now everyone can see what a dead end this Obamanomics was but I underestimated the stupidity of the American people. Won't happen again.
Posted by: Big E at August 08, 2013 03:14 PM (Fr15L)
If your enemy is attempting to commit suicide - don't stop him. And you might just sharpen his blade for him or give him a bigger gun.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 07:02 PM (Ojgjr)
How, exactly, are you going to give the Rats, which are 100% opposed to you, a bigger gun/sharper blade when you have no influence in a smaller organization that is merely 80% opposed to you?
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 03:17 PM (o44nj)
The ultimate point of the Third Party is Conservative control of the leadership. No matter how many conservative representatives are elected to the GOP, a sizable number will always be peeled away and the power of the remaining will be neutered by the Establishment Power base.
Also, a Third Party will attract the remaining Conservative reps away from the GOP. The end results will be devastating to the GOP Party Establishment because it will remove all political cover for the RINOs since they will have no more neo-con "wacky birds" within the Party to blame for the predictable policy clustefarks that are already developing.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 03:17 PM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 07:17 PM (o44nj)
Influence by subtraction. The more Conservatives leave the Grand Old Progressives, the more liberal RINO's will fill the void. There will be little to no conservative "wacky bird" political cover for the RINOs to blame their failed policies on - especially when the Third Party is gaining momentum in opposition to the RINO's.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 03:21 PM (Ojgjr)
Influence by subtraction. The more Conservatives leave the Grand Old Progressives, the more liberal RINO's will fill the void. There will be little to no conservative "wacky bird" political cover for the RINOs to blame their failed policies on - especially when the Third Party is gaining momentum in opposition to the RINO's.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 07:21 PM (Ojgjr)
Which can be done without the suicide mission to the Rat Party. That was tried once, after the disintegration of the Federalist Party in 1816, and it took 16 years (and 8 after the corruption of the 1824 election) for an alternative to happen.
By contrast, when the Whig Party (said alternative) disintegrated, there was a nearly-ready-made alternative to the Rats (the GOP began in 1854, 2 years after the Whigs flamed out), and by 1861, the Rats were so far out of power they threw a Civil War.
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 03:28 PM (o44nj)
I've got a feeling a "Constitution Tea Party" that rose up would mainly be SoCon idiocy on steroids. Think Christine O'Donnell (who ran on a similar 3rd Party platform before getting the GOP nomination in Delaware) and you're probably there. I have no interest in that wing.
I'm more of a Libertarian conservative, but Libertarians largely support open borders, so they're out.
I like a lot of what Rand Paul is saying, but I don't like his father's Jane Fonda schtick (but I'm also sick of the super hawk bullshit the neocons are spouting)
What kind of Party do you make from this?
Posted by: McAdams at August 08, 2013 03:30 PM (40nki)
"By contrast, when the Whig Party (said alternative) disintegrated, there was a nearly-ready-made alternative to the Rats (the GOP began in 1854, 2 years after the Whigs flamed out), and by 1861, the Rats were so far out of power they threw a Civil War."
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 07:28 PM (o44nj)
Uh-huh. Thanks for the history lesson perfesser. Now show me the historical parallel for a Far-Left Socialist Party, their Demagogue Tyrant of a leader, and the opposition Party that basically enabled the Far-Left socialist by adopting the same policies under the false guise of a "winning" political strategy.
We're not repeating history here son - we're making it. The script is still being written.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 03:39 PM (Ojgjr)
Welcome to reality, Ace.
Enjoy your stay.
Keep your powder dry, kids...and build your 'networks' locally, just in case.
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at August 08, 2013 03:41 PM (klGLB)
Uh-huh. Thanks for the history lesson perfesser. Now show me the historical parallel for a Far-Left Socialist Party, their Demagogue Tyrant of a leader, and the opposition Party that basically enabled the Far-Left socialist by adopting the same policies under the false guise of a "winning" political strategy.
We're not repeating history here son - we're making it. The script is still being written.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 07:39 PM (Ojgjr)
Tell me exactly how infiltrating the Rats, after we proved we couldn't influence the less-hostile and smaller Pubbies, is going to work better than simply going third-party and ultimately shoving the GOP to the curb.
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 03:52 PM (o44nj)
I like it
What's funny is, I would say 99% of Republicans I come into contact with largely have the same view, but somehow the wrong people got a hold of the party power structure and the message.
If we can just dodge the bullet of Amnesty, I honestly believe the McCain's of the GOP are on their way out and the GOP future will be more like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.
Posted by: McAdams at August 08, 2013 03:55 PM (40nki)
"Tell me exactly how infiltrating the Rats, after we proved we couldn't influence the less-hostile and smaller Pubbies, is going to work better than simply going third-party and ultimately shoving the GOP to the curb."
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 07:52 PM (o44nj)
What exactly do you mean by "infiltrating the Rats" ?
If you mean - voting for Democrap candidates - then that would obviously mean accelerating the inevitable burn-down of the RINO Party. And all the sooner for the Phoenix to rise (so to speak) from the ashes in a Third Party.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 04:11 PM (Ojgjr)
What exactly do you mean by "infiltrating the Rats" ?
If you mean - voting for Democrap candidates - then that would obviously mean accelerating the inevitable burn-down of the RINO Party. And all the sooner for the Phoenix to rise (so to speak) from the ashes in a Third Party.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 08:11 PM (Ojgjr)
Let's go back to the lunacy that you, Reggie1971 and Schaeffer espouse - After that point, I think one idea might be for a lot of us to register as Democrats and do all we can to wreak havoc on their party. Again, how the fuck are you going to "wreak havoc" on a party that is more-hostile and larger than the one we lost control of?
As for the lunacy of voting for the Rats, what credibiliy does an opposition to a 100% of the vote/100% turnout party have? NONE! If you want opposition to mean something, either withhold your vote entirely or vote for somebody other than one who represents either half of the bipartisan Party-In-Government. Don't give the Rats the 100%/100% "legitimacy" Hugo Chavez, Saddam Hussein, and other despots have.
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 04:22 PM (o44nj)
"Again, how the fuck are you going to "wreak havoc" on a party that is more-hostile and larger than the one we lost control of?"
By giving them all the victories they desire, and there by speeding up the demise wrought through their policies. As stupid and vapid as the mouth breathing public is, they surely have their limit to the amount of policy-stupid they can live with. Let's find out what that limit is. It's inevitable.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 04:47 PM (Ojgjr)
There's bribery. And then there are the Clinton's FBI files. And the NSA.
Maybe this is coercion.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at August 08, 2013 04:55 PM (dmbXR)
By giving them all the victories they desire, and there by speeding up the demise wrought through their policies. As stupid and vapid as the mouth breathing public is, they surely have their limit to the amount of policy-stupid they can live with. Let's find out what that limit is. It's inevitable.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 08:47 PM (Ojgjr)
Enjoy the 74 96-and-counting years of darkness the Russians experienced are experiencing, the 64-and-counting years of darkness the bulk of the Chinese are experiencing, the 54-and-counting years of darkness the Cubans are experiencing because they followed that plan.
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 04:58 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: steveegg at August 08, 2013 08:58 PM (o44nj)
Uhm..... none of those countries ever tasted the sweet milk of the American Experiment that is the representative republic in their pasts. We have. And that taste still lingers. Making the decline all the unpalatable - even for the stupid.
And if not - then the entire cause is already pointless - no?
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 05:02 PM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: Coleridge at August 08, 2013 05:20 PM (BglJL)
Picking up my ball and going home is a damn sight more preferable than handing it over to the GOP Party of Democrap-lites.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 05:27 PM (Ojgjr)
Pick your death: fast of slightly less fast.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 05:31 PM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 08, 2013 05:50 PM (RUw+I)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 08, 2013 05:55 PM (RUw+I)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 08, 2013 05:58 PM (RUw+I)
Posted by: troyriser at August 08, 2013 06:05 PM (ptcFO)
Posted by: troyriser at August 08, 2013 06:08 PM (ptcFO)
I'm not quitting. I'm not giving up my conservative values. I'm simply advocating sabotage to both the existing socialist parties.
Because..... this isn't a game of winning and losing - this is a war of living and dying. Adapt and defeat. But never quite fighting.
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 06:49 PM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at August 08, 2013 07:02 PM (JQuNB)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at August 08, 2013 07:30 PM (+4pu5)
^^^ THIS ^^^
Posted by: Strife at August 08, 2013 07:40 PM (Ojgjr)
Wait till that traitorous pile of crap Marco starts making noise about abortion against Hillary. You will be back. Maybe some Muslim kills Ameicans and Krispie Kreme Christie will get all huffy and say we have to kill the terrorists. You will be back.
I wish I was wrong.
Posted by: Mike at August 09, 2013 03:24 AM (Z4jGs)
Mike,
Fuck you......no I won't. You don't get it.... the political parties (yes, both of them) have destroyed any patriotism I had left. If the day comes that we as a nation move back to the founding, I'm all in. Til then? The R's can blow me....I'm not their bitch.
Posted by: FITP at August 09, 2013 04:27 AM (IDXRG)
Posted by: WannabeAnglican at August 09, 2013 06:24 AM (jGDkw)
What I am building for myself and mine are separate from this country. This country is subverted, perverted and a caricature of what the founding fathers bestowed upon us. Clinging to an ideal, while all around us the reality is smacking us in the face, is lunacy. Its over. There is no path back to good government, there is only following it down the drain and being ready to take the reins after the collapse.
Here is a clue for you. if your small government republicans cant even force NPR into the private sector, what fucking chance do you think they have in making a real change for the better? grow the fuck up and face reality.
Posted by: Vikings fan at August 09, 2013 06:04 PM (u1ZOY)
This bill passes and I'll be more than happy to vote for any party that supports taxing to death the rich sunuvabitches who want to turn us into a country of serfs. But we're not there yet. Keep up the fight.
Posted by: Wilson at August 10, 2013 11:41 AM (j3y6O)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3259 seconds, 720 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Bastards all.
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at August 08, 2013 11:37 AM (pgQxn)