October 30, 2013
— DrewM I've argued before in various places that conservatives need candidates who are better liars. Democrats run candidates in red/purple states that talk a reasonable game back home but when they get to DC, they vote the Reid/Pelosi/Obama line without fail. The GOP on the other hand has a nasty habit of running candidates that talk a very conservative game and then vote like moderates when it counts. Conservatives need to find a way to flip that calculus within the GOP if the marriage is to survive.
One reason I think conservative voters want their candidates to stake out the most rightward position possible and try and hold them to it is they often distrust a candidate who sounds moderate to actually be conservative when push comes to shove.
Yesterday Senator Mike Lee gave a speech at Heritage which set a lot of conservative hearts aflutter. Personally I have decidedly mixed feelings about it and I think it has to do with the sound moderate/be conservative challenge for Republicans.
And let me say this as clearly as possible...I know Mike Lee is a conservative. I'm not accusing him of being an establishment squish.
After reading the speech, which if you haven't you should, I wanted to like it but I don't. That's not to say I dislike it. It just feels...off to me. I'm deeply, deeply ambivalent about it.
My biggest problem with it is Lee isn't arguing that government can not and should not try to solve all of the problems he identifies or that the country faces. At least that's not the overriding theme of the speech. He offers policy ideas where I'd personally prefer a candidate to say, "Government can NOT do anything about this! Stop believing people who say it can".
An example from Lee's speech...
The federal government also needs to open up AmericaÂ’s transportation system to diversity and experimentation, so that Americans can spend more time with their families in more affordable homes, and less time stuck in maddening traffic.
What? Are you nuts? The federal government is going to make your commute easier and quicker? Who is giving this speech, a leading conservative or Dennis Kucinich?
But then you look at his policy suggestion.
Under our bill, the federal gas tax would be phased down over five years from 18.4 cents per gallon, to 3.7 cents. And highway authority would be transferred proportionately from the federal government to the states.Under our new system, Americans would no longer have to send significant gas- tax revenue to Washington, where sticky-fingered politicians, bureaucrats, and lobbyists take their cut before sending it back with strings attached. Instead, states and cities could plan, finance, and build better-designed and more affordable projects.
Some communities could choose to build more roads, while others might prefer to repair old ones. Some might build highways, others light-rail. And all would be free to experiment with innovative green technologies, and new ways to finance their projects, like congestion pricing and smart tolls.
But the point is that all states and localities should finally have the flexibility to develop the kind of transportation system they want, for less money, without politicians and special interests from other parts of the country telling them how, when, what, and where they should build.
For the country as a whole, our plan would mean a better infrastructure system, new jobs and opportunities, diverse localism, and innovative environmental protection.
And for working families, it could mean more access to quality, affordable homes, less time on the road... and making it home in time for dinner with the kids.
Oh. That's actually a radical small government notion. He just couched it in big government, low-information voter terms (the all important "Cares about people like me" standard).
That's...wonderfully sneaky.
I'm not as much of a fan of his child-tax credit ideas because I want to see as flat a tax code as possible (a version of which is part of Lee's overall plan) and once you start handing out credits and rebates, you open the can of worms that gets us where we are today. It's politically smart but it leads to the picking of winners and losers he's worried about.
People praising the speech should also be honest and recognize he only gives fleeting mention to the two biggest issues we are facing...what to do in the aftermath of the ObamaCare meltdown and entitlements. Saying there needs to be lots of ideas on those two things is fine but hardly as instructive as he is with some of the lower hanging fruit he goes after in the speech.
I think my ambivalence about the speech, in particular the transportation example (which is a stand-in for how to deal with other policy issues, talk big, act small) is that I want someone to have a national fight about the role and scope of government. I want to take the ObamaCare debacle and discredit the notion of big government paternalism for the ages! In short I want to crush the Democrats, see them driven before us, and to hear the lamentation of their women.
Lee's approach isn't as satisfying as Rand Paul's slash and burn approach (which Lee supported) but it's likely to be more politically effective.
While Lee might be able to make these kinds of pitches because conservatives trust him, I think it's going to be hard for the average Republican to do it simply because of the distrust that exists between the base and the GOP. Even as someone who wanted to see this kind of approach (moderate talk, radical action) it's still hard to trust, even someone as conservative as Lee. And let's be honest, Lee doesn't represent the majority of the GOP on these issues. This approach isn't a solution to the on-going civil war, it's simply a possible strategy for one side.
There's a Catch-22 here for conservatives and the GOP that I'm still not sure can be resolved.
Posted by: DrewM at
05:37 AM
| Comments (181)
Post contains 1013 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 30, 2013 05:41 AM (uf1pv)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 30, 2013 05:41 AM (uf1pv)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at October 30, 2013 05:42 AM (8JJ6O)
and sometimes honey works better than vinegar for the national stage.
But it is necessary to at least appear to be able to be convincing to fight for the right causes.
Posted by: willow at October 30, 2013 05:43 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at October 30, 2013 05:43 AM (epxV4)
Posted by: boned to the bone at October 30, 2013 05:43 AM (Ph479)
Posted by: willow at October 30, 2013 05:44 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at October 30, 2013 05:44 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 30, 2013 05:44 AM (IXrOn)
That He not hire the same advisers that Romney or McCain did?
Posted by: willow at October 30, 2013 05:46 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: unf-ing-believable at October 30, 2013 05:47 AM (/kIi7)
Posted by: RoyalOil at October 30, 2013 05:48 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: lowandslow at October 30, 2013 05:48 AM (IV4od)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 30, 2013 05:48 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 30, 2013 05:48 AM (8D0/R)
Posted by: Jesse at October 30, 2013 05:49 AM (As/N8)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 30, 2013 05:49 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 30, 2013 05:49 AM (IXrOn)
Did Dems notice that? and accept He was just saying what He needed to to win?
Posted by: willow at October 30, 2013 05:50 AM (nqBYe)
It's language, Drew. When I hear a conservative use the word "diversity," my hackles go up and I am instantly suspicious.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at October 30, 2013 05:52 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: willow at October 30, 2013 05:52 AM (nqBYe)
He must have been watching a different House, probably in some alternate dimension.
As for the rest, too much feed-the-base pap, an excess of buzz-phrases, and WAY too much "government-has-to-do..." shit for my taste.
Jury's still out on this dude. He needs to man up if he's going to push for conservative beliefs, or simply say so if he's planning to join in with the Squish Brigade.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 30, 2013 05:53 AM (kaGpp)
Posted by: My Name is Nobody at October 30, 2013 05:53 AM (pRe5G)
Posted by: SO ANGRY TRUE CON at October 30, 2013 05:54 AM (hX+qW)
**
Well that's just it, this IS the problem....We are in a time where every snarky little know nothing screeches, "Well whats your plan" "Whats your solution" Blah Blah Blah...
Politician always feel the need to have some magical alternative to what is always a big gov made problem.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 30, 2013 05:56 AM (wmU4G)
Posted by: NAME REDACTED at October 30, 2013 05:56 AM (9/c6c)
Posted by: lowandslow at October 30, 2013 05:56 AM (IV4od)
You mean you want a friggin' liar like Choom Boy?
At some point, politicians will be FORCED to tell the truth -- not by voters, but by simple reality and the laws of math and economics -- and the current crop of political hacks will be cast aside by people who feel the pain of losing their Free Shit.
Those people will be a hell of a lot more dangerous to politicians' health than we can be.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 30, 2013 05:57 AM (kaGpp)
Posted by: brak at October 30, 2013 05:58 AM (M2qTM)
Willow? A cup, please?
Oh, and wear the pencil skirt.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/b][/u] at October 30, 2013 05:58 AM (JpC1K)
I mostly ignore these speeches as they are crafted for, and given in front of crowds that usually eat up this stuff.
"what to do in the aftermath of the ObamaCare meltdown and entitlements. Saying there needs to be lots of ideas on those two things is fine but hardly as instructive as he is with some of the lower hanging fruit he goes after in the speech."
The reason he gives no policy solutions is he, and conservatives in general, have none. "Fixing" healthcare in this country is not compatible with "small government". Voters and other Americans are sick of the way they are treated in mostly unregulated insurance markets. Obamacare isn't the answer, however, as it makes health insurance even more expensive and doesn't improve health CARE at all.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 30, 2013 05:58 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 30, 2013 05:59 AM (ee9LE)
I was going piss and moan about not having a Sebelius thread but there's no point. I swear to christ our congresspeople are dumber then a fucking box. It's freak'n pitiful, not Sebelius, our side.
=======================================
Agreed! References to the Wizard of Oz, that Hall guy from Texas(what the f#ck was he even talking about?), and other abysmal questions from d!psh!ts who have no ability to question appropriately.
Posted by: boned to the bone at October 30, 2013 05:59 AM (Ph479)
I was going piss and moan about not having a Sebelius thread but there's no point.
Posted by: lowandslow at October 30, 2013 09:48 AM (IV4od)
Another dog and pony show between a corrupt Obumfuk official and the corrupt congress. Nothing will get accomplished and nothing will be done.
I'd rather listen to a herd a cats in heat than that crap.
Posted by: ExSnipe at October 30, 2013 05:59 AM (57ubW)
Posted by: Chairman Mow at October 30, 2013 05:59 AM (RGDtb)
Posted by: jakeman at October 30, 2013 05:59 AM (vH4YP)
And then conservatives would have those phrases and terms--already market tested safely outside political consequence--at the ready to deploy.
Instead . . . well you see what intellectual heft they bring to the conservative movement.
Palin coined "death panels" not National Review.
Posted by: RoyalOil at October 30, 2013 05:59 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 30, 2013 09:49 AM (IXrOn)
He got elected because he spoke without a trace of a negro dialect. He was a hard core commie for all to see. Most chose not to see
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 30, 2013 06:00 AM (1Jaio)
============
I see you've read jwest.
Posted by: RoyalOil at October 30, 2013 06:00 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 30, 2013 06:01 AM (ZshNr)
Leverage their corruption of language
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 30, 2013 06:01 AM (4tK7k)
Voters and other Americans are sick of the way they are treated in mostly unregulated insurance markets
=======================================
Unregulated? The insurance industry? Have you ever made an insurance claim?
Posted by: boned to the bone at October 30, 2013 06:02 AM (Ph479)
Posted by: Boone at October 30, 2013 06:02 AM (3p8HS)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 30, 2013 06:02 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: ontherocks at October 30, 2013 06:02 AM (27orT)
So DrewM has embraced the Mitt Romney model now?
Posted by: polynikes at October 30, 2013 06:03 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 30, 2013 06:03 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 30, 2013 06:04 AM (659DL)
7Yet another in the long line of useless hearings. References to the Wizard of Oz, recognizing Sebelius' father or grandfather(whatever). It's a fucking circus parade of clowns.
---
Send in the clowns!
Posted by: Zombie Frank Sinatra at October 30, 2013 06:04 AM (/Crba)
Baby steps. This ploy is still in its infancy.
Open up could be replaced with "infuse" or something else as the new-newspeak lexicon gets fine tuned
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 30, 2013 06:04 AM (4tK7k)
..........
I'm talking about caps and hidden clauses and the myriad ways insurers get out of actually paying claims.
I'm not a big fan of overreaching consumer protection. But in the case of health insurance, they have gone off the rails in recent decades in what they are allowed to offer.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 30, 2013 06:05 AM (f9c2L)
The 16-day government shutdown hurt jobs growth in the private sector this month with only 130,000 jobs added, a drop if 15,000 from September, according to ADP's National Employment Report.
September also didn't add as many jobs as ADP originally reported. It revised private sector payroll increases from 166,000 to 145,000.
How does a government shutdown reduce the number of private sector jobs?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 30, 2013 06:05 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami - GO CARDS!!! at October 30, 2013 06:05 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 30, 2013 06:06 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 30, 2013 06:06 AM (ee9LE)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at October 30, 2013 06:06 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 30, 2013 06:07 AM (0LHZx)
I'm going to let people who have more time to watch him decide who and what Mike Lee is. What I would like to hear more of from Republican Senators is though, something like this:
We don't have a majority caucus, so we are not able to pass any legislation that is part of our conservative agenda. However, we are not powerless. We can stop Obama and Reid and the liberal Democrats from allowing the government to intrude on people's lives any more than it already does. Some of our caucus may not agree with us on how to best do this, but if we stand together on that ONE point - stopping the Democrats from taking more money and freedom from the American people - we will be doing what we were sent to Washington to do.
Or words to that effect.
Posted by: BurtTC at October 30, 2013 06:07 AM (TOk1P)
Drew - what it sounds like you are looking for is a conservative who can speak in "glittering generalities" sufficient to get elected, but once elected work on the conservative end of those glittering generalities. That sounds good.
Next question - where do we find these people? By the way, that is a serious non-snark filled question. I mention that because you wrote of the dream of the great smash-down fight that will destroy the progressives. That sounds like fun, but that isn't actually politics (and I know you know that). At least it isn't American politics - maybe Stalinism where you put a bullet in the back of the skull - but not politics here.* Politics here is usually the incrementalism, and that isn't as fun in the doing. So we need incremental people and an incremental plan a - for want of a phrase - a long march. Now, how does that get done?
*It is like Obama wanting to destroy the GOP. Unless he actually plans on killing every Republican he's living in a dream world. The Great Depression didn't kill the GOP so I doubt he will.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Get Your Vitriolic Harangues At The Outrage Outlet at October 30, 2013 06:07 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 30, 2013 09:58 AM (JpC1K)
**
Yeah I googled "pencil skirt"
Nice.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 30, 2013 06:07 AM (wmU4G)
=======================================
Unregulated? The insurance industry? Have you ever made an insurance claim?
==========
Yeah, I think Chi-Town just outed himself as a LIV. Seriously, if you know anything about insurance, you know it's one of the most highly regulated industries in the nation.
I don't think I can name another product that I'd have to seek approval from the state in each and every state I want to sell it in.
And that's in addition to the SEC and other various federal agencies I have to make sure I'm complying with.
Saying insurance is "mostly unregulated" is stupider than saying the Sun rises in the West.
Posted by: RoyalOil at October 30, 2013 06:07 AM (VjL9S)
And somewhat boner inducing, if I can say that here and not seem, "weird".
Posted by: Dang at October 30, 2013 06:08 AM (Hx2XA)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 30, 2013 06:08 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 30, 2013 06:09 AM (ZshNr)
Space is where it is at. Set a big hairy goal...Mars, spaced-based manufacturing, orbital solar power stations, SOMETHING, and do it. It's a hell of a lot sexier than health care or free phones.
---
Get your ass to Mahs!
Posted by: Ah'nold at October 30, 2013 06:09 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: California red at October 30, 2013 06:10 AM (L39bP)
I'm not a big fan of overreaching consumer protection. But in the case of health insurance, they have gone off the rails in recent decades in what they are allowed to offer.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 30, 2013 10:05 AM (f9c2L)
The insurance industry, specifically the claims paying section, is one of the most regulated industries in the States. There is not 'a way to get out of paying claims' if the policy provides coverage.
Posted by: polynikes at October 30, 2013 06:10 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 30, 2013 06:10 AM (ee9LE)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies with whipped cream. at October 30, 2013 06:10 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel who's life was saved by rock and roll at October 30, 2013 06:10 AM (7ObY1)
Well, they have got Cowardly Lyin's, the Wicked Witch of the West, and plenty of straw men if not precisely Scarecrows.
---
They've got a few Munchkins like Sen. Barbara Mikluski as well.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 30, 2013 06:11 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Dennis Kucinich at October 30, 2013 09:40 AM (Myqtp)
Tell us about the anal probe, Dennis. We know you got one, wink wink nudge nudge.
Posted by: joncelli at October 30, 2013 06:11 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 30, 2013 06:11 AM (4tK7k)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 30, 2013 06:12 AM (IXrOn)
I'm talking about caps and hidden clauses and the myriad ways insurers get out of actually paying claims.
I'm not a big fan of overreaching consumer protection. But in the case of health insurance, they have gone off the rails in recent decades in what they are allowed to offer.
==================================
The caps in my policy are in a summary sheet provided with the booklets explaining my coverage. As far as "hidden clauses" go, I'm not sure what you're referring to exactly.
Posted by: boned to the bone at October 30, 2013 06:12 AM (Ph479)
Sure, there may be a few idealogues out there, somewhere, who have the ability to lie convincingly "for the cause", and won't immediately betray their base.
But it's not a proposition worth wagering on.
Posted by: Luke at October 30, 2013 06:12 AM (9CQH4)
And the actual performance of today's stock market has more to do with sacrificing chickens and baying at the moon than actual profit/loss supply/demand economics.
When reality sets in -- and, in time, it must -- the market crash will be epic. Fortunes will vanish, and people will die. Look at 1929 and think "we ain't seen nothin' yet!"
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 30, 2013 06:12 AM (kaGpp)
Here, I will extend an olive branch that only has, like, at most, one raptor holding it to the other side of this circular firing squad. When you admit that conservatives are not nutty mcnutbar crazypants for not believing that much of the GOP is going to treat us like The Chicken as soon as humanly possible and then act all shocked and horrified that the base is furious about it, I will consider pondering that you are acting in good faith in an attempt to find a way to better lie to get conservative results.
---
This kind of writing is why I LOVE coming to this site.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 30, 2013 06:12 AM (/Crba)
Drew has violated the rules at AoSHQ.
The bylaws explicitly state that any comment by a republican elected official will be interpreted in a manner as to insert as many liberal values as possible.
The bylaws also make it clear that no benefit of a doubt will be given at any time.
Drew had no problem following the rules with Rubio. Why is he bending the regulations for Lee?
Posted by: jwest at October 30, 2013 06:13 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami - GO CARDS!!! at October 30, 2013 06:13 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 30, 2013 06:13 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at October 30, 2013 06:13 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 30, 2013 06:13 AM (659DL)
Third, and here is where I'll probably encounter some pushback: If we're going to think big as a country, it needs to be for something with concrete benefits. Space is where it is at. Set a big hairy goal...Mars, spaced-based manufacturing, orbital solar power stations, SOMETHING, and do it. It's a hell of a lot sexier than health care or free phones.
Yes. And stand firm in the firestorm of "but there's all these poor people in America! Why are we wasting money in space?"
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at October 30, 2013 06:13 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 30, 2013 06:13 AM (0LHZx)
And the actual performance of today's stock market has more to do with sacrificing chickens and baying at the moon than actual profit/loss supply/demand economics.
When reality sets in -- and, in time, it must -- the market crash will be epic. Fortunes will vanish, and people will die. Look at 1929 and think "we ain't seen nothin' yet!"
---
The South Park episode where Geithner et all determined the value of a Margaritaville machine by cutting the head off a chicken and seeing where the body stopped moving is probably one of the most accurate depictions of government economics I've ever seen.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 30, 2013 06:14 AM (/Crba)
============
When people taste actual freedom, they love it.
Problem is, the GOP has no interest in letting people be free.
Hell, just getting rid of the stupid "federal law prohibits smoking blah, blah, blah" on airplane take-off would be a small step and they can't even rouse themselves for that.
It's been how many fucking decades since it was banned? I think we all got it by now, thanks.
There are a whole shitload of stupid regulations the GOP could be chipping away at and they . . . "we canna do nothin' 'till we have the warp engines back online."
Posted by: RoyalOil at October 30, 2013 06:14 AM (VjL9S)
92One reform I would love to see is reduce the 6 year senate term to 4 years.
Nope. The only tinkering with what the Founders' established in that regard is that we should either have term limits or a maximum age 70, 72 somewhere in there.
---
I'd go with term limits rather than an age limit.
You still have very smart people capable of contributing in their old age and, besides that, it is easier to head off a legal challenge to term limits than it is to head off one to an age cap for the position.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 30, 2013 06:16 AM (/Crba)
"He just couched it in big government, low-information voter terms
That's...wonderfully sneaky."
Yeah. It's also easier to flip the end result around so that the delivery of the 'big government, low-information basic idea' ends up serving the Leftist notion of social engineering when it comes to working with the Dems to turn the idea into actual policy.
Posted by: Speller at October 30, 2013 06:16 AM (J74Py)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 30, 2013 06:16 AM (IXrOn)
Nice.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 30, 2013 10:07 AM (wmU4G)
Try "hobble skirt" next.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at October 30, 2013 06:16 AM (zF6Iw)
I had a situation where a policy was cancelled for non payment and then a claim was submitted subsequently against that policy. Subsquently the carrier was forced to provide coverage because the portion of the cancellation notice that gave the explanation was not written in 12 point font.
Yeah , not regulated.
Posted by: polynikes at October 30, 2013 06:17 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 30, 2013 06:17 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: mama winger at October 30, 2013 06:17 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 30, 2013 06:18 AM (659DL)
Posted by: jakeman at October 30, 2013 06:18 AM (vH4YP)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 30, 2013 06:18 AM (ee9LE)
"That's...wonderfully sneaky."
Yes, but will the LI(C)V's be able to pick up on it?
I've been arguing for this for years, but have always worried that many conservatives would never bother with the actually particulars of a plan, but would just listen to the TV headline and act accordingly.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at October 30, 2013 06:18 AM (YYJjz)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 30, 2013 06:18 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at October 30, 2013 06:18 AM (zF6Iw)
Serious You Guys, if you ever need empirical proof that life is not fair, the Kucinich marriage is all you need.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies with whipped cream. at October 30, 2013 06:19 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 30, 2013 06:19 AM (ujMoa)
Those people will be a hell of a lot more dangerous to politicians' health than we can be.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 30, 2013 09:57 AM (kaGpp)
I don't think sodium pentathol and hot pincers can get a politician to tell the truth. And reality won't force them. Example: "Me? Lie to you? My dear friends, we were Betrayed by __________ over there!"
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Get Your Vitriolic Harangues At The Outrage Outlet at October 30, 2013 06:19 AM (hLRSq)
willow, here, I shall help you walk so that you and your pencil skirt make it to the tea just fine. *shoots glare over shoulder at Bannion*
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies with whipped cream. at October 30, 2013 06:20 AM (VtjlW)
104 "Why don't we look at conservatives who have a track record of actually doing what they say they will do, who have a track record of actually sticking to conservative principles in the face of all odds, of actually implementing conservative policies, rather than just who makes the best speeches about it?"
Because some times people like this have high pitched voices that embarrass us, so they need to be destroyed.
Posted by: jwest at October 30, 2013 06:21 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: mama winger at October 30, 2013 06:21 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 30, 2013 06:21 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 30, 2013 06:22 AM (659DL)
I remember visiting Berlin in '94...although "the wall" and almost all signs of it were long gone, you could still tell the instant you drove into the former East Germany. The roadway immediately transformed from a smooth & modern highway to a pothole-filled, crumbling third-world backroad.
If Senator Lee gets his wish, I imagine driving into a "blue" state will be the same experience.
Posted by: Icedog at October 30, 2013 06:22 AM (r5sZy)
111 -
That looks kinky. Whereas, pencil skirts CAN be worn to the office. Of course, it really does depend on the office, and without question seriously depends on the wearer. Some can, some can't. If you can't, ladies, KNOW THIS ABOUT YOURSELVES! There is a sexy outfit for all occasions, for nearly all shapes and sizes of women. Figure out what yours is, and stick with that. We really won't mind if you can't pull of some certain looks.
Posted by: BurtTC at October 30, 2013 06:22 AM (TOk1P)
Yeah , not regulated. .
On my claim, every question/section I had to fill out was accompanied by the government insurance code section that corresponded to each question on the form. That's why I was curious as to what Chi-town Jerry was getting at.
Posted by: boned to the bone at October 30, 2013 06:22 AM (Ph479)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 30, 2013 06:22 AM (ujMoa)
105You still have very smart people capable of contributing in their old age
Name one in Congress right now.
I'll wait.
---
Sen. Tom Coburn is about 65. Sen. Jim Inhofe is 78. Haven't found a list of House members sorted by age yet.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 30, 2013 06:23 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 30, 2013 06:23 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 30, 2013 09:58 AM (f9c2L)
Insurance markets are highly regulated. Get on your state's website and look up the insurance commission. I am certain you will find a list of regulations and a link to your state's statutes on insurance.
Unregulated? Come on, you are better than that.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Get Your Vitriolic Harangues At The Outrage Outlet at October 30, 2013 06:23 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 30, 2013 06:24 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 30, 2013 06:24 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 30, 2013 06:24 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Anachronda at October 30, 2013 06:24 AM (U82Km)
The one working on an amnesty 'compromise'?
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at October 30, 2013 10:23 AM (U2UQk)
-------------
No, but you're in the right state.
Governor Scott Walker. He's done it. He's doing it. Not just making speeches about it. Not just posturing.
Posted by: mama winger at October 30, 2013 06:24 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel who's life was saved by rock and roll at October 30, 2013 06:25 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at October 30, 2013 06:25 AM (NW4xW)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 30, 2013 06:26 AM (8D0/R)
i see that some in the room were willing for me to have another sprained ankle all for the glory of checking out a peek at panties during the fall moment. (and remember it wasn't a planned fall where everything looks gently, tastefully planned out!
hands bagel over.
snorts at Bannnion.
Posted by: willow at October 30, 2013 06:26 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 30, 2013 06:26 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami - GO CARDS!!! at October 30, 2013 06:26 AM (bCEmE)
122 -
My guess is, if the person is NOT in the medical provider business, to say the insurance industry is unregulated means they had a claim that was not paid, and they don't think that's fair.
If the person is IN the medical provider business, it means they're tired of all those insurance companies with all their different payment schedules.
Posted by: BurtTC at October 30, 2013 06:26 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 30, 2013 06:27 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: thunderb at October 30, 2013 06:27 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: willow at October 30, 2013 06:27 AM (nqBYe)
137Sebelius: The system isn't functioning so we don't have reliable data on how many people have enrolled.
---
Frankly, admitting that is probably less embarrassing for them than saying how many people have applied for policies, which is incredibly low.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 30, 2013 06:28 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: mama winger at October 30, 2013 06:28 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 30, 2013 06:28 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 30, 2013 06:29 AM (8D0/R)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 30, 2013 09:58 AM (f9c2L)
You have got to be shitting me.
Posted by: [/i][/b]KG at October 30, 2013 06:29 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 30, 2013 06:29 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: willow at October 30, 2013 06:30 AM (nqBYe)
145Drudge says 404 care crashed during the hearing.
---
Pretty funny considering that Sebelius is insisting that the site has NEVER crashed.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 30, 2013 06:30 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 30, 2013 06:30 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 30, 2013 06:31 AM (8D0/R)
**
This^^
The eloquent truth without stepping on their dicks. They have to be perfect in what they say, the MFM holds the right to a different standard. At the same time they cannot be afraid to call out the MFM for this hypocrisy.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 30, 2013 06:32 AM (wmU4G)
Posted by: Barksdale at October 30, 2013 06:32 AM (xFg3I)
Posted by: Two Pit Bulls fighting over a Christmas Ham in a burlap bag at October 30, 2013 06:32 AM (efBdc)
__________
You're an idiot. Insurance is a contract. An insurance company can't just decide one day to not pay what the contract says it will pay for.
This is the biggest lie that liberals have been allowed to get away with....that insurance companies kick you off the plan when you get sick. It has never happened. And if it ever did, the plaintiff would win that lawsuit 999 out of 1000 times. Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 30, 2013 10:17
===========
On this, you are right.
It is a big, fucking lie-John Grisom and Hollywood be damned.
Disclosure: I do some work for auto insurance companies. You know what I see? Overpayment. Always erring on the side of "just pay the claim before they file a complaint with the State Board of Insurance."
See, everyone wants to believe the insurance companies are the greedy ones. There are only a few insurance companies. And they have the full force and weight of the state looking over their shoulder to catch any "unfairness."
There are millions of consumers. Who have no problem lying on their application, lying about what happened, and raising bloody hell over the fender-bender with $1,000 in property damage that therefore entitles them to $25,000 in pain and suffering.
I had this fucking guy crying on the phone--crying!--over the $2,500 in vehicle damage claim. He's trying to tell me the 10mph collision is still giving him nightmares! And he's just flat-out lying to me. I'm looking at the pictures of his vehicle and he's telling me the collision was soooo violent and hard that the license plate of the other vehicle left an imprint in his bumper!! Holy fuck did I settle that fast. Who wants a lying retard like that on the stand?
Posted by: RoyalOil at October 30, 2013 06:32 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: dananjcon at October 30, 2013 10:07 AM (wmU4G)
Try "hobble skirt" next.
**
How apropos for Halloween!
Bunk.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 30, 2013 06:33 AM (wmU4G)
A rifled slug barrel is designed for slugs. Remington sells a separate rifled slug barrel for the 870, which makes it handy for a swap-out. Or you could buy a single-shot H & R with a slug barrel.
Posted by: mrp at October 30, 2013 06:34 AM (HjPtV)
@ 155 - "You guys who keep calling every one a "RINO" have no fucking idea what a RINO is or what the Republican Party has traditionally stood for."
I'm not sure that *anyone* knows what the Republican Party stands for.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at October 30, 2013 06:34 AM (YYJjz)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 30, 2013 06:34 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel who's life was saved by rock and roll at October 30, 2013 10:25 AM (7ObY1)
You can fire slugs out of the non rifled barrrel. The rifle barrel is really only necessary for sabots.
Posted by: polynikes at October 30, 2013 06:34 AM (m2CN7)
@ 140 - " Chitown Jerry is this where you show off you awesome skills of persuasion by calling people who disagree with you retards and telling them to STFU?"
Maybe it's just me, but I've always found his argument on that point to be extremely cerebral and persuasive.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at October 30, 2013 06:36 AM (YYJjz)
Posted by: toby928© at October 30, 2013 06:37 AM (QupBk)
By the way, Chi-Town Jerry, Jay Carney is saying that the insurance industry is "like the wild west". Are you sure you want to take the same stance as Jay Carney, a professional prevaricator?
I mention this little thing out of the goodness of my heart.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Get Your Vitriolic Harangues At The Outrage Outlet at October 30, 2013 06:42 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: blindside at October 30, 2013 06:54 AM (WzWmY)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 30, 2013 07:16 AM (659DL)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel who's life was saved by rock and roll at October 30, 2013 07:23 AM (7ObY1)
The situation requires spending cuts, deregulation and devolving of power to the states.
The required actions have been obvious for years. Politicians are not interested in doing those things because said actions lower the power and enrichment of politicians.
Bye.
Posted by: Meremortal at October 30, 2013 07:36 AM (1Y+hH)
I'm guessing that this is the first time you examined things that Senator Lee has written or said, but as a resident of Utah and a strong Lee supporter, this has been Lee's approach ever since he decided to run for the Senate as candidate Mike Lee.
I'm glad that with this Heritage speech, more Americans are getting exposed to Senator Lee, and to his ideas and suggestions. You might want to consider 'friending' him of Facebook. He frequently posts there concerning what is going on in the Senate, and legislation that he either sponsors, supports, or submits. I think the more you get to know him, the more you will like him.
Posted by: Brent Glines at October 30, 2013 07:48 AM (90aTA)
And therein lies the problem....MANY Republicans are smitten to the notion that GOVERNMENT somehow is able to solve the ills of a Nation.
1) Government CREATES more problems than it solves
2) Politicians of ALL parties generally aren't around when the problems they created hit the populace like a ton of bricks, and are subsequently NEVER held accountable
3) Politicians simply cannot grasp the concept of "unintended consequences"
For all of those who believe ObamaCare will simply "self-destruct", let me remind you that Entitlements simply do not go away. Since politicians treat your wallet as an endless source of revenue, ObamaCare can crash and burn but someone will ALWAYS be there to bail it out.
Until and unless Republicans can nominate people who can effectively communicate that the Federal Govt creates more problems than it solves, and provides plenty of examples that even a dumbed-down voter can understand, they will continue to get creamed on the National stage.
That means YOU Chris Christie!
Posted by: Pelosi Schmelosi at October 30, 2013 08:02 AM (Mijq/)
To make every Republican candidate sound like Jim DeMint at all times is a great way to hand control of the country over to Democrats. If the electorate was built that way, we would never lose an election.
I understand a "zero tolerance" policy if a Republican comes from say South Carolina, but you need to let Republicans "play the game" that come from places like Massachusetts and Illinois.
I honestly believe that even Blue State Republicans are actually far more conservative than they let on. Think about it, if you wanted a much easier career path and had liberal instincts, wouldn't be a whole hell of a lot easier to simply run as a Democrat?
Posted by: McAdams at October 30, 2013 08:06 AM (Z8gcK)
"For all of those who believe ObamaCare will simply "self-destruct", let me remind you that Entitlements simply do not go away."
So far, ObamaCare seems to be a negative entitlement, since for too many people, it involves policies that cost more, cover less, and have higher deductables that people had previously.
Not much of an entitlement, so it may very well self destruct.
Posted by: Brent Glines at October 30, 2013 08:07 AM (90aTA)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 30, 2013 08:41 AM (vd7A8)
Fair enough, but we just had that election. And we lost. 51-47.
Now, of course, you all will instantly rejoinder with the typical comments about how it was Romney and Paul Ryan's fault, that they were flawed candidates.
Fine, believe that if it makes you feel better.
But remember that Romney-Ryan, who touched the *untouchable* big issues of Medicare and Social Security reform, the debt and free-market conservatism, won the majority white vote by the same margin as Reagan in 1980.
In effect, we fought the big ideological show-down you (and I) wanted Drew, and we lost because the country has changed and become a quasi-welfare-state.
The United States of 2012 just isn't the United States we still imagine it to be. It sucks, but the data doesn't lie.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at October 30, 2013 09:32 AM (jhI6f)
Sure Social Security is an awful deal and Medicare was never sustainable. So what? You think 41% of America considers themselves "conservative," by the polls, but when you ask that 41% what changes are accepting to SS & MC to save those programs from BANKRUPTCY, a plurality still say, "NONE."
If 41% of America were conservative, we would never have elected a far-left buffoon like Obama. Pretending we can sweep in and reverse the "progressive" trend of the last century is delusional. We got where we are incrementally, one step at a time over 100 years or more, and that isn't going to be reversed in a Presidential term or two, much less a single Congress.
Those who can't wrap their heads around that fact are actually detrimental to changing things because they scare the bejesus out of the LIVs and send them running to the Democrats to "protect" their "rights."
Posted by: Adjoran at October 30, 2013 09:43 AM (473jB)
Posted by: NYC_Esq at October 30, 2013 09:48 AM (JYCBl)
Posted by: J.S. at October 30, 2013 10:01 AM (jNIQD)
Posted by: J.S. at October 30, 2013 10:32 AM (jNIQD)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2147 seconds, 309 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Dennis Kucinich at October 30, 2013 05:40 AM (Myqtp)