March 07, 2013
— Ace The network that once gave serious coverage to Code Pink (when Bush was president) now thinks Rand Paul is just a silly boringhead who's boring.
This is important to MSNBC White for several reasons. The most important reason is helping CNN's liberal audience -- which likes to consider itself enlightened and Deeply Concerned about civil liberties -- cope with the cognitive dissonance of supporting Barack Obama, who asserts the right to kill Americans on American soil even if there is no ticking-timebomb urgency and Dick Durbin, who objects to a Sense of the Senate Resolution stating that the president is not allowed to murder people.
The second reason is simply to support Obama. Obama always gets the Tone of Seriousness and Heroism in CNN's reporting; anyone who challenges him gets the Tone of Comedy, of Ridicule, of Triviality.
It doesn't matter what people do or say. We're accustomed to watching movies and TV, in which the what a character says or does is only incidental to his Heroism. The main determinant of whether someone's a hero or villain is simply how the movie treats him tonally.
Only the Designated Hero Wins Applause. AP edits out the standing ovation Paul received at the conclusion of his filibuster.
Even though Paul is making the same objections AP (and Erin Burnett) used to make -- and considered themselves quite Heroic for so objecting -- he can't be the Hero because we already know King Barack is the Hero.
So Paul must be the Clown or the Villain. A movie can only have one Hero.
Posted by: Ace at
09:26 AM
| Comments (277)
Post contains 279 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: ace at March 07, 2013 09:30 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: ace at March 07, 2013 09:31 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: sTevo at March 07, 2013 09:31 AM (qptIN)
Posted by: Fritz at March 07, 2013 09:31 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 07, 2013 09:31 AM (E7Qlq)
I also seem to recall John Rambo being, in fact, a hallucinatory, violent killer who blew up half a town because somewhere in his mind he was reliving Vietnam.
Posted by: Jeff B. at March 07, 2013 09:31 AM (bcLhD)
Han Solo was basically a drugrunner, but Star Wars makes him out to be a lovable rapscallion.
Posted by: Lemmenkainen, Freelance Warlord at March 07, 2013 09:32 AM (ZWvOb)
Every heist movie ever?
Posted by: Waterhouse at March 07, 2013 09:32 AM (vBSha)
Posted by: GardenGnome at March 07, 2013 09:32 AM (Io7hX)
Posted by: Lemmenkainen, Freelance Warlord at March 07, 2013 09:33 AM (ZWvOb)
Posted by: Flaming Toaster of Dave Barry at March 07, 2013 09:33 AM (LYwCh)
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 07, 2013 09:33 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Ken in NH at March 07, 2013 09:33 AM (N9thc)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 07, 2013 09:34 AM (UOM48)
Paul Krugman Declares Personal Bankruptcy
http://tinyurl.com/atz3362
Posted by: kbdabear at March 07, 2013 09:34 AM (mCvL4)
If Reince Preibus and the RNC have their shit together, they should now be putting together a training program for every elected Republican in the country on how to filibuster... with a reproduction of the Senate floor built underground to practice on and a medical team tasks with getting them acclimated to the cath'.
RNC donors should demand nothing less than that.
Posted by: Serious Cat at March 07, 2013 09:35 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Clownf*cker at March 07, 2013 09:35 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at March 07, 2013 09:35 AM (qfMZe)
Posted by: Barack Obama
Sigh. Ok, but the the record reflect that my jaw aches and my knees have given out.
Posted by: John McCain [/i] [/b] at March 07, 2013 09:35 AM (fMgJk)
Paul Krugman Declares Personal Bankruptcy
http://tinyurl.com/atz3362
I think I'll going to kill myself.
Posted by: Paul Krugman at March 07, 2013 09:36 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: andycanuck at March 07, 2013 09:36 AM (ORGYc)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 07, 2013 09:36 AM (mCvL4)
Posted by: Andrew at March 07, 2013 09:37 AM (HS3dy)
IDK if Chase intended that entirely, but it happened.
Posted by: The Q at March 07, 2013 09:37 AM (yVmMc)
please. these guys performed a clusterfuck GOTV program in the middle of an election where a President who gets about 10% approval from Republicans was up for election. Micheal Steele of all people did better then him. I opposed his re-election as chair for a reason.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at March 07, 2013 09:37 AM (yAor6)
Who needs CNN/MSNBC when we have Graham & Mc Cain shooting us in the back.
I do so hope that they had a lovely dinner with the SCOAMF while an actual conservative was doing the hard lifting.
Posted by: Cheri at March 07, 2013 09:37 AM (G+Wff)
We call this the denouement
And Lindsey Graham is false protaganist. A role which he will fight John McCain for.
Posted by: Marcus at March 07, 2013 09:37 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: As long as Mindy's little Barry-Boo is happy, that's what matters at March 07, 2013 09:37 AM (wk9P4)
Posted by: Two ton Tony from NJ at March 07, 2013 09:38 AM (0K4Xj)
Posted by: Wally in Walla Walla at March 07, 2013 09:38 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Andy at March 07, 2013 09:38 AM (C/NnJ)
Posted by: Marcus at March 07, 2013 09:38 AM (GGCsk)
What problems are not exacerbated by the corrupt media?
Posted by: GardenGnome at March 07, 2013 01:32 PM (Io7hX)
We'll let you know, sit tight sweetheart.
Posted by: Heralder at March 07, 2013 09:38 AM (+xmn4)
This is why the culture is important.
Jacobins and their leftist successors hardest hit.
Posted by: PJ at March 07, 2013 09:38 AM (ZWaLo)
The media did this to Newt, too...back in the 90's.
Newt used Cspan to reach the people, direct, without the media filter.
There was talk of 'Newt for President'.
So they systematically set out to destroy him.
Of course, it didn't help that Newt's own ego provided additional ammunition for them to use.
Posted by: wheatie at March 07, 2013 09:38 AM (QPnFm)
http://tinyurl.com/atz3362
Posted by: kbdabear at March 07, 2013 01:34 PM (mCvL4)
Just saw on twitter that the 'Daily Currant' is a satire site.
Posted by: Tami[/i] at March 07, 2013 09:39 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at March 07, 2013 09:40 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: Marcus at March 07, 2013 09:40 AM (GGCsk)
Attorney General Eric Holder wrote Sen. Rand Paul,R-Ky., to confirm that President Obama does not have the authority to kill an American on U.S. soil in a non-combat situation, ObamaÂ’s spokesman announced today.
http://tinyurl.com/b9vdg7g
Posted by: Tami[/i] at March 07, 2013 09:40 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 07, 2013 09:40 AM (xIzGn)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 07, 2013 09:41 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 07, 2013 09:41 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: andycanuck at March 07, 2013 09:42 AM (ORGYc)
I really didn't like that movie. Broderick's character was a total d-bag. (Granted, the principal was a jerk and all, but still.)
Also, The Blues Brothers, which was an awesome film. Though part of the movie is that A) Jake and Elwood are doing this for a good cause, and B) they (spoiler!) do go to prison in the end.
Posted by: Lance at March 07, 2013 09:42 AM (0aMfR)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at March 07, 2013 09:42 AM (6zgse)
Rand Paul ... DRONES ... on and on..
Get it?! This is why YOU are not qualified to tell the masses what's what. Because YOU are not this clever.
Posted by: Warden at March 07, 2013 09:43 AM (0DlnM)
Posted by: Tami at March 07, 2013 01:39 PM
Damn, happens to the best of us!
Posted by: kbdabear at March 07, 2013 09:43 AM (mCvL4)
Posted by: Rick Ellison at March 07, 2013 09:44 AM (KHo8t)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 07, 2013 09:45 AM (xN73L)
Posted by: BSR at March 07, 2013 09:45 AM (CBCxo)
Posted by: Daybrother at March 07, 2013 09:45 AM (+paCV)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at March 07, 2013 09:45 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: navybrat at March 07, 2013 09:45 AM (CgiRY)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 07, 2013 09:45 AM (b8TXQ)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 07, 2013 09:47 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at March 07, 2013 09:47 AM (/b8+5)
I thought the game in TV was to fight for the top ratings spot? Did I miss something?
Posted by: Marcus at March 07, 2013 09:47 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Daybrother at March 07, 2013 09:48 AM (+paCV)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at March 07, 2013 09:48 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 07, 2013 09:48 AM (VtjlW)
I don't know who that is, but I know that gay = honorary white.
And white + gay = ultrawhite. That's why we all have to defer to them and watch the shitty TV shows they like.
--
I also seem to recall John Rambo being, in fact, a hallucinatory, violent killer who blew up half a town because somewhere in his mind he was reliving Vietnam.
In the first movie he wasn't heroic. He was fixed-idea crazy. But his antagonists' motivations were more irrational--and their ideas more madly fixed--than his.
That's sort of the point of the thing. It's a (belated) seventies movie. There are no good guys in it, just people stuck. You're not supposed to think he's cool.
Posted by: oblig. at March 07, 2013 09:48 AM (cePv8)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 07, 2013 09:48 AM (QupBk)
I'm surprised they didn't edit in Boos.
Posted by: Daybrother at March 07, 2013 01:45 PM (+paCV)
NBC is working on the tape right now to edit in a lot of racial slurs
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 07, 2013 09:48 AM (1Jaio)
We should bombard McCain's and Graham's offices with lollipops.
A sucker for two suckahs.
Posted by: soothsayer at March 07, 2013 01:45 PM (b8TXQ)
Lots of stuff you could send those a-holes...silver pieces, tiny fiddles(that could go 2 ways)...sky is the limit
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 07, 2013 09:48 AM (FIDMq)
45 Sorry if this has already been posted, but looks like Rand won:
Attorney General Eric Holder wrote Sen. Rand Paul,R-Ky., to confirm that
President Obama does not have the authority to kill an American on U.S.
soil in a non-combat situation, ObamaÂ’s spokesman announced today.
-----------
Thanks, Tami.
But I think we need to get a definition of..."non-combat situation".
Some guy wearing camo?
That's a combat situation!
Posted by: wheatie at March 07, 2013 09:48 AM (QPnFm)
Posted by: Warden at March 07, 2013 09:48 AM (0DlnM)
Huey Long wore black pants for a reason during his famous filibuster...
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at March 07, 2013 09:48 AM (yAor6)
There are lots of these.
Sadly, the one coming to mind most readily (because I *still* want those hours of my life back) is the Leonardo DiCaprio character in Titanic. He's a con-man who seduces another man's fiance. And we're supposed to be sad that he dies.
But, as ace mentions- you can really look at a bunch of Action Heroes. James Bond, with slightly different tone, is one evil sonofabitch. You could say Martin Riggs from the Lethal Weapon movies (at least the first one), too.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 07, 2013 09:49 AM (xN73L)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 07, 2013 09:49 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: "And turn down that damn rock and roll!" at March 07, 2013 09:49 AM (MT+0i)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 07, 2013 01:41 PM (VtjlW)
I sense some retirement opportunities for you.
Posted by: Heralder at March 07, 2013 09:49 AM (+xmn4)
Posted by: Bubba from County at March 07, 2013 09:49 AM (5PMD3)
Posted by: Bosk at March 07, 2013 09:50 AM (n2K+4)
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney quoted from the letter that Holder sent to Paul today. “Does the president have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on an American soil,” Holder wrote, per Carney. “The answer is no.”
Carney added that, “if the United States were under attack, there were an imminent threat,” the president has the authority to protect the country from that assault.
Posted by: Tami[/i] at March 07, 2013 09:50 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: alex® at March 07, 2013 09:50 AM (m9cpE)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 07, 2013 09:50 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at March 07, 2013 09:51 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: Mary Cloggenstein from Brattleboro, Vermont at March 07, 2013 09:51 AM (jCQ+I)
Meanwhile, we are mocking them and laughing at their abject ignorance and stupidity.
Did anyone ever tell them the media scores lower than anyone in the polls? One thing they do have is being resoundingly loathed, lower than lawyers. So they got that going for them.
Posted by: Marcus at March 07, 2013 09:52 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 07, 2013 09:52 AM (FIDMq)
And he's wrong. The President does not have the authority summarily to kill a US Citizen at any time. US Citizens are provided Due Process.
Now, if he dies because the only people who can stand up to him are SEAL Team 6, and they kill him trying to take him into custody, that's fine. If he just decides "Nope, that guy has a machine-gun and is firing back: that's a combat situation!" bzzzt. Wrong answer.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 07, 2013 09:52 AM (xN73L)
Posted by: Tami[/i] at March 07, 2013 09:52 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 07, 2013 09:53 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 09:54 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 07, 2013 01:52 PM (xN73L)
Instead of calling in a drone strike...call us instead!
Posted by: LAPD Housing Remodeling Unit at March 07, 2013 09:54 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: alex® at March 07, 2013 09:54 AM (m9cpE)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at March 07, 2013 09:54 AM (xAtAj)
Lol. "Another man's fiance" hated the slimy bastard she was being forced to marry.
It's a stupid movie, but there's nothing shameful in treating a woman like she's not livestock.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at March 07, 2013 09:54 AM (/kI1Q)
***
Bill Murray's character in Ghostbusters.
Posted by: WalrusRex at March 07, 2013 09:54 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: elevenwing Plover at March 07, 2013 09:54 AM (KXm42)
Honestly, I literally want to know whether the applause was because they approved of the filibuster, or whether they approved of the fact that he had finally stopped talking.
I would LOVE to see Sen. Paul do this sort of thing for a REAL issue - and there are surely DOZENS, but from what I've seen of the facts, he has chosen a non-issue to champion. Is the tactic, then, to start to behave like the Left now? Drum up excitement with the low-information voters on non-issues? This is just sad.
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 09:55 AM (Mxt9o)
Silence of the Lambs? Dr. Lechter?
Posted by: real joe at March 07, 2013 09:55 AM (lTlc7)
[I'd say Buddy even more than Guy.]
I'm not your buddy, guy!
Don't call me guy, pal!
We're not pals, buddy!
I'm not your buddy, guy!
Posted by: Warden at March 07, 2013 09:55 AM (0DlnM)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 07, 2013 09:56 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Daybrother at March 07, 2013 09:56 AM (+paCV)
Attorney General Eric Holder wrote Sen. Rand Paul,R-Ky., to confirm that
President Obama does not have the authority to kill an American on U.S.
soil in a non-combat situation, ObamaÂ’s spokesman announced today.
I'd send what ever hard copy he has to a lab to ensure that there is no invisible ink involved.
Do. Not. Trust.
Posted by: Cheri at March 07, 2013 09:56 AM (G+Wff)
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at March 07, 2013 09:57 AM (fMgJk)
Dorothy in The Wizard Of Oz.
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 07, 2013 09:57 AM (w+Dvf)
And that's exactly the point we're making.
If you treat him (the slimeball fiance) differently tonally, he's suddenly the good-guy. You could even use (most of) the same lines, just delivered with a slightly different tone of voice, and then he's not "treating a woman like she's livestock," he's instead trying to protect his naive and sheltered fiance from a con-man who just wants to get into her petticoat.
It's all about the tone.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 07, 2013 09:57 AM (xN73L)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 07, 2013 09:57 AM (vanqS)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 09:57 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 07, 2013 09:57 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Daybrother at March 07, 2013 09:58 AM (+paCV)
That annoying little piece of shit Rudy who thought he could fucking play football with the real players. Fuck that guy and his fucking enthusiasm.
What? We were all thinking it.
Posted by: Warden at March 07, 2013 09:58 AM (0DlnM)
I would LOVE to see Sen. Paul do this sort of thing for a REAL issue - and there are surely DOZENS, but from what I've seen of the facts, he has chosen a non-issue to champion. Is the tactic, then, to start to behave like the Left now? Drum up excitement with the low-information voters on non-issues? This is just sad.
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 01:55 PM (Mxt9o)
"You don't know very much, do you ? "
Posted by: The Jackhole at March 07, 2013 09:58 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Bubba from County at March 07, 2013 09:58 AM (5PMD3)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 07, 2013 09:58 AM (VtjlW)
Do. Not. Trust.
Posted by: Cheri at March 07, 2013 01:56 PM (G+Wff)
I would ask for a concrete definition of a 'combat situation' - as that, it seems, can bring down death from above.
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 07, 2013 09:59 AM (FIDMq)
The Oberlin College campus welcomes drone strikes! We will not tolerate descent and encourage President Obama to decimate those bigots who disagree with us. Tolerance forever.
Posted by: Oberlin College at March 07, 2013 09:59 AM (wIgpo)
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 07, 2013 09:59 AM (ccXZP)
Rand Paul's nearly 13 hour live filibuster of John Brennan's nomination to head the CIA got support for the Kentucky Republican from some unlikely places.
"He's using the filibuster the way it's meant to be used," said Jon Stewart, whose satire carries some political weight from his perch at "The Daily Show."
"It was a courageous and historic effort by Sen. Paul and his colleagues to demand information from this administration on an issue where they have refused to give it," said Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel to the ACLU. He said he hopes the ultimate broad Republican support for the filibuster signals a change in Congress.
"This is part of Congress reasserting its constitutional role of checks and balances between the president and the Congress. For too long on national security issues we've had congress out to lunch," said Anders.
Barry must be livid because this has completely overshadowed his little political theater dinner. It shows him as the inconsequential little prick that he should be
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 07, 2013 10:00 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 01:55 PM (Mxt9o)
American citizens being deprived of due process is not a "real" issue?
Posted by: Heralder at March 07, 2013 10:00 AM (+xmn4)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at March 07, 2013 10:00 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: elevenwing Plover at March 07, 2013 01:58 PM (KXm42)]
Yeah, you're doing it wrong. Just take the computer screen and rub it all over your groin. It'll make your balls smell like wealth and women will want to perform oral sex on you.
Seriously, I do it all the time.
Posted by: Warden at March 07, 2013 10:00 AM (0DlnM)
I know you all passed this on your SAT tests:
Hagel is to Bagel as Zucker is to _________________.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 07, 2013 10:01 AM (p/cQy)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 07, 2013 10:01 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Sheriff Joe at March 07, 2013 10:01 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 07, 2013 02:00 PM (GoIUi)
Is he going up and down ?
Posted by: The Jackhole at March 07, 2013 10:02 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Heralder at March 07, 2013 02:00 PM (+xmn4)
No topic is interesting unless it's interesting to me.
Duh.
I sort of get what Opt is saying, but the trick is to pick a topic that 3/4 of Americans can agree on, and use it as a wedge issue. It's politically brilliant, and makes JEF look like a SCOAMF.
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at March 07, 2013 10:02 AM (xAtAj)
If we had shot down one of the planes on 9/11 before it hit one of the towers, killing all on board, would that have been unconstitutional?
Posted by: angler at March 07, 2013 10:02 AM (SwjAj)
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 01:55 PM (Mxt9o)
Take the high road, eh, Optimizer? Time to start wringing your hands. Any chance at feeling pleased that once, this month, it almost felt like we were going over to the attack? That the initiative had passed from them to us?
Why is it even necessary to have to get a sense of the Senate resolution over the question in the first place?
Posted by: Mike James at March 07, 2013 10:02 AM (cgDgK)
85 Here's the rest of it wheatie:
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney quoted from the letter that
Holder sent to Paul today. “Does the president have the authority to use
a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on an
American soil,” Holder wrote, per Carney. “The answer is no.”
Carney added that, “if the United States were under attack, there
were an imminent threat,” the president has the authority to protect the
country from that assault.
---------
That all 'sounds' good.
But when you're dealing with weasels, who use weasel-words...it's hard to know what they mean.
"engaged in combat"..."under attack"..."eminent threat"
We think we know what these words mean.
But we have a Preezy who ran a website called "Attack Watch"...which called on citizens to report any verbal or written 'attacks' on him.
Many powerful Dems have called the Tea Party "terrorists".
They've also accused conservatives of waging a "War on Women".
So, when these same weasels have the power to determine what an "eminent threat" is...it is still a dangerous situation.
Posted by: wheatie at March 07, 2013 10:02 AM (QPnFm)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 07, 2013 02:01 PM (1WM2H)
FINE...you can have your stupid barrel back...and NOT sorry for the additional holes!
Posted by: Glory Hole Gramnesty at March 07, 2013 10:02 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Bubba from County at March 07, 2013 10:02 AM (5PMD3)
I am still pissed and McCain and Graham, especially saying the chances of drone strike on citizens is zero, hey dumbass? what about a bullet? is it ok if the prez murders that way asshole.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 07, 2013 10:03 AM (p/cQy)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 07, 2013 10:04 AM (g7xKU)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 10:04 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: beach at March 07, 2013 10:04 AM (XYSwB)
The cast of The Big Bang Theory.
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 07, 2013 10:04 AM (w+Dvf)
Ever seen the libtard matubatory flick "On Deadly Ground"
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 07, 2013 10:05 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 10:06 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 07, 2013 10:06 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: polynikes at March 07, 2013 10:06 AM (m2CN7)
I'm surprised they didn't edit in Boos.
Posted by: Daybrother at March 07, 2013 01:45 PM (+paCV)
----
hmmm. We have several opening for senior editors...
Posted by: AP at March 07, 2013 10:06 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: auldoux at March 07, 2013 10:06 AM (Kxz3Y)
But when black people get hit with a drone strike, the're all like THIS ... with their hips n' shit? And they're all, "Wasssup with THAT?!!"
Posted by: Time Traveling Black Comedian From 1987 at March 07, 2013 10:06 AM (0DlnM)
I must say that I find myself rooting for Boyd Crowder and even Ava on Justified.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at March 07, 2013 10:07 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 10:07 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at March 07, 2013 10:07 AM (qfMZe)
But when you're dealing with weasels, who use weasel-words...it's hard to know what they mean.
==========
Not that I disagree with you, but I *think* the wording is Rand Paul's wording.....not Holder's or Obama's, i.e. The Weasels.
Posted by: Tami[/i] at March 07, 2013 10:07 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 07, 2013 10:07 AM (0q2P7)
First: I should have said "On American Soil" (not that such wording changes your question- I just realized I missed it).
Second: That's a very good question. The question there, though, is not the targeting of US Citizens, but what level of "collateral damage" we're willing to accept. As has been said before: the Constitution is not a suicide pact.
In general, I would say that on September 11, 2001, that would have been unconstitutional. Until that day, we never imagined that someone would really hijack a plane full of innocent people and pilot them into buildings, including the Pentagon and (possibly) the Capitol or White House.
So firing on them then would have been killing a bunch of innocents to keep from having to negotiate with hijackers.
OTOH, if the same thing happened now, then I don't think it would be unconstitutional. Now the tactic has been used, and we have to assume they would like to use it again. So if someone hijacks a plane, then shooting that plane down could be justified. However much it would suck.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 07, 2013 10:07 AM (xN73L)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 07, 2013 10:07 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 07, 2013 10:08 AM (g7xKU)
Posted by: WalrusRex at March 07, 2013 10:08 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 07, 2013 10:08 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Tami[/i] at March 07, 2013 10:09 AM (X6akg)
Can anyone come up with an earlier example then 'Bonnie and Clyde'.
Murderous bank robbers as romantic heros
Posted by: AP at March 07, 2013 10:09 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: akula51 at March 07, 2013 10:09 AM (Vgn84)
As to movies with a perverse sense of heroism, there is no shortage. A kind of odd sort of example that comes to mind is the movie "Madagascar". I remember when I first saw it I was actually kind of confused at the end. I grew up on stories (even movies) where people sought freedom, and the end of the story - where justice is done, or they all live happily ever after - they achieve that freedom. In Madagascar, the main characters gain their freedom - despite themselves - and in the end literally seek to go back to being imprisoned!
The real heroes of the movie (and at least the public had the good sense to view them positively) were the penguins, who were the can-do, industrious types who had pulled off the escape in the first place. They were portrayed as comic relief.
So, the movie is hard-core Nanny-State propaganda, for programming kids. It really irks me - I can't watch it.
Oh, and somewhere in the mix the lion is demonized for becoming desirous of consuming one of his friends (who is some sort of animal that lions eat). In other words, he's evil for being a lion.
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 10:10 AM (Mxt9o)
Murderous bank robbers as romantic heros
***
There were bout a million Jesse James movies.
Posted by: WalrusRex at March 07, 2013 10:10 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: LizLem at March 07, 2013 10:10 AM (8wqqE)
Posted by: auldoux at March 07, 2013 10:10 AM (Kxz3Y)
@codepink
We are Americans who want to see more transparency. @SenRandPaul is taking a stand, will Democrats??
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at March 07, 2013 10:10 AM (fMgJk)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 07, 2013 10:11 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at March 07, 2013 10:11 AM (6zgse)
Posted by: akula51 at March 07, 2013 10:11 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: elevenwing Plover at March 07, 2013 10:11 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 07, 2013 10:11 AM (0q2P7)
And they'd have that funky music playing and some booty shakin goin' on in the background. But they'd have to stop once the first of the month came. Awww, yeah. Haha! You know why. Look, all the white people out there got all stiff and uncomfortable.
It's true! It's true! How you think them booty dancers gettin paid?
Posted by: Time Traveling Black Comedian From 1987 at March 07, 2013 10:12 AM (0DlnM)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at March 07, 2013 10:12 AM (wbmaj)
Posted by: akula51 at March 07, 2013 10:12 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: elevenwing Plover at March 07, 2013 10:12 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Joejm65 at March 07, 2013 10:13 AM (f7n8D)
Posted by: maddogg at March 07, 2013 10:13 AM (OlN4e)
True. But we didn't know that at the time. Not when it could have done any good.
If, theoretically, we could have gotten fighters on scene in NYC between the first hit and the second, shooting down the second WTC jet would have been okay. But we were all still in shock, then. It wasn't until that second airliner hit that everyone realized what had happened wasn't some monumental screw-up, but a deliberate attack.
You can't judge yesterday's actions with today's knowledge.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 07, 2013 10:13 AM (xN73L)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 07, 2013 10:13 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 10:13 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: angler at March 07, 2013 02:02 PM (SwjAj)
No, that would have been justifiable. The hijacked plane had been turned into a weapon by foreign nationals. Once the plane became a weapon, then due process was moot. The example Paul was using was some US citizen is sitting at a sidewalk cafe drinking a cup of coffee. That someone might be a known terrorist with plans to do great evil, but, right at that moment, it would be wrong for the POTUS to kill him w/o due process. Due process implies arrest with the chance to surrender and a trial.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at March 07, 2013 10:14 AM (kXoT0)
Murderous bank robbers as romantic heros
***
There were bout a million Jesse James movies.
Robin Hood.
To a lesser extent: Gilgamesh.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 07, 2013 10:14 AM (xN73L)
If Reince Preibus and the RNC have their shit together, they
should now be putting together a training program for every elected
Republican in the country on how to filibusters
First you gotta have balls. Most Repubs are missing theirs.
Posted by: katya the designated driver at March 07, 2013 10:14 AM (DoZD+)
There were bout a million Jesse James movies.
---
i expect he would be the 'star' of the movie, but was he treated as the hero?
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at March 07, 2013 10:14 AM (SO2Q8)
I think its funny that oblather made mccain and graham look like fools again right after they went after Rand Paul.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 07, 2013 10:15 AM (p/cQy)
Posted by: katya the designated driver at March 07, 2013 10:15 AM (DoZD+)
One who was a villian througout the movie and then did a 'heroic' gesture at the end was Alec Baldwin's character in The Cooler.
Posted by: polynikes at March 07, 2013 10:17 AM (m2CN7)
Let's get back to talking about what good head we both gave Obama under the restaurant table last night!
Posted by: Senators McCain and Lindsey at March 07, 2013 10:17 AM (ggRof)
it hit one of the towers, killing all on board, would that have been
unconstitutional?
What was your target? The people on board or the plane? The plane obviously, the death of the people is incidental. The military calls it collateral damage. And yes it is permissible. It would be the same as shooting down a Pear Harbor raider over populated Oahu, knowing that people would die when the plane crashed.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 07, 2013 10:18 AM (0q2P7)
McCain's relevance was gone the day he lost the election. Sure he won reelction after that. He could have hung on. He could have served a purpose with his military background. But the day he didn't really standup against Hagel confirmed for me what has been obvious for years.
Posted by: SH at March 07, 2013 10:18 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at March 07, 2013 10:18 AM (Ec6wH)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 10:19 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: SH at March 07, 2013 10:19 AM (gmeXX)
Apparently issues of the Constitution are not understandable to low information voters and need not be addressed. However, bathroom issues are an issue that must be broadcast. First.
Posted by: Regular Moron at March 07, 2013 01:41 PM (feFL6)
Baby talk. Just as Ace said in the last thread.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 07, 2013 10:19 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at March 07, 2013 10:19 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 07, 2013 01:29 PM (T0NGe)
The 'Matrix' movies, where Keanu Reeves' Neo character and his pals kill more unwitting security guards, police officers, and innocent bystanders than the plagues of Egypt. Even though these people are stored in tanks somewhere in the real world and used as energy sources by the machines, we're told if you die in the Matrix, you die.
Eggs, omelets, whatever.
Posted by: troyriser at March 07, 2013 10:19 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: © Sponge at March 07, 2013 10:20 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at March 07, 2013 10:20 AM (wbmaj)
The Sheriff was a duly appointed official going about his duties. They weren't very nice duties, but they were his duties. And, again, we're talking "tone," here. If you change the "tone" of how you deal with the characters in the story of Robin Hood, you have an outlaw who is stealing from the treasury to prevent the English Crown from paying the ransom for the rightful king. That "John Wants to be King" stuff was kind of assumed. There's also the part where at least once before the events of Robin Hood John had levied his vassals to pay the ransom for Richard.
You've heard the term "A King's Ransom?" Yeah.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 07, 2013 10:20 AM (xN73L)
can you come up with some examples where a movie actually does this,
takes someone who by any measure is a villain and, tonally, makes him a
hero?
Every heist movie ever?
That's why as soon as I read that a movie's main storyline is a heist they've lost me. I just have no interest in travails of career criminals.
Posted by: Decaf at March 07, 2013 10:21 AM (Dqox6)
Posted by: akula51 at March 07, 2013 10:21 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: SH at March 07, 2013 10:22 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at March 07, 2013 10:22 AM (Ec6wH)
Posted by: Decaf at March 07, 2013 02:21 PM (Dqox6)
How can you not like Heat?
Posted by: polynikes at March 07, 2013 10:22 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at March 07, 2013 10:22 AM (Ju5ZD)
Jayne Cobb is a villain I root for.
Shoot, the whole crew is a bunch of pirates. Speaking of pirates, Depp's band of murderers, rapists and thieves (including Barbosa's gang) are all anti-heroes.
Posted by: katya the designated driver at March 07, 2013 10:23 AM (DoZD+)
208Even Oskar Schindler was a bit of a cad and opportunist. Other than that, he was a pretty good guy.
----
I thought about him. At the beginning he's just a lesser villian. A parasite feeding off the dying jews of Kracow. He's an immoral profiteer, in it for the money and the free pussy.
He's a hero because he is transformed from all of that. He is redeemed by the lives he saves.
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at March 07, 2013 10:23 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 10:24 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 07, 2013 10:24 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Current (No more analogies) SAT kid at March 07, 2013 10:24 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Tami at March 07, 2013 01:39 PM (X6akg)
Yeah, that name is so serious sounding, that anybody could be fooled.
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at March 07, 2013 10:25 AM (673KB)
@141 "... Take the high road, eh, Optimizer? Time to start wringing your hands. Any chance at feeling pleased that once, this month, it almost felt like we were going over to the attack? That the initiative had passed from them to us?
Why is it even necessary to have to get a sense of the Senate resolution over the question in the first place?"
I would LOVE to partake in that feeling, but this "attack" is a big tease. There is still no attack on real issues, just this fake one to try to feel good about. It reminds me of the media "bravely speaking truth to power" by taking swipes at the oh-so-dangerous George W Bush. It's a joke. Nobody has really stood up to anybody about anything real, just a show for suckers who want to feel good thumbing "the man", like some loser who does buys into Global Warming because it affords the opportunity to feel virtuous, even though it accomplishes nothing good, and actually causes harm.
Holder hasn't had to answer for his (real!) contempt-of-Congress, no answers have been had on Fast and Furious or Benghazi (where we were literally told, with even MORE contempt, "What difference does it make?" - by the most likely next presidential contender, no less), the march to Socialized medicine (which will undoubtly undermine my own health someday) carries on unabated, my wife's uncle's Delphi pension remains stolen, GM remains half-nationalized, and I'm not even half-warmed up yet.
Do any of you guys even have a quote from either Obama or Holder where they claimed to have the right you say they are asserting? I didn't think so.
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 10:25 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at March 07, 2013 10:25 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 07, 2013 10:26 AM (0q2P7)
I guess that, unlike Ms. Lindsey, the WH thought Rand Paul's question deserved an answer.
Stupid Ms. Lindsey.
And speaking of Lindsey Graham, that is one horsy grin in the sidebar. Tell me it's photoshopped, no-one has choppers that size.
Posted by: Decaf at March 07, 2013 10:27 AM (Dqox6)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 07, 2013 10:28 AM (g7xKU)
Posted by: GardenGnome at March 07, 2013 10:28 AM (XwDPQ)
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 02:25 PM (Mxt9o)
It was in a letter from Holder as an anwser to a series of questions posed to him by the committee. Senator Cruz seized on that answer and made Holder backtrack.
Posted by: polynikes at March 07, 2013 10:28 AM (m2CN7)
Not a movie, but am I the only who who, in the Looney Toons cartoons, always rooted for Wile E and Sylvester and Elmer and Daffy? All the antagonists basically. You knew they were never gonna succeed, and I always wanted them to get just one win. I REALLY hated Tweety Bird in particular, which maybe that ties back into the cuteness/rage thing?
Posted by: LizLem at March 07, 2013 10:29 AM (8wqqE)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 02:13 PM (9Bj8R)
From what I recall she (the pilot in the F-16) was unarmed and planned to run into the other plane.
Probably for the best. The terrorists would just have taken her sidewinders and raped everyone.
Posted by: Jollyroger at March 07, 2013 10:29 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at March 07, 2013 10:30 AM (qfMZe)
Can we all just take a moment to savor the irony of Holder et al using the 9/11 planes as an example of when drone force is necessary...after years of using Cheney's admitted willingness to shoot down one of the 9/11 hijacked planes as justification that he is, in fact, eeeeevil incarnate?
Posted by: Lizzy at March 07, 2013 10:30 AM (QEUX+)
That's too bad, because Leverage was intermittently really awesome for 5 seasons. Especially the episode where they tase Wil Wheaton.
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 02:24 PM (B/VB5)
OK then. Wil Wheaton being tased is definitely worth watching.
Posted by: Decaf at March 07, 2013 10:31 AM (Dqox6)
I took this from the IMDB Errol Flynn version
"With King Richard the Lionhearted away fighting wars in the Holy Land, his brother Prince John seizes the Regency. The Normans are hard on the Saxon peasants, and when Prince John learns that Richard is being held for ransom in Vienna, he taxes them beyond all reasonable limits supposedly to pay for his release. Sir Robin of Locksley, a Saxon lord, rebels against the Prince and his principal henchman, Sir Guy of Gisbourne. Declared an outlaw, he takes up residence in Sherwood Forest and begins to surround himself with those who are loyal to King Richard: "
I don't see fighting against tyranny as making you a villain. How should the founding fathers (a bunch of traitors) be treated?
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at March 07, 2013 10:31 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 10:31 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: elevenwing at March 07, 2013 10:32 AM (KXm42)
Anti hero movies? Seriously? There is a metric shit ton of them.
Hell, Brando usually played one. There were classes of them in the 70s, Scarface in the 80s, anything Tarantino, Hannibal had his own show...
Hollywood loves the antihero.
Posted by: Jollyroger at March 07, 2013 10:32 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: polynikes at March 07, 2013 10:32 AM (m2CN7)
@246
I remember there was a chick who gave an interview a few years ago. I think it was linked here. She was on Wasington aircap that day.
Posted by: Jollyroger at March 07, 2013 10:33 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at March 07, 2013 10:33 AM (qfMZe)
Posted by: LizLem at March 07, 2013 02:29 PM (8wqqE)
Me too, I found Tweety Bird dethpicable.
Posted by: Decaf at March 07, 2013 10:34 AM (Dqox6)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 10:36 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: Lizzy at March 07, 2013 10:36 AM (QEUX+)
Jayne Cobb is a villain I root for. Shoot, the whole crew is a bunch of pirates.
----
Another case of the lesser villians. The Alliance is the Villian of the series and Serenity's crew is sort of freedom fighters. (not so much Jayne). I contrast that with the Bonnie and Clyde i mentioned. Simple criminals without any redeeming cause.
An interesting case might be John Brown, i could imagine making a movie casting him as hero or villian.
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at March 07, 2013 10:36 AM (SO2Q8)
"F-16 pilot was ready to give her life on Sept. 11"- http://wapo.st/nmBMSW
Posted by: 80sBaby at March 07, 2013 10:37 AM (YjDyJ)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 07, 2013 10:37 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at March 07, 2013 10:39 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 02:25 PM (Mxt9o)
It was in a letter from Holder as an anwser to a series of questions posed to him by the committee. Senator Cruz seized on that answer and made Holder backtrack." What's the quote? Make me feel stupid and uninformed - please! All I have seen is clips from Holder's actual testimony, and he does not assert any such authority. He actually asserts the contrary, IIRC. At any rate, we're getting spun up over a hypothetical - because Obama has refused to tell us yet another bold-faced lie, as soon as we DEMAND it!! It's madness.
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 10:40 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at March 07, 2013 10:41 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 07, 2013 10:41 AM (g7xKU)
@260
'... I am sorry to inform you that politics at the national level today mostly IS a "show for suckers." Images. Political theater. Soundbites. '
I'm sure it has been for longer than I've been alive. The point is for US - in this forum - not to be the suckers.
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 10:42 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: Lizzy at March 07, 2013 10:44 AM (QEUX+)
Posted by: Nino at March 07, 2013 10:46 AM (eyuLr)
Posted by: Joejm65 at March 07, 2013 10:49 AM (UZuc4)
This discussion had me consider just the opposite scenario.
John McCain was considered a hero for quite sometime for his service and POW conduct.
John McCain now, at least to me, is the diametric opposite of a hero. His conduct is similar to betrayal in addition to being a whiney, arrogant snot. He has no traits of heroism and he used up all of his reserves.
Posted by: polynikes at March 07, 2013 10:50 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: typo dynamofo at March 07, 2013 10:51 AM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at March 07, 2013 10:51 AM (Ju5ZD)
Posted by: Gmac - Waiting for the revolution at March 07, 2013 10:55 AM (IanLz)
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 02:40 PM (Mxt9o
Holder indicated that under extraordinary circumstances it a strike would be allowed.
WASHINGTON (CBSDC) — Attorney General Eric Holder and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, got into a heated discussion during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing about the use of drones against American citizens.
Questioning Holder about a letter he sent to Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., in which the attorney general said it would take an “extraordinary circumstance” to use a drone to kill an American on U.S. soil, Cruz asked if such lethal force would be constitutional.
Posted by: polynikes at March 07, 2013 10:58 AM (m2CN7)
People don't like to hear this, but being a POW doesn't make you a hero, it just makes you less lucky than the guy wasn't, and more lucky (usually) than the guy who was KIA. The heroism lies in going into combat, putting your life on the line for the country. The guys who came out OK were just as heroic as the ones who didn't. In SOME cases, there must have been guys who did something stupid, and got themselves in trouble that way - which is not heroic. The elevation of those who got hurt is basically survivor's guilt, more than actual heroism.
That being said, Sen McCain MEETS my criteria - he put himself at risk in service to the country. Shame on anyone who questions his heroism, regardless of his current shortcomings. It would have been refreshing to have a war hero in the WH again.
You're also forgetting about how he refused special treatment while he was a POW. Again, he may currently be a disappointment in many ways, but shame on anyone for questioning his character and downplaying his service. He may not be heroic these days, but that doesn't take away from what he has done in the past. By the same token, "past results do not guarantee future returns"...
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 11:05 AM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: Pervy Grin at March 07, 2013 11:07 AM (OxKj2)
McCain, for as much as I despise him now, was not a hero for being a POW. He was a hero for being a heroic resistor in the face of repeated, actual torture. Read the accounts of the guys who were there.
Posted by: typo dynamofo at March 07, 2013 11:12 AM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 03:05 PM (Mxt9o)
Agreed. I don't like attempts to denigrate McCain's character or downplay his service. He's wrongheaded much of the time and almost Bidenesque in his inability to understand what's going on around him and his daughter is a complete ditz, but I don't doubt his love of country.
Posted by: troyriser at March 07, 2013 11:12 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: glide55 at March 07, 2013 11:14 AM (Z2aee)
Posted by: Optimizer at March 07, 2013 03:05 PM (Mxt9o)
I did not question his heroism in the past, but I question his character now and for the past twenty years. He has done much to betray the things I believe in and his heroism in the past does not bind me to everlasting servitude.
I can name a few military men on the top of my head who showed great heroism who unfortunately made bad and immoral choices subsequent to that heroism. They do not get the respect you demand for McCain.
Posted by: polynikes at March 07, 2013 11:30 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at March 07, 2013 12:15 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: GalosGann at March 07, 2013 12:44 PM (T3KlW)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3604 seconds, 405 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: AmishDude at March 07, 2013 09:29 AM (T0NGe)