May 06, 2013
— Ace She rejects the political fiction of a "clump of cells" that the left and the media (but I repeat myself) pushes.
I’ll put my cards on the table: I think life begins at conception and would love to live in a world where no women ever felt she needed to get an abortion. However, I know enough people who are pro-abortion rights—indeed, I was one of them for most of my life—to know that reasonable and sincere people can disagree about when meaningful life begins. They also can disagree about how to weigh that moral uncertainty against a woman’s right to control her body—and her own life. I have only ever voted for Democrats, so overturning Roe v. Wade is not one of my priorities. I never want to return to the days of gruesome back-alley abortions.But medical advances since Roe v. Wade have made it clear to me that late-term abortion is not a moral gray area, and we need to stop pretending it is. No six-months-pregnant woman is picking out names for her “fetus.” It’s a baby. Let’s stop playing Orwellian word games. We are talking about human beings here.
How is this OK? Even liberal Europe gets this. In France, Germany, Italy, and Norway, abortion is illegal after 12 weeks. In addition to the life-of-mother exception, they provide narrow health exceptions that require approval from multiple doctors or in some cases going before a board. In the U.S., if you suggest such stringent regulation and oversight of later-term abortions, you are tarred within seconds by the abortion rights movement as a misogynist who doesn’t “trust women.”
Speaking as a liberal who endorses more government regulation of practically everything—banks, water, air, food, oil drilling, animal safety—I am eternally perplexed by the fury the abortion rights contingent displays at the suggestion that the government might have a serious role to play in the issue of abortion, especially later-term abortion.
She then analogizes NARAL to the NRA, a comparison that occurred to me as well, though I would put it differently than Kristen Powers. Let's look at the media's alleged problem with the NRA.
What is the problem with the NRA? That the NRA, to protect a core right, illogically and wrongly blocks "common sense legislation" on the outer peripheries of that right, and this is terrible because the "great majority of the public" wants such "common sense legislation." Furthermore, the NRA, because of its central position in politics, is able to scare off politicians from "doing the right thing" by branding them as weak in The Cause. That dratted NRA just won't compromise.
Remember that the media is required to disguise all substantive policy opinions as merely opinions about procedure. That's why their beef against the NRA is phrased as if the substance of the right, the right to be armed, is the furthest thing from their mind. No, as the media tells the tale, their disapproval with the NRA is not about what the NRA protects but merely how it protects it.
Well: if all we're talking about is tactics and not substance, how is NARAL different than the NRA at all?
Watch how easy it is for me to re-write the above paragraph starting "What's the problem with the NRA?" to direct it against NARAL:
What is the problem with NARAL? That the NARAL, to protect a core right, illogically and wrongly blocks "common sense legislation" on the outer peripheries of that right, and this is terrible because the "great majority of the public" wants such "common sense legislation." Furthermore, NARAL, because of its central position in politics, is able to scare off politicians from "doing the right thing" by branding them as weak in The Cause. That dratted NARAL just won't compromise.
Now, if the media's objection to the NRA is strictly procedural and not about the substance of which rights the media believes should be guaranteed by the Constitution -- why isn't NARAL attacked by the media for the same sins?
Note: I'm not actually analogizing the two. I'm saying that if the media claims this is its problem with the NRA, and this has nothing to do with its leftist bias, why aren't they flogging NARAL for similarly pushing the "most extreme interpretation of the right under question" and "absolutely refusing to cede even the smallest amount of territory in the name of common-sense compromise?"
Recently we saw a Planned Parenthood representative stating that it was her opinion, and her employers' opinion, that the decision whether or not to kill an already-born baby was between the mother and her doctor.
Where's the media's interest in "extremism"? Oh right, they're goddamned liars and they're not against "extremism" so long as it's extremism of the left.
Posted by: Ace at
03:36 PM
| Comments (251)
Post contains 807 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Ezra Jay Carney-Klein--now with new stuff! at May 06, 2013 03:39 PM (r2PLg)
Which to the left is an oxymoron. You can't be left and too extreme.
Posted by: pep at May 06, 2013 03:40 PM (6TB1Z)
Soon to be torn apart by the MFM in 3...2...1...
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 06, 2013 03:41 PM (lVPtV)
I appreciate her coming forward on this, because I am sure she is going to get a lot of flack.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 06, 2013 03:41 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 06, 2013 03:42 PM (lVPtV)
Kirsten Powers Fun Fact
Kirsten Powers briefly dated former Congressman Anthony Weiner in 2002, and remained his close friend after their romantic relationship ended.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 06, 2013 03:42 PM (kdS6q)
KP: I never want to return to the days of gruesome back-alley abortions.
Don't tell me what went on in Gosnell's House of Horrors isn't gruesome.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 03:43 PM (+z4pE)
She is slowly seeing the light. She did date Anthony Weiner, pretty hard to live that one down. Why is her hair always orange ?
Posted by: The Jackhole at May 06, 2013 03:43 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: A Leftist Paradigm of Rational Policy Discussion at May 06, 2013 03:44 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: boulder hobo at May 06, 2013 03:45 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: Ronster at May 06, 2013 03:45 PM (lwnOz)
Posted by: Dave S. at May 06, 2013 03:46 PM (UvR6d)
I've been following the Kirsten Powers conservative transformation for a couple years now. Her transformation is taking longer than most...but she just mouths most liberal positions nowadays. Probably to maintain her paying gigs.
Always knew she was too pretty for a liberal.
Posted by: Icedog at May 06, 2013 03:46 PM (ZolUS)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 06, 2013 03:46 PM (8ZskC)
Barky, himself, is an extremist...by his own definition.
His idea of 'compromise' is to do it his way, or not at all.
If you don't do what he wants...then you are labeled "unreasonable" and an extremist.
So if you copy his behavior, then he calls you an extremist.
Posted by: wheatie at May 06, 2013 03:47 PM (Tjo5u)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 06, 2013 03:48 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: U.W.P. at May 06, 2013 03:49 PM (o+Mtb)
Did somebody summon me again?
Posted by: The Outrageous Strawman at May 06, 2013 03:49 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 06, 2013 03:49 PM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Mandrill Redass at May 06, 2013 03:50 PM (lT6go)
I think the gruesomeness of Gosnell's "practice" should be recited to every single abortion-rights proponent. And I'm talking getting down and dirty with the descriptions, right to their faces.
Make them own the barbarity, the jars full of infants' feet, the snipped spines of newborns, the babies flushed down the toilets, the deaths of the adults.
"This is what you support? How do you call yourself human?"
I am so over being civil to these people anymore.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 03:50 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: Icedog at May 06, 2013 03:50 PM (3qKP/)
Posted by: Kommissar Janeane Gar-awful-0 at May 06, 2013 03:50 PM (GtPfa)
Posted by: the media's interest at May 06, 2013 03:51 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: U.W.P. at May 06, 2013 07:49 PM (o+Mtb)
Excellent point. Any high risk mother to be that actually has her life on the line with a continued pregnancy is certainly going to look in the Yellow pages or Yelp to find the nearest abortion provider to keep her safe!
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 06, 2013 03:52 PM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Dan Collins at May 06, 2013 03:52 PM (/JxW7)
Now, onto the next step.
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 03:53 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Sarcastic and Radicalized Redneck Queen at May 06, 2013 03:54 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 03:55 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: huerfano at May 06, 2013 03:55 PM (bAGA/)
Posted by: wooga at May 06, 2013 03:56 PM (BhTwW)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at May 06, 2013 03:56 PM (WxJTH)
Interesting. Having conceded the origin of life at conception in the first sentence, she then tacks on the subjective qualifier of "meaningful," a wholly subjective quality on the part of those whose desire it is to end that life. As I recall, the world "meaningful" doesn't appear in the list of unalienable rights appurtenant to the status of "human being."
Posted by: RS at May 06, 2013 03:56 PM (YAGV/)
Last week, on The Five, Greg Gutfeld had a great line: "The media didn't want to report on Gosnell because they were afraid what they would see in their own soul."
It's time conservatives really make a stand against abortion. The facts are on our side, the emotions are on our side and there are a thousand ways to push back, starting with such strict abortion clinic mandates that it makes them costly and near impossible to operate.
Posted by: Liberty Lover at May 06, 2013 03:58 PM (eQ4W/)
Posted by: Dan Collins at May 06, 2013 03:58 PM (/JxW7)
Posted by: Dan Collins at May 06, 2013 03:59 PM (/JxW7)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 06, 2013 03:59 PM (yJYwC)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at May 06, 2013 03:59 PM (pmsMR)
Posted by: Jay in PA at May 06, 2013 03:59 PM (WSgyE)
Posted by: Stirner at May 06, 2013 04:02 PM (Ytuz8)
I can't help but remember Justice Clarence Thomas' reference to "natural rights." This issue, IMO, fits his definition well.
Life at conception, if left alone to Nature and Nature's God, results in a human. I'm of course discounting real diseases or other causes. I'm speaking in general.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 04:03 PM (+z4pE)
Restaurants have to close if they violate health laws and don't clean up their act. But abortion clinics? No problem says PP.
Posted by: Cheri at May 06, 2013 04:03 PM (EAgmr)
There's been more MSM coverage of "The Cicadas Are Coming"...than the Gosnell trial.
Which is only a story for the NE part of the county, because we get those noisy little buggers every summer, here in OK.
Yet another reason for Liberals to stay away from OK.
The Cicadas will getcha.
Posted by: wheatie at May 06, 2013 04:03 PM (Tjo5u)
Posted by: LGoPs at May 06, 2013 04:03 PM (4x8W0)
Posted by: Ernie McCracken at May 06, 2013 04:04 PM (ZETiK)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 04:04 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at May 06, 2013 04:05 PM (x1L8S)
Posted by: Jay in PA at May 06, 2013 04:05 PM (WSgyE)
Posted by: rickl at May 06, 2013 04:05 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: The ACC Sucks at May 06, 2013 04:05 PM (Rk8LS)
Posted by: Mandrill Redass at May 06, 2013 04:05 PM (lT6go)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 06, 2013 04:05 PM (yJYwC)
47...Life at conception, if left alone to Nature and Nature's God, results in a human.
But Liberals claim to be all for Nature, and what is 'All Natural'.
There is nothing 'All Natural' about an abortion.
Posted by: wheatie at May 06, 2013 04:07 PM (Tjo5u)
"middle ground" compromises are the mark of a dying culture
and "middle ground" compromises have a knack of always favoring the Left
Posted by: soothsayer at May 06, 2013 04:07 PM (GcwH1)
The fact that they fight for restrictions to catch and stop Gosnell type cases is proof that they'd just as soon those "urban trash" wimmens die.
Posted by: palerider at May 06, 2013 04:07 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: Jay in PA at May 06, 2013 04:07 PM (WSgyE)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II[/i]
I prefer the pseudo-religion framework. Mental illness doesn't really require automatic gainsaying of demonstrably true elements of human nature; menz and wimmenz are interchangeable, high taxes don't discourage productivity, America's success is due to its evilness, etc.
The Left really come across as a broken and half-assed cult, defiantly standing in the face of our physical world and human nature.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 06, 2013 04:07 PM (Yr6sH)
*scribbles "Crock of Obama" in the margins of AoSHQ Style Manual*
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 04:08 PM (+z4pE)
Only if I see that she has a true epiphany will I believe her.
Posted by: Cheri at May 06, 2013 04:10 PM (EAgmr)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 04:11 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: Extremely grumpy momma bear at May 06, 2013 04:11 PM (YJo3a)
Posted by: Craig Poe at May 06, 2013 04:11 PM (BVkEs)
Posted by: RWC at May 06, 2013 04:11 PM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: mallfly at May 06, 2013 04:11 PM (bJm7W)
The fact that the left fights AGAINST inspections and sanitary standards should be thrown in their face as proof that they must want poor urban women encouraged to wait until that fetus is a baby (per Kirsten's words) and then going to a Dr Gosnell type horror shop where they will at minimum suffer serious mental distress and could very well wind up with serious infections, injuries or even death.
Posted by: palerider at May 06, 2013 04:12 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: The Tolerant Left at May 06, 2013 04:14 PM (8DnZn)
Posted by: U.W.P. at May 06, 2013 04:15 PM (o+Mtb)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 04:15 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: Josef at May 06, 2013 04:17 PM (Kd2Tr)
There is nothing 'All Natural' about an abortion.
Exactly.
These Leftarded idiots need to be confronted with their bullshit. Make them uncomfortable, prick their conscience, make them see their confusions and contradictions. Some of them will wake up, as KP is attempting to do.
The rest? We'll deal with them later. They are the ones who should be marginalized. This Gosnell case is good, in that it gives us the opportunity to highlight the inhuman practices that our government has somehow deemed "legal."
"What the fuck is wrong with you?" seems like a good retort to these people.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 04:17 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I am at May 06, 2013 04:17 PM (fggky)
Posted by: RWC at May 06, 2013 04:17 PM (Wl/Ht)
I used to be like Kirsten on abortion--but all the scientific research supports "No Late-Term Abortion." (Progs love science, except when they don't, like on the abortion issue.)
The reason for no limits on abortion is STOP H8IN' WIMYN, U H8ERS.
Posted by: Quint&Jessel, Sea of Azof, Bly, UK at May 06, 2013 04:18 PM (7v5Ct)
Abortion providers under maximum government scrutiny = Bad, evil, wimmen-hating!!!
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 06, 2013 04:18 PM (Yr6sH)
Posted by: hello, it's me Donna at May 06, 2013 04:18 PM (9+ccr)
-C. Everett Koop, M.D., former U.S. Surgeon General
Posted by: U.W.P. at May 06, 2013 08:15 PM (o+Mtb)
***
THIS. I have always, always thought this. If the mother's health is in danger, why in the hell would you try to pull the baby through the birth canal? Of course you would do a C-section, if health of the mother was the concern. The problem though is that at the end of the C-section you have a live baby. Hence the 'notion' that you protect the mother's health by delivering the baby through the birth canal and then killing it as it emerges.
It's the fucking lies that I can't abide.
Posted by: LGoPs at May 06, 2013 04:19 PM (4x8W0)
Posted by: thunderb at May 06, 2013 04:20 PM (EZYc8)
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I am at May 06, 2013 04:21 PM (fggky)
Posted by: RWC at May 06, 2013 04:22 PM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: U.W.P. at May 06, 2013 08:15 PM (o+Mtb)
I study a lot of these cases and I can't only point to one solitary case of this. And it's the so called "phoenix case" that arose about 2 years back now.
But it was strange, bizarre, and probably could have been handled different before it reached the train wreck outcome it did. (And there's still debate over whether labor could have been induced in that case.)
But, what also made it unique was the mother in that case was pro-life and wanted to carry the baby as far as possible before inducing labor to give it the best chance. Then things went pear shaped in little more than 48 hours leading to the catastrophe it became. (And for what it's worth I'm not touching that case with a 10 foot pole. I may oscillate between crazy and career suicidal, but I'm not THAT crazy or career suicidal.)
Posted by: tsrblke at May 06, 2013 04:23 PM (GaqMa)
Oh if you want my to go ballistic on you, give me the liberal tripe "God aborts almost one in five of every child conceived" (or the like) God kills us all in time; You've just made an argument why that makes it OK for someone to kill YOU right now.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at May 06, 2013 04:23 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: RWC at May 06, 2013 04:23 PM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 04:24 PM (XvHmy)
Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss didn't seem fazed by a rare congressional invitation to golf with President Barack Obama Monday, sinking a hole-in-one on the par-three 11th hole. The ace shot helped lead Chambliss and GOP teammate Sen. Bob Corker or Tennessee to victory over the Democratic duo of Obama and Colorado Sen. Mark Udall on an outing meant to strengthen ties between the president and Congress.
Posted by: mallfly at May 06, 2013 04:26 PM (bJm7W)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 08:24 PM (XvHmy)
In fairness to Koop, they hadn't invented abortion pills yet, so abortion was not the treatment, Tube removal was.
Posted by: tsrblke at May 06, 2013 04:26 PM (GaqMa)
http://tinyurl.com/ccocgg3
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 08:24 PM (XvHmy)
***
Then I stand corrected. I suspect the number requiring that is probably very small and in a sane society, would be taken care of anyway.
Posted by: LGoPs at May 06, 2013 04:28 PM (4x8W0)
Posted by: toby928© at May 06, 2013 04:28 PM (QupBk)
Killing puppies & kitties bad! Unless your PETA - that's okay
Crazy people with guns killing people is bad - so take away the rights of legal gun owners under the guise of "It's for the children!"
Abortion on Demand - Great! Choice! But taxpayers need to pay for it and the Catholic church and other religions must adhere to our abortion mandates!
Bush - War Criminal, Hitler, 9/11 inside job
Obama - President Gutsy Call! Got OBL! Long Live our King! Loved around the world
Bush - Dumbass!
Obama - Dreamy!
Actually I could keep going on this list but it is making me kind of sick.
Posted by: Cheri at May 06, 2013 04:30 PM (EAgmr)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 04:31 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: wattyler1381 at May 06, 2013 04:31 PM (F2Vrz)
Posted by: Jay in PA at May 06, 2013 08:07 PM (WSgyE)
Even the most hardened pro-abortion voter, when faced with this reality, has to cringe. I hope so, anyway...that they would want to save a puppy from a puppy mill...or gasp when Chris Christie kills a spider, then continue to believe in the "clump of cells fetus" and not cringe at the thought of infanticide and Gosnell's hell clinic. Kirsten is correct...I never once referred to the baby growing within me as a "fetus."
The "clump of cells" picture is what progressives cling to, that and their misshapen belief in "rights" yet denying the rights of a human infant. It is quite the conundrum for them, no? Yet they yap on. This, and other liberal causes, have become their idol and the altar upon which they worship. These "open-minded" people are only open-minded to their own repetitive lies which the media and politicians perpetuate.
When progressive issues invade churches, as it has, we have a problem...but it is a hill I may die on as I have stood up to our own denomination and left, a week ago, for a reformed church, created due to the differences and wishing to adhere to Biblical teachings. In fact, as I had no idea who the guy in the suit was at a recent meeting or I may have been shy, I laid bare my soul and challenged the suits. I told him (a head honcho of the state in our denomination) that I will someday answer to God and not these "leaders." Liberals have empowered me, and they had better get off my lawn.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 06, 2013 04:33 PM (baL2B)
NARAL is fighting against the right of unborn babies to be born. We have a right to life; there is not a right for someone else to kill us because we aren't convenient.
Of course, that argument won't work in real life because Look, Squirrels!
Posted by: cranky-d at May 06, 2013 04:33 PM (y1rgI)
I'm sorry, I just can't deal with an argument that starts with "people can disagree about when life begins." No, they can't. It's a scientific fact. There's no personhood fairy. We can mark the exact moment when the male and female pronuclei fuse to form a new, unique human being. Saying that people can disagree with this fact is like saying that people can disagree that water is H20.
Posted by: Lauren at May 06, 2013 04:34 PM (CFNW8)
So you're fine with Gosnell since he was out in the open? So noted.
Posted by: NR Pax at May 06, 2013 04:35 PM (U+O64)
Posted by: tmitsss at May 06, 2013 04:36 PM (rzVkR)
Posted by: Cheri at May 06, 2013 08:30 PM (EAgmr)
Posted by: wattyler1381 at May 06, 2013 08:31 PM (F2Vrz)
If we don't impose our will upon these "people," then they'll impose their will upon us.
A big part of the problem is that we didn't when we had the opportunity. This whole abortion issue just might get turned around with the right kind of societal pressure.
Maybe prefacing my "WTFIWWY?" with "You can't be serious, didn't you hear about Gosnell?" would be prudent. This is a big enough story to where only those who willfully ignore the news haven't heard about it.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 04:38 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: Lauren at May 06, 2013 04:38 PM (CFNW8)
Two women who went missing as teenagers about a decade ago were found alive Monday in a residential area just south of downtown, within a few miles of where they disappeared.
CBS affiliate WOIO in Cleveland reports police arrested a 52-year-old man at the house where the three women were found.
http://tinyurl.com/c2p88qe
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 06, 2013 04:38 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: palerider at May 06, 2013 04:39 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: Jay in PA at May 06, 2013 04:39 PM (WSgyE)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 04:39 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectal at May 06, 2013 04:40 PM (wR+pz)
http://tinyurl.com/c6k4by9
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 06, 2013 04:40 PM (GvZxI)
A classic...
"I have to march because my mother could not have an abortion."
Rep. Maxine Waters of California
Posted by: Icedog at May 06, 2013 04:40 PM (ZM9OS)
Posted by: Jay in PA at May 06, 2013 04:41 PM (WSgyE)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at May 06, 2013 04:42 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 06, 2013 04:43 PM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I am at May 06, 2013 04:43 PM (fggky)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 08:24 PM (XvHmy)
***
Then I stand corrected. I suspect the number requiring that is probably very small and in a sane society, would be taken care of anyway.
Posted by: LGoPs at May 06, 2013 08:28 PM (4x8W0)
A tubal pregnancy is detected very, very early. It cannot be compared to a 24-30 week pregnancy in a uterus with a digoxin injected into the heart causing fetal demise. A tubal pregnancy is often detected before the mother even knows she is pregnant. The width of the fallopian tube is around 2mm---so this pregnancy is not viable. I have not heard this argument before.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 06, 2013 04:44 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 06, 2013 04:45 PM (GvZxI)
Posted by: Jay in PA at May 06, 2013 04:46 PM (WSgyE)
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I am at May 06, 2013 04:47 PM (fggky)
Posted by: rickl at May 06, 2013 04:47 PM (sdi6R)
------------
If you are against slavery, don't own one.
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 04:48 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 04:48 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: wattyler1381 at May 06, 2013 04:48 PM (F2Vrz)
Posted by: Misanthropic humanitarian at May 06, 2013 04:48 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 04:49 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: Lauren at May 06, 2013 04:50 PM (CFNW8)
It may seem you are trying to parse a split hair.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 06, 2013 04:52 PM (GvZxI)
The hard left are too far gone.
But I do believe that if pro-choice people who are not on the 'activist' side actually saw what goes on in these clinics - particularly after 9 weeks - a majority of them would have a conversion.
Posted by: Cheri at May 06, 2013 04:52 PM (EAgmr)
Posted by: AmishDude at May 06, 2013 04:52 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Cheri at May 06, 2013 04:53 PM (EAgmr)
Posted by: Jay in PA at May 06, 2013 04:54 PM (WSgyE)
------------
If you are against slavery, don't own one.
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 08:48 PM (P6QsQ)
And if you don't like guns, then don't buy one.
Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at May 06, 2013 04:54 PM (D00cy)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 04:56 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 06, 2013 04:56 PM (9Bj8R)
I knew of another LTC in old unit. Uber dick to all so no one under his command liked him. And then he fell on his own penis during a TDY. Others had seen him and a female A1C being the only ones left at a bar. Next morning the A1C was saying how wonderful he was. To shorten the story, he got the boot at year 19 from the military and his wife divorced him after 19 years.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 06, 2013 04:56 PM (GvZxI)
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 04:57 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Cowboy at May 06, 2013 04:57 PM (FMrA0)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 08:49 PM (XvHmy)
Ah..but you are arguing a point that is not argued in the abortion battles. I have never heard of anyone thinking a "tubal pregnancy is viable and let the mother die." A tubal pregnancy is not taking a baby early to spare the mother----which is an incredibly rare event in a hospital. As the former surgeon general was quoted above: in that case the baby is born early but TREATED as a live, human premature baby, in a hospital. Not left to die in a utility closet or a shoebox or other horrors. This is a pointless argument on your part, as no one with any medical knowledge would go there, and it is not possible as 2mm is barely a 7 week pregnancy if attached to a fallopian tube, and if the tube ruptures the mother will bleed to death. I am not going to argue apples and oranges with you.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 06, 2013 04:57 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: AmishDude at May 06, 2013 04:57 PM (T0NGe)
The aspect that infuriates me is the charge by leftists that we want capital punishment, but oppose abortion, and hence are hypocritical.
Which would be a great point, if only a baby and a convicted adult murderer were interchangeable morally.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 06, 2013 04:58 PM (IDSI7)
Posted by: wattyler1381 at May 06, 2013 04:58 PM (F2Vrz)
The reason the "life loophole" is a loophole is that the proponents extend it to "life and health" and extend that to "mental health".
And from there to "financial health." Which gets them back to where they want to go.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 06, 2013 04:58 PM (IDSI7)
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 04:59 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: GALA at May 06, 2013 05:00 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: RWC at May 06, 2013 05:00 PM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: Misanthropic humanitarian at May 06, 2013 05:00 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: CBrown at May 06, 2013 05:00 PM (dPRne)
Posted by: AmishDude at May 06, 2013 05:01 PM (T0NGe)
But I do believe that if pro-choice people who are not on the 'activist' side actually saw what goes on in these clinics - particularly after 9 weeks - a majority of them would have a conversion.
Agreed. Perhaps that's what KP went through when she finally got a good idea of what went on in the Gosnell case.
People can be persuaded. IMO, this is a good time to start pressing the issue, while this Gosnell case is going, even afterwards. Keep it going, keep presenting the truth of what happened. He may get off in court, but there's also the court of public opinion.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 05:02 PM (+z4pE)
They understand that is is extremely difficult to get something you don't like banned outright but quite attainable if you limit access a little bit more every year or so until you've gotten the desired result. "We're not talking about taking away your X, just reasonable limits on private ownership of the high-powered X that no individual should ever feel a need to own."
They've been running this scam in so many areas for so long, they know exactly what it means if any proposal is made to limit something they hold near and dear. I'd expect an increasing push to allow euthanasia of children born with severe defects, just to keep the goal post safely in distant territory. Although I have no doubt a lot of lefties would be very comfortable with post-natal abortions of those they deem defective and would take up the banner quite sincerely rather than view it as a means to an end.
Posted by: epobirs at May 06, 2013 05:02 PM (kcfmt)
Posted by: RWC at May 06, 2013 05:02 PM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:02 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 08:49 PM (XvHmy)
An ectopic pregnancy will not continue. It will either be discovered and removed (been there) or the tube will burst, ending the life of the fetus and potentially the mother.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 06, 2013 05:03 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: AmishDude at May 06, 2013 05:03 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 05:04 PM (XvHmy)
Correct there is no "undiscovered third trimester tubals."
My wife's first failed pregnancy was a tubal we suffered we knew there was something very wrong within 4 weeks and got a pretty good briefing.
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:05 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at May 06, 2013 05:05 PM (Sptt8)
I can show you a charming film where a nice leader deeply in bed with the media was mainstreaming the notion of post term abortive procedures....
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:06 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I am at May 06, 2013 05:06 PM (fggky)
Posted by: RWC at May 06, 2013 05:07 PM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 06, 2013 05:07 PM (IDSI7)
properly translated from the liberalese it is "for whatever fucking reason the bitch wants the baby dead asshole"
and I'm sorry that standard is not good enough if the little darlings can go get plan B w/out a parent's input they sure as fuck can get a 1st tri abortion as well.
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:08 PM (LRFds)
btw, don't give to Komen, there are other breast cancer groups actually using the money to do research and not fund planned parenthood.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 06, 2013 05:09 PM (jKWYf)
Are we just a bunch of animals who are unable to control our urges yet unable to figure out we are pregnant, and then unable to make up our minds whether to have a baby or have the cell clump removed?
In some cases, apparently yes, for certain values of "we."
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 06, 2013 05:09 PM (IDSI7)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 05:09 PM (XvHmy)
I admit that I am not familiar with the particulars of what is and is not commonly argued in abortion battles due to the fact that I really don't like having to think about such disturbing stuff.
That it is disturbing is one of the major reasons why I am against it.
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 09:04 PM (XvHmy)
Ok. Trying not to insult you: but look up how large a uterus is in cm, and how large it can accommodate a growing baby, vs a (at the widest diameter) a 2mm fallopian tube. I am only asking you to get your facts straight, as this is not a valid argument on the incredibly rare "death of the mother" issue in the abortion pro or con.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 06, 2013 05:09 PM (baL2B)
The decision whether or not to purchase African slaves is between the plantation owner and his supplier. Because Jefferson Davis fought for a white man's right to choose whether or not a black man is a human being.
Posted by: pst314 at May 06, 2013 05:10 PM (T4dRn)
>>>I know I've said this many times before, but I'll repeat it, as it is the dominant thought in my mind whenever the issue of abortion comes up: does Barack the Merciful ever reflect on the (imputed) fact that, had abortion been legal in 1960/1, he'd have ended his days in a metal pail on some physician's floor?
***
Oh, were it so. WERE. IT. SO.
Posted by: LGoPs at May 06, 2013 05:10 PM (4x8W0)
My wife's first failed pregnancy was a tubal we suffered we knew there was something very wrong within 4 weeks and got a pretty good briefing.
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 09:05 PM (LRFds)
I knew I was pregnant and was at my first prenatal doctor's visit when I got what I thought was just a really severe gas pain in the waiting room. While talking with the nurse, she said, 'Do you feel ok? You've gone completely pale...lay down. I'm going to go get the doctor.' They did an internal ultrasound and discovered there was nothing in my uterus. Reran a pregnancy test which came up positive. I went straight to the hospital and had surgery the next morning.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 06, 2013 05:10 PM (X6akg)
Hat I bear you no deep grief.
The net is at the best of times a potnetially inelegant medium, add in the ill ease with this topic and misunderstandings can occur my friend.
Speak your mind you're amongst friends.
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:10 PM (LRFds)
Speaking of dumbass sprts talkers, wheremthe hell is Olberdouche nowadays?
Still torturing me with taco dinner farts in the bathtub.
Thanks for asking.
Posted by: Kweef Olberdouche's Rubber Duckie at May 06, 2013 05:10 PM (+z4pE)
I think RU-486 or whatever equivalents there are now that will chemically abort at 4-6 weeks should also be legal-- and I think that early surgical abortion is acceptable for now to soothe the "christian theocracy" fears of LIVs who have taught to fear that imaginary bogey man.
Late term abortions -- no, no and hell no. -- and I suspect there are some dumb young women who think "BC pills are bad for me based on the lawsuits and the 'don't take if you smoke etc' and multiple abortions are also bad for me, so if I get pregnant its better to wait as long as I can before having an abortion."
So I really would like to have "We have to be like Europe on this one" as the law --- and leave churches and parents to make the case that "legal does not mean moral" to their congregants and children as they wish.
Posted by: palerider at May 06, 2013 05:11 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 05:11 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Jenny Hates Her Phone at May 06, 2013 05:11 PM (GmTxn)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 07:55 PM (XvHmy)
OMG, those articles made me physically ill, and embarrassed and ashamed for my fellow human beings. I wish I hadn't read either one of them, but I guess it helps me understand why they're so militant about it.
Posted by: kalneva at May 06, 2013 05:11 PM (XyrkB)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 09:09 PM (XvHmy)
Yeah, I think you just picked the wrong 'life of the mother' example.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 06, 2013 05:11 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Cowboy at May 06, 2013 05:12 PM (FMrA0)
128 Plus there is no one in the prolife movement who opposes removing the tubes during a tubal pregnancy. The goal is to save the mother, not kill the child. The law of double effect applies.
---
Even the Catholic Church is on board with that. This is what the New Catholic Encyclopedia has to say:
“What is
particularly noted in all cases of the discovery of a tubal pregnancy is that
one is never permitted to remove or destroy the human fetus directly. The only
legitimate surgical approach to any tubal pregnancy is based on the necessity of
excising all or part of a seriously damaged fallopian tube in those
circumstances in which the danger to the mother is already imminent and the
chance for fetal survival is negligible.” (Vol. 5, pg. 8
The procedure in this case is not an abortion.
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at May 06, 2013 05:12 PM (sYTYw)
Comfortable to the point they'd "abort" most of us, even though we've been living outside the womb for quite some time now.
This is a fucking myth. Some liberal document a "gruesome" abortion after 1950.
Uhhh...not a liberal, but I expect the "back alley" abortions they whine about were no less unsanitary than Gosnell's place.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ drinking beer at May 06, 2013 05:12 PM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: Misanthropic humanitarian at May 06, 2013 05:13 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 05:13 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: The Crips at May 06, 2013 05:14 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: The Political Hat at May 06, 2013 05:14 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: Cowboy at May 06, 2013 05:15 PM (FMrA0)
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 09:11 PM (LRFds)
My poor husband was in Canada on a business trip. I had to call him and tell him what was going on. I was doing ok until I heard his voice, then I just burst out crying in the ER.
Add to this that my mom and sister were visiting and at home with our 4 year old son and our newly adopted daughter. I hadn't even told either one of them I was pregnant. Oy....that was a weird phone call.
And my poor son had pitched a fit when I was leaving for the doctor's appt. I promised him I'd be right back. 3 days later I was.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 06, 2013 05:15 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 06, 2013 05:15 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 05:15 PM (P6QsQ)
Sorry, but i'll never understand why it's "reasonable" to pretend that life doesn't begin as soon as an egg is fertilized and cells start dividing, if that's not life then what is it? And how is life at that stage any less meaningful than life at any other stage? It doesn't matter if your life is ended in it's first ten seconds or when you're 90 years old, dead is dead and last i checked that one life is all you have so every second of it is pretty dam meaningful.
Posted by: booger at May 06, 2013 05:17 PM (E1tcO)
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 09:13 PM (P6QsQ)
Awww....thanks mama....it was a bit frightening.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 06, 2013 05:18 PM (X6akg)
You have my deepest sympathy I would not deign to imagine I understand a 1/5th of the pain and emotional hurt facing that is for the woman. I know that it closed off a part of the wife and I for a half decade that enabled the greatest risk to our marriage we endured. Forgive me that I don't recall if you've been blessed post the trauma with children but I pray God it is so and if not it may well be if it is your desire.
Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:18 PM (LRFds)
Although now that I've typed that, there's probably some Ivy League art student collaborating with a biomed student on just that for a senior project.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ drinking beer at May 06, 2013 05:18 PM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: Elizabethe on the phone at May 06, 2013 05:19 PM (qPCAa)
It's coming....Barky wants to control cost by controlling cessation dates as much as possible.
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:19 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 05:20 PM (+z4pE)
Wife bore the physical pain, and thanks for the thought.
She lurks here quite passionately and it means a lot.
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:20 PM (LRFds)
All those medical shows on TV, infant skull surgery and such. I leave the room when my wife puts them on. But jeez I wash there was one showing what happens in a late term abortion.
I just cannot figure out why I've never seen one...
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at May 06, 2013 05:21 PM (sYTYw)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at May 06, 2013 08:23 PM (0q2P7)
Unintentional implication by the liberal tripe. "I am an equal to God, why can't I abort whomever I want?"
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 06, 2013 05:22 PM (rm+Am)
Posted by: Elizabethe on the phone at May 06, 2013 05:22 PM (qPCAa)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 06, 2013 05:23 PM (baL2B)
---------------------------
The logical flow of that would be to adjudicate each case then and have a jury render its verdict as to whether or not it is indeed justifiable homicide or merely homicide. In other words, provide evidence that the child threatened you in some tangible way .
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 05:23 PM (P6QsQ)
Dear lord allow me to resist the temptation to post on that particular logic exercise in the mood I've been is since the Gosnell case has neared fruition.
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:24 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Elizabethe on the phone at May 06, 2013 05:25 PM (qPCAa)
Fast forward till today. The situation is worse. Killing your kid is but a "medical procedure", and one couched in the wrappings of empowerment, rights, and individual choice. Rawr!
The one difference, the only difference, is the ease with which you can do it. Abortion today is medical. Back then, it was delivering a fatal blow, or tossing the unwanted kid in a river (as happened two weeks ago around here). In the end, exact same result.
Posted by: Cowboy at May 06, 2013 05:25 PM (FMrA0)
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 05:25 PM (P6QsQ)
Unintentional implication by the liberal tripe. "I am an equal to God, why can't I abort whomever I want?"
I'd counter that that is, in no way, unintentional.
As Toby mentioned upthread, the disease of our time is Hubris.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 05:26 PM (+z4pE)
http://tinyurl.com/cn3rxxu
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 06, 2013 05:26 PM (GvZxI)
Posted by: Occam's Safety Razor at May 06, 2013 05:27 PM (lpR33)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 06, 2013 05:29 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 06, 2013 05:30 PM (GvZxI)
Posted by: Cowboy at May 06, 2013 05:32 PM (FMrA0)
Regarding all those "gruesome" back ally abortions abortion advocates are always talking about: My mother worked as an ER nurse in a South Florida hospital in the years before and after Roe. Years later I asked her how many women she'd seen in the ER with botched abortions prior to Roe. Her answer: "none", which is more than the ER nurses near Gosnell's clinic can say.
And for those who don't know, Dr. Bernard Nathanson, co-founder of NARAL, admitted decades ago that the numbers they gave the press about illegal abortions and resulting fatalities were completely made up. Anyone can probably find his book on Amazon. He quit doing abortions when he watched a sonogram of a baby he was aborting.
Posted by: girldog at May 06, 2013 05:34 PM (i/s89)
Posted by: Elizabethe on the phone at May 06, 2013 05:34 PM (qPCAa)
Posted by: wattyler1381 at May 06, 2013 05:35 PM (F2Vrz)
There's a line in I, Claudius Where Livia laments Claudius not being exposed to Augustus and he says, "we've not done that for ages dear."
or somesuch....
http://youtu.be/_cnk5JJRxqg
Around I think Minute 13 in the piece there
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:35 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: LindaFell at May 06, 2013 05:35 PM (PGO8C)
Posted by: Elizabethe on the phone at May 06, 2013 05:36 PM (qPCAa)
This.
Posted by: Elizabethe on the phone at May 06, 2013 09:36 PM (qPCAa)
-------------
Yes indeed.
Posted by: mama winger, lemur-free at May 06, 2013 05:36 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at May 06, 2013 05:38 PM (2up3Q)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectal at May 06, 2013 05:38 PM (wR+pz)
quite well said....
Gosnell changed something in me and I do believe I'd cheer if someone made Obama swallow teeth the next time he goes into "I uh just er want to ah protect the weakest" mode
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 06, 2013 05:38 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at May 06, 2013 05:38 PM (e8kgV)
they most certainly know what they're doing. I'd bet they have PAs do the bulk of them if possible
Posted by: BlackOrchid at May 06, 2013 09:38 PM (2up3Q)
I just don't know how people can do that day, after day, after day....and it has no effect on them. How? How black is their soul?
Posted by: Tami [/i] at May 06, 2013 05:39 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 06, 2013 05:39 PM (1XrHv)
All the new technology that allows doctors and parents to see into the womb in real time destroy that argument.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 06, 2013 05:39 PM (GvZxI)
As Toby mentioned upthread, the disease of our time is Hubris.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 09:26 PM (+z4pE)
Unintentional in that if you actually tried to nail them on the claim, they would evade rather than proudly claim the position - because it is absurd.
It can't stand up to rational thought - so it is hidden away and snuck in under the radar.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 06, 2013 05:40 PM (rm+Am)
Posted by: Misanthropic humanitarian at May 06, 2013 05:40 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at May 06, 2013 05:41 PM (2up3Q)
#216 I work for a crisis pregnancy center (i do data entry). Over 80% of our clients who are considering an abortion decide to carry their babies to term after seeing an ultrasound. You want to destroy the "clump of cells" lie? Show them video evidence of a living child.
Which is the very reason pro-abortion fans do not want the woman to have an ultrasound, much less be required to witness it through state law. Thank you for all you do.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 06, 2013 05:41 PM (baL2B)
But that's liberal justice for ya.
Posted by: Cowboy at May 06, 2013 05:42 PM (FMrA0)
The clump of cells argument is to keep things abstract enough for a woman to not think she is killing another human being.
Using an admittedly reduced form of that argument, those who claim that should be just fine without their brain or their heart if they were removed, shouldn't they?
After all, it's just a clump of cells...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 06, 2013 05:43 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: Tami [/i] at May 06, 2013 05:45 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Occam's Safety Razor at May 06, 2013 05:46 PM (lpR33)
Posted by: Elizabethe on the phone at May 06, 2013 05:47 PM (qPCAa)
Posted by: Occam's Safety Razor at May 06, 2013 05:48 PM (lpR33)
everything. our bodies, our fates, other people, our babies, the weather, etc
it's because of Hubris, but the "life is a construct we control" thing is worse.
Beautifully put. And we are willing to kill for our illusion of control.
Posted by: typo dynamofo at May 06, 2013 05:50 PM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: Mr Pink at May 06, 2013 05:50 PM (00z4x)
Posted by: Weirddave at May 06, 2013 06:10 PM (aH+zP)
Posted by: Y-not at May 06, 2013 06:28 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at May 06, 2013 07:56 PM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Neucker at May 07, 2013 12:38 AM (u3N3z)
Posted by: theBuckWheat at May 07, 2013 04:26 AM (siI12)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2818 seconds, 379 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: pep at May 06, 2013 03:39 PM (6TB1Z)