December 10, 2013
— DrewM News from the GOP Senate primary front:
Congressman Steve Stockman announces he will take on John Cornyn in Texas.
The Senate Conservative Fund endorses Milton Wolfe against Pat Roberts in Kansas.
Let's look at each of these in turn.
Cornyn is the GOP's number 2 guy in the Senate. That means the top leadership of the Senate is being primaried by reasonable, if not likely, candidates. That's not good from a party perspective. Even if Cornyn and Mitch McConnell win in walks they will spend a lot of money doing it and the party will be subject to a lot of "civil war" stories. No matter the outcome of the races, the GOP is not a healthy party.
Stockman filed at almost the last minute and has almost no money (he's got $32K compared to Cornyn's $7 million). The Senate Conservative Fund hasn't made a decision yet but the Club For Growth has said they are staying out.
Stockman is giving up a safe House seat to take on what's clearly going to be a longshot race. What is hoping to tap into?
'Roots in TX wonders why, when the state has their Senators' backs, would a Senator communicate and act like a Senator from a mod state.
— Melissa Clouthier (@MelissaTweets) December 10, 2013
There was a sense with KBH that she was representing DC's opinion to TX, not the other way around. Lots feel same way abt Cornyn.
— Melissa Clouthier (@MelissaTweets) December 10, 2013Will it be enough?
People will point to the Cruz/Dewhurst race but there are some major differences.
That was a fight for an open seat, not with a long-term well connected DC incumbent. More importantly, there was a 3rd candidate who go ~13% of the vote keeping Dewhurst under 50% leading to the runoff which Cruz (like a lot of insurgents) won in a walk.
Stockman may not win but he's going to give Cornyn a headache.
The Roberts-Wolfe race is a total mystery to me.
According to Heritage Action's scorecard, Roberts is number 5 on their list of Senators with a 90% score (the same score as Stockman gets in the House).
What's the goal here?
You can say, "Primary ALL of them!" Ok but resources are always limited. Is going after Mike Enzi and Pat Roberts the best use of resources when Lindsey Graham and Lamar Alexander are basically getting a pass?
The Senate Cosnervative Fund is also going after Thad Cochran from Mississippi and trying to get a more conservative candidate as the nominee in Louisiana. I think both of those are smart moves.
On the other side of this debate are Michael Medved and John Podhoretz who argue that the GOP is conservative enough and all of this primary stuff is nonsense.
It's a really long piece and I'm not sure they think there ever should be any primaries short of out and out hostility to the GOP. Last night on Twitter Podhoretz claimed they laid out when it was ok to primary. I'm guessing this is it.
In other words, primary challenges to sitting members of the Senate or the House can seriously damage the party’s overall prospects and most certainly will do nothing to burnish the Republican brand. Regardless of the outcome of each of the various battles in this possible “civil war,” bitter internal disputes over whether a given candidate qualifies for admiration as a pure-bred “true conservative” or deserves contempt as a mongrel squish can only strike swing voters and independents as eccentric, fanatical, or even cultish—especially at a time when barely a third of the electorate describes itself as “conservative.”It is also peculiarly anachronistic. There was once an ideological divide in the GOP, when liberal Republicans like Clifford Case (alongside Jacob Javits of New York, Richard Schweiker of Pennsylvania, Edward Brooke of Massachusetts, Margaret Chase Smith of Maine, Lowell Weicker of Connecticut, and the geographical outlier Mark Hatfield of Oregon) were genuinely hostile to conservatism and protective of their place in the mainstream “establishment.” They were, indeed, RINOs, if by Republican you mean someone who generally adheres to a right-of-center point of view. But demographic and geographic changes in the United States over the past 40 years have basically made those original RINOs an extinct species. Talking about manifestly conservative politicians of the early 21st century as though they are no different from liberals rightly creates cognitive dissonance in the minds of voters who do not follow the ins and outs of Republican politics day to day, and inclines many of them to back away in discomfort as one does when seeing a married couple squabble in public.
If that's their criteria for a primary I would suggest there's one candidate this year who fits even that narrow definition: Susan Collins. Her vote for the stimulus plan alone should earn her a primary challenge for hostility to the GOP. Remember only the retired Olympia Snow and the turncoat Arlen Specter voted for it.
As much as I loathe Collins, primarying her would be idiotic. She's the best the GOP is going to do in Maine. So what's gained by running a conservative against her?
I'd suggest any rule for primaries that leads to your side losing seats is really just an incumbent protection scheme.
So who should be the focus of targeted primary challenges?
For me it's three basic things:
1. A lukewarm voting record
2. A record of vocal opposition to conservatives, especially when coupled with a history of "reaching across the aisle".
3. A record of abandoning our side on key votes. People will say "someone who votes with my 80% of the time is an ally, not an enemy". That's not necessarily true.
Look at the Supreme Court. There are a lot more 9-0, 8-1, 7-2 decisions than there are 5-4 ones. But which ones are the really important votes? If the 20% of the time you are against me are the votes that really matter, you're not an ally.
Conservatives need to focus on primarying candidates that do real damage to the movement and whose replacement would bring real value.
I get being mad and wanting to punish these people for what they've done but it has to be done in a smart, methodical and most importantly, effective way.
If you indiscriminately start primarying guys like Enzi and Roberts people won't take your complaints very seriously. And worse, you'll lose a lot of the races and then they'll stop fearing you.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:52 AM
| Comments (449)
Post contains 1092 words, total size 8 kb.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at December 10, 2013 06:55 AM (6fSty)
You know the Senate isn't a lifetime appointment, right?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 10, 2013 06:57 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, channelling Nicholson!Joker at December 10, 2013 06:58 AM (naUcP)
Posted by: taylork at December 10, 2013 06:58 AM (ppNDn)
Posted by: Countrysquire at December 10, 2013 06:58 AM (LSJmV)
Stockman isnt serious. No money and filing in on the eve of the deadline? What kind of a campaign is that supposed to be? This will end like the McCain primary in 2010. A wasted opportunity.
Posted by: The Awkward-Turtle at December 10, 2013 06:59 AM (LH35J)
Circular firing squad, Ready! Aim! Shoot!
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at December 10, 2013 06:59 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, channelling Nicholson!Joker at December 10, 2013 06:59 AM (naUcP)
Posted by: AmishDude at December 10, 2013 07:01 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Countrysquire at December 10, 2013 07:02 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at December 10, 2013 07:03 AM (naUcP)
Posted by: Tom Servo at December 10, 2013 07:03 AM (8Fa5Z)
Posted by: Countrysquire at December 10, 2013 07:04 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Countrysquire at December 10, 2013 07:07 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at December 10, 2013 07:07 AM (A0sHn)
Posted by: Ken Cuccinelli at December 10, 2013 07:07 AM (gXRIG)
Posted by: Vic at December 10, 2013 07:07 AM (T2V/1)
http://tinyurl.com/na89b3k
So he's a SoCon dingbat that's obsessed with abortion. Yeah just the fight we need. Akin 2.0
I would honestly like to have seen a quality candidate challenge Cornyn. Oh well.
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 07:07 AM (2TMCu)
Posted by: Chrissy Liebowitz at December 10, 2013 07:08 AM (iB0Q2)
Posted by: no good deed at December 10, 2013 07:08 AM (HsJeN)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 07:09 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: Countrysquire at December 10, 2013 07:10 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Tom Servo at December 10, 2013 07:10 AM (8Fa5Z)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at December 10, 2013 07:11 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 07:13 AM (nUH8H)
"My gripe in this post with the Mandela situation is a fear on my part that history concerning the man will become lost and a legend will arise that promotes strongly the agenda of my enemies.
Every single damned issue in this country morphs into a diatribe about race and racial grievance. I am sick to death of, and in despair over, this because it's being used by Obama and the other Communists in our country to destroy what I love."
Posted by: tubal at December 10, 2013 07:13 AM (YEQ2h)
Posted by: DrewM. at December 10, 2013 07:14 AM (SgXEz)
Heck, I'm not just planning to vote against Alexander in the primary....I'm planning to vote Dem if he does win the primary.
Cutting off my nose to spite my face? Maybe, in the short term. But I will not be lied to by my representative again ......If you really think No Child Left Behind is great and that we need to add 30 million more low skilled laborers to the pool in order to help your business buddies make more money, then be a man and SAY SO.
Then, if you are the lesser of two evils, I'll probably vote for you. Until then, Lamar Alexander AND Bob Corker can kiss my ass.
Posted by: FITP at December 10, 2013 07:15 AM (oerre)
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 10, 2013 07:15 AM (BAS5M)
I thought Ms. Lindsey does have a couple of respectable challengers? In fact, I'm pretty sure of it.
I don't think that the head cash groups, like the RNSC, should get involved in these primaries though. That ain't their job.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 10, 2013 07:16 AM (wNF3N)
BTW - a "no primaries" for incumbents rule is the political equivalent of asking your Mom to buy your clothes.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 10, 2013 07:16 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:16 AM (r+7wo)
If you want to make that ridiculous slogan your campaign's official bumper sticker, yeah, you're a SoCon dingbat that's obsessed.
Every Republican that represents Texas in Congress is also pro-life, couldn't we find one that doesn't sound like Akin to take on Cornyn.
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 07:17 AM (2TMCu)
Posted by: DrewM. at December 10, 2013 11:14 AM
That's THEIR fucking problem, Drew. I absolutely refuse to give politicians Special Snowflake status.
Some people believe you should rub a pet's nose in the mess when they poop on the floor. I don't. But I sure as hell advocate that for politicians.
Posted by: MrScribbler at December 10, 2013 07:17 AM (veRXo)
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/susan-collins/
Screwey as she is, its hard to unseat someone with 61% approval.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/s] at December 10, 2013 07:17 AM (UVadJ)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 11:16 AM (r+7wo)
Ok, Chique, thanks. I'll jump in the "Way-Back Machine" and go read it. Tubal
Posted by: tubal at December 10, 2013 07:18 AM (YEQ2h)
Posted by: Roy at December 10, 2013 07:18 AM (75fUy)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:18 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: jwest at December 10, 2013 07:18 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: eman at December 10, 2013 07:18 AM (AO9UG)
First, the Podhoretz piece can be dismissed out of hand for obvious reasons--and I think Drew does agree on that. As long as it's even conceivable that the GOP will pass amnesty, the GOP is not conservative enough.
I understand the argument about resources, but the problem with just going after the "problem" Senators like Grahamnesty and McCain is that as soon as they're gone, some backbencher will just step up to the plate. So, targeting the backbenchers is acceptable too, *especially* in a deep red state like Kansas. Didn't Pat Roberts vote for amnesty? I'm pretty sure he did, and I'm pretty sure that Cornyn did too. The important thing is to keep leadership scared at all times, until the leadership looks just like Ted Cruz.
Posted by: Mr Estrada at December 10, 2013 07:18 AM (5piqN)
Posted by: SFGoth at December 10, 2013 07:19 AM (QX6cc)
Posted by: Countrysquire at December 10, 2013 11:10 AM (LSJmV)
No, but an insane fixation on the least effective way to combat abortion is the mark of a dingbat.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 10, 2013 07:19 AM (oJ5Fd)
Posted by: Phelps at December 10, 2013 07:20 AM (1xfHM)
..........
Care to mention which votes exactly? Besides his non-support of the symbolic Cruz statements against O'Care, what votes?
He has 100% rating with both NRA and right-to-life groups. 0% ratings with pro-abortion groups.
WTF did he do to piss you off so much?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at December 10, 2013 07:20 AM (f9c2L)
Drew - keep in mind that we can't just look at a politician's voting record to determine their worthiness. VRs can and are cherry-picked by the deciding organisation routinely.
Basically, it comes down to this question: does the politician in question have a record of standing by elite Washington interests over and against the people who elected them? For Roberts, from all I can see, the answer would be "No," so I see no reason to primary him. Cornyn, on the other hand, has way too much of the "old guard thick or thin" in him. He probably needs to be retired.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at December 10, 2013 07:20 AM (YYJjz)
Posted by: Kirk Lazarus[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 10, 2013 07:21 AM (yz6yg)
4-3?
That is not pure enough.
We will accept nothing worse than 7-0
Posted by: Sargeant Dildo: Purity Brigade at December 10, 2013 07:21 AM (oJ5Fd)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at December 10, 2013 07:21 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 10, 2013 07:21 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 10, 2013 07:21 AM (wNF3N)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 10, 2013 07:21 AM (pqBkB)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 07:22 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 07:22 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: tubal at December 10, 2013 11:13 AM (YEQ2h)
_______
About Mandela...it made sense for anyone genuinely oppressed to flirt with communism in the early 60s; they had a good grievance game and won a lot of adherants. Mandela didn't come out of jail in 1990 acting all commie. He acted all healing.
Two bad things didn't happen in the early 90s that seemed like they were destined to happen. The unwinding of apartheid and the unwinding of Soviet communism looked like unavoidable bloodbaths, but they weren't. DeKlerk and Gorbachev had the grace to yield to history and not go down in reactionary violence. Mandela's approach and the subsequent "truth and reconcilliation" was masterful.
There ain't no saints, but everyone who isn't Ronald Reagan isn't necessarily a sinner.
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at December 10, 2013 07:22 AM (A0sHn)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humantiarian at December 10, 2013 07:22 AM (HVff2)
Concur 100% . I call it political hygiene. A big part of the problem for both parties is that House seats across the country are, in large part, gerrymandered. They are political fiefs, with federal and state apparatchiks selecting the most suitable, pliable candidate. Someone who will vote the "right way" when that candidate arrives in DC.
Posted by: mrp at December 10, 2013 07:22 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Zakn at December 10, 2013 07:23 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: Mr Estrada at December 10, 2013 11:18 AM (5piqN)
What Officer Ponch said.
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 10, 2013 07:23 AM (BAS5M)
From Twitchy - http://tinyurl.com/ogd8f62
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 07:23 AM (27gH7)
^^^THIS is the problem in a nutshell. They should fear the electorate, and fear for the fate of the nation. There's not nearly enough of either.
If they're terrified, they certainly aren't projecting it, or acting like they are.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/s] at December 10, 2013 07:24 AM (UVadJ)
Posted by: eman
..........
Really? Not a waste of money having to spend millions in some cases fighting your own party? Only to then be left fighting against the same rhetoric again from your Dem opponent?
You are eff'n clueless. The Dems simply sit back and collect all the dirt thrown at a candidate by his own party during the primary, then re-broadcast it during the general.
Not a waste of time and money? As I said.. eff'n clueless.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at December 10, 2013 07:24 AM (f9c2L)
Especially when they are regularly screwing up The Job.
Perhaps we should look at making politicians "at will" employees who can be fired on the spot when they mess up big-time.
Posted by: MrScribbler at December 10, 2013 07:24 AM (veRXo)
Posted by: steevy at December 10, 2013 07:25 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: Charlie Crist at December 10, 2013 07:25 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:25 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: Lucky Pierre at December 10, 2013 07:25 AM (5fSr7)
So he's a SoCon dingbat that's obsessed with abortion. Yeah just the fight we need. Akin 2.0
Yeah, what's a few million murdered children here or there? We've got elections to win, dammit!
Here's a tip for you, nickelfucker - keep calling people opposed to abortion "dingbats," just as you call people wanting to see the GOP fight back against the Dems "spoiled children," and see how many elections you win. Because right now, I'm not supporting anyone who won't shove the deliberate, systematic murder of children right down the Dems' throats.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 10, 2013 07:25 AM (zF6Iw)
@ 70 - "Really? Not a waste of money having to spend millions in some cases fighting your own party"
You're right - and I'm sure all the conservative Republican candidates over the past few years who have had to spend millions to repair the damage from their own Party's "elite" would agree with you as well.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at December 10, 2013 07:26 AM (YYJjz)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 10, 2013 07:26 AM (/Crba)
If you won't be a voice for conservatism in the Senate, then you don't deserve your Senate seat.
Primary everyone, and support the most conservative option.
That's the only way this works.
Posted by: BurtTC at December 10, 2013 07:26 AM (xCw24)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 07:26 AM (27gH7)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 07:26 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: eman at December 10, 2013 07:26 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Roy at December 10, 2013 07:26 AM (75fUy)
Posted by: ontherocks at December 10, 2013 07:26 AM (rZ6q/)
Luckily he is a grownup and didn't do it for the adulation....he did it because he thought it was the right thing to do.
But....a more reasonable sample of sub-Saharan Africa would yield much more benign feelings towards Bush.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 10, 2013 07:27 AM (oJ5Fd)
Stockman could just file and run a $0.00 non-campaign that just gets his name on the ballot. He'd lose, but how badly or not that he loses by might prove sobering.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/s] at December 10, 2013 07:27 AM (UVadJ)
Posted by: Mr. Wizard at December 10, 2013 07:28 AM (S5LPT)
That's silly.
What there is, however, is a limited amount of money for weak-kneed, go-along/get-along, "I'm super-conservative in election year" candidates.
The dollar amount of donations keeps shrinking not because of primary challengers but because the donors are finding less and less reasons to donate.
Did you ever hear the Dems condemn the Kos Kiddies for funding Lamont? No.
Posted by: RoyalOil at December 10, 2013 07:28 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 10, 2013 07:28 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:29 AM (r+7wo)
___________________________________________________
That was the US press corps booing.
Posted by: Lucky Pierre at December 10, 2013 07:29 AM (5fSr7)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 07:29 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: troyriser at December 10, 2013 07:30 AM (V9ol4)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at December 10, 2013 07:30 AM (+H/11)
But the party is damned if it does and damned if it doesn't meddle in these primaries, because you find one weirdo with a magical vagina theory, and all of a sudden they're the face for the platform.
And yet, somehow, the GOP can't pull its head out of its ass long enough to make harridans who dance to "Celebrate" at Planned Murderhood to celebrate abortion or idiots who run on "if men could get pregnant, abortion would be legal" slogans the faces of their platforms.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 10, 2013 07:30 AM (zF6Iw)
............
Perfect case in point. You don't think 6 months of primaries and debates didn't hurt Romney? How man Dem ads did you see featuring the voice of Newt or Perry? I saw lots.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at December 10, 2013 07:31 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: RWC at December 10, 2013 07:31 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at December 10, 2013 07:31 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 10, 2013 07:31 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at December 10, 2013 07:32 AM (QF8uk)
But at the same time they boo a man who did exactly the same thing.
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 07:32 AM (m2CN7)
What happens in the general if the other 30% sit it out? He's still gotta do something to enthuse them enough to pull the lever for him in Nov.
With sitting it out and letting it burn becoming more attractive every day, the usual default voter actions no longer apply.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/s] at December 10, 2013 07:32 AM (UVadJ)
Posted by: jwest at December 10, 2013 07:32 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 10, 2013 07:33 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at December 10, 2013 07:33 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:33 AM (r+7wo)
Cornyn deserves it. I got to hear his performance on the Sean Hannity radio program during the shutdown, and Cornyn exposed himself as a weasel on a par with Miss Lindsey.
Posted by: @JohnTant at December 10, 2013 07:33 AM (PFy0L)
Posted by: DangerGirl at December 10, 2013 07:34 AM (waJ+2)
@ 96 Chi-Town Jerry
"Perfect case in point. You don't think 6 months of primaries and debates didn't hurt Romney? How man Dem ads did you see featuring the voice of Newt or Perry? I saw lots."
I fully agree, CTJ! It's high time we eliminated all of this "letting the people vote" thing and just started appointing candidates by a committee of elected Republican office-holders.
Posted by: J. Random FisCon at December 10, 2013 07:34 AM (YYJjz)
Posted by: X at December 10, 2013 07:34 AM (KHo8t)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 10, 2013 07:34 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:34 AM (r+7wo)
32 -
So runnng against them is punishing them, Drew?
That's just asinine. I can't believe somebody could be so dense as to think something like that. Reword, or I'll assume you really are that dumb.
Posted by: BurtTC at December 10, 2013 07:34 AM (xCw24)
Posted by: mrp at December 10, 2013 07:34 AM (HjPtV)
Mr. Drew, since you claim you do not 'get the goal'.
The GOP will not fight anyone but conservatives.
Bring it, they say, e.g., McConnell's Examiner interview.
If we lose, really, at this point, what possible difference could it make?
Posted by: gary gulrud at December 10, 2013 07:35 AM (uv0Aw)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at December 10, 2013 07:35 AM (+H/11)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:35 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 07:35 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: RWC at December 10, 2013 07:36 AM (fWAjv)
I know little about Stockman, but I would take him because I do know about Cornyn.
In other news, Oblather took a smiling selfie of himself at the Mandela funeral.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 10, 2013 07:36 AM (MaP11)
In purple states, find a conservative who can talk like a moderate.
It's not that fucking hard GOP.
----------
Nope, but the GOP leadership is not conservative, so why would they bother?
Posted by: @JohnTant at December 10, 2013 07:36 AM (PFy0L)
Posted by: Dogbert at December 10, 2013 07:36 AM (VyRoX)
You know, there should be no such thing as an ENTRENCHED politician of any sort in Washington, D.C.
Can I get an AMEN??
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at December 10, 2013 07:36 AM (YYJjz)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 07:36 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: Burbmom at December 10, 2013 07:36 AM (Jh9QN)
If they do, they need to be fired.
But they're not going to make their move until after the deadline to file for the primary election.
So we need to have strong challengers in place for the primary to keep them honest.
If the leadership keeps faith with us, no harm, no foul. The challenge dies on the vine an the challenger gets a sinecure somewhere.
If the leadership betrays us, we can pour resources in, and have a good chance of making a very visible example of the miscreant.
Posted by: Luke at December 10, 2013 07:37 AM (2MUaT)
I'm done with the idiots that want to make this issue the cornerstone of their campaign ALL THE TIME.
If you won't support a Republican unless they trot around such an absurd bumper sticker or because they don't want to talk about the uterus all day, I'm fine with you leaving and starting your own Akin/Santorum political party.
We're certainly not winning elections on this platform, so I don't see what we have to lose by pissing off the freaks.
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 07:37 AM (2TMCu)
Let's see. Who's getting all pissy here about Stockman? Good enough for me! Stockman 2014!
Posted by: buzzion
As they say, judge a man by his enemies.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 10, 2013 07:37 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 10, 2013 07:37 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:37 AM (r+7wo)
49 I saw The Sandy Flukes open for Everyone
I believe that is one of those continuing tour thingies.
Posted by: Drill_Thrawl at December 10, 2013 07:38 AM (/2ciC)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 10, 2013 07:38 AM (/Crba)
Nothing like threatening the safety of Republican congressional seats to bring the RINOS and trolls out.
Posted by: BurtTC at December 10, 2013 07:38 AM (xCw24)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 07:39 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: steevy at December 10, 2013 07:39 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: gary gulrud at December 10, 2013 07:39 AM (uv0Aw)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 07:39 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: DrewM. at December 10, 2013 07:40 AM (SgXEz)
Much like Morons For Apartheid, those candidates only exist inside your head.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 10, 2013 07:40 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: X at December 10, 2013 07:40 AM (KHo8t)
"I blah I blah blah I blah blah blah I"
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 07:40 AM (27gH7)
As I said this AM, as a former TX Supreme Court justice, Cornyn was well-positioned to be the leading legal light in the Senate against Obaaamacare.
He has said nothing not already said. He is either a weak legal mind or he is weak in his opposition. Neither is good for Texas.
He had also done nothing to spotlight the poor legal qualifications of the JEF's court nominees. Again, speaks poorly of him.
That he made a big show of publicly removing his name from the Cruz letter drives another nail into his reputation as a conservative.
Don't forget that it was Cornyn who personally directed the support for Crist over Rubio.
Posted by: RoyalOil at December 10, 2013 07:41 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 10, 2013 07:41 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 10, 2013 07:41 AM (ZshNr)
So there's that.
Posted by: Jeanne of the North at December 10, 2013 07:42 AM (GdalM)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 07:42 AM (4df7R)
Dog bites man. Let me know if she's ever at a state occasion and *doesn't* look pissed.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 10, 2013 07:42 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: J. Random FisCon
............
I'm not saying to do away with primaries... especially presidential ones. But the egos up on stage have to always resort to negative ads against their fellow Repubs.. and it always comes back to haunt them. If they wanna run on their own records and policy proposals, that's fine. But don't damage the party.
As far as Senate or House seats go.. geeebus.. spend the money on meaningful races, not one where the incumbent vote conservative 98% of the time!
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at December 10, 2013 07:42 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 07:42 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 07:42 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: McAdams
Tsk Tsk. That's what Democrats call conservatives. Dial it back a bit to keep it real.
Posted by: mrp at December 10, 2013 07:43 AM (HjPtV)
140 -
I'm not making demands, boy. I'm offering you an opportunity to look less stupid.
You chose stupid. Which is back to form for you, because you've been hiding it well for months now.
Posted by: BurtTC at December 10, 2013 07:43 AM (xCw24)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 07:44 AM (27gH7)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 10, 2013 07:44 AM (olDqf)
If the GOP does strong-arm someone to not mess up an incumbent's seat, then people shit all over them for that.
Posted by: Jeanne of the North at December 10, 2013 07:44 AM (GdalM)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 11:42 AM (nUH8H)
Yes. Exactly.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 07:44 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 07:45 AM (27gH7)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 07:45 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 10, 2013 07:45 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:46 AM (r+7wo)
Late for work, but will say this: break up/shake up the senority thing, and if people want to primary their senator, it's their business. If these shitheads want to keep their jobs, make 'em work/pay for it. Dearly.
Cornyn's a longtime behind-the-scene asshole weasel. When Chuck DeVore ran for senate in 2011, Cornyn - in charge of the NRSC - wouldn't even meet with him. Just ignored him. Not even a courtesy meeting. And they supported that self-funding, electable "sure thing" Carly Fiorina. Note the Crist vs Rubio backstory. Cornyn lied, plain and simple.
I think people are really fed up with the weasledom of these guys in general. Everything's already burning, so what the hell why not?
Posted by: joanne at December 10, 2013 07:46 AM (s/quq)
Also, how do you stop a guy from running?
Posted by: Jeanne of the North
Seen our ballot access rules lately? BHAW HAW HAW!
Posted by: The Virgina Republican Party
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 10, 2013 07:46 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 10, 2013 07:47 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: BurtTC at December 10, 2013 11:43 AM (xCw24)
You do know that DrewM is a person of color?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at December 10, 2013 07:47 AM (oJ5Fd)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 07:48 AM (Y92Nd)
The question is: if Cornyn announced retirement would Stockman be the one that conservatives would get behind?
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 10, 2013 07:49 AM (MaP11)
Here are the Republican Senators that need primarying this time around: Lindsay Graham (SC) and Lamar Alexander (TN), based on two criteria: 1) red state and 2) voted for the Rubio-Schumer-Ryan amnesty plan.
The other red state amnesty-traitors should get primaried when their time comes.
Posted by: Steve in Greensboro at December 10, 2013 07:49 AM (icBMk)
I stand in awe of the unmitigated gall of those folks.
They truly believe that they can put a dent in nature's fury with the power of their own belief.
Absolutely astonishing. o.o
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at December 10, 2013 07:49 AM (kM76g)
Posted by: 7 Days in May at December 10, 2013 07:49 AM (j6DTo)
Care to mention which votes exactly? Besides his non-support of the symbolic Cruz statements against O'Care, what votes?
He has 100% rating with both NRA and right-to-life groups. 0% ratings with pro-abortion groups.
WTF did he do to piss you off so much?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at December 10, 2013 11:20 AM (f9c2L)
Well ya got me there. Stopped me in my frothing snarling rabid posturing tracks.
On PAPER his voting record looks okay. But it feels like the record of the Washington Generals since he IS the #2 guy in the Senate. Where was the fight, the opposition, the strong leadership to make a stand and not mewlingly accept his party's role as the practice squad.
But mostly it was his abandonment of Cruz that got me. He chose Washington cocktail parties over Texans. And for that he needs to go.
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 10, 2013 07:49 AM (BAS5M)
Well, how about SCOAMF shaking hands with Raul Castro?
Talk about symbolically spitting on the graces of 200 million victims of Communism.
What a despicable, disgusting bastard he is.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 10, 2013 11:44 AM (olDqf)
God, I know. Just... UGH. The man... he's not even a man, i can't call him a man. The CREATURE is repulsive on every level.
Of course his fangirls were out in force, screaming and getting him to wave at them during the ceremony. Because even at a memorial service, it's All About Obama.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 07:49 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Countrysquire at December 10, 2013 07:50 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 07:50 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 07:51 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 07:51 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: noone, really at December 10, 2013 07:52 AM (5ikDv)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:53 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at December 10, 2013 07:53 AM (R8hU8)
I stand in awe of the unmitigated gall of those folks.
They truly believe that they can put a dent in nature's fury with the power of their own belief.
Absolutely astonishing. o.o
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at December 10, 2013 11:49 AM (kM76g)
It's amazing. They claim to have respect for nature, and then go flat out Titanic on it. "We can control the uncontrollable!"
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 07:53 AM (4df7R)
"How about windmills tilting at hurricanes?"
"...what?"
"Windmills fighting hurricanes, weakening them, making life easier for the coastal folk."
"A windmill will get annihilated in a hurricane."
"What if there were thousands of windmills. "
"....have someone in PR get ahold of the press. We're gonna make a killing."
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at December 10, 2013 07:53 AM (kM76g)
Posted by: sock_rat_eez at December 10, 2013 07:54 AM (gUoN4)
I'm done with the idiots that want to make this issue the cornerstone of their campaign ALL THE TIME.
If you won't support a Republican unless they trot around such an absurd bumper sticker or because they don't want to talk about the uterus all day, I'm fine with you leaving and starting your own Akin/Santorum political party.
We're certainly not winning elections on this platform, so I don't see what we have to lose by pissing off the freaks.
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 11:37 AM (2TMCu)
The issue is going to come up no matter what. The assholes in the MFM will make damned certain of it, and you know it. AFAIC, the issue should be attacked head on, and any variation of "it's settled law that I cannot change and I have no plan to. But if you want to talk abortion, ask my opponent why he's comfortable taking money and votes from murderers."
Either stand for something or fold like a cheap suit. You don't have to bring up abortion, but if the MFM does, kick the bastards in the balls.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 10, 2013 07:54 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 07:54 AM (27gH7)
If you indiscriminately start primarying guys like Enzi and Roberts people won't take your complaints very seriously.
Maybe they don't take it very seriously themselves. You can make a decent living gathering support for a revolution you never seriously intend to wage.
Posted by: CJ at December 10, 2013 07:54 AM (9KqcB)
173 -
Why, it's almost as if these people in Washington know what their "voting records" will look like, and cast votes to up their percentages!
No... of course not, they only cast votes based on their conscience and common sense.
Posted by: BurtTC at December 10, 2013 07:54 AM (xCw24)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 07:55 AM (nUH8H)
I'm done with the idiots that want to make this issue the cornerstone of their campaign ALL THE TIME.
Seems to me the Republican party did pretty good with one issue as the cornerstone of their campaign.
**taps chin**
What could it have been? Something awfully SoCon and divisive, no doubt.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 10, 2013 07:55 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 10, 2013 07:55 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: George Lynch at December 10, 2013 07:55 AM (h+2SD)
Hello, my fair twin. Does "odious" work?
As people with health conditions are losing their insurance plans, doctors, ability to afford medication, it's all about him achieving a political victory and showing all those haters. No thought is given by him or his worshipers to the wake of destruction he's leaving behind, not only in this country, but also in other parts of the world.
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 11:53 AM (r+7wo)
Hello, dusky hued twin of mine! Odious is an excellent word to describe the Preezy. I especially appreciate the assonance of Odious Obama.
His self-absorption, and the blinded devotion of his cultish followers, is mind-boggling. It puts the worst aspects of human nature on full display. If I were trying to explain the hysterics to a group of aliens, I'd be ashamed.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 07:56 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 07:57 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 07:57 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at December 10, 2013 11:42 AM"
*off to read this foolishness*
O_o *blinks*
"Jacobson did not address the feasibility or the political and environmental challenges of building such massive offshore wind farms along hurricane-prone coastlines. Proposals for smaller offshore wind farms have generated significant opposition and controversy, especially along Cape Cod in Massachusetts."
Umm....yeah. Let me know how that 1.5 billion wind turbine project works out, mkay?
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at December 10, 2013 07:57 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: Biff Boffo at December 10, 2013 07:57 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 07:58 AM (27gH7)
Competition is good. Incumbents shouldn't feel like these are lifetime appointments. Go for it. Primary all of them.
Posted by: exceller at December 10, 2013 07:59 AM (/1owm)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 07:59 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 10, 2013 08:00 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 08:00 AM (27gH7)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 10, 2013 08:00 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 08:01 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/s] at December 10, 2013 08:01 AM (UVadJ)
Posted by: RWC at December 10, 2013 08:01 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 11:58 AM (27gH7)
We should come up with an alphabet of words to describe Obammy, from A to Z. It would be fun narrowing down the most appropriate word to represent each letter.
For example, A. Apathetic? Asinine? Arrogant? What word is most accurate in describing the Dear Leader?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:01 AM (4df7R)
The only one talking about "the uterus" all day is the commie vampires on the left (and those idiot morons on the right who aid and abet them).
Conservatives talk about babies being murdered.
Posted by: Pam at December 10, 2013 08:01 AM (cgrL5)
1. Pick high profile conservative who is almost guaranteed to win.
2. Make news for backing challenger to high-profile conservative.
3. Solicit donations from the naive Purity Brigade.
4. Toss a small fraction of donations to said challengers, keep the rest.
5. Rinse, repeat.
Does anyone really think that Steve (who?) Stockman has a snowball's chance in Hell? Anyone?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 10, 2013 08:02 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 08:02 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: Countrysquire at December 10, 2013 08:02 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: mugiwara at December 10, 2013 08:03 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 08:04 AM (27gH7)
202 -
I'd go with McCain. I realize he isn't up for reelection next year, but since we're dreaming, I'm gonna dream big.
Honestly, as a body with 100 bodies, I think about 95 of them don't deserve their jobs, so knocking off one incumbent Republican is about as good as any other, I believe.
Posted by: BurtTC at December 10, 2013 08:04 AM (xCw24)
Posted by: The Primary Hat at December 10, 2013 08:04 AM (Vk2pI)
The GOP's farm team are usually strangled in their crib.
As not to embarrass their elders in DC.
Posted by: Pam at December 10, 2013 08:05 AM (cgrL5)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 08:06 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: BurtTC at December 10, 2013 08:06 AM (xCw24)
I mean, FFS.
Hurricane Katrina, which devastated New Orleans and the Louisiana Gulf Coat in 2005, was the costliest and and one of the deadliest hurricanes to ever hit the U.S.
Jacobson's Katrina simulations assumed arrays of 70,000 turbines — 300 gigawatts of installed power — had been built 100 kilometers offshore southeast of New Orleans and were designed to withstand winds of up to 50 meters per second, just above the strength of a Category 3 hurricane, or roughly 111 mph.
The simulations showed that the turbines would create a net energy reduction in the atmosphere, slashing wind speeds as energy was sapped from the storm and dramatically reducing storm surge, which is caused by high winds pushing water inland as a hurricane barrels toward the coast.
Wind speeds would have been reduced enough to allow the wind turbines to survive the storm themselves, with winds never reaching 50 meters per second, above which the turbines could topple.
...
“If we have large arrays of offshore wind turbines — large walls of turbines — we could dissipate winds and storm surge quite a bit,” particularly in the vicinity of the turbines themselves, Jacobson said.
There is so much stupid bundled up in that scenario, I don't even know how to unparse it without having to have myself committed afterward.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:06 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Ken Cuccinelli at December 10, 2013 08:06 AM (gXRIG)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 08:08 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: mrp at December 10, 2013 08:08 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 11:37 AM (2TMCu)
A political party is as much a cultural and moral association as it is a political one. Currently, the Democratic Party advocates abortion up to and including the ninth-month moment of birth, which is essentially (and biologically) infanticide, the murder of a human being. Rahm Emmanuel's brother, Ezekiel, is a colleague and fellow of prominent bioethicist Peter Singer, and has written highly influential papers and delivered numerous lectures promoting Singer's ideas relating to preferential utilitarianism, which (boiled down) means the State decides whose life has merit and meaning worthy of medical care and treatment--even continued existence--and whose doesn't. Thus, theirs is the extreme, 'freakish' position on this issue. We're talking about life and death and the power of the State. Nothing is more culturally, morally, and politically crucial, not even your precious pocketbook issues. The Democrats get this. You don't.
If the GOP cannot oppose infanticide and euthanasia of the old and sick with as much fervor as the Democrats promote it, then the GOP doesn't deserve to exist.
Posted by: troyriser at December 10, 2013 08:08 AM (V9ol4)
Posted by: mugiwara at December 10, 2013 08:09 AM (W7ffl)
LOL
Posted by: mrp at December 10, 2013 08:09 AM (HjPtV)
Absurd. There's exactly zero chance that Obama will ever sign off on repealing Obamacare, and there's just as likely a chance that enough Dems would flip to override it.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 10, 2013 08:09 AM (SY2Kh)
And thank you to the Horde for listing other reasons Cornyn has to go, using his #2 role to put body english on not supporting conservatives in their election races, being Amnesty friendly, advancing odious legislation and nominees through committee when those votes are not counted on his "selected voting record."
He's too comfortable in Washington and not uncomfortable enough back home. Yet.
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 10, 2013 08:09 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: RWC at December 10, 2013 08:10 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:10 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 10, 2013 12:02 PM (SY2Kh)
That's what they said about Cruz. Its possible that Stockman can win the primary. Unfortunately , Cornyn has a better chance to win the general because Stockman can be made to look like a boogeyman - women hater and will give any democrat nominee a fighting chance. Unlikely a Dem could win but it would be closer than I want it to be.
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 08:10 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 08:10 AM (27gH7)
Posted by: toby928 at December 10, 2013 08:11 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 10, 2013 08:11 AM (0FSuD)
Club For Growth (of Democrat Senate Majority) Posted by: Tattoo De Plane
Thanks. Sometimes that inside-the-Beltway stuff is hard to follow.
Posted by: mrp at December 10, 2013 08:11 AM (HjPtV)
I'm confused- Stockman is running for Senate and competing on American Idol?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 10, 2013 08:12 AM (SY2Kh)
"I get being mad and wanting to punish these people for what they've done but it has to be done in a smart, methodical and most importantly, effective way."
Uh, no, Mitch, John, Paul or whoever you are......here is the problem with your type - Your idea of 'smart, methodical...effective' is not the same as mine. Your idea of 'smart, methodical....effective' is what we've been doing for quite sometime, it gives us the Mitch's, the McCain's, the Romney's, it gives us the Paul Ryan Plans that balance the budget in 30 years..
Let me put it in number terms....Your idea of smart is having a 6 foot 10 inch apple picker only pick apples on the lowest branches, because there is a chance that if he has to reach above his head he might accidently knock one or two off in the process.
Your idea of methodical is only trying to obtain the 80% obtainable, leave the 30% or 40% obtainable alone.
Your (and Mitch's, John's, Romneycare's, etc), idea of effective, is to slow the growth of government from 8% a year to 6% a year then tell us serfs that you cut the government by 25%.
Posted by: doug at December 10, 2013 08:12 AM (uJ8q7)
There are devices that can slow surface wind speeds quite a bit and they require no power or maintenance...they've been cleverly disguised...as trees.
If you're inland a few miles with a decent bit of tallish foliage between you and the beach, the wind has been knocked down quite a bit by the time it gets to you.
The mistake is in building expensive critical infrastructure close to the ocean that doesn't NEED to be there.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/s] at December 10, 2013 08:12 AM (UVadJ)
Perry will endorse Cornyn.
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 08:12 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 10, 2013 08:13 AM (0FSuD)
I have a sneaking suspicion that the SCF is being unserious, more interested in internal fundraising than improving the makeup of the Senate.
Me too.
And losing candidates who "took on the establishment" can always find a job selling such wares.
Posted by: CJ at December 10, 2013 08:13 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: mythical "GOP Establishment" at December 10, 2013 08:13 AM (5ikDv)
Posted by: WVinMN at December 10, 2013 08:13 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Shoey at December 10, 2013 08:14 AM (jdOk/)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at December 10, 2013 08:14 AM (HVff2)
-
Yeah, don't they realize that would stop the rotation of the Earth?
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 10, 2013 08:14 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: RWC at December 10, 2013 08:15 AM (fWAjv)
What? You don't think 1.5 billion wind turbines is feasible?
Think of the children
and middle class
Posted by: RWC at December 10, 2013 12:10 PM (fWAjv)
I mean, let's just pretend such a thing WERE feasible. How would it affect shipping lanes? Tourism? Regular air and ocean patterns in the absence of hurricane force winds?
Hurricanes suck, but they're a natural part of the earth's climate. Would diminished wind and storm surge damage over an extended period of time have a negative impact on the coastal biosphere?
And having all these wind turbines is supposed to deplete the strength of a hurricane to the point that the turbines themselves aren't destroyed. Well, great. But how about the turbines on the front lines? The ones taht take the brunt of the hurricane head on, before it's has a chance to dissipate some of its energy? What, are they just, like, REALLY strong? Maybe they're reinforced with Unicorn Magic and Starlight?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:16 AM (4df7R)
Your idea of smart is having a 6 foot 10 inch apple picker only pick apples on the lowest branches, because there is a chance that if he has to reach above his head he might accidently knock one or two off in the process.
There’s a danger pretending you have a 6’ 10” picker when it’s only 4’ 10” and you don’t want to do the planning necessary to acquire a bigger one.
Posted by: CJ at December 10, 2013 08:16 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:16 AM (nUH8H)
E is for Egregious
F is for Farcical
G is for Grifter
H is for Hyped
I is for Insipid
J is for Jerk
K is for Kleptomania
L is for Lackadaisical
M is for Mendacious
N is for Narcissist
O is for Over-inflated
P is for Petty
Q is for Quarrelsome
R is for Racist
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 08:17 AM (27gH7)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 10, 2013 08:17 AM (g1DWB)
Either stand for something or fold like a cheap suit. You don't have to bring up abortion, but if the MFM does, kick the bastards in the balls.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing
No, he's MAKING it an issue.
Obviously, a pro-life Republican in Texas is par for the course, you're making some straw man argument that because someone doesn't talk about abortion politics with over the top language all the time, it means they want to kill babies.
Also, I get tired of this whining from SoCons when these issues are brought up, they attack people for saying it's a distraction, yet THEY are the ones that insist that candidates take these positions on hot button issues. So which is it? Somebody putting out a bumper sticker like Stockman did is putting it front and center.
But you're solution of politicians saying "abortion is settled law, but it's murder" is essentially the pro-choice position. I was always thought the pro-life position was legally criminalizing abortion, not just name-calling.
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 08:17 AM (2TMCu)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 10, 2013 08:17 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Senator John McCain at December 10, 2013 08:18 AM (5ikDv)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 08:18 AM (r+7wo)
Cruz was a Republican / GWB administration insider with the associated connections, running for an open seat. Apples and oranges.
It's 'possible' that Stockman can win in the same way it's 'possible' that I'll be struck by lightning while banging Kate Upton three hours after winning the lottery.
The "primary them all!" crowd will still give the SCF money for taking up the lost cause, and that's all that really matters.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 10, 2013 08:19 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: WVinMN at December 10, 2013 12:13 PM (4Pleu)
About a month ago, my car radio was on the local station that Medved's on and out of curiosity I thought I'd listen to him to see if he was still a worthless squishball. It was his "Disagreement Day" and the change from four or less years ago, when only libs would call in for it, and now when mainly conservatives call to bitch him out, was pretty severe.
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 10, 2013 08:19 AM (XIvZV)
Posted by: mugiwara at December 10, 2013 08:19 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:19 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 10, 2013 08:19 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: jwest at December 10, 2013 08:20 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:20 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 08:20 AM (r+7wo)
If they stood up for individual freedom, it would be different.
If 2009 to present has proven anything, it is that the Federal Government, and those that run it from all sides, is completely out of control and the first casualty is individual freedom.
The war is on, and right now is the next to last box available, the ballot box.
Because the only box left if the ballot box proves corrupt is the ammo box.
Posted by: BZ from NW at December 10, 2013 08:20 AM (MexEV)
Unlike your SOCON strawman which you beat the shit out of with screams of " AKIN! AKIN! AKIN" every time a conservative discusses pulling the party to the right.
Totally different.
Posted by: Senator John McCain at December 10, 2013 08:20 AM (5ikDv)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 08:21 AM (zOTsN)
I predict there would be many stumps and an ocean covered in debris.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 08:21 AM (27gH7)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 10, 2013 12:19 PM (SY2Kh)
You haven't a clue about Texas or Texans. Though I have no doubt you believe you do.
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 08:22 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 10, 2013 08:22 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 10, 2013 08:22 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: toby928 at December 10, 2013 08:22 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: X at December 10, 2013 08:23 AM (KHo8t)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 12:18 PM (r+7wo)
I know. I'm just a glutton for punishment, what can I say?
There are devices that can slow surface wind speeds quite a bit and they require no power or maintenance...they've been cleverly disguised...as trees.
If you're inland a few miles with a decent bit of tallish foliage between you and the beach, the wind has been knocked down quite a bit by the time it gets to you.
"You mean when a hurricane moves inland, topographical features actively deplete the wind energy, meaning that there's less damage? OMG! STOP THE PRESSES!!!!!
Next you'll be telling me that tornadoes are most common in flat lands as opposed to places with lots of hills and mountains! Then my gob will ahve been smacked!"
- Very, very stupid people, or roughly 52% of the voting public
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:24 AM (4df7R)
This type of one-dimensional thinking is a waste of time and resources.
Don't get me wrong. I don't care for Cornyn but it is not because he is not "conservative" enough. What the hell does that mean anyway when a guy gets an 87% rating? Zilch.
I don't like Cornyn because he represents everything that is wrong with Washington. He's a career politician who when in a pinch folds like a lawn chair in a windstorm to save his own ass and cut deals with his friends.
That being said, there are other ways to gain leverage from a senator who is clearly going to win. That includes pressuring his donors and supporters. Go after the things important to him and necessary to maintain his power.
Sure you may feel good you "sent him a message" with some buffoon primary candidate (he ain't no Cruz). But in the end, Cornyn doesn't change. In fact, he probably doubles down on bad behavior. Cornyn has what- one more term in him? STOOPID.
Posted by: Marcus at December 10, 2013 08:24 AM (GGCsk)
More probably it's insane.
It's like trying to stop a freight train with a pebble.
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 10, 2013 12:22 PM (GaqMa)
More dead seagulls, pelicans and migrating waterfowl to pretend don't exist.
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 10, 2013 08:24 AM (XIvZV)
Posted by: RWC at December 10, 2013 08:24 AM (fWAjv)
I registered Republican (from Independent) so I could vote for Ted Cruz in the primary and run-off.
I look forward to using that status to vote against Cornyn, very possibly for Stockman. Cornyn's behavior to cut Cruz off at the knees about the shutdown argument when later events with the ObamaCare launch proved Cruz right.
Even if he wins re-election, Cornyn needs a course correction from the Texas electorate, I think.
Posted by: Advo at December 10, 2013 08:24 AM (7vbG1)
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 10, 2013 08:24 AM (0FSuD)
The "pro-choice[sic]" position is that dismembering a fetus is equivalent to having an ingrown toenail fixed, except abortion clinics don't need to be held to the same standards of cleanliness and safety as a nail salon, let alone a podiatrist's office.
They sure have you fooled.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 10, 2013 08:25 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: brak at December 10, 2013 08:25 AM (M2qTM)
Of course Perry will endorse Cornyn- whether he agrees with him or not. Perry has been a good Governor (especially these last couple sessions), but he's still a Politician first.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 12:20 PM (nUH8H)
There is no and about it. It was just a statement. And as a reminder you didn't always think Perry was a good Governor.
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 08:25 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 10, 2013 08:25 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 08:25 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Schaeffer at December 10, 2013 08:25 AM (rqazu)
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at December 10, 2013 08:25 AM (DL2i+)
http://annapuna.blogspot.com/2005/08/no-room-for-homo-sapiens.html
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 08:26 AM (27gH7)
Posted by: Hurricane LaFawnduh at December 10, 2013 08:26 AM (pginn)
Posted by: jwest at December 10, 2013 08:26 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at December 10, 2013 08:27 AM (DL2i+)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 10, 2013 08:28 AM (g1DWB)
I wonder how far a broken windmill propeller would go in a hurricane?
One of those propellers hitting an oil rig would not be pretty.
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 10, 2013 12:24 PM (0FSuD)
Decapitate one manatee and There Will Be Blood.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:28 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:28 AM (nUH8H)
http://tinyurl.com/o6gb9f3
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 10, 2013 08:29 AM (XUKZU)
I'm a Texan that voted for Cornyn in 2008 only because at the last moment, I decided to be lazy and vote straight ticket. I only decided that because I went to vote to do my part to help anyone beat Obama. If I was going to hold my nose for McCain, I could do it for Cornyn.
Alas, Melissa's last tweet says it pretty well for me. Except within Texas, it's not just telling us what DC thinks. There is also the aspect of telling us what Austin thinks. Both seats of government seem to think the people really don't know, and so they presume to act for what's in our best interest. We can suffer that for awhile, but it gets old fairly quick.
Finally, regardless of money, the Republican will win in Texas. Obama has done too much to screw over Texas. Also, the Governorship is up for vote along with almost all the at-large positions in Texas State government. There will be people like me in 2008 that will decide to vote straight ticket, and that will allow even a shortchanged Republican US Senate candidate to carry the day.
Posted by: Leland at December 10, 2013 08:29 AM (1hLHC)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 10, 2013 08:29 AM (sOx93)
he also endorsed Gore. Posted by: X at December 10, 2013 12:23
Yes, jackass ... 25 years ago. Do you not want people to switch from D to R?
Posted by: buzz at December 10, 2013 08:29 AM (3cM9S)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at December 10, 2013 08:29 AM (zfY+H)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 08:29 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at December 10, 2013 08:30 AM (DL2i+)
259 -
Continuing the football analogy. So many of these Republican Senators are like Quarterbacks on losing teams.
They get their yards after games are out of reach, when their team has to throw the ball, so they have big numbers at the end of the season.
But but but... 90% conservative voting record!!!
Yeah, and what's that gotten us? How many wins does that translate into?
Posted by: BurtTC at December 10, 2013 08:30 AM (xCw24)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:30 AM (nUH8H)
http://annapuna.blogspot.com/2005/08/no-room-for-homo-sapiens.html
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 12:26 PM (27gH7)
Lefties are just...
I can't even call them idiots anymore. It's not a strong enough term. Lunatics.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:30 AM (4df7R)
Balderdash. I'll have you know that I have watched multiple episodes Walker Texas Ranger.
I don't claim to be an expert on Texas, but I do know what $36,000 and an announcement on World Nut Daily gets you against a well funded, senior leadership incumbent though.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 10, 2013 08:31 AM (SY2Kh)
If they we're doing their FUCKING JOBS we wouldn't be having this thread.
Their job is to get elected. Our job is to make our views so popular they need to adopt them to get elected. Different jobs. So far they have been doing theirs better that we have been doing ours.
Posted by: CJ at December 10, 2013 08:31 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Huggy at December 10, 2013 08:31 AM (o00SF)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 10, 2013 08:31 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: President Barky at December 10, 2013 08:32 AM (AqqsJ)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 10, 2013 08:32 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 10, 2013 08:32 AM (g1DWB)
Decapitate one manatee and There Will Be Blood.
Well, yes, by definition.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 12:30 PM (nUH8H)
I was going for layers of meaning. You know, nuance.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:32 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at December 10, 2013 08:32 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 08:34 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 10, 2013 08:34 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 10, 2013 08:35 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 10, 2013 08:35 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:35 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at December 10, 2013 08:36 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Soona at December 10, 2013 08:37 AM (mFvkI)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 10, 2013 08:37 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 10, 2013 08:37 AM (27gH7)
There is no and about it.
Then why bring it up? Seriously, that's akin to saying "The Democrats will endorse Wendy Davis." Of course they will, it's a moot point unless you think it moves the needle.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 12:28 PM (nUH8H)
Why bring it up? Oh I don't know. We're talking about the Senate primary race? I guess I shouldn't have mention that Perry will endorse one of the candidates. He's not required to endorse anyone or the encumbent. I liked you better when you just repeated the same post over and over.
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 08:37 AM (m2CN7)
This is as good and cogent an analysis as any others I've seen.
Posted by: Marcus at December 10, 2013 08:37 AM (GGCsk)
Me.
---
Nor do I. He may have come up with a replacement, but I think he would have kept his promise to EO Zerocare out of existence on day 1.
What can I say, I'm a fan of the Alternate History genre.
Posted by: Biff Boffo at December 10, 2013 08:37 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:38 AM (nUH8H)
Lord love a waterfowl, they predicted a strike on New Orleans with Hurricane Ivan, the year before, a LSU predicted a much larger disaster, with the pumps being underwater, it will happen, no unicorns will stop it,
Posted by: jeffrey pelt at December 10, 2013 08:38 AM (Jsiw/)
So Obammy gets adoring fangirls screaming his name and all but throwing their panties at him during the Mandela memorial.
Dubya gets booed.
Tell me again which one has actually done a damn thing for the African continent? Well, besides throwing the northern tier of the continent into abject chaos with Libya and Egypt.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:39 AM (4df7R)
Now, at first I thought this was a hoax. But it appears it isn’t. Apparently a fellow writing into a Jihadi chat show wants to do “martyrdom operations.” The sheikh he talked to says they’ve got a great new technique to blow up infidels. We hide explosives up your butt. There’s just one hitch. You’ve got to be repeatedly sodomized in order to be able to accommodate the explosive. So, the questioner wants to know if it is permissible for him to be regularly rogered, if doing so makes his posterior more amenable to hiding explosives. The fellow on camera, Shiite cleric Abdallah Al-Khilaf, says that even though sodomy is forbidden if it is necessary for jihad, well, then it is required. Because jihad is the highest obligation.
Now, what I find hilarious here is that it never occurs to anyone that there might be some kind of technological work-around short of repeated sodomy. You know, maybe thereÂ’s a device or a technique, something that is a little less unpleasant, inconvenient or forbidden than straight-up buggery? Nope. Gotta go with the sodomy. The Saturday Night Live skit writes itself.
Jihadi: What if we make the bomb smaller?
Sheikh: What? ThatÂ’s crazy. Sodomy is the only way.
Jihadi: CouldnÂ’t I use replica of a male, well, you know. In private like . . .
Sheikh: Shh! LetÂ’s not even discuss it.
Jihadi: What if IÂ’m willing to tolerate a lot of discomfort when it comes time for the martyrdom operation? I mean, itÂ’s my choice. I am blowing myself up after all. WhatÂ’s a little discomfort?
Sheikh: YouÂ’re not hearing me. This is the way it has to be. DonÂ’t you want to murder infidels?
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 10, 2013 08:39 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Mr. Powerstroke Super Duty 4X4 King Ranch Edition at December 10, 2013 08:39 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 08:39 AM (zOTsN)
Totally different.
Posted by: Senator John McCain
Give me an example of a candidate that's gone "all in" on these issues and not blown up? Conservatives that want to obsess over abortion politics usually go down in flames like Akin, see Cuccinelli for a recent example. Sometimes men really are made of straw.
And why is someone's obsession on abortion politics the ultimate test of how "conservative" they are?
Republicans like Huckabee were basically just big government statists, yet somehow they get street cred for being super awesome conservatives because of that one issue.
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 08:40 AM (2TMCu)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:40 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 10, 2013 12:34 PM (GaqMa)
They must have never seen the aftermath of a moose strike.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 10, 2013 08:40 AM (4df7R)
RE the Gulf Windmills and man's delusions of effect against Nature.
The 1900 Great Storm at Galveston, TX had winds estimated at 145 mph (what would be a Category 4 when that scale came into being, later) and a storm surge of over 15 feet. Between 6,000 and 12,000 people died, with the most common estimate at 8,000.
Galveston then built a 17-foot high seawall and raised the city 17 feet on dredged sand. Safety from hurricanes in our time!
Mother Nature: Challenge accepted.
The 2008 Hurricane Ike had wind speeds of 110 mph and a 22-foot storm surge. 37 confirmed deaths and hundreds are still missing.
Hooters was washed away. (Oh, the humanity!)
On the day of landfall, police were stopping travelers at La Marque, 4 miles (6 km) north of Galveston, and making them exit the highway. Interstate 45 at La Marque had been closed because boats and parts of wrecked piers were strewn throughout floodwaters blocking the road.
Mother Nature: Do you feel me now?
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 10, 2013 08:40 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 10, 2013 08:40 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 08:41 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: soothie at December 10, 2013 08:41 AM (mZGNr)
Posted by: Ken Cuccinelli at December 10, 2013 08:41 AM (gXRIG)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 10, 2013 08:41 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: t-bird at December 10, 2013 08:42 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at December 10, 2013 08:42 AM (5xmd7)
If you punish them no matter what, they'll either stop working or they'll run off to find someone else who will reward them for what they do.
Posted by: DrewM. at December 10, 2013 11:14 AM (SgXEz)"
They are being rewarded by contributors for doing things that I wish they would not do. I certainly can't outbid the money guys so the only option I have is to withhold my vote and my support.
I imagine that some of the dissatisfaction with John Cornyn is not all stuff that he has personally earned but overflow from McCain, Lindsey, Alexander and the rest of the GOP establishment that Senator Cornyn is so comfortable with. There is a certain amount of "We can't vote against your buddies but we can vote against you" going on.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at December 10, 2013 08:43 AM (BcCwi)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at December 10, 2013 08:44 AM (kxSZr)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:44 AM (nUH8H)
Every incumbant needs to be challenged every time they come up for election.
Every Republican needs to be primaried every time? The only candidates who would welcome that prospect are career politicians. For the House, it will mean campaigning always, non-stop. The few folks who put their lives on hold to run and do the right thing will opt out.
Posted by: CJ at December 10, 2013 08:44 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 08:44 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:45 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 10, 2013 08:45 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Biff Boffo at December 10, 2013 08:46 AM (YmPwQ)
Chickens are roosting.
Posted by: soothie at December 10, 2013 12:41 PM (mZGNr)
Better than what I'm used to.
Posted by: The Chicken at December 10, 2013 08:46 AM (zF6Iw)
http://tinyurl.com/pjz4x7b
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 10, 2013 08:47 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 08:47 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: physics geek at December 10, 2013 08:48 AM (MT22W)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at December 10, 2013 08:49 AM (5xmd7)
"Conservatives that want to obsess over abortion politics usually go down in flames like Akin, see Cuccinelli for a recent example"
Yeah, because Terry McAwful never had a word to say concerning the state of women's vajayjays during the campaign.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 10, 2013 08:49 AM (zF6Iw)
356 -
Which, ironically enough, would be a better description of pro-abortion Republicans, who can't seem to stop talking about it.
Posted by: BurtTC at December 10, 2013 08:49 AM (xCw24)
No, there will be an investigation. How the fuck did a manatee got to LA from FL?
Smugglers!
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 10, 2013 12:35 PM (0FSuD)
It got lost because global warming.
Posted by: Sandra Fluke's solid gold diaphragm at December 10, 2013 08:49 AM (e4elg)
Posted by: McAdams
DU much?
You make the ProgStatist case very well.
Give me an example of a candidate that's gone "all in" on these issues and
FTFY
Obama thinks it's cool to kill babies who survive abortion. He is president.
Cornyn is a guy who will selll out to Obama in 2 seconds if it means keeping his job.
You can close one eye and step around that shit pile if it suits you.
Some of us freak and idiots prefer to have both eyes open.
Posted by: noone, really at December 10, 2013 08:50 AM (5ikDv)
Posted by: soothie at December 10, 2013 08:50 AM (mZGNr)
#227
Well, sodomy is the left's obsession....they are in our K-12 preaching how normal and loving it is, all day, every day. As for rape....the Dems could care less, as evidenced by their shrugs at Bill Clinton and OWS rape camps.
And may I remind everyone how the Senate GOP promised Jim DeMint they would "leave his (conservative) legislation on the kitchen counter like a rotten banana."
Which is prob why he went to the Heritage Foundation.
Scaring the shit out of them is always good news.
Posted by: Pam at December 10, 2013 08:50 AM (cgrL5)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at December 10, 2013 08:51 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: Gov Chris Creosote (D) at December 10, 2013 08:51 AM (YmPwQ)
FIFY.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 10, 2013 08:51 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: soothie at December 10, 2013 08:51 AM (mZGNr)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 08:52 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at December 10, 2013 08:52 AM (QF8uk)
Yeah the COMPLETE FAILURE of the RNC/GOP establishment to support him caused him to lose by a MASSIVE....
3%.
But we shouldn't primary Cornyn. Because (R) .
And shit.
Posted by: noone, really at December 10, 2013 08:52 AM (5ikDv)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:52 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: jeffrey pelt at December 10, 2013 08:52 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at December 10, 2013 08:53 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 10, 2013 08:53 AM (GaqMa)
How did those senators handle their roles in the Senate's infamous Shamnesty vote this year? Did they roll with McCain and Rubio? Then primary them!
Posted by: Born Free at December 10, 2013 08:53 AM (xL8Hf)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 08:54 AM (zOTsN)
Stockman is almost certainly the only member of Congress to have been caught with 30 mg of valium hidden in a cellophane wrapper in his underwear. He's defended militia groups; accused an attorney general of "premeditated murder"; appeared on a Holocaust-denying radio program; waged a one-man war against Alfred Kinsey; compared his constituents—favorably—to Branch Davidians; and traveled to Denmark to protest climate change while wearing a red blindfold.
I love the prospect of having to waste time once again explaining away another jackass who appointed himself spokesman for conservative views.
Posted by: CJ at December 10, 2013 08:54 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz
No, obsessing over it= making your official campaign bumper stickers say " If babies had guns, they wouldn't be aborted."
http://tinyurl.com/na89b3k
This stuff is just the tip of the iceberg for Stockman, he's a nut who's spent more than a few nights in jail for things like drug possession.
Look, Stockman is going to go down in flames, I'm not actually worried about him making it to a general election and handing a seat to a Democrat, but conservatives need to call out the freaks before they do real damage.
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 08:54 AM (2TMCu)
3%.
But we shouldn't primary Cornyn. Because (R) .
And shit.
Posted by: noone, really at December 10, 2013 12:52 PM (5ikDv)
^^^THIS^^^
Posted by: Havedash at December 10, 2013 08:54 AM (gvqyH)
Posted by: soothie at December 10, 2013 08:55 AM (mZGNr)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 10, 2013 08:55 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at December 10, 2013 08:56 AM (u8GsB)
I registered Republican (from Independent) so I could vote for Ted Cruz in the primary and run-off.
I look forward to using that status to vote against Cornyn, very possibly for Stockman. Cornyn's behavior to cut Cruz off at the knees about the shutdown argument when later events with the ObamaCare launch proved Cruz right.
Even if he wins re-election, Cornyn needs a course correction from the Texas electorate, I think.
Posted by: Advo at December 10, 2013 12:24 PM (7vbG1)
Texas does not register voters to a party. In the primary you just go to that party's polling place. Your Voter Registration card will be stamped Democratic or Republican to show in which primary you voted in case there is a runoff election. You can only vote in that runoff if you did not vote in the other party's primary.
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 10, 2013 08:56 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Obama LIVs at December 10, 2013 08:56 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at December 10, 2013 08:57 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:57 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at December 10, 2013 08:58 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: Soona at December 10, 2013 08:58 AM (7MnqG)
Posted by: jeffrey pelt at December 10, 2013 08:58 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 12:17 PM (2TMCu)
Well, there's your problem. You just don't think very much.
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at December 10, 2013 08:58 AM (60Q+L)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 08:58 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 12:54 PM (2TMCu)
Do you live in Texas? Why exactly is Stockman a freak?
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 08:59 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 09:00 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 09:00 AM (nUH8H)
Is there an outspoken conservative you wouldn't have to "waste time... explaining away?" 'Cause I'm thinking "no."
The only way not to have to "explain away" someone is if they're so mealy mouthed that the Democrats can't even manufacture anything. Such a person would not exactly fill me with confidence.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) STILL Home at December 10, 2013 12:57 PM (nUH8H)
The only time McAdams posts here is when he gets to bash conservatives/tea partiers
Posted by: buzzion at December 10, 2013 09:01 AM (LI48c)
is settled law, but it's murder" is essentially the pro-choice position.
I was always thought the pro-life position was legally criminalizing
abortion, not just name-calling.
Well, there's your problem. You just don't think very much.
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon
So instead of name-calling, what part of my post do you disagree with?
Is the pro-life position not outlawing abortion?
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 09:01 AM (2TMCu)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 10, 2013 09:02 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Soona at December 10, 2013 12:58 PM (7MnqG)
Damn skippy.
Here's another thought - if you hear about Kermit Gosnell and your first thought is, "shit, the Dems will crucify me if I mention this, rather than "the fucker and everyone who supported and covered for him should burn in hell," maybe that's a clue you're in the wrong party.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 10, 2013 09:03 AM (zF6Iw)
Is the pro-life position not outlawing abortion?
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 01:01 PM (2TMCu)
Well the pro life faction supported the 20 week Texas bill. They did not demand that Texas outlaw abortion. Or is this the slippery slope people like you are afraid of?
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 09:04 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 09:05 AM (zOTsN)
Have you SEEN the man's watch? It just screams wealthywomenminorityprolifewingnutpoorhater !
Posted by: Mother Jones at December 10, 2013 09:05 AM (5ikDv)
proves he's smart enough to not talk about his views on amnesty at this time.
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at December 10, 2013 09:06 AM (kxSZr)
Do you live in Texas? Why exactly is Stockman a freak?
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 10, 2013 12:59 PM (m2CN7)
How about smuggling Valium in his underwear to get it inside the jail cell with him?
http://tinyurl.com/nhxwwft
If a Democrat was busted doing something like that, would you call him out on it?
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 09:07 AM (2TMCu)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 10, 2013 09:09 AM (sOx93)
Is there an outspoken conservative you wouldn't have to "waste time... explaining away?" 'Cause I'm thinking "no."
I didnÂ’t have to waste much time with Rand Paul. I want someone who can appeal beyond the conservative base. To sell limited government to more voters. I donÂ’t need quips and hackneyed tweets. I want candidates able to speak in compete sentences that appeal to new voters. No more faux pas machines. No more goofballs. Even good guys who canÂ’t make a good point without grating on people. Sorry Ted Cruz. I prefer a Rand Paul style.
Posted by: CJ at December 10, 2013 09:14 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 10, 2013 09:17 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 09:20 AM (Y92Nd)
http://tinyurl.com/nhxwwft If a Democrat was busted doing something like that, would you call him out on it?
Posted by: McAdams at December 10, 2013 01:07 PM (2TMCu)
I suppose if we have to stay out of bedrooms, we should also stay out of underwear.
Posted by: Havedash at December 10, 2013 09:21 AM (gvqyH)
I've personally met, worked for and given to Cornyn. Not anymore. Too many times he would rather take the Washington side of a vote and not protect Texan interests. I know you guys look at from a national perspective and justifiably so. As a local, I expect Texan Senators to represent our state interests and Cornyn has come down on the DC side of the fence one time too many for me.
Posted by: Rob B at December 10, 2013 09:23 AM (q32Ly)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 09:24 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 10, 2013 09:25 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: CJ at December 10, 2013 01:14 PM (9KqcB)
Let's just hope Rand Paul doesn't bring any of his father's style with him, or some of his ideas, such as the elder Paul's belief that Iran, for example, is a victim of evil Zionist subterfuge and persecution. You know, the jew-hating stuff. Or the elder Paul's personal and professional associations with the likes of Willis Carto, 'Spotlight' publisher and founder of the Holocaust denial 'movement' and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who believes the Rothschild family is at the heart of a world-conquering Zionist banker plot to Rule Ze Vorld. Yet more jew-hating stuff.
I'm guessing young Rand Paul was spoonfed this hateful shit when he was growing up, kind of like Mel Gibson and his virulently antisemitic father. We know how that turned out.
Posted by: troyriser at December 10, 2013 09:32 AM (V9ol4)
And that article on Stockman was as deep and politically dispassionate as the ones on Choom Boy and Marion Berry and their recreational habits.
riiiiiiiiiiight.
So MAC. Who's the "purist" now?
Posted by: noone, really at December 10, 2013 09:33 AM (5ikDv)
Even Stalin understood that you can only afford ideological purges when you have a firm grip on power, not in the middle of the struggle for power.
Posted by: Trayvon McGuffin at December 10, 2013 09:35 AM (473jB)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 10, 2013 09:47 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Iblis at December 10, 2013 09:49 AM (9221z)
Posted by: Shoey at December 10, 2013 09:51 AM (jdOk/)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 10, 2013 09:53 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Shoey at December 10, 2013 09:53 AM (jdOk/)
Posted by: Biff Boffo at December 10, 2013 09:54 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 10, 2013 09:55 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 10, 2013 10:01 AM (sOx93)
Let's just hope Rand Paul doesn't bring any of his father's style with him, or some of his ideas
I fully expected that. Or that the media would hang those issues around the sonÂ’s neck. DidnÂ’t happen.
Posted by: CJ at December 10, 2013 10:02 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 10, 2013 10:06 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 10, 2013 10:07 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Shoey at December 10, 2013 10:08 AM (jdOk/)
Posted by: Daybrother at December 10, 2013 10:16 AM (OP5bV)
The reason for primarying Roberts is simple; Kansas is more conservative as a state than he is, and can do better than a Senator who is little more than a seat-warmer. Same with Cornyn, whose outstanding virtue as a Senate leader is doing nothing.
The real issue is that the GOP "moderates" have a very poor track record of handling primary losses, and tend to throw hissy fits attacking the conservative candidate who beats them.
Medved and Podhoretz keep dancing around this, but the facts are simple; conservatives have a far better track record of accepting losses and taking one for the team than do the GOP "moderates", who are all of the John "How Dare You Challenge ME, Whacko Bird!" McCain and Jon "Chinese Say Stab in Back Save Two In Front" Huntsman school.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at December 10, 2013 10:48 AM (VcVIw)
Posted by: CJ at December 10, 2013 02:02 PM (9KqcB)
As a GOP primary voter, I'm not demanding that Rand Paul disavow his own father. I do ask that he explain what, if any, of his father's ideas he does share. He cannot evade his father's legacy--or notoriety. The elder Paul hung around ideologically with some disreputable assholes like Willis Carto, like Alex Jones. The younger Paul needs to address those associations and the ideas that go with them. If Rand Paul cannot or will not repudiate all of that nonsense in its entirety, then no, I'm not voting for the guy.
Posted by: troyriser at December 10, 2013 11:25 AM (V9ol4)
That said- I reject your "limited resources" argument, because it ignores the grass roots in the States. Yes, Stockman currently has ~32K in his war-chest. A couple of "money bombs" will shore that up. Additionally, Cornyn is already in trouble, as evidenced by the fact that he's been running "I am TOO conservative!!!" adds for at least the last 3 months- even before he had a challenger. Obviously he knows he's weak.
So, while it's true that the Senate Conservatives Fund only has so much money, that doesn't preclude politicians from raising a fair amount of money. Also, simply being out-spent doesn't necessarily mean as much anymore.
Finally, I'll say this- Primary all of them, every time. I want them to remember that they answer to us, not the other way 'round."
Hear, hear! It's not necessary to enumerate the many bath-house antics of the McConnell/Cornyn & NRSC stiff arms here for we all know. Losing Cornyn is a lynchpin to losing an establishment senate.
Primary them all.
Posted by: CO at December 10, 2013 11:45 AM (Wf0TQ)
Posted by: Brian at December 10, 2013 12:28 PM (pKkx4)
Posted by: Shoey at December 10, 2013 12:43 PM (jdOk/)
I'm so excited that Stockman is challenging him. Texas should not have to put up with a RINO liar like Cornyn, not when their other senator is Cruuuuz.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at December 10, 2013 02:01 PM (KL49F)
I'm a little annoyed at Roberts for endorsing Sebelius as HHS, but he was there to #StandWithRand and although out of DC and couldn't be there in person to #MakeDCListen, he was tweeting his support the entire time.
Posted by: KC_EDM at December 10, 2013 02:42 PM (tDnMR)
Posted by: Mr Estrada at December 10, 2013 11:18 AM (5piqN)
Nope, he didn't. He is 100% sealed border by USCB.org ratings.
Posted by: KC_EDM at December 10, 2013 02:50 PM (tDnMR)
Posted by: JJ Stone at December 10, 2013 03:29 PM (qVGaA)
You don't know why these things are happening? It's because there are people out there who have the same attitude you have toward people they think of as RINOs (read: any Republican who doesn't agree with you on at least 90% of things). And they're trying to do something about it.
And only now, it seems, do you realize that some of this energy is misspent.
Sigh.
Posted by: Demosthenes at December 10, 2013 04:59 PM (c5AtG)
Posted by: Shoey at December 10, 2013 07:00 PM (vA94g)
Posted by: monkeytoe at December 11, 2013 04:03 AM (sOx93)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4084 seconds, 577 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Cicero Kid at December 10, 2013 06:53 AM (6fSty)