March 20, 2013
— Ace Crichton's famous essay, "Environmentalism as Religion," noted that structural anthropologists found that, for whatever reason, very similar patterns of human thinking and social organization keep reappearing in different societies and for different purposes.
Although the essay, as the title indicates, discusses the many tropes and structures of religion (from pagan traditions to more modern Christian ones) appear in enviornmentalism, his general point can be broadened. Many see the government as essentially being their Mission (in the religious sense) and seek to perform Good Acts and to Spread the Word through their church.
The two closely-related areas especially amenable to cultification are The Environment (the Cult of Gaia) and Health (the Cult of Bodily Sanctity).
Read the whole thing, if you haven't, but here's an excerpt.
I studied anthropology in college, and one of the things I learned was
that certain human social structures always reappear. They can't be eliminated from society. One of those structures is religion. Today it is said we live in a secular society in which many people---the best people, the most enlightened people---do not believe in any religion.But I think that you cannot eliminate religion from the psyche of mankind. If you suppress it in one form, it merely re-emerges in another form. You can not believe in God, but you still have to believe in something that gives meaning to your life, and shapes your sense of the world. Such a belief is religious.
Today, one of the most powerful religions in the Western World is environmentalism. Environmentalism seems to be the religion of choice for urban atheists. Why do I say it's a religion? Well, just look at the beliefs. If you look carefully, you see that environmentalism is in fact a perfect 21st century remapping of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs and myths.
There's an initial Eden, a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature, there's a fall from grace into a state of pollution as a result of eating from the tree of knowledge, and as a result of our actions there is a judgment day coming for us all. We are all energy sinners, doomed to die, unless we seek salvation, which is now called sustainability. Sustainability is salvation in the church of the
environment. Just as organic food is its communion, that pesticide-free wafer that the right people with the right beliefs, imbibe.Eden, the fall of man, the loss of grace, the coming doomsday---these are deeply held mythic structures. They are profoundly conservative beliefs. They may even be hard-wired in the brain*, for all I know. I certainly don't want to talk anybody out of them, as I don't want to talk anybody out of a belief that Jesus Christ
is the son of God who rose from the dead. But the reason I don't want to talk anybody out of these beliefs is that I know that I can't talk anybody out of them.These are not facts that can be argued.
These are issues of faith.
And so it is, sadly, with environmentalism. Increasingly it seems facts aren't necessary, because the tenets of environmentalism are all about belief. It's about whether you are going to be a sinner, or saved. Whether you are going to be one of the people on the side of salvation, or on the side of doom. Whether you are going to be one of us, or one of them.
Am I exaggerating to make a point? I am afraid not.
The asterisk * is there for some backstory on this idea of hard-wiring of a deep and unconscious preference for certain myths and social structures. Structural linguistics postulated that babies are hard-wired with a certain understanding of how grammar should work; there's a theory that babies simply aren't exposed to enough words and sentences to be able to deduce grammar based upon seeing patterns in so many sentences. Since they don't have the raw data necessary to understand grammar and language through pure deduction, it must be the case (this theory goes) that they come pre-loaded, if you will, with the basic Operating System of human speech already in their brains.
Structual anthropology took that idea and applied to, if you will, the "grammar" and "vocabulary" of social structures and myths, that babies might already come pre-loaded with certain tendencies of thought, beliefs rather than just mere words. (Note that religious people can join in this belief, while rejecting the biological reason structural anthropologists offer: They can (and often do) say that a basic belief in God is inherent in most people, due to the Holy Spirit's resonance.)
One more point: Cognitive theorist Jonathan Haidt says that all humans think in terms of six basic moral goods, and that liberals differ from conservatives primarily in how they prioritize those moral goods. For example, he says liberals rate the "sanctity/purity" moral good quite low, as compared to conservatives.
I don't believe that for a red-hot second. I think liberals rate purity/sancticy extremely high, but they counterfeit this belief to themselves, because they've been taught that sanctity/purity is an indulgence of the weak-minded religious types. But while they deny that impulse, they actually act upon it, directing their sanctity/purity impulses not towards sexual restraint (as a religious person might) but towards health of the environment and health of the body.
This is why they are, in strictly anthropological terms, so fucking annoying about everything and always shrieking about this Moral Panic or that.
There's an old put-down when someone's going on about sex negatively (whether on the right or left): That person just needs to get laid so the rest of us can move on with our lives without being bothered by these sorts.
A similar put-down -- which is actually even more true than the "laid" one -- applies here. These people need to get religion, or, more accurately, find something outside of government and politics to give meaning to their empty lives so they can finally spare the rest of us from the folly and malice of their misdirected religious impulses.
Posted by: Ace at
01:21 PM
| Comments (376)
Post contains 1022 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at March 20, 2013 01:26 PM (Lq5WC)
A 'republican government' is designed to protect your individual rights, not your soul.
---
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
- John Adams
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 01:28 PM (FX38i)
Posted by: Whatev at March 20, 2013 01:28 PM (A7Wh1)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at March 20, 2013 01:28 PM (3+b6b)
Posted by: huerfano at March 20, 2013 01:29 PM (bAGA/)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 20, 2013 01:30 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 01:30 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: dantealiegri at March 20, 2013 01:30 PM (HXWlL)
Posted by: logprof at March 20, 2013 01:31 PM (+iA5G)
#7,
"When someone tells you it's for your own good and they just want to help you better yourself, something is about to go to hell"
"We're from the Government and We're Here to Help" ring a bell?
Posted by: Jess1 at March 20, 2013 01:31 PM (lbiWb)
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 01:32 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 20, 2013 01:32 PM (l+kmq)
Posted by: mama winger at March 20, 2013 01:32 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 01:33 PM (j3uk1)
" if the government cannot tell me if I can put a dick in my mouth, the government cannot tell me if I can put a donut in it either"
Now that we're footing the bill we can tell you what and when to put in your mouth...
/lovingarmsofgovernment
Posted by: Jess1 at March 20, 2013 01:33 PM (lbiWb)
Posted by: L, elle at March 20, 2013 01:33 PM (cmekS)
And now we're going to force our people to be moral and religious. I forget what religion Adams was in exactly; I've heard Deist, Unitarian and Congregationalist. Either way it was whatever Harvard was preaching.
So Adams is getting his wish.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 20, 2013 01:33 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: soothsayer, of the Righteous & Harmonious Fists at March 20, 2013 01:33 PM (3Aqe5)
The 10 Commandements:
1. I am the Lord thy God. Thou shalt not have other Preezys before me.
2. Thou shalt only make graven images of me and download only my speeches on thine Ipod.
3. Thou shalt not keep thy take home pay in vain.
4. Remember Cloward-Piven and keep it holy.
5. Honor thy State and The Party, that thy days may be long.
6. Thou shalt not kill, except by drone strike and sequestration.
7. Thou shalt not commit adulation except for me.
8. Thou shalt steal in the name of restorative justice.
9. Thou shalt not bear witness to any shortcomings of the Party or the administration.
10. Thou shalt not foreclose on thy constiteunts house.
Posted by: Brack O'Bama at March 20, 2013 01:34 PM (nELVU)
Of course "enviromentalism" is a religion.
Non-believers are branded as heretics.
Carbon Credits are "dispensations".
Al Gore is considered a infallible Pope, supported by a hierarchy of scientists serving as Cardinals.
Simply believing in the dogma bestows enlightenment.
etc, etc....
Posted by: proudvastrightwingconspirator at March 20, 2013 01:34 PM (dkw5q)
Posted by: Thorvald drinking good Scotch in broad daylight at March 20, 2013 01:34 PM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 20, 2013 01:35 PM (NzBQO)
glad. it's obviously my hobbyhorse lately. I'm glad others find it interesting.
Actually this stuff is like the Number 23, in that, you can take it too far. Once you start seeing it you start seeing it *maybe too much*, if you take my meaning.
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 01:35 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at March 20, 2013 01:35 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 20, 2013 01:35 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 20, 2013 01:35 PM (7D4cd)
Is it to much to hope that we'll soon start seeing schisms and violence based on minor disagreements over pin-dancing angels?
Posted by: pep at March 20, 2013 01:36 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 20, 2013 05:35 PM (NzBQO)
Defend us, Barack Obama!!!
Posted by: dum-dum at March 20, 2013 01:37 PM (+iA5G)
Because STFU, that's why. Babies are punishments.
Posted by: King Baracka Vomitus I at March 20, 2013 01:37 PM (UOM48)
Archived by Anthony Watts' invariably valuable site:
http://tinyurl.com/32wsbzu
Posted by: torquewrench at March 20, 2013 01:37 PM (gqT4g)
Ace, job alert!!!
WaPost Seeks Blogger to Write 'at Least a Dozen Pieces' a Day
This is how we do it. Infiltration of conservative and obviously hard working bloggers!! Style section, but that's where we start. Why not? Best high heels to wear when shooting an AR 15??
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 01:37 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: ace
***
Did you see that movie too? (23)
Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at March 20, 2013 01:37 PM (uhftQ)
------------
I don't think you can ever see too much of the truth. And what you're writing is hitting a lot of it.
Posted by: mama winger at March 20, 2013 01:38 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 01:39 PM (ZPrif)
I can think of no other thing that would induce me to resubscribe to the Post, but hey, I'm sure that paywall thing is gonna work out for them.
Posted by: pep at March 20, 2013 01:39 PM (6TB1Z)
one can take it that way. as a nonbeliever I take it to mean that people have strong inborn tendency to explain things according to god/gods.
Which is one reason I'm defensive of the religious. Even though I don't think they're right, I do see like 85% of the population believing in God, gods, or god-like anthropomorphizations of abstractions like "the environment."
We all do it, for crying out loud. I don't get the atheists' or the secularists' ego on this point.
Even I as a nonbeliever do it. I've got my own pseudoreligion. It doesn't make a lot of sense and it's mostly just affirmations without proofs, but it gets me through.
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 01:39 PM (LCRYB)
I sent you a hundred bucks on PayPal I would be thrilled to send you more for that purpose.
Even an 1100 buck repair on my business car will not stop me from funding the Crichton giveaway.....
Crichton's death after he turned on evangelical leftism really reminds me of Breitbart's loss.
Had he lived I think Crichton would have killed the Goreon beast by now.
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 01:40 PM (LRFds)
easy, the fetus is invading them and threatening their health. Ever heard of morning sickness?
Posted by: RiverC at March 20, 2013 01:40 PM (El+h4)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at March 20, 2013 01:40 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 01:40 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: museisluse at March 20, 2013 01:40 PM (DGx2X)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at March 20, 2013 01:41 PM (hEr50)
Interesting factoid:
I am reading W.S. Churchill's biography from Hillsdale, written by his son and a whole team (very dry, a lot of first person letters interspersed, I'm on Vol. I of V).
But he had quite an interesting habit to prepare himself for politics. He read all of the parliamentary debates. All of them. From 1874 to the present. Before he read the discussion of a particular issue, he wrote down his own thoughts and arguments on it. Then he read the debate. Then he refined his thoughts and rewrote his positions/arguments as he deemed it necessary or correct.
THIS. IS. PREPARATION.
You want to talk about gay marraige. KNOW EVERY FUCKING ARGUMENT. Same with abortion. same with taxes. same with the economy.
Every tricky issue should be subject to this exact type of scrutiny by every GOP politican in D.C. A "messaging" and "rationale" school, if you will.
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 01:41 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 01:41 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 20, 2013 01:41 PM (FsUAO)
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 01:41 PM (LRFds)
-----
How do you come to that conclusion?
My point was that government is overstepping it's authority when it compelled any 'moral' outcome. Such a mandate COULD be in conflict with a citizens own moral (religious) code, as in a State Religion.
The Islamists are a good example of what happens when a moral authority also becomes a legal authority. You could go to jail for sinning. Or worse.
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 01:42 PM (FX38i)
Posted by: Thorvald drinking good Scotch in broad daylight at March 20, 2013 01:42 PM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 20, 2013 01:42 PM (l+kmq)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 01:42 PM (ZPrif)
Even Nietzsche understood this. Seems like the left that supposedly embraced him doesn't (nor many who supposedly follow his philosophy.)
In short, most of us are hardwired for religious belief and certainly all of us are hardwired for meaning.
I myself cannot think of a time that I did not believe in God; though I certainly have had times of doubt.
Nietzsche actually already understood the left that came after him. He called them the last men.
Posted by: RiverC at March 20, 2013 01:43 PM (El+h4)
Posted by: andrew breitbart at March 20, 2013 01:43 PM (tt8wK)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at March 20, 2013 01:44 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: mama winger at March 20, 2013 01:44 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 20, 2013 01:44 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jenny hates her phone at March 20, 2013 01:45 PM (Ti7xB)
Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at March 20, 2013 01:45 PM (uhftQ)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 20, 2013 01:45 PM (FsUAO)
Posted by: museisluse at March 20, 2013 01:45 PM (DGx2X)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 20, 2013 01:45 PM (NzBQO)
Posted by: andrew breitbart at March 20, 2013 01:46 PM (AWl8t)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at March 20, 2013 01:46 PM (RZ8pf)
If done right recycling is just practical. I would agree that in places where it's unaffordable and not useful, it's stupid. But AFAIK, our county seems to do well with taking about half your non stained trash and recycling it.
Anyway, conservatives were into recycling before it was cool. Hand me down shoes, hand me down cars, reusing the plastic bag for cat poo, you know.
Posted by: RiverC at March 20, 2013 01:46 PM (El+h4)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 20, 2013 01:46 PM (7D4cd)
Posted by: Typical Democrat at March 20, 2013 01:46 PM (YYJjz)
Posted by: Thorvald drinking good Scotch in broad daylight at March 20, 2013 01:47 PM (1V6Pv)
#61,
That would require energy, effort, and thought. Otherwise known as "things in short supply these days".
Posted by: Jess1 at March 20, 2013 01:47 PM (lbiWb)
Thoughts?
Erg has no idea what he means. He's just here to get attention.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 20, 2013 01:47 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon now 63/64ths less Irish at March 20, 2013 01:47 PM (pLvWv)
I think porkpie hats and bowling shirts on 20-somethings is pretty damn original.
Posted by: pep at March 20, 2013 01:47 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 20, 2013 01:48 PM (7D4cd)
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 05:39 PM (LCRYB)
--Over Christmas my wife (as usual) got started on a conversation about religion. My younger brother just shrugged and said, "I'm a Bootyist."
Posted by: logprof at March 20, 2013 01:48 PM (+iA5G)
The Farmers all knew it was the same old shit though.
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 01:48 PM (FX38i)
Posted by: Serious Cat at March 20, 2013 01:48 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: mama winger at March 20, 2013 05:44 PM (P6QsQ)
----
You mean the same generation that brought us Fast and Furious VII and remakes of Tru Grit, Red Dawn, The Flinstones, and the Day the Earth Stood Still???
Posted by: fixerupper at March 20, 2013 01:48 PM (nELVU)
I have no idea what an NCMO session is, but if it has something to do with meeting girls, then we were on the same wavelength.
Posted by: pep at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: mama winger at March 20, 2013 05:32 PM (P6QsQ)
------------------------------------
I am also. Some good shit.
Posted by: Soona at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (uzR7E)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (XYSwB)
Is that your superego talking or just a real volcano?
Once again derp doesn't understand what is being discussed so takes it into his cramped comfort zone.
Read a book, dolt. I suggest Henri Levy-Strauss. He started this theory.
You do read books, right? I don't mean Rachel Maddow books. I mean real books. Right?
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (l+kmq)
Posted by: andrew breitbart at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (AWl8t)
Posted by: Vic at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (53z96)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 20, 2013 05:44 PM (UOM4
--At least it passed on mentioning cocaine.
Posted by: logprof at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (+iA5G)
"If done right recycling is just practical"
Sure, if one is actually "recycling". Trouble is that this ritual is NOT recycling, but is just sorting - a task that used to be carried out downstream. Now we waste energy by washing out plastic bottles...
Posted by: Jess1 at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (lbiWb)
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (MMC8r)
we called it "ecology club" when I was a kid...and yea we did verily purse the urge to merge.
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at March 20, 2013 01:49 PM (QF8uk)
Except that we have Todd Akins instead of Winston Churchills.
So the Akin types prepare themselves to enter public debate by carefully refining their insane medieval nonsense to a fine pitch. Which, guess what, is no help at all.
Akin really honestly truly did believe that there are magical rape sperm detectors in women's vaginas. It wasn't a careless choice of words. He did not misspeak. That's what the dumb cluck really thought. He accurately communicated to the public. With a horrifying message.
So before making a fetish of preparation for public debate, it would be best to make step one instead be a familiarization with basic facts. And not 14th century basic facts, either.
Posted by: torquewrench at March 20, 2013 01:50 PM (gqT4g)
It seems to me that the environmentalists don't want to be good stewards . They want the earth to have dominion over man instead of the other way around. To them, the earth is superior to mankind, and if push comes to shove, the one is to be sacrificed for the other. Earth is their god, and if need be, man must die for it.
Posted by: mama winger at March 20, 2013 01:50 PM (P6QsQ)
Well ace and other nonbelievers:
Once you understand that evolution is literally impossible and a laughable theory from a purely mathematical standpoint (see a mathemetician and physicist from Cambridge and Oxford (I think)), then where does that lead the thinking. By the way, both of these professors are atheists as well.
In other words, evolution is as junk science as global warming (don't you dare give in to the switch and say climate change). So if evolution is wrong, then what...
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 01:50 PM (tVTLU)
I don't see much of a distinction between this and tribalism, given that tribes will war over Whose Gods Are Stronger.
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 01:51 PM (LCRYB)
Thoughts?
Erg has no idea what he means. He's just here to get attention.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 20, 2013 05:47 PM (UOM4
--I can only hope we'll get another thread by Ace that beings with the words "erg's an idiot."
Posted by: logprof at March 20, 2013 01:51 PM (+iA5G)
Posted by: andrew breitbart at March 20, 2013 01:51 PM (tt8wK)
He ran out just before posting here. That's why he's cranky.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 20, 2013 01:51 PM (QTHTd)
IOW, cheap. Just like my dad who, thanks to his cheapness, will never need money from me in retirement, and instead is supporting lots of societal parasites even in retirement. Who knew he was a leftist?
Posted by: pep at March 20, 2013 01:51 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 20, 2013 01:52 PM (l+kmq)
High school kid invited Kate Upton to prom over the internet, and she accepted.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 20, 2013 01:52 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: andrew breitbart at March 20, 2013 01:52 PM (tt8wK)
my nose hair told me the other night, "enjoy me it may be the only hair you hhave along with those ear weirdos in another ten years"....
fun with hallucinogens....
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 01:53 PM (LRFds)
You want to talk about gay marraige. KNOW EVERY FUCKING ARGUMENT. Same with abortion. same with taxes. same with the economy.
Every tricky issue should be subject to this exact type of scrutiny by every GOP politican in D.C. A "messaging" and "rationale" school, if you will.
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 05:41 PM (tVTLU)
Yes, an excellent idea. And something that Reagan actually did a lot of when he was busy doing radio pieces and writing essays. He just made it seem like he was winging his responses later but he absolutely did know his policy details. A lot of modern conservative politicians would do well to emulate his complete example.
Posted by: Mætenloch at March 20, 2013 01:53 PM (pAlYe)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 20, 2013 01:53 PM (TIIx5)
what about "volcano=superego?" What about that reification?
You're an idiot. Your god is not strong. Your god is stupid and weak. That's why the stupid and weak chant to him.
The God of Derps.
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 01:53 PM (LCRYB)
Sure, if one is actually "recycling". Trouble is that this ritual is NOT recycling, but is just sorting - a task that used to be carried out downstream. Now we waste energy by washing out plastic bottles...
Posted by: Jess1 at March 20, 2013 05:49 PM (lbiWb)
But, as an added benefit, the kitchen smells better and the racoons don't come around the garage
Posted by: Serious Cat at March 20, 2013 01:53 PM (UypUQ)
he'd have plenty to say about Emperor Momjeans' "I can kikll anyone at anytime" doctrine too champ...
go play in fucking traffic
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 01:53 PM (LRFds)
Do you understand, bud? The abysss?
The shit abyss?
Posted by: Jim Lahey at March 20, 2013 01:54 PM (+iA5G)
Posted by: soothsayer, of the Righteous & Harmonious Fists at March 20, 2013 01:54 PM (Y4TdB)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 01:54 PM (ZPrif)
I'm in a crisis on "derp"....you can tell "derp" is a real meme.....
all the kids at my son's school with conservative parents use the hell out of it now...
too much IMHO
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 01:54 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Serious Cat
It's why the left is so enamored with labels and relabeling. They really think relabeling is important because it makes their bullshit a moving target. They're constantly trying to cover their tracks of constant and utter failure.
Posted by: Dang at March 20, 2013 01:54 PM (R18D0)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 01:55 PM (j3uk1)
Torquewrench:
Exactly. And what I forgot to mention was that the debate, at least on one side of the aisle, is so fucking pathetically stupid in most instances, would it be worth even reading the congressional record for our politicians? Perhaps. But what I do think would be good would be for candidates to read every speech by the other side's major candidates. It would arm us to understand what nerves they are hitting and what they are saying.
I'm actually a huge fan of this. What did Sun Tzu say: Know not yourself and know your enemy, and you have already lost. Know yourself and not your enemy, and you will lose many battles. Know yourself and your enemy and you are prepared to fight. (paraphrased I know, just read Art of War as well. His comments on spies at the end of the book are very interesting).
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 01:55 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 01:55 PM (MMC8r)
High school kid invited Kate Upton to prom over the internet, and she accepted.
Posted by: Jane D'oh
He'll never make it. He'll be a dry, shriveled husk before he ever gets there, IYKWIMAITYD.
Posted by: pep at March 20, 2013 01:55 PM (6TB1Z)
Sure, if one is actually "recycling". Trouble is that this ritual is NOT recycling, but is just sorting - a task that used to be carried out downstream. Now we waste energy by washing out plastic bottles...
Posted by: Jess1 at March 20, 2013 05:49 PM (lbiWb)
They used to make us do that shit here (yes even in SC). We had to sort out the "recyclables " and put them in separate containers. Food trash went into special yellow bags you had to buy at the store. Supposedly that was to discourage not recycling.
People hated it because the bags were cheap shit. Everyone complained at council meetings contiuously. So they agreed to do away with the bags and only have bins for metal, aluminum, and other. The metal and aluminum were the only things they had actually been recycling. The other stuff just went into the land fill just like the old days.
But low they had to have a tax hike to make up for loss of the "yellow bag" money. So we found the real reason for the recycling, money.
This is always the case for government controlled green shit.
Posted by: Vic at March 20, 2013 01:55 PM (53z96)
THAT is the proper function of government. The first amendment respects our right to fill in the details. We have the natural right of self-determination, and that right is enumerated in the constitutional right to choose our own system of Good and Evil.
Even Atheists have a system of Good and Evil that they follow. (They just don't buy off the rack.)
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 01:56 PM (FX38i)
Interesting? Not really, but like the man himself, there is value in sticking with something just because it's the right thing to do and it's good for you. Really.
Posted by: pep at March 20, 2013 01:56 PM (6TB1Z)
40 is the new 40...
I didn't need to take chemicals to hear inner voices I just needed to be awake 49 hours.
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 01:56 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Beagle at March 20, 2013 01:56 PM (+wV7d)
Posted by: David Marcoe at March 20, 2013 01:56 PM (5I0mE)
Nice piece Ace but I think most (intelligent) religious people would not reject the biology but surmise that it is the mechanism by which the Holy Spirit resonates.
Posted by: pashmr at March 20, 2013 01:57 PM (3aNC4)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 01:57 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 01:57 PM (MMC8r)
derp. derp derp. derp, derp derp, derp derp derp derp.
derp. derp derp. derp derp derp derp derp derp.
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 01:57 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 20, 2013 01:57 PM (l+kmq)
Posted by: Max Power at March 20, 2013 01:58 PM (q177U)
*****
Always have, always will.
The Global Warmingists are perhaps the most zealous with their dogma that you should die for not believing and should die in general.
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at March 20, 2013 01:58 PM (+I8Mq)
Interesting? Not really, but like the man himself, there is value in sticking with something just because it's the right thing to do and it's good for you. Really.
Posted by: pep at March 20, 2013 05:56 PM (6TB1Z)
Someone commented on it in one of the recent Sunday book threads. They said it was good.
Posted by: Vic at March 20, 2013 01:58 PM (53z96)
When you start out by not being able to name your exact source, you fail.
When you start out by assuming the proposition you've no intention of backing up properly, you fail.
Hey, maybe your theory is correct. But you fail. What you're selling, I'm not buying.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 20, 2013 01:59 PM (QTHTd)
the worst thing I can say about Bush is he was bad enough to still be better than the last two communists the left ran....
McCain and Romney were both better than Choom IMHO but "Ebonyish Democratonium" shielding means God would have a hard time beating the Choom King
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 01:59 PM (LRFds)
What evolutionary reason would there be for an inborn desire for God?
"We are fearfully and wonderfully made."
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 20, 2013 01:59 PM (GoIUi)
Maetenloch: I didn't know that, there's a reason these guys were the best!! But you knew Reagan knew his crap just by listening to his radio addresses. Pure genius.
Flatbush Joe:
Let me rephrase. Species evolution is complete junk science. Totally. You cannot reproduce it in a lab.
It has often been said in literature that the eye is the window to the soul. How true that turned out. You see, for eyesight to occur, roughly 250 microbiological things must happen instantaneously. The odds of "evolving" into something like that are so astronomical it literally is laughable. After all, we've only been here 4 billion years allegedly.
Now it is true that certain species can lose their eyes/eyesight, like the cave dwelling creatures or us with our gall bladder. That kind of "evolution" I do not dispute. I would call that atrophical evolution.
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 01:59 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Thorvald drinking good Scotch in broad daylight at March 20, 2013 01:59 PM (1V6Pv)
derp. derp derp. derp, derp derp, derp derp derp derp.
derp. derp derp. derp derp derp derp derp derp.
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 05:57 PM (LCRYB)
--Eine Kleine Derppmusik?
Posted by: logprof at March 20, 2013 02:00 PM (+iA5G)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at March 20, 2013 02:00 PM (XYSwB)
It is good, but it isn't Mickey Spillane.
Posted by: pep at March 20, 2013 02:00 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 05:51 PM (LCRYB)
*****
Like I said- not to put too fine a point on it. I guess I make a distinction in the two when it comes to a supernatural "explanation" or unifying theory. That "giant mystery" that gives a broader meaning to existence. Tribes are more about survival in the here and now. Religion ponders the hereafter as well.
Maybe it's just an extension of the tribe.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon now 63/64ths less Irish at March 20, 2013 02:00 PM (pLvWv)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at March 20, 2013 02:00 PM (QF8uk)
Posted by: soothsayer, of the Righteous & Harmonious Fists at March 20, 2013 02:00 PM (KeJAW)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:01 PM (j3uk1)
Flatbush Joe:
Let me rephrase. Species evolution is complete junk science. Totally. You cannot reproduce it in a lab.
It has often been said in literature that the eye is the window to the soul. How true that turned out. You see, for eyesight to occur, roughly 250 microbiological things must happen instantaneously. The odds of "evolving" into something like that are so astronomical it literally is laughable. After all, we've only been here 4 billion years allegedly.
Now it is true that certain species can lose their eyes/eyesight, like the cave dwelling creatures or us with our gall bladder. That kind of "evolution" I do not dispute. I would call that atrophical evolution.
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 05:59 PM (tVTLU)
--Species evolution is BS? How did Man's Best Friend come from wolves, then?
Posted by: logprof at March 20, 2013 02:01 PM (+iA5G)
Posted by: andrew breitbart at March 20, 2013 02:02 PM (tt8wK)
Posted by: soothsayer, of the Righteous & Harmonious Fists at March 20, 2013 02:02 PM (LVtr+)
I don't mean that at all. Obviously healthy > non healthy.
I mean the priests who have installed themselves in the Contra Costa city council who've decided they have to ban ecigs to let the Followers know that smoking is bad, mmkay?
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 02:02 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:02 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: mama winger at March 20, 2013 02:02 PM (P6QsQ)
derp. derp derp. derp, derp derp, derp derp derp derp.
derp. derp derp. derp derp derp derp derp derp.
***
Vivaldi's Concerto for Derp?
Posted by: WalrusRex at March 20, 2013 02:02 PM (Hx5uv)
Correct!
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 06:00 PM (LCRYB)
--I think David Derppman will be conducting a performance of that at the Kennedy Center next week.
Posted by: logprof at March 20, 2013 02:03 PM (+iA5G)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 20, 2013 02:03 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 20, 2013 02:03 PM (GHpOB)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at March 20, 2013 02:03 PM (8HlS8)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 20, 2013 02:03 PM (GHpOB)
Boulder toilet,
Give me a fucking break, I'm at work and doing other shit right now. I do remember that they were going to do a presentation at Wash U in St. Louis as to how ridiculous random evolution from raw matter to mankind would be, so infinitescimal that it is laughable. And they were both avowed atheists.
Basically, the abstract of the discussion was that people could believe we were created by aliens, a flying spaghetti monster, God, whatever, but the idea that we, in our current form, somehow evolved to that state in merely 4 billion years is beyond laughable. I'll try to find you a link to these guys.
But does anyone else question, that we have gone from using stone implements to splitting the fucking atom in just 10,000 years of recorded human history. I mean, what the fuck, and most of this occurring in the last 1000 years.
That's aaaawwwwffffullllllyyyyy convenient, dontcha think?
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 02:03 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 02:03 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 20, 2013 02:03 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 20, 2013 02:03 PM (GHpOB)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 20, 2013 02:04 PM (GHpOB)
We could throw institutionalized racism into the mix. It's nothing more than 'Racial Collectivism'. You sincerely BELIEVE that your team is superior, and you do everything in your power to make sure your team has every advantage over all others (usually at the expense of all others).
It's all the same thing.
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 02:04 PM (FX38i)
1. Presidential Limo breaks down; gas tank filled with diesel. Limo not diesel. Advance Limo flown back from Jordan to Israel. Presidential Limo 1 flown back to US for repairs.
2. Obama gives Israel a magnolia tree, which is ceremoniously planted. No one thought to clear this with the Japanese Agriculture Ministry. Digging it up now.
I don't care about the facts as much as the image it sends on the international stage: WE SUCK.
Posted by: Joe Theisman's Prostate at March 20, 2013 02:04 PM (HqXYa)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at March 20, 2013 02:04 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: soothsayer, of the Righteous & Harmonious Fists at March 20, 2013 02:04 PM (vanqS)
God hates well insert demon "x'...
hey you should check out Allen G's non blog...
we may be getting something off the ground soon...
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 02:04 PM (LRFds)
et tu?
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 20, 2013 02:04 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: pep at March 20, 2013 05:49 PM (6TB1Z)
Non-Committal Make Out session.
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 20, 2013 02:05 PM (NzBQO)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 20, 2013 02:05 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: Thorvald drinking good Scotch in broad daylight at March 20, 2013 02:05 PM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 20, 2013 02:05 PM (UOM48)
derp. derp derp. derp, derp derp, derp derp derp derp.
derp. derp derp. derp derp derp derp derp derp.
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 05:57 PM (LCRYB)
♫ -- ♫ ♫ -- ♫ - ♫ ♫ - ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫.
♫ -- ♫ ♫ -- ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫.
Posted by: Serious Cat at March 20, 2013 02:05 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 20, 2013 02:05 PM (F0bki)
It has often been said in literature that the eye is the window to the soul. How true that turned out. You see, for eyesight to occur, roughly 250 microbiological things must happen instantaneously. ....
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 05:59 PM
***
On top of that, new species are "suddenly appearing" in places that are inhabited both long enough and densely enough that the likely hood of these critters being overlooked is fantastically small.
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at March 20, 2013 02:06 PM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 20, 2013 02:06 PM (OevbG)
tribalism an faction building are hard wired into the bald monkey in us...
personally I strive to be a thinking being past all that instinct shit but then again I have a God that has a book and sorta says "nut up you bald apes"....
if your whole life is spent in a Mommy Dearest-esque game of 'love me daddy" with the Church then instinct becomes a warm blankie...
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 02:06 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at March 20, 2013 02:07 PM (8HlS8)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:07 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 20, 2013 02:07 PM (GHpOB)
Posted by: WMCB at March 20, 2013 02:07 PM (jjsXL)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 02:08 PM (ZPrif)
Logprof:
My apologies, I am somewhat handicapped as the language is defined by the very people that push such theories. Let's go with genus then.
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 02:08 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Truman North and his shiny new website at March 20, 2013 02:09 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 20, 2013 02:09 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 20, 2013 02:09 PM (F0bki)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 20, 2013 02:10 PM (l+kmq)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 20, 2013 02:10 PM (I/HMT)
and sided with AQ in the Bush era IIRC...
basically they have managed to destroy every common touchstone I had with pop culture to the point I am a man without a "pop" country
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 02:10 PM (LRFds)
I'm still not seeing the actual name of that awesome genius physicist-mathematician who has overthrown a century or two of biological research and DNA analysis.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 20, 2013 02:10 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: The Religious Order of Obamacans at March 20, 2013 02:10 PM (j2lYi)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 06:07 PM
****
You can download the sample files and flash the eprom
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at March 20, 2013 02:10 PM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: RiverC at March 20, 2013 02:11 PM (El+h4)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 20, 2013 06:06 PM (OevbG)
----------
This is why one of the first things to happen in a totalitarian regime, including communist countries like China, the USSR, and North Korea, is the outlawing of non-approved religious communities and services. It is estimated the hundreds of thousands of Chines Christians have been killed in the last 40 years or so, and countless thousands in N. Korea as well. Oddly enough, reports out of both countries seem to indicate that the Church is growing and flourishing underground, in spite of it.
Marxists must eliminate God in order for their plans to succeed. God laughs.
Posted by: mama winger at March 20, 2013 02:11 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 06:06 PM (MMC8r)
Don't forget the DVD set sent to the Queen early in Obama Regime 1. It had the wrong country code, and was therefore useless. Most people learn from their mistakes. This administration is apparently too arrogant.
Posted by: Joe Theisman's Prostate at March 20, 2013 02:11 PM (HqXYa)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 20, 2013 02:12 PM (GHpOB)
2. Obama gives Israel a magnolia tree, which is ceremoniously planted. No one thought to clear this with the Japanese Agriculture Ministry. Digging it up now.
I don't care about the facts as much as the image it sends on the international stage: WE SUCK.
Posted by: Joe Theisman's Prostate at March 20, 2013 06:04 PM (HqXYa)
"MR. PRESIDENT? WHAT ABOUT YOUR GAFFES?!""
Posted by: Said, No Reporter, Ever at March 20, 2013 02:12 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 20, 2013 02:12 PM (UOM48)
Color me stupid, but what do the Japs have to do with Israel?
Posted by: rickb223 at March 20, 2013 06:09 PM (F0bki)
My bad. The ISRAELI Ministry. Must be dipping into the Valu-Rite a tad early. I denounce myself.
Posted by: Joe Theisman's Prostate at March 20, 2013 02:12 PM (HqXYa)
Posted by: RiverC at March 20, 2013 02:13 PM (El+h4)
Christianity without Christ's absolution is a system rather prone to "great man" syndrome...
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 02:13 PM (LRFds)
If you are a rational person, you won't ever restrain your behavior voluntarily. You will lie, cheat and steal if you can get away with it.
this is so false I don't know what to say.
Look up "martial code."
warriors almost always develop a code of behavior that *disadvantages* them (in as much as it forbids certain things and demands others) and yet they cling to it, as the warrior's code is what distinguishes them from the coward.
You always say this. No matter how many times it's disproven, you'll keep on saying it.
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 02:13 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:13 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon now 63/64ths less Irish at March 20, 2013 02:13 PM (pLvWv)
Posted by: Vic at March 20, 2013 02:13 PM (53z96)
*****
If you only knew how much booze pours through the West Wing you'd swear they were Top Morons.
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at March 20, 2013 02:13 PM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 20, 2013 02:13 PM (I/HMT)
It's utopian, believing man and his works can be perfected, through the agencies of man, specifically the elites.
All good comes from the State.
There is no end but the State, the source of our benefits, the mechanism that will perfect us.
There is nothing more powerful than the State, and the rights of Man are accorded from it.
The State achieves moral ends-- 'fairness,' and 'equality.'
Yada yada yada.
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 05:55 PM (MMC8r)
----------------------------------------------------
Enviromentalism: The creation of the state.
Abortion: The creation of the state.
Political correctness: The creation of the state.
Welfare: The creation of the state.
Health (presently): A creation of the state.
ETC., ETC.
Posted by: Soona at March 20, 2013 02:14 PM (uzR7E)
Posted by: Whatev at March 20, 2013 02:14 PM (A7Wh1)
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 06:06 PM (MMC8r)
Don't forget the DVD set sent to the Queen early in Obama Regime 1. It had the wrong country code, and was therefore useless. Most people learn from their mistakes. This administration is apparently too arrogant.
Posted by: Joe Theisman's Prostate at March 20, 2013 06:11 PM (HqXYa)
No, no, no. He gave legally blind Prime Minister Gordan Brown the unplayable DVD set. The Queen got the iPod loaded with Obama's speeches.
Posted by: mugiwara at March 20, 2013 02:14 PM (hpYnL)
Why is it that liberal assholes get this kind of religion, but turn into such fucking dicks about EVERYTHING.
Meanwhile, most Catholics I know are nice people.
But not liberals, they turn into judgmental douchebags.
Religion is supposed to give you hope, but they always focus on the most insane negative crap, and get tats and prance around like effete dancers.
So damned judgmental. Worse than any nun I ever had, seriously...I've know more than a few athiest idiots...all childish jerks, judging and rubbing people's nose in not being just like them.
Posted by: Rev dr E buzz at March 20, 2013 02:14 PM (raGXo)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 20, 2013 02:14 PM (GHpOB)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:15 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Evi. L. Bloggerlady at March 20, 2013 02:15 PM (4kTo2)
Flatbush Joe:
You are just as guilty as the enviro wackos on this one. Don't you see the trap you've fallen into. This is how you started out:
"Evolution isn't junk science. You sound stupid when you say that."
I say evolution is junk, at least the kind of the fish to human variety. I have provided several reasons as to why that is the case. You come back with:
"I have no time for the anti-evolution crazies."
"It's just a fact. Deal with it."
"[Denying it] doesn't work with anyone with a decent education."
"Got no time for the nutjob anti-evolutionistas."
These are not arguments. Are you going to resort to the "tea bagger" line of the leftists next.
Now, if you're saying that the evolutionary plan was built into the first matter or living thing I suppose, and that it is just unlocking as the original designers intended, and that's the kind of designed "evolution" you are referring to, well then ok, I can buy into that theory.
But the idea that one genus involves into another is totally laughable. Or that something with no eyesight can evolve those microbiological functions in a matter of 4 billion years is also laughable.
And this is coming from a very highly educated, former atheist, former liberal, and someone who is marginally sane.
But in the end, I'll just invoke Crichton. You want to state that genus evolution is a fact, prove it.
But the sad thing is that it cannot be proven. And I have very good arguments as to why the probabilities are so low such a theory should be mocked.
"Evolution" has become religion of the worst kind, accepted principles as fact. It's like global warming without the internet and true scientific investigation. If anything, the Scopes trials are against those who call it into question. They are hit with "crazies" "nutjob" "bad education". These are the responses of the leftist. Not of a rational human being that wants to discuss an issue.
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 02:16 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at March 20, 2013 02:16 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Said, No Reporter, Ever at March 20, 2013 02:16 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: soothsayer, of the Righteous & Harmonious Fists at March 20, 2013 02:16 PM (vyPsz)
"People are aghast when I say I don't sort my trash"
Most of our friends & associates know this of me, so a couple took their own empty bottles (home, I guess) from the #1 Nephews Grad party we threw this past fall rather than have me toss 'em.
I was amazed. Saddened, but amazed.
Posted by: Jess1 at March 20, 2013 02:16 PM (lbiWb)
Posted by: RiverC at March 20, 2013 06:13 PM (El+h4)
I saw a report that said 90% of the communities that do this shit simply haul it to the land fills and dump it all together again. The only thing that is really recycling is aluminum and steel. All the rest cost money to do so they don't do it.
Personally even though they quit making us do it I still save aluminum cans separately. I take them to the fire station in town to a bin they have. They sell them and the proceeds go to the Shriner's Burn Children Hospital.
Posted by: Vic at March 20, 2013 02:17 PM (53z96)
The science is settled!!!!!! You sound like a warmist
Posted by: pashmr at March 20, 2013 02:17 PM (3aNC4)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 02:17 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: BrianInWisconsin at March 20, 2013 02:17 PM (bjtc4)
their evangelical wing says without irony that "mankind is a virus on Earth" I could probably give you a dozen examples...
I just wish they'd martyr themselves instead of trying to martyr progress....
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 02:17 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 20, 2013 02:17 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Yale Taft Portman: Gay Son at March 20, 2013 02:17 PM (wIgpo)
Posted by: Truman North and his shiny new website at March 20, 2013 02:17 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:17 PM (j3uk1)
****
It's what give them the strength character to develop the killing skills and restraint in their application. And why those who are privy to this knowledge and stray to villainy are anathema.
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at March 20, 2013 02:17 PM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 20, 2013 02:18 PM (I/HMT)
Posted by: Hopeless at March 20, 2013 02:18 PM (d3X9n)
--Species evolution is BS? How did Man's Best Friend come from wolves, then?
Speciation, AKA microevolution. In other words, the loss of genetic material, not the adding of it. As far as I know.
"Evolution" is a pretty ambiguous term by itself.
Posted by: Grey Fox at March 20, 2013 02:18 PM (/ZHx6)
Posted by: logprof at March 20, 2013 02:18 PM (+iA5G)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 20, 2013 02:18 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 02:19 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Truman North and his shiny new website at March 20, 2013 02:19 PM (I2LwF)
"So they envision an "elect" who are worthy and the rest...there must be some sort of a solution for them"
Yeah. They stupidly believe that they will be the "elect" when TSHTF. Remind them of which group spent the most time staring at the gallows' blade...
Posted by: Jess1 at March 20, 2013 02:19 PM (lbiWb)
Yup...probably a pretty final one as well...
the thing is I would not play God myself on 'picking who stays and who goes away" and I would die before I let them play that game.
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 02:19 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 20, 2013 02:19 PM (tkWnt)
One thing that struck me.... was the 'programed' students question.... of how he was 'prejudiced' against Environmentalism...
Prejudice is to PRE Judge... to NOT look at the facts... yet has has thought and studied this area.... so much that he has written books...
Ergo.... he has JUDGED it... not prejudged it...
But the student was going for a Liberal Enviroweenie Got ya question... thus the 'evil' prejudice...
Posted by: Romeo13 at March 20, 2013 02:20 PM (lZBBB)
----
Which, despite their claims otherwise, proves that leftists who like to call themselves 'Secular Humanists', are not at all rational.
All morality is subjective. There is no way to twist objective science into a type of morality. To do so violates the tenets of objectivity. Science doesn't care who lives or dies. Science doesn't care who suffers. If they were as objective as they say, the left certainly wouldn't care what was "fair" and what was not.
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 02:20 PM (FX38i)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 20, 2013 02:20 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: zsasz
***
Derp-dini
Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at March 20, 2013 02:20 PM (uhftQ)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 02:21 PM (ZPrif)
Yep. I think in our county they just trash whatever they can't sell / recycle properly, and thus don't end up the same stupid problem they have in other places. The removal of vegetable/animal parts definitely helps this; but I will admit I don't know where the bottles and cardboard go; I would assume that not all get recycled. I am however glad to let them make that choice if they can economically slow the progress of the landfill filling up.
Posted by: RiverC at March 20, 2013 02:21 PM (El+h4)
Posted by: mama winger at March 20, 2013 02:21 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: soothsayer, of the Righteous & Harmonious Fists at March 20, 2013 02:21 PM (Fely/)
Posted by: mugiwara at March 20, 2013 02:22 PM (hpYnL)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at March 20, 2013 02:22 PM (8HlS8)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 20, 2013 02:22 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 02:22 PM (MMC8r)
I'll help Ace give away some copies...
hell I would run a contest that the first person to whatever gets a copy...
State of Fear should have been the beginning of the end for the watermelons...
instead we lost a great mind too soon
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 02:22 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: soothsayer,
He's right here if you're curious:
http://theothermccain.com/2013/03/09/you-stay-classy-bill-schmalfeldt/
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at March 20, 2013 02:22 PM (UCv7P)
Posted by: Thorvald drinking good Scotch in broad daylight at March 20, 2013 02:23 PM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 02:23 PM (ZPrif)
There is no reason for those beliefs to preclude each other as far as I can see.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 20, 2013 02:23 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:23 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Whatev at March 20, 2013 02:23 PM (A7Wh1)
Pharm and Grey Fox:
YES!! Fellow commenters, please pay attention to this. This is CONSENSUS and has nothing to do with science. Look at the ridiculous attacks and namecalling from one of our own just because I dare question it. You can read my prior comments to know that I do not suffer from a bad education and am only a little nuts. But yet, how dare one question the religion of evolution and you must be NUTS and an IDIOT.
How scary is that. Evolution is touted by the left, it is the champion of all that they stand for. IT IS THEIR IDENTITY. To NOT be created by God.
Now imagine if that falls. Do you see why they cling to it and must silence any opposition. The more advances we make in microbiology, the stupider evolution looks. It initially was opposed on religious grounds. Now it's only defense is the religion of atheism.
If evolution as taught by the lefties falls, then we have taken the cornerstone out of their foundation AND THEY SHALL SURELY BE DESTROYED. My guess it's going to take another 50-100 years and some brave, brave souls. They have already started up that hill.
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 02:23 PM (tVTLU)
warriors almost always develop a code of behavior that *disadvantages* them (in as much as it forbids certain things and demands others) and yet they cling to it, as the warrior's code is what distinguishes them from the coward.
It is only irrational if you assume that the only end goal of warfare is to destroy the enemy. That is very seldom only goal.
Posted by: Grey Fox at March 20, 2013 02:24 PM (/ZHx6)
Posted by: Ted Danson at March 20, 2013 02:24 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at March 20, 2013 02:25 PM (8HlS8)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 20, 2013 02:25 PM (GHpOB)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at March 20, 2013 02:25 PM (ZPrif)
Removal of Christ/God from it makes two things. First, you get unitarians that are afraid to believe that God condemns anyone at all. But the condemning doesn't go away. It just moves, all of it, into the finger, that waggling finger... called the social gospel. Next, since that God isn't worth believing in because he's unnecessary, you get our liberals.
Puritans. The worst thing that happened to them was they succeeded.
Posted by: RiverC at March 20, 2013 02:25 PM (El+h4)
Posted by: Truman North and his shiny new website at March 20, 2013 02:25 PM (I2LwF)
sadly you mispelled "never" these days....
I think the world we be a better place if we Carthaged a jihadist den...
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 20, 2013 02:25 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 20, 2013 02:26 PM (GHpOB)
------
Yes. I was about to say that 'rational' doesn't necessarily mean what you think it means.
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 02:26 PM (FX38i)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:26 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 20, 2013 02:27 PM (HDgX3)
How about this. Evolution is insufficiently explained* to even qualify as a scientific theory.
*And therefore insufficiently understood.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 20, 2013 02:27 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Jmel at March 20, 2013 02:27 PM (9tSXa)
Posted by: Thorvald drinking good Scotch in broad daylight at March 20, 2013 02:28 PM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: steevy at March 20, 2013 02:28 PM (9XBK2)
Did I say oceans? I meant "my career."
Posted by: Ted Danson at March 20, 2013 06:24 PM (j3uk1)
______________
Come again?
Posted by: CSI at March 20, 2013 02:28 PM (HDgX3)
Chimps and humans share 99% of DNA. How can you look at this and not believe in evolution?
I say that's all just wind in sails.
Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at March 20, 2013 02:28 PM (7v/wS)
Posted by: BSR at March 20, 2013 02:29 PM (H0Rot)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 20, 2013 02:29 PM (GHpOB)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 20, 2013 02:29 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Grey Fox at March 20, 2013 06:24 PM (/ZHx6)
No.... the goal is controlled violence.... not just violence... its about When, and How Much....
Posted by: Romeo13 at March 20, 2013 02:30 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Truman North and his shiny new website at March 20, 2013 02:30 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: teej at March 20, 2013 02:30 PM (AoY8i)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:30 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 02:30 PM (FX38i)
I would add the naive to that list.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 20, 2013 02:30 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Prescient11
No, you got that covered before you brought up evolution, sparky.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at March 20, 2013 02:31 PM (UCv7P)
Electromagnetism can be proven and observed.
Genus evolution, not so much. 250 microbiological functions, happening instantly at the same time and coordinating with each other, now the chances of that evolving in the random amoeba, not so much....
I will say this, evolution is the ultimate religion of the lefties. Thinking more on it, bringing it into serious question on probability theories. Quote from an atheist mathematician (not the one I was thinking about):
The notion that not only the biopolymers but the operating program of a living cell could be arrived at by chance in a primordial soup here on Earth is evidently nonsense of a high order.
Sir Fred Hoyle
If you beat evolution, then everything that the statist/leftist argues for starts to fall. But evolution beats itself, it's a laughable idea.
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 02:31 PM (tVTLU)
>>>Seems efficient to me.
Detroit hasn't built a "Brand New Car" (A Car that doesn't use significant elements from pre-existing cars) in a long long time.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at March 20, 2013 02:32 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 02:32 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at March 20, 2013 02:32 PM (8HlS8)
Posted by: WMCB at March 20, 2013 02:32 PM (jjsXL)
Where stompy boots and short shorts will be common.
http://en.bijin-snap.com/2013/03/21/no-892/
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 20, 2013 02:32 PM (tkWnt)
Posted by: ace at March 20, 2013 02:33 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Ted Danson at March 20, 2013 02:33 PM (wIgpo)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:33 PM (j3uk1)
Look up "martial code."
warriors almost always develop a code of behavior that *disadvantages* them (in as much as it forbids certain things and demands others) and yet they cling to it, as the warrior's code is what distinguishes them from the coward.
I don't know - you could also make the case that this is mostly a way of signalling extreme fitness to women and others in the warrior caste - a behavioral form of the male peacock's tail. And if that results in a higher likelihood of them passing on their genes, then it is 'rational' in the evolutionary sense.
Males of lots of species do 'irrational' dumbshit things that only make sense in this context.
Posted by: Mætenloch at March 20, 2013 02:34 PM (pAlYe)
Chimps and humans share 99% of DNA. How can you look at this and not believe in evolution?
Why would I assume that a correlation between DNA and a common descent?
Actually, on a more fundamental level: If I believe that humans evolved by random chance why would I assume that any order that I see in the world is actually real and not just an illusion of my mind? After all, if seeing something that isn't there is a survival trait - like religion is supposed to be - why would I assume that anything i see is actually real?
Posted by: Grey Fox at March 20, 2013 02:34 PM (/ZHx6)
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 02:35 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: chaz at March 20, 2013 02:36 PM (sSNkG)
All 'choices' should be a product of the situation.
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 02:36 PM (FX38i)
Posted by: zsasz at March 20, 2013 02:36 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Grumpy Cat at March 20, 2013 02:38 PM (j3uk1)
What do we do about it? You can't talk a fanatic out of their beliefs.
Posted by: Aaron at March 20, 2013 02:40 PM (Tlix5)
Males of lots of species do 'irrational' dumbshit things that only make sense in this context.
Posted by: Mætenloch at March 20, 2013 06:34 PM (pAlYe)
More.... I think there are Social, as well as physical, evolutions.... ie... rules for a given set of animals which help survival...
Things like the Wolf Pack Alpha hierarchy....
Warrior Codes fit into this nitch IMO.... ie... the control on violence helps them cooperate with the rest of the community... thus helping ALL survive...
Posted by: Romeo13 at March 20, 2013 02:42 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 20, 2013 02:45 PM (BAS5M)
Sounds like a lot of
*sunglasses*
monkey business.
YEEEEAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!
Posted by: Horatio Caine at March 20, 2013 02:49 PM (YpecZ)
So say I do the things I see as beneficial for the environment (like compost, recycle have good garden management, ride my bike around instead of tooling around in my car - whatever it may be), but I disagree that the oceans will swell and flood the earth in less than a decade because I drive an SUV and think carbon credits are a scam then all that I do is for not in their eyes. It is laughable.
I live among Prius Villains who drive to the corner market feeling all high and mighty but suck down 20 cardboard cups of Starbucks a week ad do all sorts of other things they seem to deem as OK because they drive a Prius and eat grassfed beef and sustainably grown carrots while chanting some quote from Michael Pollan. And I know this because they tell me.
Enviropietism. I just made up a word.
Maybe it is only like that out here in Kookville.
Posted by: shan at March 20, 2013 02:53 PM (V9MHw)
Posted by: Socratease at March 20, 2013 03:10 PM (3V4IJ)
They believe that human beings are the only animal that is better off in an artificial environment.
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 03:15 PM (FX38i)
Posted by: troyriser at March 20, 2013 03:22 PM (vtiE6)
You're different. We get it. Now get over yourself already.
Have a government cookie.
Posted by: Fritz at March 20, 2013 03:33 PM (WM+rJ)
Posted by: Jeff B., who knows a fight he can clean up on when he sees it at March 20, 2013 03:34 PM (/COnL)
We observe its apparent effects on our instruments and things.
Our instruments are a subset of all possible instruments, and our things (available elements and subatomics available in this corner of the universe) are a subset of all possible things.
Which is to say, there MAY be more to electromagnetism that we're currently capable of understanding. We MAY just be seeing a subset of it.
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 20, 2013 03:42 PM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Prescient11 at March 20, 2013 06:23 PM (tVTLU)
Communism/socialism is still alive and kicking, so being intellectually untenable is unfortunately no hindrance to bad ideas.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at March 20, 2013 03:57 PM (v3pYe)
I mean, look at how climate skeptics are treated?
Posted by: Maus at March 20, 2013 03:59 PM (amo0F)
I don't believe that for a red-hot second. I think liberals rate purity/sancticy extremely high, but they counterfeit this belief to themselves, because they've been taught that sanctity/purity is an indulgence of the weak-minded religious types. But while they deny that impulse, they actually act upon it, directing their sanctity/purity impulses not towards sexual restraint (as a religious person might) but towards health of the environment and health of the body."
I was thinking about this point in a slightly different context the other day. Some study showed that liberals brains didn't light up nearly as much as conservatives when "scary" images were shown, thus "proving" that liberals are brave badasses and conservatives are bedwetting pansies. BUT, the images they showed were of things that liberals have trained themselves not to fear. Show a bunch of liberals pictures of corporate logos or oil refineries or guns and their fear centers would light up like Christmas trees.
Posted by: BS Inc. at March 20, 2013 04:12 PM (gZ2Xq)
Posted by: fabrexe at March 20, 2013 04:17 PM (npxIc)
Posted by: Icedog at March 20, 2013 04:27 PM (ZolUS)
Posted by: madamex at March 20, 2013 04:35 PM (Yx0Sd)
I think it's an important book, because it explains the economic boom in the 20s. Coolidge was serious about balancing the budget and cutting the excesses left over from WWI. He was an interesting guy too. He broke up a strike by the police, who had legitimate grievances, because he felt they did not have the right to leave the public at risk. The main problem I have with the book is that you sometimes lose his place in history and forget the other things going on in the country at that time. I would recommend it, and it's definitely well written. It's just that Coolidge is not going to be one of the most exciting bios you'll ever read
Posted by: notsothoreau at March 20, 2013 04:53 PM (5HBd1)
Posted by: Californio at March 20, 2013 05:17 PM (2eIwi)
Please DO discuss evolution--I want to see how different it will be than the messes I used to see at LGF--and there is no sarcasm intended here.
Posted by: irongrampa at March 20, 2013 05:20 PM (SAMxH)
Uncanny. For years, I've said "they should get a REAL/fake religion" of the enviro-authoritarians. For it's clear, per Crichton, Ace, and others, that many of the crusades of the contemporary authoritarians ("progressives" or in PJ O'Rourke's very memorable phrase, "compassion fascists") do in fact seem to represent religious undertakings.
My/Ace's/Crichton's/others' observation is both basic and critical, but I think it's important not to let it be misconstrued as lazy, derogatory reductionism. In English, that means we're not "explaining away" these peoples' beliefs and actions in some way that's indirect, demeaning, and fails to address the substance of their mindset (the "they need to get laid" approach). On the contrary.
It's the clear lack of scientific rigor, and in many cases outright fraud, sloppiness, and tendentious distortion - with the icing on top of arrogance and authoritarian presumption - that we can and do confront and crush, easily.
AGW is a ridiculous mess of a "theory", that fails the most basic standards of scientific method and logic, from the outset. Even to a non-scientist, it's pretty stunning. It would have been ridiculed and deconstructed instantly in high school science, in my day.
So it's not that these people need a "real" fake or real religion - though that seems often to be the case. It's that even the most sober, "scientific" presentation of their argument (AGW, lead poisoning for CA condors, "fragility" of most ecosystems, etc.) is extremely unpersuasive and lacking in seriousness.
Justice Roberts may have come up with his ridiculous "opinion" re taxes and Obamacare because he's a coward and/or a foolish strategist, but that's of no interest. It's the substantive emptiness and even silliness of his ruling (federal tax law is actually pretty simple, and he completely and literally just made shit up to dress up an indefensible bit of reasoning) that matter, and that must be exposed.
Posted by: non-purist at March 20, 2013 05:34 PM (afQnV)
------
....and beliefs don't require any objective proof. They "have faith" that "the science is settled".
Beliefs and Opinions are choices. They are the very definition of SUBjective. And through the used of government authority, of subjection.
Posted by: gastorgrab at March 20, 2013 05:39 PM (FX38i)
Posted by: Corona at March 20, 2013 06:57 PM (fh2Y7)
Posted by: PJ at March 20, 2013 09:27 PM (ZWaLo)
I'll disagree about environmentalism as religion.
Religious believe supposes that all who adhere will be saved.
Environmentalism is about polarization, about carving out pristine areas for the elites, free from over population.
Environmentalism doesn't want to save everybody. It is about segregation, and different standards of living.
Posted by: mike oh at March 20, 2013 11:36 PM (0gLFC)
Posted by: AlanR at March 21, 2013 04:47 AM (dS4CN)
Posted by: Corona at March 20, 2013 10:57 PM (fh2Y7)
Okay. Burn with inexplicable resentments much?
Posted by: troyriser at March 21, 2013 05:49 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: occam at March 21, 2013 06:14 AM (GUG2O)
Posted by: ace at March 21, 2013 06:21 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: ace at March 21, 2013 06:22 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: ace at March 21, 2013 06:26 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: h-unit at March 22, 2013 05:04 AM (5DeWh)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.286 seconds, 504 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








"so screechy-shrill and fucking annoying."
Well, I don't recall that exact phrase ever coming up in Antho class, but it works...
Continue reading
Posted by: Jess1 at March 20, 2013 01:23 PM (lbiWb)