April 05, 2013
— Ace The MSNBC Messaging Machine finds new ways to be stupid just about every day.
MSNBC is a televised blog. I keep saying this because it's true: part of blogs' charm, at least initially, was that they gleefully ignored any standards of professionalism. The honesty about the slapdash nature of them was bracing. And the honesty about agenda -- to wit, we have one -- was liberating.
But that upside of blogs also comes with a downside. Blogs speak relentlessly to one side of the aisle (are there any actual centrist blogs out there? It's a business model I don't think can actually work). We look for new ways to provoke -- because it's fun and profitable. And I don't mean that in the cliched joke way; I mean, it's literally both fun and profitable (at least in the sense of hit-whoring) to find exciting new manners of juvenile tweaking of one's political enemies.
The medium tends towards two things: emotional hotness and intellectual dumbness. Those aren't cast-iron rules, of course. (Present company excepted!)
MSNBC has fully embraced the blogger ethos of hit-whoring provocation first, second, last, and always. As well as exploring all the new and inventive ways to call people you don't like Nazis.
There simply is no professionalism at MSNBC, no aspiration to any kind of standards at all. It's Dumb By Design (TM), because Dumb is Easy and Easy is Holy.
It's a televised blog. It's a vlog (a term that never really caught on). It's a tlog, I suppose.
It's not a professional news organization in any way -- it's not professional, and it's not about news. It's also apparently overseen by callow morons so it's really not all that organized. It's sloppy, stupid liberal agitation 24/7.
Television is itself a potent medium -- people read less when TV came along. They also stopped going to movies as much. TV's easy and convenient.
Back in the day, the blogosphere was full of blog triumphalism. We actually thought Blogs Could Change the World (or at least we pretended to, sometimes).
It turns out we were right... in a way. What we failed to understand is that You Really Haven't Made It Until You're On TV. And we failed to understand that television was a ravenous, indiscriminately-consuming organism, always needing "content" (of a kind) to fill the time between commercials, and it was furthermore a highly adaptable, very fecund, very insidious sort of colonizing/cannibalizing pullulating growth.* Like the Thing, it imitates and consumes.
What we failed to understand, in short, was that the Triumph of the Blogs would come when a television channel adopted an all-blog format, with all the Hot Sloppy Stupid that is characteristic of blogs on their bad days.
And we failed to understand the Iron Law of American Dumb that is responsible for the rise of TV in the first place: It's just easier to watch people talking rather to read people writing. Pictures are fun and words are work.
Dumb is Easy and Easy is Holy.
MSNBC took a fairly Easy form of writing and made it even Easier, but taking out the "reading" part of it.
* Pullulating means "breeding or spawning new life freely." I just learned the world last night, looking up something about the Drake Equation and the Fermi Paradox (i.e., why isn't the the universe pullulating with detectable alien life, if such life is as common as many estimations for the Drake Equation suggest?).
Anyway, I thought it was a neat, Lovecraftian sort of word, and figured if I used it it might stick in my brain. So I used it.
Posted by: Ace at
01:30 PM
| Comments (453)
Post contains 617 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 01:32 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: mofo at April 05, 2013 01:33 PM (6V1UP)
You mean like stories about MSNBC? Which I'm fine with, btw.
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 01:34 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: EC at April 05, 2013 01:34 PM (doBIb)
speaking of blogs...
it's been ages since you did a De-Lurk post.
It'd be nice to get some new blood in this place.
Posted by: soothsayer at April 05, 2013 01:35 PM (OgiBc)
Posted by: toby928© Red Partisan at April 05, 2013 01:35 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man at April 05, 2013 01:36 PM (csi6Y)
MSNBC: Kindergarten for angry unemployable people, as in someone on MSNBC proposed sending angry people to kindergarten. And my reaction to that was, yeah sounds baout right for MSNBC.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 01:36 PM (HDgX3)
I actually disagree with this. Yes, TV controls the mind-thoughts of a segment of the population; generally the dumber fraction. Real thought leaders read books, and increasingly blogs like this one. People who get their worldview from TV are sheep.
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 01:37 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: wheatie at April 05, 2013 01:37 PM (5kUwW)
Posted by: luigi vercotti at April 05, 2013 01:38 PM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at April 05, 2013 01:38 PM (deaac)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 05, 2013 01:38 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 01:39 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 01:39 PM (u0HjB)
Posted by: Keith Olbermann at April 05, 2013 01:40 PM (wIgpo)
Posted by: EC at April 05, 2013 01:40 PM (doBIb)
14....People who get their worldview from TV are sheep.
True...but they outnumber us.
And they vote.
Posted by: wheatie at April 05, 2013 01:40 PM (5kUwW)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 05, 2013 01:40 PM (KqmXZ)
Fox, for all of its flaws, is professional. Fox as newspaper, MSNBC as blog
Posted by: The Q at April 05, 2013 01:41 PM (lB4ch)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 01:41 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at April 05, 2013 01:41 PM (tXLNR)
You can't picture that on a tlog.
Posted by: Debbie Schlosserman Wartz at April 05, 2013 01:41 PM (0It32)
Posted by: The Fed at April 05, 2013 01:41 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 01:42 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Joey Biden at April 05, 2013 01:42 PM (oJQ+J)
True...but they outnumber us.
And they vote.
That.....may change.
Posted by: The big bad wolf at April 05, 2013 01:42 PM (6TB1Z)
Ace is right. A prefect example is the TMZ show, or even Pardon The Interruption on ESPN.
It's stupid simple television for stupid simple people. A marriage made in Heaven.
Posted by: soothsayer at April 05, 2013 01:42 PM (OgiBc)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 05, 2013 01:42 PM (BAS5M)
Don't need profit. Just need money.
Two words.
Koch Bros.
Posted by: Tobacco Road at April 05, 2013 01:42 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at April 05, 2013 01:43 PM (Y5I9o)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 01:43 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Bill54 at April 05, 2013 01:43 PM (XXl7H)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at April 05, 2013 01:43 PM (deaac)
Posted by: EC at April 05, 2013 01:44 PM (doBIb)
Posted by: Eaton Cox at April 05, 2013 01:44 PM (DLsRw)
TMZ and MSNBC even have sidebars!
They even make the layout look like a computer screen!
Good eye, Ace.
Posted by: soothsayer at April 05, 2013 01:44 PM (OgiBc)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 01:44 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Arbalest at April 05, 2013 01:45 PM (yldXV)
Posted by: Eaton Cox at April 05, 2013 01:45 PM (DLsRw)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at April 05, 2013 01:45 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at April 05, 2013 01:46 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 01:46 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 01:48 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 01:48 PM (u0HjB)
Posted by: Whatev at April 05, 2013 01:48 PM (A7Wh1)
Posted by: Vic at April 05, 2013 01:49 PM (53z96)
If you "pullulate" excessively, you'll go blind.
Posted by: maddogg at April 05, 2013 01:49 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 05:42 PM (r2PLg)
_____
Propaganda machine, definitely.
Tax write off? No. It makes a healthy profit.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 01:49 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 01:50 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 01:51 PM (u0HjB)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 01:52 PM (T0NGe)
http://youtu.be/GlN3oEjMpUQ
*bounds off innocently*
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at April 05, 2013 01:52 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 01:53 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: Vic at April 05, 2013 01:53 PM (53z96)
Posted by: Ken Royall at April 05, 2013 01:53 PM (x0g8a)
Posted by: tom servo at April 05, 2013 01:53 PM (z+Xap)
Posted by: Zippity Doo Dah at April 05, 2013 01:54 PM (E55AK)
http://is.gd/kAHEop
It's gonna be fabulous.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at April 05, 2013 01:54 PM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man at April 05, 2013 01:54 PM (csi6Y)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 05, 2013 01:54 PM (GwD92)
Posted by: Harlekwin15-I'd buy that for a dollra at April 05, 2013 01:55 PM (Tovmf)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 01:55 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 01:55 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 01:55 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: Harlekwin15-I'd buy that for a dollra at April 05, 2013 01:56 PM (Tovmf)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 01:56 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at April 05, 2013 01:56 PM (tXLNR)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 05, 2013 01:56 PM (GwD92)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 01:57 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 05, 2013 01:57 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Harlekwin15-I'd buy that for a dollra at April 05, 2013 01:57 PM (Tovmf)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 01:58 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 01:58 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: The Political Hat at April 05, 2013 01:58 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 01:59 PM (6TB1Z)
Full to the brim with the firm convictions of a centrist.
Posted by: Dodd at April 05, 2013 01:59 PM (ZC9/i)
Posted by: Mindy at April 05, 2013 01:59 PM (wk9P4)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 01:59 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Beagle at April 05, 2013 02:00 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 02:00 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 02:00 PM (r2PLg)
Ace is an inspired writer yes but have you heard ace speak? His personality is about energizing as a stoned sea sponge.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 02:00 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Ken Royall at April 05, 2013 05:53 PM (x0g8a)
___________
I'm not sure what's more pathetic. That MSNBC gets 1 million viewers or Storage Wars gets 3 million viewers.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:00 PM (HDgX3)
O/T Seems that the Denver DA has a double standard when it comes to prosecuting threats on state politicians.
http://tinyurl.com/brr29du
Posted by: Ronster at April 05, 2013 02:01 PM (4PYOi)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:01 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 02:01 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: Psychedelicat at April 05, 2013 02:01 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 02:01 PM (r2PLg)
The hallmark of really advanced tool-using civilizations is that they cover their tracks really, really well. Why? Shut up, that's why.
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 02:01 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 05, 2013 02:01 PM (wtW72)
Sent.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at April 05, 2013 02:02 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 02:02 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:03 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 02:03 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at April 05, 2013 02:03 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Mindy at April 05, 2013 02:04 PM (wk9P4)
>>is it possible mitochondria were actually a separately-arising form of life which were then subsumed into the dominant line?
You been dipping into CAC's stash?
Posted by: garrett at April 05, 2013 02:04 PM (EEAbP)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 05, 2013 02:04 PM (wtW72)
Ghee is clarified butter. Interesting juxtaposition.
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 02:05 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 02:05 PM (j3uk1)
By comparison CNN made $595M and Fox made $870M
Still they do eek out a profit.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:05 PM (HDgX3)
101...I think the point of my piece is rather to say that MSNBC is NOT a success -- though its embrace of the Blogger Way of Doing Things Hot, Sloppy, Dumb, & Partisan does mark the success of the Blogger Way.
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 05:59 PM (LCRYB)
-----
I understood that's what you meant, Ace.
It's not a 'News Channel'...it's a TV Blog, masquerading as a news source.
Posted by: wheatie at April 05, 2013 02:05 PM (5kUwW)
i am extremely tired lately and don't know why.
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 06:01 PM (LCRYB)
Changing of the seasons?
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 05, 2013 02:06 PM (UypUQ)
******
It's not about changing minds, it's about setting and controlling the narrative. Flood the channel with every key Dem-approved story. Have each host mock and pull the "how dare you!" response to any legitimate Republican/conservative message. Play each SNL skit round the clock until it becomes common knowledge that Palin said "I can see Russia from my house" and every other narrative-enforcing myth.
Posted by: Lizzy at April 05, 2013 02:06 PM (KqmXZ)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 02:06 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at April 05, 2013 02:06 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Mindy at April 05, 2013 02:06 PM (wk9P4)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 05, 2013 02:07 PM (jucos)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:07 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 05, 2013 02:07 PM (wtW72)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 02:07 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 02:08 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 05, 2013 02:08 PM (BAS5M)
Posted by: CarlosRamirez at April 05, 2013 02:08 PM (0qVDf)
The molt is a stressful time in the annual cycle of the Ewok.
Shedding and replacing your coat takes a lot of energy.
Posted by: garrett at April 05, 2013 02:09 PM (EEAbP)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:09 PM (HDgX3)
"...and Hillary is really just such a great person, you know, just a great person with a really funny sense of humor, which doesn't show in public you know, just such a great person, she's amazing and I know she's running in 2016 and will make such a great president, because she's just such a great person you know, and our president, my god he's such a great black person you know, and he's such a great president, why he isn't getting credit for this great economy I can't understand, he's fantastic because he's such a great person you know..."
Guest: "EXCUSE me Chris, can I please finish my answer?"
"...and Chuck Schumer is just so smart you know, why people can't see that I'll never understand, and gay marriage is such a great thing and gun control is the best idea ever, and everybody should pay more taxes you know, and Republicans are the devil, and did I mention how great Hillary is, she's such a great person you know..."
Posted by: Chris "The Auctioneer" Matthews at April 05, 2013 02:09 PM (wAQA5)
Posted by: stace, NOW what?! at April 05, 2013 02:09 PM (DX63t)
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 02:10 PM (6TB1Z)
I hate all of you.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at April 05, 2013 02:10 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Beagle at April 05, 2013 02:10 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 02:10 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 05, 2013 02:10 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 05:58 PM (MMC8r)
________
Then you can say that about FNC as well since they get a lot of their reporting from other NewsCorp divisions like WSJ for example.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:11 PM (HDgX3)
"Two solar manufacturing companies, Nanosolar and SoloPower, plan major layoffs this month in California, according to filings the companies made with state regulators. "
* * *
"Six years after the US Department of Energy (DOE) awarded Nanosolar a US$42 million Solar American Initiative (SAI) Technology Pathway Partnership (TPP) grant, the company has advised that all 10 major tasks have been achieved or surpassed"
* * *
"SoloPower, in August 2011, received $197 million loan guarantee (from the DOE) to “support the retrofit of an existing building to operate a thin-film solar panel manufacturing facility in Portland, Oregon,” while claiming they would create 270 construction and 450 permanent jobs.
To make matters worse, SoloPower also snagged $40 million of Oregon taxpayer money and “despite the warning signs, the state of Oregon is continuing to put taxpayer money at risk. In December, the agency Business Oregon issued SoloPower a $20 million tax credit. The company sold the tax credit for $13.5 million in cash," reported Fox News last month. "
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at April 05, 2013 02:11 PM (mN8D3)
MSNBC exists to validate the opinions and beliefs of the Left in this country.
In that sense, it is an "unpaid" supporter of the Modern Democrat Party, Barack Obama in particular.
Rush once discussed his radio show, and said that while he hoped to persuade and convert people, he did not place high expectations on this. But what he hoped to do was encourage like-minded people that they were not alone in their beliefs, and stiffen their resolve. Validation.
So the purpose of MSNBC is lost on most of the people at AoS, and similar places, because we pretty much see it as flap-doodle nonsense propaganda (which - objectively - it is). But Matthews in particular didn't used to be unwatchable 15 years ago. Criminy, I can remember him being on Gordon Liddy's radio show years ago and they were civil and having fun with each other discussing politics.
Now he is full tilt propaganda Left. Demented from the malaria?
They have gone full tilt Leftist validation, to keep the hot red center of the Left in a frothing frenzy. This is the same function as Mother Jones, The Nation, etc., but TV is more graphic and visceral, and like the Ace himself says, stupid and easy.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes more nonsense.... at April 05, 2013 02:11 PM (RFeQD)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 05, 2013 02:11 PM (wtW72)
Posted by: CarlosRamirez at April 05, 2013 02:12 PM (0qVDf)
109...some days I just have nothing.
i am extremely tired lately and don't know why.
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 06:01 PM (LCRYB)
--------
Vitamin B-12 tabs, sublingual...under the tongue.
Ever tried them, Ace?
They might help.
Posted by: wheatie at April 05, 2013 02:12 PM (5kUwW)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 02:12 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:12 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 02:12 PM (Yu5xN)
MSNBC is nothing more than the "tingle" network.
When someone refers to them, you need only chuckle or laugh or roll your eyes.
When is the last time they "broke" any NEWS????
Posted by: Prescient11 at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (tVTLU)
110103 NFL Player: Four Gay Players May Come Out Simultaneously
Please Please Please let one of them be Jay Cutler. I would laugh my ass off. Of course I know he isn't but still.............
Posted by: Molly K. at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (Gjit/)
I fully believe there were separate. Not subsumed by the "dominant" form (One would suggest plant eukaryotic life is at least as dominant as "animal" life) but can only exist in what is very close to the original primordial soup as they are essentially unevolved life forms. So they made homes within the forming life conglomerates known as animal eukaryote cells. The animal cell then becomes less of a singular dominating structure and more of a community of proteins that all bonded together in one housing development. The processing of TCP of course being the most important factor in determining cellular function, as Mitochondria based eukaryote needed to continually find new sources of sugar to make into TCP, so animal eukarote cell communities collectively evolved around getting that sugar from a variety of places, hence animation, and became the animal kingdom.
I think something very similar happened with plant eukaryotes and chloroplasts. Again the defining nature of the cell became acquiring TCP. Which chloroplasts could do from just being exposed to sunlight driving the evolution of plant eukaryotes in the direction they went. Static structure specifically.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Beagle at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Gmac - Waiting on the Revolution, or something at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (VVO+n)
He's right, but he misses the appeal of the thing. It's an insane cult eschatology.
"The superior-to-us (and by us I mean you) is out there, says here. And when we find it, which it says here we will (unless you're so sinfully repugnant you're making it hide from us), that's THE END OF YOUR PUNY LITTLE WORLD! So, might as well give up on it now, right? Says here. And give it to science. Or to its local representative.
"Here's our current list of sins you should go and do no more, so as not to offend our coming Lord(s). It is also science."
Posted by: oblig. at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (cePv8)
Posted by: Psychedelicat at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 02:13 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 06:01 PM (LCRYB)
Ever have your thyroid checked?
Posted by: Tami[/i] at April 05, 2013 02:14 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 02:14 PM (MMC8r)
What sort of viewers did Soledad use to get?
I wonder if that might have something to do with why she was fired.
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 05, 2013 06:11 PM (wtW72)
__________
No comment.
Posted by: CNN Chief Executive Officer at April 05, 2013 02:14 PM (HDgX3)
http://preview.tinyurl.com/bssgsjl
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 05, 2013 02:15 PM (VlXYw)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 02:15 PM (piMMO)
I think the Huffington Post is more of a challenge/problem for the right than MSNBC. A lot of people perceive it as 'middle-of-the-road' and check it daily from work.
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 05, 2013 02:15 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:15 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 02:15 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:16 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Psychedelicat at April 05, 2013 02:17 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 02:17 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 02:18 PM (7xPCu)
I think the Huffington Post is more of a challenge/problem for the right than MSNBC. A lot of people perceive it as 'middle-of-the-road' and check it daily from work.
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 05, 2013 06:15 PM (UypUQ)
___________
Yep. That's because HuffPo does a lot of non-political stuff like entertainment, sports, comedy. So people go there for non=-news stuff and get sucked into the news stories without realizing this is a far left operation. I think the blaze is trying to to something similar. It's effective.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:18 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 05, 2013 02:18 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Truman North at April 05, 2013 02:18 PM (I2LwF)
steevy, I am not so sure that Matthews hated Clinton. In those days he was an "open" Democrat, but he did care about the nature of the brand, and thought that Clinton was tarnishing it. Now, he doesn't care about any sense of perosnal integrity or that sort of thing. It's power for power's sake, and a tingle up your leg, when Barack speaks.
It's the malaria, I tell you.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes more nonsense.... at April 05, 2013 02:18 PM (RFeQD)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 02:19 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at April 05, 2013 02:19 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 05, 2013 06:18 PM (jucos
Me: spiders, clowns, puppets. That order. Oh, and I despise mimes.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 05, 2013 02:19 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 05, 2013 02:20 PM (wtW72)
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3gnsasp
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 05, 2013 02:20 PM (VlXYw)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 05, 2013 02:21 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 05, 2013 02:21 PM (wtW72)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 02:21 PM (7xPCu)
What would have happened if that MSNBC interview went a little longer:
“Do you think George Bush is a bad man or a good man? You don’t think he’s a good man, do you? No. That’s right, he’s a very bad man.”
Posted by: Hepcat at April 05, 2013 02:21 PM (nPbm2)
Posted by: Harlekwin15-I'd buy that for a dollra at April 05, 2013 02:21 PM (Tovmf)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 02:21 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 02:22 PM (9XBK2)
You think you've seen MSNBC floating in the gutter? Watch the video segment today of some MSNBC trollop interviewing a 5 year old about gay marriage. Coaxing her along.
Disgusting. I guess her parents Bruce and Monty thought that it was just fabulous!
Posted by: Cheri at April 05, 2013 02:22 PM (G+Wff)
Posted by: Marcel Marceau at April 05, 2013 02:22 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 06:16 PM (Yu5xN)
Nah, just a Cutler hater. Bronco fan
Posted by: Molly K. at April 05, 2013 02:22 PM (Gjit/)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 02:22 PM (Yu5xN)
The Huffington Post does what Kos and others thought they could do, which was mainstream Leftist thought by pouring into the everyday and mundane.
Politics is everything and everything is political. That is Marxist - Leninist fundmentals. The undertone of Leftist thought permeates almost everything written at HuffPo, and certainly is evident in the comments.
They are indeed fighting die Kultur Kampf on a wider front than say, Oliver Willis (although that is a pretty wide backside he's got goin' on).
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes more nonsense.... at April 05, 2013 02:22 PM (RFeQD)
It's all about the diet. Eat better you'll feel better. And by better I mean reduce the amount of processed food you eat.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:22 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 02:23 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: tasker at April 05, 2013 02:23 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 05, 2013 02:23 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:23 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Pug Mahon, Assault CAD Monkey at April 05, 2013 02:23 PM (K+mtQ)
Seriously. What are you going on about?
Good, it's not just me.
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 02:24 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:24 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 05, 2013 02:24 PM (wtW72)
KID KNOWS NEVER TO CHANGE THEM. EVER!
Posted by: KayInMaine at April 05, 2013 02:24 PM (3w4WK)
Tom Cruise. Boom.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at April 05, 2013 02:24 PM (+lsX1)
Make a statement, any statement one of the 6 billion+ religious folks on the planet will believe you are in some way insulting/denying their god(s). I'm Catholic and an Engineer, and have been accused on more than one occasion of
1. Denying God exists.
2. Insulting God by relaying facts or even stories from the OT.
3. Not being Christian because Catholic's aren't Christian. (Wait What?!)
If I can't escape it as a Catholic. What hope do you have? Shrug it off.
All that said. A number of science minded Evangelical atheists do like to latch onto and twist any new found idea of science into their ontological silver bullet with which to slay God. So it does go both ways.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 02:25 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 02:25 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at April 05, 2013 02:25 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: MSNBC at April 05, 2013 02:26 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 05, 2013 02:26 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 02:26 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 05, 2013 02:26 PM (UypUQ)
I despise Steven Spielberg and all his works.
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 02:26 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:27 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 02:27 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 02:27 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 02:27 PM (piMMO)
84 Michael Crichton pretty much eviscerated the Drake Equation as no better than astrology. The equation contains so many terms that are completely unverifiable that it's meaningless.
----------
You say that like it's a bad thing.
Posted by: Michael Mann at April 05, 2013 02:27 PM (IrbU4)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 05, 2013 02:27 PM (jucos)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 06:24 PM (LCRYB
How did you cure your apnea? My husband has it.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 05, 2013 02:27 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 02:27 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 05, 2013 02:28 PM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 05, 2013 02:28 PM (wtW72)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:28 PM (LCRYB)
- - - - - - - - -
Clowns are evil. They are Satan's spawn. They possess terrible black powers. How else can you explain so many of them fitting in a tiny car.
They are evil incarnate.
Posted by: Hepcat at April 05, 2013 02:28 PM (nPbm2)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 02:28 PM (ZfBzk)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:29 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Y-not at April 05, 2013 02:29 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 05, 2013 02:29 PM (wtW72)
Only Matthews and Maddow fail to be doubled up in the demos by Fox.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 06:23 PM (T0NGe)
__________
I said a good chunk of MSNBC profit comes from Morning Joe. I didn't say Morning Joe beats Fox & Friends. Look at ads on MJ vs F&F. MJ is BMWs, F&F is Chevy Trucks. BMW audiences cost more per viewer than Chevy audiences. This is the same phenomenon with Mad Men. It gets pretty piss poor ratings compared to other shows in the same time slot. But look at the ads. All high end stuff like BMW, Nordstrom. The small MM audience is more valuable than the gargantuan audience for whatever's on NBC or ABC at the same time on a per viewer basis.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:29 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:29 PM (LCRYB)
I'll actually do this. Thanks.
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 06:16 PM (LCRYB)
Untreated thyroid problems can cause a whole shit load of other problems.....one is fatigue. Others are heart palpitations, depression, weight gain, hair loss, dry skin, etc.
Posted by: Tami[/i] at April 05, 2013 02:30 PM (X6akg)
MSNBC trollop interviewing a 5 year old about gay marriage. Coaxing her along.
Cheri, I think the trollop was interviewing her daughter.
Posted by: Ronster at April 05, 2013 02:30 PM (4PYOi)
Whoa! How did that become mutually exclusive? I really see no conflict in believing aliens exist (someplace else, not here) and God exists. I don't remember himsaying "I'm going to tell you everything I do with my spare time"
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 02:30 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Waldo at April 05, 2013 02:31 PM (xY6Ip)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 05, 2013 02:31 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 02:32 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 05, 2013 02:32 PM (UypUQ)
Shop our stores for our New Spring Line of Moo Moo's.
Uniquely styled in:
'Battleship Grey'...'Hindenburg Striped'...as well as 'Peterbuilt Red' and 'MontanaSky Blue'.
Shop Target, for all your plus-size needs.
Posted by: Target Stores at April 05, 2013 02:32 PM (5kUwW)
Anyone know anything about it?
TIA
Sorry to be off topic but it's freaky
Posted by: Caustic at April 05, 2013 02:32 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 02:32 PM (7xPCu)
I think that Frank Drake was kinda drunk one night up at Greenbank Radio Observatory up in West Virginia where he worked, and dreamed up the Drake equation, and then his pal Carl Cosmos ran with it (I read it first in a book that Carl wrote in 1967 "The Search for Intelligent Life in the Universe")
And then he really couldn't take it back, so there it is.
Meaningless? Who knows? Is life meaningless? You see a lot of echos of that in stuff that Carl Cosmos wrote, like "Contact".
I think that it is hard for civilizations to keep their technology, for obvious reasons we are seeing right now in our so-called civilization. And technological civilizations have to exist simultaneously and near enough to each other to validate their existence. If they are more than a few hundred light years apart, how do you carry on a conversation?
"Hi, how YOU doin'?"
two hundred years (or more) for an answer, in which time the questioner is dead. And that is unless somebody changes the station or lost interest.
"Not bad, what about you?"
All this babble about wormholes and super-light speed travel is just so much babble until somebody comes up with a better theory about how the universe works. Until then, we're stuck with the limits of the speed of c (300k km/sec).
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes more nonsense.... at April 05, 2013 02:33 PM (RFeQD)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 02:33 PM (ZfBzk)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at April 05, 2013 02:33 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 06:24 PM (LCRYB)
________
Cool. I'm doing that as well. Not 100% but essentially no bread, no pasta, no rice, no potatoes. But most importantly I try to avoid as best I can anything that comes in a package.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:33 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at April 05, 2013 02:35 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Y-not at April 05, 2013 02:35 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 02:35 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 02:36 PM (T0NGe)
Ya know, the national weather service has a website. You can put your zip code in and it tells you everything happening weather wise in your area.
It's a pip.
Posted by: Tami[/i] at April 05, 2013 02:36 PM (X6akg)
I like to call that "comment lag"
Someone else said it, and it got responded to, before I could pull my head out of work far enough to finish typing my comment and hit post. I know, I should concentrate on work less. But I do like to eat.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 02:36 PM (0q2P7)
***
A few years ago, kept an innocent guy locked in jail for about six months on the word of his alleged victim, his ex-wife. She contended that he had raped her at gunpoint. He was no angel, in fact, he was exactly the kind of guy who would do something like that. I had no trouble believing her. She testified at preliminary hearing. Then the DNA came back proving that he had not had sex with her. We confronted her. She admitted to lying because they had a custody hearing within the next few days and she thought ti would be better if he were in jail instead of in court. She was charged with perjury for lying at the PH but that was not my case. I told the prosecuting DA that she should be locked up at least as long as he was but she got essentially nothing, ten days or so as I recall.
And the punchline is that the DNA that proved that she was lying also proved that she had been doing the nasty with her sister's fiance.
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 05, 2013 02:36 PM (VlXYw)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:36 PM (LCRYB)
Go hang out on /r/Atheism and tell me that.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 02:37 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 05, 2013 02:37 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: SarahW at April 05, 2013 02:37 PM (LYwCh)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:37 PM (LCRYB)
My husband cannot stop with a healthy serving. And I have no idea what crap he eats for lunch, although his office manager swears he "eats like a bird" when he's in the office.
Anyone?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 05, 2013 02:38 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Kim Jong Un at April 05, 2013 02:38 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at April 05, 2013 02:39 PM (ZMzpb)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:39 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Alex who does not watch MSNBC at April 05, 2013 02:40 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 02:40 PM (9XBK2)
My husband cannot stop with a healthy serving. And I have no idea what crap he eats for lunch, although his office manager swears he "eats like a bird" when he's in the office.
Anyone?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 05, 2013 06:38 PM (lVPtV)
I'd avoid that Sensa stuff. He might need more protein if he's not feeling full....up the meat.
Posted by: Tami[/i] at April 05, 2013 02:41 PM (X6akg)
However, Fox revenue is four times that of MSNBC.
http://tinyurl.com/b5jr7ux
Go to "cable economics".
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 06:36 PM (T0NGe)
_____________
FNC beats everyone hands down. It's the only game in town for non-let wing news. Of course it will get good ratings. It will be interesting to see what happens if a center/right competitor to fox gets up and running.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:41 PM (HDgX3)
Then seek huge numbers of Federal dollars.
Not to say I don't think there is life on other planets. Just that current technology can't get us there in anything approaching a normal lifetime. Unless we begin to measure lifetimes in light years.
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet at April 05, 2013 06:25 PM (feFL6)
I don't get why people are so down on Drake's Equation. It's just an attempt to quantify how much potential detectible intelligent alien life there is in the universe. It was mostly a thought tool to break down what would be required for us to find ETs into individual factors that could be debated and estimated separately. If people come up with different results they can always compare their parameter values and figure out where their assumptions diverge.
It doesn't say that there is or isn't life or that we have to spend a ton of money looking for ETs. It's just a useful model - nothing more or less.
Posted by: Mætenloch at April 05, 2013 02:41 PM (pAlYe)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 05, 2013 02:41 PM (VlXYw)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at April 05, 2013 02:41 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Y-not at April 05, 2013 02:42 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Alexioso at April 05, 2013 02:42 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 02:42 PM (MMC8r)
>>>no not entirely. it's perfectly possible God created life elsewhere -- and it's just not mentioned in the Bible, as the Bible's about OUR world.
---
Hebrews 12:1 : Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses....
Posted by: Craig Poe at April 05, 2013 02:42 PM (BVkEs)
Posted by: Soothsayer at April 05, 2013 02:43 PM (vzLhi)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:43 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 02:43 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Alexioso at April 05, 2013 02:44 PM (aPAIU)
It's an estimate that brackets it's results over several orders of magnitude. Of limited use for anything.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 02:44 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Tami at April 05, 2013 06:41 PM (X6akg
Trust me, he's a carnivore. I think know he's eating too much. He could have consumed the entire Easter leg of lamb by himself and totally skipped the sides.
It would also help if he'd hit the fitness center (me too).
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 05, 2013 02:44 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Alexioso at April 05, 2013 02:44 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: Y-not at April 05, 2013 02:44 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 02:44 PM (T0NGe)
Have a great weekend morans.
Btw, WHERE IN THE FUCK ARE THE T-SHIRTS???
Enough with the books Julian!!
Those in the know, know.
Posted by: Prescient11 at April 05, 2013 02:45 PM (tVTLU)
If Ace is tired and depressed, I think he needs more positive affirmation from this here Horde of Morons.
Yay Ace! You are doing a FABULOUS job with this blog. It is my go - to source for conservative thinking, and the commenters are GREAT. Some of you blog posts are so much better than anything that I read anywhere else.
Keep up the good work, and I'm going to hit the Tip Jar.
(and don't say God Bless because the guy's an atheist and it would probably be a bit of an insult)
So that's how it's done. Get on it. A group of you should write stuff like this everyday. I mean, Ace is giving, and giving and giving some more, and puts out all these posts, and it's wrecking his health and he probably doesn't have that much longer to live, so how much could it hurt to compliment him and make his last years kinda happy? I mean, serious you guys, buck him up some.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes more nonsense.... at April 05, 2013 02:45 PM (RFeQD)
Posted by: ace at April 05, 2013 02:45 PM (LCRYB)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 02:45 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 02:46 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Alexx at April 05, 2013 02:46 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: Y-not at April 05, 2013 02:46 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 02:46 PM (piMMO)
What is earth like galactic reality TV?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 02:46 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 02:46 PM (0q2P7)
It's a marvel to see what the MSM gets upset over. I've said that I can tell a person's employment and financial status by what they get upset over
As anyone ever seen a homeless guy with a sign that says "Legalize Same Sex Marriage NOW" ?
Posted by: kbdabear at April 05, 2013 02:46 PM (mCvL4)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 02:47 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 02:47 PM (dYf+Z)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at April 05, 2013 02:47 PM (feFL6)
I'm shuddering picturing Ace with a frou-frou neurotic carry-chihuahua.
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 06:45 PM (MMC8r)
_________
Chihuahua? I thought we were talking about dogs, not rats.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:47 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 05, 2013 02:47 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 06:45 PM (MMC8r
Carried in a manpurse (manbag? murse?). {{{{shudder}}}}
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 05, 2013 02:47 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Y-not at April 05, 2013 02:48 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 02:48 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Alexx at April 05, 2013 02:48 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 02:49 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: PETA, PP, NOW, ECT... at April 05, 2013 02:49 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 02:49 PM (j3uk1)
1. Does the universe have a creator?
2. Is the creator sentient?
3. Does the creator know it created the universe?
4. Does the creator know that humankind is within the whole of the creation?
5. Is the creator able to influence events in the human sphere?
6. Does the creator care to influence events in the human sphere?
7. Does the creator act in the interests of humans?
You have to answer all of these questions with a "yes" before you even get to the concept of a God along Judeo-Christian (or islamic) lines. Any "no" take you off the map into uncharted territory. Then you're probably not talking about something that most would consider God.
Faith aside, it seems like any answer could easily be a no.
Posted by: Cicero, Semiautomatic Assault Commenter at April 05, 2013 02:50 PM (8ZskC)
Then you run the danger of eliminating essential nutrients. I was on crutches last summer because of a potassium deficiency. Knee would lock up, then spasm and drag my sorry ass directly to the ground with zero ability to walk. Needed potatoes (P) oranges (O) tomato (T) apricot (A) strawberries (S) iceberg lettuce (I) ... you get the acronym by now.
'Fad' diets are bad, mkay class, now pass the marra j wanna cigarette to the front, class?
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet at April 05, 2013 06:47 PM (feFL6)
______________
I eat a lot of fish which is high in potassium and bananas too. You don't need breads or processed garbage to get nutrients.Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:50 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 02:51 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 02:51 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 05, 2013 02:52 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 02:53 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 02:53 PM (dYf+Z)
Posted by: Y-not at April 05, 2013 02:54 PM (5H6zj)
What bullshit. Ace mentions he's tired and the predictable avalanche of broscience follows.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at April 05, 2013 02:54 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 02:54 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Pam Bondi, Florida's AG at April 05, 2013 02:55 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 02:55 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: PETA, PP, NOW, ECT... at April 05, 2013 02:55 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 06:53 PM (MMC8r)
---
It's being reported that Reggie Love has locked himself in the bathroom.
here and now
Posted by: Craig Poe at April 05, 2013 02:55 PM (BVkEs)
1. Does the universe have a creator?
Trick question, it wasn't created. Its an illusion.
2. Is the creator sentient?
Being the creator of the illusion is you and me, yes.
3. Does the creator know it created the universe?
The creator thinks his dream is real. It is confused.
4. Does the creator know that humankind is within the whole of the creation?
???
5. Is the creator able to influence events in the human sphere?
God? No. Us? Sure.
6. Does the creator care to influence events in the human sphere?
God? No. Us? Yes.
7. Does the creator act in the interests of humans?
Yes?
You
have to answer all of these questions with a "yes" before you even get
to the concept of a God along Judeo-Christian (or islamic) lines. Any
"no" take you off the map into uncharted territory. Then you're
probably not talking about something that most would consider God.
Faith aside, it seems like any answer could easily be a no.
Posted by: Cicero, Semiautomatic Assault Commenter at April 05, 2013 06:50 PM (8ZskC)
I believe Jesus was unique in that he was 'awake' and could perform miracles and such because he knew the rules of the world were rules but not law.
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 05, 2013 02:56 PM (UypUQ)
-
Maybe it's a doglog?
Posted by: Name:* at April 05, 2013 02:56 PM (/5apW)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 02:56 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 02:56 PM (dYf+Z)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 02:56 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: EC at April 05, 2013 02:56 PM (doBIb)
Posted by: t-bird at April 05, 2013 02:57 PM (oJQ+J)
A dog would rather be stuck in an apartment and loved than euthanized.
Sure, she'd prefer a large yard.
But she'd also prefer to live in a pack and have puppies and regular hunt and kill birds and all sorts of crap the average suburban dog never gets to do.
Don't feel bad about having an apartment dog. Only a heartless bastard would tell you otherwise.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 05, 2013 06:47 PM (ZPrif)
_______________
I've got two large dogs, both about 100 lbs. They sleep in our bedroom and that's about the only time they spend indoors. As soon as we're up, they're outside through the doggy door. And I see them throughout the day chasing each other and sometimes just running back and forth in the yard for the hell of it. Some days they don't come back in until dinner time.
The fenced portion of my property is about 200' by 175'. I can't imagine how miserable they'd be cooped up in an apartment all day.
When I got the first dog it was from a rescue group. They wouldn't let me have the dog until they did a home inspection. One of the criteria was a fenced yard. Guess they were heartless bastards too.
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 05, 2013 02:57 PM (HDgX3)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 02:57 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Y-not at April 05, 2013 02:58 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 02:58 PM (dYf+Z)
It's also what I call specific biased. The same way one would conclude using the Drakes equation that intelligent life in any given star system is immensely improbable. Yet...here we are.
Shorter question list. Does morality exist in an absolute sense? Y/N
Well Y puts you into theological territory.
How about this? Given the infinite expanse of the multiverse (which includes who knows how many universe like structures.) what are the odds that a multidimensional sentience evolved? If such a being evolved would it be concerned with metaphysics? Or the development of sentient intelligent forms of life? Our own mucking around in both those categories might give you some useful insight.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 02:58 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: LSD at April 05, 2013 02:58 PM (aPAIU)
I think I saw this in The Matrix.
Posted by: Cicero, Semiautomatic Assault Commenter at April 05, 2013 02:58 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 02:59 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 02:59 PM (9XBK2)
326 The MSM is all butthurt over TFG commenting on CA AG Kamala Harris as "best looking AG" (Pam Bondi actually is)
Maybe Barky made that remark because he got so much notice for being with his boyfriends last weekend.
So it was, you know...time to make a 'manly remark'.
And I agree, Pam Bondi is a lot better looking.
Posted by: wheatie at April 05, 2013 02:59 PM (5kUwW)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 03:00 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Y-not at April 05, 2013 03:00 PM (5H6zj)
I gave her the "face". Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 06:59 PM
You should have handed her your optometrist's business card
Posted by: kbdabear at April 05, 2013 03:00 PM (mCvL4)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 05, 2013 03:00 PM (dYf+Z)
Posted by: EC at April 05, 2013 03:00 PM (doBIb)
I gave her the "face".
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 06:59 PM (piMMO
Oh good grief. She's lucky the "face" was all she got from you. Is the bitch blind?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 05, 2013 03:01 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Alex at April 05, 2013 03:01 PM (aPAIU)
Crichton's point is that Drake's Equation is precisely not that at all. To quote:
Nor can there be “informed guesses.” If you need to state how many planets with life choose to communicate, there is simply no way to make an informed guess. It’s simply prejudice.
As a result, the Drake equation can have any value from “billions and billions” to zero. An expression that can mean anything means nothing.
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 06:43 PM (j3uk1)
Well here I think Crichton was just wrong or was referring to ways that people have abused Drake's Equation. Does anyone here actually disagree that it would be an roughly accurate model if we could know the individual factors?
If you accept that it is, then you can start playing with different estimates to see what effect they have - even if we never will know their true values.
I can think of several models that are theoretical in sense that we'll likely never precisely know certain parameters but are still useful in understanding the system and its possible behavior.
Posted by: Mætenloch at April 05, 2013 03:01 PM (pAlYe)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 03:01 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 03:01 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Waldo at April 05, 2013 03:02 PM (xY6Ip)
Posted by: t-bird at April 05, 2013 03:02 PM (oJQ+J)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 03:02 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Alex at April 05, 2013 03:02 PM (aPAIU)
>>>When I got the first dog it was from a rescue group. They wouldn't let me have the dog until they did a home inspection. One of the criteria was a fenced yard. Guess they were heartless bastards too.
And if you would have gotten say a 150lb great dane they would warn you about over exercising. It depends on the dog.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 03:02 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: luigi vercotti at April 05, 2013 03:02 PM (Jsiw/)
Religion can be good or bad. It is a social invention by people to get them together to do stuff, and make them feel connected.
Faith is the inner belief in a Supreme Being, a benevolent Creator that loves you and cares about your life. My faith is in this Supreme Being that sent his begotten Son to live among men, and teach and preach love and brotherhood, and try to inspire us all to be better men. Like spreading seed, some places it takes root, other places the seed is on barren ground. Many places the seed appears to grow, but the roots are shallow, and a strong wind will blow it away. Faith sometimes means feeling very close to God, even when you are alone. There are times when I have been alone in contemplation and felt the very nearness of Him. You don't need a bunch of hairy backslappers to validate your Faith.
No one can make you believe, or find Faith in your heart. It is a grace and gift that takes some looking for, and inner struggle, and just because you were raised in a Christian church of some kind (or Jewish, or whatever your birth religion might have been), doesn't mark you as a "believer". You have to choose, to live your life. Not to choose is still a choice.
We all struggle with the World, the Flesh and the Devil, even if we don't believe in God. Some people get lost in the Flesh, or the World. We all fall very short, and all our souls are pretty black. It's easy to judge others who apparently fall short, but the believer and person of Faith has to look within. That's where your biggest struggles are.
I am still not the man I should be, and still not the man I want to be, but thank God I am not the man I used to be.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes more nonsense.... at April 05, 2013 03:03 PM (RFeQD)
Posted by: Soothsayer at April 05, 2013 03:03 PM (uff2W)
Posted by: Waldo at April 05, 2013 03:03 PM (xY6Ip)
Posted by: Alex at April 05, 2013 03:04 PM (aPAIU)
Y-not - GREAT POINT.
Look tonight's my night to get drunk. Lucy got drunk last night, so tonight's my night. And if Lucy and I are both drunk, my dad will take Trinity.
I live in my car. I'm sure you people have tons of liquor in your houses. My car is my house. How is that open liquor?
I think we're done here.
Posted by: Prescient11 at April 05, 2013 03:04 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Alex at April 05, 2013 06:58 PM (aPAIU)
From the perspective of God and heaven, the physical world does not exits. Do people think God is made of atoms? Closest analogy I can think of is dream state. Only in reverse.
My believes are a mash-up of the teaching of Christ and the worldview of Hinduism. But I consider myself Catholic.
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 05, 2013 03:04 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at April 05, 2013 03:04 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 03:04 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: Alex at April 05, 2013 03:04 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: Alex at April 05, 2013 03:05 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: Tugjobs4all at April 05, 2013 03:05 PM (5zghW)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 03:05 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 03:06 PM (j3uk1)
382...He does a lot of overcompensation.
Heh. Like trying to make a hoop shot? ...Over and over again?
Posted by: wheatie at April 05, 2013 03:06 PM (5kUwW)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 03:06 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 03:06 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 03:07 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: steevy at April 05, 2013 03:07 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Alex at April 05, 2013 03:07 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: zsasz at April 05, 2013 03:07 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Waldo at April 05, 2013 03:07 PM (xY6Ip)
Posted by: Sigmund Freud at April 05, 2013 03:07 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Alex, Pig lover at April 05, 2013 03:08 PM (aPAIU)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at April 05, 2013 03:08 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 05, 2013 03:10 PM (T0NGe)
I gave her the "face".
>>>That's an incredible level of delusion. We don't have to talk about Dolly Madison, etc. Doesn't she even think of the fabulous Jackie Kennedy?
Yeah. To be fair the quote was "one of the prettiest" not "the prettiest"
In all fairness, most of MOs competition is not that great in the looks department. I would also say, that MO has the LEAST polite comportment, either by the lady's standard or the gentleman's take your pick, or any first lady on record other than maybe Mary Lincoln.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 05, 2013 03:10 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 03:11 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: The Mating Call of the Liberal at April 05, 2013 03:11 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Tugjobs4all at April 05, 2013 07:05 PM (5zghW
You new here? And it's "Faux" news, according to you libs. Try to keep up.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 05, 2013 03:11 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Sigmund Freud at April 05, 2013 03:12 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 05, 2013 03:13 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 05, 2013 03:13 PM (7xPCu)
Posted by: t-bird at April 05, 2013 03:13 PM (oJQ+J)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 03:15 PM (j3uk1)
Yes. The definition of the terms are not even definable. No one can clearly define "planets capable of supporting life" without prior agreement on what qualifies as life and what "capable of supporting life" really means. Most of the other terms are equally nebulous.
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 07:06 PM (j3uk1)
What if we were to stipulate that it had to be capable of supporting known Earth life? Would that be definable for you?
Because if not, then we simply cannot discuss any model dealing with life at all since it's not definable.
Posted by: Mætenloch at April 05, 2013 03:16 PM (pAlYe)
Posted by: rickl at April 05, 2013 03:16 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 05, 2013 03:18 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 05, 2013 03:20 PM (VlXYw)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at April 05, 2013 03:21 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: Beagle at April 05, 2013 03:21 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 03:23 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: the bearded UNIX god at April 05, 2013 03:24 PM (j3uk1)
Posted by: FenelonSoke at April 05, 2013 03:24 PM (bddKN)
Posted by: Pecan Scandi at April 05, 2013 03:27 PM (Uamfo)
Rachel Jackson was especially fine, as was Laura Bush.
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 03:30 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: illegally posting anonymously on the internet [/i] at April 05, 2013 03:33 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: FenelonSoke at April 05, 2013 03:40 PM (bddKN)
Posted by: FenelonSoke at April 05, 2013 03:42 PM (bddKN)
Posted by: Freak Out! at April 05, 2013 03:47 PM (jmVS/)
Posted by: Rebecca the Raccoon at April 05, 2013 03:52 PM (UOjzE)
Video blog. Nonsense.
I call it a "Film Blog". AKA..."flog."
So let's start flogging.
Posted by: Taco Stand at April 05, 2013 05:26 PM (C+qQ0)
Posted by: notsothoreau at April 05, 2013 05:59 PM (5HBd1)
Posted by: Cognito at April 05, 2013 08:59 PM (EbMxL)
Posted by: moom at April 06, 2013 04:29 AM (XV9ZM)
Posted by: Clyde at April 06, 2013 04:39 AM (8xaxZ)
Posted by: PTL at April 06, 2013 05:24 AM (lB7NI)
As your driveby European anarchist, (hi y`all) I would posit that Bjørn Stærk runs a pretty good centrist blog. And that republicans could benefit from engaging in factual discussions with honest people of serious but differing political views. All this Ann Coulter-like screeching about how evil liberalism is is wearing kind of thin. Hate is obviously not selling well. You need to engage on the battlefield of ideas.
Stating that your opponent is a evil communist who wants to make your children gay is not an argument. /sarc off.
Posted by: Fnord at April 06, 2013 05:28 AM (xc6He)
P.S. Being centric doesnt mean never taking a stand, it means you evaluate all arguments rationaly.
Posted by: Fnord at April 06, 2013 05:32 AM (xc6He)
Posted by: Mike Giles at April 06, 2013 07:18 AM (cmE/b)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4618 seconds, 581 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








MSNBC is that apotheosis.
Mighty fancy words there, pardner.
Posted by: pep at April 05, 2013 01:32 PM (6TB1Z)