September 24, 2013
— Ace
Breaking: RT @KellyO NBC News has learned @SenRandPaul opposed @SenTedCruz and his "no" vote tactic in private GOP meeting.
— Lauren Fox (@FoxReports) September 24, 2013
Eh.
You know the thing that bothers me here? It's not whether or not Cruz wins or not (he won't), and it's not whether the Establishment is vindicated or not (and when you're partly arranging for your own vindication, that's not such an achievement).
What bothers me is the Hot Talk about crap that most of us, frankly, know very little about, and I include myself. I'll confess that when Gabe and Drew were discussing defund vs. delay on the podcast, I honestly had no idea what they were talking about. I was just silent, because I was listening. Learning.
Right now there are all these Narratives cooked up -- by our side; we have our own Narratives too -- about Cruz the Hero and how anyone who thought this plan was a bit cockamamie is a RINO.
And everyone's shouting, and everyone's full of emotion, and shouting crowds out talking and emotion crowds out thinking.
Well, this Rand Paul thing, if true, sort of pricks the balloon of the easy Narratives where the world gets divided neatly into Black Hats and White Hats.
Which is something we all should have known, and when I say "we" I mean me first of all.
I personally ventured a lot of conveniently vague opinions on this stuff without really having much good thinking to support those opinions.
I think online stuff is very much geared to produce "momentum" for ideas, or people, or products. And there's a viral mindset we online (I include myself again) have, where "success" is determined by whether one can help gin up some viral momentum for something.
It's sort of the Drudge Siren idea (which I of course swiped and made a Flaming Skull). There's a certain amount of fun or satisfaction in pushing something out there, or pushing something along. But I think maybe it's too much fun, or there's too much satisfaction in it.
To the extent it becomes overvalued, or over-rewarded, and therefore over-done.
And this requires, as any political campaign does, the excision of facts that messy up clean Narratives. And it also requires an application of heat to get the soup boiling.
And in the end, what? This is all foolish. This wasn't going to work. So what was all the fighting about? The symbolism of it? Do we usually have Enormous Bruising Fights over stuff that is completely symbolic and without force?
This reminds me again that we seem to want to fight other conservative-leaning people more than we want to fight Democrats. We don't like Reid, but we hate the RINOs among us.
I don't know. People will probably tell me not to give up the fight, and actually I intended to not say anything about how cockamamie I've come to think this all is until it was over, so as not to hurt the cause.
But I'm not sure what the cause is, here, exactly. It seems pretty obvious that Cruz is not going to prevail on this point. So it's not about that.
It seems pretty plain to me now at this point this was a purely tactical argument about a hypothetical plan to defund ObamaCare (which was never in the cards). It is largely about political positioning.
And it doesn't seem to me, then, this being about procedure over a hypothetical plan, that so much emotion should have attached to it.
This isn't to say that there was no debate to be had. But given that this was largely just about procedure and tactics for a doomed cause, should there have been so much emotional debate over it? Should this have been trigger for the 6,000th RINO vs. TrueCon meltdown?*
This is just how I'm feeling right now. I'm feeling like, "What the hell was all this about?" Apparently nothing, it turns out.
* I'm not knocking the TrueCons, actually. I'm knocking everyone. The RINOs sure got pretty hot over all this too. The oppo dumb to Chris Wallace was a nice, classy touch.
It's like one of those arguments that people in doomed marriages have in which they start screaming at each other over the most trivial things -- "Did you wear my sweatshirt without asking me?!"
Because the argument is not about the sweatshirt; it's about the fact that both parties want to split and go their separate ways.
Eh. This is part of the reason I don't even want to be a part of this party. The party is in an unstable state and really cannot do much of anything until it works its own shit about.
Now here's something heartwarming.
Uh, ignore the fact that the lyrics aren't quite appropriate here. Don't overthink it.
Thanks to @Andrews_Dad.
Posted by: Ace at
12:36 PM
| Comments (399)
Post contains 830 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 12:39 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: mallfly at September 24, 2013 12:39 PM (bJm7W)
I'm feeling like, "What the hell was all this about?"
Crossfit. That and Scandis. Worse still, Crossfitting Scandis.
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 24, 2013 12:39 PM (t06LC)
Posted by: Jaws at September 24, 2013 12:41 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Jason at September 24, 2013 12:41 PM (6VB4r)
Yeah, I'm with you, I don't have a terribly well formed opinion on the tactics in play here.
But what pisses me off about this "news" about Rand Paul is that some asshole GOP hack leaked this info to NBC News.
We always hear about the "Big Tent" and that we should be okay with moderates in the GOP. And I agree. But most conservatives are fine with that. What is never noted is the amount of venom that the moderates in the GOP have for the conservative wing of the party.
I thought it was supposed to be a Big Tent?
Posted by: dan-O at September 24, 2013 12:41 PM (D0bIN)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at September 24, 2013 12:42 PM (/WGNb)
Posted by: mallfly at September 24, 2013 12:42 PM (bJm7W)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at September 24, 2013 12:42 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: tasker at September 24, 2013 12:42 PM (r2PLg)
2) Details of "private meeting" leaked to NBC.
What's that thing about "third time is enemy action?"
Posted by: RoyalOil at September 24, 2013 12:42 PM (VjL9S)
Posted by: RolandTHTG at September 24, 2013 12:42 PM (QM5S2)
Posted by: Pipe Holder at September 24, 2013 12:42 PM (VTeUD)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at September 24, 2013 12:43 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: rockhead at September 24, 2013 12:43 PM (jtTKf)
Noted RINO Thomas Sowell also says this has been a stupid waste of time and energy. I'm sure we'll manage to turn this into 2 or 3 lost Senate Seats by replacing incumbents with Sharron Angle clones in primaries.
Posted by: buzz at September 24, 2013 12:43 PM (i27M5)
unsourced statement critical of Cruz? From a Private REPUBLICAN meeting??? How... novel...
Can you say John McCain?
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 24, 2013 12:44 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 12:44 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at September 24, 2013 12:44 PM (d2g9U)
Posted by: Sam at September 24, 2013 12:44 PM (gpLiM)
Actually this isn't at all a surprise.
Think back to socialist parliments in the early 20th century. At one time the socialists all sat together in the left wing. Over time though, they began to have serious fights (fist fights from what I understand) over political differences not with the conservatives, but rather fellow socialists. To remedy this, the fascists (socialists) were sent to the far right of parliament and the communists were sent to the left. Both socialists, but they despised each other over means of being socialists.
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 24, 2013 12:44 PM (t06LC)
Posted by: alexthechick - Booze. Not just for breakfast. at September 24, 2013 12:44 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Jason at September 24, 2013 12:45 PM (6VB4r)
Posted by: jakeman at September 24, 2013 12:45 PM (vH4YP)
So I ain't the only wondering WTF is the most helpful course of action on this issue. I don't consider myself super smart by any stretch but this thing has me flummoxed. I don't know WTF is up or down on this.
Posted by: fastfreefall at September 24, 2013 12:45 PM (awLVJ)
And yeah, I get that people are angry, frustrated and want something to be done, even if they don't exactly know what. That they're looking for someone to blame besides the obvious actors (Democrats).
I believe that as Americans we have an especially difficult time when confronted by an unsolvable problem. It's not in our DNA to accept that there are some goals we're unable to achieve, no matter how hard we try.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 24, 2013 12:46 PM (SY2Kh)
What a day for RINO-hunting, though! First Thomas Sowell was excommunicated, now Rand Paul.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 24, 2013 12:46 PM (n/+FT)
I'm just thrilled someone is calling these fascist scumbags out and making them take a public stand on supporting 0vomitcare and every other nauseating piece of crap legislation the foist on us (but not on themselves). It also helps to know who to support in the primaries as well...
Posted by: jcv123 at September 24, 2013 12:46 PM (SSrsH)
Posted by: Animal House of Representatives at September 24, 2013 12:47 PM (QM5S2)
Posted by: Suppressed Flasher at September 24, 2013 12:47 PM (X+nFp)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at September 24, 2013 12:48 PM (a4Omg)
Posted by: wte9 at September 24, 2013 12:48 PM (ZL7LA)
Posted by: tofer732 at September 24, 2013 12:48 PM (z3MpN)
"Ace, if you want a money idea. . . write a book featuring the best of your classic posts like the Scandi one, the best humor or hard hitting from the past decade, you can do diff categories in the book if you wish. Get it ready to release next year on the tenth year(?) anniversary of the AoS blog. Maybe add some new stuff, ppl like new stuff too. Put on the Amazon, we all buy thru your amazon portal. . . PROFIT! One of the few underpant gnome plots that will work.
Posted by: LizLem, who wants to get off this crazy thing at September 24, 2013 04:40 PM (8wqqE)"
Posted by: LizLem, who wants to get off this crazy thing at September 24, 2013 12:48 PM (8wqqE)
@7
Tactically speaking you're right and I view Mr. Paul's statements with a degree of skepticism. Paul shot to prominence with his filibuster over drone policy and got some non-binding statement on something only a few people really cared about. What would a filibuster over something 60% of the country hates do for Cruz's prominence? Who is going to be in the 2016 field?
Eh, this might not be about strategy so much as tactics and Cruz got there first.
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 24, 2013 12:48 PM (t06LC)
Posted by: Serious Cat at September 24, 2013 12:48 PM (UypUQ)
When do we get to the fun part of mom and dad trying to out-do each other gift-wise come Christmas and birthdays?
'Cause I'll be damned but so far mom and dad haven't given me shit.
Mostly, I've gotten slapped and told, "You shut your fucking mouth! If it wasn't for me, you'd be living on the street!"
Posted by: RoyalOil at September 24, 2013 12:48 PM (VjL9S)
i hear ya, as an emotional matter, but if we're arguing about Futile Gestures, I don't know what the hell we're arguing about.
It seems to be an argument that "My Futile Gesture is better than Your Futile Gesture."
Posted by: ace at September 24, 2013 12:48 PM (/IWYB)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 24, 2013 12:49 PM (T0Pku)
Posted by: Jaws at September 24, 2013 12:49 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: steevy at September 24, 2013 12:49 PM (9XBK2)
Is the Library of Congress still archiving every non-protected tweet?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, BFD, ZOMG, WTF, BBQ, QED at September 24, 2013 12:49 PM (/kI1Q)
>>>"What the hell was all this about?"
Sounds like Duke crying to Marlene in the car outside the store.
Posted by: Bigby's Typing Hands at September 24, 2013 12:49 PM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: garrett at September 24, 2013 12:49 PM (nKFzF)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at September 24, 2013 12:49 PM (/PCJa)
Posted by: tasker at September 24, 2013 12:49 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at September 24, 2013 12:49 PM (/PCJa)
Are any of these motherless ckufs with Cruz?
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at September 24, 2013 12:50 PM (0axsw)
Simple solution: Filibuster, but make the content of the filibuster a harangue (yes, I don't mind using that term) of the *American people* for having elected Harry Reid's majority.
Of course it sounds like a downer and an electorally inadvisable move. Of course.
But how different is it from the GOP infighting anyway? And it's not Obama telling the American people that they are not worthy of him and his vision. It's conservatives telling the American people that they are failing themselves and electing unworthies.
We can't shame Dem-side politicians (and Establishment GOP types) for both their words and their actions, on the floor of the US Capitol chambers, because these are brazen hucksters with no shame to begin with.
So we need to wake up to and attack the root-cause issue.
Pipe-dream it may be, but why not try flooding the Cruz/Lee/Paul/whoever communication banks with demands that they name and shame an American public that elects an Obamacare-enabling political class?
Can it truly hurt to try that?
Posted by: RamonAllones at September 24, 2013 12:50 PM (3lLli)
Posted by: Eton Cox at September 24, 2013 12:50 PM (q177U)
1. Screw NBC, they are probably lying.
2. If lying or not, the word has been put out to destroy Cruz, they are going to try to Bork him.
3. This whole CR kabuki disturbs me in that every time this 'we gotta hurry up and fund the govt', all kinds of costly payoffs and debilitating regulations get implemented.
4. Boned.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at September 24, 2013 12:50 PM (sj9LN)
News bimbo tweets that some other news whore reports that a Senator said a mean thing about another Senator.
We're being ruled by middle schoolers.
Posted by: BurtTC at September 24, 2013 12:50 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: LizLem, who wants to get off this crazy thing at September 24, 2013 12:50 PM (8wqqE)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at September 24, 2013 12:50 PM (a4Omg)
Posted by: dillhole12 at September 24, 2013 12:51 PM (uURnG)
"Rand at least got Holder to concede that he couldn't assisinate an American citizen****."
*on US soil
** without due process
*** without being a present danger
Maybe.
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 24, 2013 12:51 PM (t06LC)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 12:51 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: getonwithit at September 24, 2013 12:51 PM (MbeEN)
Posted by: tasker at September 24, 2013 12:52 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: mrp at September 24, 2013 12:52 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Yip at September 24, 2013 12:52 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 24, 2013 12:52 PM (eoeps)
No, actually, you're behind the times with the rationalization. Now we're being told (by DrewM and other commenters here) that this was never really about Obamacare at all -- it was REALLY about "the war of the Tea Party vs. the Establishment."
No, seriously. That's their argument. That all this theater, this threat of a government shutdown, the public debacle, all of it -- it was all a false-flag operation designed as a means of conducting the real war, the one certain people never ever, ever, ever want to stop fighting: Tea Party vs. RINO.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 24, 2013 12:52 PM (n/+FT)
Posted by: AmishDude at September 24, 2013 12:52 PM (T0NGe)
Nobody "excommunicated" Rand Paul or Thomas Sowell. They said they disagreed with them about this
There's a lot of projection there. People who thought defunding was a bad idea weren't arguing in good faith. They have been pretty much calling the other side every kind of euphemism for maniacs that can be thought of.
The people who do get referred to as RINOs are people with shitty track records like Mitch McConnell, John McCain, Marco Rubio and John Boehner.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 24, 2013 12:52 PM (TpXEI)
In some third world countries, when one faction is opposing another faction, they will cut out the hearts of their enemies and eat them.
We send tweets.
Posted by: BurtTC at September 24, 2013 12:52 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Buzzion at September 24, 2013 12:53 PM (N3egu)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 12:53 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at September 24, 2013 12:53 PM (0axsw)
Talking about coming around full circle as referenced in a couple of the previous threads.
We giving up. Let it burn.
(Just a small note: It's already burning.)
Posted by: Soona at September 24, 2013 12:54 PM (3sDOE)
Posted by: CarolT at September 24, 2013 12:54 PM (Eflez)
@41 LizLem,
that's a great idea. It worked well for Gustavo Arellano, of "ask a Mexican" fame. It's a dear abby kind thing, people ask goofy shit and he responds. He put several years worth in a book and it sold pretty well.
Ace, time to get rich bro!
Posted by: fastfreefall at September 24, 2013 12:54 PM (awLVJ)
=========
Was it your wife's taco?
Or some other woman's taco?
Posted by: RoyalOil at September 24, 2013 12:54 PM (VjL9S)
I've ignored all the details of this "fight."
The Obamacare battle was lost long ago. Our representatives did not represent us. They walked away from the fight.
I simply do not care about this bullshit any more. I'm tired of swimming in other people's hidden motives and lies.
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 12:54 PM (HzhBE)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 12:54 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at September 24, 2013 12:55 PM (9+ccr)
>>>They still have a monument at the Alamo and at Thermopayle for a reason.
BECOZ OF THE LGBT RIGHTS, HATER!!1!
Posted by: LIBTARD at September 24, 2013 12:55 PM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 24, 2013 12:55 PM (5H6zj)
There is no downside to this.
Cruz makes a name for himself as the lone fighter who stood up to Obama.
There won't be any government shutdown, so that narrative is lost.
Obamacare won't be defunded, so the issue at the midterms will be that Cruz could have won, if only for a few more "R" seats in the Senate.
No one who will make a difference in a presidential election year is paying any attention to any of this, so it's just for the base.
The fight in on the right for control of the GOP will be moved farther into the Cruz/Palin wing than the Rove/McCain wing.
Everything is fine and dandy.
Posted by: jwest at September 24, 2013 12:55 PM (u2a4R)
So McConnell is all over a drone strike filibuster.
But stopping zerocare, nah, this is not the hill to die on.
Got it stupid party, you're the best.
Posted by: prescient11 at September 24, 2013 12:55 PM (tVTLU)
Coaches debate each other all the time on proper strategy. Frankly, I think it shows a lot more character that he's not trying to undermine it now.
Second, I think it's important at this time to make some sort of display showing some Republicans vociferously opposing this trainwreck.
...
eh, yeah, I agree.
and yet we are here arguing about the value of the intangible. we're not arguing that this really would work.
Posted by: ace at September 24, 2013 12:55 PM (/IWYB)
Just for starters, most of the time I don't give a fuck what the pundits say, they seem to be wrong a lot, their perception in not the public's perception.
Best scenario, the public, of which a majority are against Barakahnaten's health care plan, see this as a shout against it.
Worst scenario ( most likely ) the MFM spins it as Cruz is a lunatic.
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 24, 2013 12:55 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: AmishDude at September 24, 2013 12:56 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 12:56 PM (HzhBE)
Posted by: bonhomme at September 24, 2013 12:56 PM (yETln)
Watch the media double-down on painting Cruz as a delusional wonk that can't work with anyone in DC..... wait for the letters pouring in from Texans who beg him to please stop his fillibuster.... just like in the movie.
Posted by: Yip at September 24, 2013 12:56 PM (/jHWN)
yeah i am mad, and at least attention is being made to this issue.
He is openly stating how this is so bad and so bad for our economy, our job outlooks,
But it was so good that all leadership exempted themselves from it.
although i realize few people are watching and listening but those that give a damn, because they recognize our individual rights and fiscal future is slipping away .
he also is making the point Dems did this, connected it to outlook on jobs for young and old.etc.
If one watched cspan this a.m when Leahy was speaking this country is in trouble yes economically but because it isn't Fair. OR it's republicans fault.
Posted by: willow at September 24, 2013 12:56 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 24, 2013 12:56 PM (cqONJ)
It's like grade-school tactics. What's next- reporting that Rand called him a bad name?
There is zero discipline or leadership worthy of respect. It's a bunch of factions who insist on calling themselves a party. Why? I have no idea they don't even stand principally for the same things.
I don't buy this is an argument over the heart and soul or "tactics" as to how to achieve the parties aims. They don't have any shared goals...other than trying to keep themselves employed.
Guys like Boehner and McConnell don't know how to do anything else. It's pathetic people like them would hang around Washington so long. An honest assessment would conclude that career politician is an oxymoron.
Honestly what kind of an inept, bungling idiot would want to be a career politician. Probably someone who really isn't good at anything and it shows.
Posted by: Marcus at September 24, 2013 12:56 PM (GGCsk)
He's putting it in terms any LIV who stumbles on CSPAN could understand. Not a likely scenario, but possible. Love the anecdotes about his dad! I can hear the MSNBC crones factchecking his life story in 3...2...1...
Posted by: LizLem, who wants to get off this crazy thing at September 24, 2013 12:57 PM (8wqqE)
Cruz makes a name for himself as the lone fighter who stood up to Obama.
There won't be any government shutdown, so that narrative is lost.
Obamacare won't be defunded, so the issue at the midterms will be that Cruz could have won, if only for a few more "R" seats in the Senate.
No one who will make a difference in a presidential election year is paying any attention to any of this, so it's just for the base.
The fight in on the right for control of the GOP will be moved farther into the Cruz/Palin wing than the Rove/McCain wing.
Everything is fine and dandy.
...
but then what were we fighting about?
just about such-and-such's political positioning?
Posted by: ace at September 24, 2013 12:57 PM (/IWYB)
@91
Spot on.
Further, it puts pressure on the republicans to move to the right to look at least as conservative as Cruz and Paul.
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 24, 2013 12:57 PM (t06LC)
Posted by: GOP at September 24, 2013 12:57 PM (M2qTM)
Posted by: Buzzion at September 24, 2013 12:57 PM (N3egu)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 12:58 PM (DmNpO)
any of 20 RINOs who wish to subvert Cruz/Lee/Paul.
Posted by: ace at September 24, 2013 12:58 PM (/IWYB)
Posted by: tasker at September 24, 2013 12:58 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 12:58 PM (HzhBE)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 24, 2013 12:58 PM (T0Pku)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at September 24, 2013 12:58 PM (a4Omg)
Posted by: willow at September 24, 2013 12:59 PM (nqBYe)
45 -
Here's an idea Ace: If you are a Senator or Congressman, how about you make a declarative statement that you oppose Obamacare, and will try to stop it whatever way you can.
Then the rest of us don't have to wonder whether your voting for it before you vote against it stuff is a sign of one or the other. You'll follow whatever tactic you think is going to accomplish the best possible outcome.
Our problem right now is that there really really really are some Republicans who want Obamacare to become the way of the world, but they are playing games with it, so as to avoid being outed as Obamacare lovers.
We have commenters here doing the same thing.
It's not that hard.
Posted by: BurtTC at September 24, 2013 01:00 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, kaiju wrangler at September 24, 2013 01:00 PM (naUcP)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at September 24, 2013 01:00 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at September 24, 2013 01:00 PM (0axsw)
we're not arguing that this really would work.
Well, I kinda wonder if Americans see a shutdown, and learn it doesn't affect them too much, maybe they won't care if it keeps dragging on.
I suspect the first few times America ran without a budget people were kinda freaked out about it. Now people just yawn.
Or maybe Imperious Leader decides to go forward unilaterally. Who knows what the public's reaction to that would be.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 24, 2013 01:00 PM (TpXEI)
Whatever. We never win, anyway.
Posted by: garrett at September 24, 2013 04:59 PM (nKFzF)
truther!
Posted by: willow at September 24, 2013 01:00 PM (nqBYe)
So why are so many people in these comment threads (and over on places like Hot Air) absolutely convinced that what Cruz is doing can work? Why do they believe this? Why did Cruz keep saying this in public? Why is he saying it right now, on the floor of the Senate, in fact?
And I really would like this one answered: why am I supposed to support and be all gung-ho in favor of a guy who -- as you yourself have now granted -- was selling lies to the base and ginning them up with rage, feeding them false hopes only to inevitably crush them? Why am I supposed to say "oh man that guy is a fighter!" and applaud this potentially destructive move?
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 24, 2013 01:00 PM (n/+FT)
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 01:00 PM (m2CN7)
Can he succeed? Probably not. We blew much better chances. That is over and done though, no point refighting that. Now we have Churchill's warning about sooner or later fighting when there is no chance of victory, only death or slavery. That is where we are now. So lets fight like there is no tomorrow, because if we lose there ain't. Jan 1 the freebies start and the path to single payer and the end of the Republic is a done deal.
And yes we do fight RINOs harder, probably even hate them more. Because until we deal with the lackof resolve in our own party we ain't got a snowballs chance in hell of defeating the iron lockstep legions of Hell on the other side.
Posted by: John Morris at September 24, 2013 01:00 PM (sCRhB)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (T0Pku)
Posted by: tasker at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (r2PLg)
Speaking of marriage, I really hate that my wife thinks sharing things off my plate is romantic. I put the exact amount of food that I wanted on my plate. Get your own fucking plate. I'll even get up and fix one up for you.
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (HzhBE)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke Circumsizing her Clitorous in Solidarity to Muslim Women in an Obscure Tribe at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (PytgW)
They're called heretics, and heretics are for burning; like "It's cold, throw another heretic on the fire."
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Outrage Outlet has the Embarrassing LP's of Your Youth! at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (gmoEG)
Posted by: AmishDude at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (T0NGe)
@103
Being cynical, partly. But it does give us something. It has the effect of giving the base some soul, something to fight for, to rally behind.
I don't think the establishment likes it, and that's why I'm nominally for it. Make them uncomfortable. Make their constituents demand they move further right.
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (t06LC)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (cqONJ)
Yes, precisely.
This is about which faction will take the torch and run with it and who will carry the water.
The only objectives met are not principled, they are political in terms of fostering talking points.
Like people don't know who is responsible for Obamacare.
The whole thing is a waste of time and a distraction.
Posted by: Marcus at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (GGCsk)
With your "pox on both their houses" attitude in the battle between - as you put it Trucons and RINOs, you are missing the bigger picture and the point.
Whether or not Cruz's plan was stupid or gets anywhere, or the establishment is "vindicated" when Obamacare remains the law of the land and we add to our national debt, the bigger issue that you seem to miss or not care about is this:
Most of the base does not trust the GOP at all anymore. For years we have bitched and moaned about the GOP, sure. But, that is a big difference to waking up and realizing the GOP simply does not like conservatives, has no interest in conservative ideas or goals, and frankly, doesn't care who knows it.
By attacking Cruz and anyone who wants to try and find a way to defund Obamacare, and attack in such a mean spirited way (that they would never dream of using to attack dems or liberals), they show who they hate the most. And it is not leftists - it is conservatives.
Sure, the Cruz plan had no way to really accomplish much of anything, except maybe highlight the issue and show some backbone. But, in reality, the "establishment" plan accomplished what? Complete and utter capitulation without even pretending to care.
Not sure what is worse. Waging a battle we know we will lose but which may shine some light on the issue for the mushy middle while giving the base some satisfaction, or simply saying "we'll never win, just give the dems what they want."
What exactly do we lose when the Cruz plan fails? We end up right where the GOP wanted to be in the first place, which is giving the Dems a clean CR so Obamacare can continue to become fixed as law and the gov't can continue to run up the debt.
To me, no matter what happens, the GOP is the big loser here - based on their reaction to conservatives - not b/c of any tactics, etc. For some time we have seen their disdain for us. But we always hope that if we do more, if we elect more conservatives, eventually that will change.
But it hasn't and it won't. The GOP hates conservatives. Period. End of story. It always has. The establishment hated Reagan. It hates every conservative that runs for office. In every chance they have, even in the deepest red district, they try to get non-conservatives as the candidate. The establishment only fights nasty and hard when it is against conservatives - it never pulls out the long knives to fight liberalism.
That says it all. I, for one, will not volunteer, donate or vote for the GOP again. Everyone can say "but then you'll get Obama" or whatever inane argument you want to make. To which I say - what has the GOP given us? Bush increased the size and scope of gov't and increased the deficits incredibly. Even Reagan didn't really reduce the size or scope of gov't. The vaunted Gingrich contract with America had little lasting effect as gov't continues to grow radically.
What really has the GOP ever done but help the left push its agenda forward. Sure, at times the GOP makes that agenda go slightly slower. But that is not enough. Not nearly enough.
The GOP stands for nothing. It is worth nothing. It deserves nothing from conservatives.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (sOx93)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at September 24, 2013 01:01 PM (/PCJa)
***
When did they ever stop?
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 04:58 PM (DmNpO)
Hope is a thing with feathers....
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 24, 2013 01:02 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: adams cinéma vérité porn at September 24, 2013 01:02 PM (gQKHE)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 01:02 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at September 24, 2013 01:02 PM (a4Omg)
... and for a fillerbuster, he sure is saying a lot of pertinent things and doing it in a way that is pointed and easily defended later. At least he is speaking above the press filter via C-span. If only it can leak out to those that haven't been listening the last two hours or so...
Posted by: Yip at September 24, 2013 01:03 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 24, 2013 01:03 PM (5H6zj)
Uh, guys Obamacare goes into effect in 7 days, at least Cruz is trying to do something even if it's folly.
What are the other chuckle heads in the Senate and House doing?
That would be nothing.
Stand with Cruz!
Posted by: Kreplach at September 24, 2013 01:03 PM (cxNF0)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 01:03 PM (DmNpO)
What is it about dogs and little children that turn grown men into blithering idiots?*
*The exception being, you kitteh lovers.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at September 24, 2013 01:03 PM (dzKbD)
granted -- was selling lies to the base and ginning them up with rage,
feeding them false hopes only to inevitably crush them? Why am I
applaud this
potentially destructive move?
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 24, 2013 05:00 PM (n/+FT)
you mean like the other Reps do during every budget talks?
how they are going to ....? nothing
Posted by: willow at September 24, 2013 01:03 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 24, 2013 01:03 PM (T0Pku)
@41 LizLem,
that's a great idea. It worked well for Gustavo Arellano, of "ask a Mexican" fame. It's a dear abby kind thing, people ask goofy shit and he responds. He put several years worth in a book and it sold pretty well.
Ace, time to get rich bro!Posted by: fastfreefall at September 24, 2013 04:54 PM (awLVJ)
The only possible pitfall would be that book launches require promotion, and Ace, like the mighty Sasquatch, be camera shy. (Though Ace on Redeye to promote his book, cracking wise with the gang, would make my decade. HE could wear an Ewok mask.) But there are other ways, including getting camera friendly coblogs like Gabe to do the footwork. Plenty of time to prep for an unveiling next year. Think about it Ace!
Posted by: LizLem, who wants to get off this crazy thing at September 24, 2013 01:03 PM (8wqqE)
Posted by: CarolT at September 24, 2013 01:04 PM (DVPta)
"but then what were we fighting about?
just about such-and-such's political positioning?"
I don't know anyone who argued that Obamacare was actually going to be defunded, except maybe a few real die-hards.
This has always been a posturing that drives home the point that democrats own Obamacare and republicans are against it. When the midterms come around, most voters who can be motivated will be taking an ass fucking on their premiums or in some way being pissed off by Obamacare.
If it produces a 2006 style turnout and result it's all worth it.
Posted by: jwest at September 24, 2013 01:04 PM (u2a4R)
So you undermine your own party? What's the goal? You can't win elections like this, that should be evident by now.
The dearth of effective leadership and discipline is absolutely stunning.
Posted by: Marcus at September 24, 2013 01:04 PM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Hurricane LaFawnduh at September 24, 2013 01:04 PM (pginn)
Ace:
****Well, this Rand Paul thing, if true, sort of pricks the balloon of the easy Narratives where the world gets divided neatly into Black Hats and White Hats.****
No, not really, because notice that Rand, if he opposed it, did so *privately* rather than telling everyone what a horrible person Ted Cruz is. He disagreed with a point of strategy apparently, but he's not outraged at Cruz like the establishment types are, and that's because he's basically on board with fighting Obamacare, and with Cruz' messaging, even if that fight can't be won right now.
The fact is, there was no possible plan that could've likely worked to defeat Obamacare at this point. What matters is that conservatives like Cruz will now be on record as fighting it - really fighting it at personal risk rather than just talking about fighting it someday - in a year from now as everyone is suffering from this miserable law. That will make all the difference between whether the base is fired up or completely demoralized.
The RINOs aren't mad at Cruz because of a minor issue of strategy, or because he tried to fight Obamacare with one strategy and they wanted to try another. They're mad because he's actually fighting, and they didn't actually want to fight at all.
If they had some other strategy for fighting, they could have taken the initiative to push it themselves, rather than leaving all the initiative to Cruz and then bitching about how he was somehow diminishing their "negotiating power." Or, if they weren't willing to do that, they could've helped Cruz with his strategizing rather than backbiting and badmouthing him for months.
But they didn't do that because they didn't really want to, and they aren't really happy about the base being fired up because they realize that a fired up base is as likely to punish them as the Democrats.
Posted by: The Deuce at September 24, 2013 01:04 PM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 05:01 PM (HzhBE)
Had a house guest w/ a girlfriend who jumped in on his soup!
His fucking soup.
I don't know why that's worse. But it is.
There's a definite hierarchy, there.
Desserts are the least offensive. Bowls of warm liquid are the most offensive.
Posted by: garrett at September 24, 2013 01:05 PM (nKFzF)
Posted by: Minnfidel at September 24, 2013 01:05 PM (sUMBr)
Posted by: soothsayer at September 24, 2013 01:05 PM (kagAm)
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at September 24, 2013 01:06 PM (oDCMR)
Thanks for reading my mind and telling me what I'm thinking. It's really helpful because this actually comes as a revelation to me.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 24, 2013 01:06 PM (n/+FT)
Stupid Party.
Posted by: KG[/i][/b] at September 24, 2013 01:07 PM (p7BzH)
Like people don't know who is responsible for Obamacare.
Were I to rely solely on the comments here, I'd believe that Republicans (The GOP Establishment) is responsible for Obamacare.
Thankfully, I'm not a delusional reactionary.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 24, 2013 01:07 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: miriam at September 24, 2013 01:07 PM (Nx76m)
In the old days, people used to say "the country above party". Obamacare is destroying the liberties of the people. I choose the Constitution of the United States of America.
Posted by: mrp at September 24, 2013 01:08 PM (HjPtV)
They are not covering this as a fight against Obamacare. They don't even mention that.
They've made it about a crazy Republican whose own party members are willing to stab in the back. And how the fearless Democrats and their god-king are fearlessly standing up to him.
That accomplishes what exactly? Getting a bunch of acolytes to clap?
It doesn't even rate a golf clap in my book.
Posted by: Marcus at September 24, 2013 01:08 PM (GGCsk)
Tune in and watch them speak Dumbese to their Dumb audience.
Posted by: soothsayer at September 24, 2013 05:05 PM (kagAm)
Obamacare ;It's so wonderful they don't want to be a part of it!
Posted by: willow at September 24, 2013 01:08 PM (nqBYe)
I think we can expect that regardless of what happens in the Senate.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, BFD, ZOMG, WTF, BBQ, QED at September 24, 2013 01:08 PM (/kI1Q)
Thankfully, I'm not a delusional reactionary.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 24, 2013 05:07 PM (SY2Kh)
No dude the GOP hates conservatives and wants Obamacare, that's why they fought tooth-and-nail against it and only lost because of some bullshit budget reconciliation rule.
Posted by: Paul at September 24, 2013 01:08 PM (JM48I)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at September 24, 2013 01:09 PM (8InM1)
No one wants to weigh in on sharing a plate? Listen, this is an important issue. I know exactly how much i want to eat. I do NOT know how much my wife wants to eat.
This creates problems.
I can't be responsible for both parties.
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 01:09 PM (HzhBE)
Whatever. But there sure seems to be a shitload of RINOs hating anyone who doesn't "understand" (love the status quo) and a shitload of name calling and backstabbing originating from the so-called "reasonable adults here"
If you don't like pitches thrown at your head, it's a good idea not to stick it in your opponent's ear first.
Conservatives are fighting a two-front battle here. They expect the Dems to fight dirty, but it's outright treacherous from the McCain Wing of the GOP
Posted by: kbdabear at September 24, 2013 01:09 PM (/9IC1)
Posted by: Paul at September 24, 2013 01:09 PM (JM48I)
I love being told (by one commenter in particular) that I actually secretly LOVE Obamacare, and want it to go into effect, but I'm just lying about it cannily. Presumably the way I've been lying about my dead-red conservative Republicanism here for nearly a decade. We're regular Cylon sleeper agents, we're so good at hiding the truth.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 24, 2013 01:09 PM (n/+FT)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 24, 2013 01:10 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 24, 2013 01:10 PM (cqONJ)
The place to stop funding of Obamacare is only in the House. However, a show of support from fellow Repubs sure the hell would help with negotiations if they were actually serious about shutting down the govt.
But McCain et al aren't, they love big govt and secretly obamacare, as long as they are not a part of it.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at September 24, 2013 01:10 PM (sj9LN)
@161
That's nice but what have they done, really.
The only way to defeat Obamacare is to force the Dems and the President to shut down the government.
You do that by passing a budget and doing away with the CR's and stripping out Obamacare and let the chips fall where they may.
Once the first check goes out to beneficiaries the program is here to say or put another way - THERE IS NO TOMORROW, FIGHT IT, FIGHT IT WITH EVERYTHING WE'VE GOT.
Posted by: Kreplach at September 24, 2013 01:10 PM (Eyozp)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 24, 2013 05:06 PM (n/+FT
You really are clueless. You have posted at least 50 comments on how supporters of Cruz have been thinking and how they have been duped. You don't even know what you're thinking if I use the many walkbacks and apologies you have had to give as evidence.
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 01:11 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Hurricane LaFawnduh at September 24, 2013 01:11 PM (pginn)
>>>>There's a definite hierarchy, there. Desserts are the least offensive.Bowls of warm liquid are the most offensive.
Yeah. You can have a sip of my beer. No problem. But there are limits that one should observe.
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 01:11 PM (HzhBE)
Posted by: Jean at September 24, 2013 01:12 PM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 24, 2013 04:52 PM (TpXEI)
Plus JeffB has been lying his ass off about Cruz in every single thread, and he won't stop. That man has no shame.
Posted by: KG[/i][/b] at September 24, 2013 01:12 PM (p7BzH)
Trust? Never trust a politician. But I can and will encourage them when they OPENLY fight against an issue that the majority of the populace finds reprehensible.
Secret, procedural deals are done by thieves and dictators who want the darkness to shield them from being seen what they really are.
Go Cruz go!
Posted by: Soona at September 24, 2013 01:12 PM (3sDOE)
Speaking of marriage, Ireally hate that my wife thinks sharing things off my plate is romantic. I put theexactamount of food that I wanted on my plate. Get your own fucking plate. I'll even get up and fix one up for you.
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 05:01 PM (HzhBE)[/I
_______
Only time I think I'd mind my other half eating off my plate is if her grill was fucked up and rotten. For some reason, that just seems gross. Nice teeth? no problem. Jagged, piranha mouth, oxidized grill? Oh fuck no!
Posted by: fastfreefall at September 24, 2013 01:12 PM (awLVJ)
So far, no one has had success at getting rid of ZeroCare. Hell, the clowns in officeat the time had zero success in preventing it's enactment.
If McConnell would jump into the arena (see: Roosevelt, T) with both feet, I'd listen (given his parliamentary skill, he could actually be helpful). If Paul has an opinion on the subject I might listen (but I might not, since he's just a "vote" we already have). Cornyn is a bullshitter who can't find his ass with either hand and written instructions. McVain is...well...he's not high on my list, lets just say. So I don't consider the sideline Senators opinions on Cruz' tactics as necessarily worth listening to, honestly.
These guys are already losers on the subject, while Cruz is in there fighting with everything he's got. I support Ted.
Posted by: MTF at September 24, 2013 01:12 PM (B5y+v)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at September 24, 2013 05:02 PM (a4Omg)
Shit.... am I a LINO then??? Libertarian in Name Only???
Because I don't like Ron Paul.... am not a total Isolationist (but think we should not be quite as involved everywhere as we are)... don't want all drugs legalized... believe in Strong borders... and American Rights for AMERICANs...
crap..... I am a LINO.... sigh...
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 24, 2013 01:13 PM (lZBBB)
Napoleon said attack and see what happens. Think Cruz understands this advice.
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at September 24, 2013 01:13 PM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at September 24, 2013 01:13 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 24, 2013 01:13 PM (5H6zj)
"SHUT UP!!! There's a firework coming. Okay."
Jesse, when I caught you fooling around in that other thread I warned you. Now, I'm just gonna have to get your attention.
Now, right now I'm driving down the Interstate in my old Caddy but when I get to ABQ in a few days I'm gonna M-60 your ass GOOD AND HARD!
Posted by: Walt at September 24, 2013 01:13 PM (LA7Cm)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 24, 2013 01:13 PM (ZshNr)
Were I to rely solely on the comments here, I'd believe that Republicans (The GOP Establishment) is responsible for Obamacare.
Thankfully, I'm not a delusional reactionary.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 24, 2013 05:07 PM (SY2Kh)
For instance. Please point out these comments.
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 01:14 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: tasker at September 24, 2013 01:14 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at September 24, 2013 05:13 PM (oDCMR)
And then Cruz and the Banzai Charge Brigade can also wind up in exile on a deserted island.
Posted by: Paul at September 24, 2013 01:14 PM (JM48I)
Obviously I'm referring to two different sets of Cruz supporters when I talk about the ones who think defunding can actually work and the ones who USED to hold that line but now say "oh it's really about The War Against RINOs."
And I walk things back and apologize when I'm wrong because I try to have some fucking intellectual integrity and don't consider it a fatal attack on my sense of self to occasionally admit to Being Wrong On The Internet. You should try that sometime, it's a healthy attitude.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 24, 2013 01:14 PM (n/+FT)
173 -
My wife used to do that. Now she's dead.
Does one have to do with the other? I'm not saying.
Posted by: BurtTC at September 24, 2013 01:14 PM (TOk1P)
White House Celebrates Bisexual Visibility Day with an Official Closed-Door Event
http://is.gd/w47skv
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, BFD, ZOMG, WTF, BBQ, QED at September 24, 2013 01:15 PM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 24, 2013 05:01 PM (cqONJ)
That ship has sailed, hit an iceberg and is sitting at the bottom of the Atlantic.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at September 24, 2013 01:15 PM (yh0zB)
Posted by: CAC at September 24, 2013 01:15 PM (p+uIO)
The Obamacare battle was lost long ago. Our representatives did not represent us. They walked away from the fight.
I simply do not care about this bullshit any more. I'm tired of swimming in other people's hidden motives and lies.
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 04:54 PM
_______________________________________
They didn't walk away, they were outnumbered and lost because of "math" - a science the "RINO hunters" seem to frequently forget about.
I was actually pleasantly surprised (more like shocked) that the likes of McCain, Lugar and Snowe all stuck with the conservatives in 2009, but when you are outnumbered 60-40 there ain't much you can do.
Posted by: buzz at September 24, 2013 01:15 PM (i27M5)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 24, 2013 05:10 PM (cqONJ)
LOL.... almost lost a girlfriend one time when she said that...
because I called the waitress over and ordered another order of what I was having...
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 24, 2013 01:16 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Madamex at September 24, 2013 01:16 PM (islXR)
Posted by: LizLem, who wants to get off this crazy thing at September 24, 2013 01:16 PM (8wqqE)
202 Napoleon said attack and see what happens. Think Cruz understands this advice. Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at September 24, 2013 05:13 PM (oDCMR)And then Cruz and the Banzai Charge Brigade can also wind up in exile on a deserted island.
Maybe, are become the only memorable Republican seen fighting against it. What's that worth come 2016?
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at September 24, 2013 01:16 PM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 01:16 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at September 24, 2013 01:16 PM (8InM1)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at September 24, 2013 01:16 PM (a4Omg)
Posted by: tasker at September 24, 2013 01:17 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: bonhomme at September 24, 2013 01:17 PM (yETln)
I'm about to get ass fucked by my government. I'm not the kind that takes kindly to getting ass fucked and if I had an opportunity to fight my ass fucking off by giving reasons as to why this ass fucking is complete bullshit I'd do everything I could. Even if that ass fucking is going to happen one way or another! I don't care if other people in this country could give a rip about the ass fucking that I'm about to take, but I sure appreciate those that have the same feelings about being ass fucked that have a voice in DC speaking up against said ass fucking.
What really pisses me off is that the party that supposedly has my best interests at heart are the ones lubing and spreading my ass cheeks for the fucking while telling me not to worry and just take it because when it comes down to it its better for them if I just keep my mouth shut. Of course what they keep trying to get me to ignore is that they aren't getting ass fucked at all because they made sure as part of the deal that they are a part of the group that are doing the ass fucking as well.
Basically, I'm being Jodi Fostered in the Accused on a pinball machine by the main fuckers (Democrats), the peer pressured go along fuckers (GOP), and anyone else that has gotten a waiver in this country (take your pick). The fact that Ted Cruz is sitting there saying this is bullshit is the only solace I get to take out of the whole thing.
Sorry for the rant but I'm fucking pissed. The idea of America has been completely betrayed by pretty much all of Washington...
LiB
Posted by: H Badger at September 24, 2013 01:17 PM (n/0Nw)
Posted by: Beff J. at September 24, 2013 01:17 PM (ggRof)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at September 24, 2013 01:18 PM (8InM1)
Posted by: tasker at September 24, 2013 01:18 PM (r2PLg)
No, he's not a "straight up guy". He's a politician.
Recall the amnesty debate- he spend most of it being very evasive regarding his views and how he'd vote.
He did end up voting against it, but not because he was opposed to amnesty. He voted against it because he believed Congress (not DHS) should've been the ones to decide if the border was secure.
And that's not the only time he's played Split The Baby, either.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 24, 2013 01:18 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 01:18 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: adams climate solutions porn at September 24, 2013 01:19 PM (gQKHE)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 01:19 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: booger at September 24, 2013 01:19 PM (xRDdL)
I might try to sneak him some candy. #MakeDCListen @SenTedCruz
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 05:18 PM (DmNpO)
And by "candy" I mean Meth.
Posted by: @SenRandPaul at September 24, 2013 01:20 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at September 24, 2013 01:20 PM (0axsw)
No one wants to weigh in on sharing a plate?
------ ----- ----- ------ ------
.......But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.
Posted by: Mo's Invisible Friend at September 24, 2013 01:21 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: @SenRandPaul at September 24, 2013 05:20 PM (UypUQ)
Make sure it's the blue stuff!
Posted by: Heisenberg at September 24, 2013 01:21 PM (ggRof)
223 -
Funny thing is, if you spend all your time complaining about what somebody is doing, people get the impression you want them to stop doing it.
Cruz is trying to stop Obamacare. Why do you want Cruz to stop trying to stop Obamacare, Hollowpoint?
Posted by: BurtTC at September 24, 2013 01:21 PM (TOk1P)
Two sips out of a bottle of water. That's my favorite.
It's not like you have to waltz out to the back 40 and carry a bucket of water back to the house...
only want two sips of water? Drink it out the fucking faucet like normal human.
Posted by: garrett at September 24, 2013 01:21 PM (nKFzF)
>>>They didn't walk away, they were outnumbered and lost because of "math" - a science the "RINO hunters" seem to frequently forget about
Bitch McConnell coulda kept those fucks over Christmas break and made 'em pass Obamacare on Christmas Eve, but he said fuck it and went home for some egg nog.
They didn't fight even a losing fight. They didn't fight at all.
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 01:21 PM (HzhBE)
This! That!...and all the rest!!
Well said
Posted by: Albie Damned at September 24, 2013 01:21 PM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 24, 2013 01:22 PM (pqBkB)
Speaking of marriage, Ireally hate that my wife thinks sharing things off my plate is romantic. I put theexactamount of food that I wanted on my plate. Get your own fucking plate. I'll even get up and fix one up for you.
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 05:01 PM (HzhBE)
Can't you just make a little extra or put a little more on your plate, knowing she'll swipe some? Anticipate it? I do that at my house, works every time.
Posted by: LizLem, who wants to get off this crazy thing at September 24, 2013 01:22 PM (8wqqE)
Yes, everybody knows Republicans oppose ObamaCare. But why do they oppose it? Because they're greedy? Because they hate poor people? Because they've been bought off by Big Pharma or whatever? Maybe Jon Stewart can spell it out for us.
The only thing the Republicans have going for them is the impressive awfulness of ObamaCare itself. If the public wises up, it will be no thanks to the GOP.
Posted by: sandy burger at September 24, 2013 01:23 PM (4dy3y)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at September 24, 2013 01:23 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Chilling the most at September 24, 2013 01:23 PM (Rn9xc)
Posted by: the most interesting at September 24, 2013 01:23 PM (Nx76m)
The Senate Dems know that Ocare is poison and the Ruling Party GOPniks don't want to be the sacrificial lambs for a successful cloture vote.
Posted by: mrp at September 24, 2013 01:24 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: willow at September 24, 2013 01:24 PM (nqBYe)
And I walk things back and apologize when I'm wrong because I try to have some fucking intellectual integrity and don't consider it a fatal attack on my sense of self to occasionally admit to Being Wrong On The Internet. You should try that sometime, it's a healthy attitude.
------ ------- ----- --------- ----- -------
This "wrong," what is it?
Posted by: JEF at September 24, 2013 01:25 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at September 24, 2013 01:25 PM (8InM1)
And in the world of double standards it has come to this:
Rand Paul's (admittedly futile filibuster on drones) BRILLIANT, WONDERFUL POLITICS, Masterful display, way to go Rand...
Ted Cruz's (admittedly likely futile filibuster on zerocare) FUCKING SHAM, EGO TRIP, IT'S ALL ABOUT CRUZ.
Why does such a double standard exist for Cruz. All he's doing is trying to do what the GOP got ELECTED TO FUCKING DO!
It's beyond exasperation. You can't win the fight unless you get in the fucking ring. And jerk off votes that don't do shit WON'T WIN ANYTHING. won't stop anything. Don't fucking matter.
Posted by: prescient11 at September 24, 2013 01:25 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: @SenSeriousCat at September 24, 2013 01:25 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:25 PM (j+cSS)
241 -
The flaw in your argument is that if Obamacare is so awful, and it's really so easy to make the case to the LIVs, and the R Party isn't making that case, then maybe they aren't so opposed to it after all.
Posted by: BurtTC at September 24, 2013 01:25 PM (TOk1P)
Diet Coke? Srsly? Who drinks that shit? Coke Zero FTW!
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at September 24, 2013 01:26 PM (yh0zB)
Posted by: Albie Damned at September 24, 2013 01:26 PM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 01:26 PM (g1DWB)
The only thing the Republicans have going for them is the impressive awfulness of ObamaCare itself. If the public wises up, it will be no thanks to the GOP.
Posted by: sandy burger at September 24, 2013 05:23 PM (4dy3y)
On the fringes. Now they know that not only did they oppose it but they tried to basically overturn and not have it go into effect. The press cannot spin it any other way.
Now when the LIV feel the negative effects of Obamacare, the Dems will own it completely.
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 01:27 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: buzz at September 24, 2013 04:43 PM (i27M5)
I voted for Mourdock and against Lugar in the primary, knowing that Mourdock--obviously not ready for the big leagues--would probably lose to Donnelly in the general but believing it was more important to have a Republican candidate who actually represented my beliefs running for the office rather than Dick Lugar, that Beltway RINO Establishment hack who hasn't lived in Indiana for over 15 years. I don't regret that vote. So yeah, if it comes to that, I'll risk an Angle or a Mourdock if it means there's a chance to get a thinking, fighting conservative Republican in that seat. The risk is worth it. Go big or go home.
Posted by: troyriser at September 24, 2013 01:27 PM (2jF2B)
Posted by: LizLem, who wants to get off this crazy thing at September 24, 2013 05:16 PM (8wqqE)
****************
You usually address the person sitting in the chair at the moment in the Senate.
So that "honor" usually goes to the newbies of the Senate majority party.Posted by: tasker at September 24, 2013 05:18 PM (r2PLg)
Thanks. He was addressing Obama for a while, then Madam Presidenting it up. made me lol.
Rand up now on the floor. . .
Posted by: LizLem, who wants to get off this crazy thing at September 24, 2013 01:27 PM (8wqqE)
Posted by: RoyalOil at September 24, 2013 01:27 PM (VjL9S)
Posted by: mrp at September 24, 2013 05:24 PM (HjPtV)
And certain House republicans obliged them. Which shows where their priorities lie...
Posted by: KG[/i][/b] at September 24, 2013 01:27 PM (p7BzH)
Posted by: willow at September 24, 2013 01:27 PM (nqBYe)
Say what you want about JeffB,, there are times he can bring the funny.
Posted by: lowandslow at September 24, 2013 01:27 PM (APJIX)
Both sides are guilty of resorting to name-calling and using hyperbolic rhetoric. For my part, as someone who is pro-delay*, I believe that those in the pro-defunding camp have their hearts in the right place but I disagree with the strategy.
*Push full repeal, settle for delay
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 24, 2013 01:28 PM (YjDyJ)
Posted by: booger at September 24, 2013 01:28 PM (xRDdL)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 05:26 PM (g1DWB)
Yes exactly. I was trying to find a way to say it short and sweet. That does it.
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 01:28 PM (m2CN7)
The sideline Senators are already losers on the subject of ZeroCare so their opinions count for little.
I support Ted. He's in the arena and fighting.
Posted by: MTF at September 24, 2013 01:29 PM (B5y+v)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:29 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: @SenSeriousCat at September 24, 2013 01:29 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: LauraC at September 24, 2013 01:29 PM (fXZDm)
I'm sure if we all listened and learned on Amnesty we would have somehow seen how awesomely GENIUS that Rubio was
The trouble with all this "inside baseball" shit on procedure and protocols is that most of us live real lives outside the Beltway. We don't know how the sausage is made, we don't WANT to know. Just kill the pig and make the damned sausage
I'm sure that the podcast is all sorts of engaging if you're into sausage making, but it sounds to me like Keith Law putting people to sleep with his microanalysis of each and every damned pitch in the game.
I suppose like most of us I'm a bit more LIV than I'd like to admit, but in the end I just want to know who won the game
Posted by: kbdabear at September 24, 2013 01:30 PM (/9IC1)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 24, 2013 01:30 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 24, 2013 01:30 PM (pqBkB)
@244
But we don't want Assad to win easily either. Hizballah and Pasdaran (IRGC) are there taking casualties: A Good Thing. When two enemies are fighting the cruel but wise thing to do is keep it going. Sure, it's a bit like showing up in a fire truck full of gasoline, but the world sucks.
Posted by: Beagle at September 24, 2013 01:30 PM (sOtz/)
Well at least we got the straight skinny on Cornyn. Texas, we have a little work to do.
If Wendy Davis is smart she'll run for Cornyn's seat after he gets roughed up in a primary cause it needs to happen to him.
Posted by: DanMan at September 24, 2013 01:30 PM (RusNE)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 01:30 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: m at September 24, 2013 01:30 PM (jlqKz)
How about you read the comments yourself? You can find them in every thread about this topic.
Or just scrolling up a little in this very thread:
Our problem right now is that there really really really are some Republicans who want Obamacare to become the way of the world, but they are playing games with it, so as to avoid being outed as Obamacare lovers.
But McCain et al aren't, they love big govt and secretly obamacare, as long as they are not a part of it.
I could find you pages and pages more, but instead how about you find me ONE such thread where the "blame the GOP for Obamacare" sentiment isn't pervasive?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 24, 2013 01:31 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Dan at September 24, 2013 01:31 PM (m3gf3)
It's obama who won't compromise--he is the one forcing a shutdown because he wants 100% of what he wants.
Posted by: RoyalOil at September 24, 2013 01:31 PM (VjL9S)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 05:26 PM (g1DWB)
true but many are intimating those that believe in using this opportunity to have cruz and rand paul and lee voice OUR honest arguments with the bill are reactionary idiots
Posted by: willow at September 24, 2013 01:31 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Rand Paul at September 24, 2013 01:31 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: booger at September 24, 2013 05:28 PM (xRDdL)
Thanks - no cable or satellite here. And, #69 superfine. Heh.
Posted by: mrp at September 24, 2013 01:32 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: 4th horseman of the apocalypse (no I haven't lost my head) at September 24, 2013 01:32 PM (KuZ6A)
Posted by: m at September 24, 2013 01:32 PM (jlqKz)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 24, 2013 05:30 PM (pqBkB)
*************
See? While the rest of you fags are arguing about fantasy football politics, Jeff is preaching the fucking gospel.
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 01:32 PM (HzhBE)
Posted by: willow at September 24, 2013 01:32 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: LauraC at September 24, 2013 05:29 PM (fXZDm)
heh ^
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 24, 2013 01:32 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 01:32 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 01:33 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 24, 2013 01:33 PM (YjDyJ)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 24, 2013 01:33 PM (T0Pku)
Posted by: garrett at September 24, 2013 01:33 PM (nKFzF)
I do know that the concerted effort to trash Ted Cruz is reminiscent of the sliming of Sarah Palin and a lot of the same DC Republicans seem to have been involved in both efforts.
I have voted in every election since I turned 18 and I have voted Republican since Ronald Reagan but I am not sure it is worth the effort any more.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at September 24, 2013 01:34 PM (31Nrp)
Mark Levin has this dead on. He is 100% right. As is his concept of state nullification and/or a constitutional convention.
The latter is scary, but I look foward to hearing his comments on how to deal with such an issue.
Posted by: prescient11 at September 24, 2013 01:34 PM (tVTLU)
I have just got in the habit of putting toast in both sides of the toaster, because every time my wife smells it and starts eating mine before i have put the butter and jam away.
She never turns it down
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 24, 2013 01:34 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 24, 2013 05:30 PM (pqBkB)
Hah, I stand corrected.
Cruz is talking about boots, hahaha...something for all the morons and moronettes!
Posted by: LizLem, who wants to get off this crazy thing at September 24, 2013 01:35 PM (8wqqE)
Posted by: Me at September 24, 2013 01:35 PM (YbL96)
285 -
There's a world of difference between "responsible for" and "did nothing to stop it," smart guy.
Posted by: BurtTC at September 24, 2013 01:35 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: ginaswo at September 24, 2013 01:35 PM (QSkES)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 24, 2013 01:35 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 24, 2013 01:35 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 24, 2013 01:35 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:36 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 05:30 PM (g1DWB
And when the Kiwis win tomorrow for the Cup, my conspiracy theory will be complete. Seriously, how great would it be if Oracle could pull this out. One of the top three comeback sporting events ever.
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 01:36 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 24, 2013 01:37 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: DFCtomm at September 24, 2013 01:37 PM (E7GZC)
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 24, 2013 05:33 PM (YjDyJ)
Interesting, very interesting
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 24, 2013 01:37 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at September 24, 2013 01:37 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 24, 2013 01:38 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 05:33 PM (g1DWB)
Any path will end up the same way, so the delay plan wasn't any better nor had better chance of success. We wanted more of a fight, we always want more of a fight, and liked it when Cruz decided to. Not that it is reasonable to expect the republicans as a whole to really fight, because they haven't been in the habit of doing so so for many years.
Posted by: KG[/i][/b] at September 24, 2013 01:38 PM (p7BzH)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 05:30 PM (g1DWB
And when the Kiwis win tomorrow for the Cup, my conspiracy theory will be complete. Seriously, how great would it be if Oracle could pull this out. One of the top three comeback sporting events ever.
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 05:36 PM (m2CN7)
Pretty cool. I don't know anything about sailing. I fish and prefer power boats, but those racing boats can haul ass downwind !
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 24, 2013 01:39 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: m at September 24, 2013 01:39 PM (jlqKz)
Posted by: LauraC at September 24, 2013 05:29 PM (fXZDm)
And we have a winner, folks! LauraC please pick up your internets at the payout window!
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at September 24, 2013 01:39 PM (yh0zB)
why are so many people in these comment threads (and over on places
like Hot Air) absolutely convinced that what Cruz is doing can work?
You mostly just make up shit. I don't know about HA, but I've been following most of these threads and haven't read 1 commenter state that he/she was absolutely convinced that what Cruz is doing can work. Read more before you make such statements of "fact".
Posted by: Ronster at September 24, 2013 01:39 PM (J8dt5)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 01:39 PM (g1DWB)
True story: My wife and I got into a fight on our honeymoon because I wouldn't share a dessert with her.
I didn't not share MY dessert. I simply didn't WANT dessert. All I wanted was coffee.
My wife said she felt stupid eating her dessert "alone." Which is strange because I was right next to her drinking my coffee.
Posted by: Warden at September 24, 2013 01:40 PM (HzhBE)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 24, 2013 01:41 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 24, 2013 05:33 PM (YjDyJ)
Interesting, very interesting
I wouldn't put much stock in what they have to say, especially Rubin who's been attacking Cruz non-stop on twitter.
Posted by: booger at September 24, 2013 01:41 PM (xRDdL)
Posted by: Serious Cat at September 24, 2013 01:41 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 24, 2013 01:41 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: booger at September 24, 2013 01:42 PM (xRDdL)
Posted by: Low information Republican Squish at September 24, 2013 01:42 PM (RFeQD)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:43 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: willow at September 24, 2013 01:43 PM (nqBYe)
I recognize all these words, but the order they're in make no sense to me.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, BFD, ZOMG, WTF, BBQ, QED at September 24, 2013 01:43 PM (/kI1Q)
This nation was founded by people who were willing to fight any fight, at any time, and stand their ground AGAINST ALL ODDS, as the whole world around them were telling them they could not prevail. I think there is a lesson in their attitude for those of us today.
Posted by: BackInTime at September 24, 2013 01:43 PM (NP8ek)
Posted by: 4th horseman of the apocalypse (no I haven't lost my head) at September 24, 2013 01:43 PM (KuZ6A)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 24, 2013 01:44 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 24, 2013 01:44 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 24, 2013 01:44 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:45 PM (j+cSS)
Does what Cruz is doing advance his career? Sure. Is it strictly grandstanding, or an honest expression of his opposition? No one knows that for sure, but a fair guess would be a bit of both.
If what he is doing gives House Rs a little more backbone, where the real battle is being fought, isn't that a win on its own? One battle does not, in general, determine a war. At least he is battling.
Posted by: GnuBreed at September 24, 2013 01:45 PM (wNF3N)
He's not trying to stop Obamacare. He's smart enough to know that he can't.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 24, 2013 01:45 PM (SY2Kh)
No, he can't. But the American people can.
Posted by: mrp at September 24, 2013 01:46 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Boone at September 24, 2013 01:46 PM (3p8HS)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 01:46 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at September 24, 2013 01:46 PM (dvRYt)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:47 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: m at September 24, 2013 05:39 PM (jlqKz)
Read the Bible, that's good for a while or read the constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence. Read common sense.
Someone should bring in a military choir to sing behind him
Posted by: the most interesting at September 24, 2013 01:47 PM (Nx76m)
Posted by: mrp at September 24, 2013 05:46 PM (HjPtV)
And they decided not to when they gave Obama a second term. It can't be stopped, now they must be made to suffer and realize the enormity of their mistake.
Posted by: Paul at September 24, 2013 01:47 PM (JM48I)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 24, 2013 01:47 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: LauraC at September 24, 2013 05:29 PM (fXZDm)"
That is because the GOP is not an ideological organization. It is not even an organization that is designed to get Republicans elected to public office.
In its present form the Republican Party is an organization who's only purpose is to efficiently transfer money from donors to political consultants. That's it. If you would like an opposition political party or a party that will work to get control of the elected offices of the United States, you will either need to start another political party or take over the GOP and throw out the old set of rascals. I am not saying that the new replacements will not also be rascals but, hopefully the fate of the old rascals will motivate them to put as much effort into winning political battles against Democrats as they put into fighting Republicans.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at September 24, 2013 01:48 PM (31Nrp)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:49 PM (j+cSS)
It is especially a good idea as the whole thing is iterative, and "a loss" now will lead to a better position in the future.
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 05:36 PM (j+cSS)
Sorry dude, any time I see "We'll win by losing", my bullshit alarm gets tripped.
Posted by: Paul at September 24, 2013 01:49 PM (JM48I)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 24, 2013 01:49 PM (LhvOs)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 24, 2013 01:50 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:50 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: Serious Cat at September 24, 2013 01:50 PM (UypUQ)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 05:46 PM (g1DWB)
Better than the end of One Crazy Summer?
Posted by: garrett at September 24, 2013 01:50 PM (nKFzF)
That's what this fight is really about I think ace. The Republicans are either too stupid or actually wish it to happen, but the base has been demoralized to the point where LIB and more appropriately MIB is becoming a real attractive option. We are more and more, seeing the Reagan years as a true anomaly, not likely to repeat themselves, and Goldwater being the rule.
Right now the base needs a reason not to actively assist with what appears to be the inevitable implosion of the US. Yes we will lose this fight. But we *might* get something out of it that we otherwise wouldn't have had. And that will show that we can fight. And we could fight and win, if only we had more seats.
It's not about this fight. It's about having the ability to fight.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Laughing Maniacally While Throwing Matches. at September 24, 2013 01:50 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:51 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: Paul at September 24, 2013 05:49 PM (JM48I)
A lot of battles that were lost allowed for the war to be won.
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 01:52 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:52 PM (j+cSS)
Fun game to play when out to eat with friends.
"You can have anything you want dear, anything at all. Of course, you know the rules - 20 minutes, max. before you need to go and throw it up."
Posted by: garrett at September 24, 2013 01:52 PM (nKFzF)
Posted by: Lizzie at September 24, 2013 01:52 PM (aYZp4)
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 05:52 PM (m2CN7)
I am sure you know the most famous.
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 01:52 PM (m2CN7)
Don't pass a CR. Let the panic attack and government shutdown start.
The House passes not another CR but an official budget. Go on TV and talk about how Harry Reid and the Democrats haven't passed a budget since...whenever. Budget at 2011 rates. Message as, families all across America have had to cut back as this recession has dragged on so why should Washington be any different?
So then it goes to the Senate and, what, we're right back where we are now where if the Senate passes the bill it goes to committee and gets marked up with all the stuff stripped out added back in by the Dems?
Fine, vote and fail it in the House. Surely Washington can survive at 2011 spending levels while so many Americans are out of work or have actually given up hope and dropped out of the workforce. Then pass another budget. Lather, rinse, repeat until the Dems blink. Go populist on their asses.
Crazy talk?
Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at September 24, 2013 01:53 PM (6WVi+)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:53 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 24, 2013 01:54 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:54 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: mrp at September 24, 2013 01:54 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at September 24, 2013 01:56 PM (0axsw)
The GOP deserves it. These fuckers were sent to DC to fight. I want to see them take concrete steps to reduce the governments power over the citizens. Starting with a law that requires Congress to obey any and all laws imposed on citizens. Abolish the IRS, institute a flat tax. Never produce a bill longer than 3 pages. True transparency. I'm done voting for people that won't even attempt to limit their own power.
Where is the politician that will talk about these things?
Posted by: TC at September 24, 2013 01:56 PM (ygAxO)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:57 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: mrp at September 24, 2013 05:54 PM (HjPtV)
Dude, those were all catastrophic defeats the Union won IN SPITE, not BECAUSE of. Or are you seriously suggesting letting Lee roflstomp his forces a few times was part of Lincoln's master plan?
Posted by: Paul at September 24, 2013 01:57 PM (JM48I)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 24, 2013 01:58 PM (T0Pku)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 01:58 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: Hurricane LaFawnduh at September 24, 2013 01:58 PM (pginn)
Posted by: mrp at September 24, 2013 02:01 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at September 24, 2013 02:01 PM (j+cSS)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 24, 2013 02:01 PM (n/+FT)
Where is the politician that will talk about these things?
Posted by: TC at September 24, 2013 05:56 PM (ygAxO)
Okay so you're done voting for those people. Are you going to begin to vote for the left or you just done voting?
Posted by: polynikes at September 24, 2013 02:02 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Lois Lerner has flabby titties at September 24, 2013 02:07 PM (IIIE8)
Posted by: Arbalest at September 24, 2013 02:08 PM (FlRtG)
Done. I've written to my rep and senators asking the simple question "What have you done to limit your own power during this term?"
I'm sure I'll get a reply any day now. Any politician who wants my vote has to at least attempt to limit their own power.
Posted by: TC at September 24, 2013 02:11 PM (ygAxO)
Posted by: TC at September 24, 2013 06:11 PM (ygAxO)
Well, it's fair to say that by choosing not to vote, you've done all you can to limit your own power.
Posted by: troyriser at September 24, 2013 02:12 PM (2jF2B)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 24, 2013 02:12 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 24, 2013 02:15 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 24, 2013 02:19 PM (MhA4j)
From what I have read thus far, Drucker is not a particularly biased reporter. (All reporters are biased but some more than others.) As for Sen. Paul, he has signaled he would vote "yes", then changed his mind. I can think of several reasons why but only he knows the reason.
@DavidMDrucker @JRubinBlogger He wasn't a "yes." But I felt comfortable writing that he was signaling such, based on his quotes.
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 24, 2013 02:29 PM (YjDyJ)
I wouldn't ask or want anyone to be quiet. Shout it from the rooftops- Obamacare is a disaster.
I just want our side to come down to reality, start thinking strategically, and to stop expecting the impossible then getting pissed off when they don't get it.
The enemy is on the other side of the isle.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 24, 2013 02:34 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: LauraC at September 24, 2013 02:41 PM (fXZDm)
The House passed H.Con.Res. 25 on March 21st.
Go on TV and talk about how Harry Reid and the Democrats haven't passed a budget since...whenever.
They finally passed one this year. The reason why there has not been a budget conference committee is because (1) Senate Democrats refuse to agree to the terms put forward by House Republicans and (2) Senate Republicans blocked Reid's request to form a budget conference committee.
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 24, 2013 02:46 PM (YjDyJ)
Posted by: REGGIEM at September 24, 2013 03:44 PM (qJN4i)
Posted by: GalosGann at September 24, 2013 03:52 PM (vW1n3)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at September 25, 2013 04:50 AM (B7iEg)
Posted by: BigTentNoMo at September 25, 2013 10:49 AM (QqFev)
Posted by: Seymour Butts at September 26, 2013 07:04 AM (ETaa8)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.257 seconds, 527 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: mallfly at September 24, 2013 12:38 PM (bJm7W)