May 16, 2013
— Ace The article isn't all that bad. In fact, if you read it, you'll generally agree with it.
That headline, though. The headline itself is bien pensant concern-trolling.
Why?
Because when someone tells you something that's perfectly obvious, and imputes to you ignorance of the perfectly obvious, it's a kind of passive-aggressive superiority move.
This is 75% the reason I despise leftists' concern-trolling-- it's not that I disagree that "racism is bad." It's that it's an insult for a leftist idiot to presume to tell me that, as I did not know, and am in need of his instruction on the matter.
I've got nothing against NR -- or not much, anyway -- but I also resent the lecturey, chiding tone of that headline.
So, anyway. Headline aside, the actual article isn't so bad. Especially as it's advice to Republican office-holders, who are, in fact, rather a dim lot, and may need some guidance.
We urge them to do so with vigor, but also with a keen sense of the limits of political scandal. Republicans must guard against the temptation to count on scandal to deliver election victories in 2014 and 2016.It is a lesson they should have learned in 1998. Republicans expected to make large gains in Congress that year but ended up losing five House seats and standing pat in the Senate. The problem was not so much that Republicans “overreached” in pursuing the impeachment of President Clinton, as the conventional wisdom has it. The Republicans that year did not really run on a promise to remove Clinton from office — or on any other agenda. Their strategy was to assume that the scandal would redound to their benefit, and that they merely had to sit back and let victory rain o’er them. It didn’t.
The current lot should not make the same mistake. Democratic scandal does not take the place of a Republican agenda. It does not reform the tax code or reduce the debt or ease regulatory burdens on small business. It cannot substitute for a strategy to replace Obamacare. By all means, Republicans should run against the president and his party — against their refusal to take the entitlement crisis seriously, against the implementation of their “train wreck” health-care law, and even against the unusually politicized executive-branch culture that contributed to the post-Benghazi cover-up. They should at the same time understand that a purely negative message, however justified, will not produce the governing majority Republicans should be aiming for in the next two elections.
I would caveat, though, that scandal is also important.
Policy-wonks dismiss scandal because it's not in their specialty wheelhouse of policy. But governance is not just policy -- it is also governance, that is to say, it is also management, and all the requirements of sound management, such as focus to detail, ethics, integrity, and honesty.
Why is it somehow "less" to knock the White House and the Democrats for failing at these things? Are they not important as well?
Policy matters, but so does personnel. And, let's recall -- policy is personnel.
Let's be honest here: 40% of the voters have no idea what policies are in play in any specific election, and 70% of them don't know the specifics of policies under consideration. We tend to know broad strokes.
I will not be shocking any of you when I confess I am a broad-strokes guy, myself.
So yes, I do wish to run on scandal, at least partially, because You cannot trust them is a very effective campaign theme, and has won more elections than any policy-based theme. Obama just ran on this theme in 2012. He didn't seem to have to offer a "positive agenda" himself.
In addition, a commenter -- I forget his name, but if you recognize your quote, speak up -- said something sort of profound last week. He said:
It's easier to get someone to change his mind than to get him to care in the first place.
People may poo-poo scandal as being less high-minded than policy dispute, but the fact of the matter is that an objection to someone's honesty, ethics, and sense of fairness will get more people to care than any discussion of policy.
Policy's important. Don't get me wrong. But I don't think policy is as important as policy wonks think it is, just as I don't think skill at written expression is as important as writers think it is, just as I don't think hammers are as important as the Big Nail thinks they are.
The fact of the matter is, no matter what the intellectually-oriented people might think or wish, politics is essentially dumb and played out between the groin and the top the of the ribcage.
Posted by: Ace at
01:16 PM
| Comments (194)
Post contains 802 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: tony redenzo at May 16, 2013 01:18 PM (Vodnq)
Posted by: The Q at May 16, 2013 01:20 PM (XQzGn)
Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a malignant traitor.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:20 PM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 16, 2013 01:20 PM (CkFoK)
Posted by: Bill Clinton at May 16, 2013 01:21 PM (vJ+mj)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:21 PM (+98Gb)
speaking of scandals...
they're dwindling, rapidly
We began the week with Gosnell, AP taps/leaks, Benghazi, and IRS scandals.
Gosnell scandal has already evaporated, and the IRS scandal is almost out of the news cycle completely.
Next to disappear without a trace is the AP scandal.
Posted by: soothsayer, now with 20% less ruth at May 16, 2013 01:21 PM (yhYn1)
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 16, 2013 05:18 PM (tVTLU)
We need to hope and pray that the Repubs have at least the attention span of gnats so that they don't get distracted as usual.
Oh look, a Republican candidate misquoted a phrase from the Bible bring out the circular firing squad(s).
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 16, 2013 01:21 PM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: hello, it's me Donna at May 16, 2013 01:21 PM (9+ccr)
The article isn't all that bad. In fact, if you read it, you'll generally agree with
Perhaps, but the title isn't just concern-trolling; in this case, it's wrong, too.
Scandal may not be policy, but promising to "clean house" certainly is. Running on an agenda of "The Government is obviously too big, too massive, and it must be cut down to size" is an agenda- and it's one I think more Amercians are open to now than they were two weeks ago.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:22 PM (/PCJa)
Sorry a bit OT, but this is 5 minutes old from Boston Herald:
The seven people who were allegedly trespassing at the Quabbin Reservoir in Ware early Tuesday are not tied to any other criminal activity, State Police said today.
How in the world can they know that? And neither were the Boston bombers. IT DOESN'T MATTER!!!
They wanted to look at the reservoir these people said. Can you even see anything at the dead of night? Which is when they were there.
Anyone familiar with this structure?
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 16, 2013 01:22 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: hello, it's me Donna at May 16, 2013 01:22 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 16, 2013 01:23 PM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:24 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: SpongeBob Saget at May 16, 2013 01:24 PM (epxV4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:24 PM (+98Gb)
I don't know, I kind of think the headline is perfect. Like you said, the GOP politicians are pretty stupid, in fact. And people are so caught up in the scandal, and have such a strong contempt for Obama and his despicable Chicago-style politics, that the scandals *are* the entire focus.
I agree with you that they should be the impetus behind and given political push at this moment, but: what exactly is the political push?
For example, I have not heard a single Republican talk about the IRS scandal and bridge into how this shows that the IRS should be abolished. Or even that we need broad tax reform.
Posted by: dan-O at May 16, 2013 01:24 PM (D0bIN)
Hrothgar:
Absolutely right. Thorough, not jumping to conclusions. But these are real scandals.
The lesson that the dweebs at fucking NRO don't seem to understand, is that most Americans don't give a shit if Clinton was stepping out on his wife. Who doesn't want some side action now and then.
But 4 dead Americans and sending no help and not picking up the phone. IRS targeting people.
Yeah, that's a big fucking deal and that is not excusable. That is pure abuse of power, not a moral failure. Americans forgive the latter. The former somebody needs to pay for.
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 16, 2013 01:25 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 16, 2013 01:25 PM (qyfb5)
Democrats are stupid too. They just don't care about it and their constituents applaud them for it. The media covers for them, so they're all good.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 16, 2013 01:25 PM (xmcEQ)
and the IRS scandal is almost out of the news cycle completely.
I don't think so. I could be wrong, but I do not think we've heard the last of that one. People are generally not accepting the "tendering his resignation" thing from fall-guys. They (including the Media) seem to know that the designated fall-guys either a) weren't actually responsible (Miller wasn't in that position when the events began) or b) couldn't have done it without someone higher approving (this new guy who's resigning).
This goes up to cabinet level at least, and pretty well everyone knows it.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:25 PM (/PCJa)
BEA.
ARTHUR.
NAKED.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 05:20 PM (+98Gb)
I saw the painting.......um......uh.......yeah......uh....
Posted by: © Sponge at May 16, 2013 01:25 PM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: harleycowboy at May 16, 2013 01:26 PM (yfeAd)
There were some exit polls that indicated that voters wanted a break from the constant Clinton drama
Posted by: kbdabear at May 16, 2013 01:26 PM (mCvL4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:26 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at May 16, 2013 01:26 PM (ZKzrr)
Hell...even Shep Smith was pissed off today.
Not just pissed. Outraged.
He was outraged at Barky, for dodging the question about "Did he know?"
When even Sheppie is outraged...this thing is not going away any time soon.
Posted by: wheatie at May 16, 2013 01:27 PM (y8LTw)
Posted by: Average Joe at May 16, 2013 01:27 PM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:27 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: scofflawx at May 16, 2013 01:27 PM (hcgfJ)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 16, 2013 01:27 PM (+x8q5)
Posted by: Dr Spank at May 16, 2013 01:28 PM (3+QKS)
Merovign,
Agreed 100%. But the nerds at NRO don't understand. They have it all fucking wrong. Americans didn't really like the GOP going full tilt against Clinton for fucking an intern.
These scandals are entirely different. And, if Americans know about this shit, the damage to the dems will be significant.
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 16, 2013 01:28 PM (tVTLU)
How the IRS scandal is unfolding is quite intriguing. The employees who actually did the illegal targeting will not lose their jobs, but a supervisor and a temporary acting commissioner take the axe.
Posted by: soothsayer, now with 20% less ruth at May 16, 2013 01:28 PM (FC8Yl)
The States fund the Federal government directly thereby restoring the principles of the 10th amendment and instituting State authority over the Federal government's budget.
Why that's just crazy talk.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:28 PM (/PCJa)
Wheatie:
hahahaha. Shep is one weird fucking dude. He looks like a cross between a groundhog and a mole or something.
Posted by: Prescient11 at May 16, 2013 01:29 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at May 16, 2013 01:29 PM (pxDth)
As for scandal not being policy, that may be true, but I can't say I've ever had a policy induced boner or bought pudding because of wonkish policy either.
Seeing the scalps of your enemies nailed to walls? Fapworthy. Every freaking time baby. Every time.
Posted by: @PurpAv at May 16, 2013 01:29 PM (/gHaE)
I'm betting they're planning to run with "Immigration Reform; Hispanics Are Natural Conservatives Who Want to Love Us!"
Posted by: kbdabear at May 16, 2013 01:29 PM (mCvL4)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at May 16, 2013 01:29 PM (NcPjb)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 16, 2013 01:29 PM (+x8q5)
Still, he gave Be a some nice aureolas.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 05:27 PM (+98Gb)
Agreed. I was wondering if that was a rendering or artist interpretation, cuz....a few beers...a bottle of Jack.....maybe?
Posted by: © Sponge at May 16, 2013 01:30 PM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Misanthropic humanitarian at May 16, 2013 01:30 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Lauren at May 16, 2013 01:31 PM (wsGWu)
Posted by: exceller at May 16, 2013 01:31 PM (RHEAo)
Posted by: Dr Spank at May 16, 2013 01:31 PM (3+QKS)
The drones need to be fired too to serve as examples of what happens when you act on illegal orders.
Posted by: @PurpAv at May 16, 2013 01:31 PM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 16, 2013 01:32 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: scofflawx at May 16, 2013 01:32 PM (hcgfJ)
Posted by: The Jackhole at May 16, 2013 01:32 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at May 16, 2013 01:32 PM (NcPjb)
But I don't think policy is as important as policy wonks think it is...
Ramesh Ponnuru hardest hit.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at May 16, 2013 01:33 PM (ZRmWD)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:33 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: zsasz at May 16, 2013 01:34 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Misanthropic humanitarian at May 16, 2013 05:30 PM (HVff2)
I think Republicans could get far on running against scandal and as the party of "No." But they have to make those positions into their agenda.
NO to ObamaCare and a Tax for simply being alive.
NO to leaving our Ambassador out to dry.
NO to using the agencies of Government to coerce, intimidate,and silence opposition.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:34 PM (/PCJa)
52 The employees who actually did the illegal targeting will not lose their jobs
The drones need to be fired too to serve as examples of what happens when you act on illegal orders.
---------
And prosecuted, too.
They will sing like canaries, about 'Who' told them to do it.
It's the only way to find out how high up this went.
Posted by: wheatie at May 16, 2013 01:34 PM (y8LTw)
Look, I agree that an optimal response is to pound away at ScandalGate and to advance policy positions on other matters as well. But given that Our Betters have yet to demonstrate an ability to chew gum, let alone walk while doing so, how about we focus on the fundamental attacks on the structure of the American republican form of governance first? M'kay?
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at May 16, 2013 01:35 PM (Gk3SS)
"West is married to Maya Harris, currently Vice President of the Ford Foundation in New York City. His sister-in-law is current Attorney General of California Kamala Harris" http://tinyurl.com/bja6zq5
Tony West http://tinyurl.com/aq63s2k
"President Obama gets heat for saying Kamala Harris is 'best looking attorney general,' while First Lady accidentally calls herself a 'single mother'"http://tinyurl.com/cx2n3gv
Posted by: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, at May 16, 2013 01:35 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: Axeman at May 16, 2013 01:35 PM (cAr2x)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:36 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: t-bird at May 16, 2013 01:36 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:37 PM (+98Gb)
Well...it's nice to see that you don't hold it against them for being a passel of hypocritical white whities
Posted by: Albie Damned at May 16, 2013 01:38 PM (Yhu4q)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 16, 2013 01:38 PM (rMcKn)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at May 16, 2013 05:35 PM (Gk3SS)
What does it say that a blog with people who do other things for a living can see this -and be pretty sure it would work- and our supposed "betters" in the Republican Party can't?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:38 PM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Soona at May 16, 2013 01:38 PM (TewEN)
Posted by: Skip Tracer at May 16, 2013 01:39 PM (2+bRt)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at May 16, 2013 01:39 PM (NcPjb)
Republicans are more likely to win with scandal than agenda. you'll get more people to run from a scandalous corrupt failed democratic regime than you will get people flocking to Republicans in the name of tax reform or easing regulatory burdens. in this day and age its the sizzle you have to sell, and scandal is sizzling baby.
Which reminds me....I like my political platforms the same way I like my steak and my women.
Lean and hot on the outside and pink in the middle.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at May 16, 2013 01:39 PM (ZRmWD)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:40 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at May 16, 2013 01:40 PM (GEICT)
A sex scandal like Bill Clinton's maybe doesn't lend itself to a positive Republican agenda. OK, I get that. But these particular Obama scandals do. In fact, they crystallize what should be our agenda:
1. Obamacare should be repealed because the IRS cannot be trusted to enforce it even-handedly, given what we've learned in the IRS scandal.
2. Big government needs to be rolled back because government bureaucrats cannot be trusted with that much power, as we've learned in the AP wiretapping scandal.
3. America needs to be take off the rose-colored glasses when it comes to the "Arab Spring," and be more conscious of protecting our citizens and diplomats from jihadists, as we learned in the Benghazi scandal.
Etc.
Posted by: The Regular Guy at May 16, 2013 01:40 PM (qHCyt)
Identification (ID) card
Age 59 and younger: new $16 Expires after six years (on your birthday)
Age 59 and younger: renewal $16 Expires six years after previous expiration date
Age 60 and older: new or renewal $6 Never expires
Replacement ID card $11 Current expiration date does not change
Replace a lost, stolen, or damaged ID card
Change address or name
Limited term ID card
For temporary visitors to the U.S. $16 Expires when period of lawful presence expires, or in one year if lawful presence period is “duration of status”
ID card for individuals registered under Chapter 62, CCP
New or renewal $21 Expires one year after previous expiration date
Yeah NOBODY can afford THAT. NOBODY.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 16, 2013 01:40 PM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:40 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:40 PM (/PCJa)
But when I checked my email, its prog news service was scrolling a story about his presser... anchored by the Marine umbrella-holding picture everybody's talking about instead.
I'm just going to enjoy this while it lasts before the camps gin up.
Posted by: Filly at May 16, 2013 01:40 PM (6XG5P)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 16, 2013 01:41 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: USA at May 16, 2013 01:41 PM (VIaw0)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:41 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at May 16, 2013 01:41 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: Barrel Sommelier at May 16, 2013 01:41 PM (fsA8A)
NRO is mostly a bunch of chickensh*t eggheads how have never done anything but write their entire lives ... only a handful of real jobs in their entire staffs background (I mean adult post college jobs) ...
no, I do not consider writing opinions a real job ... entertainment maybe ...
Posted by: JeffC at May 16, 2013 01:41 PM (A3tpD)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:42 PM (+98Gb)
Ace,
Policy's important. Don't get me wrong. But I don't think policy is as important as policy wonks think it is, just as I don't think skill at written expression is as important as writers think it is, just as I don't think hammers are as important as the Big Nail thinks they are.
The fact of the matter is, no matter what the intellectually-oriented people might think or wish, politics is essentially dumb and played out between the groin and the top the of the ribcage.
This is exactly correct. And it is why the GOP performs so badly against the DNC in politics. The GOP (and conservatives) are forever trying to run on policy issues and the DNC runs on things like "they'll kill old people", "they're racist", "they love the rich and hate the poor."
When was the last time any dem politician actually put forth any kind of real policy ideas in a campaign? I can't think of any. Obama certainly didn't in either campaign. they put forth emotion and they play hardball (it helps when the press backs you 100%) and they play dirty.
The GOP has not learned how to do any of that. Even the elections we have won, we have won mostly because the majority was sick of the other side. We took over congress in 1994 as a reaction to Clinton's attempt to nationalize health-care. Bush II won to a large extent because of Clinton scandal fatigue (if the public wasn't sick of the scandals, Gore would have won handily I think).
Part of this is branding. For the last 50 years, the DNC/media has been relentless at branding the GOP as rich, white homophobic, racist, mysognists who hate the poor. For a short span (1980 - 1992), the GOP was somewhat successful on the presidential level of branding DNC candidates as liberal tax and spenders, which is why liberals still run from the liberal label.
But, the GOP has never made any real effort to brand the DNC overall as the party of special interests, spending, wealth redistribution, abortion, etc. It seems to shy away from that kind of confrontation.
Thus, no matter how liberal a candidate we run for any office, they will be branded by the media/DNC as right-wing extremists (see Romney, McCain). While dems continue to get away with running candidates as "conservative".
Scandal comes into play big-time when branding the other side (remember how the DNC used scandals to re-take the house, branding the GOP as corrupt?). time to turn the tables and use all of these scandals to brand the DNC as essentially corrupt. the taint won't last forever (and b/c of the media won't be as successful as the DNC's efforts), but it will sway a bunch of the mushy middle in the next couple of cycles much more than diatribes on reforming the tax code will.
The GOP needs a nation wide marketing effort put forth on branding the DNC and its candidates as extremely left, partisan, spenders, taxers, etc.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at May 16, 2013 01:42 PM (sOx93)
Dick Trickle dead. Apparent suicide?
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 05:38 PM (+98Gb)
Story so far, he was in a cemetery.
Called 911 and told them to go to the cemetery because they'd find a dead body. HIS.
Either he was terminal and couldn't handle it....had a loved one die recently, or he was into some seriously freaky shit that was about to become public......
Posted by: © Sponge at May 16, 2013 01:42 PM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: zsasz at May 16, 2013 01:42 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 16, 2013 01:42 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 16, 2013 01:43 PM (rMcKn)
That one of the fundamental problems with politics is that those of us who can see such things recoil at the thought of being utterly destroyed should we try to move into a position to implement them?
I keep coming back to Mitch Daniels and what many of those here had to say about his personal life and his wife. That's what was coming from those who are friendly to his positions. I blanch to think of the savaging he would take from the Left. There is no way in Hell that I would ever, ever subject me and mine to an election. Never.
To be even more happy camper, I see no end of it. The politics of personal destruction works. Why would anyone abandon it?
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at May 16, 2013 01:43 PM (Gk3SS)
"Democratic scandal does not take the place of a Republican agenda."
But neither should the Democratic agenda be so scandalous.
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at May 16, 2013 01:43 PM (U+goV)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:43 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at May 16, 2013 01:43 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: AmishDude at May 16, 2013 01:43 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 05:21 PM
Cue a bunch of penny-loafer-wearing, tea-sipping effete "intellectuals" doing their best Wm. F. Buckley imitation (nose daintily in the air and a self-satisfied smirk): "We ah not ah-muuuused."
Posted by: MrScribbler at May 16, 2013 01:43 PM (mHrip)
Posted by: Dr Spank at May 16, 2013 01:43 PM (3+QKS)
Posted by: zsasz at May 16, 2013 01:43 PM (MMC8r)
$2.5M for THAT?
Posted by: zsasz at May 16, 2013 05:42 PM (MMC8r)
You should see my Helen Thomas painting
Posted by: First Year Art Student at May 16, 2013 01:44 PM (nTgAI)
That one of the fundamental problems with politics is that those of us who can see such things recoil at the thought of being utterly destroyed should we try to move into a position to implement them?
Thanks.
Where'd I put that razor...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:44 PM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Lauren at May 16, 2013 01:44 PM (wsGWu)
Posted by: Lauren at May 16, 2013 05:44 PM (wsGWu)
I must be getting desensitized.
I made it three whole sentences into that before I felt like puking.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:45 PM (/PCJa)
"It's easier to get someone to change his mind than to get him to care in the first place."
That was me.
Posted by: furious_a at May 16, 2013 01:45 PM (8lw4l)
Posted by: The Jackhole at May 16, 2013 01:45 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: USA at May 16, 2013 01:46 PM (VIaw0)
Posted by: RioBravo at May 16, 2013 01:46 PM (eEfYn)
I like this story in the Sidebar:
"Daily Mail: Men who are physically strong and have large penises are more likely to have right wing political views..."
Like I've always said...Conservative Men Are Just Hotter.
Posted by: wheatie at May 16, 2013 01:46 PM (y8LTw)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:46 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at May 16, 2013 01:46 PM (pxDth)
It has nothing to do with suppression, and everything to do with enabling fraud.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile at May 16, 2013 05:42 PM (qyfb5)
EXACTLY!!!
Where's my politician that will say that?
Where's the guy getting up on the senate or house floor saying:
"The reason Democrats don't want Voter ID is because of fraud. They benefit from it every time. Illegal aliens (THATS right, I SAID IT) tend to vote Democrat because of their stance on free stuff."
I'd vote for them for king.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 16, 2013 01:46 PM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Axeman at May 16, 2013 01:46 PM (cAr2x)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 01:47 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 16, 2013 01:47 PM (piMMO)
I read the whole thing.
Time to go home and drink a lot.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at May 16, 2013 01:47 PM (ZKzrr)
Cue a bunch of penny-loafer-wearing, tea-sipping effete "intellectuals" doing their best Wm. F. Buckley imitation (nose daintily in the air and a self-satisfied smirk): "We ah not ah-muuuused."
Posted by: MrScribbler at May 16, 2013 05:43 PM (mHrip)
You forgot to mention that they're holding the tea cup daintily between thumb and forefinger, and have their little fingers out.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 16, 2013 01:47 PM (IDSI7)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 16, 2013 01:47 PM (piMMO)
the "news" on my boob toob now:
-- stroller falls on tracks (rolls, not falls, because mother wasn't paying attention)
-- unexpected passenger (young deer crashed thru window of moving bus and then goes nuts inside the bus
and now, more OJ Simpson "news"
Posted by: soothsayer, now with 20% less ruth at May 16, 2013 01:47 PM (8dspl)
Posted by: Thunderb at May 16, 2013 01:47 PM (nH8jP)
Posted by: zsasz at May 16, 2013 01:47 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at May 16, 2013 01:48 PM (DVPta)
Posted by: Lauren at May 16, 2013 01:48 PM (wsGWu)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at May 16, 2013 01:48 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at May 16, 2013 01:49 PM (bYRF2)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 16, 2013 01:49 PM (rMcKn)
I made it three whole sentences into that before I felt like puking.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 05:45 PM (/PCJa)
I only made it half a sentence, then hit the scroll wheel.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 16, 2013 01:49 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Axeman at May 16, 2013 05:46 PM (cAr2x)
Whether you like it or not, most people (even my relatively well informed parents) thought the Clinton Impeachment was about his having sex with an intern.
Yes, it was hypocritical too- and the real reason was the suborning perjury and obstruction of justice- but people didn't care. They couldn't get outraged over Clinton having an afair.
So, whatever the truth was, the Remembered Truth is that "it was all about sex."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:50 PM (/PCJa)
Posted by: © Sponge at May 16, 2013 05:40 PM (xmcEQ)
That's what would be called, outside of politics, a "transparently dishonest argument."
It has nothing to do with suppression, and everything to do with enabling fraud.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile at May 16, 2013 05:42 PM (qyfb5)
Took my gram to the doc the other day. They took her picture like they do in the DMV, said it was now required by law. I innocently asked why they wouldn't just ask to see her driver's license and got treated to a diatribe of "it's not us, if you don't like it, ask the government".
Posted by: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, at May 16, 2013 01:50 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: PersonFromPorlock at May 16, 2013 01:50 PM (5hNpF)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 16, 2013 01:50 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: L, elle at May 16, 2013 01:50 PM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: brando at May 16, 2013 01:51 PM (IPGju)
Texas Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst called for a “full scale” investigation, releasing this statement: “In a week when serial murderer Kermit Gosnell was found guilty of killing babies, I read with disgust about the allegations of Houston-based abortionist Douglas Karpen performing illegal late term abortions surrounded by appalling sanitary conditions in his clinic.”
The district attorneyÂ’s office said its investigation began before the lieutenant governor demanded a probe.
Operation Rescue was alerted to the Houston physician through its “Abortion Whistleblowers Program” which offers a $25,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of an abortionist breaking the law.
Posted by: Thunderb at May 16, 2013 01:51 PM (nH8jP)
I blanch to think of the savaging he would take from the Left. There is no way in Hell that I would ever, ever subject me and mine to an election. Never.
Over the years, I've had a few people say I should run for office.
My stock response is that between the paper trail and rampant drug use, my nomination would never get off the ground. Which is largely true.
Fuck the fucking people. They've got the internet. They choose ignorance, I choose guns. We'll see who The Burning Times favours.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck: Barrelled 05/13 at May 16, 2013 01:51 PM (ZRmWD)
What happened in 1998 was that the GOP failed to parse how LIVs on the street would view the Lewinsky scandal and the prospect of impeachment.
The GOP perspective was that, hey, this is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, and he has provably perjured himself under oath in front of a federal grand jury, and that's a genuinely serious problem that we have to address.
Whereas your typical LIV's perspective was that, hey, this was a known horndog with an ugly cold-fish wife, said horndog having been getting a bit of strange to make up for an unsatisfactory marital bed, and this isn't worth all the time and trouble and fuss, and who could take these Republicans seriously that they think this is a big deal?
Sleeping around happens all the time in the lives of ordinary LIVs themselves, and they watch adultery-related fluff constantly on the cheesy talk shows that LIVs love. They don't find it an outrage. They find it mildly titillating at worst. They're not conceptually or intellectually equipped to deal with the legal and constitutional impact of Presidential perjury, so they ignore that part.
What I was further tearing my hair out about at the time was that the GOP was in no position to be perceived as pointing an accusatory finger at someone else's casual adultery.
There were, I warned, plenty of lingerie-clad skeletons waiting to come tumbling out of closets on the Republican side once the Palace Guard Media were to rush to Clinton's defense. Which is precisely what happened once the PGM dug up the dirt on Gingrich, Livingston, et cetera. Making the entire party look like sanctimonious hypocrites of the worst order.
Posted by: torquewrench at May 16, 2013 01:52 PM (gqT4g)
Posted by: AmishDude at May 16, 2013 01:52 PM (T0NGe)
But of course, my good fellow!
Still hope I live long enough to see some Conservative Thought Leader and Pundit display enough Dangling Courage Units to wake up and say: "Too much scandal, too many felonies, too much treason. It's time to impeach Choom Boy."
Yes, say it out loud. Never mind what the pantywaists in charge at Clownhall.com, Tepid Air and Rude State think of the "optics" or the Democrat buddyroos' opinions....
Posted by: MrScribbler at May 16, 2013 01:52 PM (mHrip)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 16, 2013 01:52 PM (rMcKn)
Posted by: Staff at May 16, 2013 01:53 PM (vJ+mj)
$2.5M for THAT?
Posted by: zsasz at May 16, 2013 05:42 PM (MMC8r)
I've got an exhibition of my own paintings coming up in August. My prices just went way up.
Posted by: troyriser at May 16, 2013 01:53 PM (vtiE6)
>>>Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 16, 2013 05:43 PM (rMcKn)
Well, fact is not an agenda, actually. An agenda, in this context, means some type of legislative/political goal. What is the goal right now?
I'm not sure people actually read the article, because nowhere does it say that the GOP should stop making such a big deal over the scandals. They don't say anything like that.
They are saying that these scandals should be used as momentum-builders for a conservative agenda.
A total a**shole once said: "never let a crisis go to waste". Well, he is right, and if all the capital gained from these scandals are simply spent on impeachment-masturbation, then we are letting this crisis go to waste.
Posted by: dan-O at May 16, 2013 01:53 PM (D0bIN)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 16, 2013 01:55 PM (rMcKn)
Posted by: Thunderb at May 16, 2013 01:55 PM (nH8jP)
Posted by: FART at May 16, 2013 01:55 PM (erQJO)
Posted by: Dave S. at May 16, 2013 01:56 PM (AoY8i)
Posted by: Lauren at May 16, 2013 01:57 PM (wsGWu)
I just figure if anything on there is ever worth reading, you guys will let me know.
Posted by: Filly at May 16, 2013 01:58 PM (6XG5P)
Affairs are only bad if Republicans have them.
Sad but true.
If you can't parlay this scandal into an argument about the merits of a limited, humble government then you aren't much of a politician.
Also true. The "sad but true" on this one is that the vast majority of Republican politicians can't do it.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 01:58 PM (/PCJa)
Posted by: dan-O at May 16, 2013 05:53 PM
Are you suggesting that the alternative is what we have now? Three-plus more years of sniggering, tittering and uttering profound polysyllabic criticism of the Choom Boy regime's minor violations?
We can follow up by making excuses for Boner and Rubio, while looking for the Good Parts of the amnesty bill, and wistful backward glances at the Good Old Days when we had a Constitution.
Posted by: MrScribbler at May 16, 2013 01:59 PM (mHrip)
The fundamental problem is that you see things through the prism of a politically aware, conservative blog commenter who spends time online almost exclusively among other politically aware, conservative bloggers and commenters.
They have to look at it from a political perspective. They don't have the luxury of turning up their noses at the notion of political ramifications.
What would greatly please readers of the AoSHQ blog would in most cases go over like a lead balloon with the electorate at large.
I'll say this again- you, me, and the rest of us in this thread represent a VERY SMALL MINORITY. The Internet makes that far too easy to overlook.
tl;dr- They don't do what you want them to do because it's usually bad political advice you're advocating.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 16, 2013 01:59 PM (SY2Kh)
If you can't parlay [these scandals] into an argument about the merits of a limited, humble government then you aren't much of a politician.
And that's the crux of it, ladies and gentlemen.
At the very least, we should be able to really dust up Obama with these scandals.
Posted by: soothsayer, now with 20% less ruth at May 16, 2013 02:00 PM (LPRBM)
Posted by: imp at May 16, 2013 02:00 PM (UaxA0)
They don't do what you want them to do because it's usually bad political advice you're advocating.
Funny. They keep doing it their way and losing, yet they're saying doing it our way (which they won't even try) would cause them to lose.
Hmmm...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at May 16, 2013 02:01 PM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Fritz at May 16, 2013 02:01 PM (G9Mmf)
Not really. The New Republic is always abbreviated as TNR. National Review has always been NR.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 16, 2013 02:02 PM (n/+FT)
“When you have a good scandal, one that has legs, you know what the underlying problem is,” Dean said. Benghazi fails that test, “and with no clear charge, the public is confused and bored and not terribly interested”
Posted by: Herbert Hymenhopper at May 16, 2013 02:05 PM (p8RjH)
A total a**shole once said: "never let a crisis go to waste". Well, he is right, and if all the capital gained from these scandals are simply spent on impeachment-masturbation, then we are letting this crisis go to waste.
EXACTLY. Well said.
I'll add that it needs to be in the context of what is politically plausible.
It doesn't matter how much you might like the idea of eliminating the IRS, instituting a flat tax, repealing Obamacare, etc.
It doesn't matter if you're right, correct, and I agree.
It's not going to happen while the Dems control the White House and Senate. No scandal will change that.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 16, 2013 02:06 PM (SY2Kh)
Fast and Furious, Solyndra, IRS, AP and other scandals are tailor made for highlighting the virtues of limited government. Not that the Republicans have more than a couple of office holders who would know how to take advantage of that.
Posted by: somebody else, not me at May 16, 2013 02:07 PM (29vnO)
Posted by: Dave S. at May 16, 2013 02:09 PM (erYRT)
156 The photos show babies that are huge, with gashes in their necks, indicating that these babies were likely born alive, then killed, just as Kermit Gosnell did at his ‘House of Horrors’ clinic in Philadelphia,” said Troy Newman, president of Operation Rescue. “In fact, there are numerous similarities between Karpen and the Gosnell case, including the disregarding of complaints by the authorities that allowed both men to continue their illegal operations.”
---------
Makes me wonder if there's a convention these guys go to in order to swap ideas and give awards to each other.
Posted by: Assault Citizen Anachronda at May 16, 2013 02:10 PM (xGZ+b)
Posted by: Lauren at May 16, 2013 02:19 PM (wsGWu)
Why don't our politicians talk about the stuff that people find ridiculous about government? Stuff they can understand? Just saying burdensome regulations hurts job growth means nothing. I can whip up a crowd in 10 minutes with this kind of stuff. I've read about these regs and they are truly insane. They're BIG GOVERNMENT gone wild.
Posted by: jeannebodine at May 16, 2013 02:23 PM (LBBS3)
“When you have a good scandal, one that has legs, you know what the
underlying problem is,” Dean said. Benghazi fails that test, “and with
no clear charge, the public is confused and bored and not terribly
interested”
Posted by: Herbert Hymenhopper at May 16, 2013 06:05 PM (p8RjH)
I dunno. Letting four good men die to cover for Hillary's incompetence and President Obama's dishonesty in re a resurgent Al Queda sounds like legs to me.
By the way, when making an argument from authority, John Dean is a questionable 'authority'.
Posted by: troyriser at May 16, 2013 02:23 PM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Ed at May 16, 2013 02:32 PM (KXcGC)
Posted by: troyriser at May 16, 2013 02:35 PM (vtiE6)
Posted by: MTF at May 16, 2013 02:35 PM (8V4jN)
TERM. LIMITS.
AND limit the amount of time one can be employed by the federal govt.
Seriously, massive, constant turnover. Get these fuckers out.
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at May 16, 2013 05:40 PM (GEICT)"
[\i]<\i>
No, that will probably make things worse. The problem is that there are a whole lot of permanent government workers in Washington and most of them are Democrats. In this case all they needed was to get the word from an unscrupulous pack of Democrats to abuse their government power to help Democrats win an election.
I don't think that there is any way to change the fact that most government workers are going to continue to be Democrats but we can change their behavior. Government workers like a nice safe job where they generally don't have to work all that hard, they have good benefits and they look forward to a pension. They are also normal middle class people so they are scared of going to prison.
Scare them with a credible threat that they will be fired and lose their retirement for obeying instructions to abuse government power for partisan political reasons. There should also be prison time in the penalties but that should only be necessary when they won't roll over on the next level up in the conspiracy.
The critical thing in these laws is that the statute of limitations has to be so long that the Democrat government workers will be sure that there will be a Republican in office at some point who will enforce the laws against them. I would either make the statute of limitations 50 years or just have no statute of limitations at all. That means that at some point a Republican can decide to reduce the head count of civil service government workers who cannot be fired by investigating and prosecuting them. Workers who did abuse their positions but who kept secret CYA "get out of jail" records can trade them for their pensions if they have enough to nail their supervisors. Supervisors can have the same deal if they have enough to nail somebody higher than themselves.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at May 16, 2013 02:41 PM (31Nrp)
Posted by: MTF at May 16, 2013 02:44 PM (xCh2P)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 16, 2013 02:52 PM (+98Gb)
Posted by: booger at May 16, 2013 03:09 PM (E1tcO)
Posted by: zsasz at May 16, 2013 04:12 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Lyndon Johnson at May 16, 2013 04:45 PM (vGJ+y)
Posted by: Deborah at May 16, 2013 05:58 PM (ouzwb)
Posted by: rockmom at May 16, 2013 07:18 PM (Ea7Up)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.369 seconds, 322 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Prescient11 at May 16, 2013 01:18 PM (tVTLU)