October 21, 2013
— Guest Blogger The Washington Examiner's Phillip Klein called (800) F1UCKYO (no, seriously) and it went about like you'd expect.
As the programÂ’s central website was under repair, Obama encouraged Americans seeking insurance to sign up the old-fashioned way by calling 1-800-318-2596.But when I tried calling the number and followed the prompts in what I deemed the most logical manner, I got referred back to the website Healthcare.gov and its live web chat feature.
It gets worse. If the person on the other end of the live web chat tries to assist in filling out a live application, they have to use the same broken Healthcare.gov site that sent you to the phone in the first place.
I read somewhere that there's also an option for them to take your information and mail you a paper form, but that it takes several weeks to arrive and obviously the comparison shopping part of the Internet-based system isn't going to work too well.
What strikes me about this, having worked in a healthcare business with significant online and call center operations in the past, is that you don't just take an action that dials up the call center volumes on a whim. There's no possible way they were staffed for this alternative, given the rose-colored glasses they've been looking at the whole project through to date, and there's sure to be a lot more of this:
Just called the number. They said there's too high call volume and call back on the weekend. "We're sorry for the inconvenience. Goodbye."
— Kasie Hunt (@kasie) October 21, 2013
Buh, bye.
And as far as the "tech surge" idea of bringing tech experts in to fix this disaster, Geraghty had this blurb in the Morning Jolt, and it's absolutely true:
NR cruiser Bruce Webster, professional analyst of big organizations and how they tackle complicated projects, writes in again:When I saw thisÂ…
The Obama administration Sunday said it’s called on “the best and brightest” tech experts from both government and the private sector to help fix the troubled website at the root of the Obamacare enrollment problems.…I immediately thought of this:
“Adding manpower to a late project makes it later.” — Brooks’s Law (first coined in The Mythical Man-Month by Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., back in 1975…
The two basic ideas behind Brooks’s Law are (1) the new people have to come up to speed on the project, and (2) you’ve just added an exponential number of new possible communication channels — from (N^(2)-N)/2 to ((N+M)^(2)-(N+M)/2, where ‘M’ is the number of new people added.
Translation: the problems are about to get worse, not better.
Link Added [ace]: I added the link to the Morning Jolt subscription page, which many of you already subscribe to, but if you don't, here's your chance.
One catch: It costs zero dollars.
Posted by: Guest Blogger at
10:00 AM
| Comments (285)
Post contains 487 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at October 21, 2013 10:02 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami - GO CARDS - WOOHOO!!! at October 21, 2013 10:02 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at October 21, 2013 10:03 AM (8JJ6O)
Frankly they should have set up a call center and hired a bunch of nerdowells to answer the phones/sign people up. Its jobs for the middle class!!!1
Posted by: Gaff at October 21, 2013 10:03 AM (jPS2y)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 21, 2013 10:04 AM (DmNpO)
Of course, for people with historical memories which last longer than fifteen minutes, the phrase "the best and the brightest" recalls an earlier era, when another Democratic administration put who they called "the best and the brightest" in charge of Vietnam policy. That didn't work out particularly well.
Posted by: torquewrench at October 21, 2013 10:04 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 21, 2013 10:05 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami - GO CARDS - WOOHOO!!! at October 21, 2013 10:05 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: rdbrewer at October 21, 2013 10:05 AM (Iyg03)
Posted by: Iblis at October 21, 2013 10:05 AM (9221z)
Posted by: Lauren at October 21, 2013 10:06 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 21, 2013 10:06 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at October 21, 2013 10:06 AM (da5Wo)
The two basic ideas behind Brooks’s Law are (1) the new people have to come up to speed on the project, and (2) you’ve just added an exponential number of new possible communication channels — from (N^(2)-N)/2 to ((N+M)^(2)-(N+M)/2, where ‘M’ is the number of new people added.
Translation: the problems are about to get worse, not better.
--------------------------------------------
Breaker breaker, Rubber Ducky! Looks like we got a confab!
Posted by: Soona at October 21, 2013 10:07 AM (yAvU2)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at October 21, 2013 10:07 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Andy at October 21, 2013 10:07 AM (CofEF)
As far as the government is concerned, this is a feature, not a bug.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at October 21, 2013 10:07 AM (knoK7)
So Obama urged people to call the 800 number which was busy and had someone gotten through the person on the other end has to use the same website that is so crappy??
Why is it that EVERYTHING this man touches turns to crap? I think the woman fainted at his presser due to the weight of his crap slinging.
Posted by: Cheri at October 21, 2013 10:08 AM (G+Wff)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at October 21, 2013 10:08 AM (XvrTA)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 21, 2013 10:08 AM (KvM9d)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at October 21, 2013 02:02 PM (8JJ6O)
No kidding. I had to go to the Social Security office a few years ago to get a new card. What did I notice? They were not even open for 8 hours a day, and they were only open 4 days a week. And you know, the time when most people that work that have to go there would be around lunch time. Which is when all but one of them was going on lunch.
Posted by: buzzion at October 21, 2013 10:08 AM (LI48c)
They figured they were only going to have to provide insurance for the smidgen of the populace without coverage, since Bamster said they could keep their coverage and whatnot. Worse, I think they still believe that.
Posted by: Bigby's Latex Gloves at October 21, 2013 10:09 AM (3ZtZW)
The lessons are almost 50 years old, yet every new generation of techies and management seems compelled to relearn them the hard way.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 21, 2013 10:09 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 21, 2013 02:06 PM"
I heard it was $640 million. But what I also heard on Mark Steyn's filling in for Rush is that noncompliance -- or simply paying the fine -- will be a felony and damage your credit rating.
Posted by: John the Libertarian at October 21, 2013 10:09 AM (/rhjC)
You own this, Obama. The next few months will be a continuing slow-motion crash. Just wish the GOP would take the opportunity to blast him for this.
Posted by: Lizzy at October 21, 2013 10:09 AM (JRmiD)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at October 21, 2013 10:09 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2013 10:10 AM (zZbNF)
Several readers with employer-sponsored insurance say their premiums are going up for 2014, and blaming Obamacare.
It's true that health reform is contributing to higher premiums and plan changes. But Obamacare, which is imposing new fees on companies and insurers starting in 2014, is not the driving factor, experts say. Health care costs are rising because the economy is improving so people are going to the doctor more.
An improving economy equals more doctor visits equals rising healthcare costs. That even making heads spin at Minitrue
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 21, 2013 10:10 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Captain Hate on his iPhone at October 21, 2013 10:11 AM (qwZG1)
Posted by: torquewrench at October 21, 2013 02:04 PM (gqT4g)
-----------------------------------------
Ah, yes. The McNamara gang, headed up by their fearless micro-leader LBJ.
Posted by: Soona at October 21, 2013 10:11 AM (yAvU2)
I don't believe that. I read the law, all of it, a couple of years ago, and saw no such wording.
Cite the section
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 21, 2013 10:11 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: buzzion at October 21, 2013 02:08 PM (LI48c)
Did you know you can do all of that over the internet and over the phone? I signed up to draw SS this year all over the internet.
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2013 10:11 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: Meghan McCain at October 21, 2013 10:12 AM (XvrTA)
Posted by: Guest Commenter at October 21, 2013 10:12 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Lizzy at October 21, 2013 02:09 PM (JRmiD)
They're busy focusing on the what they really care about and who is a threat to them. Holding onto their power and Ted Cruz.
Posted by: buzzion at October 21, 2013 10:12 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: Purp at October 21, 2013 02:11 PM (l5zzX)
As I said, I heard Mark Steyn make this claim, but no one said it with any certainty.
Posted by: John the Libertarian at October 21, 2013 10:12 AM (/rhjC)
Posted by: Adjoran at October 21, 2013 10:12 AM (473jB)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 21, 2013 10:13 AM (sByIH)
Posted by: Lizzy
A few have such as Cruz, Lee, Paul. The rest of the Old GOP just sit around and pubicly criticize them. McCain, McConnell, King, etc. are worse than worthless, they seem to actively go against these true conservatives feeding power to the left.
Posted by: Cheri at October 21, 2013 10:14 AM (G+Wff)
Well that will be awesome, since being a felon blocks you from firearms ownership and in most places makes you unable to vote.
Posted by: Lemmenkainen, Freelance Warlord at October 21, 2013 10:14 AM (ZWvOb)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 21, 2013 10:14 AM (SY2Kh)
They need to actually cut the number of people with hands on on this project and get some expert analysts to look at where they went wrong in design.. then design a path to fixing it.. then you can start thinking about coding.
What a clusterf*ck...
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 21, 2013 10:14 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2013 02:11 PM (zZbNF)
This was to get a new card. And I don't think they were doing the internet sign ups at the time.
Posted by: buzzion at October 21, 2013 10:14 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2013 02:10 PM (zZbNF)
---------------------------------------------------
Yup. My co-pay remains basically the same, but the premiums that I'm paying went up 125% and the deductable went from $500 to $2000.
Thank you, Ocare.
Posted by: Soona at October 21, 2013 10:15 AM (yAvU2)
The corollary to this is at the other end of the spectrum. To wit, that the fewer people you have on a project, the more efficient internal processes and communications then become.
The legendary Kelly Johnson of Lockheed, who developed stunning technological breakthroughs such as the SR-71 Blackbird in total secrecy, on time and on budget, did so with what he termed a "skunk works" engineering team.
Johnson in later life published a brief set of rules for successfully managing a Skunk Works. Including this:
"The number of people having any connection with the project must be restricted in an almost vicious manner. Use a small number of good people (10% to 25% compared to the so-called normal systems)."
Of course, such management methods run completely counter to the way that things are done in contemporary Washington, D.C.
Inside the Beltway, the natural incentive is to increase headcount as much as possible, to then be able to argue that the program is "major" in size and not to be casually trifled with at budget time. More snouts in the trough mean more support.
And, the federal diversity _zampolits_ insist that all development teams must tick every box on a long demographic list. Don't need a transgendered Albanian? You get to hire one anyway and have them in every planning meeting.
Oh, you've been given some people who are not "good people" per Skunk Works rules, i.e., not technically competent? They're unfireable, like everyone else in the federal monolith. Make do as best you can with them.
Posted by: torquewrench at October 21, 2013 10:15 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Bufalobob at October 21, 2013 10:16 AM (r8ENS)
Posted by: Captain Hate on his iPhone at October 21, 2013 10:16 AM (qwZG1)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 21, 2013 10:16 AM (2up3Q)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 21, 2013 10:17 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: maddogg at October 21, 2013 10:17 AM (xWW96)
"Non-essential" federal employees (such as EPA*) left hanging by government shutdown = the worst thing ever/Republican hostage-taking. Give them muffins and a raise, stat!
Regular citizens, including some of our poorest left hanging by government screw-up (seriously, call back next week!?!?!?) = a system with a few minor glitches that actually exceeds some expectations. Let them hang but still threaten IRS action if they can't get healthcare in time.
Posted by: Lizzy at October 21, 2013 10:17 AM (JRmiD)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Redneck Queen of Tea Party, Eleventy District at October 21, 2013 10:17 AM (baL2B)
Posted by: Lauren at October 21, 2013 10:17 AM (ELdpj)
are going to the doctor more.
...going to the REMAINING doctors more...
If you look at the Daily Job cuts web site regularly, its clear that there's a massive jobs bloodbath going on all over the country in medical services.
Ogabecare makes hospitals more quality rather than volume oriented via fines and penalties for re-admissions, so naturally any staff there to handle volume is going to be shed.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 21, 2013 10:17 AM (l5zzX)
>>But what I also heard on Mark Steyn's filling in for Rush is that
noncompliance -- or simply paying the fine -- will be a felony and
damage your credit rating.
.
.
.That's not true, well at least for now. I do not know where that rumor is coming from.
Posted by: Registered Voter at October 21, 2013 10:17 AM (xqjwP)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at October 21, 2013 10:18 AM (rrokN)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 21, 2013 10:18 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at October 21, 2013 10:18 AM (rXcBX)
Posted by: Soona at October 21, 2013 10:19 AM (yAvU2)
This is just another albatross that will be hanging around his neck when he's out of the White House... but his followers will look at it as another one of his "crowning achievements".
Posted by: Pimp Daddy Welfare at October 21, 2013 10:19 AM (Jls4P)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at October 21, 2013 10:19 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 21, 2013 10:19 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Bufalobob at October 21, 2013 10:19 AM (r8ENS)
Posted by: Roy at October 21, 2013 10:20 AM (VndSC)
http://www.socialsecurity.gov/ssnumber/
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2013 10:20 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: Registered Voter at October 21, 2013 02:17 PM (xqjwP)
--------------------------------------------
That's a rumor that could catch fire. I say let's stoke it.
Posted by: Soona at October 21, 2013 10:20 AM (yAvU2)
.........
doubt it.. DOD doesn't do high-volume transaction oriented web sites..
I would look to someone like Amazon or Zappos or one of the other really big web presences.
What killed these idiots is forcing (late in the game) the user to register and give their personal info so the pages could calculate their subsidy into the jacked-up prices for premiums.
That means NO static web pages to simply present the info.. that woulda been a snap.
But now, each page is dynamic, calculating costs for that individual.. a nightmare with that volume.. not impossible.. but it shoulda been designed from the start with that feature. There are a dozen different ways you could present those calculated totals, and they probably chose the most inefficient one.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 21, 2013 10:20 AM (f9c2L)
Go to a 404Care web site that doesn't work, where you are then directed to call a 1-800 number that doesn't work, where you are then directed back to the 404Care site that doesn't work...
repeat until you become an Obamabot.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 21, 2013 10:20 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: maddogg at October 21, 2013 10:21 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Meghan McCain
Needs more "youknow", "um", like", and "really" to be believable.
GNOME I SAYIN'?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 21, 2013 10:21 AM (cb5D2)
"Number 267543. Number 267543."
*chews gum, blows bubble, fiddles with SEIU badge on necklace*
"Number 267543. Next window."
Posted by: ObamaCare Navigator at October 21, 2013 10:22 AM (wAQA5)
Emanations and penumbras?
Posted by: torquewrench at October 21, 2013 10:22 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Joe at October 21, 2013 10:22 AM (7pOq5)
Posted by: Roy at October 21, 2013 10:22 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at October 21, 2013 10:22 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: thunderb at October 21, 2013 10:23 AM (zOTsN)
If you liked Medicare Part D, wait until you see Obamacare Part D:
Part A- Log in to Healthcare.gov website
Part B- Call in to phone bank service center
Part C- Request a paper application by mail
Part D- Put message in bottle, throw into the ocean, wait patiently.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at October 21, 2013 10:23 AM (N/Sup)
The HealthCare.gov website directed me to call 1-800-867-5309 and to ask for Jenny.
Posted by: Roy at October 21, 2013 10:23 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Mindy at October 21, 2013 10:23 AM (ZrNcx)
Posted by: Guest Commenter at October 21, 2013 10:23 AM (ujMoa)
In my experience (I've programmed some very well-known software for 20 years) techies understand and believe TMMM fine. It's management who think that if I'm doing great work in time X, then adding 3 people will produce the same great work in time X/4. They probably also believe that 9 women can have a fully-grown baby a month after conception.
Posted by: Ian S. at October 21, 2013 10:23 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: eman at October 21, 2013 10:24 AM (AO9UG)
seriously
I have never met a prog who did not describe themselves as an activist, even if their "activism" was confined to ruining family gatherings
Posted by: thunderb at October 21, 2013 10:24 AM (zOTsN)
With customer service like this, they are going to lose all of their customers to a competitor.
Oh, I see.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 21, 2013 10:25 AM (HJ9LB)
Posted by: Screeching Leftist Harpy at October 21, 2013 10:25 AM (vd7A8)
Posted by: eman at October 21, 2013 10:25 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Purp at October 21, 2013 02:09 PM (l5zzX)"
I think that it is more like - in every generation there are some people who are so arrogant that they refuse to learn from the experience of others and demand to make the same mistakes for themselves.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at October 21, 2013 10:25 AM (q1sF4)
Posted by: Guest Commenter at October 21, 2013 10:26 AM (ujMoa)
I expect to enjoy this farce, although I would enjoy it more if it were happening in someone else's country.
Posted by: Jerome at October 21, 2013 10:26 AM (eQa5p)
Posted by: No Information Progressive at October 21, 2013 10:27 AM (bKA83)
Both were fabulously successful and very inexpensive compared to normal projects. Their performance in the market way outstripped the modest development costs.
Both started out as "off book" employee instigated guerrilla efforts and stayed that way for several months until it was painfully obvious they were producing results far in excess of the staff working on them. Of course, once it was clear these were gonna be winners, all the droids wanted in on them
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 21, 2013 10:27 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 21, 2013 10:27 AM (MhA4j)
Translation: the problems are about to get worse, not better.
Good. Fuck them all in the squeakhole.
And by the way, can we stop calling this the ACA? It's Obamacare. It's what the dog-eating crackhead jammed down our throats, so we should rub it in the faces of every one of his LIV jackholes.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at October 21, 2013 10:27 AM (zF6Iw)
Your tax penalty (shared responsibility fee) for not having insurance is paid on your taxes at the end of the year. If your taxable income is below 133% of the FPL you are exempt from this tax.
2014 = $95 per person per year or 1% of your Income
2015 = $325 per person per year or 2% of your Income
2016 = $695 per person per year or 2.5% of your Income
2017 = Tax Penalty will increase by the rate of inflation going forward, or 2.5% of your Income
• The penalty is based on modified adjusted gross income.
• The total penalty for the taxable year cannot exceed the national average of the annual premiums of a bronze-level health insurance plan offered through the health insurance marketplaces.
• The maximum penalty per family is capped at no more than 300% of the minimum penalty (e.g. $695 x 300% = $2,085)
• Children under 18 are assessed at 50% of the minimum penalty.
• The penalty is pro-rated for the number of months you are without
health insurance, though there is no penalty for a single gap in
coverage of less than 3 months in a year.
• Health insurance plans will provide proof of coverage for their
customers so as long as you have health insurance you don't have to
worry about the details.
So if you make $70K/year your penalty is $700 for 2014 but it goes up after that greatly.
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2013 10:27 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at October 21, 2013 10:28 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Guest Commenter at October 21, 2013 10:28 AM (ujMoa)
Not to mention "produced by 55 different contractors."
Posted by: Splunge at October 21, 2013 10:28 AM (bKA83)
>>>I called the Atlanta Braves ticket line on October 1st:
"Baseball season is over. Check back in April. Good bye."<<<
I got the same message calling the Chicago Cubs ticket line in August.
Posted by: Roy at October 21, 2013 10:29 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: J Bush at October 21, 2013 10:29 AM (l3RZ9)
Posted by: imp at October 21, 2013 10:29 AM (L9AnB)
108 How the tax penalty works
Do you really think the tax penalty will continue once Mr. Sensitive is gone? These are politicians who are in business to make their electorate happy. They are going to tell their citizens they must be punished?
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at October 21, 2013 10:30 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Mainah at October 21, 2013 10:30 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 21, 2013 10:30 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Roy at October 21, 2013 10:31 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 21, 2013 10:31 AM (sByIH)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 21, 2013 10:31 AM (KvM9d)
>>>I called the Atlanta Braves ticket line on October 1st:
"Baseball season is over. Check back in April. Good bye."<<<
I got the same message calling the Chicago Cubs ticket line in August.
Posted by: Roy at October 21, 2013 02:29 PM (VndSC)
*****
ditto, Colorado Rockies, May 16th
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at October 21, 2013 10:31 AM (N/Sup)
Posted by: eman at October 21, 2013 10:31 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Conservative Crank at October 21, 2013 10:32 AM (sQ0LB)
Obama just announced that he is hiring the Pixy software team to fix the healthcare website.
#twoweeks
Also, ampersands.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 21, 2013 10:32 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Fritz at October 21, 2013 10:32 AM (UzPAd)
“Is it really true that no one saw through this,” he asks, “in an article that was cited 350 times, in a field which touts itself as being so scientific?”
Posted by: Loron Thomas at October 21, 2013 10:33 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 21, 2013 10:34 AM (sByIH)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 21, 2013 10:34 AM (0HooB)
(a) Weak executive picks a team of incompetent yes-men subordinates.
(b) Weak executive comes up with a silly, overcomplicated plan.
(c) Incompetent subordinates accept plan because they're too dumb to realize it isn't actually feasible to implement.
(d) Plan fails.
(e) Weak executive bitterly blames subordinates instead of blaming the root cause, because the actual root cause is of course the weak executive himself.
(f) Subordinates are ceremonially scapegoated and fired, leaving weak executive in place. Weak executive hires a new set of incompetent subordinates and comes up with another incomprehensible, unimplementable plan. Lather, rinse, repeat.
The Obamacare fustercluck has now progressed to stage (e). I figure we are going to see the scapegoating ceremonial firings soon. It's going to be VERY interesting if and when those fired people start talking.
We may see the underlings get spirited away into quiet sinecures elsewhere in the bowels of the institutional left. Giving them a comfortable exit route in exchange for their silence. But if they don't get with the plan and if they fail to clam up, oh boy, that will be fun.
Posted by: torquewrench at October 21, 2013 10:34 AM (gqT4g)
>>Yeah, but cows have an attitude problem.
.
.Not those happy California cows. I used to see them on the TV all the time, so they have plenty of time on their hands now..
Posted by: Registered Voter at October 21, 2013 10:35 AM (xqjwP)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 21, 2013 10:35 AM (sByIH)
Posted by: MSM at October 21, 2013 10:36 AM (XvrTA)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 21, 2013 10:36 AM (vd7A8)
Breaking: HHS Secretary Sebelius to testify before a congressional panel on #Obamacare #PJNET
"What difference, at this point, does it make!!! SQUAAAAWK!!"
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 21, 2013 10:36 AM (cb5D2)
Posted by: Chris Matthews at October 21, 2013 10:36 AM (sWgE+)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 21, 2013 10:36 AM (sByIH)
It was pretty easy to see this coming if you recall all those fake solar company bankruptcies that were just payoffs to these corrupt bastard's friends.
Same with the website.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 21, 2013 10:37 AM (N8z9m)
I come across Brooks Law when dealing with my defense attorneys. Law firms that deal in Workers Compensation law find that they have more than usual turnover because its kind of the entry level of law practice or that the file can be handed off frequently between attorneys in the firm.
As such, some try to sneak in billing for review of the file when it touches new hands. Unless its unusual circumstances , I don't pay for that.
Posted by: polynikes at October 21, 2013 10:37 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)--also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 21, 2013 10:38 AM (659DL)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at October 21, 2013 10:38 AM (da5Wo)
-------
I spoke to an Obamacare service rep, and I think the process of getting prices takes several weeks. At best, mind you.
They send you an app, or you download it, and you fill it out, mail it in. They submit to the insurance companies, and then send you back pricing info. Including, the rep said, your subsidy level, if applicable.
I seriously doubt that time estimate takes into account mailing delays, processing delays, etc. It also assumes a clean app right from the start, which isn't going to happen very often. I have no idea how they think they'll deal with defective applications. Usually you have an insurance agent to keep on top of stuff like this, but that's obviously not going to happen with self-service apps. I think the answer is that they have to answer for defective applications.
Also, an under-reported problem with the online process: when you complete the app online, the last thing that has to happen is that the website verifies your identity. I completed the application, but the ID-verification failed.
I called in, and the rep got a conference call with Experian, which is providing the ID-verification service. The Experian rep said they couldn't verify my ID because they *hadn't received the request from Healtchare.gov*. She went on to say the Experian wasn't receiving files in almost every case.
This makes me think that the number of people who have successfully seen pricing, let alone enrolled, is exceptionally low.
Posted by: Andrew at October 21, 2013 10:39 AM (cq0FO)
Wanna bet they haven't kept their design docs, test plans, etc. up to date because they were too busy implementing last minute changes? Those "best and brightest" are going to waste A LOT of time trying to figure out what's been done before they start to fix.
Posted by: Lizzy at October 21, 2013 10:39 AM (JRmiD)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at October 21, 2013 10:39 AM (LDdOY)
Posted by: alexthechick - Commence drinking now. at October 21, 2013 10:39 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 21, 2013 10:39 AM (ZPrif)
The classic sequence of events under weak executives is this:
(a) Weak executive picks a team of incompetent yes-men subordinates.
Alternate: Underlings, "This is bullshit."
Yes-Men Subordinates, "This promotes growth and should be good."
You know the rest of the story.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 21, 2013 10:39 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 21, 2013 10:39 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 21, 2013 10:40 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 21, 2013 10:40 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Fritzworth at October 21, 2013 10:40 AM (7svyX)
There's a right way to do this and it involves a LOT of egg on Obama's face. Which is why they won't do the right thing.
Posted by: grognard at October 21, 2013 10:40 AM (/29Nl)
Rock your world, it will: Confirm what you thought you knew, and more
and yeah, I yada yada yada-ed Obamacare. So should we all
Posted by: Jerry Jack in Jacksonville, maintaining a simulacrum of normality at October 21, 2013 10:40 AM (omBWL)
Posted by: polynikes at October 21, 2013 10:41 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 21, 2013 10:41 AM (vd7A8)
It's whatever they want it to be, peons!
Posted by: Lizzy at October 21, 2013 10:41 AM (JRmiD)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 21, 2013 10:42 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at October 21, 2013 10:42 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Catmman at October 21, 2013 10:42 AM (C8XlI)
Stages and specific categories of people.
Posted by: polynikes at October 21, 2013 10:42 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 21, 2013 10:42 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2013 02:10 PM (zZbNF)
Which, of course, means it's not really your old plan, is it?
Posted by: Conservative Crank at October 21, 2013 10:43 AM (sQ0LB)
William Casey got a fatal brain cancer or something a day or two before he was supposed to spill the beans on Iran-contra...
...these things happen in D.C.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 21, 2013 10:43 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 21, 2013 10:43 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 21, 2013 10:43 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 21, 2013 10:44 AM (U2UQk)
What Obama likes on his face is definitely not egg.
Posted by: Ian S. at October 21, 2013 10:44 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at October 21, 2013 10:44 AM (LDdOY)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)--also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 21, 2013 10:44 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Dan at October 21, 2013 10:44 AM (m3gf3)
Posted by: butch at October 21, 2013 10:44 AM (0APJ3)
"Wanna bet they haven't kept their design docs, test plans, etc. up to date because they were too busy implementing last minute changes?"
One of the funniest things I can recall is when the University of East Anglia (arch-global-warming-fantasists) had the source code for their computer climate models be leaked.
It was instantly clear upon reading the comments that the in-house software developers (not the climate 'scientists') thought the code base was junk and the underlying data sets were completely unfit for purpose. Scathing language. Oh, and there did not appear to have been any design documentation or version control either.
Posted by: torquewrench at October 21, 2013 10:44 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Roy at October 21, 2013 10:44 AM (VndSC)
The world and especially all of us here in Peruvia are relieved!
Posted by: gracepmc at October 21, 2013 10:45 AM (rznx3)
Posted by: Andrew
............
Not only that, but the income level you enter to enroll has not been verified. How much you wanna bet the income most people enter will be wrong, given the number of "incomes" on a W-2 and/or a 1040 form.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 21, 2013 10:45 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: RWC - G.R.O.S.S. Member at October 21, 2013 10:45 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Joe at October 21, 2013 10:45 AM (7pOq5)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at October 21, 2013 10:45 AM (89oiB)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)--also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 21, 2013 10:45 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Berserker-Dragonheads Div at October 21, 2013 10:46 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at October 21, 2013 10:46 AM (LDdOY)
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at October 21, 2013 10:46 AM (l0lja)
Morons and Moronettes are some of the smartest people I know. There are references here on a daily basis that your average man on the street will never know.
Posted by: Ian S. at October 21, 2013 10:47 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: Count de Monet at October 21, 2013 10:47 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)--also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 21, 2013 10:47 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 21, 2013 10:47 AM (vd7A8)
the object is not to fix it
the object is to "appear" to fix it
and then the goal is to fail
scrap it
single payer baby!!!
Posted by: thunderb at October 21, 2013 10:47 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 21, 2013 10:47 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: © Sponge at October 21, 2013 10:48 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)--also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at October 21, 2013 10:48 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 21, 2013 10:48 AM (oFCZn)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 21, 2013 10:48 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 21, 2013 10:48 AM (ZPrif)
>>This makes me think that the number of people who have successfully seen pricing, let alone enrolled, is exceptionally low.<<
I was able to see premiums by plan for my county, but nothing about the co-pay/deductible other than the basic 60/40, 70/30, ...
The stuff isn't cheap, unless you get a big subsidy.
Posted by: Roy at October 21, 2013 10:48 AM (VndSC)
That is why I get exasperated when I hear techies moan about the doooom of global warming. Those climate models make Minx look like quality software.
Posted by: Ian S. at October 21, 2013 10:48 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 21, 2013 10:49 AM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 21, 2013 10:49 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky
I actually read some lib's claim that the only reason this website has problems is that conservatives were getting on the site to jam it up. Seriously.
Posted by: Cheri at October 21, 2013 10:49 AM (G+Wff)
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at October 21, 2013 10:49 AM (l0lja)
What Obama likes on his face is definitely not egg.
Though it is white, runny and full of protein.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at October 21, 2013 10:50 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Catmman at October 21, 2013 10:50 AM (C8XlI)
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 21, 2013 10:51 AM (MhA4j)
I am pretty sure they gave different sections of the software to different people, but they didn't have any coordination or testing of how the software worked together. They're gonna have to start over.
But really, how hard is it to make a website for people to voluntarily give you their most personal information. The nigerian scammers do it everyday.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 21, 2013 10:51 AM (N8z9m)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 21, 2013 02:43 PM (t3UFN)
*
...And she appeared to be pregnant.
Yeah...she's Obama smart.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 21, 2013 10:51 AM (wmU4G)
"Successful president seeks software engineers. (Washington, DC)
You will be working on the best healthcare portal in the world! You will be in charge of coding and bug testing the customer interface and make sure everyone gets their subsidies they qualify for.
Skills and requirements:
GED or better in computer science
Democrat voter registration
A "small" donation to your local DNC office
Location: Washington, DC.
It is not ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests.
Posted by: EC at October 21, 2013 10:51 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: torquewrench at October 21, 2013 02:15 PM (gqT4g)
The US Navy has a system the tracks all repairs, for every piece of equipment.... symptoms, what part... and WHO fixed it...
I was really bored one cruise and started to run the numbers on my Electronics suite.. (I had access to Spruance Class Destroyer data)....
It turned out that 10% of the Techs, FIXED 87% of the Problems.... others were either inefficient, or did paperwork...
Up till then, I thought the 90/10 rule was a myth....
So at my next command.... I figured out who the 10% were... and used them as trainers for the rest... end result? one of the best electronic shops in the fleet...
But it only worked because the 10% were picked by Result... not how good their uniform looked....
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 21, 2013 10:51 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: thunderb at October 21, 2013 02:47 PM (zOTsN)
When we finally get the single payer catastrophic, we need to insist on one of the provisions popular with the auto and home insurance markets...
Total loss.
Give people the option of accepting a check up to certain limits in lieu of the healthcare provider giving treatment, except for pain and comfort.
Let the individual decide when it's time to call it quits.
Posted by: jwest at October 21, 2013 10:52 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: eman at October 21, 2013 10:52 AM (AO9UG)
@197 Paging Capt. Obvious, white courtesy phone. Capt. Obvious, white courtesy phone, please.
--------------
Racist!
Posted by: junior at October 21, 2013 10:52 AM (UWFpX)
Coders can generate bugs much faster than QA can find them.
Unfortunately, most organizations reverse that ratio and suffer the consequences
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 21, 2013 10:53 AM (l5zzX)
The tried-n-true government solution. Right after "burn a dump-truck load of money."
Posted by: RoyalOil at October 21, 2013 10:53 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 21, 2013 10:54 AM (sByIH)
Posted by: thunderb at October 21, 2013 10:54 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 21, 2013 10:54 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 21, 2013 10:54 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 21, 2013 10:54 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at October 21, 2013 10:55 AM (l0lja)
But it only worked because the 10% were picked by Result... not how good their uniform looked....
Results, merit, actual job performance: I'll take "What are three things Washington DC knows nothing about for $1000, Alex."
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 21, 2013 10:55 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: RWC - G.R.O.S.S. Member at October 21, 2013 10:55 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: eman at October 21, 2013 10:56 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Guest Commenter at October 21, 2013 10:56 AM (ujMoa)
Most people don't consciously want to do a shitty job. Often, they just need to be shown what a good job looks like.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 21, 2013 10:56 AM (l5zzX)
Now DC is littered with big, massive failed tech projects, FAA ATC, and the FBI case management system to name a few - but they never got extensive news coverage.
But thanks to Barry....we get the perfect storm.
People are so gullible, (thanks to the media) Obama was sold was the 'tech savvy" President because he used a blackberry and had a campaign team that created a successful data profiling strategy. (His team used Amazon Web Services to host the infrastructure...not "old tech" or HHS type thinking.)
Man-Month is spot on, lets talk about all the points being missed by journalists who know even less about technology than economics.
1. "data from several data basses": I would bet the number of data sources used by the system is at least a few thousand. So you have all the problems to getting uncorrupted data "from and to" the data hub, the browser and to the insurance company systems. You have issues like taxnomy, master data management, that are complex within a large business, I can't imagine the discovery and coordination required to make this work correctly across that many sources - even with existing standards.
2. "best and brightest" - you won't find them at most SI's or anywhere in government (except at NSA ?) but at google, amazon, games companies or start-ups scattered on the left coast or perhaps Texas. Who will you turn too, will amazon or apple just loan you a bunch of people. No, you will just be shipping more people with the same skill sets, imagine all the meetings to plan more meetings, to discuss what changes need to be made.
3. "Fixing one problem often creates another", self explanatory to anyone who has worked in software.
4. "Weeks to fix", Definitely not, I would opine that no one really knows how much time and work will be required to fix this. Given the administration is lying through it's teeth and won't share detailed site metrics. nor project plans or detailed documents - we just don't know. So experienced people speculate - and few in tech want to anger Obama & Co.
5. "fixed " ? The ability to support 50,000, 100,000 or 1 million concurrent users ? How about the ability to provide data accuracy so a user gets correct information to the insurance company ? Is that 50%, 70% or 99.9% of the time.
How about the time, # of sessions required to complete an application.
We could go on, but what is brilliant here is that the MSM can't avoid the results, every log-on, every day is a test of "Obama" and big liberalism's competence.
Posted by: standfast24 at October 21, 2013 10:56 AM (wx/BY)
Posted by: m at October 21, 2013 10:57 AM (fzFaG)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at October 21, 2013 02:45 PM (89oiB)
Look for code comments in broken English....
Based on the technology used, this was not done by 'American' Programmers...
Which is why Sebelius is trying to duck Congress...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 21, 2013 10:58 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Purp at October 21, 2013 02:56 PM (l5zzX)
Come over here and I'll tell you a story about a group of people who call themselves "Teamsters."
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at October 21, 2013 10:58 AM (oJ5Fd)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at October 21, 2013 10:58 AM (zF6Iw)
@237 (800) F1UCKYO
Really? Somebody's having them on.
-------------
I'm not sure which option worries me more - that no one in the Obama administration realized what that number spelled out to? Or that someone in the Obama administration *did* realize what that number spelled out to.
Posted by: junior at October 21, 2013 10:59 AM (UWFpX)
Huh. That's the last 2.5 years of my life. Next lifetime I'm getting knocked up by a deadbeat and dropping out of high school and living off Uncle Sugar, I swear.
OTOH, the health insurance I get from the death march was "deemed sufficient" and (my portion) of the premium only increased 11% and added on a bunch of co-pays after the deductible was met, so at least I have that.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 21, 2013 10:59 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: thunderb at October 21, 2013 02:54 PM (zOTsN)
We spend more now than I proposed with vouchers, so are you saying that the "conservative" approach is to insist that more money be spent using a bureaucracy and unions instead of letting the parents decide?
Posted by: jwest at October 21, 2013 10:59 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 21, 2013 10:59 AM (sByIH)
----
So THAT'S what they had her up on the stage for! Where were the other eight women?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at October 21, 2013 02:49 PM (l0lja)
Bill Clinton is "interviewing" them.
Posted by: Ian Galt at October 21, 2013 10:59 AM (QdOC1)
The lessons are almost 50 years old, yet every new generation of techies and management seems compelled to relearn them the hard way.
Posted by: Purp at October 21, 2013 02:09 PM (l5zzX)
**************************************
I worked with a company that was still using a 360 a few years ago. They employed about a dozen consultants who were all retired from programming jobs to write code, because no one knows how to program a 360 any more, especially if you are pasting lines into code someone else wrote 30 years ago. They hired us as consultants because they thought their problem was that they had too much headcount, which they did, because their SOP for years was to throw bodies at the problem and reconfigure the data manually when the outputs from one program weren't the right data in the right format to be inputs to another program on the 360. A gigantic mess, in other words, not to mention jobs for life for the dwindling number of programmers. Our recommendation was to just blow it up and start over from scratch. Hmmmmm. . . . .
Posted by: Caesar North of the Rubicon at October 21, 2013 11:00 AM (oSwy7)
Posted by: thunderb at October 21, 2013 11:00 AM (zOTsN)
>>When my state went to MANDATORY AUTO INSURANCE (or you don't get your registration card and plate sticker) you were REQUIRED to fill out your insurance company and policy number. Having a natural affinity toward not giving a fuck, I'd fill in my auto ins. company name, then make up some number that looked legit. Never a problem.
.
.I did something similar at my old Doctors office. They said a state law mandated that a husband and wife must list each others place of employment and job in case one insurance company did not pay. That way they could ding the other insurance company to pay if there was one. I said OK. Completely filled out the form and listed the wife's place of employment as Acme Inc., and her job description as Ninja Assassin. Nobody said a word.
Posted by: Registered Voter at October 21, 2013 11:00 AM (xqjwP)
Posted by: thunderb at October 21, 2013 11:01 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: eman at October 21, 2013 11:01 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: standfast24 at October 21, 2013 02:56 PM (wx/BY)
Fuckin' A!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at October 21, 2013 11:01 AM (oJ5Fd)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 21, 2013 11:01 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at October 21, 2013 02:54 PM (OWjjx)
Ok... you got me.... I hate Kiss Asses... and the Stupid... especially those who CHOSE to be stupid...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 21, 2013 11:01 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: m at October 21, 2013 11:02 AM (fzFaG)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 21, 2013 11:02 AM (sByIH)
When we finally get the single payer catastrophic, we need to insist on one of the provisions popular with the auto and home insurance markets...
Total loss.
Give people the option of accepting a check up to certain limits in lieu of the healthcare provider giving treatment, except for pain and comfort.
Let the individual decide when it's time to call it quits.
Posted by: jwest at October 21, 2013 02:52 PM (u2a4R)
Don't worry. Your overlords in govt will have that whole, "calling it quits" thing covered. (refer to the crazy snowbilly gal from Alaska)
Posted by: Havedash at October 21, 2013 11:02 AM (F0WNa)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 21, 2013 11:03 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 21, 2013 11:03 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: thunderb at October 21, 2013 03:01 PM (zOTsN)
So your approach to educational funding is everyone for themselves?
Lay it out for us. I'm dying to know how a true conservative deals with education.
Posted by: jwest at October 21, 2013 11:04 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at October 21, 2013 11:04 AM (oDCMR)
That is cause Eminem has a new CD and one of the songs has words that can be construed to be mean to gay people and, well, its now time for our 2 minutes of Hate.
Even though Eminem has come out for gay marriage. He used the F word and no, not the one that rhymes with luck. So he has to be publicly castigated.
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at October 21, 2013 02:51 PM (OWjjx)
******************************************
Roll out Elton John for another duet!
Posted by: Caesar North of the Rubicon at October 21, 2013 11:05 AM (oSwy7)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 21, 2013 11:05 AM (vd7A8)
Really, we need to thank all those Republican Governors who told Obama to fuck off and refused to either expand Medicaid or set up state exchanges.
This whole thing was designed to force the states to do most of the work and eventually put up much of the money. Insurance is a state-based market and the idiots who designed Obamacare thought that because the Massachusetts exchange sorta kinds works, all the other states could do one easy and quick. The problem is that the Massachusetts exchange platform does not compute the subsidy for you. You get a state tax credit for all or some of your premium when you file your tax return. If you are a salaried worker you can adjust your state tax withholding to reflect the credit, which offsets some or all of the premium you pay. It makes you do a little bit of work if you want a tax credit, so the state doesn't have to do the work for you at extra cost and complication of the system.
The Obamabots unnecessarily complicated this website because they (a) wanted to hide the true cost of the insurance, which they knew would be hideous and a huge turnoff to people applying, and (b) they wanted people to see right up front how much of other people's money they were getting to help them pay for their insurance. This was the vote-buying part of it.
Posted by: rockmom at October 21, 2013 11:05 AM (aBlZ1)
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 21, 2013 11:06 AM (MhA4j)
They'll probably do it as part of some political controversy -- like if Republican pass a law that restricts abortion, some hacker group will releases a list of every registered Republican who takes boner pills or something like that.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 21, 2013 03:03 PM (ZPrif)
*********************************
Months, if not weeks.
Posted by: Caesar North of the Rubicon at October 21, 2013 11:06 AM (oSwy7)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 21, 2013 03:03 PM (ZPrif)
They would have to crack each individual Electronic Medical Record system... they don't talk to each other yet...
Reason? We in the industry have been trying to get HHS to give us a FORMAT to put health records in, for well over 15 years...
Once they do that.... its just conversion.... but they won't do it... so no portable Electronic Health records yet...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 21, 2013 11:07 AM (lZBBB)
Dang. You could carry your med records in a thumb drive necklace with today's technology.
Posted by: Guest Commenter at October 21, 2013 11:08 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 21, 2013 11:09 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: jwest at October 21, 2013 03:04 PM (u2a4R)
Education is a local and State responsibility, NOT a federal one.
It has been around in some form since 1867, but elevated to a Cabinet-level position by the 2nd worst President (Carter) in 1979.
Posted by: Ian Galt at October 21, 2013 11:10 AM (QdOC1)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 21, 2013 11:10 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Steve Warshak at October 21, 2013 11:10 AM (vd7A8)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 21, 2013 11:11 AM (sByIH)
Posted by: Guest Commenter at October 21, 2013 03:08 PM (ujMoa)
Better plan is to encode your medical record on a Credit Card Mag Strip... with a private key phrase or number in case you loose it...
But you should also be able to download it at will.... securely... sure some will be compromised, just like banking data now... but we will save a LOT of lives by Doctors having your complete record... ie ALL the medication you are taking and such...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 21, 2013 11:12 AM (lZBBB)
Microsoft also leverages all of Microsoft as hidden unofficial test staff. The moment something becomes stable enough to not crash instantly, people start using it on their office machines.
Rather than concocting a bunch of fake "user scenarios" that may or may not match field reality, that forces the code into real life actual user scenarios on real user's machines.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 21, 2013 11:12 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 21, 2013 03:10 PM (ZPrif)
I've got 18 different Doctor Offices as clients... most having more than one Doctor (largest is 23)....
We support 15 different Electronic Medical Record Systems...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 21, 2013 11:14 AM (lZBBB)
"Education is a local and State responsibility..."
No shit, Sherlock.
Right now, the local and State governments of Detroit, Baltimore and dozen other large cities are spending over $25,000/pupil/year through their bureaucracies and unions, with an average result of 1 kid in 5 graduating (which doesn't necessarily mean they can read).
I suggested giving a $25K voucher to the parents, since in my conservative view, they would do a better job spending it and demand a better educational result.
You seem to disagree, so I asked what it is you want to either change or keep the same.
Posted by: jwest at October 21, 2013 11:15 AM (u2a4R)
I would hope someone architected a "vendor neutral" ODBC style interface to the various insurance companies, where the company provided the company specific abstraction layer code...
...but probably not.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 21, 2013 11:16 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Guest Commenter at October 21, 2013 11:16 AM (ujMoa)
the Army method of quickly obtaining a baby:
1) find 9 willing women
2) get each one pregnant
3) obtain baby on accelerated schedule in one month!
but probably similarly delusional. I'm all for it; we need a string of ACA-WACKA-Care implementation failures that leave people in a rage over the possibility of no longer having any insurance at all. But some will still blame Bush.
Posted by: chuckR at October 21, 2013 11:22 AM (n1exz)
Geraghty's still worth it though.
Posted by: Created Or Saved at October 21, 2013 11:22 AM (iJ3YG)
Posted by: Jeffrey Quick at October 21, 2013 11:23 AM (g9neE)
"As the program's central website was under repair, Obama encouraged Americans seeking insurance to sign up the old-fashioned way by calling 1-800-318-2596."
Doesn't it strike you as absolute *bizarre* that the President of the United States should be behaving like Ron Popeil or Tammie-Fae Bakker, urging people out there in the viewing audience to pick up their phones, dial an 800 number, and buy some piece of crap? At least with Popeil or Bakker, you got something for your call - say, a Pocket Fisherman or eternal life with Jesus; but with Barry, all you get is an apologetic operator and minutes off your plan.
This is beyond risible. This is healthcare provision scripted by Samuel Beckett, except that Estragon and Vladimir are on hold, waiting for the website to clear, forever.
I am in absolute awe: this is the clusterfuck to end all clusterfucks.
Posted by: Brown Line at October 21, 2013 11:23 AM (WN9m7)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 21, 2013 11:24 AM (vd7A8)
Posted by: Ernst Blofeld at October 21, 2013 11:29 AM (XZWie)
"We had to destroy US health care to save it"...new Obama slogan.
Posted by: standfast24 at October 21, 2013 11:35 AM (wx/BY)
...but probably not.
Posted by: Purp at October 21, 2013 03:16 PM (l5zzX)
Nope... the ONLY common standard? Billing Codes...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 21, 2013 11:35 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Mr. Feverhead at October 21, 2013 11:39 AM (SzAZ7)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars [/i] [/b] [/s] at October 21, 2013 11:41 AM (y+Ufa)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars [/i] [/b] [/s] at October 21, 2013 11:46 AM (tLRcG)
Posted by: President Barkyskins at October 21, 2013 12:08 PM (EMtVt)
--
I like your style, Registered Voter, similar to my own. A few months ago I went to my doctor, and the office staff sat me down in front of a computer to fill out my medical history. (In a nice twist of fate, I hadn't been there in 4 years and they'd dropped me off their patient rolls, said they didn't have a file for me anymore).
Obviously, they are going to electronic records. Having no faith and trust in anything related to Obamacare, I answered a couple of innocuous questions truthfully, then decided to mirandize myself and not reveal anything else. Just skipped over pages and pages of stuff, not answering the litany of questions. My little bit of civil disobedience. My doctor (who I love) didn't say a word.
Posted by: Mayday at October 21, 2013 12:09 PM (eHc+1)
It's wrong to use Obama's middle name "Hussein".
That may be what his mommy called him; but those of us in the know, looking at how he as the reverse Midas touch know that his real name is
Barack "Clusterfuck" Obama.
Posted by: Comanche Voter at October 21, 2013 12:17 PM (0fuCe)
Accessing Healthcare.gov from a DoD connection will get you this alert:
"The security certificate presented by this website was not issued by a trusted certificate authority. This problem might indicate an attempt to fool you or intercept any data you send to the server. We reccomend you close this webpage."
They can't even play nice with their other friends in the government
Posted by: Dwayne the canoe guy at October 21, 2013 12:34 PM (2EmS8)
Posted by: President Barkyskins at October 21, 2013 01:27 PM (EMtVt)
Posted by: 11B40 at October 21, 2013 05:28 PM (Feb0+)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2541 seconds, 413 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at October 21, 2013 10:01 AM (8JJ6O)