January 29, 2013
— Ace TNR's risible goof -- failing to see that Obama was obviously using body-English to psychically influence another one of his many-thousand golf shots, in a hilarious p-shop -- isn't just all fun and games.
It illustrates the blind spots and double standards and political biases of the "objective" press.
Any statement which helps Obama is deemed presumptively true by liberals. No fact-checking needed, no skepticism applied; if it helps Obama, then it must be true, right? After all, Obama's right, ergo, claims which demonstrate he's right have a higher-than-usual chance of themselves being right. Right?
And of course any statement which hurts Obama is deemed presumptively false-- even if it appears superficially true, it's time to put on your skepticism hats and start parsing like the Dickens, to find that fundamental falsity which you're sure lurks somewhere inside it.
You can see this effect in full, uhhh, effect in the various "Fact Checking" columns the liberal press uses to attack Republicans.
Democratic statements tend to only be evaluated on their superficial truthfulness (or truthiness, to use a term I've never liked, but it's useful here). If Obama makes a claim, and on its most superficial reading it's got "truthiness" to it -- even though it's being used in service of making a very tendentious point -- then the Fact Checkers rate it as true.
They presumed it true from the start, and it passed the most superficial once-over, so they're comfortable now calling it "True."
But if a Republican makes a statement about Obama... well then a whole different process is employed.
Now, the statement is presumed false -- and the game is now to simply discover in what way it's false. And you do know, ab initio, it's false -- after all, a Republican said it. Gotta be false.
So now, if you find a Republican statement about Obama that is superficially true, you now have to consider all the implications that may or may not flow from it. And if you can find one implication of the true statement which you deem to be false (or at least arguable), then you now proceed to branding the entire statement "false."
After all, the statement may have been true, but it may mislead you into thinking something else, so the statement is False. *
Glenn Kessler, Politifact, and the rest of the liberal liars never apply this second- or third-order analysis of possible implications when it comes to a superficially true Democratic statement. If the Democrats claim that Paul Ryan "cosponsored" a bill with Todd Akin, for example, they'll label that as "True." They don't bother examining the intended implications of that, such as "Paul Ryan has the same crude beliefs as Todd Akin" and "Paul Ryan hates women." **
Democrats are permitted their untrue implications. Republicans, on the other hand, are not permitted their own tendentious implications.
Or even implications that aren't even fairly present in their claim. The liberal fact-checkers will check, and re-check, and sur-check until they can find something, some tendentious implication, that they don't like, at which point they label the initial statement "false" or "misleading," precisely as they had intended before even bothering to fire up the Google machine.
TNR's goof here (apparently duplicated by the brain trust at Buzzfeed) is superficially laughable -- until you realize the mindset that produced it (and will continue to produce the same error until the end of time itself) is no laughing matter at all.
This stupidity -- this dishonesty -- this low-order conclusion-driven do-not-question-assumptions herd-thinking -- actually shapes our country's political trajectory and ultimately affects our individual fates.
* This is the reason for the well-known, and completely true, phenomenon that parroting back the tendentious claims of your professor will get you a better grade, and disputing his claims will get you a worse one.
When you agree with him, he presumes you're right (after all, you're agreeing with him) and you don't have to bring much evidence or argument to the table to convince him of that which he already believes.
But when you disagree with him -- why, now, he's going to want to see each of your subsidiary premises demonstrated with citations and he'll brook no sloppy logic as you press them.
The media is a liberal professor, and Obama is -- as he's been throughout his life -- the lazy and yet dutifully doctrinaire Apple of the Professor's Eye, gifted with the ability to tell them that which they believed without needing to be told.
And they give him straight A+'s, of course. Only occasionally docking a point here or there just to show they're "fair."
And anyone who disagrees with the Liberal Professor -- well, if you write a sumptuously-cited, impeccably-argued refutation of his beliefs, he'll give you a very grudging B-. Anything short of that and you're looking at a C, D, or F.
** And speaking of Todd Akin -- it was just this sort of thinking (if a claim supports another claim I think is true, that first claim must most likely be true as well) that got him into trouble, and exposed him as a conclusion-driven illogical dummy.
And yet the same liberal press that savaged him for this sort of conclusion-driven non-thinking engages it in with every firing of every synapse.
Posted by: Ace at
10:30 AM
| Comments (224)
Post contains 893 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 29, 2013 10:35 AM (Rh+Np)
TNR published all those stories without fact-checking shit. They started panicking when several astute blogs, including this one here, started seeing flaws in his story. Then came all the ass covering by TNR, leading up to a conference call with Beauchamp's CO and TNR.
Bob Owens had an awesome takedown of Beauchamp's Bradley exploits on his old blog.
Posted by: EC at January 29, 2013 10:36 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Lil Jon, rapper extraordinaire at January 29, 2013 10:37 AM (uOWHN)
Posted by: Lil Jon, rapper extraordinaire at January 29, 2013 10:37 AM (uOWHN)
Posted by: Koenig Jojo at January 29, 2013 10:37 AM (Yv6gq)
Posted by: Koenig Jojo at January 29, 2013 10:37 AM (Yv6gq)
Posted by: Serious Cat at January 29, 2013 10:37 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Serious Cat at January 29, 2013 10:37 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Jimmy at January 29, 2013 10:37 AM (driXj)
Posted by: Jimmy at January 29, 2013 10:37 AM (driXj)
Posted by: mallfly at January 29, 2013 10:37 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: mallfly at January 29, 2013 10:37 AM (bJm7W)
>>And yet the same liberal press that savaged him for this sort of conclusion-driven non-thinking engages it in with every firing of every synapse.
The Left obviously engages in synapse fire of the circular variety.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 29, 2013 10:38 AM (aZ6ew)
>>And yet the same liberal press that savaged him for this sort of conclusion-driven non-thinking engages it in with every firing of every synapse.
The Left obviously engages in synapse fire of the circular variety.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 29, 2013 10:38 AM (aZ6ew)
Why don't you just watch Fox all day, and shut the fuck up?
Posted by: Walt Winchell at January 29, 2013 10:38 AM (pxmox)
Why don't you just watch Fox all day, and shut the fuck up?
Posted by: Walt Winchell at January 29, 2013 10:38 AM (pxmox)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 29, 2013 10:38 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 29, 2013 10:38 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Dana Loesch (and her House Husband) at January 29, 2013 10:38 AM (uRumV)
Posted by: Dana Loesch (and her House Husband) at January 29, 2013 10:38 AM (uRumV)
He used to have a blog called Confederate Yankee that was really good. He picked up on the Beauchamp stories and basically singlehandedly dismantled TNR's reporting of them.
Read them here if you have the time. It's pretty damn awesome work.
http://confederateyankee.mu.nu/archives/cat_beauchamptnr.php
Posted by: EC at January 29, 2013 10:40 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at January 29, 2013 10:40 AM (8Jp6C)
Its almost like there is an unwritten rule that they must lie.
Of course, they may be true anyway because WaPo is nothing but a Democrat PR rage anyway.
Posted by: Vic at January 29, 2013 10:40 AM (53z96)
Eat more obama cock.
WAT MORE OBAMA COCK!
CHOKE ON THAT OBAMA COCK!
ALL THE WAY TO THE BALLS BITCH!
TAKE IT!
ALL THE WAY DOWN!
Posted by: jeremiah God Damn Barack Obama the Mother Fucking SCoaMF wright at January 29, 2013 10:40 AM (+OTLF)
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at January 29, 2013 10:40 AM (Hl0E3)
If he did that, you'd have no place to post your babble.
Posted by: Tami[/i] at January 29, 2013 10:41 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 29, 2013 10:41 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 29, 2013 10:41 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: buzzion at January 29, 2013 10:41 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Vic at January 29, 2013 10:41 AM (53z96)
http://bit.ly/VlOlH8
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 29, 2013 10:41 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Ace's unofficial editor at January 29, 2013 10:41 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 29, 2013 10:42 AM (l86i3)
You guys just can't stand a media outlet that refuses to suck Barry's tiny little wang.
Now shoo, Walter. Get back under the stairs.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 29, 2013 10:43 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: occam at January 29, 2013 10:43 AM (fbUla)
Posted by: mallfly at January 29, 2013 10:43 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: ace at January 29, 2013 10:44 AM (LCRYB)
MSNBC edited testimony from the father of one of the Newtown victims to make it look like pro gun spectators were heckling him
The whole video shows they were not, but the whole commie journalist guild is screaming their outrage
Outrageous: How the left-wing media lied about Newtown ‘hecklers
http://tinyurl.com/bjbgcu8
Posted by: kbdabear at January 29, 2013 10:44 AM (wwsoB)
30 Ace. When I post a Wall-O-Text (on that blog I don't have), I at least warn people.
---------
Your warning is that bit at the bottom where it says "Ace".
Posted by: Citizen Anachronda at January 29, 2013 10:44 AM (NmR1a)
Posted by: mallfly at January 29, 2013 10:44 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: Scott 'Rambo' Beauchamp at January 29, 2013 10:45 AM (27KAF)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 29, 2013 10:45 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Steve Kroft at January 29, 2013 10:45 AM (DrC22)
2013: Fiat/Jeep announces: "Fiat/Jeep will make Jeeps in China."
Posted by: forest at January 29, 2013 10:46 AM (L7wZc)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 29, 2013 10:46 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: mallfly at January 29, 2013 10:46 AM (bJm7W)
Having a golf club that doubles as a shotgun for shooting skeet.
I've got top men working on it right now. Top. Men.
Posted by: Barack Obama at January 29, 2013 10:46 AM (BuSM8)
Posted by: jill pleskotty at January 29, 2013 10:47 AM (Rh+Np)
Posted by: Barack. at January 29, 2013 10:47 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 10:47 AM (Hz1zc)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 29, 2013 10:47 AM (VtjlW)
I'm sympathetic to this idea, and trying to incorporate it in my own life, but let's not forget that's how we came to be ruled by the FSA.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 29, 2013 10:47 AM (ZKzrr)
TNR published all those stories without fact-checking shit. They started panicking when several astute blogs, including this one here, started seeing flaws in his story. Then came all the ass covering by TNR, leading up to a conference call with Beauchamp's CO and TNR.
Bob Owens had an awesome takedown of Beauchamp's Bradley exploits on his old blog.
Posted by: EC at January 29, 2013 02:36 PM
Piers Morgan was fired from the Daily Mirror for running photos of Brit troops allegedly committing atrocities on Iraqis which were almost immediately discovered to be fakes.
Morgan still insists that the stories were true.
So was your termination, Piers
Posted by: kbdabear at January 29, 2013 10:47 AM (wwsoB)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 29, 2013 10:47 AM (piMMO)
then lets re-elect George Bush.
Why?
Because i want to see every liberal head explode like a ripe watermelon being shot by a double barrel shotgun loaded with rock salt.
Now that would be hilarious.
Posted by: jeremiah God Damn Barack Obama the Mother Fucking SCoaMF wright at January 29, 2013 10:48 AM (+OTLF)
Posted by: simpleton at January 29, 2013 10:48 AM (i3pKT)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 29, 2013 10:48 AM (8y9MW)
The most powerful guy in the US is the SCOAMF, and his 'bots can't get enough of shrieking about how he's a victim because us powerless nobodies don't worship him.
Lawl.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 29, 2013 10:49 AM (ZKzrr)
See, I kinda figure every guy either plays golf or he shoots. There's a lot of cross over but the rule generally holds its one or the other that they prefer. Bammy is a golfer.
I'm a shooter. Not that I'm much good, but I can't physically play golf.
Posted by: Bigby's On The Other Hand at January 29, 2013 10:49 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 02:47 PM (Hz1zc)
Coming from a shithead troll that thinks Obama is not a marxist. Hilarious.
You know he'd probably come for you guns first you little shit, if it weren't for the fact that you would burn down your neighbors houses with them in it if he asked you to.
Posted by: buzzion at January 29, 2013 10:49 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Barack. at January 29, 2013 10:49 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Walt Winchell at January 29, 2013 02:47 PM
Ohhhh, internet tough guy!
Do you have posters of your heartthrob Barry on your wall like a teeniebopper with Justin Bieber?
Do you write "Walt Obama" with hearts all over the margins of your notebook?
Now go home and get your fuckin' shine box
Posted by: kbdabear at January 29, 2013 10:50 AM (wwsoB)
I totally believe that David Frum retweeted the photo because he got the joke.
Yep.
BRB, reading BridgesForSale dot com.
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 29, 2013 10:50 AM (SUKHu)
Your statement is demonstrably racist.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at January 29, 2013 10:50 AM (sbV1u)
The U.S. government has approved the sale of U.S. taxpayer-backed A123 Systems to a Chinese company, despite security and economic concerns about sensitive technology changing hands.
Obama at it again.
Posted by: Vic at January 29, 2013 10:51 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 10:51 AM (Hz1zc)
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg277/gigg423/Skeeting_zps1a2dc6ce.jpg
Posted by: gigg at January 29, 2013 02:48 PM (41VCE)
Just aimin' at Bo, for that tender juicy dinner meat. They were all out of wagyu, so he went for wag-you.
Posted by: tcn at January 29, 2013 10:51 AM (VLG62)
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 29, 2013 10:51 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at January 29, 2013 10:51 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 29, 2013 10:51 AM (ZKzrr)
File under "Forbidden Knowledge"
Posted by: beverly at January 29, 2013 10:52 AM (9W6+R)
Posted by: Walt Winchell
Yeah, he's as popular as W entering his 2nd term.
Posted by: Dr Spank at January 29, 2013 10:52 AM (w+Dvf)
..."TNR's goof here (apparently duplicated by the brain trust at Buzzfeed) is superficially laughable -- until you realize the mindset that produced it (and will continue to produce the same error until the end of time itself) is no laughing matter at all."
-------
Yeah, Ace.
TNR was so desperate to support the JEF's claim that he "shoots skeet"...they ran with that photo-shopped photo to prop him up.
And they didn't even notice how spazzy it made him look!
'Blind spot', indeed.
And yeah...what it represents, is no laughing matter.
Posted by: wheatie at January 29, 2013 10:53 AM (BZMZX)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 10:53 AM (Hz1zc)
Yeah, why don't you go buy yourself a stack and go work on that on the edge of a subway platform.
.......take your time and research carefully, we'll wait.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 29, 2013 10:53 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 29, 2013 02:51 PM (UOM4
RUN IN CIRCLES AND SCREAM FAUX NEWS!!!! RUN IN CIRCLES AND SCREAM FAUX NEWS!!!!
Posted by: Tami[/i] at January 29, 2013 10:54 AM (X6akg)
You republicans werent whining about media bias when bush was president.
We were pointing out the obvious bias in the press back when your father was haggling with your mother's pimp, kiddo. Hardly a new thing.
Posted by: Grey Fox at January 29, 2013 10:54 AM (VzwgP)
And wasn't the idiot Akin doing what we're supposed to be doing? A "scientist" said something, so it must be 100% true and don'tyoubelieveinscienceyourightwingwacko.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 29, 2013 10:54 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo
That rule of thumb makes too much sense for AoSHQ commenters to follow.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 29, 2013 10:54 AM (xz0nG)
So, give the fawning media some slack, Ace.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 29, 2013 10:54 AM (f9c2L)
Maybe check the results of the last two Presidential elections before you profer stupidity like that, stoner.
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 29, 2013 10:54 AM (xGlYu)
How the left-wing media lied about Newtown ‘hecklers’http://tinyurl.com/bzs6dr4
Posted by: sigh at January 29, 2013 10:55 AM (HqGwX)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at January 29, 2013 10:55 AM (S08dG)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 29, 2013 10:56 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Clemenza at January 29, 2013 10:57 AM (x59Gv)
How about Party Media. And call induhvidual 'journalisters' Party Spokeman/Spokewomyn. Because while they aren't government agencies (like they would serve a Republican administration this faithfully...) they are always Party Men.
And not Democrat. No, just The Party because just everybody understands the implication of that phrasing and we can clue the rest in. As in One Party State because every stinking one of them believes it. Even establishment Republicans see themselves as the token opposition, just for show.
Posted by: John Morris at January 29, 2013 10:57 AM (sCRhB)
It's called "Inside the Beltway."
Or "On the dole."
Either/or.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 29, 2013 10:57 AM (8y9MW)
Buttchump's wife was his conduit IIRC and they were bombing Bush....maybe we should publish the wildest drone jockey stories we can come up with?
Posted by: sven10077 at January 29, 2013 10:57 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Clemenza at January 29, 2013 10:58 AM (x59Gv)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 29, 2013 02:47 PM (VtjlW)
------------------------------------------------------
If it looks like reality is alluding them, start telling them about Chompy and Ripper.
Posted by: Soona at January 29, 2013 10:59 AM (Kk3Lm)
Posted by: Clemenza at January 29, 2013 10:59 AM (x59Gv)
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 29, 2013 10:59 AM (SUKHu)
Posted by: gigg at January 29, 2013 11:00 AM (41VCE)
Someone remind me: What is his little jaunt to Vegas to give another stupid speech costing us?
*rage meter pinging away*
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 29, 2013 11:00 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Clemenza at January 29, 2013 11:00 AM (x59Gv)
It's almost as if the weakminded, once a template is set in their minds, cannot recognize the truth even if it is staring them in the face.
I think this O'Spades person is on to something.
Posted by: jwest at January 29, 2013 11:01 AM (ZDsRL)
.......
Naaah.. it's just a slow day over at Daily Kooks.. everyone is leaving and posting a "Ta Ta For Now" diary explaining why.. And know why they are leaving? Because some lefty's actually believe in the 2nd Amendment and have been defending the right to keep arms. It's just too much for some of the whackos, so they are leaving.. lol
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 29, 2013 11:01 AM (f9c2L)
Yeah M Aj I've taken to mocking them then congratulating them on their brilliance....
a few assholes even gloat a little if you're quick enough...
"hats off take your fucking bow moonbat"
"ban tampons" when did I decide that was in the platform?
The Koch brothers didn't put it in the newsletter....
*sigh*
we're doomed
Posted by: sven10077 at January 29, 2013 11:02 AM (LRFds)
Barack Obama is a bi-sexual. Does that count as a plus or minus in liberal land? Just wondering if they would deny it or celebrate it.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 29, 2013 11:02 AM (p/cQy)
Srsly? I haven't been there since before the election.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 29, 2013 11:02 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Clemenza at January 29, 2013 11:03 AM (x59Gv)
Posted by: polynikes at January 29, 2013 11:03 AM (m2CN7)
Strange ain't it?
Posted by: eleven at January 29, 2013 11:03 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 29, 2013 11:03 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 11:04 AM (Hz1zc)
Posted by: Ace's unofficial editor at January 29, 2013 11:05 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: Barack. at January 29, 2013 11:05 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Clemenza at January 29, 2013 11:05 AM (x59Gv)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 29, 2013 11:05 AM (GFM2b)
I'm starting to think the NFL rigs the playoffs like the NBA does.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 29, 2013 11:05 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 11:05 AM (Hz1zc)
*****
Yup. I wish our side would quite tearing ourselves apart over guys like him. It just encourages the media to do it again.
Todd Akin says something monumentally stupid. The media pounces and goes in into destroy mode. We tear ourselves apart debating about if we should dump the guy or not. Akin loses. Repeat.
I mean, the media is the enemy. Are we really winning if we help our enemy destroy one of ours?
Yeah, if we support Akin unconditionally, it can sound like "rah rah cheerleading". I don't really have an answer to that, except to say that it strikes me as a questionable tactic to publicly agree with our enemy in anyway when they are attacking us.
They aren't a free press. They are the enemy. (And yes, when his opponent Claire McFuckstick is discretely supporting him, yeah that's a strong indicator that he is a fuck up and not going to help us. I just wish we could resolve our problem without all the internal fur flying. Maybe that's mission impossible.)
Posted by: Abe at January 29, 2013 11:05 AM (C+qQ0)
The preezy is laying it on thick in Vegas today. The hate....it burns.
Posted by: Soona at January 29, 2013 11:06 AM (Kk3Lm)
Posted by: Mary Clogginstein from Brattleboro, Vt and Proud of it !!!!!!!!!! at January 29, 2013 11:06 AM (48wze)
Why don't you just watch Fox all day, and shut the fuck up?
Posted by: Walt Winchell at January 29, 2013 02:38 PM (pxmox)
Bwahahahahhaha! The liberal cry. Put some tears with it, baby. Fox is too liberal for me, sorry.
Posted by: Meremortal, watching it burn at January 29, 2013 11:06 AM (1Y+hH)
Not really. Ryan isn't a real runner and wouldn't remember his time from an old marathon when put on the spot (by a friendly interviewer, BTW). Obama's skeet comment was planned and calculated and a lie for a purpose.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 29, 2013 11:06 AM (T0NGe)
Envirotards weep.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 29, 2013 11:07 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:07 AM (QxSug)
A conservative pro-immigration reform group has issued talking points to Republican lawmakers, telling them to avoid referring to the U.S. citizen children of illegal immigrants as "anchor babies" or calling for the construction of an "electric fence" on the border, among other things.
The talking points, published by Buzzfeed, went out to Republican lawmakers on the Hill as momentum builds for an immigration bill that would legalize most of the country's 11 million illegal immigrants. The memo urges lawmakers to call them "undocumented immigrants" and to avoid terms such as "aliens" or "illegals," which are seen as offensive and dehumanizing. Another phrase to avoid? "Send them all back."
We the legal citizens better watch what we say about the illegals. Up next you better not call bank robbers criminals it might hurt their feelings
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 29, 2013 11:07 AM (RRVBX)
> And wasn't the idiot Akin doing what we're supposed to be doing? A "scientist"
> said something, so it must be 100% true and
> don'tyoubelieveinscienceyourightwingwacko.
No. The Party will evaluate what the Truth is, Party Scientists will produce the evidence to back it up (since it is of course True they will have little problem doing this, if they fail it is because they are bad scientists) and then you will will be told what you should believe and what is to be done. Forward!
It's right there in the slogan, there is ONE path, the Party will reveal it unto you. Your only task is to follow.
Posted by: John Morris at January 29, 2013 11:07 AM (sCRhB)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 29, 2013 11:07 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 29, 2013 11:07 AM (VtjlW)
Sports Illustrated reported that among Lewis’ many treatments for his torn triceps, suffered Oct. 14, was a deer-antler spray, which is banned by the NFL. Philly.com published quotes from the SI article from phone conversations between Lewis and Mitch Ross, the owner of “Sports with Alternatives to Steroids” (S.W.A.T.S.).
According to the quotes, Lewis told Ross to “just pile me up and just send me everything you got, because I got to get back on this this week.”
So a murderer and a cheat?
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 29, 2013 03:03 PM (9Bj8R)
Justice would be suspending him from the Super Bowl. It will not happen though. And the story will be buried for the rest of the week.
Posted by: buzzion at January 29, 2013 11:07 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 11:08 AM (Hz1zc)
Posted by: CelticCaptain at January 29, 2013 11:08 AM (7N2jC)
Posted by: Barack. at January 29, 2013 11:08 AM (l86i3)
Stupid liberals can't even tell that the photo has nothing to do with guns or skeet shooting. No shooting platform, no eye protection, no ear protection, etc., and so on.
Idjits.
Posted by: Meremortal, watching it burn at January 29, 2013 11:08 AM (1Y+hH)
I love what you consider to be a "lie" -- one which serves no purpose even if it were one -- and what you excuse. Keep in mind that Obama IS a lawyer.
A lawyer who created subprime mortgages.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 29, 2013 11:09 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: ABC-NBC-CBS-NYT-CNN-MSNBC coordination group at January 29, 2013 11:09 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:10 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 29, 2013 11:10 AM (IS2o0)
So then you admit that Obama shooting skeet is a lie.
Since you conflated the two, I mean.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at January 29, 2013 11:11 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 11:11 AM (Hz1zc)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 29, 2013 11:11 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:11 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: gigg at January 29, 2013 11:11 AM (41VCE)
There you're absolutely wrong. It is because of Liberal news outlets that our culture could even consider electing the JEF, let alone twice. It is because of Liberal news outlets (and liberals taking over education) that Democrats think they can get away with conflating the ideas of a Right and a Privilege such that "health care" becomes a "right" but self defense becomes a "privilege."
The war is a cultural one, not merely a political one.
The one place you're right, of course, is that Fox News is not your enemy. They have specifically chosen, as much as possible, not to take a side. Which makes them defacto allies of the Democrat Propaganda Media.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 29, 2013 11:12 AM (8y9MW)
No I don't mean a lie dickless. I mean he mispoke about a irrelevant topic. Obama intentionally lied about shooting skeet. All the time. For the purpose of forwarding his agenda on gun control.
You lefties can't help but project your character flaws on others. Its what you do.
Posted by: polynikes at January 29, 2013 11:12 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Fritz at January 29, 2013 11:12 AM (/ZZCn)
Trolls are freaking out. How dare we insult their God? They can't take it. Policy bothers them less than mockery.
Interesting.
Posted by: Meremortal, watching it burn at January 29, 2013 11:12 AM (1Y+hH)
And you know Mooch is eagerly planning another lavish trip soon.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 29, 2013 11:12 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 29, 2013 11:13 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 29, 2013 11:13 AM (p/cQy)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at January 29, 2013 11:13 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: gigg at January 29, 2013 11:13 AM (41VCE)
This issue has several levels, all of which make me laugh:
1. TNR didn't even have the sense to question the skeet shooting statement with a request for amplification, like what type of gun.
2. TNR was embarrassed that they were caught swallowing a lie without even blinking, and furthermore whoever edited the piece was too stupid to notice a patently ridiculous claim by TFG.
3. They were already catching flack for the interview, so they desperately went looking for vindication. They were so desperate they didn't even read the web site to see it was a parody.
4. And now they are desperately trying to cover up why they were desperately posting crap.
Yes, only those highly skilled journalists should be respected, not stupid bloggers or the rif-raff who post in comments sections.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 29, 2013 11:13 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 29, 2013 03:06 PM (T0NGe)
And he actually said "we go skeet shooting all the time." The use of "We" from a narcissistic jackass that uses "I" for every single thing he possibly can. If he really fired a gun he would not be using "We" for that statement.
Posted by: buzzion at January 29, 2013 11:14 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: polynikes at January 29, 2013 11:14 AM (m2CN7)
Thank you, I worked very hard for that.
Posted by: Michel Foucault at January 29, 2013 11:14 AM (sbV1u)
A company I worked for briefly handed out evaluation forms that let the employees grade the managers and the work environment. So the boss said "anyone who gives a single point less than a 5/5 score has to fill out a whole page explaining why." So almost everyone just took the easy route and gave 5/5 scores.
Posted by: fb at January 29, 2013 11:14 AM (1Zoh4)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:15 AM (QxSug)
The hell?
Of course they don't. Just like fishermen never "misremember" the one that got away being smaller than it was. Just like people never "misremember" their bowling score being lower than it actually was.
We call that "human nature" and it's part of the fact that all humans have a vested interest in seeing themselves as better than they really are. People may remember accurately, but the ones who do not will tend to "misremember" in their own favor.
Film at 11.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 29, 2013 11:15 AM (8y9MW)
The SCOAMT is evil. And all who mindlessly follow him are also.
We are watching the not-so-slow process of a republic turning into a blatant dictatorship.
Posted by: Soona at January 29, 2013 11:15 AM (Kk3Lm)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 29, 2013 11:16 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: polynikes at January 29, 2013 11:16 AM (m2CN7)
no no Paul Ryan's "mystique" I think is what Obambibots call it...
Here is footage of SCOAMF in his blonde MN disguise....
http://youtu.be/5yhqb1Zcwms
"perfect"
Posted by: sven10077 at January 29, 2013 11:16 AM (LRFds)
Well the base photo is of the Camp David Skeet range. Lot's of clues it was Pshop but "nothing" is a little bit strong.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at January 29, 2013 11:17 AM (81UWZ)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 11:17 AM (Hz1zc)
***
You know Jordan, if you keep posting calm, measured responses like that, it makes it hard for me to maintain my bile and bitterness.
Having said that, I will continue to watch them (the media) and bitch because I want to counter their pernicious propaganda.
As far as the "enemy" thing goes,...you can call it a bit of hyperbole. I don't literally want their head on a pike paraded through the street. But they are actively working to subvert me and mine. Call it an "adversarial" position if you like.
Cheers.
Posted by: Abe at January 29, 2013 11:17 AM (C+qQ0)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at January 29, 2013 11:17 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: Ace's unofficial editor at January 29, 2013 11:18 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: Ian S. at January 29, 2013 11:18 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 29, 2013 11:18 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:19 AM (QxSug)
THIS. This is why Affirmative Action is so insidious.
Go ahead, read Michelle Obama's senior thesis at Princeton and tell me that is typical Ivy League quality from a senior. Seriously. It was the Ivy League equivalent of Eddie Murphy's Tyrone Green skit.
C-I-L-L My. Landlord.
Or read Obama's thesis from Columbi.....oh, sorry....he's the most brilliant Preezy evah, so of course there would be no proof of that.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at January 29, 2013 11:19 AM (sbV1u)
Yes. Bill O'Rielly and Greta Van Sustren (or however you spell their names) are huge Conservatives. Yep, that's it.
Yes, Fox's opinion segments are largely dominated by conservatives- guess what, that's what sells for them. Their news coverage is either scrupulously "fair and balanced" (as found by numerous studies over the last several years, most of them trying to debunk that claim), or also left leaning (see: Smith, Sheppard.)
You want to try that again? Or are you still waiting for the 2011 Texas Legislative Session to adjourn?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 29, 2013 11:20 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Ace's unofficial editor channeling Yoda at January 29, 2013 11:20 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:20 AM (QxSug)
Gore about being sung the Union Label song as a kid
Hillary being named after Sir Edmund
Bill Clinton on what the meaning of is is
Gore on inventing the internet
obama on his entire history
yeah, but Ryan's marathon score is a big deal
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 03:19 PM (QxSug)
What difference does it make!!!!!!
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 29, 2013 11:20 AM (RRVBX)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:21 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 11:21 AM (Hz1zc)
Until last year, when I looked it up in the "every home run in Miller Park history" database and learned....it was Corey Koskie. (His last career major-league HR; he suffered a concussion during the next game and never made it back to the bigs)
I guess this makes me a liar.
Although I really did meet Weird Al in a hallway once.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 29, 2013 11:22 AM (ZKzrr)
Fox "News" takes sides does it...?
Really?
Fox commenters wholeheartedly you are saying Shempf Smiff is a raging Obama hater are you?
Posted by: sven10077 at January 29, 2013 11:22 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:23 AM (QxSug)
When was the last time Fox News presented forged papers as authentic and did so long after they were proven fake?
When was the last time Fox News reported false stories about a dictator so they could continue with access to the dictator?
For every alleged false story told by the right, I can name a couple of dozen confirmed false stories told by the left. For every alleged bias report by Fox News I can name a hundred by the other networks.
Posted by: polynikes at January 29, 2013 11:25 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: realityman at January 29, 2013 11:25 AM (obXkJ)
obama on his entire history
My favorite: Obama's mother and father first met on the bridge at Selma, when Obama was four years old. No mention of whether anyone brought any frankincense or myrrh.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 29, 2013 11:26 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: buzzion at January 29, 2013 11:27 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: gp at January 29, 2013 11:27 AM (+Jpqc)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:28 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 11:31 AM (Hz1zc)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:32 AM (QxSug)
***
I remember when we first started working to overthrow Gaddafi. Somebody asked me what I wanted as an end state.
I said that I wanted his severed head on a pike, paraded through the streets of Libya by U.S. soldiers or Marines. I then wanted it tied to the bow of a U.S. warship and sailed back to America, where it would then be suspended by chains from a bridge in a New York city harbor, for all to see, until the gulls had picked all the flesh from the bones.
I hated that fucker.
(Granted, the aftermath of that (Benghazi) may have been too high of a price, but Gaddafi dead with a knife up his ass bothered me not one whit. People who said the brutality of his death somehow rendered the righteousness of his death made zero sense to me.)
Posted by: Abe at January 29, 2013 11:32 AM (C+qQ0)
"On his latest trip to the golf course President Obama shot 17 holes-in-one."
If these guys are going to act like the Pyongyang Times, they ought to get it right.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - sees the gods of the copybook headings on the horizon at January 29, 2013 11:32 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: the jordan rubber[/i] at January 29, 2013 11:33 AM (ORGYc)
To quote Hillary, Obama "gave a speech in 2004."
That, frankly, is the extent of his accomplishments. By every conceivable metric, he's a clusterfuck as a President, and according to more than a few liberals, as a human being.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at January 29, 2013 11:34 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 11:35 AM (Hz1zc)
Posted by: joeindc44 is now more concerned about Dark Ages 2.0 than Great Depression 2.0 at January 29, 2013 11:37 AM (QxSug)
Romney, on the other hand, pulled himself up by his bootstraps from the mean streets of Detroit and earned his way into Harvard Law by his own efforts.
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 03:31 PM (Hz1zc)
Troll can never ever let the actual truth about his boyfriend Obama stand. He must always redirect it. He did the exact same thing last night when he did not let the fact that he voted for a gun grabbing socialist marxist stand. Jordan is a lying murderous hypocrite like his bf Obama.
Posted by: buzzion at January 29, 2013 11:39 AM (GULKT)
I hope that this Breitbart "Conversation" platform can be leveraged as an effective weapon against these marxist media scumbags because it's only going to get worse until a healthy beat down comes.
They've consolidated their propaganda machine to keep the perpetually clueless and the moochers enlisted.
We need to peel off the winnable assets in what's left of the malleable middle
with the obvious message that their being abused by the Big Liars of the Left.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 29, 2013 11:41 AM (aZ6ew)
"President Obama visited a manufacturing site for solar panels and gave the workers direct instruction."
Come on, CBS et al., just adopt it, let yourselves go. You know you want to, and you are already deflowered. Just admit it to yourselves, what you are, and be proud.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - there on Thunder Island! at January 29, 2013 11:41 AM (hLRSq)
Unlike the fucking idiot you twice pulled the lever for, nobody ever pretended getting into Harvard Law was Romney's greatest achievement.
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 29, 2013 11:41 AM (xGlYu)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 11:43 AM (Hz1zc)
Posted by: Jeff B. at January 29, 2013 11:46 AM (OQZWo)
"On his latest trip to the golf course President Obama shot 17 holes-in-one."
If these guys are going to act like the Pyongyang Times, they ought to get it right.
Five time first-round draft MLB choice!
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 29, 2013 11:47 AM (IDSI7)
really? see #40. democrats by larger margins believe bush conspired with terrorists to bring down the twin towers as well as lied about weapons of mass destruction, apparently conspiring with every intelligence agency on earth, held by the iraqi regime in an effort to get us into a war because, uh, wars are good politics or something...oh, and someone's getting rich by pumping out all the iraqi oil or selling rifles to somebody or something, you know, because it was a sure way to win more elections.
and yet compare that to your dubious assertions, which even if true, are hardly surprising considering the inside book cover of obama's own freaking book said he was kenyan so are we to believe obama or obama? i'm confused. oh, and weren't one or two members of his family muslim and communist. most families in the US consider you to belong to the religion of your parents; again, hardly difficult to see why people are curious as to where his latest beliefs currently lie seeing as his recent career seems to be a contradiction to his upbringing, education, and positions pre-national stage politics.
Posted by: matt foley at January 29, 2013 11:47 AM (X69df)
Posted by: Jordan at January 29, 2013 11:48 AM (Hz1zc)
Posted by: buzzion at January 29, 2013 11:49 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's mobile at January 29, 2013 11:49 AM (fKyp3)
1. I don't believe Obama is a Marxist.
Because he doesn't have the intellect to understand Marxism?
Well, you make a good point.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 29, 2013 11:49 AM (IDSI7)
Perhaps you don't remember Johnny Coldcuts, it's been awhile since he's been taken out of mothballs. The tone of the blog does seem to have shifted a little bit since those days, to be fair. Perhaps the siege mentality we've all felt during the Obama years playing a role in that.
Posted by: Jeff B. at January 29, 2013 11:51 AM (OQZWo)
Posted by: Monkeytoe at January 29, 2013 11:51 AM (sOx93)
Then they write this shit...and make me look the fool.
Outrageous: How the left-wing media lied about Newtown ‘hecklers’
I take it back. They are the enemy. They are seeking to take away my civil rights. Just like the KKK tried to take away the rights of blacks.
The KKK was the enemy. So is the media.
Despicable.
God damn them to hell.
God damn them to hell.
Posted by: Abe at January 29, 2013 11:54 AM (C+qQ0)
Posted by: Monkeytoe at January 29, 2013 03:51 PM (sOx93)
You must have missed the post yesterday http://minx.cc/?post=336978 where the new owner claimed that TNR would not be liberally biased. So yes they are attempting to pretend that they are objective and unbiased.
Posted by: buzzion at January 29, 2013 11:57 AM (GULKT)
WTF? They don't have that down at Walgreens.
Valu-Rite Pharmacy. Aisle 9.
Posted by: rickb223 at January 29, 2013 03:07 PM (GFM2b)
So ol' Ray was trying to get himself some Bambi pussy? That's perverted. Next thing you'll be telling me he killed some guy.
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at January 29, 2013 12:04 PM (29+x5)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 29, 2013 12:10 PM (evdj2)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2539 seconds, 352 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Koenig Jojo at January 29, 2013 10:32 AM (Yv6gq)