November 21, 2013
— DrewM Each day seems to bring a new polling low for Obama and a new disaster for ObamaCare. The GOP is seeing a corresponding rise in the polls. From this morning's NRO Morning Jolt.
"Loyalty prevails among partisans, but among independents, 42 percent trust the Democratic Party more when it comes to handling healthcare compared with 58 percent who trust the Republican Party more."
Unfortunately some will see this is as a signal the GOP needs to offer an alternative approach to ObamaCare. People who publicly advocate this course of action should be locked in a basement until after the 2014 elections.
The public isn't suddenly enamored of the GOP, they just really hate Obama and the Democrats at the moment. As soon as you start offering detailed examples of what the GOP would do you make the conversation about which approach is better. You invite people to make a choice. And just because they really don't like the Democrats approach doesn't mean they will like the GOP's.
More to the point, why in the world would you give the Democrats an out on this stuff? Right now the conversation is only about how the Democrats have lied and made a hash out of a system, that while imperfect (though it looks better now than ever), seemed to work for most people.
One reason opposition to ObamaCare didn't really kick into high gear until now is the damage was theoretical. Democrats could talk about keeping people on insurance until 26 and outlawing pre-existing conditions and on and on. All opponents could offer was projections that most people didn't follow or really understand (I'm talking about mushy-moderate/swing voter types). These low information voters could just write it off to "partisian bickering". Well, now they can't hide from it anymore.
The last thing the GOP should want to do is take the focus off the real and concrete pain people are seeing and turn the conversation back into a theoretical He says/She says political fight over competing theories of governance.
Right now the GOP is standing firmly with the maximum number of people possible. Once they start talking about hard policy options with potential downsides (as all policy choices have for some), you start to peal away part of the existing number of ObamaCare opponents/GOP supporters. Nothing tangible has been won against ObamaCare yet, this is not the time to start forcing people to begin making choices again. They are choosing to hate Obama and ObamaCare, the GOP should let them do it in peace. Don't fall into the trap that just because people don't like ObamaCare they will like the GOP alternatives.
Yes, the Democrats will say "they don't have a plan!" So? The retort is simple, "Our plan is to undo the damage that Democrats have done with their unworkable scheme to take your health insurance away from you. We will fight to make sure you are once again able to have an insurance plan you like and keep the doctors you trust. We stand with you in your desire to be free from the incompetents in Washington who can't even make a website work but think they know better than you what's right for you and your family!".
The GOP's healthcare reform message is going to have to be carried by it's nominee in 2016. There's no point in trying to have hundreds of candidates for Congress running on all sorts of different plans that will never be signed into law by Obama.
A simple message (Hope! Change!) is what resonates with people. (Remember: In 2008 Democrats ran on "reform". In fact, Obama ran against the individual mandate. Details don't matter in campaigns.)The conservative healthcare wonks and Democrats in the media will insist on seeing the GOP's "detailed plan to do better than ObamaCare". Do not listen to them. You start talking about pre vs. post tax dollars, risk pools and things that make up an actual plan and you lose people. They. Don't. Care. They want to be able to go to their doctor and feel better. Promise you will make that possible and remind them that the Democrats are taking that away. Bash the Democrats over the head with each new horror story, pass symbolic bills that Obama won't sign like Upton's, then sit down, shut up and let the Democrats stew in their own mess.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:22 AM
| Comments (218)
Post contains 756 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Stewie Griffin at November 21, 2013 06:25 AM (4mTwY)
Yes, the Democrats will say "they don't have a plan!" So? The retort is simple, "Our plan is to undo the damage that Democrats have done with their unworkable scheme to take your health insurance away from you. We will fight to make sure you are once again able to have an insurance plan you like and keep the doctors you trust.
and asked about the millions more that lost their insurance?
will employers assist in this fight, or Be grateful they no longer have to funnel out huge amts for healthcare. What about the Insurance companies being paid subsidies for new enrollies?
how do we stop this fkn train?
Posted by: willow at November 21, 2013 06:25 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: 7 Days in May at November 21, 2013 06:26 AM (j6DTo)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at November 21, 2013 06:26 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: Stewie Griffin at November 21, 2013 06:27 AM (4mTwY)
Posted by: The Fuse on the Employer Mandate Bomb at November 21, 2013 06:27 AM (yQwq5)
Posted by: toby928© insists on talking about robots at November 21, 2013 06:28 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/s] at November 21, 2013 06:28 AM (Xlbr8)
Posted by: thunderb at November 21, 2013 06:28 AM (cjEHB)
Posted by: Y-not at November 21, 2013 06:28 AM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: willow at November 21, 2013 06:28 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Joe at November 21, 2013 06:30 AM (7pOq5)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, upholstering his throne of skulls at November 21, 2013 06:30 AM (naUcP)
Posted by: Extreme Pain at November 21, 2013 06:31 AM (Tb01R)
Posted by: rickb223 at November 21, 2013 06:31 AM (ix+5k)
Posted by: RNC at November 21, 2013 06:31 AM (Ua6T/)
And the most amazing thing about it is that nobody in Dogeater's entire administration seems to have given a moment's thought to how they would handle it when the bomb finally detonated.
WTF?
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at November 21, 2013 06:31 AM (yQwq5)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:32 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: AMDG at November 21, 2013 06:32 AM (eFytx)
Posted by: thunderb at November 21, 2013 06:32 AM (cjEHB)
My friendsshh...
Posted by: Sen. John McCain at November 21, 2013 06:32 AM (yQwq5)
Posted by: willow at November 21, 2013 10:26 AM (nqBYe)
::: pours Cosmo through the USB port :::
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/s][/i][/u][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:32 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: dan a nj con formerly known as dana nj con at November 21, 2013 06:33 AM (wmU4G)
Posted by: bonhomme at November 21, 2013 06:33 AM (6qlHs)
Posted by: nip at November 21, 2013 06:33 AM (jI23+)
I think it was linked here a couple of days ago. A story about commie totalitarianism. At the end of the article the author said that Robert Conquest was asked whether he wanted to re-title "The Great Terror" for its re-issue, and he said, yes, call it
"I told you so, you fucking fools!"
Which should be our OCare mantra. You didn't need to be a policy analyst to know they would bollocks this up, you just had to know that the government couldn't do this well and had no business trying anyway.
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at November 21, 2013 06:33 AM (A0sHn)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at November 21, 2013 06:34 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: RoyalOil at November 21, 2013 06:34 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: willow at November 21, 2013 10:26 AM (nqBYe)
Water, tea, soda, coffee? Yes.
Bourbon, scotch, whisky, vodka, tequila, et al.? Nope.
*Pours willow some deliciousness*
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at November 21, 2013 06:34 AM (fwARV)
some will see this is as a signal the GOP needs to offer an alternative approach to ObamaCare.
If you can't access the article, it's by the National Review's Yuval Levin and Ramesh Ponnuru, and they also discuss it over at NRO:
http://tinyurl.com/mm8o6e4
And they apparently think Screwball Andy Sullivan is worth discussing the issue with, so they also do that -- at length.
National Review -- Subscribe Now!
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 21, 2013 06:34 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Conservative Crank at November 21, 2013 06:34 AM (sQ0LB)
Posted by: buzz at November 21, 2013 06:34 AM (i27M5)
Posted by: nip at November 21, 2013 10:33 AM (jI23+)
Knowing Karl Rove, the excuse will be that the dick was too big and kept getting in the way.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/s][/i][/u][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:34 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Y-not at November 21, 2013 06:35 AM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: Styro at November 21, 2013 06:35 AM (MheaI)
Yes - It is staffed by former Obama WH and campaign people and Sebelius was "asking" health insurance CEOs to donate to them last Spring. It is OFA:Healthcare edition.
Posted by: Lizzy at November 21, 2013 06:36 AM (JRmiD)
That phrase came with some....uh.... uhhhh.......odd visuals.
Now I'll start drinking.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/s][/i][/u][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:36 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at November 21, 2013 10:34 AM (6T8Ay)
Rove hasn't seen his dick in seven years.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at November 21, 2013 06:36 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: D-Lamp at November 21, 2013 06:36 AM (bb5+k)
Dems announce they are going to call any republican plans Cruz Care
Now there's a golden opportunity if there ever was one. Cruz could offer up free-market solutions and tort reform, interstate portability and reduced red tape and watch the Dims freak out.
After all, he has a lot more in the way of that gravitas stuff now.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:37 AM (0HooB)
Bash the Democrats over the head with each new horror story, pass symbolic bills that Obama won't sign like Upton's, then sit down, shut up and let the Democrats stew in their own mess.
Good plan, Drew; I concur wholeheartedly.
(Now if you'll excuse me, I must now pinch myself to see if I'm dreaming)
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 06:37 AM (Y4TdB)
Now I'll start drinking.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at November 21, 2013 10:36 AM (6T8Ay)
You're welcome. But get your own deliciousness.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at November 21, 2013 06:37 AM (fwARV)
They never bothered to report on any of the GOP plans proposed in 2009/2010, just showed the ad--during the newscasts--of Paul Ryan killing an old lady. Pretty sure that would be the intellectual depth and heft of any "scrutiny" a new alternative plan would receive.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at November 21, 2013 06:37 AM (ZKzrr)
There is nothing to "fix." There is nothing that can be done to make it better.
-------
That's the answer to "what would you do?"
Posted by: RoyalOil at November 21, 2013 06:37 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: NotCoach at November 21, 2013 06:38 AM (rsudF)
mine and theirs.
Posted by: willow at November 21, 2013 10:31 AM (nqBYe)
*prepares French Maid outfit for willow*
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 06:39 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Ma Bell at November 21, 2013 06:39 AM (RLdcX)
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 10:39 AM (GQ8sn)
Hmmmm, I see you do have a redeeming quality.
Carry on.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/s][/i][/u][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:40 AM (6T8Ay)
Though I would rather the push be for full repeal and have that repeated over and over, I don't think simply sitting on the sidelines hoping that Obamacare will hurt enough people that it will implode, is the best thing to do in terms of political optics. This is a case where the GOP really has to play three dimensional chess. They must appear to be looking for a solution that will help people without stopping the momentum of the crash that crush the Democrats. Whether they are competent enough to do this is to be seen. I have to say though, so far so good.
And back to my first recommendation to push for repeal, this must be accompanied by the fact that Obamacare is applied unevenly and those that are forcing people onto Obamacare are they themselves exempt. This is the LIV dog whistle.
Posted by: polynikes at November 21, 2013 06:40 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at November 21, 2013 06:40 AM (nUH8H)
Posted by: D-Lamp at November 21, 2013 06:40 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 10:39 AM (GQ8sn)
You let her wear an outfit???
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at November 21, 2013 06:40 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:40 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Left wing dilemna alert! at November 21, 2013 06:41 AM (Tb01R)
Posted by: California red at November 21, 2013 06:41 AM (L39bP)
Carry on.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at November 21, 2013 10:40 AM (6T8Ay)
*points*
Velcro!
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 06:41 AM (GQ8sn)
100% agreement Drew.
At some point we'll need to do more - either come up with a conservative alternative or challenge the "heath care crisis" narrative that wins empathetic suburban voters - but not now.
Posted by: CJ at November 21, 2013 06:41 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at November 21, 2013 10:40 AM (fwARV)
Annnnnnnd I'm out!
Bunk
BRB
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/s][/i][/u][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:41 AM (6T8Ay)
To respond with a plan, and to the cries of "they don't have a plan!!!!", is tantamount to agreeing there is a problem that needs fixing and, AND, will be spun as agreement on the specifics of the problem.
Let It Burn. While, of course, expressing concern for those unfortunate constituents that were bamboozled and hoodwinked by the Liar-in-Chief and his consorts in the Congress.
Posted by: steve walsh at November 21, 2013 06:41 AM (qRZ5f)
Posted by: rickb223 at November 21, 2013 06:41 AM (ix+5k)
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at November 21, 2013 10:40 AM (fwARV)
I'm not a complete brute.
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 06:42 AM (GQ8sn)
I don't know what's more exciting, watching Reid lie in his creepy-ass-pedophile-whisper or watching the big Boeing takeoff from a short strip in Wichita.
oh. hahahahaha, now Reid is quoting from "scripture."
*not The Bible, scripture
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 06:42 AM (NLH1M)
Posted by: tsrblke PhD(c) (No really!) at November 21, 2013 06:42 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humantiarian at November 21, 2013 06:42 AM (HVff2)
I'm not a complete brute.
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 10:42 AM (GQ8sn)
Hm... Noted...
We should ask willow.
WILLOW: Which do you prefer - cleaning the house in a French maid outfit or cleaning the house sans any outfit?
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at November 21, 2013 06:43 AM (fwARV)
--
Can you please put this on a chip and implant it into Boehner and McConnell's brains? This kind of statement would simply bury the Democrats. It would resonate strongly because the pain is here and people are so pissed. And if they're not yet, they will be.
Posted by: Lady in Black at November 21, 2013 06:43 AM (XB5Ak)
Posted by: Memo to GOP leadership at November 21, 2013 06:43 AM (Tb01R)
Posted by: tsrblke PhD(c) (No really!) at November 21, 2013 06:43 AM (GaqMa)
*not The Bible, scripture
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 10:42 AM (NLH1M)
Are you saying that the Necronomicon is not scripture, you anti-religious bigot?
Posted by: Harry Reid at November 21, 2013 06:43 AM (+H/11)
Posted by: backhoe at November 21, 2013 06:45 AM (ULH4o)
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at November 21, 2013 10:43 AM (fwARV)
Sometimes, a little mystery is nice!
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 06:45 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at November 21, 2013 06:45 AM (VtjlW)
See what Reid's doing here? He's not gonna use the 'nuclear option,' he's just gonna humiliate and brow-beat the Republicans into submission.
Will the R's fold?
Yeah, probably.
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 06:46 AM (ZgBZU)
Posted by: bonhomme at November 21, 2013 06:47 AM (6qlHs)
I made a snarky reply to you in the other thread. It's meaningless.
Can you bullshit your way through a job interview? Do you know how to sound like you know what you're talking about?
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 06:47 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: jwest at November 21, 2013 06:48 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at November 21, 2013 06:48 AM (aqORt)
Yeah I keep reading (especially from desperate Liberals) that the GOP needs to offer an "alternative" to ObamaCare or JUST SHADDUP or something.
Part of the problem with health care costs in this Country is that the Government is ALREADY the largest purchaser of health care, even before BozoCare came into effect. So of course the answer must be MORE Government involvement - right?:
WRONG! Government picks winners and losers, and distorts what little of the Free Market exists in health care.
The GOP "answer" SHOULD NOT be another new Government program.
There are a few good things about ObamaCare and they should be kept, like the pre-existing condition clause. Otherwise the GOP answer should be to do as little as possible and utilize FREE MARKET reforms. PERIOD!
Posted by: Pelosi Schmelosi at November 21, 2013 06:48 AM (tkLBb)
Posted by: tsrblke PhD(c) (No really!) at November 21, 2013 06:50 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: mrp at November 21, 2013 06:50 AM (HjPtV)
I just got the text from Amazon that my 55 gallon drum of Astroglide will be delivered today.
So I'm good.
Given the current status of the Obamacare meltdown, that should last me, oh.....maybe a week.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/s][/i][/u][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:50 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Tim Scott at November 21, 2013 06:50 AM (Pr6hk)
Posted by: rickb223 at November 21, 2013 06:50 AM (ix+5k)
incidentally, if the Republicans were smart they'd be out there mentioning the "record highs" on Wall Street under obama AND the very high unemployment for Black men under obama
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 06:51 AM (vzLhi)
Posted by: Registered Voter at November 21, 2013 06:51 AM (Hdbf3)
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at November 21, 2013 06:51 AM (aqORt)
Posted by: rickb223 at November 21, 2013 06:52 AM (ix+5k)
Ettes may dip their entire persons in the drum for maximum efficiency.
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 06:52 AM (GQ8sn)
Of all the lies told on behalf of Obamacare, that one pisses me off the most.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at November 21, 2013 06:52 AM (ZKzrr)
Cabbage Patch Kid-face McConnell is speaking now. His retort to Reid: Hey, about that obamacare, eh?
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 06:53 AM (xIzGn)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 21, 2013 06:53 AM (t3UFN)
I've looked a couple of times and I still can't find that link I ran across pre-coffee this morning that mentions a GOP plan from 2010 that they passed as an alternative to BenghaziCare. It addressed a lot of the ills we're seeing now.
The Pubbies should dust it off and rename it the "I Told You So, Neener, Neener, Neener Bill of 2013."
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:54 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 10:53 AM (xIzGn)
Fixed.
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 06:54 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Hillary Clinton at November 21, 2013 06:54 AM (Pr6hk)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 21, 2013 06:54 AM (t3UFN)
Good point! you get and extra 10% off, and they throw in a free Fench Maid outfit after the 5th shipment!
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/s][/i][/u][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:54 AM (6T8Ay)
receive more press scrutiny in a week than Obamacare did in 4 years.
Exactly! When Palin was interviewed by Matt Lauer a few weeks ago about Obamacare he demanded: What is the Tea Party's plan? What is the Tea Party's plan!?!
Lauer was just begging for a squirrel.
Posted by: Lizzy at November 21, 2013 06:55 AM (JRmiD)
http://tinyurl.com/l6gyssw
swsfw
Posted by: dan a nj con formerly known as dana nj con at November 21, 2013 06:55 AM (wmU4G)
Dammit, EC!
BRB
Bunk
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/s][/i][/u][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:55 AM (6T8Ay)
Reid knows if he goes nuke, he ends his and obama's hope for Amnesty.
Reid will not do it. This is just an excuse to get TV cameras on the Senate floor and broadcast a brow-beating.
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 06:55 AM (GcwH1)
Would have had to be 2011, if it passed. Pelosi never let the plans proprosed in 2009 and 2010 come to the floor for discussion.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at November 21, 2013 06:56 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: rickb223 at November 21, 2013 06:56 AM (ix+5k)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at November 21, 2013 06:56 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Stewie Griffin at November 21, 2013 06:56 AM (4mTwY)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at November 21, 2013 06:57 AM (IXrOn)
While the Dems are completely unraveling, someone in the GOP will show up with some knitting needles and "save the day" for Obama. (For which they will get no credit at all from the Media/Dems, of course.) The GOP just can seem to help themselves.
Posted by: Null at November 21, 2013 06:58 AM (xjpRj)
Posted by: the littl shyning man at November 21, 2013 06:58 AM (tmFlQ)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at November 21, 2013 06:58 AM (ZKzrr)
"Repeal and Stabilize"
Posted by: Adam Smith at November 21, 2013 06:58 AM (Pr6hk)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at November 21, 2013 06:59 AM (IXrOn)
Remember, the only setback that POS FDR ever suffered was when he tried to pack the courts.
('Course, he got his way anyway as it cowed the court.)
Posted by: RoyalOil at November 21, 2013 06:59 AM (VjL9S)
Read that a recent survey had 1 in 5 registered voters either had their plan cancelled or knew someone who did. Imagine what that number will balloon to when this is no longer impacting 'just' the 5% in the individual market.
From a purely cynical political standpoint the Repubs could do one thing, pass a 'fix' to O-care that requires a longer notification period of cancelled plans so those cancellations are going out in June/July next year. Just might get a veto-overriding majority in both chambers with that one.
Posted by: Joe at November 21, 2013 06:59 AM (QFnhZ)
Would have had to be 2011, if it passed. Pelosi never let the plans proprosed in 2009 and 2010 come to the floor for discussion.
Oh yeah, good point.
The 111th Congress, Nazi Pelousi's proudest "achievement." I'll be glad when these idiot legislators realize that with each new law, a little of our freedom is lost. The last thing they should be doing is passing more of them.
I like Insty's idea for a new branch of Congress devoted solely to repeal.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at November 21, 2013 06:59 AM (0HooB)
all the fault of Republicans because they did not offer any alternatives or participate in the legislative process when O Care was being created.
That's the John Edwards Dodge. "Why didn't you come to me like a fucking man and tell me to stop fucking this Chicken?
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at November 21, 2013 06:59 AM (yQwq5)
a better campaign makes people afraid of what the Other Guy wants
( see 1964, 1948, 1968, 1980, 1992, 2008.......
Posted by: stuff Sun Tzu said but didn't write down at November 21, 2013 07:00 AM (omBWL)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at November 21, 2013 07:00 AM (bCEmE)
National Review -- Subscribe Now!
Looking for witty, informed conservative commentary with twice the website loading speed of The Daily Caller and only half the pop-ups?
Have we got a deal for you!
Posted by: National Review at November 21, 2013 07:00 AM (BrQrN)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at November 21, 2013 07:00 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at November 21, 2013 07:01 AM (aqORt)
LOL at the people of Seattle! Sorry PGiS! This has to be aggravating.
http://tinyurl.com/kmlr96r
"Seattle City Councilmember-elect Kshama Sawant told Boeing machinists her idea of a radical option, should their jobs be moved out of state
“The workers should take over the factories, and shut down Boeing’s profit-making machine,” Sawant announced to a cheering crowd of union supporters in Seattle’s Westlake Park Monday night."
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 07:01 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: tsrblke PhD(c) (No really!) at November 21, 2013 07:01 AM (GaqMa)
The sun. The sun is out.
Time to go for a nice walk.
yay
Posted by: artisanal 'ette
In complete agreement. Life is too good not to be lived & enjoyed. Goin' out with my 2 dogs....
Posted by: backhoe at November 21, 2013 07:02 AM (ULH4o)
Posted by: California red at November 21, 2013 10:41 AM (L39bP)
End the medical industries exemption from the Sherman and Clayton acts. Restore true competition and a free, open market for medical services.
Or let the medical monoplies continue and bankrupt everyone.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at November 21, 2013 07:02 AM (rXcBX)
Posted by: eman at November 21, 2013 07:03 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: MTF at November 21, 2013 07:03 AM (F58x4)
Posted by: Dems will go nuclear at November 21, 2013 07:04 AM (Tb01R)
Talking is what politicians do. Unfortunately for the Dems, at the moment, ObamaCare is a big f*cking deal.
Posted by: mrp at November 21, 2013 07:05 AM (HjPtV)
Spot on! The MSM and Dems are just dying for/baiting Republicans to offer their solution. And the ONLY reason that is the case is so that they can discuss the evils of the Republican proposals instead of Obamacare.
The MSM and Dems want to discuss ANYTHING other than the sinking of SS Obamacare. Republicans should not help start the pumps keeping the water out...
Posted by: Dan at November 21, 2013 07:06 AM (JwDEy)
Posted by: JEM at November 21, 2013 07:06 AM (o+SC1)
I hope they get everything they deserve.
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 07:06 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: panzernashorn at November 21, 2013 07:06 AM (MhA4j)
And as far shutting down the government again.. Hey! What did I just tell you? STFU!!1!
We (the GOP more specifically) have no leverage. Do NOT throw away this opportunity to take back the Senate and, possibly, greatly increase our House majority.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 21, 2013 07:07 AM (f9c2L)
They are not getting covered for free you know; the parents must pay to add them to their polices, and one hopes most parents have their adult offspring reimburse them. But in most cases it is a group policy from the parents' work with more competitive rates than the 24 year old buying an individual policy could get. Its win/win as well as being popular with the LIV crowd.
Posted by: PaleRider at November 21, 2013 07:07 AM (5CusZ)
The Republicans should say it will be impossible to undo all of the damage and return things to the status quo ante, but that they will try. They should also say that everything Obama has done to "fix" it is both cynical and illegal. They should point out he is still lying and misleading by offering fixes that are not fixes and by promising things he does not have the power to deliver.
Posted by: Thatch at November 21, 2013 07:07 AM (qYvEa)
Right now the conversation is only about how the Democrats have lied and made a hash out of a system
Mmmmmmmmm, hash!
Posted by: Homer Obama at November 21, 2013 07:07 AM (QHUpb)
An individual health account (think: IRA-like), for instance. Tax free in-AND-out ... unless withdrawn for non-health-issues. Inheritable, and "yours".
Adding little details like "If you shove $5000 into it, the penalties are waived..."
-> Just putting more stakes into Obamacare. That is, it doesn't "fix" any specific problems with Oc, it (a) starts a path that could be a fix, and (b) draws even more people out of the "crucial to the plan" exchanges.
Posted by: Al at November 21, 2013 07:07 AM (9ynpo)
Exit question: 2014 will see the re-emergence of
a) Occupy
b) Tea Party
c) neither
d) both
My answer? In a moment..
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 07:07 AM (vanqS)
What the hell is going on in this country?
*offers a cup of shut the hell up to the gop*
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 21, 2013 07:07 AM (iGPSR)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 21, 2013 07:08 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: perturbed at November 21, 2013 07:09 AM (TXq4O)
I hope they get everything they deserve.
Posted by: EC
I lived on Vashon Island in the early eighties with my first Dead Wife, Helen. Seattle was nice then but the MoonBats from cali were already making inroads. Pity.
Posted by: backhoe at November 21, 2013 07:10 AM (ULH4o)
would it be helpful to claim that the plan is to replace obamacare with something that can garner bipartisan support?
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at November 21, 2013 07:10 AM (SO2Q8)
-
THE SUN IS OUT!!!! OH SHIT!!! WE NEED TO SEND BRUCE WILLIS AND A RAGTAG GROUP OF ADVENTURERS TO EXPLODE A NUKE AT THE SUN'S CORE TO RESTART IT!!!!
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 21, 2013 07:10 AM (Hx5uv)
Here's the Greta interview with the libtard lady who was the victim of the "knockout" crime.
http://tinyurl.com/kyklj2h
Listen to her rationalization at the end about how she ultimately feels over the whole incident.
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 07:11 AM (GQ8sn)
a) Occupy
b) Tea Party
c) neither
d) both
My answer? In a moment..
-
Want to piss off a lib? Tell them the Occupy movement killed Kennedy.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 21, 2013 07:12 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: George Costanza (R) at November 21, 2013 07:12 AM (SO2Q8)
I need the government to do something....
Posted by: California red
An attitude that will cause not but heartache for yourself and others.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 21, 2013 07:12 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: rickb223 at November 21, 2013 07:12 AM (ix+5k)
Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at November 21, 2013 07:12 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: JEM at November 21, 2013 07:12 AM (o+SC1)
(3rd time)
My answer, and the correct answer is: d) both.
The Left is bringing back Occupy, bigger than ever, precisely because they know remnants of the 2010 Tea Party will return.
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 07:13 AM (8dspl)
Posted by: Luke at November 21, 2013 07:13 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: panzernashorn at November 21, 2013 07:13 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: RWC at November 21, 2013 07:13 AM (fWAjv)
"Seattle City Councilmember-elect Kshama Sawant told Boeing machinists
her idea of a radical option, should their jobs be moved out of state
“The
workers should take over the factories, and shut down BoeingÂ’s
profit-making machine,” Sawant announced to a cheering crowd of union
supporters in SeattleÂ’s Westlake Park Monday night."
-
Going Detroit squared.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 21, 2013 07:14 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Registered Voter at November 21, 2013 10:51 AM (Hdbf3)
Yeah - every time any of us sees that, we need to remind people that the Republicans were LOCKED OUT OF THE ROOM when this legislation was being drafted, no resolutions from Republicans were entertained, and lawmakers only had 72 hours to look at the legislation before it was voted on.
And remind people that NOT ONE REPUBLICAN IN EITHER CHAMBER OF CONGRESS voted for this shit sandwich.
And that the bill which ultimately passed was not even originally a healthcare bill, but some harmless piece of legislation which was taken up on the Senate floor, only to have every last bit of it - up to and including the name of the damn thing - completely gutted and replaced with the democrat Senate's version of a healthcare bill.
So, yeah - it's not like Republicans didn't help with this law.
They were shut out at every turn by the very people who are now complaining because they won't help them fix it.
Screw.Them.
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (@Teresa_Koch) at November 21, 2013 07:14 AM (PZ6/M)
Posted by: The Governor at November 21, 2013 07:15 AM (Tlix5)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 21, 2013 07:15 AM (CJjw5)
THE SUN IS OUT!!!! OH SHIT!!! WE NEED TO SEND BRUCE WILLIS AND A RAGTAG GROUP OF ADVENTURERS TO EXPLODE A NUKE AT THE SUN'S CORE TO RESTART IT!!!!
*furiously scribbles notes for next class*
Posted by: EC's Step-Kid's Science Teacher at November 21, 2013 07:16 AM (BrQrN)
Posted by: logprof at November 21, 2013 07:16 AM (fETNt)
Posted by: Businessman, Warping in, warping out at November 21, 2013 07:16 AM (tszTA)
Posted by: soothsayer
I dunno. Occupiers are mostly young people, right? And we know that less than half of the 'invincinbles' are signing up for OCare. It will take some serious Soros cash to fund a 2014 campaign. Non-Occupiers, on the other hand, are being clobbered with taxes, regulation, lower wages, and ever-increasing premiums for substandard health care.
Posted by: mrp at November 21, 2013 07:17 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: 7 Days in May at November 21, 2013 07:18 AM (j6DTo)
Posted by: ontherocks at November 21, 2013 07:18 AM (wnkWt)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at November 21, 2013 07:19 AM (659DL)
*furiously scribbles notes for next class*
Posted by: EC's Step-Kid's Science Teacher at November 21, 2013 11:16 AM (BrQrN)
Hahaha!!!
Posted by: EC at November 21, 2013 07:19 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Typical RINO at November 21, 2013 07:19 AM (Pr6hk)
Posted by: JEM at November 21, 2013 07:20 AM (o+SC1)
all the fault of Republicans because they did not offer any
alternatives or participate in the legislative process when O Care was
being created.
-
That argument won't appeal to anybody who has not drunk so much Kool Aid that they are beyond saving.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 21, 2013 07:20 AM (Hx5uv)
another question:
Why are people naming their babies "Colt" these days?
I'd like to see the return of the name Nebuchadnezzar.
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 07:21 AM (GcwH1)
No need to mention what step 2 is.
Posted by: Marmo at November 21, 2013 07:21 AM (QW+AD)
Posted by: panzernashorn at November 21, 2013 07:21 AM (MhA4j)
You see a version of it on the local news in cities sometime. Precious Snowflake gets arrested for his participation in a robbery where someone dies, and his mother or aunt tells the camera about how he's such a good kid and everything would have been fine if that other bad kid hadn't brought the gun.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at November 21, 2013 07:21 AM (ZKzrr)
The "Nuclear Option" of known pedarast Harry Reid would only apply to judicial nominations and preznit appointments.
You would be silly to think this would apply to anything else.
Reid is evil, not stupid.
Posted by: Drill_Thrawl at November 21, 2013 07:21 AM (Z7toi)
Get on the horn to Mitch McConnell and tell him that, just in case he accidentally starts to grow some balls.
Posted by: EoJ
.........
Coming from one of the shutdown proponents, I will take this with a grain of salt..
How did that shutdown work out for us, huh? Remember those of us who promised O'Care was gonna be so fucking bad that all we needed to do was shut the fuck up and let them self-destruct? No, of course you don't remember.
Leverage, to me would mean majorities in both the House and the Senate. You still don't fucking get it do you? We can't pass anything. We can only block legislation. Anything passed in the House dies in the Senate without even a consideration. Yes, we have some popular opinion AGAINST the Dems. But once we start pushing shutdowns we will lose any advantage.
Give us the Senate.. and please please give us Reid's nuclear option, and we'll pass repeal in both houses and dare that mother fucker Obama to veto it.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 21, 2013 07:22 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Registered Voter at November 21, 2013 10:51 AM (Hdbf3) <<<
Yeah - every time any of us sees that, we need to remind people that the Republicans were LOCKED OUT OF THE ROOM when this legislation was being drafted, no resolutions from Republicans were entertained, and lawmakers only had 72 hours to look at the legislation before it was voted on.
And remind people that NOT ONE REPUBLICAN IN EITHER CHAMBER OF CONGRESS voted for this shit sandwich.
And that the bill which ultimately passed was not even originally a healthcare bill, but some harmless piece of legislation which was taken up on the Senate floor, only to have every last bit of it - up to and including the name of the damn thing - completely gutted and replaced with the democrat Senate's version of a healthcare bill.
So, yeah - it's not like Republicans didn't help with this law.
They were shut out at every turn by the very people who are now complaining because they won't help them fix it.
Screw.Them.
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (@Teresa_Koch) at November 21, 2013 07:23 AM (PZ6/M)
Republicans take A Lot of shit from Reid and the Senate Democrats, but there's no way they'll "work with" them on Amnesty if Reid pulls this stunt.
Posted by: soothsayer at November 21, 2013 07:23 AM (KwX0v)
154
Exit question: 2014 will see the re-emergence of
a) Occupy
b) Tea Party
c) neither
d) both
My answer? In a moment..
Posted by: soothsayer
For whatever it's worth I am a founding member of both mainland & Island chapters here on the coast. The JEF's "win" demoralized us pretty badly.
Then? We re-grouped. We aren't going away.
Posted by: backhoe at November 21, 2013 07:23 AM (ULH4o)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (@Teresa_Koch) at November 21, 2013 07:23 AM (PZ6/M)
My greatest fear is that GOP sweeps the next elections and doesn't change at all, just goes back to their big government, corporatist ways because, really, what would me to lead to think they wouldn't?
Posted by: jeannebodine at November 21, 2013 07:24 AM (2LJqa)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at November 21, 2013 07:24 AM (t3UFN)
-
Like chocolate and peanut butter, Kennedys and dead/raped girls.
P.S. Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches are now racist. See Drudge.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 21, 2013 07:25 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: jwest at November 21, 2013 07:26 AM (u2a4R)
Massive amounts of new construction of warehouse/light industrial space around DFW airport, office buildings going up in the North Dallas / Plano / Frisco suburban corporate parks, and giant housing and apartment developments.
Back to 2006 levels of development.
Posted by: phreshone at November 21, 2013 07:26 AM (Pr6hk)
Posted by: GOP Amnesty Caucus at November 21, 2013 07:26 AM (Tb01R)
Posted by: jeannebodine
That would depend on candidates and primaries. More TEA, please.
Posted by: mrp at November 21, 2013 07:26 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 21, 2013 07:27 AM (lZBBB)
elections and doesn't change at all, just goes back to their big
government, corporatist ways because, really, what would me to lead to
think they wouldn't?
-
Right. Establishment Pugs care only about which party gets the corner office with the window.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 21, 2013 07:28 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 21, 2013 07:32 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: RWC at November 21, 2013 07:34 AM (fWAjv)
201 - Nevergiveup
"ONLY" Judicial appointments? And you don't think that is important? To pack the Courts below the Supreme Court? Get a clue
Oh I have clue but I was not clear. This is not a good thing by any means. It was more in response to those who assume the PhillyBuster would be completely off the table and effect legislation like Grahmnesty.
We are on the same team. Avoid freindly fire incidences.
Posted by: Drill_Thrawl at November 21, 2013 07:34 AM (Z7toi)
Posted by: panzernashorn at November 21, 2013 07:58 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at November 21, 2013 08:15 AM (vd7A8)
Great point, Ace. AND we need to
shift the focus from "Look they incompetent" to "Obama's
a Lightbringing, Organizational Genius who has surrounded himself
with the best team of competent, caring technocrats since Lincoln.
No one could do what he's trying to do.
Republicans need to
defeat individuals - so incompetence matters. Liberty needs to
defeat Coercive Compassionate Tyranny - so the message ought to be
"Poor man is failing because no one could - or should - do
what he's trying to do."
Posted by: macgeorge at November 21, 2013 08:25 AM (I4Qbd)
1. We need immediate legislation to end this ongoing disaster before it does any more damage to the country.
2. In order to solve the problem we need a change of leadership in the White House and the Senate.
3. After those two conditions have been met maybe we can "have all the negotiations around a big table. We'll have doctors and nurses and hospital administrators. Insurance companies, drug companies -- they'll get a seat at the table, they just won't be able to buy every chair. But what we will do is, we'll have the negotiations televised on C-SPAN, so that people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents, and who are making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies. And so, that approach, I think is what is going to allow people to stay involved in this process."
Posted by: ThomasD at November 21, 2013 09:15 AM (sPW8y)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3408 seconds, 346 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channeling Breitbart at November 21, 2013 06:22 AM (nUH8H)