May 03, 2013
— Ace Indeed. Corrected: The slain officer's name is Collier, not Collins, as I mistook it to be.
Giuliani argues that by obstructing justice they were not just aiding and abetting Jahar after the fact, because the shooting of Collier would come later. He thinks they can and should be charged as accessories to murder.
The federal code has a seldom-charged law, "misprison of a felony," that makes it illegal to actively conceal knowledge of a felony. I'm not sure how that's much different than obstruction of justice, and, in addition, it only carries a sentence of three years. (Although the law itself states that it's illegal to merely not report a felony, a limitation imposed by a court in 1977 adds the requirement of active concealment. But that wouldn't help Jahar's buddies. But I think the law, as the courts have refashioned it, is now basically just obstruction of justice by another name.)
As for Giuliani's argument that the buddies can be charged as murders, I'm not sure the law of aiding and abetting can be pushed that far. The language seems vague enough to allow a prosecution, but as in the case of misprison of a felony, judicial rulings have almost certainly limited that broad language. The aid the buddies rendered did not have a direct relationship to the crime Giuliani suggests they be charged as principals in; an indirect relationship, yes, but nothing direct like providing them with a gun or ammo or keys to a getaway vehicle.
I don't know if such a direct relationship is required, but I'd bet money that something like that is in the law on this. Giuliani's theory is too broad-- I don't think the law can hold you responsible for all the crimes someone commits if you offer aid to them that isn't foreseeably connected to those crimes.
Posted by: Ace at
08:40 AM
| Comments (159)
Post contains 328 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Vote Lord Humungus 2016 at May 03, 2013 08:44 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: mugiwara at May 03, 2013 08:44 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Vote Lord Humungus 2016 at May 03, 2013 08:45 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at May 03, 2013 08:45 AM (VtjlW)
Is it correct, I keep asking, that the Boston mosque where Tamerlan pitched a couple fits did not drop a single dime while the photo internet sleuths were tracking him down?
If true I think that is relevant in many ways.
Posted by: Beagle at May 03, 2013 08:45 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at May 03, 2013 12:43 PM (OWjjx)
That's why Casey Anthony is a free woman.
If the prosecution went for negligent homocide or manslaughter instead of 1st degree murder, she'd probably be in prison.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at May 03, 2013 08:45 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 03, 2013 08:45 AM (pHivF)
Posted by: Y-not at May 03, 2013 08:45 AM (5H6zj)
I strongly disagree.
Obama killed MIT officer Collins with his unnecessary, political visit to Boston
which diverted crucial law enforcement resources away from the investigation.
Posted by: soothie at May 03, 2013 08:45 AM (ZgBZU)
I would think the Muslim card would be more effective in this instance and I was under the impression that playing both is against the rules.
Posted by: Flyguy at May 03, 2013 08:46 AM (35x9C)
Posted by: EC at May 03, 2013 08:47 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Mallamutt,
No, that's a very destructive impulse that has run rampant in our legal system, and, as other have pointed out, it's a gambit that's likely to lead to jaded judges and juries.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 03, 2013 08:47 AM (Yr6sH)
Posted by: Flyguy at May 03, 2013 12:46 PM (35x9C)
Worked for Obama.
Posted by: mugiwara at May 03, 2013 08:48 AM (W7ffl)
felony murder rule. If you are committing a felony, and one of your co-conspirators commits a murder in the furtherance of that felony, than you are just as responsible foe the murder as if you had pulled the trigger.
Good old fashioned felony/murder rule.
Plus the taking of the evidence, knowing the Vaseline was used in the bomb, Dias visiting Joker shortly after the bombing, all demonstrate prior knowledge.
The throwing away of the evidence shows consciousness of guilt, not just of Joker's criminality, but probably their own
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 08:48 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: Navycopjoe in sunny Waikiki at May 03, 2013 08:49 AM (HQX6o)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 03, 2013 08:49 AM (ZPrif)
I'm all for any possible charges that can be brought against any of them, regardless of how tenuous they may be. I also want each and every victim to be brought into the courtroom, with a vivid description of their injuries.
I want the bombers to be made into examples, although I rather doubt that will happen.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 03, 2013 08:50 AM (+z4pE)
Posted by: Serious Cat at May 03, 2013 08:50 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 03, 2013 08:50 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: mugiwara at May 03, 2013 08:51 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Navycopjoe in sunny Waikiki at May 03, 2013 12:44 PM (HQX6o)
LOL, but I think you missed the magnificence that is my FAIL. It was actually a multipart FAIL, the first being my first post claiming to be second, then my "and first!" post being the third. Chockful of irony, overcleverness, and --dare I say it?--yes, abject stupidity.
How could I fail so galatically well in just two comments comprising a total of three words? I credit my assiduous study of our nation's leader.
Posted by: Aloha Akhbar @PirateBallerina at May 03, 2013 08:51 AM (/lWM8)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 03, 2013 08:51 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at May 03, 2013 08:51 AM (/b8+5)
Don't be silly. They're not Republicans.
Posted by: dick 'dick' wolf at May 03, 2013 08:52 AM (mGBy8)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 03, 2013 08:52 AM (tsPRH)
Posted by: Navycopjoe in sunny Waikiki at May 03, 2013 08:53 AM (HQX6o)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 03, 2013 08:53 AM (pHivF)
Posted by: Spypeach at May 03, 2013 08:53 AM (6xG9/)
No, that's a very destructive impulse that has run rampant in our legal system, and, as other have pointed out, it's a gambit that's likely to lead to jaded judges and juries.
As a slight variation on a popular meme, what do you think would happen if the perps were Tea Partiers?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 03, 2013 08:54 AM (+z4pE)
Setting a bomb in a crowd loaded with ball bearings pretty much covers intent.
Posted by: rickb223 at May 03, 2013 12:53 PM (pHivF)
There's no disagreement about the Kablamov brothers. We're talking about the other three.
I don't think they can be charged with murder in any degree.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at May 03, 2013 08:54 AM (fwARV)
From what little we know, we can't know for certain that these two knew Jahar was involved.
Sure, they'd have to be pretty fucking stupid to take the actions they did without at the very least a strong suspicion he was one of the bombers. Then again, being 19 goes hand in hand with stupid.
It's possible they believed Jahar wasn't involved, but that the stuff in his room might (in their minds) falsely incriminate him.
They were in the wrong, of course. But out of malice or stupidity we don't know for certain.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 03, 2013 08:55 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: laddy at May 03, 2013 08:55 AM (znNnT)
Reading and thinking about this whole situation starts moving me into the redzone. These folks need to end up as community girlfriends in prison. Damn I'm so pissed.
Posted by: fastfreefall at May 03, 2013 08:55 AM (MPEti)
@20
If they are linked to the conspiracy with prior knowledge it can be plain old murder. Under the felony murder rule there need not be an act of commission merely deaths "during" or in furtherance of the act, transactional analysis. The kidnapping is one felony murder basis right now.
Posted by: Beagle at May 03, 2013 08:55 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Yip at May 03, 2013 08:55 AM (/jHWN)
My thoughts exactly. Holder isn't going to do shit about any of this. Except maybe arrange for a professorship at Brown or something. Holder's law firm defended bombers. Clinton pardoned a bunch of Puerto Rican bombers as a direct result of being lobbied by Holder's firm.
Posted by: navybrat at May 03, 2013 08:55 AM (2ZO++)
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 03, 2013 08:55 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at May 03, 2013 08:55 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: tasker at May 03, 2013 08:55 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: joe biden at May 03, 2013 08:55 AM (mGBy8)
Posted by: Shoot Me at May 03, 2013 08:56 AM (qiXMt)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 03, 2013 12:54 PM (+z4pE)
They would never have been arrested. They'd have been killed 'while engaging law enforcement personnel.'
Then, the MFM could say whatever they wanted without opposition or a silly trial.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at May 03, 2013 08:56 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: Y-not at May 03, 2013 08:56 AM (5H6zj)
Dick Wolfe would need new pants.
Posted by: Flyguy at May 03, 2013 08:56 AM (35x9C)
yeah, Obama recited some very radical anti-American campus claptrap in front of Mexican students in Mexico
Posted by: soothie at May 03, 2013 08:58 AM (vanqS)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 03, 2013 12:54 PM (+z4pE)
All AosHQ commenters would be charged as accessories.
Posted by: Eric Holder at May 03, 2013 08:58 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Spypeach at May 03, 2013 08:58 AM (6xG9/)
Basically the difference is if you already involved in an ongoing investigation or prosecution. Obstruction of justice only occurs when you conceal knowledge/information when you've been directly questioned about a crime by authorities (police or court) or you directly interfere in an investigation/prosecution.
Misprison of a felony occurs when you have knowledge about the felony that was committed and do not pro-actively notify the authorities to share your knowledge (i.e., the authorities don't know about you -- or even that the felony has been committed -- and/or haven't directly questioned you and you fail to come forward) *and* you actively take steps to conceal the felony (i.e., it takes more than knowing about a felony and not reporting it to qualify as misprison of a felony; you have to have actively taken steps to conceal it).
Posted by: Useless Information at May 03, 2013 08:58 AM (FDGeg)
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 03, 2013 09:00 AM (LRFds)
Forget Gitmo. Blindfold. Cigarette. Firing Squad.
Posted by: Fritz at May 03, 2013 09:00 AM (UzPAd)
Jokar, Nidal Hassan, Kalid Shake Mohammed, James Holmes, Jared Loughner, none of these criminals will ever go on trial as long as Obama is in office.
If any of them go on the stand and talk, people will swear they were listening to one of Obama's speeches. They all think the same way: Anti-American.
Posted by: soothie at May 03, 2013 09:00 AM (39q3n)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 03, 2013 09:00 AM (+z4pE)
Also, was mentioned on the ONT last night the security nightmare July 4 is gonna be in Boston this year, now that we know the bombs were meant for July 4. Not to beat a dead horse, but if Boston really is worried about this, there MIGHT be someone with MA ties they can consult with, that handled a major international event with monstrous security issues not 5 months after 9/11 happened. Went off with out a hitch (well except for some French and Russian judges.) Name rhymes with Spitt Bombney. . . just a thought.
In all seriousness now, I was in SLC during the olympics; you guys have no clue how worried we were out here about terrorism. The last Olympics on US soil had a major bombing, I assumed SLC would too. Even China's olympics didn't escape unscathed, and I suspect that for all Russia's precautions their olympics next year might not either. Romney and his team did good on that score.
Posted by: LizLem at May 03, 2013 09:01 AM (8wqqE)
The question becomes, can you be forced to speak?
The Right to Freedom of Speach, must hold its antithesis... ie the Freedom NOT to speak, or it is not a Right at all.
We've been eroding our Rights for a couple of generations now... ever since the Constitution destroying statment that 'the Constitutiton is not a suicide pact' was made so they could ignore it, instead of the escape clause the Founders put in, ie amending it.
We've even gotten to the point now where we need Government Permision to perform some Rights (right to BEAR Arms).... how can it be a RIGHT, if I need Pre approval?
Sadly... the Legal case for this is probably sound... as the Laws today really don't adhere to the Plain Language of the Constitution...
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 03, 2013 09:02 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: tasker at May 03, 2013 09:02 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Navycopjoe in sunny Waikiki at May 03, 2013 12:53 PM (HQX6o)
Your original comment was not about me? How is that possible? Everything is about me. Just ask me, I'll set you straight.
In other words: Oops.
Posted by: Aloha Akhbar - philosophunculism jihadi at May 03, 2013 09:02 AM (/lWM8)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 03, 2013 12:55 PM (SY2Kh)
I should never be a judge or work in criminal law, because regardless of whether it was malice or stupidity, I would charge them to the fullest extent possible to make an example.
Posted by: Heralder at May 03, 2013 09:03 AM (+xmn4)
have the Obama/CNBC balloons dropped from the ceiling yet?
15K!!
Unemployment is down!!
Let's go to war in Syria!!
Posted by: soothie at May 03, 2013 09:03 AM (yhYn1)
If an attack did occur in Russia, I'm not sure who I'd be more afraid of- the terrorists or the Russian authorities.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 03, 2013 09:04 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at May 03, 2013 09:04 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit
I've wanted to shoot something since I turned on the computer. Does that count?
Posted by: madamemayhem at May 03, 2013 09:04 AM (S2RnE)
You know eleventy D chess says we congratulate Obama on growing the economy by the sequester and ask why he is not cutting more?
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 03, 2013 09:04 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: jwb7605 ([i][u]Let it Burn[/u][/i])[/s][/b] at May 03, 2013 09:05 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Nessuno at May 03, 2013 09:06 AM (KBh73)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at May 03, 2013 09:07 AM (/kI1Q)
Send the four of them to the Supermax and keep them alive... if they die, they'll be looked at as being martyrs for the "cause".
Posted by: Mjolnir, Banhammer from the Gates of Hell at May 03, 2013 09:07 AM (Jls4P)
sven, too clever
plus it's Friday; the Republicans are back home recuperating from their Thursday night hangover
Posted by: soothie at May 03, 2013 09:07 AM (FC8Yl)
Anyway, his bros showed sufficient specific knowledge of what (they thought) would obstruct the investigation to justify a misprision (or analogous) charge--and because of that, also whatever the venue-appropriate version of an abetting/"felony murder"/etc charge is. Prosecutors hit people with those really freely.
But it's not going to happen. It probably wasn't anyway--this isn't a normal railroad-the-Loser-on-murder-one-so-he'll-plead-to-murder-two case--but Rudy's informal overcharge in the press guarantees it. Nobody involved in this is going do what he tells them.
Posted by: oblig. at May 03, 2013 09:07 AM (cePv8)
earlier, perhaps before the bombing but I do not know, Joker took Speed bump's car in for a repair. On the afternoon of the 18th, before they murdered the MIT cop, Joker went to the shop looking for the car. He was so sweaty and nervous the mechanic thought he was strung out on drugs. The car was not ready.
They somehow got to the neighborhood near MIT, and Robel's apartment. Robel, the third guy, the one charged with false statement who lied to the Feds until they found the backpack in the landfill on April 26th. Robel, who went to high school with Joker.
I am not sure they did not provide some material assistance to the bomber brothers. Today we found out speed bump called his wife that night. We will know who else they called
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 09:07 AM (nH8jP)
never forget I am a believer in "win at checkers before playing 3d let alone eleventy d"
and yeah John's just about in gear
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 03, 2013 09:09 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 03, 2013 09:09 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Spypeach at May 03, 2013 12:53 PM (6xG9/)
Yep; just when you think he is beyond parody. Maybe he will go run Mexico after he's finished running us into the ground here? Good riddance, but not sure with their strict immigration laws he could even get into the country *eyeroll*
since ppl seem to be in need of good news, and in case was not mentioned earlier. . . that poor kid who got expelled from his HS for accidentally leaving a gun in his car, has a full scholarship from Liberty University. Kid is an Eagle Scout and honor student, they heard his plight and decided he would be perfect for them. So happy for him!
http://preview.tinyurl.com/ccx49h9
Posted by: LizLem at May 03, 2013 09:10 AM (8wqqE)
Robel and Joker are citizens, Dias and Azamat are not
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 09:11 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: Beagle at May 03, 2013 09:11 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 03, 2013 09:12 AM (piMMO)
You reich wingers have just gone TOO FAR now......
Posted by: © Sponge at May 03, 2013 09:12 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at May 03, 2013 09:12 AM (/b8+5)
conspiracy, murder under felony/murder rule, obstruction of justice, false statement
but I'm like that
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 09:13 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: nerdygirl at May 03, 2013 09:13 AM (ynec7)
Posted by: tasker at May 03, 2013 09:13 AM (r2PLg)
It's possible they threw away the stuff they knew they bought for him--like fireworks.
Also why not do what Giuliani suggests and charge them with aiding the murder of the MIT cop?
They might bargain down by giving you more information--possibly.
Regardless of their intent, they should come down hard on them. Even if they truly believed their friend to be innocent, they hid evidence.
They might not know anything of interest, but the authorities can always drop charges as appropriate.
I'm a little leery about prosecuting someone for not doing something (failing to call the FBI). Likewise, charging someone as an accomplice if (and it's a big "if") they didn't know or believe him involved makes me nervous.
According to the article, they tossed the backpack only two hours before the policeman was murdered. In my opinion it's unlikely the authorities could've acted in time to have made a difference.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 03, 2013 09:13 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 03, 2013 09:14 AM (piMMO)
I don't think they found the laptop in the land fill. It wasn't in the affidavit. I don't think they turned it over either.
Remember Dias and Azamat's apartment was searched when they were arrested on 19 Apr for visa violations. I think Dias kept it
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 09:15 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: rickl at May 03, 2013 09:15 AM (zoehZ)
Posted by: tasker at May 03, 2013 09:15 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 03, 2013 09:16 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 03, 2013 09:16 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: ejo at May 03, 2013 09:16 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: Vote Lord Humungus 2016 at May 03, 2013 09:17 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 09:17 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: tasker at May 03, 2013 09:18 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: pat at May 03, 2013 09:18 AM (LLHgu)
Posted by: ejo at May 03, 2013 09:18 AM (GXvSO)
You are the company you keep.
Actions DO have consequences, despite what the left thinks.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 03, 2013 09:18 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: waldo at May 03, 2013 09:18 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: tasker at May 03, 2013 01:18 PM (r2PLg)
I'm eager to see what they can recover from it. Besides all the goat porn, I mean.
Posted by: Heralder at May 03, 2013 09:19 AM (+xmn4)
Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
Charge 18 U.S.C. 371
If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.
Who needs the additional accessory charge? There is enough material evidence to prosecute them under these statutes which include those legal elements (and penalties).
Plus I disagree with dopes like Dershowitz who say the obstruction charge is weak and meant to pressure them into giving up more. It's meant to cover their actions as accessories both before and after the fact.
Posted by: Marcus at May 03, 2013 09:19 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Mongoose at May 03, 2013 09:19 AM (DXfkx)
Posted by: tasker at May 03, 2013 09:21 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: tasker at May 03, 2013 09:23 AM (r2PLg)
the lap top was no mentioned in the affidavit for the brothers or the three amigos. It was not found in the landfill. They just started reported that they had it yesterday afternoon. I think Dias took it, kept it, perhaps hid it or gave it to someone. He seemed to be running the clean up crew, as it were.
When Dias and Azamat were arrested at their apartment on the 19th, Azamat was smiling according to a neighbor. The FBI was telling him to get the smile off his face.
I think they thought they covered their tracks. I doubt they gave up the laptop or we would've heard about it sooner. I think they wanted the laptop more than anything, not as an after thought because the laptop would point to them as being involved in some fashion and providing some support.
Charges are going to be added IMO. I think they just charged what they did to hold them for now. There will be more
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 09:23 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: nerdygirl at May 03, 2013 09:23 AM (ynec7)
Posted by: tasker at May 03, 2013 01:18 PM (r2PLg)
I'm eager to see what they can recover from it. Besides all the goat porn, I mean.
Posted by: Heralder at May 03, 2013 01:19 PM (+xmn4
Other things it would be interesting to find:
1. Contributed to Obama campaign.
2. Commenter/fan at Daily Kos, Salon, Huffpo
3. Member of Occupy Wall Street
Of course, the MFM would never report this. Alan Colmes just told Megyn Kelly that the OWSers have "nothing to do with the Dem party."
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 03, 2013 09:24 AM (lVPtV)
Or North Koreans on a student Visa, but I suspect you are correct. Norks have been eerily silent lately; makes me more nervous than the saber rattling. either something's up or Kerry/Rodman slipped them more money to shut up.
Posted by: LizLem at May 03, 2013 09:25 AM (8wqqE)
Is it correct, I keep asking, that the Boston mosque where Tamerlan pitched a couple fits did not drop a single dime while the photo internet sleuths were tracking him down?
And that mosque was funded in part by the city of Boston!
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at May 03, 2013 09:25 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/West 2016 at May 03, 2013 09:26 AM (XIxXP)
Top men in Eric Holder's Justice Department are at this very moment reviewing the hateful Mountain Dew goat video. Top. Men.
Posted by: Fritz at May 03, 2013 09:26 AM (G9Mmf)
Posted by: tasker at May 03, 2013 09:27 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 09:28 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: DrDrill at May 03, 2013 09:29 AM (Davlr)
Posted by: socalcon at May 03, 2013 09:30 AM (vHlQ5)
Posted by: Baldy at May 03, 2013 09:31 AM (tyDFN)
Dias' attorney told the press yesterday that LE had recovered Joker's laptop.
Dias' attorney. Strange, nu?
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 09:33 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: KG at May 03, 2013 09:34 AM (p7BzH)
@95 Hollowpoint
Moving material evidence is absolutely not merely "not doing something" as I think you are saying. That could be the concealment phase of a conspiracy and could suggest foreknowledge. As in murder versus obstruction. Remember Dr. Mudd? That is a nice historical example of how little someone can do in furtherance of a conspiracy from the old days. Unless he was in on it when Booth bought the whatever he did from Mudd. I don't actually know. Not trying to start a Civil War geek war.
The real world possibility the Kazaks could have saved lives by coming forward is assumed really. Jihadi terrorists with bombs on the loose. Minutes could matter. In two hours the police could have rounded up a hundred jihadis in Boston, if someone came forward with specific information.
Posted by: Beagle at May 03, 2013 09:35 AM (sOtz/)
A criminal whom has already killed in cold blood? Presumably has the capability to kill again in our society. Aiding them in anyway which prolongs apprehension by law enforcement shows a negligent disregard for human life, and if such human life is lost, I think makes them by conspiracy guilty of manslaughter in the first degree.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at May 03, 2013 09:35 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 09:36 AM (nH8jP)
We may never know. I'm not sure the FBI would be forthcoming about whether (or who) any of the many tips they no doubt got offered up Speedbump's name.
Especially if they got one or more anonymous tips.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 03, 2013 09:36 AM (SY2Kh)
Ace, you got Officer Sean's surname wrong, mixed up with the newly gay NBA dude.
Posted by: KG at May 03, 2013 09:37 AM (p7BzH)
Yes they (potentially) were. Conspiracy after the fact applies.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at May 03, 2013 09:37 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Soona at May 03, 2013 09:37 AM (ymDPi)
“Robel is a very obedient kid,” the source said. “His mom is very religious and he grew up in a pretty religious household.” http://tinyurl.com/d593byl
Posted by: Baldy at May 03, 2013 09:37 AM (tyDFN)
It might be time for a NGO surveillance system though.
Fake Converts and PI dossiers
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 03, 2013 09:38 AM (LRFds)
It would for me at least be a sign of "Balance" if this current WH swiftly ramped this "littlest" Boston Bomber onto the fast-track of justice the same way they did Timothy McVey......but there is that "Work Place Shooting"
at Ft. Hood that they are so dumbfounded and so unable to get their collective arms around........
Hell, I see this kid running for Congress and winning in 4 years
yes.....it is THAT bad........
Posted by: Richard at May 03, 2013 09:38 AM (5P9D4)
Posted by: DrDrill at May 03, 2013 09:41 AM (Davlr)
Giuliani could get the conviction. That guy was a machine as a prosecutor. As for their obstruction not being linkable to subsequent crimes, I'm not so sure. When mass murderers are trying to escape, the prosecution might argue they would be likely to commit additional serious crimes to facilitate their escape. Not much of a reach, especially since they went on to commit the murder of Collier and had the massive shootout with police. Yeah. Giuliani could get the conviction, probably even with O.J.'s jury.
Posted by: OCBill at May 03, 2013 09:42 AM (Mj+FA)
Posted by: Russ from Winterset at May 03, 2013 09:44 AM (iJUs7)
Fake Converts and PI dossiers
Yep.
I don't like the idea of a surveillance state, but when it comes to mosques (most of which are funded by the Saudis), then yeah. I want the FBI to know what every fucking one of them had for breakfast that morning.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 03, 2013 09:47 AM (SY2Kh)
"Alex."
I'll take Bull Dykes in Democratic Administrations with the name of "Janet"
for 1 Trillion Dollars.
Yes I would......
Posted by: Richard at May 03, 2013 09:50 AM (5P9D4)
@144
A couple e-mails showing foreknowledge and sympathy, BAM!, a little overt acting, and BAM!, murder charges. But 'bam' sadly not white Tea Partiers.
Posted by: David "BAM!" Sirota at May 03, 2013 09:53 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Tom22ndState at May 03, 2013 10:01 AM (xrzBp)
Posted by: @PurpAv at May 03, 2013 10:02 AM (O9X1o)
I'm normally not comfortable with this type of broad interpretation. Think it swings too much power to the government, which inevitably leads to overreach.
But in this case, I'm still so angry about the bombings and aftermath, to hell with it. You side with scumbags and help them, and if innocent people (cops, soldiers, first responders, bystanders, whatever) get hurt, well, tough s*&t for you.
Posted by: RM at May 03, 2013 10:05 AM (/Frlf)
For the charge of accessory after the fact under MA state law (up to 7 years), they would need to establish that they knew Tsarnaev had committed the felony. If they could not prove that they knew he had done it (vs just knowing he was the suspected of it but not knowing themselves that he had done it) then the accessory after the fact charge would not hold up.
Chapeter 274:
Section 4. Whoever, after the commission of a felony, harbors, conceals, maintains or assists the principal felon or accessory before the fact, or gives such offender any other aid, knowing that he has committed a felony or has been accessory thereto before the fact, with intent that he shall avoid or escape detention, arrest, trial or punishment, shall be an accessory after the fact, and, except as otherwise provided, be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than seven years or in jail for not more than two and one half years or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars.
Posted by: Landru at May 03, 2013 10:11 AM (x8l09)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at May 03, 2013 10:12 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Yip at May 03, 2013 10:14 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: waldo at May 03, 2013 10:21 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: Waldo at May 03, 2013 10:30 AM (sXWmd)
from the National Enquirer (remember they took down Edwards)
Auto mechanic Gilberto Junior, owner of Junior Auto Body, Inc., in Somerville, Mass., came face to face with Jahar less than 24 hours after the bombings and says he was certain “(Jahar) was on drugs” when he showed up at his shop.
Jahar seemed desperate to pick up a white Mercedes station wagon heÂ’d dropped off a few weeks before with a damaged rear bumper. HeÂ’d said the car belonged to a girlfriend.
Junior said Tsarnaev often brought in cars for wealthy friends from Boston University and MIT, and always paid in cash. What was strange was that Jahar showed up the day after the bombings wanting the car back early, clearly on edge.
“He was very nervous, biting his nails, agitated,” Junior said. “I thought he was on drugs, medication.” Junior didn’t report it to police. Tsarnaev took the Mercedes without having it fixed.
The Mercedes was not the car that the Tsarnaev brothers were in when cops cornered them in Watertown, killing JaharÂ’s brother Tamerlan, while Jahar sped off, running over his brother. He later ditched the vehicle and escaped on foot.
so, who's car did he pick up?
Posted by: Thunderb at May 03, 2013 11:35 AM (nH8jP)
Posted by: Dustin at May 03, 2013 12:37 PM (QJwr3)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2019 seconds, 287 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Aloha Akhbar @PirateBallerina at May 03, 2013 08:43 AM (/lWM8)