June 09, 2013
— Open Blogger Last week, I solicited responses to the question, what is the dumbest thing ever said to you by a liberal, and thanks to you morons, the thread was pure comedy gold.
I think what surprised me the most, although maybe it shouldn't have, were the examples where the liberal simply refused to look at contrary evidence, even when the conservative held it up right in front of their face. Here are some examples:
99 My ultra-Leftist sister told me she could never vote Republican because of slavery, the Ku Klux Klan and the plight of the American Indian.
I informed my sister that the Republican Party was founded by fifty men determined to end slavery, that her Democrats tore America in two and went to war in defense of slavery, that her Democrats founded and controlled the Ku Klux Klan, and that the Trail of Tears was the direct result of a lawless Democrat president choosing to ignore the ruling of the Supreme Court.
She told me that "everyone knows that none of that is true."
I offered her three history books. She refused to take them.
Posted by: Sam Adams at June 01, 2013 12:19 PM (ECDAN)
221 91 This isn't quite as stupid but my father, who has a PhD in mechanical engineering so he's no dummy, told me that Bush lied and the Republicans forced the authorization of force through the Senate. I told him that the Democrats controlled the senate in September 2001.
He wouldn't look at my phone when I pulled it up on the internet.
Posted by: Timon at June 01, 2013 12:17 PM (LGDTn)
200 "Margret Sanger was not a racist eugenicist!"
Upon showing him a website to the contrary (this was before Wikipedia) he declared it to be conservatively biased.
The website in question: Columbia University's History Department.
Posted by: tsrblke at June 01, 2013 12:41 PM (GaqMa)
555 Another otherwise bright co-worker was upset that Military Spending was more than the US GDP. When I pointed out that it was more around 5% or less of GDP he said I didn't know what I was talking about. When I sent him a link to the government figures he responded "Everyone is entitled to their own facts."
Yes, really. He said that.
Posted by: Mr. Feverhead at June 01, 2013 05:56 PM (SzAZ7)
Isn't that bizarre? And we're not talking about opposing opinions based on subtle differences of interpretive nuance, but simple, bare-bones facts that everyone ought to know. You can argue about the truthfulness of the fact, or the accuracy of the fact, or the significance of the fact, or the relevance of the fact, but to simply pretend the fact isn't there makes me wonder how it's possible to even talk to these people, much less reason with them.
Oh, and one more amusing item. I gave some examples of stupid liberal crap just to get the ball rolling, including this one:
"The main stream media are hopelessly biased in favour of the right - a result of the fact that they are owned by mega-corporations."
"Mega corporations" of course being the number 1 bad guy in the progressive left cosmology. So, after giving this as a prime example of liberal dumbass-itude, along comes one of our clueless resident trolls with:
527 The main stream media is biased towards earning the mega corporations that own them the largest profits possible.
Posted by: occam at June 01, 2013 04:32 PM (DAHhf)
See what the halfwit troll did there? He all but cut and pasted the original dumb-assed comment and presented it as serious wisdom.
Of course, he'll probably claim he was being ironic.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
04:45 PM
| Comments (315)
Post contains 626 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 04:47 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 04:47 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 04:49 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 04:49 PM (9XBK2)
They probably think the same thing about us.
Posted by: Valiant at June 09, 2013 04:49 PM (aFxlY)
Now that I have seen leftism, I'm not so sure of that any more.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at June 09, 2013 04:50 PM (A4irB)
Posted by: JohnKerryIsADoucheBag at June 09, 2013 04:50 PM (6sqK6)
Posted by: Andy at June 09, 2013 04:50 PM (li+aS)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 04:51 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Jack at June 09, 2013 04:51 PM (gWHwW)
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 04:51 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 09, 2013 04:51 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 04:51 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 04:52 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 04:53 PM (9XBK2)
Me- Yes the rainforests are important but the people cut and burn them so they can feed themselves.
Her- Well, they should just do something else.
Me- (aneurism)
Posted by: typo dynamofo at June 09, 2013 04:54 PM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: Peaches at June 09, 2013 04:55 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 04:56 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Jack at June 09, 2013 04:56 PM (gWHwW)
Posted by: nerdygirl at June 09, 2013 04:56 PM (qAtlQ)
Posted by: toby928© Alabama Alumnus and Native Texan, now with twice the insufferability at June 09, 2013 04:57 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at June 09, 2013 04:58 PM (1hekh)
Yes, this. Much like my sister, who has never, ever read a newspaper or had a serious conversation, whose head is full of little sparkly cupcakes she mistakenly believes are the smart things to think. No amount of racist-y fact-talking is going to change them.
Posted by: Peaches at June 09, 2013 04:58 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 04:58 PM (sdi6R)
Code: Block. Cauterize. Stabilize.
Posted by: Combine AI at June 09, 2013 04:59 PM (qrHMp)
Posted by: Adam at June 09, 2013 04:59 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: The Political Hat at June 09, 2013 05:00 PM (Vk2pI)
I missed the original thread; here are my two favorites:
Senator Ted Kennedy allegedly once said he was appalled that half of the American people earn less than the median income. I doubt the truth of the story, but then again, it's Ted Kennedy.
During college, late 70s, a buddy and I (both of our dads worked in the oil business) were talking to a sociology prof about the energy crisis. Dr. K said he couldn't understand how anyone could be in business solely to make money. My buddy and I were speechless.
Posted by: Jim in Virginia at June 09, 2013 05:01 PM (YlUYT)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 05:01 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Thunderb at June 09, 2013 05:01 PM (nH8jP)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectal at June 09, 2013 05:02 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: nerdygirl at June 09, 2013 08:56 PM (qAtlQ)
There was a female poster here who told a story about being out somewhere and she was having a conversation with a black woman. Don't remember the specifics but I remember her telling us that in the course of the conversation she said Lincoln was a Republican. The woman did not believe her.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 09, 2013 05:03 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl..back home at June 09, 2013 05:03 PM (8JJ6O)
My boss had to calm me down and get me to step out for a bit.
Posted by: NR Pax at June 09, 2013 05:05 PM (U+O64)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectal at June 09, 2013 05:06 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at June 09, 2013 05:07 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectal at June 09, 2013 05:07 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:08 PM (bb5+k)
No, that math works. If you're in the 11th Dimension. Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 09, 2013 08:51 PM (GEICT)
I didn't know CAC was in charge of military spending.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at June 09, 2013 05:08 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: I Be That Chick at June 09, 2013 05:09 PM (wiJTg)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 09, 2013 05:09 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 05:09 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at June 09, 2013 05:09 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 09, 2013 05:10 PM (TCGmg)
Posted by: RS at June 09, 2013 05:10 PM (YAGV/)
"Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old former CIA technical assistant, says he passed the classified information that blew open a number of intense surveillance operations, to the media because he doesn't 'want to live in a society that does these sort of things.' Snowden, who now works for Booz Allen Hamilton, a defense contractor for the National Security Agency, caused a firestorm after he leaked the sensitive documents to The Guardian over several days of interviews."
is this a snowden of yesteryear?
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl..back home at June 09, 2013 09:03 PM (8JJ6O)
What can I say? Snowden lost his guts.
Posted by: Yossarian at June 09, 2013 05:10 PM (YCDYX)
Posted by: Barney F. at June 09, 2013 05:10 PM (m5Tr1)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:11 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Thunderb at June 09, 2013 05:11 PM (nH8jP)
To make things worse, I was on Active Drill status in the Corps at the time so things were getting driven home right then and there.
Posted by: NR Pax at June 09, 2013 05:12 PM (U+O64)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 08:56 PM
Like the poor Indians (dot, but also feather) who were forced to do their native dances for tourists to earn a living. Eating is demeaning, I guess.
Posted by: huerfano at June 09, 2013 05:13 PM (bAGA/)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 09, 2013 05:13 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: The Third Horesman Of The Apocalypse at June 09, 2013 09:08 PM (vbh31)
The problem is that we really aren't meeting. They believe there should be NO surveillance at all (except maybe Republicans) while we want surveillance on people who want to kill us but with judicial oversight. The only meeting is that we both think Barry went too far this time.
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at June 09, 2013 05:13 PM (1hekh)
I have never found that I need any chemical assistance to do either.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at June 09, 2013 05:15 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 05:15 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:15 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 09, 2013 05:17 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:17 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: "Prognosticus" at June 09, 2013 05:18 PM (u6IuP)
Posted by: Molly k. at June 09, 2013 05:18 PM (WgeYS)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 09, 2013 05:18 PM (5p18q)
Posted by: Thunderb at June 09, 2013 05:18 PM (nH8jP)
Posted by: Rufus T. Firefly at June 09, 2013 05:18 PM (PwV7G)
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl..back home at June 09, 2013 05:20 PM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: eleven at June 09, 2013 05:20 PM (fsLdt)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 09, 2013 05:20 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: weew at June 09, 2013 05:21 PM (ElfHn)
Posted by: Hanoverfist at June 09, 2013 05:21 PM (HiKk0)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 09, 2013 05:21 PM (CA2NO)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 09, 2013 05:21 PM (5p18q)
Posted by: Jim in Virginia at June 09, 2013 05:22 PM (YlUYT)
Posted by: RWC at June 09, 2013 05:22 PM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: RWC at June 09, 2013 05:24 PM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: weew at June 09, 2013 05:24 PM (ElfHn)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 08:51 PM (9XBK2)
Yep. About 25-35% (depending on the poll) of the country are radical leftists that would vote for democrats or communists automatically and cannot be turned. 30-40% of the country is "conservative" and are open to voting republican. The rest are "moderates" 25-35% (depending on the poll) who are mostly LIV's and vote where the winds take them and are open to persuasion.
I was in the latter (LIV) category about 7 years ago.
Posted by: NWConservative at June 09, 2013 05:24 PM (M1gmo)
Posted by: WTP at June 09, 2013 05:24 PM (xVT49)
religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world."
Winston Churchill (1899)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at June 09, 2013 05:26 PM (z4m16)
Posted by: RWC at June 09, 2013 05:26 PM (Wl/Ht)
Deluded is a more accurate diagnosis. As Reagan said, "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant.... It's that they know so much which isn't so. ""
The trouble with liberals is their assumption that involuntary collective action is less costly than voluntary collective action. From that one false assumption flow a million different stupid policies.
Posted by: Sudden Clarity Clarence at June 09, 2013 05:26 PM (qleDs)
Posted by: Whoopi Goldberg, professional wit at June 09, 2013 05:26 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: no good deed at June 09, 2013 05:27 PM (mjR67)
Posted by: Berserker at June 09, 2013 09:05 PM (FMbng)
No. Some of them are quite intelligent and even well informed. (About other things, of course.)
I just had a experience like that this week. A guy who works for me, one of the best scientists I've ever met and a really good guy, made some comment about the evils of capitalism. I pointed out that capitalism was the greatest force for lifting people out of misery and poverty in the history of mankind, well over a billion in the last 20 years alone. He responded that it was at the price of some guy in North Carolina getting rich by shipping textile jobs overseas. I told him I seriously doubted that the one billion cared about someone getting rich in NC because now they could feed their families. I also asked him if he was familiar with the concept of comparative advantage, or had read Wealth of Nations. His response: that's a very old book.
I gave up.
Posted by: pep at June 09, 2013 05:28 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Thunderb at June 09, 2013 05:28 PM (nH8jP)
It's a simple as this: it's a lot easier to FEEL than it is to THINK.
Intelectually, liberals are like a morbidly obese person who knows damn well the realities of caloric intake and exercise... but eats the donut anyway.
The donut feels good, and the treadmill feels bad. Posted by: weew at June 09, 2013 09:21 PM (ElfHn)
And we have a winner!
Sadly this is the way the country is going. Logic is dead.
I just read an article by RSMcain today which talked about the ascendance of "scientific data" justifying behavior and morality and noted we used to have the "naturalistic fallacy" (or the Is/Ought problem) and people understood it and avoided it.
But no more. Now nature is morality. (Rather than morality being what separates us from the rest of nature.)
Posted by: tsrblke at June 09, 2013 05:28 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Berserker at June 09, 2013 05:28 PM (FMbng)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 09, 2013 05:29 PM (CA2NO)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 05:29 PM (9XBK2)
Liberals:
- think short-term
- are interested almost exclusively about results
- are interested almost exclusively about directly tangible outcomes
Conservatives:
- think long-term
- are interested more about process than about results
- are interested both in the tangible outcomes but also in the non-tangible outcomes
So when it comes to something like welfare, liberals see a poor woman living in poverty and say "the government should give her money". And that's it. No consideration for the moral hazards, no consideration for how the money was obtained in the first place (extracted from wealth creators), no consideration for concerns about economic liberty or any of that.
In other words, liberal "philosophy" is just shallow means-justify-the-ends nonsense.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 09, 2013 05:30 PM (5p18q)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 09, 2013 09:21 PM (5p18q)
My liberal boss believes that Barack Obama comes to her in her dreams. They are TOTALLY hypnotized by their political figures, it is a cult.
Posted by: NWConservative at June 09, 2013 05:30 PM (M1gmo)
-------------------------
(yawn...) Well..., I think I'll wrap it up for tonight. Axelrod, see that I'm not disturbed until..., oh, 9:00 a.m.
Posted by: Barky O. at June 09, 2013 05:31 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Tuna at June 09, 2013 05:31 PM (M/TDA)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 09, 2013 05:32 PM (CA2NO)
Sorry, Chemjeff, but I couldn't disagree more. They're about striking a pose, not results.
Posted by: pep at June 09, 2013 05:32 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Beto at June 09, 2013 05:32 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 09:29 PM (9XBK2)
So true! He speaks in a way that they can understand: talking point speak.
Posted by: NWConservative at June 09, 2013 05:32 PM (M1gmo)
Sorry, Chemjeff, but I couldn't disagree more. They're about striking a pose, not results.
Posted by: pep at June 09, 2013 09:32 PM (6TB1Z)
Well, yeah. I suppose it should be rephrased as "interested almost exclusively on what they believe the result will be".
Posted by: chemjeff at June 09, 2013 05:33 PM (5p18q)
Posted by: Adam at June 09, 2013 05:34 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: RWC at June 09, 2013 05:34 PM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 05:34 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Tuna at June 09, 2013 09:31 PM (M/TDA)
The same Peter King who had a hissy fit because Ted Cruz came to a rally in NY state. He is just as bad as John McCain and miss Lindsey.
Posted by: NWConservative at June 09, 2013 05:34 PM (M1gmo)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at June 09, 2013 05:35 PM (V1ZIU)
That's the favorite refrain from Eric Alterman.
Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at June 09, 2013 05:35 PM (fnPRp)
Posted by: FordCityKathy at June 09, 2013 05:35 PM (moC+6)
- think short-term
- are interested almost exclusively about results
=====
I'd argue this one. Liberals couldn't give a crap about results. Look at all their 'feel good' programs. Zero results.....or negative results. Yet, they 'feel good' about what they did.
Posted by: Tami [/i][/b][/s][/u] at June 09, 2013 05:36 PM (X6akg)
He totally lost me over the Hurricane Sandy kerfluffle.
Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at June 09, 2013 05:36 PM (fnPRp)
Posted by: Sister Sestina at June 09, 2013 05:36 PM (ESbvS)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at June 09, 2013 05:36 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: JQP at June 09, 2013 05:36 PM (GVL0g)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm71Khu5-Lk
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 05:37 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 09, 2013 05:37 PM (GEICT)
You know what will really freak them out? Tell them that all of the major unions are actually organized as.... *corporations*.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 09, 2013 05:38 PM (5p18q)
Posted by: baldilocks at June 09, 2013 05:38 PM (Su0W2)
Posted by: Demosthenes at June 09, 2013 05:38 PM (okNST)
Posted by: zsasz at June 09, 2013 05:38 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Jack at June 09, 2013 05:38 PM (gWHwW)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:38 PM (bb5+k)
And people talk about the Children's Crusade as if its an aberration and abomination caused by the religious faithful without realizing we are seeing a similar one right now with the FSA/OWS bunch.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 09, 2013 05:38 PM (TCGmg)
Her: nobody needs a gun.
Me: gun ownership actually saves more lives than it 'costs,' a lot more.
Her: don't spout your statistics at me! I know how I FEEL !!
Posted by: Joe Doaks at June 09, 2013 05:38 PM (auzCl)
Posted by: Rosie O'Donnell at June 09, 2013 05:39 PM (qrHMp)
Posted by: Tami at June 09, 2013 09:36 PM (X6akg)
What I mean by this, is that they don't really care how a particular result was obtained.
If a poor guy got a government welfare check and was now suddenly not as poor, the liberal would consider this to be a "success" without any consideration on how the money was obtained, how the money was distributed, and what the money was ultimately spent on.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 09, 2013 05:39 PM (5p18q)
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2013/02/11/wonder-festival-2013-winter-cosplay/
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 09, 2013 05:40 PM (TCGmg)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 09, 2013 05:40 PM (CA2NO)
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 05:40 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:40 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 05:41 PM (9XBK2)
You're forgetting that the liberal would also not consider what use the money MIGHT have gone for. The unseen, baby. Bastiat. Hazlitt.
Liberal: "What? Who?"
Exactly.
Posted by: Demosthenes at June 09, 2013 05:41 PM (okNST)
Posted by: Tom Sawyer at June 09, 2013 05:41 PM (7zSvv)
Posted by: Juan de Hattatime at June 09, 2013 05:42 PM (CqZmo)
Of course, corporations exist to give people jobs. We probably wore out the Sword of Truth quotes the other day, but "Faith of the Fallen" very aptly describes the liberal idea of what a corporation is and what it should do.
Posted by: no good deed at June 09, 2013 05:42 PM (mjR67)
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl..back home at June 09, 2013 05:42 PM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: Cate in IN at June 09, 2013 05:42 PM (1JJGO)
If a poor guy got a government welfare check and was now suddenly not as poor, the liberal would consider this to be a "success" without any consideration on how the money was obtained, how the money was distributed, and what the money was ultimately spent on.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 09, 2013 09:39 PM (5p18q)
Ah, ok.
Buy a man a fish or teach a man to fish.
Posted by: Tami [/i][/b][/s][/u] at June 09, 2013 05:42 PM (X6akg)
I think of them as sort of a Platonic ideal, second only to a nice backside.
Posted by: pep at June 09, 2013 05:42 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:43 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Tom Sawyer at June 09, 2013 05:43 PM (7zSvv)
Posted by: South Park 'Smug Alert!' at June 09, 2013 05:44 PM (q4QfH)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 09, 2013 05:44 PM (TCGmg)
Posted by: Juan de Hattatime at June 09, 2013 05:45 PM (CqZmo)
Posted by: South Park 'Smug Alert!' at June 09, 2013 09:44 PM (q4QfH)
Yup, they actually believe that we "hate the poor", without irony or exaggeration.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 09, 2013 05:46 PM (5p18q)
Posted by: Beto at June 09, 2013 05:46 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: baldilocks at June 09, 2013 05:46 PM (Su0W2)
Posted by: Jake in ID at June 09, 2013 05:46 PM (s/TCI)
Posted by: Sister Sestina at June 09, 2013 05:46 PM (ESbvS)
Posted by: Adam at June 09, 2013 05:46 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: sydney jane at June 09, 2013 05:46 PM (3a4vw)
Posted by: Demosthenes at June 09, 2013 09:38 PM (okNST)
But you can ignore a fact and it is much easier than dealing with it!
Posted by: Weimar Republican at June 09, 2013 05:47 PM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Hanoverfist at June 09, 2013 05:47 PM (HiKk0)
Posted by: Jack at June 09, 2013 05:47 PM (gWHwW)
For the left, truth, as we have come to know it, is a malleable and situationally variable quantity.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 09, 2013 05:47 PM (Dc/7h)
Posted by: Thunderb at June 09, 2013 05:47 PM (nH8jP)
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 05:47 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:48 PM (bb5+k)
O/T, but found the perfect place for all you gun-loving and boobeh-loving morons!
"Girls for Gunslingers"
It's 99.9% SFW (it's Facebook). Also great pic material for an ONT or gun thread.
Posted by: Icedog at June 09, 2013 05:48 PM (ZolUS)
Posted by: Dr. DangerGirl Ph.F.D., B! @deadlyestrogen at June 09, 2013 05:48 PM (GrtrJ)
Posted by: Sister Sestina at June 09, 2013 05:48 PM (ESbvS)
Posted by: SARDiver at June 09, 2013 05:49 PM (jL2SU)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at June 09, 2013 05:49 PM (lLReE)
...it says.
LOL. You ain't no conservative, Troll Unit # (7zSvv) .
Posted by: Rosie O'Donnell at June 09, 2013 05:49 PM (qrHMp)
Posted by: sydney jane at June 09, 2013 09:46 PM
Didn't he feel all icky about saying someone slipped something past the smartest president EVAH?
Posted by: huerfano at June 09, 2013 05:50 PM (bAGA/)
Posted by: baldilocks at June 09, 2013 05:50 PM (Su0W2)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:53 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Mandy P., lurking lurker who lurks at June 09, 2013 05:53 PM (qFpRI)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at June 09, 2013 05:53 PM (lLReE)
But no more. Now nature is morality. (Rather than morality being what separates us from the rest of nature.)
Posted by: tsrblke at June 09, 2013 09:28 PM (GaqMa)
This is just the projection of "I want it to be so, therefore, it is so." They really feel that returning to their animalistic urges will somehow fulfill them in a way that living a moral and ethical life will not. After all, once you abandon God, you have no rational reason to conform to any system other than "if it feels good, do it."
They have the brains of infants in this regard.
Posted by: tcn at June 09, 2013 05:54 PM (VLG62)
Posted by: The NSA at June 09, 2013 05:54 PM (gWHwW)
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 05:54 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Cate in IN at June 09, 2013 05:54 PM (1JJGO)
Posted by: Hanoverfist at June 09, 2013 05:56 PM (HiKk0)
Posted by: Weirddave at June 09, 2013 05:56 PM (aH+zP)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:57 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 09, 2013 05:58 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: Sister Sestina at June 09, 2013 05:58 PM (ESbvS)
Posted by: Beto at June 09, 2013 05:59 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 05:59 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 05:59 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: The NSA at June 09, 2013 06:00 PM (gWHwW)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s][/u] at June 09, 2013 06:00 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 09, 2013 09:46 PM (5p18q)
I love to ask them, "What have you done today for a poor person, exactly?"
My other favorite is when I am attacked for my pro-life stance, and somebody says "Oh, yeah, like you are going to adopt all those babies nobody wants." I get to tell them that I did, and would, and will. They really don't see it and assume all conservatives hate women/poor/liberals. They might be right about that last one, but it's more pity than hate at this point.
Posted by: tcn at June 09, 2013 06:00 PM (VLG62)
"Better to be feared than liked." - Machiavelli.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 09, 2013 06:00 PM (TCGmg)
Posted by: Weirddave at June 09, 2013 06:01 PM (aH+zP)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 09, 2013 06:02 PM (GEICT)
Woman is drippy, uses sock for a rag
strong but stupid flagella swim the rest of the way Posted by: Beto
------------------
Okay..., gonna need some more scotch here
Posted by: Mike Hammer at June 09, 2013 06:03 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 09, 2013 06:03 PM (CA2NO)
Posted by: RWC at June 09, 2013 06:03 PM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: JQP at June 09, 2013 06:03 PM (HfKLk)
Posted by: Rufus T. Firefly at June 09, 2013 06:03 PM (PwV7G)
Posted by: zsasz at June 09, 2013 06:04 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Mandy P., lurking lurker who lurks at June 09, 2013 06:04 PM (qFpRI)
Posted by: baldilocks at June 09, 2013 06:05 PM (Su0W2)
Posted by: Mandy P., lurking lurker who lurks at June 09, 2013 10:04 PM (qFpRI)
Well, you can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make her think.
Posted by: tcn at June 09, 2013 06:06 PM (VLG62)
Thank you, steevy. You're a Great American!
Posted by: Sean Hannity at June 09, 2013 06:06 PM (qrHMp)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at June 09, 2013 06:06 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: Sean Hannity at June 09, 2013 10:06 PM (qrHMp)
Oh great, another one who only reads the comments.
Posted by: tcn at June 09, 2013 06:07 PM (VLG62)
Posted by: Beto at June 09, 2013 06:08 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl..back home at June 09, 2013 06:08 PM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: JQP at June 09, 2013 06:08 PM (HfKLk)
Kabul International Airport under attack.
Suicide bombers said to be in US Air Force section.
Reported by Reuters
and
On Twitter by Ahmad Mukhtar
Posted by: LeBron Steinman at June 09, 2013 06:08 PM (jfWE9)
Posted by: Beto at June 09, 2013 10:08 PM (MhA4j)
Actually, far less, if you're not super-picky about your posting!
And, damn, the Heat have come alive here. Their defense is astonishing.
Posted by: Peaches at June 09, 2013 06:09 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: Thunderb at June 09, 2013 06:09 PM (nH8jP)
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 06:09 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Rufus T. Firefly at June 09, 2013 06:09 PM (PwV7G)
Posted by: BubbaLou at June 09, 2013 06:09 PM (qKpun)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 09, 2013 06:09 PM (TCGmg)
Out here in the People's Soviet Socialist Republic of Commiefornia, the typical liberal talking point is that "military spending is 50% of the budget".
I come back with the actual figure, and they say "But you're not counting the cost of Bush's wars".
(Note that although my liberal Democratic representative in the House, and one of my two liberal Democratic senators, both voted for both of the wars in question, the wars are always "Bush's wars" here, and always will be.)
I point out that I am in fact counting the cost of the wars to the penny.
They then say "You're not counting veterans' programs."
I point out that I am.
They start to get panicky. "You're not counting the CIA."
No, I'm not. Because that's not military spending. But let's add in CIA, NSA and various other three-letter agencies. Still not anywhere even remotely close to 50% of the budget.
(Liberal eyes shifting rapidly.) "You aren't counting nuclear weapons support costs at the Department of Energy."
Fair enough. Let's put that in. (Those costs are basically a rounding error.)
They insist on adding anything and everything even remotely related to defense and still don't get their cherished "50%" of the budget. Even wanting to add present-day interest on defense-related components of prior years' budgets.
What's the final fallback?
"Secret black programs that nobody knows about."
When you cock your head and say, "So we're down to undisprovable assertions now?", their response is to say smugly, "See, you don't have all the answers."
Rational discourse across the left-right divide really is no longer possible. The only solution is to shut down the USA, and split up the country as amicably as we can all manage.
Posted by: torquewrench at June 09, 2013 06:11 PM (gqT4g)
Plus, I will never forget when he tried to go all ghetto-gansta with some rapper on tv. That was a real facepalm moment right there. He's about as gangsta as I am.
Posted by: Peaches at June 09, 2013 06:11 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: Mandy P., lurking lurker who lurks at June 09, 2013 06:13 PM (qFpRI)
Posted by: Hanoverfist at June 09, 2013 06:13 PM (HiKk0)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/u][/s] at June 09, 2013 06:14 PM (CA2NO)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 09, 2013 06:14 PM (TCGmg)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s][/u] at June 09, 2013 06:15 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: eman at June 09, 2013 06:15 PM (cQ4xo)
Posted by: The NSA at June 09, 2013 06:15 PM (gWHwW)
Posted by: Tuna at June 09, 2013 06:16 PM (M/TDA)
http://tinyurl.com/m3cuxtw
Michelle Malkin wrote a great piece about Antony Wee ner and his problems. Then, in the last paragraph she fell short. New Yorkers will buy wee ners crap cause "he's the best of a bad lot". They won't take her challenge. They'll elect him in spite of her to show her some conservative isn't going to tell them what to do or challenge them.
She's need an alternative stronger ending.
Posted by: caustic at June 09, 2013 06:16 PM (/b8+5)
That's because ignoramuses make up the core constituency of the Democrats.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at June 09, 2013 06:17 PM (9+PGS)
Posted by: BubbaLou at June 09, 2013 06:17 PM (qKpun)
Posted by: zsasz at June 09, 2013 06:17 PM (MMC8r)
----------
It's not a lie if you believe it.
Posted by: Anachronda Hears Stuff at June 09, 2013 06:18 PM (U82Km)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at June 09, 2013 06:18 PM (bb5+k)
We lost our tails
Evolving up
From little snails
I say it's all
Just wind in sails
Are we not men?
We are Devo!
Are we not men?
D-E-V-O
Posted by: Mark Mothersbaugh at June 09, 2013 06:19 PM (e8kgV)
The whole world should be able to vote in American elections because we are so powerful and have so much influence and control it isn't fair to the other contries , who are all pretty much oppressed by us.
No shit. Some hippie chick actually said that to me in almost those exact words with full sincerity. They have forever since been etched into my mind.
Posted by: JSR4225 at June 09, 2013 06:19 PM (oG53/)
Take a read through _Top Secret America_ some time.
One of the points made in the book is that if you take the entire potentially eligible workforce in the USA, and you throw out everyone with stuff in their background which makes them ineligible for work inside the clearance wall, like criminal convictions, even minor, or being foreign nationals, et cetera, then the potential hiring pool goes from an ocean to a puddle real damn quick.
And, with the huge demand for cleared workers post-9/11, the number of private contractors and government agencies needing to get at that puddle of recruits is... considerable. Plus, the clearance investigation backlog moves at a pace which makes the Post Office look like a frenzy of activity.
So otherwise undistinguished and mediocre people find themselves in the career catbird seat, and they get enormous salaries and responsibilities far beyond their actual talents, simply because their employers CAN'T GET ANYONE BETTER who has the necessary clearance.
It really is that simple, and that complex, all in one.
Posted by: torquewrench at June 09, 2013 06:19 PM (gqT4g)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 06:20 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Cate in IN at June 09, 2013 06:21 PM (1JJGO)
Century 21 real estate agent Kerri Jo Heim says Sunday that the owner of the house wanted the couple out so that the home could be sold.
Heim says police came by on Wednesday to ask where the couple went. She told them she didn't know.
Posted by: Diogenes' Honest Man at June 09, 2013 06:21 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 06:21 PM (9XBK2)
=============
They haven't experienced smallpox..., or rotted teeth..., or tetanus..., or typhus..., bubonic plague, etc.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at June 09, 2013 06:22 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: baldilocks at June 09, 2013 06:22 PM (Su0W2)
Posted by: Arbalest at June 09, 2013 06:22 PM (FlRtG)
Posted by: Cate in IN at June 09, 2013 06:22 PM (1JJGO)
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at June 09, 2013 06:23 PM (qIFL7)
I said about Ayn Rand at the time, "She systematically demolished my most cherished beliefs and assumptions, then proceeded to rebuild them on a stronger foundation."
Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 09:47 PM (sdi6R)
I think the ones who change from liberal to conservative are those who respect the truth. In order to be a liberal, you have to live in a cognitive vacume and believe that your policies help people. Which is why they always try to silence opposing viewpoints, because they initiate cognitive dissonance when faced with facts or with reality.
They are three times more likely than either a conservative or moderate to try and shun or shut down conversations with people online when opinions are antithetical to their internal belief. Many of them are not payed for their beliefs and so form an internal set of rules and views that are much harder to wrangle with than someone who is bribed/forced to think a certain way. Which is why congresspeople change their views to suit what is popular since they will get their affirmations from external sources of either punishment:voters or rewards: donors.
When a lowly liberal faces facts and reality, the cognitive dissonance is incredibly uncomfortable for them and it is easier for them to just shut down the conversation or call the facts/ person arguing with them liars. I know, that is exactly how I was.
Posted by: NWConservative at June 09, 2013 06:23 PM (M1gmo)
Posted by: caustic at June 09, 2013 06:23 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: eman at June 09, 2013 06:23 PM (cQ4xo)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 06:25 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Hanoverfist at June 09, 2013 06:26 PM (HiKk0)
Posted by: occam at June 09, 2013 06:26 PM (DAHhf)
fact, or the significance of the fact, or the relevance of the fact,
but to simply pretend the fact isn't there makes me wonder how it's
possible to even talk to these people, much less reason with them."
---------------------
Thus it is that liberals, by their nature, are (at least) slightly insane.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at June 09, 2013 06:27 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: baldilocks at June 09, 2013 06:27 PM (Su0W2)
Posted by: Tuna at June 09, 2013 06:29 PM (M/TDA)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at June 09, 2013 06:30 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: PT Barnum at June 09, 2013 06:31 PM (93bRa)
Posted by: eman at June 09, 2013 06:31 PM (cQ4xo)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at June 09, 2013 06:31 PM (aDwsi)
Further, there are checks and balances in the system. We write checks to Verizon for information on Pubs and they add the money to their bank balance. We are on top of this situation like Bull humping a Steer.
And, I will not be drawn into a technical conversation with reporters from Fox news who don't even know the difference between a wedgie and a fisting. I cannot answer any more questions. Good day.
Posted by: Barney F. at June 09, 2013 06:32 PM (m5Tr1)
"Americans are x% of the world's population and use xx% (some very high percentage) of the world's----
My response goes along the lines of "Yeah, we're depriving the Muslim world of their fair share of bacon with all our greed.."
The idea of how much of the world's --- is produced by Americans or what other cultures might actually desire never enters their heads, it's all about how we should feel guilty and greedy.
Posted by: JHW at June 09, 2013 06:33 PM (B38OD)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at June 09, 2013 06:34 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: I Be That Chick at June 09, 2013 06:34 PM (wiJTg)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at June 09, 2013 06:35 PM (61Bps)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 09, 2013 06:35 PM (TCGmg)
Posted by: baldilocks at June 09, 2013 06:36 PM (Su0W2)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at June 09, 2013 06:37 PM (4Mv1T)
Posted by: baldilocks at June 09, 2013 06:38 PM (Su0W2)
Posted by: Mandy P., lurking lurker who lurks at June 09, 2013 06:39 PM (qFpRI)
Posted by: caustic at June 09, 2013 06:39 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: T. at June 09, 2013 06:40 PM (u6IuP)
Posted by: Hanoverfist at June 09, 2013 06:40 PM (HiKk0)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at June 09, 2013 06:43 PM (aDwsi)
No shit. Some hippie chick actually said that to me in almost those exact words with full sincerity. They have forever since been etched into my mind.
Posted by: JSR4225 at June 09, 2013 10:19 PM (oG53/)
Sooo, they DO want us to go around the world sticking United States of Earth flags in everyone's asses. Good to know.
Posted by: Berserker at June 09, 2013 06:43 PM (FMbng)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 09, 2013 06:44 PM (MBqvE)
Posted by: Tobacco Road at June 09, 2013 06:45 PM (4Mv1T)
-----------------------
As though Proglodytes are disturbed by contradiction...., or hypocrisy.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at June 09, 2013 06:47 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl..back home at June 09, 2013 06:48 PM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 09, 2013 06:48 PM (MBqvE)
Posted by: Hal at June 09, 2013 06:52 PM (76LPi)
For the Ayn Rand / Objectivist folks:
Do any Randians have kids? Did they have them after becoming Objectivists? From the little I know of the movement, none did.
But I am open with my ignorance (and laziness in doing research) and am hoping to be informed.
Posted by: Hal at June 09, 2013 06:54 PM (76LPi)
All one can do now is maximize their cognitive dissonance and enjoy. Or, just annoy them:
Liberal: We need comprehensive immigration reform.
Me: Why?
Liberal: We cannot deport 11 million people.
Me: How many can we deport? Let's start with that and build on it.
Posted by: Buckethead at June 09, 2013 07:00 PM (u3N3z)
I'm reminded of when I mentioned to a co-worker, some years ago, about how the top few percent pay half of the income tax. They acted like they had never heard that before, and did not believe me. Yeah, I'm guessing it was a liberal.
The way I see it, the top few percent of tax payers pay the first half, the next 50 percent pay the second half - and the third half is borrowed!
Posted by: Optimizer at June 09, 2013 07:09 PM (Mxt9o)
Posted by: MrX at June 09, 2013 07:12 PM (PxmNZ)
aw look....catpiss troll tried to make a funny
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl..back home at June 09, 2013 10:48 PM (8JJ6O)
It wasn't a joke.
Everyone who reads what you say has a lot of interesting things to say about the emptiness and hate inside a person so consumed with a stranger on the internet. Think about that, if you can find your lib brain.
Posted by: caustic at June 09, 2013 07:13 PM (/b8+5)
Everyone who reads what you say has a lot of interesting things to say about the emptiness and hate inside a person so consumed with a stranger on the internet. Think about that, if you can find your lib brain.
Posted by: caustic at June 09, 2013 11:13 PM (/b8+5)
She's not the one keeping dossiers on commenters and stalking moron meetups. That's you, you deranged psychopath.
Posted by: buzzion at June 09, 2013 07:39 PM (LI48c)
The Left likes to blurt out "The USA has 5% of the world's population, but consumes 30% of the world's resources! That's wrong!"
When a lefty told me this, I replied:
"You're right. I take your point. We should vaporize the other 95% of the world's population. Then we would be 100% of the world's population, but consume 30% of the world's resources, and we'd be cool, right?"
Posted by: Jay Guevara at June 09, 2013 07:40 PM (Z2Bkq)
Posted by: John the Libertarian at June 09, 2013 07:41 PM (jKf/K)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at June 09, 2013 07:50 PM (x6weF)
Posted by: D1stewart at June 09, 2013 08:24 PM (fIkHQ)
In the neighborhood where I grew up there was a mockingbird that, every spring for a number of years, would perform its repertoire at 2AM in the morning almost on a nightly basis in a tree two houses down. The only good thing was that the cursed bird was easily silenced with a closely located shot from a BB pistol.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at June 09, 2013 08:54 PM (9+PGS)
http://i.imgur.com/Jf9YjhO.jpg
Posted by: caustic at June 09, 2013 09:17 PM (/b8+5)
sorry link fail, here is link for 299
Posted by: caustic at June 09, 2013 09:19 PM (/b8+5)
Posted by: chaz at June 10, 2013 01:19 AM (vZIUi)
The one we have there now has managed to imitate the distinctive meow of a feral cat who begs for food every morning, sort of a scratchy croak. And I swear to you that once summer, there was one who imitated a telephone ringing, because I kept hearing the phone and would go inside and there was no call.
Posted by: Miss Marple at June 10, 2013 02:31 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 10, 2013 02:45 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: defendUSA at June 10, 2013 03:09 AM (nAHMK)
Posted by: steevy at June 09, 2013 08:47 PM (9XBK2)"
It's liberal fascism, straight up.
Posted by: dissent555 at June 10, 2013 04:48 AM (yR6A1)
Posted by: deepred at June 10, 2013 05:18 AM (rUiSC)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at June 10, 2013 05:27 AM (7ObY1)
The one nearest to where I live now does a convincing imitation of a parakeet in its spring daily lineup of impersonations.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at June 10, 2013 07:50 AM (vd7A8)
Posted by: Jen at June 10, 2013 07:51 AM (eMzIq)
the tinyurl link used to go to breitbart's listing of everyone who got arrested under the Occupy Whatever flag. When confronted with facts, shoot the messenger, put your hands over your ears, and start chanting "Not listening, not listening!"
Posted by: hurricane567 at June 10, 2013 10:51 AM (ryui/)
Posted by: Book at June 10, 2013 12:04 PM (y1BMK)
Posted by: Book at June 10, 2013 12:06 PM (y1BMK)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2388 seconds, 443 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: rickl at June 09, 2013 04:47 PM (sdi6R)