March 06, 2013


— Ace

Hudak yesterday told a rape victim, Ms. Collins, that she was just "looking out for her interests" when she supports the same gun ban that got the Collins raped in the first place. You see, a man ill just take a gun from a woman anyway, and then use it against her, so Hudak is defending women here.



Additional questions for her here.

Posted by: Ace at 10:00 AM | Comments (202)
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Don't you worry your pretty little head about that big bad man.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 06, 2013 09:59 AM (GsoHv)

2 Nothing shrinks a boner like a cold 9 mm shower.

Posted by: joncelli, dodging the Zombies of Sequester at March 06, 2013 10:00 AM (RD7QR)

3 "...the stupidity of the rabid cleric trained to chant dogma."

Ace, you seem to do some of your best work on Twitter.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 06, 2013 10:01 AM (GsoHv)

4 Evi Hudak saves lots of people. Just last week she told someone not to run with scissors.

Posted by: soothsayer at March 06, 2013 10:01 AM (E1X66)

5 Brilliant twitter stream, Ace.

The libs are really, really losing this gun argument, aren't they? Every time they say something, others attack them with the truth. I have learned more about the efficacy of guns since they tried to ban them than I ever knew.

Are there really stats about how many assaults were averted by an armed woman?


Posted by: PJ at March 06, 2013 10:02 AM (ZWaLo)

6 Evi Hudak - Like Lena Dunham, a woman who has nothing to fear from rape, and everything to gain.

Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 10:02 AM (t06LC)

7 Her backtrack was just as perverted:

"I feel so horrible for what some of these people have endured," Hudak said. " I am actually really looking out for their best interest."

Their best interest?

Obscene. Fucking obscene Statist, authoritarians.

Fuck you and your best interest.

Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at March 06, 2013 10:03 AM (fMgJk)

8 Rand talking about the HQ. "Is being on a site, sympathizing with some crackpot on the internet, is that enough to bring down a Hellfire missile on your head?"


Lol

Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 10:03 AM (da5Wo)

9 Take a rape for the team?  What's up with that?

Posted by: Soledad O'brien at March 06, 2013 10:04 AM (KXm42)

10 The fact that the rapist    already HAD a gun    is apparently lost on this stupid woman.   In this situation, the young woman would ahve been able to even the odds     if she'd been permitted to have a gun.    But Hudak is too fucking stupid to understand basic things like WORDS.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:05 AM (4df7R)

11 THIS is an excellent question: :: epressiveBlogger69 @AceofSpadesHQ .@senhudak do you think female police officers should be disarmed, given that a stronger male attacker will just take their guns from them?::: Also, should women in combat be disarmed, given that male enemy soldiers will simply take their weapons?

Posted by: Biz Markie at March 06, 2013 10:05 AM (eKiiX)

12 so is this a good argument for not allowing women to be cops or in combat? Anyway, libs seem to believe that there is no reason for anyone to have a gun, because if you pull a gun on a criminal he'll get angry and take the gun away from you. (Unless you're a white Hispanic. Or you shoor him in the face five or six times.) 

Posted by: mallfly at March 06, 2013 10:06 AM (bJm7W)

13 You gotta post some of those tipsforlongdistancedriving tweets. Hilarious

Posted by: wte9 at March 06, 2013 10:06 AM (6Tcdo)

14

Rand talking about the HQ. "Is being on a site, sympathizing with some crackpot on the internet, is that enough to bring down a Hellfire missile on your head?"


 

lol!

 

Like I said, if I suddenly disappear one day without a trace, never to be heard from again, just assume drone strike.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:06 AM (4df7R)

15
I took the high hard one for the team in '34.

Posted by: Helen Thomas at March 06, 2013 10:06 AM (ndqJC)

16 8 Rand talking about the HQ. "Is being on a site, sympathizing with some crackpot on the internet, is that enough to bring down a Hellfire missile on your head?"


Lol

Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 02:03 PM (da5Wo)


[Quickly scans the sky]

Posted by: joncelli, dodging the Zombies of Sequester at March 06, 2013 10:06 AM (RD7QR)

17 let's test this out: Pvt. Collins, you can't have this rifle. The Taliban man will just take it away and use it on you. See? it makes perfect sense.

Posted by: soothsayer at March 06, 2013 10:06 AM (LVtr+)

18

I have a question for her:

 

Have you always been a scrunt or just congeal into one?

Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at March 06, 2013 10:06 AM (uhftQ)

19

I was saying Rand should read the comments here to make a kind of meta-filibuster. History making at its finest! or dumbest.

 

Anyway, I'd feel all helmet-special [NOT star-special] you know?

Posted by: Bigby's Chinese Finger Traps at March 06, 2013 10:07 AM (3ZtZW)

20 Holy crap I just saw one of my Tweets at Twitchy


do I win something?

Posted by: Jones in CO at March 06, 2013 10:07 AM (8sCoq)

21 I think we figured out why Rand voted for Hagel. He's using it as cover to make this stand against Brennan.

Posted by: BSR at March 06, 2013 10:07 AM (H0Rot)

22 The key to reducing rapes is estrogen injections for men. That and not dressing like a trollop, or whore.

Posted by: Evi Hudak at March 06, 2013 10:07 AM (4cRnj)

23 Ms. Hudak,     why is it okay for women to serve on the front lines in a live fire combat situation,    despite centuries of   prohibition   on such a thing,    but   it's NOT okay    for women to carry a firearm here at home for their personal protection,   despite centuries of women doing just that?

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:08 AM (4df7R)

24

So does this mean Rand is one of us?

 

Strange new respect?

Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 10:08 AM (t06LC)

25 You would think that NOW (National Organization for Women) would track the numbers on rapists shot full of holes by women defending themselves. Oh crap, nevermind, what the heck was I thinking/drinking?

Posted by: Judge_Roy_Bean at March 06, 2013 10:09 AM (cCxiu)

26 Holy crap I just saw one of my Tweets at Twitchy


do I win something?

Posted by: Jones in CO

 

Drone strike

Posted by: Lurking Canuck at March 06, 2013 10:09 AM (BrQrN)

27 Sen. Hudak:  Do you think women      really need to vote?  I know it is an exercise of a right guaranteed by a constitutional amendment, but so is bearing arms.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 06, 2013 10:09 AM (pT3XC)

28 It's only logical to take away guns from all women police. It's for their own good.

Posted by: soothsayer at March 06, 2013 10:09 AM (KeJAW)

29 So does this mean Rand is one of us? He had me at Aqua-Buddha.

Posted by: toby928© furthers the meme at March 06, 2013 10:10 AM (QupBk)

30 Did someone say "Taking one from a team of Clydesdales"?

Weady and wwwwwwwilling!

Posted by: Bawney Fwank at March 06, 2013 10:10 AM (/5s+3)

31 Evi, take away her perfume, make-up, and pretty dresses, so she can't tempt the bad man.

Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at March 06, 2013 10:10 AM (kXoT0)

32 For God's sake, don't allow women in combat to carry scary weapons.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 06, 2013 10:10 AM (UOM48)

33

"I feel so horrible for what some of these people have endured," Hudak said. " I am actually really looking out for their best interest."

----

And i can do that because i know what's best for them so much better than they do. Mommy knows best.

Posted by: Evil Hudek at March 06, 2013 10:10 AM (SO2Q8)

34 Fuck that scrunt. History is being made on the Senate floor right now.

Posted by: tony redenzo at March 06, 2013 10:10 AM (TtA6H)

35 Anyway. its all true. Female grizzly bears get their claws and teeth taken away by predators alla time too. Its a Rule of Nature that males just grab shit from females when their all ragin' and shit.

Posted by: Bigby's Chinese Finger Traps at March 06, 2013 10:10 AM (3ZtZW)

36 It's only logical to take away guns from all women police.

It's for their own good.

Posted by: soothsayer at March 06, 2013 02:09 PM (KeJAW)

 

For the PUBLIC good, too.   I mean, you know how us ladies can get during "that time of the month."   Why, we'd be blowing people away left, right and center!

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:11 AM (4df7R)

37 Is Rand conversation movng here, or staying back at the old thread?

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:11 AM (piMMO)

38  Sen. Hudak: Do you think women really need to vote? I know it is an exercise of a right guaranteed by a constitutional amendment, but so is bearing arms.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 06, 2013 02:09 PM (pT3XC)

 

Rapists can take votes. Best just to lie back and think of England.

Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 10:11 AM (t06LC)

39 When politicians see human brings as statistics, they need to go. Did I hear that this young woman's rapist murdered a woman he raped subsequently? This young woman could have saved herself and the murdered woman. That's something a "number" cannot do. Real people. Real life... and death.

Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 06, 2013 10:11 AM (Sptt8)

40 I'd like to see him go really old school and start reading phone books and baseball statistics and stuff

Posted by: BSR at March 06, 2013 10:11 AM (H0Rot)

41 34 Fuck that scrunt. History is being made on the Senate floor right now.



this

Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 06, 2013 10:11 AM (UOM48)

42 I hope the victim told Senator Fatass where to shove her "apology."

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 06, 2013 10:11 AM (eKiiX)

43 The best way to avoid rape in Colorado?  Hang out with Evie Hudak.  Or get an Evie Hudak T-shirt.

Yikes.

Posted by: Fritz at March 06, 2013 10:12 AM (UzPAd)

44 I'm not too keen on rape whistles. Have you ever cut your lip on one of those things? Worse then the rape itself.

Posted by: Evi Hudak at March 06, 2013 10:12 AM (4cRnj)

45 Democrats don't listen, and they don't care about us.

Posted by: toby928© furthers the meme at March 06, 2013 10:12 AM (QupBk)

46 40 I'd like to see him go really old school and start reading phone books and baseball statistics and stuff

Posted by: BSR at March 06, 2013 02:11 PM (H0Rot




Nope.  "Dreams From My Father" (the really revealing parts) and the Crunchy Figs poem.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 06, 2013 10:12 AM (UOM48)

47 39: I dont know if he murdered anyone, but he was a career criminal and serial rapist...a bullet to his head would have been a net benefit to more than just this one young woman

Posted by: BSR at March 06, 2013 10:13 AM (H0Rot)

48 Hey, now, opposing guns is of great moral significance. So what if some eggs get killed or raped in the process? It's a small price to pay for the disarming omelet. Also, please explain to me why the vicious nastiness is public but the apology is private? I was always taught that for an apology to be sincere, it must be given in approximately the same forum in which the offense occurred.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 06, 2013 10:13 AM (VtjlW)

49 Nothing shrinks a boner like a cold 9 mm shower. Posted by: joncelli, dodging the Zombies of Sequester at March 06, 2013 02:00 PM (RD7QR) And, the flipside: Nothing makes a conservative woman more wet than a Rand filibuster.

Posted by: cspan2 xxx at March 06, 2013 10:13 AM (XYSwB)

50 So are bullets fired from a gun held by a woman less lethal than ones from a gun held by a man?

Posted by: Buzzsaw at March 06, 2013 10:13 AM (81UWZ)

51 That Evi Hudak certainly is a handsome woman.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 06, 2013 10:13 AM (UOM48)

52

@35

 

Lets not forget female Black Widow spiders. Even though much like an armed woman they have a tactical advantage, when they encounter a male black widow they always end up raped due to being female.

Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 10:13 AM (t06LC)

53

Ms. Hudak, why is it okay for women to serve on the front lines in a live fire combat situation, despite centuries of prohibition on such a thing, but it's NOT okay for women to carry a firearm here at home for their personal protection, despite centuries of women doing just that?

---

Because in combet, the girls will be surrounded by hulking American neanderthals to protect them from harm. Obviously.

Posted by: Evil Hudek at March 06, 2013 10:13 AM (SO2Q8)

54 Evi, take away her perfume, make-up, and pretty dresses, so she can't tempt the bad man.

Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at March 06, 2013 02:10 PM (kXoT0)

 

In fact, we'd better mandate that women should only wear shapeless, full body garments that cover everything from head to toe.     Leave a little hole where the eyes are, but make sure to cover it with a mesh panel so that she can see out, but her sexy, sexy eyes are suitably muted.

 

and you know what?  Better make sure    she's accompanied by a male guardian at all times.   Put that in the law, too.   "Women must always be   accompanied by a male guardian."

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:13 AM (4df7R)

55 Mitch McConnell's head is gonna explode. (which might be good because his chin might pop out)

Posted by: soothsayer at March 06, 2013 10:14 AM (LPRBM)

56 Politco: Immigration Talks Gaining Momentum In House, With Help From Paul Ryan

Posted by: Tilikum the Killer Assault Whale at March 06, 2013 10:14 AM (uhftQ)

57 And, the flipside: Nothing makes a conservative woman more wet than a Rand filibuster.

Posted by: cspan2 xxx at March 06, 2013 02:13 PM (XYSwB)

 

BRB, have to go turn on CSPAN for the wife...

Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 10:14 AM (t06LC)

58 55

Mitch McConnell's head is gonna explode.

(which might be good because his chin might pop out)




lulz

Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 06, 2013 10:15 AM (UOM48)

59 Also, please explain to me why the vicious nastiness is public but the apology is private?

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at March 06, 2013 02:13 PM (VtjlW)

 

I thought the same thing.   Way to take the coward's way, Evil Hordak.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:15 AM (4df7R)

60 Rand talking about the HQ. "Is being on a site, sympathizing with some crackpot on the internet, is that enough to bring down a Hellfire missile on your head?" Lol ________________ Thing is Rand Paul is sort of referring to Al -Aulaqi. This is what he did starting in 2006-- On August 31, 2006, al-Aulaqi was arrested with four others on charges of kidnapping a Shiite teenager for ransom, and participating in an al-Qaeda plot to kidnap a U.S. military attaché.[14][77] He was imprisoned in 2006 and 2007, reportedly under American pressure on the Yemeni authorities.[57] He was interviewed around September 2007 by two FBI agents with regard to the 9/11 attacks and other subjects, and John Negroponte, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence, told Yemeni officials he did not object to al-Aulaqi's detention. ___________ So don't do that.

Posted by: tasker at March 06, 2013 10:15 AM (r2PLg)

61 I am actually really looking out for their best interest.

Ah, I see.  But it's strange.  I don't recall authorizing you to do that.  Let's do it now.  Please submit in triplicate your reasoning as to why you are better suited to look out for me than I am.  No?  Okay, well I'm only looking out for your best interests by giving you a swift kick in what I assume is your rather voluminous ass. 

Posted by: pep at March 06, 2013 10:15 AM (6TB1Z)

62 "Women must always be accompanied by a male guardian."

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at March 06, 2013 02:13 PM (4df7R)

 

But the male guardian must always walk and front. And during that special time of the month, women need a special chair to sit on, because um, otherwise the couch will get dirty and thats gross.

Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 10:16 AM (t06LC)

63
This is as good a place as any.  My mother-in-law wants to sell some rifles and handguns as she was widowed about a year ago, although she will keep her gun.

What is the best way to sell these 6 firearms from the standpoint of getting the best price?  Is there a clearing house anybody would recommend?  Is there a site to value these or just do a general search?

Also Rand on his second binder, not just reading bs, but actual commentary on the republic.  I am enjoying this immensely.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 06, 2013 10:16 AM (p/cQy)

64 well this Hudak beast has really stepped on her dick- the story has gone national

Posted by: Jones in CO at March 06, 2013 10:16 AM (8sCoq)

65

So what i cannot figure out is this...

 

An armed women has rape attempted on her by a lesbian. Who ends up with the gun?

Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at March 06, 2013 10:16 AM (SO2Q8)

66 Fabulous quote of the day: Dem Strategist: Women Don’t Need Guns, Just Tell Men “Not To Rape Women”… http://tinyurl.com/cf52d3l/ h/t weaselzippers

Posted by: cspan2 xxx at March 06, 2013 10:16 AM (XYSwB)

67 24 So does this mean Rand is one of us? Strange new respect? Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 02:08 PM (t06LC) I called this during the DumDum confirmation. Brennan made Rand much more upset, and it shows. I know Morons here will back Rand when it comes to standing up to SCOAMF.

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 10:17 AM (FsUAO)

68 Ms. Hudak, do you believe you have the moral authority to speak on this issue since, according to statistics, your chances of being raped are 0%(due to your hideousness)?

Posted by: Dr Spank at March 06, 2013 10:17 AM (4cRnj)

69

@63

Gunbroker. Craigslist. An honest gun dealer who will only charge a comission.

Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 10:17 AM (t06LC)

70 Ace, Take your twitter fury and turn it on the media/pols regarding Rand's filibuster. One constant failure on the right is failure to promote those promoting our own interest. It's that "10,000 papercuts of support" that allows the left to advance so often. It's not merely a filibuster. It's "the most important filibuster of all time" and requires immediate overwhelming coverage, discussion, etc. Each and every media person must answer "do they stand with Obama in his policy of being able to snuff reporters that he views as dangerous?" And "has he assassinated reporters under this Obama doctrine? If not, who will be the first reporter assassinated with a drone for asking questions?". Etc.

Posted by: Hopeless at March 06, 2013 10:18 AM (IqMNQ)

71

"Also Rand on his second binder, not just reading bs, but actual commentary on the republic. I am enjoying this immensely."

 

This reminds me of Newt in the early days, speaking in House after hours.

Posted by: jwest at March 06, 2013 10:18 AM (u2a4R)

72

I'd like to see him go really old school and start reading phone books and baseball statistics and stuff

--

Break out the cowboy poety

Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at March 06, 2013 10:18 AM (SO2Q8)

73

And, the flipside: Nothing makes a conservative woman more wet than a Rand filibuster

 

C-SPAN2     has just morphed into Vivid Video.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:18 AM (4df7R)

74 Who needs a gun to protect themselves from rape when they have free condoms?

Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 06, 2013 10:18 AM (qYvEa)

75

Holy crap I just saw one of my Tweets at Twitchy


do I win something?

 

 

You'll get whatever NDH   got. I saw one of her tweets over on Twichy earlier today on a different subject.

 

 

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at March 06, 2013 10:18 AM (+z4pE)

76 So what i cannot figure out is this...

An armed women has rape attempted on her by a lesbian. Who ends up with the gun?

Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at March 06, 2013 02:16 PM (SO2Q

 

Lena Dunham.

Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 10:18 AM (t06LC)

77 I take it the senator does not believe women in the armed forces should have a gun because a man would just take it from them?

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:18 AM (GGCsk)

78 Ask her if she will be issuing State Senator Evi Hudak masks to women to prevent future rapes in lieu of the use of firearms.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at March 06, 2013 10:18 AM (iR2Oi)

79 So we just lost an election in part b/c of stupid comments about rape, and the Dems respond by making comments incandescently more stupid than those. But which party is anti-woman? Dont ask the media. MSM delenda est.

Posted by: BSR at March 06, 2013 10:19 AM (H0Rot)

80 One govt website tells you to stock up on food for emergencies. Another says you might be a terrorist for it. Killing. It.

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 10:19 AM (FsUAO)

81 Of course, the Colorado Senate passed the bill.

Posted by: Lurker DeLurked at March 06, 2013 10:19 AM (ePFyF)

82

Though I think it just goes back this:

 

When all sex is rape, all rape is nothing but sex. Unless rape-rape, or legitimate rape, or whatever.

Posted by: Bigby's Chinese Finger Traps at March 06, 2013 10:20 AM (3ZtZW)

83 Guillotine merkin. The Lorena Bobbitt model should be quite popular. Have a nice day, you guys. This Hudak broad probably worries about Guam tipping over, too.

Posted by: GnuBreed at March 06, 2013 10:20 AM (ccXZP)

84 Forget guns for potential rape victims. How about the belt buckle that blows shoots projectile if not disarmed with a code before unbuckling?* Call it The Rapefucker *may or may not exist

Posted by: Opus An Arcus at March 06, 2013 10:20 AM (cfNCa)

85 You'll get whatever NDH got. I saw one of her tweets over on Twichy earlier today on a different subject. *** Oh! I wasn't aware. I'll have to go find it. But, experience tells me, you get a big fat nothing.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:20 AM (piMMO)

86 Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 06, 2013 02:16 PM (p/cQy)

Private sales will be your best bet for maximum return. Just do it within the law, and it will be fine.

I would get a receipt for each sale which has the serial number of the weapon on it.


Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 06, 2013 10:20 AM (GsoHv)

87

Dem Strategist: Women Don’t Need Guns, Just Tell Men “Not To Rape Women”…

http://tinyurl.com/cf52d3l/


 

STUPID RAPIST:  "Durrrrrr... Okay.  I'll go rape some pretty guys.    But, you know what?  I still like raping women.  So    I'm gonna keep doing that, too.   Personal growth.  Look, Ma!   Top o' the world!"

 

People are so... soo.... STUPID.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:20 AM (4df7R)

88 Megyn Kelly (man how hot is she) is beating this story pretty hard

Posted by: Jones in CO at March 06, 2013 10:21 AM (8sCoq)

89 Remember ace-- the Obama doctrine states, "obama can order the assassination of reporters who he judges to be a threat to his presidency." Until he denies it, it's true.

Posted by: Hopeless at March 06, 2013 10:21 AM (NSO0r)

90 So, what happens if, when Rand gets an "acceptable" answer from Brennan he then, as Darth Wyatt suspects, he casts his vote for Brennan?

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:22 AM (piMMO)

91 I think most women are deeply offended that some fucking politician presumes to decide FOR them how they should protect themselves from rape or other assault

Posted by: Jones in CO at March 06, 2013 10:22 AM (8sCoq)

92 Rand Paul, has in two short hours, restored my faith in the country by a couple degrees. If only we had another 20 or 30 like him. *sigh*

Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 06, 2013 10:22 AM (feFL6)

93 A Shocking Jacket For Personal Protection http://is.gd/KXk8S5 80,000 volts of no.

Posted by: toby928© furthers the meme at March 06, 2013 10:22 AM (QupBk)

94 New Woman's Rape Accessory: Bawney Fwank.

Posted by: cspan2 xxx at March 06, 2013 10:22 AM (XYSwB)

95 Senator Hudak, I guess it's God's will that unarmed women get raped- right?

I mean, since they are so much weaker an apt to get hurt by defending themselves?

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:22 AM (GGCsk)

96 So...Hudak thinks that instead of letting women carry guns, we should tell men not to rape. Alrighty then. This is not a gun; its a bullhorn. And those projectiles aren't bullets, they're little flyers that say "This is a rape free zone!". Hey you say "no" your way, I'll say it mine. How dare you try to silence a proud womar?!

Posted by: Jenny tries too hard and also hates her phone at March 06, 2013 10:23 AM (dkh08)

97 90 So, what happens if, when Rand gets an "acceptable" answer from Brennan he then, as Darth Wyatt suspects, he casts his vote for Brennan? Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 02:22 PM (piMMO) Probably, like DumDum. But isn't this strange that JEF's gang can't give one?

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 10:23 AM (FsUAO)

98 You think they'd be thanking me....

Posted by: Hudak the Hutt at March 06, 2013 10:23 AM (5OEha)

99 Lemme get this straight: Gabby Giffords: Shot by madman, indisputable moral authority Amanda Collins: Raped by career criminal in gun-free zone, can be safely ignored. The rock/paper/scissors game of leftist victimology is getting impossible to keep track of.

Posted by: BSR at March 06, 2013 10:23 AM (H0Rot)

100 Or woman, even...

Posted by: Jenny tries too hard and also hates her phone at March 06, 2013 10:23 AM (dkh08)

101 I thought we were fooked in NY. Colorado is apparently not far behind.

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:23 AM (GGCsk)

102 2nd look at Rand Paul?

Posted by: Jones in CO at March 06, 2013 10:24 AM (8sCoq)

103

84Forget guns for potential rape victims.

How about the belt buckle that blows shoots projectile if not disarmed with a code before unbuckling?*

Call it The Rapefucker

----

Personally, i had my vajayjay laced with anti-personael mines years ago. Nobody's tried to rape me ever since(or before...). Just takes a few pounds of corbomite.


 

Posted by: Evil hudek at March 06, 2013 10:24 AM (SO2Q8)

104 Objectively Pro Rape.  That is now an official plank of the Democratic Party 2013.  Too bad the dumb dumbs running the Republican party won't take advantage of this turn of events.

Posted by: Shtetl G at March 06, 2013 10:24 AM (FpTMi)

105 So, what happens if, when Rand gets an "acceptable" answer from Brennan he then, as Darth Wyatt suspects, he casts his vote for Brennan?

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 02:22 PM (piMMO)

 

Not speaking for anyone else, just myself:  I think the confirmation    of Brennan is going to happen.  Whether Rand votes yea or nay, it's going to happen.  And he can't fillibuster forever, as much as he may want to.   A man's got to sleep, eat, drink sometime.

 

I think what he's doing now, standing up there and literally reading history and knowledge into the Congressional record, is the more important aspect of this    fillibuster.    

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:24 AM (4df7R)

106

:::24 So does this mean Rand is one of us?

Strange new respect?
Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 02:08 PM (t06LC) :::

 

Not from me, but knock yourself out. 

 

This just looks like Fruitbat, Jr. is ginning up some free name recognition in advance of his 2016 run.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 06, 2013 10:24 AM (CJjw5)

107
Gonna be kind of tough for a rapist to take a woman's gun if he's dealing with a sucking chest wound.


Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 06, 2013 10:24 AM (TIIx5)

108 OK, so the internet consists of: (1) Ace tweets really good stuff. (2) Twitchy collects Ace's tweets. (3) Ace links back to Twitchy to write his own post on it. I have only one question: How does The Conversation play into this? Because I think Ace is now the King of All Websites.

Posted by: Dominican hooker at March 06, 2013 10:25 AM (T0NGe)

109

I wasn't aware. I'll have to go find it. But, experience tells me, you get a big fat nothing.

 

The Platinum Level  Membership  upgrade isn't exactly nothing.

 

Ampersands will not be mocked!

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at March 06, 2013 10:25 AM (+z4pE)

110 Is it me? Or has anyone else noticed the three ring binder on the podium? The one where it appears that after almost 3 hours, he's 1/4 to 1/3 of the way through.....

Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 10:25 AM (da5Wo)

111 Off Menendez sock. Ew.

Posted by: AmishDude at March 06, 2013 10:25 AM (T0NGe)

112 How about the belt buckle that blows shoots projectile if not disarmed with a code before unbuckling?

My late husband had a derringer belt buckle.  It is made to look decorative.  The derringer pops out of the buckle.  It actually shoots a bullet and a small shotgun shell.

Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at March 06, 2013 10:25 AM (kXoT0)

113 Breitbart argues that Holder is right and Rand is wrong. http://t.co/dGcU3C86J4

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:26 AM (piMMO)

114 This just looks like Fruitbat, Jr. is ginning up some free name recognition in advance of his 2016 run.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 06, 2013 02:24 PM (CJjw5)



Self aggrandizing? Sure. But you can't argue with the knowledge he's bringing.

Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 10:26 AM (da5Wo)

115

>>>Dem Strategist: Women Don’t Need Guns, Just Tell Men “Not To Rape Women”…

 

AKA Just Say No

 



 

Posted by: Bigby's Chinese Finger Traps at March 06, 2013 10:26 AM (3ZtZW)

116

 "obama can order the assassination of reporters who he judges to be a threat to his presidency."

---

Still looking....

Still looking....

maybe under this rock....

Still looking...

 


 

Posted by: Crypto-zoologist at March 06, 2013 10:26 AM (SO2Q8)

117 90 So, what happens if, when Rand gets an "acceptable" answer from Brennan he then, as Darth Wyatt suspects, he casts his vote for Brennan? Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse ---------------------------------- I think he will still vote yes if al-quds already has the votes. He's goal is to bring this issue into the open until Barry can sufficiently answer it and part of that is saying he will vote yes if he gets the answer. He's playing a bigger game here than just the nomination I think.

Posted by: BSR at March 06, 2013 10:27 AM (H0Rot)

118 OT: why is it acceptable for the President to hold closed door meeting and "dinners" to negotiate directly with senators? Shouldn't the senators legislate and pass bills that the President then signs or vetos? It's like he's playing good cop, bad cop with his opponents to get them to slip and change their positions.

Posted by: Chairman LMAO at March 06, 2013 10:27 AM (9eDbm)

119 Breitbart argues that Holder is right and Rand is wrong.

Do I even need to say it anymore?  Oh, alright.

RINO!

Posted by: pep at March 06, 2013 10:27 AM (6TB1Z)

120

din't they just approve of women in some previously restricted combat roles in the military?

 

Is she going to suggest they be disarmed and instead taught combat peeing and vomiting?  The Bulimia Brigade? 

Posted by: thunderb at March 06, 2013 10:27 AM (Dnbau)

121 And I am getting a little tired of Gabby Gifford's husband running around the country as if he is some firearms or LEO expert, alluding to military credentials, credentials which have zero to do with expertise in firearms, talking about how we should all disarm and forget the Second Amendment.

The man's a dupe, his appeals are sophistic, his statements contradict fact and therefore he has zero credibility.  He's a delusional spaceman.

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:27 AM (GGCsk)

122 What's all this talk of binders?  I thought we established binders are so 19th century during the last election?

Posted by: typical Obama voter at March 06, 2013 10:28 AM (5OEha)

123 There needs to be a separate Rand Paul is awesome thread.

Posted by: Dr Spank at March 06, 2013 10:28 AM (4cRnj)

124 >>>Dem Strategist: Women Don’t Need Guns, Just Tell Men “Not To Rape Women”…

AKA Just Say No

In other words, No means No, seriously, guy, I said No.  Wait, you have a knife and are gonna cut me, bitch.  What?  I said No, dammit.

Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at March 06, 2013 10:28 AM (kXoT0)

125 I honestly think Rand cares about this. He let DumDum get the nomination, even without answers he liked. He's not letting this one go. Sure it helps him in 2016. It would hearten me if Cruz/Rubio/Anyone else took a few swings at JEF too.

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 10:28 AM (FsUAO)

126 Evi Hudak saves lots of people. Just last week she told someone not to run with scissors.

Posted by: soothsayer at March 06, 2013 02:01 PM (E1X66)



What ????

Posted by: WEIRD AL YANKOVIC at March 06, 2013 10:29 AM (e8kgV)

127 I think what he's doing now, standing up there and literally reading history and knowledge into the Congressional record, is the more important aspect of this fillibuster. *** Which is how I feel but there are plenty of folks screaming "kabuki theater" over on twitter, just waiting on him to fail.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:29 AM (piMMO)

128 Is it me? Or has anyone else noticed the three ring binder on the podium? The one where it appears that after almost 3 hours, he's 1/4 to 1/3 of the way through.....

Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 02:25 PM (da5Wo)

 

"It's probably full of women.  HMPH!  Typical RethugliKKan male!"

-Stupid NOW Whore

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:29 AM (4df7R)

129 Sorry back to the topic here: Gun rights don't apply for rape-rape, at least for peons.

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 10:29 AM (FsUAO)

130 Hudak stop thinking with your vagina and use the apparently very small brain God gave you.

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:29 AM (GGCsk)

131 Letting women have the right to defend against rape sounds a lot like rape.

Posted by: Puffy faced scrunt at March 06, 2013 10:29 AM (OlN4e)

132 He's playing a bigger game here than just the nomination I think.

Posted by: BSR at March 06, 2013 02:27 PM (H0Rot)

 

If only the entire party thought like that. Make Barry earn a win on each little budget matter and trivial bullshit meanwhile eating up the clock, political capital, and approval ratings...

 

Sigh.

Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 10:29 AM (t06LC)

133 Self aggrandizing? Sure. But you can't argue with the knowledge he's bringing.

Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 02:26 PM (da5Wo)


Well I can now while he's telling us what he 'admires' about Obama.

Posted by: Tami[/i] at March 06, 2013 10:29 AM (X6akg)

134 The man's a dupe.. ** the man's a pimp.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:30 AM (piMMO)

135 There's nothing a rape can do that a good abortion can't take away

Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 06, 2013 10:30 AM (e8kgV)

136 The GOP should really run with this. This is Akin bad. Not close enough to an election to do as much damage, but this is bad.

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 10:30 AM (FsUAO)

137 114 This just looks like Fruitbat, Jr. is ginning up some free name recognition in advance of his 2016 run. Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 06, 2013 02:24 PM (CJjw5) Self aggrandizing? Sure. But you can't argue with the knowledge he's bringing. Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 02:26 PM (da5Wo) ______________ Knowledge in other areas sure--but he is underselling Al -Aulaqi for his own political gain. Kind of creepy.

Posted by: tasker at March 06, 2013 10:30 AM (r2PLg)

138 All the women in my family are very good shots. Just sayin, you guys.

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:31 AM (GGCsk)

139 Gifford's hubby is just riding that sweet Sarah Brady rocket sled to success.

Posted by: B at March 06, 2013 10:31 AM (5OEha)

140 I think a lot saner solution to rape is to just set up dick free zones. It worked for schools, right?

Posted by: Puffy faced scrunt at March 06, 2013 10:31 AM (OlN4e)

141 Well I can now while he's telling us what he 'admires' about Obama. Posted by: Tami at March 06, 2013 02:29 PM (X6akg) _______________ Yuck--I turned it off. I really couldn't take the oversimplification of Al-Aulaqi the internet activist.

Posted by: tasker at March 06, 2013 10:31 AM (r2PLg)

142 24 So does this mean Rand is one of us? Strange new respect? Posted by: Jollyroger at March 06, 2013 02:08 PM (t06LC) He was probably more concerned about his day commenting at zero hedge

Posted by: Buzzion at March 06, 2013 10:31 AM (HXUe2)

143 There's no "problem" that a rape can make that a good abortion can't take away  .. at least that's what my personal assistance Sandra Fluke told me

Posted by: Pres**ent Barack “Unexpectedly Humble” Obama at March 06, 2013 10:32 AM (e8kgV)

144 Well I can now while he's telling us what he 'admires' about Obama.

Posted by: Tami at March 06, 2013 02:29 PM (X6akg)



Yeah, I hate that "polite, gentlemanly" crap. But he used the "admiration" to set up the hypocrisy charge.

Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 10:32 AM (da5Wo)

145 Hudak, isn't the right to protect yourself against rape in the Constitution or something?

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:32 AM (GGCsk)

146 Which is how I feel but there are plenty of folks screaming "kabuki theater" over on twitter, just waiting on him to fail.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 02:29 PM (piMMO)

 

Well, they're welcome to    say and think whatever the hell they want.   But they clearly don't understand    political kabuki, which is the     application of    unsubstantial    words and actions to mask a genuine problem.    Rand's fillibuster is far from unsubstantial,  in word or in action,   and isn't being used to mask a    problem but to bring the problem to light.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at March 06, 2013 10:32 AM (4df7R)

147

Gabby Giffords husband, like Carolyn McCarthy and Cindy Sheehan has Ultimate Moral Authority.

 

Living rape victims, not so much.  They are to lie back and think of Hudak

Posted by: thunderb at March 06, 2013 10:32 AM (Dnbau)

148 I think it's a bit of projection on her part. She wants to be bent over and banged like a screen door in a hurricane. Poor thing probably hasn't had it in decades.

Posted by: Bosk at March 06, 2013 10:33 AM (n2K+4)

149 137--- underselling Al -Aulaqi?

Posted by: wut at March 06, 2013 10:33 AM (dcm5Z)

150 "Chant dogma"? No Ace, this ladies gone full mani wheel.

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:33 AM (GGCsk)

151

I'm surprised Hudak just didn't recommend all women wear chasity belts instead of arming themselves.

Posted by: polynikes at March 06, 2013 10:33 AM (m2CN7)

152
Yeah, I hate that "polite, gentlemanly" crap. But he used the "admiration" to set up the hypocrisy charge.

Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 02:32 PM (da5Wo)



It can be done without the 'admire' setup.....start with they hypocrisy.

Posted by: Tami[/i] at March 06, 2013 10:34 AM (X6akg)

153 Taggart: I got it! I got it!

Hedley Lamarr: You do?

Taggart: We'll work up a Number 6 on 'em.

Hedley Lamarr: [frowns] "Number 6"? I'm afraid I'm not familiar with that one.

Taggart: Well, that's where we go a-ridin' into town, a-whompin' and a-whumpin' every livin' thing that moves within an inch of its life. Except the women folks, of course.

Hedley Lamarr: You spare the women?

Taggart: Naw, we rape the shit out of them at the Number Six Dance later on.

Hedley Lamarr: Marvelous!

Posted by: Pres**ent Barack “Unexpectedly Humble” Obama at March 06, 2013 10:34 AM (e8kgV)

154
Thanks for the info, Craigslist isn't actually allowing gun listings here.  I found something called Armslist that I am looking at. 

She was talking about selling them and I encouraged her to do it while the market is high now, plus fuck we live in CO.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 06, 2013 10:34 AM (p/cQy)

155 He said he "admired" when Obama agreed with his current position. Thats a backhanded compliment at best. FFS, he cant just get up and call the president an asshole for 4 hours. There are still politics in politics.

Posted by: BSR at March 06, 2013 10:35 AM (H0Rot)

156 She was talking about selling them and I encouraged her to do it Anything good?

Posted by: toby928© furthers the meme at March 06, 2013 10:35 AM (QupBk)

157 The man's a dupe, his appeals are sophistic, his statements contradict fact and therefore he has zero credibility. He's a delusional spaceman.  Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 02:27 PM (GGCsk)

But, he cash Gabby checks like a MoFo. 

Any bets on whether or not he has a mistress to keep his ego and other parts stroked? 

They may be able to prop Giffords up and have her make prepared remarks, but, she is bone thin and very fragile.

Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at March 06, 2013 10:36 AM (kXoT0)

158 Your vagina. That thing I did in it without your permission has no consequences according to Hudak.

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:36 AM (GGCsk)

159 There's no "problem" that a rape can make that a good abortion can't take away  ---- So i guess they're aborting STDs now...

Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at March 06, 2013 10:37 AM (SO2Q8)

160

well good for Rand.  I will take a voice howling in the wilderness over Benghazi at least.  Perhaps it will shame the others.

 

On the otherhand, I do not give two shits if American Taliban are droned overseas. 

Posted by: thunderb at March 06, 2013 10:37 AM (Dnbau)

161 149 137--- underselling Al -Aulaqi? Posted by: wut at March 06, 2013 02:33 PM (dcm5Z) ____________ Read upthread. Did Rand Paul tell you that Al-Aulaqi was arrested in 2006 and imprisoned for participating in an AL-QAEDA plot to kidnap a US military attaché?

Posted by: tasker at March 06, 2013 10:38 AM (r2PLg)

162 What ever I kill is a "private matter" between me, the victim and God.
The government should keep their f..ing nose out, less they become the victim.

Posted by: Judge Dred at March 06, 2013 10:38 AM (e8kgV)

163 Forget guns for potential rape victims. How about the belt buckle that blows shoots projectile if not disarmed with a code before unbuckling?* Call it The Rapefucker *may or may not exist Posted by: Opus An Arcus at March 06, 2013 02:20 PM (cfNCa) Read Snowcrash by Neal Stephenson

Posted by: cspan2 xxx at March 06, 2013 10:39 AM (XYSwB)

164 What ever I kill is a "private matter" between me, the victim and the mother.

Posted by: Abortionist at March 06, 2013 10:39 AM (e8kgV)

165 Now I am just postulating, but my guess is if more women who may be potential rape victims were armed, there would be less rape.

But that of course depends on how many rapists would be willing to die for their crime.

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:39 AM (GGCsk)

166 Nothing says "no thank you" like a semi-automatic handgun.

Posted by: Marcus at March 06, 2013 10:39 AM (GGCsk)

167 I'm not watching it so I wouldn't actually know what he's saying.  As long as he's not underselling that whole "American citizen" thing and the "extrajudicial killing" thing and the  "due process" thing, I'm probably ok with it.  What does Al-Awlaki's arrest have to do with anything?

Posted by: wut at March 06, 2013 10:40 AM (dcm5Z)

168 This is similar to my husband's belt buckle derringer.  http://snallabolaget.com/?page_id=506

Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Wily Wrepublican Wench at March 06, 2013 10:41 AM (kXoT0)

169
They all work Toby so thats good.  But three are Rugers .44, .357 and a .32.  I understand the .32 may be hard to get ammo for (even before the current situation).  These are all revolvers though.

The rifles are antique.  A 30-30 1893 Marlin side ejection lever action.  Awesome, made in 1900.  Then a single .410 shotgun "rabbit gun" and another 30-30 rifle.  All pre 1930.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 06, 2013 10:42 AM (p/cQy)

170 I think what he's doing now, standing up there and literally reading history and knowledge into the Congressional record, is the more important aspect of this fillibuster. Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at March 06, 2013 02:24 PM (4df7R) yeah, a while ago, he said, he knows he will be confirmed, but his purpose of being there today was in response to the Holder drone thing

Posted by: cspan2 xxx at March 06, 2013 10:43 AM (XYSwB)

171 Hudak demonstrates why guns are never a menace & thus don't need to be regulated:  If someone points a gun at you, just take it away from him!  It's that easy!  Of course, then he'll grab it back, but you can take it away again!  Back/forth, etc.  The important thing is the gun never fires because the target keeps grabbing it.

Posted by: Jack Squat Bupkis at March 06, 2013 10:43 AM (F3nFt)

172 167 I'm not watching it so I wouldn't actually know what he's saying. As long as he's not underselling that whole "American citizen" thing and the "extrajudicial killing" thing and the "due process" thing, I'm probably ok with it. What does Al-Awlaki's arrest have to do with anything? Posted by: wut at March 06, 2013 02:40 PM (dcm5Z) He's almost only talking about American citizens on US soil. That's the answer he's waiting for.

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 10:44 AM (FsUAO)

173 I agree with Evie; all of this talk about rape is ugly. 

Maybe we can convince Evie to craft legislation that will have the word "no" stricken from the dictionary.

But only for women.

Posted by: Fritz at March 06, 2013 10:44 AM (WM+rJ)

174 On the otherhand, I do not give two shits if American Taliban are droned overseas. *** But that's not the fight. He's trying to get answers as to whether Americans can be killed on American soil.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:45 AM (piMMO)

175 Self aggrandizing? Sure. But you can't argue with the knowledge he's bringing. Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 02:26 PM (da5Wo) and, a nice way to skirt the media

Posted by: beach at March 06, 2013 10:45 AM (XYSwB)

176 Stephanie Cutter email: Thanks to Republican obstructionism in Congress, the nation was forced into the sequester last Friday -- a series of automatic and destructive budgets cuts that you and your neighbors are just beginning to feel. In the face of these devastating cuts, House Speaker John Boehner went on TV and said, "I don't know whether it's going to hurt the economy or not ... I don't think anyone quite understands how the sequester is really going to work." Really? We're not talking about some abstract numbers on a piece of paper -- this is real. The sequester will cut 10,000 teaching jobs, 70,000 spots for preschoolers in Head Start, $43 million for food programs for seniors, $35 million for local fire departments, and access to nutrition assistance for over half a million women and their families. And the reason congressional Republicans let these cuts go into effect is because they simply wouldn't support closing tax loopholes for millionaires and billionaires -- for things like yachts and corporate jets. I wish I were kidding. More than 340,000 OFA supporters have added their names to support President Obama's balanced plan and call on congressional Republicans to take action to stop the sequester budget cuts right now.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:46 AM (piMMO)

177 172.  oh ok, thanks.  sounds like a good thing he's doing and everyone should be sad it's come to this.

Posted by: wut at March 06, 2013 10:47 AM (dcm5Z)

178

he is arguing againt the use of drones against American citizens in the US.  Okay.  He seems to basically understand the Laws of Armed Conflict (LOAC).

 

But he is making some, disturbing, false equivalences.  He does not seem to understand the difference between a "non-combatant" and an "unlawful combatant."   He is using the terms interchangibly.  They are not.   Likewise, he seems to be making little distinction between a "target" and "collateral damage."

 

He must resist the urge to deploy the Paulian hyperbole of his father

Posted by: thunderb at March 06, 2013 10:47 AM (Dnbau)

179 There needs to be a separate Rand Paul is awesome thread. Posted by: Dr Spank at March 06, 2013 02:28 PM (4cRnj) Or a How Will Rand Paul pee, thread.

Posted by: beach at March 06, 2013 10:47 AM (XYSwB)

180 Dem Strategist: Women Don’t Need Guns, Just Tell Men “Not To Rape Women”… p Well. That's a good idea. Maybe they could pass a law.

Posted by: blaster at March 06, 2013 10:48 AM (/1U3u)

181 Or a How Will Rand Paul pee, thread. *** heh

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:48 AM (piMMO)

182 YESS!!! Tweet from Bret Baier: from @ChadPergram: "A relief pitcher is warming up in the filibuster bullpen - Sen Mike Lee will join @SenRandPaul on the Senate floor soon

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:49 AM (piMMO)

183 FFS, he cant just get up and call the president an asshole for 4 hours. There are still politics in politics. Posted by: BSR at March 06, 2013 02:35 PM (H0Rot) exactly, he brought up a lot of crap obama said in the past that he did a 180 on later.

Posted by: beach at March 06, 2013 10:52 AM (XYSwB)

184
182 YESS!!!

Tweet from Bret Baier:

from @ChadPergram: "A relief pitcher is warming up in the filibuster bullpen - Sen Mike Lee will join @SenRandPaul on the Senate floor soon

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 02:49 PM (piMMO)



Hahahahaha. Finally, they're doing something right.

Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 06, 2013 10:54 AM (da5Wo)

185
Rand Paul is making way to much sense. I must be hallucinating this....Republicans roll over, and bare their vitals to the democrats. That's how the fucking game is played! Ask Boner!

Posted by: Sticky Wicket at March 06, 2013 10:55 AM (eyJh9)

186 Rand lecturing about the 9th and 10th amendments.

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 10:56 AM (FsUAO)

187 I bet if we had some sorta "tenther" here that had a blog, theoretically, this person might be happy.

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 10:56 AM (FsUAO)

188 this would make some good campaign material for ads.  Just sayin

Posted by: thunderb at March 06, 2013 10:57 AM (Dnbau)

189 Hayek!  Drink!

Posted by: thunderb at March 06, 2013 10:57 AM (Dnbau)

190 Lee stepping in now

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 06, 2013 10:57 AM (piMMO)

191 Mike Lee is up.

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 10:58 AM (FsUAO)

192 Sen Mike Lee will join @SenRandPaul on the Senate floor soon I must be dreaming... a display of testicular fortitude on the (R) side ... not to mention bladder control.

Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 06, 2013 10:59 AM (feFL6)

193
Mike Lee is up.

Now we know how Rand Paul is going to pee.

Paul did 3+ hours. I hope he comes back soon. This is great. Though....I'm still convinced I'm suffering a Sterno and Mouth Wash cocktail hallucination.

Posted by: Sticky Wicket at March 06, 2013 11:01 AM (eyJh9)

194 Paul did 3+ hours. I hope he comes back soon. This is great. Though....I'm still convinced I'm suffering a Sterno and Mouth Wash cocktail hallucination. Posted by: Sticky Wicket at March 06, 2013 03:01 PM (eyJh9) Due to Snowquester in DC, I'm out of Valu-Rite. I'll have what you're having!

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 11:02 AM (FsUAO)

195 Hudak: Objectively pro-rape. Also, quite stupid.

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 06, 2013 11:05 AM (bxiXv)

196 Sen. Hudak: Do you think women really need to vote? I know it is an exercise of a right guaranteed by a constitutional amendment, but so is bearing arms.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 06, 2013 02:09 PM (pT3XC)

--

Come to to think of it, do women really need to get paid for their work?  Men will just take their money from them.

No need to feed the women folk either.  Men will just take their food.

I am only looking out for the good of us wimmens.


Posted by: Mayday at March 06, 2013 11:08 AM (F3s39)

197 Cruz is up.

Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 06, 2013 11:08 AM (FsUAO)

198 I give Ace crap when I think he deserves it, now I have to give him praise. That was a fine showing.

Posted by: Kerry at March 06, 2013 11:23 AM (AYfPj)

199 Sen. Hudak: please run on your position here. Your women constituents deserve a vote!!

Posted by: sherlock at March 06, 2013 11:23 AM (81ia8)

200 You guys are missing the logic of all of this.  If a woman is armed then she must be a Republican.  If she is a Republican then she deserves to be raped.

When viewed in that light it all makes perfect sense... if you are a leftist.

Posted by: Voluble at March 06, 2013 11:31 AM (qYvEa)

201

This may or may not have been said already:

 

Let's make sure that all those women going into infantry battalions have their guns taken away  too . Because  Spetznaz would try to take their guns away.

 

Or something like that.

Posted by: LGoPs at March 06, 2013 01:07 PM (BJVEF)

202 Losing the argument but winning the war. Remember the Dems in the senate support her 100%.

Posted by: Billll at March 07, 2013 06:40 AM (JV6C/)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
169kb generated in CPU 0.1085, elapsed 0.2866 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2477 seconds, 330 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.