April 02, 2014
— Ace I agree with atheists that religion is a serious impediment to clear thought.
This is particularly the case when a close-minded, fire-breathing Religious Zealot does not even realize he's in the grips of a Religious Hysteria.
An anonymous writer -- an insider in the tech world, but unwilling to share his or her name (go figure) -- writes about the Moral Panic burning over the tech industry over the elevation of Brendan Eich to the head of Mozilla.
Eich once made a $1,000 donation to Prop 8, in 2006, shortly before the pro-gay-marriage Senate candidate Barack Obama would be persuaded by the righteousness of the traditional marriage cause, and thus announce his conversion to the proposition that marriage must be as it had been eternally, a union between a man and a woman.
For some reason, the rabid Upper Income White Women (and Feminized White Men) of the tech industry don't seem to think Barack Obama deserves criticism for that position, but they're very sure that Eich should either recant or be fired.
One of the most widely-shared and lauded of the countless statements issued in response to the appointment was written by Owen Thomas, managing editor of Valleywag, a self-described “tech gossip rag.” This is such a remarkable document that I can’t help quoting from it extensively:
YouÂ’ve already said that you wonÂ’t bring any personal exclusionary beliefs to the workplace. But your actions in 2008 were not personal or private: They were public acts of speech, for which your constituents are rightly holding you accountable now. You did not merely express a personal view on same-sex marriage; you attempted to persuade others to support your point of view. . . .Stop saying that this was merely a private matter that wonÂ’t affect your work as MozillaÂ’s CEO. ThatÂ’s disingenuine and beneath a leader of your stature.
Say that whatever chain of logic led you to conclude that your personal views required you to support Proposition 8 was flawed, erroneous, incorrect. You may well maintain those same views—that’s your prerogative—but you don’t have to draw the same conclusions from them today as you did six years ago.
Go further. Say that you support the rights of people to enter into same-sex marriages everywhere. Say that you will not only support employees in the United States who are in same-sex marriages, but that you will also fight for the civil rights of Mozilla employees who work in societies with less progressive views.
Finally, make a donation equal in amount to the money you gave to Proposition 8 and candidates who supported it to the Human Rights Campaign or another organization that fights for the civil rights of LGBT people.” [Emphases in the original]
Grammar and diction unworthy of an editor aside, one of the most striking things about this passage is its tone, or perhaps we should say its genre. The remedies demanded (public recantation, propitiatory sacrifice) are of the sort necessitated by ritual defilement, rather than the giving of offense. It is also clear that Thomas does not merely wish Eich to say that he has changed his views, he truly, sincerely, desperately hopes that Eich be transformed. The key realization is that the howling mob which Thomas has ginned up is only partially an instrument of chastisement. It is also intended to educate. Thomas is in this to save souls.
Whether or not Eich keeps his position, this episode is instructive for those who hold out hope for a détente in the culture wars. The flawed analogy between the movement to end discrimination against African-Americans and the movement to allow gays and lesbians to marry is sincerely believed by many. But it is not merely a convenient piece of rhetoric or a skillful legal strategy. The moral force of the civil rights movement did not permit any sort of accommodation or compromise with bigots, and contemporary social conservatives who believe that they can negotiate more favorable terms of surrender have fallen prey to wishful thinking. What Thomas’s statement and others reveal is that the same-sex marriage movement has inherited that same genuine moral outrage, that same crusading zeal. While supporters of traditional marriage would like to convince the world that they are correct, they may soon find it difficult enough just to establish that they are not monsters. What is certain is that this will not be the last time that a public example is made of a dissenter from the new moral order.
Good luck on that.
Incidentally, it might make for a good question for the media to ask Obama or Carney -- whether or not they favored the pillorying of Eich for agreeing with Obama on the position he allegedly held on gay marriage from 2008-2011.
It would be informative. It would illustrate what the progressives actually think, or rather, what they feel.
Ergo, it will not be asked.
Posted by: Ace at
12:13 PM
| Comments (392)
Post contains 859 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: Hello it's me Donna and I know nuthink! at April 02, 2014 12:15 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 02, 2014 12:16 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: rd at April 02, 2014 12:16 PM (D+lxs)
Posted by: Teh Most Interesting Man at April 02, 2014 12:17 PM (dTh2r)
Posted by: Hello it's me Donna and I know nuthink! at April 02, 2014 12:18 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2014 12:18 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Chi-town Jerry at April 02, 2014 12:18 PM (Z7PrM)
"so you VOTED for a man who agreed with me in 2008 but "grew" but I must be purged?"
Then fire their asses
Posted by: sven10077 at April 02, 2014 12:19 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: Chi-town Jerry at April 02, 2014 12:19 PM (Z7PrM)
Posted by: Dan at April 02, 2014 12:19 PM (COpZ4)
Posted by: IrishEd at April 02, 2014 12:19 PM (D0NZx)
Posted by: Jack Burton Mercer at April 02, 2014 12:20 PM (ISRS1)
Posted by: rickl at April 02, 2014 12:20 PM (zoehZ)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: Paris St-Germain( 2 ) v Chelsea( 1 ) Live at April 02, 2014 12:21 PM (IXrOn)
Um can you show me where the right has scorch earthed like this please?
Posted by: sven10077 at April 02, 2014 12:21 PM (TE35l)
Back in the good old days of the Salem Witch Trials, if the "witch" would admit they were a witch and then recant, they'd forgo punishment. If the witch refused to admit they were a witch, and denied they were a witch, THEN they'd be burnt at the stake.
If Eich does not recant, he is going to get smoked.
Posted by: rd at April 02, 2014 12:21 PM (D+lxs)
You left out a few steps...
windage and elevation lads...W+L
Posted by: sven10077 at April 02, 2014 12:21 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: Paris St-Germain( 2 ) v Chelsea( 1 ) Live at April 02, 2014 12:21 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: AMDG at April 02, 2014 12:21 PM (eFytx)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2014 12:22 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Ricardo Kill at April 02, 2014 12:22 PM (gOoFi)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 12:23 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) at April 02, 2014 12:23 PM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Adriane... at April 02, 2014 12:23 PM (qoKTg)
"disingenuine"
As qualified to be editor as SCOAMF to head up the Harvard Law Review.
Posted by: WTF? at April 02, 2014 12:23 PM (08jH8)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 02, 2014 12:24 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: Paris St-Germain( 2 ) v Chelsea( 1 ) Live at April 02, 2014 12:24 PM (IXrOn)
Ace mentioned firing those calling for the ouster of the CEO.
Note, NOTHING, would help help America's sick political culture then for this CEO to do exactly that, and let it be known that Mozilla will fire anyone that exhibits the same intolerance.
Also, it would be pretty cool to see Firefox become the conservative browser vs Chrome (liberal/NSA) and internet exploder.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 02, 2014 12:24 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Roy at April 02, 2014 12:24 PM (VndSC)
Posted by: Hello it's me Donna and I know nuthink! at April 02, 2014 12:24 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: AMDG at April 02, 2014 12:24 PM (eFytx)
Posted by: Liberals at NRO at April 02, 2014 12:25 PM (MVGKx)
**
Ooh!! This is another one of them liberal brain teasers! We should create a game show or walk around a college campus asking these questions.
And shit.
Posted by: dananjcon at April 02, 2014 12:25 PM (NpXoL)
Posted by: Soothsayer, corn bread assassin at April 02, 2014 12:25 PM (5Kf7w)
So, how's my truce on social issues working out?
Also, anybody seen my wife lately? Damned if I can find her.
Posted by: Gov. Mitch Daniels
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at April 02, 2014 12:25 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Hello it's me Donna and I know nuthink! at April 02, 2014 12:25 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 02, 2014 12:26 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) at April 02, 2014 12:26 PM (HDwDg)
These are only to be permitted if you are willing to say the correct things. We have no objection, at this time, if you take more liberty in your speech to yourself.
Posted by: The Left at April 02, 2014 12:26 PM (IN7k+)
Posted by: brak at April 02, 2014 12:27 PM (iEoiA)
Posted by: jwest at April 02, 2014 12:27 PM (u2a4R)
Hate is not to be tolerated.
Hate is to be stamped out.
Why no, I will not stop and consider that I am being hateful, why do you ask?
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at April 02, 2014 12:27 PM (9PrpA)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at April 02, 2014 12:27 PM (dfYL9)
***
Propaganda. The media discovered no one was going to call them on pushing anything.
Gay marriage is primarily a proxy to attack Christians for daring to have a moral compass independent for the media-government complex and a damn good one...so the State Media starting working on it in the early 00s. It seems to have sprouted fruit around the middle 00s.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 02, 2014 12:27 PM (78TbK)
It's absolutely jaw-droppingly astounding just how many single-issue voters there are in the SF Bay Area on the subject of gay marriage. When I say, "single-issue voters", gay marriage is THE ONLY ISSUE EVAR. It is as though the entire universe hinges upon it.
Obama could have gotten us into a catastrophic nuclear war in 2011, and this crew would have come crawling out of the irradiated wreckage to vote to re-elect him the next year. Because gay marriage. Nothing else appears to matter to them. It's absolutely pure, quadruple distilled, extra strength tribal-signifier politics.
So I said to one of these people, "Who said this? 'I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now, for me as a Christian, it's also a sacred union. You know, God's in the mix.'"
Their response was, "Some homophobic trailer trash fuck in flyover land."
I said, "Um, actually, no, that was Barack Obama in 2008."
They said, "Oh, that. None of us took it seriously. We all knew he was lying about that in order to get elected."
So, yeah, the progtards have already internalized the spin on this one.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 02, 2014 12:28 PM (noWW6)
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
And a religion for idiots.
They are fucking crazy. You can't reason with crazy.
The religion of buttfucking and atheism has gone way too far without being checked. Time to put these fuckers in their place.
Posted by: prescient11 at April 02, 2014 12:28 PM (tVTLU)
We will lose one or the other in this matter.
One protects the freedoms of all.
The other protects and sets aside special privileges for favored groups.
Posted by: RoyalOil at April 02, 2014 12:28 PM (VjL9S)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2014 12:28 PM (ix+5k)
Posted by: Ricardo Kill at April 02, 2014 12:28 PM (gOoFi)
Posted by: AMDG at April 02, 2014 12:28 PM (eFytx)
Posted by: Soona at April 02, 2014 12:28 PM (MzhHs)
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i][/b] at April 02, 2014 12:28 PM (bFFNE)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: Paris St-Germain( 2 ) v Chelsea( 1 ) Live at April 02, 2014 12:28 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 12:29 PM (mx5oN)
Fire.Them.All
Fuck those whiny hypocriticle assholes, they have double standards that make Obama blush.
Posted by: Gmac at April 02, 2014 12:29 PM (4pjhs)
Posted by: blaster at April 02, 2014 12:29 PM (4+AaH)
Posted by: Chris at April 02, 2014 12:29 PM (crkWb)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: Paris St-Germain( 2 ) v Chelsea( 1 ) Live at April 02, 2014 12:30 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 02, 2014 12:30 PM (84gbM)
Grow up already.
========
Evil preaches tolerance until it gains power.
Then it brutally enforces conformity with its views.
Make no mistake: I am saying those pushing gay marriage are holding hands with evil.
Posted by: RoyalOil at April 02, 2014 12:30 PM (VjL9S)
Pity party at jwest's.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at April 02, 2014 12:30 PM (9PrpA)
As someone here has said multiple times before, it isn't just good enough to accept gay marriage, now it has to be praised and lauded and outright celebrated, or else you are a hater.
Well fuck it. I'm a hater then.
Posted by: DangerGirl at April 02, 2014 12:31 PM (GrtrJ)
Posted by: NotCoach at April 02, 2014 12:31 PM (rsudF)
Posted by: BuddyPC at April 02, 2014 12:32 PM (jfUIE)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 02, 2014 12:32 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2014 12:32 PM (MVGKx)
We're getting closer to actual, no-kidding re-education camps every day.
The push back will be epic. Short & bloody, but epic.
--
Promises, promises....
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 02, 2014 12:32 PM (eoeps)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 02, 2014 12:32 PM (APuJ7)
Yes because we are getting J "throw grannie from the train" West financially hurt in his real life...
Little Lord FauntleWest what happened next...here have a crying rag and couch m'lord...
Posted by: sven10077 at April 02, 2014 12:32 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 02, 2014 12:32 PM (HVff2)
This is why you see the left ever more closely associating itself with what is traditionally evil.
Look at Leland Yee...he is the natural progression of the abandonment of traditional ethics.
Say what you need to to acquire political power...then use that power to make yourself wealthy and more powerful...wash rinse repeat. All we have is the hear and now so why not?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 02, 2014 12:32 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Hauptreichsfuhrer Kathleen Sebelius at April 02, 2014 12:33 PM (8ZskC)
I am perfectly willing to live and let live. I am unsure about the whole "gay marriage" thing, and I'm highly doubtful about our current arrogant willingness to overturn all (but all) the wisdom of our ancestors. But please, stop forcing me to care by persecuting people for following their consciences and beliefs.
It is not likely to work out well.
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 12:33 PM (DV/Ik)
It's absolutely jaw-droppingly astounding just how many single-issue voters there are in the SF Bay Area on the subject of gay marriage.
Posted by: torquewrench
The Bay area? How about the Republican Party? Lest we forget the hyperventilating from Le Partie Official over Ken Cuccinelli.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at April 02, 2014 12:33 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 02, 2014 12:33 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 02, 2014 12:33 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Countrysquire at April 02, 2014 12:33 PM (LSJmV)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2014 12:33 PM (ix+5k)
Posted by: brak at April 02, 2014 04:27 PM (iEoiA)<
No. Any political donation above either $200 or $250 has to be reported to the government quarterly - and is then made public. HuffPo dedicates a portion of their site to tracking political donations. You can search by zipcode, name, whatever. During the recall here against Walker, the teachers unions used these public domain listings to target companies for boycotts and individuals for abuse.
Not sure how state laws differ for disclosure.
Posted by: Muad'dib at April 02, 2014 12:33 PM (sjdRT)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at April 02, 2014 12:33 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: Socratease at April 02, 2014 12:33 PM (2GbWn)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 02, 2014 12:34 PM (SY2Kh)
My guess is he either 1) bows at the altar of gay or 2) is out of a job by the end of this month.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk
----------
I would love to see the dollar amount in the wrongful termination suit.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 02, 2014 12:34 PM (eoeps)
Posted by: hairless mule at April 02, 2014 12:34 PM (EcY0f)
Posted by: naturalfake at April 02, 2014 12:35 PM (0cMkb)
***
Things that 18-1 said were going to happen five years ago if we didn't hold the line then...
I'm just wondering now whether the next crusade will be accepting one of the intolerable things that the slippery slopers said would happen or double down on forcing the populace to participate further in "alternate lifestyles".
Posted by: 18-1 at April 02, 2014 12:35 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2014 12:35 PM (ix+5k)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 02, 2014 12:35 PM (HVff2)
He should be asking for their resignation. If I were to bad mouth -publicly- my CEO, my job security would become somewhat problematic.
Posted by: physics geek at April 02, 2014 12:36 PM (MT22W)
No one was burned at the stake at Salem, or (generally) in England.
The score at Salem was 19 hanged, one pressed, and approximately 200 died of disease awaiting trial.
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 12:36 PM (DV/Ik)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2014 12:36 PM (MVGKx)
Well fuck it. I'm a hater then.
Posted by: DangerGirl at April 02, 2014 04:31 PM (GrtrJ)
**
Well then...No Ellen repeats for you!
Posted by: dananjcon at April 02, 2014 12:36 PM (NpXoL)
Part of the problem when this sort of this shit happens is that the person being attacked doesn't want to stand up for their principles. It's time to man the F up.
They isolate and demonize. If you stand up you're on your own against the mob.
Posted by: eleven at April 02, 2014 12:36 PM (fsLdt)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at April 02, 2014 12:36 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: AMDG at April 02, 2014 12:36 PM (eFytx)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 02, 2014 12:37 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Hello it's me Donna and I know nuthink! at April 02, 2014 04:24 PM (9+ccr)
----------------------------------------------
It's been written by prophets and others that Christians/Godly people will find themselves standing alone against rabid mobs of the worldly. It's happened before, it'll happen again.
I pray for strength.
Posted by: Soona at April 02, 2014 12:37 PM (MzhHs)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 02, 2014 12:37 PM (bitz6)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2014 12:37 PM (MVGKx)
Consider Commiefornia's Prop 8, the anti-gay-marriage initiative approved by CA voters and later nullified by a gay federal judge.
One of the key factors in putting Prop 8 over the top was the black church vote. Which supported 8 by enormous margins.
Except... the institutional left simply CAN'T GO AFTER those black voters in a confrontational, accusatory way. That would be a disaster for them. Those blacks are a key leftist voting bloc when they're not occasionally supporting things like Prop 8.
So since there are fewer politically and ethnically approved targets available, it means that the total available vitriol has to be superconcentrated upon acceptable white targets such as Eich. Nuke the whole site from orbit.
FYI, I voted against 8. My longstanding position is that marriage is an inherently conservative institution, and encouraging more people towards conservative institutions is all right by me. I also take a pretty expansive view of the 14th Amendment equal-protection clause.
But, these endless pink-hued witch hunts are really putting the point across that by casting that vote on principle, I really did climb into bed politically with some very very unpleasant folks on the left.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 02, 2014 12:37 PM (noWW6)
___
Amnesty, gay marriage, and higher taxes. If it wins for the Democrats why not us too?
Posted by: John Boehner at April 02, 2014 12:37 PM (78TbK)
Attempting to persuade others to support your point of view is an OUTRAGE! Therefore as your punishment, you must Say that you will not only support employees in the United States who are in same-sex marriages, but that you will also fight for the civil rights of Mozilla employees who work in societies with less progressive views.
ie. persuade others to your new, correct according to the gay mafia, point of view.
Cheese and fucking rice, these people. They won't be happy until they've either shamed us all into accepting their bullshit or killed us.
Posted by: DangerGirl at April 02, 2014 12:37 PM (GrtrJ)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: Paris St-Germain( 3 ) v Chelsea( 1 ) Final booo at April 02, 2014 12:38 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2014 04:36 PM (ZshNr)
*
Hey! He keeps the interwebs running!
Posted by: dananjcon at April 02, 2014 12:38 PM (NpXoL)
Posted by: Kim Jong Un, Dictator for Life and National Tonsorial Paradigm at April 02, 2014 12:38 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 02, 2014 12:38 PM (bitz6)
Not if we group together in a counter mob....
THAT is where we fail.
Posted by: sven10077 at April 02, 2014 12:38 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at April 02, 2014 12:38 PM (dfYL9)
Of course, it's no concern that the license stopped saying "Husband and Wife" and started reading "Party One and Party Two". Nice.
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at April 02, 2014 12:39 PM (pgQxn)
Posted by: nerdygirl at April 02, 2014 12:39 PM (dPc6Y)
Posted by: SH at April 02, 2014 12:39 PM (gmeXX)
I have a direct relative who was burned at the stake in England for being a Protestant Minister. I'd have to get back to you with details, but it's true.
I also have a relative who was scalped alive by Native Americans. She was pretending to be dead after they shot her husband dead and brained her baby against a rock.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at April 02, 2014 12:39 PM (J79eW)
Posted by: Countrysquire at April 02, 2014 12:39 PM (LSJmV)
No. Any political donation above either $200 or $250 has to be reported to the government quarterly - and is then made public. HuffPo dedicates a portion of their site to tracking political donations.
Posted by: Muad'dib
That's for donations to candidates and bundlers. Don't think individual issue group donations get disclosed at the Federal level.
At the state level, there was a lawsuit in California to keep the donor list for Prop. 8 private for just this reason.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at April 02, 2014 12:40 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 02, 2014 04:28 PM (bFFNE)
++++
With the whole demand for self-denunciation, my first thought was of the Maoists, but perhaps that is because I recently watched "The Last Emperor".
Posted by: The Left at April 02, 2014 12:40 PM (IN7k+)
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at April 02, 2014 12:40 PM (zT0DN)
Posted by: physics geek at April 02, 2014 04:36 PM (MT22W)
-----------------------------------------------------
Problematic? My job security would become non-existant.
Posted by: Soona at April 02, 2014 12:40 PM (MzhHs)
Posted by: jwest at April 02, 2014 12:40 PM (u2a4R)
Report: EPA tested deadly pollutants on humans
--
Not surprised. The EPA hates capitalists especially, but all humans in general.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 02, 2014 12:40 PM (eoeps)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2014 12:41 PM (MVGKx)
@52 They said, "Oh, that. None of us took it seriously. We all knew he was lying about that in order to get elected."
So, yeah, the progtards have already internalized the spin on this one.
----------------------
They'd already internalized it back when he said it. Everyone who deeply cared about the issue was already convinced it was a "wink, nod" comment meant to placate those who weren't as heavily invested, but still considered it to be important.
Posted by: junior at April 02, 2014 12:41 PM (UWFpX)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 12:41 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: Zombie Giles Corey at April 02, 2014 12:41 PM (APuJ7)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2014 12:42 PM (ix+5k)
So a contribution to a particular political party would be grounds for calling for the resignation of a CEO?
Posted by: polynikes at April 02, 2014 12:42 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Countrysquire at April 02, 2014 12:42 PM (LSJmV)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 02, 2014 12:42 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2014 12:43 PM (ix+5k)
Posted by: MTF at April 02, 2014 12:43 PM (LISuA)
Posted by: MacGootbone at April 02, 2014 12:44 PM (t4bIp)
Posted by: Taco Shack at April 02, 2014 12:44 PM (C+qQ0)
Oh, you've be told how you can have your hair...but you won't be able to get the Aniston or the Johnny Plugs...
Posted by: 18-1 at April 02, 2014 12:44 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Zombie Haing S. Ngor at April 02, 2014 12:44 PM (APuJ7)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2014 12:45 PM (MVGKx)
Posted by: polynikes at April 02, 2014 12:45 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) at April 02, 2014 12:45 PM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 12:45 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 02, 2014 12:45 PM (HVff2)
***
Now if we can just get you fin cons to chill on taxes and spending, and the border hawks to STFU I think we'll be in pretty good shape.
Posted by: John Boehner at April 02, 2014 12:45 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 02, 2014 12:46 PM (32Ze2)
Posted by: random thought generator at April 02, 2014 12:46 PM (GIXMb)
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 04:36 PM (DV/Ik)
Didn't they cage a few and throw them into the river? I thought that was a common test to see if someone was a witch (those who survived being the guilty ones of course).
Posted by: MTF at April 02, 2014 12:46 PM (LISuA)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2014 12:46 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Brenden at April 02, 2014 12:46 PM (wa+SP)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at April 02, 2014 12:46 PM (5xmd7)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 02, 2014 12:46 PM (T0NGe)
>>I agree with atheists that religion is a serious impediment to clear thought.
Not religious at all, but I agree with religionists that religion is an education in itself.
Posted by: Bigby's Rodeo Hands at April 02, 2014 12:46 PM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Chi-town Jerry at April 02, 2014 12:47 PM (Z7PrM)
@ 166 - ""I agree with atheists that religion is a serious impediment to clear thought.""
"I think everybody using Cartesian math to prove anything may disagree with you."
What's more, as the past few years are showing us, atheism itself seems to be a serious impediment to clear thought.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at April 02, 2014 12:47 PM (YYJjz)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2014 12:48 PM (MVGKx)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) at April 02, 2014 12:48 PM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 02, 2014 12:48 PM (aDwsi)
Speaking of religious fervor (take 2).. I think Harry Reid got a heads up on the Supreme Court ruling last week and thus went all Koch-y-eyed to put their name on the radar. Thus when the lib twitterverse went ape shi# today, the rest of the libs now know what they are talking about. Presto - off year election straw men. Is it illegal to get a heads up on a Supreme Court ruling?
Posted by: MacGootbone at April 02, 2014 12:48 PM (t4bIp)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 04:41 PM (mx5oN)
-------------------------------------------
Already done.
Posted by: Soona at April 02, 2014 12:48 PM (MzhHs)
Posted by: McCool at April 02, 2014 12:48 PM (nCSwS)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 02, 2014 12:48 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 02, 2014 12:49 PM (bitz6)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 12:50 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: Countrysquire at April 02, 2014 12:50 PM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at April 02, 2014 12:50 PM (/djtm)
An atheist, an agnostic and a believer walk into a bar.
The sign inside said all the free beer you can drink.
The atheist said he didn't believe it, the agnostic said its possible but he will believe when he sees it and the believer was on his third beer.
Posted by: polynikes at April 02, 2014 12:50 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2014 12:51 PM (MVGKx)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 12:51 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 02, 2014 12:52 PM (APuJ7)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 02, 2014 12:52 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: McCool at April 02, 2014 12:52 PM (nCSwS)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at April 02, 2014 12:52 PM (/djtm)
Posted by: Countrysquire at April 02, 2014 12:52 PM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 04:36 PM (DV/Ik)
Too much TV and public education. There are so many things I saw and heard that just aren't true.
Posted by: rd at April 02, 2014 12:53 PM (D+lxs)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at April 02, 2014 12:54 PM (KSjsb)
Posted by: ejo at April 02, 2014 12:54 PM (GXvSO)
Fuckers would take all lands and property from your families if you were found guilty, either through admission or through their kangaroo courts. Posted by: Zombie Giles Corey
That argument does not work.
Rebecca Nurse's family lost nothing (I did a paper on this), nor did any other family.
Granted, almost every victim of the Witch Bitches was a woman, whose property would usually consist of the one-third life interest in an estate, but still.
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 12:54 PM (DV/Ik)
----
Hey. Asshole.
Whatchagonna do with the people that dont want to live in your new dream world??
Posted by: fixerupper at April 02, 2014 12:54 PM (nELVU)
@177 Is it illegal to get a heads up on a Supreme Court ruling?
---------------------------
Probably not. But reportedly it's very difficult to do. The Justices are traditionally very tight-lipped about their rulings. And the interns working for the Justices know that if they'll be in big trouble (fired, of course, and likely find it more difficult to find work afterwards) if they talk. It's generally considered something that Is Just Not Done.
That doesn't mean that Reid (or someone else) doesn't have an inside line. But it's not something that traditionally happens.
Posted by: junior at April 02, 2014 12:54 PM (UWFpX)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2014 12:54 PM (MVGKx)
***
In the future, liberals will embrace a policy of "work makes you free" for those guilty of crimes against the state.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 02, 2014 12:54 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 02, 2014 12:55 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: The Tolerant Left at April 02, 2014 12:55 PM (ILBCY)
***
That guy was a bad ass IIRC..."You need more rocks"
Posted by: 18-1
Actually, Giles Corey's last words: "More weight".
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 12:55 PM (DV/Ik)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 02, 2014 04:53 PM (bitz6)
*
I like Mothra better, he always had more range.
Posted by: dananjcon at April 02, 2014 12:56 PM (NpXoL)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 02, 2014 12:56 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 02, 2014 12:57 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 12:57 PM (mx5oN)
............
Naaah.. they've been on the Koch hating bandwagon for some time now.. the Koch Bros. are the devil incarnate over at Daily Kooks and HuffPo.
Posted by: Chi-town Jerry at April 02, 2014 12:57 PM (Z7PrM)
Hey, do have a job or business? Yeah, well then, shut the fuck up with your opinions and shit.
It appears they "Went There". And he didn't even express an opinion he donated money.
Posted by: eleven at April 02, 2014 12:57 PM (fsLdt)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 02, 2014 12:58 PM (bitz6)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 02, 2014 12:58 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 02, 2014 12:59 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 01:00 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: Countrysquire at April 02, 2014 01:00 PM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 02, 2014 01:00 PM (5Kf7w)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 02, 2014 01:00 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 02, 2014 01:00 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 02, 2014 01:00 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 01:01 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 02, 2014 04:52 PM (bitz6)
To a fever pitch of hot, angry tolerance apparently.
Posted by: MTF at April 02, 2014 01:01 PM (LISuA)
Posted by: Your Morally Preening Betters at April 02, 2014 01:01 PM (UB6eP)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2014 01:01 PM (MVGKx)
Posted by: Damiano at April 02, 2014 01:01 PM (j0wOO)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 02, 2014 01:02 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Elderflower Cocktail at April 02, 2014 01:02 PM (ZshNr)
"Our goal is liberation. We have a radical view of the fight for justice: We are feminist. We are anti-racist. We want queer liberation. And we are against capitalism. Prisons are part of the system that oppresses and divides us. By building a movement and taking action against this system of violence, we will create the world we dream of. "
***
Man, I just love these clueless fucktards. "I am against capitalism!" In other words, I am against the very thing responsible for every fucking thing in my world, from the food I eat to the roof over my head and every other facet in between. "Oh, and prisons! Because we certainly don't need those."
I would love for someone to toss these asshats in the lifer wing of a major prison for a month and then put's what left of them in a fucking line for bread in Venezuela.
Posted by: B at April 02, 2014 01:02 PM (6iEQd)
Posted by: Havildar - Major at April 02, 2014 01:02 PM (kduZC)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2014 01:02 PM (MVGKx)
same in England; only Continental Witches were burnt
Posted by: Jules ( sniffing t-shirts ) at April 02, 2014 01:03 PM (JyjXt)
Posted by: jwest at April 02, 2014 01:03 PM (u2a4R)
"I agree with atheists that religion is a serious impediment to clear thought."
It's the Atheist Delusion.
Marx had it too. It just isn't true. By and large, atheists can become far more superstitious, subject to conspiracy theories and subject to flights of new-agey thinking than those with a grounded theology.
Also, religious people don't have to keep rediscovering morality. They have a healthy respect for the past and accumulated knowledge.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 02, 2014 04:59 PM (T0NGe)
G.K. Chesterton: "When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing — they believe in anything."
Posted by: rd at April 02, 2014 01:03 PM (D+lxs)
Posted by: Killerdog at April 02, 2014 01:03 PM (eJVn4)
Posted by: Jules ( sniffing t-shirts ) at April 02, 2014 01:03 PM (JyjXt)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 02, 2014 01:04 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Countrysquire at April 02, 2014 01:04 PM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Countrysquire at April 02, 2014 05:00 PM (LSJmV)
*facepalm* Posted by: Insomniac
I'm still giggling!
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 01:04 PM (DV/Ik)
I should also expand on that to indicate that I was utterly horrified by the way the court challenges to 8 shook out afterward.
We had a gay federal judge toss out the clearly stated will of the CA electorate on a matter specifically involving gays. Even though I was on the side that the judge supported, I thought this was a case where recusal ought to have been self-evident and axiomatic. He had a dog in the fight. This was black-robed radicalism at its worst.
And, we had Commiefornia's elected officials pulling a trick that Obama has since picked up on and polished into a centerpiece of his act: the open refusal to actively defend in court a law that was enacted by completely aboveboard means, and a law that should bind every officeholder. This is the road to what Pournelle calls "anarcho-tyranny".
Posted by: torquewrench at April 02, 2014 01:05 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: Carol at April 02, 2014 01:05 PM (gjOCp)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2014 01:05 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 02, 2014 01:05 PM (5Kf7w)
The sadistic part of me is kinda smiling...
If someone, be it the CEO of a tech company, or father of a CEO of a duck call company, or just the average dude down the street, not sharing your morality bothers you to the point that you won't be able to rest until they are completely and utterly destroyed, then you are going to have a very miserable life.
The leftist thought police are going to be very very miserable, and that makes me all happy inside.
Posted by: Carnivorus Herbavore at April 02, 2014 01:05 PM (h0ygp)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 02, 2014 01:06 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2014 01:06 PM (ix+5k)
Besides, how can you stomp out heresies without a good pair of stompy boots?
Posted by: Thatch at April 02, 2014 01:06 PM (qYvEa)
It's all about the free shit.
http://is.gd/iNRwoU
Posted by: HR at April 02, 2014 01:06 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 02, 2014 01:06 PM (T0NGe)
same in England; only Continental Witches were burnt
Posted by: Jules ( sniffing t-shirts )
And in Scotland.
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 01:06 PM (DV/Ik)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 02, 2014 01:07 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2014 01:07 PM (ix+5k)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 02, 2014 01:08 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Ricardo Kill at April 02, 2014 01:08 PM (gOoFi)
Posted by: Zombie Arlen Specter at April 02, 2014 01:08 PM (APuJ7)
Former CIA deputy director Mike Morell testified Wednesday that the spy agency knew almost immediately that al-Qaeda-linked terrorists had been involved in the 2012 Benghazi attacks that killed four Americans, seemingly contradicting a widely-cited New York Times report published last year.
“The analysts said from the get-go that al-Qaeda was involved in this attack,” Morell said during a hearing on Capitol Hill before the House Intelligence Committee.
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at April 02, 2014 01:09 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 02, 2014 01:09 PM (5Kf7w)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2014 01:09 PM (ZshNr)
"How long have you been a witch, and who made you a witch? Name those you have made witches. Who did you see at your meetings?"
"See these instruments? This is the thumbscrew. We will place it on your thumb and turn it. If we keep turning the screw, your thumb will be crushed. The nail will fall off, the blood will burst through your skin, and the marrow will run out. We would hate to use this on you. Please answer the questions. How long have you been a witch...."
That's how.
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 01:10 PM (DV/Ik)
That's the War on Womynz, not Teh Ghey. Moms work less (and more likely at lower-paying jobs) than men; there is nothing interesting in the observation that households with two full-time earners average more income than a household with 1.5 or fewer full-timer earners.
Posted by: HR at April 02, 2014 01:11 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Deputy Governor Danforth at April 02, 2014 01:12 PM (APuJ7)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 01:12 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2014 01:12 PM (XyM/Y)
Oh, guilty as charged, your worship!
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 01:13 PM (DV/Ik)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 01:13 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 02, 2014 01:13 PM (qyfb5)
Madam, you are currently on trial for bitchcraft. How do you plead?
Umm......how do you feel about bitches?
Posted by: Bitch at April 02, 2014 01:13 PM (fsLdt)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 02, 2014 01:14 PM (5Kf7w)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 01:14 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: Constantine The Great at April 02, 2014 01:14 PM (jfUIE)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 02, 2014 01:15 PM (bitz6)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC opening for Hawkwind at April 02, 2014 01:15 PM (yNSNw)
Maybe the assholes getting all over Eich can go right up the street and save some of the kids currently being molested by members of the San Fran goernment.
But NOOOOOoooooo....that would be too fucking much to ask, wouldn't it.
I am astounded how gay everything is demanded to be, all the time, at every moment.
Fuck that noise.
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz Christies at April 02, 2014 01:15 PM (xggaJ)
Posted by: Countrysquire at April 02, 2014 01:16 PM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 02, 2014 01:16 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2014 01:16 PM (ZshNr)
For example, biomass plants emit nearly 50 percent more carbon dioxide — a gas that is used by plants which will cause the extinction of all life on Earth — per megawatt hour of electricity produced than coal plants, the study concluded.
Posted by: Rachel Carson at April 02, 2014 01:16 PM (e8kgV)
That's why they do it over *everything*.
In some perverse way, it makes them happier than being happy does.
I mean, seriously, when was a leftist regime every *happy and contented* after a purge?
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 02, 2014 05:08 PM (qyfb5)
---------------------------------------------
They find happiness in the destruction of happiness. They wallow in delicious misery.
And when they find they have no control over what makes people happy (like spiritual happiness), that's when the killing starts.
Posted by: Soona at April 02, 2014 01:17 PM (MzhHs)
<<But POTUS says if GOP policies were deli food, they'd be a "stinkburger" or a "meanwich.">>
http://tinyurl.com/lvez4r9
Posted by: Buzzsaw at April 02, 2014 01:17 PM (tf9Ne)
Wait, wait!!
Down tools everyone. It's time for our afternoon two minutes of hate. Hairy Reid just issued a statement about the evil Koch (Emmanuel Goldstein) Brothers.
Just like Mitt Romney it seems they hate poor people so much they don't pay taxes. Yes, this has been totally discredited but it's Senator Harry Reid (D-Pederasty) who is making the claim now so it probably is true.
Posted by: MTF at April 02, 2014 01:17 PM (LISuA)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at April 02, 2014 01:17 PM (yNSNw)
Posted by: National Health Service at April 02, 2014 01:17 PM (mx5oN)
Carbon dioxide is only bad if it comes from plants that died 300M years ago.
Posted by: HR really needs a beer at April 02, 2014 01:18 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Mandy P., lurking lurker who lurks at April 02, 2014 01:18 PM (qFpRI)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 02, 2014 01:18 PM (5Kf7w)
Posted by: PJ at April 02, 2014 01:18 PM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 02, 2014 01:19 PM (bitz6)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 02, 2014 01:20 PM (0q2P7)
The question recurs, what will satisfy them? Simply this: We must not only let them alone, but we must somehow, convince them that we do let them alone. This, we know by experience, is no easy task. We have been so trying to convince them from the very beginning of our organization, but with no success. In all our platforms and speeches we have constantly protested our purpose to let them alone; but this has had no tendency to convince them. Alike unavailing to convince them, is the fact that they have never detected a man of us in any attempt to disturb them.
These natural, and apparently adequate means all failing, what will convince them? This, and this only: cease to call slavery wrong, and join them in calling it right. And this must be done thoroughly - done in acts as well as in words. Silence will not be tolerated - we must place ourselves avowedly with them. Senator Douglas' new sedition law must be enacted and enforced, suppressing all declarations that slavery is wrong, whether made in politics, in presses, in pulpits, or in private. We must arrest and return their fugitive slaves with greedy pleasure. We must pull down our Free State constitutions. The whole atmosphere must be disinfected from all taint of opposition to slavery, before they will cease to believe that all their troubles proceed from us.
I am quite aware they do not state their case precisely in this way. Most of them would probably say to us, "Let us alone, do nothing to us, and say what you please about slavery." But we do let them alone - have never disturbed them - so that, after all, it is what we say, which dissatisfies them. They will continue to accuse us of doing, until we cease saying.
I am also aware they have not, as yet, in terms, demanded the overthrow of our Free-State Constitutions. Yet those Constitutions declare the wrong of slavery, with more solemn emphasis, than do all other sayings against it; and when all these other sayings shall have been silenced, the overthrow of these Constitutions will be demanded, and nothing be left to resist the demand. It is nothing to the contrary, that they do not demand the whole of this just now. Demanding what they do, and for the reason they do, they can voluntarily stop nowhere short of this consummation. Holding, as they do, that slavery is morally right, and socially elevating, they cannot cease to demand a full national recognition of it, as a legal right, and a social blessing.
Nor can we justifiably withhold this, on any ground save our conviction that slavery is wrong. If slavery is right, all words, acts, laws, and constitutions against it, are themselves wrong, and should be silenced, and swept away. If it is right, we cannot justly object to its nationality - its universality; if it is wrong, they cannot justly insist upon its extension - its enlargement. All they ask, we could readily grant, if we thought slavery right; all we ask, they could as readily grant, if they thought it wrong. Their thinking it right, and our thinking it wrong, is the precise fact upon which depends the whole controversy. Thinking it right, as they do, they are not to blame for desiring its full recognition, as being right; but, thinking it wrong, as we do, can we yield to them? Can we cast our votes with their view, and against our own? In view of our moral, social, and political responsibilities, can we do this?
Wrong as we think slavery is, we can yet afford to let it alone where it is, because that much is due to the necessity arising from its actual presence in the nation; but can we, while our votes will prevent it, allow it to spread into the National Territories, and to overrun us here in these Free States? If our sense of duty forbids this, then let us stand by our duty, fearlessly and effectively. Let us be diverted by none of those sophistical contrivances wherewith we are so industriously plied and belabored - contrivances such as groping for some middle ground between the right and the wrong, vain as the search for a man who should be neither a living man nor a dead man - such as a policy of "don't care" on a question about which all true men do care - such as Union appeals beseeching true Union men to yield to Disunionists, reversing the divine rule, and calling, not the sinners, but the righteous to repentance - such as invocations to Washington, imploring men to unsay what Washington said, and undo what Washington did.
Neither let us be slandered from our duty by false accusations against us, nor frightened from it by menaces of destruction to the Government nor of dungeons to ourselves. LET US HAVE FAITH THAT RIGHT MAKES MIGHT, AND IN THAT FAITH, LET US, TO THE END, DARE TO DO OUR DUTY AS WE UNDERSTAND IT.
Posted by: Caesar North of the Rubicon at April 02, 2014 01:20 PM (MOIp+)
Posted by: Ricardo Kill at April 02, 2014 01:21 PM (gOoFi)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2014 01:21 PM (ix+5k)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 02, 2014 01:21 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2014 01:22 PM (XyM/Y)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:24 PM (9W+0f)
I think that is what we'll actually see, rather than some revolutionary pushback.
Posted by: [/i]KG at April 02, 2014 01:24 PM (p7BzH)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 01:24 PM (mx5oN)
Formal religion's purpose was to take that magical thinking and compartmentalize it, and once people stumbled onto it, with organized priesthoods stamping out primitive beliefs, they were able to use a lot more of their formerly-distracted gray matter for other tasks, which saw the rise of early civilizations. The more that man embraced reason and built a fence around religion in his mind, the further those civilizations rose.
But something strange happens when you try to tear down that fence and exterminate that last germ of religious thought. The magical thinking, once ordered and contained, begins to return. Suddenly the world is full of banksters, Koch Brothers, the 1%, Rothschilds, Reptilians, or Sorcerers once again.
Posted by: Cato at April 02, 2014 01:25 PM (4cRuH)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:26 PM (9W+0f)
@255 I'm referring to a study done by Prudential.
The median income for gays they quoted was $60K. The median overall that they compared it to is $50K.
This was also household income, not individual income.
--------------------
Do you know if the study had a category for childless straight couples? I suspect that might have had something to do with it.
Posted by: junior at April 02, 2014 01:27 PM (UWFpX)
Posted by: KG at April 02, 2014 05:24 PM (p7BzH)
-------------------------------------------
I do too. As long as people are warm in the winter, cool in the summer, and are able to cook their fancy food recipes, they'll go along like lemmings. The excuses for not fighting back will be as numerous as the laws that bind them.
Posted by: Soona at April 02, 2014 01:28 PM (MzhHs)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:29 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2014 01:29 PM (XyM/Y)
Posted by: B at April 02, 2014 01:31 PM (6iEQd)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 02, 2014 01:32 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:32 PM (9W+0f)
http://tinyurl.com/kwzot7q
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2014 05:22 PM (XyM/Y)
Utterly vile. But it's the Christians who are the "haters."
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 05:24 PM (mx5oN)
++++
The worst part? This:
"Police urged the organizers to dissolve the rally, in order 'to avoid escalation.' The organizers of the demonstrations expressed their disappointment of the missing support by the police and that a basic right - the right of assembly, was not protected," the Observatory report said.
Instead of rounding up the shit-flingers, the cops tell the parents to get lost.
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at April 02, 2014 01:32 PM (IN7k+)
I was going with the dreary method that was all-too-familiar on the Continent.
Though Salem had its own - as you noted - catalog of absurdities.
Posted by: Dianna at April 02, 2014 01:32 PM (DV/Ik)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:32 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 02, 2014 01:33 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 02, 2014 01:33 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:33 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: ManWithNoParty at April 02, 2014 01:34 PM (ojnk6)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:35 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Eisenhorn at April 02, 2014 01:35 PM (/8qpd)
Posted by: and irresolute at April 02, 2014 01:36 PM (RqHWH)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:37 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Havildar - Major at April 02, 2014 01:38 PM (kduZC)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:39 PM (9W+0f)
I predict further limits on deductibility of some large tax breaks, means testing for Medicare (and probably a scaling-back of the "doc fix"), and the devolution of some of the social programs largely administered by the states anyway - Section 8, food stamps, Medicaid, etc. - to the states, with block funding that declines slowly in real terms over several years. Some states (let's call them "blue") will try to maintain benefits, and some states (let's call them "red") will reduce benefits. This will work to increase the fiscal crisis in the blue states and increase the migration of producers from blue states to red states. The end result will be fiscal emergencies, leading to rioting in the large cities in the blue states. Which, of course, further increases the out-migration of producers, which increases the negative spiral in the blue states. And there will be outright bankruptcies of some blue institutions - cities, counties, universities.
In the end, the states with sanity, common sense, and American can-do spirit prevail and rewrite the social compact. But it will be a long and ugly half-century getting there.
Posted by: Caesar North of the Rubicon at April 02, 2014 01:41 PM (MOIp+)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:42 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2014 01:43 PM (XyM/Y)
Posted by: ejo at April 02, 2014 01:43 PM (GXvSO)
Posted by: ace at April 02, 2014 01:43 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:44 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Inspector Cussword at April 02, 2014 01:45 PM (FBTT7)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:47 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Havildar - Major at April 02, 2014 01:48 PM (kduZC)
Posted by: ace at April 02, 2014 01:49 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at April 02, 2014 01:52 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2014 01:52 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Havildar - Major at April 02, 2014 01:53 PM (kduZC)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at April 02, 2014 01:54 PM (vd7A8)
Posted by: PJ at April 02, 2014 01:54 PM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Caesar North of the Rubicon at April 02, 2014 01:56 PM (MOIp+)
Posted by: PJ at April 02, 2014 01:56 PM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: TimothyJ at April 02, 2014 01:57 PM (ep2io)
Posted by: OregonMuse at April 02, 2014 01:58 PM (I8YZX)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at April 02, 2014 02:01 PM (dfYL9)
My point wasn't an anti-religious one, at least, the one I was trying to make, but a strongly pro-religious one. One of the hallmarks of every early civilization was organized religion, and that's not a coincidence. Organized religion almost always draws a clear line between the spiritual world and the daily world, and that duality is what starts encouraging people to see the world as it truly is, rather than a place where everything is magic.
The point I went on to make is that when you remove that structure, when you try to get rid of religion altogether, the previous unstructured chaos returns. It's the belief that everything is just peachy-keen and can only be perfect until some evil outsider works magic against the righteous, IE, the entire thought process of the modern left. They just exchange their sorcerers for Koch Brothers.
Posted by: Cato at April 02, 2014 02:01 PM (4cRuH)
Posted by: Cato at April 02, 2014 02:02 PM (4cRuH)
Posted by: Havildar - Major at April 02, 2014 02:06 PM (kduZC)
There's a big point to this that goes beyond gay marriage -- intimidating execs at public companies from making donations to causes opposed by the Left. That's a sizeable donor pool. Note that there's no mention of Eich being an outspoken critic of gay marriage -- there's just the one donation.
How did Eich's name ever become public? Was it leaked, as suggested above?
There's Supreme Court precedent to support advocacy groups from not having to reveal donor lists. The early cases involved the NAACP. Justice for thee, but not for me.
I was a regular contributor to a political blog run that was an executive of a public company. While initially aimed at Princeton alums it got broader reach and was actually quite good. Many of the contributors were critical of Romney. Nearly all of the contributors opposed Obama for principled reasons. The executive shut it down in the Spring of 2012 without giving a good explanation. I suspected at the time that "someone got to him."
Posted by: Ignoramus at April 02, 2014 02:13 PM (EPEqj)
Posted by: LFW - Honorary Pointy Eared Vulcan at April 02, 2014 02:22 PM (RQDhf)
Posted by: Jen at April 02, 2014 02:25 PM (IdGqX)
He was wrong.
I don't think it will take that long.
Posted by: Pentangle at April 02, 2014 02:37 PM (QDrOD)
Posted by: Havildar - Major at April 02, 2014 02:42 PM (kduZC)
Posted by: rickl at April 02, 2014 02:44 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Blor-Utar at April 02, 2014 02:57 PM (BqWL/)
Posted by: Stuff Whoopi Goldberg Didn't Say, Vol. 7 at April 02, 2014 03:03 PM (H4aQb)
Hint..... it just ain't gonna happen. There is a big difference between accepting or understanding a behavior and having positive emotional feelings about that behavior.
Posted by: Anchovy at April 02, 2014 03:31 PM (MNxW+)
Posted by: Chris at April 02, 2014 03:32 PM (crkWb)
Posted by: The Political Hat at April 02, 2014 03:35 PM (CTCNK)
Posted by: The Political Hat at April 02, 2014 03:36 PM (CTCNK)
Posted by: Thatch at April 02, 2014 05:57 PM (qYvEa)
Posted by: Thatch at April 02, 2014 05:57 PM (qYvEa)
Posted by: Kafiroon at April 02, 2014 06:04 PM (HZMpv)
Posted by: theBuckWheat at April 02, 2014 06:06 PM (nmcha)
Posted by: Astro at April 02, 2014 07:38 PM (2C1bq)
Posted by: Astro at April 02, 2014 07:38 PM (2C1bq)
Posted by: Astro at April 02, 2014 07:38 PM (2C1bq)
Posted by: ech at April 02, 2014 08:02 PM (vRPbs)
Posted by: ZZMike at April 02, 2014 08:26 PM (/le2f)
"Until Death Do You Part" means until _*SHE*_ gets a better offer.
Charlie (ain't going there again)
Posted by: Charlie at April 02, 2014 08:40 PM (hmPAt)
Posted by: fromabroad at April 02, 2014 09:55 PM (rnV3B)
Posted by: anonymous at April 02, 2014 10:58 PM (aBswB)
Posted by: fromabroad at April 02, 2014 11:01 PM (rnV3B)
Posted by: fromabroad at April 02, 2014 11:03 PM (rnV3B)
Posted by: Chas C-Q at April 03, 2014 01:52 AM (GNZ0/)
It's no damned wonder we have no national standards of behavior.
Posted by: Stringer Davis at April 03, 2014 02:11 AM (xq1UY)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at April 03, 2014 05:27 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: stephen wick at April 03, 2014 06:42 AM (7vUkH)
Comparisons to interracial marriages are false. Interracial couples could find preachers to marry them. This is why the northern states stepped in to invent marriage licenses. Before, it had been up to the preachers and the neighbors to police this.
Fanatics have no need to make sense; all they want is power. They will grasp at any rationale.
Remember that the Progressives came out of the New England Social Gospel movement of the 1830s. They want to create a heaven on earth through governmental actions; they gave us the trade unions, public schools, the blue laws, prohibition, onerous regulations, crony capitalism and big government. They never asked if God wanted them to do those things; they wanted to force God's hand to speed up the Rapture.
Most Progressives, these days, no longer rely on God because they have accepted the government as the supreme arbiter.
God is likely to disagree. His wrath is supposed to be mighty against false religions, but he is often slow to act. That is just as well, if the Gay's excesses will destroy them. They are too small in numbers to affect us without the Democrats behind them.
Posted by: Louis Wheeler at April 03, 2014 10:32 AM (TbquH)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2411 seconds, 520 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 02, 2014 12:15 PM (aDwsi)