October 23, 2013
— DrewM It begins with a reported 6 week delay in the deadline to buy Obamasurance (why not?).
But it was not immediately clear Wednesday whether the adjustment to a cornerstone of the Affordable Care Act would need to be approved by Congress or could be done by the Department of Health and Human Services administratively.As the law stands now, individuals are expected to begin the application process via HealthCare.gov by Feb. 15 to avoid a financial penalty. But under the prospective change, individuals will be expected to have started enrollment by March to avoid incurring the penalty.
Last week only extremists who probably should be charged with sedition believed in delaying anything about the ACA, now it's going to be official Obama administration policy.
The reaction from the GOP should be interesting. Will they support this (rhetorically, no way Obama goes to Congress for this) or will they insist that Obama live by his words of the last few months.
Here's the administration's veto statement on the employer and individual mandate bills the House passed (pdf).
. House passage of
H.R. 2667 and H.R. 2668 will undermine this security for tens of millions of Americans with pre-existing conditions.
H.R. 2667 is unnecessary, and H.R. 2668 would raise health insurance premiums and increase the number of uninsured Americans. Enacting this legislation would undermine key elements of the health law, facilitating further efforts to repeal a law that is already helping millions of Americans stay on their parents' plans until age 26, millions more who are getting free preventive care that catches illness early on, and thousands of children with pre-existing conditions who are now covered.
Now, a little more than a week after the end of the shutdown over delaying these very provisions, Obama is going to do it himself.
The reaction of the GOP will be interesting. Will they use this as a chance to show the American people that the federal government simply can not do everything for them or will they simply say give them power so they can deliver goodies in a more effective way?
Yeah.
Update:
NBC is wrong again. Individual mandate timing hasnt changed. Deadline for having insurance is March 31. Was true this am. Is true tonight.
— Josh Earnest (@jearnest44) October 23, 2013
What seems to have happened is that while the open enrollment period runs through the end of March, you had to buy insurance by the middle of February to avoid the tax/penalty. So you could have purchased insurance during the designated time period and still not have complied with the law.
Believe it or not, no one realized how stupid this was until a week or so ago. So what the administration is saying is as long as you buy a policy before the end of the first open enrollment period (Oct 1, 2012-March 31, 2014) you won't be penalized.
It's not so much a delay as confirmation that this bill was poorly drafted and no one really understands what's in it.
Posted by: DrewM at
03:40 PM
| Comments (326)
Post contains 518 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: jjshaka at October 23, 2013 03:42 PM (prmsv)
Posted by: Winston Smith at October 23, 2013 03:46 PM (AynnL)
Posted by: steevy at October 23, 2013 03:49 PM (zqvg6)
Either get it at full strength or repeal it, there's no middle ground. The GOP should not allow Obama to "mend" this shit sandwich.
Posted by: Jeepers at October 23, 2013 03:49 PM (XDRsa)
Posted by: Every Democratic strategist on cable TV at October 23, 2013 03:50 PM (29vnO)
No letting up.... 1 year delay or nothing. removal of penalties.... highlight all those who lost coverage this fall, highlight all that lost hours....
it's so easy, anyone but a RINO could do it...
we're so screwed
Posted by: phreshone at October 23, 2013 03:50 PM (Pr6hk)
Posted by: fluffy at October 23, 2013 03:51 PM (AynnL)
Posted by: BuckIV at October 23, 2013 03:55 PM (gedHR)
Posted by: MTF at October 23, 2013 03:56 PM (B+HTd)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 03:56 PM (aDwsi)
It's like eating a shit sandwich, but now you can put pepper on it...
Yum! It's really good with extra paste!
Posted by: Special Joe at October 23, 2013 03:56 PM (lVPtV)
and re 5: there's nothing wrong with doing what your opponents want after they lost, provided the right people lost.
Posted by: mallfly at October 23, 2013 03:56 PM (bJm7W)
Posted by: Yip at October 23, 2013 03:57 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: MTF at October 23, 2013 07:56 PM (B+HTd)
Yeah. *heads to liquor cabinet to kill liver*
Posted by: Special Joe at October 23, 2013 03:57 PM (lVPtV)
@HealthCareTara
This is is not a mandate delay. Deadline for having insurance is March 31. Don't believe everything you read on twitter.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 23, 2013 03:57 PM (MDh08)
Posted by: LASue at October 23, 2013 03:58 PM (gjIQF)
Posted by: Minnfidel at October 23, 2013 03:58 PM (ixf9H)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 23, 2013 03:58 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at October 23, 2013 03:58 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: DEM MFM at October 23, 2013 03:59 PM (ixf9H)
Posted by: fluffy at October 23, 2013 03:59 PM (AynnL)
Posted by: MTF at October 23, 2013 07:56 PM ...............Hey, we'll decide when and how we do shit around here minion.
Posted by: DEM MFM at October 23, 2013 04:00 PM (ixf9H)
No letting up.... 1 year delay or nothing. removal of penalties.... highlight all those who lost coverage this fall, highlight all that lost hours....
it's so easy, anyone but a RINO could do it...
we're so screwed
Posted by: phreshone at October 23, 2013 07:50 PM (Pr6hk)
Yep. The only thing that's funny about this is the GOP really did call O's bluff on this, but since the MSM will spin like schizoids, it probably doesn't matter.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at October 23, 2013 04:00 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:01 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: Jimmy the Greek at October 23, 2013 04:02 PM (1O46M)
2020 - Ex-Pres Obama when asked about the soaring cost and deficit as a consequence of Obamacare replies, "No one told me..."
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:02 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at October 23, 2013 04:02 PM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Special Joe
RINO!
*heads to liquor cabinet to kill liver even more*
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at October 23, 2013 04:02 PM (GJc4d)
Posted by: Donna V. sez go cards at October 23, 2013 04:03 PM (R3gO3)
Posted by: Buzzion at October 23, 2013 04:03 PM (NmCiK)
Posted by: bicentennialguy at October 23, 2013 04:03 PM (4qdsJ)
Posted by: Fritz at October 23, 2013 04:03 PM (TKFmG)
Note the "successes" idiotically claimed by the WH press release (funny, this "list" was tossed off almost verbatim by some cretinous "journalist" being interviewed by Hugh Hewitt today).
"Children" of 26 staying on parents' plans? WTF? They aren't children, and the rational choice for them and for society is to have minimal catastrophic plans, which would be CHEAP if health "insurance" were actually insurance.
Pre-existing conditions. Some welfare programs are both noble and sustainable (very few). Any pre-existing condition bullshit is welfare, not insurance (OK, play with high-risk pools etc. all you want, but do not call wealth transfers and welfare and subsidies anything other than that. And again, if the insurance industry were allowed to attack this problem instead of jump to the idiotic whistles of the do-gooders (including many "conservatives") then there probably would be cheaper solutions.
Preventive care. First, in a non-strangled health care market simple preventive care would be much cheaper, easily within reach of most, easily subsidized for the reast. Second, so-called preventive care does NOT end up saving much money or changing health outcomes as people think. Studies have shown a rather pronounced lack of financial improvement, in fact.
So, that's nice. We've got lots of un-facts and lots of nonsense being touted as "successes" for this catastrophic law. Par for the course in today's dumbed-down, greedy, ignorant, rudderless, one-party America.
Posted by: non-purist at October 23, 2013 04:03 PM (afQnV)
Posted by: newrouter at October 23, 2013 04:03 PM (dsgCY)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:04 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:04 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 23, 2013 07:49 PM (lVPtV)
Until you`re completely bent over (our Highness I mean).
Posted by: rightlysouthern at October 23, 2013 04:05 PM (uOxBm)
Posted by: wooga at October 23, 2013 04:05 PM (DYQTd)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:05 PM (zOTsN)
I don't see the downside for small-Govt' conservatives. I really don't.
Posted by: Yip at October 23, 2013 04:06 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: rabidfox at October 23, 2013 04:06 PM (Gejy0)
Posted by: Ted Cruz at October 23, 2013 04:07 PM (ujMoa)
I would add too, the full Vitter Amendment.
With people out there already feeling the sting of this, it would be a small token to show that one party still thinks that the people (Congress, staffers, Exec branch employees) who make shitty laws shouldn't get to escape them.
Posted by: non-essential commenter #27791629 at October 23, 2013 04:07 PM (/C6Mj)
You'd damn well better hope he's the "ex-president" by then.
Posted by: creeper at October 23, 2013 04:07 PM (1O46M)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at October 23, 2013 04:08 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: Yip at October 23, 2013 04:08 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Lester at October 23, 2013 04:08 PM (qTsuK)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:09 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: steevy at October 23, 2013 04:09 PM (zqvg6)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:09 PM (aDwsi)
The GOP passing something to deal with this real problem could have saved the nation a lot of headaches, even if it wasn't a pure free market solution, I would rather have a government solution for 3% of the population than put 100% of Americans into socialized medicine.
Posted by: Jeepers at October 23, 2013 04:09 PM (XDRsa)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 23, 2013 04:09 PM (UbDLm)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:10 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Yip at October 23, 2013 04:10 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:10 PM (ujMoa)
Well, since the GOP did its best to trample to conservatives who led this fight while Boehner, McConnell and the rest of the DC GOP "leadership" scrambled desperately to find the fastest way to cave, um... no, it will merely be predictable and pathetic.
Posted by: Richard McEnroe at October 23, 2013 04:10 PM (qvify)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:10 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: LizLem at October 23, 2013 04:11 PM (43C0x)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 23, 2013 04:11 PM (UbDLm)
I say O Care is the law of the land and as we have witnessed over the last month the Administration does not want any part of this program delayed.
Posted by: Registered voter at October 23, 2013 04:11 PM (d0+yW)
Posted by: Yip
------------------------
John Kerry says that it sin't so..., he just had dinner the other night with Saudi chief towel.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:11 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 23, 2013 04:12 PM (UbDLm)
What does Congress have to do with it? Barry will issue an edict and it will be done.
Posted by: huerfano at October 23, 2013 04:12 PM (bAGA/)
Posted by: fluffy at October 23, 2013 04:12 PM (AynnL)
Posted by: The Dildoheads at October 23, 2013 04:12 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Carlos F. Danger at October 23, 2013 04:12 PM (hemD9)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:12 PM (ujMoa)
More sage wisdom from Brook's The Mythical Man Month: "Take no small slips".
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 23, 2013 04:13 PM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Ted Cruz at October 23, 2013 08:07 PM.........OK. How about the Dildohead Sisterhood Instruction manual? It's got some pictures too, but you might not want to see them.
Posted by: Minnfidel at October 23, 2013 04:13 PM (ixf9H)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:13 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:13 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: soothie at October 23, 2013 04:13 PM (f/s0F)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 23, 2013 04:13 PM (UbDLm)
Posted by: MTF at October 23, 2013 04:14 PM (B+HTd)
Posted by: The Bourbon in Boehner's Belly at October 23, 2013 04:14 PM (CRY7r)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:15 PM (zOTsN)
but I wish Congress could call him in for questioning regularly. Our reps, not the MSM, should be the ones grilling him.
Good lord, that would be like watching a red-headed retarded step-child get smacked around.
Funny and necessary, but mildly painful at times.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at October 23, 2013 04:15 PM (GJc4d)
Posted by: Ted Cruz at October 23, 2013 04:16 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Yip at October 23, 2013 08:10 PM (/jHWN)<<<
Serious enough that SCOAMF has Reggie Love over there helping to limber us his back for the epic bowing that will be needed as penance...
Oh, wait, that's not why he helping, it's just a typical Wednesday.
Posted by: non-essential commenter #27791629 at October 23, 2013 04:16 PM (/C6Mj)
Jeepers, exactly - but not sure what the hell the GOP alone has to do with this.
Pre-existing conditions, ipso facto, are not "insurable". Anything "done" about them will be a transfer payment (cough cough), welfare. Fine. An actual safety net, the sort almost everyone supports, and which can be implemented in a sustainable and non-destructive way, is exactly this sort of thing.
Guvamint can "help" only insofar as it (1) gets out of the way in terms of fedeal tax code and federal regulation and state-level regulation that makes all health care much more expensive than needed, incl. that for serious chronic conditions (2) enables extraordinary measures such as cooperation/semi-cartel behavior by insurers in collaboration with feds/states to set up high-risk pools.
So Jeepers, let's take your incredibly tiny focus and make it more serious by applying it to the ENTIRE law: why the fuck does taking care of comparatively limited issues for a small minority of the populace justify wholesale destruction or massive inflation in the rest of the already strangled market-place?
Posted by: non-purist at October 23, 2013 04:16 PM (afQnV)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:17 PM (zOTsN)
I am sure they would have settled for that
Not Posted by: Thunderb
They wouldn't have "settled" but it would have taken the wind out their sails.
They took a small, but real problem and basically put the whole nation on government healthcare over it.
Posted by: Jeepers at October 23, 2013 04:17 PM (XDRsa)
Posted by: The Bourbon in Boehner's Belly at October 23, 2013 04:18 PM (CRY7r)
Posted by: wooga at October 23, 2013 04:18 PM (DYQTd)
Posted by: Ted Cruz at October 23, 2013 08:16 PM (ujMoa)
Or Rush.
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at October 23, 2013 04:18 PM (MnSla)
Posted by: fluffy at October 23, 2013 04:18 PM (AynnL)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:19 PM (zOTsN)
They need to be in high risk pools who are subsidized if necessary. This exists in many states and worked pretty well.
The intent of the entire scheme was to cancel cheaper policies that didn't make a high enough profit margin and raise rates as high as they dared on everyone. They paid for his election. Twice. When the scheme was hatched the economy was tootling along, but with a recession/depression now going on five years the explosion of premiums, deductibles, and co-pays is going to tip the economy into a meltdown with the amount sucked out of disposable income. It is a rolling disaster.
Posted by: Lester at October 23, 2013 04:20 PM (qTsuK)
Posted by: wooga at October 23, 2013 04:20 PM (DYQTd)
Posted by: zombie at October 23, 2013 04:20 PM (+cx5n)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:21 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Minnfidel at October 23, 2013 04:21 PM (ixf9H)
Posted by: soothie at October 23, 2013 04:22 PM (f/s0F)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 23, 2013 04:22 PM (sByIH)
Posted by: steevy at October 23, 2013 08:09 PM (zqvg6)
Heh. So was the Fugitive Slave Act and posterity has quite rightly damned the Dred Scott decision.
The juiceboxers in the White House and the MFM have zero knowledge of history. All those dullards think is. "Who cares? That was like a hundred years ago."
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at October 23, 2013 04:22 PM (Ud9dC)
Oh, and the wholesale destruction of private insurance (already massively and indefensibly burdened by the absurd WWII-era Office of Price Control tax provision subsidizing company plans) will not be affected one whit by any delay.
The millions who have lost private insurance (or will decline to pay the equivalent of a mortgage for a minimal catastrophic-type of coverage) will get no relief from anything being discussed. Yayyy!
Posted by: non-purist at October 23, 2013 04:22 PM (afQnV)
I remember the Hillarycare thing in the early 90's architected by Ira Magaziner. It would have been an even worse clusterfuck than Obamacare. Obamacare is simply inept and unworkable. Hillarycare was almost Soviet in its complexity and unworkability
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 23, 2013 04:22 PM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Jean at October 23, 2013 04:23 PM (AP6/F)
-Empire of Jeff
----------------------
Beer spitter.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:23 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: zombie at October 23, 2013 04:23 PM (+cx5n)
>>An IRS appeals officer must look at about 7 different systems to see what is going on in a taxpayers case.
.
.
.Try going to the VA for care. Each person has a minimum of two or three computers on their desk. Kind of weird watching the Doctor switching back and forth between them while they are talking to you asking what is wrong, writing a script, etc. Oh and don't give them a piece of paper with any medical stuff on it when you come in.....scary.
Posted by: Registered voter at October 23, 2013 04:24 PM (d0+yW)
119 If that lasts for more than four hours you should consult a physician.
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:24 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: steevy at October 23, 2013 04:24 PM (zqvg6)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:25 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Ted Cruz at October 23, 2013 08:07 PM (ujMoa)
Aw, I loved hearing Green Eggs and Ham from the Senate floor, it was epic!
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at October 23, 2013 04:25 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:25 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 04:25 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: zombie at October 23, 2013 08:20 PM (+cx5n)
Is that anything like the Liverpool pathway?
Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at October 23, 2013 04:26 PM (WLywR)
But I AM enjoying the Schadenfreude!
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at October 23, 2013 04:26 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 23, 2013 04:26 PM (sByIH)
Posted by: zombie at October 23, 2013 04:26 PM (+cx5n)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 04:26 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Jesse at October 23, 2013 04:27 PM (As/N8)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:27 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 23, 2013 04:27 PM (0LHZx)
But when i do I wish I could do it as good as the cACA Obama HellCare fiasco.
Posted by: Worlds Most Interesting Man at October 23, 2013 04:27 PM (WGm5T)
Posted by: zombie at October 23, 2013 04:27 PM (+cx5n)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 23, 2013 04:27 PM (UbDLm)
Posted by: awkward davies at October 23, 2013 04:27 PM (WK8VM)
----------------------
You're forgetting the hobo hunters.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:28 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Lizzy at October 23, 2013 04:28 PM (JRmiD)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 23, 2013 04:28 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at October 23, 2013 04:28 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Lester at October 23, 2013 04:29 PM (qTsuK)
Boston's in the World Series?
Well alrighty then. Put me in coach!
I'm tanned, rested and healthy! And I gots a really BIG glove to stop those grounders.
Posted by: Bill Buckner at October 23, 2013 04:29 PM (57ubW)
Posted by: WOW at October 23, 2013 04:29 PM (6j8ke)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Ecclesiates 9:11) at October 23, 2013 04:29 PM (lAZep)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 23, 2013 04:30 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:30 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 23, 2013 04:30 PM (UbDLm)
Its rather simple really, six weeks to fix it - don't make me laugh.
The best ad the brightest? Verizon is the first one called. How about the worst and the dimmist?
It simply amuses me now as the admin is now consistently not just making bad choices, but in each case making the "Worst possible choice!"
Posted by: Mycroft at October 23, 2013 04:30 PM (5a9bI)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 23, 2013 04:30 PM (sByIH)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:30 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at October 23, 2013 08:28 PM (P6QsQ)
My guess is that the Dems in Congress are getting panicky about the way that the WH is handling this mess. Someone or their staffer leaked this to the press to try and put pressure on the Administration.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at October 23, 2013 04:30 PM (lr3d7)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 08:21 PM (ujMoa)
Yeah, I thought I would get fat, until I found that I didn`t have enough money to eat regular.
Posted by: rightlysouthern at October 23, 2013 04:30 PM (uOxBm)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:31 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:31 PM (aDwsi)
Back to welfare support for pre-existing conditions. Wasn't there a federal program pre-dating this whole fiasco - one that basically fizzled because of lack of interest?
Isn't the actual scale of the need for subsidizing uninsurables (a non-orwellian way of saying "pre-existing conditions"), like the scale of the problem of those actually seeking/needing some sort of health insurance but unable to afford it, fantastically exaggerated? Remember this idiot affirmative action POS, er, president, changing his undocumented numbers about the number of uninsured Americans several times a month in his lead-balloon speechifying, each time because he was challenged to document the numbers?
The "problem" with health insurance and heath care is the massive artificial cost burden on it from (1) state strangulation of the health insurance market - shame the constitution doesn't have anything on this .... say, some sort of "commerce clause" (2) tax code subsidies/distortions for company plans (3) the national liability/shake-down industry. None of these things are improved by "Obamacare", all are made much worse. Brilliant!
Takes a very serious country, with an intelligent elite and populace, to come up with this sort of advance.
Posted by: non-purist at October 23, 2013 04:31 PM (afQnV)
Jeepers, exactly - but not sure what the hell the GOP alone has to do with this.
Pre-existing conditions, ipso facto, are not "insurable". Anything "done" about them will be a transfer payment (cough cough), welfare. Fine. An actual safety net, the sort almost everyone supports, and which can be implemented in a sustainable and non-destructive way, is exactly this sort of thing.
Guvamint can "help" only insofar as it (1) gets out of the way in terms of fedeal tax code and federal regulation and state-level regulation that makes all health care much more expensive than needed, incl. that for serious chronic conditions (2) enables extraordinary measures such as cooperation/semi-cartel behavior by insurers in collaboration with feds/states to set up high-risk pools.
So Jeepers, let's take your incredibly tiny focus and make it more serious by applying it to the ENTIRE law: why the fuck does taking care of comparatively limited issues for a small minority of the populace justify wholesale destruction or massive inflation in the rest of the already strangled market-place?
Posted by: non-purist
I'm "blaming" the GOP because we had control of Congress during most of the 90's and the Presidency/Congress during most of the 2000's but what did we ever do to address healthcare? Absolutely nothing. Which is a big reason why we got ObamaCare which could lead to single payer.
I think conservatives could have crafted something that points a solution in a free market direction, but uses the government as a backstop in severe cases, that way 90% plus would use private health insurance instead of going through the government. Instead, we ignored it because there's never going to be a "pure" conservative solution to health care. So we let people plow into MediCaid, and now have ObamaCare that's destroyed private health insurance. The end result being 100% government health care.
Posted by: Jeepers at October 23, 2013 04:31 PM (XDRsa)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 23, 2013 04:31 PM (UbDLm)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 23, 2013 04:31 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: no name but shame at October 23, 2013 04:32 PM (MnSla)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at October 23, 2013 04:32 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 23, 2013 04:32 PM (23Kgq)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at October 23, 2013 04:33 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: The Dildoheads at October 23, 2013 04:33 PM (Dwehj)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 23, 2013 04:34 PM (sByIH)
The only way some people learn is to actually experience the fail, not just conservatives telling them it will fail. Well, now people can see with their own eyes, feel with their own pocketbooks, that this cannot work. Govt cannot and should not interfere with medicine. Lenin was once quoted as saying that government control of health care is the goal of all Commies. One less tool for them if the people wake up. Tough lesson learned, but it will silence commies like O & Hil with their "care" plans.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at October 23, 2013 04:34 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:34 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: Colorado Alex at October 23, 2013 04:34 PM (lr3d7)
-----------
A standard observation by engineers, "You can't take 9 women and have a baby in 1 month."
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:35 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 23, 2013 04:35 PM (UbDLm)
bah humbug it was cruz and lee
Posted by: newrouter at October 23, 2013 08:03 PM (dsgCY)
Ack, I'm usually more careful than that.. of course it wasn't the "GOP" it was ALL Cruz/Lee. God bless them.
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at October 23, 2013 04:35 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: soothie at October 23, 2013 04:36 PM (f/s0F)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at October 23, 2013 04:36 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 04:36 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Justamom at October 23, 2013 04:36 PM (Sptt8)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 23, 2013 04:36 PM (23Kgq)
Posted by: non-essential commenter #27791629 at October 23, 2013 04:36 PM (/C6Mj)
Posted by: Colorado Alex
------------
fast - nope
cheap - nope
correct - nope
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:36 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:36 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 23, 2013 04:37 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: awkward davies at October 23, 2013 04:38 PM (WK8VM)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:38 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:38 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 23, 2013 04:38 PM (23Kgq)
Posted by: lymond at October 23, 2013 04:39 PM (fzxq4)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 23, 2013 04:39 PM (UbDLm)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 04:39 PM (DmNpO)
Yes. And since when did marriage have anything to do with it? Plenty of married and formerly married women have discovered a love of tacos.
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at October 23, 2013 04:39 PM (MnSla)
Posted by: T. at October 23, 2013 04:40 PM (m/Cr5)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 23, 2013 04:40 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:40 PM (MpP9p)
cheap - nope
correct - nope
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 08:36 PM (aDwsi)
See, I considered 3 years to implement to be fast for something like this, based on some of the articles I've seen elsewhere about how long a project like this should take. But that's me being generous.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at October 23, 2013 04:40 PM (lr3d7)
Posted by: Minnfidel at October 23, 2013 04:41 PM (ixf9H)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:41 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 23, 2013 04:41 PM (IXrOn)
Poor Bambi. He had to call Merkel today and apologize for the NSA listening in on German phone calls; WH said the US would never ever listen to HER personal calls (but didn't say whether they had done so in the past.)
Democrats in Congress are turning into Tea party terrorists on the individual mandate. (Personally, a man date is the LAST thing I want.) The Obamacare staff is the gang that couldn't shoot straight.
And the Saudi- US relationship has gone from bad to worse. Smart diplomacy will lead to the Saudis getting their own nukes. They will probably buy them from Israel. (Would you trust North Korean or Pakistani tech?)
Yes children, Barack Obama's chickens are coming home... to rooooost.
Posted by: Jim in Virginia at October 23, 2013 04:42 PM (UYzFT)
I fully expect the delay will eventually be to have insurance by Dec. 31, 2014.
That way it gets it past the next election.
But yeah, remember when it was needed to be done Now, NoW, NOW!!! People are dying without health insurance!!!!
now not so much I guess.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 23, 2013 04:42 PM (LSErD)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 23, 2013 04:42 PM (IXrOn)
I ripped it off TPB. It put me to sleep inside 20 minutes.
Had I paid real money for it, as I did for the trilogy, I'd have returned it demanding my money back. In this case, piracy SAVED them money by not handling a returned product.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 23, 2013 04:43 PM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:43 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 23, 2013 04:43 PM (23Kgq)
Posted by: soothie at October 23, 2013 04:44 PM (f/s0F)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 23, 2013 04:44 PM (UbDLm)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 23, 2013 04:44 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at October 23, 2013 04:45 PM (DajPN)
Jeepers, I see what you're saying, and agree that something - no, make that a lot - should have been done about health care insurance prior to 2009. Mostly the three things I noted in my last comment. None of which are fixed now, all of which are exacerbated by O-care.
But you know I'll say it again - when discussing how the latest statist assault on liberty and common sense is a disaster, EXPLAIN why and how that is, by contrasting it with real, workable, sensible approaches (which are almost always nearly entirely private-sector).
Acquaintance last year: "but what about people who can't afford health insurance?"
Me: "do we build food-stamp stores for those with nutritional needs? Do we any longer build public housing since Cabrini-Green? Why the hell does "helping" a very small part of the populace entail distorting and destroying the entire currently functioning system? Why not cutting a few checks, as we do, in effect, with food and housing aid?"
Acquaintance: "Oh, good point"
As the nominal opposition party, the GOP ought to, you know, actually try to educate and convince people by raising their currently utterly degraded levels of understanding. And vacuous talking points with vague references to "market solutions" don't cut it. Get specific, get practical, get aggressive.
Posted by: non-purist at October 23, 2013 04:45 PM (afQnV)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:46 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Low Information Voter at October 23, 2013 04:46 PM (Dwehj)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 04:46 PM (DmNpO)
-------------------
Obama: "Angela, I just found out about it when I read it in the papers".
Posted by: Mike Hammer at October 23, 2013 04:46 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at October 23, 2013 08:31 PM (0LHZx)
The more people you throw at this problem, the WORSE it will be.
You cannot write code by committee.... you cannot design by committee... and the larger the group? the slower it is to get everyone on the same page, and make needed change.
In fact, the reason this project is a Mess? is there was no single TECHNICAL entity in charge... it was run like a Political campaign, not a Software design project.
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 23, 2013 04:46 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:47 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: soothie at October 23, 2013 04:47 PM (f/s0F)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at October 23, 2013 04:47 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 23, 2013 04:48 PM (23Kgq)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at October 23, 2013 04:48 PM (P6QsQ)
------------------
Ah! That reminds me.
No more food for you Ukrainians.
Posted by: Joe Stalin at October 23, 2013 04:48 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at October 23, 2013 04:49 PM (N/Sup)
Posted by: wooga at October 23, 2013 04:49 PM (DYQTd)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 23, 2013 04:49 PM (23Kgq)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 23, 2013 04:49 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at October 23, 2013 04:50 PM (N/Sup)
Posted by: non-purist at October 23, 2013 08:45 PM (afQnV)
The Two things the GOP should have pushed in health care reform...
Being able to buy health insurance across state lines.... (note we still can't)
Making all Health insurance payments non taxable income.... for people not just a business....
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 23, 2013 04:50 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:51 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: non-essential commenter #27791629 at October 23, 2013 04:51 PM (/C6Mj)
The only thing committees can do in the software process is produce requirements documents.
Then actual architects and designers can tell them how they're on drugs and its impossible to produce that product
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 23, 2013 04:52 PM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 04:52 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at October 23, 2013 04:52 PM (MnSla)
Posted by: Donna V. sez go cards at October 23, 2013 04:52 PM (R3gO3)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:53 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 23, 2013 04:53 PM (23Kgq)
Our letter from our insurer started out, "The ACA has caused us to cancel many policies.....
*my wife's eyes get big*
..... but we are keeping yours....
whew.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 23, 2013 04:53 PM (LSErD)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 04:53 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at October 23, 2013 04:53 PM (MnSla)
We have to change policies by then. So why would this matter to us? We're still getting screwed.
Posted by: shibumi at October 23, 2013 04:53 PM (25HWz)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 23, 2013 04:53 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:54 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at October 23, 2013 04:54 PM (dfYL9)
Joe Buck and Tim McCarver (for baseball) = Sign me up for Obamacare/take me to the death panels
Posted by: non-essential commenter #27791629 at October 23, 2013 04:55 PM (/C6Mj)
Posted by: awkward davies at October 23, 2013 04:55 PM (WK8VM)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 04:55 PM (zOTsN)
As soon as I heard The Hobbit was going to be multiple movies, the Bad Idea Jeans SNL skit started going through my head.
Sadly, I saw it in the theatre with the family. Sadly, I was correct.
One movie, probably would have been awesome. Three? Le Suck.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at October 23, 2013 04:55 PM (GJc4d)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:56 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: steevy at October 23, 2013 04:56 PM (zqvg6)
In fact, I'm using it right now!
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 08:56 PM (MpP9p)<<<
lol. Actually, have Levin on so listeneing to him, watching the game.
Posted by: non-essential commenter #27791629 at October 23, 2013 04:57 PM (/C6Mj)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at October 23, 2013 04:57 PM (P6QsQ)
211: But comrade for the good of the State, some have to make sacrifices?
You can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.
One death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic.
That V.I. Lenin was one smart dude.
Posted by: Jim in Virginia at October 23, 2013 04:57 PM (UYzFT)
Jeepers, I see what you're saying, and agree that something - no, make that a lot - should have been done about health care insurance prior to 2009.
Like government keeping their fucking hands out of it the last 30 years.
Posted by: rightlysouthern at October 23, 2013 04:58 PM (uOxBm)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 04:58 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 23, 2013 04:58 PM (23Kgq)
Posted by: awkward davies at October 23, 2013 04:58 PM (WK8VM)
Globull warmening, is there anything it can't do?
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at October 23, 2013 04:59 PM (MnSla)
Allow me to explain the idiocy of Earnest's spew:
March 31 is merely the deadline to avoid the full 12-month taÂ…erÂ…penalty. When the sun rose this morning, it meant the breakpoint between paying 4 monthsÂ’ worth of said taÂ…erÂ…penalty and 12 monthsÂ’ worth of same. What Team SCOAMT is doing (illegally, I might add) is changing 3/31 to being the breakpoint between paying 0 monthsÂ’ worth of said taÂ…erÂ…penalty and 12 monthsÂ’ worth of same.
Oh yeah - I explained the illegality of what Team SCOAMT is doing back at my slightly-less-dusty blog - http://bit.ly/16uhQSd
Posted by: steveegg at October 23, 2013 04:59 PM (o44nj)
>>"Will they support this (rhetorically, no way Obama goes to Congress for this) or will they insist that Obama live by his words of the last few months."
Is that a serious question or are you mocking us?
Posted by: rrpjr at October 23, 2013 05:00 PM (n06s/)
Posted by: steevy at October 23, 2013 05:00 PM (zqvg6)
Seamus, I believe the serious numbers for uninsured are actually a small fraction of 47 million. Remember, the only meaningfun number is for those who 1) actually want insurance 2) do not get it primarily because of cost. This is a very small number, as it excludes most younger 20-somethings.
And, of course, the most important reason even the very small number cannot afford it is because, in the first place, of government interference. I recall two decades ago, in the shithole of DC, being able to get a very cheap (for that time) catastrophic plan on a private basis. Those plans climbed in price as all the govt. dysfunction was piled on, and now are basically gone because they are truly ridiculous in what they cost vs. what they provide.
And Romeo13, absolutely not, no tax breaks for health insurance. The break for company plans is one of the original sins that has ruined the health insurance market. As with just about everything else that makes the code thousands of pages, the tax code should be silent on health insurance.
Enough of the dumb social engineering! Let adults make their own decisions. Stop preventing price discovery in medical care. There is absolutely nothing essentially different with medical care than with any other private good or service. If anything, medical care is OVER-consumed, on average. Not entirely an artifact of tax/govt. interference, some medical culture there too, but get the tax code the hell out of everything, starting with the frankenstein currently called "health insurance".
Posted by: non-purist at October 23, 2013 05:00 PM (afQnV)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 05:01 PM (MpP9p)
Out of all MLB teams, I like the Red Sox the least.
This inning is just a disaster for the Cards.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 23, 2013 05:01 PM (LSErD)
Posted by: Justamom at October 23, 2013 05:02 PM (Sptt8)
Posted by: steevy at October 23, 2013 05:03 PM (zqvg6)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 05:03 PM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 05:04 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: steveegg at October 23, 2013 05:04 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at October 23, 2013 05:04 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at October 23, 2013 05:04 PM (GEICT)
Seamus, I believe the serious numbers for uninsured are actually a small fraction of 47 million. Remember, the only meaningfun number is for those who 1) actually want insurance 2) do not get it primarily because of cost. This is a very small number, as it excludes most younger 20-somethings.
Posted by: non-purist at October 23, 2013 09:00 PM (afQnV)
*****
Oh, I'm well aware of that. The 47 million number was bogus from the get-go. My comment was merely poking fun at the consequences of a badly conceived, badly written, badly executed piece of legislation that will not correct the problems that it purported to fix. The irony is strong in this whole clusterflock.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at October 23, 2013 05:04 PM (N/Sup)
So very true. John Madden and Pat Summerall for football... good times, good times.
Whoa, Papi robbed of grand salami. But, now 5-0.
Posted by: non-essential commenter #27791629 at October 23, 2013 05:04 PM (/C6Mj)
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at October 23, 2013 05:04 PM (GJc4d)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 05:05 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at October 23, 2013 05:05 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 05:05 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: Justamom at October 23, 2013 05:06 PM (Sptt8)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at October 23, 2013 05:06 PM (N/Sup)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 23, 2013 05:06 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at October 23, 2013 05:06 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 05:07 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 05:07 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at October 23, 2013 05:07 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Mama winger on her iPad at October 23, 2013 05:09 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at October 23, 2013 05:11 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: steevy at October 23, 2013 05:11 PM (zqvg6)
Seamus, indeed.
And T. points us back to what I think ought to be one of the enduring themes of rebellion and criticism as we stumble through this degrading and disastrous period in US history (we need to prioritize, there is so much outrageous and disgraceful and damaging shit going on, ceaselessly).
Lawlessness.
Lawlessness. It's key. The constitution and law are what were put up to hem in the idiocy of the populace and its worst representatives, for a reason. As those guard-rails have been bent and damaged - and in recent years, to be realistic, basically discarded - so has the idiocy of the worst of the populace and their reps been allowed to start ruining the country.
So in my taxonomy of lawlessness, these alterations (even if this one has been withdrawn) of law by presidential decree (right, we don't have those, but there's no other way to describe several previous actions by this admin.) are in the Executive category. The brilliant inter-locking system of checks and balances designed by the founders is not working because the players aren't playing, and the system's not self-enforcing.
If only we had a serious opposition party, they'd have jumped on this absolutely essential issue long before now.
Posted by: non-purist at October 23, 2013 05:11 PM (afQnV)
Posted by: Justamom at October 23, 2013 05:12 PM (Sptt8)
Ha Haw! <iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/lAUNlO6-rlk?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Posted by: Nelson Muntz at October 23, 2013 05:13 PM (2LTPq)
Why can't the Cards play like this when they play against the Brewers?
The Sox showed up to play in the WS. The Cards evidently showed up to play in some April game.
Posted by: Donna V. sez go cards at October 23, 2013 05:13 PM (R3gO3)
Posted by: Vendette at October 23, 2013 05:13 PM (MpP9p)
Posted by: LASue at October 23, 2013 05:14 PM (gjIQF)
Posted by: Justamom at October 23, 2013 05:15 PM (Sptt8)
Posted by: Donna V. sez go cards at October 23, 2013 05:17 PM (R3gO3)
Last 2 ('04, '07) Red Sox WS... sweeps.
'04 was against Cards.
Posted by: non-essential commenter #27791629 at October 23, 2013 05:18 PM (/C6Mj)
Posted by: Thunderb at October 23, 2013 08:17 PM (zOTsN)
Just holler "Bamajuice" three times.
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at October 23, 2013 05:25 PM (60Q+L)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 23, 2013 05:29 PM (Y92Nd)
As frightful as the Sox look, there's no uglier SOB in baseball than Brian Wilson of the Dodgers. Hitters facing him are probably temporarily blinded by his ugliness.
Posted by: Donna V. sez go cards at October 23, 2013 09:17 PM (R3gO3)
Yep, he looks like a Hatfield-McIroquois-French trapper-Alferd Packer descendant.
Posted by: rightlysouthern at October 23, 2013 05:30 PM (uOxBm)
Posted by: Dan at October 23, 2013 05:48 PM (m3gf3)
We are in unbelievably dangerous territory right now.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 23, 2013 05:50 PM (LYIrp)
Posted by: buffy at October 23, 2013 06:20 PM (INAPN)
Posted by: Callawyn at October 23, 2013 09:13 PM (+7Wfv)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 23, 2013 10:54 PM (/IXKu)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2634 seconds, 454 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Duh.
Posted by: cool arrow at October 23, 2013 03:41 PM (WMsq+)