December 09, 2013
— DrewM Surely you're not surprised that the GOP really isn't committed to cutting spending are your? If so, I've got a bridge to sell you so leave your email address in the comments.
With lawmakers due back in town Tuesday, aides said [House Budget Committee Chairman Paul] Ryan and [Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman] Murray are likely to bypass the committee and take the deal, if finalized, straight to the full House and Senate. Congressional leaders hope to finish work quickly and leave town for the holidays as soon as Friday.Senior aides familiar with the talks say the emerging agreement aims to partially repeal the sequester and raise agency spending to roughly $1.015 trillion in fiscal 2014 and 2015. That would bring agency budgets up to the target already in place for fiscal 2016. To cover the cost, Ryan and Murray are haggling over roughly $65 billion in alternative policies, including cuts to federal worker pensions and higher security fees for the nationÂ’s airline passengers.
Republican leaders are also seeking additional savings to knock a small dent in deficits projected to exceed $6 trillion over the next decade. But the deal would do nothing to trim the debt, which is now larger, as a percentage of the economy, than at any point in U.S. history except during World War II.
It became clear months ago when the House only passed appropriation bills that increased spending and not the ones that actually cut spending that the fix was in.
And don't buy the nonsense about fees (aka "taxes") or higher pension contributions offsetting some of the spending. First, like almost all stopgap gimmicks they are...gimmicks. Second, in the case of higher pension contributions, that should happen even with the sequester in place to reduce costs, not to offset new ones.
The biggest problem with the "off-set" flimflam is that even if it helps offset hiking the budget and the debt, it does nothing to shrink the size and scope of government. I've said it before and I still mean it, I'd rather a federal budget that takes up 17-18% of GDP and was out of balanced than a budget that consumes 24% and is balanced. Size and scope of government matter more than perfectly balancing the books.
Oh and when Team GOP types say, "well, we told you this would happen because you pushed the shutdown" ask them what in the world prevented the House from passing a "clean CR" that kept the sequester intact? If they answer anything other than "Um, nothing", they are lying.
Keep this betrayal in mind (and it will be a betrayal because you can bet Boehner's going to need Democrats to make this work) when Team GOP says "stop primarying Republicans and focus on Democrats!".
Until Republicans stop kicking conservatives in the shins, I'm all for conservatives kicking Republicans in the balls.
But hey, cheer up! Sure the GOP is going to sell you out on spending but they'll give you amnesty later in the year as a makeup present.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:27 AM
| Comments (389)
Post contains 523 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: joncelli, looking for his outrage at December 09, 2013 06:29 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at December 09, 2013 06:29 AM (/TxIY)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at December 09, 2013 06:31 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: Tami at December 09, 2013 10:31 AM (bCEmE)
He let himself be buffaloed by Joe Biden, submoron. "Disappointment" is an understatement.
Posted by: joncelli, looking for his outrage at December 09, 2013 06:32 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Ncj at December 09, 2013 06:32 AM (dqux0)
Posted by: Guido at December 09, 2013 06:32 AM (ktbKX)
Posted by: ontherocks at December 09, 2013 06:33 AM (UevTI)
Posted by: rickb223 at December 09, 2013 06:33 AM (h1D+w)
Posted by: Ncj at December 09, 2013 10:32 AM (dqux0)
-------------
Hey now.
Posted by: grammie (cuz mama is way way old) winger at December 09, 2013 06:33 AM (P6QsQ)
Please get back to me as soon as possible regarding that bridge. I'm really in the market for one.
Thank you,
RepublicanLIV@dingusville.com
Posted by: Sphynx at December 09, 2013 06:34 AM (OZmbA)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at December 09, 2013 06:34 AM (P2Sby)
Posted by: grammie (cuz mama is way way old) winger at December 09, 2013 06:34 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Hatchet Harry Lonsdale at December 09, 2013 06:34 AM (/Crba)
This is so depressing. I mean, I knew it was coming, but that doesn't make it less depressing.
*lies down morosely on trampoline*
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 06:35 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) working from home at December 09, 2013 06:36 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 06:37 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: Hatchet Harry Lonsdale at December 09, 2013 10:34 AM (/Crba)
Or you could always have Big Chris slam someone's head in a car door a couple dozen times. That works well.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 06:38 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at December 09, 2013 10:35 AM (4df7R)
There, there. It will be OK.
::: pats MWR's rack :::
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 06:38 AM (6T8Ay)
(Note to self, buy lottery tickets. Big jackpot)
Posted by: Three more years. at December 09, 2013 06:38 AM (JMwom)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) working from home at December 09, 2013 06:39 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Barry the Baptist at December 09, 2013 06:39 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: Roy at December 09, 2013 06:40 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 06:40 AM (GaqMa)
I need a new bridge. Send it to me at mark.dayton@mn.gov It'll look great next to my new NFL stadium.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at December 09, 2013 06:40 AM (EGPJQ)
Piss on him and ALL the sell-out GOP leadership. They are dead to me.
Posted by: Vic at December 09, 2013 06:41 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: JoeShmoe99 at December 09, 2013 06:41 AM (XsOa7)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at December 09, 2013 06:41 AM (1hM1d)
You mean those federal workers that haven't had a pay raise in 3 years while simultaneously having their benefits cut like the rest of America?
Those federal workers?
The ones that everyone here pretty much thinks are parasites?
Those guys?
::: raises hand :::
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 06:41 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) working from home at December 09, 2013 06:41 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at December 09, 2013 06:42 AM (659DL)
Posted by: PAUL RYAN at December 09, 2013 10:41 AM (Cs2tJ)
Posted by: Barney Fwank at December 09, 2013 06:42 AM (OZmbA)
Posted by: Lenny the thief at December 09, 2013 06:43 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at December 09, 2013 06:43 AM (bCEmE)
A:
A:
A: ....Anyone? Anyone?... anyone? Raised or lowered?... raised tariffs, in an effort to collect more revenue for the federal government. Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the United States sank deeper into the Great Depression. Today we have a similar debate over this. Anyone know what this is? Class? Anyone? Anyone? Anyone seen this before? The Laffer Curve... Anyone know what this says? Anyone?
Bueller?... Bueller?... Bueller? Bueller?
Posted by: Whadever at December 09, 2013 06:43 AM (Xv7f/)
Posted by: Roy at December 09, 2013 06:44 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 06:45 AM (GaqMa)
True that. But no sense in giving the other side a breather though.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 06:45 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Barry the Baptist at December 09, 2013 06:45 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 09, 2013 06:46 AM (6Xmna)
Posted by: Null at December 09, 2013 06:46 AM (P7hip)
Posted by: Tami at December 09, 2013 10:43 AM (bCEmE)
Pweese TwansWate into Engwish
Posted by: Barney Fwank at December 09, 2013 06:46 AM (OZmbA)
Posted by: lowandslow at December 09, 2013 06:46 AM (7Nq2G)
And you know, things could actually be worse. Imagine if Romney had won and Ryan was presiding over -- and voting in -- a split Senate.
Oh, the agita!
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 09, 2013 06:46 AM (kdS6q)
IMO, there is not a single agency, department, plan or program in the entire government that cannot be pruned, trimmed, cut back, downsized or, in too many instances, eradicated.
Not. A. Friggin'. One.
We can't just advocate hacking away at "entitlements." They are only the tip of an ugly iceberg.
And while we're at it, there are 535 self-important, pork-chugging, corrupt creatures of porcine derivation in Congress who need to be (as the Brits say) "made redundant."
Posted by: MrScribbler at December 09, 2013 06:46 AM (csjXD)
Posted by: Lenny the thief at December 09, 2013 06:46 AM (/Crba)
Yep. Digs hole. Jumps in. Pulls the hole in after him....
Posted by: backhoe at December 09, 2013 06:46 AM (ULH4o)
This is how the regular budget process is supposed to work, folks. The House passed a budget and the Senate passed a budget. Not surprisingly there was a big difference in spending levels between the two. They were going to have to meet somewhere in between.
Republicans never much liked the sequester, especially with all the defense cuts.
But by all means, go ahead and keep thinking there can be more budget cuts and debt reduction with a Democratic Senate and President. It's all the fault of the GOP betraying conservatives. Or not fighting hard enough. Or something.
Posted by: rockmom at December 09, 2013 06:47 AM (aBlZ1)
As unemployment is reduced by this increase in Government hiring, the economy will pick up steam, and prosperity will return. Once everyone works for the Federal government, making above average wages, with good benefits stable economic growth will solve many of the problems we now face.
We just need to execute our new five year plan to stabilize the economy, create jobs, reduce unemployment, reduce government waste and fraud, and preserve peace in the Middle East. We are well on our way to economic prosperity. Now is not the time for drastic measures that will only upset our magnificent five year plan for economic prosperity.
Posted by: Fake Janet Yellen at December 09, 2013 06:47 AM (JMwom)
Posted by: Insomniac at December 09, 2013 06:47 AM (DrWcr)
Oh you're damn right it's gonna get tweaked.
The worst part is, and I speak in very general terms, it's the Federal AFGE types that are the layabouts and the exempt employees that are the producers.
So the irony is....we'll pay more so we can get more epic fail.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 06:48 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Rory Breaker at December 09, 2013 06:48 AM (Ua6T/)
The fact that public sector pensions haven't also been transitioned is a picture worth a thousand words.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 06:48 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: Dr. Jesse Pinkman at December 09, 2013 06:49 AM (h4eud)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 09, 2013 06:50 AM (LmMET)
There, there. It will be OK.
::: pats MWR's rack :::
Posted by: Sean Bannion at December 09, 2013 10:38 AM (6T8Ay) p
OI!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 06:50 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: mugiwara at December 09, 2013 06:50 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 09, 2013 06:50 AM (/Crba)
We use the term "pension" in the generic sense.
The Feds haven't been on a defined benefit plan in decades. They're all defined contribution plans now.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 06:50 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 09, 2013 06:50 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Roy at December 09, 2013 06:50 AM (75fUy)
No our entitlement system is the iceberg. We could cut all discretionary spending, every federal department and every federal paycheck and we would still be running deficits.
Posted by: lowandslow at December 09, 2013 06:51 AM (7Nq2G)
We really should not allow (lol) dems and republicans leaders to hang out together for years on end.
srsly they shouldn't be able to all stay in DC month after month, They get a skewed version of reality .
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 06:51 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Rory Breaker, mad man with an afro at December 09, 2013 06:51 AM (Ua6T/)
Do you really want to bounce on a snow covered frozen trampoline?
And this post is a good reason to go and write.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 06:52 AM (5oAy6)
The Feds haven't been on a defined benefit plan in decades. They're all defined contribution plans now.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at December 09, 2013 10:50 AM (6T8Ay)
Wow, that's surprising and positive. When I hear "pension," I immediately think defined benefit. It comes from programming backend COBOL on both DB and DC plans for years.
Now, if only the States and municipalities would wake up.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 06:53 AM (/29Nl)
================
I went 3 years without a pay raise here in the private sector. My sympathy for federal workers is somewhat nonexistent.
Posted by: physics geek at December 09, 2013 06:53 AM (MT22W)
Posted by: Math Genius Paul Ryan at December 09, 2013 06:53 AM (Y92Nd)
how is Your unemployment rate in DC?
hey man it's great!
Hey well what about the citizens in DC, aren't they feeling the rising costs of food?
are you kidding I'm making hand over fist on these deals.
well the housing market sucks?
not from where i'm sitting we're booming!
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 06:53 AM (nqBYe)
Current Spending $986B
With Sequestration $967B
Republican *Negotiated* Compromise $1000B
"Christ almighty, it's like I'm sittin' here playing cards with my brother's kids"
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 09, 2013 06:53 AM (kdS6q)
So the irony is....we'll pay more so we can get more epic fail.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at December 09, 2013 10:48 AM (6T8Ay)
Pretty sure you just defined "federal government"
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 09, 2013 10:50 AM (LmMET)
That's government in general.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 06:53 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: MTF at December 09, 2013 06:54 AM (VHfsw)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 06:54 AM (VtjlW)
The point of the post was not oneupmanship. The point was that the pain was already shared.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 06:54 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 06:55 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 09, 2013 06:55 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 06:55 AM (5oAy6)
Posted by: Barfly Jack at December 09, 2013 06:55 AM (/Crba)
Yüp.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 09, 2013 06:55 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 10:54 AM (VtjlW)
::: swoon ::::
Blondie?
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 06:55 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: t-bird at December 09, 2013 06:56 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: MTF at December 09, 2013 06:57 AM (VHfsw)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 06:57 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at December 09, 2013 06:57 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: Carl Showalter at December 09, 2013 06:57 AM (/Crba)
Current spending $986B
With Sequestration $967B
Republican Compromise $1000B
They were going to have to meet somewhere in between.
Posted by: rockmom
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 09, 2013 06:57 AM (kdS6q)
FERS is still around.
My wife in enrolled in it. Granted it's been somewhat nerfed as it's now part of a "3 pronged approach" (which is FERS/401K and of all things Social security.)
FERS is not a defined benefit plan.
CSRS was a defined benefit plan. CSRS has been gone for years.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 06:58 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: ontherocks at December 09, 2013 06:58 AM (UevTI)
Well this is the end of all things.
*waits*
Hmmm. The end of all things is taking its sweet time to get here.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Death Capades - ObamaCare on Ice! Sponsored by the Outrage Outlet at December 09, 2013 06:58 AM (hLRSq)
we had to cut our personal budget.
why is the govt above doing the same?
never occurred to us to spend tons more money and leave everyone else holding the bag.
must.be.nice.
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 06:58 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: DrewM. at December 09, 2013 06:58 AM (64tBw)
Blondie?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at December 09, 2013 10:55 AM (6T8Ay)
No, she's a ginger. ^_^
And also: AtC - *swoon*
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 06:59 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Y-not awake too early at December 09, 2013 07:00 AM (zDsvJ)
This is all theatrics, a mere side show. Wait until inflation hits ~3-4%, that's when it gets down right ugly. We are talking Mad Max ugly. When Federal interest payments alone take over 50% of all Federal income, we won't have a choice about budgets cuts then.
Everything between now and then is just B$.
Posted by: Registered voter at December 09, 2013 07:01 AM (d0+yW)
Posted by: cute & cuddly Rory , m with an afro at December 09, 2013 07:01 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: ontherocks at December 09, 2013 07:02 AM (UevTI)
"That's just the way it works!" is not an effective excuse for raping the future of our children, EVERYONE's children.
If someone makes their bones on claiming to care about fiscal solvency, you would think that their natural actions would be consistent with that stance. You know, treating it like the disaster that was claimed.
When the fiscal crusaders roll over out of expediency, they undermine the entire argument that the fiscal crisis is indeed a crisis.
Look, even PAUL RYAN doesn't believe that shit.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 07:02 AM (/29Nl)
willow, have you a bagel that you might be willing to share? I am in a morose mood, what with the country being in the hands of idiots, and unfortunately I have no bagel. I am bagel-less.
Anna P: Jumping on a snow encrusted, frozen trampoline is, indeed, a bad idea. Although I wonder if it would be fun to build a snowman on the trampoline and then see if I can get it to bounce so high it actually launches itself into the air and squashes a passing liberal like an icy cold deus ex machina. Heaven knows in New England it shouldn't be hard to find one worth squashing.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 07:03 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 07:03 AM (Y92Nd)
Now I want pancakes.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 09, 2013 07:03 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: fluffy at December 09, 2013 07:04 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 07:04 AM (VtjlW)
The PSC denied the increase for specious reasons. So the company was forced to eat the billions they spent on it. We immediately got a 5% pay cut and wages frozen there for the next two years.
Don't tell me that gov workers can't get a pay freeze or cut.
Posted by: Vic at December 09, 2013 07:05 AM (T2V/1)
>>Uhh...
FERS is still around.
My wife in enrolled in it. Granted it's been somewhat nerfed as it's now part of a "3 pronged approach" (which is FERS/401K and of all things Social security.)
I tried to find out about getting my wife out of it because I suspect it'll be non-existent when the time comes to collect. I'd much rather have the cash in hand and deal with it myself.
(Granted the IRAs and 401k's may all be taken too, so given my young age, I'm probably screwed no matter what I do.)
.
.
.It is not an opt out system from what I have been told. I left civil service two months short of 10 years and can't collect anything until I am 62, and it isn't much. It might cover the cable bill each month. I think you can take back your contribution if you have less than 5 years of service, but that's about it from what I can remember.
Posted by: Registered voter at December 09, 2013 07:05 AM (d0+yW)
we had to cut our personal budget.
why is the govt above doing the same?
never occurred to us to spend tons more money and leave everyone else holding the bag.
must.be.nice.
Posted by: willow
If it weren't for my wives "death benefits" I'd be living under the nearby Lanier bridge.
Slash all gubmint budgets in half. Then halve them again. And again, and again until the screaming starts. Then cut some more....
Posted by: backhoe at December 09, 2013 07:05 AM (ULH4o)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 07:05 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 11:04 AM (VtjlW)
With frickin' laser beams on its head?
::: runs off to the Royal Warehouse ::::
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 07:06 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Y-not awake too early at December 09, 2013 07:06 AM (zDsvJ)
and smacks Bannion for patting areas publically.
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 07:06 AM (nqBYe)
"Hey lets see if we can launch a snowman off a trampoline!"
Just omit any chatter of 'squish a lib'
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 07:06 AM (5oAy6)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 07:07 AM (5oAy6)
Posted by: fluffy at December 09, 2013 07:07 AM (Ua6T/)
So here's an interesting OT: Vlad the Chekist tightens his grip.
(Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin tightened his control over Russia's media on Monday by dissolving the main state news agency and replacing it with an organization that is to promote Moscow's image abroad.
The move to abolish RIA Novosti and create a news agency to be known as Rossiya Segodnya is the second in two weeks strengthening Putin's hold on the media as he tries to reassert his authority after protests against his rule.
Posted by: joncelli, looking for his outrage at December 09, 2013 07:07 AM (RD7QR)
I know you would have preferred it in private, but, hey, you weren't here.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 07:08 AM (6T8Ay)
I'm sure Bannion knows how to flush a toilet but apparently the diversity hires can't.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 09, 2013 07:08 AM (ZKzrr)
Confirmed: DrewM does not own a mirror, nor does he understand the concept of one.
Seriously? You or all people are asking why they couldn't just pass a "clean" CR as was requested by Reid and Obama?
Unfuckingbelieveable.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 09, 2013 07:09 AM (SY2Kh)
these days i just imagine them all planning schemes while stuffing their personal coffers, while telling us how much they care .
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 07:09 AM (nqBYe)
And, get this, they'll be right. The point of the last one was to delay Obamacare because we were sure it would be a disaster. It was a disaster. But it's out of the bag. So while it can't be used again, at this point we look kinda prescient; 'hey, maybe those Republicans knew what they were talking about with that shutdown nonsense.'
The fact is, we control too little of the government to set the budget and fighting over it would be counterproductive. In general, the best approach is to make as little fuss as possible and thereby refuse to give the Democrats the legitimate distraction that they desperately, desperately want. And the budget isn't worth it. After $16 trillion, what's another $900 billion?
Posted by: dawnfire82 at December 09, 2013 07:10 AM (1/hzQ)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 11:05 AM (Y92Nd)
-------------
Forget words. Words are cheap. Look at actions. There is no one in America that has actually ENACTED a more conservative agenda, in the face of unimaginable opposition, than Scott Walker.
Posted by: grammie (cuz mama is way way old) winger at December 09, 2013 07:10 AM (P6QsQ)
One does one's humble best.
*rests head on shoulder* My team was super mean to me yesterday and we have to go to trial tomorrow and this being a grown up thing SUCKS.
Also I want a unicorn shark.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 11:04 AM (VtjlW)
*comforts*
I must admit when my Pats beat the Browns, my first thought was, "Oh dear. Poor AtC!" Well, technically my first thought was, "DAMMIT, GRONK!" But that's par for the course.
I have no unicorn shark, but will a narwhal do?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 07:11 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Call me Ishmael at December 09, 2013 07:11 AM (O7OxF)
Thanks Radish, I appreciate the vote of confidence.
Most of Da Boyz from DCMA are AFGE union types (I am assuming this is being managed by DCMA....)
They're union types because apparently it's a good idea to put people who are functionally illiterate in charge of multi-billion dollar contracts.
Who knew?
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 07:11 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 09, 2013 07:12 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 07:12 AM (Y92Nd)
For the 444th time, it seems we have dodged a real bullet by not having Paul Ryan as VP.
I did a ton of work for Romney. Yard sign, drove neighbors to the polls, etc.
NEVER AGAIN. If we nominate some squish, fuck it, I do not want it on my conscience that I voted for the least worst candidate that was just fucking over the country in a slower decline than the leftist demorats.
Plus his love for the outright socialist commie Guitierrez on "immigration reform". Who the fuck do these people think they are?
These aren't minor policies. These are major positions and they just don't give a shit. No more RINOs. Fucking period.
Posted by: prescient11 at December 09, 2013 07:12 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: lowandslow at December 09, 2013 10:46 AM (7Nq2G)
Let me approach this in as reasonable a tone as I can:
The first question to ask is, why don't they care? Are they pig-ignorant, hopeless Pollyannas or convinced their can-kicking will last their lifetimes? IMO, they don't care because they are physically and economically isolated from any collapse that will happen.
Let's take Nancy Pelousi as an example. Oh, sure, we can talk about primarying her withered, skanky ass, but it won't happen. She won't be attacked from the left and an attack from the right is as likely as not to be sabotaged by the Establishment. She knows her political office is hers until she decides to give it up. So she fears no political blowback.
She also knows that, despite frothing here, on other boards, at Tea Party gatherings and at the local pub, the right will never physically threaten her. They won't picket her house, they won't cyberstalk her, they won't try storming her office. She fears no physical blowback.
And, at last, she has her bottomless Fed salary and pensions, as well as the money accumulated by her sleazy crook of a husband. She can afford armed guards, gated communities or even militarily-escorted flights out of danger should a "collapse" happen to pig her radar. She fears no economic blowback.
Now, multiply her by all the other tax-fatted, worthless homunculi squatting on Capitol Hill, daring to stand up on their hind legs atop their feculent mound of power and lecturing us to sit down and shut up. None of them have any reason to fear the collapse because they will be able to escape it.
Prove me wrong. I sincerely doubt you can.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 09, 2013 07:12 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 07:12 AM (VtjlW)
And I get reassured that deciding no longer to vote in federal elections was the right decision.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 09, 2013 07:13 AM (MaP11)
Posted by: oyeah at December 09, 2013 07:13 AM (lB/5N)
Posted by: mythical GOP establishment at December 09, 2013 07:14 AM (5ikDv)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 07:14 AM (5oAy6)
how many times do i have to tell you, They are like a spouse that makes promise after promise, get your hopes up that They will change, and than choke when they reach the deadline!
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 07:14 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 09, 2013 07:14 AM (LmMET)
It really just proves these skidmarks have no interest in winning, they just intend to be the permanent minority 'opposition' party. Vote for us, we're not registered as Democrats!
Posted by: mugiwara at December 09, 2013 07:14 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 07:14 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: dawnfire82 at December 09, 2013 11:10 AM (1/hzQ)
What a lovely and succinct summary of the attitude that has fucked the United States crosswise with a pineapple.
Your lovely strategy has a fatal flaw.
With this brand of GOP completely in charge, there wouldn't be any rollbacks. If you disagree, I would ask you for evidence to the contrary during the brief period that the GOP held Congress and the Presidency.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 07:14 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 11:06 AM (nqBYe)
So privately is a-ok? How you doin
Posted by: Red Shirt at December 09, 2013 07:15 AM (FIDMq)
And I get reassured that deciding no longer to vote in federal elections was the right decision.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 09, 2013 11:13 AM (MaP11)
More and more people are sitting it out. Voting just doesn't seem to make a difference anymore. Somebody said, correctly, that "America is in that awkward in-between time: too late to work within the system but too soon for armed insurrection."
Posted by: joncelli, looking for his outrage at December 09, 2013 07:15 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 07:15 AM (GaqMa)
Stabby is the unicorn unicorn. The unicorn shark is Bitey.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 11:12 AM (VtjlW)
Goblin sharks are freakin' CREEPY. Especially when they're out of the water and all... well, gobliny. Their name is well-suited.
*wonders if can find crochet pattern for goblin shark to give to AtC with Stabby...*
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 07:15 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 07:15 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 11:14 AM (Y92Nd)
Forget it Jake, it's republitown
Posted by: Red Shirt at December 09, 2013 07:16 AM (FIDMq)
Oh! In order to make things right in your world, my Queen, I had Giselle Bunchen-Brady's microderm abrasion cream replaced with 50 grit sandpaper.
And I had Bernard Pollard traded to the Dolphins for next week's game. So...there should be at least one more Patriot with a ripped ACL next week.
Will this make you feel better?
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 07:16 AM (6T8Ay)
The Rethugs continually spit in their base's face.
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 09, 2013 07:17 AM (Hx5uv)
Tattoo, yep. I was so depressed after election night, it lasted like a week. But when I see this shit come down, I actually take heart.
Right here, right now. No more fucking NEXT GUY UP routine. We need a solid litmus test for national candidates. Period. No more Bob Doles, John McCains, or Mitt Romneys. Fucking squishes all. I liked GWB, but let's be honest, he didn't win the popular vote in 2000 and his great response on 9-11 is what got him back in 2004.
It's time we take politics seriously, and not just as a fucking game to pad the ruling GOP class elite's pockets and their friends.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
Posted by: prescient11 at December 09, 2013 07:18 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: ayup at December 09, 2013 07:18 AM (J4Gi+)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 07:18 AM (VtjlW)
I assure you, that FERS is nothing like CSRS. Quite.
And since you're a (VERY) youngin, I'll forgive your ignorance.
THIS TIME.
Now get off my lawn.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 07:18 AM (6T8Ay)
Prove me wrong. I sincerely doubt you can.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 09, 2013 11:12 AM (zF6Iw)
sheesh i would give anything to be capable of writing that .
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 07:19 AM (nqBYe)
It makes ME feel better, at least.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 09, 2013 07:20 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 07:20 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 07:20 AM (Y92Nd)
I doubt they've really thought this through. I don't think there's any escaping it. These people need infrastructure the same as everyone. They will do better, longer, but eventually someone will come to count coup.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 07:21 AM (/29Nl)
Guys, maybe we're being too harsh. I've heard that Paul Ryan has a plan to get us to a balanced budget in 20 fucking years. Racking up more debt that entire time, of course.
Just wait until interest rates normalize at 5%. You think we have problems now? National debt still increased when we had surpluses under Clinton. Why? Interest on the debt.
Posted by: prescient11 at December 09, 2013 07:21 AM (tVTLU)
I looooooove narwhals. Love them like cake. I went to CT to go to the first Moron Meetup a day earlier so that I could go to the aquarium because narwhals!
I'm not surprised! They're basically like what would happen if you bred a manatee with a unicorn, both of which are AtC approved Animals to be Wanting.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 07:21 AM (4df7R)
trade ya?
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 07:21 AM (nqBYe)
Grognard:
If it gets as bad as I think it may down the road, there might be a Black Friday in DC. And if you know the history of that, no, some of them won't escape it...
Posted by: prescient11 at December 09, 2013 07:22 AM (tVTLU)
Thank you, willow, for the bagel. It was just what I needed. *noms happily*
*the headdesks* I just had to try and explain to a coworker how to open a .jpg. "Double click on it" was not clear enough.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 07:22 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at December 09, 2013 07:23 AM (vjQ/G)
Posted by: prescient11 at December 09, 2013 11:22 AM (tVTLU)
It's not hard to find examples of people who will not let this sort of demolition of the United States go unpunished. Don't even have to hit the dark net to find them.
They are just waiting for events to progress past the point of no return. Then they will collect the debt. And they will be very patient.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 07:24 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 07:24 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at December 09, 2013 07:25 AM (/i3Yt)
I think it is preferable to standing with them while they pretend to do something significant and crying later when they end up "saving" 5 dollars and only because of awesome accounting skills. .
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 07:25 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: rickb223 at December 09, 2013 07:25 AM (h1D+w)
Posted by: blue.dot at December 09, 2013 07:25 AM (mAFJ3)
I mean, I thought it was incredibly stupid (politically) of him to push a bill that changes MediCare when you know it was going to be shot down with glee, but I thought "here's a guy that's willing to go the mat for conservative policy" but he's McCain 2.0
Posted by: McAdams at December 09, 2013 07:25 AM (2TMCu)
I'm totes interested! Would you accept a billion dollar coin as payment?
Hope! Change! Underpants Gnome profit schemes reign supreme!
Posted by: Lizzy at December 09, 2013 07:26 AM (JRmiD)
Posted by: 7 Days in May at December 09, 2013 07:27 AM (j6DTo)
Posted by: sexypig at December 09, 2013 07:28 AM (dZQh7)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 07:28 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 07:28 AM (Y92Nd)
If it gets as bad as I think it may down the road, there might be a Black Friday in DC. And if you know the history of that, no, some of them won't escape it...
It's not hard to transpose the geography of a public square in Tehran with the National Mall in DC. And in this age, it's not hard to imagine that history will repeat itself.
The question is - who will be in the Mall?
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 07:28 AM (/29Nl)
$1,015 in guaranteed spending and a _possible_ $65 in cuts---or 6.4%.
You know how people beat down the doors on Black Friday to save 6.5%?
Yeah.
Posted by: RoyalOil at December 09, 2013 07:28 AM (VjL9S)
Hey Blue Duck every cut is murder, unless it is defense in which case it is brave...
Posted by: sven at December 09, 2013 07:29 AM (9jfyN)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 07:29 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at December 09, 2013 07:29 AM (/i3Yt)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 11:28 AM (Y92Nd)
from your keyboard to ....
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 07:29 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at December 09, 2013 07:29 AM (da5Wo)
They've discovered a new cold weather cockroach in New York City.
Then they realized, "Oh, never mind, it's just De Blasio."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 07:29 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: willow at December 09, 2013 11:19 AM (nqBYe)
You're very kind, willow. It's a chore to write without exploding into profanity. But these days, the absolute idiocy, unresponsiveness and arrogance of the government is driving my blood pressure sky-high.
Let me just say that when it comes to the left and most of the right, I have a pretty good idea of how Marat and Roland Friesler must have felt.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 09, 2013 07:29 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: ejo at December 09, 2013 07:30 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: ontherocks at December 09, 2013 07:30 AM (UevTI)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 07:30 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at December 09, 2013 11:29 AM (da5Wo)
Why? Why is there so much stupid? I just... *flail*
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 07:30 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at December 09, 2013 07:30 AM (+bhTC)
Posted by: Dr. Jesse Pinkman at December 09, 2013 07:31 AM (h4eud)
The good news is that you are rich.
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 09, 2013 07:31 AM (Hx5uv)
Unicorn sharks are a thing: http://bit.ly/1ksL6K4 Okay, technically, it's a goblin shark but look at it! Unicorn shark.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 11:12 AM (VtjlW)
Goblin Shark my patootie. Where are the Orc Sharks with AK-47s? Great Uruk-hai Sharks carrying Phased Plasma Rifles in the 40 watt range?
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 09, 2013 07:31 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: naturalfake at December 09, 2013 07:31 AM (0cMkb)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 09, 2013 07:32 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Geraldine Ferraro at December 09, 2013 07:32 AM (XpAxm)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 07:33 AM (GaqMa)
-
Because equality, diversity, and shit.
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 09, 2013 07:34 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Kafiroon at December 09, 2013 07:35 AM (U0DWi)
Posted by: toby928© at December 09, 2013 07:35 AM (QupBk)
I am about to start stabbing Amazon Payments.
My credit union does not support Instant Verify. So had to wait 5 to 7 business days to see the Amazon deposits in the account. Well the deposits happened and I want to verify.
Should be simple right? But NO! Amazon Payments is only saying 'having problems with Instant Verify' and no sign at all of how to enter the deposit amounts. There is not even a search window. and Help is worthless.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 07:36 AM (5oAy6)
Posted by: azul.dot at December 09, 2013 07:36 AM (vjQ/G)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at December 09, 2013 11:29 AM (da5Wo)
The only logical explanation to her still being there is that your Granddad and Dad value incompetence. highly.
Because if they didn't....she'd be gone.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 07:36 AM (6T8Ay)
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
Posted by: prescient11 at December 09, 2013 11:18 AM (tVTLU)
I'm feeling good about claiming Graham's scalp in SC and mailing it to McShame in AZ.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 11:28 AM (Y92Nd)
This was once a custom of my people. In my lifetime I shall take two. This is the first.
Posted by: Major Joe Makatozi at December 09, 2013 07:36 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at December 09, 2013 07:37 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Roy
This is also what I find maddening. I don't really believe this, but it's almost like he's a plant for the Left.
It's like the one entitlement he wants to go after is far and away the most popular that everyone knows is NEVER going to be cut by a Democrat President and Senate.
I really couldn't think of a bigger gift to Democrats than when Ryan decided that was going to be the crusade for the newly minted Republican House.
And what happens when we get something that approaches real cuts in our government? He can't wait to cut a deal to restore them.
And enough with the military bullshit from the Super Hawks, the military wastes money just like every other government agency. We're not going to be conquered because the Pentagon can't get a shiny new trillion dollar jet fighter.
Posted by: McAdams at December 09, 2013 07:37 AM (2TMCu)
I saw "Goblin Shark My Patootie" open for the "Smashing Pumpkins" at the Iowa State Fair in 1998.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 09, 2013 07:37 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 09, 2013 07:37 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 07:37 AM (Y92Nd)
After this passes, the Dems will be grinning and backslapping for their first budget that made it past the House in 5 years. Make no mistake, this was their lowball figure - it is a win for them.
Who is going to be there grinning with them, and celebrating bipartisanship?
Here's a pro tip: if you have to do something for expediency, explain that. Then explain your plan for changing things down the road. And make it a plan with teeth. Build in some expediency. Help people understand that.
But you never hear them say they are voting under protest. All they do is grin along with the rest, while lapping up Dem ball sweat.
If you're giving them everything but a few half-pennies on the dollar, YOU LOST.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 07:38 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 09, 2013 07:38 AM (CJjw5)
Paul Ryan and Patty Murray walk into a bar.
The bartender says " What can I get you"
They said "give us the most expensive bottle of scotch you have and put it on our tab"
The bartender says " The bar has too many deliquent tabs now and can't accept anymore or we will go broke and have to close"
They said " Don't think of it as a tab. Think of it as an off set "
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 09, 2013 07:38 AM (m2CN7)
now, why the FUCK would you want to dump a few more million laborers
into the workforce?
-
Because equality, diversity, and shit.
Obamacare, si se puede!
Posted by: Mexican youth at December 09, 2013 07:39 AM (5ikDv)
Posted by: Rootin Tootin Eric Cantor Wont at December 09, 2013 07:40 AM (Y92Nd)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at December 09, 2013 07:40 AM (da5Wo)
This was once a custom of my people. In my lifetime I shall take two. This is the first.
Awesome book. As good as L'Amour's westerns were, I liked his non-westerns the best.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 09, 2013 11:38 AM (CJjw5)
Word, brother. That line is one of my favorite bits of badmotherfuckerism in literature.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 09, 2013 07:40 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: rickb223 at December 09, 2013 07:40 AM (h1D+w)
Posted by: ontherocks at December 09, 2013 07:40 AM (UevTI)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 09, 2013 07:41 AM (Y92Nd)
Stupid Outside.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 07:41 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: ayup at December 09, 2013 07:41 AM (J4Gi+)
Posted by: rickb223 at December 09, 2013 11:40 AM (h1D+w)
See?!??!?!
THIS is what we're saying!!!!
Posted by: Some Goat Fucking Jihadi[/i][/s][/u][/b] at December 09, 2013 07:41 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 07:42 AM (5oAy6)
Posted by: RWC at December 09, 2013 07:43 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at December 09, 2013 07:43 AM (da5Wo)
As long as the psychotic rage is directed at the squirrels, it's kinda hot.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at December 09, 2013 07:45 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 09, 2013 07:46 AM (CJjw5)
That's why I don't bother, after all, Effort Is Bad.
That's what the gubmint told me!
OMFG DIE SQUIRREL DIE STOP TRYING TO GNAW YOUR WAY IN THROUGH THAT WINDOW YOU TREERAT ARRRRRGGGHHHHHH
Stupid Outside.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 11:41 AM (VtjlW)
I wonder WHY they want to get in so badly. Is the window coated with the squirrel version of catnip?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 07:46 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: toby sunshine at December 09, 2013 07:46 AM (QupBk)
This is why I believe we will have a second revolution in this country.
Last night I thoroughly enjoyed telling a loud mouthed liberal broad who was saying how dreamy Obama is that I was a proud member of the Tea Party. She looked at me horrified. Enjoyed it I did!
Posted by: Cheri at December 09, 2013 07:46 AM (G+Wff)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at December 09, 2013 07:47 AM (HVff2)
I've always depended on the kindness of idiots.
Posted by: Jamie Gorelick at December 09, 2013 07:47 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: toby sunshine at December 09, 2013 07:48 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: DangerGirl at December 09, 2013 07:48 AM (0MVzQ)
Posted by: Barky McFucklepants at December 09, 2013 07:48 AM (Cs2tJ)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 07:49 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: X at December 09, 2013 07:49 AM (KHo8t)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 07:49 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 07:50 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: the squirrels at December 09, 2013 07:50 AM (QupBk)
I can't decide if your easy switching back and forth between witty commentary and psychotic exploding rage is attractive or frightening.
Think of her as our very own Red Queen.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 09, 2013 07:51 AM (zF6Iw)
Squirrel 2, "I wish I was in there warm and dry."
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 07:51 AM (5oAy6)
Posted by: mugiwara at December 09, 2013 07:51 AM (W7ffl)
The GOP beltway leadership relies on something akin to battered wife syndrome. No matter how many times they slap their political base in the face, they figure that we'll look at the alternative and come home on election day. They are oblivious fools. If amnesty is passed, the Republican party is DEAD. Those who oppose it will garner the support of the base, but as far as support for the party structure as a whole is concerned, that will disintegrate immediately. It's sad that they can't see this.
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 09, 2013 07:51 AM (S11Oq)
No, shithead, this deal doesn't do ANYTHING to decrease the debt. NOTHING. Much worse than NOTHING. Yes, I am shouting at shithead commentary that goes like that, no matter the source.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 09, 2013 07:52 AM (cHZB7)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 11:49 AM (VtjlW)
That would definitely be a good reason. I'm pretty sure, were I in teh squirrels' position, I, too, would be gnawing at the window trying to get in. And my reason for not using the door would be that gnawing at the lead-lined flashing had rotted my brain.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 07:52 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 09, 2013 07:52 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at December 09, 2013 11:43 AM (da5Wo)
Yes.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at December 09, 2013 07:52 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 07:53 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at December 09, 2013 07:54 AM (da5Wo)
So Colin Powell comes out and says that we need socialized medicine just like Canada and Europe!!!!! What a fricken genius he is! With Colin it is all about supporting his boyfriend in the WH.
I would like one, just one media type to ask him why he champions socialized medicine when the VA can't even clear their backlog of 400K vets waiting for their benefits. Certainly he cares about veterans right? Oh, and wouldn't it be great if he would let us all know when he and his family sign up for O care, eh General?
Posted by: Cheri at December 09, 2013 07:54 AM (G+Wff)
Posted by: rickb223 at December 09, 2013 07:54 AM (h1D+w)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 07:55 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 09, 2013 07:56 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 09, 2013 07:57 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 07:57 AM (VtjlW)
268
Colin Powell is a Democrat. He always has been. He has identified with the Republican party for the purpose of career advancement only. I bet if someone asked him why he doesn't identify himself as a Democrat, he'd give them a blank stare.
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 09, 2013 07:58 AM (S11Oq)
The "TEA Party caucus" / "cut the size of government caucus" decided, and the exhortation of people like you, that we had to have a "fight" over ObamaCare, even though every single individual with a functioning brain knew that we'd lose the fight. The rest of the Republican Party went along with them.
What happened?
We lost the fight, real conservative Ken Cuccinelli lost the VA Gov race to Terry McCauliff (sp?), RINO Chris Christi won his Gov race in a blow out, and the Republican brand was seriously hammered with the American people. (Yes, it recovered, or at least the Democrats got hammered more, because of the ObamaCare rollout. You know, the thing you strategic geniuses were fighting so hard to prevent. Just think where it would be if we had NOT spend the first half of October fighting to no victory!)
Now, having destroyed all your capital with the rest of the Republican Party, you profess to be shocked with they ignore you, and the rest of us? Really?
Thank you for demonstrating the sheer tactical and strategic genius of George Custer. Because, frankly, if you're the least bit surprised by this, you're an idiot.
"ask them what in the world prevented the House from passing a "clean CR" that kept the sequester intact?"
Gee, I don't know. Please do tell us, why didn't the House do that, back in late September? Oh, that's right, it's because you emotional children were desperate for a "fight", and so you demanded that House Republicans NOT do that.
Thanks for fucking everything up, dudes.
Posted by: GregQ at December 09, 2013 07:59 AM (XXoyQ)
People who have purposeful lives, who live in community, who fulfill their social duties and obligations are less likely to commit suicide. But, it is also true that people need to belong to a moral community, a community that has accomplished good and even great things, a community that has garnered more than its fair share of successes.
There is, in other words, no great virtue in constantly talking down America, in constantly complaining about it, in failing to emphasize what is good and even great about the country. Making people feel that their nation is an organized criminal conspiracy, that it has exploited people, places and things is not going to make them want to live happy and productive lives.
Talking America down is likely to produce, not to cure depression. Once a depressive state of mind finds a rule that requires people to express their feelings fully and to act spontaneously, you have a formula for suicide.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 09, 2013 08:00 AM (zF6Iw)
"It's funny because the squirrel gets dead."
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at December 09, 2013 08:01 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: Meremortal, back from the brink at December 09, 2013 08:01 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: Cheri at December 09, 2013 08:01 AM (G+Wff)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at December 09, 2013 08:01 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: prescient11 at December 09, 2013 11:18 AM (tVTLU)"
OK. I know that it is not your main point but in reality nobody knows who won the popular vote in 2000. The count for the popular vote was within a few thousand when Gray Davis, Democrat Governor of California, ordered a recount of all ballots.
The way it works is that is that after election day if the election is not close enough for the number of absentee ballots and provisional ballots to make a difference, they are simply thrown away and not counted. Even though Al Gore won overwhelmingly in California, Gray Davis ordered all the ballots to be counted which added three million popular votes to the Al Gore total without affecting any election results. Republican governors like Rick Perry in Texas could have ordered similar recounts which would have spent additional money but not have changed the election results but they chose not to spend the money needlessly. What those recounts would have done, though, is that they would have boosted the popular vote totals for George W.Bush. Would the popular vote total for Bush have exceeded the total for Al Gore? Nobody knows and with the ballots destroyed nobody will ever know.
That is how the Democrats created the meme that Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000 and now it is part of the conventional wisdom.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at December 09, 2013 08:01 AM (BcCwi)
http://annapuna.blogspot.com/2013/01/powells-stance.html
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 08:02 AM (5oAy6)
I'm honestly note sure "boarder enforcement" is a sellable position to the LIVs in light of that.
Especially considering so many of them are probably deadbeats who can't be bothered to pay their rent anyway.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 08:03 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 09, 2013 08:03 AM (m2CN7)
This is why the whole "Wisconsin will save the GOP" thing was a farce from day 1.
Posted by: Ian S. at December 09, 2013 08:03 AM (B/VB5)
Gee, I don't know. Please do tell us, why didn't the House do that, back in late September? Oh, that's right, it's because you emotional children were desperate for a "fight", and so you demanded that House Republicans NOT do that.
Thanks for fucking everything up, dudes.
Have fun winning elections without we "emotional children," nickelfucker.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 09, 2013 08:04 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 09, 2013 08:04 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: DangerGirl at December 09, 2013 11:48 AM (0MVzQ)
----
pissed off ???
Im thinking pissed on.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 09, 2013 08:04 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: rfichoke at December 09, 2013 08:05 AM (wxgsq)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 09, 2013 12:04 PM (zF6Iw)
Bravo. The only comeback that bullshit required.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 08:05 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: maddogg at December 09, 2013 08:05 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Meremortal, back from the brink at December 09, 2013 08:07 AM (1Y+hH)
I saw "Nickelfucker" Open for "Nickleback" at the Dome in 2007.
Everybody was thoroughly confused.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 09, 2013 08:08 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: rfichoke at December 09, 2013 12:05 PM (wxgsq)
Two possible reasons:
1) Vested interest in the system operating the way it does now.
2) Psychological need for the current system to be legit, and for the GOP to be good-faith operators, because the alternative is horrifying.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 08:08 AM (/29Nl)
Squirrels are Democrats. They live to loot other people's stuff.
Posted by: mrp at December 09, 2013 08:08 AM (HjPtV)
*twisting idea from old thread into new jokes*
Can we set them all adrift.
I'm not your RINO, teabagger.
You're not my teabagger, squish.
I'm not your squish, wingnut.
*and re DC*
I'm not your serf, establishment.
We're not your establishment, taxcrop.
I'm not your taxcrop, parasites.
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at December 09, 2013 08:10 AM (DL2i+)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 08:11 AM (VtjlW)
popular vote in 2000 ...
Posted by: prescient11 at December 09, 2013 11:18 AM (tVTLU)"
OK. I know that it is not your main point but in reality nobody knows who won the popular vote in 2000. The count for the popular vote was within a few thousand when Gray Davis, Democrat Governor of California, ordered a recount of all ballots.
The way it works is that is that after election day if the election is not close enough for the number of absentee ballots and provisional ballots to make a difference, they are simply thrown away and not counted. Even though Al Gore won overwhelmingly in California, Gray Davis ordered all the ballots to be counted which added three million popular votes to the Al Gore total without affecting any election results. Republican governors like Rick Perry in Texas could have ordered similar recounts which would have spent additional money but not have changed the election results but they chose not to spend the money needlessly. What those recounts would have done, though, is that they would have boosted the popular vote totals for George W.Bush. Would the popular vote total for Bush have exceeded the total for Al Gore? Nobody knows and with the ballots destroyed nobody will ever know.
That is how the Democrats created the meme that Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000 and now it is part of the conventional wisdom.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole
Al Gore won the popular vote by about 500k votes. To say if they did more digging, Bush would have made up that margin is not realistic. Most provisional type ballots tend to go overwhelmingly for Democrats anyway.
Personally, I blame the media that basically called the race early, had that not happened, I think Bush would have won the popular vote and Al Gore would not have had the wind in his sails to litigate like he did in Florida.
Posted by: McAdams at December 09, 2013 08:11 AM (2TMCu)
pissed off ???
Im thinking pissed on.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 09, 2013 12:04 PM (nELVU)
Can it not be both?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 08:11 AM (4df7R)
Or, you know, we could wait and see what they actually come up with instead of (yet again) throwing little tantrums based on rumors from the WaPo.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 09, 2013 08:11 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Hollowpoint
If the House passes an amnesty bill, you're going to see plenty, Hollowpoint.
Posted by: mrp at December 09, 2013 08:13 AM (HjPtV)
Not to mention the fact that a CR in an of itself is not the authorized method of budgeting, but only a way to sneak in even more pork.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at December 09, 2013 08:13 AM (/i3Yt)
[iI] kinda want to print this out and rub this all over me: http://bit.ly/1bRS381
Uh-oh. We've just lost the 'Rons. *watches 'Rons' eyes glaze over*
Also wtf it's snowing in Australia? Isn't it mid-summer there?
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 12:11 PM (VtjlW)
aussie was just on the headlines (or dump?) thread talking about listening to Christmas carols during the heat of the summer! Whereabouts in Oz is it snowing? Because clearly I am too lazy to just google it for myself.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 08:14 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 09, 2013 12:04 PM (g1DWB)
Heh, I assume you are being sarcastic.
But really , a lot of people make assumptions here about what will happen. GregQ is making assumptions of what would have happened to bolster his position.
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 09, 2013 08:14 AM (m2CN7)
Reportedly, even more presumed conservatives (Mormons and Catholics) voted for Obama his SECOND time around than did his first. I heard that in the days after the last election and have not heard it refuted as false.
So if you can no longer have a chance of winning the game, why play? One way or the other, you're beaten.
Downer? Yes. The biggest one there is. If my facts or reasoning is in error, feel free - please - to point it out.
Posted by: Spock at December 09, 2013 08:15 AM (J4Gi+)
Posted by: Low Information Voter at December 09, 2013 08:16 AM (Dwehj)
Posted by: mrp at December 09, 2013 12:13 PM (HjPtV)
----
Yup.
Actually, as one of the "emotional children" spoiling for a fight the last go round..... I'm kinda inclined to give a pass on the New and Improved Sequester Plan..... I dont particularly "like" it..... but right now there is a white hot spotlight on the catastrophe formerly known as Obamacare. I do not want to see that light shining on anything else. Sequester, continuing resolution.... or amnesty.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 09, 2013 08:17 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 08:17 AM (VtjlW)
Out shopping, boys?
Posted by: kbdabear at December 09, 2013 08:18 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) working from home at December 09, 2013 08:19 AM (PYAXX)
OT: Drudge headline of "Putin dissolves State Media".
I wish we could dissolve NBC (et al), CBS, ABC and CNN too.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 09, 2013 08:19 AM (MaP11)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 09, 2013 08:20 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 08:20 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Jaimo at December 09, 2013 08:21 AM (9U1OG)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) working from home at December 09, 2013 08:21 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: rfichoke at December 09, 2013 08:22 AM (wxgsq)
Um, take it from me, that won't work on eunuchs.
Posted by: Lord Varys at December 09, 2013 08:22 AM (+H/11)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 08:22 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) working from home at December 09, 2013 08:22 AM (PYAXX)
Robot Carnival.
http://youtu.be/CNIUwBp7Zt0
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 08:22 AM (5oAy6)
He didn't do anything when SCOAMF bypassed Congress and amnestied a couple million young criminals by fiat, either.
Posted by: Jamie Gorelick at December 09, 2013 08:22 AM (ZKzrr)
Then we'll hear how Amnesty has to be passed if the GOP is to continue as a functioning party
But remember Morons, the failures were because us serfs didn't believe enough, didn't send in enough cash, fought "experienced and electable" Republicans, and don't know how much they do for us
Posted by: kbdabear at December 09, 2013 08:22 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 09, 2013 08:23 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Jaimo at December 09, 2013 08:23 AM (9U1OG)
Posted by: Buzzion at December 09, 2013 08:23 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: DangerGirl at December 09, 2013 08:24 AM (GufPw)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 09, 2013 12:20 PM (g1DWB)
again, those are assumptions on what will happen. I can live with those as it is an assumption that will either be proven correct or incorrect. What I don't like , are assumptions after the fact used to 'prove' someone's position because those assumptions can never be proven correct or incorrect.
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 09, 2013 08:25 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Buzzion at December 09, 2013 08:26 AM (LI48c)
Apparently it's the rough equivalent of the Rockies getting snow in July. Weird but it does happen.
Over 10,000 feet you can expect anything.
Posted by: garrett at December 09, 2013 08:26 AM (5WkPq)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 08:27 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) working from home at December 09, 2013 12:21 PM (PYAXX)
Excellent posts, both of them! I'd comment but my damned outdated browser here at work is in a death feud with comment boxes. It's a blessing in disguise that Pixyware is so damn utilitarian, or y'all would lose my witty commentary and longshoreman vocabulary.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 08:27 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: fluffy at December 09, 2013 08:28 AM (Ua6T/)
pissed off ???
Im thinking pissed on.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 09, 2013 12:04 PM (nELVU)
Can it not be both?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at December 09, 2013 12:11 PM (4df7R)
Like the late Earl Warren?
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 09, 2013 08:28 AM (zF6Iw)
I'm just not assuming the worst until I see some actual evidence. Posted by: JackStraw at December 09, 2013 12:20 PM
Unlike the disclaimers from stock brokerage commercials, past performance is indicative of future results
We'll continue to live with no border enforcement because that's a feature, not a bug
Everything proposed by the GOP is "we'll get to border enforcement, swearsies. We want to but the NY Times and WSJ keep saying NO"
Even the laws they pass are as toothless as a Helen Thomas blowjob
Posted by: kbdabear at December 09, 2013 08:28 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 09, 2013 08:28 AM (m2CN7)
What you just accurately described is an almost exact parallel to word-faith voodoo long preached by Oral Roberts types on the TBN "Christian" [not!] network.
Posted by: Spock at December 09, 2013 08:28 AM (J4Gi+)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at December 09, 2013 08:28 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 08:29 AM (5oAy6)
Posted by: redclay at December 09, 2013 08:29 AM (NVFSz)
NEVER AGAIN. If we nominate some squish, fuck it, I do not want it on my conscience that I voted for the least worst candidate that was just fucking over the country in a slower decline than the leftist demorats.
***
I warned people that if the Republicans nominated and most conservatives voted for Romney, he of Romneycare, that the Republican establishment would take that to mean that there is no vow they can't break to the Republican electorate that will cost them.
Until we replace the establishment, or at least have them in terror that they will lose their jobs, for stabbing us in the back they will continue to do so.
Every incentive in DC points them to talking as conservatives and governing as liberals, and as such this is exactly what we see...
Posted by: 18-1 at December 09, 2013 08:30 AM (P3U0f)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) working from home at December 09, 2013 08:30 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Hussein No'Marbles at December 09, 2013 08:30 AM (wAQA5)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Now with extra taunting. at December 09, 2013 12:27 PM (VtjlW)
Generally they do that so that they can officially retire as a member of the team with which they first signed.
And thank you for the bubble wrap! I'm going to need it, I can tell.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 08:30 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: toby928© at December 09, 2013 08:30 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: rfichoke at December 09, 2013 12:22 PM (wxgsq)
---------------
Yes it is.
Posted by: grammie (cuz mama is way way old) winger at December 09, 2013 08:31 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Judge_Roy_Bean at December 09, 2013 08:31 AM (oQ2ZI)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 09, 2013 08:31 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 12:29 PM (5oAy6)
-----
Saw lots and lots of them in the ditch between KC and Warrensburg last nite.
At least two rollovers.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 09, 2013 08:31 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) working from home at December 09, 2013 08:32 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: fluffy at December 09, 2013 08:32 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: Low Information Voter at December 09, 2013 08:32 AM (Dwehj)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at December 09, 2013 08:33 AM (LmMET)
enough, didn't send in enough cash, fought "experienced and electable"
Republicans, and don't know how much they do for us"
***
Yes, of course establishment Republicans were given control of all of the elected branches of the government in 2004 and they gave us...a new entitlement program.
The core problem America faces right now is that we have two liberal parties. One of them has some conservatives in it...but the system is designed to keep them trapped in a position where they cannot change anything, and many will eventually be corrupted by the graft that dominates DC.
Posted by: 18-1 at December 09, 2013 08:33 AM (P3U0f)
Posted by: BuddyPC at December 09, 2013 08:34 AM (jfUIE)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 09, 2013 12:29 PM (5oAy6)
I jsut might. Though the back roads are hilly and twisty, and at least this morning there was nary a salt or sand truck to be seen. I may try to sneak out a little early tonight, just so I can have alittle bit of daylight.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/i][/u] at December 09, 2013 08:35 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: blindside at December 09, 2013 08:35 AM (WzWmY)
Posted by: Meremortal, back from the brink at December 09, 2013 08:36 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: 7 Days in May at December 09, 2013 08:36 AM (j6DTo)
All I can recommend to people is do everything possible to reduce what you pay to the federal govt (I know most people try to do this nominally, but go for every cent). Because in the end, if you are a producer instead of a taker, when the time comes that you need some govt love will be the time when there is no govt love to be had. (this includes Soc Sec, food stamps, health care and the whole nine yards.)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 09, 2013 08:37 AM (MaP11)
A few anecdotes and telling them they will hurt their job prospects don't phase them when they have The First Black President and the msm telling them daily that anyone who objects is a racist sub-moron.
It doesn't help that the RINOs and squishes in the party would sell their souls for a blowjob from the MFM and don't have the stones to call them out for the motherfucking treasonous liars who aren't swining from lampposts only by the grace of God that they are. Call me they day Bonehead or Bitch McConnell treat a reporter the way they treat the base.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 09, 2013 08:37 AM (zF6Iw)
***
This should be part of a *much* larger initiative, but it works here too. Break the budget apart.
Long before they need to be pass the bills for the spending you want, don't say jack shit about the rest - adjourn the session. Make sure the bills are completely unobjectionable.
Complain on TV Obama won't fund the VA or the Treasury Dept or whatever.
If Obama/Reid don't pass the spending bills ask them why not. Never change the topic to anything else....If he doesn't pass the budgets call him out for closing down the government. If he does pass them then we go to the next step.
When the time comes to say...fund the White House, demand he enforce the law. If he doesn't go home.
Posted by: 18-1 at December 09, 2013 08:38 AM (P3U0f)
I hope when the pain of retirement wears off a bit, he joins Pat Hentgen as a coach, and we can kick Pete Walker to the fucking curb.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2013 08:39 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: Spock at December 09, 2013 12:28 PM
I got a huge laugh from Oral when he said if the faithful didn't send him 8 million in 6 weeks that God was going to whack him
That convinced me that my boyhood friends in Jersey were right, God is an Italian ...
Posted by: kbdabear at December 09, 2013 08:40 AM (aTXUx)
That's a long-standing American feature. Americans loved foreign armament contracts in 1939 and 40, but strongly opposed military involvement overseas until Pearl Harbor. The typical American's attitude towards government is leave me alone and yes, I'll take seconds of those government goodies. This administration kept pushing hard on the first part, and suddenly the second part perks are becoming irrelevant.
Posted by: mrp at December 09, 2013 08:44 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Shoey at December 09, 2013 08:44 AM (jdOk/)
The GOP needs reform so that the United States can be saved. Better?
Posted by: mrp at December 09, 2013 08:48 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Jean at December 09, 2013 08:48 AM (4JkHl)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at December 09, 2013 08:48 AM (/Crba)
At least 6 of those 51 will vote with the Dems 3/4 of the time, or form "Gangs"
Remember, even with a majority they'll tell us they can't give us what we want because "then we'd lose our majority"
Sorry shills, Lucy can swear she'll hold the ball, but this time I'm kicking that bitch in the head
Posted by: kbdabear at December 09, 2013 08:52 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: traye at December 09, 2013 08:52 AM (QEE/F)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at December 09, 2013 08:54 AM (zfY+H)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at December 09, 2013 08:54 AM (zfY+H)
Posted by: rfichoke at December 09, 2013 09:07 AM (wxgsq)
Posted by: Born Free at December 09, 2013 09:09 AM (xL8Hf)
Posted by: Born Free at December 09, 2013 01:09 PM (xL8Hf)
Do you split atoms with your mind also?
Posted by: polynikes self proclaimed king of walked into a bar jokes at December 09, 2013 09:23 AM (m2CN7)
@DrewM, just letting you know I'm gonna use that one. In fact, I think language to that effect will play nicely in my next letter to one of my U.S. Senators.
Posted by: halodoc at December 09, 2013 10:24 AM (Fzbp3)
I just want to point out that it always has been and always will be utter folly to believe that we will ever limit the size and scope of the federal government by electing politicians to wield power in the federal government.
You see: NO MATTER WHO GETS ELECTED INTO POWER, THEY WILL ALWAYS BE INTEGRAL PARTS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
Politicians running for elected office at the federal level are - get this - seeking _power_ at the federal level.
It is inherently contradictory to the point of foolishness to believe that the very kinds of people who seek power at the federal level will (upon obtaining that power) turn around and diminish the very power they sought to obtain.
IT WILL NEVER EVER HAPPEN.
It is a prepubescent wet dream that conservatives must get over in order to realize a paradigm shift in the game they are (supposed to be) playing.
The federal-election-cycles-game to truly limit the power of the federal government can never be won.
Yes, we can win an election cycle here and again. - But none of these wins nor any series of wins will EVER cause federal politicians to stop growing the government. It has never happened.
Even under my second favorite president of all time, Ronald Reagan, the federal government expanded.
Even under the Republican revolution of the 90's led by Gingrich and others: despite balancing the federal budget the federal government still expanded.
(And, incidentally, the fiscal trajectory of Social Security still continued to slide in the wrong direction while Medicaid and Medicare continued to run deficits. - Those budgets were "fixed" through temporary _discretionary_ spending cuts. Not through real structural changes.)
The likes of the great Ted Cruz will always be the RAREST of exceptions in elected politicians. (Duh!)
And we would need a minimum of forty Ted Cruzs in the US Senate alone in order to have a shot at doing what has never been done: actually _reversing_ the size and scope of the federal government.
Posted by: _Dave_ at December 09, 2013 11:40 AM (J+Q+d)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at December 09, 2013 02:23 PM (5xmd7)
Posted by: ginaswo at December 09, 2013 05:01 PM (Was8V)
Posted by: Coleridge at December 09, 2013 08:26 PM (BglJL)
Posted by: Zombie Commie Walter Cronkite at December 11, 2013 08:13 AM (oNqbW)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2445 seconds, 517 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at December 09, 2013 06:28 AM (659DL)