January 28, 2013

San Diego Chief of Police: We Can Disarm America "Within a Generation"
— Ace

As the goal is admitted, let us have no more discussion of these ridiculous diversions.

The goal sought is disarmament, period. Accomplished bit by bit. But none of those bits are "reasonable" or "common sense" as they are admittedly simply elements of the intended goal, which is complete disarmament.

If the goal isn't worthy, then none of the steps towards it should be undertaken.

Posted by: Ace at 10:59 AM | Comments (284)
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a malignant traitor.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 11:00 AM (8y9MW)

2 I'll be dead by then

Posted by: tmtisss at January 28, 2013 11:00 AM (rdav6)

3 FIRST

Posted by: mallfly at January 28, 2013 11:00 AM (bJm7W)

4 Disarm the gangs and then get back to me

Posted by: tmtisss at January 28, 2013 11:01 AM (rdav6)

5 Let me guess, he is a Democrat right?  Anyway, since they have thrown out the Constitution we should do.  Outlaw the Democrat Party in red States.

Posted by: Vic at January 28, 2013 11:01 AM (53z96)

6 Fuck you, San Diego.  May you and your state both    be swallowed up by the Pacific.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at January 28, 2013 11:01 AM (4df7R)

7 Molon.  Labe.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 11:01 AM (8y9MW)

8 He can keep on jacking it in San Diego.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:01 AM (piMMO)

9

Is this whole thing starting to move very rapidly or is it just my perception?

 

Because it feels like it's snowballing.

Posted by: Who Knows at January 28, 2013 11:02 AM (W+Itt)

10 in b4 the revolution/secession talk!

Posted by: soothsayer at January 28, 2013 11:02 AM (vanqS)

11 Of course to do that we would need a real opposition Party and not a bunch of accommodating SOBs with "R"s after their name.

Posted by: Vic at January 28, 2013 11:02 AM (53z96)

12 Makes sense. Big city police chiefs are gov't-employed union hacks, and just like other union hacks they want a monopoly on what they do.

Posted by: logprof at January 28, 2013 11:02 AM (jVAw4)

13 But you do realize the press will do everything it can to distract from the goal and focus on every incremental step that it takes to get their instead right? Then the day it happens look for the NY times to editorialize "well woops I guess he is a liberal president and wanted to ban guns all along".

Posted by: Mr Pink at January 28, 2013 11:03 AM (/zrB9)

14 The west coast and northeastern US will disarm themselves.  The rest of us?  Ha.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2013 11:03 AM (UOM48)

15 BTW, I visited SD once and didn't want to come home. I loved it. Alas, it seems it might be falling in with the rest of the state.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:03 AM (piMMO)

16 It is very clear they have set up the paradigm. It is not longer the case they they are public servants accountable to us. It is the state against the people

Posted by: Thunderb at January 28, 2013 11:03 AM (Dnbau)

17 well, anyone besides me notice that the "ban handguns" crown never went away?

Posted by: mallfly at January 28, 2013 11:03 AM (bJm7W)

18

There's this and the rapid population change that's being hurried along as fast as they can.

 

 

Posted by: Who Knows at January 28, 2013 11:03 AM (W+Itt)

19 Shit, it didn't even take the Aussies that long.

Posted by: joncelli at January 28, 2013 11:04 AM (RD7QR)

20 Molon Labe

Posted by: BlueStateRebel at January 28, 2013 11:04 AM (7ObY1)

21 I've long been willing to sell California back to Mexico for the price we paid for it, adjusted to 2013 QEeleventy dollars, plus interest.  Now I'm willing to haggle about the interest.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 28, 2013 11:04 AM (ZKzrr)

22 Man an I liked SD. It seemed so different from LA.
I guess shit rolls south.

In any case, I'll call my friend and SD and tell him to lock up his airsoft rifles they'll be coming for those next!

Posted by: tsrblke (work) at January 28, 2013 11:04 AM (b4xCO)

23 oh, and the NYC police chief was on TV recently saying that in NYC the real problem is handguns.

Posted by: mallfly at January 28, 2013 11:04 AM (bJm7W)

24 This will not end well for these gun grabbers.  Just saying...

Posted by: quarkstud at January 28, 2013 11:04 AM (XNEXn)

25 I thought San Diego was pretty conservative. How does this guy slip through, assuming he's elected or appointed by an elected official?

Posted by: Xander Crews at January 28, 2013 11:04 AM (8bgDT)

26 I have made quite a few trips to San Diego.  Normally it is a "red" area so I don't know what this asshole's problem is.


They also have the best weather in the nation.

Posted by: Vic at January 28, 2013 11:04 AM (53z96)

27 Because it feels like it's snowballing.

To a lot of them, it's going to taste like it, too.

Posted by: comatus at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (qaVK+)

28 15 BTW, I visited SD once and didn't want to come home. I loved it. Alas, it seems it might be falling in with the rest of the state. Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 03:03 PM (piMMO) --I went there and '05 and also loved it, but damn if I didn't luck into the one weekend that year it rained there. So I skipped the zoo.

Posted by: logprof at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (jVAw4)

29 Yeah disarm the gangs first.  Good luck with that porous border.

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (PzMYS)

30 silly wingnuts, I haven't seen any diagrams in which julia would ever need to own, use, or need a gun. Therefore, what is not mandatory is forbidden. duh.

Posted by: joeindc44 wonders if anyone has any advice for the GOP at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (QxSug)

31 This fella is going somewhere.  He just might get himself elected.

Posted by: Fritz at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (WM+rJ)

32

 

They can't keep illegal immigrants out...or drugs.

So how are they going to keep gun shipments from being smuggled in? 

 

 

Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (BZMZX)

33 3 FIRST
Posted by: mallfly


Barrel. Now.

Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (xz0nG)

34 Shall not be infringed. Which word is so fucking difficult to comprehend?

Posted by: akula51 at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (YesJa)

35 To a lot of them, it's going to taste like it, too.

YES!!!

Posted by: Kal Penn at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (ZKzrr)

36 Is this whole thing starting to move very rapidly or is it just my perception? Because it feels like it's snowballing. Exactly how the Jews must have been feeling circa 1938...

Posted by: BlueStateRebel at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (7ObY1)

37 Yeah, isn't San Diego kind of a conservative tomn for Cali? Whats up with that?

Posted by: joeindc44 wonders if anyone has any advice for the GOP at January 28, 2013 11:05 AM (QxSug)

38 21 I've long been willing to sell California back to Mexico for the price we paid for it, adjusted to 2013 QEeleventy dollars, plus interest. Now I'm willing to haggle about the interest.

==============



I'm willing to just give it to them.....or pay them to take it.




Posted by: Tami[/i] at January 28, 2013 11:06 AM (X6akg)

39 But .. but .. that "gun info" site says that cops don't want to your take away your guns!

Posted by: Gerry at January 28, 2013 11:06 AM (DJIo7)

40 I'd rather they be this honest. Try and argue that you want to actually disarm everyone and leave them defensless instead of argue these bullshit claims and jacked up stats and gun control laws.  Debate honestly about your intentions, then we can see where people really stand.

Posted by: Heralder at January 28, 2013 11:06 AM (+xmn4)

41 Go fuck yourself San Diego.

Posted by: Ron Burgandy at January 28, 2013 11:06 AM (t06LC)

42 Wow, *someone* needs to read Bob Owens' analysis of the requirements for such a feat. It's like I told my Mom and brother (neither of whom plan on surrendering *their* firearms, either) -- they will never get all of them. They won't even get most of them. All they'll get is a lot of lead, and a lot of dead.

Posted by: Miller at January 28, 2013 11:06 AM (DPqcf)

43 A smart republican party would have the senate working on gun control. A smart republican party would be working on that and any other issue besides immigration. But whatever the minute they pass amnesty you do realize pretty much every gun in the nation will slwy be restricted and only sold at approved federal ABC like vendors, will be limited to bolt action, and contain a national registry for licensing. And we won't be able to do shit about it.

Posted by: Mr Pink at January 28, 2013 11:06 AM (/zrB9)

44 I did not and do not want to live in interesting times. I stand by my predictions of what will happen when this is attempted. And it will be attempted.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 28, 2013 11:06 AM (VtjlW)

45 Yeah my sister in law's CoP....


Mexifornia one of my joys in our new powerless state will be trying to get you sent back to mexico.

Posted by: sven10077 at January 28, 2013 11:06 AM (LRFds)

46 combine here, the lefty Alinsky tactic of freezing a target and the lefty tactic of slippery slopism, foot in the door path to total acceptance, and yes: They need to exploit a tragedy to ban guns.

Posted by: joeindc44 wonders if anyone has any advice for the GOP at January 28, 2013 11:06 AM (QxSug)

47 I have made quite a few trips to San Diego. Normally it is a "red" area so I don't know what this asshole's problem is. They also have the best weather in the nation. *** It's a beautiful city and, if I could afford it, would love to have a place there.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:06 AM (piMMO)

48 Isn't this interesting.  From headline at Drudge:

http://tinyurl.com/avpw3lh

How do NYC cops get away with packing in DC?  Because of Bloomy?  And demanding ID from a reporter?

Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2013 11:07 AM (UOM48)

49 15 BTW, I visited SD once and didn't want to come home. I loved it.

Alas, it seems it might be falling in with the rest of the state.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 03:03 PM (piMMO)


SD is gorgeous. My sister and nieces used to live there before they moved to Charlotte. I asked her why she did it because Charlotte, while okay, just isn't as wonderful as SD. She said she just wanted to be closer to my dad. I asked my other sister what the real reason was; she said "She moved because SD is part of California now."

Posted by: joncelli at January 28, 2013 11:07 AM (RD7QR)

50 Shit. Having sworn an oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign AND domestic, what do I do now? Guess it's time to lose more firearms in tragic boating accidents. WOLVERINES!

Posted by: Emdoc at January 28, 2013 11:07 AM (0RJ16)

51 No sir that is not an illegal firearm. It's undocumented.

Posted by: RioBravo at January 28, 2013 11:07 AM (eEfYn)

52 Is this whole thing starting to move very rapidly or is it just my perception?

Because it feels like it's snowballing.


The Left is confident.  When that happens, they forget to be dishonest.

Posted by: AmishDude at January 28, 2013 11:07 AM (T0NGe)

53 What I don't know yet is whether the anti-gun stuff is a distraction for amnesty or the amnesty talk is a distraction to ban buns. One way or another, we're being played like a harp.

Posted by: soothsayer at January 28, 2013 11:07 AM (+oin+)

54 San Diego red area?  I think the ONT last night or night before the California people in the SD area were all talking of fleeing as fast as possible.

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 28, 2013 11:07 AM (PzMYS)

55

We are getting hit from all sides. Guns. Immigration. Abandoning the Constitution.

 

 

 

And now the asshats are after football.

 

 

 

Where do we defend? Where do we give? Me?

 

 

Flags up!

Posted by: AZ Hi Desert (All my Hate cannot be found) at January 28, 2013 11:07 AM (8cJXl)

56

I live here. It is one of the most beautiful places in the world, let alone the country.

We are also being pounded with huge wave of illegals. The food pantries can't keep up and the usual crap is going on with absentee landlords, who don't seem to know that 2 or 3 families are in each rental, trashing it in the process.

 

My home town is going to hell and I can't do a thing about it.

Posted by: Who Knows at January 28, 2013 11:07 AM (W+Itt)

57 --I went there and '05 and also loved it, but damn if I didn't luck into the one weekend that year it rained there. So I skipped the zoo.

Posted by: logprof at January 28, 2013 03:05 PM (jVAw4)


I skipped the zoo because it was like $40/person to see it.

I live in St. Louis (#1 Free zoo in the US and like #2 or 3 overall) don't really regret it.

Posted by: tsrblke (work) at January 28, 2013 11:07 AM (b4xCO)

58 They're dreaming. The 270 million firearms in civilian hands aren't going away. First come, then take.

Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 28, 2013 11:08 AM (evdj2)

59 What I don't know yet is whether the anti-gun stuff is a distraction for amnesty or the amnesty talk is a distraction to ban buns.

Because it couldn't possibly be that they want both.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 11:08 AM (8y9MW)

60 "She moved because SD is part of California now."

Posted by: joncelli at January 28, 2013 03:07 PM (RD7QR)


So SD is now blue?  Must be all those Mexicans coming in, just natural Republicans you know.



We should let in another 30 million of them.

Posted by: Vic at January 28, 2013 11:09 AM (53z96)

61 Hey I see Menendez is on that stage with the humps for immigration control. Hey why not, he wants more young underage honey's here for his pleasure. hey go for it man

Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 28, 2013 11:09 AM (9Bj8R)

62

Hunh. That must be what all that "Universal Background Check" for private transactions is all about, hmm?

 

"Oh sorry, they didn't approve the sale"

Posted by: Tim Foyle at January 28, 2013 11:09 AM (3ZtZW)

63 damn bitter clingers.. it would be easy to disarm America without the clingers!

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 28, 2013 11:09 AM (f9c2L)

64 Paging Rick Perry... Rick Perry, you have a phone call from the future Republic of Tex-iana on line 1.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:09 AM (e0xKF)

65 I saw movie once where only the police and military had guns.


It was called Schindler's List.

Posted by: EC at January 28, 2013 11:10 AM (GQ8sn)

66 No sir that is not an illegal firearm. It's undocumented.

That should go viral.  Also be cross-stitched into a sampler.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 28, 2013 11:10 AM (ZKzrr)

67 Re; Menedez, obviously only if you are a Secret Service agent do you get run out of town for playing with the foreign hookers.

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 28, 2013 11:10 AM (PzMYS)

68 Maybe we should do what liberals do to make the unacceptable, acceptable through language like "taxes" are "revenue" and gun control is now gun "safety." If we started calling guns "rainbows" maybe liberals wouldnt find guns so scary and leave us alone and let us keep them.

Posted by: L, elle at January 28, 2013 11:10 AM (0PiQ4)

69 Oh you want to keep your gun? That's hilarious. Well that's too bad there are 15 million new democrat party line voters that don't give a shit other than voting straight D ticket. They outnumber you. Get fucking bent.

Posted by: Marco Rubio at January 28, 2013 11:10 AM (/zrB9)

70 President Rick Perry and VP Rand Paul kind of roll off the tongue.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2013 11:10 AM (UOM48)

71 OT: Illegal immigrants at CA Capitol

"I remember having a conversation with some of my friends and they were like, ‘How is it that you are such a political freak and you haven't been able to vote here in the United States or in Mexico?’" Sergio said. "And I'm like, 'There are other ways in which I can actually influence the political atmosphere with a more direct way.'

"For example, when I was working with Assembly Member Mendoza or Assembly Member Block's office, I was actually advising the member on how to vote on certain things by collecting information, by analyzing bills, by doing things that other people are not able to do."

-- Illegal aliens. Doing jobs others can't.


Posted by: RioBravo at January 28, 2013 11:10 AM (eEfYn)

72

But of course this is the goal...

 

Hopefully NYC's law will be immediately appealed up to the court's.

 

Honestly though, I want to see Heller II get appealed directly to the Sup. Ct.  This one would be a two-fer, knock out the so-called "AWB" and a "registration of every firearm law".

 

If we can knock those two laws out, the Second Amendment will be secure.

Posted by: Prescient11 at January 28, 2013 11:10 AM (tVTLU)

73 But who will thin the out-of-control flocks of clay pigeons?

Posted by: Fritz at January 28, 2013 11:10 AM (WM+rJ)

74 It's almost as if the country we thought we lived in never existed, and the people living there were figments of our collective delusion. I don't like this place called "the real world" and most of the people here are assholes.

Posted by: Eaton Cox at January 28, 2013 11:10 AM (q177U)

75 Sad thing is, liberals, should they get their utopian wishes granted, are just as fucked as the rest of us.

Posted by: © Sponge at January 28, 2013 11:11 AM (xmcEQ)

76

Here's another tip on how to handle the media.

 

Use what this San Diego police chief said as if the JEF chiseled it into the base of the Lincoln Memorial.  State it as fact, as if everyone on the planet agreed, that Obama's goal is total civilian disarmorment.

 

Start the conversations from that point.  The rest is easy.

Posted by: jwest at January 28, 2013 11:11 AM (ZDsRL)

77

>>>It is very clear they have set up the paradigm. It is not longer the case they they are public servants accountable to us. It is the state against the people

 

Been that way for a while now on all levels, in most localities.

Posted by: Bigby's Over Mitt at January 28, 2013 11:11 AM (3ZtZW)

78 God, relax. They don't want to outlaw guns just like they don't want socialized medicine just like there have been no terrorist attacks on American soil since January 2009.

Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at January 28, 2013 11:11 AM (sri11)

79

55
We are getting hit from all sides. Guns. Immigration. Abandoning the Constitution.

 

It's the same issue...those things are all related to accomplishing the goal of enslaving us under totalitarian rule.

 

Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2013 11:11 AM (BZMZX)

80 Per the article, he's in trouble with the left for "manhandling" Occupy protesters, and he wants to disarm the citizenry.

I'll bet you anything that the "progressives" consider those two positions inconsistent, never making the connection between how much easier it is to manhandle people who are unarmed.

Posted by: Ken at January 28, 2013 11:11 AM (3ar4L)

81 58 They're dreaming. The 270 million firearms in civilian hands aren't going away. First come, then take. --- I think the idea is to have registration as well as a formal background check for all transfers, including inheritances. The idea being that, after a generation, any "undeclared" weapon will be considered illegal and be used as causus belli to put a bunch of dissidents behind bars.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:11 AM (e0xKF)

82 That is what "Universal Background Checks" are all about.  Registering every gun sold, given or inherited in a master file. YOU also have to pay for the transfer background check, basically a tax on gun transfers. 

Then if your gun is not in the file you will be accused of having a stolen gun.

Register, then take.  UBC must be stopped, it is not benign.

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 11:11 AM (wR+pz)

83 61 Hey I see Menendez is on that stage with the humps for immigration control. Hey why not, he wants more young underage honey's here for his pleasure. hey go for it man

Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 28, 2013 03:09 PM (9Bj8R)


Shit yes. Why go out when you can get delivery?

Posted by: joncelli at January 28, 2013 11:12 AM (RD7QR)

84 If we started calling guns "rainbows"
----
Christian rainbow or GLBT rainbow?

Posted by: RioBravo at January 28, 2013 11:12 AM (eEfYn)

85 While I was at Walmart last night (buying their last 250 count 9mm box) the old guy in front of me (also buying ammunition- I think for a shotgun, but I didn't look that closely) and the old guy at the register were talking about DiFi's proposed gun ban.

The guy in front of me said he's going to put all of his guns in a Trust so that his kids don't "inherit them."  Now, I don't know if that will actually work or not, but my wife asked me later how the government would prevent transfers anyway.

I think maybe I'll show her this tonight.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 11:12 AM (8y9MW)

86 He's right.

Posted by: Ronald Reagan[/i] at January 28, 2013 11:12 AM (sri11)

87 Monster.

Posted by: MadisonConservative at January 28, 2013 11:12 AM (Y/HG5)

88 -I went there and '05 and also loved it, but damn if I didn't luck into the one weekend that year it rained there. So I skipped the zoo. *** I skipped the zoo too because, after business, I only had a couple of days to see the city. I did the cheesy thing and bought one of those tour bus passes which was terrific because it was about $50 for two days and I could get off and on as much as I wanted. I made it out to the beach and hopped off in Little Italy. I had an outstanding, inexpensive dinner, and then walked back to the Marriott on the water. Incredible weather.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:13 AM (piMMO)

89

It's very difficult to not see all of this as a piece of whole cloth.

 

This what the second term will be like. He has nothing to lose.

Posted by: Who Knows at January 28, 2013 11:13 AM (W+Itt)

90  No sir that is not an illegal firearm. It's undocumented.

Posted by: RioBravo at January 28, 2013 03:07 PM (eEfYn)

 

Well done

Posted by: The Jackhole at January 28, 2013 11:13 AM (nTgAI)

91

70 President Rick Perry and VP Rand Paul kind of roll off the tongue.

 

Perry/Paul ?

Works for me!

Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2013 11:13 AM (BZMZX)

92 White House press secretary Jay Carney on Monday welcomed an immigration deal reached by a bipartisan group of senators and gave credit to President Obama for pressing the issue. "I think it's important before we let the moment pass to acknowledge that the progress we're seeing embodied in the priniciples put forward by this bipartisan group is happening for a reason: I think it's happening because consensus is developing in the country, a bipartisan consensus, and it's happening because the president has demonstrated significant leadership on this issue," Carney said.

Posted by: Baron Münchhausen at January 28, 2013 11:14 AM (e8kgV)

93 Like Soros is knocking on Death's door, Obama only has this second term to get his dreams done.  So the rush is on.

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 28, 2013 11:14 AM (PzMYS)

94 The guy in front of me said he's going to put all of his guns in a Trust so that his kids don't "inherit them." Now, I don't know if that will actually work or not, but my wife asked me later how the government would prevent transfers anyway. *** One of the attorneys who started the gun trust thingamajig is here in Jax and has a blog. He is a serious gun nut. www.guntrustlawyer.com

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:14 AM (piMMO)

95 But whatever the minute they pass amnesty you do realize pretty much every gun in the nation will slwy be restricted and only sold at approved federal ABC like vendors, will be limited to bolt action, and contain a national registry for licensing. And we won't be able to do shit about it.

Posted by: Mr Pink at January 28, 2013 03:06 PM (/zrB9)

 

 

------------------------------------------------

 

 

Two things going against this.  First, is state nullification.  States do not have to adhere to any law that is obviously against our God-given rights.

 

Secondly, they're going to be up against people like me who won't mind being a headline in the news.

Posted by: Soona at January 28, 2013 11:14 AM (DM+ui)

96 Perry/Paul ? Works for me! **** Me too

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:14 AM (piMMO)

97 I saw movie once where only the police and military had guns.


It was called Schindler's List.

Posted by: EC at January 28, 2013 03:10 PM (GQ8sn)

 

I am stwaling this. Brilliant

Posted by: The Jackhole at January 28, 2013 11:14 AM (nTgAI)

98 absentee landlords, who don't seem to know that 2 or 3 families are in each rental, trashing it in the process.

They know.  Its just like doing a Section 8 rental.  You know the place is gonna get blasted but you don't care if the checks keep coming.

This is how slums are created. 

I tried to be an ethical landlord years ago, it was financially ruinous.

Posted by: @PurpAv at January 28, 2013 11:14 AM (GlnE7)

99 90 No sir that is not an illegal firearm. It's undocumented. Posted by: RioBravo at January 28, 2013 03:07 PM (eEfYn) Well done --- It's a "wetback" firearm. Damn thing just walked out from the bottom of a lake.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:14 AM (e0xKF)

100 36 Is this whole thing starting to move very rapidly or is it just my perception?

Because it feels like it's snowballing.


It's not snowballing anywhere but in the MSM.  The rest of the country is scared as shit about their talk.  We take the Senate in 2014


Please Barry make these assholes in the Senate vote for Fienstien's bill.  It will be their last vote.

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 11:15 AM (wR+pz)

101 79 55 We are getting hit from all sides. Guns. Immigration. Abandoning the Constitution. They want us toiling during the day and huddled in the dark at night.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 28, 2013 11:15 AM (tmzN0)

102 Jeez.

I've been in a huge funk for the last three months. Just feel like there's this massive other shoe about to drop, you know? I almost wish it would come on and get it over with so I could at least stop stressing worrying about what's going to happen.

Anyone else going through anything similar?

Posted by: Emile Antoon Khadaji at January 28, 2013 11:15 AM (SbV8+)

103 my wife asked me later how the government would prevent transfers anyway.

I think maybe I'll show her this tonight.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 03:12 PM (8y9MW)



ISWYDT

Posted by: BCochran1981 at January 28, 2013 11:16 AM (da5Wo)

104 97 I saw movie once where only the police and military had guns.It was called Schindler's List. Posted by: EC at January 28, 2013 03:10 PM (GQ8sn) I am stwaling this. Brilliant --- There's a related line from the TV show Action, in which some Hasidic Jews are being asked for investment money. "Whenever someone tells Jews to 'Get on the train', it never ends well."

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:16 AM (e0xKF)

105

BTW, I visited SD once and didn't want to come home. I loved it.

Alas, it seems it might be falling in with the rest of the state.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 03:03 PM (piMMO)

 

Yeah, I grew up here, and have been alarmed since I moved back at how Red it has become and is becoming. The cancer has spread from SF and LA as the liberal cockroaches flee the problems they created there.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 28, 2013 11:16 AM (IDSI7)

106 The British tried that at Lexington and Concord.

How'd that work out Chief?

Posted by: Marcus at January 28, 2013 11:16 AM (GGCsk)

107 The Chief better go out and get some more guys.

Posted by: Joe Biden's Dead Flacid Unit at January 28, 2013 11:16 AM (GrtrJ)

108 I tried to be an ethical landlord years ago, it was financially ruinous. *** I am presently renting and my landlords think I am a dream. I got lucky with them as well.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:16 AM (piMMO)

109 Did anyone notice that this douchebag cop is wearing a shiny, custom 1911? Which would normally give me a big woody, but I guarantee that no one else in SDPD is allowed to carry a 1911, because it supposedly scares the proles when they see a cocked hammer in a cop's holster.

Typical guns for me not for thee bullshit.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 28, 2013 11:17 AM (TIIx5)

110 President Rick Perry and VP Rand Paul kind of roll off the tongue. Please do not taunt Happy Fun Alex.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 28, 2013 11:17 AM (VtjlW)

111 Which word is so fucking difficult to comprehend?

Posted by: akula51 at January 28, 2013 03:05 PM (YesJa)

 

If you've been following the news, both print and video, you'll notice a great many features lately arguing for dispensing with the Constitution--although some on the Left grant that maybe keeping the more memorably worded bits as a kind of legacy artifact of some sort might be a good idea.

 

The US Constitution is In The Way. Guns are In The Way. And we who believe in one and own the other? Guess.

 

Molon labe.

Posted by: troyriser at January 28, 2013 11:17 AM (vtiE6)

112 It's the same issue...those things are all related to accomplishing the goal of enslaving us under totalitarian rule.

Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2013 03:11 PM (BZMZX) 

 

 

 

So we are at the "When in the Course of human events"stage.

Posted by: AZ Hi Desert (All my Hate cannot be found) at January 28, 2013 11:17 AM (8cJXl)

113

hahahahahahahhaha.

 

Drudge has the Bloomberg story up front and center.

 

It's a beautiful piece.  As it shows the utter hypocrisy of this fuck and gets a pot shot on the soda ban as well.

 

Some animals are more equal than others....

 

INDEED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  FUCK YOU MSM.  DIE ALREADY JUST FUCKING DIE.

Posted by: Prescient11 at January 28, 2013 11:17 AM (tVTLU)

114 Lots of noise on this right now, but I don't see any such measure passing the House (ie under any circumstances) right now, and I think the chance of it even passing in the Senate is probably less than 50-50.

So I chalk this up as leftist red-meat to the "base". 


.

Posted by: looking closely at January 28, 2013 11:17 AM (6Q9g2)

115 I felt the voice of a hundred thousand guns in boats sinking, then nothing.

Posted by: Barack "I'm your only hope" Obama at January 28, 2013 11:17 AM (xAtAj)

116

>>>One way or another, we're being played like a harp.

 

About that? You remember how Ace was talking about micro-targeting of votes, right? There's always been room for side-projects, the IDing of who would NOT vote for them, your preferences, how you would jump if stimulus A or B was given..... Do you doubt it? I don't.

Posted by: Bigby's Over Mitt at January 28, 2013 11:18 AM (3ZtZW)

117 So we are at the "When in the Course of human events"stage.

It's getting there.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 11:18 AM (8y9MW)

118 I'm waiting for the inevitable double dip or for the next bubble to pop. Then, the whole thing falls like a house of cards.

Posted by: Jollyroger at January 28, 2013 11:18 AM (t06LC)

119 BTW. I always thought Nevada and Arizona would make some great beachfront property when that whole state falls into the sea.

Posted by: Marcus at January 28, 2013 11:18 AM (GGCsk)

120 anna what wireless printer did you end up getting?

Posted by: phoenixgirl at work & a member of NRA at January 28, 2013 11:19 AM (JT/Hz)

121 White House press secretary Jay Carney on Monday welcomed an immigration deal reached by a bipartisan group of senators and gave credit to President Obama for pressing the issue.

I suppose the White House will also take credit for helping Senator Bob Menendez procure sex with underaged Dominican prostitutes.

Posted by: Mark Foley at January 28, 2013 11:19 AM (e8kgV)

122 They can come and fucking try to get them.

Posted by: ElKomandante at January 28, 2013 11:19 AM (xIUnF)

123

Jeez.


I've been in a huge funk for the last three months. Just feel like there's this massive other shoe about to drop, you know? I almost wish it would come on and get it over with so I could at least stop stressing worrying about what's going to happen.

Anyone else going through anything similar?

Posted by: Emile Antoon Khadaji at January 28, 2013 03:15 PM (SbV8+)

 

I would guess all of us.

Posted by: troyriser at January 28, 2013 11:19 AM (vtiE6)

124 I suppose the White House will also take credit for helping Senator Bob
Menendez procure sex with underaged Dominican prostitutes.

Posted by: Mark Foley at January 28, 2013 03:19 PM (e8kgV)


They did it for the children.

Posted by: joncelli at January 28, 2013 11:19 AM (RD7QR)

125 the founders really knew the score didn't they?

Posted by: #6 at January 28, 2013 11:19 AM (KHo8t)

126 What I don't know yet is whether the anti-gun stuff is a distraction for amnesty or the amnesty talk is a distraction to ban buns. You may take my ground beef, but you'll never take my CHEESEBURGER!

Posted by: rickb223 at January 28, 2013 11:20 AM (GFM2b)

127 Anyone else going through anything similar?

Yeah. I think "all of us," is the right answer.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 11:20 AM (8y9MW)

128 I am presently renting and my landlords think I am a dream.

I got lucky with them as well.


Go on...

Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at January 28, 2013 11:20 AM (sri11)

129 The British tried that at Lexington and Concord.

How'd that work out Chief?

Posted by: Marcus at January 28, 2013 03:16 PM (GGCsk)

 

The Mexicans tried that at Gonzales. Siestas a bitch.

Posted by: Sam F'n Houston Bitchez at January 28, 2013 11:20 AM (t06LC)

130 They'll disarm all the law-abiding citizens and THEN go after the gangs and the criminals.  Sure, sounds good to me.  But then I've had a stroke lately.

Posted by: Princess Hillary at January 28, 2013 11:20 AM (71LDo)

131 The endgame is to have the law still say you can 'own a gun', but it'll be just a single shot low power thing that costs so much, is so heavily regulated that you have to jump through so many hoops to legally have it you'll throw your hands up and go FUCK THIS! Yep. From 7 rounds in your gun, to 5, then 3, then 1. And the ammo will get so hideously expensive, and getting the permit to even HAVE it will get so long and frustrating, they count on most people just GIVING UP. That's why this IS the hill to die on. NOT. ONE. FUCKING. STEP. FURTHER.

Posted by: drawandstrike at January 28, 2013 11:20 AM (uVLJc)

132 What I don't know yet is whether the anti-gun stuff is a distraction for amnesty or the amnesty talk is a distraction to ban buns. --- I think it's a distraction from the fact that every single fucking thing this SCOAMF does is illegal and/or unconstitutional.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:21 AM (e0xKF)

133 Anyways. Won't happen.

Molon Labe.

If they try it there will be blood on the streets.

Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at January 28, 2013 11:21 AM (xAtAj)

134 They did it for the children. **** It saved them from the evils of working night and day in a garment factory! With his jobs plan, they only worked nights.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:21 AM (piMMO)

135 125 the founders really knew the score didn't they?

Posted by: #6 at January 28, 2013 03:19 PM (KHo8t)


They actually bothered to read history. This is all nauseatingly predictable. I thought we could avoid it but it looks like even a machine as magnificent as the constitution can't overcome human nature.

Posted by: joncelli at January 28, 2013 11:21 AM (RD7QR)

136 #109

NYPD cops are only issued either true double action only guns or striker-fired autos (like Glocks) with artificially heavied triggers to simulate a double-action pull.  In fact this modification to the Glock is actually called a "New York trigger".

There is one exception that older cops who originally qualified with other guns can still keep them.   So some desk-job sgt can keep his 1980s issue snubnose. 

1911s were never standard issue for NYPD cops (ie ever) and I bet this guy doesn't qualify to carry one under the rules everyone else has to follow.

Posted by: looking closely at January 28, 2013 11:21 AM (PwGfd)

137

Megan Kelly was talking today about the 'length of time' it takes for 911 to respond to your call...

 

She was surprised to learn that it often takes 20 minutes, to an hour, in some places...for police to get to your location.

 

"Wow. That's taking too long."...Megan said, shaking her head. 

 

Fuck, Megan. Welcome to the real world.

Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2013 11:22 AM (BZMZX)

138 I got lucky with them as well. Go on... **** EEEW! ISWYDT

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:22 AM (piMMO)

139 Let me get this straight: Finding 11,000,000 illegal aliens is a law enforcement job far too difficult to even attempt? But rounding up 310,000,000 guns --- at least 100,000,000 of which you could stow in a lunchbox --- that's going to be a piece of cake? Oh rly???

Posted by: Pops at January 28, 2013 11:22 AM (QjFDb)

140 I thought we could avoid it but it looks like even a machine as magnificent as the constitution can't overcome human nature.

Once I thought about it, I knew it would fail eventually.  I just never thought (until recently) that it would be possible for "eventually" to be in my lifetime.  Now, I'd put it at 50/50.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 11:22 AM (8y9MW)

141 *raises hand as to question about being in a funk*

I still can't believe That Fucking Guy was re-elected. 

Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2013 11:22 AM (UOM48)

142 San Diego? If the Military moved out of San Diego and the surrounding burbs it would be Tihuana North

Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 28, 2013 11:22 AM (9Bj8R)

143 @94

The problem  is Trust can not buy guns, only people with an id can.  There is no real way to transfer a gun already in possession to a trust.  You need some proof of the transfer.  That would mean selling the guns to the trust.  The trust can not get approve for the sale.


See it's a circular argument. A bill of sale to the trust would not remove the name of the last owner, UNLESS that owner had an Id.   This is why there are FFL's that own the guns before you buy them.

Bottom line, sound like a bad lawyer to me.

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 11:22 AM (wR+pz)

144

The goal sought is [disarmament] socialism, period. Accomplished bit by bit. But none of those bits are "reasonable" or "common sense" as they are admittedly simply elements of the intended goal, which is [complete disarmament] socialism.

 

 

Posted by: CJ at January 28, 2013 11:23 AM (9KqcB)

145 I read somewhere that the democrats know they can't push through most of this but are doing it to divide the base with the repub establishment, depress the base so that they can win back the House, at which time they can push through the gun grabbing and amnesty and every other miserable dream legislation they have in mind to bring about the destruction of the Middle class and capitalism. All they are doing now is to soften public opinion so the public will be more open to it in 2 yrs.

Posted by: L, elle at January 28, 2013 11:23 AM (0PiQ4)

146 If the feds start to take records from licensed dealers I hope dealers respond by destroying their records and "getting robbed".

Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at January 28, 2013 11:23 AM (xAtAj)

147 135 Joncelli,

It can but it needed ruthlessly defended and the "greatest generation" God help me for saying this refused to spank the kids....

we're not blameless either but this was decided when Teddy kennedy got away with his games on immigration coupled with letting the smelly ass hippy fucks take over schools and the media.....

we're fucked.

Posted by: sven10077 at January 28, 2013 11:24 AM (LRFds)

148 #109

OK. . .didn't read what you wrote.

In San Diego, apparently the cops can carry whatever they like, so long as its approved by the rangemaster.  Lots of them DO carry 1911s, including the chief.

Posted by: looking closely at January 28, 2013 11:24 AM (PwGfd)

149 Now, I'd put it at 50/50. --- And there's only a 10% shot of that.

Posted by: Captain Ed Hocken at January 28, 2013 11:24 AM (e0xKF)

150 Hey, we should just disarm San Diego. It worked out just fine for our neighbors in Tijuana!

Posted by: wooga at January 28, 2013 11:24 AM (arbYd)

151 146 If the feds start to take records from licensed dealers I hope dealers respond by destroying their records and "getting robbed". --- It's the damndest thing... they were in the fireproof safe back at the house and we had a fire so hot the contents of the safe disintegrated!

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:25 AM (e0xKF)

152 **But rounding up 310,000,000 guns --- at least 100,000,000 of which you could stow in a lunchbox --- that's going to be a piece of cake? ** you don't understand, you are easier to control because you mostly follow the law. Plus, the law doesn't apply to liberal complaint groups, especially now that the left has decided to import the PRI's voting block from mexico so that they can be in charge of things here for the next 89 years

Posted by: joeindc44 wonders if anyone has any advice for the GOP at January 28, 2013 11:25 AM (QxSug)

153 A lot of people are not complying with Il Duce's command in New York, so that feller's opinion strikes me as a bit overoptimistic. 

Posted by: Aaron at January 28, 2013 11:25 AM (Tlix5)

154 145 L, elle,

Well I am making up my mind on staying or leaving and frankly I'm leaning towards leaving.

"Honest" John Boehner invoking secret meetings on immigration just maxed my fuck you we're fucked meter.

Posted by: sven10077 at January 28, 2013 11:25 AM (LRFds)

155 Bottom line, sound like a bad lawyer to me.

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 03:22 PM (wR+pz)


Maybe the trust can have a tragic boating accident.

Posted by: joncelli at January 28, 2013 11:25 AM (RD7QR)

156 4 Disarm the gangs and then get back to me Posted by: tmtisss at January 28, 2013 03:01 PM (rdav6) --- I agree. However, the inconvenient truth is that the gangs create the violence required to generate gun the unnecessarily high gun crime statistics they so desperately need in their attempt to persuade those on the fence. In other news, go fuck yourself San Diego.

Posted by: Socktopus at January 28, 2013 11:26 AM (1FLBb)

157 153 A lot of people are not complying with Il Duce's command in New York, so that feller's opinion strikes me as a bit overoptimistic. --- He may be right as far as California goes. In the saner parts of the country, however, I don't see it happening without a massive fight.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:26 AM (e0xKF)

158 I agree. However, the inconvenient truth is that the gangs create the violence required to generate gun the unnecessarily high gun crime statistics they so desperately need in their attempt to persuade those on the fence. In other news, go fuck yourself San Diego. --- Where's Zombie Charles Bronson when you need him?

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:27 AM (e0xKF)

159 I am begging them, with tears in my eyes, not to try this.

Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 28, 2013 11:27 AM (evdj2)

160

@142

 

No, its a loophole for the NFA (national firearms act). You can also use an LLC, but you'd have to pay a tax. They've been in existance for over a decade. They key would be to put in a clause removing perpetuities (say placing the trust under Florida law)

I've been looking at this myself and have a draft I'm working on.

Posted by: Sam F'n Houston Bitchez at January 28, 2013 11:27 AM (t06LC)

161 41 Go fuck yourself San Diego.

Posted by: Ron Burgandy at January 28, 2013 03:06 PM (t06LC)


Winner.

Posted by: washington nearsider at January 28, 2013 11:27 AM (fwARV)

162 Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 03:22 PM (piMMO)

It's the Baby Lambs Rule. Sorry.

Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at January 28, 2013 11:27 AM (sri11)

163 142 Billy Bob,

An LLC held in trust CAN buy guns though if the transaction is legal.

You do not have to have a Class III to rent guns ergo...

you put all three voting shares of the LLC in the trust's name.

Posted by: sven10077 at January 28, 2013 11:27 AM (LRFds)

164 I seriously doubt that dipshit could successfully disarm a puppy. Were it armed in the first place, of course.

Posted by: model_1066 at January 28, 2013 11:28 AM (7xPCu)

165 Semi-OT.  My hilarity today consists of asking liberals, "Why is the ACLU even needed today?  Is the government a threat to our liberties or something? Should we get rid of the ACLU since it's not needed?"

Their sputtering amuses me.

Funniest response yet: "The ACLU keeps majority power blocs from taking over government at the expense of minorities and in violation of the Bill of Rights and other amendments.  Often the parties named in ACLU lawsuits are governmental entities, but the real power blocs are white people, heterosexuals, Christians, etc.  Governments are targeted, not because they're powerful, rights-snatching socialists, but because they're wimps."

Posted by: Tonic Dog at January 28, 2013 11:28 AM (X/+QT)

166 Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 03:22 PM (wR+pz) 



http://www.jacksonvillelawyer.pro/lawyer-attorney-1315473.html

Posted by: BCochran1981 at January 28, 2013 11:28 AM (da5Wo)

167 SD looks all pretty but there are plenty of home burglaries, rapes, & murders. People have the right to protect themselves. Hopefully they shit can this guy. And there will always be exceptions: cops & people who can hire armed guards will be safe -- the rest of us, not so much. How commie of them!

Posted by: Baby Marmalade at January 28, 2013 11:28 AM (jwumz)

168 , Obama only has this second term to get his dreams done.
***
What makes you think he has only one four more years.

Let me make a prediction.

2013: the Reps cave, give Obama gun registration and amnesty. For the latter they throw in delaying language, Obama ignores it and registers the 20-30M illegals for the 2014 election.

2014: Dems take the House. Outcries about voter fraud go nowhere. A few prominent conservatives publicly declare the time for deciding issues at the ballot box is over. Most Republicans call them dangerous radicals. Militias start to form in most red/purple states.

2015: Gun confiscation measure passed. Several violent stand offs occur, militias start opposing federal actions. Obama declares a state of emergency. Most establishment Republicans join the "Democrat-Republican Unity Party"

2016: 22nd Amendment repealed. President declares martial law.


Posted by: 18-1 at January 28, 2013 11:28 AM (AUeaU)

169 The Constitution isn't dead. It's resting.

Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at January 28, 2013 11:29 AM (sri11)

170 He may be right as far as California goes.

Actually, I don't think he is.  Think about it: it's so hard to get a gun in CA already that the people who have them are going to be more jealous of that right than, say, some guy in New Mexico who can pick one up at the grocery store.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 11:29 AM (8y9MW)

171

 

Think about it....

How can they possibly enforce a 'Gun Ban'?

 

If they make it "only for future purchases"...as they are claiming...then how do they tell the difference between new purchases and previously owned?

 

They would use this excuse to try to create a National Registry.

 

Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2013 11:29 AM (BZMZX)

172 But rounding up 310,000,000 guns --- at least 100,000,000 of which you could stow in a lunchbox --- that's going to be a piece of cake?

Oh rly???


Nah- they wouldn't go door to door to bust in and confiscate them.  They'd just make sure that you could never carry or use it without fear of arrest.

Any firearms people didn't turn in would become illegal and thus black market guns.  But don't worry- I'm sure that the criminal element would never get involved in the black market.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 28, 2013 11:29 AM (SY2Kh)

173 If they make guns illegal, they won't be able to confiscate all of them. But they will have a great excuse to put you in jail if they decide they want you there.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 28, 2013 11:29 AM (tmzN0)

174 The problem is Trust can not buy guns, only people with an id can. There is no real way to transfer a gun already in possession to a trust. You need some proof of the transfer. That would mean selling the guns to the trust. The trust can not get approve for the sale. ... Bottom line, sound like a bad lawyer to me.

I think it sounds like a clever lawyer scam. Presumably, the Trustee would be the person with ID. And the Trustee is going to be the lawyer. And when some court invalidates the Trust owning the guns, then... I'm sure the lawyer then has a great paper trail showing that he is actually the owner. Presto, lawyer gets himself lots of free guns.

Posted by: wooga at January 28, 2013 11:30 AM (arbYd)

175 On the other hand, we have this officer: http://bit.ly/SC7pE0

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:30 AM (piMMO)

176 169 The Constitution isn't dead. It's resting.

Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 28, 2013 03:29 PM (sri11)


There was also a prolonged squawk in 1966. 

Posted by: model_1066 at January 28, 2013 11:30 AM (7xPCu)

177 I am begging them, with tears in my eyes, not to try this.

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, consider that you might be mistaken."

Yeah... that didn't end well either.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 11:31 AM (8y9MW)

178

It's not that hard to find the guns.

 

Once the kids see all the positive attention they get at school for turning in their dad and grandparents, a lot of the hidden guns will be found.

 

Maybe a few Jews in the attic too.

Posted by: jwest at January 28, 2013 11:31 AM (ZDsRL)

179 If the feds start to take records from licensed dealers I hope dealers respond by destroying their records and "getting robbed". I'm sensing a business opportunity. "It's the damndest thing occifer. Someone broke in to my gunstore in the middle of the night and all they took were my books!"

Posted by: rickb223 at January 28, 2013 11:31 AM (GFM2b)

180 Once I thought about it, I knew it would fail eventually. I just never thought (until recently) that it would be possible for "eventually" to be in my lifetime. Now, I'd put it at 50/50.

Jefferson and others didn't think it would last two generations.

What's amazing to me about the Founders is that, unlike pretty much every intellectual movement that came after, the Founders didn't think they had the answer to everything.

They thought about structure and figured that almost every new idea was a bad idea because...it wasn't new.

The big problem with all of these Left-wing movements is that they all agree that things need to "change" and they all have in mind what the change should be.  However, it's all different.

Posted by: AmishDude at January 28, 2013 11:32 AM (T0NGe)

181 176 169 The Constitution isn't dead. It's resting. Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 28, 2013 03:29 PM (sri11) There was also a prolonged squawk in 1966. --- It's pining for the fjords.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:32 AM (e0xKF)

182 Once I thought about it, I knew it would fail eventually. I just never thought (until recently) that it would be possible for "eventually" to be in my lifetime. Now, I'd put it at 50/50. Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at January 28, 2013 03:22 PM (8y9MW) I'd put it at 50/50 that it's by the end of this year. I'm not really joking.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 28, 2013 11:32 AM (VtjlW)

183 Well the Fast-N-Furious gambit to create the gun crisis backfired. I wonder just how badly the Sandy Hook crisis will backfire. One thing's for certain: the gun-grabbers are milking things for all they're worth.

And check out the hassling of Jason Mattera (http://tinyurl.com/avpw3lh) for simply asking Gun-Grabber Bloomberg about his security detail and Hizzoner's denying citizens their own protection.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 28, 2013 11:32 AM (eHIJJ)

184 I hope the leftist dipshits think this through better than they  did with Obamacare. Unintended consequences which include  acute  lead poisoning aren't a good plan.

Posted by: Roy at January 28, 2013 11:32 AM (VndSC)

185 I predict a long, slow, socialist decline. Not collapse.

That's with 75% certainty.

Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 45% more DOOM! at January 28, 2013 11:33 AM (xAtAj)

186 I think it sounds like a clever lawyer scam. Presumably, the Trustee would be the person with ID. And the Trustee is going to be the lawyer. And when some court invalidates the Trust owning the guns, then... I'm sure the lawyer then has a great paper trail showing that he is actually the owner. Presto, lawyer gets himself lots of free guns.

Posted by: wooga at January 28, 2013 03:30 PM (arbYd)

 

Trustee is usually the Settlor (creator). I would emphasize that once again these have been around for over a decade, and are routinely ok'd by the ATF for SBRs, Supressors, and machine guns (NFA goodies). Legit. Not a scam.

Posted by: Jollyroger at January 28, 2013 11:33 AM (t06LC)

187 Once I thought about it, I knew it would fail eventually. I just never thought (until recently) that it would be possible for "eventually" to be in my lifetime. Now, I'd put it at 50/50.
***
Our last hope is that John Boehner finds a pair. He has enough power to stop Obama right now, if he wants, as the majority leader of the most powerful element of the government - the House.

Unfortunately, it isn't going to happen, and we are going to get to see, in person, in the next four years, what happens when the government formally severs itself from the Constitution.

Posted by: 18-1 at January 28, 2013 11:33 AM (AUeaU)

188 You'll get my guns one piece at a time. Starting with the used ammo.

Posted by: CraigPoe at January 28, 2013 11:33 AM (BVkEs)

189 Oh hell.  Is this a photoshop?

From Moonbattery:

http://tinyurl.com/aorblc2

Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2013 11:33 AM (UOM48)

190 2016: 22nd Amendment repealed. President declares martial law. Democrats in Washington don't want Obama to be president for life. Enough covet the office and its power that they'll tell him to go home when his term is up. It wasn't just Republicans who were sick of FDR.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 28, 2013 11:33 AM (kdfQ/)

191 @166

Alright then, I have six LLC they are 98% owned by my sons, when I die they get the controlling 2%.  Please explain to me how I am going to buy a gun in an LLC?  They will want an id, mine.  If not, I have six pistol permits and I'll buy some guns.

Better yet, I know Larry Hyatt, he owns the largest independent gun store in the country.  I'll go down tomorrow and ask him to sell me some shit in my LLC's name.


What to take bets how that is going to work out? 

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 11:34 AM (wR+pz)

192 I'd put it at 50/50 that it's by the end of this year. I'm not really joking. --- And I wasn't joking either when I said "and there's only a 10% chance of that." It's coming, barring something major happening in the next few months, because We The People are getting ass-fucked by the Democrats and a bunch of go-along-to-get-along RINOs.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:34 AM (e0xKF)

193 Our last hope is that John Boehner finds a pair.

With all due respect, this statement doesn't pass the straight face test.

Posted by: joncelli at January 28, 2013 11:35 AM (RD7QR)

194 Well the Fast-N-Furious gambit to create the gun crisis backfired. I wonder just how badly the Sandy Hook crisis will backfire. One thing's for certain: the gun-grabbers are milking things for all they're worth. *** Well, there is one parent of a Sandy Hook victim who has his head on straight. He said they could name the law after his own son and he would still not want it to pass.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:35 AM (piMMO)

195 the refuse to round up the illegals and ship them home but they are willing to gather up all the guns and melt them down.....great

Posted by: phoenixgirl at work & a member of NRA at January 28, 2013 11:35 AM (JT/Hz)

196 As an LI commenter noted, it looked odd that the chief was wearing his gunbelt during the interview. I also noticed the DC Metro Police Chief wearing hers on CSPAN's "Q and A" last night.

Posted by: derit at January 28, 2013 11:35 AM (I88Jc)

197 148 #109

OK. . .didn't read what you wrote.

In San Diego, apparently the cops can carry whatever they like, so long as its approved by the rangemaster. Lots of them DO carry 1911s, including the chief.

Posted by: looking closely at January 28, 2013 03:24 PM (PwGfd)







Yeah, I was wondering where NYPD was coming from.

I'm surprised about SD letting them use 1911s. It's almost unheard of for a med to large PD.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 28, 2013 11:35 AM (TIIx5)

198 181 176 169
The Constitution isn't dead. It's resting.


Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 28, 2013 03:29 PM (sri11)

There was also a prolonged squawk in 1966.

---

It's pining for the fjords.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 03:32 PM (e0xKF)


You couldn't make that constitution 'voom' if you put four million volts through it!  Forty million FSA votes, that's another matter.

Posted by: model_1066 at January 28, 2013 11:36 AM (7xPCu)

199 182 AlexTheChick,

Neither am I the longest arc is 8-12 years....that's it tops.

They pass Amnesty they will microtarget enough Red municipalities it is over.

Posted by: sven10077 at January 28, 2013 11:36 AM (LRFds)

200 Trustee is usually the Settlor (creator). I would emphasize that once again these have been around for over a decade, and are routinely ok'd by the ATF for SBRs, Supressors, and machine guns (NFA goodies). Legit. Not a scam. *** Yeah. I've dealt with David Goldman, here in Jax, and he's a lover of guns and gun owners. He's not out to rob anyone.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:36 AM (piMMO)

201

@191

 

I will tell you its routine for NFA goods. A lot of people place their NFA items in the trust in the first place, and many gunstores here in Texas have a lawyer they will refer you to or have a form sitting by. I think the ATF just checks the trustee's info. The NFA check is also way more streneous than a regular check, so if it passes that, a regular check is no problem at all.

Posted by: Jollyroger at January 28, 2013 11:37 AM (t06LC)

202 BlueStateRebel: "Exactly how the Jews must have been feeling circa 1938..."

A decade ago, that'd be called a Godwin hyperbole. Now, it's becoming truth. A cold wind is blowing across the land. Brace yourselves and try to remember where the canoe tipped over when you lost your, um, braces.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 28, 2013 11:37 AM (eHIJJ)

203 Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 03:34 PM (wR+pz)



Did you actually read anything that people responded to you with? Did you read the short commentary at the website? Just because you don't like/understand something, that doesn't make it invalid. Get a grip.

Posted by: BCochran1981 at January 28, 2013 11:37 AM (da5Wo)

204 Our last hope is that John Boehner finds a pair. So. We're fucked then. Good to know.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 28, 2013 11:37 AM (VtjlW)

205 Democrats in Washington don't want Obama to be president for life
***
Oh, they will argue it isn't for life. Just, with "the troubles" we need steady leadership right now. There will still be an election in 2016. Obama will be the only candidate on the ballot in all 50 states though. As will be the case in 2020.


Posted by: 18-1 at January 28, 2013 11:37 AM (AUeaU)

206 195 PhoenixGirl,

you gte it they do NOT work "for us" they think we work at their leisure "for them"

Article V blow this up and start over.

Posted by: sven10077 at January 28, 2013 11:37 AM (LRFds)

207 @166

One more note.  I am not buying Class III weapons.


http://tinyurl.com/y3mwr9h

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 11:37 AM (wR+pz)

208 the refuse to round up the illegals and ship them home but they are willing to gather up all the guns and melt them down.....great **** Cash for clunkers?

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:37 AM (piMMO)

209 @57 - I lived in SD for four years.  Occasionally, they would have a free admission day at the zoo.  Well, we made the HUGE mistake of going one year when a friend of mine was in town visiting.  If you have ever seen the Star Trek episode, The Mark of Gideon, it was just like that....wall-to-wall friggin' people.  You literally had to keep your arms at your sides and squeeze through the crowds.  It was awful.  Ever since that day in 1996, I have NEVER gone anywhere where there was free admission or something was being given away for free.

Posted by: bicentennialguy at January 28, 2013 11:38 AM (vg8iE)

210 From Moonbattery:

http://tinyurl.com/aorblc2

Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2013 03:33 PM (UOM4



Oh that's funny....

Posted by: © Sponge at January 28, 2013 11:39 AM (xmcEQ)

211

@207

 

Doesn't matter. Works the same way.

Posted by: Jollyroger at January 28, 2013 11:40 AM (t06LC)

212 204 Our last hope is that John Boehner finds a pair.


So. We're fucked then. Good to know.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Team Stompy. at January 28, 2013 03:37 PM (VtjlW)


Oh he'll find a pair....they won't be his, though.

Posted by: model_1066 at January 28, 2013 11:40 AM (7xPCu)

213 With the current generation of teens and 20 year olds, which is barely sentient, inarticulate, and utterly devoid of critical thinking...yeah, the powers that be could pretty much do whatever they want with them.

Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 28, 2013 11:40 AM (Ec6wH)

214 Did you actually read anything that people responded to you with? Did you read the short commentary at the website? Just because you don't like/understand something, that doesn't make it invalid. Get a grip. *** The website you linked for Goldman is, btw, the corresponding website to the blog I linked above.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:41 AM (piMMO)

215 Get back to me when you stop the drug runners, Chief.

Posted by: Mikey NTH - sees the gods of the copybook headings on the horizon at January 28, 2013 11:41 AM (hLRSq)

216 213 With the current generation of teens and 20 year olds, which is barely sentient, inarticulate, and utterly devoid of critical thinking...yeah, the powers that be could pretty much do whatever they want with them. --- Several generations of union teaching bearing its fruits, or vegetables in this case.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 28, 2013 11:41 AM (e0xKF)

217 Cash for clunkers?>>

Bucks for Boomsticks.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at January 28, 2013 11:41 AM (81UWZ)

218 215 Get back to me when you stop the drug runners, Chief.

Posted by: Mikey NTH - sees the gods of the copybook headings on the horizon at January 28, 2013 03:41 PM (hLRSq)


Then who would sign the White House visitor guest book?

Posted by: model_1066 at January 28, 2013 11:42 AM (7xPCu)

219 Oh, they will argue it isn't for life. Just, with "the troubles" we need steady leadership right now. There will still be an election in 2016. Obama will be the only candidate on the ballot in all 50 states though. As will be the case in 2020. They explicitly won't want that. There are 535 people in Washington who want to be president. If Barry tries to hog the office, he'll be back in Chicago with lightning speed. Barry can run roughshod over us. Over them is a different matter. There will be some other Democrat in power in 2016.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 28, 2013 11:42 AM (ytax8)

220 It was awful. Ever since that day in 1996, I have NEVER gone anywhere where there was free admission or something was being given away for free.

So that's why you never come by anymore

Posted by: Sandra Fluke at January 28, 2013 11:43 AM (SY2Kh)

221 Did you actually read anything that people responded to you with? Did you read the short commentary at the website? Just because you don't like/understand something, that doesn't make it invalid. Get a grip.

Posted by: BCochran1981 at January 28, 2013 03:37 PM (da5Wo) 


Yes, I read them.  Seem like this only apply to Class III weapons.  As I said earlier, I will try tomorrow to buy some gun in one of my LLC's.


What to bet how that is going to work out? 


By the way, I also have a GRAT, I am not unfamiliar with trusts.  You think a guy that is going to die broke (he he) hasn't figured some things out?

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 11:43 AM (wR+pz)

222 Takes for sale sign off Bushmaster . Sighs

Posted by: awkward davies at January 28, 2013 11:43 AM (USjX1)

223 The website you linked for Goldman is, btw, the corresponding website to the blog I linked above.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 03:41 PM (piMMO)



Yeah, I know. That's how I found it. Sorry, should've passed along that it was from your link.

Posted by: BCochran1981 at January 28, 2013 11:43 AM (da5Wo)

224 Okay so the goal not to stop gun violence or eliminate gun crime it's to disarm America with its Constitutionally protected right to bear Arms.

That's the kind of stretch that needs a rope and a scaffold there ocifer.



Posted by: ontherocks at January 28, 2013 11:44 AM (aZ6ew)

225 I still say the key to future power on this land is the Air Force nuclear weapons arsenal. Fortuitously, the world's largest repository of nuclear weapons is in Bayou country. A strike on Washington DC would, shall we say, change the argument.

Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 28, 2013 11:44 AM (Ec6wH)

226 I am begging them, with tears in my eyes, not to try this.

Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 28, 2013 03:27 PM (evdj2)








Heh. Nice reference to Gen Mattis' infamous quote.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 28, 2013 11:45 AM (TIIx5)

227 Worked so well on the war on drugs now near 40 years old. If only they made meth and cocaine illegal and filled the jails with druggies and criminals related to sale and distribution of drugs there would be no one shot by crossfire in Chicago in a drug war turf battle. 

Posted by: Trevor (@tjexcite) at January 28, 2013 11:45 AM (Ea64Y)

228 Oh and BC, nothing will make me happier if Larry sells me some guns to my LLC. 

Just wondering how my name on the pistol permit is going to get changed to the LLC?

Not going to happen.

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 11:45 AM (wR+pz)

229 Yeah, I know. That's how I found it. Sorry, should've passed along that it was from your link. *** No no no. That wasn't what I meant. I just meant that if you were interested, I had also linked his blog above.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:45 AM (piMMO)

230

67 million guns have been sold since Obama took office the first time.

 

Well done asshole, well done.

Posted by: The Jackhole at January 28, 2013 11:46 AM (nTgAI)

231 BC, did you see anything at the show that made your trigger finger itch?

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:46 AM (piMMO)

232 231 67 million guns have been sold since Obama took office the first time.

Well done asshole, well done.

Posted by: The Jackhole at January 28, 2013 03:46 PM (nTgAI)


Hey, credit where it's due.

Posted by: model_1066 at January 28, 2013 11:47 AM (7xPCu)

233 67 million guns have been sold since Obama took office the first time. Well done asshole, well done. *** Since he took office... I wonder if that includes the numbers sold in anticipation of and immediately following his election. I bought my gun about a week after he was elected.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:47 AM (piMMO)

234

 

The media makes major money off of Presidential Elections.

It is a big cash cow for them.

 

They make money off the Primaries...they make money all during the General Election.

 

You think they will be onboard with doing away with that?

 

While the useful idiots in front of the cameras may like the idea of having Barky as a Preezy-for-Life...their bosses won't.

 

Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2013 11:47 AM (BZMZX)

235

@222

 

They'll prbably check you out, but it really happens all. the. fucking. time. With class 3 shit.

 

Go to the NFA section at ar15.com

Hell, I know 3 guys in my office that have done it, and another 1 that is in the process.

Posted by: Jollyroger at January 28, 2013 11:48 AM (t06LC)

236

If you really want to collect an arsenal of Class III weapons, do it like this.

 

File the simple forms to start a non-profit, educational organization.  If you live in West Bumfuck, file the forms for the West Bumfuck Museum of Firearms.

 

Use grant money to purchase the arms by making requests showing you're displaying "banned" guns and want to continue adding to the display.  Cover the BATF regs by showing you're not a gun nut, but a serious achedmic studying scary guns.

 

Of course, house the exhibit in a trailer so that it can be moved easily (or heaven forbid, stolen).

Posted by: jwest at January 28, 2013 11:49 AM (ZDsRL)

237 I just suddenly had an image cross my mind of Rand Paul sitting in for Paul Ryan in the VP debate.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:49 AM (piMMO)

238 Oh and BC, nothing will make me happier if Larry sells me some guns to my LLC.

Just wondering how my name on the pistol permit is going to get changed to the LLC?

Not going to happen.

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 03:45 PM (wR+pz)

 

Buy it in your name, transfer to the LLC. Have a receipt. Done.

Posted by: Jollyroger at January 28, 2013 11:49 AM (t06LC)

239

Anybody think this fascist blackshirt has any intention of disarming himself or his troops.

Ask yourself this. What is the justification for arming police any differently than civilians?  (Moreover, what is Feinstein's justification for allowing RETIRED cops to have greater rights under the Second Amendment than anybody else?)

Under our Constitution, a police officerÂ’s right to use a firearm is governed by standards that are identical to those that govern a civilianÂ’s use of a firearm.   A civilian police officer has no lawful right to use a firearm that is greater than, or is any different than, a civilianÂ’s right.

Supreme Court authority about this is monolithic. A police officer may only use deadly force to defend himself or another from a significant threat of death or serious physical injury. That is precisely the same standard governing a civilianÂ’s use of deadly force. Given that the standards are identical ,then it only follows that police officers have no right or necessity to be armed in any way superior to civilians.  If a police officer or Secret Service agent  "needs" an M-16 to defend himself or others from a significant threat of death or serious physical injury, then so do I.

Please, push back on this. IÂ’d be interested to hear the counter-argument.

Posted by: D Boone kilt a bar on this tree at January 28, 2013 11:50 AM (Xv7f/)

240 237
If you really want to collect an arsenal of Class III weapons, do it like this.

File the simple forms to start a non-profit, educational organization. If you live in West Bumfuck, file the forms for the West Bumfuck Museum of Firearms.

Use grant money to purchase the arms by making requests showing you're displaying "banned" guns and want to continue adding to the display. Cover the BATF regs by showing you're not a gun nut, but a serious achedmic studying scary guns.

Of course, house the exhibit in a trailer so that it can be moved easily (or heaven forbid, stolen).

Posted by: jwest at January 28, 2013 03:49 PM (ZDsRL)


I'd rather the feds not try to classify what weapons I possess.

Posted by: model_1066 at January 28, 2013 11:50 AM (7xPCu)

241

234...Since he took office...

 

I wonder if that includes the numbers sold in anticipation of and immediately following his election.

 

Yeah, NDH.

There were record sales going on back in 2008...*before* the election.

Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2013 11:50 AM (BZMZX)

242 I mentioned to Andy that a gun trusts piece might be good for the gun post. It seems there might be some debate about it.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:51 AM (piMMO)

243 They are expecting people that understand their God given rights protected by the Constitution to give up their guns instead of their lives?

What difference at that point does this make?

Posted by: ontherocks at January 28, 2013 11:51 AM (aZ6ew)

244

Lansdowne believes that the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut weakened the gun lobby's power and has opened the door for new gun control legislation.

"We broke the NRA," Lansdowne said off-camera.





I'm sure the criminals are applauding this assclown's stance

Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 28, 2013 11:51 AM (1Jaio)

245 238 I just suddenly had an image cross my mind of Rand Paul sitting in for Paul Ryan in the VP debate.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 03:49 PM (piMMO)


Better than an image of Ru Paul sitting in for Paul Ryan. I think.

Posted by: model_1066 at January 28, 2013 11:51 AM (7xPCu)

246 I'd rather the feds not try to classify what weapons I possess.

Posted by: model_1066 at January 28, 2013 03:50 PM (7xPCu)

 

I'm the same way, but at least my method makes it easier to get a shoulder fired anti-tank weapon.

Posted by: jwest at January 28, 2013 11:52 AM (ZDsRL)

247 Our last hope is that John Boehner finds a pair.

Posted by: 18-1 at January 28, 2013 03:33 PM (AUeaU)

 

All that stands between us and Marxist dystopia are John Boehner's balls? Great. Just great.

Posted by: troyriser at January 28, 2013 11:53 AM (vtiE6)

248 Better than an image of Ru Paul sitting in for Paul Ryan. I think. *** I was flipping channels a few months ago and saw that he... she... he... WTFE it is, had a show of his...her...own. Really? People watch that?

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:53 AM (piMMO)

249 Remember all that 'Fight the Power Brothers and Sisters!' stuff we used to spout back in the '60s? Well, we're the power now, proles, so just get all that crap out of your mind and fall into line!

We're oppressing you for your own good!

Posted by: Bill Ayres at January 28, 2013 11:53 AM (DLu2s)

250

In the four years since Barack Obama was first elected president in November 2008, an estimated 67 million firearms have been purchased in the United States. ThatÂ’s more than were sold in almost seven years before his first election.

December 2012 saw a record-shattering number of requests for criminal background checks on prospective gun buyers — more than 116,000 of those from Kansas and Missouri alone.
“Since Obama was re-elected,” said Gary Jessup of UT Arms in Kansas City, Kan., “it’s been off the chart.”
Nationwide, more than 2.7 million of those checks were recorded for December, according to statistics kept by the FBI. Since late 1998 when federal law began mandating such checks for prospective gun buyers, the only other month that exceeded the 2 million mark was November 2012 — when Obama won a second term.

 

 

Posted by: The Jackhole at January 28, 2013 11:53 AM (nTgAI)

251 @236

I have no desire to have any Class Three shit.  I thought this idea was for transferring guns to an LLC and then having the Trust own the LLC.  I see no way you can purchase a handgun in the state on NC in an LLC. 

If you have a Class Three license, you are basically a dealer.  Setting up and LLC to become a dealer would be the norm.  How does that help me?  I don't see how.  I am not going to get fingerprinted, etc to get a Class Three license.

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 11:54 AM (wR+pz)

252 new Menendez thread up

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 11:54 AM (piMMO)

253 249 Better than an image of Ru Paul sitting in for Paul Ryan. I think.

***

I was flipping channels a few months ago and saw that he... she... he... WTFE it is, had a show of his...her...own.

Really? People watch that?

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 28, 2013 03:53 PM (piMMO)


You might as well try to explain the existence of infomercials.

Posted by: model_1066 at January 28, 2013 11:54 AM (7xPCu)

254

The Sheriff is a moonbat.  He fully supports Obama's and Feinstein's gun grab and boasted about undercutting the NRA.

From the article there is petition by liberals going around for his resignation as they contend that he man-handled OWS San Diego Supporters. 

So this bag of hot air has managed to piss off both the right and left. Bravo!

Posted by: Cheri at January 28, 2013 11:55 AM (G+Wff)

255 There's no direct link to the interview that I could find. The video at the linked article is a different interview, in which he doesn't say anything about disarming all Americans.

All I could find about the controversial statement was this summary: "San Diego's Lansdowne, who plays an active role in the western region of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), said in the interview it may take a generation, but guns will eventually be taken off the streets through new laws."

This is pretty vague. Did he say *all* guns would be taken off the streets, or just some of them? He seems to be concerned about military-style assault rifles (yes, I know this is hard to define), but not handguns, shotguns, etc.

It seems to me that he probably didn't say what people are claiming he said.

Posted by: sauropod at January 28, 2013 11:57 AM (WdzGK)

256 If you have a Class Three license, you are basically a dealer. Setting up and LLC to become a dealer would be the norm. How does that help me? I don't see how. I am not going to get fingerprinted, etc to get a Class Three license.

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 03:54 PM (wR+pz)

 

Its not a class 3 license. Paperwork is the same. You can use a trust, or an llc.A lot of people go the trust route. The sample I'm looking at has regular guns and a special section for NFA ones to be owned by the LLC. Why couldn't you buy a regular handgun and then transfer it to an LLC? Class 3 is more stringent, so if it works there, ergo it should work for regular firearms.

Posted by: Jollyroger at January 28, 2013 11:58 AM (t06LC)

257 Yeah, total disarmament is the goal. We, who Ace once described as "gun dick strokers" have always known this. This knowledge is the source of our radical opposition. I'm glad so many who could not see this perviously are now enlightened.

Posted by: maddogg at January 28, 2013 11:58 AM (OlN4e)

258 Buy it in your name, transfer to the LLC. Have a receipt. Done.

Posted by: Jollyroger at January 28, 2013 03:49 PM (t06LC)

That was my point earlier.  Having a receipt from the LLC will not get my name off the gun.  The burden, if anything is done with the gun, will be on me to prove I sold the gun.  Trust me, I know how to own shit in LLC.  ALL my cars, boats and other toys are in my LLC's name.  I highly recommend that for your cars especially.  They can not run a trace on my LLC to see who is driving or whether or not I have a CC. 

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 11:59 AM (wR+pz)

259 252 Billy Bob,

Get in your car, go to the nearest range that rents guns and ask how they own the guns.

I am not in Carolina Del Nor er New York del Sur but in Ohio LLC's own non class 3 firearms.

"Good luck"

Posted by: sven10077 at January 28, 2013 11:59 AM (LRFds)

260 Enough, sorry for the thread jack.  Will report in on purchase attempt tomorrow.


Have I talked to you about "Herba Life"?

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 12:01 PM (wR+pz)

261 Counter-cultural icon William S. Burroughs once protested, "After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military." Of course, the same twits who'll gladly talk up WSB's free stance regarding their vice of choice always dismiss this by telling you that WSB famously, drunkenly William Telled his wife with his pistol, and hid behind his family's money to evade the law. As if that delegitimizes the separate sentiment and ends the subject. God forbid they reply the same about Ted Kennedy necessitating strict car control.

Posted by: Buddy PC at January 28, 2013 12:01 PM (jfUIE)

262 260 Billy Bob,

Billy Bob if you are the controlling officer of the LLC the LLC has ownership of the firearm you carry.

You seem like a savvy guy talk to 2 groups.

1) an armed personal protection company and see how they handle company guns for carry and what laws are involved and

2)an indoor range that rents guns.

You are either adding unnecessary complexity to the paradigm or not in NC only way to find out is to ask or hire a lawyer.

Posted by: sven10077 at January 28, 2013 12:02 PM (LRFds)

263

Lansdowne believes that the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut weakened
the gun lobby's power and has opened the door for new gun control
legislation.

"We broke the NRA," Lansdowne said off-camera.



By broke I guess he means doubled their membership. 

 

And even though the Chief Kelly in NYC conceded that most of the crimes are committed overwhelmingly by illegally possessed handguns he still supports the AWB and puts the blame on the high gun related crimes in NYC to other states and their ability to sell these devil tools.

Posted by: polynikes at January 28, 2013 12:04 PM (m2CN7)

264

@260

What are you trying to get out of exactly? As of right now there is no restriction on transferring guns. Do it now, they pass someting later, you're grandfathered and they can't come after you with an ex-post facto law.

The llc owns the weapon, and say if Feinstien wants to prohibit transfers altogether, so what? Just transfer ownership in the LLC. It will last for perpetuity. (Yes I am a lawyer)

If you want out of any kind of background check, head to MLK blvd in any major city, there are probably a few guns you can buy FTF.

Posted by: Jollyroger at January 28, 2013 12:04 PM (t06LC)

265 One advantage of the AR15 is the way it is registered. Oh you want it back? Here is the registered stripped lower you are looking for. (insert jedi joke)

Posted by: nip at January 28, 2013 12:06 PM (11Tdq)

266 We'll be home by Christmas!

Posted by: Gen Lansdowne at January 28, 2013 12:10 PM (SzAZ7)

267 Of course, the same twits who'll gladly talk up WSB's free stance regarding their vice of choice always dismiss this by telling you that WSB famously, drunkenly William Telled his wife with his pistol, and hid behind his family's money to evade the law. As if that delegitimizes the separate sentiment and ends the subject. God forbid they reply the same about Ted Kennedy necessitating strict car control.

Posted by: Buddy PC at January 28, 2013 04:01 PM (jfUIE)

 

There's been conjecture--and I believe it--that Burroughs deliberately nailed his wife between the eyes with that little party trick. Burroughs was a slimy, lowlife pedophile--something anyone would know about him if they bothered to read a single random paragraph from, say, 'The Wild Boys'. In his thinly-veiled autobiographical novel, 'Junkie', Burroughs pretends to be a desperate, streetwise junkie living on the edge. In truth, his family (old St. Louis money) bankrolled his depraved adventurism his entire life. He was always the tourist, free to leave and go whenever and wherever he wanted.

 

I was a Literature major in college. In an attempt to win over the professor, an enthusiastic Beat afficionado, I did a make-or-break term paper on Burroughs which required that I read everything he wrote. Wanted to take a shower afterwards. What an asshole. What a slimeball. What a sleaze.

Posted by: troyriser at January 28, 2013 12:12 PM (vtiE6)

268 @266

It has never occurred to me to put guns in an LLC, for the reason I mentioned earlier, it will not remove my name from the gun.  I also have personal property tax concerns.  If I transfer the guns to the LLC, they will have to list the property and pay property tax on them.  Listing them might be a wise move to prove that the transfer really did occur, but now I am paying no property tax on them except the standard rate for my personal belongings in my home.

I'll have to work on this.  I also might not want to list guns on an LLC tax return that currently are completely invisible.  By trying to get some of my guns invisible I might be shooting myself in the foot by making others visible.



People make good money with Amway too?

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 12:13 PM (wR+pz)

269 Soon San Diego will be as free as guns as it is of drugs and illegal immigrants.

Posted by: Chief Lansdowne at January 28, 2013 12:14 PM (SzAZ7)

270 36 Is this whole thing starting to move very rapidly or is it just my perception?

Because it feels like it's snowballing.

Exactly how the Jews must have been feeling circa 1938... Posted by: BlueStateRebel

Uhhhh, NO, because by 1938, Jews had already lost their German citizenship, were barred from civil service and various professional jobs, were routinely boycotted, and had no lobbying organization.

Posted by: SFGoth at January 28, 2013 12:16 PM (dZ756)

271 Guns should renamed Gays, so that the Democrats will have to get everyone a Gun, I mean a Gay

Posted by: edmund at January 28, 2013 12:18 PM (Bjz58)

272

Sometimes cultures and values collide.  Then a choice must be made, whose is  the superior culture?

Upon being appointed to govern a province in the British Raj, Gen. Sir Charles Napier ended the Hindu practice of suttee which was the practice of burning a manÂ’s widow alive on his funeral pyre.  The local Hindu leadership complained about the prohibition of suttee and Sir Charles gave a reply for the ages on what happens when values and cultures collide.  One, or the other, must give way:

“You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours.”

And THAT was the end of sutteei.

So too, I fear, will it be with this collision of cultures and values.  Molon labe.

Posted by: History major at January 28, 2013 12:22 PM (Xv7f/)

273

@270

 

By all intents and purposes, for a regular non class 3 weapon, saying you sold it makes it invisible. You don't report anything else to anyone. If you want invisible from inception, buy face to face from an individual.

Posted by: Jollyroger at January 28, 2013 12:23 PM (t06LC)

274 Sorry.  Forgot.

Posted by: History major at January 28, 2013 12:30 PM (Xv7f/)

275 Hey, all those  paranoid gun owners are right.

Posted by: Hepcat at January 28, 2013 12:35 PM (gBUvl)

276 This police chief is targeting everyone b/c most of the gun violence in San Diego is caused by gangs and Mexican drug cartels. But that would be "racist" to admit, so disarm everyone!

I'm sure the criminals will cooperate too.  Yeah, right. It would be a blood bath if they went into the barrio to get the weapons.

Posted by: pj at January 28, 2013 12:38 PM (ZWaLo)

277

Occasionally, they would have a free admission day at the zoo. Well, we made the HUGE mistake of going one year when a friend of mine was in town visiting.

Posted by: bicentennialguy at January 28, 2013 03:38 PM (vg8iE)

 

My family and I went to the last day of the SD county fair, and rather than going to visit the zoo, it was as if the zoo came to visit us.

 

It looked like the bar scene from Star Wars. All manner of tatted up Third World gang banger types were in evidence, with not a single baseball hat on the right way around.

 

On having to pass through a metal detector to get in I felt a bit uneasy, but once I saw the clientele, I was actually glad.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 28, 2013 12:39 PM (IDSI7)

278

Guns should renamed Gays, so that the Democrats will have to get everyone a Gun, I mean a Gay

 

Great idea. We could paint 'em pink, and then claim that gun control was an effort to oppress women and homosexuals.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 28, 2013 12:42 PM (IDSI7)

279 In the original Washington Guardian article, the above quote no longer exists.  I wonder if they got some heat?

Posted by: I Callahan at January 28, 2013 12:43 PM (pTlmk)

280 Contained in the newly signed NY SAFE Act (gun control law) is the requirement that a widower/widow place all firearms owned by a deceased with "the authorities", to be held while a sale is arranged by the administrator of the deceased's will.  The spouse and/or family of the deceased are NOT permitted to inherit any firearms.  So, if not voluntarily turned in by the family, the authorities would have to confiscate that property.  ( I think the family is prohibited from buying any of the guns as well)

The rules regarding the sale of the firearms in these situations are (purposefully) unclear, but what is clear is that if the firearms are not sold legally within one year of the death of the owner, the state destroys the guns, and the living spouse/family will NOT be compensated a single penny.

How do ya like me now?

Posted by: GrandeMe at January 28, 2013 12:48 PM (i0yTO)

281 @275

Jolly, I know.  I have several throw away pistols from various Eastern Block countries that have no history.

Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 28, 2013 01:02 PM (wR+pz)

282 With all due respect to Andy Cuomo, if it isn't registered, it doesn't exist.  It appears NY gun owners have figured that out already.  I'm guessing most of the ARs will not be registered in NY.  They can't steal it from the estate if they don't know about it.


Posted by: MarkD at January 28, 2013 01:25 PM (+xUiW)

283 Alternate headline: America, now drug-free!

Posted by: Publius75 at January 28, 2013 04:18 PM (HlUS4)

284

We Can Disarm America "Within a Generation"

 

No, you can't.  Go ahead and try, if you dare.

Posted by: disa at January 28, 2013 07:09 PM (R+h7Q)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
239kb generated in CPU 0.0862, elapsed 0.2697 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.232 seconds, 412 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.