January 25, 2013
— Ace Steven King wants you to pay $0.99 on Amazon to read his scary-novel (see what I did there?) thoughts on gun control.
He concludes with what he calls “a trio of reasonable measures to curb gun violence”:1. Comprehensive and universal background checks.
2. Ban the sale of clips and magazines containing more than ten rounds.
3. Ban the sale of assault weapons such as the Bushmaster and the AR-15.
I heard that from Dianne Feinstein and she didn't charge me a buck, neither.
I have a completely-obvious observation but I bothered to write it up anyway. If Steven King is going to write obvious things, and charge a buck for the job, then I can write extremely obvious things and give them away for free.
The measures being proposed are so obviously inadequate to accomplish what they purport to accomplish that a gun-righter could almost say, "Sure, let baby have his bottle, if you want these cosmetic, symbolic, futile actions to convince yourself you're a Good Person, and then you'll shut up about it, fine."
But a guns-righter can't say that. Because he realizes something: These proposed measures are in fact so obviously inadequate to accomplish what they purport to accomplish that that must not be the reason they are offered at all.
Because these measures would accomplish nothing directly, one must then wonder why they would be advanced at all; and of course the immediate realization is that they are advanced to accustom people to the ritual of giving up this and that freedom in response to some new Moral Panic.
That is, the only way we could really see gun-control benefits would be to implement an England-style complete ban.
Even there, there are still gun murders, and lots more murders with knives and pipe-wrenches! But still, that sort of complete ban would have an effect on gun violence (even if the major effect is to increase non-gun-violence).
But they cannot agitate for that, for the public would not hear of it; so instead they push measures which are deliberately calculated to be perfectly useless for attaining their stated goal, but in fact are quite useful for attaining their unstated goal, which is to say, conditioning the public to give up gun rights on a piecemeal, this-one-and-then-that-one basis such that that which cannot be accomplished in one great step can be accomplished in 40 or 100 smaller ones.
And hence the shouting, because we are, in fact, not talking about these measures in reality; we are on both sides really talking about the intended endgame of complete disarmament of the public.
If we were talking about achieving the goal of reducing the number of people killed by guns, why on earth would a gun-control advocate be extolling the shotgun as a more efficient and deadly person-killing weapon than an AR-15?
Suddenly the high lethality of the shotgun is a reason to endorse it and the relatively lesser lethality of the AR-15 is the reason to ban it?
What?
Again, this makes no sense as the measure is completely disjoined from its alleged object. If shotguns are more deadly killing machines, and we want to reduce deaths-by-guns, then we should outlaw those.
But of course that's not what we're doing. We're just picking out some guns that are currently in the news and look kinda-scary and pushing to outlaw those because those are the only ones the public would agree to ban.
And it's the "public agrees to ban" which is the important consideration, not the stated purpose of "reducing gun deaths" which is important.
The latter isn't even considered... except in the long view.
Obvious enough, I guess.
I should sell this shit on Amazon.
Posted by: Ace at
12:59 PM
| Comments (233)
Post contains 631 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at January 25, 2013 01:02 PM (QyMDY)
Posted by: Witchfinder at January 25, 2013 01:03 PM (03+wb)
I had this e-mailed to me. IÂ’m no lawyer, but if this is correct, Feinstein is clearly treading into Constitutionally settled caselaw.
United States v. Miller 1939.
Miller possessed a sawed-off shotgun banned under the National Firearms
Act. He argued that he had a right to bear the weapon under the Second
Amendment, but the Supreme Court ruled against him. Why? At the time,
sawed-off shotguns were not being used in a military application, and
the Supremes ruled that since it didnÂ’t, it was not protected. Even
though Miller lost that argument, the Miller case set the precedent that protected firearms have a military, and thus a legitimate and protected Militia use.
The military now uses shotguns regularly, but not very short, sawed-off
shotguns, but an AR-15/AK-47 type weapon is currently in use by the
military, therefore it is a protected weapon for the Unorganized
Militia, which includes just about every American citizen now that both
age and sex discrimination are illegal. (The original Militia included
men of age 17-45) Therefore any firearm that is applicable to military
use is clearly protected under Article II, and that includes all those
nasty-looking semi-automatic black rifles, including full 30 round
magazines.
Â… so much for the hunting argument
Posted by: Perry Mason at January 25, 2013 01:03 PM (e8kgV)
Such wonderful specifics. What about rifles that are not built on an AR platform? What about the other weapons that Bushmaster produces?
Bet he doesn't even know it's a brand and not a weapon model. -.- Friggin ignoramus, and second-rate author to boot.
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at January 25, 2013 01:03 PM (W/dW1)
Posted by: Country Singer at January 25, 2013 01:04 PM (mDanm)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 25, 2013 01:04 PM (mOyDx)
So, 9 rounds and we're all cool. 11 rounds, and it's the apocalypse. Do I have that right?
Posted by: pep at January 25, 2013 01:04 PM (6TB1Z)
boy this is fun!
"for the children"
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:05 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: wooga at January 25, 2013 01:05 PM (q4KYY)
I would really like to tell Stephen King that one of the reasons I got into guns in the first place was his Gunslinger series. I'd like him to feel proud about that.
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at January 25, 2013 01:05 PM (QyMDY)
Universal checks are long overdue. No galaxy's records should go unconsulted. Those guys who have the death mark on 12 systems won't slide through anymore.
Posted by: Cicero, Semiautomatic Assault Commenter at January 25, 2013 01:06 PM (QKKT0)
"I had this e-mailed to me. IÂ’m no lawyer, but if this is correct,
Feinstein is clearly treading into Constitutionally settled caselaw."
Since when has case law, the Constitution itself, precident, logic, common sense, or efficacy had any bearing on what Democrats (especially ones from CA) propose?
Posted by: Jaws at January 25, 2013 01:06 PM (4I3Uo)
or you know ban Vans and stoned people walking outside at dusk/dawn hours....
"for the children"
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:06 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Shillary at January 25, 2013 01:07 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 25, 2013 01:07 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: joncelli, with skewed priorities at January 25, 2013 01:07 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 25, 2013 01:08 PM (QF8uk)
Posted by: Red Shirt at January 25, 2013 01:08 PM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:09 PM (l86i3)
The Regulators was so bad, it should be called an 'assault book'.
Posted by: JustLikeDavidHasselhoff at January 25, 2013 01:09 PM (QyMDY)
so Mr. King is okay with the Armalite Semi-Automatic M-15 then?
He doesn't even know what he is trying to say, Stevey baby you want to ban semi-automatic rifles, based on the Eugene Stoner AR pattern capable of accepting a magazine of greater than 10 rounds.....
of course what if I buy a Ruger Mini-14 with 10 shot magazine in 5.56 is it somehow less lethal than an AR?
"no"
but this is not about getting something "done" it is about getting something "started" ain't it spider boy?
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:09 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at January 25, 2013 01:09 PM (QF8uk)
Posted by: zsasz at January 25, 2013 01:09 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Tommy, Age 8 at January 25, 2013 01:10 PM (FcR7P)
correct, then there is the original ending of "Apt Pupil" which is a little different in the novella....
yeah Dickey B I take you REALLY seriously buddy.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:11 PM (LRFds)
You know, pretty much every solid and liquid object on the planet can be used to kill people.
(*shifty eyes*)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 25, 2013 01:11 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Tommy, Age 8 at January 25, 2013 05:10 PM (FcR7P)
And then I'll show you the guns in MY house, Tommy!
Posted by: Hairy Reed at January 25, 2013 01:12 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:12 PM (l86i3)
Ace, nice of you to wake up and state what has been obvious for the rest of us bitter-clingers for a little bit.
And when I mean for a little bit I mean probably before you were born.
Posted by: John P. Squibob, channeling his inner Howard Cosell at January 25, 2013 01:12 PM (kqqGm)
Posted by: Rule #2 at January 25, 2013 01:13 PM (CypDC)
Posted by: just a suggestion at January 25, 2013 01:13 PM (KAyQl)
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 25, 2013 01:13 PM (8sCoq)
And when I mean for a little bit I mean probably before you were born.
Posted by: John P. Squibob, channeling his inner Howard Cosell at January 25, 2013 05:12 PM (kqqGm)
15-yard penalty for failing to tell him to get off your damn lawn.
Posted by: joncelli at January 25, 2013 01:13 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 25, 2013 01:13 PM (jE38p)
If this was all about ending school killings, Obama could have proposed putting an armed school resource officer (cop) in the other 2/3 of schools nationwide that don't have them already (1/3 of all schools nationwide have them) and it could have already been passed and law of the land.
Social engineering. Hope the next GOP POTUS does everything in his power including Executive Orders to end abortion. Fifty million dead from abortion since Roe V Wade. No outcry.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 25, 2013 01:14 PM (VrVBw)
It all so confusing
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 25, 2013 01:14 PM (wR+pz)
You'd think.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at January 25, 2013 01:14 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 01:14 PM (evdj2)
...if you scroll down, you get to King being quoted as saying his novels tag him as mentally ill. Huh.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 25, 2013 01:14 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Adrienne Barbeau at January 25, 2013 01:15 PM (ZIah7)
Posted by: phoenixgirl waiting for spring training at January 25, 2013 01:15 PM (H0fzi)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 25, 2013 01:15 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: brian dennehy at January 25, 2013 01:16 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Randy Weaver at January 25, 2013 01:16 PM (KAyQl)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 25, 2013 01:16 PM (+qMCO)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:17 PM (Mj6r9)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 01:17 PM (evdj2)
Do they really "need" to write about guns?
If shouting "FIRE!" in a movie house is illegal, shouldn't every word that scares people also be illegal?
SAVE OUR CHILDREN! WORD CONTROL NOW!
Posted by: gastorgrab at January 25, 2013 01:17 PM (FX38i)
at some point you've said enough words.....
//barky choom or was it Davy Crockett?
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:17 PM (LRFds)
Um, call me picky, Mr. King...but aren't all weapons by definition "assault weapons?" It ain't like I'm buying that hunting knife or pistol with the intention of fluffy bunnies and rainbows coming out of it.
Posted by: DangerGirl at January 25, 2013 01:18 PM (GrtrJ)
(*shifty eyes*)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at January 25, 2013 05:11 PM (ZKzrr)
That's just ridiculous. Would you like some leg of lamb?
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at January 25, 2013 01:18 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: MJ at January 25, 2013 01:19 PM (vl5mg)
He always got gun stuff wrong. One page a ".45" would be a revolver, the next the same gun would be a semi-auto.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 25, 2013 01:19 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:19 PM (Mj6r9)
Yeah Randy maybe you should have hit them first instead of letting them shoot your fully loaded assault baby....?
no more Wacos No more ruby ridges
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:19 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at January 25, 2013 01:19 PM (evdj2)
@44
That there should be a bumber sticker.... or on a shirt.... or something. Wasn't that one of the platforms of the DNC this last election cycle?
That's wye the dems one. Puer Jenius.
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at January 25, 2013 01:19 PM (pXUhl)
Well just because you write about evil doesn't mean you believe evil exists. You just know how to write a good story about it.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 01:19 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: OJ Simpson [/i] at January 25, 2013 01:19 PM (feFL6)
You know, pretty much every solid and liquid object on the planet can be used to kill people.
Phosgene just called and wants to talk to you.
Posted by: imp at January 25, 2013 01:19 PM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:20 PM (l86i3)
I don't mind him on the lawn, just want to remind him that the idea didn't originate in head.
Sorta like History beginning On January 20, 2009 (and re-beginning on January 20, 2013).
Posted by: John P. Squibob at January 25, 2013 01:20 PM (kqqGm)
63Gunnutter fantasies above the need for arsenals to defend liberty against governmental tyranny works out pretty well. Try it!
Posted by: Randy Weaver
"Marvel at the meta-irony of this."
Marvelling shouldn't make me feel like snapping someone's neck, should it?
Posted by: Jaws at January 25, 2013 01:20 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: UncleZeb at January 25, 2013 01:20 PM (Nvirt)
Posted by: t-bird at January 25, 2013 01:20 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Whatev at January 25, 2013 01:20 PM (lreFA)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:20 PM (Mj6r9)
Posted by: Stuff Jefferson Said, Vol. XXI (unabridged) at January 25, 2013 01:20 PM (2jQGY)
SAVE OUR CHILDREN! WORD CONTROL NOW!
Posted by: gastorgrab at January 25, 2013 05:17 PM (FX38i)
----------------------------------------------
What do you think political correctness is?
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 01:21 PM (/ZV9/)
Posted by: ElKomandante at January 25, 2013 01:21 PM (6P0lT)
Posted by: Joe 'Drunk All Week' Biden at January 25, 2013 01:21 PM (Cm5S0)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at January 25, 2013 01:21 PM (w41GQ)
Posted by: MWTexas at January 25, 2013 01:21 PM (N05oL)
Phosgene just called and wants to talk to you.
Phosgene? pfffft What a pussy.
Posted by: Gamma ray emitter at January 25, 2013 01:21 PM (6TB1Z)
It is the last backstop for Liberty. There are no hills after that one. Just a future ditch filled with corpses.
And that goes for Republicans, too. No matter what their other positions, they cannot be allowed to falter on this one.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 25, 2013 01:21 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: SMOD at January 25, 2013 01:22 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: polynikes at January 25, 2013 01:22 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:22 PM (Mj6r9)
Posted by: Noone of Consequence at January 25, 2013 01:23 PM (2kDk2)
tell Elmer Fudd the GOP will eliminate hunting in retaliation....
all or nothing...
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:23 PM (LRFds)
Medical records, financials, civil court actions, it could mean anything and everything. This is the most dangerous proposal of them all.
I'm OK with "Felony conviction checks" but that's not what they are talking about.
Posted by: forest at January 25, 2013 01:23 PM (L7wZc)
Posted by: SMOD at January 25, 2013 01:24 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 01:24 PM (0q2P7)
Ever read Stephen King's short story 'Survivor Type'?. It's about a guy who gets stranded on a barren desert island. All he has with him is a notebook and pencil, a set of surgical tools and a suitcase full of heroin.
If he had a gun with him the story would have been way less horrible. And even shorter.
Posted by: wth at January 25, 2013 01:24 PM (wAQA5)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 25, 2013 01:25 PM (1Jaio)
Every time I see one of "his" books displayed in a bookstore, it's emblazoned with STEPHEN KING filling most of the cover, and in much smaller print below something like "With author X you've never heard of".
Translation: He stuck his name on the cover to sell the book, but let someone else actually write most of it.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 25, 2013 01:25 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:25 PM (Mj6r9)
Is it evidence of your fine cooking, or your cooking of some fine evidence? Or, more to the point, did you wash it real well before it went into the oven?
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at January 25, 2013 01:25 PM (DLu2s)
A country where the populace is unarmed and the Gestapo get to run around torturing and killing honest folks who just want to live in peace and enjoy the products of their labor.
Posted by: Al at January 25, 2013 01:25 PM (V70Uh)
Maybe not but he has written many books containing vivid descriptions of dying and dead children, so maybe he believes in that.
Posted by: observer at January 25, 2013 01:25 PM (mV5Rx)
Posted by: Stuff Jefferson Said, Vol. XXVII (Appendix A) at January 25, 2013 01:25 PM (2jQGY)
Posted by: SMOD at January 25, 2013 05:22 PM (l86i3)
No, Fuck YOU, SMOD!
Where were you in November when we needed you?
You ain't bad. You a poosay!
Posted by: Jaws at January 25, 2013 01:26 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Stuff Jefferson Said, Vol. XXI (unabridged) at January 25, 2013 05:20 PM (2jQGY)
Most anti climatic scene in any series evah! A fucking spider. Are you kidding me.
Posted by: polynikes at January 25, 2013 01:26 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: chuckinseattle at January 25, 2013 01:26 PM (l2t7I)
well he was entrapped by the govt, the evidence of the crime was so underwhelming he won the case, the FBI illegally shot first w/out identification and was as violent as they could be....yeah all good examples of why we should blindly trust the govt to be benign and accepting of our rights and not engaged in partisan games....
it's like a Babushka doll of suck
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:26 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: SMOD at January 25, 2013 01:26 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: t-bird at January 25, 2013 01:27 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: MJ at January 25, 2013 01:27 PM (vl5mg)
or Michael Moore is to the relationship of diet and exercise.
Thanks anyhooo
Posted by: ontherocks at January 25, 2013 01:27 PM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: SMOD at January 25, 2013 05:26 PM (l86i3)
Promises promises
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 25, 2013 01:27 PM (1Jaio)
His politics SUCK.
Posted by: Elwood Blues at January 25, 2013 05:23 PM (MPjT
-----------------------------------------------
I still think "Salem's Lot" was his best.
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 01:28 PM (/ZV9/)
Posted by: SMOD at January 25, 2013 01:28 PM (l86i3)
Steven King...
A guy who has gotten rich from writing horror stories.
This is a guy who has illustrated...repeatedly...that there are scary people out there, who will kill us if we let them.
And how many nutjobs have gotten inspiration from the horrors that are on display in his movies?
What a fucking hypocrite!
Posted by: wheatie at January 25, 2013 01:28 PM (fH4X9)
I think simple take-that-Losers sadism is a stronger motive than any sort of frog-boiling escalation thing. All people really want from politics is for other people to get hurt right now, all the time.
Smart politicians with Plans For Us All can rise above that desire in themselves, make use of it in others, and continually notch shit up. But really, we're ruled by randomly chosen dunces. They're just angrily flailing.
That's not good either. But...it lasts a long time. Which is annoying.
Posted by: oblig. at January 25, 2013 01:28 PM (cePv8)
SMOD is like that girl.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:29 PM (Mj6r9)
Neither, really. Something so totally, Lovecraftian else-universally other that it was beyond King's ability to adequately describe (meaning he was too lazy to try so he cheaped out). In the main, though, yes, clown and spider.
Posted by: observer at January 25, 2013 01:29 PM (mV5Rx)
The guy has become even crazier since then.
Posted by: Al at January 25, 2013 01:30 PM (V70Uh)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:30 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: t-bird at January 25, 2013 05:27 PM (FcR7P)
---------------------------------------------------
To be honest, I thought "November 1962" was good. It was the best story involving time travel that I've read. The premise was sound.
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 01:31 PM (/ZV9/)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:32 PM (Mj6r9)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 25, 2013 01:32 PM (+qMCO)
Is he for or against these things? I want his ass asked that question.
Posted by: observer at January 25, 2013 01:32 PM (mV5Rx)
That killing kids is bad? Ummm yeah, we kind of get that here too. We just know that it isn't going to stop by doing the pissall stuff Feinstein suggested (QED Columbine) and disarming the citizenry is both impossible, and undesirable, and so other measures need to be considered. I would have thought a level headed guy like King could see that. Well maybe he's just a mindless drone progressive too. Just parroting the prog line.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 01:32 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:32 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: RWC at January 25, 2013 01:33 PM (fWAjv)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at January 25, 2013 01:33 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at January 25, 2013 01:34 PM (DLu2s)
Posted by: Tami[/i] at January 25, 2013 01:34 PM (X6akg)
137 I always liked Cujo.
If that woman trapped in the car by Cujo, had had an 'assault weapon'...then that would've been a short story.
Hey, maybe that's King's thinking here...
He *likes* for people to be unarmed victims.
Posted by: wheatie at January 25, 2013 01:34 PM (fH4X9)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:34 PM (Mj6r9)
Posted by: Al at January 25, 2013 01:34 PM (V70Uh)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:34 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: RWC at January 25, 2013 01:35 PM (fWAjv)
Good lord,
I've never actually read any Stephen King, but I'm told he has an "ending problem."
As in he can't end a book to save his life.
Given some of what's being written here I see why.
I quote from the WashPo Article:
"“I have nothing against gun owners, sport shooters, or hunters,” King writes, but “how many have to die before we will give up these dangerous toys? Do the murders have to be in the mall where you shop? In your own neighborhood? In your own family?”"
Wait now what? "I have nothing against you, except this obvious dripping superiority complex and hatred of you and your ilk" Is he intentionally being that unself-aware or is he just stupid?
Posted by: tsrblke at January 25, 2013 01:35 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 25, 2013 01:35 PM (p/cQy)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at January 25, 2013 01:36 PM (ndlFj)
That is who they are.
Obama's political mentor asked for 25,000,000 of us to be killed.
The media knows this, I knew this, we told folk they said "but he smiles well, and BLACK BLACK!"
Be prepared.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:36 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:36 PM (Mj6r9)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:36 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 25, 2013 01:36 PM (+qMCO)
Posted by: Liberal, with head up his ass at January 25, 2013 01:36 PM (feFL6)
That's like saying "the Chevy and the S-10". Fucking imbecile. Yet another person who speaks of things they know nothing about, and have made no effort to learn about.
He hasn't written a book worth a fuck since 1995, and the majority of the good ones were before 1985.
Posted by: MadisonConservative at January 25, 2013 01:37 PM (Y/HG5)
But little girls that start fires, devil dogs from the grave, and freaky cult leaders after mass plagues are good I guess?
Ooooo scary, scary black guns, that really terrorizes Mr. King. Yeah right, that guys head is a mass of fucked up given what he spews out on the page.
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at January 25, 2013 01:37 PM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at January 25, 2013 05:33 PM
Hate all you want, buy you know we still love you
.
Posted by: tsrblke at January 25, 2013 01:37 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at January 25, 2013 01:38 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:38 PM (Mj6r9)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:38 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: DanInMN at January 25, 2013 01:38 PM (XqeyF)
Posted by: RWC at January 25, 2013 01:39 PM (fWAjv)
Yeah, I know. Wrong thread. Is that a banning?
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 25, 2013 01:39 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at January 25, 2013 01:39 PM (P3dtw)
Alcohol?
As for reparations, I suggest not discussing spider clowns. Just a thought.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at January 25, 2013 01:40 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at January 25, 2013 01:41 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 25, 2013 01:41 PM (+qMCO)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:41 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: RWC at January 25, 2013 01:41 PM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Underground Vulgarian at January 25, 2013 01:41 PM (n2M+Z)
Funny you should tie those two together. The most disturbing thing in IT is the scene where a young barely-teen (maybe 12, can't recall) puts out "in love" to "save" her four or so 12 year old male friends from IT. Child porn fiction? King's been there and done it.
You can just tell King was jacking off when he wrote it. It made me so G-damn mad he'd sucked me in good up to that point.
Once heard he had another story where a boy was raped in a library, supposedly very vividly and descriptively.
No one tell me this coke-fried perv bastard has ANY moral ground on which to preach on ANY conceivable subject. He don't.
Posted by: observer at January 25, 2013 01:42 PM (mV5Rx)
/enjoys nice saucer of milk, coughs up hairball, stretches/
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at January 25, 2013 01:42 PM (DLu2s)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at January 25, 2013 01:42 PM (bxiXv)
I adore you and all your weird Japanese fetishes. But "puissant"? When the english word "powerful" would suffice. Does the word "pedantic" apply?
Posted by: Al at January 25, 2013 01:42 PM (V70Uh)
or humpty dumpty being about out of control intrusive govt that by modern standards was so benign it's laughable.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:43 PM (LRFds)
He obviously thought he was above writing decent endings to story arcs that encompassed seven novels, as well.
Want good, fun fiction? Read Vince Flynn or Larry Correia. I avoid King's work like the plague.
Posted by: Boogie at January 25, 2013 01:43 PM (Vm9OZ)
Hey, maybe that's King's thinking here...
He *likes* for people to beunarmed victims.
Posted by: wheatie at January 25, 2013 05:34 PM (fH4X9)
-------------------------------------------------------
Good point. You should go to his website and post that.
I also think King's back yard should be dug up after he "passes on".
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 01:44 PM (/ZV9/)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:44 PM (l86i3)
Noted genius, and munitions scholar Joey Plugz stated the reason FOR banning ARs is "that criminals don't use them."
That man's idiocy is so complete and unaware it borders on a horrid beauty like a black hole snatching stars from the ether.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 01:44 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at January 25, 2013 01:44 PM (P3dtw)
DISAGREE!
Throwing watermelons off the roofs of high buildings was hilarious. Everything else in his repertoire blew, it's true.
Posted by: pep at January 25, 2013 01:46 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:47 PM (l86i3)
The younger morons may not know that we went through the same song-and-dance in the 90's that resulting in the previous 'assault weapon' ban.
------------------------------------------------
Young whippersnapper. The bans started when JFK was assassinated. That's when they made it illegal for mail-order guns.
And those mail order guns were sweet too.
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 01:48 PM (/ZV9/)
At UCSD, the annual watermelon toss off of Urey (Nobel laureate) Hall has been going on since the early 70s.
Posted by: Al at January 25, 2013 01:48 PM (V70Uh)
>>>And those mail order guns were sweet too.
Well and have them shipped directly to you. I have mail ordered weapons to an FFL.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Offering Moobats Gasoline and Matches at January 25, 2013 01:49 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:50 PM (Mj6r9)
Noted genius, and munitions scholar Joey Plugz stated the reason FOR banning ARs is "that criminals don't use them."
That man's idiocy is so complete and unaware it borders on a horrid beauty like a black hole snatching stars from the ether.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 05:44 PM (LRFds)
Makes sense to me, theocrat wingnut. You're probably white and from the South, too. Pbbt.
Posted by: Chillah at January 25, 2013 01:50 PM (7xeJQ)
Totally anecdotal observation I admit, but it seems the higher the capacity mag the more likely a jam. Libs should be saying a 15 round mag minimum.
*don't argue anecdotal observations are good enough for global warming. Science!
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 25, 2013 01:52 PM (p/cQy)
Right, mail-order weapons sales and inexpensive revolvers AKA 'Saturday Night Specials'. And they 'dried up the supply' of them and now we have no crime! /sarc
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at January 25, 2013 01:54 PM (DLu2s)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at January 25, 2013 01:54 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: Gamma ray emitter at January 25, 2013 05:21 PM (6TB1Z)
*
Meh, go fuck yourselves.
Posted by: SMOD at January 25, 2013 05:22 PM (l86i3)
*
Shut up you tiny things.
Posted by: Hypernova SN2007bi at January 25, 2013 01:55 PM (uYNn4)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 25, 2013 01:55 PM (Mj6r9)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at January 25, 2013 01:59 PM (xjpRj)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 01:59 PM (l86i3)
well that was the last time we had an empowered collectivist corruptocrat go hog wild....
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 02:00 PM (LRFds)
still think "Salem's Lot" was his best.
Posted by: Soona at January 25, 2013 05:28 PM (/ZV9/)
=====================
Definitely his scariest. Kept me up all night once.
Posted by: Elwood Blues at January 25, 2013 02:00 PM (MPjT8)
Yup.
LBJ and a Dem congress. When RFK and MLK were killed within a few months, they had the momentum. It's almost as if they weren't letting a crisis go to waste!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at January 25, 2013 02:01 PM (GsoHv)
Posted by: Haiku Guy at January 25, 2013 02:01 PM (XPfkb)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 25, 2013 02:13 PM (l86i3)
Posted by: slug at January 25, 2013 02:14 PM (vVv3V)
This assault weapons ban has zero chance of passage in the House. So why are they pushing it? It is fairly simple if you think it through. They are asking for the moon and stars so when they 'compromise' they will get exactly what they really want.
How many times do they have to say the words 'Universal Background Check' before the light goes on? Translated from the NewSpeak that is 'Universal Gun Registration' and has been a progressive goal almost as long as universal health care. Obama has created the monster that will collapse into Universal Health Care in a couple of years and has now moved on to the next big goal.
Get national registration, wait until the lists are accurate as guns change hands, get passed down, etc. Then you just wait for another loon to go postal and collect the guns. Registration becomes confiscation 100% of the time throughout history, therefore one is essentially the same thing as the other.
Now what is the game plan to stop it? Forget the Assault Weapons bill and start planning a response to the actual plan now; lets not get caught flat footed in a month or so when they find a 'gang of' RINOs to work out a compromise with.
Posted by: John Morris at January 25, 2013 02:28 PM (sCRhB)
The correct response is "ask for everything you want Di Fi."
Then you politely explain to Boner that if he passes anything the GOP is dead.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 25, 2013 02:33 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Witchfinder at January 25, 2013 05:03 PM (03+wb)
Kudlow's another person who hasn't been worth shit since he kicked a major blow habit.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 25, 2013 02:52 PM (R4Bz0)
Posted by: Quint&Jessel, Sea of Bly, Azof, UK at January 25, 2013 03:00 PM (7v5Ct)
Posted by: Tonic Dog at January 25, 2013 03:45 PM (X/+QT)
Posted by: Pennsyltucky at January 25, 2013 03:58 PM (Rs1uj)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 25, 2013 04:46 PM (lD8ju)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 25, 2013 04:48 PM (lD8ju)
Posted by: sablegsd at January 25, 2013 07:29 PM (AKS75)
Or *Stephen* King?
Posted by: Mr Wolf, Esq at January 25, 2013 05:06 PM (fxaQz)
What difference does it make?
Posted by: sablegsd at January 25, 2013 07:31 PM (AKS75)
Posted by: Paul in NJ at January 26, 2013 10:07 AM (xoOMu)
Posted by: mkf at January 31, 2013 03:11 PM (6VjVs)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3174 seconds, 361 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna let it burn really.really bummed at January 25, 2013 01:01 PM (9+ccr)