April 21, 2013
— Open Blogger

AlextheChick: The Early Years
Good morning morons and moronettes and welcome to the randomly scattered, yet with deeper, hidden patterns Sunday Morning Book Thread here at the award-winning AoSHQ.
I don't have a big 'theme' for the book thread this time, so here are some random, book-related items that have been knocking around inside my head this week.
On the Reading of Exhausting Books
In the comments of last week's thread, Molly k. wrote:
I had been thinking about Gulag Archipelago since the day it was featured in the "reading part" of the thread. I found a used copy on Ebay and it showed up yesterday. I got through the first 40 pages last night before I fell asleep. It has potential I think but it's a slow read. The writing in the book I got is so small I almost need a magnifier to read it.
I wanted to reply to this last week, but since I am still unable to post a comment, I couldn't. So I hope Molly is here to read this. Here is what I say about that: Yes, I agree. Archipelago a slow read, and can be very tedious. At least, parts of it. For example, in the chapter on getting arrested by the commie authorities, Solzhenitsyn goes into mind-numbing detail concerning who got arrested, when they got arrested, how they got arrested, what sorts of arrests characterized different years of the post-tsarist, commie era, interspersed with eyewitness accounts of atrocities committed by the authorities, and also some of Solzhenitsyn's biographical details. This last bit is important. You can skim through much of this stuff if you like, but be careful, because without warning, Solzhenitsyn will suddenly start talking about himself, how he came to run afoul of the Soviet authorities, how he was sent to prison, etc. So you don't want to miss out on that. Also, he makes a number of references to Russian history and literature, and expects the reader to know what he's talking about. I stumbled many times over these things.
Solzhenitsyn is doing this for a reason, and not because he's a Russian writer who writes long, tedious books. He wants Lenin's/Stalin's/Krushchev's/etc. atrocities to be recorded for the sake of history so they won't be forgotten. Frequently, what he has put into print in the Archipelago series exists no one else. If it weren't for him, the commies would have succeeded in covering it up, keeping it hidden, and eventually, flushing it down the memory hole. So all of these details that read so tediously to us are vitally important to have in there, so they may be kept alive, so that the world may remember, and evil may be confronted with its own fruits.
I encourage you to stick with it. If necessary, limit your reading to a little bit at a time. I think you'll find it's worth the effort.

Mr. Sirota Insists Upon Himself
Dead Symbols
“The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.” This is the opening line of William Gibson's authoritatively famous cyberpunk novel Neuromancer. Whole essays have been written about what an awesome opening line and what an awesome novel it is, but I can't agree. It all seems so dated now. Remember when that sort of thing seemed so cool and hip? But think about that line. It only makes sense if you're old, written as it was in the days of analog television and local stations that went off the air after midnight. In these days of 24/7 cable and satellite HDTV, I think that the image of a dead television channel is less and less capable of carrying the weight that Gibson intended.
Cyberpunk pretty much shot its wad a couple of decades ago, am I right? After the movie Blade Runner, that was just about it. From what I see, people are fascinated a lot more by stories about vampires and zombies than they ever were about grimly dystopian cities with neural net electronic gizmos.
I read Neuromancer a number of years ago, back when i was told it was cool and hip, and I remember almost nothing about it now. I think it's a novel whose time has come - and gone.
Battle of the Brits
Objective criticism is probably the most difficult task anyone can ever do. Whether it's about a book, a movie, a poem, a painting, or whatever, it is extremely hard to separate "this is bad" from "I don't like this".
OK, so at this point, I think I'm ready to argue that Terry Pratchett is a better writer and deserves more honor than P.G. Wodehouse. In my view, Pratchett's characters are better developed, funnier, and his books have more variety. The tendency that prolific writers have to struggle against is doing the Same Old Thing again and again. Because coming up with fresh, new ideas is hard and writers can be lazy like the rest of us. Also, if you find something that works, you want to keep on doing it. That's a human tendency, too. I will grant that all writes rely on formula to a certain extent, and Pratchett certainly isn't exempt, but as far as the Same Old Thing goes, nobody milks the cow quite like Wodehouse. If you cut up his series of 'Jeeves' books into chapters, put them in a big box, and then accidentally drop the box, you would have a hard time figuring out what chapter went where, they all read so much alike.
I read Wodehouse and I smile. I read Pratchett and I laugh out loud.
Books For Morons
Longtime Ace reader and infrequent commenter Anwyn (who, by the way, has her own blog) e-mailed me earlier this week to recommend Ken' Wheaton's novel Bacon and Egg Man, which she thinks morons would enjoy. Why? Because
It is a snappy, hilarious read that brings up serious issues without taking itself any too seriously...Wes lives in the northeast corner of what used to be the United States. New York and its surrounding blue-state cohorts have seceded, and in the resulting Federation, original Bloomberg’s original soda ban has led to the illegality of fat and sugar and basically everything that tastes good...Wes lives the life of an average guy who works a job, makes a living at it, and keeps to himself. But he’s a drug dealer and a user—not only does he get bacon, eggs, real milk and butter, ribeyes, sausage, and yes, soda for his clients, he eats them himself...
And soon he gets caught.
In other words, we're not just living in a nanny state. We're living in a nanny Bloomberg state, which is far worse. You can read the rest of her review here. She also says (in her e-mail, not in the review):
Also, it ties right in to this post of Ace's because in this vision of the future, all the media is Gawker. Or Google, for media "utilities" like real-time weather or webcam views of pretty much anywhere. But mostly Gawker. Umpteen channels of Gawker.
Because that's just what everybody needs. More Gawker.
___________
So that's all for this week. As always, book thread tips, suggestions, rumors, and insults may be sent to OregonMuse, Proprietor, AoSHQ Book Thread, at aoshqbookthread@gmail.com.
So what have you all been reading this week? Hopefully something good, because, as we all know, life is too short to read lousy books.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
07:04 AM
| Comments (206)
Post contains 1258 words, total size 8 kb.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 21, 2013 07:09 AM (iOEg6)
This is really absurd. You need to contact Andy or Maet. They seem to be able to unstick people quickly.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at April 21, 2013 07:09 AM (X6akg)
I did read Pohl's "Merchants of Venus" but I reviewed that *last* Sunday (PM). Something about it seemed off, so I looked the guy up. Yep. Communist League until Ribbentrop-Molotov. True-believer Marxist, in short.
Posted by: boulder hobo at April 21, 2013 07:10 AM (QTHTd)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at April 21, 2013 07:12 AM (PH+2B)
Posted by: goathead at April 21, 2013 07:14 AM (bWQXp)
Posted by: Lauren at April 21, 2013 07:14 AM (wsGWu)
Excellent point about Gulag. Solzhenitsyn is acting as the first historian, not just an author.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 21, 2013 07:15 AM (/WLC3)
Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2013 07:16 AM (53z96)
Everything you need to know about the liberal mind is in that book.
Gonna go look for some 9 milly,
happy reading
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at April 21, 2013 07:18 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Janetoo at April 21, 2013 07:18 AM (R+fMx)
Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2013 07:18 AM (53z96)
"Jimmy Stewart, Bomber Pilot"' by Starr Smith is a good read about the actor's WW 2 experiences. Written after his death the stories are from those who served with him.
Already a movie star and pilot, Stewart enlisted in the Army as a Private in March 1941. He ended the war as a full Colonel in command of the 2nd Combat Bomb Wing, 8th Air Force. Before he flew B-24 bombers from England he was a B-17 bomber instructor in Idaho. Officially credited with 20 combat missions he also flew about 20 that were not credited. After the war he transferred to the reserves and retired in 1967 as a one star general.
One disappointing part of the book is a very short reference to a combat mission Stewart flew in 1966 on a B-52 over South Vietnam while on active duty. I had to find info about that mission on the web.
With the exception of the WW 2 era film about Band Leader Glenn Miller, who died December 1944 when his plane crashed, Stewart never made a WW 2 war movie. He said Hollywood never got it right. He rarely talked about his wartime experience and never allowed Hollywood to capitalize on his war record.
Posted by: ExSnipe at April 21, 2013 07:19 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2013 07:19 AM (53z96)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at April 21, 2013 07:20 AM (XvrTA)
radical moonbats will disappear the book....
The GA is on a hate list for 'college progressives'
they are into petty bullshit passive aggressive games as seen at bookstores nationwide.
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at April 21, 2013 07:22 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 21, 2013 07:23 AM (ZshNr)
On what I *have* read, I finished William T Vollman's "Europe Central" which was written very much in the manner of the Serbian writer Danilo Kis's samizdat works (the book was dedicated to him in a manner which I obviously thought was fitting) which used to infuriate the Soviets because they were written in a very Borgesian factual manner which also incorporated real characters. It dealt with German and Russian people involved in WW2 and how they got the rug pulled out from under them by both Hitler and Stalin. It is a bunch of interconnected short stories where characters from one will subsequently show up being viewed from a different perspective. A major presence throughout the book was Dmitri Shostakovich, who was continually being threatened by Stalin for his art and refused to knuckle under. Highly recommended if you like the sort of thing it was, which not everybody will. I found it fascinating.
Following that I knocked off a novella by Denis Johnson called "Train Dreams" which my youngest Hatette recommended. It was like an understated tall tale about this guy logging in the Northwest who bad things seem to happen to as he ambles his way through life. It is very well written and kept me spellbound for the short time it took me to finish it (a day and a half and I'm a *very* slow reader). It was originally published in the Partisan Review and everybody who read it liked it so much that they talked him into publishing it as a stand alone book.
I just started "Phi: A Voyage from the Brain to the Soul" by Giulio Tononi, which is a fictional work that has Galileo interacting with more modern scientists on the nature of the soul. I just started it and learned about it from a review in the WSJ which fascinated me. I think it's done somewhat in the manner of Godel, Escher, Bach which was highly recommended to me by a number of people, including fellow morons, but for some reason had a hard time getting into and put it down for a while. That might be because of my state of mind at the time and I'll try to pick it up subsequently. Anyway the current book is gorgeously illustrated and annotated which makes it quite the aesthetic experience.
Oh and also for books that I've been reading for a long time; I made some headway last night into "Freedom at Midnight" by Larry Collins and Dominiwue LaPierre about the partition of Pakistan. I keep putting it aside because I get involved with other books but I think I'll stay with it to the end this time.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 21, 2013 07:24 AM (86Ex2)
Posted by: hobbes at April 21, 2013 07:26 AM (GQLx0)
Posted by: Ragamuffin at April 21, 2013 07:27 AM (fzFF6)
Yes very slow read, I struggled through it until I got to the part where he blamed Christians for the fall and I closed it up and took it back to the library.
Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2013 07:27 AM (53z96)
Collins and LaPierre wrote a great book called "O Jerusalem," about the fight for Jerusalem during Israel's war of independence.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 21, 2013 07:28 AM (/WLC3)
Posted by: waldo at April 21, 2013 07:28 AM (y2XjR)
Posted by: RWC at April 21, 2013 07:29 AM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: pep at April 21, 2013 07:30 AM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2013 07:32 AM (53z96)
I also read "The Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc" Vols. I and II. by Mark Twain. These were ebooks on my iPhone. Free. Tough reading. Not humorous except in small doses. But good reading nonetheless.
Posted by: navybrat at April 21, 2013 07:33 AM (t1VIV)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 21, 2013 11:28 AM (/WLC3)
They're very good writers. I picked this up when I found out from my son in law that his grandfather was almost killed in the partitioning of Pakistan. Reading this certainly points out the carnage that people endured (shocking that the rock worshipers have been such disruptive murdering pieces of shit) and also what a fucking weirdo Gandhi was in ways that the entertainment/education fuckheads have sanitized.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 21, 2013 07:33 AM (86Ex2)
Posted by: The Regular Guy at April 21, 2013 07:34 AM (34Hju)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at April 21, 2013 07:35 AM (k5zTJ)
Posted by: Sabrina Chase at April 21, 2013 07:36 AM (wfSF5)
Posted by: Zakn at April 21, 2013 07:37 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: zsasz at April 21, 2013 07:37 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: The Regular Guy at April 21, 2013 07:37 AM (34Hju)
Posted by: Heh at April 21, 2013 07:37 AM (1jM8S)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 07:37 AM (l86i3)
http://tinyurl.com/chm3akr
You may have heard of this man, if you recall hearing of O'Neill space colonies or cylinders. He was a space settlement activist.
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 21, 2013 07:39 AM (cHZB7)
Posted by: motionvew at April 21, 2013 07:39 AM (6Tbb5)
Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2013 11:27 AM (53z96)
Gibbon commits a number of howlers which updated footnotes gleefully point out. He was extremely well read in putting this together but some of the blind spots point out the dangers of being an autodidact.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 21, 2013 07:40 AM (86Ex2)
Posted by: antisocialist at April 21, 2013 07:40 AM (eGr8Z)
Posted by: redmonkey at April 21, 2013 07:41 AM (OmxJU)
Posted by: The Regular Guy at April 21, 2013 11:37 AM (34Hju)
I'll second that.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 21, 2013 07:41 AM (86Ex2)
29 Capt Hate,
Glenn Beck often talks about Gandhi in a good way. I agree, I don't think he and others have read about his non peaceful acts. They only read the good parts about him.
Posted by: ExSnipe at April 21, 2013 07:41 AM (PBm/l)
I recently read "The Quest for the Lost Roman Legions", by Tony Clunn. He's a British Army officer that was fascinated by the the German destruction of the Roman legions under Varus in the Teutoberg Forest. After many years of painstaking walking the ground with a metal detector and plotting recovered items, tens of thousands of artifacts were discovered to pinpoint the location of the battle. Germany has built a museum there, near Osnabruck. It's a Roman Custer's Last Stand writ large.
Posted by: JHW at April 21, 2013 07:41 AM (B38OD)
Posted by: Jeff Spicoli at April 21, 2013 07:42 AM (OZoBY)
Re Niall Ferguson... read his book The Ascent of Money.
Re Paul Johnson... Intellectuals is a great read and reminds us that, if a politician or political theorist treats the people closest to him like shit, then what he says politically shouldn't be trusted. (A rule applicable to the past two Democratic Presidents.)
Posted by: The Regular Guy at April 21, 2013 07:43 AM (34Hju)
Posted by: jeannebodine at April 21, 2013 07:44 AM (LBBS3)
Posted by: antisocialist at April 21, 2013 07:45 AM (eGr8Z)
It's called "Instruction Manual for Ruger SR-Series."
SR9, nothing better out there at that price, and many priced higher that aren't as good.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 21, 2013 07:46 AM (BeSEI)
read The Good Soldier by Ford Madox Ford. Wow! I can't remember when
the sentence-by-sentence writing of a novel was more surprising and
exciting. It's almost a century old now (it came out in 1915, I
believe). I can't believe I hadn't read it before now.
Posted by: The Regular Guy at April 21, 2013 11:37 AM (34Hju)
I'll second that.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 21, 2013 11:41 AM (86Ex2)
I just looked that up on Amazon. The Kindle edition is free.
http://tinyurl.com/ce4pnfz
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at April 21, 2013 07:47 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Truman North at April 21, 2013 07:48 AM (EsTrr)
Posted by: real joe at April 21, 2013 07:48 AM (PD2ad)
Posted by: A. Mindful Webworker - too smart for words at April 21, 2013 07:49 AM (U13jb)
Posted by: luigi vercotti at April 21, 2013 07:49 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: Sabrina Chase at April 21, 2013 07:50 AM (wfSF5)
I read somewhere that work will make you free, so you've got that going for you. Which is nice.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 21, 2013 07:50 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: mama winger, maybe today at April 21, 2013 07:50 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: A. Mindful Webworker - leaving now. Really. Honest. ... at April 21, 2013 07:50 AM (U13jb)
Posted by: zsasz at April 21, 2013 07:50 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: real joe at April 21, 2013 07:50 AM (PD2ad)
Posted by: Truman North at April 21, 2013 07:50 AM (EsTrr)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 21, 2013 07:51 AM (IXTKs)
Posted by: Sabrina Chase at April 21, 2013 07:53 AM (wfSF5)
Posted by: Truman North at April 21, 2013 07:55 AM (EsTrr)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 21, 2013 07:55 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: mama winger, maybe today at April 21, 2013 07:55 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at April 21, 2013 07:56 AM (XvrTA)
To me, it seems pretty authentic (and hard to put down). After reading some of the more critical reviews, I thought, "C'mon, the author was sixteen years old when the book started and a whopping 19 when the war ended in 1945. Does the fact that he got some names of equipment and places wrong really surprise anyone?" Hell, I retired from the Air Force last year and already I'm having trouble remembering the names of guys in my squadron that I deployed overseas with as recently as two years ago. Some stuff fades, some sticks forever (I'll never forget accidentally flying into Mexico while trying out the nav system on what we thought was the most technologically advanced helicopter in the world at the time. Oops...)
Sometimes, I think the demand that every fact and detail in a memoir be absolutely spot on gets a little out of control. Unless you're an obsessive diary keeper, I think errors are going to be inevitable. If I tried to write something based on my life, I shudder to think how much I would screw up the details.
Posted by: Pave Low John at April 21, 2013 07:57 AM (vSrwu)
and became a Russian prince.
Posted by: luigi vercotti at April 21, 2013 07:57 AM (Jsiw/)
David Palmer - Emergence
Alastair Reynolds - The entire Revelation Space universe (5 novels at present)
Dan Simmons - The Hyperion Cantos (4 novels)
Many more, but those three are my go-to after The Master (Heinlein).
Posted by: Captain Ned at April 21, 2013 07:58 AM (i+Fm3)
Posted by: Captain Whitebread, Designated Commenter at April 21, 2013 07:58 AM (5J54Q)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 07:59 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: antisocialist at April 21, 2013 07:59 AM (eGr8Z)
I had the privilege of taking a summer course on Solzhenitsyn in the summer of 1975 after release from USN active duty - English lit elective - several Russian Lit majors, a few Eng lit types, a few Poli Sci folks, and me, the Biochem guy. Edward Rozek, Ph.D. came several times - local Poli Sci prof and WWII survivor of Polish battles with Soviets and Nazis - very stark, very brutal time, and the texts reflect the same.
I would recommend Cancer Ward, as well - a droll and equally brutal view of what evolved in Medicine in that era.
Posted by: Tx Doc at April 21, 2013 08:01 AM (EwzGY)
Posted by: Libra at April 21, 2013 08:01 AM (q5QAW)
Posted by: Truman North at April 21, 2013 08:02 AM (EsTrr)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 21, 2013 08:06 AM (g0iT9)
Posted by: Skookumchuk at April 21, 2013 08:08 AM (x4x3r)
Posted by: motionvew at April 21, 2013 08:08 AM (6Tbb5)
MOLLY, your little friends are wrong. They have been affected by the skepticism of a skeptical age. They do not believe except they see. They think that nothing can be which is not comprehensible by their little minds. All minds, Molly, whether they be men's or children's, are little. In this great universe of ours man is a mere insect, an ant, in his intellect, as compared with the boundless Workers' State about him, as measured by the intelligence capable of grasping the whole of truth and knowledge.
Yes, MOLLY, there is a Joe Stalin. He exists as certainly as love and state-compelled generosity and devotion to the State exist, and you know that they abound and give to your life its highest beauty and joy.
Posted by: new york times' editor at April 21, 2013 08:09 AM (mGBy8)
Posted by: Noel Gallagher at April 21, 2013 08:11 AM (8Mr2R)
72 Pave Low John,
I read that book about 20 years ago. Pretty good from what I remember. I seem to remember he was quite honest about what his side and the "good Germans" did on the Eastern Front. But I could be wrong.
Posted by: ExSnipe at April 21, 2013 08:12 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: Sabrina Chase at April 21, 2013 08:13 AM (wfSF5)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 08:15 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: PaleRider at April 21, 2013 08:15 AM (vL0Nv)
Posted by: L, elle at April 21, 2013 08:16 AM (IMejC)
That theme has been explored many times in sci fi. You'd probably like This Immortal by Roger Zelazny as well.
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 21, 2013 08:16 AM (cHZB7)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 08:16 AM (l86i3)
Tzouliadis, The Forsaken: An American Tragedy in Stalin's Russia; Dolgun, An American in the Gulag; Bardach, Man is Wolf to Man.
Anne Applebaum's Gulag: A History is also interesting; somewhat dry but complete and readable.
I haven't read Gulag Archipelago but One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is short and interesting.
I didn't read all preceding comments here so if this is duplicative, sorry about that.
cheers
chuck
Posted by: dhmosquito at April 21, 2013 08:17 AM (MGZg4)
Posted by: FART at April 21, 2013 08:18 AM (erQJO)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 21, 2013 08:18 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Sabrina Chase at April 21, 2013 08:19 AM (wfSF5)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 08:20 AM (l86i3)
Yeah, some of it is pretty grim reading, especially the treatment of Soviet POWs. They basically let them freeze and starve to death, he has one really eye-opening memory of a flat-top train car crowded with almost-naked Russian POWs. With it being winter and all, the few survivors were huddled behind a huge pile of their dead comrades, trying to get out of the freezing wind created by the train's movement. Not the kind of thing one would forget seeing, I imagine.
Cyberpunk was a big reason behind why I wanted to be a military helo pilot. I read Walter Jon Williams "Hardwired" back in high school and thought that flying a "Panzer" (low-altitude ground effect vehicle, used for smuggling in the novel) was the coolest thing I had ever read about in a novel. Since "Panzers" don't really exist, I figured SOF helicopters would be the next closest thing. Funny thing is, I read a lot of Williams and Sterling and other follow-on cyberpunk authors before I got around to reading Gibson, no idea how that happened.
Of course, I know people that read some of the thick-fantasy rip-offs of Tolkien (Jordan, Brooks, Goodkind, etc...) before they got around to the man who started it all.....
Posted by: Pave Low John at April 21, 2013 08:22 AM (vSrwu)
Mr Mulliner FTW
But the greatest story might be "The Great Sermon Handicap" (in _Inimitable Jeeves_).
For my 2 cents, Wodehouse is the much better writer - he makes farce look easy, _almost_ 100% of the time. Pratchett can come across as labored and silly, like D. Adams.
*ducks*
Posted by: pandelume at April 21, 2013 08:25 AM (TXzIm)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 08:25 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: FART at April 21, 2013 12:18 PM (erQJO)
Not if he made you read One Day In The Life of Ivan Denisovitch!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 21, 2013 08:26 AM (/WLC3)
Solzhenitsyn also wrote a pretty good novel about the First World War, "August 1914." Pretty readable, has about 620 pages. Hard to find, though, I stumbled on a copy in an indoor flea-market, grabbed it for 5 dollars.
Posted by: Pave Low John at April 21, 2013 08:28 AM (vSrwu)
Posted by: Skookumchuk at April 21, 2013 08:29 AM (x4x3r)
Dad was one of those awful, awful public school teachers it's so fashionable to hate around here.
Posted by: FART at April 21, 2013 12:18 PM (erQJO)
Your dad sounds like he was a great guy (you're speaking of him in the past tense so I don't know if he's still among the living). Just for the record, there were a couple teacher's at my daughter's public high school whom I respected a great deal because they had a lot of integrity and were committed to having the light go on in their students' heads. The rest of them were useless union humps who had *other* priorities.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 21, 2013 08:29 AM (86Ex2)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 21, 2013 08:29 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: motionvew at April 21, 2013 08:31 AM (6Tbb5)
Posted by: rickl at April 21, 2013 08:32 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 08:33 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 21, 2013 08:34 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: rickl at April 21, 2013 08:35 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 21, 2013 08:36 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: soothsayerl'c at April 21, 2013 08:39 AM (vzLhi)
Posted by: Truman North at April 21, 2013 08:39 AM (EsTrr)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 08:41 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Truman North at April 21, 2013 08:41 AM (EsTrr)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 08:42 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 08:43 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 08:44 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Ragamuffin at April 21, 2013 08:44 AM (fzFF6)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 08:44 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Kirk Turner at April 21, 2013 08:44 AM (aUkzm)
Posted by: Truman North at April 21, 2013 08:45 AM (EsTrr)
Posted by: Davey Sirota at April 21, 2013 12:37 PM (vbh31)<<
Not likely.
Posted by: Muad'dib at April 21, 2013 08:46 AM (SCTXH)
Posted by: Truman North at April 21, 2013 08:47 AM (EsTrr)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 08:47 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 21, 2013 08:49 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: zsasz at April 21, 2013 08:49 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 08:50 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: zsasz at April 21, 2013 12:49 PM (MMC8r)
MFM: A larger Tea Party conspiracy!!!!!!!
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 21, 2013 08:50 AM (IXTKs)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 08:51 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 21, 2013 08:52 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: soothsayerl'c at April 21, 2013 08:53 AM (/v7wy)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 12:50 PM (piMMO)<<
I think you have more than 10 cellmates here at the HQ.
Oh, you said soul....
Posted by: Muad'dib at April 21, 2013 08:54 AM (SCTXH)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at April 21, 2013 08:55 AM (XvrTA)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 08:55 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: teej at April 21, 2013 08:55 AM (K4AdI)
Posted by: Assault Citizen Anachronda at April 21, 2013 08:55 AM (U82Km)
Posted by: soothsayerl'c at April 21, 2013 08:55 AM (ZgBZU)
Posted by: RushBabe at April 21, 2013 08:56 AM (orY9d)
I remember the prof saying that a key theme in the lit was the Motherland as almost a Christ figure. Suffering, betrayal, redemption. Even post revolution. Posted by: Ragamuffin at April 21, 2013 11:27 AM (fzFF6)
Passionate love of their country (not necessarily love of whatever regime they are suffering under at the moment) appears to be characteristic of the Russians. That's always interested me, because life for the average Russian has never been easy.
I remember P.J. O'Rourke (I think it was O'Rourke) saying somewhere that the Russians were always baffled by American commies who would visit the USSR and trash the US. Of course, the Party welcomed the propaganda value of such tools, but privately, they had contempt for the American commies, because they couldn't imagine themselves going abroad and trashing Mother Russia, however much they hated the government.
I've just started "Citizens" by Simon Schama, a history of the French Revolution. I'm interested in finding out just why it became so f'ed up compared to our revolution.
Posted by: Donna V. at April 21, 2013 08:56 AM (R3gO3)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 08:56 AM (l86i3)
If you want to get up to speed on that concept, look up the phrase "causal chain of events" and how that applies to aircraft mishaps. That was a big part of the Flight Safety Officer course I took a decade or so ago. According to the AF Safety Center in NM, almost every mishap with military aircraft involves a chain of events, fairly harmless when they happen in isolation, that ultimately build up and result in a crash or mishap. The whole idea of a safety program was to "break" the chain before it got to that end state.
Example: Pilot #1 fights with the wife all night, doesn't get any sleep. Pilot #2 is hung-over from a bachelor party. They both forget to check the Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) that warn about the loss of weather reporting facilities at a destination they are flying to. They notice some weather while enroute, try to check it with the closed facility, can't get an update. They also seem to be having problems with their weather radar. They don't want a delay, however, and decide to press on....right into a thunderstorm cell. Aircraft has its wings ripped off, jet crashes.
As you can see, if one of the things had been "fixed" in the above scenario, the jet would have probably diverted around the thunderstorm area and safely landed somewhere else or turned around. It was the "chain of events" that caused the crash, not any one single problem in itself.
Posted by: Pave Low John at April 21, 2013 08:57 AM (vSrwu)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 21, 2013 08:57 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: soothsayerl'c at April 21, 2013 08:57 AM (qpM85)
'I am reading "The Shakespeare Guide to Italy" which isn't really about the guy we think of as Shakespeare.'
The Oxfordians believe that De Vere's first hand knowledge of Italy is one of the stronger points in defense of De Vere as author - since there's no known evidence that the Stratford Man ever did anything even as exotic as, say, travelling anywhere.
Posted by: Zombie Shane at April 21, 2013 08:58 AM (dScAL)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 08:58 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: boulder hobo at April 21, 2013 08:59 AM (QTHTd)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 21, 2013 09:00 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: rickl at April 21, 2013 09:01 AM (sdi6R)
Is it accurate to call them 'sleeper' cells?
Posted by: soothsayerl'c at April 21, 2013 12:55 PM (ZgBZU)
Sleeper did bring us the Orgasmitron.
Posted by: Woody Allen at April 21, 2013 09:02 AM (YYyqq)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 21, 2013 09:02 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Assault Citizen Anachronda at April 21, 2013 09:04 AM (U82Km)
Another good author is Helen MacInnes - some of her books have been re-issued in both print and Kindle form; the rest will be released in August of this year on Kindle.
Good stuff for being between 50-70 years old; lots of relevance to some of the stuff that we are seeing today.
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at April 21, 2013 09:04 AM (ADnWI)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 09:05 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Skookumchuk at April 21, 2013 09:05 AM (x4x3r)
I would've guessed they would try to inject themselves, like Obama did, into Boston's aftermath.
Posted by: soothsayerl'c at April 21, 2013 12:53 PM (/v7wy)
They've never protested the rock worshipers because they hate the homos as much as Phelps' band of fuckheads. Plus the religion of pieces might fire back.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 21, 2013 09:06 AM (86Ex2)
Posted by: Muad'dib at April 21, 2013 09:07 AM (SCTXH)
I think it's time to say that "White Christian Males" are the new Jews.
The media, feminists, and faculty elite at any university can use any vague generalization against a WCM, any hateful diatribe or hyperbole with unquestioned authority even while it's veracity is presumed. Guilt and intention is presumed without question as though they (we) are all members of the original KKKlan or White Supremacist Nazi's.
The media will pick it up and parrot it as the Truth ad nauseum until it becomes reality because it conforms to their agenda. An agenda that originally was to defend minorities has morphed into full attack on Christians and especially White Male Christians even after illegal immigration has relegated them to another minority status.
To paraphrase a jewish survivor of WWII Germany: What will you do when they come for you and everyone else is already gone?
Posted by: MrObvious at April 21, 2013 09:08 AM (NlAiP)
I IMMEDIATELY tweeted back to say that I would buy a plane ticket exclusively for the purpose of participating in their beat-down if they did.
https://twitter.com/WBCSays
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 01:05 PM (piMMO)
I posted too quickly and failed to realize there's no depth to which these ghouls won't descend.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 21, 2013 09:08 AM (86Ex2)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 09:09 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: soothsayerl'c at April 21, 2013 09:09 AM (E1X66)
Posted by: soothsayerl'c at April 21, 2013 09:11 AM (E1X66)
Incontheevable!
Posted by: soothsayerl'c at April 21, 2013 01:09 PM (E1X66)
I think the MFM has been lowballing the Westboro vermin lately since conservatives are starting to fire back with how Phelps is a life long donk and a delegate to the 2000 convention for fat tub of shit ManBearPig.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 21, 2013 09:13 AM (86Ex2)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 09:13 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: soothsayerl'c at April 21, 2013 09:14 AM (E7Qlq)
Posted by: rickl at April 21, 2013 09:20 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: teej at April 21, 2013 09:21 AM (e0nsQ)
Posted by: Cobalt Shiva at April 21, 2013 09:25 AM (OY/SZ)
Posted by: rickl at April 21, 2013 09:27 AM (sdi6R)
That was Niemoeller, a "Christian" minister from Germany justifying his policy of standing up for Communists during the McCarthy hearings.
He knew full well that the Communists wouldn't stand up for him if they were let loose, either. He was basically a Communist propagandist himself.
To de-Godwin a bit from this discussion: the Ayatollah Khomeini killed or exiled almost every Communist from Iran. This isn't one of the acts I condemn him for.
Posted by: boulder hobo at April 21, 2013 09:28 AM (QTHTd)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 21, 2013 09:31 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Donna V. at April 21, 2013 12:56 PM (R3gO3)
It's a good book and answers your question pretty well. It was written before Schama completely lost his mind and went completely lib in his outlook. As it was, he still couldn't resist throwing in some snarky dicksuck comments about Reagan, all of which have been proven to be utter horseshit.
Although Citizens is loaded with facts, it's not his most well narrated book. You might be interested in reading Jay Winik's "The Great Upheaval" to see the event portrayed in a much more readable manner in addition to getting greatly informed on what was going on in the US and Russia concurrently. It was recommended to me by a fellow moron and is one of the best works of history I've ever read.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 21, 2013 09:32 AM (86Ex2)
Posted by: geoffb at April 21, 2013 09:37 AM (d3wbb)
"I really wish we could edit our own comments for grammatical errors"
If we did that most of the comments would be blanks.
Posted by: harleycowboy at April 21, 2013 09:38 AM (+9AX9)
Posted by: zsasz at April 21, 2013 11:52 AM (MMC8r)
***
I found Ghandi III (The Pacifist Strikes Back) to be a little too derivative and meandering.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at April 21, 2013 09:39 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: rickl at April 21, 2013 09:44 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: LiveFreeOrDie at April 21, 2013 09:45 AM (4yFKY)
Greetings, you pantsless literary buffs, you.
I picked up Vince Flynn's American Assassin at the Goodwill store the other day for $1.99 in hardcover. They had a really good selection of books, and they were all the same price.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at April 21, 2013 09:54 AM (+z4pE)
Posted by: teej at April 21, 2013 12:55 PM (K4AdI)
_________
Thanks teej for that recommendation.
Posted by: mama winger, maybe today at April 21, 2013 09:59 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at April 21, 2013 10:04 AM (+z4pE)
I've read the Gulag A'o, and yes, it is quite a slog and by the end of it you are really just reading the rest because books are sacred to you and you can't leave a classic unfinished.
Then you go pick up "A Day in the Life of John Dennison," also by Alexandr Solz'n, and you slap your forehead and say: "Chto za huy!!!!, I could have just read this, and Koestler's "Darkness at Noon" and I would know all I need to know about Soviet Communism!"
Posted by: Sharkman at April 21, 2013 10:06 AM (03IDC)
Posted by: ADK46er at April 21, 2013 10:11 AM (+Q4af)
Posted by: Floyd Alsbach at April 21, 2013 10:19 AM (Ad13n)
As others have noted, if all you have read of Wodehouse is Jeeves and Wooster, you are missing about 85% of his total output, and also some of his best work. The Blandings Castle books are my particular favorites, but I know some Mr. Mulliner fans and some strong Uncle Fred proponents as well. I am not a golfer, but I still laugh out loud when I re-read Heart of a Goof, his collection of golfing stories, for example.
Wodehouse passed away at the age of 94, in 1975, after writing over 90 books over the span of about 60 years (in fact he was, in the hospital at the end, in the middle of writing one more -- Sunset at Blandings). In another 40 years, people will still be reading and enjoying his works, because they are so diverse and timeless, while Pratchett will be just a footnote in literary history, because he took one clever idea and rode it until its legs fell off.
Posted by: TH at April 21, 2013 10:27 AM (tcvYF)
Posted by: Chandler's Ghost at April 21, 2013 10:32 AM (9JS/n)
Posted by: PaleRider at April 21, 2013 10:42 AM (ql12X)
One of the best opening lines that I ever read in a book (and 1 that caused me to blow Dr. Pepper from my nose) was from one of those "The Destroyer" books:
"His name was Remo Williams, and all he wanted to do was help the homeless".
The book was written back in the mid 80's, when the media was trying to play down the success of Ronald Reagan's economic policies with constant stories about rampant homelessness. I don't know why, but that line has just stuck in my head for some reason.
Posted by: DaveKinNC at April 21, 2013 10:47 AM (/NgNT)
Another reason is that he was making a *legal* case against the Soviet authorities. As other survivors of the Gulag have noted, in particular Alexander Dolgun (who is cited in "Gulag" as the only man who survived the KGB interrogations and kept his sanity, and whose memoir, "An American in the Gulag", is a must-read for anyone who's interested in the Soviet terror-machine), the achilles heel of the Soviet apparachiks was their supposed legality. The Soviet legal code detailed exactly what sentences should be meted out for which crimes, and how prisoners were to be treated - rules that were trampled on by the regime - but being able to cite how the authorities ignored their own laws showed both that individual apparchiks had broken their own law, and brought into question the legitimacy of the entire regime.
By the way, I would suggest starting with Volume 3 rather than Volume 1. Solzhenitsyn finished that in the west, so it more tightly organized. Also, it's more personal; and parts of it, particularly the chapter "First Cell, First Love", are, strangely enough, quite funny.
If anyone asks why I *hate* the Left, I show them those books.
Posted by: Brown Line at April 21, 2013 10:57 AM (CIG73)
Your dad's students were lucky kids. Unfortunately, far too many of us have had to endure high-school teachers from the Randi Weingarten school of pedagogy: unionized nitwits whose notion of teaching was to preach left-wing cliches.
Posted by: Brown Line at April 21, 2013 11:04 AM (CIG73)
Just downloaded The Last Roman. I like those kinds of books.
Thanks.
Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2013 11:15 AM (53z96)
Posted by: waelse1 at April 21, 2013 11:15 AM (CvOIm)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at April 21, 2013 01:04 PM (ADnWI)
Second the McInnes Reccommendation. Read a lot of both her books ( a female spy/thriller author is fairly rare) and Alistair McClean's (usually more than once) as a teenager because my dad had them.
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, assault Hobbit at April 21, 2013 11:28 AM (wbeNt)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 21, 2013 01:05 PM (piMMO)
Yep. It's quite telling that the freaks are threatening to disrupt the victim's funreal and not that of the jihadi bomber.
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, assault Hobbit at April 21, 2013 11:29 AM (wbeNt)
Posted by: tomc at April 21, 2013 11:55 AM (avEuh)
Posted by: Matt in Maine at April 21, 2013 12:27 PM (t/+KI)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 21, 2013 01:02 PM (Cnqmv)
I've been an AF pilot for 25 yrs and she did a GREAT job of nailing the personality of the heroine. I wonder if she has any inside info?
Thanks Sabrina, it was one sci-fi series that I can give to my (early) teenage daughters in the hope that it inspires them the way Heinlein did me back in the late 70's.
Posted by: Phat at April 21, 2013 01:05 PM (+OGrL)
I've always really liked Neuromancer, which was fun in a SF noir way, and was sadly prescient in predicting the future. Of course back in the Eighties when Reagan ruled America, the "smart people" all embraced Cyberpunk as the hippest, coolest expression of Science Fiction, and swept the rest of it aside, so that anything other than cyberpunk was left to Harry Turtledove, Jerry Pournelle, and David Weber. (I exxagerate, but that's what a viewer might think anyway.) Then when the era of Ronaldus Magnus turned into the reign of WIlliamus Porkswordus, the "smart people" were quick to kick Cyberpunk to the curb. After all, there was NO chance that the era of End of History and Compassionate BIg Government would EVER lead the way to the Cyberpunk future, right? Well, now it's 2013, you guys tell me Gibson's world view hasn't beaten Clarke, Heinlein, and Roddenberry to become the Future Imperfect.
Posted by: exdem13 at April 21, 2013 01:18 PM (kfSXj)
I requested it from my library and, after a year, it finally arrived. It is HILARIOUS.
Absurdist humor that hits all of the right targets. It surprises me that this book has been out for almost 20 yrs and I'd never heard of it.
Thank you, Sunday Book Thread!
Posted by: Phat at April 21, 2013 01:28 PM (+OGrL)
Posted by: Kerry at April 21, 2013 01:32 PM (AYfPj)
You mean Not only because he's a Russian writer who writes long, tedious books.
Posted by: West at April 21, 2013 01:43 PM (LHKGX)
Also, tough going. I'm just accepting that I don't remember a whole lot of philosophy 101, not that that would help me. But it's easy to get his major point that we are veering far away from reason into passion, from the Enlightenment to the French Revolution.
Posted by: PJ at April 21, 2013 01:53 PM (ZWaLo)
The Gulag Archipelago also contains many stories of numerous heroic individuals. Vasily Grigoryevich Vlasov and Georgi Tenno are two in particular. But their stories are woven in different chapters throughout the books. You really have to pay attention, but it will be well worth it.
Posted by: deepred at April 21, 2013 02:23 PM (rUiSC)
The Gulag Archipelago is slow....but it is the details that mean everything, i.e. the show trials of the thirties where the accused communists would admit to anything to save their families, yet they were all placed in the work camps-prisons or shot eventually. I read Dr. Zhivago by Boris Pasternak soon after and Russian writers are all slow, but then maybe something gets lost in translation. The Gulag Archipelago should be required reading in High School.
I've been reading mindless pap on my Kindle...re-reading Edgar Rice Burroughs John Carter of Mars series which I haven't read in 50 years. I am also in the third book of Mongoliad. I actually like them all and they have been free from AmaZon or the Kindle Library.
Posted by: Budahmon at April 21, 2013 05:00 PM (P6jbe)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1913 seconds, 334 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Travis at April 21, 2013 07:08 AM (9WkMB)