November 24, 2013
— Open Blogger

Good morning morons and moronettes and welcome to the award-winning AoSHQ's prestigious Sunday Morning Book Thread.
Oh No, Not More JFK Coverage
Hey, do you know what famous person died on Nov. 22, 1963? Well, C.S. Lewis, for one. I ask again, do you know what famous person died on Nov. 22, 1963? How about Aldous Huxley?
Huxley wrote a royal crap ton of stuff, stories, satire, and novels, and was one of the leading intellectuals of his day. His best known work is probably the dystopian novel Brave New World.
Lewis also wrote a royal crap ton of stuff, and perhaps best known for The Screwtape Letters, although I believe the best way to get to know him is by reading Mere Christianity or, my personal favorite, God In The Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics. And of course, the Narnia Chronicles.
Kennedy "wrote" Profiles in Courage, and I use quotes because it is now known that he wrote PiC the same way that Barak Obama wrote his books, i.e. he didn't. Instead, PiC was mostly written by his lackey speechwriter Ted Sorensen, who admitted decades later that he very well paid by Kennedy for his ghost writing services. Because of his work, Kennedy was awarded a Pulitzer Prize.
The strange coincidence of these three men dying on the same day is the basis for the book Between Heaven and Hell: A Dialog Somewhere Beyond Death with John F. Kennedy, C. S. Lewis & Aldous Huxley by Peter Kreeft, who imagines a conversation between these men, each representing distinct worldviews, with Kennedy as a modern humanist, Lewis representing Christian theism and Huxley advocating Eastern pantheism.
I grabbed the "triptych" photo from this article, which also has a trivia quiz so you can test your knowledge on Lewis, Huxley and Kennedy.
And doesn't Huxley look like a complete nerd?
The Sunday Morning Book Thread Gets Results!
And by "gets results", I mean "causes PGiS to blow off work in order to read and futz around on the internet":
I read that book recommended by OregonMuse on yesterday's book thread, "Gone at 3:17." It was avery gripping book and I blew off doing useful things today because I wanted to finish it. It was an interesting read because it covered more than just the school explosion, it talked about the East Texas oil fields, the way the news story was covered, and the shocking lack of safety regulations in schools--many of those regulations were put into place after this tragedy.
Reading the book resulted in me spending time on the internet today looking at photos and then reading about other school fires and then watching a weird newsreel film by the Los Angeles Fire Department about "Our Obligation" in terms of keeping kids safe while at school...
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle
I knew nothing about the book when I posted it last week, other than it looked like it might be interesting. I'm glad it turned out not to be a dud.
Gone at 3:17: The Untold Story of the Worst School Disaster in American History is available on Amazon.

"Martin Bashir Said What?"
Oops, She Did It Again
Earlier this week, I thought I heard, way off in the distance, the pop-pop-pop sound of tiny liberal heads exploding. So I figured Sarah Palin must have said or done something to cause this. Sure enough, she has another book out, so I wasn't just hearing things. Good Tidings and Great Joy: Protecting the Heart of Christmas, is her new book, and in it, she
defends the importance of preserving Jesus Christ in Christmas—whether in public displays, school concerts, and pageants, or in our hearts—and delivers a sharp rebuke to today's society for the homogenization of the holiday season. Sharing personal memories from Palin Christmases past, she illustrates why she holds the celebration of Jesus Christ's Nativity so dear.
I have no idea if it's any good or not. My guess is that if you like Sarah Palin, you'll probably like the book, and vice versa. As for me, if she has something to say about public policy regarding the role of religion (specifically Christianity) in the public square, I'd be interested to hear it. On the other hand, I don't particularly care about her personal or family life. I read the introduction available on Amazon, and I wasn't impressed. The exaggeratedly kitschy/folksy writing style of the intro is very off-putting and makes me not want to read the rest of the book. But I have to say I take great enjoyment in the fact that Palin is a continual source of existential pain to liberals and progressives, and so despite whatever I might think about the book, I hope that it will turn out to be a raging shadenbonerrific best seller.
Also, you can have fun by reading the one-star Amazon reviews and seeing if there's any evidence that the reviewer actually read the book.
Moron Recommendation
From one of the morning threads this week:
I've been reading a wonderful book called The Reach of Rome by Alberto Angela. It's a journey through the Empire during the reign of Trajan, embodied in a single coin as it travels from the mint to Britannia and then as far away as India as it changes hands. The last third of the book seems rushed, as if the editor told Angela to cut things, but it's very well written, with characters (all drawn from actual archeological finds or ancient writings) so vivid you wish they would travel along with the coin instead of using it in commerce.
Highly recommended.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing
The Reach of Rome: A Journey Through the Lands of the Ancient Empire, Following a Coin by Alberto Angela. Also available on Kindle. Thank you MP4 for the tip.
___________
Got an e-mail this week from Markham Pyle who asked me to plug a novel written by his business partner, so I will. Cross and Poppy: a village tale by GMW Wemyss, first in a series about a “cozy UK village slice of life” which, underneath the surface, ain't so quiet and aint so cozy, featuring "Trollopean clerics, comic peers with hidden depths, the villagers of a thousand cozy English novels … but in a very modern world: our own." So I think this means that if Anthony Trollope were alive today, he'd have written a book like this.
$3.99 on Kindle.
___________
So that's all for this week. As always, book thread tips, suggestions, rumors, threats, and insults may be sent to OregonMuse, Proprietor, AoSHQ Book Thread, at aoshqbookthread, followed by the 'at' sign, and then 'G' mail, and then dot cee oh emm.
What have you all been reading this week? Hopefully something good, because, as I keep saying, life is too short to be reading lousy books.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
06:52 AM
| Comments (115)
Post contains 1159 words, total size 8 kb.
Posted by: Dang at November 24, 2013 06:54 AM (YWXTN)
Posted by: Insomniac at November 24, 2013 06:57 AM (MeVdV)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at November 24, 2013 06:59 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 24, 2013 07:00 AM (23Kgq)
Posted by: NCKate at November 24, 2013 07:00 AM (vjZKo)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at November 24, 2013 07:02 AM (u82oZ)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at November 24, 2013 07:02 AM (zihxQ)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 24, 2013 07:02 AM (23Kgq)
In paper I just got "The Law of Self Defense" by Andrew Branca, using the Moron discount (check the gun thread today, it's usually mentioned there).
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at November 24, 2013 07:02 AM (yh0zB)
Posted by: turfmann at November 24, 2013 07:04 AM (GgGgG)
Later roonz and roonettez. Fear no evil.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at November 24, 2013 07:04 AM (yh0zB)
The 1937 New London, TX school explosion reminded me of this forgotten 1959 Houston elementary school bombing. It was probably caused by a climate of hate.
Posted by: Frankly at November 24, 2013 07:08 AM (yLy0R)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 24, 2013 07:10 AM (23Kgq)
As a person that resisted Kindle a great deal, let me tell you about my Kindle paperwhite. It is a great book reading platform. I was lugging around Song of Ice and Fire for a while (never got to it), and this Paperwhite is much prefered. Drop the coin for one, or give the hint to your significant other that you would like one for Christmas. It is a great book reading platform.
Posted by: Zakn at November 24, 2013 07:10 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at November 24, 2013 07:10 AM (zihxQ)
Oh and the Democrats stole the '60 election.
Sound familiar....
Posted by: Kreplach at November 24, 2013 07:11 AM (hmUex)
He's got it as a free Kindle download this weekend:
https://tinyurl.com/ml693mh
Posted by: Country Singer at November 24, 2013 07:12 AM (V1PJQ)
Posted by: Passerby at November 24, 2013 07:12 AM (sOlwy)
Posted by: creeper at November 24, 2013 07:13 AM (B4E7O)
Posted by: Passerby at November 24, 2013 07:14 AM (sOlwy)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 07:15 AM (XIxXP)
Heh. That or a lot of "like minded individuals."
Posted by: Country Singer at November 24, 2013 07:15 AM (V1PJQ)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 07:16 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Zakn at November 24, 2013 07:17 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 07:20 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: OregonMuse at November 24, 2013 07:20 AM (fd0Pp)
The author is former SAS and mil contractor; the book is along the lines of J.W. Rawles, "A. American", and Glen Tate's stuff. A better categorization than PAW would be "Prepper" fiction.
Posted by: Country Singer at November 24, 2013 07:20 AM (V1PJQ)
Posted by: OregonMuse at November 24, 2013 07:21 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: Country Singer at November 24, 2013 07:22 AM (V1PJQ)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at November 24, 2013 07:24 AM (Usdw3)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 07:25 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Emile Antoon Khadaji at November 24, 2013 07:31 AM (CrJzY)
http://tinyurl.com/mhkq9zk
The review doesn't exactly make me want to run out and buy it, but I hope my local library gets a copy so I can check it out.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 24, 2013 07:31 AM (cHZB7)
Posted by: HH at November 24, 2013 07:32 AM (XXwdv)
A lot of the genre is like that. Rawles' first book Patriots was good, but the follow-ons are hit and miss. Tate's 299 Days series has been pretty good so far, but they're overpriced (especially for Kindle) and he's taking forever to release the seventh installment. Bracken's Enemies plots, especially in The Reconquista, tend to push the suspension of disbelief envelope a little too much. The best consistency has been "A. American's" Home series.
Posted by: Country Singer at November 24, 2013 07:32 AM (V1PJQ)
Posted by: ontherocks at November 24, 2013 07:32 AM (g1FLl)
Posted by: Severe Conservative riding Orca at November 24, 2013 07:32 AM (v6hyJ)
Posted by: Matt in Maine at November 24, 2013 07:32 AM (MhK7g)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at November 24, 2013 07:32 AM (Usdw3)
I watched her interview on the Chris Wallace program and she said it was a great book. So there
My next book purchase will probably be something devoted to the CS Lewis - JRR Tolkien friendship. A cursory search shows several possibilities.
Posted by: mrp at November 24, 2013 07:33 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 07:33 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: OregonMuse at November 24, 2013 07:33 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: shredded chi at November 24, 2013 07:35 AM (J4eqE)
I should mention that each of those series are along the same basic "crypto-Marxist liberals finally get their way and look what happens" plot lines.
Posted by: Country Singer at November 24, 2013 07:35 AM (V1PJQ)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at November 24, 2013 07:35 AM (Usdw3)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 07:38 AM (XIxXP)
It's the best in the series; the other two are good reading, but a little over the top, plot-wise.
Posted by: Country Singer at November 24, 2013 07:38 AM (V1PJQ)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 07:41 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Severe Conservative riding Orca at November 24, 2013 07:42 AM (v6hyJ)
Posted by: Freezing In LA at November 24, 2013 07:42 AM (kkbgQ)
The possible scenarios are endless. Alternate history is *fun*. I wish there was more of it that was worth a damn.
The thought upthread about how Rockefeller might have challenged Kennedy in '64: imagine if Nelson had in fact won it.
And then as an incumbent President in tough times faced a convention fight in 1968 with a discontented rightist faction led by Goldwater.
Posted by: torquewrench at November 24, 2013 07:44 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Roc Ingersol at November 24, 2013 07:45 AM (r9IFY)
Posted by: Severe Conservative riding Orca at November 24, 2013 07:45 AM (v6hyJ)
Posted by: OregonMuse at November 24, 2013 07:46 AM (fd0Pp)
The libs love themselves some myth.
Posted by: --- at November 24, 2013 07:47 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Severe Conservative riding Orca at November 24, 2013 07:49 AM (v6hyJ)
Posted by: Emile Antoon Khadaji at November 24, 2013 11:31 AM (CrJzY)
You hear anything about the next book? His website has no info whatsoever.
Posted by: redclay at November 24, 2013 07:50 AM (4ajtD)
Posted by: Emile Antoon Khadaji at November 24, 2013 07:54 AM (KvKOu)
Posted by: Roc Ingersol at November 24, 2013 07:55 AM (x+Knu)
I think the problem may be that fiction, contrary to what they might want us to believe, has a finite shelf life (pun intended). Some of it, anyway. There needs to be something about it that is relevant to the current reader, and I don't particularly think it is the reader's responsibility to understand the contexts in which these supposed "great works" were written.
If it doesn't hold up today, it doesn't hold up.
Me, I've never read it. Frankly, I have little use for most fiction. I just started in on Antony Beevor's D-Day. Which should be great. Given his track record, and the subject matter.
Posted by: BurtTC at November 24, 2013 07:58 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: tms at November 24, 2013 07:59 AM (7ub16)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at November 24, 2013 11:32 AM (Usdw3)
Or he was constantly stoned and grinning like an idiot.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at November 24, 2013 08:02 AM (oJ5Fd)
G. Gordon Liddy has recommended that book in the past as being one of the best on the subject.
Oh, and....BUY GOLD!!!
Posted by: --- at November 24, 2013 08:05 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Nip Sip at November 24, 2013 08:06 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: USA at November 24, 2013 08:09 AM (VIaw0)
Didn't stop the Kennedys from pushing themselves really hard as imagined model Catholics in boroughs where there was a big Catholic vote to be drawn.
Unfortunately, too many Catholics bought into the schtick. Especially Irish ones.
I knew a formidable old Irish lady who had to resist the double siren song of voting for another Irish Catholic just like herself. Every single member of her extremely large extended family pulled the lever for JFK, because it was a thumb in the eye to the WASPs who they felt looked down on the Irish Catholics.
Tribal solidarity. They felt that JFK was one of them. Of the blood, of the Faith. Which of course he was not. He merely seemed to be.
She sensed, accurately, that there were some things very wrong about the guy. And was not surprised when the stories later came out confirming her suspicions.
Posted by: torquewrench at November 24, 2013 08:18 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Nip Sip at November 24, 2013 08:23 AM (0FSuD)
Been a member of the History Book Club for about 30 years. This month there must be about 6 new books on JFK glorification. I am so tired of this crap. Getting ready to resign. Get over it; he was shot by a card-carrying Commie along with the fact that there hasn't been a Kennedy born who wasn't a spoiled, ignorant, self-centered piece of crap.
Posted by: Libra at November 24, 2013 08:24 AM (GblmV)
I've never read any of Cashill's books. I just hope he writes better than he talks.
Guy used to be on TV (PBS) and local talk shows all the time here in KC. Frankly, I found him boring, and almost obsessive about whatever it was he was going on about.
He comes off, at least to me, as someone who just goes on and on about some sort of conspiracy. I'm sure you know the type. Just.won't.quit.
He may have some interesting ideas, but I would never invite him to a party.
Posted by: HH at November 24, 2013 08:27 AM (XXwdv)
Posted by: The Bourbon in Boehner's Belly at November 24, 2013 08:27 AM (0cMkb)
Posted by: The Bourbon in Boehner's Belly at November 24, 2013 08:30 AM (0cMkb)
Posted by: Tuna at November 24, 2013 08:32 AM (M/TDA)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 24, 2013 11:10 AM (23Kgq)
Have you ever seen the small book about The Prayer of Jabez? What an eye-opener to look at the current way of reading it compared to how they were meant in the time period in which they were written!
Posted by: RushBabe at November 24, 2013 08:35 AM (hrIP5)
Posted by: Phinn at November 24, 2013 08:35 AM (KOGmz)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 08:46 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 08:47 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 24, 2013 08:48 AM (23Kgq)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 08:51 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 24, 2013 08:51 AM (23Kgq)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at November 24, 2013 08:52 AM (XIxXP)
A few years ago I found out that a number of my ancestors had been peons on some of Richelieu's estates in the Loudun area, whom he'd recruited to go settle Acadia (Nova Scotia), roundabout 1635-1640, which inspired me to revisit the Loudun possessions. He was a real prick but, then again, so were all the other political players of the time.
Posted by: Trotsky with an ice-pick in his head at November 24, 2013 08:52 AM (MAlP4)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at November 24, 2013 08:53 AM (23Kgq)
Miss Marple, on another blog, posted this morning that she has not been here since the Incident, and that anyone posting at Ace as 'miss Marple' is an imposter.
Posted by: Mr Natural at November 24, 2013 08:58 AM (yjSCI)
Dunno if you've ever read it, but one of the great books about conspiracies and people who believe them is 'Foucault's Pendulum' by Umberto Eco.
All at once weird, funny, and scary...
Posted by: HH at November 24, 2013 08:59 AM (XXwdv)
Posted by: OregonMuse at November 24, 2013 09:00 AM (fd0Pp)
Oh brother, I know someone who has a specific interest in pre-Islamic Arabic poetry, in fact, he mentioned some collection he was working through last year. BUT he's imbibed so much Kool-aid, you wouldn't be able to talk to him about anything outside of the poetry or translation without, well, smacking him maybe? If you think you could deal with him, and he does know his stuff in this particular area, let me know when you're ready and I can ask him for you.
Posted by: Trotsky with an ice-pick in his head at November 24, 2013 09:01 AM (MAlP4)
Catholics didn't support JFK because JFK ran as a Catholic. JFK really didn't run as a Catholic - he spent so much time telling the Baptists that he believed in the separation of Church and State, that some quipped that he was running for office as the first *Baptist* President.
(This was back when the Baptists were still much like the Danbury Baptists - they didn't trust establishment WASP progressive religiosity any more than the Catholics did.)
What happened in 1960 was Catholic memory of a 1920s candidate: Al Smith. When Smith ran, the nation had a collective freakout about this Papist secret agent. The campaign was really, really ugly.
Al Smith didn't help his case, true; by floating comments about how Christians should help the poor, he made people suspect he was going to be a social-activist in power - think Huckabee, but with pals in the Irish mob (which was a thing then).
But instead of attacking Smith, the Protestant churches (including Baptist churches) went out of their way to attack all things Catholic.
It got American Catholics' Irish up, as they say, and they turned out in droves when they got the chance again a generation later.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at November 24, 2013 09:13 AM (K6nQG)
Posted by: Paranoidgirlinseattle at November 24, 2013 09:33 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at November 24, 2013 09:43 AM (ndlFj)
Posted by: Severe Conservative riding Orca at November 24, 2013 09:44 AM (v6hyJ)
Thanks, OM.
IÂ’d like to add something, on two heads. First, the New London School Disaster has always been something close to me: my great-great-uncle, W. Chesley Shaw, was the school superintendent when it happened (he was my dadÂ’s motherÂ’s fatherÂ’s brother, and there are a right smart of Shaws and Eatons and Rayfords and Gaudets in Pleasant Hill Cemetery, and a right smart of those with birthdates in the Twenties and the same March 18, 1937 date of death: GrammyÂ’s cousins and second cousins and all). One thing about it: we may have become the first family in America to learn that you couldnÂ’t trust Walter Cronkite. With 2012 being the 75th anniversary, the disaster got some attention outside Rusk County: not only in Gone at 3:17, as mentioned, but in Ron RozelleÂ’s My Boys and Girls Are In There, which I highly recommend. Ron Rozelle, funnily enough, lives down here and is an old friend of my uncleÂ’s, GrammyÂ’s younger son and thus one of Chesley ShawÂ’s grandnephews; Mr. RozelleÂ’s a danged fine writer with tons of experience. (GervÂ’s and my Â’37: the year of portent, which also came out in 2012 and which youÂ’ve kindly plugged heretofore, has an entire section on the New London School Disaster, in parallel with the Battle of Guadalajara in the Spanish Civil War.) BrownÂ’s book is quite good; RonÂ’s may just be a bit better. (YMMV.)
Again, thanks for plugging Gerv’s new novel. It’s a novel, not a political essay, but I think I should say a word or two to my fellow ’Rons here. It’s British (as all get-out), so it doesn’t precisely map over to our own politics, but you don’t have to follow UK events to enjoy the duke’s comments on the Cameroons (the Tory version of RINOs), and you can’t not, I think, love a character – the duke, again – who, in addition to being IMO funny as hell, has four interests in life: cricket, steam trains, High Church Anglicanism, and Thatcherism. Social cons will like it best once they’ve hit the ending (slight twist and all), and then, possibly, read it again in a new light; libertarians will, I think, like it for the secular passages but may get uneasy with the church passages. I don’t think anybody, though, Left, Right, or Center – okay, “Centre” – can read the account of the Remembrance Sunday services at the village war memorial and not be moved. Anyhow, thanks for the plug for a book I was glad to help publish; and I’d like to know how folks like it.
Posted by: Markham S. Pyle at November 24, 2013 09:51 AM (WlkUc)
Posted by: Captain Hate on the iPhone at November 24, 2013 09:52 AM (LnCzx)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at November 24, 2013 09:53 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Markham S. Pyle at November 24, 2013 10:01 AM (WlkUc)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at November 24, 2013 10:02 AM (Nsoq9)
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at November 24, 2013 10:03 AM (+FlW1)
Posted by: Markham S. Pyle at November 24, 2013 10:04 AM (WlkUc)
Posted by: IrishEd at November 24, 2013 10:07 AM (bfm04)
Posted by: Markham S. Pyle at November 24, 2013 10:17 AM (WlkUc)
Posted by: william at November 24, 2013 10:27 AM (RcZhL)
Posted by: Meekle at November 24, 2013 10:36 AM (kqHcW)
Posted by: Trimegistus at November 24, 2013 10:41 AM (Y010F)
Posted by: no good deed at November 24, 2013 10:45 AM (HsJeN)
Now the rocking chair will interfere. I am simply burned out on the road.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at November 24, 2013 10:47 AM (YowqD)
Intelligence is expressed in different ways. Huxley, for example, was a sucker for medical scams. In the 40s and 50s there was a scammer by the name of Bates who claimed he could correct visual impairments such as nearsightedness by means of eye exercises, as if the distortion of the lens was the effect of weak muscles. The slogan 'Throw away your glasses!' is still used by those working the scam today.
Huxley was a public supporter of Bates. Bennett Cerf recounted a story were Huxley was giving an after-dinner speech and found himself stumbling. He pulled his notes from his pocket and that only made things worse as Huxley couldn't read what was there. He then produced a magnifying glass from his pocket and was able to read his notes. A hush had come over the room because everyone present was familiar with Huxley's advocacy of 'The Bates Method.'
I have a friend whose father was very close to Robert Heinlein. This friend dreamed of being an Air Force pilot as a kid but the coke bottle lenses in his glasses made it painfully obvious that he'd never qualify. Corrective surgery was still decades away from common use. Surprisingly, Heinlein recommended the Bates Method to my friend. This was sometime in the mid to late 70s. I don't know if Heinlein from his woes until he found a new aspiration or if he really believed the Bates nonsense.
Posted by: Epobirs at November 24, 2013 10:53 AM (bPxS6)
Posted by: NCKate at November 24, 2013 11:14 AM (vjZKo)
A friend who I haven't seen in nearly a decade had a pet theory about the assassination being a form of euthanasia calculated for political effect. There wasn't any provision for relieving the President of his office due to infirmity. The 25th Amendment wasn't enacted until 1967 but the first proposals were in 1963, with Sen. Estes Kefauver having raised the disability issue frequently in his career. (We know now that JFK lied about his Addison's diagnosis while campaigning in 1960.)
At the start, the main precedent he had in mind was likely Woodrow Wilson, who had a stroke during his time in office and would almost certainly be relieved of office under the 25th Amendment. But a certain number of people knew that Kennedy had serious medical issues with cognitive side effects and that the treatments had yet more cognitive effects.
A long time ago, I read a translated French novel about an immortality drug that also cures all ailments. There are limits, as shown when the first creature used as a test is so far beyond its normal life span that its wings have crumbled to dust and it cannot grow new ones. The drug can cure illness but not produce regeneration beyond the normal capability of the body, so trauma will still kill an immortal. To maintain a kind of detente, samples of the drug are given to world leaders. Nobody can use the drug to become an immortal dictator because they will immediately have numerous rivals. An analog to the nuclear standoff.
In the book, JFK is President and his pain is truly severe. He succumbs to temptation and takes the drug. He is restored to health but to restore the balance of power is assassinated by a section of the CIA that exists solely for this purpose.
I've tried to find the title of that novel but no luck.
Posted by: Epobirs at November 24, 2013 11:31 AM (bPxS6)
Posted by: John F Not Kerry @jfd1965 at November 24, 2013 11:39 AM (HF2US)
Posted by: waelse1 at November 24, 2013 11:46 AM (5m4Yl)
Posted by: NCKate at November 24, 2013 03:14 PM (vjZKo)
I am not sure which one it was. I have read three or four that are used as Wofford textbooks. This is the one I love the best so it is probably the one I referenced. (especially since I borrowed all of them originally from a friend and this is one that I went back and purchased for myself).
Ironically, when I went to check to verify the title I can not find my copy so I have loaned it to someone. Which means I will have to go buy another copy.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at November 24, 2013 11:49 AM (YowqD)
Posted by: Gem at November 25, 2013 01:56 AM (zw+pb)
Posted by: BornLib at November 25, 2013 04:40 PM (zpNwC)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.224 seconds, 243 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: NCKate at November 24, 2013 06:52 AM (vjZKo)