December 15, 2013
— Open Blogger

Good morning morons and moronettes and welcome to the award-winning AoSHQ's prestigious Sunday Morning Book Thread.
Get Ready For SkyNet
Well, here we go. From the sidebar earlier this week, we're supposedly on the verge of creating devices with human-level intelligence, and the implications, a new book by James Barrat claims, are not good. The progression from 'normal' human-level intelligence to artificial super intelligence will be lightning fast and impossible to stop.
Me, I'm skeptical. Keep in mind that Barrat is not an AI specialist, but rather a filmmaker whose work, according to his website, mainly focuses on Mideast archeology. I don't believe in exclusive professional "guilds" where outsiders are shut out completely, and that gifted amateurs can certainly contribute, but on the other hand, there is a tendency for the amateur, who may know just enough to be dangerous, to latch on to a theory and then cherry-pick evidence from the experts who are sympathetic and discount or explain away contrary evidence from those that aren't. I've seen this happen, among other places, in the flap over Y2K preparedness. So what you get is not science, but rather some form of ideology or belief masquerading as science, impervious to refutation, even theoretically.
I went to one of the links in the review article and learned that this issue is referred to as the "AI foom" debate, that is, if generally intelligent AIs could undergo a “foom” in which they very rapidly improve their own capabilities with little or no warning. For those interested in looking more into this, they even have an eBook of a foom debate by two AI experts, Robin Hanson and Eliezer Yudkowsky, free for downloading. You can get it in pdf, ePub or Mobi formats.
Sgt. Mom on Sale, This Week Only, Save 15%
She e-mails:
I usually do three or four Christmas sales events at this time of year, but this year one was cancelled and another absolutely wrecked by insanely cold weather. I am going to have a one-week long sale of print books through my own website, through the 19th in order to recoup some of what I might have earned.
It's 15% off, and a special deal for five of my print books at $50 - autographed, personal message if requested.
Here is the order page at her website.

When Bad Sex Is Good Sex
OK, so the British magazine Literary Review gives out a prize every year to the novel with the worst sex scene. It was started in 1993 to "to draw attention to the crude, tasteless, often perfunctory use of redundant passages of sexual description in the modern novel, and to discourage it." This year the prize went to a book I had never heard of and have no interest in reading, so I'm not going to go into any detail about it. But what caught my eye was this:
Past winners include Tom Wolfe, Rachel Johnson, Giles Coren, AA Gill and Norman Mailer, and in 2008 John Updike was awarded a lifetime achievement prize.
The last bit about Updike is pretty funny, but... Tom Wolfe? Really? Wolfe wrote a bad sex scene? I Googled around a bit and sure enough, it turns out that Wolfe won the prize in 2004 for his novel I Am Charlotte Simmons
Wait a minute.
I read that book. I remember the sex scene they're talking about. The main character makes a poor decision and gives up her virginity to a worthless, entitled douchebag. She is left with nothing but loss. Yes, it's bad sex. Yes, it's spectacularly unerotic. But that's the whole point. Wolfe deliberately wrote it that way. It's not every erotic to be talked into doing something you really don't want to do with some scummy guy you really don't want to be with, for reasons that turn out to be more or less pointless. Charlotte Simmons' first experience with sex is one big negative, and I think the non-erotic deflowering scene communicates this very well.
There's a difference between trying to be sexy, and failing, and trying not to be sexy, and succeeding. I think the Literary Review unwisely conflated the two.
Another thing I learned here is that the rat bastard commie folksinger Woodie Guthrie wrote a book. It made the bad sex prize short list:
His book House of Earth, written in 1947, was published for the first time this year - with an introduction by the actor Johnny Depp, and a love scene lasting 30 pages that is literally a roll in the hay: "Back and forth, side to side, they moved on their bed on the hay. Back and forth, side to side, they moved their hips, their feet, their legs, their whole bodies. Their arms tied into knots like vines climbing trees, and the trees moved and swayed, and there was a time and a rhythm to the blend of the movement."
Yeah, that's pretty bad. If the movie Plan 9 From Outer Space had a sex scene, it would probably look something like that.
Book Bleg Results
Thank you to 'Nash Rambler' and the other morons who identified my book bleg as Anything Can Happen by George and Helen Waite Papashvily, first published in 1945. Commenter 'Alifa' describes it as "a wonderful immigration-to-America story; it has both humor and sadness." I gotta get me a copy. The title sounds like an earlier version of the comedian Yakov Smirnoff's signature exclamation 'What a country!'
Books For Morons
One of the fans of the book thread e-mailed me this week and wants me to mention that her husband, who has won Emmy and Peabody awards for his writing on cartoons such as Animaniacs, Pinky & the Brain, and Freakazoid, has written a funny little story, Jury Doody available on Kindle for 99 cents.
___________
So that's all for this week. As always, book thread tips, suggestions, rumors, threats, and insults may be sent to OregonMuse, Proprietor, AoSHQ Book Thread, at aoshqbookthread, followed by the 'at' sign, and then 'G' mail, and then dot cee oh emm.
What have you all been reading this week? Hopefully something good, because, as I keep saying, life is too short to be reading lousy books.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
07:00 AM
| Comments (107)
Post contains 1056 words, total size 7 kb.
This despite being infused with all kinds of liberal trash.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at December 15, 2013 07:09 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at December 15, 2013 07:15 AM (QBm1P)
Posted by: RS at December 15, 2013 07:15 AM (YAGV/)
Posted by: PaleRider at December 15, 2013 07:17 AM (cQZV0)
Back and forth, side to side,
****
Wait, slow down, I'm trying to take notes here. Back and forth? That doesn't sound right.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at December 15, 2013 07:18 AM (N/Sup)
Posted by: alo89 at December 15, 2013 07:19 AM (IacRz)
we're supposedly on the verge of creating devices with human-level intelligence,
***
I'm not sure that is setting the bar very high.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at December 15, 2013 07:19 AM (N/Sup)
Made much easier by the proliferation of the LIVs and dumbed Dem base.
Posted by: George Orwell at December 15, 2013 07:28 AM (Vv4Go)
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at December 15, 2013 07:31 AM (2oU2+)
Posted by: Jorge at December 15, 2013 07:31 AM (ZRPb2)
Posted by: Your friendly neighborhood sentient robot farmer at December 15, 2013 07:31 AM (U82Km)
Posted by: extra at December 15, 2013 07:33 AM (XTlIj)
Rise of the machines has been done long before War Games or Terminator. In movie format there is The Forbin Project where the US and USSR defense computers take the world hostage. In the literary there is the Hugo winning short story by Harlan Ellison called I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream and also the short novel The Adolescence of P-1.
Last night in the ONT I mentioned the book 100 Great Science Fiction Short Short Stories.
Science Fiction for Telepaths by E. Michael Blake.
Aw, you know what I mean.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 15, 2013 07:35 AM (vjloV)
Posted by: Anachronda at December 15, 2013 07:40 AM (U82Km)
Posted by: Sgt. Mom at December 15, 2013 07:42 AM (Asjr7)
I expect their morality will be simple.
Humans bad. Kill them all.
Posted by: Jimbo at December 15, 2013 07:43 AM (V70Uh)
Posted by: Jimbo at December 15, 2013 07:44 AM (V70Uh)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 15, 2013 07:44 AM (Tl6G3)
***
I'm not sure that is setting the bar very high.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at December 15, 2013 11:19 AM (N/Sup)
Yeah... Is this Moron smart or LIV smart?
Finished reading "Under the Loving Care of the Fatherly Leader" yesterday. It's a history of North Korea and the Kims, and is every bit as awful as you can imagine, and then some. It's from around 2005, so current events have overtaken it; the last chapter is speculation about who would succeed Kim Jong-Il, with the author expressing fervent hope it wouldn't be Kim Jong-Un... who of course it was.
Lots of interviews with defectors. The horror stories almost get redundant after a while, especially the ones from the mid 90's, when the country had a horrific famine and people were literally eating grass and tree bark.
It's in the same category as Rudolf Hoess' autobiography: I'm glad I read it, but the subject matter is so depressing and awful that I don't know if I'd recommend it to anyone else.
Posted by: Secundus at December 15, 2013 07:45 AM (ZwjWK)
They were limited time Kindle freebies from Amazon links posted by morons. The titles are A Distant Eden and Adrian's War by Lloyd Tackitt. There are two more books in the series now; all are $3.99 for the Kindle. I'm contemplating buying the last two, and I'm a well known cheap bastard.
What he does is interweave survival skills, prepping, military tactics and a story together. It's entertaining and sends me to the web to look up stuff like plant pictures. I learned quite a few things from the first two books.
On the downside, his editing and proofing leaves a bit to be desired. He does make a few continuity mistakes and even contradicts himself in a couple of spots. But I'm nitpicking, I suppose.
Overall, if you're interested in prep type stuff in a SHTF fictional story, I recommend giving the first one a try.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 15, 2013 07:46 AM (cHZB7)
I began "Red Fortress: History and Illusion in the Kremlin" by Catherine Merridale. In the introduction she mentions that Stalin narrowly followed Nicholas I as the greatest name in Russian history. There's something seriously wrong for a country to think that way.
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 15, 2013 07:46 AM (37Azy)
Posted by: tomc at December 15, 2013 07:46 AM (avEuh)
Posted by: Jimbo at December 15, 2013 07:48 AM (V70Uh)
?
I'm a little lost. What the hell are they then?
Posted by: AD at December 15, 2013 07:51 AM (nuiAZ)
Posted by: Secundus at December 15, 2013 07:51 AM (ZwjWK)
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 15, 2013 07:53 AM (37Azy)
Posted by: AD at December 15, 2013 11:51 AM (nuiAZ)
Originally Huns. They subsequently united with Slavonics but he was erroneously describing them at a point in time prior to that.
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 15, 2013 07:57 AM (37Azy)
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 15, 2013 11:46 AM (37Azy)
Funny thing, he wasn't even a Russian. In addition to the whole 'mass murdering genocidal spawn of Satan' thing. Speaking of which, Simon Sebag Montefiore's "Young Stalin" is well worth a read. Follows Uncle Joe from birth the the October Revolution, and has lots of stuff from old Soviet archives that apparently hadn't seen daylight before.
Posted by: Secundus at December 15, 2013 07:58 AM (ZwjWK)
Posted by: Comanche Voter at December 15, 2013 07:58 AM (VAche)
Posted by: tomc at December 15, 2013 07:59 AM (avEuh)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at December 15, 2013 08:01 AM (u82oZ)
Yes I'm sure the Georgian gimp was mistrusted by a lot of European leaning Rooskis, which he rewarded by liquidating a significant number of which.
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 15, 2013 08:02 AM (37Azy)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at December 15, 2013 08:08 AM (u82oZ)
Yeah. A lot of the other Bolshies didn't like him, either-- one of his principal jobs was fundraising for the movement via theft, extortion, gun running, piracy (the hijacking boats kind, not the RIAA kind), kidnapping for profit and bank robbery. Trotsky and Co. seemed to think he was giving them a bad name... Which he was, of course, but by the time they realized he was also building a network of buddies who had more guns and fewer scruples than them, it was too late.
Posted by: Secundus at December 15, 2013 08:10 AM (ZwjWK)
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at December 15, 2013 08:10 AM (2oU2+)
Seamus, I could fortell you would say that.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 15, 2013 08:14 AM (vjloV)
Posted by: ExSnipe at December 15, 2013 08:14 AM (57ubW)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at December 15, 2013 08:14 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at December 15, 2013 08:16 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 15, 2013 08:17 AM (cHZB7)
Wiley Sword also wrote a book that covers this, "President Washington's Indian War" that covers the campaigns in detail, with some chilling recollections from survivors. Highly interesting and recommended if you have any interest in the subject.
Posted by: JHW at December 15, 2013 08:20 AM (fP7ld)
Posted by: Tonestaple at December 15, 2013 08:21 AM (B7YN4)
Posted by: Zoltan at December 15, 2013 08:21 AM (RXos3)
some early episodes of the Caucasus war, but not much of note, as compared to Catherine or Peter the Great.
Posted by: jeffrey pelt at December 15, 2013 08:22 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 15, 2013 08:22 AM (vjloV)
The difference is, this time you've got me.
*TFG*
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 15, 2013 08:25 AM (cHZB7)
A non-Ghost in the Shell story idea with no relation to nano-technology just popped to mind. A crime drama, really muse? Well let me scribble it down.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 15, 2013 08:25 AM (vjloV)
Posted by: no good deed at December 15, 2013 08:26 AM (HsJeN)
http://tinyurl.com/kn3vzba
Okay, okay; my book cover looked like this:
http://www.saltmanz.com/pictures/Cover%20Scans/Book%20Covers/Gateway.jpg.php
But the former is more true to the text, given that no-one actually pilots any ships. . .
Gateway is (supposedly) the sequel to the (horrible and evil) "Merchants of Venus", but more like the way the first Summer Glau "Terminator" season was a sequel to "Terminator 2". Namely: it's a rewrite of the same material.
These stories are about alien-tech prospectors. The aliens who left this tech are the mysterious Heechee (read "Merchants" for why). If they go someplace interesting and come back alive with information and/or tech, the survivor(s) get a royalty.
In "Gateway" the prospectors are doing their work in outer space. The guys on Venus found a ship that went to a space-station, the Gateway - actually, the first Gateway; there exist more. On the Gateway(s) are many Heechee ships that go... wherever you tell them to go. But there isn't an instruction manual, so . . . luck helps.
"Merchants"'s point was about how capitalism was just dumb luck so SOCIALISMO O MUERTE (as in "Merchants"). Here Pohl offers more an in-depth look at survivor-guilt.
So, here is where the 1970s hilarity comes through. There are references to transcendental meditation and EST. People here go to confessional by shrink, and Freud is his Prophet. It is further assumed that everyone is bisexual to X percent (yay, Alfred Kinsey!). On that topic what the prospectors do in their spare time is to fuck each other. I was literally surprised that the London Boys didn't make a cameo. The story's "hero" also porks a 16-year-old girl, which even her family doesn't seem to mind. (He then breaks up with her, and leaves her and his other ex-gf stranded near an event-horizon. But he feels really bad about it.)
Pohl's mean streak, stronger in "Merchants", does come out from time to time. For instance one of the earlier destinations for a Heechee ship was Barnard's Star, but that voyage came up empty. Nerds of the late 1970s would have associated this with the then-ongoing debunking of Peter van de Kamp's planet. Maybe some people laughed at the time. Me, I thought "what an ass".
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at December 15, 2013 08:27 AM (Nsoq9)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at December 15, 2013 08:29 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Prez'nit 404 at December 15, 2013 08:32 AM (Dwehj)
But it has been years since I have read any of those books, perhaps should purge them from the shelves. Though for some odd reason one line from the short story The Extrapolated Dimwit has always stuck in my mind - "I would go back to mother if she wasn't a six fingered lizard!"
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 15, 2013 08:33 AM (vjloV)
Posted by: Cowboy at December 15, 2013 08:33 AM (tFH99)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at December 15, 2013 08:34 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: The Albino Freckled Desert Sand-Breathing Fish at December 15, 2013 12:25 PM (KBvAm)
I read Iron Sunrise and enjoyed it, along with Accelerando, a great deal; he incorporates a lot of interesting concepts effectively. He's a fucking lib nut when it comes to politics and unfortunately inserts them sporadically in his work.
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 15, 2013 08:39 AM (37Azy)
Posted by: Tonestaple at December 15, 2013 08:41 AM (B7YN4)
There simply is no conflating processing power with intelligence, and that's what the prophets of A.I. always do.
My autistic child has every bit as much processing power as I do, running on similar hardware architecture, yet she is (and I say this with all the love in my heart) a drooling idiot.
To the best of our current knowledge (or, current when I was last keeping up with it, anyway) neurons transmit information by using 6 independent channels, all conveying different information simultaneously, all of which can be modulated in intensity. Digital information is processed in a single binary channel, with no modulation.
If artificial intelligence came to exist, it would be utterly alien to us, and we almost certainly wouldn't recognize it as such.
But the benchmark we use is the Turing Test, or to what degree output from a computer program resembles reactions from a human.
I've "met" several people online who could be easily simulated by a short program in BASIC. Whoopie. Artificial Stupidity has been achieved.
I don't think anyone would argue that this would be an efficient use of resources. But it's pretty much what we're attempting to do: make a computer use thought processes similar to our own. You might as well try to teach a goldfish to sing.
Posted by: Luke at December 15, 2013 08:41 AM (2MUaT)
some early episodes of the Caucasus war, but not much of note, as compared to Catherine or Peter the Great.
Posted by: jeffrey pelt at December 15, 2013 12:22 PM (Jsiw/)
I was surprised that neither of them were one or two. Inscrutable Rooskis.
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 15, 2013 08:42 AM (37Azy)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 15, 2013 08:43 AM (E+uky)
Posted by: Paranoidgirlinseattle at December 15, 2013 08:44 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at December 15, 2013 08:44 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Darian Elliott at December 15, 2013 08:44 AM (pCf+a)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 15, 2013 08:52 AM (E+uky)
Posted by: baldilocks at December 15, 2013 08:52 AM (36Rjy)
Posted by: MtTB at December 15, 2013 08:53 AM (xehjI)
But who would vote for Democrats, then?
Posted by: MtTB at December 15, 2013 08:56 AM (xehjI)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 15, 2013 08:56 AM (vjloV)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at December 15, 2013 09:05 AM (qyfb5)
British aircraft used for raid at Taranto: Fairey Swordfish. Obsolete (heh) biplanes, nicknamed "Stringbag." Remained in service until VE Day.
Posted by: butch at December 15, 2013 09:08 AM (EV3Uf)
Posted by: Bookaday at December 15, 2013 09:11 AM (+HEUC)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 15, 2013 09:12 AM (vjloV)
Anyway, love this weekly discussion, and my lurking often pays off.
Posted by: Gidget at December 15, 2013 09:15 AM (tfg7i)
Posted by: the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth at December 15, 2013 09:21 AM (52lgb)
What a great loss.
Posted by: Gidget at December 15, 2013 09:27 AM (tfg7i)
Posted by: Paranoidgirlinseattle at December 15, 2013 09:28 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette at December 15, 2013 09:39 AM (GDulk)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette at December 15, 2013 09:39 AM (GDulk)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette at December 15, 2013 09:50 AM (GDulk)
Posted by: Lizzie at December 15, 2013 09:53 AM (cfDJS)
Posted by: Lizzie at December 15, 2013 09:59 AM (cfDJS)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette at December 15, 2013 10:17 AM (GDulk)
Posted by: extra at December 15, 2013 11:33 AM (XTlIj)
Depends on what you are trying to understand. Books that place it in long-term historical context are different from books that deal with the diplomatic maneuvering that immediately preceded the war or books that narrate the progress of the war itself. Here is a short list that includes titles from each category:
The Long Fuse Laurence LaFore
July 1914 Sean McMeekin
The Great War Cyril Falls
A History of the Great War John Buchan
The Eastern Front 1914-1917 Norman Stone
The World Crisis Winston Churchill
I specifically do not recommend Tuchman's Guns of August. She was a pretty good writer, but more of a simple narrator than a good historian and gets a lot of the backstory wrong. Churchill was an excellent writer, but actually participated in the events, so he is more of an entertaining read than an unbiased and reliable analyst.
Posted by: HTL at December 15, 2013 10:41 AM (hhBXE)
Posted by: Doug at December 15, 2013 10:48 AM (zTUQR)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette at December 15, 2013 10:50 AM (GDulk)
Posted by: rickl at December 15, 2013 10:53 AM (sdi6R)
Currently reading A Throne of Bones by Vox Day, not far into it but good so far. Up next is Wardogs Coin and The Last Witchking, also by Vox Day in the same 'verse as Throne of Bones, and The Irrational Atheist, also by Vox Day. Kind of on a Vox Day kick lately I guess.
Vox Day has the distinction of being the only writer to be thrown out of the SFWA, so he has that going for him.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at December 15, 2013 11:08 AM (yh0zB)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette at December 15, 2013 11:13 AM (GDulk)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette at December 15, 2013 02:50 PM (GDulk)
I would say they are very similar. I guess Churchill's writing style is an acquired taste (at least to a modern audience...back in the day he was quite a popular author).
On the bright side, the WWI book is shorter. Even the "special edition director's cut" only ran to five volumes.
Posted by: HTL at December 15, 2013 11:15 AM (hhBXE)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo says, free toby at December 15, 2013 11:19 AM (iQxYV)
Posted by: rickl at December 15, 2013 02:53 PM (sdi6R)
I have not read The Sleepwalkers yet, but it is on my list. July 1914 is excellent, however, and contains significant details that other histories on the subject have either overlooked, glossed over or deliberately ignored.
Posted by: HTL at December 15, 2013 11:23 AM (hhBXE)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette at December 15, 2013 03:13 PM (GDulk)
He's a dick. He got into some big argument with the PTB at SFWA and they booted him. I don't know what the argument was over.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at December 15, 2013 11:25 AM (yh0zB)
Posted by: rickl at December 15, 2013 11:31 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at December 15, 2013 03:25 PM (yh0zB)
According to Wiki he made some racist statements.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at December 15, 2013 11:33 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Anachronda at December 15, 2013 11:43 AM (U82Km)
Posted by: rickl at December 15, 2013 03:31 PM (sdi6R)
In the west that period is known as "The Race to the Sea", which culminated in the First Battle of Ypres. It does get a mention in most general histories (Falls, Buchan), and in Buchan gets more attention than most, but that's because he wrote 8 volumes and had a lot of space to fill. He is also a less than neutral observer, but at least covers all of the battles. There is a book about 1st Ypres by Ian Beckett which I have not read, but it probably has more detail about this period than any other. The Osprey book on 1st Ypres is also probably pretty good.
For the east that period is covered in The Eastern Front by Stone, and since that is almost the only history that covers the eastern front in any detail at all, that's going to be about it.
Posted by: HTL at December 15, 2013 12:08 PM (hhBXE)
Posted by: Jafo at December 15, 2013 12:41 PM (FIvA6)
Posted by: Kermit the Forg at December 15, 2013 03:23 PM (tsz5J)
Posted by: JohnMc at December 15, 2013 04:09 PM (RHBWt)
Posted by: former lurker at December 15, 2013 07:32 PM (1rVuA)
Posted by: George at December 16, 2013 08:35 AM (rdFOT)
Posted by: Rollory at December 18, 2013 01:30 PM (iWqAg)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2702 seconds, 235 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: NCKate at December 15, 2013 07:09 AM (R2eVV)