January 31, 2013
— Ace Ted Cruz may have sunk Hagel.
The Israel question won't hurt Hagel too much -- it's a niche question that only Jews and conservatives care about. Non-Jewish Democrats despise Israel and generally agree with Hagel's dark conspiracies about the "Jewish Lobby."
But Cruz might have made Hagel a very difficult for Democrats. Cruz played audio of Hagel agreeing with a questioner's premise that the US was "the world's bully," complimenting that sentiment as an "important observation" (or words to that effect).
Will our troops really be led by someone who calls them The World's Bully?
Little bonus on that question and response: Hagel said this on.. Al Jazeera.
Consider the politics there.
The left's counter-spin -- and they are already spinning like tops, all the "reporters" like Chuck Todd -- is that Hagel "merely accepted" the premise, he did not offer it himself. And, they say further, is someone appearing on Al Jazeera really required to dispute all premises he disagrees with?
But the same people have claimed that politicians are indeed required to dispute questioner's premises -- see, for example, the ruckus they made when Rick Santorum failed to object to the premise that Obama was a Muslim. And you of course remember all the media attacks in 2008 over McCain's/Palin's failure to silence every single dumb shout at a rally.
But now they're claiming someone can call the US (and its military, of course) "the world's bully" on Al Jazeera and Chuck Hagel can call this an "important observation" and that's okay because We Said.
Update: Here's the Al Jazeera clip in question.
via @brianfaughan and @amandacarpenter
Posted by: Ace at
10:31 AM
| Comments (148)
Post contains 281 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Hillary!! at January 31, 2013 10:34 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Jess1 at January 31, 2013 10:34 AM (lbiWb)
Posted by: Anabolic State at January 31, 2013 10:35 AM (PPfwk)
Posted by: name at January 31, 2013 10:35 AM (Camtm)
Posted by: navybrat at January 31, 2013 10:35 AM (UdhwR)
Me? I do. I know Hagel's got the nominal R, but the Democrats are a crazy quilt of constituencies and their pro-Israel pro-American minority needs to hear more from the rest of the party.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 31, 2013 10:35 AM (xSegX)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at January 31, 2013 10:35 AM (Sptt8)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka wright Damns the Imoral shitfuckstained in the tank media at January 31, 2013 10:36 AM (+OTLF)
The fact that this person (and unfortunately so many others) can get into a place of power over us is a very good argument for limited, localized govt.
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at January 31, 2013 02:35 PM (Sptt
Its an even better argument for using the guillotine when removing politicians from power.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka wright Damns the Imoral shitfuckstained in the tank media at January 31, 2013 10:37 AM (+OTLF)
The fact that this person (and unfortunately so many others) can get into a place of power over us is a very good argument for limited, localized govt.
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at January 31, 2013 02:35 PM (Sptt
Its an even better argument for using the guillotine when removing politicians from power.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka wright Damns the Imoral shitfuckstained in the tank media at January 31, 2013 10:37 AM (+OTLF)
Posted by: zsasz at January 31, 2013 10:37 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 10:37 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: zsasz at January 31, 2013 10:37 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 10:37 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 10:37 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 10:37 AM (r2PLg)
Little bonus on that question and response: Hagel said this on.. Al Jazeera.
---
It'll look patriotic once we're done with it.
Degree of difficultly 9.7
Posted by: MSNBC at January 31, 2013 10:38 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: The Political Hat at January 31, 2013 10:38 AM (XvHmy)
Little bonus on that question and response: Hagel said this on.. Al Jazeera.
---
It'll look patriotic once we're done with it.
Degree of difficultly 9.7
Posted by: MSNBC at January 31, 2013 10:38 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: The Political Hat at January 31, 2013 10:38 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: The current CiC at January 31, 2013 10:38 AM (SSWdi)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 31, 2013 10:38 AM (EDjKF)
Posted by: The current CiC at January 31, 2013 10:38 AM (SSWdi)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 31, 2013 10:38 AM (EDjKF)
Posted by: joncelli at January 31, 2013 10:38 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: joncelli at January 31, 2013 10:38 AM (RD7QR)
So long Israel, was fun while it lasted.
Maybe in another 2000 years.....
Honestly? At this point, I think Israel could more legitimately say that to US.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at January 31, 2013 10:39 AM (4df7R)
So long Israel, was fun while it lasted.
Maybe in another 2000 years.....
Honestly? At this point, I think Israel could more legitimately say that to US.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at January 31, 2013 10:39 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 10:39 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 10:39 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Jeff Foxworthy at January 31, 2013 10:40 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at January 31, 2013 10:40 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: cicero skip at January 31, 2013 10:40 AM (3m9Uc)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 10:41 AM (r2PLg)
The Left is not fond of Hagel. They hate him. His appointment is being backed by establishment libs and the media, but he's going to get reamed by both the Republican shadow media and by the subversive leftists like Stewart.
It's won't end well.
Give him a few days to let the attention die down, and after a number of denials about a replacement and showy overt public support from Obama, Hagel will withdraw.
Posted by: imp at January 31, 2013 10:41 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 31, 2013 10:42 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at January 31, 2013 10:42 AM (nZvGM)
Posted by: zsasz at January 31, 2013 10:43 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: joncelli at January 31, 2013 10:43 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at January 31, 2013 10:43 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at January 31, 2013 10:43 AM (Sptt8)
Posted by: Bigby's Palm Pilot at January 31, 2013 10:43 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 10:44 AM (Dnbau)
Yeah, call the U. S. military "bullies." POS. Talk about totally killing what morale is left.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 31, 2013 10:44 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: President Ketchum at January 31, 2013 10:44 AM (/eBe8)
I'm feeling very uncomfortable about this whole thing. It's been too easy to club this guy over the head, even though he deserves every bit of it.
Whichever way this goes, the MFM/WH propaganda machine have already planned this out.
Posted by: Soona at January 31, 2013 10:44 AM (gnJaC)
Hagel call the troops and U.S. military "bullies."
Would anyone expect differently from preezy's nominations?
Posted by: Deli LLama at January 31, 2013 10:44 AM (lGu1O)
7 Just the fact that he's appeared on Al Jazeera should disqualify him.
I gave my first foreign policy address on Al Jazeera.
So, Hagel is my kind of guy!
Posted by: Barqy Al Clusterfuq at January 31, 2013 10:45 AM (BZMZX)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 31, 2013 10:45 AM (l86i3)
Will our troops really be led by someone who calls them The World's Bully?
Will? Does that mean is?
Posted by: The current CiC at January 31, 2013 02:38 PM (SSWdi)
I don't see a problem either.
Posted by: The new Secretary of State at January 31, 2013 10:45 AM (mETGQ)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 31, 2013 10:45 AM (e0xKF)
And I also wish Lindsay Graham was always like this.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky poised in fluid situation at January 31, 2013 10:45 AM (baL2B)
Posted by: 80sBaby at January 31, 2013 10:45 AM (YjDyJ)
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at January 31, 2013 10:46 AM (ZMzpb)
Honestly? At this point, I think Israel could more legitimately say that to US.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at January 31, 2013 02:39 PM (4df7R)
--- Don't worry about Israel. all of the rest of the ME assholes better be really worried
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at January 31, 2013 10:46 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: zsasz at January 31, 2013 10:46 AM (MMC8r)
Now we know why Barry likes him.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 31, 2013 10:46 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: John F'n Kerry, seared into your memory as Sec of State at January 31, 2013 10:47 AM (Fdm2J)
Posted by: tasker at January 31, 2013 10:47 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 31, 2013 10:47 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Sarah Jessica Parker at January 31, 2013 10:47 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 31, 2013 10:47 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Jordan at January 31, 2013 10:48 AM (Hz1zc)
They are going to do a 'tentative Vote' when they come back from recess.
Whatever the hell that is..
Posted by: wheatie at January 31, 2013 10:48 AM (BZMZX)
If he was, it isn't definitive proof of competence, but if he wasn't, that would be pretty damning on the military record for a potential SoD.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 31, 2013 10:49 AM (aZ6ew)
If he is confirmed after engaging in such a sputtering clusterfuck of a confirmation hearing, then the Senate officially loses whatever credibility it might have once had (you know,b ack when it actually used to pass budgets and shit). Your average LIV doesn't know SecDef from shinola and doesn't care. The only ones watching this right now are engaged individuals on BOTH sides, left and right.
The left hates Hagel, the right hates Hagel, and he's done NOTHING to disprove any of the arguments against him. If anything he's managed to reinforce every negative comment ever made about him. And he's done it in spectacular, mind-numbing fashion on live television. If the idiots in the Senate then choose to CONFIRM him, after his public display of incompetence, all the engaged people - left and right -- who have been watching him babble like a concussed turd will give their representatives merry hell from now until the next millenium.
Politicians are stupid, but even stupid people don't like having granola-eating hippies picketing outside their offices and calling them war criminals for five years because they confirmed an idiot like Hagel.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/i][/u][/b] at January 31, 2013 10:49 AM (4df7R)
So far, he's doing much better than I'd feared.
Posted by: President Ketchum at January 31, 2013 10:49 AM (/eBe8)
Sean and Jean, is this close to what you are seeing in the briefings on the cutbacks?
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 31, 2013 10:49 AM (S7Hzw)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at January 31, 2013 10:49 AM (C8mVl)
Gee, I remember when Chris Tingles asked Michele Bachmann about investigating congress with regard to their anti-American views, and the fit hit the shan.
Sauce for the goose...
Posted by: Amalgamated Cliff Divers, Local 157 at January 31, 2013 10:49 AM (Ph479)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 10:50 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 31, 2013 10:50 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 31, 2013 10:50 AM (8sCoq)
I can't believe we're not doing that yet. Isn't there a hack list we can check?
Posted by: comatus at January 31, 2013 10:50 AM (qaVK+)
I can't help but wonder if the President didn't think this would be a slam dunk because CH, while a dirty RINO, he is still an R and - something something - Republicans will HAVE to confirm him - right?
Posted by: TFG at January 31, 2013 10:51 AM (Walj9)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 31, 2013 10:51 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: MSNBS at January 31, 2013 10:52 AM (MMC8r)
This is the one time I'm glad we don't have a training program for republican politicians that teaches them how not to say something stupid.
Posted by: jwest at January 31, 2013 10:52 AM (ZDsRL)
Idiot in charge as the Secretary of State w/t John Kerry? Check
Similar idiots scattered throughout this administration? Check
Chuck Hagel's nomination fits in like a condom on a banana used in sex education classes? Check
What's next? Bob Menedez being nominated for something?
Personally, I hope the Hagel nomination gets shot down and that Menendez dies screaming in a fire, short of that perhaps a nice 25 year stint in a federally supervised prison, but thats just me.
Posted by: Gmac - Waiting for the revolution at January 31, 2013 10:52 AM (IanLz)
Oh look the resident asshat contratian liberal unemployed troll who claims to be a libertarian progressive who just wants us all to get along is back.
You should slap your mother for not swallowing.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka wright Damns the Imoral shitfuckstained in the tank media at January 31, 2013 10:52 AM (+OTLF)
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 31, 2013 10:52 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 31, 2013 10:52 AM (9Bj8R)
#17 Why would Obama hire an America-bashing Jew hater for SecDef?
Because he can't appoint himself.
Posted by: zsasz at January 31, 2013 02:37 PM (MMC8r)
You just know that teh SCOAMF thinks he would make a better SecDef than anybody else anyway. He wants a "yes man".
Posted by: Marmo at January 31, 2013 10:53 AM (QW+AD)
Posted by: that guy that doesn't read all the comments at January 31, 2013 10:54 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: Billy Bob, Pseudo Intellectual at January 31, 2013 10:54 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 31, 2013 10:54 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 31, 2013 10:54 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 31, 2013 02:50 PM (8sCoq)
----------------------------------------------------
As I said, if Dear Leader wants this guy, the dems will vote for him. Senators fear tyrants too.
Posted by: Soona at January 31, 2013 10:54 AM (gnJaC)
Posted by: zsasz at January 31, 2013 10:54 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: thunderb at January 31, 2013 10:55 AM (Dnbau)
66 - No, I fully agree that "non-Jewish Democrats hate Israel" but there's no need to bring me into it.
Posted by: General Izemutch at January 31, 2013 10:55 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Jones in CO at January 31, 2013 02:52 PM (8sCoq)
Finally, a candidate I can support!
Posted by: Chris Christie at January 31, 2013 10:55 AM (nZvGM)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 31, 2013 10:56 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 31, 2013 10:56 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 31, 2013 10:57 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 31, 2013 10:57 AM (UOM48)
Because Jews.
Will be the story--not officially, but it'll be what's believed, and Hagel will be added to the list of Good People The Joos Have Destroyed In Their Quest To...Whatever.
And Bang Blondes.
Curiously, the paleocon "neocon"-haters I keep up with seem to be staying away from commentary on the hearing. Today's scene should be pissing them off. Hagel's getting yacked for saying dumb-guy versions of some of the stuff they sometimes say. But so far, nothing.
Left-sympathetic "libertarians" are all in on the "neocon war-boner" talk today, but the right-symps aren't. It's like they see there's some bamboozlin' going on, and they're leaning back and squinting at it.
Posted by: oblig. at January 31, 2013 10:57 AM (cePv8)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Author of Amy Lynn available on Amazon. http://tinyurl.com/ahc8poj at January 31, 2013 10:57 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 31, 2013 10:58 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 31, 2013 10:59 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 31, 2013 02:54 PM (UOM4
--------------------------------------------
Enlistments will definitely go down for American warriors like your son. What I'm afraid of are the people who will volunteer under the present leadership. With the culling of the warriors in the higher ranks, I'm beginning to wonder if this is the start of the buildup of Baraka's Homeland Security Force.
Posted by: Soona at January 31, 2013 11:00 AM (gnJaC)
So full of crap. Generalize much?
Posted by: Jordan at January 31, 2013 02:48 PM (Hz1zc)
Those anti Israel protests manned mostly by non jewish democrat voters would appear to further confirm what a dope you are.
Posted by: polynikes at January 31, 2013 11:02 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Saddam at January 31, 2013 11:04 AM (phUqH)
has he mentioned if america should be allowed borders ?
you know some things are just crazytown.
Posted by: ette at January 31, 2013 11:05 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Clemenza at January 31, 2013 11:06 AM (3GuQx)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 31, 2013 02:59 PM (UOM4
it's seems to have become acceptable again.
Posted by: ette at January 31, 2013 11:08 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: ejo at January 31, 2013 11:18 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: exceller at January 31, 2013 11:24 AM (ROGMG)
McCain for his media whoring 'Maverick' personae and being pro-amnesty Senator from a border state. All that Mavericky selling out to the MSM for all those years and what did it net him?
Graham for offering amnesty to criminals which he's okay with because he's from the border state of South Carolina.
And Hagel because he's apparently just too stupid to get with the program.
Posted by: CozMark at January 31, 2013 11:26 AM (WAHqd)
Posted by: Mikey NTH - there on Thunder Island! at January 31, 2013 11:27 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: rex the wonder god at January 31, 2013 11:27 AM (21TJo)
Posted by: somejoe at January 31, 2013 11:28 AM (SSWdi)
When Hagel's done they should nominate Sen. Durbin for Asst. SecDef.
Then all would be complete in the unity of policy.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - there on Thunder Island! at January 31, 2013 11:29 AM (hLRSq)
When Dems start dreaming about a purple Texas, remind them that Ted Cruz was just elected.
Posted by: SH at January 31, 2013 11:32 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Peregrine Took, Hobbit S.O.B. at January 31, 2013 11:41 AM (erlzv)
Posted by: RonW at January 31, 2013 11:43 AM (HRJmX)
Posted by: Iluv jumbo black nuts at January 31, 2013 11:45 AM (zCojJ)
Would the WH want exactly this to happen? Hagel (A Repub in name only) gets the crap kicked out of him by fellow R's. His nomination gets ash canned and TFG puts up someone farther to the left of Hagel with the WH tossing up their hands saying that this is further proof that they can't work with R's.
Posted by: Tony253 at January 31, 2013 11:53 AM (PryWG)
If Hagel's nomination is going to be defeated by Dems, the most likely place is the committee (less press coverage). Republicans can't really defeat Hagel on the floor but are laying out markers on unpopular national security policies that Hagel supports (and probably Obama as well). For example, no sanctions on Iran, anti-Israeli talk, and now how the U.S. is a bully etc. are not really popular positions in the U.S.
Each of these generally unpopular stances can reduce the electability of Dem. senators in specific situations either by pissing off campaign donors and/or voters. So you would need to analyze specific Dem. senators on the committee to determine the effects.
Posted by: wg at January 31, 2013 11:58 AM (uVc0d)
Too bad Cruz was born in Canada.
Posted by: McAdams at January 31, 2013 12:01 PM (EU2BU)
Posted by: drawandstrike at January 31, 2013 12:03 PM (uVLJc)
From what I've read, Cruz is a U.S. citizen by birth, having been born in Calgary to an American-born mother. Because his mother had U.S. citizenship at the time of his birth, it transferred to him on foreign soil.
Posted by: TxAnn56 at January 31, 2013 12:20 PM (Y/hkJ)
Posted by: sexypig at January 31, 2013 12:20 PM (dZQh7)
Posted by: phreshone at January 31, 2013 12:20 PM (0SXI6)
Posted by: Socratease at January 31, 2013 12:28 PM (3V4IJ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3351 seconds, 276 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Little bonus on that question and response: Hagel said this on.. Al Jazeera.
Oops.
Taken out of context? Nah, that ain't gonna fly. Misquoted? Uh uh. Blame Bush? Tough sell. Must think, must think...
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 31, 2013 10:33 AM (IDSI7)