August 09, 2013
— Ace I've got a great idea: The Republican Party should go meekly along with funding ObamaCare, because it's obviously so popular. It might cost them seats to oppose it.
ObamaCare’s cost-cutting board — memorably called a “death panel” by Sarah Palin — is facing growing opposition from Democrats who say it will harm people on Medicare.Former Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean drew attention to the board designed to limit Medicare cost growth when he called for its repeal in an op-ed late last month.
Dean was quickly criticized by supporters of the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), who noted his ties to the healthcare industry as an adviser to a major D.C. lobbying firm.
But the former Vermont governor is not the only Democrat looking to kill the panel.
A wave of vulnerable Democrats over the past three months has signed on to bills repealing the boardÂ’s powers, including Sen. Mark Pryor (Ark.) and Reps. Ron Barber (Ariz.), Ann Kirkpatrick (Ariz.), Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.) and Elizabeth Esty (Conn.).
All five are considered vulnerable in next yearÂ’s election, highlighting the stakes and the political angst surrounding the healthcare measure.
Obama and his leftist cultist have created monsters in order to "fix" two problems: difficulty getting insurance for the already-sick and permitting "children" to stay on their parents' insurance until their "Sweet Twenty-Sixth" birthday.
But apparently it's more important to "have the issue" than to actually accomplish any public good.
Harry Reid: Gee I Sure Hope the GOP isn't Opposing ObamaCare Because Obama is Black. No, that's why Mark Pryor and Howard Dean oppose it though.
Posted by: Ace at
10:14 AM
| Comments (243)
Post contains 287 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: oeJay44incday at August 09, 2013 10:16 AM (QxSug)
Yeah.
A note from inside the field.
Apparently no "experts" want to hitch their wagon to this beast either.
It recalls the "God Panels" of the original dialysis machines which drew the ire of so many (and both made and ruined careers).
No one wants to take that risk. Even people who have gladly worked with Government before.
It's THAT BAD.
Posted by: tsrblke at August 09, 2013 10:16 AM (GaqMa)
I'll bet that's not covered.
Posted by: Kensington at August 09, 2013 10:17 AM (/AHDz)
Posted by: joncelli at August 09, 2013 10:17 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: @whitehouse at August 09, 2013 10:19 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Daniel Simpson Day at August 09, 2013 10:19 AM (aA2hG)
Posted by: tsj017 at August 09, 2013 10:20 AM (pUOLh)
Posted by: Kensington at August 09, 2013 02:17 PM (/AHDz)
I dunno, I plan on claiming my stress over job loss needs to be covered by giving me a sweet sweet government gig.
"Because, health is everything and everything is health."--The WHO
(That's not an actual quote)
(It's pretty accurate though.)
Posted by: tsrblke at August 09, 2013 10:20 AM (GaqMa)
Yep. You're right Ace.
With Republicans like this - who needs Democraps?
Posted by: Strife at August 09, 2013 10:21 AM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: Hurricane LaFawnduh at August 09, 2013 10:21 AM (pginn)
Posted by: Death Panels at August 09, 2013 10:22 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: wooga at August 09, 2013 10:22 AM (7SbaW)
It has always, always been about getting to single-payer. Any opposition to IPAB is tactical and local; the goal is single-payer and the strategy is to burn down the present system.
Remember all the alternatives to this abortion of a law when it was first proposed like tort reform, high-risk pools, and permitting intrastate competition?
What happened to them? And the people advocating them? There are better ways to reform health care and insurance and we're not hearing them.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at August 09, 2013 10:22 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at August 09, 2013 10:23 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at August 09, 2013 10:23 AM (7UMow)
"ObamaCare’s cost-cutting board — memorably called a “death panel” by Sarah Palin — is facing growing opposition from Democrats who say it will harm people on Medicare."
Snidely Whiplash has discovered that he tied himself to the railroad tracks instead of Nell, and the afternoon express is coming around the bend....
Posted by: Mikey NTH - owner of the Outrage Outlet by the 4-way stop at August 09, 2013 10:23 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Bigbys Cell Fingers at August 09, 2013 10:23 AM (1FO/I)
Posted by: caustic at August 09, 2013 10:23 AM (/b8+5)
By my count this is the 713 Gagilllionth thing that Libs were wrong on.
**Yawn**
Birm
Posted by: dananjcon at August 09, 2013 10:23 AM (jvd3N)
Posted by: Death Panels at August 09, 2013 02:22 PM (FcR7P)
Let's see, you're a minority woman in need of a new liver. I don't see any problem with this. Wait, you voted for a Republican once? Most unfortunate. Next!
Posted by: Death Panelista at August 09, 2013 10:23 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: t-bird at August 09, 2013 10:23 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: TenthJustice at August 09, 2013 10:24 AM (qB8lN)
And, for those who always bitch that conservatives do a lousy job of messaging, not that this is NOT a conservative publication yet it used the term "Death Panel" in the headline! That sort of stuff sends liberals into orbit. In fact, I'll bet someone at The Hill has already received a blistering phone call from the White House press office demanding that they change that headline.
Say what you want about Sarah Palin, but her "death panel" comment lives on in a way that no other message on Obamacare has, and it has affected both popular opinion and the debate in Washington and the states.
Posted by: rockmom at August 09, 2013 10:24 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: Lauren at August 09, 2013 10:24 AM (ELdpj)
After all, it worked out so well for the Soviet Union.
We remind you comrade, that Soviet citizens always had shoes. Often one right and one left.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at August 09, 2013 10:24 AM (8ZskC)
Even if we are successful at defunding it - which is only about 1% likely being successful - the Dems would then argue during the election cycle that Obamacare was never given a chance.
I say, let it kick in and people will know what a real disaster the Dems have foisted upon us.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 09, 2013 10:24 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Strife at August 09, 2013 10:24 AM (Ojgjr)
Our error, sorry, we thought she was saying "deaf" panels in her snowbilly accent.
Posted by: Politifact Editors at August 09, 2013 10:25 AM (CMlD4)
As has already been noted, its like Sarah Palin isn't dumb at all and it was just a made-up media attack to get Oblather elected and further the Democrat War on Women.
Or something.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at August 09, 2013 10:25 AM (qM18f)
It wouldn't be in Their interest to have to spend money on 90 year old drunks, or sick children would it?
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 10:26 AM (nqBYe)
Difficulty getting "insurance" for the already-sick --- of course it is.
It is like trying to get an auto insurnce policy to cover an accident you already had.
If you are already sick, what you are really seeking is a payment plan.
We are deluding ourselves when we call it insurance.
Posted by: Brian at August 09, 2013 10:26 AM (kFeuD)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 09, 2013 10:27 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Hurricane LaFawnduh at August 09, 2013 10:27 AM (pginn)
Death Panels only affect the poor.
If you have money, you can always buy whatever procedure you or your loved ones need. All a Death Panel does is to protect the taxpayer from being repeatedly raped to pay for multiple, non-cost effective procedures.
Posted by: jwest at August 09, 2013 10:27 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Ralph Malph at August 09, 2013 10:27 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: t-bird at August 09, 2013 10:27 AM (FcR7P)
and of course that was a criminal act where her retardness was banished forever to be classified as not helpful to conservatives.
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 10:27 AM (nqBYe)
Correction: Democrats Face Growing Opposition In Mid-Term Elections.
After that - these Democraps will be back on the ObamaCare-Reservation.
Rinse And Repeat.
Posted by: Strife at August 09, 2013 10:28 AM (Ojgjr)
When they get stolen, and you've already thrown away the textbooks...
http://is.gd/DKDfgv
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at August 09, 2013 10:28 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Hurricane LaFawnduh at August 09, 2013 10:28 AM (pginn)
Posted by: Grim Reaper at August 09, 2013 10:28 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Conservative Crank at August 09, 2013 10:29 AM (sQ0LB)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 09, 2013 10:29 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 09, 2013 10:29 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at August 09, 2013 10:29 AM (aRz16)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry
There is a point at which trying to be too clever results in one being run over by a large truck.
Here's the potential truck: what if it's a disaster and voters don't care?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at August 09, 2013 10:30 AM (jcnm8)
Posted by: naturalfake at August 09, 2013 10:30 AM (n50fF)
That accursed 49% of the country that is paying for the other 51%. The entire thing will collapse about 1 year into implementation and the "government" will just have to take over completely.
The you will see some real "death panels". They call them hospitals in Great Britain.
Posted by: Vic at August 09, 2013 10:30 AM (lZvxr)
#5 joncelli - Actually, I think Ace rather nailed this a long time ago, when he described Obamacare as the perfect scheme of more or less "privatized socialism." That was a brilliant observation. Obamacare socializes medicine while keeping it nominally in the hands of private actors. This way, the government can command the outcomes it wants but is insulated from the complaints when people start dying. Much of the cost is also not directly on the government books, either, so liberals can maintain the charade that this is not going to cost taxpayers anything while millions more poeple get coverage.
In this way, liberals were able to achieve a rather radical reform of the health care system while avoiding the charge that the government is totally taking over, which they know people do not want.
It was a very, very, very, very, very clever scheme. Not that a lot of progressives still do not want single payer; they do. But they don't have the votes for it in Congress and never did, and never will.
Posted by: rockmom at August 09, 2013 10:30 AM (Q4elb)
Posted by: Conservative Crank
...............
Who said anything about cheering it on? It's the law. We just sit back and let the shit fly.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 09, 2013 10:31 AM (f9c2L)
Amazing how stupid Caribou Barbie could quickly see this, and put it in such perfectly understandable language, years ahead of our oh-so-smart betters.
Posted by: Lizzy at August 09, 2013 10:31 AM (CzGy/)
Whoa! Hold on there. We don't want to alienate any potential new voting blocks with any wacky-bird conservative crap. We need to be more like Democrats!
Posted by: RINO RATIONALE at August 09, 2013 10:31 AM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: garrett at August 09, 2013 10:31 AM (HV1RX)
so yeah , thrilled with it all.
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 10:32 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Harry Reid at August 09, 2013 10:32 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 09, 2013 10:32 AM (ZPrif)
Yeah, Fascism.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at August 09, 2013 10:32 AM (/kI1Q)
I am not sure this is correct, but wasn't it Insurance companies that Helped write the bill?
IIRC, it was written primarily by some Dim who was in jail at the time. His name escapes me right now.
I find it amazing that a law that is so unpopular is still being enacted against the will of the people. We've completely lost our government. We have no control over anything that goes on in Washington.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at August 09, 2013 10:32 AM (0HooB)
Finally, a job Harry Reid can do! Set him up with a little office, and attach probes to the little man. Put pictures up in front of him. When he's turned on, the machine will flag that picture. That person gets health insurance on their parent's plan. Anyone who doesn't ping is too old.
Call the system "Reid Gate".
Posted by: bonhomme at August 09, 2013 10:32 AM (J79eW)
Posted by: Me So Horny at August 09, 2013 10:32 AM (oDCMR)
I can't remember where I saw it, but there was another bit of Obamacare-related news today. The beauracracy that's supposed to manage the patient database for Obamacare still doesn't have the proper security. And they keep trying to foist the task of fixing the database security off on other agencies.
Posted by: junior at August 09, 2013 10:32 AM (UWFpX)
Posted by: Lauren at August 09, 2013 10:33 AM (ELdpj)
Here's the ironic part once the planned single payer goes into effect: only the rich and politically well connected will get quality care. So plan accordingly.
Further irony will occur when those who supported it and denied or delayed care will still say it was better then what we have.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at August 09, 2013 10:33 AM (qM18f)
Posted by: Andrew Sullivan at August 09, 2013 10:33 AM (eS0WH)
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at August 09, 2013 10:33 AM (7UMow)
Posted by: rockmom at August 09, 2013 02:30 PM (Q4elb)
Yes, a thoughtful analysis as always with you, rockmom. [Hands rockmom a rose] So they get single payer results without single payer backlash. As you say, clever and cowardly, which is why the Dems loved it.
Posted by: joncelli at August 09, 2013 10:33 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: garrett at August 09, 2013 02:31 PM (HV1RX)
from your lips to...
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 10:33 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 09, 2013 10:33 AM (ZPrif)
That depends on how many people see the name Pryor and think "AA Funnyman".
Like that moron Greene who got onto the ballot with his last name.
Posted by: bonhomme at August 09, 2013 10:34 AM (J79eW)
Posted by: RNC at August 09, 2013 10:34 AM (FcR7P)
Robert Creamer, husband of IL Congresswoman Jan Shakowsky.
Posted by: Lizzy at August 09, 2013 10:34 AM (CzGy/)
Posted by: chique d'afrique at August 09, 2013 10:35 AM (JQ4Eq)
Yeah, that whole Third Party idea is just crazy ain't it?
We should just wait it out a little longer with the Republicans and see if.....
???
Posted by: Strife at August 09, 2013 10:35 AM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: The GOP, meekly placing résumé on the table at August 09, 2013 10:35 AM (Hx2XA)
Posted by: Lauren at August 09, 2013 10:35 AM (ELdpj)
That's Wasilly.
Posted by: Obama at August 09, 2013 10:35 AM (J79eW)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 09, 2013 10:36 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: AmishDude at August 09, 2013 10:36 AM (T0NGe)
I'm working on fixing that.
Posted by: Obama at August 09, 2013 10:36 AM (J79eW)
We've completely lost our government. We have no control over anything that goes on in Washington.}
Posted by:BackwardsBoy at August 09, 2013 02:32 PM (0HooB)
That's a Feature , That's is as they wanted it. and we have NO srs. representation.
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 10:36 AM (nqBYe)
The GOP isn't exactly "weak" or "gutless" or "unprincipled." Those things are just symptoms. They're pathologically sick -- stricken with an irremediable Stockholm Syndrome and a deeper self-loathing. They are completely incapable of becoming an actual opposition party. The effort would crack them open. Obama and the Left know this, always have.
The GOP must die or be ransacked and overthrown. There is no other answer.
What we really need is a sort of anti-Leftist "party" to spontaneously take shape and just start doing business as a coalition of like-minded conservatives dedicated to exposing, attacking and undoing Leftism. My guess is that frustrated conservatives across the country would exult, and demand that it fulfill itself into an actual party.
Posted by: rrpjr at August 09, 2013 10:36 AM (DH73I)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 09, 2013 10:36 AM (/Crba)
So no cause of action in a lawsuit.
Posted by: Vic at August 09, 2013 10:37 AM (lZvxr)
I can cleary see Andrew Jackson wait for Harry Reid at the gates of purgatory - with 4' of hickory in his hand.
Posted by: Jean at August 09, 2013 10:37 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Buzzion at August 09, 2013 10:37 AM (ickRu)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 09, 2013 10:38 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: rickb223 at August 09, 2013 10:38 AM (qc7at)
Posted by: chique d'afrique at August 09, 2013 02:35 PM (JQ4Eq)
I can only conclude they'll want the same thing. A Huge govt and no ability of those concerned about over wielding govt or financial stability to have any power.
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 10:38 AM (nqBYe)
"People say this is a trojan horse to get to single payer. No its not. It says it right there". - That dude in that video
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at August 09, 2013 10:38 AM (qM18f)
Posted by: wooga at August 09, 2013 10:39 AM (7SbaW)
It'll be a disaster, and voters will care. But their "caring" will be focused by the Democrats into an effort to enact the "Public Option" or "MORE MONEY."
It'll never EVER be to repeal and go to a free market solution.
Posted by: bonhomme at August 09, 2013 10:39 AM (J79eW)
Which is fascism, except for some reason we aren't allowed to use accurate terms for things because they might scare the moderates. Posted by: Lauren at
When do the spiffy boot contracts come out?
Posted by: Jean at August 09, 2013 10:39 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Jean
No. *looking at clipboard* Nope. No "Harry Reid" on the list. Might want to check with the guys down the stairs on the left.
Posted by: Purgatory at August 09, 2013 10:39 AM (Hx2XA)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 09, 2013 10:40 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: waldo at August 09, 2013 10:40 AM (tCBZk)
You know who likes the nationalized health care in England? The people who aren't actually using it, and members of the FSA-Muslim immigrant division. You wanna wait 6 months for "elective" gallbladder surgery while it feels like your liver is being harpooned every time you eat? Want to see healthcare R&D screech to a halt (other than stem cells, so they can further champion fetal murder)?
My point isn't about the law. My point is about the politics. Political judo only works if you continue to fight your opponent while letting his own momentum take him down. If you just stand there, or worse yet lie down for him, he'll bowl you over and go all St. Trayvon on your ass.
Posted by: Conservative Crank at August 09, 2013 10:40 AM (sQ0LB)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 09, 2013 02:38 PM (ZPrif)
-- There you go again advocating socialism////
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at August 09, 2013 10:40 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at August 09, 2013 10:40 AM (qyfb5)
Yes! Every Brit twit hates the NHS generally, but change it? NO! We don't want people dying in the streets like in the US!
Posted by: bonhomme at August 09, 2013 10:41 AM (J79eW)
Posted by: alexthechick - Welcome mighty SMODlets! at August 09, 2013 10:41 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: GOP at August 09, 2013 10:42 AM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: Sen. Mark Pryor at August 09, 2013 10:42 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at August 09, 2013 10:42 AM (eHIJJ)
"I am not sure this is correct, but wasn't it Insurance companies that Helped write the bill?"
As a matter of fact, yes. The insurance companies did write the bill.
You see, the point most people miss is the fact that everyone in the U.S., citizens, illegal aliens, rich, poor, black, white, whatever all are given world-class healthcare. No one is ever denied.
A small portion of the cost for the healthiest of society is paid for privately. The bulk of the expense is paid for by taxes. Already. As in right now, the federal government is spending enough to pay for all the healthcare for the poorest and sickest utilizing the most expensive avenues of caregiving.
The only possible way to spend more money would be to include the insurance companies into the large chunk of the pie that they aren't into presently. Therefore - ObamaCare.
Now, insurance companies will be able to add their piece and get a cut of the action.
Posted by: jwest at August 09, 2013 10:42 AM (u2a4R)
............
What reality do you live in?
My reality, as far as Obamacare goes, was that the GOP stood together and did NOT vote for it. Obamacare is solely owned by Democrats.
If you cannot take that simple fact to the voters next year and increase your lead in the House and take back the Senate, then the GOP is really as stupid as we think they are.
And all the bitching and moaning by Dem defectors should be used at every GOP town hall an stump speech.
Jeeesus.. this isn't fucking rocket science.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 09, 2013 10:42 AM (f9c2L)
I would but since they voted for the scummy assholes they can eat their shit sandwich and like it.
Posted by: Vic at August 09, 2013 10:43 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe
The GOP is the Western chapter of the Tory party. Past tense. Actualized. Already. Previously on Murder She Wrote. Brought to you by the makers of Yesterday, A While Ago, and Rear View Mirror.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at August 09, 2013 10:43 AM (jcnm8)
No one ever accused the left of seeing the "long game".
When someone sees granny or their parents undergo a "death panel", & then that person get a terminal illness", what's to stop them from taking a few "antagonists" with them?
Gives new meaning to the term "bucket list".
Yep. This will be our dirty war. Pretty soon being appointed to a government panel will be a death wish.
Posted by: Me So Horny at August 09, 2013 10:43 AM (oDCMR)
joncelli - actually, Ace was the first to express this idea, at least that I read. It is the only thing that makes sense. This was an extremely well thought out scheme to radically change our health care system without appearing to radically change it; to shift the burden of paying for health care for poor and moderate income people to the insurers and the states so the true cost would not show on the federal government's books; and to get a lot of middle class people hooked on subsidies for their health insurance while assuring them they could keep their doctor and we would not end up like Britain or Canada with rationed care and long wait times.
Ace went on to talk about how this new system is going to turn us all into nudges and tattletales, turning us against our co-workers and friends and neighbors to get them to stop smoking and exercise and eat better, give up their guns, etc. Once everyone sees how much their own insurance premiums go up because so many unhealthy people now have to be covered, people are going to see that it is in their self-interest to hound other people to be healthier. So we won't need another big bureaucracy to make people eat better and exercise.
Posted by: rockmom at August 09, 2013 10:43 AM (qE3AR)
Posted by: Mrs. Mittens at August 09, 2013 10:44 AM (w6sep)
Correction: Thank you Mr Bush (Mr GOP Compassionate Conservative)
Posted by: Strife at August 09, 2013 10:44 AM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: alexthechick - Welcome mighty SMODlets! at August 09, 2013 02:41 PM (VtjlW)
Two words
-- Administrative Assistant
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at August 09, 2013 10:44 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Obamacare at August 09, 2013 10:44 AM (Hx2XA)
Posted by: chique d'afrique at August 09, 2013 10:44 AM (JQ4Eq)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 09, 2013 10:44 AM (/Crba)
Announce they are going to defund this piece of shit unless everyone in government goes on the same plan as the rest of us.
Most of the house republicans in congress want to be seperate from us, you see they are better than you. You can make all the suggestions you want but they are not who you think they are.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at August 09, 2013 10:44 AM (qM18f)
Ocare (with the ) will not be defunded. It will not be repealed. The LIV's and the FSA will make sure of that because they know they're the only ones that congress is listening to.
Posted by: Soona at August 09, 2013 10:45 AM (duhSs)
Posted by: Lauren at August 09, 2013 10:45 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: alexthechick - Welcome mighty SMODlets! at August 09, 2013 02:41 PM (VtjlW)
No.
I mentioned that above.
I'm not attending the annual conference this year.
However, I suggested that next years topic be "healthcare economics"
Surprisingly it was somewhat well received by at least one member of the planning committee.
Posted by: tsrblke at August 09, 2013 10:45 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: AmishDude at August 09, 2013 10:46 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: waldo at August 09, 2013 10:46 AM (tCBZk)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 09, 2013 10:46 AM (/Crba)
Chris Christie Spends 4.7 Mil from Hurricane Sandy Funds on His Own Political Ads
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at August 09, 2013 10:47 AM (jcnm8)
Seriously. WTF?
Posted by: Strife at August 09, 2013 10:47 AM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: Bigby's Accusing Finger at August 09, 2013 10:48 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Buzzion at August 09, 2013 10:49 AM (ickRu)
Posted by: waldo at August 09, 2013 10:49 AM (tCBZk)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 09, 2013 10:50 AM (2Tv3A)
136 And this guy is going to be the GOP nominee:
Chris Christie Spends 4.7 Mil from Hurricane Sandy Funds on His Own Political Ads
Hey now! We need a BIG TENT because ....... well, have you seen Christie Cream's ASS?
Posted by: GOP at August 09, 2013 10:50 AM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: alexthechick - Welcome mighty SMODlets! at August 09, 2013 10:50 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 09, 2013 10:50 AM (/Crba)
drags my wood glue , sandpaper, finish nails , stain crayonn out to repair desk.
yes i do know how to do some stuff.
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 10:50 AM (nqBYe)
Robert Creamer, husband of IL Congresswoman Jan Shakowsky.
Ahh, that's him. Thanks, Lizzy.
Saw a video from a townhall meeting somewhere today on teh Intarwebz. A Pubbie was getting railed by his constituents for not fighting more in DC. Naturally, he was all "I'm concerned and shit" while not actually doing anything to stop this crap.
I'm coming around to Ace's point of view: there is nothing we can do to influence Washington these days, so why not start a third party? At least we could start to talk about alternatives to Big Brother Gubmint, which our side currently seem unable to do.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at August 09, 2013 10:50 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 09, 2013 10:50 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 09, 2013 10:51 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Omar The Tentmaker at August 09, 2013 10:51 AM (/Crba)
Defunding Obamacare, I think, is a mistake. The Democrats have a millstone on their necks. Let it sink them. From what we all know about Obamacare it is going to be a stunning disaster. Why save people from it? As an entitlement strategy you want something that affects a loyal cohort positively, while affecting those who pay for it very little. This is why Medicare/Medicaid was so popular. Old people get healthcare and the cost is so minimal, yay! Well Obamacare is the opposite. The cost is enormous, it affects everyone that has insurance negatively while providing little benefit. It is going to fail. So let it. You protect children form hurting themselves not adults.
Let California have Obamacare. I used to work for the state of CA and my former coworkers are living the effects of Obamacare suddenly highly partisan lifelong Democrats are having second thoughts. When that states public sector unionized employees watch their copays go through the roof then they will learn those crazy Tea Partiers weren't so crazy. And this unfortunately is the only way they will learn.
Posted by: theworldisnotenough at August 09, 2013 10:51 AM (QYlN7)
If your "plan" is shutting down the government, go sit in the corner with the dunce cap. It's a non-starter. Obama don't mess around, Homey. You want a "shut down?" That ninja will shut it all down (except his party and travel budget, and a few other essential functions) STARTING WITH Social Security checks and Medicare coverage and all federal money to states and schools. We cannot win that battle. We could lose the House trying, would that make you feel all "pure" and shit?
Posted by: Adjoran at August 09, 2013 10:51 AM (473jB)
i however feel so burnt i believe we have neither.
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 10:52 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Death Panel at August 09, 2013 10:52 AM (Hx2XA)
Posted by: rickb223 at August 09, 2013 10:52 AM (qc7at)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at August 09, 2013 10:52 AM (NJs1e)
Posted by: JackStraw
The corollary to Fen's Law:
They all believe they will be in charge.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at August 09, 2013 10:52 AM (jcnm8)
Posted by: AmishDude at August 09, 2013 10:53 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 10:53 AM (nqBYe)
What we really need is a sort of anti-Leftist "party" to spontaneously take shape and just start doing business as a coalition of like-minded conservatives dedicated to exposing, attackingand undoing Leftism. My guess is that frustrated conservatives across the country would exult, and demand that it fulfill itself into an actual party.
Posted by: rrpjr at August 09, 2013 02:36 PM (DH73I)
Look at the history of the Whig Party, specifically the mechanics of its dissolution. You're right: such things don't happen all at once, and what happened to the Whig Party is the closest American historical example I can find of what Ace calls the preference cascade. The problem, as I see it, is that when such things as a major party split do happen, they're usually the result of a triggering event that sets things in motion. Perhaps the vote on nation-killing immigration 'reform' legislation in the House will be that triggering event should it gain passage--which could only happen as the result of Republican support. The Democrats claim they have 40-50 Republican votes already. I'm not sure of the numbers but think they could conceivably pull it off.
Posted by: troyriser at August 09, 2013 10:53 AM (V9ol4)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 09, 2013 10:53 AM (/Crba)
This is going to be interesting. Just mailed off a book someone bought from me on eBay. They paid and everything.
I just stumbled across about 30 negative reviews of this buyer on another site. This buyer tends to give bad feedback if the item is NOT 100% as described. And then resell these books using a different eBay account.
I would not have even looked except the address I am sending to was a bit odd sounding and when I looked on the maps, its an industrial park where office supply stores are.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 09, 2013 10:53 AM (gPyYF)
Posted by: rickb223 at August 09, 2013 10:54 AM (qc7at)
Posted by: Jean at August 09, 2013 10:54 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: JackStraw
They're going to run some ads showing IRS staff smiling and shaking hands with "normal people" and stuff. Very down-to-earth shit. It's gonna be fine. You'll see.
Posted by: Death Panel at August 09, 2013 10:55 AM (Hx2XA)
Posted by: McCool at August 09, 2013 10:55 AM (nCSwS)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at August 09, 2013 10:55 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: EC at August 09, 2013 10:55 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at August 09, 2013 10:55 AM (PH+2B)
Posted by: Typical Fucking Moonbat at August 09, 2013 10:56 AM (/Crba)
Hear hear my good man! I like the cut of your jib!
Yes. Let's do nothing. That's the safe bet. And it's worked so well for us thus far!
Well played sir.
Posted by: GOP Elite at August 09, 2013 10:56 AM (Ojgjr)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 09, 2013 10:57 AM (2Tv3A)
1/2 black. Posted by: rickb223
Let's flip a coin...
Posted by: Death Panel member, Anton Chigurh at August 09, 2013 10:57 AM (Hx2XA)
Posted by: EC at August 09, 2013 10:57 AM (GQ8sn)
"We could lose the House trying, would that make you feel all "pure" and shit?"
There was a perfectly good plan out there for Individual Medical Accounts, which would pay for all non-catastrophic care, coupled with either a private catastrophic policy or government catastrophic single payer.
Much more control to individual and less cost than ObamaCare.
But, it didn't pass the purity test.
Posted by: jwest at August 09, 2013 10:57 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at August 09, 2013 10:58 AM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Soona at August 09, 2013 10:58 AM (duhSs)
"I think Rubio is done because he displays the type of behavior from Congress most party members abhor. That would be unprincipled stands which don't comport with facts (as written in the actual bill, which nobody completely read) which members of Congress tell us don't really mean what we are reading, or are perhaps a part of some grand political mastermind scheme we rubes don't understand. Just trust us.
In the vernacular of a common man. Bullshit.
What frustrates us is that nobody on our side sticks up for us. The bully beats us day after day and our alleged representatives tell us to toughen up it could always be worse. Then they cut a deal with the bully so he won't pound them.
Most of us call that cowardice or perhaps Vichy representation and we're tired of it."
Posted by: Marcus at August 09, 2013 10:58 AM (FmaxF)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 09, 2013 10:59 AM (2Tv3A)
Hey come on now. Rockmom has assured us that Roberts decision on obamacare being a tax was actually a win for conservatives.
Posted by: Buzzion at August 09, 2013 02:49 PM (ickRu)
Hey now. Don't want to hijack this thread, but I never said it was a win for conservatives. Not sure where you got that. It was an unhappy outcome but one that did not surprise me.
Posted by: rockmom at August 09, 2013 10:59 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at August 09, 2013 10:59 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at August 09, 2013 10:59 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at August 09, 2013 10:59 AM (9+ccr)
yes i do know how to do some stuff.
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 02:50 PM (nqBYe)
How do you make a sandwich with all those? >>
Those supplies are used to construct a box trap to catch the bunny filling for the sandwich.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at August 09, 2013 10:59 AM (wrS2o)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at August 09, 2013 10:59 AM (BqDT7)
Posted by: chique d'afrique at August 09, 2013 11:00 AM (JQ4Eq)
Posted by: Ru Paul at August 09, 2013 11:02 AM (1rA+B)
Posted by: Assistant to the NSA listener assigned to AoSHQ at August 09, 2013 11:02 AM (r2PLg)
No, you cut the hell out of - esp. the marketing dollars - and shut down the government over that. Waiving the bloody shirt of NO SS Checks is a false flag and you know it - those check go out regardless of the current appropriation.
You want a plan - how about the 30+ States without exchanges join into a multistate compact that allows for interstate competition and larger insurance pools. Expand the Texas practices and provide an alternative - one with doctors.
Posted by: Jean at August 09, 2013 11:04 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at August 09, 2013 11:04 AM (PH+2B)
Posted by: chique d'afrique at August 09, 2013 11:04 AM (JQ4Eq)
Posted by: caustic at August 09, 2013 11:04 AM (/b8+5)
BWAAAHAAAHAAAHAAA!
Posted by: GOP Elite at August 09, 2013 11:04 AM (Ojgjr)
Thanks, Obamacare.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at August 09, 2013 02:59 PM (BqDT7)
--------------------------------------------------
This is coming to all health monitering services. Sure, a person gets the same healthcare, but it's "dispersed" over a much longer period of time.
We're going to see a lot more end-stage cancers in the yearly stats.
Posted by: Soona at August 09, 2013 11:04 AM (duhSs)
http://badbuyerlist.org/buyer/3631bc03d9e32129ff0e
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at August 09, 2013 11:05 AM (gPyYF)
You know, they're a bunch a rubes, hicks and "extremists". Oh yeah and Christine McDonnell or something.
That includes most prominently people like McConnell and Boehner. Who are about to find out they are also active voters.
Hey guys, you can't get Democrats to vote for you and Independents think you suck.
Posted by: Marcus at August 09, 2013 11:05 AM (FmaxF)
191 177
..... if it makes you feel any better..... most of us are with you guys on this one....
Posted by: The NSA listener assigned to AoSHQ at August 09, 2013 02:57 PM (nELVU)
*******
Hey!...was on an earlier thread--thought I would make sure you got this message--
"Burn the Witch" is keeping a "list" of commenters here--he could be --how shall we say this--
useful.
[See rockmom's comment about Ace's Snitches Theory upthread.]
Posted by: Assistant to the NSA listener assigned to AoSHQ at August 09, 2013 03:02 PM (r2PLg)
Being a capo can pay ...
Posted by: G Soros at August 09, 2013 11:05 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: joncelli at August 09, 2013 11:06 AM (RD7QR)
http://tinyurl.com/m2al476 (link goes to Weasel Zippers)
Posted by: Ian S. at August 09, 2013 11:07 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: Soona at August 09, 2013 03:04 PM (duhSs)
I dunno the math for the Pap smears (I don't).
I will say though I still stand on the side of getting rid of the PSA as a "screening" mechanism.
The NNH well out balances the NNT.
There's a book form the 90s called "Overtreated" that does discuss how we've gone a bit overboard in medicine.
Having said all that, fuck the goverment's involvement in this, put the research out there, let the docs educate themselves and make choices with the patients.
Posted by: tsrblke at August 09, 2013 11:07 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at August 09, 2013 11:07 AM (9+ccr)
useful.
?
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 11:07 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 09, 2013 11:08 AM (2Tv3A)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at August 09, 2013 11:08 AM (aRz16)
"Harry Reid: Gee I Sure Hope the GOP isn't Opposing ObamaCare Because Obama is Black."
I see more and more of this, stating that opposition to the Obama Administration is due to racism. And I really don't see it getting a lot of traction.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - owner of the Outrage Outlet by the 4-way stop at August 09, 2013 11:08 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: RWC at August 09, 2013 11:09 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Marcus at August 09, 2013 11:09 AM (FmaxF)
you can keep your doc- congress
5 years for a pap?
well i guess hpv and other diseases will really takes it toll in that amt of time.
Posted by: willow at August 09, 2013 11:09 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at August 09, 2013 11:09 AM (2Tv3A)
Adding another adult to your comprehensive family plan doesn't save money. The correct path is to go with a separate, low cost catastrophic plan for the kid. The whole 26 yo insurance thing was a political gimmick for the young voters and a gift to the insurance companies. It jacks up the cost of the family plan with a presumably healthy - low cost young adult. Double-edged knife.
Posted by: G Soros at August 09, 2013 11:09 AM (CMlD4)
The IPAB turned down my Dermatology referral
Posted by: Job at August 09, 2013 03:04 PM (3ZtZW)
Here, have some pottery shards.
xoxo, Your Friendly Neighborhood IPAB
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at August 09, 2013 11:12 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Lauren at August 09, 2013 11:13 AM (ov6Ir)
I think there has to be a solution to this issue.
I am not for Obamacare or any government involvement. But insurance companies have milked this for years. It is a key issue that many people hate and Democrats stoked and leveraged that hate to pass healthcare.
If for whatever reason, I want to pay a child's health insurance until they aree 26- why not? Especially in this economy. Kids can't get jobs or you are trying to help them get on their feet financially. I certainly don't want them to go without it.
Posted by: Marcus at August 09, 2013 11:13 AM (FmaxF)
Posted by: BarakaTarkata at August 09, 2013 11:15 AM (si4cu)
Posted by: EC at August 09, 2013 11:15 AM (GQ8sn)
I see Dear Leader is lying again. He's moving his lips (I have the sound off).
He'll probably be exhausted after this presser and will need another vacation.
Posted by: Soona at August 09, 2013 11:17 AM (duhSs)
Posted by: chique d'afrique at August 09, 2013 11:18 AM (JQ4Eq)
Posted by: Lauren at August 09, 2013 11:20 AM (ov6Ir)
Posted by: EC at August 09, 2013 11:20 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Marcus at August 09, 2013 03:13 PM (FmaxF)
---------------------------------------------------
If they're 18 years old or older they voted for this monstrosity. They need to be kicked out of the house let them live on their own with their decisions. Fuck 'em. They deserve it.
Posted by: Soona at August 09, 2013 11:21 AM (duhSs)
Posted by: rockmom at August 09, 2013 11:26 AM (Q4elb)
Posted by: rickb223 at August 09, 2013 11:27 AM (lwkv9)
Thats the problem Marcus, your not paying... everyones rates go up
Posted by: Big Ben at August 09, 2013 11:27 AM (I5Htn)
I have a 30-year-old nephew who has not ever had a fulltime, year-round job that provides health insurance. He does seasonal contract work and then travels the rest of the year. He has had an individual health policy since he was 22 and has had no trouble paying for it. He is a libertarian, too, hates Obama and all liberals. ;-)
Amazingly, my other nephew has also been able to find an affordable individual policy even though he has type II diabetes and a history of drug addiction. He is 27.
So I kinda have a hard time believing all these sob stories of millions of young people going without health insurance.
Posted by: rockmom at August 09, 2013 11:32 AM (qE3AR)
Posted by: LaQuisha Largess' at August 09, 2013 11:34 AM (3lMGK)
Posted by: Tryone at August 09, 2013 11:38 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Locopelli at August 09, 2013 11:40 AM (OtDfb)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at August 09, 2013 11:48 AM (aRz16)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at August 09, 2013 11:49 AM (aRz16)
Posted by: Buzzion at August 09, 2013 11:55 AM (onRJA)
They didn't learn the last 200 times their MiniUtopian Visions failed, what's so special about this one?
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile at August 09, 2013 02:55 PM (qyfb5)
*************************
I would submit to you that this has never happened. As a Californian I can attest to the Republicans preventing the Democrats from enacting their worst ideas and preventing Californians from feeling the worst of the effects. This is no longer the case. California is cutting programs, Healthy Families is getting cut. It was a big benefit for Mexicans and included "nutrition assistance." More free food above and beyond WIC. It will be fun to watch California Progressives squirm as Democrats choose between illegals and unions, while trying to convince businesses not to leave. Hell Jerry Brown wants to expand oil, oil! This time no republicans to get in the way. What should be different at the national level is the strategy. Look unions in the eye and tell them they wanted this, now take it. You want out of it you know how to get it. That is what will hopefully be different.
Posted by: theworldisnotenough at August 09, 2013 12:21 PM (QYlN7)
Posted by: G Soros
.................
I doubt it raises your premium much. Even if it does, it will be less than a separate premium, especially under Obamacare. A parent who wants to teach their kid responsibility would simply have the kid pay the difference. Just like most parents do regarding auto insurance.
The thing is, under Obamacare you will not be able to buy a cheap low-cost catastrophic plan. Those have been outlawed. A young, healthy 25 yr old, or 30 yr old (whatever) will have to purchase a full service plan under Obamacare. That's why I say let Obamacare kick in. The Dems rely on the stupid youth vote - let those young people feel the sting of this shit sandwich.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 09, 2013 12:41 PM (f9c2L)
..........
This is what the "defund O'care" folks don't get.
Leave people who are hurt the worst over this no other choice - the only way to get out of this mess is to vote for Republicans.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 09, 2013 12:43 PM (f9c2L)
Posted by: labman57 at August 10, 2013 08:01 PM (D4/AC)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4056 seconds, 371 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Andy at August 09, 2013 10:15 AM (0xTSZ)