April 16, 2013
— LauraW You'll Get Nothing, And Like It
Sometimes when people are highly ideological, and driven to score all the points they can for their team, they fail to appreciate the necessary political compromises that exist in society. This is not a game, this is a nation. And absolutism simply fails to thrive in American politics.
In response to the Gosnell trial, some absolutist pro-choice folks are saying that the reason Gosnell's slaughterhouse was so awful is because late-term abortions should be legal, and women were 'driven underground' to see this illegal doctor.
Gosnell was a legal and known abortion provider, not 'underground.' His transgressions would have been caught if only he had been subject to the same inspections that every other outpatient facility is subject to. It sure wasn't rightwing zealots that shielded him from ordinary audits.
But that's neither here nor there. We need to address this insistence that there be no limits on abortion. Which means to legalize the termination of large, healthy babies that pose no risk to the mother's life.
The problem with absolutism is that it shoots itself in the foot. Truly radical pro-choicers do not understand that the assumption that abortion primarily kills very tiny, unviable blobs, is the very thing that keeps abortion legal. It is in fact the only thing keeping a majority of people ignoring the subject. In the case of abortion, this is the social/ political compromise that exists within the non-ideological crowd (most people): Many are willing to say that abortion is wrong (or at least not good), but the majority of these are also willing to allow it, as long as the understanding is that 'a clump of cells' is being eliminated.
As long as the belief persists among most reasonable people that the child has not been formed yet, and will not suffer, they will tolerate this practice even if they think it is wrong.
However, as soon as they understand that big, live, squealing babies are being murdered in abortion facilities, the spell is broken. There will be a closer look. And we know in our bones there are more Kermit Gosnells out there, don't we? It behooves all absolutists to observe the kneecapping that pro-choicers will give themselves if they continue to very stupidly get on the wrong side of this issue and actually argue for a more obvious and expansive infanticide.
This is what happens in the case of unrestricted late-term abortion:
a) If a woman wants her baby, he is her precious newborn son, a patient of the hospital, and even if prematurely delivered he will receive humane medical care.
b) If the woman does not want her baby, cut his head off and toss the body in the bin with the others.
Note that the difference between a) and b) is merely the emotional whim of one parent. This is what distinguishes this killing as 'abortion' and not infanticide, to the extremist end of the pro-choice crowd.
On the lady's word, that which would otherwise be considered a child, lives or dies.
This is not a good enough distinction or reason. Humans recoil from this.
When innocent little babies are in danger, most human beings - not deranged mutants like Amanda Marcotte, but actual, decent people - feel an imperative to intervene. If you tried to harm a child within the sight of most people, they would hasten to reduce you to 'a clump of cells.'
Everyone knows that people love babies and children. This is why the pro-choice side uses the terms 'fetus,' or 'clump of cells.' This is why they constantly hammer the idea that this is just like any other ordinary medical procedure. They understand the importance of eliminating the notion that babies are being harmed.
And this is also why the pro-life forces are constantly trying to show those gory photos of very tiny aborted babies. Because they are trying to smash the sterile concept that keeps people from caring about abortion as a moral issue.
Most folks do not want to live in a state of public upheaval. Most folks are willing to live with less than their ideal, in favor of the good. We make these little social agreements so that we can live mostly peacefully. Compromise doesn't make difficult issues go away, but it transforms them into ones that only a relative few are willing to go to war over.
In the abortion compromise, the pro-choice crowd has had the better end of the deal for decades. A significant part of three generations of the youth of America have been vacuumed from their mothers' wombs; millions of children destroyed, never to be named or known.
If the absolutist pro-choice crowd tries to expand upon the definition of a disposable fetus to include what are obviously big healthy babies, they will ultimately break the social stalemate on abortion, to the detriment of their own cause.
So, you know. Go for it.
Posted by: LauraW at
07:30 AM
| Comments (280)
Post contains 832 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 16, 2013 03:27 AM (M5XvF)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 03:30 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: lauraw at April 16, 2013 03:32 AM (yGblt)
Posted by: Liberty Lover at April 16, 2013 03:33 AM (eQ4W/)
Pray for Boston
Posted by: Vic at April 16, 2013 03:37 AM (53z96)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 03:37 AM (tqLft)
Life begins at conception is an absolute. How does one moderate that view?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2013 03:39 AM (/WLC3)
Posted by: Tom Servo at April 16, 2013 03:39 AM (hTDbY)
Posted by: Endeavor to Persevere at April 16, 2013 03:39 AM (zZJJp)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 16, 2013 03:42 AM (BVq/X)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 03:42 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: CitizenEgg at April 16, 2013 03:43 AM (RB0el)
Posted by: GalosGann at April 16, 2013 03:45 AM (T3KlW)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 16, 2013 03:45 AM (BVq/X)
Posted by: Liberty Lover at April 16, 2013 03:48 AM (eQ4W/)
Posted by: DangerGirl at April 16, 2013 03:48 AM (qYDVx)
Posted by: tony redenzo at April 16, 2013 03:48 AM (1MsBy)
I do believe it will eventually slow to a bare-minimum in most developed parts of the world, because better medical technology will clearly and unmistakeably show that the baby is a baby much earlier than most people currently assume. And also that medical technology will make abortion nearly obsolete as a necessity too. Like, something a man could take, to make him temporarily shoot blanks.
You get the idea.
Posted by: lauraw at April 16, 2013 03:49 AM (yGblt)
Posted by: Cartman's _Evil_Twin at April 16, 2013 03:49 AM (VytuT)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at April 16, 2013 03:50 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Liberty Lover at April 16, 2013 03:52 AM (eQ4W/)
Posted by: perturbed at April 16, 2013 03:54 AM (u6Ueb)
What?
Posted by: lowandslow at April 16, 2013 03:57 AM (Fz2C7)
22 I have compassion for the young, poor girls getting these abortions in Philly. Watch the video documentary "3801 Lancaster" on YouTube. Most of them did not grow up with the values that I did. They had poor parenting, are hanging out will the wrong crowds and are being advised by so called "medical professionals" that they best thing to do is abort.
Also look at the protestors in this doc. They are all black pro-life supporters from the Philly neighborhoods. The GOP says elections are won or lost in PA in the Philly burbs. Well here are your new constituents - go talk to them for crying out loud. They need our support.
Posted by: Liberty Lover at April 16, 2013 03:57 AM (eQ4W/)
sooner or later, life in the womb is an American life - endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.
silver lining is that aborted Americans (and all aborted human beings) die in grace, pass go, collect two hundred dollars and beat their "mother" to the next plane of existence. if there is one, ofcourse. i believe there is.
Posted by: i like anchors at April 16, 2013 03:57 AM (nBE5A)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 16, 2013 03:58 AM (XYSwB)
Amen, Laura. It's on both sides, and it covers a large number of issues these days. We won't budge, because we're afraid of what they'll do if we do.
It's not a recipe for civil society. It's how wars start.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 16, 2013 03:59 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 16, 2013 04:03 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at April 16, 2013 04:04 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: Body Builder at April 16, 2013 04:04 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: Avi at April 16, 2013 04:05 AM (8lFrv)
Posted by: Jean at April 16, 2013 04:06 AM (xBps2)
The pictures of the Boston Marathon look eerily like those at the back room of Gosnell's clinic. The only difference is the age of the victims. And the media coverage.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at April 16, 2013 04:06 AM (EGPJQ)
28 What the left really hates is putting any stigma on the "hooking up" culture that leads to this. Watch them go ape-shit if a school wants to teach chastity. If, like you say, these kids are too immature to understand what abortion does to a baby, they have no maturity to have sex either. The nonsense of Obamacare covering our 'kids' until they're 26 on the parents insurance, but parents not being allowed to know if their 16 year old is getting birth control or an abortion tells you who the left is. If there ever was a 'war on women', the battleground is here.
Posted by: Liberty Lover at April 16, 2013 04:08 AM (eQ4W/)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 16, 2013 04:10 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: lauraw at April 16, 2013 07:49 AM (yGblt)
I don't share your optimism. I believe that the world is entering a dark time, where the selfishness inherent in an areligious society is going to roar to the front.
There is birth control available seemingly everywhere we turn, yet the carnage in these abortion mills is unabated by this access. The issue seems to be a total insensitivity to the possibility of conception, and no concern for exactly how momentous that event is.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2013 04:10 AM (/WLC3)
Posted by: Moral Majoriy at April 16, 2013 04:11 AM (tLNEC)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at April 16, 2013 04:11 AM (feFL6)
Lately I have been able to turn a blind eye to this murder. I tell myself the country's future lies in the balance of a quiet war we're having with the Left. That aborting these tots limits the number of future liberals and their dependents.
Nothing new about that observation, just my willingness to buy into it. And certainly not every child that gets the Cuisinart would have grown up to be a liberal or a dependent, but that's just collateral damage, right? Can't be helped.
Posted by: spongeworthy at April 16, 2013 04:11 AM (r5w1L)
Yeah, this is why Gosnell is not news, while a medical practitioner killing premature newborns in the maternity ward would be--he was acting on the instructions of the mothers.
Except in the case of the teenager who was restrained and drugged so the baby could be killed against her will...that one's really bothering me. Underage teens have the "right" to kill their baby without parental knowledge or consent, but if they want to give birth against parental consent...that's the apparently only time the pro-abortion folks agree that the parents should be involved in the "choice."
This all kind of feeds into my theory that "family courts" are all about the egos of the adults and have jack shit to do with the best welfare of the children.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at April 16, 2013 04:12 AM (hO8IJ)
These abortionists should be tried and sen to jail. They are killers of innocent life.
Posted by: Moral Majoriy at April 16, 2013 04:12 AM (tLNEC)
Posted by: Bigby's Typo Tpying Hands at April 16, 2013 04:12 AM (RLTt1)
35 Tattoo parlors, nail salons, hair salons, spas, summer camp kitchens, charity events that sell food to the public, ALL regulated harder in PA than abortion clinics.
Many people reported on the horrors of the Gosnell clinic and top officials at the PA state Dept of Health covered it up. There are layers of sickening illegalities here. Mary Chastain at Breitbart wrote a series of articles on the negligence at the highest levels.
It makes me sick.
Posted by: Liberty Lover at April 16, 2013 04:12 AM (eQ4W/)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:12 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Vic at April 16, 2013 08:03 AM (53z96)
This is the post you choose for this comment?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2013 04:13 AM (/WLC3)
Most abortions are performed at that unviable stage. Mine certainly was. What keep it legal is the right to choose, especially when birth control fails, which is what happened to me.
Years ago, there were two options for a woman: back alley abortions, or if you were wealthy, a discreet doctor. Teenaged girls were ostracized and forced to leave town. Now that it's available and affordable for everyone, there's moral outrage. Late term abortions should be illegal, unless there's a severe medical condition or the life of the mother is in danger. This is because by that stage of the pregnancy, she should have determined whether or not she would carry it to birth. Abortion foes tend to lose concern for the child after it's born, except to complain about the number of children in families who don't bother with birth control and thrive on welfare.
There are mental midgets out there who seriously believe that it is a form of abortion, because you're preventing the fertilization of an ovum and sperm, and therefore, "killing" potential life. I'm not kidding. Teenage pregnancy has gone through the ozone. Sex education in the public schools should include (if it already hasn't) the responsibility of the teenage boy, as well. Too many of them get off scott-free.
As for the likes of Gosnell, hang that mutherfucker up and beat him like a pinata.
Posted by: sfcmac at April 16, 2013 04:13 AM (TLbgU)
Posted by: Pope Cavil I, Cylon Catholic Church at April 16, 2013 04:14 AM (m9V0o)
According to the CDC's numbers on abortion, we've selectively killed 85,000,000 Americans.
My grandfather fought the Nazi's, whom he described to me as the "most morally bankrupt movement to ever see the light of day" due to what he saw when they found the concentration camps. The Nazi's, depending on the numbers you want to use, killed 6,000,000 jews. So, how is it that we can kill 14 times more people in the name of "reproductive choice" and feel we're more noble than the butchers that killed in Dachau in the name of "racial purity?"
Posted by: Rob B. at April 16, 2013 04:15 AM (q32Ly)
LauraW,
Excellent post. But it doesn't just apply to abortion. It applies to adults as well.
Remember Terri Schiavo? She was an inconvenience to her husband and when her feeding and water tubes were removed it took 13 days for her to die. The outrage then was lacking like it is now with Gosnell.
When we have so little regard for the lives of the not yet born or those who might be a "burden", who will be next? Well history has shown who will be next.
Posted by: ExSnipe at April 16, 2013 04:15 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: Mr. Peabody at April 16, 2013 04:16 AM (0b17P)
IMO, and that of science and the church, if you are pregnant, then there is a baby. Abortion is murder, straight up.
Posted by: tcn at April 16, 2013 04:16 AM (VLG62)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:17 AM (tqLft)
47
35 Tattoo parlors, nail salons, hair salons, spas, summer camp kitchens, charity events that sell food to the public, ALL regulated harder in PA than abortion clinics.
I asked my barber one time if he would give me an old-timey shave. Hot towels, boar brush with soap, straight razor. He said " I'm really not supposed to do this. The health department won't let me". Two adults contracting with each other is squashed by some idjit in the health department? He did, in fact, give me the best shave i have ever had in my entire life. I was baby-smooth for three days. Viva la Anarchy Barber!
Posted by: Cicero Kid at April 16, 2013 04:18 AM (026j9)
Live birth is a "lifestyle choice"...like biking to work or eating paleo. Even women who can't conceive or can't bring a baby to term, or for some other reason just don't conceive (no husband, husband with medical issues, etc) are assumed to have intentionally "chosen" a childless lifestyle.
The 21st century is a barbaric place.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at April 16, 2013 04:19 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:20 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Andy at April 16, 2013 04:22 AM (OZPoa)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:23 AM (tqLft)
And we know in our bones there are more Kermit Gosnells out there, don't we?
__
He also had a practice in Delaware, with a partner. That clinic was shut down on the news of his indictment.
Posted by: kallisto at April 16, 2013 04:23 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 16, 2013 04:25 AM (XYSwB)
Repeat customers are the bread and butter of any small business, you'd think they'd be meticulous about their use sterile instruments just for that reason.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at April 16, 2013 04:25 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at April 16, 2013 08:19 AM (hO8IJ)
Except it's not. At least for people with some modicum of morality. But we have been buried beneath an avalanche of post-modern narcissism and selfishness.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2013 04:26 AM (/WLC3)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:27 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: zsasz at April 16, 2013 04:27 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Andy at April 16, 2013 08:22 AM (OZPoa)
Exactly. And use Gosnell as the poster boy for the entire abortion industry.
They throw Akin in our faces? We throw a mass murderer in theirs.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2013 04:29 AM (/WLC3)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at April 16, 2013 04:30 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: occam at April 16, 2013 04:31 AM (Vns6X)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:34 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 16, 2013 04:35 AM (XN0LR)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:35 AM (tqLft)
64
J.J. Sefton,
Terri Schiavo didn't have a choice and neither did her parents. They were willing to take care of her but the courts basically said so what, let her die.
Posted by: ExSnipe at April 16, 2013 04:35 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 16, 2013 04:36 AM (XYSwB)
Yeah, I should have put more words into that. For hundreds of years babies were miracles--God blessed you, or he didn't--and now they're just hobbies, or accessories. You know that's wrong, I know that's wrong, but that's the prevailing attitude.
And conservatives/the Horde buy into that attitude all the time when they bash "childless women", as if the only possible reason any woman could reach middle age without a live birth is "choice." Endometriosis is not a choice; a series of stillbirths is not a choice; I guess "not whoring around with deadbeats and jerks for their sperm" was a choice but I'm tired of defending it.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at April 16, 2013 04:36 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 16, 2013 04:36 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: maddogg at April 16, 2013 04:37 AM (OlN4e)
Fantastic post.
As Reagan pointed out, an unborn child can inherit property in probate.
How can an unborn baby have rights to property, but no right to life? Could the mother kill the unborn baby in order to inherit the entire estate.
True murder for profit. Under today's laws, yes.
Posted by: Prescient11 at April 16, 2013 04:37 AM (LI1Kh)
Posted by: Body Builder at April 16, 2013 04:37 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: blaster at April 16, 2013 04:39 AM (GBWoT)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 16, 2013 04:40 AM (MhA4j)
And I should have made it clear that I was agreeing with you, and simply expanding your point.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2013 04:40 AM (/WLC3)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:40 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 04:40 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:41 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: zsasz at April 16, 2013 04:41 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 16, 2013 04:42 AM (GVxQo)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:43 AM (tqLft)
I recall years ago the argument was "what's the difference between killing a child in the womb and one that's just been born?"
I never imagined that it would become a distrinction without meaning.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at April 16, 2013 04:43 AM (WvXvd)
Posted by: blaster at April 16, 2013 04:43 AM (GBWoT)
Still went over her head. Abortion in its current form is about convenience. As the President said about his daughters of not being a mistake to burden them. Only thinking in selfish terms which lead to this 'problem' in the first place.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 04:43 AM (IF6dz)
Posted by: Zombie Steve McQueen at April 16, 2013 04:44 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Hank Hill at April 16, 2013 04:44 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Horrified Observer at April 16, 2013 04:45 AM (/sohm)
Not even for an ampersand?
If we could do it over, we would have as many kids as possible. The more the merrier.
I see the casual attitude toward pregnancy and I despair for our country.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2013 04:46 AM (/WLC3)
Posted by: Zombie Steve McQueen at April 16, 2013 04:47 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 04:47 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: spongeworthy at April 16, 2013 04:48 AM (r5w1L)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 16, 2013 08:36 AM (XYSwB)
I don't see it that way. I have no problem with single motherhood. A lot of single mothers work very hard for their children to ensure they have a good life. And while sex out of wedlock may be frowned upon by many different religions, I can think of few (with the exception of fringe extremists, and Islam) that would turn a young mother away if she sought guidance and help from them.
My problems lie solely with those single mothers who portray themselves as victims. "I'm a single mom and my job won't let me work from home. I'm a victim!" "I'm a single mom and I have to work three jobs to pay the bills. I'm a victim!" "I'm a single mom and they won't give me more food stamps. I'm a victim!"
No. They are NOT victims. They are living the consequences of their choices. As I said, many single mothers -- and single fathers, not that anyone gives a rat's ass about them -- work very hard to give their children every opportunity to succeed. Whether they're single because they got pregnant out of wedlock, or because they got a divorce, or because they were widowed, doesn't matter to these parents. What they care about is their children. They will swallow their pride if needs be and work in a profession or series of professions from which they'd otherwise abstain if they feel that doing so will give their children the best chance to grow up and have a good life.
Selfish single parents care less about their children and more about themselves. Their life choices aren't about what will make lives better for their children, but what would make life better for THEM. THESE are the single mothers (and fathers) who earn nothing but scorn from me. They are the spoiled children of the adult class, and unfortunately these are the single parents who are becoming the face of the group as a whole.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 16, 2013 04:49 AM (4df7R)
Benghazi proved that. Four Americans dead and the American public hit the snooze button and went back to sleep.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 04:49 AM (IF6dz)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 16, 2013 04:49 AM (XN0LR)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:49 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:50 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: RWC at April 16, 2013 04:51 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Icedog at April 16, 2013 04:51 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: Sammy D. jr at April 16, 2013 04:51 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: RondinellaMamma at April 16, 2013 04:52 AM (53riN)
The authorities in PA didn't turn a blind eye to Gosnell because they were protecting an ideology. They wanted as much death and mayhem heaped upon the poor as possible. If you talk to one of these "Choice" true believers they will tell you they want these poor black children dead. period. They don't want them around to bother their comfy little world.
Posted by: The Dept. of Acuracy at April 16, 2013 04:52 AM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 16, 2013 04:52 AM (Cnqmv)
You do realize that the likelihood of you paying for a drink at the Meet Up is miniscule, right? Hell, the unattached Rons may end up Thunderdoming for the right to buy your dinner.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at April 16, 2013 04:52 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 16, 2013 04:52 AM (XYSwB)
I've noticed there's very little SOCON bashing on AoS. Every social issue thread on HA turns into an immediate flame war.....even abortion topics.
Oh, there's plenty of SoCon bashing. But it's usually not right out of the gate, and generally we SoCons give as good as we get.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 16, 2013 04:53 AM (4df7R)
Laura, this is the best post you've ever done, imho.
Posted by: Lady in Black at April 16, 2013 04:53 AM (3V9LU)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 04:53 AM (l86i3)
Icedog, there's nothing unlibertarian about hating abortion. Nothing. Do some research and come back.
Or better, don't.
Posted by: spongeworthy at April 16, 2013 04:53 AM (r5w1L)
qualms about the hippocratic oath.
Posted by: luigi vercotti at April 16, 2013 04:54 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: Reggie Love: Night Nurse at April 16, 2013 04:54 AM (ypzqs)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 04:54 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: madamex at April 16, 2013 04:54 AM (Tj05I)
Posted by: RWC at April 16, 2013 08:51 AM (fWAjv)
I've found that pro-choicers really get upset when they see pictures of the after-effects of abortion. They claim to be offended, though I've never understood why. You're more offended by pictures of the practice than the practice itself? That makes sense. Though, I suspect the thing they are really offended by is the fact that someone disagrees with them and is attempted to change minds.
Posted by: Mullaney at April 16, 2013 04:54 AM (hv+cC)
What in the blue hells is wrong with people? Someone just posted picture of the guy with no legs from Boston. There is blood all over the sidewalk around him. Another person to his right laying on their back with blood under that person's leg. And what looks like a first responder in the picture.
And some are still claiming because he is showing no emotion on his face, the photo is a fake. That he is a fake.
SMOD now!
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 04:54 AM (IF6dz)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 16, 2013 04:54 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at April 16, 2013 08:52 AM (da5Wo)
lol! Well I not much of a drinker, so the point is probably moot.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 16, 2013 04:54 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 16, 2013 04:55 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 16, 2013 04:55 AM (XN0LR)
Posted by: RWC at April 16, 2013 04:55 AM (fWAjv)
SMOD now!
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 08:54 AM (IF6dz)
Shock, how does it work?
Posted by: BCochran1981 at April 16, 2013 04:56 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 04:56 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 04:57 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at April 16, 2013 08:54 AM (4df7R)
We'll fix that problem.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at April 16, 2013 04:57 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 16, 2013 04:57 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Endeavor to Persevere at April 16, 2013 04:57 AM (zZJJp)
Posted by: P MIKE at April 16, 2013 04:57 AM (WXY9S)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 16, 2013 04:57 AM (GVxQo)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 04:58 AM (l86i3)
Which is why abortion zealots scream and howl and curse when people opposed to them speak out, and hold signs saying "choose life".
Posted by: Lord Humungus of the Jamaican Wasteland at April 16, 2013 04:58 AM (b84lr)
--
We've probably all heard how they think abortion (early, mid, late, hell even born alive) is preferable to living a life of poverty. Just kill them and there's one less human that won't wind up in prison. I've heard these exact words.
Posted by: Lady in Black at April 16, 2013 04:59 AM (3V9LU)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 04:59 AM (IF6dz)
Posted by: RWC at April 16, 2013 08:55 AM (fWAjv)
I believe the term you're looking for is "Weapons Free!"
......hmmm? Oh. Not what you meant? Well, what did you expect? We're Morons.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at April 16, 2013 05:00 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 16, 2013 05:01 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: RWC at April 16, 2013 05:01 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Lauren at April 16, 2013 05:01 AM (wsGWu)
http://www.hlj.com/product/NEC35433/Act
Annoy the liberals when you put it on display and they complain by innocently saying "But I like the game."
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 05:01 AM (IF6dz)
"We've probably all heard how they think abortion (early, mid, late, hell even born alive) is preferable to living a life of poverty. Just kill them and there's one less human that won't wind up in prison. I've heard these exact words."
I would't want my daughter punished with a baby.
Posted by: Barky O' Fuckstick at April 16, 2013 05:02 AM (026j9)
And some are still claiming because he is showing no emotion on his face, the photo is a fake. That he is a fake.
Oh for God's sake. Has everyone in the world suddenly turned into Alex Jones? WTF? Next they'll be saying that ball bearings don't shred flesh, just like fire doesn't melt steel.
SHOCK, dipshits. DO YOU SPEAK IT?
How about we chop off your* legs with a violent explosion and we'll see how you handle the situation. Odds are your body would shut down THE SAME DAMN WAY, because the body is smart enough to realize, "Holy shit, this is bad. Uh, don't panic. Shit, can't run. Uh... uh... Okay, I'm just... I'm just going to turn off for a while. This shit is heavy."
*I expect the Horde understands that the "you" in this situation is meant to indicate the dumbass conspiracists, not anyone here at teh HQ.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 16, 2013 05:02 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Icedog at April 16, 2013 05:02 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 05:03 AM (IF6dz)
Of course, the purpose is to dehumanize the human, and the only reason that's ever done is to facilitate the mental gymnastics necessary to kill whatever it is we're talking about.
And you are absolutely right. The reason abortion remains such a volatile topic in this country is that cases like Roe, essentially drew lines. Rational people ask, "why draw the line at that spot?" The absolutist crowd won't answer that question, because it can't. There is no rational basis for drawing a line anywhere, if the end result is the death of a human being. Thus, do the Marcotte's of the world rise up to defend even a Gosnell, for fear that any movement of the line will lead to a massive rational re-examination of the question in it's entirety, and lead to a result they do not want.
Posted by: Shermlaw at April 16, 2013 05:04 AM (YAGV/)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 05:04 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 16, 2013 05:04 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 05:04 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 05:05 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 05:06 AM (IF6dz)
I have strong Libertarian tendencies. But I disagree with most Libertarians on this issue. The rights of the mother do not override the rights of the fetus/forming human being. Both have the right to life. The mother has the inconvenience of her error. BFD.
Let me ask you this, all of you reasonable middle of the road pro choice-to-a-certain-point people: Where do you draw the line? When does a blob of tissue quit being a Thing and begin being a Human Being? Hmmm? 6 months? 7 months? 8 months? The moment the woman's water breaks?
Posted by: Sphynx at April 16, 2013 05:06 AM (OZmbA)
"As I said, many single mothers -- and single fathers, not that anyone gives a rat's ass about them -- work very hard to give their children every opportunity to succeed. Whether they're single because they got pregnant out of wedlock, or because they got a divorce, or because they were widowed, doesn't matter to these parents. What they care about is their children"Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at April 16, 2013 08:49 AM (4df7R)
Exactly! I was a single mother after my first husband passed away. I was 30 yrs old and had a 2yr old son when I became a widow. I was not my choice. The only thing that kept me sane was my son. I focused on keeping his life upright even if mine had been turned upside down. I had no interest in what was most convenient or fun for me. It took 5 yrs before I found Hubbymayhem and it wasn't easy trusting anyone with my kid. He had to love the boy as much as he loved me. My son is 18 now and will graduate from H.S. in about a month. He is the commander of his NavyJROTC unit, member of the National Honor Society, active in the American Legion, volunteers for numerous events and is hoping for the appointment to West Point. Everyone tells us the boy is awesome and says "I just love that kid." He did not get this because of luck. He had parents to guide him and teach him. Some single parents still do that.
Posted by: madamemayhem at April 16, 2013 05:06 AM (S2RnE)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 16, 2013 09:01 AM (XYSwB)
So true. And a solid chunk of the blame for that can be laid right at the feet of the bastards and whores who are currently running this country, and who got their baptism by leftist fire in the protest culture of the 60s.
Also, i'd be in favor of reanimating LBJ's rotted corpse JUST to kill him again for the genocide his so-called "Great Society" has levied against the American family, not least of all against the black family.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 16, 2013 05:06 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2013 09:05 AM (/WLC3)
I'll have to speak with Bannion. Btw, I voted for the restaurant who's upstairs private area referred to the table as "The Stage". Alas, it was not to be.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at April 16, 2013 05:06 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 05:07 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 05:07 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: lauraw at April 16, 2013 05:07 AM (rjLMx)
Posted by: Rosie O'Donnell at April 16, 2013 05:07 AM (K4CaP)
Posted by: RWC at April 16, 2013 09:01 AM (fWAjv)
Lets take that logic a step farther: A lot of the sons of bitches are parasites 35 years later, and the leftards think they are just great, because they vote for leftards. If its ok to kill them in the womb because they are parasites, why can't we kill the fucking proven parasites walking around sucking the life out of society?
Posted by: maddogg at April 16, 2013 05:07 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 09:06 AM (IF6dz)
Actually, we would probably just dismiss it as another Ace movie review and comment away totally ot
Posted by: Red Shirt at April 16, 2013 05:07 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 05:08 AM (l86i3)
Arguing 2A stuff on thehill the other day and Gosnell somehow came up. The person stated that the child is a 'parasite' until it's born.
Posted by: RWC at April 16, 2013 09:01 AM (fWAjv)
And did you use the opportunity to get clarification on the status of our nation of rent-seekers who live off the sweat and labor of their neighbors, friends, family and countless countrymen unknown? Why, I was under the impression that 'parasites' were a protected class.
Posted by: JQP at April 16, 2013 05:08 AM (GVL0g)
Simply ask if they can live without breathing? When they say no. Inform them that they are a parasite taxing poor Gaia for air.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 05:09 AM (IF6dz)
On a day with very little good news; thanks for the chuckle.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2013 05:09 AM (/WLC3)
Posted by: madamemayhem at April 16, 2013 09:06 AM (S2RnE)
You, Madame, are a testament to the benefits of being a good parent regardless of circumstance. It sounds like your son is already an excellent young man!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 16, 2013 05:09 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Thorvald is Pro Life at April 16, 2013 05:10 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 05:10 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 05:10 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at April 16, 2013 05:11 AM (hMlH+)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 16, 2013 05:11 AM (IF6dz)
Posted by: Endeavor to Persevere at April 16, 2013 05:13 AM (zZJJp)
Here we saw government in two ways perform very well. ... I never was as a member of Congress one of the cheerleaders for less government, lower taxes. No tax cut would have helped us deal with this or will help us recover. This is very expensive."
Oh? It performed well in two ways? What two ways are that? Are you talking about the first responders? B/C newsflash, asshole, those are funded by STATE taxes, not federal. If the grand solons in DC had chosen to cut taxes instead of raise them over and over again then there'd be more money in State economies to pay those police and firefighters' salaries, probably even hire more of them. Maybe then there'd have been just one policeman on the scene who noticed something odd and discovered teh bombs before they went off. Maybe then these people wouldn't have died or been injured and maimed. Maybe this would have been a cautionary tale instead of a nightmare.
So guess what, jerkass punk bitch ho: you chose to never fight for lower taxes and lower spending, so THIS IS YOUR FAULT.
Go shove a piece of shaved ginger up your ass, you fat fuck.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 16, 2013 05:15 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 05:15 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 05:16 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at April 16, 2013 09:09 AM (4df7R)
Thank you. This bias against all single parents really steams me. It is the reason (well one of them anyway) I left FreeRepublic. I used to like that place until the single mother bashing went nuclear. It was as if those people never heard of a young widow who didn't become a hooker for fun and profit.
Posted by: madamemayhem at April 16, 2013 05:17 AM (S2RnE)
Posted by: parteagirl at April 16, 2013 05:17 AM (Ty8IY)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 05:17 AM (9Bj8R)
Imagine the squeek as the ball sack catches then releases over and over while sliding down the shiny pole.
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 09:15 AM (l86i3)
Suddenly, I've got the urge to play tether ball. Anyone up for a game?
Posted by: JQP at April 16, 2013 05:17 AM (GVL0g)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 16, 2013 05:18 AM (JunLs)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 05:19 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: zsasz at April 16, 2013 05:21 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 16, 2013 05:22 AM (JunLs)
I have to go to work,
But I remember about a year ago when the PoMos on the academic side started pushing for "post-birth abortion."
Never mind their reasoning (it was just Peter Singer rehashed.)
What was important was their language (as LauraW points out.)
The noted in the paper that they specifically rejected "infanticide" because that term had too much weight with it.
Somehow it never clicked to those morons that there was a reason that term had so much weight (and that merely "renaming" it "Post birth abortion" didn't change the act itself.)
Posted by: tsrblke at April 16, 2013 05:23 AM (GaqMa)
>>> Because they recognize what compromise on this issue means, the eventual abolition of the liberal sacrament. <<<
Yeah, but they don't get all the say in the deal. And we get to call them "extremists" for not compromising.
I get your other objections. Don't really agree, but understand.
Posted by: spongeworthy at April 16, 2013 05:23 AM (r5w1L)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at April 16, 2013 05:23 AM (l86i3)
a) If a woman wants her baby, he is her precious newborn son, a patient of the hospital, and even if prematurely delivered he will receive humane medical care.
b) If the woman does not want her baby, cut his head off and toss the body in the bin with the others.
Note that the difference between a) and b) is merely the emotional whim of one parent. This is what distinguishes this killing as 'abortion' and not infanticide, to the extremist end of the pro-choice crowd."
***
It's not just late term abortions. How many of us have been in our offices and one of our colleagues shows us the picture of the ultrasound of their baby? At 8-12 weeks? We all go "goo-goo-gah-gah," and congratulate him or her and say pleasant things about the child's features and little fingers and toes or, if we know the fellow well enough, joke about the size of the infant boy's penis, etc.
We all, in other words, assume that the first-trimester baby is, in fact, a baby. BUT ONLY IF OUR FRIEND HAS SUBJECTIVELY DECIDED THAT IT IS A BABY. If our friend instead has decided that it's not a baby, then he can decide to kill it.
Orwell. Double. Think.
Posted by: The Regular Guy at April 16, 2013 05:24 AM (qHCyt)
A significant part of three generations of the youth of America have been vacuumed from their mothers' wombs; millions of children destroyed, never to be named or known.
Or hugged. Or had a bedtime story read to them. Or taken fishing. Or played pitch with.
Or loved.
While it's not a perfect solution, I'd like to see the emphasis shifted from abortion to adoption. It could be done. I'd rather err on the side of life.
Gosnell is a subhuman and the more that we find out about his house of horrors, the better for the nation. I also hope the merchants of death on the left squirm when their hypocrisy is shown.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit. at April 16, 2013 05:24 AM (+z4pE)
Posted by: realityman at April 16, 2013 05:42 AM (9AQdP)
Posted by: Just Us for all? at April 16, 2013 05:42 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Andy at April 16, 2013 05:44 AM (HJcb1)
JJ Sefton, yeah, I've never understood why someone doesn't make a defense that a fetus is not a baby so how can they be charged with murder.
It is the ultimate irony. You commit a crime and harm a pregnant woman where she loses a baby = murder.
Woman walks into abortion clinic to kill same baby = choice.
The disconnect is beyond strange. I think a lot of cynics consider themselves pro choice because it keeps minority populations down.
It's just a bad business altogether. I would consider myself prolife except in the case of rape, incest and the life of the mother. I was very surprised to learn that Roger Ebert was staunchly prolife and only if the mother's life was at risk was his only exception.
Posted by: Prescient11 at April 16, 2013 05:44 AM (LI1Kh)
Posted by: Der Apparat at April 16, 2013 05:53 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Shlem Budyenni at April 16, 2013 05:57 AM (3X3ZR)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at April 16, 2013 06:00 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: lauraw at April 16, 2013 06:07 AM (rjLMx)
Posted by: Abigail at April 16, 2013 06:24 AM (kP2XV)
Posted by: Yip at April 16, 2013 07:14 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: anonymous irishman at April 16, 2013 07:17 AM (DJgfL)
Laura, you wrote, "If the absolutist pro-choice crowd tries to expand upon the definition of a disposable fetus to include what are obviously big healthy babies, they will ultimately break the social stalemate on abortion, to the detriment of their own cause."
I once read a book called "The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing And The Psychology Of Genocide", about the German physicians who worked in concentration/labor/death camps. Interesting book--one of the most interesting I've ever read--but to the point: do you know why the Nazis settled on Zyklon B gas, formerly a cyanide-based pesticide, as the means of disposal?
Early in the Eastern war, the SS sent out units called Einsatzgruppen in the wake of front line infantry and armored units to mass murder Jews, Gypsies, and other undesirables. They killed these people--thousands of them--by machinegunning them on the edges of large pits, which were then bulldozed over as mass graves. The problem? Even the most hardened and fanatical SS men started developing psychological problems, having nervous breakdowns and the like. Turns out most human beings, even the most well-indoctrinated, aren't emotionally cut out for mass murder.
The solution? Sanitize the killing process. Reduce the number of people with direct exposure to the actual slaughter. Keep it as bloodless as possible and away from the eyes of even most of those most directly involved in the killing. Hence Auschwitz.
You see where I'm going here. They'll start performing officially sanctioned post-birth abortions (aka infanticide) soon, and--as long as they maintain control of the media--they'll probably get away with it. I write 'probably' because I have hopes the Gosnell case will energize and possibly radicalize the pro-life movement and put the abortion issue at the forefront, where it belongs. More and more, I'm seeing that abortion, like slavery before it, is THE issue, all else aside. We cannot reconcile the mass murder of babies with 'Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness' any more than we could reconcile slavery with 'All Men Are Created Equal'.
Posted by: troyriser at April 16, 2013 07:25 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 16, 2013 07:28 AM (4sTLj)
F* yeah. I've got nothing to add. You've said it. This is the humpback I know and love right here.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose DOOMCASTER! at April 16, 2013 07:35 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: BENGHAZIIIIIIIIIII!! at April 16, 2013 07:35 AM (7MbCG)
Posted by: madamex at April 16, 2013 07:35 AM (Tj05I)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 07:35 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: madamex at April 16, 2013 07:36 AM (Tj05I)
Posted by: Doktor Kermit Gosnele at April 16, 2013 07:36 AM (FcR7P)
Well said, EoJ. It is dishonest to take the increase in abortion and lay it at the feet of those who absolutely push against abortion, while ignoring the efforts of those who push for mass serial murder of the helpless, or those who just want to ignore the "ick".
Compromise solutions have worked so well in debates over fiscal matters. Clearly we need to adopt it in moral debates such as abortion.
How long did that 3/5 compromise for slavery last, again?
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at April 16, 2013 07:37 AM (rm+Am)
Posted by: tangonine at April 16, 2013 07:38 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at April 16, 2013 07:40 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: madamex at April 16, 2013 07:40 AM (Tj05I)
Posted by: Baldy at April 16, 2013 07:40 AM (opS9C)
You are correct, too Laura. They are in total fear that this may shut down abortion everywhere. When they cry, "this will make it illegal!Eleventy!!" I tell them to look at the Philadelphia map, which shows many, many abortion clinics in Philadelphia, surrounding Gosnell...but that people came to him, some forcably (they do not seem to care about that sticky wicket: the girls against their will and tied down to the filthy stirrups). I ask, what about the segregation? More cricket chirping.
When they would wail that late term abortion is "rare" I would do the math for them: per Grand Jury report, Gosnell performed 3-4 late term abortions 24+weeks gestational age, once a week. Records were destroyed. There are no current records on abortion for the country to the CDC for numbers or demographics since 2009 (and their preznit was elected).
When they would state how "rare" it is to have a dirty slaughter house clinic, I would link the recent closure of Planned Parenthood clinic in Delaware, and throw in stats like in 38 states there are NO regular inspections by the state, it is sort of up to Planned Parenthood to maintain sterile environments and quality procedures. More crickets chirp.
What about the fact they were mostly teen black girls (I got called racist). They are afraid. And I mock relentlessly. Have taken a break due to being sad about Boston and losing my edge. But I will be back in the game soon to mess with their scrambled brains.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at April 16, 2013 07:41 AM (baL2B)
Posted by: tangonine at April 16, 2013 07:41 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Average Joe at April 16, 2013 07:42 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 16, 2013 07:42 AM (4sTLj)
Posted by: Grim at April 16, 2013 07:42 AM (gyNYk)
We have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
We swear we just wanted to gin up some debate not push an agenda!
Posted by: The editors of the Journal of Medical Ethics at April 16, 2013 07:43 AM (YjnYc)
Posted by: madamex at April 16, 2013 07:44 AM (Tj05I)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 07:44 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2013 07:44 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: tangonine at April 16, 2013 07:45 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 16, 2013 07:45 AM (4sTLj)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 07:45 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: t-bird at April 16, 2013 07:45 AM (FcR7P)
Bet it's really, really warm....
Posted by: Tex Lovera at April 16, 2013 07:46 AM (wtvvX)
Posted by: Baldy at April 16, 2013 11:40 AM (opS9C)
--- Yes, and no
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at April 16, 2013 07:46 AM (R8hU8)
Oh, look. It's the cocksucker.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 16, 2013 11:45 AM (4sTLj)
My ex wife is here!?
Posted by: tangonine at April 16, 2013 07:46 AM (x3YFz)
Am I given to understand that Eric Holder's wife owned Gosnell's building?
Christ, if John Ashcroft's wife owned Jeffrey Dahmer's apartment building, we'd still be hearing about it.
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 16, 2013 07:46 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 16, 2013 11:42 AM (4sTLj)
I see your point EoJ. But I wonder to what extent this is internally consistent.
Saying "I want that law it moves in the right direction (while being woefully inadequate) is not the same as saying "I support those cases not restricted by the law."
I tend to think of it the following way "damn it, I can't save them all, but at least this round I can save some while not stopping my agitation!"
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at April 16, 2013 07:47 AM (YjnYc)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 07:47 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 16, 2013 07:47 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 16, 2013 07:47 AM (iANqq)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 11:47 AM (9Bj8R)
I had to take a number.
Posted by: tangonine at April 16, 2013 07:47 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 07:47 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 16, 2013 07:48 AM (ZDP2l)
Posted by: Havedash at April 16, 2013 07:48 AM (F0WNa)
No, she owns stake in a different building with a doc under investigation for different stuff.
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at April 16, 2013 07:48 AM (YjnYc)
She sucks cock and you got rid of her?
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2013 11:47 AM
Never said it was *his* cock.
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 16, 2013 07:48 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: fluffy at April 16, 2013 07:50 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 16, 2013 07:51 AM (iANqq)
No shit viability is a bad metric. It's philosophically unsound on multiple levels.
Setting aside the obvious thing you pointed out, "viability" is often determined by how much medical care we give a child and what medical tech we have. It's a target moving ever closer to conception (although it may never hit there). (I think it's at like 24 weeks now. even 15 years that would have been unheard of.)
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at April 16, 2013 07:52 AM (YjnYc)
Posted by: soothsayer at April 16, 2013 07:53 AM (s+8Vv)
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at April 16, 2013 11:37 AM (rm+Am)
That 3/5 agreement in the Constitution wasn't about slavery so much as it was about getting the vote count in the South up and getting more delegates to congress. The South would have been glad to count ALL of them for census purposes.
As for the abortion debacle it originally was illegal in most States to perform an abortion after the first trimester. Indeed for the really early history of the nation abortion after "quickening" was a felony in all the colonies.
Posted by: Vic at April 16, 2013 07:54 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 16, 2013 07:54 AM (4sTLj)
Posted by: t-bird at April 16, 2013 07:54 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Mammon at April 16, 2013 07:56 AM (90aTA)
Posted by: t-bird at April 16, 2013 07:57 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: goy at April 16, 2013 08:12 AM (QsFws)
Posted by: anonymous irishman at April 16, 2013 08:22 AM (DJgfL)
Anything that can roll back this culture of death is a good thing.
Abortion is the "sacrament" that allows sex to be consequence free for all. It allows men to walk away and it allows the left to grow government to support those left behind by dirtbag guys.
Posted by: Iblis at April 16, 2013 08:22 AM (9221z)
Posted by: tasker at April 16, 2013 08:29 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: lauraw at April 16, 2013 08:45 AM (rjLMx)
"As long as the belief persists among most reasonable people that the child has not been formed yet, and will not suffer, they will tolerate this practice even if they think it is wrong."
I agree with this. I think many of the people who think of themselves as "pro-choice" just don't think about it much. They don't want viable fetuses aborted, but they believe most abortions are done early, and are just a clump of cells. They don't want victims of rape or incest to be forced to have a baby. They don't want a mother's life to be threatened by giving birth. They've never seen a picture of a 7 week old fetus. They don't really know the statistics on why the vast majority of abortions (including late-term) are performed, i.e., convenience and financial reasons. You force them to think about it, and look at the reality of it, that support disappears.
Posted by: mbs at April 16, 2013 08:58 AM (JlabF)
Posted by: Vic at April 16, 2013 11:54 AM (53z96)
And the North wanted none. It was a bandaid compromise on the issue of slavery (and how it played into political representation) to get the United States off the ground.
Later fights over the inclusion of new slave/non-slave states were also about political representation - if the majority of new states were non-slave states, that would change the balance of power in the Senate. To say it was "only politics" is to ignore the purpose of the political power sought.
As far as the relation of the 3/5 compromise to absolutism, I don't think there is a clean or easy way to resolve this issue. There will be a tipping point and a choice in either direction, much like on the issue of slavery.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at April 16, 2013 09:13 AM (v3pYe)
President Obama and Congress should pass a law that requires people to register pressure cookers so what happened in Boston does not re-occur.
Posted by: Tiny Tiny Tommy the Liberal at April 16, 2013 09:18 AM (HlUFk)
Posted by: Shoot Me at April 16, 2013 09:26 AM (qiXMt)
One end of the birth canal or the other? One moment or the next? Who the hell cares? They want a dead clump of cells? Let them have their dead clump of cells. And what's so magical about birth? Two year old clumps of cells are still pretty non-viable in lots of ways, not to mention inconvenient. Why should a woman be punished with one of those?
Let's just say "Clumps of cells are fair game!". As long as their demise is ensured in a humane manner, of course -- we're not monsters, after all. Until the clump of cells can pry the scissors from its mother's hand on its own and move out of its room in the basement and get a job and stop being a burden, hey, what the hell. Gimme mine.
They're right! Gosnell is a f***ing hero. Standing up for the rights of poor disadvantaged women. Well, most of 'em anyhow. Omelets, eggs, you understand. OK. Fine. Let 'em have it their way.
One day, the worm will turn.
Or SMOD. Or something.
Now excuse me. I have to go hug my grandkids.
Posted by: pjf at April 16, 2013 09:59 AM (e4wW9)
Posted by: Samuel at April 20, 2013 11:45 PM (LWEwN)
Posted by: Samuel at April 21, 2013 12:10 AM (LWEwN)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3354 seconds, 408 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Too many people disassociate themselves from the reality of abortion. And the Left, because it is wise in the ways of manipulation, has used that and amplified that to reach the point where we are having a discussion about whether an abortion is okay at 30 weeks.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2013 03:19 AM (/WLC3)