May 09, 2013
— Ace I just read two pieces by two liberals on #Benghazi, one by Michael Hirsh and one by Marc Ambinder. There will be no links. I'll explain that in a moment.
Both pieces denied the possibility of a cover-up. Ambinder seemed very confused about why the administration would possibly lie about the matter, despite the fact that an email from Hillary's spokeswoman Victoria Nuland specifies the why: The email says that her "superiors" are concerned that the CIA's talking points suggest that Hillary overlooked warning signs in Benghazi.
And hence the talking points were rewritten to claim the massacre happened "spontaneously." Spontaneously = no possible overlooked warning signs.
This is difficult to parse? They really need hand-holding with this?
It's as if OJ wrote an email saying "Niccole Brown fills me with an intense, murderous sexual jealousy which I fear is consuming all my reason and restraint," and Ambinder and Hirsh then say, "I don't get it. I don't see a motive for OJ to murder her."
Sure. Except for his own words.
In addition, while these two hacks deny any cover-up, they refuse to mention the smoking gun evidence of a cover-up: The demotion of a whistleblower, retaliation against Gregory Hicks, for telling the truth about the talking points.
Because this point is all but unspinnable -- except to essentially say that Hillary Clinton enjoys the queenly right to dismiss the courtiers who displease her -- they choose the media's all-too-common tactic of late: Silence.
They simply do not mention it, and therefore they have nothing at all to spin away.
If no one knows, then no one will notice the omission.
This ends it for me. This is the end of things.
It is time to put Voltaire's observation into action: It is good in this country to hang a admiral [who fails] from time to time, to encourage the others.
You don't have to hang every admiral to make your point to all admirals. You just have to hang one.
We have to hang Admiral NBC. We have to get Levin, Limbaugh, everyone on this.
I don't mean NBC News. No one watches that and it's a rounding error in their operation.
I mean NBC itself-- Entertainment Division.
I mean Comcast.
And I mean, as a secondary matter, an end to the practice of linking the media.
We can attribute quotes. We can rewrite stories-- all fair use. We can note from where this information comes from.
But we can do that without a link.
They have declared war on the truth.
It's time we all understood we in a war and stopped giving aid, comfort, and traffic to the enemy.
All media is losing money, pretty much. And this is happening naturally. It is now well past time to add concerted, deliberate action to their woes.
NBC is now finishing behind Spanish-language Univision in the ratings. It is time to take NBC's pitiable, money-losing position and turn it into a financial disaster that they can no longer ignore.
It's time to stop talking about the weather and start doing something about it.
Actually it was time four years ago.
It's well overdue now.
Just for the humor of it: Paul Anka understood what must be done when the band is misbehaving.
Posted by: Ace at
11:17 AM
| Comments (544)
Post contains 556 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 11:20 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 09, 2013 11:21 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Mr Orwell at May 09, 2013 11:22 AM (jYLHT)
Posted by: VIA, on the tiny keyboard at May 09, 2013 11:22 AM (LKUDA)
Posted by: Dan Collins at May 09, 2013 11:23 AM (/JxW7)
This is what I said earlier, look it really doesn't matter because if the media don't talk about it, it didn't happen.
Go out into the world and ask any ten people about Benghazi and you willl find 8 people who don't have any idea what you are talking about, two who do and one of them are wrong.
Nothing will happen because of this, and there really isn't much that we can do about it either. Suggestions?
Posted by: BlearyTruth at May 09, 2013 11:23 AM (sYLzD)
Posted by: Serious Cat at May 09, 2013 11:23 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: Minnfidel at May 09, 2013 11:23 AM (dedTA)
Posted by: Body Builder at May 09, 2013 11:24 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 09, 2013 11:24 AM (Hfieh)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 09, 2013 11:24 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: mrshad at May 09, 2013 11:24 AM (Xqfwb)
I don't watch much, if any, NBC shows because Roku. And I don't go to many movies or buy new CDs, really.
Open to further suggestions, I guess.
If we succeed in crippling some division, won't they just invest in some other area?
Posted by: Bigby's Opposable Thumbs at May 09, 2013 11:25 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: El Kabong at May 09, 2013 11:25 AM (WAXuD)
========
I was saying that months ago.
Why are we not out-and-out stealing from them?
They are stealing our country, our government, our future from us and we . . . . give them links to help boost their advertising revenue directly and through rankings.
Screencap that shit if you feel a need to provide evidence.
Otherwise, fuck them.
Let a thousand thistles bloom, or some such shit.
Posted by: RoyalOil at May 09, 2013 11:25 AM (VjL9S)
===============================================
Thank you. I have never understood the point of giving traffic to sites that we know are useless arms of the Liberals, even to make fun of them. Talk about them, make fun of them, but don't go there. You can't win an argument with them so why do people persist in trying?
Posted by: Deanna at May 09, 2013 11:25 AM (Q5Zev)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at May 09, 2013 11:26 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: taylork at May 09, 2013 11:26 AM (a+Gry)
Posted by: mrshad at May 09, 2013 11:26 AM (Xqfwb)
Posted by: Bigby's Opposable Thumbs at May 09, 2013 11:26 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: taylork at May 09, 2013 11:27 AM (a+Gry)
NBC is now finishing behind Spanish-language Univision in the ratings. It is time to take NBC's pitiable, money-losing position and turn it into a financial disaster that they can no longer ignore.
Run 'em into the ground, drive their stock prices so low even I could buy them.
Then have somebody on our side buy them.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 09, 2013 11:27 AM (+z4pE)
Posted by: Paul Fucking Anka at May 09, 2013 11:27 AM (4cRnj)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:27 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 09, 2013 11:27 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: holmes at May 09, 2013 11:28 AM (75E4o)
NBC may be finishing behind univision.
Of course NBC also owns univision...so...I guess it's a wash.
Even if you kill NBC, USA's doing pretty well.
Syfy is in that weird sorta "on and off again" mode it hits up every few years.
And Comcast is troublesome because it's managed to mandate monopoly's in certain areas.
There's also this problem that conservatives have really never been big on boycotts, I think it's our nature. Sell me a product and shut up. If you're product is good (i.e. entertaining) I'll take it. If not I'm leaving it.
(Interestingly, NBC proper's stuff is getting far to overly pandering to hispanics to be entertaining. It's no so much that I don't like hispanics, it's that the pandering is done so poorly it's just bad and it lowers the overall quality of the product.
"Look here's a character that only talks in spanish on my English TV show. They add nothing to the plot but get tons of screen time." Or "here's shakira on The voice with lots of spanish singers."
It's transparent.
Posted by: tsrblke (work)[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 09, 2013 11:28 AM (eqnXx)
Posted by: ace at May 09, 2013 11:28 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Joe at May 09, 2013 11:28 AM (19AvL)
I'm open for ideas. I haven't watched anything on the network for years - but I'm not a Nielson member. Comcast isn't available as a provider. Gimmee an idea fearless leader(s)?
Posted by: ShirtlessJoeTheHappy at May 09, 2013 11:29 AM (MDY9p)
And the little furry guy understands human nature, and the spotting of nuances better then anyone I know.
It's a matter of perspective.
Nuance occurs close to the ground. That's right in his wheelhouse. Also, it sticks to fur.
Posted by: garrett at May 09, 2013 11:29 AM (o6hXg)
Posted by: GadsdenBC at May 09, 2013 11:29 AM (AT1Ju)
I do.
Yeah. Somebody was talked out of it. Don't know the reasons why. I can imagine the threats and the fears.
But: It was always a good idea.
There should be a file of dirt an inch thick on every major media personality.
Posted by: RoyalOil at May 09, 2013 11:29 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: CarolT at May 09, 2013 11:29 AM (5TFvk)
Posted by: Grey Fox at May 09, 2013 11:29 AM (XQsSC)
Posted by: El Kabong at May 09, 2013 11:30 AM (WAXuD)
Posted by: Misanthropic humanitarian at May 09, 2013 11:30 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 09, 2013 11:31 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: steevy at May 09, 2013 11:31 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:31 AM (ZPrif)
Ambinder is right about "why?", although in his case its a disbelief that they would, because barack and hillary never lie or something.
But it is clear that the video excuse was a clear attempt at misdirection and obfuscation, the question does remain as to why they lied. And my guess is its a doozy, not just plain incompetence, based on their actions since then, ie, hiding witnesses, intimidation, etc.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 09, 2013 11:31 AM (jKWYf)
I'd be willing to work on that. I have no connections to the inside of the world of "entertainment" though.
These fuckers need to hang for some of the shit they're pulling. If the best we can start with is potentially blackmailing the bastards into actually doing their jobs, then so be it.
Posted by: GMan at May 09, 2013 11:31 AM (sxq57)
There are these marvelous invention: Sheets of paper with words written on them. The words convey instructions or narratives.
No, a boycott in itself won't be effective. Sorry guys.
What should happen is not only to boycott the likes of NBC, but go out of your way to support better alternatives.
If they lose customers, they can easily tell themselves it's anything but people being disillusioned with their product.
But if the lose customers to a competitor, that sends a message.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 09, 2013 11:32 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 11:32 AM (Z1/Hr)
That shithole paper pisses me off 10 times as much as NBC. You will never see me posting a link to them.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 09, 2013 11:32 AM (ccXZP)
Posted by: CarolT at May 09, 2013 11:33 AM (UyYYt)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 09, 2013 11:33 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at May 09, 2013 11:33 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 09, 2013 11:33 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: NewEnglandDevil at May 09, 2013 11:33 AM (73P68)
Posted by: VIA, on the tiny keyboard at May 09, 2013 11:33 AM (LKUDA)
This is often quoted in the military in a slightly different manner than in Voltair's Candide but I can't remember exactly how it goes and I am too0 lazy to hunt for it.
Posted by: Vic at May 09, 2013 11:33 AM (53z96)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 11:33 AM (Z1/Hr)
Here's to you, unqualified, media-protected, affirmative action president...
Posted by: soothsayer at May 09, 2013 11:34 AM (8dspl)
Posted by: Frank Underwood, D-South Carolina at May 09, 2013 11:34 AM (fscec)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:35 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: mallfly at May 09, 2013 11:35 AM (bJm7W)
>>There's also this problem that conservatives have really never been big on boycotts, I think it's our nature.
Oh, see what's been happening to Dick's Sporting Goods since they started being...well, you know...about guns.
Posted by: Mama AJ at May 09, 2013 11:35 AM (SUKHu)
Posted by: Gordon at May 09, 2013 11:35 AM (2sT0g)
Assholes....ruining it for everybody.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 09, 2013 11:35 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 11:35 AM (Z1/Hr)
Posted by: Fritz at May 09, 2013 11:35 AM (G9Mmf)
Posted by: mongo78 at May 09, 2013 11:36 AM (2b46R)
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at May 09, 2013 11:36 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: wooga at May 09, 2013 11:36 AM (vMJh9)
With a shell company. Notice how they circle the wagons and rally the troops to try to block the potential purchase of the LA Times by the Koch Bros? Notice how they blocked Rush from buying into a football team?
I saw today where Juan McLame is trying to pass cable TV "ala carte" legislation again. That, plus a wee bit of boycottiness from us could sink them.
Hop springs eternal.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 09, 2013 11:36 AM (+z4pE)
Take a page from the Dem playbook and import a new electorate. I'm thinking Victorian England.
Posted by: pep at May 09, 2013 11:36 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: Vic at May 09, 2013 11:36 AM (53z96)
Boycotting just seems so 70s and shit. Its like how I was drinking one of those Monster Energy Drinks and it was the Kona one and I pointed to the Tiki graphics and was like, "Man, that reminds me of how Greg blew his Dexterity check and plowed a nosedive off his surfboard" and everybody was like "Wuh? Tiki Greg Dexterity check??"
Nah, not really like that but I wanted to throw that one in somewhere and I'm in a shoehornin' mood.
Posted by: Bigby's Opposable Thumbs at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (3ZtZW)
I shall now go put on pants in penance.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (VtjlW)
I'm frustrated because I have a Yahoo email which would be a real pain to give up, but I hate giving them any business.
Posted by: Deanna at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (Q5Zev)
Walrus Rex
Conservatives are shocked to discover that the truth no longer matters and they have no idea what to do about it.
This exactly right and I don't think they will figure it out.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Minnfidel at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (dedTA)
Posted by: waldo at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: mrshad at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (Xqfwb)
Posted by: hillary at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (mGBy8)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (+z4pE)
I wish someone in a T-Shirt had the balls to correct him in that video.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 09, 2013 11:37 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 11:38 AM (Z1/Hr)
Posted by: Janet Neopolitano at May 09, 2013 11:38 AM (2iU3x)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:38 AM (ZPrif)
Don't pay Comcast for phone service -- use a wireless provider.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 03:37 PM (ZPrif)v
Go with wireless internet access as well. Most metropolitan areas have Clear or another wireless carrier for internet access. Rural areas can get DirecTV or something for internet.
Fuck Comcast. In the squeakhole. With a barbed wire fence.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 09, 2013 11:39 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:39 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: CarolT at May 09, 2013 11:39 AM (5V+hM)
I'm looking forward to the day when Matt Lauer is on the streets of Manhattan with a cup begging for change.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 09, 2013 11:39 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Deanna
---------------
You have to pick your battles. Every now and then, when some nugget of irrefutable truth emerges. I will stop over at Huff Po to see if it is being reported. Mind you, I do not go there casually...., only when I am armed with specific and undeniable truth. If I find something reported there that amounts to spin, I post as a flat observation what I know to be an inarguable counter point, with links. I rarely receive responses, which is fine..., more than fine. It means that however much the libtards dislike the truth, they can not refute it. It is from small seeds that mighty oaks grow. If just one tiny seed takes root, then it is progress..., real progress.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 11:39 AM (aDwsi)
Also, this.
Posted by: mongo78 at May 09, 2013 11:40 AM (2b46R)
Time is long past to stop linking and watching them all. The only positive note in WaPo's newspaper division's 1st quarter numbers was increased online advertising revenue. It was up from a low starting point, but still up, and everything else is circling the drain. Time to stop helping them stem the bleeding.
Posted by: Adjoran at May 09, 2013 11:40 AM (473jB)
Ace...absolutely.
I've been boycotting the Peacock for over a decade.
A lot of people have.
With greater numbers, it will be even more effective.
Question:
Does Comcast enjoy a Monopoly in the areas that it is in?
Posted by: wheatie at May 09, 2013 11:40 AM (LxEHG)
Posted by: JypseaRose at May 09, 2013 11:40 AM (iBaHp)
Eh, boycotting the use of any Comcast product is tough. This business is close to being a monopoly, and it spans both production and distribution.
I think that an approach like what Instapundit has been arguing for is better:
http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/168558/
Basically getting R's on board to hurt the entertainment industry legislatively. Apparently Mr Maverick McCain is talking about doing this. (Just when I think he is a total asshat, he redeems himself).
Posted by: dan-O at May 09, 2013 11:40 AM (Yu2MC)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:40 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: wooga at May 09, 2013 11:40 AM (vMJh9)
Posted by: GardenGnome at May 09, 2013 11:41 AM (wePjE)
According to Wikipedia (large grain of salt) they own:
Comcast Cable Communications
Xfinity
AT&T Broadband
Susquehanna Communications
Adelphia Communications (partially owned by Time Warner Cable)
Patriot Media
Commuter Cable
CN8 – The Comcast Network
Comcast SportsNet Mid-Atlantic
SportsNet New York (joint venture with the New York Mets and Time Warner Cable)
MLB Network (joint venture with Major League Baseball and other providers)
Comcast Sports Southeast/Charter Sports Southeast
Comcast Television (formerly Comcast Local) available in Michigan
E! Networks E! Entertainment
Style Network
G4
NBC Sports Network (formerly Versus, which was formerly Outdoor Life Network)
The Golf Channel
AZN Television (formerly International Networks)
ExerciseTV
FEARnet
NHL Network (United States) (joint venture with National Hockey League)
Philadelphia Flyers
Comcast Interactive Capital
Comcast Spectacor Comcast-Spectacor operating sports and entertainment venues
Comcast Spotlight (Advertising)
Comcast Interactive Media
TV One (in partnership with Radio One and DirecTV)
TVWorks (67%) (in partnership with Cox Communications)
GuideWorks (51%) (in partnership with Gemstar TVGuide)
PBS Kids Sprout (in partnership with HIT Entertainment, PBS and Sesame Workshop)
NBCUniversal (100%) (no longer a joint venture partnership with General Electric)
Posted by: ShirtlessJoeTheHappy at May 09, 2013 11:41 AM (MDY9p)
*snort*
Just before they canned her.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 09, 2013 11:41 AM (8ZskC)
I shall now go put on pants in penance.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 09, 2013 03:37 PM (VtjlW)
Let's not get all extremist with the penance, please.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at May 09, 2013 11:41 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 09, 2013 03:37 PM (VtjlW)
All that does is punish those around you.
Your penance is TO THE WEB CAM WITH YOU.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 09, 2013 11:41 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Felt Wrapper at May 09, 2013 11:41 AM (ecmD4)
I'm looking forward to the day when Matt Lauer is on the streets of Manhattan with a cup begging for change.
And I look forward to not hearing from Tingles Matthews and that Rachel Maddow fellow.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 09, 2013 11:41 AM (+z4pE)
Kill. Your. Cable.
Try it. Live your life again. Spend that money on something that's actually important.
Posted by: Jaws at May 09, 2013 11:42 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Conan at May 09, 2013 11:42 AM (tOZDv)
Posted by: eleven at May 09, 2013 11:42 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Minnfidel at May 09, 2013 11:42 AM (dedTA)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:42 AM (ZPrif)
Hold it, NOW we're supposed to start boycotting NBC???
I thought we had been doing that for years. I have, at least.
Maybe we're doing it wrong, maybe we're supposed to START watching them. For the children.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 09, 2013 11:42 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 11:43 AM (Z1/Hr)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at May 09, 2013 11:43 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:43 AM (ZPrif)
Look, I get the point ace is making and I don't actually disagree with it. I just have a wee bit of an automatic eyeroll reaction to the entire you are not a True Conservative unless you boycott all pop culture position.* This comes from growing up in an extremely Evangelical Christian household where listening to Amy Grant was considered a bridge too far. See also bias discussion of the other day. *Not that I'm saying that you are taking that position, I'm just being snotty as always.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 09, 2013 11:43 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Petrus at May 09, 2013 11:44 AM (ngOuh)
Posted by: john g at May 09, 2013 11:44 AM (3PqHz)
Giving them money? LOL!
*checks BitTorrent connections*
Posted by: EC at May 09, 2013 11:44 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 03:37 PM (ZPrif)
I'd add that the USA managed to survive and prosper without most of those TV shows and movies - so ask yourself how much do you want to support the liberals behind that content?
Don't have to go cold turkey if you don't want to, but is the entertainment you're getting worth the money you're enriching liberal causes with?
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 11:44 AM (oY6Yp)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 09, 2013 03:31 PM (jKWYf)
My guess??? Think Col. Oliver North.
The CIA annex was running guns to Syrian groups with KNOWN Terrorist ties... which means under the War on Terror Act, we were aiding the Enemy, because we are NOT at War with Syria.
The Legal and Moral Case can be made, that this is Treason...
Thus, the intitial lack of support after the first Benghazi attack.. because they did not want the Military involved... as they might talk...
And after the attack on the CIA annex? They HAD to deflect the terrorist meme, because there was no Real reason not to send support in after the FIRST attack....
They were hoping it would be over with the first attack... and thus got caught with their pants down... BUT, they still did not (and do not) want to talk about that CIA annex.... which was a LARGE group of people to be sitting in a War Torn area, with no other real American prescence there.
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 09, 2013 11:45 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Gerbil Malodor, Esq. at May 09, 2013 11:45 AM (T5dvf)
Targeting organizations is a waste of time.
If you want to change the system, focus on individuals out of the limelight. Executives and producers who can be picked apart by intense scrutiny and ridicule.
Destroy them personally and put the fear of god in their peers that the same will happen to them.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 11:45 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:45 AM (ZPrif)
Remember, Comcast got local permission from local and country governments all over the country for their local monopolies.
Comcast can't just tell us to fuck off.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 03:42 PM (ZPrif)
I think you're wrong here.
The only thing that will reign in MSNBC is a full fucking bankruptcy of the parent company and its subsidiaries..
They already have ZERO ratings and hemorrhage money, yet they continue to broadcast the worst shit ever put on TV.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 09, 2013 11:45 AM (xmcEQ)
---------
Same here. Every now and then, Mrs. Hammer tries to drag me off to see some trendy flick. I dig in my heels. Sooner or later the entertaining ('entertaining', mind you, none have any other redeeming qualities) movies make it to the local Pizza & Flick. There, the move is $3.00, and I can have beer and pizza to see me through.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 11:45 AM (aDwsi)
Just add "watched the Brewers suck ass on FOX last Saturday" to my list of ways I'm destroying America. It's so far under "goes out to work every day to support self" I'm completely out of fucks to give.
Although I do feel bad I didn't know Yuni B defected from Cuba via speedboat as an adult until I read it about Sunday.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 11:46 AM (ZKzrr)
See also: Kevin Drum, Scott Beauchamp et. al.
Posted by: 13times at May 09, 2013 11:46 AM (fGPLK)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 09, 2013 11:46 AM (kENHJ)
Posted by: @PurpAv at May 09, 2013 11:46 AM (/gHaE)
One of our biggest tactical errors as a movement was during the 2004 elections when we declared the Old Media dead. This was after Memogate and after Rather got shit canned.
It wasn't dead. It never died. It only got worse.
Posted by: El Kabong at May 09, 2013 03:25 PM (WAXuD)
-------------------------
Fucker Carlson said that just last year. Right before his fat ass took a full-time gig on the curvy couch at Fox, interviewing the world basketball dribbling champion and learning how to cook fucking paella from Chef Rocco.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 09, 2013 11:46 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Mr Pink at May 09, 2013 11:46 AM (ChWmi)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 09, 2013 11:46 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:47 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at May 09, 2013 11:47 AM (fNpC1)
We REALLY need to get behind the "ala carte cable" legislation. The sad fact is that, if you subscribe to cable, your monthly payment to your cable company is subsidising lots of dreck that you consider absolute trash. Whether it's MTV, CNN, MSNBC, BET or any of the other channels you get but don't watch, you are putting money in their pockets simply by subscribing to cable. If I could get Fox News without going thru cable, I'd do it in a minute. Unfortunately, by subscribing to cable, I am involuntarily sending a few cents to the above mentioned channels that I consider to be poison. Wait until Al Jazeera becomes part of basic cable and part of your cable bill is funding the operation of that channel!
Get on board! Much as it pains me to say a kind word about McCain, I intend to support "his" ala carte cable legislation. You should write your senator and ask for his support on this issue too.
Posted by: IMWTF at May 09, 2013 11:47 AM (ng4Y3)
Posted by: Minnfidel at May 09, 2013 11:47 AM (dedTA)
Posted by: toby928 at May 09, 2013 11:47 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: NewEnglandDevil at May 09, 2013 11:48 AM (73P68)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:48 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: CarolT at May 09, 2013 11:48 AM (5V+hM)
Ace, do you think there is any use in only going to their websites to search for the topics they are trying to bury?
Lately, I've been going to MSNBC and using their search engine to search for articles about Benghazi. Then I click on several of the "Benghazi" articles and leave. Same with CNN. Each of them usually has articles - but they are buried on the site.
I am hoping to cause them to see the query and the traffic bump the articles up to a more prominent place on their main news page. That way some of the low information liberal viewers might have cause to pay some attention to the issue.
Posted by: Brian at May 09, 2013 11:48 AM (kFeuD)
Posted by: Beagle at May 09, 2013 11:48 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 11:48 AM (Z1/Hr)
Posted by: AmishDude at May 09, 2013 11:48 AM (HSZxY)
Posted by: USS Diversity at May 09, 2013 11:48 AM (5wHPS)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 11:49 AM (ZKzrr)
If you care so little for your country that you feel you have to support our sworn enemies so you can watch your sports programming - then you're no better than a leftist.
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 03:38 PM (Z1/Hr)
Who pulled the string on your back, fucker?
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 09, 2013 11:49 AM (CJjw5)
Start by killing the weakest members of the herd. Newspapers. They're the straggling, old beast that's falling behind the herd. Find the weakest one and kill the fucker. Concentrate the strongest part of your forces on the weakest part of the opponent's forces.
Posted by: SwampFox at May 09, 2013 11:49 AM (kBWdQ)
Posted by: @PurpAv
------
We dumped Charter for Dish. Perfectly satisfied. I despise Charter.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 11:49 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Mr Pink at May 09, 2013 11:49 AM (ChWmi)
Posted by: Yip at May 09, 2013 11:50 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:50 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: mrshad at May 09, 2013 11:50 AM (Xqfwb)
Posted by: toby928 at May 09, 2013 11:50 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: grognard at May 09, 2013 11:50 AM (/29Nl)
Good job, Ace. Good point.
The sad thing is, as I will see when I visit relatives, the brainwashing has been done. It really could have been them listening to teh jug-ears in 2008, his sssssszzzzzzzz sounds that hypnotized. Or they are just plain stupid and buy into the, "Well, only FOX is reporting it therefore it is not true" neener-neener.
I want to punish the media and this is a good start and a good point. It is one of the reasons I rarely wade over to the swamps of WaPo, unless I am feeling, shall we say, in a hissy-fit of pure rage and I cannot contain it except to lash out at those basement boys who linger there, and chase a few away with the sheer laser beam of my brain and fingers. It is cathartic, yet I know every time I click I am giving ad money to those socialists and fabricators and obamaeaters. So, in spite of my pure enjoyment, like cat and mouse, I try to control myself. Plus! I doubt many read it anyway except for the basement boys. I had nearly all of the information, at the time by the British Press, on Benghazi before the first week was up. I was comment carpet-bombing for a weekend on WaPo to tick people off (this was the first of two bombing missions. The second was Gosnell). Some of those little pip-squeaks do probably remember some of what I wrote and, when the truth came out, disguised by WaPo as "rumors" or some crap, they probably thought, huh, that wacko wingnut commenter said this! She must be a spy for the media militant revolution machine (or whatever anarchists squeal over).
Sometimes my rage just overflows.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky is thankfully not the Duchess of Alba at May 09, 2013 11:51 AM (baL2B)
Posted by: John McClain Retired LEO at May 09, 2013 11:51 AM (Xv7f/)
Some thing never change.
Posted by: dananjcon at May 09, 2013 11:51 AM (jvd3N)
Posted by: steevy at May 09, 2013 11:52 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Yip at May 09, 2013 11:52 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:52 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Leit Bart at May 09, 2013 11:52 AM (oTXfa)
If you care so little for your country that you feel you have to support our sworn enemies so you can watch your sports programming - then you're no better than a leftist.
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 03:38 PM (Z1/Hr)
--------
I hear Che was a huge Packers fan, but he couldn't facepaint because the green and gold clashed with the red star.
Posted by: USS Diversity at May 09, 2013 11:52 AM (5wHPS)
Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for May 6, 2013
P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) Total Day
FNC
1,405 267 544 CNN
504 154 224 MSNBC
374 101 158 CNBC
156 48 67 FBN
49 12 28 HLN
522 177 285
Yeah, they aren't zero, but they suck pretty bad.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 09, 2013 11:52 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 11:53 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: © Sponge at May 09, 2013 11:53 AM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Minnfidel at May 09, 2013 11:53 AM (dedTA)
Posted by: jakeman at May 09, 2013 11:53 AM (96M6e)
Posted by: SwampFox
-------------
Thus I dumped our local Gannett-owned rag. I now buy a Sunday paper off the rack, which does not add to their circulation numbers. Otherwise, I read the front page while in the grocery store etc., generally, there is nothing there worth reading, or just really vapid propaganda.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 11:53 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Beagle at May 09, 2013 03:48 PM (sOtz/)
dunno why you would skip the commentary track on Sum of All Fears, it's the greatest one of all-time (and I'm being dead serious)
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 11:54 AM (vJdyz)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 11:54 AM (Z1/Hr)
Posted by: crosspatch at May 09, 2013 11:54 AM (YRCZD)
166 We REALLY need to get behind the "ala carte cable" legislation.
This!
Think of it...
Being able to pick and choose which channels you subscribe to.
We were supposed to get this 20 years ago!
But the weasels in Congress...on both sides...killed it.
I remember Cable CEOs saying:
"But, but...we *have to* bundle the channels together and offer them as a Package. Otherwise, some channels would not survive!"
Gah!
Posted by: wheatie at May 09, 2013 11:54 AM (LxEHG)
Posted by: Up With People! at May 09, 2013 11:55 AM (krveP)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:55 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 09, 2013 11:55 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 09, 2013 11:55 AM (qyfb5)
We need to use the tactics of the left.
Go after the execs...personally. Protest in front of their homes. Protest at their business. Do the sit ins. Etc. Tell them it will continue until they stop advertising on NBC.
Posted by: Tilikum The Killer Assault Whale at May 09, 2013 11:55 AM (uhftQ)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 11:56 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Yip at May 09, 2013 11:56 AM (/jHWN)
Hey big hero "fyscyl clyff ", do you pay taxes? Because a real patriot would refuse to pay all income taxes. I mean, do you even KNOW where the leftists in government spend that money!! You might be sent to jail, but hey, you would be fighting the destruction of America.
Posted by: dan-O at May 09, 2013 11:57 AM (Yu2MC)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 09, 2013 11:57 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Yip
-----------
Rope. We're gonna need rope. Perhaps the progressives that want to raise hemp are onto something after all...
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 11:57 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:57 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 11:57 AM (Z1/Hr)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 09, 2013 11:57 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Brian Pendell at May 09, 2013 11:57 AM (GDDIu)
I mean, I know museums are tools of the progressivarchy, but the dude painted landscapes.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 11:57 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 09, 2013 11:57 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: toby928 at May 09, 2013 11:58 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: @PurpAv at May 09, 2013 11:58 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at May 09, 2013 11:58 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: Littleminded Hobgoblin at May 09, 2013 11:58 AM (3ZtZW)
Oh, he's very funny - we saw him and Nathan Fillion riffing off each other at a ComicCon panel and it was possibly the funniest thing I have ever seen. Plus he seems like a reasonably intelligent guy, and if you heard him discussing his long and ultimately fruitless attempt to add a backyard pool to his house in L.A. you would think that he would get why more gubment regulation is not an automatically good thing. So it's doubly frustrating when he shows up as an advocate for restricting my rights.
Posted by: mongo78 at May 09, 2013 11:58 AM (2b46R)
NBC is already effectively boycotted by viewers. All networks are statistically unwatched. Check any channel's "total" viewership. Nobody's looking. But the few who do never fucking shut up about it.
Of course, don't help the networks. Don't give them anything. But don't think that your refusal to give hurts them. Whether you watch or not--you are not their customers. Figure out who is. Then hurt them.
"Advertisers" is not the right answer. Not exactly. What does their money do? It doesn't get them "your eyes." They know the numbers. Nobody's looking.
Almost nobody.
Who is?
What does TV do? What does it make happen? What are advertisers buying from it? Is what they're buying negative?
Fire up the ol' hamster wheel...
Posted by: oblig. at May 09, 2013 11:59 AM (cePv8)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 11:59 AM (ZPrif)
----------
You don't live in the south, do you?
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 11:59 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Yip at May 09, 2013 11:59 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 09, 2013 11:59 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: rickl at May 09, 2013 11:59 AM (zoehZ)
The nice thing about walking this talk, is that it doesn't cost you a cent; in fact it helps you keep your money in your jeans. What's not to like?
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at May 09, 2013 03:47 PM (fNpC1)
I gave up the Orlando Sentinel in 2004 and told them why as they endorsed Kerry. I rarely read any paper online. But I have to say I am not giving up Raylan in this revolution, nor CSI-LA or Major Crimes or my few other shows I escape to. I watch FOX News at 6pm. That is all, and nothing regularly other than that (we record shows). I'd rather have my eyeballs picked out by ravens than sit through O'Reilly (especially if Gerry Rivera is on, that pantyhose). Where was I? I will fight in the trenches, sling all sorts of mud and excreta, but do not ask me to give up Raylan.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky is thankfully not the Duchess of Alba at May 09, 2013 11:59 AM (baL2B)
Rememeber when Christian Slater had that pirate radio station and he told everybody to TALK HARD? And then that girl put all her track and field medals in the microwave and it BLEW UP?!
THAT WAS FUCKING AWESOME.
Posted by: Fiscyl Clyffordwing Plover at May 09, 2013 12:00 PM (CJjw5)
When I sat on my couch last week, watching an over-the-air broadcast that cost me not a single fucking penny, I "funded the destruction of America."
That is so fucking stupid even the Kossacks are scritching are their heads.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 12:00 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 12:00 PM (ZPrif)
Sure they can. And probably will.
After all, how many of "us" are there?
Approximately 30% of the public identify as Republican.
Of those, how many are politically active and aware conservatives? It's a guess, but let's say 30%.
Of those 30%, how many read conservative blogs and would be willing to participate in a boycott? My guess- about 10%
Of that 10%, how many regularly watch NBC and/or have Comcast as a TV / Internet provider in the first place? Wild ass guess- 40%.
Where's that leave "us"? .30 x .30 x .10 x .40 = .0036= .36%
Yeah, I know. I'm being a naysaying, pessimistic, defeatist jerkwad pissing in everybody's Corn Flakes.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 09, 2013 12:00 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 12:01 PM (Vgn84)
I wear cast-off burlap sacks for shirts. Posted by: toby928
--------------
Our children just play naked in the dirt front yard.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 12:01 PM (aDwsi)
I would LOVE to have a sizable group with movie-set pitch forks and lit torches march on some of these TV exec's houses and make a ruckus... heh... scare the crap out of 'em... next... Pelosi's place!! " ...she's a witch! "
I'll bring the Weighing Wood and a duck.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 09, 2013 12:02 PM (+z4pE)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 09, 2013 12:02 PM (kENHJ)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 12:02 PM (Z1/Hr)
"I'm fucking sick and tired of seeing my country destroyed before my eyes.
WAR."
Newsletter subscription application inbound.
Playing nice and by the rules is what got us in this fucking mess in the first place.
Posted by: Jaws at May 09, 2013 12:02 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 12:02 PM (ZPrif)
I stopped watching TV when they cancelled Tony Orlando and Dawn. I just couldn't do it anymore, I felt like my life was lie
/*sobbing*
Posted by: Bigby's Opposable Thumbs at May 09, 2013 12:02 PM (3ZtZW)
For a boycott to work, 3 things are needed:
1) Needs to have very, very wide support
2) Needs to have a clear target
3) Needs to be relatively easy to do.
Boycotting Comcast is none of these things. Support would be limited to committed, informed conservatives. The target is a multi-national conglomerate with its hands in multiple different industries. And finally, it is the provider of a product for which, often, there is no alternative, that people really want (making the boycott not easy).
I don't watch NBC on a regular basis (just sports), because I think they suck.
I'm just saying calling for a boycott isn't going to go anywhere.
Posted by: dan-O at May 09, 2013 12:02 PM (Yu2MC)
Posted by: Beagle at May 09, 2013 12:02 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 03:57 PM (ZKzrr)
It'd be just like you to destroy America, one museum at a time.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 12:03 PM (v3pYe)
Posted by: Mrs. Byng at May 09, 2013 12:03 PM (pxDth)
I'll go one step further. What about organizations who support NBC? For instance, someone upthread mentioned National Review Online folks showing up on MSNBC.
I haven't subscribed to NR for a long time and I don't look at their site more than a couple of times a month...but if they are willing to support MSNBC by sending their people to appear, why should we support NR/NRO? They aren't appearing to change minds...they are appearing to self-promote.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 09, 2013 12:03 PM (eytER)
You determining for me from what sources I should and I should not take joy. You telling me what the fuck to do with my life. To each and everyone one of you setting out the position that a True Conservative must not give a single penny to any production or entity that in any way employs a progressive, you do, of course, realize that you are wholeheartedly embracing the position that political beliefs are the true and sole criteria by which a person should be judged? Of course you do, none of you are so idiotic as to not comprehend the underlying premises upon which your position is based. If you want to accept that position, you are certainly free to do so. You are not, however, free to demand that I do the same. You are also more than welcome to criticize my choice to reject such a contention. I am just as welcome to find your contention lacking.
To those of you stating pick up a book instead, are you also extending your ban to books as well? After all, Stephen King is an enormous Leftist. For all of you who enjoy John Scalzi? Go read what it is he thinks about those on the Right. Precisely the same criteria can be applied to books as it can to television and film. Let us not even get into the music issue. I lived for many, many years in a culture in which the choice of appropriate forms of entertainment was incredibly circumscribed. I sat through the debates as to whether allowing a television into your home was sin. As noted above, I am biased against those who attempt to chain my choices. It matters not to me if you claim that I must do so for theological or philosophical reasons. It's the same how dare you scold. To all those of you here who stake out the position that going to a movie starring someone who is an open progressive should be verboten because you are giving financial support to such progressive, remember, there are many on the Left who believe that those who hold conservative positions should not be hired by anyone to work anywhere. You are accepting the same underlying belief. I do not. Now, I don't hold to the hard form alternate position of the one I am criticizing. There are actors whose works I will not see and authors whose works I will not read. But I will not write off entire branches of entertainment simply because those who participate therein take positions with which I disagree. I have read enough books to know how that story ends.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 09, 2013 12:03 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 09, 2013 12:04 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Yip at May 09, 2013 12:04 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 12:05 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 09, 2013 12:05 PM (+98Gb)
@USS Diversity - I hear Che was a huge Packers fan, but he couldn't facepaint because the green and gold clashed with the red star.
Fucking hilarious. When your grandkids ask you "what happened to America?" You can explain to them that you only funded the propaganda arm of our destroyers a little bit because... "FOOTBALL!!!"
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 03:57 PM (Z1/Hr)
------
*jerks thumb* who's this assclown again?
Posted by: USS Diversity at May 09, 2013 12:05 PM (5wHPS)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at May 09, 2013 12:05 PM (7ObY1)
236 Can everyone forgive me if I nitpick about something please? The media isn't "being silent about a coverup". They are doing the coverup.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at May 09, 2013 03:59 PM (uvaJ1)
---------
Thank you.
Yes. Yes they are.
The Liberal Media are participating in the Coverup.
And not just on Benghazi...on all the things that the Left doesn't want the Truth spoken about.
Posted by: wheatie at May 09, 2013 12:05 PM (LxEHG)
Posted by: Nighthawk at May 09, 2013 12:05 PM (wePjE)
Posted by: diddy at May 09, 2013 12:05 PM (X8gUA)
Posted by: DCPensFan at May 09, 2013 12:05 PM (ma/2m)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at May 09, 2013 12:05 PM (QXlbZ)
I got lots of time to fill between giving little girls the erroneous impression that it's OK to keep a roof over their own head instead of expecting someone else to do it.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 12:05 PM (ZKzrr)
Hell you talk about MSNBC, NO ONE WATCHES MSNBC! The media isn't the only problem. We have a culture here and the media is just one part. It's the schools and the teachers, the pop music culture, the media, the unions, the state and the bureaucracy.
How do you fight that?
I'm sorry peeps I wish I was wrong, but of course, I'm not. We are fucked.
Posted by: BlearyTruth at May 09, 2013 12:06 PM (sYLzD)
Constant smears work.
And yet, Fox News still survives as strong as ever. Beck still does what he does, but elsewhere.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 09, 2013 12:06 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 12:06 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at May 09, 2013 12:06 PM (fNpC1)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at May 09, 2013 12:06 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Avi at May 09, 2013 12:07 PM (Gx3Fe)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 12:07 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 09, 2013 12:07 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 09, 2013 12:07 PM (kENHJ)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 12:07 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 09, 2013 12:08 PM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at May 09, 2013 12:08 PM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: Beagle at May 09, 2013 04:02 PM (sOtz/)
Commentary track is an audio track of directors/actors/tech people talking over the movie (some are quite informative) but this one has Tom Clancy shitting on the movie and verbally abusing the director
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 12:08 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at May 09, 2013 12:08 PM (5H6zj)
Support? Yes.
Stay silent as the Breitbart sites continue on their downward spiral into WND territory? No.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 09, 2013 12:08 PM (SY2Kh)
I may have missed something, so tell me if you guys know more juicy stuff on this... cause I never heard he was forced out. Just wanted to break and develop his dream media outlet.
Posted by: Yip at May 09, 2013 12:09 PM (/jHWN)
That's why I stopped giving page-views to certain websites and stopped clicking on links at HotAir a couple years ago. There are rare exceptions based upon the article; I'm no absolutist.
Posted by: jk76 at May 09, 2013 12:09 PM (VKkox)
Posted by: BlearyTruth
--------------------
Agreed, sadly, but we must keep up the struggle. Remember your comment previously re Tyrone Woods laser-painting the mortars at Benghazi.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 12:10 PM (aDwsi)
"CurrentTV was a money loser."
--------------
I'm convinced CurrentTV was slapped together solely to give Algore something to "sell" to Middle-East oil money. This way he doesn't have to admit his real job title:
OPEC Vice-President in charge of hindering non-OPEC oil production.
Posted by: irright at May 09, 2013 12:10 PM (pMGkg)
A thousand times this.
Actually, I can play a DVD movie on my computer, and watch it on the 23" screen.
Has there ever been another human being in your living room? (And did you properly vet all the CEOs and chief engineers of all the companies that created, shipped, and sold your computer for ideological purity before wasting your money on them, so you can be assured you did not fund our destruction?)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 12:10 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s] at May 09, 2013 12:11 PM (qyfb5)
The Problem, as I see it, isn't that Conservatives don't organize or can't boycott or can't be consistent or blablablah
The Problem, no joke, is so fkn *many* of us think we're fighting the Good Fight from the Inside. You know "I'm working on change all right, I'm a change agent, Jack." And its All.Fucking.Bullshit.
What have you changed? You're just an employee of some libtard fucktank getting promoted over by a-holez that laugh behind your back or in your face. And its because there's always tomorrow to get started on that change you been meaning to get around to.
Meantime, you just vote and watch sports and sometimes speak up in support of rightwing shit in the elevator if you think you can get away with it without losing your job.
Posted by: Bigby's Opposable Thumbs at May 09, 2013 12:11 PM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at May 09, 2013 12:12 PM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Yip
--------------
I'm contemplating the $5.00/mo. fee for Blaze TV. I might be willing to pop for the $60 for a year, to see/support the idea.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 12:12 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Avi at May 09, 2013 12:12 PM (Gx3Fe)
File it under: Bumps in the road
"I think it was absolutely the right thing for us to do to align ourselves with democracy, universal rights —a notion that people have to be able to participate in their own governance.
But I was pretty certain and continue to be pretty certain that there are going to be bumps in the road because, you know, in a lot of these places, the one organizing principle has been Islam."
-- Barack Obama
September 23, 2012
Posted by: soothsayer's memory refresher at May 09, 2013 12:12 PM (LVtr+)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 12:12 PM (Vgn84)
To all those of you here who stake out the position that going to a movie starring someone who is an open progressive should be verboten because you are giving financial support to such progressive, remember, there are many on the Left who believe that those who hold conservative positions should not be hired by anyone to work anywhere. You are accepting the same underlying belief. I do not.
***
Choosing where I spend my money is the same or even similar as discriminating against someone employment wise?
No it isn't. Denying Sean Penn or Morgan Freeman the monetary fruit of my labor is not the same in any way as discriminating against someone in the job market.
Posted by: Tilikum The Killer Assault Whale at May 09, 2013 12:12 PM (uhftQ)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 04:10 PM (ZKzrr)
lol
bingo
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 12:13 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: Assault Ewok at May 09, 2013 12:13 PM (OtA7G)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at May 09, 2013 12:13 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 12:13 PM (Z1/Hr)
Goddamn, I love alexthechick.
I also lived in a household controlled by a fucking nutcase non-denominational Christian church, where everyone went to great pains to show just how fucking ascetic they could be. "Look how much pleasure I'm denying myself! How much pleasure did YOU deny yourself.? Not enough! YOU"RE DOING IT WRONG."
Burned books, smashed rock albums - the whole works. If they could have fucking banned dancing until a plucky kid from Chicago showed us that we could indeed Make A Joyful Noise Unto The Lord while accidentally rubbing our junkpiles together in a warehouse on the outskirts of town, they would have.
Fuck that and fuck you. I wouldn't let my parents tell me what the fuck to do when I got old enough to leave, and I damn sure don't care what Internet Johnny thinks about how I spend my leisure time. I does what I likes and I likes what I do, and I didn't spend six years of my life humping a ruck so I could be told I'm not PURE enough in my conservative asceticism.
Bravo, AtC.
Posted by: Fiscyl Clyffordwing Plover at May 09, 2013 12:13 PM (CJjw5)
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 12:14 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectal at May 09, 2013 12:14 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Up With People! at May 09, 2013 12:14 PM (krveP)
Posted by: SpongeBob Saget at May 09, 2013 12:14 PM (epxV4)
We should go after them and a lot of them are easy pickings.
Start with Matt Lauer, whom many already hate for his treatment of Ann Curry. My "moving from liberal to conservative with a stop in the moderate zone" daughter just told me she will NEVER watch Matt Lauer agin, after reading an article about him in People. I mean she DESPISES him!
We should get that jerk fired or whining to his psychiatrist. A concerted effort on him would send him over the edge and set off a war for who would replace him. And whoever replaces him should be monitored and harrassed for an stupid stuff he does.
And what about Trump? He should be asked to go to another network when his contract is up. I believe any other network would love to have the ratings from "The Apprentice."
You see where I am going with this. Yes, you can go after Roberts of Comcast, but no one knows who he is. More bang for your buck, more publicity, and more allies if you go after the stars.
So I say start with Lauer.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 09, 2013 12:15 PM (GoIUi)
Let's do it for reals. How about some pitchforks and rocks at Comcast/NBC HQ?
Have to laugh at TPM headline:
"Darrell Issa Acknowledges He Learned Nothing New From His Benghazi Hearing."
Yeah. That's right. Issa ALREADY knew that Obama's a lying corksoaker and Hillary was his shield and Rice was his mouthpiece.
So yeah. He learned nothing NEW.
F 'em with a rusty piece of rebar.
Meanwhile there's a guy in prison for Blasphemy, an American First.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 09, 2013 12:15 PM (yKGCL)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at May 09, 2013 12:15 PM (deaac)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 09, 2013 12:15 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 04:10 PM (aDwsi)"
Agreed - right there with you brother, and no I am not saying give up.
But this is not going to be easy or quick, and we need to start thinking out of the box and winning some of these battles.
I think starting with the young people is going to be key, we need to get to them before they are brainwashed and indoctrinated. We are going to need to adopt some of the strategies the socialist has so successfully used against the conservative.
Posted by: BlearyTruth at May 09, 2013 12:16 PM (sYLzD)
Posted by: chrisnotrock at May 09, 2013 12:16 PM (4+CYK)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 12:16 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 09, 2013 12:16 PM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 12:16 PM (Z1/Hr)
Posted by: polynikes at May 09, 2013 12:17 PM (m2CN7)
Would you just shut the fuck up for fucks sake. I'm going to resubscribe to Comcast in your honor.
Posted by: eleven at May 09, 2013 12:17 PM (KXm42)
Posted by: Gebirgsjager at May 09, 2013 12:17 PM (51wtx)
Posted by: Beagle at May 09, 2013 12:18 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at May 09, 2013 12:18 PM (deaac)
Freedom of Choice!
Freedom of Choice!
Isn't this the mantra of the Left?
We should have the Freedom to Choose which channels we pay for on Cable.
Posted by: wheatie at May 09, 2013 12:18 PM (LxEHG)
slightly amended for use for the Wash Post
PS whenever I watch a NBC show (Hannibal, that's it) I am so thoroughly annoyed by the Soviet level of greengaywhatever propaganda that I would throw a brick through my tv. But I don't I just complain a lot.
Posted by: joeindc44 at May 09, 2013 12:18 PM (k2Jn7)
I said this in the other thread (so sorry about the repitition) but it goes right to the heart of Ace's goal.
McCain has introduced a bill we should all support, to require cable companies to adopt a la carte channel ordering for consumers.
If you want to nail Comcast (NBC) and Disney (ABC), this is tantamount to ordering up a professional hit. Clean, quiet, and totally deadly.
Support the fucking bill!
Posted by: MTF at May 09, 2013 12:18 PM (B5y+v)
I'm really tiring of being outraged. Tired of constantly being reminded that far too many of my fellow citizens couldn't care less about politics, religion, context on any given narrative in the news, history, you name it.
Posted by: Yip at May 09, 2013 12:18 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Joejm65 at May 09, 2013 12:18 PM (UZuc4)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at May 09, 2013 12:19 PM (pxDth)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 12:19 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:19 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: /Looks at the Sidebar /facepalm at May 09, 2013 12:20 PM (lZBBB)
------------------
ISP's and power companies (while hardly completely innocent) are not in the *business* of spreading propaganda.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 12:20 PM (aDwsi)
I got over having no TV after about a month. All of you can, too.
However, to really make an impact is going to take something that people don't really want to do. You have to go after their advertising revenue stream with targeted boycotts.
Posted by: jc at May 09, 2013 12:20 PM (i8c5b)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 12:21 PM (Z1/Hr)
Posted by: /Looks at the Sidebar /facepalm at May 09, 2013 04:20 PM (lZBBB)
quite the conservative ideal, isn't it
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 12:21 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: Mr Pink at May 09, 2013 12:22 PM (ChWmi)
When you strip all EoJ's context, that could be a quote from just about any progg with a "health" or "environment" fetish. *srednop*
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 12:22 PM (ZKzrr)
----------------
Really? Do you suppose that Left/Libs (who despise profit) have been gathering in the profits from MS & Apple?
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 12:22 PM (aDwsi)
We are fucked.
Posted by: BlearyTruth
--------------------
"Agreed, sadly, but we must keep up the struggle. Remember your comment previously re Tyrone Woods laser-painting the mortars at Benghazi."
Yep. Fucked and hopelessly outnumbered.
Posted by: Jaws at May 09, 2013 12:22 PM (4I3Uo)
If reagan or Bush the elder were smart, or invested in local affairs rather than saving the world from the commies, they would've let cable owners go al a carte back in the 80's. Then Mtv and other commie outlets woulda been blocked by then engaged parents. snipped the porning of america in the bud
Posted by: joeindc44 at May 09, 2013 12:22 PM (k2Jn7)
Posted by: I'd rather be Surfin at May 09, 2013 12:23 PM (z2qQb)
328...Maybe we should all jump off the Google ship and go Yahoo.
Even better...use Duck Duck Go.
They don't track you or share your searches with others.
Posted by: wheatie at May 09, 2013 12:23 PM (LxEHG)
Yes.... the Conservative Community must act together... and give up the pleasure of watching things they want, and buying things they want... for the common good...
That is how wars are won, though.
Posted by: Grey Fox at May 09, 2013 12:23 PM (XQsSC)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 09, 2013 12:23 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: jwb7605 ([i][u]Let it Burn[/u][/i])[/s][/b] at May 09, 2013 12:23 PM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:23 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 09, 2013 12:24 PM (kENHJ)
buying things they want... for the common good...
Freedom is having fewer choices, comrade.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 12:24 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, totally not NSA at May 09, 2013 12:24 PM (fMiHM)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 12:24 PM (ZshNr)
Which brings up another point; don't just go after execs, also go after the "celebs" on reality shows and the actors in other programming, especially on twitter. For instance, Blake Shelton is on twitter all the time.
Posted by: Country Singer at May 09, 2013 12:24 PM (cnmE6)
...........
That's Google's CEO. The other moron was talking about Yahoo. The Yahoo CEO is the one who told all her tele-commuters they had to start showing up for work recently.. yahoooo-ooooo
Posted by: Joe at May 09, 2013 12:24 PM (f9c2L)
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 12:24 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 04:19 PM (bb5+k)
We are in a Media Catch 22 situation now...
Local Media is disappearing... because of the availability of the Large Media outlets...
Large media is more cost effective, than many more Local Media... so we end up with the New York / Washington centric news.
There was a Murder... with a MACHETE... one block from my house 3 weeks ago, and I didn't know about it for about 1.5 weeks... because it did not make NATIONAL news...
But there were thousands of stories about a Gay basketball player... who I had never heard of, will never be in my town, and will never watch.
We need to figure out how to make LOCAL news profitable, AND Conservative...
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 09, 2013 12:25 PM (lZBBB)
Like I'm going to take Life Coaching advice from some fag who doesn't like football.
Have some more penis, fyscal clyff - it's fresh!
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 09, 2013 12:25 PM (CJjw5)
Posted by: mare at May 09, 2013 12:25 PM (A98Xu)
No, it is yahoo's current CEO; she used to work at google.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marissa_Mayer
Posted by: dan-O at May 09, 2013 12:25 PM (Yu2MC)
THANK YOU.
I've been reluctant to dis the disabled. Especially one who has contributed insights to the universe but lately, he's beginning to get on my nerves with some of his pronouncements that are, shall we say, suspect and not relevant to his expertise. They do provide fodder for the very LIV's that he should be disdainful of but apparently he's trying to go out Christoper Hutchins Style.
I think it's time he met his MAKER or began a journey into the REAL FINAL FRONTIER.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 09, 2013 12:25 PM (yKGCL)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 12:26 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at May 09, 2013 04:24 PM (ZKzrr)
PROGRESS AHOY!!!
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 12:26 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:26 PM (bb5+k)
I'm hating all this anti-purity made up shit. Same argument was used to bludgeon support for fucktard RINOs. So here's the deal: Choose.
Its easy for me to be pure in the NBC/Comcast boycott since I don't use any of their products. I'd encourage, though cannot enforce, a boycott upon them for anyone. But the antis want to bitch about that encouragement like I'm forcing somebody.
OK, so no GOP votes EITHER. That will easy as shit to do, too. Let's up the ante a little bit further, if you want. Not fucking caring one way or another anymore.
Posted by: Bigby's Opposable Thumbs at May 09, 2013 12:26 PM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: mare at May 09, 2013 04:25 PM (A98Xu)
Oh.... same reason the media did not cover that we Lost an American Plane while dong Obama's Illegal bombing of Libya...
Inconvenient facts....
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 09, 2013 12:27 PM (lZBBB)
Their success translates to an open mic and a soapbox from which to preach their hateful rhetoric.
If they weren't so successful, what they have to say wouldn't get the same amount of play.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse
***
Exactly. Perhaps if we can put some of them under, MAYBE even get them bought by Conservatives, we will have a chance to start to turn things back.
As long as they are allowed to blast only what they want people to hear 24/7, we are screwed.
Posted by: Tilikum The Killer Assault Whale at May 09, 2013 12:27 PM (uhftQ)
Posted by: Beagle at May 09, 2013 12:28 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at May 09, 2013 12:28 PM (fNpC1)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 04:26 PM (bb5+k)
so fight communism with communism, sounds like a smart plan
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 12:28 PM (vJdyz)
Yep. Fucked and hopelessly outnumbered.
Posted by: Jaws
-------------------------------
But he didn't give up..., and while it is hardly a silver lining..., none of us had heard of him before, but now we have. He stands as an example for at least some who had no example.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 12:28 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 09, 2013 12:28 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:28 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Benedict Arnold at May 09, 2013 12:28 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 09, 2013 04:24 PM (kENHJ)
This.
Pravda Press is right.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky is thankfully not the Duchess of Alba at May 09, 2013 12:28 PM (baL2B)
I'm hating all this anti-purity made up shit.
--------------------
If the shoe doesn't fit, then don't wear it. I'm pretty sure everyone here was responding to fyscal clyff's dipshit tele-shaming attempts, when his real issue is that Mommy wouldn't sign the permission slip to play football and he had to ride his bike while wearing a helmet and reflective vest.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 09, 2013 12:29 PM (CJjw5)
Posted by: irright at May 09, 2013 12:29 PM (8GKDa)
Posted by: Fen at May 09, 2013 12:29 PM (a422o)
Posted by: Alamo at May 09, 2013 12:30 PM (m/tN9)
The best, scariest tactic to hurt ComCast is to get on board the anti-channel bundling movement - legislation that will allow cable/satellite consumers to pick their channels instead of paying for the 200+ crap channels no one wants.
Posted by: mrp at May 09, 2013 12:30 PM (HjPtV)
Bout time, IMO. Haven't owned a tv for many years. I refuse to give them any money. Why should I? they are attacking me, why in the hell would I give an asshole like David Gregory any money whatsoever?
These fuckers are engaging in USSR level shit. Remember Barry going on TV with Davey and sucking him off? Quid pro quo and stuff?
The Running Man was a prescient flick, and book...
One of the things that I am considering is that the level and intensity of protection is such that it could be a paid for operation.
People who get paid act the way they act.
So are they getting paid? I mean, literally, getting paid?
I'm thinking yes.
You should read Conquests biography of Stalin...not saying Barry is like Joe, but the backstory, chilling yet so human. Leftism is that.
We are who we thought we were.
Posted by: Rev dr E buzz at May 09, 2013 12:30 PM (raGXo)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 12:31 PM (Vgn84)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 09, 2013 12:31 PM (kENHJ)
Ace =Rowdy Roddy Piper. Am adding "They Live" to the growing list of prophetic documentaries (alongside "Idiocracy.")
Posted by: Nada at May 09, 2013 12:31 PM (kmd7o)
I just peeked back to September 2012 archives and it only took a few hours for the media to make the Benghazi attack about Romney. The media agreed on the following angle:
"How badly did Romney botch response in Libyan attack?"
Posted by: soothsayer's memory refresher at May 09, 2013 12:32 PM (xIzGn)
Posted by: zsasz at May 09, 2013 12:32 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Rebecca Nourse at May 09, 2013 12:32 PM (DrC22)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 12:33 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:33 PM (bb5+k)
"Go after the execs...personally. Protest in front of their homes. Protest at their business. Do the sit ins."
You go after the execs and the producers who decide content, but you don't protest in front of their homes or businesses - and sit-ins are for hippies.
What you do is put together a group of bloggers and freindly right-wing media to continue to hammer on stories and innuendo of the target.
Stories of them yelling at a waitress to the point she breaks down in tears. Stories of them being hypocrits and assholes, cutting into lines, playing the "don't you know who I am" card.
Exaggeration, conflation, outright lying is allowed in this game. The public hates the media and already views those in power in a bad light, they just need some anecdotal evidence. Everything published would be in a third person, "this is what I heard" non-committal fashion.
The people who shape how the news is portrayed at NBC are committed leftists, but their own ass is of primary importance. Fry one or two and the rest will fall in line.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 12:33 PM (u2a4R)
Give me an alternative and I'll boycott the hell out of something for good reason. No alternative, no boycott.
Posted by: polynikes at May 09, 2013 12:33 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Tina Fay at May 09, 2013 12:33 PM (DrC22)
Posted by: I'd rather be Surfin at May 09, 2013 12:34 PM (z2qQb)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 04:33 PM (ZshNr)
but it's a great conservative battle tactic to steal people's shit
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 12:34 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 12:34 PM (Z1/Hr)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies. at May 09, 2013 03:33 PM (VtjlW)
Meh. I don't watch television because I work 12 hour shifts at night and sleep during the day, then on the weekends I get in the car and go places. In short...no time.
James Mattis was also the Marine general who told the Iraqi's "I come in peace. I didnÂ’t bring artillery. But IÂ’m pleading with you, with tears in my eyes: If you fuck with me, IÂ’ll kill you all."
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at May 09, 2013 12:34 PM (yh0zB)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 09, 2013 04:31 PM (kENHJ)
Bing is slightly less left. Microsoft
Posted by: polynikes at May 09, 2013 12:35 PM (m2CN7)
I generally use DuckDuckGo, no tracking, no ads.
Posted by: Country Singer at May 09, 2013 12:35 PM (cnmE6)
Had to leave for awhile. When I came back I started reading some of the comments. I've come to a conclusion.
Besides a few exceptions of televised entertainment and/or news, the media is owned, run, and programed by leftists. We donned our sixth sense noticers way to late. Even if half the nation's population boycotted the MFM, the other 50% would support it enough for it to survive.
The only thing I see that will stop this true juggernaut is an intense burning. Maybe it'll come, maybe it won't. The American people, even conservative patriots, have been cowed to inaction, afraid of what the marxists would say about them.
That's why the "red line" will never be drawn.
Posted by: Soona at May 09, 2013 12:35 PM (2Wswi)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 09, 2013 12:35 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:36 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 04:34 PM (Z1/Hr)
If you are talking about soccer then you never played a sport.
Posted by: polynikes at May 09, 2013 12:36 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 12:36 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Nate at May 09, 2013 12:37 PM (i3OIF)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 12:37 PM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 09, 2013 04:25 PM (lZBBB)
so replace one ideology slant with another
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 12:37 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: SunSword at May 09, 2013 12:38 PM (yAamy)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:38 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 04:33 PM (u2a4R)
I'm not sure I want to take advice or moral standards from a person who thinks pulling the plug on grandma is a sacred duty.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 12:38 PM (v3pYe)
Posted by: at May 09, 2013 04:31 PM (Vgn84)
Good point. Even the chicoms won't pay a nickel to support our lib-loving tech giants. But you lot, you can't wait to buy the next iGadget. Traitors!!!!!
Posted by: fyscyl clyt at May 09, 2013 12:38 PM (h+OzC)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 04:34 PM (Z1/Hr)
Suuuuuuuurrrrre you did. Look how fucking chastened I am.
You played "sports," huh? Did you get a "sports" scholarship? Get drafted to a professional "sports" team?
What a fucking limpdick.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 09, 2013 12:38 PM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at May 09, 2013 12:39 PM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:40 PM (bb5+k)
alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies
Thanks for the clarification. FTR, I am not a purist and I will not bash others for seeing a movie with Tim Robinson. I might make a funny face when you tell me tho.
I was not aware of McCain's bill, but we should be spreading this around the interwebz and anywhere else we can.
Posted by: Tilikum The Killer Assault Whale at May 09, 2013 12:40 PM (uhftQ)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 09, 2013 12:41 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 12:41 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 12:43 PM (ZshNr)
This exactly right and I don't think they will figure it out.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at May 09, 2013 03:37 PM (R8hU
Who is this "they" and why don't you count yourself among them?
Posted by: KG at May 09, 2013 12:43 PM (p7BzH)
I'm not sure I want to take advice or moral standards from a person who thinks pulling the plug on grandma is a sacred duty.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 04:38 PM (v3pYe)
You can't be conservative if you believe that taxpayers should be tapped for unlimited charges for every procedure for everyone, regardless of their age or health.
Governing by blank check will make you a lot of friends, but it's no way to run a country.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 12:43 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 12:44 PM (Vgn84)
So when the Maverick talks about unbundling cable, I get a tingle up my leg. However, the Mav has gravely disappointed me in the past. Maybe he is trying to redeem his horrible campaign which gave us TFG?
BTW it looks like that White Hispanic George Zimmerman in the Anka tape. Did Anka's tirade set him off and cause him to go on his murderous rampage?
Posted by: PJ at May 09, 2013 12:44 PM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:44 PM (bb5+k)
Due to sheer demographics and death of elderly viewers, these networks will "die on the vine as the low hanging fruits of stupidity." Newspapers will have the same fate....as they all are just little parrot droppings from the NYT. This is the generation who, if not computer savvy, like my own Mama, they take the alphabet soup networks and newspapers as truth, as Brian Williams would not lie! The gubment would not lie!
The rest? Bah, they get their news from Facebook and propaganda from liberal friends (or so my adult sons complain). Or, heaven help me, NPR (one son, who votes conservative, listens to that swill thanks to a former girlfriend whose name is never mentioned).
So I don't need to boycott anything except online ads via links (which I do send via email) and going bananas twice a year on WaPo. Regarding movies: I will still see whatever I choose, but considering I had no idea what was going on with the Academy Awards this year, it is also part of my boycott, I guess! I check Drudge to see if the world has ended every morning after reading my emails. I check the Daily Mail for garbage to fill my brain with trivia, as I also have no idea who 90% of the people are. And I check here and other conservative sites for news.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky is thankfully not the Duchess of Alba at May 09, 2013 12:45 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: The Dude
----------
Ah. You make a point. The theft isn't materially driven , it is ideologically driven. Well..., that's a bit of an ethical challenge for a conservative. On the other hand, when the barbarians are inside the gates, questions 'fighting fair' don't carry much weight.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer pondered the issue at length, when approached with the plot to assassinate Hitler. His painful conclusion was that it was better to DO evil, than to BE evil, and thus he supported the effort.
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 12:45 PM (aDwsi)
"James Mattis was also the Marine general who told the Iraqi's "I come in peace. I didnÂ’t bring artillery. But IÂ’m pleading with you,
with tears in my eyes: If you fuck with me, IÂ’ll kill you all."
Marine generals in war zones and sheep-dipped SEALs in contact with several hundred AQ have the unfortunate luxury of saying things like that.
We currently do not.
This leaves a slate of weak-sauce bullshit like boycotts to throw at the problem.
Posted by: Jaws at May 09, 2013 12:45 PM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at May 09, 2013 12:45 PM (fNpC1)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:46 PM (bb5+k)
Perhaps as little as 5 years ago it might have been said but now?
It's become almost impossible to do some things without at least an email address and having internet access allows one to be able to spend less money overall for the same services/goods.
I could foresee very soon a legal challenge that it is a luxury and should therefore be considered like land line phones became in the early part of the 20th century.
As to going to the library for access, that isn't as easy or ubiquitous as you may think, in certain areas. I'm not necessarily arguing that the "poor" should be subsidized but perhaps the big cable and isp companies should be tightened up a bit over their rates.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 09, 2013 12:46 PM (yKGCL)
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 04:43 PM (u2a4R)
Funny, I don't govern by blank check, nor do I think taxpayers need to pay for every procedure for everyone. And I still don't have to pull the plug on grandma, nor do I need a jwest to to do it for me.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 12:47 PM (oY6Yp)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:47 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 12:47 PM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 04:33 PM (ZshNr)"
The "free shit army" is people who want free shit that given to them after it is taken from the producers by force. They want free shit the state steals and then gives to them.
Free software is nothing of the sort; this is software that the producers provide for free because they want to, and in many cases it is flat out better software. You need feel no guilt in using OSS products.
I've used Linux and other OSS solutions for over a decade and frankly can't stand any Microsoft product. Microsoft creates software that is supposed to be pretty and painless but in the end works like Time magazine - lowest common denominator, but when you want to do something advanced or look for high reliability they fail completely.
Don't let the free shit army keep you from OSS, that would be a mistake.
Try out Linux Mint, you may well be surprised, and no one stole it from the producers.
Posted by: BlearyTruth at May 09, 2013 12:48 PM (sYLzD)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:48 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 09, 2013 04:46 PM (yKGCL)
Internet's a frickin' luxury. You might as well subsidize their cable or satellite TV.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 12:48 PM (oY6Yp)
They both seem to be too busy praising Amnesty Admiral Rubio.
Posted by: FeralCat at May 09, 2013 12:48 PM (fRSUC)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke
----------------
I switched to Bing a good while back. It isn't that I love MS the more, just Google the less...
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 09, 2013 12:49 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Country Singer at May 09, 2013 12:49 PM (cnmE6)
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon
***
I should have added: support it after you've vetted it carefully.
Posted by: Tilikum The Killer Assault Whale at May 09, 2013 12:49 PM (uhftQ)
I agree. This legislation should begin in the House of Representatives.
Posted by: mrp at May 09, 2013 12:49 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:50 PM (bb5+k)
On the main point, yes, it's more than time. Please give us a list of subsidiaries.
Posted by: George LeS at May 09, 2013 12:50 PM (C4s3i)
Internet's a frickin' luxury. You might as well subsidize their cable or satellite TV.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 04:48 PM (oY6Yp)
Whoops. Sorry, knee-jerked and read in an extra "not".
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 12:50 PM (v3pYe)
Posted by: Johnny McCain [/i] at May 09, 2013 12:50 PM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 09, 2013 12:51 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: FeralCat at May 09, 2013 12:51 PM (fRSUC)
Posted by: Nate at May 09, 2013 12:51 PM (i3OIF)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:52 PM (bb5+k)
Funny, I don't govern by blank check, nor do I think taxpayers need to pay for every procedure for everyone. And I still don't have to pull the plug on grandma, nor do I need a jwest to to do it for me.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 04:47 PM (oY6Yp)
Well then, you're quite a good person. However, I'm certain that after you've bankrupted your family keeping grandma in pain for a few more days, you'll be the loud one screaming for government to pick up the tab for a more tubes shoved up every orafice she has.
Not that it's a bad thing to want your grandma to live forever, but if comes at the cost of you and a profit-motivated healthcare system torturing her to ease your mind that you've done everything possible, I'd say you might want to rethink your position.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 12:53 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:53 PM (bb5+k)
But I'd be wary of any bill sponsored by McCain.
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at May 09, 2013 04:45 PM (fNpC1)"
"an "a la carte" cable law" Huh? Why do we need a law? If a man wants to sell you a bundled cable deal at a price you are free to accept the deal or not. Why does the state need to interfere in this transaction?
Sorry, I reject this state control of the market.
Posted by: BlearyTruth at May 09, 2013 12:53 PM (sYLzD)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp
***
I will punch and kick but....biting? Pass.
Posted by: Tilikum The Killer Assault Whale at May 09, 2013 12:53 PM (uhftQ)
Posted by: Nate at May 09, 2013 12:54 PM (i3OIF)
Posted by: atourma at May 09, 2013 12:54 PM (8k5/X)
I mostly agree, with the exception of Office, which is actually very powerful and reliable.
>>> Don't let the free shit army keep you from OSS, that would be a mistake.Try out Linux Mint, you may well be surprised, and no one stole it from the producers.
Linux is almost there as a viable replacement for Windows (for everyday users I mean), but not quite there. Its lack of support for Flash is a big one.
Posted by: dan-O at May 09, 2013 12:54 PM (Yu2MC)
Posted by: BlearyTruth at May 09, 2013 04:53 PM (sYLzD)
The state already controls the market.
In so much of communications and media, especially in industries like ISPs, there are monopolies or cartels, and they are often done with the blessing of gov't.
Posted by: KG at May 09, 2013 12:56 PM (p7BzH)
The "State" is already interfering in that market.
What should be advocated is the complete privatization of cable and internet access.
Let the market shake out the losers and winners.
the only regulations should be for those areas that have limited population and thus should have some means of being subsidized for their access. Maybe.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 09, 2013 12:56 PM (yKGCL)
Yeah, me too.
Posted by: Bell Telephone at May 09, 2013 12:57 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Nate at May 09, 2013 04:54 PM (i3OIF)
Euthanizing is only something we consider for Heather's mother.
What the conversation really is about is limiting the heroic, immediate life saving procedures that are shown statistically to make little if any difference in the length of time the patient stays alive.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 12:58 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Nate at May 09, 2013 12:58 PM (i3OIF)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 12:58 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at May 09, 2013 12:58 PM (U2UQk)
Posted by: zsasz at May 09, 2013 01:00 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Nate at May 09, 2013 01:00 PM (i3OIF)
Adobe stopped supporting linux
Posted by: dan-O at May 09, 2013 01:01 PM (Yu2MC)
Not that it's a bad thing to want your grandma to live forever, but if comes at the cost of you and a profit-motivated healthcare system torturing her to ease your mind that you've done everything possible, I'd say you might want to rethink your position.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 04:53 PM (u2a4R)
I'm glad you know my grandma so well that you already know how to handle her end of life situation for me, seeing as how I will undoubtedly revert to my inner liberal self the moment my personal finances are at stake.
But since you're so eager to to talk out of your rear about circumstances you simply don't know, I'm afraid your credibility is still pegged at 0. You're in no position to judge other's conservatism when your view of "conservativism" is "jwest runs the show for the Greater Good".
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 01:01 PM (v3pYe)
Posted by: Nate at May 09, 2013 04:58 PM (i3OIF)
Yep, here its Charter cable or satellite, too far away to get att uverse, but I can get their phone service.
Posted by: Red Shirt at May 09, 2013 01:01 PM (FIDMq)
Well, that's fine, but the end result is the same: flash isn't supported for linux
Posted by: dan-O at May 09, 2013 01:02 PM (Yu2MC)
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 04:58 PM (u2a4R)
Go fuck yourself in the ass with EoJ's dick. And when you're done, open wide and suck it clean.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 01:02 PM (v3pYe)
Posted by: AJ Lynch at May 09, 2013 01:03 PM (ASPsd)
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 04:58 PM (u2a4R)
Jwest will make end of life choices for you, because he knows what's best. That's conservatism - doing what jwest thinks is in society's greater good.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 01:04 PM (v3pYe)
But since you're so eager to to talk out of your rear about circumstances you simply don't know, I'm afraid your credibility is still pegged at 0. You're in no position to judge other's conservatism when your view of "conservativism" is "jwest runs the show for the Greater Good".
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 05:01 PM (v3pYe)
When you're in a situation like this, why not just admit that you never thought the issue through and, although you would do everything possible to help your grandma, you realize now that the country can't afford to pay for every procedure for every person.
From there, you would have a fresh start and be able to discuss the future of healthcare from a rational position.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 01:05 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: AJ Lynch at May 09, 2013 05:03 PM (ASPsd)
but you're still giving them money because they get a cut of your monthly bill
Posted by: The Dude at May 09, 2013 01:05 PM (vJdyz)
Posted by: dan-O at May 09, 2013 04:54 PM (Yu2MC)"
Yes there are gaps, but for what I do - and I do write a lot of documents Open Office (or whatever they are calling it lately) works very well. Where MS is a working solution then go ahead and use it, nothing wrong with that. I just find there are very few instances this applies to me.
Flash? That's what no script is for. Trust me, pages load faster, you avoid all the intrusive ads, save on bandwidth...
And remember, the goal of Linux is not to be a MS replacement - it's goal is to be a quality, reliable and functional OS, which it is.
Everything's a trade off.
Posted by: BlearyTruth at May 09, 2013 01:06 PM (sYLzD)
From there, you would have a fresh start and be able to discuss the future of healthcare from a rational position.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 05:05 PM (u2a4R)
Real conservative there, to use a socialist healthcare system to administer healthcare.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 01:07 PM (v3pYe)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 01:08 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: fyscyl clyff at May 09, 2013 01:09 PM (Z1/Hr)
Don't get me wrong, I love linux and it has come a heck of a long way in the last 15 years I have been using it.
But the goal of a distro like Ubuntu *is* to be a MS replacement. It is meant to be able to be used for everyday tasks--like browsing the internet. And it sucks, but proprietary Adobe Flash is an important component of the internet.
Posted by: dan-O at May 09, 2013 01:09 PM (Yu2MC)
What we need is a website that will list the major advertisers for NBC and the other networks as well as NYT, WaPo and so on.
We would then be able to voice our displeasure by telling them we will not buy from them.
Complaining to the papers and networks does nothing. We are not the customers. We are the product. We are what they sell to their customers, the advertisers.
We need to tell the advertisers that we will not be sold to them anymore.
John Henry
Posted by: john henry at May 09, 2013 01:10 PM (fyzz7)
RUIN. THEM.
And anyone who tries to help that person? Ruin them as well.
There are still ways, no violence required.
THIS.
We could pool funds and hire about 20 private detectives to dig up as much humiliating (and REAL, verifiable) crap on one of these asshats as possible. DIG THROUGH THEIR LIVES like they do to one of ours. MAKE AN EXAMPLE of the fucker. Do it again to someone else until they get the hint.
Posted by: Gman at May 09, 2013 01:10 PM (UkbKS)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 05:08 PM (bb5+k)
Don't need to feel for me. All grandparents are long gone.
But it does illustrate how jwest is a little too eager to jump into everyone's family situation and scream, "SAVE MONEY! PULL THE PLUG NOW NOW NOW."
That's totally what conservatism is all about.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 01:11 PM (sGtp+)
"Dude, I would leave this issue alone. Nothing good will come of interjecting yourself in someone else's family matter. "
I would never dream of interjecting myself or any of my positions into someone else's family matter.
My position is that if someone wants to pay for any procedure, even if he's giving grandma a heart-lung transplant at age 95, I say go for it. Spend your money on whatever makes you happy.
However, I draw the line when this same person wants to increase my taxes in order to pay the $850,000 charge for that procedure in the hope that grandma will live a few more days.
That's not a conservative position.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 01:13 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: motionview at May 09, 2013 01:14 PM (ZDWV5)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at May 09, 2013 01:14 PM (U2UQk)
Posted by: zsasz at May 09, 2013 01:14 PM (MMC8r)
I'm looking forward to the day when Matt Lauer is on the streets of Manhattan with a cup begging for change.
And I look forward to not hearing from Tingles Matthews and that Rachel Maddow fellow.
Then they can join up with Keith O and Soledad OB and mosey on over to Al Jezzera.
Posted by: gracepmc at May 09, 2013 01:15 PM (rznx3)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at May 09, 2013 01:16 PM (qwK3S)
Posted by: dan-O at May 09, 2013 05:09 PM (Yu2MC)"
Yes, Ubuntu is geared at replacing MS and I wouldn't say it sucks, and as others have noted the flash component is not really a Linux support thing, talk to Adobe about that. But no, it's not perfect. Look if what you want is flash then MS is your tool, use it and be happy. -But hey if you haven't given Mint a spin, give it a shot, I stopped using Ubuntu a long time ago for a lot of reasons.
My real point if you look back was that OSS has nothing to do with the Free Shit army, which is accurate.
Oh and Bill Gates is a big socialist drone, so there is that.
Posted by: BlearyTruth at May 09, 2013 01:17 PM (sYLzD)
What we need is a website that will list the major advertisers for NBC and the other networks as well as NYT, WaPo and so on.
I'm completely able and willing to do this. Hell, I'd pay for the hosting myself even. I would just want help with compiling the list of advertisers.
Posted by: Gman at May 09, 2013 01:21 PM (UkbKS)
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 04:58 PM (u2a4R)
And who pray tell makes those evaluations? Who decides what difference it makes. Who decides what's Heroic?
Maybe a DEATH PANEL? Oh they'll name it something cute or obfuscating but the purpose will be exactly as you describe. And for one purpose only: political control of the public weal.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 09, 2013 01:24 PM (yKGCL)
Posted by: Melodicmetal at May 09, 2013 01:26 PM (QY9FJ)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 01:26 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: DrDrill at May 09, 2013 01:29 PM (sOFZs)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 01:29 PM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 01:29 PM (bb5+k)
Local TV tends to be much less biased in terms of news selection as well, mostly because it's harder to hide something everyone knows about. But still, I saw WGN Chicago do a pretty nice series of stories about corruption and government wasting money recently. WGN isn't the conglomerate ABCNBCCBS is plus it's local...so better coverage.
When I have alternatives to choose between, I pick the one that doesn't insult me and make it a point to tell them why I choose their business. We have two local sports radio stations in town. ESPN1000 and 670 the Score. You'd think the ESPN affiliate would be heavily progressive, but it really isn't. There's some of the typical ESPN soft sensationalism, but both major local shows even have a Republican and Democrat...so it's balanced and doesn't get political usually. One guy even supported Romney openly.
The Score, meanwhile, doesn't market itself as media affiliated...but they're owned by CBS. And the afternoon show, Boers and Bernstein, is the most childishly immature show on radio and incredibly liberal(BIRM). Mostly with social issues though, they openly mock Christian athletes. I remember they interviewed Adam Dunn and told him they "finally found a white guy from texas they like". Just terrible. And the producer of the morning show once compared people who think Jay Cutler wasn't actually injured to...the Tea Party. Because they're both dumb..which is bad but it's even worse because the better comparison is to Trutherism. I notice that a lot about terrible sports journalists. The political analogies are so forced and terrible, just "this bad thing" is like "this other bad thing" even without anything remotely similar to compare.
TL;DR I support the ESPN station because it respects it's audience and the other station can fuck off.
Posted by: Crazee (@Crazizzle) at May 09, 2013 01:29 PM (w7s1j)
And isn't this situation a microcosm of what we are facing as a country? Government and big corporations colluding to soak the middle class via a massive growth in regulations, fees, and government coercion? We need free markets for a free people if we want to live in a time of hope and prosperity.
Posted by: mrp at May 09, 2013 01:30 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 05:26 PM (bb5+k)
It's getting to the point where you can discuss any idea you want here...
As long as it conforms to the mob.
If you suggest that the horse thief should get a trial before he's hung, you might end up swinging with him.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 01:30 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at May 09, 2013 01:31 PM (qwK3S)
Posted by: T. at May 09, 2013 01:32 PM (QmQ3n)
Posted by: Buzzion at May 09, 2013 01:32 PM (2zJXL)
Posted by: Melodicmetal at May 09, 2013 01:33 PM (QY9FJ)
They no longer want us or our money.
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at May 09, 2013 05:24 PM (OWjjx)
Sorta. They want their cut of our cable/satellite subscription fees.
Posted by: mrp at May 09, 2013 01:34 PM (HjPtV)
515 "Jwest wants to kill anyone with cancer."
Posted by: Buzzion at May 09, 2013 05:32 PM (2zJXL)
I don't remember the exact wording of that comment. Did I want to shoot them or was there a more cost effective method?
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 01:34 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 01:35 PM (Vgn84)
I read only briefly about a new bill to break up cable companies as we know them so that consumers can purchase only the stations that they want instead of having to buy "Whole Packages".
I haven't read the bill but am leary as Mc Cain is for it. Otherwise in theory I love the idea.
There are only 5 channels I want and the rest can go to hell.
I love the Anka video - never gets old.
Posted by: Cheri at May 09, 2013 01:35 PM (G+Wff)
Posted by: Buzzion at May 09, 2013 01:36 PM (2zJXL)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 01:38 PM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 01:41 PM (bb5+k)
"If someone wants to exhaust every penny they ever made to literally live 4 more seconds? That's their right in my book. Just don't come knocking on Uncle Sugar's door, because he never should have been on the hook for that shit to begin with."
As a society, we've made a pact with each other to not let lack of money prevent someone from receiving the best medical procedures available. I agree with this.
However, like you, I recognize that there is a cost benefit analysis to be done at the extreme edge. Expensive procedures that make hospitals, doctors and labs enormous profits with next to zero risk can't continue to be paid for with taxpayer money.
At some point, we need to be able to make reasonable, informed decisions on which things we, as a society, will pay for and what we won't.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 01:42 PM (u2a4R)
As long as it conforms to the mob.
If you suggest that the horse thief should get a trial before he's hung, you might end up swinging with him.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 05:30 PM (u2a4R)
Oh, we can discuss any idea just fine. If you were looking for common ground, we could agree that healthcare is subject to diminishing returns and there is a cost/benefit analysis to make.
But it sure is funny how you insist that cost/benefit analysis for each individual situation needs to performed at a national level, which assumes a centralized national socialist healthcare system. Then you quickly attack the conservatism for anyone who disagrees with your final solution, as if anyone who disagrees with you wants an unstable positive feedback system of "free" healthcare and unlimited benefits.
Troll harder.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 01:42 PM (oY6Yp)
Posted by: Nate at May 09, 2013 01:44 PM (i3OIF)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 01:44 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 05:41 PM (bb5+k)
Am biased, but I agree with the summary. At this point, jwest is trolling with an occasional veneer of reasonableness.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 01:45 PM (sGtp+)
"But it sure is funny how you insist that cost/benefit analysis for each individual situation needs to performed at a national level, which assumes a centralized national socialist healthcare system."
It's called Medicare.
Since there is little chance that anyone is going to repeal Medicare soon, we might want to look into setting some reasonable limits on what we pay for.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 01:46 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 05:46 PM (u2a4R)
In short, let's try to make a fundamentally broken system work.
How much harm are you trying to do?
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 01:47 PM (sGtp+)
Posted by: holmes at May 09, 2013 01:48 PM (75E4o)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 01:48 PM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 09, 2013 01:48 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 01:50 PM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Crazee (@Crazizzle) at May 09, 2013 01:51 PM (w7s1j)
Posted by: [/i][/b] at May 09, 2013 01:52 PM (Vgn84)
513 If the Republicans were smart they would starting pushing legislation to allow for consumer choice in channel selection. 1. It is little guy v. Comcast; 2. it is a possible hypocrisy charge against opponents [choice, anti-corp, etc] and 3. if you can get it passed,it will potentially reduce the pool of money used to fund the leftie meme creators like MSNBC because no more bundling.
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at May 09, 2013 05:31 PM (qwK3S)
No let the market do that. Its already moving in that direction. We really don't want the government sticking their noses into what we watch or don't watch. What Republicans should be doing is looking at ways to remove regulations and the protections the networks have under current law. They should also refuse to go on an NBC or Comcast affiliated news show.
Posted by: Iblis at May 09, 2013 01:54 PM (9221z)
Posted by: Buzzion at May 09, 2013 01:54 PM (2zJXL)
"In short, let's try to make a fundamentally broken system work.
How much harm are you trying to do? "
It's worst than that.
My idea for fixing everything comes from F.A. Hayek, as outlined in "The Road To Serfdom". I want all normal, predictable medical charges paid for directly to the provider by the indivdual through a Medical Savings Account.
However, and this is where Hayek comes in, I want a nationalized system to set limits and pay for catastrophic procedures. Damn near single-payer.
I don't view this as socialist, as Hayek didn't because it is actually what government (in it's broad form) is for. Doing things that individually would be impossible.
Now you rip on me if you like.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 01:56 PM (u2a4R)
"NBC is now finishing behind Spanish-language Univision in the ratings."
So what are we doing to take advantage of the Spanish-language channels?
Posted by: Uncle Jefe at May 09, 2013 01:57 PM (25KoS)
Posted by: Occutard at May 09, 2013 01:59 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 09, 2013 03:21 PM (XUKZU)
Hit the nail on the head
Posted by: pandelume at May 09, 2013 02:01 PM (Wtd2q)
I've always wondered about this as the price charged for a particular procedure is difficult if not impossible to get an exact quote or even a ball park figure on. (by ball park, I mean within 1k +-. they will hem and haw but never tell you the exact total)
We find that a hospital on one side of town charges one price and a hospital on the other side charges something else.
This has long been a peeve of mine. What service can you go to where you never know how much the bill will be? A law suit maybe.
Anywhere else, you at least get an estimate. I don't mean a guaranteed price. I understand things happen differently for different patients but you should at least get an estimate.
But you don't and there's a reason for that. They want to hide how much they charge to prevent the very thing they fear the most: market place forces.
And that's why the health care system has been so ripe for change and now has fallen to the government. They resisted market forces and were aided and abetted by insurance companies, Health plans and the government and now the chickens are coming home to roost but unfortunately the US taxpayer will be the one to pay the bill.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 09, 2013 02:05 PM (yKGCL)
It depends on what your definition of "is" is.
Posted by: gracepmc at May 09, 2013 02:06 PM (rznx3)
In so much of communications and media, especially in industries like ISPs, there are monopolies or cartels, and they are often done with the blessing of gov't.
Posted by: KG at May 09, 2013 04:56 PM (p7BzH)"
They control too much of the market, but they do not control every transaction down to the number of channels offered. Regardless, even were we to assume they do, this does not make it right or good.
The point is it should be the market that decides if bundling is a good thing or not, not the state. A law dictating that bundling is/is not allowed is not the solution to the problem.
Posted by: BlearyTruth at May 09, 2013 02:30 PM (sYLzD)
I want all normal, predictable medical charges paid for directly to the provider by the indivdual through a Medical Savings Account.
However, and this is where Hayek comes in, I want a nationalized system to set limits and pay for catastrophic procedures. Damn near single-payer.
I don't view this as socialist, as Hayek didn't because it is actually what government (in it's broad form) is for. Doing things that individually would be impossible.
Now you rip on me if you like.
Posted by: jwest at May 09, 2013 05:56 PM (u2a4R)
In short, you want a national government run catastrophic insurance program. That is socialist because the private sector is just as capable of accomplishing that goal. Ever buy car insurance? That wasn't "individually impossible", was it? Health insurance is and can be the same thing - it's government interference that prevents that outcome.
A state law requiring every one to buy catastrophic health insurance could accomplish even better results than your idea, as individuals could customize their level of insurance to their actual needs, and the market would be more sensitive to supply and demand.
Your idea does improve on our current broken system, so that's to your credit. Where we have a problem is your constant attacks on everyone else's conservatism. It's possible to be a conservative and disagree with jwest.
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 09, 2013 03:17 PM (oY6Yp)
What were the guys watching, Paul? Watch the segment from up to 0:15 to see the girl fold and animate a napkin so as to resemble an erect penis.
But hey, she is a girl so she doesn't get a shirt.
Posted by: MachiasPrivateer at May 09, 2013 03:29 PM (0c0fX)
Posted by: KAT FIN at May 09, 2013 06:56 PM (kWUmm)
Posted by: CAPT Mike at May 10, 2013 10:54 PM (DiQnH)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3377 seconds, 672 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Serious Cat at May 09, 2013 11:18 AM (UypUQ)